digital literacy essay in mizo language

Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining

Open access
Published: 10 February 2022
Volume 27 , pages 7395–7419, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Catherine Audrin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-6000 1 &
Bertrand Audrin 2

25k Accesses

41 Citations

6 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This research aims at providing an overview of the research field of digital literacy into learning and education. Using text mining, it reviews 1037 research articles published on the topic between 2000 and 2020. This review reveals that there is a plurality of terms associated with digital literacy. Moreover, our research identifies six key factors that define the literature, which are information literacy, developing digital literacy, digital learning, ICT, social media, and twenty-first century digital skills. These factors can be grouped into three main streams, which are 1) digital literacy, 2) digital learning and 3) twenty-first century digital skills. These three streams are supported by informational and technological foundations. These results provide research avenues and offer a framework for digital literacy in education.

A systematic review on digital literacy

Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy

Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: a systematic literature review

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

With the rise of digitalization over the last decades, digital literacy has taken a central role in our society and has become an important concern for institutions and policy makers (European Commission, 2020 ; U.S. Department of Education, 2014 ). It is also a particular topic of interest for research, be it in the definition of this digital literacy (Gilster, 1997 ; van Laar et al., 2017 ) or its development (List, 2019 ; Ng, 2012 ). The impact of digital society is also studied in relation to education (Di Giacomo et al., 2017 ; Pinto et al., 2020 ) and research (Ferreira-Mello et al., 2019 ; Stopar & Bartol, 2019 ).

In the same way that the term digital transformation covers a vast and varied set of phenomena (Audrin, 2019 ; Vial, 2019 ), there is a wide range of concepts for addressing the notions of digital skills in education literature, with some specificities and overlaps among definitions. In going beyond issues of terminology, the very purpose of research on the subject of digital literacy varies, as does the context in which it is led.

Over the last twenty years, the number of publications on digital literacy has grown almost exponentially. This abundance of scientific production is, of course, beneficial because it increases knowledge on the subject, but it also represents a significant challenge for scholars: given the proliferation of studies on the subject, it is very difficult to make sense of the field of research and to fully understand its specificities and areas of interest. Scholars benefit from using digital and quantitative research methods to give sense to the field of research. For example, Stopar & Bartol ( 2019 ) analyze clusters of co-citations and co-citing sources to understand how research is organized. The rationale of this study is to make sense of the abundant body of literature on the theme of digital literacy in the context of education and learning. This study uses text mining to structure the field of research.

The purpose of this study is twofold. First, we want to map how digital literacy and its related notions are investigated in the context of learning and educational research. More specifically, we are interested in studying which concepts are used by researchers, and if these refer to distinct specific skills. The second purpose of this article is to study the key research streams on the topic of digital literacy and its related notions in the literature. Thus, our purpose is to both provide an overview of the field, as well as to highlight how research integrates digital literacy into learning and education. Our research questions are the following:

1) What place does digital literacy hold in the literature on education and learning?

2) How is digital literacy conceptualized in the educational context and what are the main research streams on the topic?

To answer these research questions, we conducted a systematic review of the literature using text mining (Ignatow & Mihalcea, 2018 ; Thomas et al., 2011 ). This method is particularly suitable for our systematic literature review because it allows us to automate to a certain extent the content analysis process, and thus to process very large volumes of data in a systematic way. Text mining works by associating words or sentences and allows patterns to be extracted from a multitude of documents (Fabbri et al., 2013 ; Thomas et al., 2011 ). Our study is based on all articles published between 2000 and 2020 in English peer-reviewed journals collected on all relevant databases (Web of Science, ERIC and PsycINFO).

As defined by Moher et al. ( 2015 ), the purpose of a systematic review is “to collate all relevant evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question” (Moher et al., 2015 , p. 3). A systematic review allows a clear synthesis of the characteristics and findings of the studies included in the review by adopting a systematic search to identify all studies that meet given eligibility criteria. While traditional systematic literature reviews are mostly performed manually, we propose using (semi) automatic methods. We believe that due to the huge amount of relevant literature available in the early stage of the literature review process (Ananiadou et al., 2009 ; Fabbri et al., 2013 ), researchers may benefit from the automatic extraction allowed by textual analyses (Thomas et al., 2011 ). Text mining is being increasingly used in research in education (Ferreira-Mello et al., 2019 ), as it helps provide new insights by analyzing huge quantities of information. Text mining has been used in the field of education on a variety of data, but has not been used, to the best of our knowledge, to conduct a systematic literature review on scientific articles in the field of education and on the topic of digital literacy.

