critical thinking movie script

Movie Reviews

Tv/streaming, collections, great movies, chaz's journal, contributors, critical thinking.

Now streaming on:

In the press materials for “Critical Thinking,” producer Carla Berkowitz drops this line about her reaction to reading the true story that inspired the film: “The image and story was haunting and I felt like I had a quantum shift in my perception of chess and who plays it.” The who in question are five Miami-area Black and Latino men who, along with their teacher, Mr. Martinez, brought back to their underprivileged Florida neighborhood the U.S. National Chess Championship. This happened in 1998. The film chronicles the loving camaraderie of the players and the events leading up to their victory.

In that same press release, acclaimed writer and actor John Leguizamo , who plays Martinez and also directs, states that he wanted to make this film because there were very few representations of Latin people on-screen when he was growing up. He also mentioned that the book The Bell Curve harmfully depicted people of color as being mentally inferior due to our genetics. I wondered if, like me, Leguizamo grew up in an environment where the Black and brown people he knew played chess, so that it wouldn’t seem unusual nor an anomaly that they did. Because Berkowitz’s statement really made me consider what exactly the standard issue chess player was supposed to look like.

Chess has appeared in a lot of movies, from Boaz Yakin ’s “ Fresh ” to Steven Zaillian ’s “Searching for Bobby Fisher” to 2016’s superb Mira Nair film, “ Queen of Katwe .” I even remember it being prevalent in a crappy Gary Coleman TV movie about a smart Black kid. The game always carries the same symbolic qualifier: the person who plays it has a mental capacity for strategy and is intelligent. Chess is often employed to teach life lessons in these movies, to the point where it has become a cliché that just so happens to be used differently depending on who’s playing it. This difference is something that I admit often sticks in my craw, so I found myself wrestling a bit with this movie even though it seemed to be addressing my concern.

Unlike Zaillian’s film, which I guess answers my question of what a “standard issue” chess player is supposed to look like, the protagonists in the other films I’ve mentioned, and in “Critical Thinking,” are people of color whose economical circumstances are far from ideal. This tends to be the model when minorities are seen playing chess in films, which bends the cinematic chess player cliché toward making the ability to play the game the audience’s reason to offer empathy. Sure, they’re broke, probably in crime-ridden areas and may even do a crime or two, but see, they’re smart, so it’s OK to feel for them! This line of thinking has to do with who stereotypically plays chess and who does not.

Leguizamo’s Mr. Martinez speaks to this early in “Critical Thinking” by asking why chess is never associated with brown people despite a Latin man playing a major role in its evolution. “Why don’t you think we know about him?” he asks the students in his critical thinking class before delivering a great, pointed monologue that speaks about how history is taught in schools. The script by Dito Montiel has some sharp commentary about the education system, from what gets funded to the over-reliance on test scores to the differences between Martinez’s inner city school and the posh preppy institutions who fall victim to our heroes on the tournament circuit. There’s a bit more bite than you may be expecting, and the writing is just prickly enough to balance out the moments when the film dives headfirst into its tropes. And there are numerous tropes to swim in; not only is this a sports movie, it’s also an entry in the “Beloved Teacher” genre.

Our chess champion team is comprised of Sedrick Roundtree ( Corwin C. Tuggles ), Ito Paniagua (Jorge Lendeborg Jr.), Gil Luna ( Will Hochman ), Rodelay Medina (Angel Curiel) and later, Marcel Martinez ( Jeffry Batista ) who joins the team after dispensing a hustler’s ass-whipping in a speed chess match. Their dialogue is peppered with the language the PG-13 won’t allow but realism will. Martinez is often telling them “watch your mouth” in his class, even if, in his less guarded moments, he’s prone to occasional profanity. Leguizamo gets good performances from each of them, especially in moments where you really feel the bond between teammates, both in the tournaments and in the streets. When they tell each other that they’ve got each other’s backs, there’s a real emotional pull that emanates straight from the actors.

Though this is an inspirational movie, Leguizamo and Montiel never sugarcoat the dangers of the environment their characters inhabit. The potential for violence, temporary homelessness, crime, and police harassment are always hovering in the margins, sometimes even invading the safe space of Martinez’s class or the school. An early sequence that shockingly ends in violence shows how good Leguizamo is at quickly establishing the audience’s tie to a character. When Rivera (Dre C) is thrown into critical thinking class after a disciplinary problem (“my class is not detention!” Martinez yells at frenemy Principal Kesler [ Rachel Bay Jones ]), he immediately runs afoul of Ito. Rivera’s lack of response is due to Spanish being his primary language, which may also have something to do with the infraction that got him sent to this class. Martinez talks to him in Spanish, lectures Ito and all seems well.

Rivera is then brutally assassinated in broad daylight after accidentally bumping into another person on the street. The film is barely 15 minutes old when this happens, but it immediately establishes that “Critical Thinking” has no plans of abandoning reality for its feel-good message. That sense of realism extends to the way the characters bond with, rib, and defend each other. Additionally, Leguizamo plays Martinez as someone who understands the temptations and frustrations of his students’ world. He challenges them to do for themselves because he knows all too well that the system has no intention of lending a helping hand.

Like Nair does in “Queen of Katwe,” Leguizamo also blatantly refuses to impose on poverty any notions of shame or requests for pity. “Chess is the great equalizer,” Martinez tells his team as they navigate snooty tournament heads and appearances against challengers from much posher ‘hoods. Even when things get expectedly dire for some of the characters, “Critical Thinking” remains focused on the characters’ response to the situation, never once stripping them of their dignity for cheap emotional manipulation.

Of all the team members, Sedrick has the most detailed arc. He has a girlfriend, Chanayah ( Zora Casebere ), who is supportive and tougher than she looks, and a father ( Michael Kenneth Williams ) whose sole job here is to fill that chess movie trope of the angry guy who uses chess as a means of brutal domination. Williams is an always welcome presence, but I could have done without him. Still, there is one very good moment where he shows some growth, and his son makes a snide comment that he silently acknowledges as being right.

The chess scenes are good even if you know nothing about chess. I’ve been playing since I was five, so of course I wanted more detailed representations than Leguizamo provides. I found his classroom lessons and the team’s banter about moves fascinating, and every time I was given a good look at a chessboard, I got closer to the screen to investigate. And yet, despite its acknowledgement of my aforementioned issues, I still felt a little itchy watching “Critical Thinking.” I am always game for a movie that makes me reckon with my personal feelings and biases, and I’m glad this one exists because representation will always speak volumes. If nothing else, “Critical Thinking” reminds you what a chess player can look like.

Odie Henderson

Odie "Odienator" Henderson has spent over 33 years working in Information Technology. He runs the blogs Big Media Vandalism and Tales of Odienary Madness. Read his answers to our Movie Love Questionnaire here .

Now playing

Simon Abrams

Megamind vs the Doom Syndicate

Late Night with the Devil

Matt zoller seitz.

The First Omen

Tomris laffly.

Brian Tallerico

Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World

Film credits.

Critical Thinking (2020)

117 minutes

John Leguizamo as Mario Martinez

Rachel Bay Jones as Principal Kestel

Michael Kenneth Williams as Mr. Roundtree

Corwin C. Tuggles as Sedrick Roundtree

Jorge Lendeborg Jr. as Ito Paniagua

Angel Bismark Curiel as Rodelay Medina

Will Hochman as Gil Luna

Jeffry Batista as Marcel Martinez

Zora Casebere as Chanayah

John Leguizamo
Dito Montiel

Cinematographer

Zach Zamboni
Jamie Kirkpatrick
Chris Hajian

Latest blog posts

A Plea for Someone to Save Megalopolis

The End of the World is Going to be Weird on Prime Video’s Quirky, Clever Adaptation of Fallout

The Zellner Brothers Take a Walk in the Woods with Sasquatch Sunset

The Scene That Clint Eastwood Cut to Make Unforgiven a Classic

Elements of Madness

Cinematic reviews, recommendations, and more.

Home › Reviews › True story “Critical Thinking” is a gripping drama powered by strong performances and fantastic direction.

True story “Critical Thinking” is a gripping drama powered by strong performances and fantastic direction.

By Douglas Davidson on September 2, 2020 • ( 1 )

May 8 th – 10 th of 1998 marked the 30 th anniversary of the U.S. Chess Federation’s National High School Championship. With 230 schools from 32 states, the Wyndham Hotel at Los Angeles Airport was filled with some of the brightest minds of the time. Each one a capable competitor, each one requiring intense focus in hopes that seeing 10 moves ahead would be enough, even as they know the person across from them is likely counting on the same. That tournament would see Cuban immigrant Marcel Martinez defeat the 1997 defending champion Harry Akopyan to win the individual competition and his team would win the tournament as a whole, a first for Miami Jackson Senior High. (The full account of the riveting battle is available via the article written by Steve Immitt, USCF Organizer .) The story of triumph for Marcel, his couch Mario Martinez, and his teammates, Sedrick Roundtree, Ito Paniagua, Roedelay Medina, and Gil Luna, is the foundation for powerhouse drama Critical Thinking , the second directorial feature for actor John Leguizamo.

L-R: Will Hochman, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Corwin C. Tuggles, and Angel Bismark Curiel in CRITICAL THINKING.

