animal abuse research paper questions

110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

🏆 best animal abuse topic ideas & essay examples, 👍 most interesting animal abuse topics to write about, 🔎 good research topics about animal abuse, ❓ animal abuse research questions.

• Causes and Effects of Animal Cruelty Therefore, it is vitally important to understand the negative impact of animal maltreatment on society, particular individuals, and the animals to realize the seriousness of the problem and take decisive actions.
• Animal Cruelty, Its Causes and Impacts In the second part of the body, I will be more specific on the effects of animal cruelty in respect to ethics.
• Cosmetic Testing on Animals The surface of the skin or near the eyes of such animals is meant to simulate that of the average human and, as such, is one of easiest methods of determining whether are particular type […]
• The Debate on Animal Testing The purpose of this paper is to define animal testing within a historical context, establish ethical and legal issues surrounding the acts, discuss animal liberation movements, arguments in support and against the act of animal […]
• Animal Cruelty: Inside the Dog Fighting In most cases the owner of the losing dog abandons the injured dog to die slowly from the injuries it obtained during the fight. The injuries inflicted to and obtained by the dogs participating in […]
• Animal Testing and Environmental Protection While the proponents of animal use in research argued that the sacrifice of animals’ lives is crucial for advancing the sphere of medicine, the argument this essay will defend relates to the availability of modern […]
• Animal Cruelty as an Ethical and Moral Problem It is due to the fact that this paper stresses that actions related to the needless and non-progressive act of animal cruelty should be considered a felony with the appropriate amount of incarceration put into […]
• Animal Testing in Medicine and Industry Animal testing is the inescapable reality of medicine and industry. However, between human suffering and animal suffering, the former is more important.
• Preclinical Testing on Animals The authors argue that despite the recent decline in the level of quality and transparency of preclinical trials, the scientific communities should always rely on animal testing before moving to human subjects and the subsequent […]
• Program for Addressing and Prevention of Animal Cruelty While it is unreasonable to expect that a larger number of people will be interested, ensuring that at least 5% of the population is invested will help to promote knowledge actively and target the remaining […]
• Using Animals in Medical Research and Experiments While discussing the use of animals in medical research according to the consequentialist perspective, it is important to state that humans’ preferences cannot be counted higher to cause animals’ suffering; humans and animals’ preferences need […]
• Animal Testing: History and Arguments Nevertheless, that law was more focused on the welfare of animals in laboratories rather than on the prohibition of animal testing.
• Laboratory Experiments on Animals: Argument Against In some cases, the animals are not given any painkillers because their application may alter the effect of the medication which is investigated.
• Animal Testing From Medical and Ethical Viewpoints Striving to discover and explain the peculiarities of body functioning, already ancient Greeks and Romans resorted to vivisecting pigs; the scientific revolution of the Enlightenment era witnessed animal testing becoming the leading trend and a […]
• Laws that Protect Animal Cruelty The softening of boundaries of the self is of paramount importance for they are too tight as one sees the other as separate, different, and apart from oneself which can lead to conflict and violence.
• Negative Impacts of Animal Testing To alter these inhumane laws, we should organize a social movement aiming at the reconsideration of the role of animals in research and improvement of their positions.
• Animal Testing: Long and Unpretty History Nevertheless, that law was more focused on the welfare of animals in laboratories rather than on the prohibition of animal testing.
• Animal Abuse Registry Justification Due to the extensive unfairness to the animals, the Veterinary department of most developed countries has established laws concerning the treatment care and support that animals have to be accorded with.
• Animal Testing as an Unnecessary and Atrocious Practice Such acts of violence could be partially excused by the necessity to test medications that are developed to save human lives however, this kind of testing is even more inhumane as it is ineffective in […]
• Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals In order to safeguard its mission, the organization runs several services, all of which aim at promoting the value of life and enhance the well-being of animals.
• Animal Experiments and Inhuman Treatment Although the results of such a laboratory may bring answers to many questions in medicine, genetics, and other vital spheres, it is frequently a case that the treatment of such animals is inhumane and cruel. […]
• Animal Testing for Scientific Research Despite the fact that the present-day science makes no secret of the use of animals for research purposes, not many people know what deprivation, pain, and misery those animals have to experience in laboratories.
• Animal Testing and Ethics I believe it is also difficult to develop efficient legislation on the matter as people have different views on animal research and the line between ethical and unethical is blurred in this area.
• Animal Testing: History and Ethics Moreover, in the twelfth century, another Arabic physician, Avenzoar dissected animals and established animal testing experiment in testing surgical processes prior to their application to man. Trevan in 1927 to evaluate the effectiveness of digitalis […]
• Dealing With Animal Cruelty One of how animal cruelty is exercised is in the way they are used to obtain meat and eggs. Various strains of diseases arise in these areas and have the potential of becoming lethal to […]
• Animal Testing Effects on Psychological Investigation In this context, ethical considerations remain a central theme in psychological research.”Ethics in research refers to the application of moral rules and professional codes of conduct to the collection, analysis, reporting, and publication of information […]
• Animal Abuse as a Public Health Issue As we have seen, the problem of animal abuse, being linked to interpersonal violence, is directly related to the sphere of public health.
• Animal Testing: Why It Is Still Being Used The major reason for such “devotion” to animal testing can be explained by the fact that alternative sources of testing are insufficient and too inaccurate to replace conventional way of testing.
• Effects of Animal Testing and Alternatives Another challenge to the proponents of animal testing is related to dosage and the time line for a study. Animal rights values rebuff the notion that animals should have an importance to human beings in […]
• Ethics Problems in Animal Experimentation In spite of the fact that it is possible to find the arguments to support the idea of using animals in experiments, animal experimentation cannot be discussed as the ethical procedure because animals have the […]
• Animal Testing: Ethical Dilemmas in Business This means that both humans and animals have rights that need to be respected, and that is what brings about the many dilemmas that are experienced in this field.
• Use of Animals in Research Testing: Ethical Justifications Involved The present paper argues that it is ethically justified to use animals in research settings if the goals of the research process are noble and oriented towards the advancement of human life.
• Ethical Problems in Animal Experimentation The banning of companies from testing on animals will force the manufacturers to use conventional methods to test their drugs and products.
• Utilitarianism for Animals: Testing and Experimentation There are alternatives in testing drugs such as tissue culture of human cells and hence this is bound to be more accurate in the findings.
• Use of Animals in Biological Testing Thus, these veterinarians have realized that the results that are realized from the animal research are very crucial in the improvement of the health of human being as well as that of animals.
• Experimentation on Animals However, critics of experimenting with animals argue that animals are subjected to a lot of pain and suffering in the course of coming up with scientific breakthroughs which in the long run may prove futile.
• Psychoactive Drug Testing on Animals The alterations in behavioral traits of animals due to psychoactive drugs are primarily attributed to the changes in the brain functions or inhibition of certain brain components in animals which ultimately translates to changes in […]
• On Animal Abuse and Cruelty In these cages, the animals are confined indoors for the whole year denying them their right to roam and feel the heat of the sun.
• Negative Impacts of Animal Testing In many instances it can be proofed that drugs have been banned from the market after extensive research on animal testing and consuming a lot of cash, because of the dire effects that they cause […]
• The Psychological Relationship Between Animal Abuse & Adolescents in the Judicial System
• Animal Abuse and Cruelty Is Wrong Sociology
• Unveiling the Global Issue of Animal Abuse and Its Impact on the World
• Animal Abuse, Inhumane, and Inhumane Experimentation
• The Unsettling Connection Between Animal Abuse and Domestic Abuse
• The Link Between Animal Abuse and Domestic Violence
• Politics, Human Nature, Science, and Animal Abuse in the Mouse Petition, a Poem by Anna Barbauld
• Vets Struggle Against Animal Abuse
• The Connection Between Animal Abuse and Other Violence
• Animal Abuse: Why Protecting Bees Should Be Our Top Priority
• The Circus and Animal Abuse
• Animal Cruelty: Physical Abuse of Animal in Traditional Farm
• Animal Cruelty: Animal Abuse as Dirty Play
• Animal Abuse and Neglect of Animal
• Animal Abuse and Animal Rights Nowadays
• Enforcing Harsher Animal Abuse Penalties
• Seaworld and PETA: The Need to Work Together to Address the Issues of Animal Abuse
• Slaughterhouse Abuse and Animal Abuse
• Fundamental Interests That Give Animals Both Moral and Legal Rights
• How Can Animal Abuse Be Prevented
• Should Animal Rights Activists Be Held Accountable for Abuse Videos
• The Need for Social Change Regarding Animal Abuse
• The Dark Side of Animal Experimentation and How to Avoid It
• Reasons Why Using Animals for Hard Labor Is Inhumane
• Critical Issues Concerning Animal Abuse
• Animal Abuse and Other Types of Abuse
• Animal Abuse: The Issue of Torturing of Animals
• The Relationship Between Animal Abuse, Human Abuse, and Antisocial Behavior
• Solutions for Cruelty to Animals
• Animal Abuse Is Wrong and There Should Be Laws to Protect Them
• The Relationship Between Animal Abuse and Criminal Behavior
• Animal Rights, Welfare, and Abuse
• Cultural Appropriation and Animal Abuse at Events
• Animal Abuse: Animal Suffering in Factory Farms
• Animal Abuse and Its Effects on America
• The Argument for Stopping Animal Abuse
• The Reasons Why Undeveloped Countries Care Less About Animal Rights
• Animal Abuse and the Evolution of Animals Rights Movements From the 1900S
• Animal Abuse and Its Effects on Society
• Punishments for Animal Abuse Are Still Too Mild
• What Animal Is the Most Abused in the World?
• How Are Animals Abused in Animal Testing?
• What Is the Main Reason for Animal Abuse?
• How Many Animals Are Abused Each Year?
• Is Hitting a Dog Animal Abuse?
• When Did Animal Abuse Start?
• What State Has the Highest Animal Abuse?
• What Dog Breed Is the Most Abused?
• Is Animal Abuse a Red Flag?
• Why Do Kids Abuse Animals?
• How Can We Stop Animal Abuse?
• How Many Abused Animals Are Killed Every Day?
• Is Animal Abuse Increasing or Decreasing?
• How Many Animals Are Abused Each Day?
• Why Do People Abuse Animals?
• How Common Is Animal Abuse in the World?
• What Percent of Animals Are Abused in Zoos?
• Dogs and Cats: Which Animals Abused More?
• Do Animals Forgive Their Abusers?
• Does Your Animal Remember if You Abuse Them?
• How Do I Say Sorry to My Abused Animal?
• What Do You Do When Your Child Abuses the Animal?
• Is Shouting at the Animal Abuse?
• What Are the Arguments for Stopping Animal Abuse?
• What Are the Facts About Animal Abuse?
• What Happens if You Abuse an Animal?
• What Is the Difference Between Animal Abuse and Animal Cruelty?
• Where Are Animals Most Abused?
• What Are the Types of Animal Abuse?
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 9). 110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-abuse-essay-topics/