Having said that, given the power of such a tool to conduct analyses on large volumes of data (such as the body of literature on digital skills in education), we believe this method could be very fruitful in order to get an understanding of the literature focusing on digital literacy in learning and education. More specifically, text mining is designed to 1) foster information retrieval, 2) extract information and 3) perform data mining by highlighting both direct and indirect associations between various pieces of information (Thomas et al., 2011 ). Such processes are central when conducting a systematic literature review. We thus used textual analysis to 1) filter and categorize journal articles and 2) summarize central topics emerging from these articles. Text mining allowed us to extract information about the main concepts studied in the selected articles and to organize said concepts based on their co-occurence.

2.1 Inclusion criteria

To select the studies included in this systematic review, we used the following criteria:

The article had to be published in a peer-reviewed journal and written in English. These criteria not only guaranteed scientific quality but also allowed us to gather the most important body of research focusing on digital literacy in learning and education. The language criterion was also necessary in order to perform the analysis with WordStat.

The article had to be published between January 2000 and November 2020. We chose 2000 as the milestone because this year represents the emerging year of the field of digital literacy in education, shortly after Gilster’s seminal work on digital literacy.

The study had to mention the constructs of interest (i.e. “digital*”, “learn*”, “educ*”) in its title and/or abstract.

2.2 Literature research strategy

The studies were identified by searching the databases PsycINFO, Web of Science and ERIC. We searched for all available records starting from January 2000 until November 2020, using the following combination of keywords in the title or abstract of the article: “digital competenc*” OR “digital (NEAR/2) skills” OR (“digital literacy” OR “e-skills”) AND (“learn*” OR “education”). We based this query on van Laar et al. ( 2017 )‘s systematic literature review. This research held an initial pool of 1460 articles. After removing duplicates, there were 1037 articles left.

2.3 Data analysis

We performed text mining with the software WordStat 8 on the titles and abstracts of the 1037 articles selected in the previous section. WordStat is a software that offers quantitative analysis of textual data (Pollach, 2011 ). Through dictionaries, it allows to explore a corpus of texts and to identify key factors underlying said corpus. Recent literature reviews have been realized using WordStat (Ćurlin et al., 2019 ; Jede & Teuteberg, 2015 ). As specified by Durach et al. ( 2017 ), researchers performing a literature review are required to summarize the findings of the different studies. Relying on a textometric analysis allows for more objectivity in summarizing studies as researchers do not intervene in the coding and thus, do not tend to introduce biases during the analysis, coding and synthesis of the literature review.

The principle of text mining is that “the frequency with which a content word appears, the statistical relationships between content words and their context all witness to thematic patterns specific to a corpus” (Lavissière et al., 2020 , p. 136). Our textometric analysis uses both processes of stemming and lemmatization. Stemming compiles and removes derivations and inflections of words to gather them into roots – or stems. We used Lovins’ algorithm (Allahyari et al., 2017 ; Vijayarani et al., 2015 ). Lemmatization identifies the basic form of the words used in the corpus and relates them to their dictionary form. It thus returns to the lemma of the world, which is the dictionary form of a given word (Schütze et al., 2008 ).

Thus, our analysis first consisted in assessing the frequency of phrases across titles and abstracts in our corpus of articles. Then, we performed a co-occurrence analysis on the frequencies of phrases in titles and abstracts. Such analysis is based on the construction of a specific dictionary for the corpus. We built this dictionary based on the results of the frequency analysis. Items were included in the dictionary if they 1) occurred more than 100 times and 2) were directly related to learning, education and digital technologies. This dictionary accounted for 11.4% of the total words of the whole corpus. When considering excluded words (such as “a”, “the”, etc.), our dictionary accounted for 96% of the corpus. This analysis allowed us to find common phrases in our corpus, and further to perform factor analysis, multidimensional scaling and link analysis on our data. Note that we considered “phrases” to be the sequence of two to eight co-occurring words. We used the Phi coefficient to measure the association between words, as its interpretation is similar to the Pearson correlation coefficient. We selected the second order clustering method, as it is based on the idea that two words are close to each other, not necessarily because they occur near each other or in a same document, but because they occur in similar environments.

