if in assignment python

Python Conditional Assignment

When you want to assign a value to a variable based on some condition, like if the condition is true then assign a value to the variable, else assign some other value to the variable, then you can use the conditional assignment operator.

In this tutorial, we will look at different ways to assign values to a variable based on some condition.

1. Using Ternary Operator

The ternary operator is very special operator in Python, it is used to assign a value to a variable based on some condition.

It goes like this:

Here, the value of variable will be value_if_true if the condition is true, else it will be value_if_false .

Let's see a code snippet to understand it better.

You can see we have conditionally assigned a value to variable c based on the condition a > b .

2. Using if-else statement

if-else statements are the core part of any programming language, they are used to execute a block of code based on some condition.

Using an if-else statement, we can assign a value to a variable based on the condition we provide.

Here is an example of replacing the above code snippet with the if-else statement.

3. Using Logical Short Circuit Evaluation

Logical short circuit evaluation is another way using which you can assign a value to a variable conditionally.

The format of logical short circuit evaluation is:

It looks similar to ternary operator, but it is not. Here the condition and value_if_true performs logical AND operation, if both are true then the value of variable will be value_if_true , or else it will be value_if_false .

Let's see an example:

But if we make condition True but value_if_true False (or 0 or None), then the value of variable will be value_if_false .

So, you can see that the value of c is 20 even though the condition a < b is True .

So, you should be careful while using logical short circuit evaluation.

While working with lists , we often need to check if a list is empty or not, and if it is empty then we need to assign some default value to it.

Let's see how we can do it using conditional assignment.

Here, we have assigned a default value to my_list if it is empty.

Assign a value to a variable conditionally based on the presence of an element in a list.

Now you know 3 different ways to assign a value to a variable conditionally. Any of these methods can be used to assign a value when there is a condition.

The cleanest and fastest way to conditional value assignment is the ternary operator .

if-else statement is recommended to use when you have to execute a block of code based on some condition.

Happy coding! 😊

Python One Line Conditional Assignment

Problem : How to perform one-line if conditional assignments in Python?

Example : Say, you start with the following code.

You want to set the value of x to 42 if boo is True , and do nothing otherwise.

Let’s dive into the different ways to accomplish this in Python. We start with an overview:

Exercise : Run the code. Are all outputs the same?

Next, you’ll dive into each of those methods and boost your one-liner superpower !

Method 1: Ternary Operator

The most basic ternary operator x if c else y returns expression x if the Boolean expression c evaluates to True . Otherwise, if the expression c evaluates to False , the ternary operator returns the alternative expression y .

Let’s go back to our example problem! You want to set the value of x to 42 if boo is True , and do nothing otherwise. Here’s how to do this in a single line:

While using the ternary operator works, you may wonder whether it’s possible to avoid the ...else x part for clarity of the code? In the next method, you’ll learn how!

If you need to improve your understanding of the ternary operator, watch the following video:

You can also read the related article:

• Python One Line Ternary

Method 2: Single-Line If Statement

Like in the previous method, you want to set the value of x to 42 if boo is True , and do nothing otherwise. But you don’t want to have a redundant else branch. How to do this in Python?

The solution to skip the else part of the ternary operator is surprisingly simple— use a standard if statement without else branch and write it into a single line of code :

To learn more about what you can pack into a single line, watch my tutorial video “If-Then-Else in One Line Python” :

Method 3: Ternary Tuple Syntax Hack

A shorthand form of the ternary operator is the following tuple syntax .

Syntax : You can use the tuple syntax (x, y)[c] consisting of a tuple (x, y) and a condition c enclosed in a square bracket. Here’s a more intuitive way to represent this tuple syntax.

In fact, the order of the <OnFalse> and <OnTrue> operands is just flipped when compared to the basic ternary operator. First, you have the branch that’s returned if the condition does NOT hold. Second, you run the branch that’s returned if the condition holds.

Clever! The condition boo holds so the return value passed into the x variable is the <OnTrue> branch 42 .

Don’t worry if this confuses you—you’re not alone. You can clarify the tuple syntax once and for all by studying my detailed blog article.

Related Article : Python Ternary — Tuple Syntax Hack

Python One-Liners Book: Master the Single Line First!

Python programmers will improve their computer science skills with these useful one-liners.

Python One-Liners will teach you how to read and write “one-liners”: concise statements of useful functionality packed into a single line of code. You’ll learn how to systematically unpack and understand any line of Python code, and write eloquent, powerfully compressed Python like an expert.

The book’s five chapters cover (1) tips and tricks, (2) regular expressions, (3) machine learning, (4) core data science topics, and (5) useful algorithms.

Detailed explanations of one-liners introduce key computer science concepts and boost your coding and analytical skills . You’ll learn about advanced Python features such as list comprehension , slicing , lambda functions , regular expressions , map and reduce functions, and slice assignments .

You’ll also learn how to:

• Leverage data structures to solve real-world problems , like using Boolean indexing to find cities with above-average pollution
• Use NumPy basics such as array , shape , axis , type , broadcasting , advanced indexing , slicing , sorting , searching , aggregating , and statistics
• Calculate basic statistics of multidimensional data arrays and the K-Means algorithms for unsupervised learning
• Create more advanced regular expressions using grouping and named groups , negative lookaheads , escaped characters , whitespaces, character sets (and negative characters sets ), and greedy/nongreedy operators
• Understand a wide range of computer science topics , including anagrams , palindromes , supersets , permutations , factorials , prime numbers , Fibonacci numbers, obfuscation , searching , and algorithmic sorting

By the end of the book, you’ll know how to write Python at its most refined , and create concise, beautiful pieces of “Python art” in merely a single line.

Get your Python One-Liners on Amazon!!

While working as a researcher in distributed systems, Dr. Christian Mayer found his love for teaching computer science students.

To help students reach higher levels of Python success, he founded the programming education website Finxter.com that has taught exponential skills to millions of coders worldwide. He’s the author of the best-selling programming books Python One-Liners (NoStarch 2020), The Art of Clean Code (NoStarch 2022), and The Book of Dash (NoStarch 2022). Chris also coauthored the Coffee Break Python series of self-published books. He’s a computer science enthusiast, freelancer , and owner of one of the top 10 largest Python blogs worldwide.

His passions are writing, reading, and coding. But his greatest passion is to serve aspiring coders through Finxter and help them to boost their skills. You can join his free email academy here.

• Module 2: The Essentials of Python »
• Conditional Statements
• View page source

Conditional Statements 

There are reading-comprehension exercises included throughout the text. These are meant to help you put your reading to practice. Solutions for the exercises are included at the bottom of this page.

In this section, we will be introduced to the if , else , and elif statements. These allow you to specify that blocks of code are to be executed only if specified conditions are found to be true, or perhaps alternative code if the condition is found to be false. For example, the following code will square x if it is a negative number, and will cube x if it is a positive number:

Please refer to the “Basic Python Object Types” subsection to recall the basics of the “boolean” type, which represents True and False values. We will extend that discussion by introducing comparison operations and membership-checking, and then expanding on the utility of the built-in bool type.

Comparison Operations 

Comparison statements will evaluate explicitly to either of the boolean-objects: True or False . There are eight comparison operations in Python:

The first six of these operators are familiar from mathematics:

Note that = and == have very different meanings. The former is the assignment operator, and the latter is the equality operator:

Python allows you to chain comparison operators to create “compound” comparisons:

Whereas == checks to see if two objects have the same value, the is operator checks to see if two objects are actually the same object. For example, creating two lists with the same contents produces two distinct lists, that have the same “value”:

Thus the is operator is most commonly used to check if a variable references the None object, or either of the boolean objects:

Use is not to check if two objects are distinct:

bool and Truth Values of Non-Boolean Objects 

Recall that the two boolean objects True and False formally belong to the int type in addition to bool , and are associated with the values 1 and 0 , respectively:

Likewise Python ascribes boolean values to non-boolean objects. For example,the number 0 is associated with False and non-zero numbers are associated with True . The boolean values of built-in objects can be evaluated with the built-in Python command bool :

and non-zero Python integers are associated with True :

The following built-in Python objects evaluate to False via bool :

Zero of any numeric type: 0 , 0.0 , 0j

Any empty sequence, such as an empty string or list: '' , tuple() , [] , numpy.array([])

Empty dictionaries and sets

Thus non-zero numbers and non-empty sequences/collections evaluate to True via bool .