"110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." IvyPanda , 9 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-abuse-essay-topics/.

IvyPanda . (2023) '110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples'. 9 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-abuse-essay-topics/.

1. IvyPanda . "110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-abuse-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "110 Animal Abuse Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-abuse-essay-topics/.

• Emotional Development Questions
• Animal Welfare Ideas
• Prison Paper Topics
• Dog Essay Ideas
• Environmental Protection Titles
• Hunting Questions
• Meat Research Ideas
• Vegetarianism Essay Ideas

Documenting Harm to the Voiceless: Researching Animal Abuse

• First Online: 03 September 2021

Cite this chapter

• Jennifer Maher 6  

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

1439 Accesses

This chapter considers how harms against nonhuman animals have been documented in criminological research, associated challenges and implications for future research. The development of animal abuse research is examined and contributions from studies identifying, defining and measuring harm to nonhuman animals are discussed. It finds that although animal welfare laws exist in most countries, legislation typically addresses a few crimes against some nonhuman animals. Protections are limited because most harms are legal, falling outside the remit of mainstream criminology. Historically, few criminological studies have adopted an animal-centred nonspeciesist approach, contributing to a legacy of speciesism in social institutions, academia included. The development of animal abuse and critical animal studies challenges the status quo, greatly expanding concepts of victimology, while highlighting a broader spectrum of harms including interpersonal violence and everyday routine harms which exploit and kill nonhuman animals in their millions. These studies shine a light on the voiceless long-suffering nonhuman animal victims and the unique challenges facing animal abuse researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

The rating produced by World Animal Protection involves a ranking of 50 countries according to their legislation and policy commitments to protecting animals (e.g. recognising animal protection, governance structures and systems, animal welfare standards, providing humane education and promoting communication and awareness). The Global Animal Law database ranks countries according to existing animal laws, civil code provisions and constitutional principles.

Other legislation exists which provides a lower standard of protect to other animals, such as the UK Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (see Nurse 2012 ).

See the RSCPA explanation of the five freedoms at https://www.rspca.org.uk/whatwedo/endcruelty/changingthelaw/whatwechanged/animalwelfareact .