Finally, we performed a latent semantic analysis by applying a factor analysis with Varimax Rotation in order to extract a small number of factors from synthesizing the data. Data was segmented between documents, meaning that the topic modeling used was based on the cooccurrence of words in one article (its title and abstract). Phrases that occurred less than 30 times were removed, as it is advised to ensure the stability of the factorial solution. We selected factors which accounted for at least 20% of the cases. To define our factors, we retained words whose loadings (standardized link between a word and its factor) were higher than .3. We chose to perform a factor analysis instead of a hierarchical cluster analysis given that in a factor analysis one word may be associated with more than one factor, which we believe is more realistic. Indeed, this may not only reveal the polysemous nature of words but also highlight that some words may appear in multiple contexts.

3.1 An ever-growing proliferation of publications in numerous journals

Results reveal a growing interest in the study of digital literacy and education, as reported in Fig. 1 . This figure reveals that very few studies were published on the topic of digital literacy and learning in 2001, while almost 300 articles were published on this topic in 2020. These results can seem logical and obvious, as digitalization as such is quite a recent concept that has really boomed over the last decade. It shows, however, how research adopts a topic and makes it a fundamental topic of research in a relative short span of time, as illustrated by the progression between 2011 (42 articles published) and 2019 (242 articles published). More precisely, we can say that a threshold has been crossed in 2015 when the number of publications got higher than a hundred in a year, almost doubling the numbers from the previous year. The numbers for the next few years confirm this trend, highlighting the growing importance of digital literacy and its relevance for research.

Number of publications by year

Four journals have published more than 20 papers on the topic, with “Computer & Education” leading at 41 articles and “International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence” following with 27 articles. Behind these big contributors, there is a very high number of journals that have published on the topic. The topic of digital literacy and learning is not limited to journals in the field of education but is also studied in other fields such as medicine and health, technology, organizational behavior, and so on. This highlights how digital literacy as a topic is widespread in literature, appearing in numerous journals with several terminologies, research angles, methods, and concerns that strongly differ.

3.2 A plurality of terms

We now turn to the content of our analysis itself. In Table 1 , we report a frequency table of the phrases which were mostly cited across all articles. As specified in the methods section, we considered “phrases” to the sequence of at least two co-occurring words. Phrases were kept if they occurred more than 100 times in the data. This table clearly highlights that “digital literacy” is a central concept, as it occurred 1734 times within 849 articles of our corpus of 1037 articles. It is then followed by “digital competence” (556 occurrences among 235 articles), “digital skills” (455 occurrences among 308 articles), and “digital competencies” (255 occurrences among 148 articles).

A first striking point is to notice the plurality of the terms used on this topic. This point has already been highlighted in various literature reviews on the topic (Aviram & Eshet-Alkalai, 2006 ; Spante et al., 2018 ), where scholars have tried to decipher the relationships between e-skills, digital literacy, information and communication technology (ICT) literacy, digital skills, digital competence, and so on. The biggest issue when trying to make sense of the relationships between such a variety of terms is to understand to which extent they are similar or distinct. By going back to the very definitions of the concepts used in the literature, we can note some differences in the way the concepts are defined and used.

