patrick henry rhetorical analysis essay example

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples History Patrick Henry

Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry's Speech

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• What Is History
• Terracotta Army
• Eleanor Roosevelt
• Revolutionary War

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry Essay

The use of rhetoric appeals to strengthen the message is a common instrument for many orators, and Patrick Henry is no exception to the rule. In his speech “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” he resorts to all possible means to convince the new government that the war with Great Britain is inevitable (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). In this way, his viewpoint is not entirely of a theoretical nature but a call to action to gain ultimate freedom. Therefore, the consideration of the inclusion of ethos, pathos, and logos in Henry’s argument in the speech will demonstrate the way he attracted the attention of the audience to the presented issue.

The first tool which Henry used to persuade people in the need to fight was related to the attempts to prove the credibility of his thoughts by referencing other reliable sources. Thus, for example, he provided extensive information on the past development of the situation by saying that the British ministry unwillingly received their petition (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). The orator also added that the presence of fleets and armies by their shores did not resemble an attempt to find a peaceful way to negotiate (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). Hence, logos was the principal instrument, which he employed to convince others of the inadequacy of actions of Great Britain by invoking their reaction to American initiatives.

The second method contributing to the good reception of Henry’s speech was pathos, and it was more frequent than the previous technique. As can be seen from the text, the author incorporated it in the very first sentence by referring to the patriotic feelings of his fellow citizens (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). He further included this appeal in the inquiry about any other possible motives that his listeners could ascribe to the actions of the British government rather than deprive them of liberty (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). In this way, Henry emphasized the need to understand their general attitude contrasted to the patriotism of Americans and thereby evoked their emotional response.

The third rhetoric appeal inherent in the speech was ethos, which implied conveying respect to the author’s personality and, therefore, his specific thoughts on the matter. In this way, the upcoming war and its significance for the prosperity of the country were demonstrated through the lens of his personal credibility. For instance, when telling about the actions of American citizens in negotiating with Great Britain, he highlighted his involvement in the decision-making process alongside other leaders (“Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death,” n.d.). Hence, the consideration of his contribution to the political affairs of the country persuaded the listeners in his awareness of the actual problems.

To summarize, Patrick Henry successfully used logos, pathos, and ethos in his speech intended to demonstrate the necessity of war actions against Great Britain. First, he referred to credible sources of information reflecting on the measures taken by the British government in relation to their country. Second, Henry appealed to the patriotic feelings of his fellow citizens to attract their attention to the global problem. Third, the orator presented himself as a person directly involved in negotiations and, therefore, aware of the current situation. Thus, the effectiveness of his attempts to transmit his thoughts on the matter was conditional upon the use of the mentioned rhetoric appeals.

Patrick Henry – Give me liberty or give me death . (n.d.). The Avalon Project. Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 2). Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry. https://ivypanda.com/essays/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-rhetoric-appeals-in-patrick-henry/

"Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry." IvyPanda , 2 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-rhetoric-appeals-in-patrick-henry/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry'. 2 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry." November 2, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-rhetoric-appeals-in-patrick-henry/.

1. IvyPanda . "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry." November 2, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-rhetoric-appeals-in-patrick-henry/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: Rhetoric Appeals in Patrick Henry." November 2, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-rhetoric-appeals-in-patrick-henry/.

• Cicero's View of the Ideal Orator
• Rhetorical Persuasion – Appeals to Logos, Pathos and Ethos
• St. Patrick’s Day
• Rhetoric Definition by Socrates and Gorgios
• Rhetoric and Philosophy of Socrates and Gorgias
• St. Patrick’s Cathedral Overview
• Voices of the Revolution Concepts: Document Analysis. Patrick Henry’s Speech
• Hillary Clinton and Oprah Winfrey Speeches Analysis
• The Origin of Rhetoric
• Immigration Effects in Patrick Buchanan's The Death of the West
• "If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It" Justification
• Rhetoric: Chief Seattle's Enviromental Statement
• The Art of Public Speaking: Steve Jobs and His Messages
• Rhetoric: Social Issues' Influences on US Children
• Donald Trump’s Immigration Speech