In 1999, a protocol which explicitly recognised nonhuman animals as sentient beings was incorporated into the Lisbon Treaty (Article 13 of Title II). The UK has no legal instrument other than Article 13 of the Lisbon Treaty to legally recognise that nonhuman animals are sentient beings. In the aftermath of the UK vote to exit the EU, the Bill to transfer this protocol on nonhuman animal sentience into UK law, brought to Parliament on 15 November 2017, failed to be passed. Consequently, there is no legal recognition of nonhuman animal sentience in the UK.

Human-like rights does not equate to human rights for animals. For a more detailed discussion on rights for animals, see Regan ( 2004 ).

For example, Luke et al. ( 1997 ) study concluded that animal abusers were: five times more likely to commit violence against people; four times more likely to commit property crimes; and three times more likely to be involved in drunken or disorderly offenses. These results were determined from the criminal records of 153 intentional animal abusers prosecuted by the MSPCA, compared to the criminal history of a control group of offenders of the same size.

According to NGO Mighty Earth, South America is home to the world’s largest meat company JBS (Hurowitz et al. 2019 ).

See for example: USA department of Agriculture https://www.ers.usda.gov/ , UN food and Agriculture organisation— http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data , world beef production https://beef2live.com/storylist-242 .

See the US/UK/Australia and Canada total calculation of animals killed for the food industry. https://animalclock.org/ .

The recognition within UK welfare legislation of animals as objects to which we have a duty of care is in stark contrast to their treatment elsewhere in law—as inanimate objects or possibly subjects to control. Lawson ( 2019 ) identifies how some controls can lead directly to the destruction of ‘dangerous’ or ‘unwanted’ dogs. These dogs are vilified and treated as subjects accountable for the risk they might pose to humans even if the risk is created by the poor standards of care provided by humans from birth.

The Animal Enterprise Protection Act was expanded in 2006 into the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act.

For example, a search for ‘animal’ or ‘animal abuse/welfare’ on the UK’s largest funding organisation for research on economic and social issues (ESRC) website reveals funding for one software project which aids the identification of the illegal wildlife trade.

Adams, C. (2018). Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals . London: Bloomsbury.

Google Scholar  

Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (Eds.). (1995). Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations . London: Duke University Press.

Agnew, R. (1998). The Causes of Animal Abuse: A Social Psychological Analysis. Theoretical Criminology., 2 (2), 177–209.

Article   Google Scholar  

American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd rev. ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (2020). What Is Ag-Gag Legislation . Available at: https://www.aspca.org/animal-protection/public-policy/what-ag-gag-legislation . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Arluke, A., & Irvine, L. (2017). Physical Cruelty of Companion Animals. In. J. Maher, H. Pierpoint, & P. Beirne (Eds.), Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies (pp. 39–58). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Arroyo-Quiroz, I., & Wyatt, T. (2019). Wildlife Trafficking Between the European Union and Mexico. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8 (3), 23–37.

Ascione, F. (2010). The International Handbook of Animal Abuse and Cruelty: Theory, Research, and Application . West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Ascione, F., & Arkow, P. (1999). Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, and Animal Abuse: Linking the Circles of Compassion for Prevention and Intervention . West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Ascione, F., & Shapiro, K. (2009). People and Animals, Kindness and Cruelty: Research Directions and Policy Implications. Journal of Social Issues, 65 (3), 569–587.

Beirne, P. (1999). For a Nonspeciesist Criminology: Animal Abuse as an Object of Study. Criminology, 37 (1), 117–148.

Beirne, P. (2007). Animal Rights, Animal Abuse and Green Criminology. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting Harms Against Environments, Humanity and Other Animals (p. 5586). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting Animal Abuse: Law, Criminology and Human-Animal Relations . Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Beirne, P. (2011). Animal Abuse and Criminology: Introduction to a Special Issue. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55 (5), 349–357.

Beirne, P. (2018). Murdering Animals: Writings on Theriocide, Homicide and Nonspeciesist Criminology . Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Beirne, P., & South, N. (Eds.). (2007). Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting Harms Against Environments, Humanity and Other Animals . Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

Braidotti, R. (2017). Four Theses on Posthuman Feminism. In R. Grusin (Ed.), Anthropocene Feminism (pp. 21–48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Brisman, A., & South, N. (2014). Green Cultural Criminology: Constructions of Environmental Harm, Consumerism, and Resistance to Ecocide . London and New York: Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Butt, N., Lambrick, F., Menton, M., & Renwick, A. (2019). The Supply Chain of Violence. Nature Sustainability, 2, 742–747.

Cazaux, G. (1999). Beauty and the Beast: Animal Abuse from a Non-speciesist Criminological Perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31, 105–125.

Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44 (4), 588–608.

Cordeiro-Rodrigues, L. (2016). Is the Animal Liberation Front Morally Justified in Engaging in Violent and Illegal Activism Towards Animal Farms? Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9 (2), 226–246.

Cox, R. (2018). New Data Reveals 197 Land and Environmental Defenders Murdered in 2017. Global Witness . Available at https://www.globalwitness.org/en-gb/blog/new-data-reveals-197-land-and-environmental-defenders-murdered-2017/ . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2011). Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and World Politics . London: Zed Books.

Deckha, M. (2013). Animal Advocacy, Feminism and Intersectionality. Deportate, Esuli, Profughe, 23, 48–65.

Favre, D. (2004). Integrating Animal Interests into Our Legal System. Animal Law, 10, 87–97.

Fitzgerald, A. (2010). A Social History of the Slaughterhouse: From Inception to Contemporary Implications. Human Ecology Review, 17 (1), 58–69.

Flynn, C. (2008). A Sociological Analysis of Animal Abuse. In F. R. Ascione (Ed.), International Handbook of Animal Abuse and Cruelty: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 155–174). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

Flynn, C. (2012). Understanding Animal Abuse: A Sociological Analysis . New York: Lantern Books.

Flynn, M., & Hall, M. (2017). The Case for A Victimology of Nonhuman Animal Harms . Lincoln Eprints. Available at http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/15917/1/15917%20Non-human%20victimology%20MH%20and%20MF%20edits.pdf . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Francione, G. (2008). Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation . New York: Columbia University Press.

Gaard, G. (2017). Critical Ecofeminism . London: Lexington Books.

Glendinning, L. (2008). Spanish Parliament Approves ‘Human Rights’ for Apes. The Guardian . Available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/26/humanrights.animalwelfare Accessed 1 January 2020.

Global Animal Law. (2020). Database Legislation . Available at: https://www.globalanimallaw.org/database/national/index.html . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Gore, M. (2017). Conservation Criminology . West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Goyes, D. (2019). Southern Green Criminology: A Science to End Ecological Discrimination . Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

Goyes, D., & Sollund, R. (2018). Animal Abuse, Biotechnology and Species Justice. Theoretical Criminology, 22 (3), 363–383.