Definitions of digital literacy are numerous in education literature, but all trace back to the original definition suggested by Gilster ( 1997 ) who defines digital literacy as “the ability to understand and use information in multiple formats from a wide range of sources when it is presented via computers” (Gilster, 1997 , p.1). This definition offers a very interesting starting point as to what digital literacy encompasses by emphasizing that digital literacy is not only about technical skills but also encompasses a cognitive dimension (van Laar et al., 2017 ; Spante et al., 2018 ). Avila and Pandya ( 2013 ) further emphasize the critical-thinking dimension of digital literacy by coining the term “critical digital literacies” (Avila & Pandya, 2013 , p. 3). Other scholars such as Aviram and Eshet-Alkalai ( 2006 ); Ng ( 2012 ); Tuamsuk and Subramaniam ( 2017 ) even go beyond in suggesting that there is another dimension to digital literacy, which is the socio-emotional dimension. In this perspective, digital literacy also integrates online behaviors and the sensibility that is required to behave appropriately (Eshet, 2004 ). One of the first things that is striking when comparing these definitions is that there is no consensus on the actual definition of digital literacy. Scholars agree that digital literacy goes beyond technical aspects to include cognitive aspects. Beyond that, digital literacy appears as a multifaceted notion with some scholars emphasizing specific elements and others emphasizing others.

The second most recurring term in our corpus is “digital competence” or “digital competencies”. It is broadly defined by Picatoste ( 2018 ) as “a set of different skills for achieving a good performance on digital society” (Picatoste et al., 2018 , p. 1033). This definition is interesting because it emphasizes the notion of performance. Other existing definitions of digital competence further insist on the notion of technology use (Scuotto & Morellato, 2013 ) and knowledge production (Cazco et al., 2016 ). These definitions are interesting because they articulate digital competence around practical aspects of using digital tools. In contrast, digital literacy seems to be focusing more on processing and communicating information.

The third term that appears most frequently in our corpus is “digital skills”. Here again, the term has been widely used in the literature and many definitions exist. Van Dijk for example defines digital skills as the “set of skills that users need to operate computers and their networks, to search and select information, and the ability to use them for the fulfillment of one’s goals” (van Dijk, 2006 , p.73). This definition distinguishes three dimensions of digital skills: technical skills (i.e. the ability to operate a computer or other kinds of digital technologies), information-seeking skills (i.e. ability to browse and select relevant information), and strategic skills (i.e. using technical and information skills in order to achieve something) (van Dijk, 2006 ). van Deursen and van Dijk ( 2009 ) further make a distinction between the technical aspects and the content aspects in the digital skills to account for the specificities of online content. The way digital skills are defined in the literature seems to put emphasis on both the technological and medium of communication aspects.

Table 1 further highlights that the term ‘twenty-first century’ appears 160 times. This term can be associated with twenty-first century skills or twenty-first century digital skills, terms that have been made popular by van Laar et al. ( 2017 , 2019 ). They provide a framework for defining twenty-first century digital skills as it identifies seven core skills, which are technical, information management, communication, collaboration, creativity, critical thinking and problem solving. Twenty-First century digital skills as such, consist of a broad array of competencies that are crucial in order to successfully accomplish tasks in the digital twenty-first century. Van Laar and colleagues further study how some determinants such as education level, age, and social support influence 21st digital skills, and are as such needed to be taken into account by educators and policy-makers (van Laar et al., 2019 ).

Based on Table 1 and on the definitions available in the literature, it appears that there is a multiplicity of overlapping concepts in education literature, all of which have their specificities and their particular inclinations. The pervasiveness of various terms such as digital literacy, digital competence(s), digital skills, and twenty-first century digital skills casts doubt on the overall appropriateness of use of the terms in the literature. It raises questions about the extent to which scholars use them with a specific intent in mind, with Fieldhouse and Nicholas ( 2008 ) noting that terms are often interchangeable in taking the example of ‘literacy’, ‘fluency’, and ‘competency’. Table 1 highlights the breadth and heterogeneity of the terminology used in the literature; the results of our co-occurrence analysis emphasize this global lack of precision in the terminology and in its use.

3.3 Co-occurrence analysis: Classroom versus everyday life

In the following section, we report the results of a co-occurrence analysis based on the frequencies of phrases in titles and abstracts. Figure 2 represents a dendrogram describing the similarities between the phrases, and Table 2 shows a table of similarity, where the coefficients can be interpreted as correlation coefficients. Note that the values of the coefficients are not based on the frequencies of the words but rather on the co-occurrences of specific words in a case.

