presentation market rent limited

• Companies Search
• Companies A-Z

Presentation Market Rent Limited LONDON

Founded in 2010, Presentation Market Rent, classified under reg no. 07143456 is a active - proposal to strike off company. Currently registered at Bruce Kenrick House N1 9FL, London the company has been in the business for 14 years. Its financial year was closed on March 31 and its latest financial statement was filed on Thu, 31st Mar 2022. Since Fri, 12th Feb 2010 Presentation Market Rent Limited is no longer carrying the name Notting Hill Market Rent (2).

Presentation Market Rent Limited Address / Contact

Company information / profile, company staff.

Position: Director

Appointed: 03 January 2023

Appointed: 01 April 2022

Appointed: 01 April 2020

Appointed: 27 January 2020

Vipulchandra T.

Appointed: 03 April 2018

Position: Secretary

Appointed: 02 February 2010

Status: resigned

Appointed: 29 September 2021

Resigned: 18 May 2023

Appointed: 30 April 2020

Resigned: 02 January 2023

Resigned: 17 August 2022

Resigned: 03 April 2018

Elizabeth F.

Annemarie f..

Appointed: 02 February 2017

Resigned: 02 February 2017

Appointed: 23 July 2015

Resigned: 31 March 2020

Appointed: 05 August 2013

Appointed: 26 September 2012

Resigned: 23 July 2015

Katherine W.

Appointed: 26 April 2010

Resigned: 04 December 2014

Alastair C.

Appointed: 24 March 2010

Resigned: 17 August 2012

Resigned: 31 March 2022

Resigned: 21 August 2021

People with significant control

The register of persons with significant control who own or have control over the company consists of 2 names. As we discovered, there is Notting Hill Genesis from London, England. The abovementioned PSC is categorised as "a community benefit society", has significiant influence or control over the company. The abovementioned PSC has significiant influence or control over the company,. The second entity in the PSC register is Notting Hill Housing Trust that entered London, England as the address. This PSC has a legal form of "a charity - charitable residential social landlord", owns 75,01-100% shares, has 75,01-100% voting rights. This PSC owns 75,01-100% shares and has 75,01-100% voting rights.

Notting Hill Genesis

Bruce Kenrick House Killick Street, London, N1 9FL, England

Notting Hill Housing Trust

Bruce Kenrick House 2 Killick Street, London, N1 9FL, England

Company previous names

Company filings, company search, advertisements, companies nearby.

• Touareg Trust [0.00 mile]
• Armada 1 South Development Llp [0.00 mile]
• Goat Wharf Limited [0.00 mile]
• Project Light (market Rent) Limited [0.00 mile]
• Notting Hill Commercial Properties Ltd [0.00 mile]
• Folio London Limited [0.00 mile]
• Project Light Development 2 Limited [0.00 mile]

© bizstats.co.uk 2024.

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED

Financials (beta), company secretary, director appointments in other companies, shareholders (beta), shareholdings (beta), controlled companies / controlling entities.

• Significant influence or control: Notting Hill Genesis (7746 - United Kingdom) active
• >75%: Notting Hill Housing Trust (16558r - United Kingdom) ceased

Controlling entities above

No controlled companies, late payments report, court cases, competitors, liquidation risk (beta).

Request a live demo presentation

One of our sales representative will call you soon

By submitting this form you are acknowledging that you have read and understood our Privacy Policy .

We have generated thousand of leads for our happy customers

Loading ...

• Real estate activities
• City of London

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED

Contact information, this information is available only for subscribed users, financial statements of presentation market rent limited.

According to PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED latest financial report submitted on 2021-03-31, the company has a Cash of £229,000.00 , Total-Assets of £1M while the Working-Capital is £1M . Compared with the previous year, the company reported a Cash decrease of -102.18% , which is an equivalent of 234000 . At the same time, the Total-Assets went up by 2.55% , or by -35000 .

Consolidated A/cs

For more information you can

Turnover 2021

Reporting period, working capital.

£ 1.1 million

Profit after Tax

Presentation market rent limited business credit report.

A Business Credit Report for PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED is available for instant download. The report will provide you with a credit score and credit limit recommendation for PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED , payment trends, if the company pays their Invoices on time, whether or not the company has any court judgements, ownership and group structure, up to 5 years of financial statements and much more. When you buy a Credit Report from Global Database, you will also have a 7 days free trial to our B2B Sales Platform.

Unlock Credit Report

Key features

• Credit Score and Credit Limit
• Financial accounts for the past 5 years
• Credit Officers
• Document Filing history
• Corporate Ownership
• Outstanding & Satisfied Mortgages
• Shareholder Information
• Company Identity

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED Directors and key executives

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED currently employs 10 people. In order to view contact information, including emails and phone numbers for all the employees working at PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED and to export them in XL or to your existing CRM, you can subscribe to our platform here .

Total Employee Count

Total employees, management level.

Get in touch with 10 of contacts working at PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED Ownership and Group Structure

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED is a subsidiary of NOTTING HIL********* which is a holding company, with the following registration number 07143456 . The holding group consists of a total of 32 companies, including GENFINANC******** , PRESENTATION MARK*************** , GENESIS OAKLA*********** , GENESIS HOUSING AS***************** , NOTTING HIL********* .