Goyes, D., Sollund, R., & South, N. (2019). Guest Editors’ Introduction’ Special issue. Towards Global Green Criminological Dialogues: Voices from the Americas and Europe. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8 (3), 1–5.

Gupta, M., Lunghofer, L., & Shapiro, K. (2017). Interventions with Animal Abuse Offenders. In J. Maher, H. Pierpoint, & P. Beirne (Eds.), Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies (pp. 497–518). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Herrmann, K. & Jayne, K. (2019). Animal Experimentation Working Towards a Paradigm Change . Boston: Brill

Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously . London: Fernwood.

Hurowitz, G., Jacobson, M., Higonnet, E., & von Reusner, L. (2019). The Companies Behind the Burning of the Amazon. Mighty Earth . Available at: https://stories.mightyearth.org/amazonfires/index.html . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Israel and Hay. (2011). Research Ethics in Criminology. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Research Methods (pp. 500–514). London: Sage.

Kenehan, S. (2019). The Moral Status of Animal Research Subjects in Industry: A Stakeholder Analysis. In K. Herrmann & K. Jayne (Eds.), Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change: Human-Animal Studies (pp. 209–223). Boston: Brill.

Lawson, C. (2019). Dogs and the Criminology of Control a Case Study of Contemporary Policy Making in England and Wales . Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Cardiff: School of Social Sciences. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

Lemieux, A., & Clarke, R. (2009). The International Ban on Ivory Sales and Its Effects on Elephant Poaching in Africa. The British Journal of Criminology, 49, 451–471.

Lewis, J. (2004). Testimony: Before the Senate Judiciary Committee . Washington, DC. Available at: https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/animal-rights-extremism-and-ecoterrorism . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Lindemann, H. (Ed.). (2005). An Invitation to Feminist Ethics . London: McGraw-Hill.

Linzey, A. (2009). The Link Between Animal Abuse and Human Violence . Sussex: Sussex Academic Press.

Lockwood, R., & Ascione, F. (Eds.). (1997). Cruelty to Animals and Interpersonal Violence: Readings in Research and Application. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Low, P. (2012). The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Human and non-Human Animals, at Churchill College , University of Cambridge, UK Available at: http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Luke, C., Arluke, A., & Levin, J. (1997). Cruelty to Animals and Other Crimes . Available at: http://support.mspca.org/site/DocServer/cruelty-to-animals-and-other-crimes.pdf?docID=12541 . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Lynch, M. (2019). Green Criminology and Environmental Crime: Criminology That Matters in the Age of Global Ecological Collapse. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 1 (1), 50–61.

Lynch, M., Long, M., & Stretesky, P. (2017). Green Criminology: Crime, Justice and the Environment . Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Lynch, M., & Pires, S. (2019). Quantitative Studies in Green and Conservation Criminology: The Measurement of Environmental Harm and Crime . London: Routledge.

Maher, J., Pierpoint, H., & Beirne, P. (Eds.). (2017). Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies . London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Maher, J., & Sollund, R. (2016). Law Enforcement of the Illegal Wildlife Trafficking: A Comparative Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Analysis of the UK and Norway. Journal of Trafficking, Organized Crime and Security, 2 (1), 82–89.

Menache, A. (2017). Animals in Scientific Research. In J. Maher, H. Pierpoint, & P. Beirne (Eds.), Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies (pp. 389–416). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Merck, M. D. (2007). Veterinary Forensics: Animal Cruelty Investigations . Ames, Iowa: Blackwell.

Mietola, R., Miettinen, S., & Vehmas, S. (2017). Voiceless Subjects? Research Ethics and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20 (3), 263–274.

Monaghan, R. (2013). Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36 (11), 933–951.

Munro, H. (2006). Animal Sexual Abuse: A Veterinary Taboo? The Veterinary Journal, 172, 195–197.

Munro, H., & Thrusfield, M. (2001). “Battered Pets”: Features That Raise Suspicion of Nonaccidental Injury. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 42, 218–226.

Musing, L., Harris, L., Williams, A., Parry-Jones, R., van Uhm, D., & Wyatt, T. (2019). Corruption and Wildlife Crime: A Focus on Caviar Trade (A TRAFFIC, WWF, U4 ACRC, Utrecht University, and Northumbria University report).

Nibert, D. (2002). Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Nonhuman Rights Project. (2018). Litigation. Available at: www.nonhumanrights.org/litigation/ . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Nurse, A. (n/d). Legal Personhood for Animals. Available at: https://www.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/what-we-do/faculty-of-professional-and-social-sciences/school-of-law/features/dr-angus-nurse-legal-personhood-for-animals-is-still-some-way-off . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Nurse, A. (2012). Repainting the Thin Green Line: The Enforcement of UK Wildlife Law. Internet Journal of Criminology. Available at: https://958be75a-da42-4a45-aafa-549955018b18.filesusr.com/ugd/b93dd4_4b720aabf88442f29fec2bec2ff6fee6.pdf . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Nurse, A. (2015). An Introduction to Green Criminology and Environmental Justice . London: Sage.

Pagani, C., Robustelli, F., & Ascione, F. (2010). Investigating Animal Abuse: Some Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Anthrozoos, 23 (3), 259–276.

Piper, H., Johnson, M., Myers, S., & Pritchard, J. (2003). Children and Young People Harming Animals: Intervention Through PSHE? Research Papers in Education, 18, 197–213.

Pires, S., & Clarke, R. (2012). Are Parrots CRAVED? An Analysis of Parrot Poaching in Mexico. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 122–146.

Regan, T. (2004). The Case for Animal Rights . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Rowlands, M. (2012). Can Animals be Moral . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Ethnography. Current Anthroplogy, 36 (3), 409–440.

Shapiro, K., & DeMello, M. (2010). The State of Human-Animal Studies. Society & Animals, 18 (3), 307–318.

Singer, P. (1995). Animal Liberation (2nd ed.). London: Pimlico.

Sollund, R. (2008). Global Harms: Ecological Crime and Speciesism . New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Sollund, R. (2012). Speciesism as Doxic Practice Versus Valuing Difference and Plurality. In R. Sollund & R. Ellefsen (Eds.), Eco-Global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges (pp. 91–113). New York: Routledge.

Sollund, R. (2017). Doing Green, Critical Criminology with an Auto-ethnographic, Feminist Approach. Critical Criminology, 25 (2), 1–16.

Sollund, R. (2019). The Crimes of Wildlife Trafficking: Issues of Justice, Legality and Morality . London: Routledge.

