Quickonomics
Natural-Rate Hypothesis
Definition of natural-rate hypothesis.
The natural-rate hypothesis (NRH) is an economic theory that states that the unemployment rate in an economy will eventually return to its natural rate, regardless of the level of economic activity. That means it describes the rate of unemployment that exists when the labor market is in equilibrium. This rate is determined by the structure and dynamics of the labor market and is independent of the level of aggregate demand.
To illustrate the natural-rate hypothesis, let’s look at the economy of a small imaginary country. In this country, the natural rate of unemployment is 5%. That means when the economy is in equilibrium, the unemployment rate will be 5%. Now, assume the government decides to stimulate the economy by increasing aggregate demand. As a result, the unemployment rate drops to 3%. However, according to the NRH, this decrease in unemployment is only temporary. Eventually, the unemployment rate will return to its natural rate of 5%.
Why Natural-Rate Hypothesis Matters
The natural-rate hypothesis is an important concept in macroeconomics. It helps economists to understand the dynamics of the labor market and the effects of government policies on unemployment. In addition to that, it is also used to evaluate the effectiveness of government policies. That is, if the government implements a policy to reduce unemployment, but the unemployment rate does not decrease, then it is likely that the policy has not been effective.
Related Terms
- Macroeconomics
Baltic Dry Index
Bretton woods agreement, ad valorem tax.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
This website uses cookies.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy .
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Winter 2018
Should We Reject the Natural Rate Hypothesis?
- Olivier Blanchard
- Article Information
- Comments ( 0 )
Additional Materials
- Replication Package (359.22 KB)
- Online Appendix (127.09 KB)
- Author Disclosure Statement(s) (139.13 KB)
JEL Classification
- E52 Monetary Policy
Natural Rate of Unemployment
- Living reference work entry
- Latest version View entry history
- First Online: 01 January 2017
- Cite this living reference work entry
- Michael J. Pries 2
437 Accesses
1 Citations
Milton Friedman defined the natural rate of unemployment as the level of unemployment that resulted from real economic forces, the long-run level of which could not be altered by monetary policy. Macroeconomic policymakers continue to view the natural rate as a key benchmark due to the belief that monetary policy can counter short-run deviations of the unemployment rate from the natural rate. It is important, however, that policymakers focus as much attention on understanding the real determinants of the natural rate, and the policies that can affect it, as they do on trying to identify and counteract deviations from it.
This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Institutional subscriptions
Bibliography
Davis, S., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Schuh. 1996. Job creation and destruction . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58: 1–17.
Friedman, M. 1976. Nobel lecture: Inflation and unemployment. Journal of Political Economy 85: 451–472.
Article Google Scholar
Hall, R. 2005a. Employment fluctuations with equilibrium wage stickiness. American Economic Review 95: 50–65.
Hall, R. 2005b. Separating the business cycle from other economic fluctuations. In The Greenspan era: Lessons for the future. Proceedings of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, August.
Hopenhayn, H., and R. Rogerson. 1992. Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy 101: 915–938.
Hosios, A. 1990. On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 57: 279–298.
Kydland, F., and E. Prescott. 1982. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50: 1345–1371.
Ljungqvist, L., and T. Sargent. 1998. The European unemployment dilemma. Journal of Political Economy 106: 514–550.
Lucas, R. 1973. Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63: 326–334.
Mortensen, D., and C. Pissarides. 1994. Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61: 397–415.
Phillips, A. 1958. The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957. Economica 58: 283–299.
Pries, M. 2004. Persistence of employment fluctuations: A model of recurring job loss. Review of Economic Studies 71: 193–215.
Shimer, R. 1998. In Why is the U.S. unemployment rate so much lower? NBER macroeconomics annual, ed. B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg, vol. 13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shimer, R. 2005. The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. American Economic Review 95: 25–49.
Taylor, J. 1999. Monetary policy rules , NBER conference report series. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Book Google Scholar
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
http://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5
Michael J. Pries
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Editors and affiliations, copyright information.
