assignment vs novation canada

Canada: Novation Or Assignment, That Is The Question

In the context of asset acquisition, and assuming that the target's contracts are assets being transferred to the purchaser, the transfer of contracts typically requires the parties to the transaction to go through either the novation process or assignment of the contract from the seller to the purchaser.

Novation is a trilateral agreement between the original parties to a contract and the purchaser seeking to replace the seller to the contract. Novation transfers not only the rights and benefits under the original contract to the purchaser, but also the obligations, thus releasing the seller from all obligations under the original contract. All parties to the original agreement need to consent to the new agreement.

Novation has been referred to as the "Hail Mary" defence for parties seeking to avoid contractual liability, however, the standard of establishing novation is quite high. The Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC ) has established a three-factor test for establishing novation. The party asserting novation must prove:

the purchaser assumes complete liability;
the creditor (one of the existing party to the original contract) must accept the purchaser as principal debtor and not merely as an agent or guarantor of the seller; and
the creditor (one of the existing party to the original contract) must accept the new contract in full satisfaction of, and as substitution for, the old contract. [1]

The SCC also stated that in the absence of an express new agreement, a court should not find novation unless the circumstances are especially compelling. [2]

Assignment and assumption, on the other hand, transfer the contractual rights and benefits held by the assignor/seller to the assignee/purchaser, but not the assignor/seller's obligations under the contract. The burden under the original contract remains with the assignor/seller, thus the assignor/seller can be held liable if the assignee/purchaser fails to perform under the contract. The assignor/seller can protect itself from potential liability by obtaining an indemnity from the assignee/purchaser.

Unlike novation, an assignment does not extinguish the original agreement and does not create a new and separate agreement. The original contract remains in force. Also, unlike novation, depending on the terms of the subject contract, an assignment of the contract may not require the consent of all parties to the agreement. Depending on the terms of the agreement, the assignor/seller usually only needs to provide a notice to the non-assigning party.

If the contract is silent as to its assignability, then the courts have held that the contract is generally assignable, except for personal services contract, where consent must be obtained. [3] The SCC has held that personal services contracts are contracts based on confidences, skills or special personal characteristics such as to implicitly limit the agreement to the original parties, [4] and the determination of whether a contract is personal services contract is often made by the courts.

Assignment and assumption may be more convenient for the seller than novation given that the seller may not need to ask for consent from a third party to assign its interest in an agreement to the purchaser, however, the seller needs to be aware of the potential liabilities if the purchaser fails to perform under the assigned contract. Although novation can protect the seller from such future liabilities, it is a more cumbersome process for all parties involved, and may not be feasible if the third party refuses to provide consent. Therefore, it is essential for parties to assess their relationship with the third party before proceeding with novation.

[1] National Trust Co. v Mead et al. [1990] 2 SCR 410 (SCC).

[3] Canadian Encyclopedic Digest, 4 th ed , ( Thomson Reuters Canada, 2016) at Title 35, Contracts, XIII 1(d)(i).

[4] Rodaro v. Royal Bank of Canada , 2002 CanLII 41834 (ONCA).

About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world's preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.

Law around the world nortonrosefulbright.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Login to Mondaq.com

Password Passwords are Case Sensitive

Forgot your password?

Why Register with Mondaq

Free, unlimited access to more than half a million articles (one-article limit removed) from the diverse perspectives of 5,000 leading law, accountancy and advisory firms

Articles tailored to your interests and optional alerts about important changes

Receive priority invitations to relevant webinars and events

You’ll only need to do it once, and readership information is just for authors and is never sold to third parties.

Your Organisation

We need this to enable us to match you with other users from the same organisation. It is also part of the information that we share to our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

What is a Deed of Novation?
What is a Deed of Assignment?

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

Nature of the Contract: The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

Family Limited Partnership (FLP) for International Estate Planning

Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) offer a strategic approach for families

How to Use Life Insurance for International Estate Planning: A Comprehensive Guide

Life insurance stands as an important tool for estate planning,

Choosing the Right Vehicle for International Estate Planning: A Guide to International Estate Planning Tools

When planning how to manage and pass on your estate,

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

1759 Avenue Road Toronto - M5M-3Y8
Contact Us By Dialing 416-250-6400
Working Hours Mon - Sat 8:00 to 18:00

The Assignment of Commercial Contracts in Legal Practice

Contracts are a prime example of intangible property. Parties to commercial contracts, like other property owners, frequently want to transfer their property to a third party. The transfer of a contract refers to the assignment of some or all of a party’s rights or the delegation of some or all of a party’s performance, or both, to a non-party to the agreement.

Some common instances in which a contracting party in a commercial context may desire to assign contractual rights, performance responsibilities, or both are as follows:

In an asset sale, a corporation sells parts or all of its company.
A contractor who subcontracts its work under certain projects.
A business conglomerate that is going through an internal corporate reorganization.
The borrower who offers its lender a security interest in its assets.
A manufacturer who sells its receivables to a third party.

In any of these cases, the non-transferring party may object to assignment or delegation for a variety of grounds, including:

The desire to choose the party with whom it does business.
Concern that a different obligor or obligee may jeopardize the non-transferring party’s capacity to benefit from the contractual deal

To decide whether the transferring party (also known as the transferor) can execute the proposed transfer without gaining the non-transferring party’s approval, the transferring party must turn to relevant legislation and the plain text of the contract. If consent is necessary and not obtained, the transferring party faces the following risks:

Violation of the contract.
Making an ineffective and invalid transfer.

The Definitions of Assignment and Delegation

Each party to a contract is an:

Obligee in terms of its contractual rights; and
Obligor in terms of its contractual performance responsibilities.

Contract “assignability” is a term frequently used by contracting parties and practitioners. While they may expressly address the assignment of a party’s rights under the contract in some contexts, they frequently use the term “assignment” to refer to both:

The delegation of duty to perform.
The assignment of rights to obtain performance.

However, assignment and delegation are two distinct legal concepts that must be treated individually due to the fact that they might have different outcomes.

What is an Assignment?

Assignment is the transfer of some or all of an obligee’s (assignor’s) rights to receive performance under a contract, generally but not always to a non-party (assignee). A contract benefit is a right (a chose in action) that, in theory, may be delegated by the benefiting party to a non-party. For clarity purposes, this informative piece will assume that the assignee is a non-party, although the rights and responsibilities of the parties addressed apply equally to an assignee who is also a party to the agreement. When these rights are assigned, the assignor no longer has any claim to the advantages of the given rights, which are completely passed to the assignee.

Technically, a contract’s burden cannot be assigned under the law (see National Trust Co. v. Mead [i] and Irving Oil Ltd. v. Canada [ii] ). Transferring performance responsibilities under a contract requires the approval of all parties, making such a transfer a novation.

In practice, parties frequently refer to “assigning a contract” or “allowing the assignment of a contract,” which is actually an inaccurate representation of their intentions. For example, the parties may plan for some or all of the following:

The contract’s rights or benefits may be assigned.
The contract’s burdens or performance duties may be transferred.
Rights and burdens may be transferred.

The Effects of Assignment

The assignor is no longer entitled to any benefits from the assigned rights, which have all been passed to the assignee; nonetheless, even if the assignor is stripped of its contractual rights, assignment does not decrease or remove the assignor’s duties to the non-assigning party. As previously stated, a contract’s burden may only be assigned to a third party with the approval of all parties. As a result, the assignor is still obligated to fulfill its contractual commitments. The non-assigning party retains the following:

Its entitlement to get performance from the assignor; and
Its remedies against the assignor in the event of non-performance.

The ordinary rule is that a party can only assign its benefits without the consent of the other party to the contract and will remain liable to the other party for its performance obligations (see National Trust Co. v. Mead [iii] and Rodaro v. Royal Bank [iv] ). If the assignor intends to transfer its obligations and both the non-transferring party and the potential assignee agree, the parties should enter into a novation agreement, which results in a new contract between the assignee and the old contract’s remaining (non-transferring) party. In practice, the assignee often undertakes the contract’s performance responsibilities as of the date of assignment, and the assignor gets an indemnity from the assignee in the event of a breach or failure to perform.