Dendrogram of the co-occurrence of phrases – generated by WordStat

Two main groups of phrases can be extracted from the dendrogram and from the similarities table. On the one hand, themes related to information literacy, digital media, literacy and social media appear to form one group of concepts. Indeed, social media and social networks are related to “online” (both phi higher than .5) and “internet” (phi = .486). Surprisingly, the term “internet” is negatively associated with concepts related to learning and education (such as “pedagogy”, phi = −.729; teaching, phi = −.652, teaching and learning, phi = −.642, school, phi = −.517 and student, phi = −.523).This leads us to the second main group of phrases, which are related to the classroom. This group includes phrases such as “learning”, “language”, “pedagog*”, “school”, “student”, “teach*, “teacher education”, “teaching and learning”, which all have an association higher than .5 with the concept of “classroom”. These terms are also strongly related with the term “competence” (association higher than .4). Moreover, competence is strongly related to “train*” (phi = .713) and “universit*” (phi = .443).

This dendrogram provides a visual representation of how the terms in our corpus are associated. It is interesting to note that two groups of phrases emerge, with terms associated with the educational and learning environment on the one hand, and those with a more practical focus on the other. We can therefore distinguish in our corpus a literature that deals with the development of digital skills from a literature that focuses on the operationalization of such digital skills. Figure 2 therefore displays two major research streams on digital literacy.

4 Discussion

The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the research field of digital literacy into learning and education. More precisely, it aimed at answering the following two questions: 1) What place does digital literacy hold in the literature on education and learning? 2) How is digital literacy conceptualized in the educational context and what are the main research streams on the topic?

Using text mining, this review maps the field of educational research in line with digital literacy. A number of 1037 studies performed between 2000 and 2020 on this topic were included, as they explicitly mentioned digital skills (or related terms such as digital literacy or competence), education and learning either in their title and/or in their abstract. This number of studies shows that there is a great deal of interest in this topic. The first question that this rapid growth raises is that of the sustainability of this research area: is digital literacy a long-lasting research topic or is it going to be out-of-date in a few years because of the emergence of new technologies? On one hand, the fact that digital literacy is tightly linked to ICT and digital media suggests that it might not be relevant in a post-digital world. On the other hand, the very concept of digital literacy is more than twenty years old and still relevant, even if technological evolution has been tremendous over that period of time. Moreover, the concept of digital literacy covers more than the sole technical dimension, which suggests that research on the subject still has a long way to go.

Our analysis suggests that the terms used (most notably, digital skills, digital literacy, digital competence(s)) need to be clearly defined, as authors tend to use them interchangeably although each term has its own specificities. These results are consistent with other literature reviews (Spante et al., 2018 ). The relative youth of the literature field (about twenty years old) might explain why the terminology is not yet fully established. Nonetheless, this may generate some confusion and potential misunderstandings, as well as a dispersion in the field of research. Our descriptive results shed light on this plurality and our analysis of the corpus provide an overview of the research field and highlights how research integrates digital literacy into learning and education. This allows researchers to better position their research on the subject and to use the appropriate terminology.

Our research allows us to go beyond the issues of terminology to offer a mapping of the field of research in education sciences on digital literacy. Text mining allows us to give an overview of the field, but also to investigate in detail the different elements that compose it.

Our results highlight a fragmentation in this field: on the one hand, there are studies focusing on digital literacy in an educational context (i.e. in classrooms and other learning contexts). On the other hand, there is research highlighting practical aspects related to digital world, such as the use of social media and social network and more generally to information literacy. This fragmentation of research in this field is in line with Stopar and Bartol ( 2019 ) who also identify distinct research clusters. This allows us to identify three main streams of research, namely: learning digital literacy, digital learning and twenty-first century digital skills, as well as two fundamental dimensions that support the digital ecosystem that are the informational and the technological base.