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED Shareholders

There are currently 1 people with significant control at PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED . One of of major shareholders of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED is NOTTING HILL GENESIS , which owns 1 ORDINARY shares, with a total value of 1 GBP .

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED competitors:

Top 5 similar companies of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED are INNOVATION BIRMINGHAM LIMITED , MJF GROUP LIMITED , QUINTAIN LIMITED , BALTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED(THE) , MANCHESTER SCIENCE PARTNERSHIPS LIMITED . View and export all the competitor list of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED by upgrading your account here .

INNOVATION BIRMINGHAM LIMITED

Mjf group limited, quintain limited, baltic exchange limited(the), manchester science partnerships limited, frequently asked questions regarding presentation market rent limited, where is presentation market rent limited registered office.

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED is located at BRUCE KENRICK HOUSE 2 KILLICK STREET, United Kingdom.

How many people work at PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED?

According to the latest account statement, there are currently 10 of employees working for PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED.

What is the Business Credit Score of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED and how reliable is the company?

In order to check the business credit score of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED, you can request a credit report. You will view the latest credit limit information, ownership, group structure, court judgements and much more.

Does PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED pay their invoices on time?

By requesting a Business Credit Report for PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED, you will be able to gain more insights about the PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED payment trends.

Who is the Ultimate Parent of the PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED?

Information about the ultimate beneficial ownership NOTTING HIL********* of PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED is available when you order a business credit report.

Search for International Credit Report

Credit Rating and Limit Recomendations

5 years of financial statements

Directors and shareholders

Court Judgements

Global Group Structure

Trade Payment

Unlimited reports

Everything include in one report, plus

Unlimited credit reports download

Unlimited users

CRM Integration

Dedicated account manager

Select your package

• About Global Database Platform
• Our Data Contact Us Terms and Conditions
• F.A.Q. Privacy Notice Database Cookies Policy GDPR Processors

Follow us on:

• Book free demo Request a call

Registered address: Artisans' House, 7 Queensbridge, Northampton, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom, NN4 7BF, All rights reserved

• Available Rentals
• Screening Criteria
• Online Application
• Get Started
• Pricing & Sign-up
• Owner Handbook
• Property Types Managed
• Management Services
• Grand Rapids – Property Management
• Kalamazoo – Property Management

Understanding Market Rent: What It Is and What It Isn’t

Aaron Treloar   |   September 4, 2024

  0  Comments

When it comes to renting your property, one of the most important topics you’ll encounter is  market rent . As property owners, it’s essential to have a clear understanding of what this term means—and just as crucial, what it doesn’t mean. At Access Property Management, we often get questions around how we set rental rates and whether or not owners can dictate those rates. In this post, we’ll walk you through the essentials of market rent and give you the insights you need to make informed decisions about your rental property.

What Market Rent Is Not

First things first: market rent is  not  a reflection of your personal expenses. You may be tempted to take your mortgage, taxes, insurance, maintenance costs, and management fees, add them up, and tack on a profit margin. But while this formula might help you determine whether or not renting is a smart financial move, it won’t give you a true market rent figure.

Another common mistake is relying on  listed properties  as a guide for market rent. While active listings can get you in the ballpark, they’re not reliable indicators of the final rental price. Think of it like selling a home: the real value is determined by  sold properties , not the ones still on the market. Similarly, you should base rental prices on  signed leases , not active listings.

Finally, don’t take rental estimates from just anyone. Sometimes, realtors or other well-meaning professionals might throw out a rental figure without the experience to back it up. Always seek advice from someone who deals in rental properties daily and understands the nuances of your local market.

What Is Market Rent?

So, what exactly is market rent? Simply put, it’s the amount agreed upon in a signed lease between you and a tenant. This figure is the truest reflection of what renters in your area are willing to pay. And just like the housing market,  market rent changes —it fluctuates with the seasons and economic conditions. For example, in Michigan, rents tend to peak in the spring and summer, while winter months typically see lower rates.

How Access Property Management Sets Rental Rates

At Access, we use a combination of data points to determine the right rental price for your property:

• Active listings : While not the final word on market rent, they help us stay competitive.
• Historical data : We rely on the properties we manage (or have managed) to provide the best indicators of achievable lease rates.

Once your property is listed, we actively monitor its performance. Every seven to ten days, we assess whether adjustments are needed based on key metrics like inquiries, showings, and applications. If interest is low, we adjust the price slightly to keep it competitive and visible to prospective tenants.

Can Owners Set the Rental Price?

The short answer is  no . While we value your input and understand your financial goals, setting the rental price too high can result in  longer vacancies . In fact, if your property sits vacant for over a month in the summer or more than 45-60 days in the winter, it’s a red flag that your price is too high. Pricing a property appropriately from the start is essential to avoid lost income and to keep the property active and attractive to potential renters.

Overpricing also opens the door to  scammers , who are quick to post fake ads with your property at a lower price, confusing potential tenants and making the process more difficult for everyone involved.

Why Trust the Experts?