Sollund, R., & Maher, J. (2015). The Illegal Wildlife Trade . A Case Study Report on the Illegal Wildlife Trade in the United Kingdom, Norway, Colombia and Brazil. A Study Compiled as Part of the EFFACE Project. Available at: http://efface.eu/ . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Solot, D. (1997). Untangling the Animal Abuse Web. Society and Animals, 5, 257–265.

Sorenson, J. (2009). Constructing Terrorists: Propaganda About Animal Rights. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2 (2), 237–256.

South, N., & Wyatt, T. (2011). Comparing Illicit Trades in Wildlife and Drugs: An Exploratory Study. Deviant Behaviour, 32, 538–561.

Taylor, N., & Fitzgerald, A. (2018). Understanding Animal (Ab)use: Green Criminological Contributions, Missed Opportunities and a Way Forward. Theoretical Criminology, 22 (3), 402–425.

Tignino, M., & Turley, L. (2018). Granting Legal Rights to Rivers: Is International Law Ready? The Revelatory. Available at: https://therevelator.org/rivers-legal-rights/ . Accessed 1 January 2020.

van Uhm, D. (2016a). Crimes Against Nature. In The Illegal Wildlife Trade: Inside the World of Poachers, Smugglers and Traders (pp. 49–74). New York: Springer.

van Uhm, D. (2016b). The Illegal Wildlife Trade: Inside the World of Poachers, Smugglers and Traders (Studies of Organized Crime) . New York: Springer.

van Uhm, D. (2016c). Monkey business: The Illegal Trade in Barbary Macaques’. Journal of Trafficking, Organized Crime and Security, 2 (1), 36–49.

van Uhm, D. (2018). The Social Construction of the Value of Wildlife: A Green Cultural Criminological Perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 22 (3), 384–401.

Vidal, J. (2010). Bolivia Enshrines Natural World’s Rights with Equal Status for Mother Earth. The Guardian . Available at: www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/apr/10/bolivia-enshrines-natural-worlds-rights . Accessed 1 January 2020.

White, R. (2015). Environmental Victimology and Ecological Justice. In D. Wilson & S. Ross (Eds.), Crime, Victims and Policy: International Contexts, Local Experiences (pp. 33–52). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

White, R. (2018). Green Victimology and Non-human Victims. International Review of Victimology, 24 (2), 239–255.

World Animal Protection. (2016). Animal Protection Index. Available at: https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/about . Accessed 1 January 2020.

World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Terrestrial Animal Health Code . Available at: https://www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_aw_introduction.htm . Accessed 1 January 2020.

Wyatt, T. (2013). Wildlife Trafficking: A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims, and the Offenders . London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wyatt, T. (2014). Non-Human Animal Abuse and Wildlife Trade: Harm in the Fur and Falcon Trades. Society and Animals, 22, 194–210.

Wyatt, T., Maher, J., & Biddle, P. (2017). Scoping Research on the Sourcing of Pet Dogs from Illegal Importation and Puppy Farms 2016–17. Social Research Series. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

Yates, R. (2011). Criminalizing Protests About Animal Abuse: Recent Irish Experience in Global Context. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55 (5), 469–482.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK

Jennifer Maher

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Maher .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Pamela Davies

Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA

Paul Leighton

Tanya Wyatt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Maher, J. (2021). Documenting Harm to the Voiceless: Researching Animal Abuse. In: Davies, P., Leighton, P., Wyatt, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_8

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_8

Published : 03 September 2021

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-72407-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-72408-5

eBook Packages : Law and Criminology Law and Criminology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Extending Animal Cruelty Protections to Scientific Research

Article sidebar.

Main Article Content

Photo by Sandy Millar on Unsplash

INTRODUCTION

On November 25, 2019, the federal law H.R. 724 – the Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act (PACT) prohibiting the intentional harm of “living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians” was signed. [1] This law was a notable step in extending protections, rights, and respect to animals. While many similar state laws existed, the passing of a federal law signaled a new shift in public tone. PACT is a declaration of growing societal sentiments that uphold the necessity to shield our fellow creatures from undue harm. Protecting animals from the harm of citizens is undoubtedly important, but PACT does nothing to protect animals from state-sanctioned harm, particularly in the form of research, which causes death and cruelty. It is time to extend and expand protections for animals used in research.

There is a long history of animal experimentation in the US, but no meaningful ethical protections of animals emerged until the 20 th century. Proscription of human experimentation and dissection led to animals bearing the brunt of harm for scientific and medical progress. For instance, English physician William Harvey discovered the heart did not continuously produce blood but instead recirculated it; he made this discovery by dissecting and bleeding out living dogs without anesthesia. [2] Experiments like this were considered ethically tenable for hundreds of years. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant, Thomas Aquinas, and Rene Descartes held that humans have no primary moral obligations to animals and that one should be concerned about the treatment of an animal only because it could indicate how one would treat a human. [3] During the 20 th century, as agriculture became more industrialized and government funding for animal research increased, the social demand for ethical regulations finally began to shift. In 1966, the Animal Welfare Act (Public Law 89-544) marked the first American federal legislation to protect laboratory animals, setting standards for use of animals in research. [4]

There has been progress in the field of animal research ethics since Harvey’s experiments, but much work remains. In the US alone, there are an estimated 20 million mice, fish, birds, and invertebrates used for animal research each year that are not regulated by the Animal Welfare Act. [5] Instead, the “3Rs Alternatives” approach (“reduce, replace, and refine”) [6] is one framework used to guide ethical treatment of animals not covered by federal protections. Unfortunately, unpacking the meaning and details of this approach only leads to ambiguity and minimal actionable guidance. For instance, an experimenter could reduce the number of animals used in research but subsequently increase the number of experiments conducted on the remaining animals. Replace could be used in the context of replacing one species with another. Refining is creating “any decrease in the severity of inhumane procedures applied to those animals, which still have to be used.” [7] The vague “ any ” implies that even a negligible minimization would be ethically acceptable. [8] An experimenter could technically follow each of the “3Rs” with minimal to no reduction in harm to the animals. One must also consider whether it is coherent to refer to guidelines as ethical when they inevitably produce pain, suffering, and death as consequences of research participation.