A clear, present, purpose to transfer the assigned rights without needing any additional action by the assignee is required for an assignment to be effective, which means that a promise to assign in the future is ineffective as an actual transfer. Otherwise, no special terminology is necessary to draft an effective assignment.

What is Delegation?

Delegation is the transfer of some or all of an obligor’s (delegating party’s) performance responsibilities (or conditions demanding performance) under a contract to a non-party (delegatee). To be effective, a delegation requires the delegatee to agree to take on the delegated performance; however, unless the non-delegating party has consented to a novation, the delegating party remains accountable for the delegated performance, whether or not it has also transferred its contractual rights.

This is distinct from an assignment of rights, in which the assignor relinquishes its contractual claims upon assignment. As a result, even if the delegating party can effectively delegate its actual performance to the delegatee (such that the delegatee’s actual performance discharges the delegating party’s duty), the delegating party cannot be relieved of its obligation to perform and liability for non-performance unless the non-delegating party agrees to a novation.

There is no precise wording necessary to create an effective delegation, just as there is not for the assignment of rights. When performance is effectively delegated, the delegatee assumes liability for the delegating party’s performance obligations (under an assumption agreement), even if the delegating party retains liability to the non-delegating party for the delegatee’s failure to adequately perform the delegated obligations in the absence of a novation. Under an assumed agreement, the delegating party may have recourse against the delegatee, which is frequently addressed through a contractual indemnity right.

If the delegating party wishes to entirely exclude itself from liability for non-performance, it must get the non-delegating party’s approval to the contract (novation). In the majority of novations, the delegating party, the delegatee, and the non-delegating party all agree on the following:

The delegatee replaces the delegating party as a party to the contract.
The delegating party is no longer liable for contract performance.
The delegatee is directly and solely liable for the delegating party’s contract fulfillment.

Types of Assignment – Legal (Statutory) Assignment vs. Equitable Assignment

Legal (Statutory) Assignment: An assignment that satisfies the provisions of the appropriate province or territory laws (for example, the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act [v] )
Equitable Assignment: An equitable assignment may be enforced even if it does not fulfill the statutory requirements for a legal assignment.

Requirements for a Legal (Statutory) Assignment

All of Canada’s common law provinces have enacted legislation allowing the transfer of contract rights. Notably, the legislation for Ontario is the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act .

These statutory assignments are enforceable if the parties comply with the following procedures:

The assignment is absolute.
The assignment is in writing, signed by the assignor
the non-assigning obligor is given express written notice.

A statutory assignment does not need consideration, and no precise words or form are necessary. They can be made as gifts and be valid.

Requirements for an Equitable Assignment

An assignment may be enforceable as an equitable assignment even if it does not fulfill the formality criteria of a statutory assignment. An equitable assignment does not necessitate the use of any specific terms or form. However, in order to comply with any provincial statutes of frauds regulations, the assignment must be in writing. The phrasing must clearly indicate that the assignee is to benefit from the rights being assigned. In contrast to a statutory assignment, consideration is required until there is a full transfer, such as a gift. It is not necessary to provide the non-assigning obligor with express written notification (except in the case of a transfer of land). However, notification is often given largely to assure that:

The obligor ceases to pay the assignor.
The assignee has priority over subsequent encumbrances.

Contractual Anti-Assignment & Anti-Delegation Clauses

Rather than relying on relatively uncertain legal rules, most commercial contract parties handle transferability issues in the written agreement. As a result, most commercial contracts include a negative covenant that restricts one or both parties’ rights to assign.

These clauses frequently include specific exceptions that allow one or more of the parties to assign and delegate rights and duties, often to designated non-parties such as affiliates and successors-in-interest to the transferring party’s business.

Courts frequently uphold provisions that prevent assignment because they favor the rights of parties to freely contract. However, subject to specific limitations, there is a broad assumption that contractual rights are assignable. As a result, the case law on anti-assignment provisions is a little erratic. Some courts have upheld anti-assignment clauses and declared the agreement unenforceable. Others have argued that an anti-assignment provision cannot preclude assignment.

Overall, contractual anti-assignment and anti-delegation provisions are commonly included in many types of business contracts. If not, transferability is determined by the contract’s subject matter and the nature of the rights and obligations to be transferred. It is important to stay knowledgeable the existence of such contractual terms when dealing with various commercial contracts…such as contracts for the sale of goods, personal service contracts, commercial real estate leases and various other types of contracts.

If you have any questions about your business’s contractual assignment or delegation needs, contact Cactus Law today to speak with a lawyer specializing in commercial law.

Disclaimer:

The information presented above is solely for general educational and informational purposes. It is not intended to be, and should not be taken as, legal advice. The information given above may not be applicable in all cases and may not even reflect the most recent authority after the date of its publication. As a result, please refer to all updated legislation, statutes, and amendments. Nothing in this article should be relied on or acted upon without the benefit of legal advice based on the specific facts and circumstances described, and nothing in this article should be interpreted otherwise.

About the Author:

Kanwar Gujral is entering his third year at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, Ontario. He has a dedicated interest in real estate, business, and corporate law.

[i] National Trust Co. v. Mead , 1990 CarswellSask 165 (S.C.C.).

[ii] Irving Oil Ltd. v. Canada , 1984 CarswellNat 137 (Fed. C.A.).

[iii] Supra note 1.

[iv] Rodaro v. Royal Bank , 2002 CarswellOnt 1047 (Ont. C.A.).

[v] Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. C.34.

Privacy Policy
Website Terms
Cookies Policy
Payment Terms
Why work with us

All Website Contents and Advertising Contents are The Exclusive Property of Cactus Law

How can we help?

13 March 2018
Commercial Real Estate

Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins

There’s often, understandably, a bit of uncertainty about whether (and how) a party to a contract can “assign” (transfer) its rights, or pass on its obligations, under that contract, to another person.

In law, the general rule is that only the original parties to the contract can discharge or fulfil the obligations and enforce the rights created under it and nobody else gets a look in. This is called “privity of contract”.

Essentially, novation and assignment are both mechanisms to get around this restriction. However, while the end result is the same, there are some important differences between these two mechanisms.

Under an assignment, one party (the assignor) keeps performing their obligations under the contract, but transfers some or all rights to a third party (the assignee). The parties to the contract remain the same so privity of contract is preserved.

Assignments can be legal or equitable. In order for an assignment to be a legal assignment, the assignment must be agreed in writing, signed by the assignor, and the other party to the contract must be given notice of the assignment. A legal assignment is usually preferable as this allows the assignee to enforce the rights in their own name directly.

If the assignment is an equitable assignment because it does not fit the criteria for a legal assignment (for example, the other party was not given notice of it), the assignee will need to get the assignor to enforce the assigned rights on its behalf.

Contracts often require the consent of the other party before any assignment can take place. Some contracts expressly prohibit assignment. However, even where there is such wording in the contract, there is nothing stopping you from asking the party to consent to the assignment anyway, though you should take care to record any agreement in writing.

The main point to remember is that you cannot assign obligations under a contract to another party – you can only assign your benefits or rights. Even if the assignee agrees that they will take on the obligations under the contract, it is still the assignor who remains responsible for performance of the obligations and liable if they are not. In practice, what often happens is that the assignee does take over the performance of the contractual obligations but simply agrees to indemnify the assignor for any failures in performance.

It is also important to note that some rights may not be legally capable of assignment.

Stephen James

View profile

Email Stephen

+44 118 960 4674

When you novate a contract, the original contract effectively ceases to exist and is replaced with a new contract. The new contract contains exactly the same rights and obligations as the original contract, except that it substitutes one of the original parties (the outgoing party) with a third party (the incoming party).