Digital literacy and digital learning are at heart of the research field, as they constitute its core focus. Research is booming and there are more and more studies investigating either the development of digital literacy or digital learning setups. There is a high correlation between these two research streams, but more research needs to be led in order to combine these two research streams. Research could for example focus on how digital literacy enables digital learning, or, at the opposite, how digital learning creates a fruitful environment to develop digital literacy (e.g. Cazco et al., 2016 ; Hatlevik, 2017 ; Yu et al., 2017 ). Research could also specifically target vocational teachers, as their role in both fostering digital literacy and creating digital learning environments are crucial (e.g. Area-Moreira et al., 2016 ; Gómez-Trigueros et al., 2019 ; Gudmundsdottir et al., 2020 ; Guillén-Gámez et al., 2019 ; Martín et al., 2020 ; Mynaříková & Novotný, 2020 ). Research also advocates that teacher training should focus more on the vocational teachers’ development of digital skills, notably by integrating ICT in their curriculum (Pombo et al., 2017 ).

The twenty-first century digital skills factor shows another axis of research in the literature field bridging the technological base and the informational base. Rather than asking the question of digital learning or learning digital literacy, the issue here is the operationalization of these skills between technology and information and communication. This factor therefore illustrates a third research axis in the literature on digital skills, which is more concerned with understanding what these digital skills are made of and how they can be used in everyday life. Research in this stream can step out of the traditional education and learning field of research to tackle other issues related to twenty-first century digital skills, for example in the workplace (van Laar et al., 2019 ).

The technological aspect is very important and can be found in the ICT and social media factors. They represent the “technological base” without which the whole digital ecosystem would not exist, demonstrating their central role in research. The particularity of digital communication tools is that they are constantly evolving, which is why studies focusing on tools are always relevant as they deal with a constantly evolving reality that needs to be understood. The social media factor, beyond its technological dimension, also has to be linked to its daily life dimension in which social media is used for all kinds of activities. This factor therefore has an embeddedness in daily life that is important to take into account.

Information and communication are also a key element of this research area, constituting what could be called the “informational base” without which the whole digital ecosystem does not exist. In this sense, the information literacy factor puts the emphasis on data and on information and communication, which are the core forms of expression in digital literacy. The performance of information and communication tasks is at the heart of digital literacy, and this “informational base” appears in both research streams.

Our study has several limitations. The first limitation is methodological in nature and concerns text mining. In contrast to traditional systematic literature reviews which focus on the most relevant articles by establishing very precise selection criteria and analyze them in depth, our approach via text mining aims rather at processing a very large number of articles (the whole body of articles published on the topic) and analyzing them in an automated way. This does not allow us to obtain the depth of analysis of traditional systematic literature reviews, but it is very useful in order to have a global understanding of the field of research. This objective of mapping the entire literature is incompatible with a more in-depth work on the content of the articles. Future studies, however, could dig deeper into the factors that have been identified in our analysis and analyze how these operate in the field of research in order to make sense of their specificities.

Another issue with text mining is that it works through keywords and can thus miss important topics if they are not signaled through the appropriate keywords. For example, private context does not appear in our analysis, even though there is an important body of literature that highlights the importance of personal factors. This literature focuses on children’s first use of ICT (Juhaňák et al., 2019 ), cultural background (Gui & Argentin, 2011 ), socioeconomic status (Hatlevik et al., 2015 ; Jara et al., 2015 ; Zhong, 2011 ), parental active mediation of ICT use (Livingstone et al., 2017 ), parental level of education (Cabello-Hutt et al., 2018 ). The absence of this dimension in our analysis might be explained by the fact that there is no term that encompasses all these sub-themes, no keyword that the automatic analysis could retrieve. This factor, however, plays an important role in the research as it seems to be a determinant of digital literacy.

Finally, one limitation of our study is its focus on education. This focus on educational research allows us to have a comprehensive view of the whole field, but limits our understanding of digital skills and their applications in daily life and notably within the world of work. Future studies could aim at bridging the classroom with the workplace in order to have a more global perspective on digital skills and results that benefit both (Ahlquist, 2014 ; Alvermann et al., 2012 ; Kivunja, 2014 ).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our parents for their continuous support and guidance.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Media, digital use and informatics didactics teaching and research unit, University of Teacher Education, Avenue de Cour 33, 1004, Lausanne, Switzerland