Other ethical guides like Humane Endpoints for Laboratory Animals Used in Regulatory Testing [9] encourage researchers to euthanize animals that undergo intractable pain or distress. This is a fate that an estimated one million animals face yearly in the US. [10] However, to use the word “humane” in this context contradicts the traditional meaning and undermines the integrity of the word. Taking living creatures, forcing them to experience intractable pain and suffering for human benefit, and killing them is the antithesis of what it means to be humane. During one of my Animal Ethics classes as a graduate student, our cohort visited an animal research facility to help inform our opinions on animal research. We observed one of the euthanasia chambers for lab mice – an enclosed metal lab bench with a sign above describing methods for euthanasia if CO 2 asphyxiation were to fail. The methods included decapitation, removal of vital organs, opening of the chest cavity, incision of major blood vessels, and cervical dislocation. [11] Behind us were rows and rows of see-through shoebox-sized containers housing five mice in each little box. Thousands of mice were packed together in this room for the sole purpose of breeding. If the mice were not the correct “type” for research, then they were “humanely” euthanized. “Humane,” in this context, has been deprived of its true meaning.

One can acknowledge that animal research was historically necessary for scientific progress, but those that currently claim these practices are still required must show empirically and undoubtedly this is true. As of now, this is not a settled issue. In the scientific community, there is contention about whether current animal research is actually applicable to humans. [12] Many drug researchers even view animal testing as a tedious barrier to development as it may be wholly irrelevant to the drug or medical device being tested. Since 1962, the FDA has required preclinical testing in animals; it is time to question whether this is necessary or helpful for drug development.

The scientific community should stop viewing animal testing as an unavoidable evil in the search for medical and technological innovation. PACT should be amended and extended to all animals and the FDA should modify the requirement for preclinical animal testing of all drugs and medical devices. It is time to encourage the scientific community to find alternative research methods that do not sacrifice our fellow animals. We use animals as test subjects because, in some sense, they resemble humans. But, if they are indeed like humans, they should receive similar protections. Science builds a better world for humans, but perhaps it is time for science to be more inclusive and build a better world for all creatures.

[1] Theodore E. Deutch, “Text - H.R.724 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act,” legislation, November 25, 2019, 2019/2020, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/724/text.

[2] Anita Guerrini, “Experiments, Causation, and the Uses of Vivisection in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century,” Journal of the History of Biology 46, no. 2 (2013): 227–54.

[3] Bernard E. Rollin, “The Regulation of Animal Research and the Emergence of Animal Ethics: A Conceptual History,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27, no. 4 (September 28, 2006): 285–304, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9007-8; Darian M Ibrahim, “A Return to Descartes: Property, Profit, and the Corporate Ownership of Animals,” LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 70 (n.d.): 28.

[4] Benjamin Adams and Jean Larson, “Legislative History of the Animal Welfare Act: Introduction | Animal Welfare Information Center| NAL | USDA,” accessed November 3, 2021, https://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislative-history-animal-welfare-act-introduction.

[5] National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Patterns of Animal Use , Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Academies Press (US), 1988), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK218261/.

[6] Robert C. Hubrecht and Elizabeth Carter, “The 3Rs and Humane Experimental Technique: Implementing Change,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI 9, no. 10 (September 30, 2019): 754, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100754.

[7] Hubrecht and Carter.

[8] Hubrecht and Carter.                           

[9] William S. Stokes, “Humane Endpoints for Laboratory Animals Used in Regulatory Testing,” ILAR Journal 43, no. Suppl_1 (January 1, 2002): S31–38, https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.Suppl_1.S31.

[10] Stokes.

[11] “Euthanasia of Research Animals,” accessed April 21, 2022, https://services-web.research.uci.edu/compliance/animalcare-use/research-policies-and-guidance/euthanasia.html.

[12] Neal D. Barnard and Stephen R. Kaufman, “Animal Research Is Wasteful and Misleading,” Scientific American 276, no. 2 (1997): 80–82.

Chad Childers

MS Bioethics Candidate Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics

Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics

🏆 best essay topics on animal cruelty, ✍️ animal cruelty essay topics for college, 🎓 most interesting animal cruelty research titles, 💡 simple animal cruelty essay ideas, ❓ animal cruelty research questions.