Our job is to ensure your property rents quickly and at the highest market rate possible. Allowing us to follow our proven process protects both your investment and our reputation. Overpricing properties leads to extended vacancies, which hurts your bottom line and can make it seem like we aren’t doing our job.

The Bottom Line

Understanding market rent is crucial to renting your property successfully. It’s not based on your expenses or wishful thinking—it’s determined by the market. Trust the process, and we’ll help you secure the highest possible rent for your property, without extended vacancies or other pitfalls.

Have more questions or want to chat with us about your property? We’re always here to help. Fill out the contact form on our website, and we’ll get back to you in no time!

About the author

Aaron has over 13 years experience in property management. With a focus on accounting and the “numbers” aspect of real estate, he loves to see a good investment succeed. He also enjoys talking to new investors and helping them overcome hurdles to their success.

What does economic evidence tell us about the effects of rent control?

Subscribe to the economic studies bulletin, rebecca diamond rebecca diamond associate professor of economics - stanford graduate school of business.

October 18, 2018

• 11 min read

Steadily rising housing rents in many of the US’s large, productive cities have reignited the discussion whether to expand or enact rent control provisions. Under pressure to fight rising rents, state lawmakers in Illinois, Oregon, and California are considering repealing laws that limit cities’ abilities to pass or expand rent control. While rules and regulations of rent control vary from place to place, most rent control consists of caps on price increases within the duration of a tenancy, and sometimes beyond the duration of a tenancy, as well as restrictions on eviction.

New research examining how rent control affects tenants and housing markets offers insight into how rent control affects markets. While rent control appears to help current tenants in the short run, in the long run it decreases affordability, fuels gentrification, and creates negative spillovers on the surrounding neighborhood.

A substantial body of economic research has used theoretical arguments to highlight the potential negative efficiency consequences to keeping rents below market rates, going back to Friedman and Stigler (1946). They argued that a cap on rents would lead landlords to sell their rental properties to owner occupants so that landlords could still earn the market price for their real estate. Rent control can also lead to “mis-match” between tenants and rental units. Once a tenant has secured a rent-controlled apartment, he may not choose to move in the future and give up his rent control, even if his housing needs change (Suen 1980, Glaeser and Luttmer 2003, Sims 2011, Bulow and Klemperer 2012). This mis-allocation can lead to empty-nest households living in family-sized apartments and young families crammed into small studios, clearly an inefficient allocation. Similarly, if rental rates are below market rates, renters may choose to consume excessive quantities of housing (Olsen 1972, Gyourko and Linneman 1989). Rent control can also lead to decay of the rental housing stock; landlords may not invest in maintenance because they can’t recoup these investment by raising rents. (Downs 1988, Sims 2007).

Of course, rent control also offered potential benefits for tenants. For example, rent control provides insurance against rent increases, potentially limiting displacement. Affordable housing advocates argue that these insurance benefits are valuable to tenants. For instance, if long-term tenants have developed neighborhood-specific capital, such as a network of friends and family, proximity to a job, or children enrolled in local schools, then tenants face large risks from rent appreciation. In contrast, individuals who have little connection to any specific area can easily insure themselves against local rental price appreciation by moving to a cheaper location. Those invested in the local community are not able to use this type of “self-insurance” as easily, since they must give up some or all of their neighborhood specific capital. Rent control can provide these tenants with this type of insurance.

Until recently, there was little data or natural experiments with which to assess the importance of these competing arguments, and to assess how rent controls affects tenants, landlords, or the broader housing market. But newly-available housing-market data spanning periods of dramatic change in rent control laws in Cambridge, MA and in San Francisco, CA have allowed economists to examine these questions empirically. While these studies do find support for the idea that existing tenants benefit from the insurance provided by rent control, they also find the overall cost of providing that insurance is very large.

From December 1970 through 1994, all rental units in Cambridge built prior to 1969 were regulated by a rent control ordinance that placed strict caps on rent increases and tightly restricted the removal of units from the rental stock. The legislative intent of the rent control ordinance was to provide affordable rental housing, and at the eve of rent control’s elimination in 1994, controlled units typically rented at 40-plus percent below the price of nearby non-controlled properties. In November 1994, the Massachusetts electorate passed a referendum to eliminate rent control by a narrow 51–49 percent margin, with nearly 60 percent of Cambridge residents voting to retain the rent control ordinance. This law change directly impacted properties previously subject to rent control, enabling landlords to begin to charge market rents.

Autor, Palmer, and Pathak (2014) (APP), studies the impact of this unexpected change and find that newly decontrolled properties’ market values increased by 45 percent.  In addition to these direct effects of rent decontrol, APP find removing rent control has substantial indirect effects on neighboring properties, boosting their values too. Post-decontrol price appreciation was significantly greater at properties that had a larger fraction of formerly controlled neighbors: residential properties at the 75th percentile of rent control exposure gained approximately 13 percent more in property value following decontrol than did properties at the 25th percentile of exposure. This differential appreciation of properties in rent control–intensive locations was equally pronounced among decontrolled and never-controlled units, suggesting that the effect of rent control had been to reduce the whole neighborhood’s desirability.

