review

judicial activism assignment

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

US government and civics

Course: us government and civics   >   unit 2.

  • Executive and legislative disagreements with the Supreme Court
  • Checks on the judicial branch
  • State checks on the judicial branch
  • Senate confirmation as a check on the judicial branch

Judicial activism and judicial restraint

  • Increased politicization of the Supreme Court
  • Checks on the judicial branch: lesson overview
  • Checks on the judicial branch: foundational
  • Checks on the judicial branch: advanced

Want to join the conversation?

  • Upvote Button navigates to signup page
  • Downvote Button navigates to signup page
  • Flag Button navigates to signup page

Video transcript

IMAGES

  1. Judicial Activism

    judicial activism assignment

  2. Judicial Activism

    judicial activism assignment

  3. What Is Judicial Activism? Definition and Examples

    judicial activism assignment

  4. Pol 2

    judicial activism assignment

  5. Judicial Activism

    judicial activism assignment

  6. (PDF) JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN INDIA AND

    judicial activism assignment

VIDEO

  1. JUDICIAL ACTIVISM / Judicial Process / LL.M

  2. How Judicial Watch is Fighting for Civil Rights

  3. Judicial Activism V. Constructivism

  4. Judicial Activism & Public Interest Litigation

  5. Judicial Activism Reading Quiz

  6. Judicial Watch Files ETHICS COMPLAINT Against Sen Whitehouse

COMMENTS

  1. Judicial activism and judicial restraint (video)

    Transcript. Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two key terms in law. Judicial activism means judges use their personal views when making decisions, sometimes seen as overstepping. Judicial restraint is when judges limit their power, sticking strictly to the constitution. The Baker vs Carr case is a famous example of these concepts.