There have been many “school story” films throughout the history of cinema. In brief, films like Stand and Deliver (1988), Lean on Me (1989) Dead Poets Society (1989), and Dangerous Minds (1995), whether based on real events or not, seek to exalt teachers and students alike by showing what happens when a bright mind is challenged by a wizened instructor. Critical Thinking bears some similarity to these stories in that the film, written by Dito Montiel ( A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints ), does focus on five students from an underfunded school in a less affluent part of Miami, Florida, who rise above their station in part because of the influence of their teacher. What’s different is that the teacher within this adaptation is not the sole heart of it. Rather, Montiel’s script rises and falls on the students themselves with their intersection being Mario “Mr. T” Martinez’s high school elective chess class. Directing, Leguizamo begins with Corwin C. Tuggles‘s ( Generation Um… ) Roundtree waking up at home, trying to get ready for school, and getting interrupted by his father, played my Michael Kenneth Williams, who challenges him to a chess match in order for Roundtree to earn milk. Leguizamo then shifts to Jorge Lendeborg Jr.’s ( Brigsby Bear ) Paniagua, for comparison, who’s trying to get off a late night shift at a garage so he can run several blocks to catch the school bus. The dichotomy of this introduction sets up not only the two dramatic anchors of Critical Thinking , but also presents two sides of what life at home is like for the kids of Miami Jackson Senior High. One has a parent who pushes too much, while the other has to work nights to provide for himself and his family. Both are just kids trying to get through, yet these are their situations. Of the core students, only Roundtree and Paniagua are explored with any measure, which might make you think they are emblematic of the time/place, except the message of Critical Thinking asks its audience to look deeper. Instead of seeing what weighs them down, Leguizamo wants you to see what pushes them forward, even when they make choices whose consequences come to bite them.

L-R: Angel Bismark Curiel, Corwin C. Tuggles, and Jeffry Batista in CRITICAL THINKING.

As much as “school” stories uplift audiences by seeing the students succeed, they often make it seem like their success comes from having the right person believe in them at the right time. While Critical Thinking does employ some of that, by keeping the primary focus on the students, the film feels far more universal and imbued with self-empowerment. This is not to say that Leguizamo as Mr. T is insignificant in the film, it’s that the script doesn’t go out of its way to make him anything other than a teacher who cares for his students, especially in his role as coach of the chess team. For those who’ve seen Leguizamo’s Broadway show John Lequizamo’s Latin History for Morons (2018), which you should absolutely take the time to watch (it’s on Netflix), his performance as Mr. T is not far removed from his performance in this show. In both cases, the actor is presenting a version of someone who seeks to improve the minds of his audience. In Latin History for Morons , the actor uses his conversation with his son to explore the removal of Latinx influence from history. In Critical Thinking , that same energy is applied to making sure that characters within the film recognize that the only path to greatness doesn’t involve the path made by White history, that there are pieces of global history from which each of them are a part, that the fact that their minds are sharper than most is enough to escape a system which has been tooled to keep them in place. Whether or not audiences are familiar with any of his other one-man shows like Freak (1998) or Ghetto Klown (2014), the actor/playwright/director is profoundly inspired by his own life and the Latinx community, using both to create a wonderfully moving, yet understated and natural performance.

L-R: Angel Bismark Curiel, Jeffry Batista, John Leguizamo, Corwin C. Tuggles, and Will Hochman in CRITICAL THINKING.

With much of the direction feeling like it was shot free-hand, the camera bobbing and weaving a bit, trailing just slightly behind the actors’ movements, Critical Thinking takes on an almost dream-like cinema verité style, creating the sense that the audience is being invited in to observe something private and personal, as opposed to something being displayed to the world. As much drama as Critical Thinking possesses, naturally as we are introduced to the main five characters, portions of their lives, and where chess fits in, what you may not expect is how griping the actual chess matches become. Within the 117-minute film, there are a total of three competitions the team engages in and each one will put you on the edge of your seat. The game itself isn’t as flashy as other sports, but it is no less athletic, something which Leguizamo captures beautifully via staging of the camera and pacing of editing. In one scene, a mixture of mid-range shots showing the respective players and a close-up of the board create a rapidly rising energy that absolutely sucks you into the match. Granted, some of this is because the script takes its time developing the individual characters as well as the group, so that when game time comes, the audience is as deeply invested in their success as they are. Whether you know the difference between the French Defense, the Caro Kann, or the Englund Gambit, or simply that there’s a white side and black side, you will find yourself holding your breath as Roundtree, Paniagua, Medina, Luna, and Martinez take on one challenger after another, each opponent calling upon them to test their mettle in ways which have zero baring on socio-economics status and everything to do with their ability to think critically, to examine actions, and understand the rippling consequences.

John Leguizamo on the set of CRITICAL THINKING.

Critical Thinking is not without its own imperfections. Rachel Bay Jones’s tight-budget Principal Kestel and Williams’s emotionally withholding Mr. Roundtree are given just enough to not appear stereotypical, and there’s a narrative thread with Lendeborg Jr. that’s left hanging in such a manner as to drape a shadow across the truly tense climax. Even still, Critical Thinking is a solid second directorial feature from Leguizamo, in no small part achieved due to the solid script structure and performances from the cast. Too often school films like to make the educator the focal point, but, in Leguizamo’s hands, Critical Thinking is a prime example of how stories should be when celebrating victories from students. It’s their story, their victory. Everyone has a role to play, a move to make. In this case, it’s almost entirely an easy checkmate.

In virtual cinemas, on VOD, and digital September 4 th , 2020.

For more information on Critical Thinking , head to the official Facebook page .

Final Score: 4.5 out of 5.

CriticalThinking_AppleTrailers_Poster_2764x4096

Discover more from Elements of Madness

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Critical Thinking (2020) - full transcript

The true story of the Miami Jackson High School chess team which was the first inner city team to win the U.S. National Chess Championship.

an image, when javascript is unavailable

‘Critical Thinking’ Review: John Leguizamo’s Inspirational High-School Chess Drama

The true story of the Miami Jackson High chess team — five brainy wizards from the inner city — is told in a rousing but conventional way.

By Owen Gleiberman

Owen Gleiberman

Chief Film Critic

‘Back to Black’ Review: Marisa Abela Nails Amy Winehouse in Every Look, Mood and Note in a Biopic at Once Forthright and Forbidding 2 days ago
‘The People’s Joker’ Is a Comic-Book Fantasia More Authentic Than Just About Any Comic-Book Movie 4 days ago
‘The Antisocial Network: Memes to Mayhem’ Review: A Netflix Doc Smartly Tells an Internet Hate Story: When 4Chan Met QAnon 5 days ago

“ Critical Thinking ” is one of those up-from-the-streets high-school competition movies where just mentioning the true story it’s based on kind of gives the game away. Set in 1998, it’s about the five chess wizards from Miami Jackson High who became the first inner-city chess team to win the National Championship. Boom! But, of course, it’s how they got there that matters, and even if this movie weren’t based on a true story, you’d know more or less know where it’s going. “Critical Thinking” has some appealing young actors, and it’s been directed, by John Leguizamo (who costars as the film’s tough-saint teacher), in a way that gives them the space to clown around and then get serious. It’s still, in the end, a bit of a connect-the-inspirational-dots movie, but that doesn’t mean you won’t be inspired.

Leguizamo plays Mario Martinez, who teaches an elective class in chess at Miami Jackson, where his students call him “Mr. T.” They’re a rowdy, bellicose, street-smart bunch, hard to control in class, so at first we think we’re seeing one of those movies, like “Stand and Deliver” or “To Sir, with Love,” about a captivatingly square gadfly instructor who shows a bunch of underprivileged kids how to transcend the expectations (or lack thereof) that have been thrust upon them.

In a way, “Critical Thinking” is one of those movies, though with a crucial caveat: The basic training — the intellectual whipping into shape — has all happened before the drama even starts. Martinez, in his thankless underpaid plaid-shirts-off-the-rack way, is beloved by his students, and he has taught them well; they’re chess players who’ve got the game in their blood. (It’s the only thing that gets them to settle down .) Leguizamo, who spent a number of his early one-man stage shows sketching in (often quite brilliantly) the lives of young people from a similar background, knows how to create scenes that bubble with spontaneity. And he himself plays Martinez with an effusive, slightly weary middle-aged demeanor that’s touching, because what he nails is the unabashed corniness of certain great high-school teachers — their willingness to put on a show for their kids, to turn the life of the mind into energized nerd theater.

At one point, using the magnetic chess board at the front of the class, he plays out a chess match authored (and recorded) by Paul Morphy in 1858, and he makes it sound as exciting as something on Roblox. He employs silly accents (Southern, French, Austrian) and puts on wigs and fake beards to enact the game, and he draws the kids into it, challenging them in his geek-with-cool-slang way (“Why is it a wack move, Sedrick? Don’t just talk to me, man, show me!”).

It’s one of the only scenes where we actually witness the mechanics of chess, and while that’s always a challenge for a chess drama (there’s only so much it can lure the lay audience into the heady intricacies of the game), I wish the students’ connection with chess were less of a given, and a little less abstract. Watching “Critical Thinking,” you’d never even know that the art of chess is rooted in thinking several moves ahead. Yet Leguizamo stages the matches with percussive power, the kids pounding their time clocks even as their eyes burrow into the board like lasers.

Much of the film’s appeal lies in the way it revels in chess as a pure symbol of leveling the playing field of opportunity. As Mr. T explains, chess is “the great equalizer.” It doesn’t matter how rich or poor you are, what Ivy League college or prison you’re in: The elemental nature of the game shears away everything but intellectual ability. So in a drama like “Critical Thinking,” where five students (four Latinx and one African-American) bust out of a high school with limited resources to attend a series of tournaments, there’s a democracy-in-action, anyone-can-win-in-America spirit.

The actors are terrific; the roles, as written, less so. Leguizamo is working from a script, by Dito Montiel, that walks the line between lived-in experience and overboiled cliché. Sedrick is played by Corwin Tuggles, who has a great pensive face, and he lends conviction to the character’s struggles at home. But it still feels like a contrivance that his father (Michael Kenneth Williams), an angry curmudgeon who treats his son’s chess victories as if they were beneath contempt, is also…the guy who plays chess with him every day! The other pivotal character is the canny hothead Ito (Jorge Lendeborg Jr,.), who begins to moonlight as a drug dealer, and though it’s not that we don’t buy it, it plays out like one of those obligatory flirtation-with-delinquency subplots from the 1980s.