© 2008 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry.
Pries, M.J. (2008). Natural Rate of Unemployment. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_716-2
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_716-2
Received : 13 January 2017
Accepted : 13 January 2017
Published : 22 March 2017
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN : 978-1-349-95121-5
eBook Packages : Springer Reference Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
Chapter history
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_716-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_716-1
- Find a journal
- Track your research
The Natural Rate of Unemployment
- Definition: The natural rate of unemployment is the rate of unemployment when the labour market is in equilibrium. It is unemployment caused by structural (supply-side) factors. (e.g. mismatched skills)
Diagram showing the natural rate of unemployment
- The natural rate of unemployment is the difference between those who would like a job at the current wage rate – and those who are willing and able to take a job. In the above diagram, it is the level (Q2-Q1)
- Frictional unemployment
- Structural unemployment . For example, a worker who is not able to get a job because he doesn’t have the right skills
- The natural rate of unemployment is unemployment caused by supply-side factors rather than demand side factors
What Determines the Natural Rate of Unemployment?
Milton Freidman argued the natural rate of unemployment would be determined by institutional factors such as.
- Availability of job information . A factor in determining frictional unemployment and how quickly the unemployed find a job.
- The level of benefits . Generous benefits may discourage workers from taking jobs at the existing wage rate.
- Skills and education. The quality of education and retraining schemes will influence the level of occupational mobilities.
- The degree of labour mobility. See: labour mobility
- Flexibility of the labour market E.g. powerful trades unions may be able to restrict the supply of labour to certain labour markets
- Hysteresis . A rise in unemployment caused by a recession may cause the natural rate of unemployment to increase. This is because when workers are unemployed for a time period they become deskilled and demotivated and are less able to get new jobs.
Explaining Changing Natural Rates of Unemployment
In the post-war period, structural unemployment was very low. During the 1980s, the natural rate of unemployment rose, due to rapid deindustrialisation and a rise in geographical and structural unemployment.
Since 2005, the natural rate of unemployment has fallen.
- Increased labour market flexibility, e.g. trade unions less powerful.
- Privatisation has helped increased competitiveness of industry, leading to more flexible labour markets.
- Rise in self-employment and gig economy, have created new types of jobs.
- Increased monopsony power of employers, who have kept wage growth low, enabling firms to employ more workers.
- Harder to claim unemployment benefits.
Natural Rate of Unemployment in EU
Even during the period of economic growth 2000-2007, unemployment in Eurozone is higher than US and UK. This suggests the Eurozone has a higher natural rate of unemployment.
- Rigidity in EU labour markets e.g. minimum wages and the maximum working week
- Restrictions on closing factories and mandatory severance pay for workers made unemployed, and this makes firms more reluctant to set up in these countries.
- Higher degrees of unionisation resulting in wage rigidity.
- Generous benefits which lessen the pain of unemployment.
- Hysteresis effects . The cyclical recessions of the 1970s and 1980s had long-lasting effects resulting in more unemployment. However, this does not appear to have affected the UK
- Growing competition from Asian countries, lead to structural unemployment from increased job competition.
During 2012-14, the higher unemployment was partly due to lower rates of economic growth – caused by austerity, and deflationary pressures of the Eurozone single currency.
Reducing the natural rate of unemployment
To reduce the natural rate of unemployment, we need to implement supply-side policies, such as:
- Better education and training to reduce occupational immobilities.
- Making it easier for workers and firms to relocated, e.g. more flexible housing market and greater supply in areas of high job demand.
- Making labour markets more flexible, e.g. reducing minimum wages and trade unions.
- Easier to hire and fire workers.
NAIRU and Non-Accelerating Rate of Unemployment
- A very similar concept to the natural rate of unemployment is the NAIRU – the non-accelerating rate of unemployment.
- This is the rate of unemployment consistent with a stable rate of inflation. If you try to reduce unemployment by increasing aggregate demand, then you will get a higher rate of inflation, and the fall in unemployment will prove temporary.
