current research in psychology and behavioral science predatory

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 08 February 2021

Hundreds of ‘predatory’ journals indexed on leading scholarly database

• Dalmeet Singh Chawla

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

The widely used academic database Scopus hosts papers from more than 300 potentially ‘predatory’ journals that have questionable publishing practices, an analysis has found 1 . Together, these titles contributed more than 160,000 articles over three years — almost 3% of the studies indexed on Scopus during the period. Their presence on Scopus and other popular research databases raises concerns that poor-quality studies could mislead scientists and pollute the scientific literature.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0

Macháček, V. & Srholec, M. Scientometrics https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4 (2021).

Article   Google Scholar  

Severin, A. & Low, N. Int. J. Public Health 64 , 1123–1124 (2019).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Manca, A. et al. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 98 , 1051–1056 (2017).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

Predatory journals: evolution keeps them under the radar

The undercover academic keeping tabs on predatory publishing

Payouts push professors towards predatory journals

A guide to the Nature Index

Nature Index 13 MAR 24

Decoding chromatin states by proteomic profiling of nucleosome readers

Article 06 MAR 24

‘All of Us’ genetics chart stirs unease over controversial depiction of race

News 23 FEB 24

Will the Gates Foundation’s preprint-centric policy help open access?

News 04 APR 24

The corpse of an exploded star and more — March’s best science images

News 28 MAR 24

How papers with doctored images can affect scientific reviews

POSTDOCTORAL Fellow -- DEPARTMENT OF Surgery – BIDMC, Harvard Medical School

The Division of Urologic Surgery in the Department of Surgery at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School invites applicatio...

Boston, Massachusetts (US)

Director of Research

Applications are invited for the post of Director of Research at Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.

Chennai, Tamil Nadu (IN)

Cancer Institute (W.I.A)

Postdoctoral Fellow in Human Immunology (wet lab)

Join Atomic Lab in Boston as a postdoc in human immunology for universal flu vaccine project. Expertise in cytometry, cell sorting, scRNAseq.

Boston University Atomic Lab

Research Associate - Neuroscience and Respiratory Physiology

Houston, Texas (US)

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)

Histology Laboratory Manager

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Predatory Behavioral Pathways: Illuminating Predatory Footprints to Monitor and Manage Risk

• Published: 13 January 2022
• Volume 37 , pages 212–221, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Elizabeth A. Duemig   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-2906 1  

298 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Predatory behavior is a complex forensic concern that requires an interdisciplinary response. Predatory behavior does not occur as a single act. It is a course of conduct that can begin in trivial or even unnoticed actions and develop into pursuit-type behaviors. Predators can escalate their attention toward their focus of interest in a manner that becomes dangerous and overt. The myriad of ways that the behavior occurs is subjective for both the pursuer and the pursued. Predation is relevant to the situation, the players involved, and the actions taken. This complexity in the behavioral expressions and context behind them make it difficult to create a distinctive predator typology. Hence, what is meant by a predator does not have a simple definition and can be a challenge to address within the criminal justice and behavioral psychology realms. Those who serve in professional roles from each of these fields use applied approaches from their disciplines to monitor and manage risk and dangerousness. A possible means of bridging this effort could be to increase our understanding of predatory behavioral pathways (PBPs). Examining and tracing behaviors within crime statistics could bring to light the predatory footprint of past and developing behaviors. The context and subjectivity of these paths of conduct could provide insight as to the offender process and the driving forces of the predation. As PBPs come more into view, an enhanced and coordinated effort could be applied by the forensic professionals tasked with monitoring and managing risk and dangerousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Script Analysis and the SCRIPT Acronym

Recidivism and the Sexually Violent Predator Population

Sexually violent predators: an overview, availability of data and material.

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Ackley CN, Mack SM, Beyer K, Erdberg P (2011) Investigative and forensic interviewing: a personality-focused approach. CRC Press Boca Raton FL

Google Scholar  

Addington v Texas (1979) 441. US 418

Barefoot v Estelle (1983) 463. US 880

Barkan SE, Bryjak GJ (2014) Myths and realities of crime and justice: what every American should know. Burlington MA: Jones & Bartl Learn

Bartol CR, Bartol AM (2013) Criminal & behavioral profiling. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA

Berstein M (2020) Stalker terrifies Portland neighborhoods. Oregon/Oregon Live. Retrieved from.  https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2020/12/stalker-terrifies-portland-neighborhoods.html

Berragan L (1998) Nursing practice draws upon several different ways of knowing. J Clin Nurs 7(3):209–217

Article   Google Scholar  

Brodsky SL (2009) Principles and practice of trial consultation. Guildford Publications, New York, NY

Carper BA (1978) Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Adv Nurs Sci 1(1):13–23

Duemig EA (2020) Forensic insight on predatory behavior: fantasy and relational paraphilic attachments in stalker processing. Walden Dissertation Doc Stud

Guyton MR, Jackson R (2016) Violence risk assessment. In Jackson, R. & Roesch, R. (eds). Learn Foren Assessment: Res Practice 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge

Hare RD (2003) Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R), 2nd ed. Tech Manual North Tonawanda NY: Multi-Health Syst

Hartman A (1990) Many ways of knowing. Soc Work 3(1):3

Heilbrun K, Grisso T, Goldstien AM (2009) Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

Hickey EW (2006) Sex crimes and paraphilia. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Hickey EW (2016) Serial murderers and their victims, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA

Hickey EW (2017) Doctoral residency conducted at the meeting of Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, Sex crimes and criminal paraphilia. Foren Psychol Resid Intens

Hodgkinson GP, Langan-Fox J, Sadler-Smith E (2008) Intuition: a fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural science. Br J Psychol 99(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1348/00712607X216666

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Lushbaugh CA, Weston (2016) Criminal investigation: basic perspectives 10th ed PB New York, NY: Pearson

Miller LS, Whitehead JT (2015) Report writing for criminal justice professionals, 5th edn. Elsevier, New York, NY

National Center for Victims of Crime (2007) The model stalking code revisited: responding to the new realities of stalking. Author, Washington, DC

Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge, London

Spitzberg BH, Cupach WR (2007) The state of the art of stalking: taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggress Violent Beh 12:64–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001

Tjaden P (2013) Stalking in America. In Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Herman, S. (Eds.) (2013). Vict Cri 4th ed Los Angeles, CA: Sage Public

Turvey BE (2012) Criminal profiling: an introduction to behavioral evidence analysis, 4th edn. Elsevier, New York, NY

U. S. Department of Justice (1999) Cyberstalking: a new challenge for law enforcement and industry, attorney general’s report to the vice-president. Author, Washington, DC

Wallace WA (2015) The effect of confirmation bias on criminal investigative decision making. Walden Dissertation Doc Stud 407

Welsh I, Lyons CM (2001) Evidence-based care and the case for intuition and tacit knowledge in clinical assessment and decision making in mental health nursing practice: an empirical contribution to the debate. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 8(4):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00386.x

Zweig J, Yahner J (2013) Providing services to victims of crime. In Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Herman, S. (Eds.) (2013). Vict Cri 4th ed Los Angeles CA: Sage Public

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express sincere appreciation for the time, consultation, and professional support of Dr. Wayne Wallace and Dr. Eric Hickey.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Cincinnati, Batavia, OH, USA

Elizabeth A. Duemig

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Duemig .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval.