There’s also a newly arrived immigrant from Cuba who joins the class — a sleek prodigy named Marcel (Jeffrey Batista), who can play (and win) four simultaneous games with his eyes closed. Always good to have someone like that on your team! As likable an actor as Leguizamo is, “Critical Thinking” never generates the teacher/student face-off intensity that “Stand and Deliver” did. The issue of how the team members fund their trips, with Martinez having to win over a skeptical principal (Rachel Bay Jones), creates some tension along the sidelines, yet once these kids start to win their tournaments it seems like they can do no wrong. The picture is pleasant enough, but watching it you’re always one or two moves ahead.

Production: A Vertical Entertainment release of a Chaplin/Berkowitz production, in association with NRSP, Cinema Veritas. Producers: Scott Rosenfelt, Jason Mandl. Executive producers: Harvey R. Chaplin, Carla Berkowitz, Emilio Estefan Jr.
Crew: Director: John Leguizamo. Screenplay: Dito Montiel. Camera: Zach Zambone. Editor: Jamie Kirkpatrick. Music: Chris Hajian.
With: John Leguizamo, Corwin Tuggles, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Will Hochman, Angel Curiel, Jeffrey Batista, Michael Kenneth Williams, Rachel Bay Jones, Zora Casebere.

More From Our Brands

The 12 best-smelling laundry detergents of 2024, from dedcool to glamorous wash, a ‘shark tank’ star’s sky-high n.y.c. penthouse seeks $38 million, shohei ohtani could be cleared by a mizuhara guilty plea, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, ahs: delicate turns back the clock, unmasking another familiar foe, verify it's you, please log in.

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Upcoming Movies and TV shows
Trivia & Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

Movies / TV

No results found.

What's the Tomatometer®?
Login/signup

Movies in theaters

Opening this week
Top box office
Coming soon to theaters
Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

Fandango at Home
Netflix streaming
Prime Video
Most popular streaming movies
What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

Civil War Link to Civil War
Monkey Man Link to Monkey Man
The First Omen Link to The First Omen

New TV Tonight

Chucky: Season 3
Fallout: Season 1
Mr Bates vs The Post Office: Season 1
Franklin: Season 1
Baby Reindeer: Season 1
Dora: Season 1
Good Times: Season 1
Beacon 23: Season 2

Critical Thinking

2020, Drama, 1h 57m

What to know

Critics Consensus

Strategic in delivering all the feels, Critical Thinking is a good old-fashioned underdog story that marks a winning directorial debut for John Leguizamo. Read critic reviews

Where to watch critical thinking.

Watch Critical Thinking with a subscription on Netflix, rent on Prime Video, Fandango at Home, Apple TV, or buy on Prime Video, Fandango at Home, Apple TV.

Rate And Review

Super Reviewer

Rate this movie

Oof, that was Rotten.

Meh, it passed the time.

It’s good – I’d recommend it.

So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Step 2 of 2

How did you buy your ticket?

Let's get your review verified..

AMCTheatres.com or AMC App New

Cinemark Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Regal Coming Soon

Theater box office or somewhere else

By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Critical thinking videos, critical thinking photos.

Miami -- 1998. Poverty, broken families, and a prejudiced system push underprivileged youth to the fringes of society. But for a magnetic group of teens, there's a reprieve. A game where it's not about where you come from, but how you play. That equalizer is chess. Mr. "T" Martinez, a chess militant and passionate coach, leads them to a completely foreign field of battle.

Genre: Drama

Original Language: English

Director: John Leguizamo

Producer: Jason Mandl , Scott M. Rosenfelt

Writer: Dito Montiel

Release Date (Theaters): Sep 4, 2020 limited

Release Date (Streaming): Sep 4, 2020

Runtime: 1h 57m

Distributor: Vertical Entertainment

Production Co: Perfect Balance, Cinema Veritas, NRSP, Hialeah Park Studios

Aspect Ratio: Scope (2.35:1)

Cast & Crew

John Leguizamo

Mario Martinez

Rachel Bay Jones

Principal Kestel

Michael Kenneth Williams

Mr. Roundtree

Corwin C. Tuggles

Sedrick Roundtree

Jorge Lendeborg

Ito Paniagua

Angel Bismark Curiel

Rodelay Medina

Will Hochman

Zora Casebere

Jeffry Batista

Marcel Martinez

Dito Montiel

Screenwriter

Jason Mandl

Scott M. Rosenfelt

Carla Berkowitz

Executive Producer

Harvey Chaplin

Emilio Estefan

Zachary Zamboni

Cinematographer

Jamie Kirkpatrick

Film Editing

Chris Hajian

Original Music

J. Mark Harrington

Production Design

Lewis Zucker

Art Director

Set Decoration

Danny Santiago

Costume Design

Avy Kaufman

Critic Reviews for Critical Thinking

Audience reviews for critical thinking.

There are no featured audience reviews for Critical Thinking at this time.

Movie & TV guides

Play Daily Tomato Movie Trivia

Discover What to Watch

Rotten Tomatoes Podcasts

Rankings FA
TV Premiere Calendar
Coming in 2024
Latest Reviews
Oscars™ New

Critical Thinking

Credits
Trailers [1]
Image gallery [2]

All images are copyrighted by their respective copyright holders and/or producers/distributors.

Rachel Bay Jones

Corwin C. Tuggles

Jeffry Batista
Zora Casebere
Ramses Jimenez

See all credits
"'Critical Thinking' shows that Leguizamo makes a good teacher on screen and behind the camera (...) A story that is truly inspiring and educational" Joe Blessing : The Playlist
"The picture is pleasant enough, but watching it you’re always one or two moves ahead." Owen Gleiberman : Variety
"Leguizamo has delivered an outstanding directorial achievement" Ethan Anderton : SlashFilm
"'Critical Thinking' does little to detach itself from genre cliché; yet this heartfelt drama (...) has a sweetness that softens its flaws." Jeannette Catsoulis : The New York Times
"The script by Dito Montiel has some sharp commentary about the education system (...) Leguizamo and Montiel never sugarcoat the dangers of the environment their characters inhabit (…) Rating: ★★★ (out of 4)" Odie Henderson : rogerebert.com
"The beauty of Leguizamo's film is that the filmmaker never tries to outmaneuver the viewer. This may be a textbook case of an inspirational teacher/underdog sports drama, but it surehandedly delivers the feels" Gary M. Kramer : Salon
"This inspirational sports drama has a worthy message (...) but viewers may ultimately prefer to have seen a documentary about the real-life participants rather than this earnest, conventional dramatisation." Tim Grierson : Screendaily

All copyrighted material (movie posters, DVD covers, stills, trailers) and trademarks belong to their respective producers and/or distributors.

User history

'Critical Thinking' Trailer: John Leguizamo Tries To Inspire A High School Chess Team In A Troubled Neighborhood

Critical Thinking should have made a triumphant debut at the South by Southwest film festival earlier this year, but the coronavirus pandemic ruined all that. The movie tells the true story of a group of Latinx and Black teens living in the toughest under-served ghetto in Miami who strive towards becoming national chess champions. But as the first Critical Thinking trailer shows, this movie directed by and starring John Leguizamo is much more than an average underdog sports drama.

Critical Thinking Trailer

Led by John Leguizamo as their inspiring teacher, these kids have an opportunity to make something of themselves instead of falling victim to the world of crime and drugs around them. It's a story that could have easily been a little hokey, but Leguizamo grounds it firmly in the harsh realities of a struggling Miami neighborhood, and it makes the proceedings feel that much more genuine and harrowing.

Corwin Tuggles , Jorge Lendeborg Jr. , Angel Bismark Curiel , Will Hochman , and Jeffry Batista all give breakthrough performances as the chess team at the center of this story, not to mention Leguizamo doing some fine work himself. If this movie had a chance to play on the big screen at film festivals, I feel like it would have made some big waves, especially in our current social climate.

Even though Critical Thinking didn't play SXSW, I still got a chance to check it out, and I wrote in my review :

"Critical Thinking could easily be described as Dangerous Minds meets Searching for Bobby Fischer , but it brings so much more to the table. John Leguizamo also directs this movie, and he's not shy about being blunt when it comes to these issues facing inner-city kids. That might be because he spent his formative years in areas like this, with kids like this, in New York City. But it's also because the script from Dito Montiel ( A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints ) doesn't bring heavy sentimentality to these proceedings."

There's something special in this movie, and since it's only getting a debut on virtual cinema, VOD and digital, I hope it manages to find an audience. It's inspiring and powerful, and it lets the underrated John Leguizamo show his passion, both as a storyteller and an actor. I cannot implore you enough to seek this one out when it arrives on September 4, 2020 .

Here's the official synopsis from when the film was meant to debut at SXSW earlier this year:

It's 1998 in Miami. Rampant poverty, broken families, and a prejudiced system push underprivileged youth to the fringes of society. But for a magnetic group of teens, there's a reprieve. A game where it's not about where you come from, but how you play. That equalizer is chess. Mr. "T" Martinez (John Leguizamo), a chess militant and passionate coach, leads them to a completely foreign field of battle: the National Chess Championship. With an underfunded school district, Martinez and his team can't just waltz into the arena. They have to fight for it. Chess runs parallel to their own experiences as Martinez teaches them that the power of Critical Thinking can not only save their kings, but also their lives.