NAIRU explained
- If there is an increase in AD, firms pay higher wages to workers in order to increase in output, this increase in nominal wages encourage workers to supply more labour and therefore unemployment falls.
- However, the increase in AD also causes inflation to increase and therefore real wages do not actually increased but remain the same. Later workers realise that the increase in wages was only nominal and not a real increase.
- Therefore they no longer work overtime. Therefore the supply of labour falls, and unemployment returns to its original or Natural rate of unemployment. It is only possible to reduce unemployment by causing an increase in the rate of inflation. Therefore the natural rate is also known as the NAIRU (non accelerating rate of unemployment.
- This model assumes workers do not correctly predict the rate of inflation but have adaptive expectations .
- Some economists argue workers will correctly predict higher AD causes higher inflation and therefore there will not be even a short term fall in unemployment; this is known as rational expectations .
Example of NAIRU
- In the above example, the natural rate of unemployment is 6%. If you try to reduce unemployment through increased demand, we get a temporary fall in unemployment, but higher inflation. (point A)
- However, this fall in unemployment is unsustainable and the short-run Phillips Curve shifts to SRPC2, and we move to (point C) and unemployment of 6%.
- Causes of Unemployment
- Voluntary unemployment
- Essay on: Natural Rate of Unemployment
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The natural-rate hypothesis (NRH) is an economic theory that states that the unemployment rate in an economy will eventually return to its natural rate, regardless of the level of economic activity. That means it describes the rate of unemployment that exists when the labor market is in equilibrium. This rate is determined by the structure and ...
ABSTRACT. Central banks throughout the world predict inflation with new-Keynesian models where, after a shock, the unemployment rate returns to its so called "natural rate". That assumption is called the Natural Rate Hypothesis (NRH). This paper reviews a body of work, published over the last decade, which is critical of the NRH.
The natural rate hypothesis (NRH) was introduced by Phelps (1967) and by Milton Friedman in his 1967 Presidential Address to the American Economic Association (1968). ... According to this definition the natural rate of unemployment is not a constant or an immutable rate, but is determined by a host of market and non-market factors. ...
The NAIRU hypothesis passes all three tests. Recent research shows that the NAIRU has fallen dramatically in the last decade. This paper refutes the need for a highly restrictive bias in macroeconomic policy because small deviations from the NAIRU will lead to only small, possibly easily correctable, changes in the inflation rate.
6 Journal of Economic Perspectives the natural rate hypothesis in his presidential address to the American Economic Association in 1968, it sounded like royal edict had established the natural rate as another one of the universe's invariant constants. Today, there is general recogni-tion that if a NAIRU exists, it must be changing over time.
Economic Association and articulated what became known as the "natural rate hypothesis." It was a joint hypothesis, composed of two sub-hypotheses. The first was that there was a natural rate of unemployment, independent of monetary policy. To quote Friedman: "The 'natural rate of unemployment' . . . is the level that
It was composed of two sub-hypotheses: First, the natural rate of unemployment is independent of monetary policy. Second, there is no long-run trade-off between the deviation of unemployment from the natural rate and inflation. Both propositions have been challenged. The paper reviews the arguments and the macro and micro evidence against each.
Friedman's 'natural rate hypothesis' maintained that '… there is a 'natural rate of unemployment' which is consistent with the real forces and with accurate perceptions; unemployment can be kept below that level only by an accelerating inflation; or above it only by accelerating deflation' (Friedman 1976, p. 458).This view of the relationship between the unemployment rate and ...
Each of the three Phillips curves on this graph is associated with a different rate of expected price inflation, denoted by Δpe on the chart. The vertical dashed red line represents the natural rate of. Figure 1 The expectations-augmented Phillips curve. Δpe = -5% Δpe = 0% Δpe = +5%. Δp = +5%. Unemployment Δp = 0%.