• Is Animal Testing Ethical: Essay Example
• Animal Testing: Benefits and Disadvantages
• Nestlé Animal Testing and Business Ethics
• The Animal Testing Problem
• Protection of Animals and Humans From Cruelty
• Animal Use in Scientific Testing Should Be Stopped
• The Animal Cruelty Issue and Its Causes
• The Problem of Using Animals in Experimentation Testing on animals in the lab provides researchers with valuable knowledge regarding a particular disease, how it could be treated, and using which medicines.
• The Use of Animals in Psychological Experiments The method of experimentation is of great significance for multiple fields of psychology, especially for the behaviorist branch.
• The Ethical Side of Animal Testing In this article, the author reflects on the ethical nature of the use of animals as objects of scientific research.
• Animal Testing: Use of Animal in Biomedical Research The research paper shall attempt to explore the reasons for and against the use of animal testing in biomedical research.
• Save Animals: Experimentation Should Be Stopped The paper proves that animal experimentation should be stopped. It addresses statistical data and the outcomes of animal testing, offering possible solutions to the problem.
• Scientific Experiments on Animals from Ethical Perspectives This paper discusses using animals in scientific experiments from the consequentialist, Kantian deontological and Donna Yarri’s Christian character-based perspectives.
• Law: Animal Testing Debates Cosmetics industry heavily employs animal testing. It is noteworthy that fighters for animals’ rights have managed to achieve a lot in their fight.
• Animal Testing and How It Should Continue It is essential to understand that animal testing should continue or find a new acceptable form as the possible benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
• Animals Testing for Cosmetic or Medical Purposes Should Not Be Allowed Experiments on animals are not a valid method either for investigating the various causes of human diseases or for developing a treatment for them.
• Lab Experiment on Animals’ Taste or Smell Senses The hypothesis of the study is that taste perception and detection of different sugars by insects were similar to that of humans.
• Animal Testing in the Modern World The current debate is on whether animal experiments have any value or they only amount to torturing animals to satisfy human curiosity.
• Animal Testing: Evaluation, Prediction and Risk The issue of animal testing is a complex issue. The way animal testing is conducted is changing as animal-friendly groups are lobbying for a tougher control on the discipline.
• Animal Experimentation: The Theory of Utilitarianism This moral issue concerns animal experimentation. It is related to the theory of Utilitarianism, the idea of which induces preference of practical changes over morally obstacles.
• Should Animals Be Used for Scientific Experiments? Unfortunately, at the moment, the use of animals in science and medicine cannot be excluded entirely. However, it is possible to conduct experiments using mathematical models.
• Animal Testing: Finding an Alternative It is possible to find a less cruel alternative to animal testing in the context of present-day development. This paper reviews the supporting arguments for this position.
• The Controversies of Animal Testing The unbalanced ecosystem is probably the best-known and publicized example, with several others being primarily of ethical origin. Animal testing falls into this category.
• Animal Testing: The Notion of the 21st Century Cruelty The paper names animal testing as one of the most vivid examples of cruelty, in terms of which animals are to suffer from medical or cosmetic experiments.
• Saving the Animals: Stop Animal Testing In the article, the author argues why animal testing should be banned and replaced with alternative research methods.
• Animal Testing in the Modern World Animal testing should be used for both commercial and scientific purposes as long as the outcome results in a direct benefit for humankind.
• Ethics: Experiments on Animals Industrial and biomedical research is often painful and most of the test ends up killing the animals. Experiments such as these often incur the wrath of the animal rights movement.
• Animal Experimentation: Arguments For and Against The controversy surrounding animal experimentation is a serious concern that should be addressed by considering views from both sides.
• Vegetarian Diet and Animal Testing Theory The ethical preference of a vegetarian diet may be proved with the theory if one considers the consequences of every person choosing to be vegetarian.
• Animal Testing and Alternatives Development Despite the concern voiced by its opponents, animal testing remains a viable practice that is both beneficial and important for humans and, to some degree, animals.
• Using Animals in Medical Experiments This paper explores how the principles of the character-based ethical approach can be applied to the discussion of using animals in the medical research and experiments.
• Ancient Rome’s Animal Cruelty for Entertainment in the Amphi-Theatre
• Childhood Animal Cruelty and Interpersonal Violence
• Animal Cruelty: Should Animals Be Treated With Dignity?
• Harsher Punishment for Perpetrators in Animal Cruelty Crimes
• Animal Cruelty Facts: Understanding the Law and the Link
• The Reasons Why Purchasing Meat Supports Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty: Physical Abuse of Animal in Traditional Farm
• Physical and Environmental Signs of Animal Cruelty
• Associations Between Different Motivations for Animal Cruelty, Methods of Animal Cruelty, and Facets of Impulsivity
• Enforcing Sympathy: Animal Cruelty Doctrine After the Civil War
• What Does the Bible Say About Animal Cruelty?
• Animal Cruelty: Fights for Animal Rights – Help Them Living a Better Life
• The Link Between Domestic Violence and Abuse and Animal Cruelty in the Intimate Relationships of People of Diverse Genders
• Animal Abuse and Interpersonal Violence: The Cruelty Connection and Its Implications for Veterinary Pathology
• Animal Cruelty and Its Effect on Society
• Potential Causal Relationship Between Animal Cruelty and Family Violence
• Animal Cruelty and Public Health Hazards in the Factory Farming Industry
• Childhood Animal Cruelty Motives and Their Relationship to Recurrent Adult Interpersonal Crimes
• Just a Dog: Understanding Animal Cruelty and Ourselves
• Animal Cruelty Laws on Abuse, Torture, and Abandonment
• Why Animal Cruelty Should Receive Maximum Jail Time
• Animal Cruelty as a Sentinel for Human Violence
• 11 Signs of Animal Cruelty and How You Can Help
• Stopping Animal Testing and Vivisection by Passing a Bill Against Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty: Early Signs of Violence
• Animal Cruelty and Domestic Violence
• Palliative Animal Law: The War on Animal Cruelty
• Getting Away With Animal Cruelty
• The Link Between Animal Cruelty and Violent Crime Victimization
• Animal Cruelty and Its Effects on Children
• Health, Environment Issues, and Being Against Animal Cruelty as the Major Reasons Why You Should Go Vegan
• Animal Cruelty and Testing in the United States
• Ways to Prevent Cruelty to Animals
• Animal Cruelty: A Serious Crime Leading to Horrific Outcomes
• The Fight Against Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty: Pathway to Violence Against People
• What Is Animal Cruelty and What Are Its Main Types?
• How America Can Efficiently Solve the Problems of Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty and Vital Aspect of Medical Advancement
• World Hunger, Animal Cruelty, and Animal Exploitation
• Risk Factors for the Development of Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty as a Gateway Crime
• Humans Should Not Engage in Animal Cruelty
• Tougher Punishments for Animal Cruelty Crimes in England
• What Is the Most Common Animal Being Abused?
• Relationship Between Animal Cruelty and Antisocial Behaviors
• Animal Cruelty: Dog Fighting
• The Psychology of Animal Cruelty
• The Causes and Effects of Animal Cruelty
• Animal Cruelty: What Can We Do to Stop It?
• How Does Animal Cruelty Affect the Society?
• What Are the Effects of Animal Cruelty?
• How Many Types of Animal Cruelty Are There?
• What Is the Main Problem With Animal Cruelty?
• Is There the Link Between Animal Cruelty and Human Violence?
• What Causes Animal Cruelty?
• Why Is Factory Farming the Largest Cause of Animal Abuse in History?
• Is Animal Cruelty a Moral Issue?
• What Are the Main Types of Animal Cruelty?
• When Did Animal Cruelty Start?
• Is There a Punishment for Animal Cruelty?
• What Is the Largest Source of Animal Cruelty?
• Why Should We Avoid Animal Cruelty?
• How Can We Stop Animal Cruelty in India?
• What Is the Maximum Punishment for Animal Cruelty in the World?
• Is Animal Cruelty a Jail Sentence?
• What Will Happen if We Don’t Stop Animal Cruelty?
• Where Is Animal Cruelty Happening Most?
• What Is the Punishment for Animal Cruelty in India?
• Does Animal Cruelty Affect Humans?
• What State of the USA Has the Highest Rate of Animal Cruelty?
• Is Animal Cruelty a Social Justice Issue?
• What Are the Best Ways to Help Stop Animal Cruelty?
• How Does Animal Cruelty Affect the Environment?
• What Are the Acts of Cruelty to Animals?

Cite this post

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 14). 106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/animal-cruelty-essay-topics/

"106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics." StudyCorgi , 14 July 2022, studycorgi.com/ideas/animal-cruelty-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) '106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics'. 14 July.

1. StudyCorgi . "106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/animal-cruelty-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/animal-cruelty-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "106 Animal Cruelty Essay Topics." July 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/animal-cruelty-essay-topics/.

These essay examples and topics on Animal Cruelty were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They meet our highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, and fact accuracy. Please ensure you properly reference the materials if you’re using them to write your assignment.

This essay topic collection was updated on December 27, 2023 .

Good Survey Questions for Animal Cruelty

Animal cruelty is a sensitive subject, and many people may struggle to find the correct questions to ask. a severe issue like this necessitates thorough planning and survey design. we've included actual survey questions about animal cruelty that we created and used in public research..

1 minute to complete

Eligibility

There are no specific eligibility requirements to fill out a survey on animal cruelty. However, it is important to be aware of the sensitivity of the topic and to be respectful of the opinions of others.