Search Search Search …
Search Search …

Best Movies for Critical Thinking: Top Picks to Challenge Your Mind

In today’s fast-paced world, movies have become an essential source of entertainment and learning, providing viewers with thought-provoking stories that challenge their intellect. One of the many subgenres of films that cater to this need is the category of movies for critical thinking. These films captivate audiences by presenting complex narratives that delve into unique philosophical concepts, moral dilemmas, and intricate character developments. A compelling critical thinking movie will often challenge perception and reality, encouraging viewers to reflect on the nature of humanity and the universe.

Such movies encompass a range of genres, from mind-bending dramas to thrilling science fiction. Critical thinking films often explore multi-layered philosophical themes and beliefs, offering distinct perspectives on the human condition and providing valuable insights into how we perceive the world around us. Ultimately, these movies aim to inspire audiences to think critically and question their pre-existing assumptions about life, society, and existence.

Key Takeaways

Critical thinking movies span various genres, offering complex narratives that promote intellectual engagement.
These films often explore philosophical themes and beliefs while challenging common perceptions of reality.
Through captivating stories, critical thinking movies encourage viewers to reflect on their own understanding of humanity and the universe.

Understanding Critical Thinking

Definition and importance.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment. It involves evaluating the validity of arguments, identifying biases, and considering different perspectives to make informed decisions. Critical thinking is essential in various areas of life, as it helps individuals to solve problems, make better choices, and foster deeper understanding.

The importance of critical thinking cannot be overstated. It enables critical thinkers to navigate complex situations, think creatively, and approach new challenges with confidence. It equips individuals to discern truth from falsehood, judge the credibility of sources, and differentiate between reliable and misleading information. By fostering critical thinking skills, people become more adept at reasoning, problem solving, and effective communication.

Relation with Movies

Movies can be a potent tool for promoting critical thinking. They offer diverse settings, complex characters, and intricate storylines that stimulate the mind and encourage viewers to engage with thought-provoking content. Many movies drive viewers to analyze the narrative, events, and character motivations, pushing them to exercise their critical thinking abilities.

Films like Inception and A Beautiful Mind challenge viewers to employ critical thinking by exploring complicated storylines and themes. These movies encourage audiences to deconstruct the elements of the plot, evaluate the motivations and actions of characters, and critically assess the impact of choices made within the story. By engaging with complex narratives, viewers develop a deeper understanding of the world portrayed in the film and enhance their own critical thinking skills as they explore various perspectives and theories.

Critical Thinking in Dramas

Forrest gump.

Forrest Gump is a captivating drama that takes viewers on an emotional journey through the life of its titular character, played by Tom Hanks. Set in America, the movie follows Forrest Gump, a man with a low IQ, as he navigates various real-life historical events and situations. Through his innocent yet profound perspective, the film encourages viewers to critically examine themes such as acceptance, loyalty, and appreciation.

The character of Forrest Gump teaches us invaluable lessons about resilience, empathy, and determination, challenging the audience’s critical thinking abilities while presenting a heartfelt story. This thought-provoking movie serves as a right of passage for those seeking a deeper understanding of life’s complexities.

Good Will Hunting

Good Will Hunting is another remarkable drama that fosters critical thinking. The film revolves around a young, self-taught mathematics prodigy, Will Hunting, portrayed by Matt Damon, who faces the challenges of living in a tough, working-class environment in America. The movie delves into real-life issues of identity, relationships, and personal growth while presenting an enthralling story of brilliance, vulnerability, and human connection.

As the protagonist navigates through the intricacies of life and academia, the audience is encouraged to examine their own understanding of success, potential, and self-worth. Through Will’s journey to confront his past and pursue his extraordinary talent, Good Will Hunting provides an excellent opportunity for viewers to reflect and engage their critical thinking skills.

Exploring Philosophy and Beliefs through Movies

The Matrix is a groundbreaking science fiction film that invites audiences to question their beliefs about reality. The movie centers on the character of Neo, played by Keanu Reeves, who discovers that his entire world is actually a simulated reality called the Matrix. Throughout the film, themes of fate, free will, and the nature of reality are explored in a compelling narrative. As it portrays a world where nothing is what it seems, The Matrix challenges viewers to critically examine their own beliefs and assumptions about the world around them.

The Truman Show

Another film that delves into the world of illusions is The Truman Show . This unique story captures the life of Truman, an unwitting participant in a reality TV show that is, unbeknownst to him, centered around his every move. As Truman starts to unravel the truth about his artificial world, the film delves into philosophical questions about the nature of existence, the role of the media in shaping our perceptions, and the importance of personal freedom. With its thought-provoking concepts, The Truman Show encourages critical thinking in the exploration of reality and the human experience.

Cloud Atlas

Cloud Atlas is an ambitious film that takes viewers on a whirlwind journey through multiple time periods, exploring the interconnectedness of human lives across time and space. With its complex narrative structure and a wide range of characters, the film delves into themes of reincarnation, interconnectedness, and the impact of individual actions on the greater world. By weaving together seemingly disparate storylines, Cloud Atlas prompts viewers to contemplate the deeper connections that bind humanity together, inviting them to reflect on their own beliefs and philosophies about the nature of existence and the impact of individual choices on the world.

Movies that Challenge Perception and Reality

Inception is a groundbreaking film that delves into the world of dreams and the manipulation of the human mind. Directed by Christopher Nolan, this psychological thriller introduces us to the concept of dream-sharing and dives deep into the complexities of the subconscious. The film follows a group of skilled professionals, led by Dom Cobb (played by Leonardo DiCaprio), who specialize in extracting ideas from people’s minds through shared dreaming. Inception challenges our perception of reality in unique ways, pushing the boundaries of film storytelling and leaving viewers questioning the nature of their own dreams and realities.

Being John Malkovich

Being John Malkovich is a quirky, surreal, and thought-provoking film directed by Spike Jonze. The story centers on a puppeteer, Craig Schwartz (played by John Cusack), who discovers a mysterious portal in his office that allows people to enter the mind of actor John Malkovich. This bizarre premise raises intriguing philosophical questions about identity, ego, and the nature of reality. As the film unfolds, the lines between the real world, the fantasy world, and the life of John Malkovich blur together, challenging our preconceived notions of perception and self-awareness.

Shutter Island

Shutter Island is a suspenseful psychological thriller directed by Martin Scorsese, based on the novel by Dennis Lehane. The film revolves around two U.S. Marshals, Teddy Daniels (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (played by Mark Ruffalo), who are sent to investigate the disappearance of a prisoner from an isolated mental institution on Shutter Island. As they delve deeper into the case, they uncover disturbing truths and confront the terrifying reality that their own sanity is at stake. The film is filled with twists and turns, constantly shifting the viewer’s perception of what is real and what isn’t, while exploring the complexity of human consciousness and the power of the mind.

These movies provide audiences with engaging and fascinating narratives that challenge our grasp on reality and perception. Through their thought-provoking storylines and inventive filmmaking techniques, Inception, Being John Malkovich, and Shutter Island inspire critical thinking and ignite our curiosity about the world around us.

Critical Thinking in Time and Space Movies

Predestination.

Predestination is a fascinating take on time travel, centered on the concept of a temporal agent who tries to prevent crimes before they happen. The movie keeps viewers on their toes, exploring themes of fate, free will, and identity. The protagonist’s journey through various time periods challenges the audience to think critically about the nature of time and the consequences of attempting to control it.

Interstellar

Directed by Christopher Nolan, Interstellar is a thought-provoking space odyssey that plays with complex theories of time, space, and the future of humanity. The plot follows a team of astronauts who travel through a wormhole in search of a new home for humanity as Earth is on the verge of collapse. The movie stretches the boundaries of science fiction with ideas about black holes, time dilation, and artificial intelligence. The viewer is encouraged to think critically about humanity’s role in the cosmos and the potential consequences of tampering with the fabric of time and space.

2001: A Space Odyssey

Regarded as a masterpiece of science fiction, 2001: A Space Odyssey delves deep into themes of human evolution, artificial intelligence, and the search for extraterrestrial life. The movie’s enigmatic presentation of past, present, and future leaves viewers questioning the true nature of reality and human existence. The audience is introduced to HAL 9000, an artificial intelligence system that develops a malfunction with disastrous consequences. This storyline provokes questions about the ethical development and application of AI technology, pushing the viewer to think critically about the relationship between humans and advanced technology.

Movies Encouraging Reflection on Self and Humanity

Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a thought-provoking film that delves into the concept of human memory and emotions. Starring Jim Carrey, this movie portrays the desire to erase painful memories in order to move on from a failed relationship. As the story unfolds, it offers a profound look into the soul, highlighting how memories define who we are and help us grow. Viewers are encouraged to reflect on their own experiences and evaluate the importance of embracing both joyful and sorrowful moments in life.

Life of Pi is a visually stunning and deeply contemplative film that centers around a young man named Pi, who finds himself stranded on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger following a shipwreck. As he navigates the challenges of survival, the movie delves into themes of spirituality, faith, and the human will to live. The story provides an opportunity for viewers to examine their beliefs, question reality, and consider the role of storytelling in the perception of truth. Through Pi’s journey, Life of Pi offers insights into the complexities of human nature and encourages reflection on the evolution of our convictions and values.

Contagion is a gripping thriller that depicts the spread of a highly contagious and deadly virus. While the primary focus of the movie is on the epidemic and the race to find a cure, it offers a sobering exploration of human behavior in the face of a global crisis. The fear and panic exhibited by characters serve as a reminder of the fragility of society and the importance of cooperation and compassion in times of adversity. Examining the responses of individuals, government agencies, and the media, Contagion triggers discussions on ethics, social responsibility, and the resilience of the human spirit in the midst of chaos.

