thesis statement examples for harrison bergeron

A Summary and Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s ‘Harrison Bergeron’

By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University)

‘Harrison Bergeron’ is a 1961 short story by the American writer Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007). The story can be categorised as ‘dystopian satire’ or a ‘satirical dystopian story’, but we’ll say more about these labels in a moment. The action of the story takes place in the future America of 2081, where everyone has been made truly equal, physically, mentally, and aesthetically.

Plot summary

The story is set in the United States in 2081. True equality has finally been achieved: nobody is allowed to be stronger, more beautiful, or more intelligent than anyone else, so people who are deemed to have an unfair advantage are forced by law to use ‘handicaps’ which limit their powers or talents. A Handicapper General, named Diana Moon Glampers, is in charge of ensuring everyone obeys the law and wears their assigned handicaps at all times.

The story focuses on a couple, George and Hazel Bergeron, whose fourteen-year-old son Harrison is taken away so that he can be ‘handicapped’ because he is abnormally strong and intelligent. George is of above-average intelligence so is forced to wear earpieces which transmit distracting noises every twenty seconds, so that he cannot concentrate or, or think about things, for too long and thus use his intellect to his advantage.

George also carries forty-seven pounds of birdshot in a canvas bag, hung around his neck, to reduce his natural athleticism. When his wife suggests opening a hole in the bottom of the bag and removing some of the lead balls, because she can see how worn-out he is, he reminds her that such a crime carries a prison sentence and a fine.

George and Hazel watch ballerinas dancing on television, but George is unimpressed by them, since they aren’t very good: no more than average, at least, because they are not allowed to be supremely gifted at ballet. The naturally attractive dancers, like other beautiful people in society, are forced to wear masks which make them look less attractive.

The ballet show is interrupted by a live news broadcast, which reveals that their son, Harrison Bergeron, has escaped from jail, where he had been held on suspicion of plotting to overthrow the government. Harrison enters the studios where the ballerinas are dancing, and tears off the handicaps he has been made to wear, which include a red rubber ball for a nose (like a clown) to make him look less handsome, and a large pair of headphones rather than the small radio his father is made to wear.

Harrison then announces that he will become emperor of the world, and asks for a woman to claim her prize as his empress. One of the beautiful ballerinas steps forward, and he removes her mask and frees her of her handicaps. He does the same to the other dancers and the musicians, and orders them to play good music.

Harrison and the dancer then ascend to the ceiling, floating above the ground, and exchange a long kiss. At that moment, Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, arrives and shoots them both dead, before ordering the dancers and musicians to put their handicaps back on.

George, who was in the kitchen getting himself a beer, misses the killing of his own son live on television, while Hazel, owing to her low intelligence, almost immediately forgets what she has seen.

This story is satirical, but what precisely is Vonnegut satirising in ‘Harrison Bergeron’? Is he taking aim at the idea of state-mandated equity, which forces everyone to be mediocre, in order to show the absurdity of such a notion? Or is he, in fact, satirising those who would oppose attempts to level the playing field for everyone?

This latter interpretation is not as unlikely as it may first appear. The first thing to establish is that Kurt Vonnegut was aware of the dangers of government overreach, and the future society depicted in ‘Harrison Bergeron’ is clearly one in which the state has too much power over the individual. They can force people to carry bags of bullets around their necks to disadvantage them physically, and even prevent them from thinking too much. People are fed a diet of mediocre television to keep them docile and compliant.

This aspect of ‘Harrison Bergeron’ reads almost like a more extreme version of Ray Bradbury’s dystopias of the 1950s: not just Fahrenheit 451 , in which books are banned because the government wants to keep everyone stupid and passive, but Bradbury’s short story ‘ The Pedestrian ’, in which the police threaten to arrest a lone man walking the streets of an evening because he isn’t sitting in front of the television, consuming a diet of cultural dross, like everyone else.

But the other key theme in Vonnegut’s story, besides government overreach and the state’s attempts to keep everyone intellectually lazy, is the one for which it is perhaps best known: egalitarianism, or the struggle for equality between all people. And on this issue, ‘Harrison Bergeron’ strikes a more ambivalent note.

On the one hand, the idea of state-mandated weights, radios, and masks to render supremely strong, clever, or beautiful people as weak, stupid, and ugly as the rest of the population strikes us as preposterously evil. Rather than pushing for a race to the bottom, a responsible and progressive government would seek to encourage weak citizens to pick up weights and build up their muscles, educate less intelligent members of society, and devise surgical techniques (such as plastic surgery) to make ugly people more attractive.

In one respect, then, Vonnegut’s story reads as a bedfellow of those satires which view communism or socialism as a way of making everyone equally miserable and poor, rather than trying to make everyone equally successful and financially comfortable.

Such an analysis is certainly defensible when we turn to the story and witness the ways in which, for instance, George Bergeron is effectively punished for his natural intellect by being bombarded with state-sanctioned noises on a regular basis: a peculiar kind of torture. The idea that one’s fourteen-year-old son could be taken away simply for being unusually strong and intelligent is abominable.

And yet Vonnegut doesn’t actually tell us why Harrison is taken away initially. We are just told that he has been taken away: nothing more. The news broadcast announces that he has been imprisoned for trying to overthrow the government.

Given George and Hazel’s short memories, and the fact that the story is focalised through them, we don’t learn, despite the story having a supposedly ‘omniscient’ third-person narrator, whether Harrison was simply taken away for being different or arrested because he had already presented a threat to the state by plotting a coup.

After all, George and Hazel have been allowed, following the application of their handicaps, to live ‘freely’ (at least relatively so) in their own home. Why was Harrison taken away? Because he was not just a little bit more intelligent than the average person, but vastly more ingenious than everyone else, so that all existing handicaps were useless on him? Or because he is already plotting something? The story refuses to tell us this.

Similarly, although the shooting of Harrison and his new girlfriend at the end of the story is shocking, Harrison’s lust for power – seeking to use his natural height, strength, and intellect to become ruler of the whole world – also strikes us as a nightmare prospect, so that the shock of his death is likely to be tempered with some degree of relief.

‘Harrison Bergeron’, in the last analysis, is a story which invites us to consider the lengths we are prepared to go to as a society in order to achieve equality. Clearly there are some things, like dancing or athletics or even thinking, which some people are more naturally gifted at than others. Do we want to punish them for their natural talent, or appreciate the things their gifts allow them to do? Just because we will never be an Olympic athlete, do we think it unfair that others get the chance to win a gold medal?

Most reasonable people would answer ‘no’ to this question. People are different, with different talents and skills. An ugly person might be extremely clever. A clever person might be a physical weakling. A body-builder might be thicker than a whale omelette. And Vonnegut’s point in ‘Harrison Bergeron’ appears to be twofold: first, that failing to accept that people are different from us is bad, and second, that government overreach is also bad.