No ethical approval is required.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Duemig, E.A. Predatory Behavioral Pathways: Illuminating Predatory Footprints to Monitor and Manage Risk. J Police Crim Psych 37 , 212–221 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09493-4

Download citation

Accepted : 17 November 2021

Published : 13 January 2022

Issue Date : March 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09493-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Behavior pathway
• Offender processing
• Risk management
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Current Research in Psychology and Behavioral Science (CRPBS)

Corpus publishers aim's to publish the work of scholars in a manner that exemplifies the highest standards in research integrity.

• ISSN: 2833-0986

Submit Article at:

Current Research in Psychology & Behavioral science Research Journal is a peer reviewed medical journal, a source for the latest findings in cognitive, behavioral, developmental, health and educational psychology. The journal publishes intervention strategies that use psychological science to improve the lives of people around the world. CRPBS seeks to enhance the flow of ideas, not only within the field of Psychology and Psychotherapy and creating bridges through the publications from Psychologists. CRPBS welcome authors to submit Research, Review, Mini-Review, Opinion, and Short Communication that explore of the Psychology, Social sciences, Education, and Home science aspects of human behavior. We also encourage studies of human behavior in original situation and combination of basic psychological principles and theories with applied work and organizational phenomena.

Submit manuscript at   https://www.corpuspublishers.com/submit-manuscript   or send as an e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office a t   [email protected]

Classification:.

• About Journal
• Editorial Board
• Review Members
• Article In Press
• Current Issue
• Classification
• Submit Manuscript
• Publication Charges

Archive List

• Ingress Full text
• Upcoming Issue
• Author Guidelines
• Submit Your Paper
• Open Access
• Propose Special Issue
• Recommend to Librarian
• Editor Registrations
• Indexing & Archiving
• Order Reprints

Recent Articles

• Influence of Grazing on the Gestation Phase of Sows and the Birth of the Piglet
• The Apparent Age of Lithophaga
• Consistent Race Performance in Racing Pigeons: A Case Report Confirming a Favorable Genetic Profile
• Polymer Additives Promoted Texturization on Monocrystalline Silicon for Solar Cell
• A 5-fold Interpenetrated and Porous Dia-net Metal-Organic Framework Constrcuted from Long and Linear Phenyl-carboxylate Linkers
• Zero-Trust Architecture (ZTA): Designing an AI-Powered Cloud Security Framework for LLMs’ Black Box Problems

Est ut minim postea necessitatibus.

Browse Corpus publishers

• Publication Ethics
• Special Issue Proposals
• Pertinax praesent sit ad (108)
• Case wisi facilisis eu (90)
• Advance Research in Sciences
• Corpus Online Journal of Civil Engineering
• Research and Development in Polymer Science
• Tinnitus Case Reports: an Hearing aid Journal
• Corpus Journal of Arboriculture and Horticulture
• Corpus International Journal of Oceanography and Aquatic Research
• Advance Research in Dermatology & Cosmetics
• Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Research
• Global Journal of Pharmaceuticals
• International Journal of Forensic Science and Criminal Investigation

Contact Us @

© 2020 Corpus Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Scientific Reports

Predator personality and prey behavioural predictability jointly determine foraging performance

Chia-chen chang.

1 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, 117543, Singapore

Huey Yee Teo

Y. norma-rashid.

2 Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Associated Data

Predator-prey interactions play important roles in ecological communities. Personality, consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour, of predators, prey or both are known to influence inter-specific interactions. An individual may also behave differently under the same situation and the level of such variability may differ between individuals. Such intra-individual variability (IIV) or predictability may be a trait on which selection can also act. A few studies have revealed the joint effect of personality types of both predators and prey on predator foraging performance. However, how personality type and IIV of both predators and prey jointly influence predator foraging performance remains untested empirically. Here, we addressed this using a specialized spider-eating jumping spider, Portia labiata (Salticidae), as the predator, and a jumping spider, Cosmophasis umbratica , as the prey. We examined personality types and IIVs of both P. labiata and C. umbratica and used their inter- and intra-individual behavioural variation as predictors of foraging performance (i.e., number of attempts to capture prey). Personality type and predictability had a joint effect on predator foraging performance. Aggressive predators performed better in capturing unpredictable (high IIV) prey than predictable (low IIV) prey, while docile predators demonstrated better performance when encountering predictable prey. This study highlights the importance of the joint effect of both predator and prey personality types and IIVs on predator-prey interactions.

Predator-prey interactions are an important component in ecological communities. Whilst predators develop certain behavioural traits to increase foraging success, prey also evolve anti-predation traits to increase their survivorship, such as improved detection and improved ability to avoid detection by prey/predators 1 , 2 . These traits are highly diverse in a population, but how the trait variation is maintained remains a prominent question in ecology and evolutionary biology. The predator-prey interactions are dynamic and bidirectional, however, little attention has been given to understanding how behavioural traits of both predators and prey simultaneously determine their interactions and their fitness consequences in the ecological communities.

Individuals show consistent differences in behaviour across time and/or across contexts 3 . For example, some individuals are consistently more aggressive, bolder, more explorative, and/or more active than others. Such personality differences are evident in numerous animal taxa, ranging from invertebrates to vertebrates 4 , 5 . The personality types of individuals are known to influence their fitness, thus selection can act on them. Personalities of either predators or prey are also known to influence predator-prey interactions 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 . For example, as predators, bolder brown trouts ( Salmo trutta ) have better foraging success than shy ones 10 , and more aggressive spiders of various species tend to attack prey faster compared to less aggressive individuals 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 . As prey, bolder rainbow trouts ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) have lower survivorship 6 . Although numerous studies have shown that personalities affect fitness, it is still unclear how personality types are maintained over evolution. One explanation is that different personality types may be maintained through life history trade-offs 15 , 16 . For example, bold individuals may be more likely to find food and have higher growth rate than shy individuals, but due to increased exposure to predators, they may also undergo higher mortality 17 . Another hypothesis suggests that the fitness of a given personality type is context dependent 18 . That is, a certain personality type may be favoured in a particular situation but not in another. For example, bold mud crabs ( Panopeus herbstii ) are preferred by predatory blue crabs ( Callinectes sapidus ) while shy mud crabs are preferred by predatory toadfish ( Opsanus tau ) 18 . In a complex community structure with multiple types of predators, prey with different personality types can therefore co-exist in the population.