Critical Thinking in Thriller Movies

Primer is a mind-bending science fiction thriller that leaves viewers questioning the nature of time and the consequences of playing with it. The movie’s complex narrative structure and attention to scientific detail encourage critical thinking in the audience. Directed by Shane Carruth, Primer tells the story of two engineers who accidentally discover time travel and grapple with the ethical implications of their newfound power. The film challenges viewers to think critically about the role that technology plays in our lives, as well as the potential dangers and moral dilemmas associated with scientific advancement.

Memento is another example of a psychological thriller that inspires critical thinking. Directed by Christopher Nolan, the film follows the story of Leonard, a man suffering from short-term memory loss, as he tries to unravel the truth about his wife’s murder. The movie is structured in such a way that it mimics Leonard’s disjointed memory, with scenes unfolding in reverse order. This unique storytelling technique engages viewers on a deeper level and promotes critical thinking by forcing them to piece together the narrative on their own. Memento also raises questions about the reliability of memory and the lengths people will go to create a sense of meaning in their lives.

V for Vendetta

V for Vendetta is a thought-provoking thriller that explores themes of political oppression, resistance, and personal freedom. Set in a dystopian future where Britain is ruled by a totalitarian regime, the film follows the mysterious anarchist ‘V’ and his quest to dismantle the fascist government. Directed by James McTeigue and featuring performances from Hugo Weaving and Natalie Portman, this movie challenges viewers to critically assess the role of government, the importance of individual liberties, and the true meaning of freedom.

Throughout these thriller films, notable actors such as Hugh Jackman and Brad Pitt have portrayed characters experiencing paranoia and the consequences of difficult choices. Directors like Darren Aronofsky have also contributed to the genre, crafting narratives that leave audiences questioning their understanding of reality and the human psyche. These movies prompt viewers to engage in critical thinking as they navigate intricate plotlines, consider ethical dilemmas, and grapple with philosophical questions.

Appreciating Movies as Art and Stories

Cinema has long been revered as both an art form and a means of storytelling. It provides a unique platform that combines visuals, sound, and narrative to convey powerful messages and evoke emotions. Throughout time, different genres and styles have emerged to challenge audiences’ perspectives, offering thought-provoking experiences.

One exceptional example of artistic storytelling is the film The Lion King . This animated classic transcends its medium by delivering a rich, thought-provoking tale that delves into themes like family, leadership, and the circle of life. The film’s visually stunning animation and evocative score also demonstrate how the art of cinema can elevate a story to new heights.

In recent years, the exploration of artificial intelligence in movies has sparked critical thinking and raised ethical questions. For instance, Ex Machina is a visually captivating and intelligent science fiction film that delves into the complexities of human-like AI. The movie invites viewers to ponder the implications of creating and interacting with such technology, as well as the potential consequences that may arise.

When it comes to appreciating movies as art, the attention to detail in cinematography, sound design, and character development is vital. These elements work cohesively to create an immersive experience that allows the viewer to engage with the story. For instance, beautifully shot landscapes and meticulously curated sets often transport audiences to different worlds, while carefully crafted characters elicit empathy and spark debate.

Moreover, understanding the theme or underlying message of a film further enhances the appreciation of movies as both art and story. These themes can range from societal issues such as poverty or discrimination to existential topics like the value of memories or the nature of time. By paying attention to the intent and vision of the filmmakers, viewers can gain a deeper understanding of the artwork and its significance.

In conclusion, the art of cinema offers a unique platform for telling thought-provoking stories that challenge and inspire the audience. By appreciating the artistic elements and themes present in movies, viewers can engage in critical thinking and find meaning in the stories shared on the big screen. [url=” https://www.theodysseyonline.com/movies-for-critical-thinkers “]

Educational and inspirational movies play a significant role in fostering critical thinking skills among audiences. These films challenge the viewer’s perspectives and encourage them to analyze complex situations or ideas. By stimulating intellectual curiosity, these movies serve as a valuable addition to educational resources.

Inception, for example, is a well-known critical thinking movie that involves puzzling concepts and intricate storytelling. It pushes the viewers to delve deep into their thought process and keep up with the movie’s intricate plot. Another great example is Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, a romantic science-fiction film that utilizes a nonlinear storyline to promote critical thinking by constantly challenging the viewers’ beliefs.

Empowering movies such as Good Will Hunting and Forrest Gump also instigate critical thinking while evoking themes of acceptance, loyalty, and appreciation. These must-watch critical thinking movies demonstrate the power of human resilience in overcoming personal and societal obstacles.

Finally, the benefits of critical thinking are not restricted to fictional movies alone. Films like Queen of Katwe, based on true stories of perseverance, showcase the value of strategic thinking and problem-solving skills through engaging chess games .

In summary, the captivating world of movies offers a vast array of films that foster critical thinking while providing audiences with thought-provoking and gratifying experiences. Whether they are fictional stories, biographical dramas, or even documentaries, these movies effectively serve as both educational and inspirational resources in today’s world.

How to answer critical thinking questions

Whether you are studying and preparing to take the LSAT or looking to engage in more meaningful workplace discussions, you need to […]

The 7 Best Game Theory YouTube Channels

Game theory is a fascinating topic that can provide insight into all levels of human interaction. To learn more about this topic […]

Debate & Critical Thinking

We’ve all had debates with friends or on social media, where we get into it over some heated issue. Emotions get out […]

Critical Thinking in 2022: The Key To Growing and Maintaining Knowledge

Although the major focus on critical thinking has only been popular in the last 100 years or so, you can see hints […]

Critical Thinking (2020)

Full cast & crew.

Directed by

Writing credits (in alphabetical order) , cast (in credits order) , produced by , music by , cinematography by , editing by , casting by , production design by , art direction by , set decoration by , costume design by , makeup department , second unit director or assistant director , art department , sound department , visual effects by , stunts , camera and electrical department , casting department , costume and wardrobe department , editorial department , location management , music department , script and continuity department , transportation department , additional crew , thanks .

Release Dates | Official Sites | Company Credits | Filming & Production | Technical Specs

Contribute to This Page

Full Cast and Crew
Release Dates
Official Sites
Company Credits
Filming & Production
Technical Specs
Plot Summary
Plot Keywords
Parents Guide

Did You Know?

Crazy Credits
Alternate Versions
Connections
Soundtracks

Photo & Video

Photo Gallery
Trailers and Videos
User Reviews
User Ratings
External Reviews
Metacritic Reviews

How to write a movie script?

“A story should have a beginning, a middle and an end, but not necessarily in that order.” -Jean-Luc Godard

How to write a good movie script?

A movie script consists of three things:

The story idea.
Movie Structures
Script Format

The Story Idea.

All movie scripts start here. The Film Connection, an immersive film school, says the number one thing they hear from prospective students is “I have an idea for a movie.” Indeed, who among us hasn’t had an idea for a movie?

The mistake most novice screenwriters make is they try too hard—they have unnecessary characters and plot lines resulting in a complicated mess. Script consultant Michale Hauge describes a good story is one that “…you can describe in TWO SENTENCES, with a single hero who encounters a specific problem and then has a simple, clearly defined goal with lots of obstacles to achieving it.”

Instead of thinking more is better, remember less is best.

Remember, a movie script is just a form of storytelling. When we talk with our friends or co-workers or schoolmates, we are all story telling in some form or other as we describe what our day was like. A good exercise to develop your story telling abilities is to spend some time each evening recounting the stories you shared that day and find that two-sentence description mentioned above and think of ways you could have told the story better. Like any craft, your ability as a story teller will improve with practice.

Commonly Used Movie Structures.

All movies have a structure and shorn down to the basic elements they all have a beginning, middle, and an end. As Jean-Luc Goddard said, how we present these three elements on the screen is not necessarily done sequentially. There are many ways to tell the same story—there is no right way or wrong way to present a story. Here are a few of the many story structures used for movies you’ve probably seen.

Classic Three-Act Structure.

Act One is the set-up, Act Two reveals the conflict, and Act Three provides the resolution. In this structure, every scene is a necessary progression to the next. Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Die Hard and a guy named Shakespeare all used this structure.

Real-Time Structure.

Stories are presented in a single, uninterrupted stream. There are no breaks, no jumps backwards or forwards in time, and every moment matters. United 93 , My Dinner with Andre and the television series, 24 all used this structure.

Fabula/Syuzhet Structure.

Originating in Russia, Fabula is the meat of the story, syuzhet the narration and how it is used to organize the story. Its form often presents the end first, then takes the audience on a journey on how we got there . Fight Club , Casino , Forrest Gump , American Beauty , Goodfellas and Citizen Kane all used this structure.

Rashomon Structure.

This structure was one of the many contributions of Akira Kurosawa and gets its name from his classic Rashomon . In this structure, the same story is told over and over through the eyes of different characters. It brings home the point that there are different sides to every story.

Non-Linear Structure.

In this structure, the story is told through backwards, forwards and sideways jumps in time. Stories told in a non-linear manner challenge the validity of the characters’ memories. Movies that used the non-linear structure include Pulp Fiction, Annie Hall and Reservoir Dogs.

A good exercise to undertake would be to take your story idea and re-tell it using three or four of the above structures until you get comfortable with one or more of the structures on your path to finding your story telling voice.

Film Industry Script Format.

A movie script is more than just a story; it is a technical document which means it requires industry standard formatting requirements. Unlike novels, things cannot be left to the reader’s imagination and so must include basic information as to settings, time of day and other necessities for the script to be broken down and budgeted. To do this a basic industry format has been develop that ranges from what font (Courier) and how big it is (12 point), to margins, number of lines and line spacing, page numbering, ad infinitum. There are many guides to proper screenwriting formatting as well as software programs that simplify the process of converting story to screenplay. The important thing to remember is that until your story is in screenplay format you won’t have anything to submit.