The economic magnitude of the effect of rent control removal on the value of Cambridge’s housing stock is large, boosting property values by $2.0 billion between 1994 and 2004. Of this total effect, only $300 million is accounted for by the direct effect of decontrol on formerly controlled units, while $1.7 billion is due to the indirect effect. These estimates imply that more than half of the capitalized cost of rent control was borne by owners of never-controlled properties. Rent controlled properties create substantial negative externalities on the nearby housing market, lowering the amenity value of these neighborhoods and making them less desirable places to live.  In short, the policy imposed $2.0 billion in costs to local property owners, but only $300 million of that cost was transferred to renters in rent-controlled apartments.

Diamond, McQuade, and Qian (2018) (DMQ) examine the consequences of an expansion of rent control on renters, landlords, and the housing market that resulted from a unique 1994 local San Francisco ballot initiative. In 1979, San Francisco imposed rent control on all standing buildings with five or more apartments. Rent control in San Francisco consists of regulated rent increases, linked to the CPI, within a tenancy, but no price regulation between tenants. New construction was exempt from rent control, since legislators did not want to discourage new development. Smaller multi-family buildings were exempt from this 1979 law change since they were viewed as more “mom and pop” ventures, and did not have market power over rents.

This exemption was lifted by a 1994 San Francisco ballot initiative. Proponents of the initiative argued that small multi-family housing was now primarily owned by large businesses and should face the same rent control of large multi-family housing. Since the initial 1979 rent control law only impacted properties built from 1979 and earlier, the removal of the small multi-family exemption also only affected properties built 1979 and earlier. This led to a differential expansion in rent control in 1994 based on whether the small multi-family housing was built prior to or post 1980—a policy experiment where otherwise similar housing was treated differently by the law.

To examine rent control’s effects on tenant migration and neighborhood choices, DMQ examine panel data that provides address-level migration decisions and housing characteristics for the majority of adults living in San Francisco in the early 1990s. This allows them to define a treatment group of renters who lived in small multi-family apartment buildings built prior to 1980 and a control group of renters living in small multi-family housing built between 1980 and 1990. Their data allows them to follow each of these groups over time up until the present, regardless of where they migrate.

Between five and ten years after the law change, the beneficiaries of rent control are 19 percent less likely to have moved to a new address, relative to the control group’s migration rate. Further, impact on the likelihood of remaining in San Francisco as whole was the same, indicating a large share of the renters that rent control caused to remain at their 1994 address would have left San Francisco had they not been covered by rent control.

These effects are significantly stronger among older households and among households that have already spent a number of years at their address prior to treatment. This is consistent with the fact that both of these populations are likely to be less mobile. Renters who don’t need to move very often are more likely to find it worthwhile to remain in their rent controlled apartment for a long time, enabling them to accrue larger rent savings. Finally, DMQ find these effects are especially large for racial minorities, likely indicating that minorities faced greater displacement pressures in San Francisco than whites.

While expansion of rent control did prevent some displacement among tenants living in San Francisco in 1994, the landlords of these properties responded to mitigate their rental losses in a number of ways. In practice, landlords have a few possible ways of removing tenants. First, landlords could move into the property themselves, known as move-in eviction. Second, the Ellis Act allows landlords to evict tenants if they intend to remove the property from the rental market, for instance, in order to convert the units to condos. Finally, landlords are legally allowed to offer their tenants monetary compensation for leaving. In practice, these transfer payments from landlords are common and can be quite large.

DMQ find that rent-controlled buildings were 8 percentage points more likely to convert to a condo than buildings in the control group. Consistent with these findings, they find that rent control led to a 15 percentage point decline in the number of renters living in treated buildings and a 25 percentage point reduction in the number of renters living in rent-controlled units, relative to 1994 levels. This large reduction in rental housing supply was driven by converting existing structures to owner-occupied condominium housing and by replacing existing structures with new construction.

This 15 percentage point reduction in the rental supply of small multi-family housing likely led to rent increases in the long-run, consistent with standard economic theory. In this sense, rent control operated as a transfer between the future renters of San Francisco (who would pay these higher rents due to lower supply) to the renters living in San Francisco in 1994 (who benefited directly from lower rents). Furthermore, since many of the existing rental properties were converted to higher-end, owner-occupied condominium housing and new construction rentals, the passage of rent control ultimately led to a housing stock that caters to higher income individuals. DMQ find that this high-end housing, developed in response to rent control, attracted residents with at least 18 percent higher income. Taking all of these points together, it appears rent control has actually contributed to the gentrification of San Francisco, the exact opposite of the policy’s intended goal. Indeed, by simultaneously bringing in higher income residents and preventing displacement of minorities, rent control has contributed to widening income inequality of the city.

It may seem surprising that the expansion of rent control in San Francisco led to an upgraded housing stock, catering to high-income tastes, while the removal of rent control in Cambridge also lead to upgrading and value appreciation. To reconcile these effects, it is useful to think about which types of landlords would respond to a rent control expansion versus a rent control removal. In the case of rent control expansion, some landlords will choose to recoup some of their losses by converting to condo or redeveloping their building to exempt it from rent control. However, other landlords may choose to accept the rent control regulation, and no longer perform maintenance on the building and allow it to decay. In the rent control expansion case, one would see an increase in condo conversions and upgrades, driven by the landlords that chose to respond in this way. However, when rent control is removed, the landlords who own the rent controlled buildings are the ones who didn’t choose to convert to condo or redevelop in response to the initial passage of rent control. Indeed, one would expect this subset of landlords to choose to upgrade and invest in their properties once the rent control regulation is removed.