As you are creating a new contract, technically you need to provide fresh consideration. Usually a simple novation agreement between all the parties will be enough, but, if there is any doubt, the parties may choose to execute the novation as a deed instead, which dispenses with the need for consideration.

The novation agreement (or deed) will specify what happens to the liabilities under the original contract. In a typical novation, the outgoing party would be released from all liabilities and the incoming party would inherit these. However, this is up to the parties to decide; they could even decide that the outgoing party will remain liable for all of the liabilities under the original contract.

Novating the contract will release the outgoing party from any future obligations which may arise. This is a crucial difference between novation and assignment.

Although the novation agreement itself can be simple, the process of getting all the parties to the table to agree and execute might be more complex. The main issue for an outgoing party will be persuading the other original party to sign. The other original party often has concerns about service continuity and may want certain assurances or information about the incoming third party.

Equally, the other original party is not obliged to agree: they can refuse to novate and then sue for breach if the party trying to exit the contract fails to meet its contractual obligations. As they still have this other option, in any novation scenario, the outgoing party is probably in a weaker bargaining position, and the other original party may well use this to their advantage.

About this article

Subject Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins
Author Stephen James
Expertise Commercial Real Estate
Published 13 March 2018

Disclaimer This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

17 April 2024
Immigration

Shaping Britain’s Future: updates to Skilled Worker and Family visas

In December 2023, the UK government, under Home Secretary James Cleverly, announced a five-point plan aimed at reducing net migration, with significant revisions to visa regulations.

‘Injured feelings’- Vento Bands

Injuring someone’s feelings through acts of discrimination, harassment or victimisation can be a costly business.

FAQs on the long awaited amendments to Statutory Paternity Leave

This April has seen a wave of new family friendly rights come into force. Amongst these, is the long awaited amendments to Statutory Paternity Leave.

10 April 2024

New Guidance: Confidence to Recruit

The new Government guide in collaboration with the CIPD aims to give employers the confidence to recruit its workforce from a wider range of people including those who may have been overlooked in the past as a problem rather than an asset.

03 April 2024

FAQ’s on the new Carer’s Leave Act

Beginning on 6 April 2024, the Carer’s Leave Act comes into force, meaning carers are now entitled to request 1 week’s unpaid leave to care for their dependants.

02 April 2024
Construction

UK housebuilders investigated over suspected exchanges of anti-competitive information

In 2022 the CMA was called upon by the Secretary of State for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities to conduct a study into the housebuilding sector and provide recommendations on how the sector can operate as efficiently as possible

404 Not found

Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know

Assignment and novation agreements transfer the benefits and rights of a contract from one person or legal entity to another. 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

Assignment and novation agreements transfer the benefits and rights of a contract from one person or legal entity to another.

Definition of Assignment

The transfer of a benefit or interest from one person or legal entity to another is referred to as assignment. The obligations or "burden," of a contract, however, are not something that can be transferred.

When viewed from a building contract perspective, an employer can assign their right to have construction work performed along with their right to pursue legal action against the sub-contractor, if they don't perform quality work. Their obligation to pay for the work being performed, however, cannot be transferred to another person or entity. Likewise, the contractor can assign their rights to receive payment for performance of the contract. However, they cannot assign their obligation to make sure the work is completed according to the terms of the contract or respond to any claims, such as those that pertain to defective work that has been performed.

Once assignment has taken place, the assignee becomes entitled to any benefits associated with the contract that are assigned to them. This means that they now have the right and ability to pursue legal action against other parties involved in the contract to enforce their rights under the contract's terms. The assignor is still obligated to the other involved parties and will continue to be held liable for performing their part of the agreement due to the fact that burdens and obligations cannot be assigned.

In normal practice, however, what happens is that the assignee will also take on the performance that the assignor is obligated to and the assignor will request to be indemnified in the event that the assignee breaches the contract or otherwise fails to perform. This is commonly known as an "assignment and novation agreement ". In scenarios such as this, the assignor will still be held liable for any liabilities that they may have incurred before assignment took place.

In construction contract scenarios, issues of assignment frequently arise when considering whether or not collateral warranties that have been granted to a party or parties that exist outside of the main contract may be eligible for assignment. Investors might require the developer to assign rights under the contract against contractors and design teams as a way of providing a measure of security. In addition, they may also require that benefits such as performance bonds or parent company guarantees are also assigned.

Assignment Provisions in Contracts

A lot of contracts either qualify or completely exclude assignment rights . The courts have also confirmed that clauses that prevent contractual parties from assigning benefits without permission from the other involved parties is considered to be legally effective and extends to all of the rights or benefits that may arise from the contract, including those pertaining to remedies. Some other frequently used qualifications pertaining to assignment rights include:

Restricting assignments made without permission from other involved parties, even if said permission is unreasonably delayed or withheld
Only one of the involved parties has the right to assign
Only a specific set of rights can be assigned
Only a certain number of assignments can be made
Assignments can only be made to specific assignees who are named in the contract

In certain agreements, which include prohibitions pertaining to the assignment of rights and benefits, it can sometimes be possible to find the reservation of certain rights that allow for the creation of a trust or even to establish security over the contract's subject matter, rather than assigning the benefits or rights themselves.

Legal and Equitable Assignment

The Law of Property Act is what allows for the ability to legally assign debts or other chosen actions in which the following are notified in an official written document:

The trustee
Any other person considered relevant to the debt

If the assignment in question is in compliance with the formalities outlined in the Act, it is considered legal. If not, it is considered to be what is known as an "equitable assignment." Certain transfers can only be equitable assignments, such as:

Oral assignments
Assignments by way of charge
Assignments of a portion of a chosen action
Assignments in which proper notice has not been provided to the debtor
Agreements to assign

If you need help with assignment and novation agreement, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

Assignment of Contract Rights
Assignment Law
Assignment Legal Definition
Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
Legal Assignment
Assignment of Rights Example
Assignment Contract Law
Assignment Of Contracts
Partial Assignment of Contract
Consent to Assignment

Assignment And Novation Agreement

Jump to Section

What is an assignment and novation agreement.

An assignment and novation agreement is a contract between two parties where one gives up their rights and responsibilities under an original contract. An assignment cancels the original contract and transfers the rights and responsibilities of one of the parties to another, third party. In novation, one of the parties surrenders their rights but retains the duties they took on under the original contract.

Each of these agreements allow a contract party to give up their rights if they desire. The specific type of agreement necessary depends on whether both parties can agree to removing both rights and responsibilities and canceling the original agreement

Common Sections in Assignment And Novation Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignment And Novation Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment And Novation Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.4 5 ex10-4.htm ASSIGNMENT AND NOVATION AGREEMENT , Viewed September 18, 2022, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment And Novation Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment and novation agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment and novation agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment and novation agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers

Transactional and Employment Attorney and Small Business Owner. I do inside counsel work from the outside. I demystify the law for my clients.

Meghan Thomas is an accomplished transactional attorney. She specializes in IP, real estate and tech related transactional matters, and business contracts. Meghan's innovative leadership style has attributed to the firm's rapid development and presence in the metro-Atlanta market. She obtained her Doctor of Law from Emory University where she worked with the State Attorney General and litigated property disputes for disadvantaged clients. Prior to practicing, Meghan negotiated complex transactions for Fortune 500 tech and healthcare companies. She lives with her family in Southwest Atlanta, enjoys cooking, travel, dance and continues to develop her research in the areas of transactional law and legal sustainability.