Apart from personality (i.e., inter-individual behavioural variation), an individual may behave differently in the same situation and the level of such variability is known to differ between individuals 19 , 20 , 21 . For example, in Ward’s damselfish ( Pomacentrus wardi ), intra-individual variability in latency to leave shelter varies across individuals 22 . Such within-individual temporal variability in behaviour has been defined as intra-individual variability (IIV) or predictability 22 , 23 . Whilst an individual’s personality type represents the average behaviour of an individual, such as being more aggressive, IIV is to show the variation in behaviour of the same individual, such as being more variable 19 . Bell et al . 24 estimated that about 63% of behavioural variation results from IIV, and theoretical studies have suggested that it may be a trait on which selection can also act 19 , 25 , but empirical studies on the effects of IIV on animal fitness are scarce. Intra-individual variability may be a form of adaptive variation in behaviour related to predator-prey interactions either to facilitate trial-and-error learning or to reduce vulnerability to predators 21 . For example, unpredictable (i.e., high IIV) prey have higher survivorship because predators are less likely to learn their predator-avoidance patterns 22 , 26 , 27 . Unpredictable behaviour is predicted to be most efficient at reducing vulnerability to stalking predators that will observe and memorize predictable patterns of a prey’s movement 28 , 29 , 30 . However, it is still unclear how individuals with different IIV levels may have been maintained within a population.

The predator-prey interactions are bi-directional, so the fitness of prey and predators should be dependent on their counterpart’s personality types. Indeed a handful of studies have revealed the joint effects of personality types of both predators and prey on predator foraging performance and prey survivorship 31 , 32 , 33 . The “locomotor crossover hypothesis” predicts that active/bold predators tend to capture inactive/shy prey, whilst inactive/shy predators tend to capture active/bold prey 34 . This has been supported by empirical studies on a system consisting of black turban snails ( Chlorostoma funebralis ) and their predator sea stars ( Pisaster ochraceus ) as well as in another system composed of crickets ( Acheta domesticus ) and their predator jumping spiders ( Phidippus clarus ) 31 , 32 . However, inconsistent with the locomotor crossover hypothesis, bolder crickets ( Gryllus integer ) have higher mortality when encountering bolder black widow spiders ( Latrodectus hesperus ) 33 . Furthermore, how the personality types and IIV may jointly influence predator-prey interactions still remains largely unexplored. Personality types are known to be related to the cognitive styles, such as sampling style, impulsivity, and learning 35 . For example, personality types are related to how likely an animal is to spend time observing the environment, with less observation time by bolder and more aggressive individuals 35 , 36 . When prey encounter more docile predators that spend time on observing prey movement during foraging, being more unpredictable may be a better strategy to defend against predators compared to more predictable prey. In the case of more aggressive predators that do not spend time on inspecting prey behaviour, the high IIV of prey may no longer be advantageous over those with low IIV. Therefore, predator personality types may influence the fitness of prey with different IIV levels, yet this hypothesis has not been tested.

The prior studies that have considered the joint effects of behavioural variation of both predators and prey on foraging performance have only examined the personality effects on their interactions, but no study has simultaneously considered the influence of personality types and IIVs on predator-prey interactions. In this study we addressed this issue using Portia labiata, a specialized spider-eating jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae), as the predator, and Cosmophasis umbratica, an ornate jumping spider, as the prey 37 . Portia labiata is well known for its high cognitive ability and complicated foraging strategies 38 , 39 , 40 . All the species of Portia that have been studied so far are well-known to use trial-and-error tactics to develop a suitable hunting strategy using feedback signals from the prey 41 . The individual difference in terms of the trial-and-error effectiveness may determine not only how likely they could capture prey, but also the predator mortality as a result of the payoff of making errors. Therefore, P. labiata is an excellent model to address the research question, which requires predators to observe and respond to the prey’s anti-predation patterns.

In this study, we addressed the question of how personality types and IIVs of both predators and prey might jointly influence predator foraging performance in terms of number of attempts required to succeed in capturing prey. We first measured aggressiveness and the IIV for the predator species P. labiata as well as boldness and the IIV for the prey species C. umbratica as inter- and intra-individual behavioural variation for further analysis. After the establishment of personality types and IIVs, we then investigated whether the interaction of personality types and IIVs of both predators and prey could predict predator foraging performance. We predicted that when we take both personality types and IIVs of both predators and prey into consideration, both personality types and IIVs of both predators and prey would jointly predict predator foraging performance. Specifically, we predicted that more docile P. labiata that are more likely to observe the prey’s anti-predation patterns would have better foraging performance when encountering more predictable (low IIV) C. umbratica, On the other hand, more aggressive P. labiata would show similar foraging performance for both predictable and unpredictable C. umbratica as more aggressive P. labiata may not spend time to observe the anti-predation patterns of C. umbratica .

Portia labiata showed consistent inter-individual differences in aggressiveness (ICC = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.52], p  < 0.001, n  = 34), and C. umbratica demonstrated consistent inter-individual differences in boldness (ICC = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.41], p  < 0.001, n  = 58). Individuals exhibited high variation in both average behaviour score as personality ( Fig. 1a,c ) and intra-individual score as IIV ( Fig. 1b,d ). Neither body mass nor carapace width was correlated with average personality and IIV ( Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 ). Portia labiata aggressiveness was not correlated with the IIV ( Supplementary Table S1 ), whilst C. umbratica boldness was positively correlated with the IIV ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Distribution of individual predator Portia labiata (n  = 34) aggressiveness score ( a ) and IIV (intra-individual variability) ( b ), and prey Cosmophasis umbratica (n  = 58) boldness score ( c ) and IIV ( d ) across five trials.