The bool function allows you to evaluate the boolean values ascribed to various non-boolean objects. For instance, bool([]) returns False wherease bool([1, 2]) returns True .

if , else , and elif 

We now introduce the simple, but powerful if , else , and elif conditional statements. This will allow us to create simple branches in our code. For instance, suppose you are writing code for a video game, and you want to update a character’s status based on her/his number of health-points (an integer). The following code is representative of this:

Each if , elif , and else statement must end in a colon character, and the body of each of these statements is delimited by whitespace .

The following pseudo-code demonstrates the general template for conditional statements:

In practice this can look like:

In its simplest form, a conditional statement requires only an if clause. else and elif clauses can only follow an if clause.

Similarly, conditional statements can have an if and an else without an elif :

Conditional statements can also have an if and an elif without an else :

Note that only one code block within a single if-elif-else statement can be executed: either the “if-block” is executed, or an “elif-block” is executed, or the “else-block” is executed. Consecutive if-statements, however, are completely independent of one another, and thus their code blocks can be executed in sequence, if their respective conditional statements resolve to True .

Reading Comprehension: Conditional statements

Assume my_list is a list. Given the following code:

What will happen if my_list is [] ? Will IndexError be raised? What will first_item be?

Assume variable my_file is a string storing a filename, where a period denotes the end of the filename and the beginning of the file-type. Write code that extracts only the filename.

my_file will have at most one period in it. Accommodate cases where my_file does not include a file-type.

"code.py" \(\rightarrow\) "code"

"doc2.pdf" \(\rightarrow\) "doc2"

"hello_world" \(\rightarrow\) "hello_world"

Inline if-else statements 

Python supports a syntax for writing a restricted version of if-else statements in a single line. The following code:

can be written in a single line as:

This is suggestive of the general underlying syntax for inline if-else statements:

The inline if-else statement :

The expression A if <condition> else B returns A if bool(<condition>) evaluates to True , otherwise this expression will return B .

This syntax is highly restricted compared to the full “if-elif-else” expressions - no “elif” statement is permitted by this inline syntax, nor are multi-line code blocks within the if/else clauses.

Inline if-else statements can be used anywhere, not just on the right side of an assignment statement, and can be quite convenient:

We will see this syntax shine when we learn about comprehension statements. That being said, this syntax should be used judiciously. For example, inline if-else statements ought not be used in arithmetic expressions, for therein lies madness:

Short-Circuiting Logical Expressions 

Armed with our newfound understanding of conditional statements, we briefly return to our discussion of Python’s logic expressions to discuss “short-circuiting”. In Python, a logical expression is evaluated from left to right and will return its boolean value as soon as it is unambiguously determined, leaving any remaining portions of the expression unevaluated . That is, the expression may be short-circuited .

For example, consider the fact that an and operation will only return True if both of its arguments evaluate to True . Thus the expression False and <anything> is guaranteed to return False ; furthermore, when executed, this expression will return False without having evaluated bool(<anything>) .

To demonstrate this behavior, consider the following example:

According to our discussion, the pattern False and short-circuits this expression without it ever evaluating bool(1/0) . Reversing the ordering of the arguments makes this clear.

In practice, short-circuiting can be leveraged in order to condense one’s code. Suppose a section of our code is processing a variable x , which may be either a number or a string . Suppose further that we want to process x in a special way if it is an all-uppercased string. The code

is problematic because isupper can only be called once we are sure that x is a string; this code will raise an error if x is a number. We could instead write

but the more elegant and concise way of handling the nestled checking is to leverage our ability to short-circuit logic expressions.

See, that if x is not a string, that isinstance(x, str) will return False ; thus isinstance(x, str) and x.isupper() will short-circuit and return False without ever evaluating bool(x.isupper()) . This is the preferable way to handle this sort of checking. This code is more concise and readable than the equivalent nested if-statements.

Reading Comprehension: short-circuited expressions

Consider the preceding example of short-circuiting, where we want to catch the case where x is an uppercased string. What is the “bug” in the following code? Why does this fail to utilize short-circuiting correctly?

Links to Official Documentation 

Truth testing

Boolean operations

Comparisons

‘if’ statements

Reading Comprehension Exercise Solutions: 

Conditional statements

If my_list is [] , then bool(my_list) will return False , and the code block will be skipped. Thus first_item will be None .

First, check to see if . is even contained in my_file . If it is, find its index-position, and slice the string up to that index. Otherwise, my_file is already the file name.

Short-circuited expressions

fails to account for the fact that expressions are always evaluated from left to right. That is, bool(x.isupper()) will always be evaluated first in this instance and will raise an error if x is not a string. Thus the following isinstance(x, str) statement is useless.

How to Write the Python if Statement in one Line

• online practice

Have you ever heard of writing a Python if statement in a single line? Here, we explore multiple ways to do exactly that, including using conditional expressions in Python.

The if statement is one of the most fundamental statements in Python. In this article, we learn how to write the Python if in one line.

The if is a key piece in writing Python code. It allows developers to control the flow and logic of their code based on information received at runtime. However, many Python developers do not know they may reduce the length and complexity of their if statements by writing them in a single line.

For this article, we assume you’re somewhat familiar with Python conditions and comparisons. If not, don’t worry! Our Python Basics Course will get you up to speed in no time. This course is included in the Python Basics Track , a full-fledged Python learning track designed for complete beginners.

We start with a recap on how Python if statements work. Then, we explore some examples of how to write if statements in a single line. Let’s get started!

How the if Statement Works in Python

Let’s start with the basics. An if statement in Python is used to determine whether a condition is True or False . This information can then be used to perform specific actions in the code, essentially controlling its logic during execution.

The structure of the basic if statement is as follows:

The <expression> is the code that evaluates to either True or False . If this code evaluates to True, then the code below (represented by <perform_action> ) executes.

Python uses whitespaces to indicate which lines are controlled by the if statement. The if statement controls all indented lines below it. Typically, the indentation is set to four spaces (read this post if you’re having trouble with the indentation ).

As a simple example, the code below prints a message if and only if the current weather is sunny:

The if statement in Python has two optional components: the elif statement, which executes only if the preceding if/elif statements are False ; and the else statement, which executes only if all of the preceding if/elif statements are False. While we may have as many elif statements as we want, we may only have a single else statement at the very end of the code block.

Here’s the basic structure:

Here’s how our previous example looks after adding elif and else statements. Change the value of the weather variable to see a different message printed:

How to Write a Python if in one Line

Writing an if statement in Python (along with the optional elif and else statements) uses a lot of whitespaces. Some people may find it confusing or tiresome to follow each statement and its corresponding indented lines.

To overcome this, there is a trick many Python developers often overlook: write an if statement in a single line !

Though not the standard, Python does allow us to write an if statement and its associated action in the same line. Here’s the basic structure:

As you can see, not much has changed. We simply need to “pull” the indented line <perform_action> up to the right of the colon character ( : ). It’s that simple!

Let’s check it with a real example. The code below works as it did previously despite the if statement being in a single line. Test it out and see for yourself:

Writing a Python if Statement With Multiple Actions in one Line

That’s all well and good, but what if my if statement has multiple actions under its control? When using the standard indentation, we separate different actions in multiple indented lines as the structure below shows:

Can we do this in a single line? The surprising answer is yes! We use semicolons to separate each action in the same line as if placed in different lines.

Here’s how the structure looks:

And an example of this functionality:

Have you noticed how each call to the print() function appears in its own line? This indicates we have successfully executed multiple actions from a single line. Nice!

By the way, interested in learning more about the print() function? We have an article on the ins and outs of the print() function .

Writing a Full Python if/elif/else Block Using Single Lines

You may have seen this coming, but we can even write elif and else statements each in a single line. To do so, we use the same syntax as writing an if statement in a single line.

Here’s the general structure:

Looks simple, right? Depending on the content of your expressions and actions, you may find this structure easier to read and understand compared to the indented blocks.