Home Essay Examples History Patrick Henry

Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry's Speech

• Category History
• Subcategory History of the United States
• Topic Patrick Henry

Throughout history, numerous ideas have been proposed by many people through various speeches and pieces of text. Literature has permitted many people, regardless of the time, to gain knowledge about former events that helped shape the present. Through these bits of literature, readers are able to establish a deeper connection and understanding of past events. One part of this literature includes Patrick Henry’s speech to the delegates from the state of Virginia, delivered in the spring of 1775. Henry gives a speech to press for the delegates of Virginia to prepare for war. In Henry’s speech, he uses numerous rhetorical devices to enable the listeners to comprehend and connect to the author’s purpose in appealing the delegates from the state of Virginia to take action in the war with Britain. Henry utilizes these rhetorical devices to persuade and advocate an armed rebellion towards Britain by indicating the necessity to be cautious of past failures, presenting the perfect opportunity to engage in armed conflict, and calling for action.

To begin his speech, Henry’s first objective of instilling a sense of urgency about war is to make the delegates from Virginia aware of past failures or defeats. In order to do so, Henry uses rhetorical strategies to set forth knowledge about past failures. This knowledge allows the delegates to realize their mistakes, and not repeat those failures. Henry lists numerous failed attempts towards Britain, such as, “We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.” The repeated use of the same grammatical structure and examples of failed attempts shows Henry’s use of parallelism. With the help of this device, the previous attempts by the delegates towards Britain have been deemed useless, since they have had no permanent effect or impact. The delegates had tried numerous times to gain freedom from Britain, but every attempt failed. With these factors placed in the minds of the delegates by Henry, a sense of realization and awareness has been gained. The delegates have now realized that the past failures had no impact at all, and that true change must be achieved to see any positive effects. Additionally, Henry points out that the delegates have attempted every possible peaceful method to retaliate against Britain, however, these efforts did not yield any results for the delegates. They have instead witnessed loss and failure from these attempts, along with the exhaustion of successful plans or ideas. Henry restates the idea of the worn-out attempts, which implements a sense of realization and awareness into the minds of the delegates, by saying, “what terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted?” Through an appeal to the reasoning ability of the delegates, Henry can instill a sense of urgency into the delegates with the use of logos. By utilizing logos, Henry provides the delegates with facts and knowledge of their past performance in previous wars partaken. With the help of this rhetorical device, Henry reminds the delegates that every plan or idea has been exhausted and that they have no other choice than to meet Britain in armed conflict if the desired change is to be made into reality. With this understanding imposed into the minds of the delegates, they gain an awareness of past failures and realize that to gain independence or freedom, a change in authority or executed plans must be brought into action.

Our writers can write you a new plagiarism-free essay on any topic

When given a perfect opportunity, one must grasp it to maximize the benefits given the current opportunities. Patrick Henry had advocated for this plan of action by bringing attention to the ordeal at hand: the incoming conflicts with Britain. Along with the use of various rhetorical devices, Henry gave information on all past events that had led up to the right moment to engage in war, “Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.” Through the use of logos, Henry supplies the delegates with knowledge regarding the inevitability of the war. Now that the delegates have been informed that they have done everything possible to avoid the war, they can see the perfect opportunity. The opportunity, in this case, is all of the events leading up to the very moment necessary to participate in war with Britain. The delegates had previously attempted and shared their peaceful retaliations or events such as, “our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded.” Through the use of parallelism, the similar sentence structure allows for the listeners, the delegates, to clearly understand how urgent the action demanded by the opportunity is. The events leading up to the war include mostly peaceful protests, in which independence was the main goal. However, through the realization of these failed attempts, this points the delegates towards the necessity for a call of action, to gain independence. By explaining and listing past events that have led up to the perfect opportunity to engage in war, Henry creates a sense of awareness and realization in the delegates.