In 39 out of 62 (62.9%) predation trials, predators successfully capture prey within an hour. For those that successfully captured prey, P. labiata spent an average of 19.57± 2.60 (range: 2.13–59.50) minutes and made an average of 2.39 ± 0.25 (range: 1–6) attempts to capture prey. For behavioural variation, when we were only concerned about either personality types or IIVs in the model, none of behavioural variations from either party or the interaction between them could predict foraging performance ( Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ). If we were concerned about both personality types and IIVs of both parties, only the interaction between predator aggressiveness and prey IIV, but neither predator aggressiveness nor prey IIV alone, predicted foraging performance ( Table 1 , Fig. 2 ). When a more docile predator encountered a more predictable prey, the predator made fewer attempts to succeed ( Fig. 2 ), whereas when a more aggressive predator encountered a more unpredictable prey, the predator made fewer attempts to succeed ( Fig. 2 ). The number of trials and the body size ratio between prey and predators did not significantly influence the predator’s foraging performance in all three types of models ( Table 1 , Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ).

The size of the circle represents the number of attempts where the bigger circles indicate more attempts made by a predator to succeed in capturing a prey. The range of number of attempts to succeed is from one to six.

* Body size ratio = carapace width of prey/carapace width of predator. Bold indicates the significant value. The full model was step-wise simplified by dropping the least significant interaction term.

In this study, we found that personality types and intra-individual variabilities (IIVs) of both predators and prey jointly influenced P. labiata ’s foraging performance (i.e., number of attempts to capture prey) during predator-prey interactions. Specifically, more aggressive predators required fewer attempts to capture more unpredictable (i.e., higher IIV) prey, while more docile predators required fewer attempts to capture more predictable (i.e., lower IIV) prey. However, the foraging performance was not predicted by the personality types or IIVs of either predator or prey alone. This is the first study to show that predator personality type interacts with prey behavioural predictability to influence the predator’s foraging performance.

The way a predator stalks its prey could also be linked to the benefit of being an unpredictable prey. Bednekoff and Lima 29 , 30 suggested that unpredictable prey can reduce their vulnerability to stalking predators, like our study predator P. labiata, because their behaviours are too unpredictable for the predators to obtain accurate information such as the prey’s movement patterns. However, the assumption that predators should spend time observing the patterns of anti-predator behaviour must be fulfilled. In this case, personality type plays an important role in determining whether being an unpredictable prey is a good strategy to evade predators. In general, more docile predators are more likely to spend time and energy on observing their prey to acquire enough information 35 , to improve their ability to capture more predictable prey over more unpredictable prey. Hence, this allows more unpredictable prey to increase their chance of escaping from predation. This may explain why, in our study, more docile P. labiata captured lower IIV C. umbratica more easily than they captured higher IIV C. umbratica . In contrast, when predators are more aggressive, more likely to be impulsive, and unlikely to spend much time observing the prey movement patterns 35 , 36 , unpredictability would not benefit the prey. Nevertheless, further study is needed to test these hypotheses.

In addition, our data also indicate that more aggressive predators were more likely to capture more unpredictable prey than predictable prey. This result is not congruent with our prediction that more aggressive P. labiata would show similar foraging performance when they encounter either predictable or unpredictable C. umbratica . One possibility is that the IIV may reflect the cognitive ability of evaluating environments 22 . For example, the IIV of hermit crabs is constrained by their cognitive ability because individuals that are unable to evaluate risk properly are more likely to behave inconsistently 19 , 22 . Therefore, in our system, in the presence of more aggressive P. labiata , higher IIV C. umbratica individuals with lower cognitive ability may not assess and perform their anti-predation strategy efficiently, resulting in more aggressive P. labiata capturing them more easily than lower IIV individuals with higher cognitive ability. This suggests that the context-dependent trade-off may be an important mechanism to maintain differences between personality types and predictability within the population.

Previous studies have suggested that in nature personality types could be maintained in the population via context-dependent mechanisms 31 , 32 , 33 . Our study clearly demonstrates that context-dependent mechanisms in predator-prey interactions may also play an important role in maintaining the natural variation of IIV when high or low IIV is advantageous in one context but not the other. The different compositions of predator personality may influence prey behavioural phenotype distribution in a population 18 , 42 . In a population with a high density of more aggressive predators, being a more predictable prey may lead to higher fitness. In contrast, when the population has a high density of more docile predators, being more unpredictable may lead to higher fitness. In nature, multiple predators with different hunting strategies may coexist, suggesting the possibility of maintaining the differences in prey IIV levels. Moreover, our findings can serve as a basis for understanding the potential evolutionary trajectory of IIV via frequency-dependent selection. When the population consists of a higher proportion of more aggressive predators than docile predators, more predictable prey will be selected because more aggressive predators are better at capturing more unpredictable prey. Therefore, the frequency of more predictable prey will increase, subsequently followed by an increase in more docile predators as more docile predators who capture predictable prey better than more aggressive predators do. As a result, the increase in more docile predators will cause the decline in the frequency of more predictable prey. Hence more unpredictable prey will increase in the population, which causes selection favouring more aggressive predators than more docile predators. Such frequency-dependent selection could make the two personality types of predators and predictability of prey co-exist in the population. Future work should focus on the theoretical and empirical study of the evolution of IIV.

In conclusion, this study emphasizes the significance of behavioural predictability and how it can interact with personality type to influence predator-prey interactions. Specifically, this study highlights that: (1) the behavioural predictability of prey plays an important role in predator-prey interactions; and (2) the behavioural variation (i.e., personality type and IIV) of both predators and prey jointly influences foraging performance. Our findings suggest that the interactions between predator and prey behavioural variation could eliminate single trait optima, so no personality type or predictability is always favoured. The joint effect of predator personality type and prey predictability may serve as an important mechanism for the maintenance of behavioural variation in a population. The study of behavioural IIV is still in its infancy and we strongly suggest that more work should be carried out to understand how predictability of individual behaviour can affect ecological communities.

Material and Methods

Study subjects and maintenance.

Female adult Portia labiata (n  = 34) and Cosmophasis umbratica (n  = 58) were collected in the Cameron Highlands (N 4.4641, E 101.3869) in Malaysia, and Ulu Pandan Park Connector (N 1.3126, E 103.7797) in Singapore, respectively, both in 2015. Spiders were kept individually in plastic cylindrical cages (diameter: 6.5 cm; height: 8.5 cm) and housed in a controlled laboratory (80–90% relative humidity; 12:12 h light: dark cycle; lights on at 0800; at approximately 25 ± 1 °C). All spiders were fed 6–7 laboratory-cultured fruit flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ) twice a week and had ad libitum access to water. All spiders were photographed using a digital SLR camera (NIKON D800) with a micro lens (MICRO NIKKOR 105 mm 1:2.8 G ED) and flash (SIGMA EM-140DG). The photographs were then analysed with ImageJ 1.49 to measure the carapace width of the spiders to the nearest 0.01 mm. The spider body mass was measured using an electronic balance to the nearest 0.01 mg.