Catherine Audrin

Chair of Human Resources and Organization, University of Fribourg, Boulevard de Pérolles 90, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland

Bertrand Audrin

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Audrin .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests/competing interests.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Audrin, C., Audrin, B. Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Educ Inf Technol 27 , 7395–7419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5

Download citation

Received : 25 June 2021

Accepted : 22 November 2021

Published : 10 February 2022

Issue Date : July 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Twenty-first century abilities
Information literacy
Text mining, digital skills and digital literacy
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Mizo Language Resource

Part of CoRSAL

About the Language

Mizo (iso 639-3 lus) is a Kuki-Chin language belonging to the Tibeto-Burman language family. It is the native language of the Mizo people in both the Mizoram state of India (23.36 N, 92.8 E) and Chin State in Burma.

About the Collection

This is a community collection of audio recordings of modern spoken Mizo covering three generations of male and female speakers, including children, recorded between 1970 and 1990 by Thangi Chhangte. Many of the speakers featured in this collection, such as Chhangte’s grandparents, were born in the early 1900s.

The collection includes Liandala (Chhangte’s maternal grandfather) singing songs he composed himself, and traditional stories narrated by Pi. Thangpuii, mother of C. L. Rema (Chhangte’s paternal grandmother). Pi. Thangpuii was a storyteller in her youth, and claimed to know a hundred Mizo folktales! There are also conversations between family members and audio “letters” to family members living outside of Mizoram—for example, messages and songs from family and friends in Mizoram, recorded on cassettes and sent in the mail. These recordings represent natural language, as family members speak casually with each other, visitors come and go, and children play in the background.

The collection includes performances of singing by children, choir, and family. The songs include zaikhawm hla, a Mizo style of group singing and a traditional way of giving thanks. These are religious songs sung in a group, often at funerals or celebrations. They are sung with a traditional drum and accompanied by dance. The songs include words of thanks to God for good fate and good days. The collection also includes performances of Mizo Christian hymns sung at home and by church choirs—many composed by Mizos. These recordings are especially important, as they were done before the advent of mass media in Mizoram; the composers were less homogeneous in the period before digital music recordings. Chhangte says the language and music was freer in those days.

Guided Search
Advanced Search
Proximity Search
Searching Help
Apply your Search Terms to:
The Full Text of the Item
Metadata (Catalog Record)

At a Glance

Latest additions rss feed.

Cite This Collection

Here is our suggested citation. Consult an appropriate style guide for conformance to specific guidelines.

Mizo Language Resource in UNT Digital Library. University of North Texas Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/MIZO/ accessed May 8, 2024. Copy Citation

Explore Holdings

Start browsing through the holdings of this collection in one of the following ways:

Resource Type

Digital Repository Mizoram University

Dspace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets.

Digital Repository of Mizoram University
M. Phil Dissertations

Department of Mizo Collection home page

1 Chawngthu, Lalthantluanga
1 Chhangte, Lalduhzuala
1 Lalawmpuia, H
1 Lalawmpuii, H
1 Lalberkhawpuimawia, V.
1 Lalbiakzuali, H
1 Laldintluangi, Ruth
1 Lalhlimpuii
1 Lallianzuala, C
1 Lalnunpuia
1 A study of trickster tales in Miz...
1 Treatment of Love in Selected Nov...
1 Treatment of Women in Selected fi...

Select your language English हिंदी

Social Share

Mizo tawng kalphung.

Author: Dokhuma, James

Keywords: Language Linguistics Literature Linguistics and languages Artificial languages A thluk danglam avanga hrang nei Thumal Noun leh Verb a hman kawp theih thenkhatte Tawng awmze in hnaih

Publisher: Mizoram Publication Board, Aizawl

Description: This book by James Dokhuma, provides a study of the structure of the Mizo language. Through the book, he explains the tonal nature of Mizo language and the different meaning that a change in tone of the same word can produced. He further adds that all the names of the animals and plants enrich the Mizo language.