And it is worth remembering that in 1961, when the story was first published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction , America was still struggling towards the legislation which would recognise that all citizens were in fact equal before the law. The Civil Rights movement would, throughout the 1960s, see African-Americans asserting their equality as racial segregation was gradually written out of state laws.

What this means is that ‘Harrison Bergeron’ is both a satire on the absurd attempts to make everyone the same and to disregard the important differences between us, and a story which rejects the human impulse to use one’s innate sense of superiority (whether real or merely assumed) in order to gain power over other people.

In this regard, Diane Moon Glampers is the villain of the story for seeking to impose equity on everyone using totalitarian force, but Harrison Bergeron himself is also a warning about what may happen if individuals are allowed to use their innate privileges for evil or depraved ends.

At the same time as it is a warning against enforced equity (i.e., everyone will be as mediocre as everyone else), the story also carries the seeds of an opposing message, namely that those who seek to enforce difference and to use their innate differences from others to attain power and privilege are also to be rejected and opposed.

Discover more from Interesting Literature

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

• Essay Editor

An Analysis “Harrison Bergeron” Essay

1. introduction.

His story is a warning that is given to the reader, and should be heeded by future generations. Harrison Bergeron is a story that is a satirical meditation on the ways of political equality can be best worst. The author, Kurt Vonnegut Jr., tries to warn the reader that one day, the United States will transform into a place where everyone is equal, that no one is better than the others. The way that this message is conveyed is done through a short story. The story is based around one family who has had their 14-year-old son taken away and jailed for the crime of having above-average intelligence and good looks. This is because in the year 2081, everyone is equal to one another, and in order to make sure that this is enforced, the United States Congress has mandated that a handicapper general is put in place. These handicaps would be handicaps of intelligence, having to wear a mental impediment radio in the ear at all times and sharper noise-making in the ear, and good looks with having to wear masks on the faces of the ugly and/or having to shave their eyebrows.

1.1 Background information

The year is 2081, the United States of America is completely altered. New amendments to the constitution force the entire nation to be fully equal in every which way. The beautiful country that we know today no longer exists. Contempt is the result of the ill enforced amendments, so the government in turn uses force to try to change the attitudes of the people. Don't think these amendments could happen? In the science fiction story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, the author explores these amendments to the equality of the American people, in the future, by satirizing what already has happened in society through the use of the characters, conflict and setting. The first paragraph of the story portrays the American people as free, happy individuals. Word choice plays a key part in this. The reader should paint a picture in their head as to what the year 2081 looks like. In the late fourteenth century we would imagine the setting to be dark, with old looking people walking around. Vonnegut gives the reader the complete opposite. "They were burdened with sash weights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one the the place of another" (Mock 6). People that are not burdened down with sash weights and false masks. Symbolically these weights and masks represent the false weight and mask the people of the future wear to attain the happiness and equality. A world where people do not have to suffer from the inequalities that we deal with today. A perfect utopia. The American people have done what they thought to get this so called happiness. Look how far people today will go, to try to attain the same thing. This only sets the idea in the head of what was done, what is the result, and what caused these amendments to happen.

1.2 Thesis statement

In "Harrison Bergeron," Kurt Vonnegut examines themes of equality, weakness of the strong, and media influence. Vonnegut answers the questions from the reader that are left unanswered in the short story "Harrison Bergeron." It is backed up by the U.S Constitution that everyone that is an American citizen has the right to bear arms. This does not exclude anybody no matter what their physical or mental limitations may be. Vonnegut's story takes on the form of a satire, a narrative in which the true meaning of the story is disguised. Satire stories are often interesting to the reader because the writer can explore his views in an unobtrusive way, which any reader prefers. Satire also spares no one and Vonnegut parodies the government, the left wing that is often for socialism, and the media. This is seen as Vonnegut's story takes place in an America that has become a socialist society. Vonnegut also said that this story is a "protest" story. His own feelings about the situation are voiced through the wise character of Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General. She ends the beautiful dance of the ballet dancers with a shotgun blast. By Diana doing this Vonnegut allows the reader to answer one last question for themselves. If all people were truly "created equal" would it have come to this? This could be the most important question that the reader needs to answer to analyze the story.

2. Analysis of Characters

Harrison represents the wild radical. He is an extremely dangerous dreamer, paralyzed by huge intelligence, anger, and resentment. A desire for power still underlies Harry's rebellion, but he would rather destroy the government than stoop to working for it. After escaping from jail, he has spent years to 'eliminate the emperor' by building an exact replica of the universe, yet the new universe is a gigantic exercise in free play rather than a political weapon. During this time, Harrison has also finally succeeded in transmogrifying himself into a 'divine and rapturous monster', but finds little satisfaction in this, either, and abandons the self-made deities to seek better company. In fact, the only time that Harrison seems truly content is in his early battles, where he is beaten but unbroken. George Bergeron is Harrison's opposite. As Hazel says, 'in the race of life, he'd got the worst start.' George has accepted the rules of the universe, which declare him to be less intelligent, less attractive, and weaker than Hazel. He has had 'scrapes with the law' for attempting to remove his handicaps, but has always been caught, and has only a vague understanding of his son's rebellious activities. George is completely reactionary and will only seek change in order to restore lost rights. This is evident to the extent that George, if given the opportunity for free thought, might not even use it, since he is incapable of imagining a different way of living. In her thirty seconds of normal intelligence, Hazel is a deeply caring and devoted woman. She wants to see things change for George and begins crying when she realizes that she will forget it. But the fact that she does indeed forget it keeps Harrison Bergeron from becoming a didactic tear-jerker about the importance of individual freedom. On some level, we know that Hazel, like her husband, will accept the tragedy as an unalterable fact and make the best of things. She represents the good side of the average person, modest and unassuming before the high and mighty and with no desire to challenge destiny. Step by handicapped step, Hazel follows her husband to the television, where they watch ballet.

2.1 Harrison Bergeron

In "Harrison Bergeron" we are presented with a society that is a utopia, because equality is finally made true. In this society, the ideal of making all citizens equal has been achieved. The authorities have tried to make the perfect society but in doing so have stunted the society's individuality. For example, a ballerina had to wear a mask on her face as everyone is equal and if she took the mask off the music would not be pleasant to hear, so to prevent the best of dancers feeling bad about themselves they made them all equal, taking away the person she once was, "she tried to think a ballet of grace of form, but her legs are weighted down by bags of birdshot and sand, she finally gave up to just be equal." This resulted in them all looking the same with no unique or distinguishing features. Coming back to the quote, it shows no matter how hard some of these people with particular skills or talents will try, they will always be brought down. The ballerina knew she will never achieve her form and grace because it's not equal to everyone else. In this society, if someone does manage to outshine everyone else, the Handicapper General will place a handicap on that person so that he is at the same level as everyone else. Harrison Bergeron is a character who is used to show the lost individuality of the society. He is a 14-year-old boy who has been excessively handicapped by the government. At 7 feet and 8 inches, Harrison is a genius and athlete, but he is no longer that person after being convicted of plotting to overthrow the government and having to live his life as a "ghost" in an asylum. He had escaped from the asylum and was still at large without his handicaps when he tore the door off the hinges in his own home to take away his parents' burden of opening doors. This is the last time George and Hazel ever saw their son as he was taken away by the government and never seen again.