Lastly, Henry’s final objective of instilling awareness into the delegates is to spur the delegates to action. Originally, the delegates had desired to press for peaceful solutions with Britain, but these efforts did not end in their favor. Instead, negative outcomes resulted from these actions, and due to this, Henry aimed to gather delegates to spread awareness and instill urgency into their minds to make a more revolutionary change to see truly beneficial results. For these effects to take place, Henry must get his message through to the delegates, for example, “the war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!” Through the use of a reiteration of words to emphasize his points, Henry uses repetition to his advantage to get his message through. By stating that the war is inevitable, Henry tries to convey that there is no way around this incoming fight, and to see any beneficial changes, a need for action must be brought to their attention. Along with this, Henry also repeats the phrase, “let it come,” which, through repetition, intensifies his main points in his speech. This repetition creates a lasting impact in the minds of the delegates by reinforcing the overall message, that engagement in war is the only solution. Additionally, Henry provides illustrative scenarios or analogies to embed a sense of urgency into the delegates. These scenarios allow for the delegates and Henry to predict future outcomes if no action is taken, “they are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which ministry have been so long forging.” Through the use of a comparison between the delegates’ freedom and chains, Henry is able to use a metaphor to support his message. The “chains” in this phrase means the restrictions on the delegates’ freedom. Henry is implying that have been forging “chains” to restrict the delegates’ freedom, a process that seems inescapable, and without any action or retaliation, the delegates’ freedom and independence will be substantially restricted once again. By comparing the restriction provided by “chains” and the delegates’ freedom, the overall message is reinforced by these scenarios and analogies. Due to all of these factors being collected by the delegates, the general message in the speech must have created a sense of urgency in the delegates, along with a sense of awareness and realization, that in order to gain independence or see change, a call for action must occur for effective and beneficial outcomes to take place.

Patrick Henry provides the delegates with numerous rhetorical devices which is able to sway their perceptions. By using rhetorical devices such as logos and parallelism, Henry wields past experiences as a tool to change mindset and to emphasize that decisive action needs to be taken. Alongside the need for decisive action, Henry reminds the delegates of their past failures, which heeds a warning for them. With these warnings, the delegates have gained a sense of realization that the perfect opportunity is incoming, due to the exhaustion of failed attempts. With all of these factors coming together, Patrick Henry is able to clarify the consequences as well as persuade the delegates to prepare for war with Britain.  

We have 98 writers available online to start working on your essay just NOW!

Related Topics

Related essays.

By clicking "Send essay" you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

By clicking "Receive essay" you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

We can edit this one and make it plagiarism-free in no time

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Rhetorical Analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech Essay Example

Patrick Henry uses persuasive language in this address in order to persuade strong, wealthy, land-owning Loyalists in Virginia who stood to lose a lot to change their diplomatic stance against British encroachment to a more treacherous one of open military readiness. In 1775, the American colonies were attempting to negotiate with the British, and most of Henry's fellow delegates preferred to wait until these negotiations were completed before taking action. However, Henry believed that postponing would be a huge mistake. He encouraged the Virginia Convention to immediately take a defensive stance against Great Britain by organizing an armed militia in every Virginia county - an action most regarded as blatant treason, and his statement reflected far more extreme rhetoric and actions than what the rest of the delegates were comfortable engaging in. Henry based his proposal on the premise that violent military operations conducted by the British would shortly be set off. Patrick Henry used three main justifications to persuade the colonists to fight the British: (1) Fighting for colonists' freedom is the only way for peace to be achieved as the British have not treated the colonists well and will not treat them well in the future; (2) If the colonists do nothing, they will eventually become so oppressed and subjugated that they won't be able to defend themselves. Also, they must take action right away because they are stronger now than they ever will be.;  (3) The colonists have a responsibility to fight for the freedom they feel that they so justly earned as a community.