Here’s our previous example of a full if/elif/else block, rewritten as single lines:

Using Python Conditional Expressions to Write an if/else Block in one Line

There’s still a final trick to writing a Python if in one line. Conditional expressions in Python (also known as Python ternary operators) can run an if/else block in a single line.

A conditional expression is even more compact! Remember it took at least two lines to write a block containing both if and else statements in our last example.

In contrast, here’s how a conditional expression is structured:

The syntax is somewhat harder to follow at first, but the basic idea is that <expression> is a test. If the test evaluates to True , then <value_if_true> is the result. Otherwise, the expression results in <value_if_false> .

As you can see, conditional expressions always evaluate to a single value in the end. They are not complete replacements for an if/elif/else block. In fact, we cannot have elif statements in them at all. However, they’re most helpful when determining a single value depending on a single condition.

Take a look at the code below, which determines the value of is_baby depending on whether or not the age is below five:

This is the exact use case for a conditional expression! Here’s how we rewrite this if/else block in a single line:

Much simpler!

Go Even Further With Python!

We hope you now know many ways to write a Python if in one line. We’ve reached the end of the article, but don’t stop practicing now!

If you do not know where to go next, read this post on how to get beyond the basics in Python . If you’d rather get technical, we have a post on the best code editors and IDEs for Python . Remember to keep improving!

You may also like

How Do You Write a SELECT Statement in SQL?

What Is a Foreign Key in SQL?

Enumerate and Explain All the Basic Elements of an SQL Query

Python Enhancement Proposals

• Python »
• PEP Index »

PEP 572 – Assignment Expressions

The importance of real code, exceptional cases, scope of the target, relative precedence of :=, change to evaluation order, differences between assignment expressions and assignment statements, specification changes during implementation, _pydecimal.py, datetime.py, sysconfig.py, simplifying list comprehensions, capturing condition values, changing the scope rules for comprehensions, alternative spellings, special-casing conditional statements, special-casing comprehensions, lowering operator precedence, allowing commas to the right, always requiring parentheses, why not just turn existing assignment into an expression, with assignment expressions, why bother with assignment statements, why not use a sublocal scope and prevent namespace pollution, style guide recommendations, acknowledgements, a numeric example, appendix b: rough code translations for comprehensions, appendix c: no changes to scope semantics.

This is a proposal for creating a way to assign to variables within an expression using the notation NAME := expr .

As part of this change, there is also an update to dictionary comprehension evaluation order to ensure key expressions are executed before value expressions (allowing the key to be bound to a name and then re-used as part of calculating the corresponding value).

During discussion of this PEP, the operator became informally known as “the walrus operator”. The construct’s formal name is “Assignment Expressions” (as per the PEP title), but they may also be referred to as “Named Expressions” (e.g. the CPython reference implementation uses that name internally).

Naming the result of an expression is an important part of programming, allowing a descriptive name to be used in place of a longer expression, and permitting reuse. Currently, this feature is available only in statement form, making it unavailable in list comprehensions and other expression contexts.

Additionally, naming sub-parts of a large expression can assist an interactive debugger, providing useful display hooks and partial results. Without a way to capture sub-expressions inline, this would require refactoring of the original code; with assignment expressions, this merely requires the insertion of a few name := markers. Removing the need to refactor reduces the likelihood that the code be inadvertently changed as part of debugging (a common cause of Heisenbugs), and is easier to dictate to another programmer.

During the development of this PEP many people (supporters and critics both) have had a tendency to focus on toy examples on the one hand, and on overly complex examples on the other.

The danger of toy examples is twofold: they are often too abstract to make anyone go “ooh, that’s compelling”, and they are easily refuted with “I would never write it that way anyway”.

The danger of overly complex examples is that they provide a convenient strawman for critics of the proposal to shoot down (“that’s obfuscated”).

Yet there is some use for both extremely simple and extremely complex examples: they are helpful to clarify the intended semantics. Therefore, there will be some of each below.

However, in order to be compelling , examples should be rooted in real code, i.e. code that was written without any thought of this PEP, as part of a useful application, however large or small. Tim Peters has been extremely helpful by going over his own personal code repository and picking examples of code he had written that (in his view) would have been clearer if rewritten with (sparing) use of assignment expressions. His conclusion: the current proposal would have allowed a modest but clear improvement in quite a few bits of code.

Another use of real code is to observe indirectly how much value programmers place on compactness. Guido van Rossum searched through a Dropbox code base and discovered some evidence that programmers value writing fewer lines over shorter lines.

Case in point: Guido found several examples where a programmer repeated a subexpression, slowing down the program, in order to save one line of code, e.g. instead of writing:

they would write:

Another example illustrates that programmers sometimes do more work to save an extra level of indentation:

This code tries to match pattern2 even if pattern1 has a match (in which case the match on pattern2 is never used). The more efficient rewrite would have been:

Syntax and semantics

In most contexts where arbitrary Python expressions can be used, a named expression can appear. This is of the form NAME := expr where expr is any valid Python expression other than an unparenthesized tuple, and NAME is an identifier.

The value of such a named expression is the same as the incorporated expression, with the additional side-effect that the target is assigned that value:

There are a few places where assignment expressions are not allowed, in order to avoid ambiguities or user confusion:

This rule is included to simplify the choice for the user between an assignment statement and an assignment expression – there is no syntactic position where both are valid.

Again, this rule is included to avoid two visually similar ways of saying the same thing.

This rule is included to disallow excessively confusing code, and because parsing keyword arguments is complex enough already.

This rule is included to discourage side effects in a position whose exact semantics are already confusing to many users (cf. the common style recommendation against mutable default values), and also to echo the similar prohibition in calls (the previous bullet).

The reasoning here is similar to the two previous cases; this ungrouped assortment of symbols and operators composed of : and = is hard to read correctly.

This allows lambda to always bind less tightly than := ; having a name binding at the top level inside a lambda function is unlikely to be of value, as there is no way to make use of it. In cases where the name will be used more than once, the expression is likely to need parenthesizing anyway, so this prohibition will rarely affect code.

This shows that what looks like an assignment operator in an f-string is not always an assignment operator. The f-string parser uses : to indicate formatting options. To preserve backwards compatibility, assignment operator usage inside of f-strings must be parenthesized. As noted above, this usage of the assignment operator is not recommended.

An assignment expression does not introduce a new scope. In most cases the scope in which the target will be bound is self-explanatory: it is the current scope. If this scope contains a nonlocal or global declaration for the target, the assignment expression honors that. A lambda (being an explicit, if anonymous, function definition) counts as a scope for this purpose.

There is one special case: an assignment expression occurring in a list, set or dict comprehension or in a generator expression (below collectively referred to as “comprehensions”) binds the target in the containing scope, honoring a nonlocal or global declaration for the target in that scope, if one exists. For the purpose of this rule the containing scope of a nested comprehension is the scope that contains the outermost comprehension. A lambda counts as a containing scope.

The motivation for this special case is twofold. First, it allows us to conveniently capture a “witness” for an any() expression, or a counterexample for all() , for example:

Second, it allows a compact way of updating mutable state from a comprehension, for example:

However, an assignment expression target name cannot be the same as a for -target name appearing in any comprehension containing the assignment expression. The latter names are local to the comprehension in which they appear, so it would be contradictory for a contained use of the same name to refer to the scope containing the outermost comprehension instead.

For example, [i := i+1 for i in range(5)] is invalid: the for i part establishes that i is local to the comprehension, but the i := part insists that i is not local to the comprehension. The same reason makes these examples invalid too:

While it’s technically possible to assign consistent semantics to these cases, it’s difficult to determine whether those semantics actually make sense in the absence of real use cases. Accordingly, the reference implementation [1] will ensure that such cases raise SyntaxError , rather than executing with implementation defined behaviour.

This restriction applies even if the assignment expression is never executed:

For the comprehension body (the part before the first “for” keyword) and the filter expression (the part after “if” and before any nested “for”), this restriction applies solely to target names that are also used as iteration variables in the comprehension. Lambda expressions appearing in these positions introduce a new explicit function scope, and hence may use assignment expressions with no additional restrictions.