The last step in writing a script for a movie is to protect yourself and your script before you submit it and to prepare it for submission.

Register your script with the U.S. Copyright office and The Writer’s Guild of America.
Prepare cover letter with your contact information, a logline (one or two sentence story description) and a synopsis (one page or less that tells the story and sketches the characters) in present tense, third person.
NOTE: The synopsis is a critical element of your script presentation and much more involved than space allows for in this article. Often it is the only thing read from the mountain of scripts that producers receive. Additionally, synopsis can be pitched without a screenplay attached.
Submit your script. To get your script in front of a producer is not easy. The fast track is to find a reputable agent who has relationships with producers and get them to take a look at yours. You can also enter screenwriting contests and competitions. You should devote time to both online and in-person networking. Look into a school like the Film Connection—their screenwriting program works with industry professionals and can get you and your script into a pitch meeting where you present your script to producers with the power to say yes.
Keep at it. Writing a script for a movie is a long journey from the “I have an idea for a movie” to getting the green light for your script to be made into a movie. It’s a story that has a beginning (the I have an idea phase), a middle (writing, structuring and formatting that idea into a script), and an end (a yet to be determined happy—sold my script or sad—I give up–ending). Good luck!

See what it takes to make a film script and how to give yourself the best chance at a film industry pro reading your piece of work.

Major Cheryl G. Agbunag Channels Military Career into TV Pilot

Learn the skills you need to take your idea from paper to the big screen.

Real world film education by filmmakers for filmmakers, optimized for today!

GET STARTED

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

50 Film Analysis

Film analysis, what this handout is about.

This handout provides a brief definition of film analysis compared to literary analysis, provides an introduction to common types of film analysis, and offers strategies and resources for approaching assignments.

What is film analysis, and how does it differ from literary analysis?

Film analysis is the process in which film is analyzed in terms of semiotics, narrative structure, cultural context, and mise-en-scene, among other approaches. If these terms are new to you, don’t worry—they’ll be explained in the next section.

Analyzing film, like analyzing literature (fiction texts, etc.) , is a form of rhetorical analysis—critically analyzing and evaluating discourse, including words, phrases, and images. Having a clear argument and supporting evidence is every bit as critical to film analysis as to other forms of academic writing.

Unlike literature, film incorporates audiovisual elements and therefore introduces a new dimension to analysis. Ultimately, however, analysis of film is not too different. Think of all the things that make up a scene in a film: the actors, the lighting, the angles, the colors. All of these things may be absent in literature, but they are deliberate choices on the part of the director, producer, or screenwriter—as are the words chosen by the author of a work of literature. Furthermore, literature and film incorporate similar elements. They both have plots, characters, dialogue, settings, symbolism, and, just as the elements of literature can be analyzed for their intent and effect, these elements can be analyzed the same way in film.

Different types of film analysis

Listed here are common approaches to film analysis, but this is by no means an exhaustive list, and you may have discussed other approaches in class. As with any other assignment, make sure you understand your professor’s expectations. This guide is best used to understand prompts or, in the case of more open-ended assignments, consider the different ways to analyze film.

Keep in mind that any of the elements of film can be analyzed, oftentimes in tandem. A single film analysis essay may simultaneously include all of the following approaches and more. As Jacques Aumont and Michel Marie propose in Analysis of Film, there is no correct, universal way to write film analysis.

Semiotic analysis

Semiotic analysis is the analysis of meaning behind signs and symbols, typically involving metaphors, analogies, and symbolism.

This doesn’t necessarily need to be something dramatic; think about how you extrapolate information from the smallest signs in your day to day life. For instance, what characteristics can tell you about someone’s personality? Something as simple as someone’s appearance can reveal information about them. Mismatched shoes and bedhead might be a sign of carelessness (or something crazy happened that morning!), while an immaculate dress shirt and tie would suggest that the person is prim and proper. Continuing in that vein:

What might you be able to infer about characters from small hints?
How are these hints (signs) used to construct characters? How do they relate to the relative role of those characters, or the relationships between multiple characters?

Symbols denote concepts (liberty, peace, etc.) and feelings (hate, love, etc.) that they often have nothing to do with. They are used liberally in both literature and film, and finding them uses a similar process. Ask yourself:

In Frozen Elsa’s gloves appear in multiple scenes.
Her gloves are first given to her by her father to restrain her magic. She continues to wear them throughout the coronation scene, before finally, in the Let It Go sequence, she throws them away.

Again, the method of semiotic analysis in film is similar to that of literature. Think about the deeper meaning behind objects or actions.

Elsa’s gloves represent fear of her magic and, by extension, herself. Though she attempts to contain her magic by hiding her hands within gloves and denying part of her identity, she eventually abandons the gloves in a quest for self-acceptance.

Narrative structure analysis

Narrative structure analysis is the analysis of the story elements, including plot structure, character motivations, and theme. Like the dramatic structure of literature (exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution), film has what is known as the Three-Act Structure: “Act One: Setup, Act Two: Confrontation, and Act Three: Resolution.” Narrative structure analysis breaks the story of the film into these three elements and might consider questions like:

How does the story follow or deviate from typical structures?
What is the effect of following or deviating from this structure?
What is the theme of the film, and how is that theme constructed?

Consider again the example of Frozen. You can use symbolism and narrative structure in conjunction by placing the symbolic objects/events in the context of the narrative structure. For instance, the first appearance of the gloves is in Act One, while their abandoning takes place in Act Two; thus, the story progresses in such a way that demonstrates Elsa’s personal growth. By the time of Act Three, the Resolution, her aversion to touch (a product of fearing her own magic) is gone, reflecting a theme of self-acceptance.

Contextual analysis

Contextual analysis is analysis of the film as part of a broader context. Think about the culture, time, and place of the film’s creation. What might the film say about the culture that created it? What were/are the social and political concerns of the time period? Or, like researching the author of a novel, you might consider the director, producer, and other people vital to the making of the film. What is the place of this film in the director’s career? Does it align with his usual style of directing, or does it move in a new direction? Other examples of contextual approaches might be analyzing the film in terms of a civil rights or feminist movement.

For example, Frozen is often linked to the LGBTQ social movement. You might agree or disagree with this interpretation, and, using evidence from the film, support your argument.

Some other questions to consider:

How does the meaning of the film change when seen outside of its culture?
What characteristics distinguishes the film as being of its particular culture?

Mise-en-scene analysis

Mise-en-scene analysis is analysis of the arrangement of compositional elements in film—essentially, the analysis of audiovisual elements that most distinctly separate film analysis from literary analysis. Remember that the important part of a mise-en-scene analysis is not just identifying the elements of a scene, but explaining the significance behind them.

What effects are created in a scene, and what is their purpose?
How does the film attempt to achieve its goal by the way it looks, and does it succeed?

Audiovisual elements that can be analyzed include (but are not limited to): props and costumes, setting, lighting, camera angles, frames, special effects, choreography, music, color values, depth, placement of characters, etc. Mise-en-scene is typically the most foreign part of writing film analysis because the other components discussed are common to literary analysis, while mise-en-scene deals with elements unique to film. Using specific film terminology bolsters credibility, but you should also consider your audience. If your essay is meant to be accessible to non-specialist readers, explain what terms mean. The Resources section of this handout has links to sites that describe mise-en-scene elements in detail.

Rewatching the film and creating screen captures (still images) of certain scenes can help with detailed analysis of colors, positioning of actors, placement of objects, etc. Listening to the soundtrack can also be helpful, especially when placed in the context of particular scenes.

Some example questions:

How is the lighting used to construct mood? Does the mood shift at any point during the film, and how is that shift in mood created?
What does the setting say about certain characters? How are props used to reveal aspects of their personality?
What songs were used, and why were they chosen? Are there any messages in the lyrics that pertain to the theme?

Writing the film analysis essay

Writing film analysis is similar to writing literary analysis or any argumentative essay in other disciplines: Consider the assignment and prompts, formulate a thesis (see the Brainstorming Handout and Thesis Statement Handout for help crafting a nuanced argument), compile evidence to prove your thesis, and lay out your argument in the essay. Your evidence may be different from what you are used to. Whereas in the English essay you use textual evidence and quotes, in a film analysis essay, you might also include audiovisual elements to bolster your argument.

When describing a sequence in a film, use the present tense, like you would write in the literary present when describing events of a novel, i.e. not “Elsa took off her gloves,” but “Elsa takes off her gloves.” When quoting dialogue from a film, if between multiple characters, use block quotes: Start the quotation on a new line, with the entire quote indented one inch from the left margin. However, conventions are flexible, so ask your professor if you are unsure. It may also help to follow the formatting of the script, if you can find it. For example:

ELSA: But she won’t remember I have powers? KING: It’s for the best.

You do not need to use quotation marks for blocked-off dialogue, but for shorter quotations in the main text, quotation marks should be double quotes (“…”).

Here are some tips for approaching film analysis:

Make sure you understand the prompt and what you are being asked to do. Focus your argument by choosing a specific issue to assess.
Review your materials. Rewatch the film for nuances that you may have missed in the first viewing. With your thesis in mind, take notes as you watch. Finding a screenplay of the movie may be helpful, but keep in mind that there may be differences between the screenplay and the actual product (and these differences might be a topic of discussion!).
Develop a thesis and an outline, organizing your evidence so that it supports your argument. Remember that this is ultimately an assignment—make sure that your thesis answers what the prompt asks, and check with your professor if you are unsure.
Move beyond only describing the audiovisual elements of the film by considering the significance of your evidence. Demonstrate understanding of not just what film elements are, but why and to what effect they are being used. For more help on using your evidence effectively, see ‘Using Evidence In An Argument’ in the Evidence Handout .

New York Film Academy Glossary Movie Outline Glossary Movie Script Database Citation Practices: Film and Television

Works Consulted

We consulted these works while writing the original version of this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find the latest publications on this topic. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial .

Aumont, Jacques, and Michel Marie. L’analyse Des Films. Paris: Nathan, 1988. Print. Pruter, Robin Franson. “Writing About Film.” Writing About Film. DePaul University, 08 Mar. 2004. Web. 01 May 2016.

Film Analysis Copyright © 2020 by Liza Long; Amy Minervini; and Joel Gladd is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

Developing technical and problem-solving skills
Engaging in more active listening
Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
Seeking out more diversity of thought
Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

What information should be included?
Which information resources should the author look to?
What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
What is the most effective way to show information?
How should the report be organized?
How should it be designed?
What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

6 Ways I Am Number Four's Reboot Can Beat Disney's Original Movie After 33% Rotten Tomatoes Letdown

Reboot of 'I Am Number Four' has potential to elevate YA dystopian genre with fresh take and improved script.
To succeed, focus on faster pacing, better visual effects, stronger characterization, and representation.
Learn from past mistakes and prioritize engaging storytelling over potential sequels for a successful reboot.

When I Am Number Four came out in 2011, it didn't take hold of the cultural mindset like other YA dystopian movies, but the upcoming reboot has the opportunity to be better than the critically panned original. Based on the young adult sci-fi book series Lorien Legacies by Jobie Hughes and James Frey under the pseudonym Pittacus Lore, the first book in the franchise, I Am Number Four , was a great success. The series went on to accrue a total of seven books, giving the revival the ability to transform a disappointing adaptation into the next great dystopian cinematic universe.

The film didn't perform terribly at the box office, but when compared to the dystopian boom and the success of movies like The Hunger Games , the studio didn't feel a sequel was worth putting the time and effort into.

Many fans of the books and the movie hoped there would be an I Am Number Four sequel in the years since the first film's release, but one never materialized. The film didn't perform terribly at the box office, but when compared to the dystopian boom and the success of movies like The Hunger Games , the studio didn't feel a sequel was worth putting the time and effort into. There has been a decline in the popularity of this genre of film in recent years, so deciding to make a reboot today is an interesting choice.

However, with better technology and a more faithful script, there are plenty of ways the new movie can improve. The things that went wrong with I Am Number Four aren't a lack of depth or intrigue in the source material but issues of timing and the red tape of Hollywood. Learning from the failures of the first film will provide insight into what works and what doesn't when adapting YA sci-fi and fantasy series. Many young up-and-coming actors could easily step into the roles, making the parts their own and cultivating a large following to spark a new franchise.

I Am Number Four grossed $149.9 million at the box office [via Box Office Mojo ] and has a 33% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes .

Updating The YA Dystopian Tropes For A Modern Audience

Viewers are very familiar with the genre and are looking for a fresh take.

In the 2010s, YA dystopian films were everywhere, and while not all of them have had the longevity of The Hunger Games franchise, they're a significant part of that period. While this does automatically generate nostalgia and interest in a reboot of a forgotten series, it also means that audiences won't be forgiving when they see the tricks and tropes of the genre. I Am Number Four was published in 2010, so there aren't just aspects of the storytelling that need updating but also necessary changes to make the plot and characters more representative of the modern world.

Most of the story's beats play out predictably, and John's love interest, Sarah (Diana Agron), is constantly put in the position of damsel in distress.

Most of the movie takes place in Ohio and revolves around the everyday aspects of teen life in rural America. The main character, John/Number Four (Alex Pettyfer), experiences bullying and ostracization at the hands of the popular kids in school, but the film doesn't delve into the larger themes of isolation common in adolescence. Additionally, most of the story's beats play out predictably, and John's love interest, Sarah (Diana Agron), is constantly put in the position of damsel in distress. However, these issues can be fixed while staying true to the heart of the original text.

This Sci-Fi Book Series Still Deserves A Movie Reboot, 12 Years After $150 Million Disappointment

Maintaining momentum after the first movie, instead of stalling out and being forgotten again.

When adapting a book series, movies can become overeager in their attempts to make sure their project turns into a franchise. While it's natural for a film based on a novel with sequels to think about the potential for additional films and where the story goes after the events of the book, it can't completely control the narrative. In some ways, I Am Number Four was less concerned with making a strong standalone film than ensuring that multiple sequels could be made. Ultimately, this backfired on the filmmakers because the negative critical reception prevented the possibility of sequels.

The filmmakers behind the reboot are likely already thinking about the possibility of sequels. There's plenty of source material to draw from, and with the success of The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes as a prequel to The Hunger Games , there is an appetite for a return to the YA genre. To capitalize on this renewed interest in YA stories, I Am Number Four must not worry about the sequel while making the first movie. Once it establishes itself as a unique offering, the reboot must pounce on the opportunity and not let timing ruin the story's potential again.

Faster Pacing & More Action

The first act drags and the exposition is clunky.

In I Am Number Four , John/Number Four is one of eight aliens sent to Earth after his home planet is destroyed, and he lives as a human.

Like any sci-fi or fantasy story, there's a lot of world-building and exposition to get through for the audience to understand the rules and history of the world. In I Am Number Four , John/Number Four is one of eight aliens sent to Earth after his home planet is destroyed, and he lives as a human. However, the catalyst of the film's plot is that the Mogadorians, the aliens who destroyed his planet, come to Earth when they find out John and the other aliens survived. Though John is being hunted, he has strength and magical powers that protect him.

This is a lot of information to communicate to the audience in a short time. Additionally, many small details and caveats complicate the story as it progresses. It takes too long for the Mogadorians to be introduced and for them to finally come face to face with John. The first act of the movie drags as too much time is spent on John’s human life. Once the action starts, the story speeds up and rushes through the climactic battles. Even splitting the first book up into two movies would have been a more effective way to tell the story.

Decentering The Romantic Relationships

Though sarah and john's relationship is important, it's not the most interesting.

Most of the best scenes in I Am Number Four don't involve the teen angst and budding romance between Sarah and John. While Diana Agron is charming and one of the better actors in the movie, she doesn't have much to do, and their relationship is forced. It doesn't make sense that John instantly falls in love with her and puts his life on the line to be with a girl he barely knows. Any good YA fantasy story includes a romance, and the best one frequently provides a tension-filled love triangle chock-full of long looks and stolen glances.

However, these romantic entanglements are a small part of the narrative that supports the protagonist's development. Some of the most annoying love triangles in movies rub the audience the wrong way because they create drama for the sake of drama and don't communicate anything important about the characters. It would be difficult to omit their relationship, but both their characters need to have more in common and more fully realized separate lives for there to be a reason that they're together. Centering romantic relationships within a narrative about the fate of the universe can be a disservice to the audience.

Better Visual Effects

Though the original effects aren't terrible, today's technology must be utilized.

Returning to a sci-fi or fantasy series many years later almost guarantees that the CGI and practical effects will look completely different. Every year, visual effects artists and animators make leaps and bounds in their abilities to bring the imagination of filmmakers and writers to life. Of all the Lorien Legacies books, I Am Number Four isn't the most visually complicated as so much of it takes place at typical Earth locations and events, like high school. However, creating intricate and engaging visual styles for the Mogadorians and portraying John's abilities well will be hugely important for the film.

Part of the appeal of I Am Number Four is that it tells a fantastical story within the confines of the human world.

However, the I Am Number Four reboot must be careful not to over-rely on CGI and green screen technology to create over-the-top battle sequences. Part of the appeal of I Am Number Four is that it tells a fantastical story within the confines of the human world. It gives the audience the feeling that these otherworldly events could happen anywhere at any time, making the narrative more accessible than stories that take place in alien worlds. This means that practical and visual effects must be combined to create a seamless world that is believable within the confines of the story.

10 Canceled YA Franchises That Ended After Just 1 Movie

Stronger characterization & performances, new actors and updated characters that are relatable to the audience.

Outside the issues of story structure, I Am Number Four is overwhelmingly white, and the actors don't give compelling performances. Though there are good actors in the original cast, like Agron and Timothy Olyphant, many of the performances feel disjointed. It’s as if the actors are in different movies. Unfortunately, Pettyfer is woefully miscast as John/Number Four. He doesn't bring the necessary depth to the role. The entire story hinges on the actor who plays Number Four, so when casting the reboot, the producers must balance picking someone who has box-office appeal and will provide a nuanced portrayal.

The reboot must not be afraid to dig into the source material and change significant parts of the books, especially when it comes to characters. Though this can be a daunting process, as fans of the novel series might struggle with changes to the beloved story, what works in a book doesn't always work in a movie. In addition to playing down the romance between Number Four and Sarah, the platonic relationships must be played up. Number Four's human connections must be important, but he must also be concerned with his relationships with the other aliens.

I Am Number Four

John Smith is an alien, sent to Earth as a child along with eight others, to escape a deadly threat on his home planet. He and the others are known as the Garde, but when John is a teenager, the enemy learns of their existence. The Garde must be killed in order, and the first three are dead. John, the fourth member, is next.

Director D.J. Caruso

Release Date February 18, 2011

Writers Marti Noxon, Alfred Gough, Miles Millar

Cast Kevin Durand, Teresa Palmer, Timothy Olyphant, Jake Abel, Dianna Agron, Callan McAuliffe, Alex Pettyfer

Rating PG-13

Runtime 109 minutes

Genres Sci-Fi, Action

Budget $50-59 million

6 Ways I Am Number Four's Reboot Can Beat Disney's Original Movie After 33% Rotten Tomatoes Letdown

IMAGES

Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking (2020)
Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking Featured, Reviews Film Threat
Critical Thinking (2020)

VIDEO

Critical thinking movie
Critical Thinking
Humans Vs AI: Writing A Movie
Critical Thinking Official Trailer (2020) , Drama Series
🥺When thinking about script by jhuna singh🥺 #treanding #sorts #treandingshort #viral #dostokibaatein
Not Every Movie Is The Best Or Worst Movie Ever!