Ms. Leavens is a corporate attorney with 10 years of experience as the General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of a Congressionally chartered, non-profit corporation, and more than 20 years of experience as an advisor to executive officers and boards of directors in for-profit and non-profit organizations. She has substantial experience within in-house legal departments managing cross-functional teams comprised of multiple business units and attorneys on large-scale mission critical projects, and within a global law firm as a manager of public and private, domestic and international, multi-party business transactions. She has unique experience implementing government-sponsored business initiatives. Ms. Leavens was honored in 2015 as one of Washington, D.C.’s Top Corporate Counsel by Bisnow and the Association of Corporate Counsel; nominated in 2014 for the Association of Corporate Counsel (WMACCA) Outstanding Chief Legal Officer Award; and the recipient in 2014 of WMACCA’s Community Service Award.

Elizabeth V.

Most of my career has been as in-house counsel for technology companies. My responsibilities included managing all vendor/procurement contracts and compliance, customer/partner/reseller contracts and compliance, data security/privacy compliance and incident responses, HR/employment issues, and legal operations. I am very comfortable negotiating Commercial Contracts, Vendor Agreements, and Procurement Contracts for goods, services, and licensing, as well as addressing Employment & Labor, Intellectual Property, and Data Privacy issues and compliance. I specialized and have a certificate in IP in law school and continued to develop in that area as in-house counsel for Interactive Intelligence, Genesys, which are unified communication companies, and KAR Global in the automobile digital services lines of business.

Since 2008, I have worked to assist clients in solving problems and addressing challenges that inevitably arise as a business grows - both anticipated and unexpected. My experience in Georgia and Tennessee in both drafting contracts and enforcing them via litigation and/or arbitration has provided clients with unique insights that help them anticipate problems and inform their decisions from start to finish.

I am an attorney licensed in Alabama and have been in solo practice for 7 years. I have experience in Contracts drafting and review, Litigation and Immigration practice areas. I am available for new projects.

With 15 years of extensive transactional/contracts experience reviewing and negotiating commercial contracts including a wide variety of purchase orders and contracts and non-disclosure agreements (NDA), I believe I can immediately contribute to the continued success of your team. I have been commended for a range of valuable skills—excellent contract management and contract administration, legal research, risk analysis, drafting and negotiations, and strategic thinking. I have worked as a legal consultant for 10+ years and I have reviewed over 7,500 contracts through this position. Contracts I have reviewed include but not limited to purchase orders, commercial and construction contracts, equipment rental agreements, non-disclosure, confidentiality, vendor agreements, service agreements, site access agreements, international agreements, request for proposals (RFP), bids and government contracts. These experiences have enabled me to master the ability to work independently and expeditiously to identify and assess issues and provide legally sound recommendations, consistent with good business practices. I have led teams (sales, insurance and management) to successfully negotiate contract terms with customers. Effective Communicator and Negotiator. I am a people person, and for the past 13 years, I have acquired excellent oral and written communication skills that enable me to interact and negotiate effectively with stakeholders at all levels. I am a self-starter with a strong work ethic. I have a high degree of resourcefulness, diligence, and dependability. Most important, I adapt to changing priorities quickly, thriving in an environment with high volume and short turnaround deadlines. My experience over the years allows me to transfer my skills to all types of contracts to meet the client’s needs. I am hopeful to provide similar legal expertise, effective contract administration and leadership to your organization. It would be a pleasure to meet within the next few weeks and discuss how my qualifications, experience, and capabilities will best fit the needs of your outfit.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Business lawyers by top cities

Austin Business Lawyers
Boston Business Lawyers
Chicago Business Lawyers
Dallas Business Lawyers
Denver Business Lawyers
Houston Business Lawyers
Los Angeles Business Lawyers
New York Business Lawyers
Phoenix Business Lawyers
San Diego Business Lawyers
Tampa Business Lawyers

Assignment And Novation Agreement lawyers by city

Austin Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Boston Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Chicago Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Dallas Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Denver Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Houston Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Los Angeles Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
New York Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Phoenix Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
San Diego Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
Tampa Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

93a Demand Letter
Accounting Services Agreement
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
Ad Agency Contract
Adhesion Contract
Advertising Services Agreement
Agency Agreement
Agency Contract

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Assignment and Novation Difference

Published on 13th August, 2016 by Benjamin Li Yong Le

Many people even lawyers are confused by the difference between assignment and novation. This article will discuss and clarify any doubts between the two legal concepts.

Everyday I see people "assigning" contracts and other rights without knowing what assignment entails. Today I will discuss what an assignment actually is and whether novation should be a more appropriate option.

An assignment involves the transfer of an interest or benefit from one person (“Assignor”) to another (“Assignee”). However, the “burden”, or obligations, under a contract cannot be transferred.

Thus, an assignment usually applies to assignments of tenancies or debts whereby the Assignor still retains responsibility of the contractual obligations, and only gives away the benefits.

The Assignor still owes obligations to the other contracting party, and will remain liable to perform any part of the contract that still has to be fulfilled since the burden cannot be assigned.

In practice, what usually happens is that the assignee takes over the performance of the contract with effect from assignment and the assignor will generally ask to be indemnified (contractual obligation whereby one party agrees to pay any losses or damage suffered by the other party) against any breach or failure to perform by the assignee. The assignor will remain liable for any past liabilities incurred before the assignment.

Usually when people say they want to "assign" something, they are actually referring to the concept of novation.

Novation is a legal mechanism whereby one party can transfer ALL its obligations under a contract and ALL its benefits arising from that contract to a third party. The third party effectively replaces the original party as a party to the contract. A novation requires the agreement of all THREE parties involved - the assignor, the assignee and the third party to whom the rights are being transferred.

About the Author - Benjamin Li Yong Le

Benjamin Li Yong Le (“Ben”), is an Advocate & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore. Ben is currently running his own boutique corporate and commercial law firm under the name and style of L’Avocat Law.

Share This Article:

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Novation?

By Jordan Bramis Lawyer

Updated on November 22, 2023 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

Assignments

Other differences between an assignment and novation, choosing between assignment and novation, key takeaways.

To further your commercial endeavours, you may wish to transfer your rights under a contract to another party. The primary legal mechanisms for transferring the rights or obligations under a contract to a third party are assignment, which involves transferring benefits or rights and novation, which facilitates the transfer of both rights/benefits and obligations. It is crucial to understand that these concepts are different. Unfortunately, many people tend to confuse the two, leading to unwanted consequences in relation to legal contracts. This article will explore the key differences between the two.

Under a contract, where a party (the original party to the contract) is initiating an ‘assignment’ , they are transferring some or all of their contractual rights to a third party, known as the “assignor”. The recipient of those contractual rights is known as the “assignee”. For instance, a party can transfer the right to receive payment or benefits under the contract through an assignment.

Following an assignment, the assignee gains the right to the benefits of the contract that the assignor has assigned. Furthermore, they gain the authority to initiate legal proceedings, either individually or in conjunction with the assignor. It is important to note, however, that the assignee does not become a contracting party to the original agreement. Under assignment, contractual burdens and liabilities cannot be transferred. Therefore, the assignor retains responsibility for fulfilling any remaining contractual obligations that still need to be discharged.

In most cases, assignment necessitates the consent of the obligor (the party obligated to fulfil the contract). The obligor needs to agree to the assignee taking over the rights held by the assignor. Additionally, the assignor must provide notice to the obligor about the assignment. This notice serves to inform the obligor that they should now deal with the assignee regarding the assigned rights.

By comparison, a novation agreement achieves the transfer of both rights and obligations to a third party. Here, the new party (the “novatee”) steps into the shoes of the original party (the “novator”) and assumes both the rights and obligations.

A novation agreement essentially terminates the contract with the original party and creates a new contract with the new party. A novation agreement means you can substitute one party for another without changing the obligations agreed to in the original contract.

Novation most often arises in big corporate takeovers or on the sale of a business. On takeover, deeds of novation are used to transfer contracts from the seller to the buyer and allow the buyer to carry on the seller’s business.

All involved parties, including the remaining contractual party, the novator, and the novatee, must unanimously agree to the novation. It is a collective decision to replace the old contract with a new one.

Novation creates an entirely new legal relationship. The old contract is set aside, and the new contract, which includes the novatee, comes into effect. Following novation, the novator is released from all obligations and liabilities associated with the original contract.