Patrick Henry starts off his argument by saying fighting for the colonists' freedom is the only way for peace to come about. Britain has not treated the colonists well and will not treat them well in the future. Henry emphasizes the state of emergency in line 3 by saying, "This is no time for ceremony," he calls for a decision to be made for this issue rather than postponing it for a later time, as this decision could have life-changing consequences. The current mindset of the colonists is described by Henry in line 8 as an "illusion of hope." One such "illusion" would be the belief that the colonies and the British might reach an acceptable peace without resorting to war. Henry warns his audience that while the "hopes" of the past may have comforted the convention, such comfort is an illusion that will not persist. This is further emphasized in lines 44 to 45 which recount the countless past attempts of the colonists to compromise with the British towards peace which ultimately resulted in vain. These failed attempts have ultimately pushed the colonies into a position with no option other than to fight for their freedom and rights.

Patrick Henry tries his best to rile up his audience by bringing up the topic of slavery and the treatment of the colonists under British rule. Henry underlines that Britain has already moved their position from a diplomatic attitude to a military approach and that they will no longer compromise but rather put the colonies "in their place." "They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging," Henry says in sentence 29. He wishes to continue the picture of slavery to illustrate that the colonies used compromises to resist British attempts to enslave them, but these efforts failed. "Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston!" he says in phrases 61 and 62. He confronts his audience with the idea that they are already enslaved and indicates that they must free themselves by fighting against Britain's subjugation. 

In his final argument, Patrick Henry emphasizes the importance of freedom and how it can be achieved if all the colonists come together as a community. Henry says, "Our brethren are already on the field," at one point. In this instance, Henry seems to be utilizing the nation-as-family metaphor to convince people to take part in the conflict. Through this sense of community, he seeks to motivate his comrades to take up arms in order to avert "chains and slavery". In the most famous last sentence from this speech "I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" Henry compares liberty and death, finding that death is preferable in the absence of freedom. 

Patrick Henry's speech at the Virginia Convention aimed to urge participants to organize a militia to repel British assaults in the future. In his speech, Henry builds an exceptionally thorough and solid case. He insists that the delegates consider reasoning, saying that you must either negotiate with the British or engage them in combat in order to achieve peace. However, history has shown that talking does not produce results, so we must fight for the country's continued progress. In order to motivate the crowd, Henry also uses hyperbole. With this comment, Henry shows his courage and exhorts the other delegates to do the same. This speech eventually persuaded those in attendance to start preparing Virginia troops for war against Great Britain.

Related Samples

• I Am Prepared To Die Speech Analysis Essay Sample
• George Bush 9/11 Speech Essay Example
• Rhetorical Analysis of Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez’s Having a Daughter does not Make a Man Decent Speech
• Barack Obama's Remarks on Trayvon Martin (Speech Analysis)
• Analysis of Ronald Reagan's Eulogy by Margaret Thatcher Essay Sample
• Texting is Killing Language by John McWhorter Ted Talk Speech Analysis Essay
• Rhetoric Analysis of Obama’s Dedication Speech
• Reflection on The Importance of Speech and Writing (Essay Example)
• Obama's Syria Speech Analysis
• Rhetorical Analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech Essay Sample

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to write a rhetorical analysis | Key concepts & examples

How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis | Key Concepts & Examples

Published on August 28, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.

A rhetorical analysis is a type of essay  that looks at a text in terms of rhetoric. This means it is less concerned with what the author is saying than with how they say it: their goals, techniques, and appeals to the audience.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Key concepts in rhetoric, analyzing the text, introducing your rhetorical analysis, the body: doing the analysis, concluding a rhetorical analysis, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about rhetorical analysis.

Rhetoric, the art of effective speaking and writing, is a subject that trains you to look at texts, arguments and speeches in terms of how they are designed to persuade the audience. This section introduces a few of the key concepts of this field.

Appeals: Logos, ethos, pathos

Appeals are how the author convinces their audience. Three central appeals are discussed in rhetoric, established by the philosopher Aristotle and sometimes called the rhetorical triangle: logos, ethos, and pathos.

Logos , or the logical appeal, refers to the use of reasoned argument to persuade. This is the dominant approach in academic writing , where arguments are built up using reasoning and evidence.

Ethos , or the ethical appeal, involves the author presenting themselves as an authority on their subject. For example, someone making a moral argument might highlight their own morally admirable behavior; someone speaking about a technical subject might present themselves as an expert by mentioning their qualifications.