Source: State Central Library, Aizawl, Mizoram

Type: E-Book

Received From: Mizoram State Library

Dublin Core View
Parts of PDF & Flipbook

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Phone . [email protected]
Email . +54 356 945234

Indian Culture App

The Indian Culture Portal is a part of the National Virtual Library of India project, funded by the Ministry of Culture, Government of India. The portal has been created and developed by the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Data has been provided by organisations of the Ministry of Culture.

Email Id : [email protected]

Essay on Digital Literacy

Students are often asked to write an essay on Digital Literacy in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Digital Literacy

Understanding digital literacy.

Digital Literacy is knowing how to use digital devices like computers, tablets, and smartphones. It’s about understanding the internet and social media. It’s important because we live in a digital world. We use digital tools for school, work, and fun.

Why is Digital Literacy Important?

Digital Literacy helps us learn and communicate. It helps us find information quickly and easily. It can also keep us safe online. We need to know how to protect our personal information and avoid dangerous sites.

How Can We Improve Digital Literacy?

We can improve Digital Literacy by learning. Schools and libraries often have classes. We can also learn from friends or family. Practice is important too. The more we use digital tools, the better we get.

Challenges of Digital Literacy

Sometimes, Digital Literacy can be hard. Not everyone has access to digital tools. Some people might find them difficult to use. But with time and patience, we can overcome these challenges.

In conclusion, Digital Literacy is a vital skill in today’s world. It helps us learn, communicate, and stay safe online. Despite challenges, we can improve our skills with learning and practice.

250 Words Essay on Digital Literacy

What is digital literacy.

Digital literacy is the ability to use digital devices like computers, smartphones, and tablets. It’s about knowing how to search for information online, use social media, send emails, and protect your personal information. It’s a bit like learning to read and write, but with technology.

In today’s world, technology is everywhere. We use it for school, work, and even fun. Being digitally literate helps you do all these things easily. It also helps you stay safe online. For example, knowing how to spot a scam email can protect you from losing money or personal information.

Parts of Digital Literacy

Digital literacy has many parts. One part is technical skills, like knowing how to use a keyboard or mouse. Another part is understanding how to find and use information online. This could mean using a search engine, reading a blog post, or watching a video tutorial.

Learning Digital Literacy

You can learn digital literacy at school, at home, or even by yourself. Many schools teach students how to use technology safely and effectively. Parents can also help by showing their kids how to use devices and the internet responsibly.

The Future of Digital Literacy

As technology keeps changing, digital literacy will also change. It will be more important than ever to keep learning new skills. This will help us keep up with the digital world and make the most of the opportunities it offers.

In conclusion, digital literacy is a key skill for the modern world. It helps us use technology safely and effectively, and it will only become more important in the future.

500 Words Essay on Digital Literacy

Digital literacy is the ability to use digital technology, such as computers, smartphones, and the internet. It includes knowing how to find information online, how to use social media, and how to stay safe on the internet. Just like we need to know how to read and write in school, we also need to learn digital literacy in today’s world.

Digital literacy is important because we use technology every day. We use it for schoolwork, to talk to our friends, and even for fun. If we do not know how to use technology safely and effectively, we could get into trouble. For example, we might accidentally share personal information online, which can be dangerous. Or we might have trouble completing school assignments if we do not know how to use the internet for research.

Digital literacy is not just about knowing how to use a computer. It has many parts. Here are a few:

1. Technical skills: This includes knowing how to use different devices, like laptops, tablets, and smartphones. It also includes knowing how to use different types of software, like word processors and web browsers.

2. Information skills: This involves knowing how to find and evaluate information online. Not everything on the internet is true, so it is important to know how to tell the difference between reliable and unreliable sources.

3. Safety skills: This includes knowing how to protect yourself online. This means understanding how to create strong passwords, how to avoid scams, and how to protect your personal information.

Improving Digital Literacy

There are many ways to improve digital literacy. Schools often teach students how to use technology and the internet. There are also many online resources that can help. These include tutorials, videos, and websites that explain how to use different technologies. It is important to practice these skills regularly, just like any other skill.

In conclusion, digital literacy is a vital skill in today’s world. It involves understanding how to use technology, how to find and evaluate information online, and how to stay safe on the internet. By improving our digital literacy, we can become more confident and capable users of technology.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics: