• Open access
  • Published: 29 July 2011

Packaged water: optimizing local processes for sustainable water delivery in developing nations

  • Ayokunle C Dada 1  

Globalization and Health volume  7 , Article number:  24 ( 2011 ) Cite this article

19k Accesses

19 Citations

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

With so much global attention and commitment towards making the Water and Sanitation targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) a reality, available figures seem to speak on the contrary as they reveal a large disparity between the expected and what currently obtains especially in developing countries. As studies have shown that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world, packaged water is suggested as a low cost, readily available alternative water provision that could help bridge the gap. Despite the established roles that this drinking water source plays in developing nations, its importance is however significantly underestimated, and the source considered unimproved going by 'international standards'. Rather than simply disqualifying water from this source, focus should be on identifying means of improvement. The need for intervening global communities and developmental organizations to learn from and build on the local processes that already operate in the developing world is also emphasized. Identifying packaged water case studies of some developing nations, the implication of a tenacious focus on imported policies, standards and regulatory approaches on drinking water access for residents of the developing world is also discussed.

The development and use of water portends wide-ranging implications for global survival, security, health and economic development [ 1 ]. This demands the need for water issues to be tackled at the highest political level. Consequently, enshrined in international covenants and attested to by world nation's heads are the MDGs, one of which is to halve the proportion of people without sustainable access to portable water and basic sanitation. Today, more than halfway into the deadlines, available figures reveal a large disparity between the expected and the achieved [ 2 ]. Following a general paraphrase of the paper in the first section, the gruesome challenges that make achievement of the Millennium Development Goals daunting task in the developing world is described in the second section of this paper. Given the prevailing social and technical cost needed to revitalize or put in place functional public institutions, associated technologies and political will power, it is much undoubted that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world in the foreseeable future [ 3 ], the third section suggests packaged water as one of the low cost alternative water provision that could help bridge the gap. As presented in the fourth section of this paper, despite the established role that this drinking water source plays in developing economies and populations, its importance is significantly underestimated. The fifth section highlights a view point that promotes identification of means of improvement rather than disqualification of local provisions and processes in a bid to safeguard public health. Using relevant case studies, it also suggests possible implication of irrational adoption of global policies on water supply access for residents of the developing world. The sixth section concludes.

The Daunting Challenge of Meeting the MDG targets

Global attention and efforts have been committed towards making the MDG target for water and Sanitation a reality. It is more than halfway into the deadline, yet available figures seem to speak on the contrary especially in the developing world [ 2 ]. In most regions of the world, this target is far off-track [ 2 , 4 , 5 ]. Reports have shown that going by current trend, the global MDG sanitation target will be missed by more than half a billion people if the trend 1990-2004 continues up to 2015 [ 2 ]. A recent report asserts that the potential challenges to actualizing the MDGs are basically: maintaining the gains already made, coping with a rapid pace of urbanization, and a huge backlog of unserved rural people [ 6 ]. Although, some regions will reach the drinking water and sanitation target, places like sub-Saharan Africa remain an area of greatest concern. For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, with an 85% increase in urban population from 1990 to 2004, the number of urban dwellers unserved with either safe drinking water or basic sanitation doubled from 1990 to 2004 [ 6 ]. Recent studies suggest that in addition to rapid urbanization [ 7 ], ineffective governance ([ 8 , 9 ]) and persistent poverty [ 10 ] remain the root cause of water infrastructure associated problems that might make the goal far from being realistic in developing nations.

A recent article [ 11 ] presents thought provoking insights to the debate on the achievement of the MDGs. Optimistic as the millennium development targets may sound, some debates are however evident. It may be argued that there are fundamental problems associated with the statement of these goals and the means of measuring progress towards meeting them. There are wide definitional variations of what constitutes "safe drinking water" and "basic sanitation". These variables are difficult to measure and each has widely different cost and effort implications [ 11 ]. Thus, indicators chosen for monitoring the MDGs are often confusing, misrepresenting and many a times missing. Examples abound to attest to this. In India, a household is considered to have access if there is a water source within one mile (1.6 km) and in many cases; it is not the individual or the household access that is measured but the village as a whole. In Lagos, the newest major mega city in Africa with so many slums and shanty towns [ 12 ], the case could be different. What a kilometre distance means to urban dwellers in Lagos would differ significantly to the structures and population densities that are available in the rural settlements, yet they apparently have the same indicator yardstick. Currently based on existing data sources access is often taken to be a facility such as a standpipe, well, or public toilet within reasonable distance [ 11 ]. Again, masking effects of richer populations being served over unserved on the overall figures presented might be evident. This could stand as potent demodulators for aggressive and timely interventions for deprived residents in deficient locations.

Even where there is a water source it may not necessarily be accessible to all owing to other associated physical, economic or social complexities [ 11 ]. Apart from distance, the cost, level of sharing and queuing are decisive factors that determine actual water availability, accessibility and use [ 13 , 14 ]. Again, in practical terms, it is not clear what providing "basic" amenities will actually mean, and this will most likely vary in different contexts and countries [ 11 ]. Furthermore, access to the 'improved access' might not necessarily infer adequacy for a healthy life as access to water within a kilometre's reach may not be convenient or sufficient to protect health. Optimally, water should be made available at home [ 15 ] or at least within a hundred meters or five minutes total collection time, which has been observed to make a difference with regard to actual water use [ 16 , 17 ].

Packaged Water: A Local Drinking Water Initiative

Several water supply models are already established, tested and proven effective in the developed world. Given the prevailing social and technical cost needed to revitalize or put in place functional public institutions, associated technologies and political will power, it is much undoubted that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world in the foreseeable future [ 3 ], Subsequently, with the renewed global commitments towards the MDGs marked for 2015, the importance of locally sourced, low-cost alternative drinking water schemes in contributing to increased sustainable access in rural and peri-urban settings of developing nations cannot be over-emphasized [ 18 ]. One of such local interventions in Nigeria, where public drinking water supply is endemic is packaged drinking water [ 19 ]. This form of packaged water is usually distributed and sold in sachets (Figure 1 ). Packaged water refers to water that is packaged generally for consumption in a range of vessels including cans, laminated boxes, glass, plastic sachets and pouches, and as ice prepared for consumption [ 20 , 21 ].

figure 1

Roadside vendors hawking chilled water in sachets .

Scattered around the breadth of developing nations are small, medium and large scale industries that manufacture packaged water sold as sachets (commonly referred to as pure water). The package water industry started initially as a cottage business to meet the demand of the thirsty population not adequately catered for by the available municipals. Today, the packaged water industry has become part of the unofficial economy as the sales of thousands of brands of thermoelectrically sealed nylon sachets containing about 0.5 L water have increased tremendously in many developing nations. Sold by the poor and patronised by members of the low and middle socio-economic class, this form of water started out as 'iced water' which was simply hand-tied nylon pouches containing treated or untreated cold water. Treatment then was simply with the use of absorbent pads (referred to as 'foam'), although it was thought to trap the all dirt and germs, it was largely effective for removal of suspended solids. Recent studies [ 3 , 22 ] confirmed the persistence of this drinking water source in some parts of Ghana owing to its affordability.

In urban Tanzania, a similar experience prevails based on the result from a recent survey that showed a significantly higher proportion of the population depend on packaged water owing to its perceived safety as compared to water from public pipes [ 23 ]. The hierarchical order of perception of safety in Nigerian water supply model is presented in Figure 2 . The public perception safety in favour of packaged water in Nigeria stems out partly from the inadequate attempts of previous governments to provide potable piped water. The second contributing factor to this perception is the prevalent doubt on the quality of 'piped water' supplied at a reasonable charge by many informal vendors at the community level. The lack of trust in the quality of water supplied by these informal vendors is attributable to the subjectivity in the construction of wells from which the water is outsourced. There is currently no formal abstraction management or regulatory scheme in place in the entire nation. The effect of rapid urbanization in cities like Lagos has seen the sprawling city extending far beyond its original lagoon setting to encompass a vast expanse of mostly low-rise developments including as many as 200 different slums where living conditions are extremely crowded and dismal [ 12 ]. The resultant effect is a continuous reduction in the spacing between inter- and intra-building septic tanks and water wells, thus increasing the vulnerability of available sources to pollution from anthropogenic influence. Yet, anyone at any point in time with the necessary financial wherewithal could employ the service of cheap local labour to dig wells of subjective depths and specifications for water vending purposes. In most instances, as a cost saving measure, only a few concrete well rings are fixed to support the dug well (Figure 3 ).

figure 2

Water for drinking and domestic purposes: Nigerian Water Supply Model .

figure 3

Water treatment process in a typical sachet water factory .

Water pumped from these 'upgraded' wells into elevated storage tanks are widely referred o as 'borehole water' or 'tap water' among the nation's populace. It costs about N100,000 (about USD800) to put this system in place. On the other hand, to install a deep drilling system using heavy duty boring machines require a minimum of N400,000 (about USD3,200). In most instances, only a restricted proportion of the citizenry, precisely the wealthy, can afford the expensive deep drilling that conventional borehole technologies offer. In most instances, when this is the case, the water is strictly for owner usage and is not available for commercial purposes. Despite the debates associated with the quality of water provided by these upgraded wells of informal vendors, water from such sources is cheap (costs about 20-50 cents for 50 Litres), readily available but usage is only restricted for domestic uses alone - washing, bathing and cleaning. Sachet water, costing 50 cents for 3 Litres (one bag containing 20 sachets each of 150 ml volume), is thus often relied upon for drinking purposes. Although restively more expensive than water for domestic uses sourced from upgraded wells of informal vendors at the community level, a public perception of safety prevails - at least it must have gone through one form of treatment or the other, even if they were gotten from questionable sources [ 24 ].

Realistically sachet water produced in recent years by small-scale industries has experienced drastic improvement as the raw water is now treated by aeration, double or single filtration using porcelain molecular candle filters or membrane filters (Figure 3 ) and in some instances, disinfection is applied. The level of treatment generally depends on the source of water [ 3 ]. Although there are still inherent quality and regulatory challenges associated with this form of drinking water [ 25 ], the importance of this form of drinking water is well acknowledged by civil societies and nation governments of the developing world [ 26 ].

Seeking Solutions For Local Problems: Local Processes Or Global Policies?

Despite the established role that this drinking water source plays in developing economies and populations, its importance is however significantly underestimated or not appreciated as presented by currently available 'guidelines' and 'policies' of internationally respected organizations - most of which are irrationally copied and adopted by the developing world [ 27 ]. The denial process stems from the equalisation of reasons attached to people's patronage of packaged water for the developing and the developed world. For example, a report by NDRC [ 28 ] asserts that given the explosion in bottled water use in the United States, driven in large measure by marketing designed to convince the public of bottled water's purity and safety, and capitalizing on public concern about tap water quality, people are willing to spend from 240 to over 10,000 times more per gallon for packaged water than they typically do for tap water [ 28 ]. As analysed by Riemann and Bank [ 29 ] in their study on regulatory standards for the developed and developing world, this is characteristic of a typical 'risk-averse' western world. Factors that stimulate demand in the developing nations are apparently different. In many developing nations, contamination of municipal water supply systems by faecal bacterial pathogens has become a public health hazard, because often there are not enough resources (cost, capital or commitment) to install or to operate functional municipal water systems leaving the civil society to resort to alternatives, one of which is packaged water.

In a similar vein, a World Health Organization (WHO) report [ 30 ] also itemizes the reasons for global consumption of packaged water. However, not elucidated in this report is the fact that packaged drinking water is an alternative source and its patronage, more of a survival strategy for many residents of the developing world rather than the reasons mentioned. This typifies the international community's partial or non-recognition given to this drinking water initiative which of course is a social adaptation to failed public municipals in the developing world. England felt a similar wave of the heat when the 2007 summer floods hit Gloucestershire leaving thousands of people to survive on packaged water which was generously distributed by the government and intervening organizations as relief aid [ 31 ]. It is much undoubted that what classifies patronage of packaged water as a survival strategy, psycho-satisfaction or a mere show of socio-economic status is more or less subjective differing with the particular prevailing situation.

In addition to the wrongly perceived cause and effect hypothesis, another conflicting view point is the definitional classification using certain 'exclusion criteria'. This is typified in the WHO report [ 30 ] that refers to 'bottled water' and 'packaged water' interchangeably without making concrete distinction between the two terms (for instance, Section 6.5.2: p114). In the report, households that relied on packaged water along with other vended sources are classified using the 'exclusion criteria' as not having 'reasonable access' to improved water supply along with those who get theirs from unimproved wells or surface water sources (Additional file 1 , Table S1). It should however be noted that water obtained from these recommended 'improved sources' can also have a significant increase in contamination between the source and storage. A report [ 16 ] suggested possible contamination arising from two distinct physical domains- the public (outside the household) and the domestic (inside the household). Thus it may be realistic to suggest that the proportion of the world's population actually using safe drinking water is likely to be lower than that using the globally recognized 'improved' drinking water sources.

Going by the 'exclusion criteria' and the 'official indicators', progress towards the water target of the MDGs is achieved as people switch to piped water connections, or to free public stand pipes, boreholes, or rainwater cisterns within a kilometre of their home [ 10 , 32 , 33 ]. But the daunting challenge is the time frame for which this could become a reality for residents of the developing. Apparently, it appears not to be too realistic a goal in the near future given the insufficiency of capital, cost (operation and maintenance) and commitment evident in most rural and urban settlements of low and medium income countries where municipal water supply functions are sub-optimal. As presented by the WHO report and other available literature, bottled water is considered unimproved and sachet water or other forms of packaged water are nowhere to be found either in the identified classes. By oppressing packaged water in a bid to protecting public health in developing nations, there is a danger that authorities could be making it still more difficult for deprived residents to obtain water which again could lead to more grievous conditions as people may revert to poorer sources (Figure 4 ). Agreeably, proffered recommendation to improving drinking water access in developing nations may not simply be about disregarding packaged water or other local initiative as unimproved. Instead, questions need be raised about what could be done to increase the effectiveness of the treatment and distribution system and how it could ultimately make a positive contribution to the widely publicised MDGs. It is therefore logical to conclude that there may be cases where improving services from so-called 'unacceptable options' (local provisions) can make much more significant difference to the well-being of the most deprived populations than striving for ideal solutions such as universal piped water connections [ 33 ].

figure 4

Fate of the Public with irrational regulatory policies .

Implication for Policy and Way Forward

The developing world is masked with challenges of coping with failing infrastructures, inadequate finance, poor legislation, lack of appropriate institutional capacity for regulation and control and often the political will to enforce control measures. The position is complicated by the fact that many of these developing nations are at a loss on how to set standards [ 27 ]. Consequently, they resort to dependence on adopted standards, policies and guidelines as presented by international organizations based on scenarios and context in the developed world. These are only moderately modified and ultimately imbibed into national regulatory structures of developing nations without the means of attainment. There could be possible serious implication of a tenacious focus on such policies, standards and regulatory approaches imported from developed countries on drinking water access for residents of the developing world (Figure 1 .1) as each situation differs in its own respect and has to be treated as such. For example, the WHO bacteriological water guidelines are widely accepted in industrialized as well as developing countries but they are not always achieved in practice [ 34 ].

Solving the water-related problems in the unserved regions of the developing world will demand acknowledgement, and attendant support of local processes that already exist in such locations. This will ultimately enable the local entrepreneurs to positively contribute their little yet significant quota to the achievement of international goals. Arguably, as a DFID report [ 35 ] portrays it, the best way to meet the people's demand for clean water and sanitation is to work with civil societies and government to help enable the voices of those without access to be heard and then for the governments to act on what they hear. In the past, many attempts by service providers and intervening non-governmental agencies have one way or the other failed because they allegedly did not involve the local community and already existent local processes in their action plans. Case studies are presented shortly of some on-going success stories in the packaged water industry. In the cited locations, various levels of stakeholder participation led to the birth of solutions that found a right balancing in between safeguarding public health through enactment of regulatory standards and improving social welfare through sustained access to packaged drinking water.

Lagos, Nigeria

An alternative to erratic pipe borne drinking water supplies in Nigeria is Sachet water, popularly referred to as 'pure water'. A high demand drinking water alternative, it is sold by the poor and finds patronage from members of low and middle socio-economic class [ 36 ]. With concerns of questionable quality of packaged drinking water, the national regulator, NAFDAC, declared a 'gradual' nationwide ban on sachet waters to allow the manufacturers of sachet water to start winding-up or change to bottle packaging [ 26 ] which is more expensive but perceived safer than water in sachets. Successful implementation of this ban on sachet water has remained far from reality as a vast majority of its population depends on it. Today, the sachet water market is witnessing tremendous growth. In a recent survey [ 24 ] of thirty-four households in the location, 86.5% of respondents claim that they cannot cope if the proposed ban were to hold given the unavailability of other affordable drinking water options. A total of 73.5% claim increased price associated with the bottled form of packaged water will ultimately deny them access to the suggested option by the regulator. It became obvious that the most probable outcome of such a ban of sachet form of packaged water is a reversion to poorer sources. Again, the federal government did assert that sachet water industry has remained one of the most successful poverty alleviation programs it embarked upon since independence. The proposed ban was consequently suspended. Focus was redirected to other means of improving the sachet water industry to produce the desired results and ultimately safeguard public health.

The late nineties marked the commencement of packaged drinking water regulation in India. Solely handled by the Bureau of Indian Standards in collaboration with the Health Ministry, the rules on its safety were drafted into a Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The original plan was to come up with a standard that matches with international standards. Given the complexities and the technologies involved in the implementation, the PFA Act however remained vague on the issue of allowable levels of pesticides in packaged drinking water. With growing health concerns, a stakeholder meeting between the BIS and the Health Ministry officials marked the declaration of specific allowable limit - no pesticide should exceed 0.0001 mg/litre and total content of pesticide not exceeding 0.005 mg/litre. It was agreed that testing methods and support are to be provided by the BIS. Again, consensus was reached that it will take some time before the necessary changes take effect in the packaged water industry [ 37 ].

Accra, Ghana

A rapidly emerging water vending business in Ghana has been that of vending sachet water or bagged water, which is a cheaper alternative to bottled water [ 22 ]. Given the unreliable supply of drinking water by the municipals, a large proportion of the people depend on this bagged form of drinking. To ensure that Ghanaians have access to cheap clean water, sachets approved by the Ghanaian government that meet the Ghana Standards Boards sanitation requirements, are being sold all over the country [ 38 ]. These sachets are one of the main contributors to the trash that blankets the streets and gutters. The Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA) declared a possible ban on the use of sachet and polythene bags for drinking water, if manufacturers of such products refused to immediately negotiate with the AMA on concrete proposals as to how to deal with the menace of plastic waste [ 39 ]. This led to the birth of several stakeholder forums that heralded the emergence of a recycling taskforce - people picked from the government, plastic manufacturers, water sachet producers and city authorities to encourage and facilitate the recycling of the sachets, creation of new recycling plants as well as working with existing recyclers to expand their facilities [ 40 ]. Sponsored by some sachet bag manufacturers, several campaigns on plastic waste disposal and management were launched at Primary and Junior Secondary Schools in the nation to educate the school children on the proper disposal of plastic waste and how to manage such waste. In addition to this, an Accra based NGO, focusing on sustainability and the environment has taken on the task of cleaning up the streets of Accra. They employ staffs which does not include the local Ghanaians that are compensated for collecting the sachets. To date, this NGO has taken over 10 million sachets off the streets of Accra [ 38 ], the proposed ban on sachet water was suspended and residents still have access to drinking water in sachets.

As presented by the examined case studies, it is evident that rather than simply disqualifying packaged water as portrayed in respected international literature, focus should be on identifying means of improvement. For instance, more research could be conducted with focus placed on determinants of the final quality of produced sachet water - treatment, handling and distribution practices. Furthermore, international and local organizations and national health agencies could help facilitate research targeted at the identification, substantiation and incorporation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) and limits. This would address hazard analysis of the treatment and distribution processes and ultimately herald the emergence of a workable water safety plan that applies specifically to the packaged water industry. Intensified efforts on local and international research that major on the production of readily accessible and adaptable in-house water testing kits could also play a significant role in fortifying daily in-house bacteriological monitoring of the finished products. International organizations could also partner with regulatory agencies and civil societies to facilitate intensive hygiene and sanitation awareness training programs for vendors, manufacturers and other relevant stakeholders in the packaged water industry. Predictably, the implementation of these will yield desired results that would warrant a better packaged water industry, an improved social welfare through sustained access to drinking water and ultimately, a safer public at large in the developing world.

Packaged water made available in sachets, like other local initiatives offer substantial hope in contributing to increased sustainable access in rural and urban settings of developing nations if acknowledged and improved upon. The call is therefore made to intervening global communities and developmental organizations for the need for to learn from and build on the local processes that already operate in the developing world. Room for optimum improvement, via collaborative efforts with relevant stakeholders will demand striking a suitable balance between two preferred options: promoting public health (through improved regulation of the packaged water industry) while concurrently improving social welfare (encouraging access through support of these initiatives that cover for institutional inadequacies in public water supply coverage).

Written informed consent was obtained for publication of the accompanying images.

Helmer R: Water quality and Health. The Environmentalist. 1999, 19 (1): 11-16. 10.1023/A:1006576620275.

Article   Google Scholar  

WHO/UNICEF: Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: a mid-term assessment of progress. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, UNICEF and the World Health Organization. 2004, Assessed 11th August, 2007, [ http://www.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/foi/disclosures/f2005177.pdf ]

Google Scholar  

Dodoo DK, Quagraine EK, Okai-Sam F, Kambo Dorsa J, Headley JV: Quality of Sachet Waters in the Cape Coast Municipality of Ghana. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. 2006, Part A 41 (3): 329-342.

WHO/UNICEF: Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. Water for life: making it happen. 2005, World Health Organization,. Geneva, 37-Assessed 24th July, 2011, [ http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/waterforlife.pdf ]

United Nations Children Educational Fund (UNICEF): Progress For Children: A Report Card On Nutrition. 2006, Assessed 11th August, 2007, [ http://www.unicef.org/media/files/PFC_Nutrition.pdf ]

WHO/UNICEF: Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, UNICEF and the World Health Organization 2006. 2006, Assessed 24th July, 2011, [ http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmpfinal.pdf ]

Satterwaite D: The Scale of Urban Change Worldwide 1950-2000 and its Underpinnings. Human Settlements Development Paper Urban-o1. 2005, Earthscan, London

Biswas AK: Challenging Prevailing Wisdoms: 2006 Stockholm Water Prize Laureate Lecture. 2006, 10

Totenson A, Tvedten I, Vaa M, (EDS.): Associated Life in African Cities. Popular Responses to the Urban Environment Series 6. 2001, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

Kjellén , Marianne : From Public Pipes to Private Hands: Water Access and Distribution in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 2006, Doctoral thesis, Department of Human Geography Stockholm University

Development Alternatives (Devalt): Drinking Water and Sanitation. 2004, 14: Article No 2

Gandy M: Planning, Anti-planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies. 2006, 43 (2): 371-396. 10.1080/00420980500406751.

MacGranaham G, Lewin S, Fransen T, Hunt C, Kjellen M, Pretty J, Stephens C, Virgin I: Environmental Change and Human Health in Africa, the Carribean and the Pacific. European Union, Swedish International Development Corporation Agency, London School of Health and Tropical Medicine, Stockholm Environmental Institute., Stockholm. 1999

UN/WWAP (United Nations/World Water Assessment Programme): 1st UN World Water Development Report: Water for People, Water for Life. 2003

Esrey SA: Water, waste, and well-being: a multi-country study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996, 143: 608-623.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Caincross S, Blumenthal U, Kolsky P, Morales L, Tayeh A: The Public and domestic domains in the transmission of disease. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 1996, 1: 27-34. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1996.d01-9.x.

Howard G, Bartram J: Domestic Water Quality, Service Level and Health. 2003, WHO/SDE/WSH/03.02. World Health Organization

UN Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD): Simple Methods Lead to Dramatic Results. The Safe Drinking Water Alliance Uniting Forces to Ensure Safe Water. 2004, By UN Commission on Sustainable Development, 12th Session New York, NY April, 2004, Assessed 09-08-2011, [ http://shopsproject.org/sites/default/files/resources/2852_file_safe_drinking_04_15_04.pdf ]

Edema MO, Atayese AO, Bankole MO: Pure Water Syndrome: Bacteriological Quality of Sachet- Packed Drinking Water Sold In Nigeria. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2004, 11 (1): 4595-4609.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Bottled Water; Final Rule.Federal Register, 21 CFR Part 103 (60), 57075-57130. Beverages: Warburton Donald Warburton, Brian Harrisona, Carol Crawford, Roger Foster, Cathy Fox, Lorraine Gour, Peter Krol, A further review of the microbiological quality of bottled water sold in Canada: 1992-1997 survey results. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1995, 39 (1998): 221-226.

Warburton DW: A review of the microbiological quality of bottled water sold in Canada. Part 2. The need for more stringent standards and regulations. Can J Microbiol. 1993, 39: 158-168. 10.1139/m93-022.

Okogia T: Water Quality And Business Aspects of Sachet-Vended Water in Tamale, Ghana. MSc Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2007, 168

Kassenga GR: The health-related microbiological quality of bottled drinking water sold in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Water and Health. 2007, 5 (1): 179-185. 10.2166/wh.2006.052.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dada AC: Pure Water Phenomenon in Nigeria: Asessment of Public Health Impacts. MSc Thesis. 2007, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, 112

Dada AC: Towards a successful packaged water regulation in Nigeria. Scientific Research and Essay. 2009, 4 (9): 921-928.

Consumer Affairs Movement of Nigeria (CAMON): Nafdac To Ban Sachet Pure Water - 97% Samples Contaminated. 2004, Consumer Link 1:1, [ http://www.luc.edu/law/academics/special/center/antitrust/pdfs/consumer_link_vol1.pdf ]

Johnstone D: Water Quality Standards and Developing Nations. 2007, M.Sc Lecture Serie, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford, United Kingdom

National Resource Defence Council (NRDC): Gaping Holes in Government Bottled Water Regulation. Bottled Water Pure Drink or Pure Hype?. 1999, Accessed 27th October, 2007, [ http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/bw/chap4.asp ]

Reimann C, Banks D: Setting action levels for drinking water: Are we protecting our health or our economy (or our backs!)?. Science of the Total Environment. 2004, 332: 13-21. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.007.

World Health Organization (WHO): Guidelines for drinking-water quality [electronic resource]: incorporating first addendum. 2006, 1: 595-Recommendations - 3

BBC News: Emergency water supplies run low. 2007, Assessed 16 th July 2011, [ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6916665.stm ]

WHO/UNICEF: Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report. 2007

Kjellén M, McGranahan G: Informal Water Vendors and the Urban Poor. 2006, Human Settlements Discussion Paper Series Theme: Water-3. IIED(London), [ http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/10529IIED.pdf ]

Jensen PK, Jayasinghe G, van der Hoek W, Caincross S, Dalsgard A: Is there an association between bacteriological drinking water quality and childhood diarrhoea in developing countries?. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2004, 9 (11): 1210-1215. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01329.x.

DFID: Why we need a global action plan on water and sanitation. Assessed 24 th July 2011, 2006, [ http://europe.mtnforum.org/rs/ol/counter_docdown.cfm?fID=1882.pdf ]

Adekunle LV, Sridhar MKC, Ajayi AA, Oluwade PA, Olawuyi JF: An Assessment of The Health and Social Economic Implications of Sachet Water in Ibadan Nigeria: A Public Health Challenge. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 2004, 7: 5-8.

The Times of India: Pesticide content in packaged water to be quantified. 2003, Accessed 28th July, 2007, [ http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-02-11/india/27261339_1_pesticide-content-pesticide-limits-detectable-levels ]

News: Ghanas pure water irony: Trashy bags its solution?. 2008, Accessed 2nd July, 2007, [ http://www.modernghana.com/news/188133/1/ghanas-pure-water-irony-trashy-bags-its-solution.html ]

Racheal: AMA To Enforce Ban On Sachet Water. 2008, Accessed 27th October, 20007, [ http://www.modernghana.com/news/138790/1/ama-to-enforce-ban-on-sachet-water-if.html ]

IRIN: Ghana: No to water in plastic bags. Science in Africa. 2004, Accessed 27th October, 2007, [ http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2004/july/ghanaplastic.htm ]

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to staff at the Water Science, Policy and Management Section, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, UK for supervisory roles played.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Ecology and Environmental Studies, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Ayokunle C Dada

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayokunle C Dada .

Additional information

Competing interests.

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

12992_2010_119_moesm1_esm.doc.

Additional file 1: Table S1 : Definition of access to water [ 30 ]. (DOC 28 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2, authors’ original file for figure 3, authors’ original file for figure 4, rights and permissions.

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Dada, A.C. Packaged water: optimizing local processes for sustainable water delivery in developing nations. Global Health 7 , 24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-24

Download citation

Received : 23 June 2010

Accepted : 29 July 2011

Published : 29 July 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-24

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Drinking Water
  • Plastic Waste
  • Drinking Water Source
  • Basic Sanitation
  • Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point

Globalization and Health

ISSN: 1744-8603

packaged drinking water essay

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

PROJECT PROFILE ON PACKAGED DRINKING WATER Product : Packaged Drinking Water

Profile image of BITTU DEY

Related Papers

A Study of Bottled Water Quality Standards in India

Aviram Sharma

Although water quality is immensely crucial for human wellbeing, it is a highly neglected area of research. My M.Phil dissertation explored the dynamics of bottled water quality standards in India. In many modern industrial economies, complex regulatory systems emerged for governance of drinking water quality standards during the last few decades. The standards for public supply of drinking water in India vary across regions, but standards for bottled water are mandatory and uniform across the country. This study traced that how the simple perceptions based notion of water quality has given way to science and technology based standards. It also analysed the distinctive standards promulgated by Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for packaged drinking water and further analysed how and why the BIS standards differed from the other regulatory standards. In addition, with help of a primary survey the study also attempted to understand the public perception of regulatory decision making in India.

packaged drinking water essay

The rapid growth in consumption of bottled water across the globe has drawn attention of policy makers and academicians alike. However, its consumption practices have been examined primarily in the context of industrialized countries. Drawing on studies of Science, Technology and Society, Public Understanding of Science, and institutions, this article explores the nuances of the consumption conundrum of bottled water in India. This mixed method study relies on data collected through surveys and ethnography of consumption practices at selected sites in Delhi. We find reasons for bottled water consumption to vary with the site of consumption. Although the notions of “purity” and “scarcity” drive consumption behavior, these attributes are far from being objective. Rather, they are shaped by a complex mix of sociocultural factors, public understanding of science, and trust on various institutional mechanisms of water provisioning.

International Journal of Research

paul dhinakaran

International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences

Mohammad Taha Yadi

This research conveys “what are the determinants of demand of the packaged drinking water”. The word demand means to make an enquiry. Willingness of a consumer to buy the product and their ability to pay backed by their income for a commodity is called as demand. Consumer demand theory puts forth that demand of a commodity depends on tastes of the consumer, price of the related goods such as substitute and complementary goods. 1622 was the year when first bottling water plant was established in the United Kingdom. The reason behind the establishment of bottle water industry was to solve the problem of transportation of the water to far distance. This industry is a booming one. In India there are around 150 domestic water bottling companies. USA tops the list of the countries which generate more revenue from selling water bottles. In India Bisleri is the market leader in this industry which captures 60% of the market share. Drinking water from the water bottle has become a high stand...

Sushil Kumar Sharma

Bangladesh Academy of Sciences

KM Mostafa Anwar

Gurmeet Singh

The study is basically aimed at examining the state of branding in Indian bottled water, focusing on the performance of major Indian enterprises in creating brands in this segment; sustaining them in the huge domestic market and expansion measure for taking them into global markets. The Indian Bottled brands do not compete globally; the present study is aimed at finding reasons for Indian Bottled Industry’s failure to stand by Global players and suggesting remedial measures to make effective strategy. Various facts revealed the lack of quality in the companies that are heading the industry in the danger control mode. Various suggestions are discussed to plug the loop holes to survive; the industry and in the industry.

Gopal Ji Singh

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Tony Yulianto

Bottled Drinking Water is water that is treated using certain technologies, then packaged in various forms. The factors that influence the competition in the sale of bottled water include Branding, Packaging, Quality, Sales, Promotion, Competition, Brand, Price, Product Quality, Marketing. From this, there needs to be an analysis to determine the competition in selling bottled water between local and national products. Therefore, research will be conducted using the factor analysis method, factor analysis aims to identify the relationship between variables so that it can be classified into several sets of variables that are less than the number of initial variables. From the ten variables can be reduced to less after a factor analysis then of the ten variables into two factors, from each factor is given a group or name where the first factor is an influence factor and the second factor is an item factor. From each local product and national product have two factors, but of the two added together to produce diversity values, local products are able to provide a cumulative diversity value of 59.474%. While the National Product is able to provide a cumulative diversity value of 62.059%. This research contributed to the decision making regarding the factors that influence the competition in the sale of bottled water. This study provides recommendations to bottled water companies to give more attention to the factors that influence the success of bottled water sales.

Journal of Consumer Culture

Richard R Wilk

RELATED PAPERS

Yuri Gliklikh

Journal of The Acoustical Society of America

Raja Rayavarapu

Estudios Demograficos Y Urbanos

Gustavo Garza

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Vishnu Karthikeyan

Fahri Özsungur

Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje

Marijana Horvat

Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi

Gülden ŞİŞMAN

Maksim iavich

Journal of Biological Rhythms

bryan olivares reyes

Paris Glickman

Transplantation

Prasad Nair

Scientific Reports

Jeanette Bishop

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Derya Ozer Kaya

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics

Pedro Rodríguez-Ayerbe

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Justin Amase

Computational Methods and Function Theory

Igor Chyzhykov

The Muslim World

Zakari Ibrahim

Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm - SODA '06

Peter Bro Miltersen

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Zahra Yousefi Amin

IX Congreso de Historia e Historiografía (ebook)

Lucas Duarte

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Arthur Slutsky

CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

yalçın tükel

Revista Brasileira de Extensão Universitária

Admilson Costa Cunha

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Global Health

Logo of globhlth

Packaged water: optimizing local processes for sustainable water delivery in developing nations

Ayokunle c dada.

1 Institute of Ecology and Environmental Studies, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Associated Data

With so much global attention and commitment towards making the Water and Sanitation targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) a reality, available figures seem to speak on the contrary as they reveal a large disparity between the expected and what currently obtains especially in developing countries. As studies have shown that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world, packaged water is suggested as a low cost, readily available alternative water provision that could help bridge the gap. Despite the established roles that this drinking water source plays in developing nations, its importance is however significantly underestimated, and the source considered unimproved going by 'international standards'. Rather than simply disqualifying water from this source, focus should be on identifying means of improvement. The need for intervening global communities and developmental organizations to learn from and build on the local processes that already operate in the developing world is also emphasized. Identifying packaged water case studies of some developing nations, the implication of a tenacious focus on imported policies, standards and regulatory approaches on drinking water access for residents of the developing world is also discussed.

The development and use of water portends wide-ranging implications for global survival, security, health and economic development [ 1 ]. This demands the need for water issues to be tackled at the highest political level. Consequently, enshrined in international covenants and attested to by world nation's heads are the MDGs, one of which is to halve the proportion of people without sustainable access to portable water and basic sanitation. Today, more than halfway into the deadlines, available figures reveal a large disparity between the expected and the achieved [ 2 ]. Following a general paraphrase of the paper in the first section, the gruesome challenges that make achievement of the Millennium Development Goals daunting task in the developing world is described in the second section of this paper. Given the prevailing social and technical cost needed to revitalize or put in place functional public institutions, associated technologies and political will power, it is much undoubted that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world in the foreseeable future [ 3 ], the third section suggests packaged water as one of the low cost alternative water provision that could help bridge the gap. As presented in the fourth section of this paper, despite the established role that this drinking water source plays in developing economies and populations, its importance is significantly underestimated. The fifth section highlights a view point that promotes identification of means of improvement rather than disqualification of local provisions and processes in a bid to safeguard public health. Using relevant case studies, it also suggests possible implication of irrational adoption of global policies on water supply access for residents of the developing world. The sixth section concludes.

The Daunting Challenge of Meeting the MDG targets

Global attention and efforts have been committed towards making the MDG target for water and Sanitation a reality. It is more than halfway into the deadline, yet available figures seem to speak on the contrary especially in the developing world [ 2 ]. In most regions of the world, this target is far off-track [ 2 , 4 , 5 ]. Reports have shown that going by current trend, the global MDG sanitation target will be missed by more than half a billion people if the trend 1990-2004 continues up to 2015 [ 2 ]. A recent report asserts that the potential challenges to actualizing the MDGs are basically: maintaining the gains already made, coping with a rapid pace of urbanization, and a huge backlog of unserved rural people [ 6 ]. Although, some regions will reach the drinking water and sanitation target, places like sub-Saharan Africa remain an area of greatest concern. For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, with an 85% increase in urban population from 1990 to 2004, the number of urban dwellers unserved with either safe drinking water or basic sanitation doubled from 1990 to 2004 [ 6 ]. Recent studies suggest that in addition to rapid urbanization [ 7 ], ineffective governance ([ 8 , 9 ]) and persistent poverty [ 10 ] remain the root cause of water infrastructure associated problems that might make the goal far from being realistic in developing nations.

A recent article [ 11 ] presents thought provoking insights to the debate on the achievement of the MDGs. Optimistic as the millennium development targets may sound, some debates are however evident. It may be argued that there are fundamental problems associated with the statement of these goals and the means of measuring progress towards meeting them. There are wide definitional variations of what constitutes "safe drinking water" and "basic sanitation". These variables are difficult to measure and each has widely different cost and effort implications [ 11 ]. Thus, indicators chosen for monitoring the MDGs are often confusing, misrepresenting and many a times missing. Examples abound to attest to this. In India, a household is considered to have access if there is a water source within one mile (1.6 km) and in many cases; it is not the individual or the household access that is measured but the village as a whole. In Lagos, the newest major mega city in Africa with so many slums and shanty towns [ 12 ], the case could be different. What a kilometre distance means to urban dwellers in Lagos would differ significantly to the structures and population densities that are available in the rural settlements, yet they apparently have the same indicator yardstick. Currently based on existing data sources access is often taken to be a facility such as a standpipe, well, or public toilet within reasonable distance [ 11 ]. Again, masking effects of richer populations being served over unserved on the overall figures presented might be evident. This could stand as potent demodulators for aggressive and timely interventions for deprived residents in deficient locations.

Even where there is a water source it may not necessarily be accessible to all owing to other associated physical, economic or social complexities [ 11 ]. Apart from distance, the cost, level of sharing and queuing are decisive factors that determine actual water availability, accessibility and use [ 13 , 14 ]. Again, in practical terms, it is not clear what providing "basic" amenities will actually mean, and this will most likely vary in different contexts and countries [ 11 ]. Furthermore, access to the 'improved access' might not necessarily infer adequacy for a healthy life as access to water within a kilometre's reach may not be convenient or sufficient to protect health. Optimally, water should be made available at home [ 15 ] or at least within a hundred meters or five minutes total collection time, which has been observed to make a difference with regard to actual water use [ 16 , 17 ].

Packaged Water: A Local Drinking Water Initiative

Several water supply models are already established, tested and proven effective in the developed world. Given the prevailing social and technical cost needed to revitalize or put in place functional public institutions, associated technologies and political will power, it is much undoubted that the standard industrialized world model for delivery of safe drinking water technology may not be affordable in much of the developing world in the foreseeable future [ 3 ], Subsequently, with the renewed global commitments towards the MDGs marked for 2015, the importance of locally sourced, low-cost alternative drinking water schemes in contributing to increased sustainable access in rural and peri-urban settings of developing nations cannot be over-emphasized [ 18 ]. One of such local interventions in Nigeria, where public drinking water supply is endemic is packaged drinking water [ 19 ]. This form of packaged water is usually distributed and sold in sachets (Figure ​ (Figure1). 1 ). Packaged water refers to water that is packaged generally for consumption in a range of vessels including cans, laminated boxes, glass, plastic sachets and pouches, and as ice prepared for consumption [ 20 , 21 ].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 1744-8603-7-24-1.jpg

Roadside vendors hawking chilled water in sachets .

Scattered around the breadth of developing nations are small, medium and large scale industries that manufacture packaged water sold as sachets (commonly referred to as pure water). The package water industry started initially as a cottage business to meet the demand of the thirsty population not adequately catered for by the available municipals. Today, the packaged water industry has become part of the unofficial economy as the sales of thousands of brands of thermoelectrically sealed nylon sachets containing about 0.5 L water have increased tremendously in many developing nations. Sold by the poor and patronised by members of the low and middle socio-economic class, this form of water started out as 'iced water' which was simply hand-tied nylon pouches containing treated or untreated cold water. Treatment then was simply with the use of absorbent pads (referred to as 'foam'), although it was thought to trap the all dirt and germs, it was largely effective for removal of suspended solids. Recent studies [ 3 , 22 ] confirmed the persistence of this drinking water source in some parts of Ghana owing to its affordability.

In urban Tanzania, a similar experience prevails based on the result from a recent survey that showed a significantly higher proportion of the population depend on packaged water owing to its perceived safety as compared to water from public pipes [ 23 ]. The hierarchical order of perception of safety in Nigerian water supply model is presented in Figure ​ Figure2. 2 . The public perception safety in favour of packaged water in Nigeria stems out partly from the inadequate attempts of previous governments to provide potable piped water. The second contributing factor to this perception is the prevalent doubt on the quality of 'piped water' supplied at a reasonable charge by many informal vendors at the community level. The lack of trust in the quality of water supplied by these informal vendors is attributable to the subjectivity in the construction of wells from which the water is outsourced. There is currently no formal abstraction management or regulatory scheme in place in the entire nation. The effect of rapid urbanization in cities like Lagos has seen the sprawling city extending far beyond its original lagoon setting to encompass a vast expanse of mostly low-rise developments including as many as 200 different slums where living conditions are extremely crowded and dismal [ 12 ]. The resultant effect is a continuous reduction in the spacing between inter- and intra-building septic tanks and water wells, thus increasing the vulnerability of available sources to pollution from anthropogenic influence. Yet, anyone at any point in time with the necessary financial wherewithal could employ the service of cheap local labour to dig wells of subjective depths and specifications for water vending purposes. In most instances, as a cost saving measure, only a few concrete well rings are fixed to support the dug well (Figure ​ (Figure3 3 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 1744-8603-7-24-2.jpg

Water for drinking and domestic purposes: Nigerian Water Supply Model .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 1744-8603-7-24-3.jpg

Water treatment process in a typical sachet water factory .

Water pumped from these 'upgraded' wells into elevated storage tanks are widely referred o as 'borehole water' or 'tap water' among the nation's populace. It costs about N100,000 (about USD800) to put this system in place. On the other hand, to install a deep drilling system using heavy duty boring machines require a minimum of N400,000 (about USD3,200). In most instances, only a restricted proportion of the citizenry, precisely the wealthy, can afford the expensive deep drilling that conventional borehole technologies offer. In most instances, when this is the case, the water is strictly for owner usage and is not available for commercial purposes. Despite the debates associated with the quality of water provided by these upgraded wells of informal vendors, water from such sources is cheap (costs about 20-50 cents for 50 Litres), readily available but usage is only restricted for domestic uses alone - washing, bathing and cleaning. Sachet water, costing 50 cents for 3 Litres (one bag containing 20 sachets each of 150 ml volume), is thus often relied upon for drinking purposes. Although restively more expensive than water for domestic uses sourced from upgraded wells of informal vendors at the community level, a public perception of safety prevails - at least it must have gone through one form of treatment or the other, even if they were gotten from questionable sources [ 24 ].

Realistically sachet water produced in recent years by small-scale industries has experienced drastic improvement as the raw water is now treated by aeration, double or single filtration using porcelain molecular candle filters or membrane filters (Figure ​ (Figure3) 3 ) and in some instances, disinfection is applied. The level of treatment generally depends on the source of water [ 3 ]. Although there are still inherent quality and regulatory challenges associated with this form of drinking water [ 25 ], the importance of this form of drinking water is well acknowledged by civil societies and nation governments of the developing world [ 26 ].

Seeking Solutions For Local Problems: Local Processes Or Global Policies?

Despite the established role that this drinking water source plays in developing economies and populations, its importance is however significantly underestimated or not appreciated as presented by currently available 'guidelines' and 'policies' of internationally respected organizations - most of which are irrationally copied and adopted by the developing world [ 27 ]. The denial process stems from the equalisation of reasons attached to people's patronage of packaged water for the developing and the developed world. For example, a report by NDRC [ 28 ] asserts that given the explosion in bottled water use in the United States, driven in large measure by marketing designed to convince the public of bottled water's purity and safety, and capitalizing on public concern about tap water quality, people are willing to spend from 240 to over 10,000 times more per gallon for packaged water than they typically do for tap water [ 28 ]. As analysed by Riemann and Bank [ 29 ] in their study on regulatory standards for the developed and developing world, this is characteristic of a typical 'risk-averse' western world. Factors that stimulate demand in the developing nations are apparently different. In many developing nations, contamination of municipal water supply systems by faecal bacterial pathogens has become a public health hazard, because often there are not enough resources (cost, capital or commitment) to install or to operate functional municipal water systems leaving the civil society to resort to alternatives, one of which is packaged water.

In a similar vein, a World Health Organization (WHO) report [ 30 ] also itemizes the reasons for global consumption of packaged water. However, not elucidated in this report is the fact that packaged drinking water is an alternative source and its patronage, more of a survival strategy for many residents of the developing world rather than the reasons mentioned. This typifies the international community's partial or non-recognition given to this drinking water initiative which of course is a social adaptation to failed public municipals in the developing world. England felt a similar wave of the heat when the 2007 summer floods hit Gloucestershire leaving thousands of people to survive on packaged water which was generously distributed by the government and intervening organizations as relief aid [ 31 ]. It is much undoubted that what classifies patronage of packaged water as a survival strategy, psycho-satisfaction or a mere show of socio-economic status is more or less subjective differing with the particular prevailing situation.

In addition to the wrongly perceived cause and effect hypothesis, another conflicting view point is the definitional classification using certain 'exclusion criteria'. This is typified in the WHO report [ 30 ] that refers to 'bottled water' and 'packaged water' interchangeably without making concrete distinction between the two terms (for instance, Section 6.5.2: p114). In the report, households that relied on packaged water along with other vended sources are classified using the 'exclusion criteria' as not having 'reasonable access' to improved water supply along with those who get theirs from unimproved wells or surface water sources (Additional file 1 , Table S1). It should however be noted that water obtained from these recommended 'improved sources' can also have a significant increase in contamination between the source and storage. A report [ 16 ] suggested possible contamination arising from two distinct physical domains- the public (outside the household) and the domestic (inside the household). Thus it may be realistic to suggest that the proportion of the world's population actually using safe drinking water is likely to be lower than that using the globally recognized 'improved' drinking water sources.

Going by the 'exclusion criteria' and the 'official indicators', progress towards the water target of the MDGs is achieved as people switch to piped water connections, or to free public stand pipes, boreholes, or rainwater cisterns within a kilometre of their home [ 10 , 32 , 33 ]. But the daunting challenge is the time frame for which this could become a reality for residents of the developing. Apparently, it appears not to be too realistic a goal in the near future given the insufficiency of capital, cost (operation and maintenance) and commitment evident in most rural and urban settlements of low and medium income countries where municipal water supply functions are sub-optimal. As presented by the WHO report and other available literature, bottled water is considered unimproved and sachet water or other forms of packaged water are nowhere to be found either in the identified classes. By oppressing packaged water in a bid to protecting public health in developing nations, there is a danger that authorities could be making it still more difficult for deprived residents to obtain water which again could lead to more grievous conditions as people may revert to poorer sources (Figure ​ (Figure4). 4 ). Agreeably, proffered recommendation to improving drinking water access in developing nations may not simply be about disregarding packaged water or other local initiative as unimproved. Instead, questions need be raised about what could be done to increase the effectiveness of the treatment and distribution system and how it could ultimately make a positive contribution to the widely publicised MDGs. It is therefore logical to conclude that there may be cases where improving services from so-called 'unacceptable options' (local provisions) can make much more significant difference to the well-being of the most deprived populations than striving for ideal solutions such as universal piped water connections [ 33 ].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 1744-8603-7-24-4.jpg

Fate of the Public with irrational regulatory policies .

Implication for Policy and Way Forward

The developing world is masked with challenges of coping with failing infrastructures, inadequate finance, poor legislation, lack of appropriate institutional capacity for regulation and control and often the political will to enforce control measures. The position is complicated by the fact that many of these developing nations are at a loss on how to set standards [ 27 ]. Consequently, they resort to dependence on adopted standards, policies and guidelines as presented by international organizations based on scenarios and context in the developed world. These are only moderately modified and ultimately imbibed into national regulatory structures of developing nations without the means of attainment. There could be possible serious implication of a tenacious focus on such policies, standards and regulatory approaches imported from developed countries on drinking water access for residents of the developing world (Figure ​ (Figure1.1) 1 .1) as each situation differs in its own respect and has to be treated as such. For example, the WHO bacteriological water guidelines are widely accepted in industrialized as well as developing countries but they are not always achieved in practice [ 34 ].

Solving the water-related problems in the unserved regions of the developing world will demand acknowledgement, and attendant support of local processes that already exist in such locations. This will ultimately enable the local entrepreneurs to positively contribute their little yet significant quota to the achievement of international goals. Arguably, as a DFID report [ 35 ] portrays it, the best way to meet the people's demand for clean water and sanitation is to work with civil societies and government to help enable the voices of those without access to be heard and then for the governments to act on what they hear. In the past, many attempts by service providers and intervening non-governmental agencies have one way or the other failed because they allegedly did not involve the local community and already existent local processes in their action plans. Case studies are presented shortly of some on-going success stories in the packaged water industry. In the cited locations, various levels of stakeholder participation led to the birth of solutions that found a right balancing in between safeguarding public health through enactment of regulatory standards and improving social welfare through sustained access to packaged drinking water.

Lagos, Nigeria

An alternative to erratic pipe borne drinking water supplies in Nigeria is Sachet water, popularly referred to as 'pure water'. A high demand drinking water alternative, it is sold by the poor and finds patronage from members of low and middle socio-economic class [ 36 ]. With concerns of questionable quality of packaged drinking water, the national regulator, NAFDAC, declared a 'gradual' nationwide ban on sachet waters to allow the manufacturers of sachet water to start winding-up or change to bottle packaging [ 26 ] which is more expensive but perceived safer than water in sachets. Successful implementation of this ban on sachet water has remained far from reality as a vast majority of its population depends on it. Today, the sachet water market is witnessing tremendous growth. In a recent survey [ 24 ] of thirty-four households in the location, 86.5% of respondents claim that they cannot cope if the proposed ban were to hold given the unavailability of other affordable drinking water options. A total of 73.5% claim increased price associated with the bottled form of packaged water will ultimately deny them access to the suggested option by the regulator. It became obvious that the most probable outcome of such a ban of sachet form of packaged water is a reversion to poorer sources. Again, the federal government did assert that sachet water industry has remained one of the most successful poverty alleviation programs it embarked upon since independence. The proposed ban was consequently suspended. Focus was redirected to other means of improving the sachet water industry to produce the desired results and ultimately safeguard public health.

The late nineties marked the commencement of packaged drinking water regulation in India. Solely handled by the Bureau of Indian Standards in collaboration with the Health Ministry, the rules on its safety were drafted into a Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The original plan was to come up with a standard that matches with international standards. Given the complexities and the technologies involved in the implementation, the PFA Act however remained vague on the issue of allowable levels of pesticides in packaged drinking water. With growing health concerns, a stakeholder meeting between the BIS and the Health Ministry officials marked the declaration of specific allowable limit - no pesticide should exceed 0.0001 mg/litre and total content of pesticide not exceeding 0.005 mg/litre. It was agreed that testing methods and support are to be provided by the BIS. Again, consensus was reached that it will take some time before the necessary changes take effect in the packaged water industry [ 37 ].

Accra, Ghana

A rapidly emerging water vending business in Ghana has been that of vending sachet water or bagged water, which is a cheaper alternative to bottled water [ 22 ]. Given the unreliable supply of drinking water by the municipals, a large proportion of the people depend on this bagged form of drinking. To ensure that Ghanaians have access to cheap clean water, sachets approved by the Ghanaian government that meet the Ghana Standards Boards sanitation requirements, are being sold all over the country [ 38 ]. These sachets are one of the main contributors to the trash that blankets the streets and gutters. The Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA) declared a possible ban on the use of sachet and polythene bags for drinking water, if manufacturers of such products refused to immediately negotiate with the AMA on concrete proposals as to how to deal with the menace of plastic waste [ 39 ]. This led to the birth of several stakeholder forums that heralded the emergence of a recycling taskforce - people picked from the government, plastic manufacturers, water sachet producers and city authorities to encourage and facilitate the recycling of the sachets, creation of new recycling plants as well as working with existing recyclers to expand their facilities [ 40 ]. Sponsored by some sachet bag manufacturers, several campaigns on plastic waste disposal and management were launched at Primary and Junior Secondary Schools in the nation to educate the school children on the proper disposal of plastic waste and how to manage such waste. In addition to this, an Accra based NGO, focusing on sustainability and the environment has taken on the task of cleaning up the streets of Accra. They employ staffs which does not include the local Ghanaians that are compensated for collecting the sachets. To date, this NGO has taken over 10 million sachets off the streets of Accra [ 38 ], the proposed ban on sachet water was suspended and residents still have access to drinking water in sachets.

As presented by the examined case studies, it is evident that rather than simply disqualifying packaged water as portrayed in respected international literature, focus should be on identifying means of improvement. For instance, more research could be conducted with focus placed on determinants of the final quality of produced sachet water - treatment, handling and distribution practices. Furthermore, international and local organizations and national health agencies could help facilitate research targeted at the identification, substantiation and incorporation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) and limits. This would address hazard analysis of the treatment and distribution processes and ultimately herald the emergence of a workable water safety plan that applies specifically to the packaged water industry. Intensified efforts on local and international research that major on the production of readily accessible and adaptable in-house water testing kits could also play a significant role in fortifying daily in-house bacteriological monitoring of the finished products. International organizations could also partner with regulatory agencies and civil societies to facilitate intensive hygiene and sanitation awareness training programs for vendors, manufacturers and other relevant stakeholders in the packaged water industry. Predictably, the implementation of these will yield desired results that would warrant a better packaged water industry, an improved social welfare through sustained access to drinking water and ultimately, a safer public at large in the developing world.

Packaged water made available in sachets, like other local initiatives offer substantial hope in contributing to increased sustainable access in rural and urban settings of developing nations if acknowledged and improved upon. The call is therefore made to intervening global communities and developmental organizations for the need for to learn from and build on the local processes that already operate in the developing world. Room for optimum improvement, via collaborative efforts with relevant stakeholders will demand striking a suitable balance between two preferred options: promoting public health (through improved regulation of the packaged water industry) while concurrently improving social welfare (encouraging access through support of these initiatives that cover for institutional inadequacies in public water supply coverage).

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Written informed consent was obtained for publication of the accompanying images.

Supplementary Material

Table S1 : Definition of access to water [ 30 ].

Acknowledgements

Thanks to staff at the Water Science, Policy and Management Section, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, UK for supervisory roles played.

  • Helmer R. Water quality and Health. The Environmentalist. 1999; 19 (1):11–16. doi: 10.1023/A:1006576620275. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • WHO/UNICEF. Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: a mid-term assessment of progress. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, UNICEF and the World Health Organization. 2004. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/foi/disclosures/f2005177.pdf Assessed 11th August, 2007.
  • Dodoo DK, Quagraine EK, Okai-Sam F, Kambo Dorsa J, Headley JV. Quality of Sachet Waters in the Cape Coast Municipality of Ghana. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. 2006; Part A 41 (3):329–342. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • WHO/UNICEF. Water for life: making it happen. World Health Organization,. Geneva; 2005. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation; p. 37. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/waterforlife.pdf Assessed 24th July, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
  • United Nations Children Educational Fund (UNICEF) Progress For Children: A Report Card On Nutrition. 2006. http://www.unicef.org/media/files/PFC_Nutrition.pdf Assessed 11th August, 2007.
  • WHO/UNICEF. Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, UNICEF and the World Health Organization 2006. 2006. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmpfinal.pdf Assessed 24th July, 2011.
  • Satterwaite D. Human Settlements Development Paper Urban-o1. Earthscan, London; 2005. The Scale of Urban Change Worldwide 1950-2000 and its Underpinnings. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Biswas AK. Challenging Prevailing Wisdoms: 2006 Stockholm Water Prize Laureate Lecture. 2006. p. 10.
  • Totenson A, Tvedten I, Vaa M, (EDS.) Popular Responses to the Urban Environment Series 6. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm; 2001. Associated Life in African Cities. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kjellén, Marianne. From Public Pipes to Private Hands: Water Access and Distribution in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Doctoral thesis, Department of Human Geography Stockholm University; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Development Alternatives (Devalt) Drinking Water and Sanitation. 2004. p. Article No 2.
  • Gandy M. Planning, Anti-planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies. 2006; 43 (2):371–396. doi: 10.1080/00420980500406751. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • MacGranaham G, Lewin S, Fransen T, Hunt C, Kjellen M, Pretty J, Stephens C, Virgin I. Environmental Change and Human Health in Africa, the Carribean and the Pacific. European Union, Swedish International Development Corporation Agency, London School of Health and Tropical Medicine, Stockholm Environmental Institute., Stockholm. 1999.
  • UN/WWAP (United Nations/World Water Assessment Programme) 1st UN World Water Development Report: Water for People, Water for Life. 2003.
  • Esrey SA. Water, waste, and well-being: a multi-country study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996; 143 :608–623. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Caincross S, Blumenthal U, Kolsky P, Morales L, Tayeh A. The Public and domestic domains in the transmission of disease. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 1996; 1 :27–34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1996.d01-9.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Howard G, Bartram J. Domestic Water Quality, Service Level and Health. WHO/SDE/WSH/03.02. World Health Organization; 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
  • UN Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) The Safe Drinking Water Alliance Uniting Forces to Ensure Safe Water. By UN Commission on Sustainable Development, 12th Session New York, NY April, 2004; 2004. Simple Methods Lead to Dramatic Results. http://shopsproject.org/sites/default/files/resources/2852_file_safe_drinking_04_15_04.pdf Assessed 09-08-2011. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Edema MO, Atayese AO, Bankole MO. Pure Water Syndrome: Bacteriological Quality of Sachet- Packed Drinking Water Sold In Nigeria. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2004; 11 (1):4595–4609. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bottled Water; Final Rule.Federal Register, 21 CFR Part 103 (60), 57075-57130. Beverages: Warburton Donald Warburton, Brian Harrisona, Carol Crawford, Roger Foster, Cathy Fox, Lorraine Gour, Peter Krol, A further review of the microbiological quality of bottled water sold in Canada: 1992-1997 survey results. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1995; 39 (1998):221–226. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Warburton DW. A review of the microbiological quality of bottled water sold in Canada. Part 2. The need for more stringent standards and regulations. Can J Microbiol. 1993; 39 :158–168. doi: 10.1139/m93-022. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Okogia T. Water Quality And Business Aspects of Sachet-Vended Water in Tamale, Ghana. MSc Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2007. p. 168.
  • Kassenga GR. The health-related microbiological quality of bottled drinking water sold in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Water and Health. 2007; 5 (1):179–185. doi: 10.2166/wh.2006.052. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dada AC. MSc Thesis. Oxford University Centre for the Environment; 2007. Pure Water Phenomenon in Nigeria: Asessment of Public Health Impacts; p. 112. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dada AC. Towards a successful packaged water regulation in Nigeria. Scientific Research and Essay. 2009; 4 (9):921–928. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Consumer Affairs Movement of Nigeria (CAMON) Nafdac To Ban Sachet Pure Water - 97% Samples Contaminated. 2004. http://www.luc.edu/law/academics/special/center/antitrust/pdfs/consumer_link_vol1.pdf Consumer Link 1:1.
  • Johnstone D. Water Quality Standards and Developing Nations. M.Sc Lecture Serie, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
  • National Resource Defence Council (NRDC) Gaping Holes in Government Bottled Water Regulation. Bottled Water Pure Drink or Pure Hype? 1999. http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/bw/chap4.asp Accessed 27th October, 2007.
  • Reimann C, Banks D. Setting action levels for drinking water: Are we protecting our health or our economy (or our backs!)? Science of the Total Environment. 2004; 332 :13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.007. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for drinking-water quality [electronic resource]: incorporating first addendum. Recommendations - 3. Vol. 1. 2006. p. 595. [ Google Scholar ]
  • BBC News. Emergency water supplies run low. 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6916665.stm Assessed 16 th July 2011.
  • WHO/UNICEF. Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report. 2007.
  • Kjellén M, McGranahan G. Informal Water Vendors and the Urban Poor. Human Settlements Discussion Paper Series Theme: Water-3. IIED(London); 2006. http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/10529IIED.pdf [ Google Scholar ]
  • Jensen PK, Jayasinghe G, van der Hoek W, Caincross S, Dalsgard A. Is there an association between bacteriological drinking water quality and childhood diarrhoea in developing countries? Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2004; 9 (11):1210–1215. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01329.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • DFID. Why we need a global action plan on water and sanitation. http://europe.mtnforum.org/rs/ol/counter_docdown.cfm?fID=1882.pdf Assessed 24 th July 2011, 2006.
  • Adekunle LV, Sridhar MKC, Ajayi AA, Oluwade PA, Olawuyi JF. An Assessment of The Health and Social Economic Implications of Sachet Water in Ibadan Nigeria: A Public Health Challenge. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 2004; 7 :5–8. [ Google Scholar ]
  • The Times of India. Pesticide content in packaged water to be quantified. 2003. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-02-11/india/27261339_1_pesticide-content-pesticide-limits-detectable-levels Accessed 28th July, 2007.
  • News. Ghanas pure water irony: Trashy bags its solution? 2008. http://www.modernghana.com/news/188133/1/ghanas-pure-water-irony-trashy-bags-its-solution.html Accessed 2nd July, 2007.
  • Racheal. AMA To Enforce Ban On Sachet Water. 2008. http://www.modernghana.com/news/138790/1/ama-to-enforce-ban-on-sachet-water-if.html Accessed 27th October, 20007.
  • IRIN. Ghana: No to water in plastic bags. Science in Africa. 2004. http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2004/july/ghanaplastic.htm Accessed 27th October, 2007.

Home | Environment | Nature | Water

Packaged Water

  • Updated July 25, 2023
  • Pages 5 (1 222 words)
  • Environment
  • Clean Drinking Water
  • Any subject
  • Within the deadline
  • Without paying in advance

Table of Contents

Introduction to the Industry

Introduction to the companies, purpose behind selecting bisleri and aquafina, segmentation, positioning, analysis of similarities and differences.

The packaged drinking water industry serves the basic need of a person to consume purified drinking water. This industry has significantly grown owing to water shortages around the world and the misuse of natural resources. In India, drinking water can be divided into three segments – premium natural mineral water, natural mineral water and packaged drinking water. There are 5,735 licensed bottlers for packaged drinking water across the country, alongside uncountable unbranded ones.

In India, bottled water is sold in different types of SKUs – 1L bottles, 2L bottles, 500 ml bottles, 250 ml bottles, pouches, and barrels of 15-20 liters. Among these, 1L bottles have acquired the largest market share of 42% (2018), followed by 500 ml bottles and 250 ml bottles. Current market trends in the industry show that the popularity of flavoured drinking water (with artificial essences) has increased and there is a shift towards institutional sales as a result of direct partnerships with airlines, restaurants, and movie theatres.

Bisleri International is an Indian bottled water brand formed by Jayantilal Chauhan and Felice Bisleri. Originally an Italian brand, Bisleri was acquired by Parle in 1969. Bisleri started off by selling packaged drinking water and soon diversified into other products like mango juice and spicy cola. Powered by 122 plants, 4500 distributors and 5000 distribution trucks across India, it stands true to its promise of providing safe and pure drinking water. Bisleri gained a lot of popularity recently with its ‘Bisleri Camel Meme Fiesta’ – Har Paani Ki Bottle Bisleri Nahin memes.

authors avatars

Aquafina is an American brand producing purified bottled water products, owned by PepsiCo. Introduced in 1994, Aquafina manufactures flavored as well as unflavored water. In the United States of America, it is the largest seller of bottled water by retail sales. The flavored variations include Aquafina FlavorSplash, Aquafina Sparkling, Aquafina Alive, and Aquafina Plus. It poses a lot of threat to other brands like Bisleri and Dasani in terms of competition.

Historically, Indians as a people preferred earthen pots and then moved to RO water purifiers, not keen on buying bottled water. Water contamination and typhoid outbreaks during the mid-1970s combined with liberalisation at the given time opened India up to bottled-water companies. Bisleri (part of the Parle Group) and Aquafina (part of PepsiCo) are private manufacturers who are presently market leaders in the Indian context since the Government failed in delivering clean drinking water. In 2023, the industry is estimated to reach ₹ 403 billion by leveraging a CAGR of 20.75% (pre-COVID-19 estimates). A steep rise in the disposable incomes of consumers in India coupled with the increased awareness of consuming clean drinking water has led to not just the need for companies that manufacture and supply packaged drinking water, but has also ensured a robust growth for them. Such an extensive distribution network demands research to understand how the companies thrive using professional marketing strategies.

STP Matrix of Bisleri and Aquafina

Bisleri caters to all people that seek hygienic drinking water. It has segmented the market into premium, popular and bulk. Primary focus lies on the masses and bulk category. According to geography, it sells in all major cities of India with a high degree of penetration. It caters to health conscious and travellers (psychographic) and families and corporates (demographic).

Aquafina focuses on the niche market of Grade A cities that have a higher population of middle and upper classes. It not only serves all those who seek hygienic drinking water, but also those who are specific about minerals and the ‘taste’ of their water. A 7-step purification process called HYDRO-7.

It has unique bottling sizes to cater to an individual’s needs which are priced differently.

All age groups, families, travellers, and corporates are targeted with the multiple SKUs offered. Generally, the middle and upper classes tend to afford a bottle of Bisleri water.

It bases itself on the needs of a younger generation of men and women that are always on the go. It has durable product formats of a can that caters to those that are environmentally conscious and those that look for durability.

“Purity” is the image Bisleri has always portrayed. It ensures a high quality product (based on rigorous testing) with an extremely low chance of tampering to ensure safety. It urges consumers to “play safe”.

Aquafina focuses more on the mineral content of the packaged drinking water and hence emphasizes on the ‘taste’ along with the safety and purity of water. It has positioned itself as a ‘cost effective and refreshing beverage”.

Aquafina and Bisleri have been rival companies in the industry for decades now. Both companies offer their products – primarily bottled water – in various sizes. Bisleri and Aquafina believe that the key to success lies in the ‘availability of the product’ and a compromise on the distribution channel is not acceptable. They both have formed very strong distribution strategies in order to gain market share. Aquafina and Bisleri faced a lot of criticism for the employment of plastic product packaging. To reduce the negative impact on the environment, Aquafina debuted a new bottle – Ecofina – that uses 50% less plastic and Bisleri launched a campaign named ‘bottles for change’ wherein plastic waste is converted into usable products.

Despite having similarities, the companies actually function very differently. Aquafina has greater worldwide presence in comparison to Bisleri. While Bisleri operates majorly in India and neighboring countries, Aquafina products are sold in the USA, Europe and Asia. Aquafina owns majority market share in the Indian markets, second to none other than Bisleri. It has been giving tough competition to Bisleri and other brands like Kinley for quite some time. As per the BCG Matrix (in the Indian markets), Aquafina is on the question mark quadrant – high growth rate and low market share. Bisleri lies on the star quadrant – high growth rate and high market share. The customer segments Bisleri caters to are need based customers and organizational customers. Aquafina caters to personal customers – generally the niche. While Bisleri has managed to supply products to the B and C grade towns in the country, Aquafina hasn’t been able to penetrate well. Bisleri follows a locational pricing strategy while Aquafina sticks to a competitive pricing model.

Suggestions and Learning Outcomes

Taking into account the current state where the world battles its way through a pandemic, the need for clean drinking water is greater than ever. Both companies have the opportunity to boost manufacturing levels since the coronavirus has not been detected in drinking water supplies. Bisleri, which has remained the market leader, has started a consumer delivery system (where water can be ordered from the website itself) in order to cater to the demand spikes during the lockdown period. As established previously, Aquafina faces penetration issues yet again as it lags behind with no special steps taken to cater to its consumer base. Trying times like these demand for initiatives taken to help the masses, and Bisleri manages to do that and more, making it clear why it has remained the market leader in the last decade.

  • India Water Review – Bottled Water Industry in India
  • Press Information Bureau – Packaged Drinking Water Industry in India
  • Business Standard – Bisleri Plans to Expand Operations, Set up New Units
  • PepsiCo India – Aquafina
  • Nestle Waters – Aquafina
  • Kent Grand Plus 8 litres

Cite this paper

Packaged Water. (2021, Apr 27). Retrieved from https://samploon.com/packaged-water/

place order image

  • Select a writer from a large pool of experts
  • Share your assignment's requirements
  • Get a 100% unique and top-quality paper

Check related topics

packaged drinking water essay

Hi! Peter is on the line!

Don't settle for a cookie-cutter essay. Receive a tailored piece that meets your specific needs and requirements.

Essay on Water for Students and Children

500+ words essay on water.

Water is one of the most important substances for life on earth to function. It is equally important for humans as well as animals. Water does not merely help us survive, but it is significant for our day to day functioning. It has numerous uses when we come to think about it. Majority of our earth is covered with water itself, but, not all of it is safe for consumption. Therefore, it makes it essential for us to utilize this transparent substance chemical wisely. Moreover, if we look at the shortage of water happening in our country, it makes it all the more important to conserve it immediately.

essay on water

Uses of Water

As we have already said that water has numerous uses, we will see where it is used. This part will most importantly help us realize the importance of water . It will make humans aware of what absence of water in the following areas can do to human life. As India’s main occupation is agriculture, water is exhaustively used here. Irrigation and cattle rearing requires a lot of water. Thus, a lot of farmers’ livelihood depends on it.

Further, industries use water for various purposes. It comes in handy when cooling, manufacturing and transporting several goods. For instance, thermal power plants consume quite a substantial amount of water for their running.

Furthermore, the domestic use of water cannot be left behind. In the day to day life of the common man, water plays a vital role. That is to say, from drinking water to washing utensils, we need water every step of the way.

After that, plants need water to survive and make food. It is one of the main elements which help them grow. Hence, water is extremely important for humans, animals, and plants to survive .

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Do not Waste Water

While water is quite essential and yet so scarce, however, people fail to realize this fact. They waste water with little or no care for the results of this activity. There are various ways in which one can avoid wasting water . To begin with, all households must get their leaking taps checked. They should fix them immediately as every drop is precious.

Similarly, we must choose buckets instead of showers for bathing. This is a very debatable topic and it needs to be settled. Showers waste a lot of water, so people must prefer buckets. This particular habit is quite commonly found in most of the households. People do not turn off their taps while brushing their teeth and washing utensils. Always remember to keep the tap off when doing so.

In addition, encourage rainwater harvesting system in all homes. This can help conserve water like never before.

In short, water is essential for the survival of mankind. But, it is, unfortunately, being waster rapidly. Every citizen and government must come together to tackle this issue. Governments must ensure all areas get water equally. On the other hand, citizens must keep in mind to use it wisely and not waste it unnecessarily.

FAQs on Water

Q.1 State the importance of water.

A.1 Water is of the utmost importance for human and animal life. It gives us water to drink. It also comes in great use for farmers and industries. Even common man requires water for various purposes like drinking, cleaning, bathing and more.

Q.2 List the ways to avoid wastage of water.

A.2 Everyone must avoid wasting water. We can do so by fixing our leaking taps, avoiding showers for bathing, and turning off taps when brushing. Furthermore, we can adopt rainwater harvesting system to conserve water.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

tutor

  • Travelling Essay
  • Picnic Essay
  • Our Country Essay
  • My Parents Essay
  • Essay on Favourite Personality
  • Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
  • Essay on Knowledge is Power
  • Essay on Gurpurab
  • Essay on My Favourite Season
  • Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Google Play

IMAGES

  1. ≫ Packaged Water Free Essay Sample on Samploon.com

    packaged drinking water essay

  2. Health Benefits of Packaged Drinking Water

    packaged drinking water essay

  3. The Essence of Hydration: Unlocking the Health Benefits of Water Free

    packaged drinking water essay

  4. Availability of Drinking Water

    packaged drinking water essay

  5. Clean Safe Drinking Water Essay Example

    packaged drinking water essay

  6. Packaged Drinking Water: What Things to Consider?

    packaged drinking water essay

VIDEO

  1. Royal Stag Packaged Drinking Water Boombox

  2. Complete Mineral Water / Packaged Drinking Water Projects

  3. Essay on water in Punjabi ||Punjabi Essay on Water || ਪਾਣੀ ਤੇ ਲੇਖ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ

  4. Packaged Drinking water 💧💧💧 Plant✴️💓💓💓

  5. AQUA NATURAL PACKAGED DRINKING WATER

  6. Water Tank Finishing and Packaging

COMMENTS

  1. Customer's Perception and Preference towards Packaged Drinking Water

    The specific objectives of this study was to (i) assess customer's perception of their choice of packaged water, (ii) assess customer's level of awareness of packaged drinking water trade standards, and (iii) compare and contrast customers habits, perception level, and purpose of packaged drinking water between market and residence place. 1.1.

  2. Packaged Drinking Water Product

    The product category I have chosen is Packaged Drinking Water. At one point of time water was a basic necessity and was free of cost but now marketing strategies have become so advanced that people are ready to buy this basic commodity for a price .It is believed that in the next current fiscal year 2012-2013 this industry will become 10,000crore worth.

  3. Packaged water: optimizing local processes for sustainable water

    The late nineties marked the commencement of packaged drinking water regulation in India. Solely handled by the Bureau of Indian Standards in collaboration with the Health Ministry, the rules on its safety were drafted into a Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. ... Scientific Research and Essay. 2009, 4 (9): 921-928. Google Scholar

  4. PDF An Empirical Study to Assess the Influence of Packaged Drinking Water

    (India Water Portal). Packaged drinking water companies have started expanding their tie ups with airlines, theatres, malls, hotels, restaurants to increase their sales. The demand for the packaged drinking water is increasing day by day and is expected to show its growth rate of 20.75% [CAGR], (Business Wire, 2019) with Rs.403.06 illion in the ...

  5. Packaged Drinking Water Case Study

    Packaged Drinking Water Case Study. 828 Words4 Pages. 1.1: Introduction: About thirty years back there was no existence of packaged drinking water but today packaged drinking water is the essential part of the market because of its stable growth and shelf life both globally and locally. Packaged Drinking water is any bottled water which is ...

  6. PDF Packaged Drinking Water

    Packaged Drinking Water As per Gazette Notification dated 15 November 2015, issued by the ministry of health and family welfare, FSS Amended Regulation 2016 (as per revised version of IS 14543: 2016) has come into force from 1 March 2017. For the latest Consumer Voice report on packaged drinking water, since the samples of water were drawn from

  7. PDF Packaging of Drinking Water W

    The water flows from the filler bowl into the bottles via ventra flow valves. These valves use an airlock method for accurate filling. The variation is no more than 5mm. When liquid reaches the end of the valve sleeve, air cannot escape. Pressure is created at the top of the bottle, and no more liquid can enter.

  8. Standards and Consumers

    How this movement, a continuous one, has played a significant part in development and up gradation of standards for packaged drinking water is one of most important findings of the study. The study also tries to explore various facets of standardization — its definition, the process of standardization, major categories and its benefits.

  9. Essay On India's Drinking Water Industry

    Essay On India's Drinking Water Industry. Secondary Research: In secondary research, we will study about the packaged drinking water industry in India, who are the major players what are the basic and common reasons for which people drink packaged drinking water what are the alternatives. Water all over, not a CLEAN drop to drink!

  10. A study on quality characteristics of packaged drinking water sold in

    Water has always been an important and life-sustaining drink to all living beings. It is rather difficult to imagine wellbeing of life without access to safe drinking water. Water sources without pollution are becoming increasingly scarce today and the drinking water crisis's looming, especially in urban centres. Adequate supply of fresh and safe drinking water is a basic need for all human ...

  11. Marketing and Distribution of Packaged Drinking Water Industry

    Page 6. fMarketing & Distribution of Packaged Drinking Water. Through policy analysis that considers the putative benefits of convenience, purity, and taste of bottled water; the real costs of energy to manufacture and transport bottles; the added costs. to collect and dispose of used bottles; and the uncertain and inadequate regulations to ...

  12. PROJECT PROFILE ON PACKAGED DRINKING WATER Product

    The growing demand for bottled water speaks volumes of the scarcity of clean drinking water and the quality of tap water. It has become an icon of healthy lifestyle emerging in India. Selling - 'safety' - i.e. pure and simple water has now become one of the fastest growing industries in India despite the harsh truth it is build on the ...

  13. PDF Comparative Analysis of Selected Packaged Drinking Water Brands ...

    The packaged drinking water industry in India is driven by the occasions of unpredicted water lack and wellbeing awareness that has begun to create in the individuals. The market of filtered water is ruled by specific players from recent years since it is focused. The fundamental showcasing rivalry among the players is that of bundling

  14. (PDF) A Review on Packaged Drinking Water, Quality ...

    Conclusion: Packaged drinking water for commercial consumption in Nigeria has good ph ysical . ... Research and Essay. 2009;4(9):921-928. 34. Semerjian LA. Quality assessment of .

  15. Packaged Water

    India's packaged bottle water industry has been valued at Rs.60 billion in 2013, and this market is expected to reach Rs.160 billion in 2018. There are around 150 domestic Indian Bottled Water Brands in the market today. When did packaged water become such an essential item, a commodity without which we find difficult to move around?

  16. Marketing of Packaged Drinking Water

    Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies (e. g. lakes, rivers, oceans and groundwater). Water pollution affects plants and organisms living in these bodies of water; and, in almost. Essay on Marketing of Packaged Drinking Water Water is the fountain of all life. Even a toddler knows that it is a commodity with utmost Importance.

  17. Project Report on Packaged Drinking Water Plant

    Better Essays. 1558 Words. 7 Pages. Open Document. PROJECT REPORT. OBJECT. SET UP OF PACKAGED DRINKING WATER/MINERAL WATER MANUFACTURING PLANT IN NIAMEY, NIGER. INTRODUCTION. Water is life and it is the major component of human body, however there is always acute shortage of pure, hygienic and safe drinking water in major parts of the world.

  18. Packaged Drinking Water

    Even though most of the time bottled water is no healthier than tap water, it can cost up to 10,000 times more, as much as $2.50 per liter or $10 per gallon in some areas. This is almost the price of a gallon of gas. Bottled water is consumed by half of all Americans. One in six Americans drink only bottled water.

  19. Packaged water: optimizing local processes for sustainable water

    The late nineties marked the commencement of packaged drinking water regulation in India. Solely handled by the Bureau of Indian Standards in collaboration with the Health Ministry, the rules on its safety were drafted into a Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. ... Scientific Research and Essay. 2009; 4 (9):921-928. [Google Scholar] Consumer ...

  20. ≫ Packaged Water Free Essay Sample on Samploon.com

    The packaged drinking water industry serves the basic need of a person to consume purified drinking water. This industry has significantly grown owing to water shortages around the world and the misuse of natural resources. ... Clean Drinking Water essays 19 papers. Winter essays 7 papers. Leadership essays 213 papers. Costco essays 23 papers ...

  21. Essay on Water for Students and Children

    A.1 Water is of the utmost importance for human and animal life. It gives us water to drink. It also comes in great use for farmers and industries. Even common man requires water for various purposes like drinking, cleaning, bathing and more. Q.2 List the ways to avoid wastage of water.

  22. PDF Packaged Drinking Water Analysis by Classification Technique of Data Mining

    P. Tamilarasi, D. Akila, "Ground Water Data Analysis Using Data Mining: A Literature Review", International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)ISSN: 2277-3878,Volume-7, Issue-5C, February 2019. Swapnali Mahadik, Dr.Anup Girdhar, "Water Quality Parameters Estimation Through Data Driven Model", Cyber Times International ...

  23. PDF Product Manual for Packaged Drinking Water (Other Than Packaged Natural

    Title : Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) No. of Amendments : 4 2. Introduction and Salient changes in this version of the manual : Please refer Annex -A 3. Product Specific Guidelines: a) Guidelines for processing Applications for grant of licence and change in scope of licence : Please refer Annex -B