Central banks throughout the world predict inflation with new-Keynesian models where, after a shock, the unemployment rate returns to its so called 'natural rate?. That assumption is called the Natural Rate Hypothesis (NRH). This paper reviews a body of work, published over the last decade, which is critical of the NRH. I argue that the NRH does not hold in the data and I provide an ...
It was composed of two sub-hypotheses: First, the natural rate of unemployment is independent of monetary policy. Second, there is no long-run trade-off between the deviation of unemployment from the natural rate and inflation. Both propositions have been challenged. The paper reviews the arguments and the macro and micro evidence against each.
1.. Introduction Friedman (1968) noted that differing steady-state inflation rates will not keep output or employment permanently high or low relative to the natural-rate level that would prevail in the absence of nominal price stickiness in the relevant economies. Since then, the natural rate hypothesis had been widely accepted. But McCallum (2004) has remarked that the earlier consensus ...
6 Journal of Economic Perspectives the natural rate hypothesis in his presidential address to the American Economic Association in 1968, it sounded like royal edict had established the natural rate as another one of the universe's invariant constants. Today, there is general recogni-tion that if a NAIRU exists, it must be changing over time.
3. Natural rate hypothesis. This section examines implications of a smoothed-off kink in demand curves for the NRH in the Calvo model. Specifically, the (non-linear) steady-state relationship between output and inflation is analyzed to show that the kink ensures that the violation of the NRH is minor.
The Natural Rate Hypothesis: An idea past its sell-by date. Central banks throughout the world predict inflation with new-Keynesian models where, after a shock, the unemployment rate returns to its so called "natural rate'. That assumption is called the Natural Rate Hypothesis (NRH). This paper reviews a body of work, published over the last ...
The natural rate hypothesisThe natural rate hypothesis (NRH) states that, on average, and regardless of monetary policy regime, output (in logs, y t) should be equal to potential output (in logs, y t *). That is, the NRH states that the mean of the output gap is zero: (1) E [y t-y t *] = 0, where E [•] denotes the unconditional expectations ...
Diagram showing the natural rate of unemployment. The natural rate of unemployment is the difference between those who would like a job at the current wage rate - and those who are willing and able to take a job. In the above diagram, it is the level (Q2-Q1) The natural rate of unemployment will therefore include: Frictional unemployment.
Non-market-clearing models apparently have survived because they have evolved to incorporate both the natural-rate hypothesis and the rational-expectations hypothesis and because the alternative "equilibrium" approach has failed empirically.This paper expands on these ideas and briefly discusses some of the problems that we face in attempting ...
In this article, Professor Kevin Lee describes Friedman's 'Natural Rate' Hypothesis in a little more detail and the profound impact it had on macroeconomic policy-making as exemplified by Thatcher's first government in 1979. Thatcher's rise to leadership of the Conservative party through the seventies, and her election to power in ...
The natural rate of unemployment hypothesis proposed in the 1960s has dominated thought about the causes of, and possible solutions to, unemployment. It asserts that only supply-side measures can achieve sustainable reductions in unemployment. ... The economics of adjustment Andrew Caplin and John Leahy 7. Hysteresis and memory in the labour ...
Economic Association, and articulated what became known as the "natural rate hypothesis." It was a joint hypothesis, composed of two sub-hypotheses: The first was that there was a natural rate of unemployment, indepen-dent of monetary policy. To quote Friedman (p. 8): "The 'natural rate of un-
Central banks throughout the world predict inflation with new-Keynesian models where, after a shock, the unemployment rate returns to its so called "natural rate'. That assumption is called the Natural Rate Hypothesis (NRH). This paper reviews a body of work, published over the last decade, which is critical of the NRH. I argue that the NRH does not hold in the data and I provide an ...
1. Hi All: I have the Lucas, 1972b paper "Econometric Testing Of the Natural Rate Hypothesis" but unfortunately not as a pdf. ( it's from a book that contains a lot of Lucas' papers called "studies in business cycle theory"). Assuming that someone reading this question has read that paper and understood it, could you explain how equations 11 ...