how to write discussion in research thesis

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

• PLOS Biology
• PLOS Climate
• PLOS Complex Systems
• PLOS Computational Biology
• PLOS Digital Health
• PLOS Genetics
• PLOS Global Public Health
• PLOS Medicine
• PLOS Mental Health
• PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
• PLOS Pathogens
• PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
• PLOS Collections
• How to Write Discussions and Conclusions

The discussion section contains the results and outcomes of a study. An effective discussion informs readers what can be learned from your experiment and provides context for the results.

What makes an effective discussion?

When you’re ready to write your discussion, you’ve already introduced the purpose of your study and provided an in-depth description of the methodology. The discussion informs readers about the larger implications of your study based on the results. Highlighting these implications while not overstating the findings can be challenging, especially when you’re submitting to a journal that selects articles based on novelty or potential impact. Regardless of what journal you are submitting to, the discussion section always serves the same purpose: concluding what your study results actually mean.

A successful discussion section puts your findings in context. It should include:

• the results of your research,
• a discussion of related research, and
• a comparison between your results and initial hypothesis.

Tip: Not all journals share the same naming conventions.

You can apply the advice in this article to the conclusion, results or discussion sections of your manuscript.

Our Early Career Researcher community tells us that the conclusion is often considered the most difficult aspect of a manuscript to write. To help, this guide provides questions to ask yourself, a basic structure to model your discussion off of and examples from published manuscripts. 

Questions to ask yourself:

• Was my hypothesis correct?
• If my hypothesis is partially correct or entirely different, what can be learned from the results? 
• How do the conclusions reshape or add onto the existing knowledge in the field? What does previous research say about the topic? 
• Why are the results important or relevant to your audience? Do they add further evidence to a scientific consensus or disprove prior studies? 
• How can future research build on these observations? What are the key experiments that must be done? 
• What is the “take-home” message you want your reader to leave with?

How to structure a discussion

Trying to fit a complete discussion into a single paragraph can add unnecessary stress to the writing process. If possible, you’ll want to give yourself two or three paragraphs to give the reader a comprehensive understanding of your study as a whole. Here’s one way to structure an effective discussion:

Writing Tips

While the above sections can help you brainstorm and structure your discussion, there are many common mistakes that writers revert to when having difficulties with their paper. Writing a discussion can be a delicate balance between summarizing your results, providing proper context for your research and avoiding introducing new information. Remember that your paper should be both confident and honest about the results! 

• Read the journal’s guidelines on the discussion and conclusion sections. If possible, learn about the guidelines before writing the discussion to ensure you’re writing to meet their expectations. 
• Begin with a clear statement of the principal findings. This will reinforce the main take-away for the reader and set up the rest of the discussion. 
• Explain why the outcomes of your study are important to the reader. Discuss the implications of your findings realistically based on previous literature, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the research. 
• State whether the results prove or disprove your hypothesis. If your hypothesis was disproved, what might be the reasons? 
• Introduce new or expanded ways to think about the research question. Indicate what next steps can be taken to further pursue any unresolved questions. 
• If dealing with a contemporary or ongoing problem, such as climate change, discuss possible consequences if the problem is avoided. 
• Be concise. Adding unnecessary detail can distract from the main findings. 

Don’t

• Rewrite your abstract. Statements with “we investigated” or “we studied” generally do not belong in the discussion. 
• Include new arguments or evidence not previously discussed. Necessary information and evidence should be introduced in the main body of the paper. 
• Apologize. Even if your research contains significant limitations, don’t undermine your authority by including statements that doubt your methodology or execution. 
• Shy away from speaking on limitations or negative results. Including limitations and negative results will give readers a complete understanding of the presented research. Potential limitations include sources of potential bias, threats to internal or external validity, barriers to implementing an intervention and other issues inherent to the study design. 
• Overstate the importance of your findings. Making grand statements about how a study will fully resolve large questions can lead readers to doubt the success of the research. 

Snippets of Effective Discussions:

Consumer-based actions to reduce plastic pollution in rivers: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach

Identifying reliable indicators of fitness in polar bears

• How to Write a Great Title
• How to Write an Abstract
• How to Write Your Methods
• How to Report Statistics
• How to Edit Your Work

The contents of the Peer Review Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

The contents of the Writing Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

There’s a lot to consider when deciding where to submit your work. Learn how to choose a journal that will help your study reach its audience, while reflecting your values as a researcher…

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 8. The Discussion
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

The purpose of the discussion section is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in relation to what was already known about the research problem being investigated and to explain any new understanding or insights that emerged as a result of your research. The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but the discussion does not simply repeat or rearrange the first parts of your paper; the discussion clearly explains how your study advanced the reader's understanding of the research problem from where you left them at the end of your review of prior research. The discussion section is the most prominent place where your voice will emerge and where readers will most closely connect with you as a researcher.

Annesley, Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.” Clinical Chemistry 56 (November 2010): 1671-1674; Peacock, Matthew. “Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles.” System 30 (December 2002): 479-497.

Importance of a Good Discussion

The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because it:

• Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation;
• Presents the underlying meaning of your research, notes possible implications in other areas of study, and explores possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your research;
• Highlights the importance of your study and how it can contribute to understanding the research problem within the field of study;
• Presents how the findings from your study revealed and helped fill gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described; and,
• Engages the reader in thinking critically about issues based on an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.

Annesley Thomas M. “The Discussion Section: Your Closing Argument.” Clinical Chemistry 56 (November 2010): 1671-1674; Bitchener, John and Helen Basturkmen. “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January 2006): 4-18; Kretchmer, Paul. Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  General Rules

These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results :

• Do not be verbose or repetitive; be concise and make your points clearly
• Avoid the use of jargon or undefined technical language
• Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or a finding that can grab the reader's attention]
• Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense
• If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes

II.  The Content

The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes :

• Explanation of results : Comment on whether or not the results were expected for each set of findings; go into greater depth to explain findings that were unexpected or especially profound. If appropriate, note any unusual or unanticipated patterns or trends that emerged from your results and explain their meaning in relation to the research problem.
• References to previous research : Either compare your results with the findings from other studies or use the studies to support a claim. This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results instead of being a part of the general literature review of prior research used to provide context and background information. Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section.
• Deduction : A claim for how the results can be applied more generally. For example, describing lessons learned, proposing recommendations that can help improve a situation, or highlighting best practices.
• Hypothesis : A more general claim or possible conclusion arising from the results [which may be proved or disproved in subsequent research]. This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a consequence of your analysis.

III.  Organization and Structure

Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper:

• Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
• Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when describing the research problem in your introduction.
• Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction.
• Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data [either within the text or as an appendix].
• Regardless of where it's mentioned, a good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. This part of the discussion should begin with a description of the unanticipated finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each of them in the order they appeared as you gathered or analyzed the data. As noted, the exception to discussing findings in the same order you described them in the results section would be to begin by highlighting the implications of a particularly unexpected or significant finding that emerged from the study, followed by a discussion of the remaining findings.
• Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses if you do not plan to do so in the conclusion of the paper. Comment on their relative importance in relation to your overall interpretation of the results and, if necessary, note how they may affect the validity of your findings. Avoid using an apologetic tone; however, be honest and self-critical [e.g., in retrospect, had you included a particular question in a survey instrument, additional data could have been revealed].
• The discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of their significance. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. This would demonstrate to the reader that you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data.

IV.  Overall Objectives

The objectives of your discussion section should include the following: I.  Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings

Briefly reiterate the research problem or problems you are investigating and the methods you used to investigate them, then move quickly to describe the major findings of the study. You should write a direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results, usually in one paragraph.

II.  Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important

No one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have. Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant. After reading the discussion section, you want the reader to think critically about the results and why they are important. You don’t want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what it all means. If applicable, begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most significant or unanticipated finding first, then systematically review each finding. Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings presented in the results section.

III.  Relate the Findings to Similar Studies

No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. The discussion section should relate your results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for your research. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your study differs from other research about the topic. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur. If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated. IV.  Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings

It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove . When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. This is especially important when describing the discovery of significant or unanticipated findings.