Pathos , or the pathetic appeal, evokes the audience’s emotions. This might involve speaking in a passionate way, employing vivid imagery, or trying to provoke anger, sympathy, or any other emotional response in the audience.

These three appeals are all treated as integral parts of rhetoric, and a given author may combine all three of them to convince their audience.

Text and context

In rhetoric, a text is not necessarily a piece of writing (though it may be this). A text is whatever piece of communication you are analyzing. This could be, for example, a speech, an advertisement, or a satirical image.

In these cases, your analysis would focus on more than just language—you might look at visual or sonic elements of the text too.

The context is everything surrounding the text: Who is the author (or speaker, designer, etc.)? Who is their (intended or actual) audience? When and where was the text produced, and for what purpose?

Looking at the context can help to inform your rhetorical analysis. For example, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech has universal power, but the context of the civil rights movement is an important part of understanding why.

Claims, supports, and warrants

A piece of rhetoric is always making some sort of argument, whether it’s a very clearly defined and logical one (e.g. in a philosophy essay) or one that the reader has to infer (e.g. in a satirical article). These arguments are built up with claims, supports, and warrants.

A claim is the fact or idea the author wants to convince the reader of. An argument might center on a single claim, or be built up out of many. Claims are usually explicitly stated, but they may also just be implied in some kinds of text.

The author uses supports to back up each claim they make. These might range from hard evidence to emotional appeals—anything that is used to convince the reader to accept a claim.

The warrant is the logic or assumption that connects a support with a claim. Outside of quite formal argumentation, the warrant is often unstated—the author assumes their audience will understand the connection without it. But that doesn’t mean you can’t still explore the implicit warrant in these cases.

For example, look at the following statement:

We can see a claim and a support here, but the warrant is implicit. Here, the warrant is the assumption that more likeable candidates would have inspired greater turnout. We might be more or less convinced by the argument depending on whether we think this is a fair assumption.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Rhetorical analysis isn’t a matter of choosing concepts in advance and applying them to a text. Instead, it starts with looking at the text in detail and asking the appropriate questions about how it works:

• What is the author’s purpose?
• Do they focus closely on their key claims, or do they discuss various topics?
• What tone do they take—angry or sympathetic? Personal or authoritative? Formal or informal?
• Who seems to be the intended audience? Is this audience likely to be successfully reached and convinced?
• What kinds of evidence are presented?

By asking these questions, you’ll discover the various rhetorical devices the text uses. Don’t feel that you have to cram in every rhetorical term you know—focus on those that are most important to the text.

The following sections show how to write the different parts of a rhetorical analysis.

Like all essays, a rhetorical analysis begins with an introduction . The introduction tells readers what text you’ll be discussing, provides relevant background information, and presents your thesis statement .

Hover over different parts of the example below to see how an introduction works.

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech is widely regarded as one of the most important pieces of oratory in American history. Delivered in 1963 to thousands of civil rights activists outside the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., the speech has come to symbolize the spirit of the civil rights movement and even to function as a major part of the American national myth. This rhetorical analysis argues that King’s assumption of the prophetic voice, amplified by the historic size of his audience, creates a powerful sense of ethos that has retained its inspirational power over the years.

The body of your rhetorical analysis is where you’ll tackle the text directly. It’s often divided into three paragraphs, although it may be more in a longer essay.

Each paragraph should focus on a different element of the text, and they should all contribute to your overall argument for your thesis statement.

Hover over the example to explore how a typical body paragraph is constructed.

King’s speech is infused with prophetic language throughout. Even before the famous “dream” part of the speech, King’s language consistently strikes a prophetic tone. He refers to the Lincoln Memorial as a “hallowed spot” and speaks of rising “from the dark and desolate valley of segregation” to “make justice a reality for all of God’s children.” The assumption of this prophetic voice constitutes the text’s strongest ethical appeal; after linking himself with political figures like Lincoln and the Founding Fathers, King’s ethos adopts a distinctly religious tone, recalling Biblical prophets and preachers of change from across history. This adds significant force to his words; standing before an audience of hundreds of thousands, he states not just what the future should be, but what it will be: “The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.” This warning is almost apocalyptic in tone, though it concludes with the positive image of the “bright day of justice.” The power of King’s rhetoric thus stems not only from the pathos of his vision of a brighter future, but from the ethos of the prophetic voice he adopts in expressing this vision.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

The conclusion of a rhetorical analysis wraps up the essay by restating the main argument and showing how it has been developed by your analysis. It may also try to link the text, and your analysis of it, with broader concerns.