Aggressiveness assay of the predator Portia labiata

To quantify the aggressiveness of P. labiata , the reaction to its own mirror image was used. When encountering conspecifics or mirror images, jumping spiders often engage in complex escalating contests 43 . The mirror images were used to minimize confounding factors associated with the difference in a conspecific’s size or mass 44 , 45 . This method was also used to quantify the aggressiveness in the other salticid species Eris militaris 46 . Before the test, we placed the housing container (diameter: 6.5 cm; height: 8.5 cm), with the cap removed, in front of a mirror (14 cm × 6.5 cm). Each individual was allowed a maximum of 20 minutes to interact with its own mirror image. The distance between the spider with agonistic displays and the mirror when it stopped approaching was recorded. As the maximal distance was 5 cm, the distance between the spider and mirror was subtracted from 5, so that individuals with higher value are more aggressive. To ensure that their reactions were repeatable over time, this assay was repeated five times with a one-day interval between trials for each individual.

Boldness assay of the prey Cosmophasis umbratica

To quantify the boldness of C. umbratica , the reaction of the individual towards an artificial predator model was recorded. A model predator mimic was constructed using blue-tack, with the basic body shape of a spider (cephalothorax and abdomen; length = 1 cm) 46 , 47 . Legs were made from small pieces of paper clips and inserted on each side. The model was attached to a 15 cm long stick. About 10 minutes before the boldness assay, we first destroyed the nest of each prey spider in its housing container so that it would not be in its nest or would not go into its nest when the trial was underway. The boldness assay was carried out in the prey spider housing container instead of a novel environment so that an extra factor of novelty was not added. After 10 minutes of acclimatization, we started the assay by pushing the model towards the spider from 5 cm away at a constant speed of about 1 cm/sec to simulate the approach of a predator. The initial reaction was recorded and scores were given based on the following criteria: (1) run away from the model (least bold), (2) turn and walk away, (3) move backwards or sideways, (4) touch, jump or climb onto the model (most bold). Moving backwards or sideways was treated as a bolder reaction than turning and walking away because spending a longer time visually assessing the novel model is considered bolder behaviour 46 . Each individual was tested five times with one-day intervals in between to check for repeatability.

Predation trials

To test how personality types and intra-individual variabilities (IIVs) of both predators and prey would jointly affect a predator’s foraging performance, we performed predation trials using one individual predator and one individual prey after the aggressiveness assay of predators and the boldness assay of prey. To standardize the hunger level of predators, all predators were starved for one week before the tests. To standardize the body size ratio between a predator and a prey item, we tried to pair the prey size to about half the predator size. Prior to the trial, we put one individual predator and one individual prey into separate 5-ml syringes. A cork was used to cap the opening of the syringe and the syringes were inserted into the arena, which consisted of a plastic petri-dish (diameter: 9 cm; height: 1.5 cm) with two gaps at the circumference to release the predator and prey through the syringes. The two individuals were given 10 minutes inside the syringe for acclimation before the corks were removed. Full-spectrum glasses, which allowed UV light to pass through, were placed on top of the petri-dish. The trial began upon the release of the predator and the prey through the syringes into the petri-dish. The two gaps were then closed with a white paper flap.

The trial ended when the predator captured the prey or after one hour if the prey survived. We recorded the number of attempts to capture the prey and if the predator successfully captured the prey. The number of attempts required to succeed was used to indicate a predator’s foraging performance as a higher number of attempts indicates lower foraging performance. Between trials, the petri-dishes and syringes were cleaned with 75% ethanol to remove any chemical cues left behind by the spiders. A total of 34 predator P. labiata were used and each was tested twice (total trials: 68), but they were never tested with the same prey individual more than once. Due to the small sample size of prey C. umbratica , we reused prey if they survived in the previous predation trials (i.e., out of 58 prey C. umbratica , 45 were tested only once, eight were tested twice, and one was tested three times). All interactions were recorded with a digital video camera (JVC GZ-MG50AG). All predation trials were conducted in a dark room with full spectrum lights (i.e., 300–700 nm) from fluorescent tubes (Hitachi BL/B, 20 W) suspended 1.5 m above the experimental apparatus. Spectral illumination including the UV range was used because UV vision is present in both prey C. umbratica and predator P. labiata and also to simulate natural conditions in the wild 48 , 49 , 50 .

Statistical analysis

Since two predators lost one of their legs before the predation trials, which impeded their movements, four trials involving these two predators and four prey C. umbratica were excluded from the data analyses. We also excluded two trials from the data analyses since in these two trials predator size was five times larger than the prey size, which was much larger than the predator/prey size ratio of the rest of trials where predator size was about 1.25–2 times larger than the prey size. Therefore, a total of 62 trials were included in the final dataset, of which, 39 resulted in predators successfully capturing the prey, and thus were used in the data analysis. In 23 trials, predators did not manage to capture their prey within an hour. We considered these trials as a failure and excluded them from the data analysis.

We used a linear mixed effect model (LMM) to quantify the individual variation of predator aggressiveness and prey boldness with log transformation. Carapace width and trial numbers were coded as fixed effects and spider identity was coded as a random effect. The adjusted repeatability was calculated as between-ID variance divided by the sum of between-ID variance and residual variance 51 . To examine the significant individual differences, likelihood ratio tests were used to compare between a full model and one model without a random effect. The personality type was calculated as the mean of the five scores from the repeated trials in the aggressiveness assay of P. labiata and the boldness assay of C. umbratica for further analysis. The IIV was calculated using the method from Stamps et al . 22 . The residuals for each individual for each behavioural trial were obtained from mixed effect models with ID as a random intercept and trial number as a random slope, and then the residual individual standard deviation (riSD) was calculated 22 . A pair-wise Spearman’s rank correlation test was performed to examine the correlation between personality type (mean), IIV (riSD), carapace width and body mass.

Generalized linear mixed effect models (GLMM) with a Poisson error structure and Laplace approximation were used to evaluate the effect of behavioural variations (personality types and IIVs) of both predators and prey, on the number of attempts to succeed 52 , using lme4 package 53 . Behavioural variations of predators and prey (i.e., predator aggressiveness, predator IIV, prey boldness, and prey IIV), trial number (1, 2) and body size ratio (carapace width of prey/carapace width of predator) were coded as main fixed effects and the two way interactions between the behavioural variation of predators and prey were also introduced in the full models. Predator ID was coded as a random effect as all predators were tested twice (number of trials). The fixed effects were mean centred for GLMMs to converge. Three models with different behavioural variations as fixed effects were run separately. First, we only considered the personality types of predators and prey, and the two-way interaction between predator and prey personality types. Second, we only considered the IIVs of predators and prey, and the two-way interaction between predators and prey IIVs. Third, we considered both personality types and IIVs of predators and prey, and all possible two-way interactions between predators and prey. No over-dispersion was found in any models. Homoscedasticity and normality of residuals were checked. All models were run in R 3.2.4 54 and the R code was provided in the supplementary materials .