V.  Acknowledge the Study’s Limitations

It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor! Note any unanswered questions or issues your study could not address and describe the generalizability of your results to other situations. If a limitation is applicable to the method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why. VI.  Make Suggestions for Further Research

You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [as opposed to offering suggestions in the conclusion of your paper]. Although your study can offer important insights about the research problem, this is where you can address other questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or highlight hidden issues that were revealed as a result of conducting your research. You should frame your suggestions by linking the need for further research to the limitations of your study [e.g., in future studies, the survey instrument should include more questions that ask..."] or linking to critical issues revealed from the data that were not considered initially in your research.

NOTE: Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section . A few historical references may be helpful for perspective, but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results, to support the significance of a finding, and/or to place a finding within a particular context. If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs.

V.  Problems to Avoid

• Do not waste time restating your results . Should you need to remind the reader of a finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the result to the interpretation. An example would be: “In the case of determining available housing to single women with children in rural areas of Texas, the findings suggest that access to good schools is important...," then move on to further explaining this finding and its implications.
• As noted, recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections. Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. However, if your findings raise a lot of new questions or issues, consider including suggestions for further research in the discussion section.
• Do not introduce new results in the discussion section. Be wary of mistaking the reiteration of a specific finding for an interpretation because it may confuse the reader. The description of findings [results section] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion section] should be distinct parts of your paper. If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding. This approach is not recommended if you lack experience writing college-level research papers.
• Use of the first person pronoun is generally acceptable. Using first person singular pronouns can help emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding. However, keep in mind that too much use of the first person can actually distract the reader from the main points [i.e., I know you're telling me this--just tell me!].

Analyzing vs. Summarizing. Department of English Writing Guide. George Mason University; Discussion. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. "How to Write an Effective Discussion." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004); Kretchmer, Paul. Fourteen Steps to Writing to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. San Francisco Edit, 2003-2008; The Lab Report. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A. et al. "The Anatomy of an Article: The Discussion Section: "How Does the Article I Read Today Change What I Will Recommend to my Patients Tomorrow?” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 74 (June 2013): 1599-1602; Research Limitations & Future Research . Lund Research Ltd., 2012; Summary: Using it Wisely. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Discussion. Writing in Psychology course syllabus. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L. A Sociology Writer's Guide . Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2009.

Writing Tip

Don’t Over-Interpret the Results!

Interpretation is a subjective exercise. As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work. With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. Remember that the data are the data: nothing more, nothing less.

MacCoun, Robert J. "Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results." Annual Review of Psychology 49 (February 1998): 259-287; Ward, Paulet al, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Expertise . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Write Two Results Sections!

One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself.

Azar, Beth. "Discussing Your Findings."  American Psychological Association gradPSYCH Magazine (January 2006).

Yet Another Writing Tip

Avoid Unwarranted Speculation!

The discussion section should remain focused on the findings of your study and their interpretation in relation to the research problem. For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among disadvantaged children in Bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a part of your original research design. If you feel compelled to theorize about alternative outcomes, do so in the form of describing possible implications or explaining possible impacts. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand your discussion of the results in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your effort to interpret the results in relation to the research problem.

Azar, Beth. "Discussing Your Findings."  American Psychological Association gradPSYCH Magazine (January 2006); Rassel, Gary R., Jocelyn DeVance Taliaferro, Stacy M. Rassel, and Elizabethann O’Sullivan. "Communicating Findings." In Practical Research Methods for Nonprofit and Public Administrators . 2nd edition. (New York: Routledge, 2022), pp. 243-256.

• << Previous: Using Non-Textual Elements
• Next: Limitations of the Study >>
• Last Updated: Nov 11, 2024 2:12 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Affiliate 💸

Get started free

Research Project Guide

How To Write Discussion In Research Paper In 7 Easy Steps

Learn how to write discussion in research paper with these 7 straightforward steps. Perfect your analysis and connect findings effectively.

Nov 5, 2024

Starting a research paper can feel like an uphill battle. One of the trickiest parts is the discussion section, where you interpret your findings and explain their importance. Maybe you're piecing together your research project and don’t know how to connect the dots. Or perhaps you're under a time crunch and need to write efficiently. This guide will help you how to start a research project , helping you achieve your research goals without getting lost. Otio, your AI research and writing partner, is here to make the process smoother. With its assistance, you can conduct research quickly and write easily, getting to the heart of your findings without the fuss.

Table Of Contents

What is discussion in research paper, parts of discussion section in research papers, examples of discussion section in research paper, supercharge your researching ability with otio — try otio for free today.

The discussion section of a research paper is where you analyze and interpret your findings. It’s not just about what you discovered but what those discoveries mean. You’re connecting your results to your research questions and showing their significance. This section helps the reader see how your research pieces fit together.

Purpose of the Discussion Section

The discussion isn’t just a recap. It’s where you interpret, analyze, and explain your findings. You show why your results matter and where they fit into the literature. It’s also your chance to be honest about any limitations of your study. This section is crucial because it demonstrates your ability to think critically and creatively about your research problem.

Why the Discussion Section is Crucial

The discussion is often seen as the most essential part of your research paper. It’s where you show your critical thinking skills and offer creative solutions to problems. You’re also highlighting the importance of your study and how it contributes to the field. This section allows you to explore your findings' implications and suggest further research improvements.

Related Reading

• How to Find Academic Sources • How to Analyze Quantitative Data • Can Ai Write a Paper for Me • How Long Does It Take to Write a Research Paper • How to Create a Research Question • Research Methodology Types • How to Organize a Research Paper • Methods Section of Research Paper​ • Argumentative Essay Topics

Start Strong with a Summary of Key Findings

Kick off your discussion section with a concise summary of your essential findings. This isn't just a recap; it's about highlighting the central results that tie your study together. You've already detailed these findings in the results section, so focus on the big picture. Avoid rehashing every point, but do provide a few key highlights. This will refresh your reader’s memory and keep them engaged with the core message of your paper.

Write Clearly and Concisely

Clarity is crucial here. While your results section might have been packed with technical jargon, the discussion is where you explain what it all means in plain language. This is where you’ll make some of your paper’s most impactful points, so ensure your writing is straightforward.

Interpret What Your Results Mean

Once you've laid out your findings, it's time to interpret them. What do your results mean in the context of your research question? Dive into the implications and significance of your findings . If your introduction mentioned theories or studies that could illuminate your results, now’s the time to use them.

Tackle Unexpected or Contradictory Results

Only some results will align with your expectations. Here, address any unexpected or contradictory findings. Consider whether the methods you used or the variables you analyzed could explain these discrepancies. Comparing your methods with those from similar studies can help you make sense of it all.

Today, knowledge workers, researchers, and students need help with content overload with fragmented, manual tools. Otio offers a solution with its AI-native workspace, streamlining research and writing. Let Otio be your AI research and writing partner — try Otio for free today!

1. Simplify Your Research with Otio

Researchers face a mountain of information and often use various apps to manage it. Otio is here to help . It offers an AI-powered workspace to streamline your research process. With Otio , you can collect data from bookmarks, tweets, and videos. The tool extracts key takeaways, providing detailed AI-generated notes and a source-grounded Q&A chat. 

This feature lets you chat with individual links or entire knowledge bases, similar to ChatGPT. Finally, Otio helps you create draft outputs using the collected data, making the transition from the reading list to the first draft quicker. Otio's top features include AI-generated notes on bookmarks and AI-assisted writing. Try Otio for free today!

2. Recap Key Findings Briefly

Start your discussion with a quick overview of the main findings. Keep it brief—no need to repeat everything from the results section. Focus on critical numbers, especially if you compare them to literature values next. This part acts as a bridge to your critical analysis of the results. Use phrases like “The results XXX and YYY indicate that [critical analysis]…” or “Because of XXX, we can say that [interpretation]…” Avoid introducing new results here.

3. Analyze Your Results Critically

Move beyond describing results to explain what they mean and what you’ve learned. Focus on unexpected, significant, or unusual findings. Highlight new trends, relationships, and knowledge uncovered by your research. List your analyses in the order in which the results section is based. If there are alternative explanations for your results, mention them and explain why you’ve excluded them.

4. Connect to Existing Research

Now, compare your findings to previous studies, especially those that inspired your work or raised questions you’ve addressed. Place your work within the larger context and show how it integrates. Use papers from the field to support any claims or speculations. If your conclusions contradict other studies, discuss plausible explanations for the discrepancy. Also, mention any generalizations you can now make about the field.

5. Address the Research Gap

Explain how your work addresses a gap in the field, showing its importance. This gap, whether large or small, should have been described in the introduction. Briefly reiterate it here, highlighting how your work fills this gap. Mention any lessons learned that advance the current edge of knowledge, such as recommending changes to best practices or known pathways.