COMMENTS

Critical Thinking movie review (2020)
In the press materials for "Critical Thinking," producer Carla Berkowitz drops this line about her reaction to reading the true story that inspired the film: "The image and story was haunting and I felt like I had a quantum shift in my perception of chess and who plays it.". The who in question are five Miami-area Black and Latino men ...
Critical Thinking (2020)
Critical Thinking: Directed by John Leguizamo. With John Leguizamo, Rachel Bay Jones, Michael Kenneth Williams, Corwin C. Tuggles. The true story of the Miami Jackson High School chess team which was the first inner city team to win the U.S. National Chess Championship.
Critical Thinking (film)
Critical Thinking is a 2020 American biographical drama film based on the true story of the 1998 Miami Jackson High School chess team, the first inner-city team to win the U.S. National Chess Championship.. Critical Thinking was directed by John Leguizamo (in his directorial debut), written by Dito Montiel, and stars Leguizamo alongside Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Angel Bismark Curiel, Will Hochman ...
True story "Critical Thinking" is a gripping drama powered by strong
Even still, Critical Thinking is a solid second directorial feature from Leguizamo, in no small part achieved due to the solid script structure and performances from the cast. Too often school films like to make the educator the focal point, but, in Leguizamo's hands, Critical Thinking is a prime example of how stories should be when ...
Critical Thinking (2020) Movie Script
Read Critical Thinking Movie Script. Created from srt subtitles. SUBSLIKESCRIPT. Movies TV ... Movies; Critical Thinking - subtitles like script; Search. Critical Thinking (2020) - full transcript. The true story of the Miami Jackson High School chess team which was the first inner city team to win the U.S. National Chess Championship. And ...
'Critical Thinking' Review: John Leguizamo's ...
"Critical Thinking" has some appealing young actors, and it's been directed, by John Leguizamo (who costars as the film's tough-saint teacher), in a way that gives them the space to clown ...
Critical Thinking
Movie Info. Miami -- 1998. Poverty, broken families, and a prejudiced system push underprivileged youth to the fringes of society. But for a magnetic group of teens, there's a reprieve. A game ...
Critical Thinking
Title: Critical Thinking (2020) Director: John Leguizamo 👨🏽🇨🇴🇺🇸 Writer: Dito Montiel 👨🏽🇺🇸 Reviewed by Li 👩🏻🇺🇸. Technical: 2.5/5 In John Leguizamo's second film made from the director's chair, his first being 2003's HBO movie Undefeated, audiences follow a true story about underestimated teens from Miami who made it all the way to the U.S ...
Critical Thinking (2020)
Critical Thinking is a film directed by John Leguizamo with John Leguizamo, Rachel Bay Jones, Michael K. Williams, Corwin C. Tuggles .... Year: 2020. Original title: Critical Thinking. Synopsis: The true story of the Miami Jackson High School chess team which was the first inner city team to win the U.S. National Chess Championship.You can watch Critical Thinking through flatrate,Rent,buy,free ...
'Critical Thinking' Trailer: John Leguizamo Tries To Inspire A High
Critical Thinking should have made a triumphant debut at the South by Southwest film festival earlier this year, but the coronavirus pandemic ruined all that. The movie tells the true story of a ...
Best Movies for Critical Thinking: Top Picks to Challenge Your Mind
5.1 Inception. 5.2 Being John Malkovich. 5.3 Shutter Island. 6 Critical Thinking in Time and Space Movies. 6.1 Predestination. 6.2 Interstellar. 6.3 2001: A Space Odyssey. 7 Movies Encouraging Reflection on Self and Humanity. 7.1 Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
Watch Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking. 2020 | Maturity Rating: 16+ | 1h 57m | Drama. An unwavering teacher and his students must overcome the perils in their underserved community as they compete in a national chess tournament. Starring: John Leguizamo, Corwin C. Tuggles, Angel Bismark Curiel. Watch all you want.
Critical Thinking
Based on a true story from 1998, five LatinX and Black teenagers from the toughest underserved ghetto in Miami fight their way into the National Chess Champi...
Critical Thinking (2020)
Critical Thinking (2020) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. Menu. ... script supervisor Transportation Department . K.C. Colebrooke ... transportation coordinator Additional Crew . David Albahae ... office production assistant Emily Lu Aldrich ...
How to write a movie script?
Keep at it. Writing a script for a movie is a long journey from the "I have an idea for a movie" to getting the green light for your script to be made into a movie. It's a story that has a beginning (the I have an idea phase), a middle (writing, structuring and formatting that idea into a script), and an end (a yet to be determined happy ...
Film Analysis
Analyzing film, like analyzing literature (fiction texts, etc.), is a form of rhetorical analysis—critically analyzing and evaluating discourse, including words, phrases, and images. Having a clear argument and supporting evidence is every bit as critical to film analysis as to other forms of academic writing.
Learn To Write Movies: Screenwriting Step by Step
Scenes are the building blocks of our screenplay, and they're not just isolated pieces of drama. A good writer will make the scenes flow together in one seamless system. Each scene is going to be essential to the script structure on. They'll build on each other until we've got intricately we've plot by the end.
Movies that are good for critical thinking activities
Hello! This may be pretty broad, but I'm looking to improve my siblings and my own critical thinking through movies. So far we have watched the first Matrix movie and we had a great time discussing the story, the symbolism and does it have some inconsistencies or strange things that needs to be confirmed etc.
Using Critical Thinking in Essays and other Assignments
Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement. Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process ...
PDF Guidelines for Writing Critical Analyses of Screenplays
b. Assume that we don't know the script story or film. c. Tend to follow the plotline of the story: This happens; then this happens. 2. Critical Evaluations, which a. Tell us whether you believe the script is good and why, like a movie review. b. Often follow this logical syllogism: Major Premise (a limited and supportable generalization ...
51 Creative Script Ideas To Help You Write Your Next Screenplay
Creative script ideas. 1. A guilt-ridden mother races against time to save her estranged son, who's been abducted by a vengeful ex-convict she helped put away. 2. A grieving widow discovers her late husband's secret, life-altering invention and must protect it from falling into the wrong hands before it's too late. 3.
AI Script Generator for Movies
HIX.AI's Movie Script Generator is a game-changing tool that empowers diverse individuals with a passion for storytelling to unleash their creative genius and craft captivating movie scripts. ... Educators can incorporate it into their lessons to encourage creativity, critical thinking, and storytelling skills. ...
[Solved] Creative works and critical thinking movie
This covers the acting, directing, cinematography, and script. Together, these components produce a unique and alluring work of art that has the power to stir emotions and alter viewers' perceptions. However, critical thinking while watching a movie entails assessing and analyzing the themes, messages, and technical aspects of the production.
6 Ways I Am Number Four's Reboot Can Beat Disney's Original Movie After
John Smith is an alien, sent to Earth as a child along with eight others, to escape a deadly threat on his home planet. He and the others are known as the Garde, but when John is a teenager, the ...

Movie Reviews

Odie Henderson

Now playing

Simon Abrams

Megamind vs the Doom Syndicate

Late Night with the Devil

The First Omen

Brian Tallerico

Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World

Critical Thinking (2020)

Cinematographer

Latest blog posts

A Plea for Someone to Save Megalopolis

The End of the World is Going to be Weird on Prime Video’s Quirky, Clever Adaptation of Fallout

The Zellner Brothers Take a Walk in the Woods with Sasquatch Sunset

The Scene That Clint Eastwood Cut to Make Unforgiven a Classic

Elements of Madness

True story “Critical Thinking” is a gripping drama powered by strong performances and fantastic direction.

Share this:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Discover more from Elements of Madness

Critical Thinking (2020) - full transcript

‘Critical Thinking’ Review: John Leguizamo’s Inspirational High-School Chess Drama

Owen Gleiberman

Reviewed online, Aug. 31, 2020. MPAA Rating: Not rated. Running time: 113 MIN.

More From Our Brands

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Email not verified

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Movies / TV

Critical Thinking

What to know

You might also like

Rate And Review

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

How did you buy your ticket?

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Cast & Crew

Critic Reviews for Critical Thinking

Movie & TV guides

Critical Thinking

User history

'Critical Thinking' Trailer: John Leguizamo Tries To Inspire A High School Chess Team In A Troubled Neighborhood

Critical Thinking Trailer

Best Movies for Critical Thinking: Top Picks to Challenge Your Mind

Key Takeaways

Understanding Critical Thinking

Relation with Movies

Critical Thinking in Dramas

Good Will Hunting

Exploring Philosophy and Beliefs through Movies

The Truman Show

Cloud Atlas

Movies that Challenge Perception and Reality

Being John Malkovich

Shutter Island

Critical Thinking in Time and Space Movies

Interstellar

2001: A Space Odyssey

Movies Encouraging Reflection on Self and Humanity

Critical Thinking in Thriller Movies

V for Vendetta

Appreciating Movies as Art and Stories

You may also like

How to answer critical thinking questions

The 7 Best Game Theory YouTube Channels

Debate & Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking in 2022: The Key To Growing and Maintaining Knowledge

Critical Thinking (2020)

Directed by

Contribute to This Page

Did You Know?

Photo & Video

Related Items

Recently Viewed

How to write a movie script?

How to write a good movie script?

The Story Idea.

Commonly Used Movie Structures.

Classic Three-Act Structure.