2.2 George Bergeron

George Bergeron is the character who represents the average man, while his son symbolizes an extraordinary individual. He is the father of Harrison and husband of Hazel Bergeron. George is a static character who undergoes little development throughout the story. Being handicapped himself, he is quite used to his life. In fact, there is a part in the story that mentions "two of George's television had on". This quote reflects how ordinary people will willingly become subjected to years of conditioning, especially the people of today. Television has become such a big part of the average person's life that he would be lost without it. George is a very intelligent man, with his exceptional intelligence being his handicap. He is burdened by the fact that he has to wear a mental handicap radio in his ear. He is quoted as saying "bags of dirt to weigh the bags down were something else again", showing how the government must have increased the handicap from time to time so that the intelligent must suffer further. He is quite a caring person, and his last act of love for his son is convincing him to take his handicaps off so he need not suffer heavy consequences later on. He is finally shown to be quite manly, going to investigate the loud, grave cry he heard coming from the television. Unfortunately for him, he had forgotten what had happened. He is quoted as saying "I forget what I was watching", and upon remembering, he is instantly burdened by the loss of some forty-nine years. George represents a typical citizen who has been suppressed by manipulative conditioning, epitomizing the potentially great men of history who have been conspicuously hampered of their potential and thus suffered the loss of a quality lifestyle. He is symbolic of today's minimalist leaders who are too preoccupied with family life and other simple pleasures to be willing to challenge the status quo and make an effort to change things for the better.

2.3 Hazel Bergeron

Then there was Hazel - she wore a little mental handicap radio in her ear; she was extremely intelligent. This is the extent of Hazel's description in the story. This, of course, serves as a good example of the tremendous handicaps that the characters are burdened with. The fact that Hazel wears no physical handicap is a startling contrast to the other characters in the story, yet she is burdened with a mental handicap. This radio sends sharp noises into her head to prevent her from thinking too intensely. When Hazel asks George what he was thinking he only responds with superstition saying that when he tried to think something happened in his head and he only has a vague idea. An example of the consequences of the handicaps can be seen in the first scene in which Hazel and George are watching television and George's average intelligence causes him to forget what it was he was watching. At the exact same moment, Hazel's thought is interrupted by a particularly painful noise in her ear, and she is unable to say what it was she was thinking. This scene serves to show that the Bergerons are no exception to the rest of the handicapped characters, and must also endure the same sort of treatment. Finally, Hazel's intelligence can be seen at the end of the story when she witness the death of her son on television. She begins to cry for reasons she is not able to articulate, which George assumes is because she cannot remember what it was she was watching. This scene serves to show the beguiling nature of the story, for while Hazel is truly crying for her son's death, she is unable to say so due to her handicap. In the end though, the fact that Hazel is only able to cry is one more example of the handicaps having taken away her joy in life.

3. Themes and Symbolism

The book states: "The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else." This is how the story explains the state of equality in the future. The equality and sameness is a prevailing theme throughout the story. It is a situation where equality has gone overboard. People have been made equal through the use of physical and mental handicaps. "Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was quicker than anybody else." Vonnegut writes: "Then all of a sudden, Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, came into the studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She fired twice, and the Emperor and the Empress were dead before they hit the floor." This is really the climax of the story because it shows the length to which the government will go to preserve equality. The government is so set on things being equal that it is willing to kill two of the success stories of people bettering the situation. Finally, the story employs a good deal of irony and satire on the general state government and society.

3.1 Equality and Conformity

In Huxley's world, status is not obtained by choice but is predetermined by genetic disposition. People in the World State are conditioned to be content with their ranking. Models of historical figures and scientific achievements are worshipped. People are reproduced in Bokanovskified, or in other words human cloning, and conditioned chemically to fit certain caste requirements. The conditioning and cloning is done in World State centres. Fetuses who will become members of the lower castes are subjected to even more chemicals so that they will be deprived of intelligence and physical strength. Any fetuses who stand a chance of being too smart or too strong are chemically altered to be less so. This conditioning provides the base on which each caste member will perform their caste duties happily and free of fear of what they are missing. Huxley uses these methods to show how the new world no longer is based on equality or independence. Each caste member is instructed to be happy with who they are, but in actuality it is merely because they know not what else to be. This is a stark contrast to the desire of the founding fathers of the United States Declaration of Independence: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Every citizen, regardless of caste, is equally duped into serving its purpose by being made to believe that they will only be happy doing so.

3.2 Handicaps as a symbol

Kurt Vonnegut's story is a revolution prescribed by the high costs of overambitious government, through the literary technique of symbolism. Among the variety of symbols within the story, there are three that are especially significant. The handicaps that the government forces upon the citizens have a very overt and direct translation to real life. The "strongbox" that George must wear around his neck, and the meaningless and unnecessary sash weights are the best examples. In the story, all of the citizens wear handicaps that are assigned by one of the many Handicapper General agents. The idea of these handicaps is to make every citizen completely equal in every aspect, thus it was. The chamber in which George uses to weigh down his bag is another excellent symbol of the world view on handicaps. George's wife Hazel has an average intelligence and therefore has very minimal handicaps, so to compensate for the inequity between George and Hazel, the government wants to give George a 47-pound bag to drag around. George, however, spends most of the story out of his handicaps and, in turn, much of his time in this chamber. The definition of a strongbox is a container of great strength in which precious items are kept to protect them. This is precisely what George does when he locks himself in his chamber. It is a safe haven for his mind and his intelligence. By taking his handicaps off and staying in this chamber, he can be liberated from the constant torment of his handicaps. He can be free to think and do as he wishes in this serene environment away from the disabilities placed upon him. And although it's just a simple room, it's the one place in the story where he is closest to possessing it.

3.3 Rebellion against the government

The citizens in this society are in a way brainwashed to associate a handicap with a positive aspect. Masks hide their faces as though not being able to see one's own face keeps them from accepting whom they really are since individuality is not accepted. Attractiveness is another thing that must be hidden; for some this is positive because we are always taught to look past the physical and into the soul. For others whose physical features are what make them truly individuals – this is a negative thing. How must they hide their beauty so as to not be envied? Bergeron's fourteen-year-old son, who is "a genius and an athlete, [who is] under-handicapped," is forced to wear a radio in his ear which plays sharp noises to distract his thoughts; something must be wrong with a society that destroys the potential of the youth. Music played by Harrison Bergeron is also "uglier than any he'd ever heard." This symbolizes a perversion of the arts in a society where the arts should be an expression of oneself. Any deviation from the common good will lead to punishment through the use of handicaps. Any who do not conform to the laws of equality by refusing a handicap will be brutally and publicly executed. The citizens' attitudes toward their handicaps seem to be accepting yet resentful. Because this is the only way of life they have known, they have grown content with their forced equality, yet there is a sense of longing for the lost attributes which were the definitions of their individuality. At one point George Bergeron, Harrison's father, tries to rebel by removing the weights he is forced to wear to handicap his intelligence and strength. His wife Hazel quickly reminds him of the negative consequences of disobeying the Handicapper General and says "I don't care if you're not equal to me for a little while." This incident is a small glance at the stirring of rebellion; something must be done to break free from the chains that are handicaps. In a way, the handicaps have done what they were supposed to do: take away the inequality of the people. This is true even of the very strong who used a force equalizer which "reduced the twenty-one gun salute to only two guns." Yet these people seek to be free from their forced equality.