Due to design constraints in the reference implementation (the symbol table analyser cannot easily detect when names are re-used between the leftmost comprehension iterable expression and the rest of the comprehension), named expressions are disallowed entirely as part of comprehension iterable expressions (the part after each “in”, and before any subsequent “if” or “for” keyword):

A further exception applies when an assignment expression occurs in a comprehension whose containing scope is a class scope. If the rules above were to result in the target being assigned in that class’s scope, the assignment expression is expressly invalid. This case also raises SyntaxError :

(The reason for the latter exception is the implicit function scope created for comprehensions – there is currently no runtime mechanism for a function to refer to a variable in the containing class scope, and we do not want to add such a mechanism. If this issue ever gets resolved this special case may be removed from the specification of assignment expressions. Note that the problem already exists for using a variable defined in the class scope from a comprehension.)

See Appendix B for some examples of how the rules for targets in comprehensions translate to equivalent code.

The := operator groups more tightly than a comma in all syntactic positions where it is legal, but less tightly than all other operators, including or , and , not , and conditional expressions ( A if C else B ). As follows from section “Exceptional cases” above, it is never allowed at the same level as = . In case a different grouping is desired, parentheses should be used.

The := operator may be used directly in a positional function call argument; however it is invalid directly in a keyword argument.

Some examples to clarify what’s technically valid or invalid:

Most of the “valid” examples above are not recommended, since human readers of Python source code who are quickly glancing at some code may miss the distinction. But simple cases are not objectionable:

This PEP recommends always putting spaces around := , similar to PEP 8 ’s recommendation for = when used for assignment, whereas the latter disallows spaces around = used for keyword arguments.)

In order to have precisely defined semantics, the proposal requires evaluation order to be well-defined. This is technically not a new requirement, as function calls may already have side effects. Python already has a rule that subexpressions are generally evaluated from left to right. However, assignment expressions make these side effects more visible, and we propose a single change to the current evaluation order:

• In a dict comprehension {X: Y for ...} , Y is currently evaluated before X . We propose to change this so that X is evaluated before Y . (In a dict display like {X: Y} this is already the case, and also in dict((X, Y) for ...) which should clearly be equivalent to the dict comprehension.)

Most importantly, since := is an expression, it can be used in contexts where statements are illegal, including lambda functions and comprehensions.

Conversely, assignment expressions don’t support the advanced features found in assignment statements:

• Multiple targets are not directly supported: x = y = z = 0 # Equivalent: (z := (y := (x := 0)))
• Single assignment targets other than a single NAME are not supported: # No equivalent a [ i ] = x self . rest = []
• Priority around commas is different: x = 1 , 2 # Sets x to (1, 2) ( x := 1 , 2 ) # Sets x to 1
• Iterable packing and unpacking (both regular or extended forms) are not supported: # Equivalent needs extra parentheses loc = x , y # Use (loc := (x, y)) info = name , phone , * rest # Use (info := (name, phone, *rest)) # No equivalent px , py , pz = position name , phone , email , * other_info = contact
• Inline type annotations are not supported: # Closest equivalent is "p: Optional[int]" as a separate declaration p : Optional [ int ] = None
• Augmented assignment is not supported: total += tax # Equivalent: (total := total + tax)

The following changes have been made based on implementation experience and additional review after the PEP was first accepted and before Python 3.8 was released:

• for consistency with other similar exceptions, and to avoid locking in an exception name that is not necessarily going to improve clarity for end users, the originally proposed TargetScopeError subclass of SyntaxError was dropped in favour of just raising SyntaxError directly. [3]
• due to a limitation in CPython’s symbol table analysis process, the reference implementation raises SyntaxError for all uses of named expressions inside comprehension iterable expressions, rather than only raising them when the named expression target conflicts with one of the iteration variables in the comprehension. This could be revisited given sufficiently compelling examples, but the extra complexity needed to implement the more selective restriction doesn’t seem worthwhile for purely hypothetical use cases.

Examples from the Python standard library

env_base is only used on these lines, putting its assignment on the if moves it as the “header” of the block.

• Current: env_base = os . environ . get ( "PYTHONUSERBASE" , None ) if env_base : return env_base
• Improved: if env_base := os . environ . get ( "PYTHONUSERBASE" , None ): return env_base

Avoid nested if and remove one indentation level.

• Current: if self . _is_special : ans = self . _check_nans ( context = context ) if ans : return ans
• Improved: if self . _is_special and ( ans := self . _check_nans ( context = context )): return ans

Code looks more regular and avoid multiple nested if. (See Appendix A for the origin of this example.)

• Current: reductor = dispatch_table . get ( cls ) if reductor : rv = reductor ( x ) else : reductor = getattr ( x , "__reduce_ex__" , None ) if reductor : rv = reductor ( 4 ) else : reductor = getattr ( x , "__reduce__" , None ) if reductor : rv = reductor () else : raise Error ( "un(deep)copyable object of type %s " % cls )
• Improved: if reductor := dispatch_table . get ( cls ): rv = reductor ( x ) elif reductor := getattr ( x , "__reduce_ex__" , None ): rv = reductor ( 4 ) elif reductor := getattr ( x , "__reduce__" , None ): rv = reductor () else : raise Error ( "un(deep)copyable object of type %s " % cls )

tz is only used for s += tz , moving its assignment inside the if helps to show its scope.

• Current: s = _format_time ( self . _hour , self . _minute , self . _second , self . _microsecond , timespec ) tz = self . _tzstr () if tz : s += tz return s
• Improved: s = _format_time ( self . _hour , self . _minute , self . _second , self . _microsecond , timespec ) if tz := self . _tzstr (): s += tz return s

Calling fp.readline() in the while condition and calling .match() on the if lines make the code more compact without making it harder to understand.

• Current: while True : line = fp . readline () if not line : break m = define_rx . match ( line ) if m : n , v = m . group ( 1 , 2 ) try : v = int ( v ) except ValueError : pass vars [ n ] = v else : m = undef_rx . match ( line ) if m : vars [ m . group ( 1 )] = 0
• Improved: while line := fp . readline (): if m := define_rx . match ( line ): n , v = m . group ( 1 , 2 ) try : v = int ( v ) except ValueError : pass vars [ n ] = v elif m := undef_rx . match ( line ): vars [ m . group ( 1 )] = 0

A list comprehension can map and filter efficiently by capturing the condition:

Similarly, a subexpression can be reused within the main expression, by giving it a name on first use:

Note that in both cases the variable y is bound in the containing scope (i.e. at the same level as results or stuff ).

Assignment expressions can be used to good effect in the header of an if or while statement:

Particularly with the while loop, this can remove the need to have an infinite loop, an assignment, and a condition. It also creates a smooth parallel between a loop which simply uses a function call as its condition, and one which uses that as its condition but also uses the actual value.

An example from the low-level UNIX world:

Rejected alternative proposals

Proposals broadly similar to this one have come up frequently on python-ideas. Below are a number of alternative syntaxes, some of them specific to comprehensions, which have been rejected in favour of the one given above.

A previous version of this PEP proposed subtle changes to the scope rules for comprehensions, to make them more usable in class scope and to unify the scope of the “outermost iterable” and the rest of the comprehension. However, this part of the proposal would have caused backwards incompatibilities, and has been withdrawn so the PEP can focus on assignment expressions.

Broadly the same semantics as the current proposal, but spelled differently.

Since EXPR as NAME already has meaning in import , except and with statements (with different semantics), this would create unnecessary confusion or require special-casing (e.g. to forbid assignment within the headers of these statements).

(Note that with EXPR as VAR does not simply assign the value of EXPR to VAR – it calls EXPR.__enter__() and assigns the result of that to VAR .)

Additional reasons to prefer := over this spelling include:

• In if f(x) as y the assignment target doesn’t jump out at you – it just reads like if f x blah blah and it is too similar visually to if f(x) and y .
• import foo as bar
• except Exc as var
• with ctxmgr() as var

To the contrary, the assignment expression does not belong to the if or while that starts the line, and we intentionally allow assignment expressions in other contexts as well.