Ethical note

The experiments comply with the current legal requirements of Singapore in which the research was conducted, and with all National University of Singapore guidelines (OSHM/PI/13/FOS-289). Although no spiders are restricted by animal protection laws in Singapore, we obtained a National Parks Board permit (NP/RP10-055) for collection. We hand collected a minimal number of spiders for the experiments and kept them in the laboratory under conditions similar to their natural environmental, as described above. The research was based on behavioural observations and all of the experiments with spiders were non-invasive.

Data accessibility . Data will be deposited in the Dryad repository at the point of publication.

Additional Information

How to cite this article : Chang, C.-c. et al . Predator personality and prey behavioural predictability jointly determine foraging performance. Sci. Rep. 7 , 40734; doi: 10.1038/srep40734 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments.

We thank Yixin Li, Christina Painting, Yong-Chao Su and Boon Hui Wong for their critical comments on the manuscripts, and Poh Moi Goh for providing fruit flies, Erick Yusuf Kencana for assisting in the collection of Portia labiata , and Samantha S. E. Wee, Tan Kwung Teng, Lee Jia Yi, and Yang Jia Qi for their assistance in the collection of Cosmophasis umbratica . We value the positive feedback from two referees and also thank them for their insightful and constructive comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier 1 grant to D.L. (R-154-000-591-112).

Author Contributions D.L., C.C. and H.Y.T. designed the study; H.Y.T., C.C., and N.Y.R. performed the experiments; C.C., D.L. and H.Y.T. analysed the data; all authors drafted the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

• Stankowich T. & Blumstein D. T. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment . P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Bio . 272 , 2627–2634 (2005). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stevens M. & Merilaita S. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives . Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 364 , 423–427 (2009). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sih A., Bell A. M., Johnson J. C. & Ziemba R. E. Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview . Q. Rev. Biol. 79 , 241–277 (2004). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kralj-Fiser S. & Schuett W. Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim. Behav. 91 , 41–52 (2014). [ Google Scholar ]
• Stamps J. & Groothuis T. G. The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives . Biol. Rev . 85 , 301–325 (2010). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Biro P. A., Abrahams M. V., Post J. R. & Parkinson E. A. Predators select against high growth rates and risk-taking behaviour in domestic trout populations . Proc. R. Soc. B 271 , 2233–2237 (2004). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bell A. & Sih A. Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ) . Ecol. Lett. 10 , 828–834 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dingemanse N. J. et al. Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback . J. Anim. Ecol. 76 , 1128–1138 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith B. R. & Blumstein D. T. Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies ( Poecilia reticulata ) . Behav. Ecol. 21 , 919–926 (2010). [ Google Scholar ]
• Sundström L. F., Petersson E., Höjesjö J., Johnsson J. I. & Järvi T. Hatchery selection promotes boldness in newly hatched brown trout ( Salmo trutta ): implications for dominance . Behav. Ecol. 15 , 192–198 (2004). [ Google Scholar ]
• Hedrick A. V. & Riechert S. E. Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior . Oecologia 80 , 533–539 (1989). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pruitt J., Riechert S. & Jones T. Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider , Anelosimus studiosus. Anim. Behav. 76 , 871–879 (2008). [ Google Scholar ]
• Kralj-Fiser S. et al. Mate quality, not aggressive spillover, explains sexual cannibalism in a size-dimorphic spider . Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66 , 145–151 (2012). [ Google Scholar ]
• Sweeney K. et al. Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome . Ethology 119 , 436–447 (2013). [ Google Scholar ]
• Stamps J. A. Growth-mortality tradeoffs and ‘personality traits’ in animals . Ecol. Lett. 10 , 355–363 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wolf M., van Doorn G. S., Leimar O. & Weissing F. J. Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities . Nature 447 , 581–584, doi: 10.1038/nature05835 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mangel M. & Stamps J. Trade-offs between growth and mortality and the maintenance of individual variation in growth . Evol. Ecol. Res. 3 , 583–593 (2001). [ Google Scholar ]
• Belgrad B. A. & Griffen B. D. Predator-prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode . Proc. R. Soc. B . 283 , 20160408. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Biro P. A. & Adriaenssens B. Predictability as a personality trait: consistent differences in intraindividual behavioral variation . Am. Nat. 182 , 621–629 (2013). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pruitt J., DiRienzo N., Kralj-Fiser S., Johnson J. & Sih A. Individual- and condition-dependent effects on habitat choice and choosiness . Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65 , 1987–1995 (2011). [ Google Scholar ]
• Westneat D. F., Wright J. & Dingemanse N. J. The biology hidden inside residual within‐individual phenotypic variation . Biol. Rev. 90 , 729–743 (2015). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stamps J. A., Briffa M. & Biro P. A. Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV) . Anim. Behav. 83 , 1325–1334 (2012). [ Google Scholar ]
• Japyassu H. F. & Malange J. Plasticity, stereotypy, intra-individual variability and personality: Handle with care . Behav. Process. 109 , 40–47 (2014). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bell A. M., Hankison S. J. & Laskowski K. L. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis . Anim. Behav0 77 , 771–783 (2009). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Okuyama T. Optimal foraging behavior with an explicit consideration of within-individual behavioral variation: an example of predation . Evol. Ecol. 29 , 599–607 (2015). [ Google Scholar ]
• Briffa M. Plastic proteans: reduced predictability in the face of predation risk in hermit crabs . Biol. Lett . 9 , 20130592 (2013). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones K. A., Jackson A. L. & Ruxton G. D. Prey jitters; protean behaviour in grouped prey . Behav. Ecol. 22 , 831–836 (2011). [ Google Scholar ]
• Brembs B. Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates . Proc. R. Soc. B 278 , 930–939 (2011). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bednekoff P. A. & Lima S. L. Why are scanning patterns so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti‐predator vigilance . J. Avian Biol. 33 , 143–149 (2002). [ Google Scholar ]
• Bednekoff P. A. & Lima S. L. Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance . Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 , 284–287 (1998). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pruitt J. N., Stachowicz J. J. & Sih A. Behavioral types of predator and prey jointly determine prey survival: potential implications for the maintenance of within-species behavioral variation . Am. Nat. 179 , 217–227 (2012). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sweeney K. et al. Predator and prey activity levels jointly influence the outcome of long-term foraging bouts . Behav. Ecol. 24 , 1205–1210 (2013). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• DiRienzo N., Pruitt J. N. & Hedrick A. V. The combined behavioural tendencies of predator and prey mediate the outcome of their interaction . Anim. Behav. 86 , 317–322 (2013). [ Google Scholar ]
• Huey R. B. & Pianka E. R. Ecological consequences of foraging mode . Ecology , 991–999 (1981). [ Google Scholar ]
• Sih A. & Del Giudice M. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective . Philos. T. R. Soc. B 367 , 2762–2772 (2012). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Griffin A. S., Guillette L. M. & Healy S. D. Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field . Trends Ecol. Evol. 30 , 207–214 (2015). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bulbert M. W., O’Hanlon J. C., Zappettini S., Zhang S. & Li D. Sexually selected UV signals in the tropical ornate jumping spider, Cosmophasis umbratica may incur costs from predation . Ecol. Evol . 5 , 914–920 (2015). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jackson R. R. & Cross F. R. Spider cognition . Adv. Insect Physiol . 41 , 115–174 (2011). [ Google Scholar ]
• Harland D. P. & Jackson R. R. A knife in the back: use of prey-specific attack tactics by araneophagic jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) . J. Zool. 269 , 285–290 (2006). [ Google Scholar ]
• Jackson R. R., Pollard S. D., Li D. & Fijn N. Interpopulation variation in the risk-related decisions of Portia labiata , an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), during predatory sequences with spitting spiders . Anim. Cogn. 5 , 215–223 (2002). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jackson R. R. & Wilcox R. S. Spider flexibly chooses aggressive mimicry signals for different prey by trial and error . Behaviour 127 , 21–36 (1993). [ Google Scholar ]
• Royauté R. & Pruitt J. N. Varying predator personalities generates contrasting prey communities in an agroecosystem . Ecology 96 , 2902–2911 (2015). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Elias D. O., Kasumovic M. M., Punzalan D., Andrade M. C. B. & Mason A. C. Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders . Anim. Behav. 76 , 901–910 (2008). [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cross F. R., Jackson R. R., Pollard S. D. & Walker M. W. Cross-modality effects during male-male interactions of jumping spiders . Behav. Process. 75 , 290–296 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cross F. R. & Jackson R. R. How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted . Behav. Process. 80 , 162–168 (2009). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Royaute R., Buddle C. M. & Vincent C. Interpopulation variations in behavioral syndromes of a jumping spider from insecticide-treated and insecticide-free orchards . Ethology 120 , 127–139 (2014). [ Google Scholar ]
• Stankowich T. When predators become prey: flight decisions in jumping spiders . Behav Ecol 20 , 318–327 (2009). [ Google Scholar ]
• Hu Z. et al. Spectral transmission of the principal-eye corneas of jumping spiders: implications for ultraviolet vision . J. Exp. Biol. 215 , 2853–2859 (2012). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li D. & Lim M. L. Ultraviolet cues affect the foraging behaviour of jumping spiders . Anim. Behav. 70 , 771–776 (2005). [ Google Scholar ]
• Lim M. L., Land M. F. & Li D. Sex-specific UV and fluorescence signals in jumping spiders . Science 315 , 481–481 (2007). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nakagawa S. & Schielzeth H. Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists . Biol. Rev . 85 , 935–956 (2010). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bolker B. M. et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution . Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 , 127–135 (2009). [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. & Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 . J. Stat. Softw. 67 , 1–48 (2015). [ Google Scholar ]
• R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).