The choice between assignment and novation depends on various factors.

If a party wishes to maintain some level of involvement and responsibility in the original contract, assignment is often the better choice. It enables the transfer of specific rights while retaining some obligations. For a complete break from the original contract, where a party wishes to shed all obligations and liabilities, novation may be preferential.

One of the most important and sometimes overlooked steps is to document what you have agreed to in writing. Have your agreement written up, signed and stored safely. The area where most disputes and disagreements arise is where parties have not written down what they agree to. This results in a conflict that could have been easily avoided.

When you are ready to sell your business and begin the next chapter, it is important to understand the moving parts that will impact a successful sale.

This How to Sell Your Business Guide covers all the essential topics you need to know about selling your business.

If you intend to assign your rights under a contract to a third party, you can do so through an assignment or a novation. However, be aware that these differ. An assignment gives some rights to a third party, whereas a novation transfers both rights and obligations to a third party. Ensure that whichever method you choose, you document this in a written agreement.

If you need further assistance with an assignment or novation, our experienced contract lawyers can assist you as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Ai in business: mastering compliance and mitigating risks, preventing sexual and gender-based harassment: your whs legal duties, protecting your retail business: understanding your legal obligations, demystifying startup funding: strategies for growth, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

What Is a Deed of Novation and How Does It Affect My Business?

You’re entering into a deed of novation – what to consider?

What is the Difference Between an Agreement and a Deed?

How do I negotiate a sale of business agreement?

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference 12 November 2020

EPC Contract
Power Plant
Transfer of rights

The English Technology and Construction Court has found that the assignment of a sub-contract from a main contractor to an employer upon termination of an EPC contract will, in the absence of express intention to the contrary, transfer both accrued and future contractual benefits.

In doing so, Mrs Justice O’Farrell has emphasised established principles on assignment and novation, and the clear conceptual distinction between them. While this decision affirms existing authority, it also highlights the inherent risks for construction contractors in step-in assignment arrangements.

"This decision shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position."

This preliminary issues judgment in the matter of Energy Works (Hull) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd & Others¹ , is the latest in a long series of decisions surrounding the Energy Works plant, a fluidised bed gasification energy-from-waste power plant in Hull². The defendant, MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd (“MW”), was engaged as the main contractor by the claimant and employer, Energy Works (Hull) Ltd (“EWHL”), under an EPC contract entered into in November 2015. Through a sub-contract, MW engaged Outotec (USA) Inc (“Outotec”) to supply key elements for the construction of the plant.

By March 2019, issues had arisen with the project. EWHL terminated the main contract for contractor default and, pursuant to a term in the EPC contract, asked MW to assign to it MW’s sub-contract with Outotec. The sub-contract permitted assignment, but MW and EWHL were unable to agree a deed of assignment. Ultimately, MW wrote to EWHL and Outotec, notifying them both that it was assigning the sub-contract to EWHL. EWHL subsequently brought £133m proceedings against MW, seeking compensation for the cost of defects and delay in completion of the works. The defendant disputed the grounds of the termination, denied EWHL’s claims, and sought to pass on any liability to Outotec through an additional claim under the sub-contract. Outotec disputed MW’s entitlement to bring the additional claim on the grounds that MW no longer had any rights under the sub-contract, because those rights had been assigned to EWHL.

The parties accepted that a valid transfer in respect of the sub-contract had taken place. However, MW maintained that the assignment only transferred future rights under the sub-contract and that all accrued rights – which would include the right to sue Outotec for any failure to perform in accordance with the sub-contract occurring prior to the assignment – remained with MW. In the alternative, MW argued that the transfer had been intended as a novation such that all rights and liabilities had been transferred. As a secondary point, MW also claimed eligibility for a contribution from Outotec under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for their alleged partial liability³.

An assignment is a transfer of a right from one party to another. Usually this is the transfer by one party of its rights and remedies, under a contract with a counterparty, to a third party. However, importantly, the assignor remains liable for any obligations it owes under the contract. As an example, Party A can assign to Party C its right to receive goods under a contract with Party B, but it will remain liable to pay Party B for those goods. Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1926 requires a valid statutory assignment to be absolute, in writing, and on notice to the contractual counterparty.

Key contacts

Rebecca Williams

Partner London

Mark McAllister-Jones

Counsel London

"In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights."

In this case, the precise scope of the transferred rights and the purported assignment of contractual obligations were in issue. Mrs Justice O’Farrell looked to the House of Lords’ decision in Linden Gardens⁴ to set out three relevant principles on assignment:

Subject to any express contractual restrictions, a party to a contract can assign the benefit of a contract, but not the burden, without the consent of the other party to the contract;
In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights; and
It is possible to assign only future rights under a contract (i.e. so that the assignor retains any rights which have already accrued at the date of the assignment), but clear words are needed to give effect to such an intention.

Hence, in relation to MW’s first argument, it is theoretically possible to separate future and accrued rights for assignment, but this can only be achieved through “careful and intricate drafting, spelling out the parties’ intentions”. The judge held that, since such wording was absent here, MW had transferred all its rights, both accrued and future, to EWHL, including its right to sue Outotec.

Whereas assignment only transfers a party’s rights under a contract, novation transfers both a party’s rights and its obligations . Strictly speaking, the original contract is extinguished and a new one formed between the incoming party and the remaining party to the original contract. This new contract has the same terms as the original, unless expressly agreed otherwise by the parties.

Another key difference from assignment is that novation requires the consent of all parties involved, i.e. the transferring party, the counterparty, and the incoming party. With assignment, the transferring party is only required to notify its counterparty of the assignment. Consent to a novation can be given when the original contract is first entered into. However, when giving consent to a future novation, the parties must be clear what the terms of the new contract will be.

"Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.”"

A novation need not be in writing. However, the desire to show that all parties have given the required consent, the use of deeds of novation to avoid questions of consideration, and the use of novation to transfer ‘key’ contracts, particularly in asset purchase transactions, means that they often do take written form. A properly drafted novation agreement will usually make clear whether the outgoing party remains responsible for liabilities accrued prior to the transfer, or whether these become the incoming party’s problem.

As with any contractual agreement, the words used by the parties are key. Mrs Justice O’Farrell found that the use of the words “assign the sub-contract” were a strong indication that in this case the transfer was intended to be an assignment, and not a novation.

This decision reaffirms the established principles of assignment and novation and the distinction between them. It also shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position. Here, it was found that MW had transferred away its right to pursue Outotec for damages under the sub-contract, but MW remained liable to EWHL under the EPC contract. As a result, EWHL had the right to pursue either or both of MW and Outotec for losses arising from defects in the Outotec equipment, but where it chose to pursue only MW, MW had no contractual means of recovering from Outotec any sums it had to pay to EWHL. Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.” A contractor in MW’s position can still seek from a sub-contractor a contribution in respect of its liability to the employer under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (as the judge confirmed MW was entitled to do in this case). However, the wording of the Act is very specific, and it may not always be possible to pass down a contractual chain all, or any, of a party’s liability.

Commercially, contractors often assume some risk of liability to the employer without the prospect of recovery from a sub-contractor, such as where the sub-contractor becomes insolvent, or where the sub-contract for some reason cannot be negotiated and agreed on back-to-back terms with the EPC contract. However, contractors need to consider carefully the ramifications of provisions allowing the transfer of sub-contracts to parties further up a contractual chain and take steps to ensure such provisions reflect any agreement as to the allocation of risk on a project.

This article was authored by London Dispute Resolution Co-Head and Partner Rebecca Williams , Senior Associate Mark McAllister-Jones and Gerard Rhodes , a trainee solicitor in the London office.

[1] [2020] EWHC 2537 (TCC)

[2] See, for example, the decisions in Premier Engineering (Lincoln) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2484, reported in our article here , Engie Fabricom (UK) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 1626 (TCC) and C Spencer Limited v MW High Tech Projects UK Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 331, reported in our article here .