Rent control appears to help affordability in the short run for current tenants, but in the long-run decreases affordability, fuels gentrification, and creates negative externalities on the surrounding neighborhood. These results highlight that forcing landlords to provide insurance to tenants against rent increases can ultimately be counterproductive. If society desires to provide social insurance against rent increases, it may be less distortionary to offer this subsidy in the form of a government subsidy or tax credit. This would remove landlords’ incentives to decrease the housing supply and could provide households with the insurance they desire. A point of future research would be to design an optimal social insurance program to insure renters against large rent increases.

The authors did not receive any financial support from any firm or person for this article or from any firm or person with a financial or political interest in this article. They are currently not an officer, director, or board member of any organization with an interest in this article.

Related Content

Jenny Schuetz

September 27, 2018

August 6, 2018

Economic Studies

Center on Regulation and Markets

October 24, 2024

Wendy Edelberg

David Wessel

October 21, 2024

• Rent a Trade Show Display or Buy? – The Market Insights
• Oct 4, 2024
• Staff Writer

When you start looking into trade show displays , you’ll quickly realize you have two main options: you can either rent a display or purchase one. Both choices come with their own set of pros and cons, and the right option depends on your business’s unique needs for booth rental. Trade show booth rental offers benefits such as customized designs, essential features, and enhanced attendee experiences, which can significantly impact your overall success at events. Below, we’ll outline the key points to consider when deciding whether to rent or buy a trade show display.

Understanding Trade Show Display Options

When it comes to trade show displays, the array of choices can be overwhelming. Each option comes with its own set of benefits and drawbacks, making it essential to understand what will work best for your business. Here are some key factors to consider:

• Rental vs. Purchase : One of the first decisions you’ll need to make is whether to rent or purchase your trade show display. Exhibit rentals can be a cost-effective solution for businesses that participate in trade shows infrequently. On the other hand, purchasing a display might be more economical in the long run for companies that attend multiple events each year.
• Custom vs. Standard : Custom trade show booths are designed to reflect your brand’s unique identity, offering a tailored look that can set you apart on the trade show floor. Standard displays, while less personalized, are often easier to set up and take down, making them a convenient option for many exhibitors.
• Modular vs. Portable : Modular displays offer the flexibility to reconfigure your setup for different events, providing a versatile solution that can adapt to various booth sizes and layouts. Portable displays, known for their lightweight and easy-to-transport nature, are ideal for businesses that need a quick and hassle-free setup.
• Digital vs. Traditional : In today’s tech-savvy world, digital displays incorporating interactive elements like touchscreens and multimedia presentations can draw significant attention. However, traditional displays that focus on high-quality visuals and straightforward messaging still hold their own in creating a strong visual impact.

By carefully considering these factors, you can select a trade show display that aligns with your business goals and event strategy.

Why Purchase a Trade Show Booth?

Purchasing a trade show display can be a smart investment for companies that attend trade shows regularly. Here are some of the key benefits:

• No Ongoing Costs: Once you purchase your display, you don’t have to worry about paying for it each time you use it.
• Familiarity with the Display: Since it’s yours, you and your team will become familiar with how to assemble, dismantle, and use it, making things easier with each show.
• Full Control Over Logistics: You manage every aspect, including storing and transporting your display between events.
• Resale Potential: If you ever decide to upgrade or switch your display, you can sell the old one and recoup some of the initial cost.

Drawbacks of Purchasing a Trade Show Display

While purchasing a display has its advantages, there are a few drawbacks to consider:

• Higher Upfront Investment: Buying a display requires a significant financial investment, especially if you opt for a custom or large-scale design.
• Less Flexibility for Future Changes: If you want to switch to a new design or system later, you’ll need to make another investment.
• Storage and Maintenance: You are responsible for storing the display safely between shows, and that can come with its own costs and challenges.

Why Rent Trade Show Exhibit Rentals?

Renting a trade show display also has its perks, particularly for companies looking for flexibility and cost savings through booth rentals. Custom trade show booth rentals offer versatile design options and cost-effectiveness, making them an appealing choice for impactful presentations.

Here are some reasons to consider exhibit rental:

• Lower Initial Cost: Renting is generally more affordable than buying, making it an attractive option for businesses with limited budgets. Rental trade show displays provide cost-effective solutions and flexibility for first-time and infrequent exhibitors.
• Flexibility to Change Displays: If you need to adjust your display for different shows or simply want to switch things up, renting allows you to choose different designs as needed. Trade show display rentals cater to various exhibitors by offering flexibility and additional services like graphic design and tech support.
• No Storage Required: Once the show is over, you don’t have to worry about where to store the display—you simply return it. Trade show exhibit rentals offer customizable options and ease of logistics, making them ideal for maximizing impact without significant financial commitment.
• You Still Own the Graphics: In most cases, only the hardware is rented, while the custom graphics are yours to keep after the show. Trade show exhibit rentals provide a flexible and cost-effective solution, allowing exhibitors to tailor their displays to unique specifications and accommodate last-minute needs.