• Paper Archives
• Journal Indexing
• Research Conference
• Add Journal

Searching By

• Search More ...

Description

Last modified: 2022-09-29 15:33:23

• No Archives

Advertisement

Anxiety, fear, panic: An approach to assessing the defensive behavior system across the predatory imminence continuum

Affiliations.

• 1 Department Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. [email protected].
• 2 Staglin Center for Brain and Behavioral Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA. [email protected].
• 3 Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. [email protected].
• 4 Department Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
• 5 Staglin Center for Brain and Behavioral Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
• 6 Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
• PMID: 35112315
• PMCID: PMC9343476
• DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00509-x

In order to effectively thwart predation, antipredator defensive behaviors must be matched to the current spatio-temporal relationship to the predator. We have proposed a model where different defensive responses are organized along a predatory imminence continuum (PIC). The PIC is a behavior system organized as a sequence of innately programmed behavioral modes, each representing a different interaction with the predator or threat. Ranging from low threat to predator contact, the PIC categorizes defense modes as pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to states of anxiety, fear, and panic, respectively. This experiment examined if the same significant stressor caused overexpression of all defensive responses along the PIC, including anxiety-like behavior, freezing, and panic-like responses. Female and male mice were exposed to acute stress that consisted of a series of ten pseudorandomly presented unsignaled footshocks (or no shocks). Mice were subsequently tested on a battery of tasks to assess stress effects on pre-encounter (anxiety-like), post-encounter (fear), and circa-strike (panic-like) behaviors. Results revealed that following stress, mice exhibited increased anxiety-like behavior shown through reduced average velocity within a modified open field. Furthermore, stressed mice showed increased fear following a single footshock in a new context as well as an increase in reactivity to white noise in the original stress context, with stressed mice exhibiting a more robust circa-strike-like response than controls. Therefore, significant stress exposure influenced the defensive states of anxiety, fear, and panic across the predatory imminence continuum. This research could therefore reveal how such responses become maladaptive following traumatic stress in humans.

Keywords: Associative learning; Behavior systems; Defensive behavior; Fear conditioning; Nonassociative; Predatory imminence continuum.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Publication types

• Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
• Behavior, Animal / physiology
• Fear* / physiology
• Predatory Behavior* / physiology

Grants and funding

• R01 MH115678/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
• T32 DA024635/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States

• Special Issues
• Conferences
• American Journal of Educational Research
• International Journal of Celiac Disease
• American Journal of Medical Case Reports
• American Journal of Public Health Research
• World Journal of Agricultural Research
• Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory
• Social Science
• Medicine & Healthcare
• Earth & Environmental
• Agriculture & Food Sciences
• Business, Management & Economics
• Biomedical & Life Science
• Mathematics & Physics
• Engineering & Technology
• Materials Science & Metallurgy
• Journal of Sociology and Anthropology
• Journal of Linguistics and Literature
• Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Research
• Journal of Computer Networks
• Applied Mathematics and Physics
• American Journal of Sensor Technology
• Quick Submission
• Apply for Editorial Position
• Propose a special issue
• Launch a new journal
• Conference Application Form
• Manuscript Tracking System
• SciEP Reviewer Platform
• Authors & Referees
• Advertisers
• Open Access

Latest Articles

• Journal Services
• Sign up for e-alerts
• Recommend to library
• Top Articles
• Special issues
• Special issue guidelines
• Propose special isssue

Current Research in Behavioral Sciences

Subject Area and Category

• Behavioral Neuroscience
• Psychology (miscellaneous)

Elsevier BV

Publication type

Information.