[3] The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 allows that “ any person liable in respect of any damage suffered by another person may recover contribution from any other person liable in respect of the same damage whether jointly with him or otherwise .”

[4] Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85

What is the difference between an assignment and novation?

Sometimes we see clients getting confused between what an assignment is and what a novation is. This article answers that. Both are often used where one company wants another to step in and fulfill its role in a contract.

How does an assignment work?

In an assignment, the person assigning the contract to another person is called the “Assignor”. The person being assigned the contract is called the “Assignee”. It is the Assignee that receives the benefit of the contract. Some contracts cannot be assigned without the consent of the other party to the contract, and some contracts may expressly prohibit assignment. If there is no provision concerning assignment, then the general position is that the contract can be assigned to another. If the contract is assigned to the Assignee, they must perform their part to the contract. As such, the other party will usually want to check that the proposed Assignee has sufficient skill and finance to carry out the contract. Therefore, it is common for there to be an assignment provision in the contract that accounts for this, so that the other party can withhold consent if the proposed Assignee fails to meet those criteria.

It is important to note that although the Assignee is expected to perform the contract, they do not carry the burden of the contract. In other words, if the Assignee fails to perform their part of the contract, the Assignor remains liable. As a result, if the Assignee is insolvent then the other party can seek recourse from the Assignor or demand that they perform the contract. However, it may be that the Assignor is no longer able to meet a demand made under the assigned contract. Thus, it is best practice to perform due diligence on the proposed Assignee before the contract is assigned to them.

What about a novation?

In a novation, the new party, known as the “Novatee”, does not take over the existing contract. Rather, the Novatee enters into a new contract with the other party/continuing party. The original party that has exited the contract between them and the other party is called the “Novator”. Unlike an Assignor, the Novator is released from their obligations under that contract. As such, they do not carry the burden of the contract. It is the Novatee that carries the burden of the contract entered into subsequently. Consequently, if the Novatee fails to perform the contract, the continuing party cannot seek recourse from the Novator. Thus, a novation is of higher risk to the continuing party than an assignment.

In forming any contract, you should ensure that the contract does not allow the other side to novate the contract prior to obtaining your consent. Prior to entering into a novation, the continuing party should do due diligence on the proposed Novatee to certify that they are sufficiently capable of performing the contract.

Generally a good option is for a contract to be novated – it is then like the new party steps into the shoes of the old and there are fewer questions about who is doing what. However, there can be reasons why an assignment is better. If you have any questions about this then we would be happy to discuss.

This article is not a substitute for legal advice and you should contact your lawyer about your specific situation. Please feel free to contact Steven Moe at [email protected]

Christchurch CBD

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480 FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS: Level 1, 60 Cashel Street Christchurch 8013, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS: PO Box 744 Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

Christchurch

PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 1 Rimu Street, Riccarton, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS: PO Box 8020, Riccarton, Christchurch, 8440, New Zealand

PHONE: +64 3 348 8480 FAX: +64 3 348 6305

PHYSICAL ADDRESS: Level 1, 80 Rolleston Drive , Rolleston, 7614, New Zealand

PHONE: +64 3 755 8673 FAX: +64 3 755 8073

PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 26 Weld Street, Hokitika 7810, New Zealand

POSTAL ADDRESS: PO Box 44, Hokitika 7842, New Zealand

Parry Field Charitable Foundation

Parry Field charitable members of NZ LAw, Global Cross Legal and SCLA

404 Not found

ADVOCATES & SOLICITO RS I COMPANY SECRETARY

+ 03 - 78779758

+6012-6582798

Aug 21, 2023

Deed of Assignment v Deed of Novation - When and how to use them

Updated: Aug 26, 2023

Regarding the transfer of rights and obligations within a contract, two frequently employed legal methods are deeds of assignment novation. Even though both approaches encompass the transfer of rights and responsibilities, they contrast in several ways, such as their effects on the original contract and the requirement of the necessary consent by the parties involved.

Rights and Obligations

In the context of a deed of assignment, the assignor transfers its rights and responsibilities to the assignee, while the initial contract remains valid. Conversely, novation entails establishing a fresh agreement that replaces the original one, forming a new agreement involving the transferor, transferee, and obligor.

Requirement of Consent

To ensure the validity of an assignment deed, the assignor needs to notify the obligor about the assignment, although the obligor’s consent isn't necessary. Conversely, novation demands agreement from all parties—transferor, transferee, and obligor.

Novation in detail

How it works

Novation mandates the approval of every party engaged, including the fresh entrant adopting the responsibilities and rights. The procedure encompasses these stages:

Agreement: All involved parties need to reach a consensus on the novation's terms and the new setup.

Paperwork: A novation agreement needs preparation and endorsement from all parties concerned.

Notification/approvals: All pertinent entities, such as financial institutions or insurers, must be informed of the novation and provide their consent/approval.

Execution: The novation becomes operational once all parties have inked the agreement and the requisite paperwork is finalized.

Novation in action:

· When a fresh contractor assumes control of a construction venture from the original contractor, taking on all the rights and duties specified in the initial agreement.

· In the context of a construction project, if a subcontractor, grappling with financial issues, intends to transfer their responsibilities to another subcontractor, the primary contractor can agree to novate the contract. This process allows the new subcontractor to inherit the obligations and commitments of the original subcontractor.

· An engineering company, commissioned by a municipality to design and build a new road, decides to sell the design and construction contract to another firm. The municipality approves a novation, permitting the new firm to take over the contract and conclude the project

· If a supplier holding a contract with a contractor to deliver construction materials opts to sell their business to another entity, the contractor can consent to a novation. This facilitates the transition of the contract to the new company, ensuring the new entity fulfills the supplier's duties as stipulated in the contract.

Assignment in detail

How an assignment works

The typical procedure for assignment includes these stages:

The initial contracting parties need to reach a consensus on the assignment.

The assignor (the entity transferring rights and obligations) is required to formally inform the other party in writing about the assignment.(typically)

The assignee (the new party assuming rights and obligations) must acknowledge the assignment in written form. (again, typically)

Assignment in action

· A subcontractor transfers their entitlement to payment for their services to a third party, often a lender, as collateral for a loan.

· A contractor delegates their right to receive payment from the project owner to a supplier or vendor, aiming to settle expenses for materials or equipment utilized in the undertaking.

· A property developer relinquishes their right to collect payments from buyers of individual units within a development to a lender, thereby obtaining financing for the venture.

· A contractor relinquishes their right to receive payment from the owner and assigns it to a joint venture partner, distributing the risk and reward of the project.

Grasping the distinctions between assignment deeds and novation is vital for selecting the right method of transferring rights and responsibilities. Prior to making a decision, it's advisable to consult legal experts for guidance on which approach to adopt.

Let's Chat

If you need help in further understanding the distinction between assignment and novation, or require some assistance in transferring certain rights and obligations, feel free to contact us to schedule a complementary consultation.

law, articles, contract
legal, articles, business law, comp

What is the Difference Between an Assignment and a Novation in the UK?

By Edward Carruthers

Updated on 21 November 2022 Reading time: 5 minutes

What is an Assignment?

What is a Novation?

Two key differences between an assignment and a novation, key takeaways, frequently asked questions.

As a business owner, you may encounter occasions where you must transfer certain beneficial rights or obligations to a third party. For example, your business may stop performing a service and wish to transfer the rights conveyed to you under a particular contract to another party. An assignment or a novation can help you do this. However, they act in very different ways and have differing requirements. This article will explain the main differences between an assignment and a novation and the circumstances where you may wish to use them.

What is an Assignment?

Under the terms of a standard contractual agreement, you or your business partners will receive rights or benefits. You can transfer the right to receive these benefits through an assignment to anyone who is not part of the original agreement. Assignments are made through an assignment deed, which will set out the benefits you wish to bestow on another person. It is worth noting that you can only assign your own rights. You cannot assign any other person’s rights conveyed in a contract.