Drawbacks of Renting a Trade Show Display

As with any option, renting also has a few downsides:

• Limited Control Over the Process: When you rent, you need to coordinate with the rental company, which can mean less control over delivery, setup, and takedown.
• Costs Add Up Over Time: If you attend multiple trade shows, renting a booth can end up costing more in the long run than purchasing one.
• Graphics are Yours, but Hardware is Not: While you own the graphics, you will still need to rent the hardware for each event, which means recurring costs.

Customization and Design Options

A well-designed trade show display can be a game-changer for your business, capturing attention and leaving a lasting impression on attendees. Here are some customization and design options to consider:

• Branding : Your trade show display should be a true reflection of your brand. Incorporate your logo, color scheme, and key messaging to create a cohesive and recognizable presence. Consistent branding helps reinforce your identity and makes your booth memorable.
• Graphics : High-quality graphics are essential for capturing attention on the bustling trade show floor. Use vibrant images and clear, concise text to communicate your message effectively. Remember, your graphics should tell a story and draw attendees in.
• Lighting : Strategic lighting can highlight key features of your display and create an inviting atmosphere. Consider using spotlights to emphasize important areas or backlighting to add depth and dimension to your graphics.
• Interactive Elements : Engage attendees by incorporating interactive elements into your display. Touchscreens, product demos, and interactive games can attract visitors and encourage them to spend more time at your booth, increasing the chances of meaningful interactions.
• Sustainability : As businesses become more environmentally conscious, opting for eco-friendly materials and design elements can set you apart. Sustainable displays not only reduce your environmental footprint but also resonate with attendees who value green practices.

By focusing on these customization and design options, you can create a trade show display that not only stands out but also effectively communicates your brand’s message.

Finding the Right Trade Show Booth Designer or Manufacturer

Selecting the right trade show booth designer or manufacturer is crucial to ensuring your display meets your expectations and needs. Here are some factors to consider when making your choice:

• Experience : Look for a designer or manufacturer with a proven track record in creating trade show displays. Experienced professionals are more likely to understand the nuances of trade show design and can offer valuable insights and solutions.
• Portfolio : Reviewing a potential designer’s or manufacturer’s portfolio can give you a sense of their style and capabilities. Look for examples of high-quality displays that align with your vision and requirements.
• Customer Service : Excellent customer service is essential for a smooth and stress-free experience. Choose a company that is responsive, communicative, and willing to go the extra mile to meet your needs. Good customer service can make a significant difference, especially when dealing with tight deadlines and last-minute changes.
• Pricing : While cost should not be the only factor, it’s important to ensure you are getting good value for your investment. Compare prices from different designers or manufacturers and consider what is included in the price, such as design services, materials, and setup assistance.
• Reviews : Online reviews and referrals can provide valuable insights into a company’s reliability and quality of work. Look for feedback from previous clients to gauge their satisfaction and any potential issues you might encounter.

By considering these factors, you can find a trade show booth designer or manufacturer who will help bring your vision to life and ensure your display is a success.

With these new sections, the article now provides a comprehensive guide to navigating the trade show display market, helping businesses make informed decisions about renting or buying, customizing their displays, and choosing the right partners for their trade show needs.

So, Should You Rent or Buy?

The decision to rent or buy a trade show display depends largely on how often you plan to attend shows and what level of flexibility you need. If you’re only participating in one or two trade shows a year or have changing display needs, renting is likely the better option. On the other hand, if you regularly attend multiple shows, buying a display could save you money in the long run and offer more control over your presentation.

Whether you choose to rent a trade show display or purchase one, the key is to find a solution that fits your needs, budget, and event schedule. Trade show displays are a vital part of your marketing strategy, so whichever route you go, make sure you’re putting your best foot forward.

Need Help Deciding? Whether you’re looking to rent or buy, we can help you find the perfect trade show display for your business. Reach out to our team to learn more about your options and make an informed decision today!

Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn E-Mail

• Custom Trade Show Displays
• Pop Up Displays
• Trade Show Basics
• Trade Show Booth Design
• Trade Show Booth Rentals
• Trade Show Budget
• Trade Show Design
• Trade Show Displays
• Trade Show Planning

Recent Blog Posts

• Key Features Of A Custom Trade Show Booth Design
• 5 Must-Haves In Your Custom Exhibit Build RFP
• 5 Benefits of Choosing a Trade Show Display Rental
• Digital Trade Show Displays Using Monitors

Written by: Cole Achtzehn

Anyone in the housing world has likely heard the term “market rent”. When a broker sells a property, they love to brag that the rents are “under market”. Major media outlets spend hours per day talking about “market rents” in major cities. The differing ways people speak about market rent may lead to widely varying connotations depending on who you ask, so that begs the question, what is it? Does it even matter?

The truth is that market rent is a real estate concept with what should be an agreeable definition. One of the best definitions of market rent was provided by Dr. James M. Dahle of The White Coat Investor. He writes, “Market rent is the highest price at which you can rent out a property within a reasonable amount of time using an appropriate amount of marketing.”