• NAME = EXPR
• if NAME := EXPR

reinforces the visual recognition of assignment expressions.

This syntax is inspired by languages such as R and Haskell, and some programmable calculators. (Note that a left-facing arrow y <- f(x) is not possible in Python, as it would be interpreted as less-than and unary minus.) This syntax has a slight advantage over ‘as’ in that it does not conflict with with , except and import , but otherwise is equivalent. But it is entirely unrelated to Python’s other use of -> (function return type annotations), and compared to := (which dates back to Algol-58) it has a much weaker tradition.

This has the advantage that leaked usage can be readily detected, removing some forms of syntactic ambiguity. However, this would be the only place in Python where a variable’s scope is encoded into its name, making refactoring harder.

Execution order is inverted (the indented body is performed first, followed by the “header”). This requires a new keyword, unless an existing keyword is repurposed (most likely with: ). See PEP 3150 for prior discussion on this subject (with the proposed keyword being given: ).

This syntax has fewer conflicts than as does (conflicting only with the raise Exc from Exc notation), but is otherwise comparable to it. Instead of paralleling with expr as target: (which can be useful but can also be confusing), this has no parallels, but is evocative.

One of the most popular use-cases is if and while statements. Instead of a more general solution, this proposal enhances the syntax of these two statements to add a means of capturing the compared value:

This works beautifully if and ONLY if the desired condition is based on the truthiness of the captured value. It is thus effective for specific use-cases (regex matches, socket reads that return '' when done), and completely useless in more complicated cases (e.g. where the condition is f(x) < 0 and you want to capture the value of f(x) ). It also has no benefit to list comprehensions.

Advantages: No syntactic ambiguities. Disadvantages: Answers only a fraction of possible use-cases, even in if / while statements.

Another common use-case is comprehensions (list/set/dict, and genexps). As above, proposals have been made for comprehension-specific solutions.

This brings the subexpression to a location in between the ‘for’ loop and the expression. It introduces an additional language keyword, which creates conflicts. Of the three, where reads the most cleanly, but also has the greatest potential for conflict (e.g. SQLAlchemy and numpy have where methods, as does tkinter.dnd.Icon in the standard library).

As above, but reusing the with keyword. Doesn’t read too badly, and needs no additional language keyword. Is restricted to comprehensions, though, and cannot as easily be transformed into “longhand” for-loop syntax. Has the C problem that an equals sign in an expression can now create a name binding, rather than performing a comparison. Would raise the question of why “with NAME = EXPR:” cannot be used as a statement on its own.

As per option 2, but using as rather than an equals sign. Aligns syntactically with other uses of as for name binding, but a simple transformation to for-loop longhand would create drastically different semantics; the meaning of with inside a comprehension would be completely different from the meaning as a stand-alone statement, while retaining identical syntax.

Regardless of the spelling chosen, this introduces a stark difference between comprehensions and the equivalent unrolled long-hand form of the loop. It is no longer possible to unwrap the loop into statement form without reworking any name bindings. The only keyword that can be repurposed to this task is with , thus giving it sneakily different semantics in a comprehension than in a statement; alternatively, a new keyword is needed, with all the costs therein.

There are two logical precedences for the := operator. Either it should bind as loosely as possible, as does statement-assignment; or it should bind more tightly than comparison operators. Placing its precedence between the comparison and arithmetic operators (to be precise: just lower than bitwise OR) allows most uses inside while and if conditions to be spelled without parentheses, as it is most likely that you wish to capture the value of something, then perform a comparison on it:

Once find() returns -1, the loop terminates. If := binds as loosely as = does, this would capture the result of the comparison (generally either True or False ), which is less useful.

While this behaviour would be convenient in many situations, it is also harder to explain than “the := operator behaves just like the assignment statement”, and as such, the precedence for := has been made as close as possible to that of = (with the exception that it binds tighter than comma).

Some critics have claimed that the assignment expressions should allow unparenthesized tuples on the right, so that these two would be equivalent:

(With the current version of the proposal, the latter would be equivalent to ((point := x), y) .)

However, adopting this stance would logically lead to the conclusion that when used in a function call, assignment expressions also bind less tight than comma, so we’d have the following confusing equivalence:

The less confusing option is to make := bind more tightly than comma.

It’s been proposed to just always require parentheses around an assignment expression. This would resolve many ambiguities, and indeed parentheses will frequently be needed to extract the desired subexpression. But in the following cases the extra parentheses feel redundant:

Frequently Raised Objections

C and its derivatives define the = operator as an expression, rather than a statement as is Python’s way. This allows assignments in more contexts, including contexts where comparisons are more common. The syntactic similarity between if (x == y) and if (x = y) belies their drastically different semantics. Thus this proposal uses := to clarify the distinction.

The two forms have different flexibilities. The := operator can be used inside a larger expression; the = statement can be augmented to += and its friends, can be chained, and can assign to attributes and subscripts.

Previous revisions of this proposal involved sublocal scope (restricted to a single statement), preventing name leakage and namespace pollution. While a definite advantage in a number of situations, this increases complexity in many others, and the costs are not justified by the benefits. In the interests of language simplicity, the name bindings created here are exactly equivalent to any other name bindings, including that usage at class or module scope will create externally-visible names. This is no different from for loops or other constructs, and can be solved the same way: del the name once it is no longer needed, or prefix it with an underscore.

(The author wishes to thank Guido van Rossum and Christoph Groth for their suggestions to move the proposal in this direction. [2] )

As expression assignments can sometimes be used equivalently to statement assignments, the question of which should be preferred will arise. For the benefit of style guides such as PEP 8 , two recommendations are suggested.

• If either assignment statements or assignment expressions can be used, prefer statements; they are a clear declaration of intent.
• If using assignment expressions would lead to ambiguity about execution order, restructure it to use statements instead.

The authors wish to thank Alyssa Coghlan and Steven D’Aprano for their considerable contributions to this proposal, and members of the core-mentorship mailing list for assistance with implementation.

Appendix A: Tim Peters’s findings

Here’s a brief essay Tim Peters wrote on the topic.

I dislike “busy” lines of code, and also dislike putting conceptually unrelated logic on a single line. So, for example, instead of:

instead. So I suspected I’d find few places I’d want to use assignment expressions. I didn’t even consider them for lines already stretching halfway across the screen. In other cases, “unrelated” ruled:

is a vast improvement over the briefer:

The original two statements are doing entirely different conceptual things, and slamming them together is conceptually insane.

In other cases, combining related logic made it harder to understand, such as rewriting:

as the briefer:

The while test there is too subtle, crucially relying on strict left-to-right evaluation in a non-short-circuiting or method-chaining context. My brain isn’t wired that way.

But cases like that were rare. Name binding is very frequent, and “sparse is better than dense” does not mean “almost empty is better than sparse”. For example, I have many functions that return None or 0 to communicate “I have nothing useful to return in this case, but since that’s expected often I’m not going to annoy you with an exception”. This is essentially the same as regular expression search functions returning None when there is no match. So there was lots of code of the form:

I find that clearer, and certainly a bit less typing and pattern-matching reading, as:

It’s also nice to trade away a small amount of horizontal whitespace to get another _line_ of surrounding code on screen. I didn’t give much weight to this at first, but it was so very frequent it added up, and I soon enough became annoyed that I couldn’t actually run the briefer code. That surprised me!

There are other cases where assignment expressions really shine. Rather than pick another from my code, Kirill Balunov gave a lovely example from the standard library’s copy() function in copy.py :

The ever-increasing indentation is semantically misleading: the logic is conceptually flat, “the first test that succeeds wins”:

Using easy assignment expressions allows the visual structure of the code to emphasize the conceptual flatness of the logic; ever-increasing indentation obscured it.

A smaller example from my code delighted me, both allowing to put inherently related logic in a single line, and allowing to remove an annoying “artificial” indentation level:

That if is about as long as I want my lines to get, but remains easy to follow.

So, in all, in most lines binding a name, I wouldn’t use assignment expressions, but because that construct is so very frequent, that leaves many places I would. In most of the latter, I found a small win that adds up due to how often it occurs, and in the rest I found a moderate to major win. I’d certainly use it more often than ternary if , but significantly less often than augmented assignment.