6. Speculate on Broader Implications

Consider how your findings apply beyond current knowledge. This could include new insights, hypotheses for future testing, or research questions. Speculate how your results fit into a bigger picture or relate to the field more generally. Ensure your research and the broader field logically support these claims. Avoid making unsupported claims.

7. Outline Future Directions

Discuss how to move forward from your research . Mention any unanswered questions and possible routes for addressing them, but avoid discussing future directions that should have been included in your study. Propose future studies to test new hypotheses or address limitations. Highlight potential applications of your work, but stay realistic.

• How to Write a Psychology Research Paper • Research Questions Examples • Research Paper Abstract Example​ • How to Write Results in a Research Paper • Title Page for Research Paper • How to Cite a Research Paper • Best AI for Data Analysis • Best AI for Writing Research Papers • Data Collection Tools • Ai Visualization Tools

Kicking Off Your Discussion: Summarize Your Findings

Start your discussion by refreshing your readers' memories about your research's main goals and discoveries. Recap the core research question, briefly outline your methods, and summarize your results. Here's an example to illustrate:

“We aimed to compare the effectiveness and user-friendliness of different storm detection software for storm tracking. Based on these aims, we ran multiple experiments under the same conditions using different storm detection software. Our results showed that in both speed and accuracy of data, 'software A' performed better than 'software B.'"

Making Sense of Your Results: Interpret What You Found

Once you've set the stage, break down what your findings mean. Discuss the implications and significance in simple terms. Check out this example:

“The results of this study indicate significant differences between classical music and pop music in terms of their effects on memory recall and cognition. This suggests that as the complexity of the music increases, so does its ability to facilitate cognitive processing. This finding aligns with the well-known 'Mozart effect,' which proposes that listening to classical music can enhance cognitive function."

Connecting the Dots: Compare Your Results to Existing Literature

Now, it’s time to link your findings to previous research. Discuss how your results stack up against similar studies and what that means for your research's place in the broader field. Here's a good example:

“Our analysis predicts that climate change will have a significant impact on wheat yield. This finding contradicts one of the main pieces of evidence in some prior simulation studies [1-3] that suggest a negative effect of climate change on wheat yield, but the result is entirely consistent with the predictions of other research [4-5] that suggests the overall change in climate could result in increases in wheat yield.”

Researchers today face a relentless stream of information. It's a chaotic world where every click leads to more data. Many patch together solutions with a mix of apps, but this approach could be more efficient. Enter Otio . This AI-native workspace offers a unified platform for researchers. It's designed to help you gather, filter, and use information more effectively. Imagine pulling in bookmarks, tweets, and videos all in one place. With Otio , managing your sources becomes second nature.

Extracting Key Insights with AI

Finding relevant information is one thing. Extracting meaningful insights is another. Otio uses AI to generate detailed notes and facilitate source-grounded Q&A chats. Think of it as having a research assistant by your side. Whether working with a YouTube video or a dense PDF, Otio helps you pinpoint the crucial takeaways. This means less time sifting through content and more time focusing on your ideas.

Streamlining Research Paper Writing

Writing a research paper demands focus and precision. With Otio , you can move from a reading list to a first draft in record time. The platform assists with writing by providing AI-generated notes on all your bookmarks. You can also chat with individual links or entire knowledge bases. This interactive element keeps you engaged with your research, making the writing process smoother and more efficient.

Let Otio be your AI research and writing partner — try Otio for free today!

• Claude Ai Alternative • Obsidian vs Evernote • Logseq vs Obsidian • Best Chat Gpt Alternatives • Milanote vs Notion • Milanote vs Miro • Note-taking AI for Students • Zotero vs Mendeley • Writesonic vs Jasper

Nov 11, 2024

17 Best Note-Taking AI For Students

Nov 10, 2024

15 Best AI Visualization Tools for Data

Join over 100,000 researchers changing the way they read & write

Chrome Extension

© 2024 Frontdoor Labs Ltd.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Refund Policy

Join over 50,000 researchers changing the way they read & write

Join thousands of other scholars and researchers

Try Otio Free

© 2023 Frontdoor Labs Ltd.