Once you (the assignor) transfer your rights to the third party (the assignee), they can enjoy the benefits of the contract you provided.

Assignments are common in construction contracts where a property developer may enter into a building contract with a contractor. The developer can transfer their rights under that contract to anyone buying the property. Those rights then allow the purchaser to demand the contractor perform their duties under the original arrangement. Otherwise, they can make a claim against the contractor for a breach of contract.

Novations are slightly more complicated than assignments. They transfer both the rights and obligations that you have under a contract. You may use a novation to leave a contract you no longer wish to be a party to and find a replacement. For example, if you stop trading in a specific service or line of goods, you can use a novation deed to remove yourself from a contract to provide these services. The novation deed will then allow you to substitute yourself for someone else willing to do this work.

Technically, a novation cancels the original contract you held with your business partner and creates a duplicate contract. In that duplicate, a third party will take the rights, benefits, and obligations conveyed to you from that agreement.

As the party leaving the contract, you will let go of all your rights to your benefits under the original contract. You will also no longer need to perform your contractual duties. It is worth noting that the burden of finding a replacement party for the novation often falls on the person leaving the contract. Therefore, to set up a novation, you must find the replacement yourself. However, you should be aware that any party involved in the existing contract can veto your decision to bring in a replacement if they are unsatisfied.

Novations often happen where businesses are bought and sold or where debt transactions occur. For example, when a company borrows money from a lender and wants to transfer the obligations to repay the debt to a third party. They can transfer these obligations via a novation.

As discussed above, the main difference between an assignment and a novation is that a novation transfers your obligations and rights under that contract. By contrast, an assignment transfers only your rights and benefits.

But there are other differences between the two that business owners must be aware of.

1. Novations Require the Consent of All Parties

An assignment does not require the consent of all parties to the contract to transfer the rights. Additionally, you do not necessarily have to notify the other parties to an agreement that an assignment is taking place. However, as a commercial courtesy, it is wise to notify your business partners that you intend to assign your rights to a third party. It is also essential to ensure no contractual terms prohibit you from transferring a benefit to a third party. Doing say may lead to breaching the contract, and you will be liable for damages.

With novations, you must obtain consent from every party to a contract before transferring your contractual obligations and rights. This is because you are transferring your duties to perform obligations to a third party. In addition, as the other businesses involved in a contract rely on the performance of these obligations, they have a right to be notified of the novation arrangements. They must also provide their consent to these arrangements. Therefore, a novation deed must be signed and approved by every party to that original agreement, including the party exiting the contract.

2. Novations Require Consideration

Consideration is an essential element of contract law. It is a legal term for payment of value in exchange for a promise. To have a legally binding contract, you must have some form of consideration passing between parties. For example, in a delivery contract, one party must pay another party for shipping a set of goods. Without that consideration passing between parties, you cannot have a legally binding contract, and you can take action against your business partner for breach of contract.

Novation deeds require you to exchange consideration before terminating the original contract. They also require consideration when making the new novation contract. On the other hand, as assignments do not involve the termination of a contract, you do not have to show that parties to the contract exchanged consideration.

Assignments and novations differ in three important ways. For instance, assignments transfer rights to contractual benefits to third parties, while novations transfer rights and obligations under a contract to a third party. Additionally, novations require the consent of all parties to the contract. On the other hand, you can make assignments without the consent of all parties. Finally, novations require consideration.

If you need help transferring your rights, our experienced contract lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page .

Assignments are where business owners can transfer a right or benefit given to them under a contractual arrangement to a third party.

A novation transfers both a business owner’s rights and obligations under a contract to a third party.

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Understanding your business’ new employment law obligations, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

How Do I Assign a Commercial Lease in the UK?

Sale of Goods Act in England?">Can I Contract Out of the Sale of Goods Act in England?

4 Steps to Take Before Signing a Contract in England

Benefits of Working With a Lawyer to Review Your Company Contract in England and Wales

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm in APAC - Financial Times

One championship 167 adds undefeated 'vanilla thunder' ben tynan vs. mauro cerilli, share this article.

ONE Championship’s rising star from the Great White North has his next assignment.

At ONE Championship 167, Canada’s Ben Tynan returns to face Italy’s Mauro Cerilli in a heavyweight bout, a promotion official recently informed MMA Junkie. The event takes place June 7 in Bangkok, Thailand.

Tynan (6-0) is 2-0 since signing with ONE Championship. He has a 100 percent finishing rate including four first-round stoppages. Prior to his professional career, Tynan went 8-0 as an amateur.

Cerilli (15-5) is a former Cage Warriors heavyweight champion. Since his ONE Championship debut in 2018, Cerilli has split his appearances for the promotion. He holds wins over Alain Ngalani, Abdulbasir Vagabov, and Paul Elliott. He has losses against Brandon Vera, Arjan Bhullar, and Amir Aliakbari.

With the addition, the ONE Championship 167 lineup includes:

Champ Stamp Fairtex vs. Denice Zamboanga
Champ Tawanchai PK aenchai vs. Jo Nattawut – muay Thai
Mikey Musumeci vs. Joao Gabriel Sousa – grappling
Johan Ghazali vs. Tran Duy Nhat Nguyen – muay Thai
Liam Harrison vs. Katsuki Kitano – muay Thai
Blake Cooper vs. Kade Ruotolo
Mauro Cerilli vs. Ben Tynan

Be sure to visit the MMA Junkie Instagram page and YouTube channel to discuss this and more content with fans of mixed martial arts.

Want the latest news and insights in MMA?

Sign up for our newsletter to get updates to your inbox, and also receive offers from us, our affiliates and partners. By signing up you agree to our Privacy Policy

An error has occured

Please re-enter your email address.

Thanks for signing up!

You'll now receive the top MMA Junkie stories each day directly in your inbox.

Upcoming Events

Apr 27 UFC on ESPN 55: Nicolau vs. Perez

May 4 UFC 301: Pantoja vs. Erceg

May 11 UFC on ESPN 56: Lewis vs. Nascimento

May 17 Bellator Champions Series: Paris

May 18 UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Murphy

Most Popular

'greatest troll job ever': mma fighters react to ryan garcia's stunning upset of devin haney, ryan garcia def. devin haney in huge boxing upset: best photos, jamahal hill offers curious perspective of ufc 300 ko sequence vs. alex pereira after referee intervention, photos: paige vanzant through the years, justin gaethje has no regrets about taking ufc 300 fight vs. max holloway, not done after brutal ko, matchup roundup: new ufc, pfl, bellator fights announced in the past week (april 15-21), ryan garcia claims he 'drank every single night' prior to upset of devin haney.

Please enter an email address.

Thanks for signing up.

Please check your email for a confirmation.

Something went wrong.