I have another example that quite impressed me at the time.

Where all variables are positive integers, and a is at least as large as the n’th root of x, this algorithm returns the floor of the n’th root of x (and roughly doubling the number of accurate bits per iteration):

It’s not obvious why that works, but is no more obvious in the “loop and a half” form. It’s hard to prove correctness without building on the right insight (the “arithmetic mean - geometric mean inequality”), and knowing some non-trivial things about how nested floor functions behave. That is, the challenges are in the math, not really in the coding.

If you do know all that, then the assignment-expression form is easily read as “while the current guess is too large, get a smaller guess”, where the “too large?” test and the new guess share an expensive sub-expression.

To my eyes, the original form is harder to understand:

This appendix attempts to clarify (though not specify) the rules when a target occurs in a comprehension or in a generator expression. For a number of illustrative examples we show the original code, containing a comprehension, and the translation, where the comprehension has been replaced by an equivalent generator function plus some scaffolding.

Since [x for ...] is equivalent to list(x for ...) these examples all use list comprehensions without loss of generality. And since these examples are meant to clarify edge cases of the rules, they aren’t trying to look like real code.

Note: comprehensions are already implemented via synthesizing nested generator functions like those in this appendix. The new part is adding appropriate declarations to establish the intended scope of assignment expression targets (the same scope they resolve to as if the assignment were performed in the block containing the outermost comprehension). For type inference purposes, these illustrative expansions do not imply that assignment expression targets are always Optional (but they do indicate the target binding scope).

Let’s start with a reminder of what code is generated for a generator expression without assignment expression.

• Original code (EXPR usually references VAR): def f (): a = [ EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation (let’s not worry about name conflicts): def f (): def genexpr ( iterator ): for VAR in iterator : yield EXPR a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Let’s add a simple assignment expression.

• Original code: def f (): a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def f (): if False : TARGET = None # Dead code to ensure TARGET is a local variable def genexpr ( iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Let’s add a global TARGET declaration in f() .

• Original code: def f (): global TARGET a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def f (): global TARGET def genexpr ( iterator ): global TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Or instead let’s add a nonlocal TARGET declaration in f() .

• Original code: def g (): TARGET = ... def f (): nonlocal TARGET a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def g (): TARGET = ... def f (): nonlocal TARGET def genexpr ( iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Finally, let’s nest two comprehensions.

• Original code: def f (): a = [[ TARGET := i for i in range ( 3 )] for j in range ( 2 )] # I.e., a = [[0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2]] print ( TARGET ) # prints 2
• Translation: def f (): if False : TARGET = None def outer_genexpr ( outer_iterator ): nonlocal TARGET def inner_generator ( inner_iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for i in inner_iterator : TARGET = i yield i for j in outer_iterator : yield list ( inner_generator ( range ( 3 ))) a = list ( outer_genexpr ( range ( 2 ))) print ( TARGET )

Because it has been a point of confusion, note that nothing about Python’s scoping semantics is changed. Function-local scopes continue to be resolved at compile time, and to have indefinite temporal extent at run time (“full closures”). Example:

This document has been placed in the public domain.

Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0572.rst

Last modified: 2023-10-11 12:05:51 GMT

Learn Python practically and Get Certified .

Popular Tutorials

Popular examples, reference materials, learn python interactively, python introduction.

• How to Get Started With Python?
• Python Comments
• Python Variables, Constants and Literals
• Python Type Conversion
• Python Basic Input and Output
• Python Operators
• Precedence and Associativity of Operators in Python (programiz.com)

Python Flow Control

• Python if...else Statement
• Python for Loop

Python while Loop

Python break and continue

Python pass Statement

Python Data types

• Python Numbers, Type Conversion and Mathematics
• Python List
• Python Tuple
• Python Sets
• Python Dictionary
• Python Functions
• Python Function Arguments
• Python Variable Scope
• Python Global Keyword
• Python Recursion
• Python Modules
• Python Package
• Python Main function (programiz.com)

Python Files

• Python Directory and Files Management
• Python CSV: Read and Write CSV files (programiz.com)
• Reading CSV files in Python (programiz.com)
• Writing CSV files in Python (programiz.com)
• Python Exception Handling
• Python Exceptions
• Python Custom Exceptions

Python Object & Class

• Python Objects and Classes
• Python Inheritance
• Python Multiple Inheritance
• Polymorphism in Python(with Examples) (programiz.com)
• Python Operator Overloading

Python Advanced Topics

• List comprehension
• Python Lambda/Anonymous Function
• Python Iterators
• Python Generators
• Python Namespace and Scope
• Python Closures
• Python Decorators
• Python @property decorator
• Python RegEx

Python Date and Time

• Python datetime
• Python strftime()
• Python strptime()
• How to get current date and time in Python?
• Python Get Current Time
• Python timestamp to datetime and vice-versa
• Python time Module
• Python sleep()

Additional Topic

• Python Keywords and Identifiers
• Python Asserts
• Python Json
• Python *args and **kwargs (With Examples) (programiz.com)

Python Tutorials

Python Assert Statement

• List of Keywords in Python

In computer programming, the if statement is a conditional statement. It is used to execute a block of code only when a specific condition is met. For example,

Suppose we need to assign different grades to students based on their scores.

• If a student scores above 90 , assign grade A
• If a student scores above 75 , assign grade B
• If a student scores above 65 , assign grade C

These conditional tasks can be achieved using the if statement.

• Python if Statement

An if statement executes a block of code only if the specified condition is met.

Here, if the condition of the if statement is:

• True - the body of the if statement executes.
• False - the body of the if statement is skipped from execution.

Let's look at an example.

Note: Be mindful of the indentation while writing the if statements. Indentation is the whitespace at the beginning of the code.

Here, the spaces before the print() statement denote that it's the body of the if statement.

• Example: Python if Statement

Sample Output 1

In the above example, we have created a variable named number . Notice the test condition ,

As the number is greater than 0 , the condition evaluates True . Hence, the body of the if statement executes.

Sample Output 2

Now, let's change the value of the number to a negative integer, say -5 .

Now, when we run the program, the output will be:

This is because the value of the number is less than 0 . Hence, the condition evaluates to False . And, the body of the if statement is skipped.

An if statement can have an optional else clause. The else statement executes if the condition in the if statement evaluates to False .

Here, if the condition inside the if statement evaluates to

• True - the body of if executes, and the body of else is skipped.
• False - the body of else executes, and the body of if is skipped

• Example: Python if…else Statement

In the above example, we have created a variable named number .

Since the value of the number is 10 , the condition evaluates to True . Hence, code inside the body of if is executed.

If we change the value of the variable to a negative integer, let's say -5 , our output will be:

Here, the test condition evaluates to False . Hence code inside the body of else is executed.

• Python if…elif…else Statement

The if...else statement is used to execute a block of code among two alternatives.

However, if we need to make a choice between more than two alternatives, we use the if...elif...else statement.

• if condition1 - This checks if condition1 is True . If it is, the program executes code block 1 .
• elif condition2 - If condition1 is not True , the program checks condition2 . If condition2 is True , it executes code block 2 .
• else - If neither condition1 nor condition2 is True , the program defaults to executing code block 3 .

• Example: Python if…elif…else Statement

Since the value of the number is 0 , both the test conditions evaluate to False .

Hence, the statement inside the body of else is executed.

• Python Nested if Statements

It is possible to include an if statement inside another if statement. For example,

Here's how this program works.

More on Python if…else Statement

In certain situations, the if statement can be simplified into a single line. For example,

This code can be compactly written as

This one-liner approach retains the same functionality but in a more concise format.

Python doesn't have a ternary operator. However, we can use if...else to work like a ternary operator in other languages. For example,

can be written as

We can use logical operators such as and and or within an if statement.

Here, we used the logical operator and to add two conditions in the if statement.

We also used >= (comparison operator) to compare two values.

Logical and comparison operators are often used with if...else statements. Visit Python Operators to learn more.

Table of Contents

• Introduction

Video: Python if...else Statement

Sorry about that.