Questions for Good Survey Questions for Animal Cruelty

Did you grow up with pets?

How many pets do you currently own?

Have you witnessed what you consider to be animal abuse before?

Do you consider any of the below scenarios animal abuse? (Select all that applicable)

• Leaving a pet in a hot car
• Leaving a pet in a cold car
• Not providing food and water
• Organized dog fight
• Overcrowding pets at home
• Caging the wild animals at Zoo
• Using the animals at circus
• Physically punishing an animal
• Using them at lab

Do you feel badly about how these types of animals are typically treated?

• Zoo Animals
• Circus Animals
• Wild animals that are hunted
• Factory farmed animals

How concerned are you about animal abuse?

• Extremely concerned
• Very concerned
• Somewhat concerned
• Not so concerned
• Not at all concerned

Do you believe more should be done to prevent animal abuse where you live?

How would you rank the below issues by importance? (1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

Is animal cruelty an issue that still occurs today?

• Strongly disagree
• Neither agree nor disagree
• Strongly agree

Are you aware of the PACT (Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act)?

“Humanities true moral test, it’s a fundamental test...consists of its attitude toward those who are at its mercy: animals”-Milan Kundera. Do you agree with this quote?

Ideas Similar to Good Survey Questions for Animal Cruelty

• What are your thoughts on animal cruelty?
• Do you believe that animal cruelty is wrong?
• What do you think should be done to stop animal cruelty?

Here are some FAQs and additional information on Good Survey Questions for Animal Cruelty

What is animal cruelty, animal cruelty is a term that encompasses acts of violence, neglect, or malicious killing of an animal. it can also include not providing an animal with basic necessities like food or water. types of animal cruelty range from unintentional (unprovoked) acts to intentional (provoked) acts., why is animal abuse a concern, animal abuse is a concern because it often does not end within a single time or with a single animal. humans if not punished or warned would continue to harm and abuse other animals., want to use this template, loved by people at home and at work.

What's next? Try out templates like Good Survey Questions for Animal Cruelty

1000+ templates, 50+ categories.

Want to create secure online forms and surveys?

Join blocksurvey..

Animal behavior research is getting better at keeping observer bias from sneaking in – but there’s still room to improve

Professor and Associate Head of Psychology, University of Tennessee

Disclosure statement

Todd M. Freeberg does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

University of Tennessee provides funding as a member of The Conversation US.

View all partners

Animal behavior research relies on careful observation of animals. Researchers might spend months in a jungle habitat watching tropical birds mate and raise their young. They might track the rates of physical contact in cattle herds of different densities. Or they could record the sounds whales make as they migrate through the ocean.

Animal behavior research can provide fundamental insights into the natural processes that affect ecosystems around the globe, as well as into our own human minds and behavior.

I study animal behavior – and also the research reported by scientists in my field. One of the challenges of this kind of science is making sure our own assumptions don’t influence what we think we see in animal subjects. Like all people, how scientists see the world is shaped by biases and expectations, which can affect how data is recorded and reported. For instance, scientists who live in a society with strict gender roles for women and men might interpret things they see animals doing as reflecting those same divisions .

The scientific process corrects for such mistakes over time, but scientists have quicker methods at their disposal to minimize potential observer bias. Animal behavior scientists haven’t always used these methods – but that’s changing. A new study confirms that, over the past decade, studies increasingly adhere to the rigorous best practices that can minimize potential biases in animal behavior research.

Biases and self-fulfilling prophecies

A German horse named Clever Hans is widely known in the history of animal behavior as a classic example of unconscious bias leading to a false result.

Around the turn of the 20th century , Clever Hans was purported to be able to do math. For example, in response to his owner’s prompt “3 + 5,” Clever Hans would tap his hoof eight times. His owner would then reward him with his favorite vegetables. Initial observers reported that the horse’s abilities were legitimate and that his owner was not being deceptive.

However, careful analysis by a young scientist named Oskar Pfungst revealed that if the horse could not see his owner, he couldn’t answer correctly. So while Clever Hans was not good at math, he was incredibly good at observing his owner’s subtle and unconscious cues that gave the math answers away.

In the 1960s, researchers asked human study participants to code the learning ability of rats. Participants were told their rats had been artificially selected over many generations to be either “bright” or “dull” learners. Over several weeks, the participants ran their rats through eight different learning experiments.

In seven out of the eight experiments , the human participants ranked the “bright” rats as being better learners than the “dull” rats when, in reality, the researchers had randomly picked rats from their breeding colony. Bias led the human participants to see what they thought they should see.

Eliminating bias

Given the clear potential for human biases to skew scientific results, textbooks on animal behavior research methods from the 1980s onward have implored researchers to verify their work using at least one of two commonsense methods.

One is making sure the researcher observing the behavior does not know if the subject comes from one study group or the other. For example, a researcher would measure a cricket’s behavior without knowing if it came from the experimental or control group.

The other best practice is utilizing a second researcher, who has fresh eyes and no knowledge of the data, to observe the behavior and code the data. For example, while analyzing a video file, I count chickadees taking seeds from a feeder 15 times. Later, a second independent observer counts the same number.

Yet these methods to minimize possible biases are often not employed by researchers in animal behavior, perhaps because these best practices take more time and effort.

In 2012, my colleagues and I reviewed nearly 1,000 articles published in five leading animal behavior journals between 1970 and 2010 to see how many reported these methods to minimize potential bias. Less than 10% did so. By contrast, the journal Infancy, which focuses on human infant behavior, was far more rigorous: Over 80% of its articles reported using methods to avoid bias.

It’s a problem not just confined to my field. A 2015 review of published articles in the life sciences found that blind protocols are uncommon . It also found that studies using blind methods detected smaller differences between the key groups being observed compared to studies that didn’t use blind methods, suggesting potential biases led to more notable results.

In the years after we published our article, it was cited regularly and we wondered if there had been any improvement in the field. So, we recently reviewed 40 articles from each of the same five journals for the year 2020.

We found the rate of papers that reported controlling for bias improved in all five journals , from under 10% in our 2012 article to just over 50% in our new review. These rates of reporting still lag behind the journal Infancy, however, which was 95% in 2020.

All in all, things are looking up, but the animal behavior field can still do better. Practically, with increasingly more portable and affordable audio and video recording technology, it’s getting easier to carry out methods that minimize potential biases. The more the field of animal behavior sticks with these best practices, the stronger the foundation of knowledge and public trust in this science will become.

• Animal behavior
• Research methods
• Research bias
• STEEHM new research

Lecturer / Senior Lecturer - Marketing

Communications and Engagement Officer, Corporate Finance Property and Sustainability

Assistant Editor - 1 year cadetship

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)