Explore the example below to get a sense of the conclusion.

It is clear from this analysis that the effectiveness of King’s rhetoric stems less from the pathetic appeal of his utopian “dream” than it does from the ethos he carefully constructs to give force to his statements. By framing contemporary upheavals as part of a prophecy whose fulfillment will result in the better future he imagines, King ensures not only the effectiveness of his words in the moment but their continuing resonance today. Even if we have not yet achieved King’s dream, we cannot deny the role his words played in setting us on the path toward it.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

The goal of a rhetorical analysis is to explain the effect a piece of writing or oratory has on its audience, how successful it is, and the devices and appeals it uses to achieve its goals.

Unlike a standard argumentative essay , it’s less about taking a position on the arguments presented, and more about exploring how they are constructed.

The term “text” in a rhetorical analysis essay refers to whatever object you’re analyzing. It’s frequently a piece of writing or a speech, but it doesn’t have to be. For example, you could also treat an advertisement or political cartoon as a text.

Logos appeals to the audience’s reason, building up logical arguments . Ethos appeals to the speaker’s status or authority, making the audience more likely to trust them. Pathos appeals to the emotions, trying to make the audience feel angry or sympathetic, for example.

Collectively, these three appeals are sometimes called the rhetorical triangle . They are central to rhetorical analysis , though a piece of rhetoric might not necessarily use all of them.

In rhetorical analysis , a claim is something the author wants the audience to believe. A support is the evidence or appeal they use to convince the reader to believe the claim. A warrant is the (often implicit) assumption that links the support with the claim.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis | Key Concepts & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved March 20, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/rhetorical-analysis/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, how to write an argumentative essay | examples & tips, how to write a literary analysis essay | a step-by-step guide, comparing and contrasting in an essay | tips & examples, unlimited academic ai-proofreading.

✔ Document error-free in 5minutes ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example

• Pages: 2 (378 words)
• Published: July 13, 2016
• Type: Essay

On the 23rd of March in 1775, Patrick Henry’s speech calling for a revolution became one of the most famous speeches in American History. Through the use of anaphora and metaphor, Henry manifests the urgency of the revolution and bolsters his reasoning for it.

Henry refers to the anaphora’s to guide into the reason why he proposes a revolution is necessary. He essentially sides with the people by repeating “we” referring to the people including himself, putting him on a more personal level with the people. The reasons he states in his speech “We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.” are stating the efforts that the people have

done but were “slighted” and “disregarded” and have “produced additional violence and insult” and were “spurned… from the foot of the throne.” Henry pointed out those reasons to stir the people’s emotions so they can recognize the urgency of the situation that is right in front of them.

Metaphors play a crucial role in Patrick Henry’s speech since it shows how dire the situation is by comparing it to something realistic, making the situation seem more serious than it actually is. The comparison causes the reader to over analyze the situation, leading to an overreaction. “Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.” Henry tries to prevent the situation by calling for a revolution since the delegates from the colony of Virginia sets aside the attempts that the people

have made to seize the wrong doings of the ministry and Parliament. This situation could cause destruction that could potentially propose a threat to the survival of our freedom.

When the use of metaphor and anaphora conjoin together, it motivates the reader to support the revolution in an act of reasoning for it. These rhetorical devices are very important for writings because not only do they add interest and effect to the writing, but it also allows the reader to go into deep thinking about the real reason and the understanding behind Patrick Henry’s war cry, “give me liberty, or give me death!”