3.4 Irony and Satire

The inconsistent statement made by Hazel that she would love to have some lead handicaps in order to compete with weight handicapper and George's reaction to it reflects how deep the handicaps given by the government are to the people. The handicapper general herself said, "They were burdened by sash weights and bags of birdshot, and their handicaps were probably the greatest in the history of the race." It is shown how it is not stated in the amendments that everyone must be equal by having handicaps, but it is the society that enforces the smart people, pretty people, strong people to wear handicaps just to have a "normal" life. The satirical actions on Harrison's parents that forgot their son's rebellion and disappearance, which is only a few minutes, that they have already used the memories to continue watching television shows. This shows how people are so consumed by the poor quality of television shows until they forget the most noble thing in their life. This gives the ironic meaning as the television show Harrison's parents are watching is about the announcement made by the government and Harrison's rebellion, but they do not have any feelings at all. This actually reflects our modern society today where people are more interested in low-quality entertainment rather than real events that are happening. This short story is used to criticize and describe the author's perception of an ideal world to which it retains the use of common sense and emotion and not only relying on the government decisions and full of lies just like Harrison's father and mother. Kurt Vonnegut used this short story to criticize the US government at that time for what they are doing, and it is not far from what our society is doing right now.

4. Conclusion

A variety of themes are portrayed in Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron". These are discussed in depth throughout the essay, explaining both the positive and negative aspects of each theme. One of the recurring themes in Vonnegut's short story is the strengthening of the weak and the weakening of the strong. This is first seen through the ballerina who endures the death of her true love when he is taken away due to the fact that he is too intelligent and attractive for her. This prevents the two from demonstrating their dance, which is the one form of art that still has potential. This action deeply affects the ballerina, and eventually she collapses under the emotional weight at a television studio. This concept is supported by an unknown ballerina who states, "That's the only way to be sure the competition will be fair." Measures such as the one taken to handicap the ballerina and her partner are used throughout the story to enforce this theme and ensure the equality of the society. While these steps taken to create equality have positive intentions, they fail to meet their purpose and in turn do more harm than good. This is demonstrated through a decrease in quality of life of the society, as the handicaps make everyday tasks extremely difficult, if not impossible. An example of this is when George Bergeron attempts to think and recite a speech on television. Due to the fact that the H-G men know he is of above average intelligence, they are forced to use a mental handicap in the form of a transmitter to prevent above average thought. This device sends sharp noises through his head at twenty-second intervals, which cause him to grip a bag of birdshot and a tearsheet and head for the nearest television station. This ultimately will lead George to an untimely death. The death will not be seen as unfair, as Vonnegut is portraying an age-old dream of man, a utopia where competition is non-existent and everyone is equal. However, the result of the death is still the same: a man dying for what he believes in, in an attempt to strengthen his mind.

4.1 Summary of main points

The paper is an analysis of Kurt Vonnegut's satirical short story, "Harrison Bergeron". It is effective in its argument that Vonnegut's vision of the perfect society is far from ideal. There are numerous examples in history where attempts to "equalize" a society in one way or another have had devastating effects. In order for the reader to fully understand the extent of Vonnegut's vision, the society in "Harrison Bergeron" must be scrutinized. This paper addresses the ways in which the government in this story tries to make everyone equal, and the gender of that equality. These attempts to level the playing field cause a myriad of effects, many of them counter-productive. Vonnegut uses the characters in the story as objects of ridicule in an attempt to display the absurdity of any attempt to achieve equality when it means taking measures to control people that defy the very definition of equality. This analysis of "Harrison Bergeron" is assertive and clear in its thesis; stating that Vonnegut's society is a masked, general totalitarianism where the only form of equality is an equal lack of progress for all. It is effective in supporting this thesis by systematically evaluating the story bit by bit in chronological order; giving numerous examples of the issues it is addressing. The paper sets out to prove that in "Harrison Bergeron", Vonnegut is illustrating the illogical nature of attempting to create a perfect society. The assertion is that the government has the best intentions for its people, but in applying such intense measures to make society equal, the very nature of it is changed. Vonnegut demonstrates that this change is not a positive one, and the deviations from what was originally intended are vast.

4.2 Final thoughts

The society in "Harrison Bergeron" is a microcosm of what happens when a single characteristic is the only thing of importance; when it is the only thing focused upon, and when it is the only thing discussed. This society was so far gone that when Harrison was 14 he was taken and locked up and kept in a guarded place because they noticed that he was above average in terms of intelligence and physical abilities. He was above average, and in the equality-driven society, being above average was a very bad thing. It was bad because there were others who could never hope to achieve the rank above average due to their handicaps, and when they saw someone who was above them they would feel worse about themselves. So they would do anything to prevent that person from making them feel bad about themselves, and this was why Harrison was locked up. He had become a threat to those who were average because they believed that he would make them feel bad about themselves. It's not their fault though because this society had drilled the fact that being below average was okay and that no one should feel bad about themselves into all of their citizens. And that was the mentality of the people. Throughout this story, we can see how dangerous an overpowered government can be, how dangerous overdependence and overtrust in someone can be, and how dangerous putting a single characteristic as the only important one can be. This is the message that Vonnegut is really trying to convey, and he uses a completely exaggerated story to do so. In this story, we see George blindly doing what he is told, without a single thought even entering his brain. This is dangerous because it shows us that once a man has grown to completely trust that his government means well, he will do anything that they say. He will do anything whether it has good or bad effects, and this is dangerous in the sense that the government is only man and man can and will make mistakes. At this point, the citizens of the country will do whatever the government tells them no matter what the consequence, and this will lead to mistakes having some very serious effects. Some citizens will realize this, and they will not like to lose their advantage, so there will be those who will try to prevent the government from enforcing their laws. This can also have very serious consequences because those who are trying to prevent the government from enforcing their laws are technically using the old laws to try and prevent the government from making new ones; they are committing very serious crimes, and they will also have some serious consequences.

Recent articles

Leisure activities: the positive effects essay.