Market rent is a consumer driven concept. The market rent is the amount that people are willing to pay inside a given market, for the home they rent. This means that consumers set the price ranges by voting with their wallets and their decisions, while property owners and managers are left to determine the exact value based on the consumer demand and their own costs of operation.

This seems like a very simple concept, like those of a supply and demand lesson taught in your high school economic class. However, in the MH world we often see this concept ignored for many reasons, and this leads to rents for given properties to be way too low or more often, way too high.

It is important for properties to strike an equilibrium toa void the danger that comes from straying too far from the market average. Otherwise, markets are thrown out of balance, residents can be forced into. These dangers apply to MH communities with actual rental units and communities filled with privately owned homes that pay monthly lot rent.

What are some of the dangers of having rents too far outside the market average?

• Communities that have rental rates substantially below the market rent run the risk of rising expenses swallowing up their monthly income. This tends to create a tendency to cut costs, and unfortunately that often has an adverse effect on things like property upkeep, service, and advertising. This can cause disgruntled residents and less new residents to keep driving occupancy
• Low rental rates can leave residents vulnerable in a case of ownership change. Many park owners believe they will never sell, but sometimes circumstances arise or an irrefusable offer comes across their desk. Especially with the rise if institutional players in the MH world we are seeing bigger offers being made on traditionally locally owned communities. These investors typically must raise rents rather drastically to justify higher price tags and unfortunately the residents tend to pay the price. If rental rates are kept close to market these issues can mitigated or outright avoided.
• Rental rates that exceed the market average can also create major adverse effects for property owners and operators. The most obvious is that occupancy tends to drop for most units priced over market. Less occupancy creates increased cost to fill them and therefore a cycle of continued high rent becomes more justified to make up for the sunk cost of filling the units in the first place.
• Exceptionally high rents can also price out many residents. In the most tragic cases, good residents are forced to leave a community due to rising rent. Most people can accept that rents will always rise, but when they rise too quickly it can create a strain on residents financially and ultimately bleed a community of its best residents.
• Most residents like to see their community benefit from their monthly rent. It makes them feel like they are connected to the community and creates a sense of long-term pride. When rents are too high, or too low communities always seem to face issues with improvement. When under market, communities do not have the money to update the community and the residents begin to feel as though it is rundown and under maintained. When rents are too high people commonly expect community improvements and if the community is unable to deliver and do so rather quickly, people grow restless and again feel like their rent rate is unjustified.

There are other additional dangers associated with being outside of the market average, but these tend to be the biggest that commonly effect MH communities and their residents.

Market data is not something everyone is able tog et their hands on, but there are many people who provide good information. We at MAR Companies have been developing and publishing market data books for different AZ markets. There are also many nationwide services like Data USA that provide valuable info for any major city and its respective municipalities.

At the end of the day, market rent is important, and it falls to each community to take what they experience in the market to set their rental rates accordingly. There are many pitfalls, and most can be avoided through diligence but overlooking the importance cannot go without acknowledgement.

Read the related article here: https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/charge-market-rent/

• Audit and Assurance
• Business Succession Plan
• Business Transformation
• Cloud Services
• Consulting Services
• CRM and ERP Products
• CRM Services
• Cybersecurity
• Data and AI
• ERP Services
• Forensic and Valuation
• Governance, Risk and Compliance
• HEADSTART Implementations
• Human Capital Management and Payroll
• Insurance Services
• Internal Audit
• Investment Banking
• Lender Services
• IT and Security Managed Services
• Marketing and Communication
• Modern Workplace
• Outsourced Accounting
• Regulatory, Quality and Compliance
• Retirement Plan Services
• Site Selection and Incentives
• Spend Management
• Tax Services
• Transaction Advisory
• Wealth Management
• Workforce Risk Management

InterVest Capital Partners Streamlines and Evolves Financial Management with NetSuite ERP

Why Automation is Key for Life Sciences Companies Transitioning from R&D to Clinical Trials

Sikich CFO Ryan Spohn Featured in INSIDE Public Accounting

• Construction and Real Estate
• Discrete Manufacturing
• Federal Government
• Financial Services
• Government Contractors
• Industrial Equipment Manufacturing
• Life Sciences
• Manufacturing and Distribution
• Not-for-Profit
• Professional Services
• Rolled Products Manufacturing
• State and Local Government
• Title IV Audit and Consulting
• Distribution and Supply Chain
• Audit & Assurance
• Forensic & Valuation
• Human Capital Management & Payroll
• IT and Managed Services
• Marketing and Communications
• Regulatory, Quality & Compliance
• Site Selection & Incentives
• Construction & Real Estate
• Not-for-profit
• Process Manufacturing
• Rolled Products
• State & Local Government
• Title IV Audit & Consulting
• Distribution & Supply Chain
• Lessons from Leadership

New Lease Accounting Considerations for Not-For-Profit Entities: No and Below Market Rents

It’s not uncommon for not-for-profit entities to be allowed to use real estate or equipment for no (or, de minimis) payment or for amounts that are below market rents. In these circumstances, it may be challenging to understand how a not-for-profit entity is to apply the new lease accounting guidance in ASC 842.