IMAGES

Novation vs Assignments
Assignment vs Novation of Contract: What's the Difference?
Differences between Novation and Assignment
Legal briefing
Assignment and Novation Difference
What Is Novation In Real Estate? Definition & Examples

VIDEO

Submitting to the lower rank
ASSIGNMENT VS AMBITION
Negotiation Strategies: Compensation
Sample Assignment
You
Assignments In Canada 🇨🇦

COMMENTS

Canada: Novation Or Assignment, That Is The Question
All parties to the original agreement need to consent to the new agreement. Novation has been referred to as the "Hail Mary" defence for parties seeking to avoid contractual liability, however, the standard of establishing novation is quite high. The Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) has established a three-factor test for establishing novation.
Assignment vs Novation: Everything You Need to Know
Assignment vs. novation: What's the difference? An assignment agreement transfers one party's rights and obligations under a contract to another party. ... The Supreme Court of Canada, or SCC, has determined that a personal service contract must be created for the original parties based on the special characteristics, skills, or confidences ...
Assignment and novation
If you want to transfer the burden of a contract as well as the benefits under it, you have to novate. Like assignment, novation transfers the benefits under a contract but unlike assignment, novation transfers the burden under a contract as well. In a novation the original contract is extinguished and is replaced by a new one in which a third ...
Assignment or Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications
Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on ...
The Assignment of Commercial Contracts in Legal Practice
Contract "assignability" is a term frequently used by contracting parties and practitioners. While they may expressly address the assignment of a party's rights under the contract in some contexts, they frequently use the term "assignment" to refer to both: The delegation of duty to perform. The assignment of rights to obtain performance.
Novation vs Assignment: Which One Is The Correct One?
Novation is the act of replacing one party in a contract with another party, while assignment is the act of transferring rights or obligations from one party to another. Novation is the proper term when a new party is being substituted for an existing party in a contract. This new party assumes all of the rights and obligations of the original ...
Assignment, novation and construction contracts
Both assignment and novation are forms of transferring an interest under a contract from one party to another. However, they are very different and in their effect. An assignment transfers the benefit of a contract from one party to another, but only the benefit, not the burden. In contrast, a novation will transfer both the benefit and the ...
Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins
13 March 2018. Commercial Real Estate. Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins. There's often, understandably, a bit of uncertainty about whether (and how) a party to a contract can "assign" (transfer) its rights, or pass on its obligations, under that contract, to another person. In law, the general rule is that only the original ...
Contracts: The critical difference between Assignment and Novation
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation. The distinction between assignment and novation was addressed recently in the case of Davies v Jones (2009), whereby ...
Assignment vs Novation: Everything You Need to Know
Assignment vs. novation: What's of difference? An assignment agreement transfers one party's rights and obligations under one contract to others party. The party transferring their rights and duties is and assignator; that party receiving them lives the assignee. Novation is a mechanism where one party transfers all its obligations and freedom ...
Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know
Definition of Assignment. The transfer of a benefit or interest from one person or legal entity to another is referred to as assignment. The obligations or "burden," of a contract, however, are not something that can be transferred. When viewed from a building contract perspective, an employer can assign their right to have construction work ...
What's the Difference Between Assignment and Novation?
Therefore, it is important to understand those differences. Moreover, assignment is a partial transfer (in respect to the rights of a contract) to a third party. A novation is a complete transfer of that contract (rights & burden) to another party. In both instances of transferring rights or obligations to a third party, consult a contract lawyer.
Assignment And Novation Agreement: Definition & Sample
An assignment cancels the original contract and transfers the rights and responsibilities of one of the parties to another, third party. In novation, one of the parties surrenders their rights but retains the duties they took on under the original contract. Each of these agreements allow a contract party to give up their rights if they desire.
Assignment, novation and construction contracts
An assignment transfers the benefit of a contract from one party to another, but only the benefit, not the burden. In contrast, a novation will transfer both the benefit and the burden of a ...
Assignment and Novation Difference
Today I will discuss what an assignment actually is and whether novation should be a more appropriate option. An assignment involves the transfer of an interest or benefit from one person ("Assignor") to another ("Assignee"). However, the "burden", or obligations, under a contract cannot be transferred. Thus, an assignment usually ...
Assignment vs. Novation: What is the Difference?
However, be aware that these differ. An assignment gives some rights to a third party, whereas a novation transfers both rights and obligations to a third party. Ensure that whichever method you choose, you document this in a written agreement. If you need further assistance with an assignment or novation, our experienced contract lawyers can ...
Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference
Novation. Whereas assignment only transfers a party's rights under a contract, novation transfers both a party's rights and its obligations. Strictly speaking, the original contract is extinguished and a new one formed between the incoming party and the remaining party to the original contract. This new contract has the same terms as the ...
What is the difference between an assignment and novation?
In an assignment, the person assigning the contract to another person is called the "Assignor". The person being assigned the contract is called the "Assignee". It is the Assignee that receives the benefit of the contract. Some contracts cannot be assigned without the consent of the other party to the contract, and some contracts may ...
What is the difference between assignment and novation?
If you need assistance with an assignment or novation of a contract, do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] or give me a call on 1300 033 934 for a no-obligation quote. Like ...
Canada: Novation Or Assignment, Such Is The Question
Included the context of asset acquisition, real assuming that aforementioned target's binding are assets essence transferred to and purchaser, the transfer the contracts typically requires the parties to the transaction to go through likewise the novation process or assignment of which contract from the seller to the purchaser.
Deed of Assignment v Deed of Novation
In the context of a deed of assignment, the assignor transfers its rights and responsibilities to the assignee, while the initial contract remains valid. Conversely, novation entails establishing a fresh agreement that replaces the original one, forming a new agreement involving the transferor, transferee, and obligor. Requirement of Consent.
Differences Between Assignment and Novation
As discussed above, the main difference between an assignment and a novation is that a novation transfers your obligations and rights under that contract. By contrast, an assignment transfers only your rights and benefits. But there are other differences between the two that business owners must be aware of. 1.
ONE Championship 167 adds undefeated 'Vanilla Thunder' Ben Tynan vs
ONE Championship's rising star from the Great White North has his next assignment. At ONE Championship 167, Canada's Ben Tynan returns to face Italy's Mauro Cerilli in a heavyweight bout, a promotion official recently informed MMA Junkie. The event takes place June 7 in Bangkok, Thailand. Tynan (6-0) is 2-0 since signing with ONE ...

Canada: Novation Or Assignment, That Is The Question

About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Login to Mondaq.com

Why Register with Mondaq

Your Organisation

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Table of Contents

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

What is a Deed of Assignment?

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Authored By Raea Khan

Find what you need

Family Limited Partnership (FLP) for International Estate Planning

How to Use Life Insurance for International Estate Planning: A Comprehensive Guide

Choosing the Right Vehicle for International Estate Planning: A Guide to International Estate Planning Tools

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

Construction & Building Law

International Estate Planning

Commercial & Business Law

Planning & Environment Law

Wills & Estates

Get In Touch

Thank You For Your Request.

The Assignment of Commercial Contracts in Legal Practice

The Definitions of Assignment and Delegation

What is an Assignment?

The Effects of Assignment

What is Delegation?

Types of Assignment – Legal (Statutory) Assignment vs. Equitable Assignment

Requirements for a Legal (Statutory) Assignment

Requirements for an Equitable Assignment

Contractual Anti-Assignment & Anti-Delegation Clauses

Novation and Assignment: Sisters, Not Twins

Stephen James

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Shaping Britain’s Future: updates to Skilled Worker and Family visas

‘Injured feelings’- Vento Bands

FAQs on the long awaited amendments to Statutory Paternity Leave

New Guidance: Confidence to Recruit

FAQ’s on the new Carer’s Leave Act

UK housebuilders investigated over suspected exchanges of anti-competitive information

404 Not found

Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know

Definition of Assignment

Assignment Provisions in Contracts

Legal and Equitable Assignment

Assignment And Novation Agreement

Jump to Section

Common Sections in Assignment And Novation Agreements

Assignment And Novation Agreement Sample

Who Helps With Assignment And Novation Agreements?

Meet some of our Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers

Elizabeth V.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Business lawyers by top cities

Assignment And Novation Agreement lawyers by city

related contracts

other helpful articles

Want to speak to someone?

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Assignment and Novation Difference

About the Author - Benjamin Li Yong Le

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Novation?

Assignments

Register for our free webinars

Related articles

We’re an award-winning law firm

Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference 12 November 2020

The English Technology and Construction Court has found that the assignment of a sub-contract from a main contractor to an employer upon termination of an EPC contract will, in the absence of express intention to the contrary, transfer both accrued and future contractual benefits.

Key contacts

Rebecca Williams

Mark McAllister-Jones

Related stories

What is the difference between an assignment and novation?

Christchurch CBD

Christchurch

404 Not found

Deed of Assignment v Deed of Novation - When and how to use them

Recent Posts