1. Introduction Leisure activities are generally defined as the use of free time for non-compulsory activities (Binder, 1977:76) and can be used in various ways. In their most commonly practiced form, leisure activities are a great source of entertainment. Whether it be an adrenaline-filled adventure, just a bit of fun or relaxation, or any of these individually, everyone has an activity that they enjoy. A hugely popular way to spend one's free time is at leisure. The importance that has been p ...

A More Perfect Union – Barack Obama Rhetorical Analysis

Section 1: Introduction Barack Obama has been controversially talked about over the years, particularly his life before being the first black president. Known as being born a mixed-race African American, Obama had lived in an environment where race and color affected one's life tremendously. Obama had recently disclaimed an association with Pastor Jeremiah Wright of the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Wright had come under the media spotlight with various racial remarks and just rem ...

Literary Theory and Criticism

Home › Literature › Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron

Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron

By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on May 25, 2021

Kurt Vonnegut is celebrated more for his longer fiction than for his short stories. Nonetheless, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron,” originally published in the Magazine of Fantasy and Science in October 1961, and currently available in the author’s collection, Welcome to the Monkey House , is a very popular short story and is often cited as an example of dystopian science fiction with an emphasis on egalitarianism. One segment of the 1972 teleplay Between Time and Timbuktu was based on the story, and it was later adapted into a TV movie, Harrison Bergeron (1995), with Sean Astin in the title role.

Set in 2081, the story depicts society’s vain search for absolute equality. Specifically, this new world does not attempt to raise standards for the disabled or handicapped but rather chooses to implement a more onerous solution: to impede those who have superior intellect, beauty, or strength. This solution deprives individuals of their talents by employing masks, loud noises, and weights in an attempt to level the playing field for the less talented. Actually the government is attempting to place all members of society at the level of the lowest common denominator, a process that is overseen by the United States Handicapper General, the shotgun-toting Diana Moon Glampers, whose primary goal is to rid society of anyone who might threaten mediocrity and inadequacy. A similar (though less developed) version of this character and idea appeared in Vonnegut’s earlier novel, The Sirens of Titan.

In this brave new world, the exceptional are consistently repressed, arrested, thrown into mental institutions, and ultimately killed for failing to be average. The central and title character, Harrison Bergeron, is, of course, a threat to this community since he is physically fit, handsome, intellectual, and, what is worse, rebellious. As a result, he is forced to bear enormous handicaps. These include distracting noises, 300- pounds of excess weight, eyeglasses to give him headaches, and cosmetic changes to make him ugly. Despite these handicaps, however, he is able to invade a TV station and declare himself the new emperor. He then strips himself of his handicaps and begins to dance with a ballerina whose amazing beauty and skills have also been distorted by the authoritarian government in an attempt to restrict her advancement and recognition as a superior individual. As the couple dance in defiance of the “rules,” the two defy gravity as they “kiss” the ceiling and assert their artistic independence as well as their refusal to be controlled by an outside authority. The story ends abruptly with two shotgun blasts, suggesting to the reader that there is no forgiveness for those who defy society’s demand for conformity to the ordinary. Added poignancy is created by the framing story, in which Bergeron’s parents are watching TV and observe their son’s demise but cannot concentrate enough to remember the incident or assess its importance. Vonnegut’s point seems to be that without the nonconformists, the dreamers, and the different, society is doomed. The good intention of equality is marred by the way society decides to maintain it. To be fair to one group, it must necessarily be unfair to another. Yet if the brilliant and talented are hindered, society will be unable to improve, and the status quo will be all it can hope for.

Kurt Vonnegut/The New York Times

Vonnegut’s more pessimistic view of life may be termed absurdist. In this future society, growth and experimentation are no longer fostered, and science and technologies are devised to hurt rather than to help humankind. The complacency of Harrison’s parents who witness his murder and yet cannot remember why they are so sad indicates they both have submitted to a world where rebellion is not tolerated and where sameness is fostered and encouraged.

While many critics have considered Vonnegut’s story as an attack on the attempt to level all individuals, what Vonnegut is really assailing is the public’s understanding of what that leveling entails. Critics like Roy Townsend and Stanley Shatt seem to have missed the underlying irony of “Bergeron,” as well as its unreliable narrator, preferring to stress the obvious and ignore the fact that the story line offers an assessment of the foolishness that is “common sense.” Common sense is shown to be ridiculous in its assumptions about equality and in its belief that a sense of morality and ethics is intuitive. Moreover, since Vonnegut’s politics were Leftist in nature, it is unlikely that he would attack the concepts of communism and socialism.

In fact, it is Harrison himself who embodies the past oppression of a dominant culture, and readers should remember his desire is to be emperor, to reassert his superiority and the power it entitles him to wield. Instead Vonnegut seems to satirize society’s limited view of egalitarianism as only intelligence, looks, and athleticism. He never addresses income distribution (the separation between rich and poor) or class prejudice (the difference between the powerful and the powerless) even though both are signifcant issues for America. The mediocrity Vonnegut decries is not a result of the future but a continuation of past practices, an antiintellectualism that is depicted in Harrison’s parents, Hazel and George, whose ideas seem to be shaped by what they see on TV and little else. Controlled by a corrupt value system that says to ignore sad things and be satisfied with normality, it is their world that is condemned more than the world of Diana Moon Glampers. They have facilitated her rise to power with all the coldness and sterility that one might associate with the lunar goddess. Freedom is not the greatest good for the smallest number; nor does it hold that a classruled society will promulgate economic success. Though the story’s message appears quite simple, its moral is rather complex, forcing individual readers to think twice before they reduce its meaning to a sentence or two. Vonnegut was clearly not just trying to side with the radical Right’s objections to big government, and “Harrison Bergeron” is definite evidence of how his convoluted texts beg for more contemplation than they have been previously given

Share this:

Categories: Literature , Short Story

Tags: American Literature , Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , appreciation of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , criticism of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , essays of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , Kurt Vonnegut , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron as a dystopian story , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron as a science fiction , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron criticism , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron essays , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron guide , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron notes , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron plot , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron story , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron structure , Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron themes , Literary Criticism , notes of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , plot of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , Postmodernism , Science Fiction , structure of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , summary of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron , themes of Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

Related Articles

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Non-Fiction
• Author’s Corner
• Reader’s Corner
• Writing Guide
• Book Marketing Services
• Write for us

Book Review

Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut

Dystopian Brilliance: Kurt Vonnegut's Warning on the Perils of Enforced Equality

Title: Harrison Bergeron

Author: Kurt Vonnegut

Genre:  Short Story, Science Fiction, Dystopia

First Publication: 1961

Language:  English

Summary: Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut

It is the year 2081. Because of Amendments 211, 212 and 213 to the Constitution, every American is fully equal, meaning that no one is stupider, uglier, weaker, or slower than anyone else. The Handicapper General and a team of agents ensure that the laws of equality are enforced.

One April, fourteen-year-old Harrison Bergeron is taken away from his parents, George and Hazel, by the government and to a place unknown. But what happens in the aftermath will challenge the status quo and inspire his peers about the hidden potential within one’s own individuality.