• Analysis for “It Was Long Ago” Essay Example
• Comparison Of 2 Characters Of The Novel Essay Example
• On La Indolencia de Los Filipinos Essay Example
• Quafayshia Essay Example
• Management and Support for Projects Essay Example
• Discourse on Method by Descartes Essay Example
• The Secrets Of The People They Share With Essay Example
• Knowing God: The Doctrine Of Revelation Essay Example
• Challenges - Blessings in Disguise Essay Example
• Celebrities Do Not Have a Right to Privacy Essay Example
• Becoming a Clinical Psychologist Essay Example
• Lament and The Flower-Fed Buffaloes Essay Example
• The Empty Space by Peter Brook Essay Example
• I Have a Dream Speech Metaphor Analysis Essay Example
• The Lamp at Noon Essay Example
• American Literature essays
• Between The World and Me essays
• Book Report essays
• Book Review essays
• Book Summary essays
• Books essays
• Character essays
• Coming of Age essays
• Dante's Inferno essays
• Everyday Use essays
• Flowers for Algernon essays
• Genre essays
• Greek Mythology essays
• Incidents in The Life of a Slave Girl essays
• Letter essays
• Literary Criticism essays
• Literary devices essays
• Literature Review essays
• Metaphor essays
• Myth essays
• Play essays
• Plot essays
• Poem essays
• Poetry Analysis essays
• Protagonist essays
• Reader essays
• Reason essays
• Rhetoric essays
• Rhetorical Question essays
• Rhyme essays
• Simile essays
• Tragic Hero essays
• Translation essays
• Understanding essays
• Utopia essays
• Villain essays
• Writer essays
• Abolitionism essays
• Adam Smith essays
• American History essays
• American Revolution essays
• Ancient Egypt essays
• Articles Of Confederation essays
• Atlantic Slave Trade essays
• Aztec essays
• Benjamin Franklin essays
• Civil Rights Act of 1964 essays
• Civil Rights Movement essays
• Civil war essays
• Cleopatra essays

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Search for samples, answers to your questions and flashcards.

• Enter your topic/question
• Receive an explanation
• Ask one question at a time
• Enter a specific assignment topic
• Aim at least 500 characters
• a topic sentence that states the main or controlling idea
• supporting sentences to explain and develop the point you’re making
• evidence from your reading or an example from the subject area that supports your point
• analysis of the implication/significance/impact of the evidence finished off with a critical conclusion you have drawn from the evidence.

Unfortunately copying the content is not possible

Tell us your email address and we’ll send this sample there..

By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions .

Home — Essay Samples — History — Patrick Henry — Why Revolution Was Needed: Analysis of T. Paine’s and P. Henry’s Speeches

Why Revolution Was Needed: Analysis of T. Paine’s and P. Henry’s Speeches

• Categories: Patrick Henry

About this sample

Words: 679 |

Published: Dec 12, 2018

Words: 679 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: History

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1308 words

2 pages / 746 words

3 pages / 1251 words

2.5 pages / 1030 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

“Give me liberty or give me death.” These famous words were uttered in the speech, “the Speech In The Virginia Convention,” when Patrick Henry addresses the Virginia convention, specifically President Randolph in the March of [...]

In March of 1775, Patrick Henry’s speech on the Parliament’s treatment of the American colonists due to the harsh mandated British taxation and acts that clearly supported the mother country rather than supporting America. The [...]

Jean Toomer, in his novel Cane, compiles issues that plague the black community of the United States through the lens of characters who struggle with conflicts that arise because of racism in both the North and the South. [...]

Cotton was often considered the foundation of the Confederacy. The question this essay will examine is ‘To what extent did cotton affect the outbreak of the Civil War.’In order to properly address the demands of this questions, [...]

Thomas Jonathan Jackson was a great Confederate general that a big part of the American Civil War, and he was one of the best known Confederate commander after Superior general Robert E. Lee. Jackson was born on January 21, 1824 [...]

Throughout many years there has been a debate on whether the US should lower the drinking age to 18 or have it remain it at 21. In the 1980’s the drinking age was raised to 21 to decrease the number of fatalities occurring and [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free