Related Tutorials

Python Tutorial

• Learn Python
• Python Lists
• Python Dictionaries
• Python Strings
• Python Functions
• Learn Pandas & NumPy
• Pandas Tutorials
• Numpy Tutorials
• Learn Data Visualization
• Python Seaborn
• Python Matplotlib

Inline If in Python: The Ternary Operator in Python

• September 16, 2021 December 20, 2022

In this tutorial, you’ll learn how to create inline if statements in Python. This is often known as the Python ternary operator, which allows you to execute conditional if statements in a single line, allowing statements to take up less space and often be written in my easy-to-understand syntax! Let’s take a look at what you’ll learn.

The Quick Answer: Use the Python Ternary Operator

Table of Contents

What is the Python Ternary Operator?

A ternary operator is an inline statement that evaluates a condition and returns one of two outputs. It’s an operator that’s often used in many programming languages, including Python, as well as math. The Python ternary operator has been around since Python 2.5, despite being delayed multiple times.

The syntax of the Python ternary operator is a little different than that of other languages. Let’s take a look at what it looks like:

Now let’s take a look at how you can actually write an inline if statement in Python.

How Do you Write an Inline If Statement in Python?

Before we dive into writing an inline if statement in Python, let’s take a look at how if statements actually work in Python. With an if statement you must include an if , but you can also choose to include an else statement, as well as one more of else-ifs, which in Python are written as elif .

The traditional Python if statement looks like this:

This can be a little cumbersome to write, especially if you conditions are very simple. Because of this, inline if statements in Python can be really helpful to help you write your code faster.

Let’s take a look at how we can accomplish this in Python:

This is significantly easier to write. Let’s break this down a little bit:

• We assign a value to x , which will be evaluated
• We declare a variable, y , which we assign to the value of 10, if x is True. Otherwise, we assign it a value of 20.

We can see how this is written out in a much more plain language than a for-loop that may require multiple lines, thereby wasting space.

Tip! This is quite similar to how you’d written a list comprehension. If you want to learn more about Python List Comprehensions, check out my in-depth tutorial here . If you want to learn more about Python for-loops, check out my in-depth guide here .

Now that you know how to write a basic inline if statement in Python, let’s see how you can simplify it even further by omitting the else statement.

How To Write an Inline If Statement Without an Else Statement

Now that you know how to write an inline if statement in Python with an else clause, let’s take a look at how we can do this in Python.

Before we do this, let’s see how we can do this with a traditional if statement in Python

You can see that this still requires you to write two lines. But we know better – we can easily cut this down to a single line. Let’s get started!

We can see here that really what this accomplishes is remove the line break between the if line and the code it executes.

Now let’s take a look at how we can even include an elif clause in our inline if statements in Python!

Check out some other Python tutorials on datagy.io, including our complete guide to styling Pandas and our comprehensive overview of Pivot Tables in Pandas !

How to Write an Inline If Statement With an Elif Statement

Including an else-if, or elif , in your Python inline if statement is a little less intuitive. But it’s definitely doable! So let’s get started. Let’s imagine we want to write this if-statement:

Let’s see how we can easily turn this into an inline if statement in Python:

This is a bit different than what we’ve seen so far, so let’s break it down a bit:

• First, we evaluate is x == 1. If that’s true, the conditions end and y = 10.
• Otherwise, we create another condition in brackets
• First we check if x == 20, and if that’s true, then y = 20. Note that we did not repeated y= here.
• Finally, if neither of the other decisions are true, we assign 30 to y

This is definitely a bit more complex to read, so you may be better off creating a traditional if statement.

In this post, you learned how to create inline if statement in Python! You learned about the Python ternary operator and how it works. You also learned how to create inline if statements with else statements, without else statements, as well as with else if statements.

To learn more about Python ternary operators, check out the official documentation here .

Nik Piepenbreier

Nik is the author of datagy.io and has over a decade of experience working with data analytics, data science, and Python. He specializes in teaching developers how to use Python for data science using hands-on tutorials. View Author posts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Python If-Else Statement in One Line - Ternary Operator Explained

Single-line conditionals in python here’s when to and when not to use them.

Python isn’t the fastest programming language out there, but boy is it readable and efficient to write. Everyone knows what conditional statements are, but did you know you can write if statements in one line of Python code? As it turns out you can, and you’ll learn all about it today.

After reading, you’ll know everything about Python’s If Else statements in one line. You’ll understand when to use them, and when it’s best to avoid them and stick to conventional conditional statements.

Don’t feel like reading? Watch my video instead:

Want to get hired as a data scientist? Running a data science blog might help:

Can Blogging About Data Science Really Get You Hired as a Data Scientist?

What’s Wrong With the Normal If Statement?

Absolutely nothing. Splitting conditional statements into multiple lines of code has been a convention for ages. Most programming languages require the usage of curly brackets, and hence the single line if statements are not an option. Other languages allow writing only simple conditionals in a single line.

And then there’s Python. Before diving into If Else statements in one line, let’s first make a short recap on regular conditionals.

For example, you can check if a condition is true with the following syntax:

The variable age is less than 18 in this case, so Go home. is printed to the console. You can spice things up by adding an else condition that gets evaluated if the first condition is False :

This time age is greater than 18, so Welcome! gets printed to the console. Finally, you can add one or multiple elif conditions. These are used to capture the in-between cases. For example, you can print something entirely different if age is between 16 (included) and 18 (excluded):

The variable age is 17, which means the condition under elif is True , hence Not sure... is printed to the console.

Pretty basic stuff, so we naturally don’t want to spend so many lines of code writing it. As it turns out, you can use the ternary operator in Python to evaluate conditions in a single line.

Ternary Operator in Python

A ternary operator exists in some programming languages, and it allows you to shorten a simple If-Else block. It takes in 3 or more operands:

• Value if true - A value that’s returned if the condition evaluates to True.
• Condition - A boolean condition that has to be satisfied to return value if true.
• Value if false - A value that’s returned if the condition evaluates to False. In code, it would look like this:

You can even write else-if logic in Python’s ternary operator. In that case, the syntax changes slightly:

I have to admit - it looks a bit abstract when written like this. You’ll see plenty of practical examples starting from the next section.

One-Line If Statement (Without Else)

A single-line if statement just means you’re deleting the new line and indentation. You’re still writing the same code, with the only twist being that it takes one line instead of two.

Note: One-line if statement is only possible if there’s a single line of code following the condition. In any other case, wrap the code that will be executed inside a function.

Here’s how to transform our two-line if statement to a single-line conditional:

As before, age is less than 18 so Go home. gets printed.

What if you want to print three lines instead of one? As said before, the best practice is to wrap the code inside a function:

One-line if statements in Python are pretty boring. The real time and space saving benefit happens when you add an else condition.

You’ll benefit the most from one-line if statements if you add one or multiple else conditions.

One-Line If-Else Statement

Now we can fully leverage the power of Python’s ternary operator. The code snippet below stores Go home. to a new variable outcome if the age is less than 18 or Welcome! otherwise:

As you would guess, Welcome! is printed to the console as age is set to 19. If you want to print multiple lines or handle more complex logic, wrap everything you want to be executed into a function - just as before.

You now have a clear picture of how the ternary operator works on a simple one-line if-else statement. We can add complexity by adding more conditions to the operator.

One-Line If-Elif-Else Statement

Always be careful when writing multiple conditions in a single line of code. The logic will still work if the line is 500 characters long, but it’s near impossible to read and maintain it.

You should be fine with two conditions in one line, as the code is still easy to read. The following example prints Go home. if age is below 16, Not Sure... if age is between 16 (included) and 18 (excluded), and Welcome otherwise:

You’ll see Not sure... printed to the console, since age is set to 17. What previously took us six lines of code now only takes one. Neat improvement, and the code is still easy to read and maintain.

What else can you do with one-line if statements? Well, a lot. We’ll explore single-line conditionals for list operations next.

Example: One-Line Conditionals for List Operations

Applying some logic to a list involves applying the logic to every list item, and hence iterating over the entire list. Before even thinking about a real-world example, let’s see how you can write a conditional statement for every list item in a single line of code.