Review: Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut

Harrison Bergeron is a dystopian satire written by Kurt Vonnegut and first published in 1961. The story imagines an egalitarian future in which individuals with above-average talent and intelligence are artificially handicapped to prevent them from dominating others. When the story’s teenage protagonist rebels against this system, tragic consequences ensue. Through dark humor and hyperbole, Vonnegut crafts a vivid totalitarian world to provide commentary on enforced equality, freedom of the individual, and governmental control.

The story is set in 2081 when amendments to the US Constitution aim to make all citizens completely equal. Strong, intelligent, or attractive people must wear physical and mental handicaps prescribed by the United States Handicapper General. For instance, graceful dancers wear heavy weights, and intelligent thinkers have distracting radio signals transmitted into their ears. Without these handicaps, they could overwhelm others and gain unfair advantages. The narrative focuses on George and Hazel Bergeron, average citizens watching television when a news bulletin announces their son Harrison has escaped from jail.

Harrison is revealed to be a genius and extraordinarily gifted athlete. He was imprisoned after refusing to wear state-imposed handicaps. The television suddenly shows the fourteen-year-old Harrison bursting into a theater and declaring himself the new Emperor before removing his handicaps. He calls for a beautiful ballerina, also handicap-free, to join him. They begin dancing together beautifully and defiantly. However, the Handicapper General arrives and kills them both with a shotgun. The story ends with George and Hazel quickly forgetting the incident and distracting themselves with trivialities.

Vonnegut’s exaggerated version of equality enforced by a totalitarian government satirically highlights flaws in applying egalitarian ideals too literally. Individual strengths and weaknesses are part of the human condition. Forcibly achieving equality by restricting talent and intelligence can undermine freedom and human dignity. True equality should empower society’s least advantaged while celebrating diversity, not dragging down the gifted.

The story also cautions against governmental overreach and regulation of citizens’ lives and abilities. The dystopia depicts a system in which the state actively impedes personal potential in the name of an ambiguous “common good.” Individual excellence is treated as inherently unfair, disregarding its social value. The absurd handicaps suggest regulation taken too far can breed mediocrity and conformity while suppressing achievement. Vonnegut implies enforced equality can ultimately dehumanize us all.

Harrison represents individualism and freedom of thought, while the Handicapper General symbolizes an authoritarian system demanding total compliance. Their conflict dramatizes tensions between individual rights and collectivist ideals. Harrison’s defiance and creativity contrast with the bleak conformity of his handicapped peers. His call to the ballerina to join him in free self-expression suggests art and culture suffer when totalitarian governments limit human potential. Their immediate deaths at the hands of the state demonstrate an authoritarian system’s swift, violent suppression of dissent.

The story’s darkly absurdist humor critiques governmental overreach and flaws in utopian striving. Visual absurdities like dancers weighted down with bags of birdshot highlight the ridiculousness of suppressing talent. Radio signals broadcast into intelligent minds satirize the regulation of thought itself. Vivid hyperbole imagines the logical extreme of enforcing physical and mental equality among citizens. By portraying an absurd system most would reject, Vonnegut prompts readers to consider which governmental controls over equality and achievement may be problematic or unethical.

The passive reactions of George and Hazel Bergeron represent conformity and loss of individuality under authoritarianism. They blithely accept their son’s televised murder, unable to grasp the broader significance of what they have witnessed. Their limited attention spans and superficial concerns symbolize diminished intellect and humanity. Through their characterization, Vonnegut suggests societies that overregulate human potential reduce citizens to passive, easily manipulated drones stripped of free thought and critical reasoning abilities.

While exaggerating for effect, the story extrapolates real twentieth-century egalitarian movements to a dystopian extreme as a cautionary tale. Written during the Cold War, its setting in 2081 evokes communism’s promised utopian future in which class differences disappear. Vonnegut suggests this ideal of equality could become authoritarian and restrictive rather than empowering when taken too far. The story remains relevant today as debates continue on regulating citizens and elites for various social goals. By vividly imagining an exaggerated dystopia, Harrison Bergeron prompts consideration of governmental overreach and suppression of individuality even in free, democratic societies.

Harrison Bergeron showcases Vonnegut’s signature satirical style. Through dystopian fiction, he sharply criticizes real-world social and political dynamics. The story’s exaggerated setting makes its themes more potent as readers recognize satirical hints at greater truths about human nature and societies. Its dark humor casts egalitarian striving in a dystopian light to provoke questions about governmental authority, individual potential, and the rights of the gifted. As a distilled satire, Harrison Bergeron continues to resonate as debates around equity, privilege, and restriction of talent persist into the modern day. Its warning about utopian striving giving way to restrictive authoritarian systems remains as relevant as ever.

Recent Articles

The three-body problem by liu cixin, why books are better than movies, how to transform your commute into “reading” time, knowing who i am by a g allen, fred calvert, related posts:, leave a reply cancel reply, stay on top - get the daily news in your inbox, subscribe to our newsletter.

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Recent Posts

Dissonance, volume i: reality by aaron ryan, maestro maestro by fred calvert, the ideal entrepreneur by rahul agarwal, popular category.

• Book Review 629
• Reader's Corner 410
• Author's Corner 182
• Author Interview 176
• Book List 111
• Mystery Thriller 96
• Historical Fiction 80

The Bookish Elf is your single, trusted, daily source for all the news, ideas and richness of literary life. The Bookish Elf is a site you can rely on for book reviews, author interviews, book recommendations, and all things books.

Contact us: [email protected]

Harrison Bergeron

Kurt vonnegut, ask litcharts ai: the answer to your questions.

Welcome to the LitCharts study guide on Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron . Created by the original team behind SparkNotes, LitCharts are the world's best literature guides.

Harrison Bergeron: Introduction

Harrison bergeron: plot summary, harrison bergeron: detailed summary & analysis, harrison bergeron: themes, harrison bergeron: quotes, harrison bergeron: characters, harrison bergeron: symbols, harrison bergeron: theme wheel, brief biography of kurt vonnegut.

Historical Context of Harrison Bergeron

Other books related to harrison bergeron.

• Full Title: Harrison Bergeron
• When Written: 1961
• Where Written: United States
• When Published: 1961
• Literary Period: Postmodern, Contemporary
• Genre: satire, science fiction
• Setting: America in the year 2081
• Climax: Harrison Bergeron is shot and killed by the Handicapper General
• Antagonist: Dianna Moon Glampers
• Point of View: Third Person

Extra Credit for Harrison Bergeron

Real World Applications. In a 2005 Kansas Supreme Court case on public school financing, attorneys arguing against equal funding for all public schools quoted “Harrison Bergeron” to claim that a statewide requirement for equal school funding would result in an unconstitutional deprivation of resources from students in wealthier districts. Vonnegut responded on the record, stating that he believed the attorneys misinterpreted his story, which is more concerned with talent and ability than it is with wealth.