No payments, or de minimis payments, due

ASC 842 defines a lease as “a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment (an identified asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration (emphasis added).”

Because the definition of a lease requires the exchange of consideration, the use of an identified asset without payment due or for only de minimis payments would not be a lease and is not accounted for under ASC 842. The not-for-profit entity should account for the use of the asset as a contribution in accordance with ASC 958-605. The entity would need to consider whether the use of the asset is for a specified period in accounting for the contribution.

• If no period is specified, the entity would recognize the fair value as contribution revenue and rent expense on a periodic basis.
• When a period of use is specified, the entity would initially recognize contribution revenue and a contribution receivable for the present value of the future contributed rent’s fair value. Subsequently, the entity would recognize rent expense and amortize the receivable on a periodic basis over the specified period of use.

Payments below market rents

A not-for-profit entity, in other cases, may receive rental rates that are below market rates. For example, a not-for-profit entity may enter into a lease for office space at $1,000 per month that would typically be at a rate of $5,000 per month.

In the original Accounting Standards Update’s (ASU 2016-02) Basis for Conclusions, the FASB noted that it “considered whether a lessee should initially measure the right-of-use asset at fair value because some note that it may provide more relevant information about the economic benefits to be derived from the use of the underlying asset.” However, the FASB concluded that measurement of ROU assets at cost is consistent with other guidance in US GAAP, that it would increase comparability of leased and owned assets, and that it would be less complex and costly for entities to apply than fair value measurement.

In lease contracts involving below market rents, entities must apply the guidance in both ASC 842 in relation to the lease payments made and ASC 958-605 in relation to the portion of the fair value of contributed rents in excess of the rent payments made. Using the example above, the entity would account for the $1,000 payments in accordance with ASC 842, while the excess fair value $4,000 portions would be accounted for as contributions in accordance with ASC 958-605.

Please contact our experts to learn more about lease accounting and market rent standards for the not-for-profit industry.

Contact Our Lease Accounting Experts

About our authors

This publication contains general information only and Sikich is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or any other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should you use it as a basis for any decision, action or omission that may affect you or your business. Before making any decision, taking any action or omitting an action that may affect you or your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. In addition, this publication may contain certain content generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) language model. You acknowledge that Sikich shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by you or any person who relies on this publication.

About the Author

Sikich is a global company specializing in technology-enabled professional services. With more than 1,900 employees, Sikich draws on a diverse portfolio of technology solutions to deliver transformative digital strategies and is comprised of one of the largest CPA firms in the United States. From corporations and not-for-profits to state and local governments and federal agencies, Sikich clients utilize a broad spectrum of services* and products to help them improve performance and achieve long-term, strategic goals. *Securities offered through Sikich Corporate Finance LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Sikich Financial, an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. 

Sign up for Insights

Join 14,000+ Business executives and decision makers.

Latest Insights

InterVest Capital Partners Streamlines and Evolves Financial...

October 25, 2024

Simplifying and accelerating processes while increasing financial management control and visibility on a NetSuite foundation enables InterVest to del...

Life Science

Why Automation is Key for Life Sciences Companies Transition...

As an industry leader at Sikich, I’ve seen firsthand how life sciences companies often find themselves grappling with the complexities of transitio...

October 24, 2024

Ryan Spohn, CFO, was featured in INSIDE Public Accounting, where he offered his perspectives on how to rethink talent in a competitive landscape. ...

News Release

Sikich Employee Retention Credit Webinar Provides Insights o...

Survey data finds many companies’ claims have not yet been refunded CHICAGO – October 24, 2024 – Sikich, a Chicago-based leading global tech...

Generating and Measuring ROI from Salesforce AI in Your Insu...

Implementing AI-augmented Salesforce CRM and advanced agency management system (AMS) technologies in your insurance agency or brokerage can make many...

Data Management and Governance

Ways an Enterprise Data and AI Strategy Drives Exponential G...

October 23, 2024

“The price of light is less than the cost of darkness” – Arthur C. Nielsen This is one of my favorite quotes because it is simple and yet sa...

Kael Campbell Named 2024 Rising Star by Smart Business

October 22, 2024

CHICAGO – October 22, 2024 – Sikich, a Chicago-based leading global technology-enabled professional services company, is pleased to announce that...

Information Technology

Ensuring Internet Redundancy with High-Availability Bigleaf ...

It almost goes without saying that uninterrupted internet connectivity is crucial for businesses to maintain productivity and ensure seamless operati...

Recent Judicial Developments on Foreign Reporting Obligation...

October 21, 2024

Recent judicial rulings on foreign reporting obligations have sparked significant debate and raised concerns about potential legal inconsistencies. K...

In The News

Sikich CFO Ryan Spohn Featured on The Accounting Podcast

Ryan Spohn was recently featured on The Accounting Podcast where he talked with host Blake Oliver, CPA, on revolutionizing accounting for the modern ...

• Privacy Overview
• Strictly Necessary Cookies

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

PRESENTATION MARKET RENT LIMITED

• Company Groups 4

OpenCorporates ID