How to publish in this journal

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Leave a comment

Name * Required

Email (will not be published) * Required

* Required Cancel

The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.

Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2022. Data Source: Scopus®

Cookie settings

Cookie Policy

Legal Notice

Privacy Policy

• Proceedings

Information

Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

• Processing Charges

http://www.psybehav.org

Time to first decision

First decision to acceptance

Acceptance to publication

• Open Access

Submission Guidelines

We're committed to making your publishing experience as easy and efficient as we can. Our submission guidelines will offer you the essential resources and guidance for a successful process of submitting and publishing your article.

Editorial Board

Psychology and Behavioral Sciences benefits from a distinguished editorial board, who actively engage in the peer review process, providing direction for ongoing development to ensure the journal remains dynamic in the field.

Reviewer Guidelines

We encourage you to explore our reviewer guidelines, where you'll discover valuable insights and practical tips to enhance your role as a peer reviewer, promoting a constructive and efficient peer review experience.

Special issues are collections of articles centered around a subject of special interest, which are organized and led by subject experts who take on the role of the guest editor. Authors should be aware that articles included in special issues are subject to the same criteria of quality, originality, and significance as regular articles.

Advances in Cognitive Modeling using Statistical-Relational Machine Learning & Uncertainty Theory

Lead Guest Editor: Karriem Perry

Submission deadline: 30 September 2024

• Propose a Special Issue

By proposing a special issue, you have the opportunity to undertake the role of lead guest editor and curate a collection of articles focused on a subject of particular interest. This allows you to showcase and explore the chosen topic in-depth.

Benefits of the Lead Guest Editor

Serving as a lead guest editor can bring a variety of career benefits, such as the following:

Thank you to all the peer reviewers who generously donated their time and expertise to Psychology and Behavioral Sciences publications. Your contributions are invaluable in maintaining the high-quality standards of our publications.

• Dr. Barbara Nuetzel Department of Psychology, German University of Prevention and Health Management, Saarbrückken, Germany
• Dr. Xin Deng Basic Neuroscience Division, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, United States

How to be an effective Peer Reviewer?

Our comprehensive guide on becoming a peer reviewer provides you with all the essential information to embark on this role successfully. It covers the following key aspects:

Why should you consider becoming a Peer Reviewer?

Engaging in the peer review process not only significantly contributes to the scientific community but also brings considerable benefits for your own research and career development. At SciencePG, we always appreciate and welcome professionals who are interested in becoming part of our dedicated reviewer team.

Psychology and Behavioral Sciences maintains an Editorial Board of practicing researchers from around the world, to ensure manuscripts are handled by editors who are experts in the field of study.

• Join the Editorial Board

Would you like to make a valuable contribution to the scientific community by joining the editorial board of this journal? Or perhaps you're a current editorial board member who wishes to recommend a colleague for this role? Your interest and suggestions are highly appreciated and warmly welcomed.

Benefits for Editorial Board Members

Joining the Editorial Board is an opportunity to be recognized as an expert in your field and to contribute to the peer review process of cutting-edge research. By acting as editor, you will have the opportunity to shape the future of research in your field and be part of a community of like-minded researchers.

As an editorial board member, You will Benefit from:

AcademicEvents is an academic event planning platform initiated by Science Publishing Group (SciencePG). AcademicEvents aims to fostering collaboration and facilitating the dissemination of innovative ideas. Whether you're an esteemed professor, a dedicated researcher, or a curious student, our platform provides comprehensive support for hosting academic events in diverse disciplines.

Webinars are typically executed as online events, following the initial planning.

You have the flexibility to organize workshops either in-person or virtually, based on your preference.

Conferences

Conferences are traditionally conducted face-to-face, with in-person attendance being the norm.

AcademicEvents strives to provide you with a seamless experience. By organizing academic events under our service, you will connect with like-minded individuals and expand your professional network. Besides, our user-friendly interface allows you stay informed about the latest conferences in your field of interest.

We also provide publishing services for conference content (past or upcoming conference). The ideas generated during the conference can be developed into articles or abstracts for publication.

Organize Your Event

Find the customized support to host a successful event

Publishing Service

Free you from the burden of managing conference outputs

Pilot Research for the Assessment of Neuroanatomical Correlates in Relation to Brain Talents Identified Through the Six Seconds Emotional Intelligence Assessment

Authors: Iannoccari Giuseppe Alfredo, ... Cariani Claudia Tania

Pages: 17-31 Published Online: 2 April 2024

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20241302.12

Social Communication Traits in Typical Hispanic Infants and Toddlers for Use in Autism Screening

Authors: Nicolás Linares-Orama, ... Valeria Torres

Pages: 12-16 Published Online: 20 March 2024

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20241302.11

Effects of the Specialized Preoperative Waiting Room on Preoperative Anxiety in Pediatric Patients

Authors: Yanqiu Tang, ... Zhengbo Liang

Pages: 5-11 Published Online: 13 March 2024

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20241301.12

Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Positive Psychological Adaptation in Migrant Children

Authors: Yang Zhou, ... Jiquan Zhang

Pages: 1-4 Published Online: 23 January 2024

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20241301.11

Assessing the Prevalence and Perceptions of Khat Use Among Secondary School Students in Hodiedah, Yemen: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study

Authors: Khaled Alselwi, ... Aiman Alwan Azazi

Pages: 99-104 Published Online: 8 December 2023

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231206.12

When Perceived Official Terror Drives People out of Politics: A Systemic Analysis of Political Alienation in the Context of Authoritarian Democracy

Authors: Achille Vicky Dzuetso Mouafo, ... Gustave Adolphe Messanga

Pages: 88-98 Published Online: 17 November 2023

DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231206.11

Science Publishing Group (SciencePG) is an Open Access publisher, with more than 300 online, peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Learn More About SciencePG

• Special Issues
• AcademicEvents
• ScholarProfiles
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Conference Organizers
• For Librarians
• Article Processing Charges
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Peer Review at SciencePG
• Ethical Guidelines

Important Link

• Manuscript Submission
• Become a Reviewer