Pop Culture. Harrison Bergeron has been the source of several TV and film adaptations, including adaptations for PBS and Showtime.

Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Harrison Bergeron — Analyzing Themes and Symbolism in “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut

Analyzing Themes and Symbolism in "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut

• Categories: Harrison Bergeron

About this sample

Words: 616 |

Published: Jan 29, 2024

Words: 616 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Table of contents

Overview of the story "harrison bergeron", references:, equality and uniformity, individuality and rebellion, symbolism in "harrison bergeron", the author's social commentary.

• Brinkmann, S. (2018, February 5). "Harrison Bergeron": A Cautionary Tale about Social Equality. National Catholic Register. Retrieved from https://www.ncregister.com/blog/sbrinkmann/harrison-bergeron-a-cautionary-tale-about-social-equality
• Disability Statistics Center. (2015). Disability Prevalence Estimates. University of California, San Francisco: Institute for Health & Aging. Retrieved from https://disabilitystatisticscenter.ucsf.edu/disability-prevalence-estimates

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof Ernest (PhD)

Verified writer

• Expert in: Literature

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 887 words

3 pages / 1406 words

3.5 pages / 1676 words

6.5 pages / 3030 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Harrison Bergeron

Equality is a universal ideal that serves as the foundation for a just and harmonious society. However, the pursuit of equality can sometimes lead to unintended consequences that threaten individual freedoms and potential. In [...]

Kurt Vonnegut's story "Harrison Bergeron" is a satirical portrayal of a dystopian society where equality is enforced through extreme measures. The story is filled with instances of hyperbole, or exaggerated statements or claims [...]

While the short film, 2081, has many common similarities with its adapted version of the short story, Harrison Bergeron, they differ from each other to the point where it can change our whole view on who Harrison Bergeron [...]

Ancient German Philosopher, Georg Christoph once said, “Equality which we demand is the most tolerant degree of inequality.” For centuries, humankind has diligently worked towards an equal society, but what happens when such [...]

In “Harrison Bergeron” Kurt Vonnegut criticized the way government took advantage of the power they had over civilians and demolished people's strongest capabilities. A few years later, Joseph Alvarez wrote “An Overview of [...]

In Kurt Vonnegut's dystopian short story, "Harrison Bergeron," the year is 2081, and an eerie sense of equality pervades the nation. However, this equality comes at a steep price, one that questions the very essence of [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron Essay

Summary of the novel, main characters, personal opinion.

The 20-th century introduced the industrial spirit to almost every country around the world. The change in the mode of production and a switch to an unfamiliar social system was quite difficult for most nations to put up with. High capital requirements, inherent to the industrial era, forced the majority of countries to create the governmental pool for resources concentration, thus shifting their social and political systems towards an authoritarian type. The amount of power and authority, acquired by administrative structures, was enormous, which made social transformation available. Following this, so-called socialism, with its principles of equal consumption and social equality, was employed in some twisted forms. As a result, the citizens of those countries turned into hostages of their government, or, at least, that is what was observed from the outside.

This significant change was reflected in the literature of that period. A new type of society – capitalistic one – was discussed there, yet, the principal amount of works were dedicated to the author’s vision of probable future, which seemed utterly unpredictable. Such works, like Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (2017) and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut (1961), made a considerable contribution to this subject by developing their own perspective of the future. It usually included adverse circumstances and negative outcomes of a government’s poor decisions. Despite the time gone by, no one has a clear image of what might happen; that is why the topic is still actual. This paper will analyze one of the books mentioned, namely “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, and provide a reasonable opinion on its content.

The story takes place in 2081, 120 years after the date of the book’s release when the new amendments to the Constitution have been introduced. According to those standards, there can be no outstanding features in any citizen. All of them should be equal in the sense that some inherent characteristics ought to be hidden by masks when it comes to beauty or heavy weights if someone is healthy or well-built. The laws are enforced by various government agents, watching the citizens all the time and punishing those who would not obey.

Then the author illustrates a family, which is, by definition, is standard and, as usual, watches a ballet on television. The only difference is that unlike the other families, this one has just lost one of its members – the son, named Harrison, taken against his will by the government. He is a clear representation of everything forbidden in this society: intelligent, attractive, and incredibly brave; the usual mechanism can not suppress the boy. Consequently, the only way to eliminate such a threat is to isolate him.

Despite that loss, the family does not seem to grieve – the couple feels a bit sad, yet, the reason remains unknown. The memories about their son and his arrest were taken away by standard methods – loud radio devices controlled intelligence. All of a sudden, the TV translation breaks, and Harrison’s escape from prison is announced. Following that, the boy shows up on the stage, tears his and ballerina’s handicaps apart, and makes the orchestra play better. He dances to the music with the ballerina, his “Empress,” as the boy proclaims her. Soon after that, Diana Moon Glampers, the General of the Handicapper, breaks in and kills both. The translation stops, and George, Harrison’s father, comes back from the kitchen, unaware of those events, to find his wife crying. The only thing she could remember is that something sad had happened on the TV.

The story itself is rather short, yet, the main characters are indeed important, as each of them represents a particular social group with its common features. However, the protagonist, on the contrary, is not that primitive; in fact, he is the most outstanding individual anyone can think of. Harrison is an attractive, smart, and courageous young man capable of destructing the whole system if not eliminated for good. As a result, in an attempt to take over the leadership in the country, he is being taken to jail, yet, he does not give up on the idea and escapes soon after that.

The role of Harrison Bergeron in this story cannot be underestimated. Not only he is the key character, but he is probably a hero of the time depicted. Some researchers note that “In a future America where being average is the professed ideal – although Vonnegut comically demonstrates that the de facto standard of “average” in the story is far inferior to simple mediocrity – Harrison is superhuman. He is not just a revolutionary, but a Nietzschean Übermensch, cut from the same cloth as Ayn Rand’s John Galt.” (Reed, 2015, p. 56). In the context of the time when no one is eager to struggle with blatant violation of a right to be someone, not a philosophical zombie, the protagonist is an expression of freedom of choice.

The next character, which is rather important, is the protagonist’s mother, Hazel. In contrast to her son, she represents the average citizen of America, meeting all the primitive requirements. According to Reed (2015), “Let us pause to consider Hazel. Because she has no handicaps, we already know a great deal about her: she is not strong, lovely, or intelligent. She’s so average, and even her name is the eye color between brown and blue. Her natural mental state is equivalent to George’s handicapped mind. She is the ideal citizen in Vonnegut’s dumbed-down future America” (p. 57). In spite of Hazel’s simplicity, she feels upset about the loss of her son, though she does not recall why, which is probably an illustration of illusive public sorrow.

The last but not least main character is George Bergeron, who is, according to his description, in a position between the two previous characters. He is not as primitive as his wife, yet, not as great as his son. Considering his intelligence, the government forced him to wear a handicap in order to suppress his mind. His immanent abilities contradict the belief in the social order, which results in complete neglect and acceptance of his son’s death (Hild, 2017).