How to Write IF and FOR in One Line

You’ll need to make two changes to the ternary operator:

Surround the entire line of code with brackets [] Append the list iteration code (for element in array) after the final else Here’s how the generic syntax looks like:

It’s not that hard, but let’s drive the point home with an example. The following code snippet prints + if the current number of a range is greater than 5 and - otherwise. The numbers range from 1 to 10 (included):

Image 1 - If and For in a single line in Python (image by author)

Let’s now go over an additional real-world example.

Example: Did Student Pass the Exam?

To start, we’ll declare a list of students. Each student is a Python dictionary object with two keys: name and test score:

We want to print that the student has passed the exam if the score is 50 points or above. If the score was below 50 points, we want to print that the student has failed the exam.

In traditional Python syntax, we would manually iterate over each student in the list and check if the score is greater than 50:

Image 2 - List iteration with traditional Python syntax (image by author)

The code works, but we need 5 lines to make a simple check and store the results. You can use your newly-acquired knowledge to reduce the amount of code to a single line:

Image 3 - One-line conditional and a loop with Python (image by author)

The results are identical, but we have a much shorter and neater code. It’s just on the boundary of being unreadable, which is often a tradeoff with ternary operators and single-line loops. You often can’t have both readable code and short Python scripts.

Just because you can write a conditional in one line, it doesn’t mean you should. Readability is a priority. Let’s see in which cases you’re better off with traditional if statements.

Be Careful With One-Line Conditionals

Just because code takes less vertical space doesn’t mean it’s easier to read. Now you’ll see the perfect example of that claim.

The below snippet checks a condition for every possible grade (1-5) with a final else condition capturing invalid input. The conditions take 12 lines of code to write, but the entire snippet is extremely readable:

As expected, you’ll see Grade = 1 printed to the console, but that’s not what we’re interested in. We want to translate the above snippet into a one-line if-else statement with the ternary operator.

It’s possible - but the end result is messy and unreadable:

This is an example of an extreme case where you have multiple conditions you have to evaluate. It’s better to stick with the traditional if statements, even though they take more vertical space.

Take home point: A ternary operator with more than two conditions is just a nightmare to write and debug.

And there you have it - everything you need to know about one-line if-else statements in Python. You’ve learned all there is about the ternary operator, and how to write conditionals starting with a single if to five conditions in between.

Remember to keep your code simple. The code that’s easier to read and maintain is a better-written code at the end of the day. Just because you can cram everything into a single line, doesn’t mean you should. You’ll regret it as soon as you need to make some changes.

An even cleaner way to write long conditionals is by using structural pattern matching - a new feature introduced in Python 3.10. It brings the beloved switch statement to Python for extra readability and speed of development.

What do you guys think of one-line if-else statements in Python? Do you use them regularly or have you switched to structural pattern matching? Let me know in the comment section below.

Assignments  »  Conditional Structures  »  Set1

Conditional Structures

1. Write a program that prompts the user to input a number and display if the number is even or odd. Solution

2. Write a Python program that takes an age as input and determines whether a person is eligible to vote. If the age is 18 or above, print "You are eligible to vote." Otherwise, print "You are not eligible to vote yet.". Solution

3. Write a program that prompts the user to input two integers and outputs the largest. Solution

4. Write a program that prompts the user to enter a number and determines whether it is positive, negative, or zero. The program should print "Positive" if the number is greater than 0, "Negative" if the number is less than 0, and "Zero" if the number is 0. Solution

5. Write a program that prompts the user to enter their age and prints the corresponding age group. The program should use the following age groups:

6. Write a program that prompts the user to input a number from 1 to 7. The program should display the corresponding day for the given number. For example, if the user types 1, the output should be Sunday. If the user types 7, the output should be Saturday. If the number is not between 1 to 7 user should get error message as shown in sample output. Solution

7. Write a program that prompts the user to enter their weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters). The program should calculate the Body Mass Index (BMI) using the formula: BMI = weight / (height * height). The program should then classify the BMI into one of the following categories:

8. The marks obtained by a student in 3 different subjects are input by the user. Your program should calculate the average of subjects and display the grade. The student gets a grade as per the following rules:

Write a program that prompts the user to input the value of a (the coefficient of x 2 ), b (the coefficient of x), and c (the constant term) and outputs the roots of the quadratic equation. Solution

10. Write a program that prompts the user to enter three numbers and sorts them in ascending order. The program should print the sorted numbers. Solution

11. Write a program that prompts the user to input three integers and outputs the largest. Solution

12. Write a program that prompts the user to input a character and determine the character is vowel or consonant. Solution

13. Write a program that prompts the user to input a year and determine whether the year is a leap year or not. Leap Years are any year that can be evenly divided by 4. A year that is evenly divisible by 100 is a leap year only if it is also evenly divisible by 400. Example :

14. Write a program that prompts the user to input number of calls and calculate the monthly telephone bills as per the following rule: Minimum Rs. 200 for up to 100 calls. Plus Rs. 0.60 per call for next 50 calls. Plus Rs. 0.50 per call for next 50 calls. Plus Rs. 0.40 per call for any call beyond 200 calls. Solution

• Free Python 3 Tutorial
• Control Flow
• Exception Handling
• Python Programs
• Python Projects
• Python Interview Questions
• Python Database
• Data Science With Python
• Machine Learning with Python
• How to Fix: ValueError: Unknown Label Type: 'Continuous' in Python
• How To Check If Variable Is Empty In Python?
• How To Fix - Python RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in scalar
• How To Resolve Issue " Threading Ignores Keyboardinterrupt Exception" In Python?
• AttributeError: can’t set attribute in Python
• How to Fix ImportError: Cannot Import name X in Python
• AttributeError: __enter__ Exception in Python
• Modulenotfounderror: No Module Named 'httpx' in Python
• How to Fix - SyntaxError: (Unicode Error) 'Unicodeescape' Codec Can't Decode Bytes
• SyntaxError: ‘return’ outside function in Python
• How to fix "SyntaxError: invalid character" in Python
• No Module Named 'Sqlalchemy-Jsonfield' in Python
• Python Code Error: No Module Named 'Aiohttp'
• Fix Python Attributeerror: __Enter__
• Python Runtimeerror: Super() No Arguments
• Filenotfounderror: Errno 2 No Such File Or Directory in Python
• ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'dotenv' in Python
• Nameerror: Name Plot_Cases_Simple Is Not Defined in Python
• How To Avoid Notimplementederror In Python?

How to Fix – UnboundLocalError: Local variable Referenced Before Assignment in Python

Developers often encounter the  UnboundLocalError Local Variable Referenced Before Assignment error in Python. In this article, we will see what is local variable referenced before assignment error in Python and how to fix it by using different approaches.

What is UnboundLocalError: Local variable Referenced Before Assignment?

This error occurs when a local variable is referenced before it has been assigned a value within a function or method. This error typically surfaces when utilizing try-except blocks to handle exceptions, creating a puzzle for developers trying to comprehend its origins and find a solution.

Below, are the reasons by which UnboundLocalError: Local variable Referenced Before Assignment error occurs in  Python :

Nested Function Variable Access

Global variable modification.

In this code, the outer_function defines a variable ‘x’ and a nested inner_function attempts to access it, but encounters an UnboundLocalError due to a local ‘x’ being defined later in the inner_function.

In this code, the function example_function tries to increment the global variable ‘x’, but encounters an UnboundLocalError since it’s treated as a local variable due to the assignment operation within the function.

Solution for Local variable Referenced Before Assignment in Python

Below, are the approaches to solve “Local variable Referenced Before Assignment”.

In this code, example_function successfully modifies the global variable ‘x’ by declaring it as global within the function, incrementing its value by 1, and then printing the updated value.

In this code, the outer_function defines a local variable ‘x’, and the inner_function accesses and modifies it as a nonlocal variable, allowing changes to the outer function’s scope from within the inner function.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• Python Errors
• Python How-to-fix
• Google Introduces New AI-powered Vids App
• Dolly Chaiwala: The Microsoft Windows 12 Brand Ambassador
• 10 Best Free Remote Desktop apps for Android in 2024
• 10 Best Free Internet Speed Test apps for Android in 2024
• 30 OOPs Interview Questions and Answers (2024)

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?