Some critics might appreciate this book for a satiric demonstration of possible future outcomes, yet, there is another opinion on the subject. According to Reed (2015), “Vonnegut’s nightmarish system … is a parody of what Americans feared might be wrought by losing … conflicts with Sino-Soviet socialists, a … fear that inflicted far more damage … than communism itself” (p. 50). Therefore, one may consider this story as a threatening, yet, a rather childish illustration of Americans’ worst nightmares. Quite an interesting thought to be considered is that the author is much more excited about the idea of equality itself, neglecting its underlying basis. In fact, the egalitarian society described is only a consequence of the system, which is rather unstable in a country like the US, where the entrepreneur spirit is a common phenomenon. However, there is no doubt that the author and the story itself should be valued for a considerable amount of thoughtful analysis in a field where everything is yet to be discovered, namely, the future.

The novel is worthy of respect due to several reasons, including the most important issue that it discusses, namely, the future prospects of humanity. However, the book’s significance is emphasized by a sociological analysis, which is translated by diverse characters that clearly represent different behavioral patterns. While some may consider the book to be a reflection of fear of socialism, the others appreciate it for what it is – a thoughtful and meaningful assumption of humanity’s prospects.

Hoff, H. (2017). Fostering the “intercultural reader”? An empirical study of socio-cultural approaches to EFL literature. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63 (3), 443-464.

Orwell, G. (2017). 1984 . Natrona Heights, PA: General Press.

Reed, B. (2015). Technologies of instant amnesia: Teaching Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” to the millennial generation. Teaching American Literature: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 8 (1), 45-69.

Vonnegut, K. (1961). Harrison Bergeron. The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, 21 (4), 5-10.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, July 2). Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron. https://ivypanda.com/essays/kurt-vonneguts-harrison-bergeron/

"Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron." IvyPanda , 2 July 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/kurt-vonneguts-harrison-bergeron/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron'. 2 July.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron." July 2, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/kurt-vonneguts-harrison-bergeron/.

1. IvyPanda . "Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron." July 2, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/kurt-vonneguts-harrison-bergeron/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron." July 2, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/kurt-vonneguts-harrison-bergeron/.

• The "Harrison Bergeron" Short Story by Kurt Vonnegut
• Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Literature Analysis
• "Harrison Bergeron" a Short Story by Kurt Vonnegut
• Harrison Bergeron Theme
• An Analysis “Harrison Bergeron”
• "Harrison Bergeron" a Short Story by Vonnegut
• “Harrison Bergeron” and Real Life
• Harrison Bergeron and Malcolm X as Revolutionaries
• Science Fiction Elements in Stories by Asimov, Bradbury, and Vonnegut
• Cat’s Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut
• Jack London’s The Call of the Wild
• Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer
• George Orwell’s Novel 1984
• The Main Characters and Themes of The Bluest Eye
• The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini

Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron

This essay delves into Kurt Vonnegut’s iconic short story, “Harrison Bergeron.” It explores the themes of enforced equality, individuality, and the role of government in a dystopian society. Through a blend of satire and symbolism, the essay discusses how the story’s characters, particularly Harrison Bergeron, symbolize the human spirit’s resistance against conformity and oppression. It emphasizes the story’s enduring relevance, both in literature and its impact on contemporary discussions about social justice and governmental power. Ultimately, this essay invites readers to ponder the profound questions raised by Vonnegut’s work and its implications for our own complex world. More free essay examples are accessible at PapersOwl about Harrison Bergeron.

How it works

In the annals of American literature, few short stories have captivated readers and provoked contemplation quite like Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron.” This dystopian masterpiece, published in 1961, offers a satirical glimpse into a world where equality is taken to absurd extremes. With its thought-provoking narrative and rich symbolism, “Harrison Bergeron” remains as relevant today as it was when it first graced the pages of a magazine. In this exploration, we’ll delve into the themes, characters, and lasting impact of this iconic work.

At its core, “Harrison Bergeron” delves into the theme of equality. In this fictional society, the government has achieved absolute equality by enforcing handicaps on those who possess exceptional talents or physical attributes. The aim is to level the playing field so that no one can outshine another. This extreme form of egalitarianism, while well-intentioned, raises critical questions about the price of conformity and the importance of individuality.

The titular character, Harrison Bergeron, stands as a symbol of the human spirit’s unquenchable thirst for freedom and self-expression. Despite the handicaps imposed upon him, Harrison refuses to conform and seeks to break free from the oppressive chains of conformity. His act of rebellion, broadcasted on live television, is a powerful statement about the indomitable nature of the human soul.

One of the story’s most poignant moments occurs when Harrison, adorned with ridiculous handicaps, bursts onto the television screen during a ballet performance. He removes his restraints and declares himself emperor, inviting a beautiful ballerina to join him. Their dance, unburdened by the constraints of the government’s equalizing measures, is a breathtaking display of the human potential that lies dormant in this dystopian world.

Vonnegut’s use of satire is a defining feature of “Harrison Bergeron.” Through humor and absurdity, he critiques the idea of enforced equality. The image of ballerinas weighed down by sashweights and masks, or musicians handicapped by earpieces that emit distracting noises, is both comical and thought-provoking. It serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of sacrificing individuality for the sake of a rigid concept of equality.

The story also raises questions about the role of government in society. While the government in “Harrison Bergeron” claims to strive for equality, it exercises absolute control over its citizens, suppressing any form of dissent or non-conformity. This portrayal serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of unchecked governmental power, even when it is pursued with seemingly benevolent intentions.

“Harrison Bergeron” has left an indelible mark on American literature and popular culture. Its exploration of themes such as individuality, equality, and the role of government continues to resonate with readers and thinkers alike. The character of Harrison himself has become an enduring symbol of resistance against oppressive systems.

The story’s relevance extends beyond literature, influencing discussions on topics ranging from social justice to the role of technology in our lives. In a world where debates over equality and individual rights continue to rage, “Harrison Bergeron” serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities and consequences of these issues.

In conclusion, Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is a timeless masterpiece that invites readers to reflect on the nature of equality, individuality, and the role of government in society. Through its satirical lens and memorable characters, the story challenges us to consider the price of conformity and the importance of preserving our unique identities. As we navigate the complexities of our own world, the lessons of “Harrison Bergeron” remain as relevant and thought-provoking as ever.

Cite this page

Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron. (2024, Jan 16). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/

"Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron." PapersOwl.com , 16 Jan 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/ [Accessed: 14 Apr. 2024]

"Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron." PapersOwl.com, Jan 16, 2024. Accessed April 14, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/

"Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron," PapersOwl.com , 16-Jan-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/. [Accessed: 14-Apr-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Unraveling the Enigma of Harrison Bergeron . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/unraveling-the-enigma-of-harrison-bergeron/ [Accessed: 14-Apr-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers