I enjoy cooperative learning with team members.
When I encounter a problem, I learn to think, understand and analyze the problem first.
I have learned to tolerate and respect different opinions.
“Learning attitude” was defined as students’ tendency to respond a certain way towards PBL learning. Four items were included in the questionnaire to measure students’ learning attitudes. “Problem identification” was students’ ability to identify the key problem to be solved or addressed. Two items were used to assess subjects’ problem-identification skills. “Information analysis” aimed to check students’ ability to inspect and comprehend information collected. Three items were included to evaluate students’ information analysis competency. “Execution” focused on students’ abilities to perform a certain task or complete study goals. Three items were employed to assess students’ execution competency. “Life-long learning” was described as students’ self-initiated and ongoing learning intentions or behaviors. It was measured by 4-item questions.
A five-point Likert scale was adopted for data collection and the responses were rated as follows: 1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral (neither agree nor disagree), 4 = Agree, and 5 = Strongly agree. A higher score indicates a positive self-evaluation of core competencies.
Students (from freshman to junior classes) were recruited to participate in the survey in September 2013. Those students were tracked to complete the survey in September 2014. Overall, a total of 322 nursing students completed the same questionnaire in both 2013 and 2014.
Each student was asked to self-evaluate their core competencies using the same questionnaire in 2013 and 2014. The Cronbach’s alpha values of internal consistency were 0.944 for the overall scale and 0.772 to 0.866 for each of the five dimensions (learning attitude, 0.772; problem identification, 0.844; information analysis, 0.821, execution, 0.777; life-long learning, 0.866). Therefore, the present study had acceptable internal consistency.
We collected data twice during the research period, as all participants completed the same core competencies questionnaire in both 2013 and 2014. The Institutional Review Board approved this study at the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (No: CS2-21113), and data were only collected after informed consent had been obtained. All participants signed an informed consent stating that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time. The data collected were only used for research purposes.
Descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were used to assess the distributions of the students’ characteristics and core competencies. Chi-square tests and paired t -tests were used to analyze the differences between groups. Radar charts were plotted to compare the changes in the student’s self-evaluations of their core competencies between groups. To adjust for the interaction between exposure and group, we used generalized estimating equations and statistical methods to predict the changes in the core competencies of each group. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 and all tests were two-tailed. The SPSS for Windows version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.
Descriptive statistics such as Chi-square tests, paired-sample t -tests, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze data.
A total of 322 nursing students (Group 1 = 106, Group 2 = 111, and Group 3 = 105 students) completed the core competency questionnaire twice, in 2013 and 2014. Though most students were female (81.4%), Chi-square tests confirmed that there was no significant difference ( p = 0.379) in the sex distribution between groups, showing that the distribution of the characteristics was homogenous between groups ( Table 2 ).
Characteristics of the three groups of nursing students (Chi-squared tests).
Group | Male, (%) | Female, (%) | X | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 22 (37.9) | 84 (31.8) | 1.940 | 0.379 |
Group 2 | 16 (27.6) | 95 (36.0) | ||
Group 3 | 20 (34.5) | 85 (32.2) |
Pre-and post-tests revealed significant changes (from 2013 to 2014) in the total self-evaluated competency scores of the students in Group 3 ( p < 0.000). Similarly, significant differences were observed for the competencies learning attitude ( p = 0.007), problem identification ( p = 0.0181), information analysis ( p = 0.007), and life-long learning ( p < 0.000) in Group 3. However, the score for the execution competency ( p = 0.086) did not significantly change in Group 3. In Group 2, pre-and post-tests showed the students’ self-evaluation scores for all competencies did not significantly change. In Group 1, students’ self-evaluation scores were only significantly different for the execution ( p = 0.021) and life-long learning competencies ( p = 0.037) in pre-and post-tests ( Table 3 ).
Comparison of the differences in students’ self-evaluations of core competencies between groups. (Paired-samples t -test).
Variable | Mean | SD | Mean of Difference | SD of Difference | 95% C.I. | -Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||||
Learning attitude | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.7571 | 0.54167 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.6958 | 0.62010 | ||||||
0.06132 | 0.69933 | −0.07336 | 0.19600 | 0.903 | 0.369 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.8333 | 0.67026 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.8446 | 0.53625 | ||||||
−0.01126 | 0.58035 | −0.12043 | 0.09790 | −0.204 | 0.838 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 105 | 4.0881 | 0.51653 | ||||||
post | 105 | 3.9286 | 0.57566 | ||||||
0.15952 | 0.59860 | 0.04368 | 0.27537 | 2.731 | 0.007 | ||||
Problem identification | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.2783 | 0.77791 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.3538 | 0.72692 | ||||||
−0.07547 | 0.96558 | −0.26143 | 0.11049 | −0.805 | 0.423 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.4640 | 0.77960 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.4955 | 0.69248 | ||||||
−0.03153 | 0.76062 | −0.17460 | 0.11154 | −0.437 | 0.663 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 106 | 3.8726 | 0.62129 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.6934 | 0.70566 | ||||||
0.17925 | 0.76591 | 0.03174 | 0.32675 | 2.409 | 0.018 | ||||
Information analysis | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.6195 | 0.57171 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.4874 | 0.70699 | ||||||
0.13208 | 0.73848 | −0.01015 | 0.27430 | 1.841 | 0.068 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.7447 | 0.71627 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.7297 | 0.60388 | ||||||
0.01502 | 0.62180 | −0.10195 | 0.13198 | 0.254 | 0.800 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 106 | 4.0220 | 0.54872 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.8113 | 0.59986 | ||||||
0.21069 | 0.61088 | 0.09304 | 0.32834 | 3.551 | 0.001 | ||||
Execution | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.7233 | 0.66424 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.5535 | 0.69142 | ||||||
0.16981 | 0.74783 | 0.02579 | 0.31383 | 2.338 | 0.021 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.8228 | 0.66183 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.8048 | 0.63161 | ||||||
0.01802 | 0.63220 | −0.10090 | 0.13693 | 0.300 | 0.765 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 106 | 3.9937 | 0.59269 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.8805 | 0.68265 | ||||||
0.11321 | 0.67281 | −0.01637 | 0.24278 | 1.732 | 0.086 | ||||
Life-long learning | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.6840 | 0.65946 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.5283 | 0.66576 | ||||||
0.15566 | 0.75786 | 0.00971 | 0.30161 | 2.115 | 0.037 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.6847 | 0.75431 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.7027 | 0.64975 | ||||||
−0.01802 | 0.68234 | −0.14637 | 0.11033 | −0.278 | 0.781 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 106 | 4.0896 | 0.58268 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.7901 | 0.75288 | ||||||
0.29953 | 0.67119 | 0.17026 | 0.42879 | 4.595 | <0.000 | ||||
Total scale | |||||||||
Group 1 pre | 106 | 3.6468 | 0.49657 | ||||||
post | 106 | 3.5454 | 0.57674 | ||||||
0.10142 | 0.61106 | −0.01627 | 0.21910 | 1.709 | 0.090 | ||||
Group 2 pre | 111 | 3.7314 | 0.63063 | ||||||
post | 111 | 3.7365 | 0.52928 | ||||||
−0.00507 | 0.51020 | −0.10104 | 0.09090 | −0.105 | 0.917 | ||||
Group 3 pre | 105 | 4.0327 | 0.49404 | ||||||
post | 105 | 3.8304 | 0.58558 | ||||||
0.20238 | 0.51206 | 0.10328 | 0.30148 | 4.050 | <0.000 |
Furthermore, we used radar charts to compare the changes in the students’ self-evaluations of their core competencies between groups. The students in group 3 had higher self-evaluation scores for the core competencies than the students in the other groups, except for the execution competency. In Group 1, the most significant change was observed in the competency of execution. The changes in student scores were lowest in Group 2; only the problem identification competency score was significantly higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (see Figure 1 ).
The radar chart comparing the changes in the core competencies.
The study questionnaire was administered twice to the same students, in 2013 and 2014. Thus, a GEE model was used to analyze the trends in the changes in the self-evaluated core competency scores between the three groups of nursing students over time. The mean changes in the total core competency scores between groups remained significantly different after controlling for the interaction effect between exposure (i.e., years of exposure to PBL) and group.
We found that the mean self-evaluated total competency score increased by 0.12 points at the post-test compared with the pre-test ( p = 0.038). Moreover, the mean total score (five competencies) for Group 3 significantly increased by 0.286 points compared with Group 1 ( p < 0.000), and the mean score of Group 2 also significantly increased by 0.199 points compared with Group 1 ( p = 0.006; Table 4 ).
Predictions of changes in the students’ self-evaluations of their core competencies (GEE model).
Dependent Variable | Parameter | S.E. | 95% Wald C.I. | Wald X | -Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||
Learning attitude | Group 3 | 0.223 | 0.0783 | 0.070 | 0.377 | 8.141 | 0.004 |
Group 2 | 0.159 | 0.0749 | 0.013 | 0.306 | 4.532 | 0.033 | |
time 2 | 0.063 | 0.0665 | −0.067 | 0.193 | 0.899 | 0.343 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | 0.084 | 0.0880 | −0.089 | 0.256 | 0.904 | 0.342 | |
Group 2 × time 2 | −0.084 | 0.0865 | −0.254 | 0.085 | 0.949 | 0.330 | |
Problem identification | Group 3 | 0.347 | 0.0954 | 0.160 | 0.534 | 13.226 | 0.000 |
Group 2 | 0.134 | 0.0937 | −0.050 | 0.317 | 2.035 | 0.154 | |
time 2 | −0.057 | 0.0917 | −0.237 | 0.122 | 0.392 | 0.531 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | 0.259 | 0.1188 | 0.026 | 0.492 | 4.763 | ||
Group 2 × time 2 | 0.040 | 0.1167 | −0.189 | 0.269 | 0.116 | ||
Information analysis | Group 3 | 0.352 | 0.0873 | 0.181 | 0.523 | 16.260 | 0.000 |
Group 2 | 0.264 | 0.0873 | 0.093 | 0.435 | 9.171 | 0.002 | |
time 2 | 0.151 | 0.0705 | 0.013 | 0.290 | 4.605 | 0.032 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | 0.048 | 0.0911 | −0.131 | 0.226 | 0.276 | 0.600 | |
Group 2 × time 2 | −0.136 | 0.0917 | −0.316 | 0.044 | 2.193 | 0.139 | |
Execution | Group 3 | 0.294 | 0.0907 | 0.116 | 0.471 | 10.480 | 0.001 |
Group 2 | 0.253 | 0.0855 | 0.085 | 0.421 | 8.739 | 0.003 | |
time 2 | 0.175 | 0.0707 | 0.037 | 0.314 | 6.142 | 0.013 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | −0.024 | 0.0957 | −0.211 | 0.164 | 0.061 | 0.805 | |
Group 2 × time 2 | −0.160 | 0.0924 | −0.341 | 0.021 | 3.002 | 0.083 | |
Life-long learning | Group 3 | 0.262 | 0.0943 | 0.077 | 0.446 | 7.697 | 0.006 |
Group 2 | 0.183 | 0.0863 | 0.014 | 0.352 | 4.506 | 0.034 | |
time 2 | 0.167 | 0.0724 | 0.025 | 0.309 | 5.339 | 0.021 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | 0.157 | 0.0971 | −0.033 | 0.347 | 2.609 | 0.106 | |
Group 2 × time 2 | −0.190 | 0.0969 | −0.379 | 0.000 | 3.824 | 0.051 | |
Total scale | Group 3 | 0.286 | 0.0766 | 0.136 | 0.436 | 13.902 | 0.000 |
Group 2 | 0.199 | 0.0719 | 0.058 | 0.340 | 7.683 | 0.006 | |
time 2 | 0.120 | 0.0580 | 0.006 | 0.234 | 4.291 | 0.038 | |
Group 3 × time 2 | 0.103 | 0.0774 | −0.049 | 0.254 | 1.758 | 0.185 | |
Group 2 × time 2 | −0.131 | 0.0755 | −0.278 | 0.017 | 2.993 | 0.084 |
Note: Group 1: Freshman students in 2013, Sophomore students in 2014. Group 2: Sophomore students in 2013; Junior students in 2014. Group 3: Junior students in 2013; Senior students in 2014.Time 1: 2013 data collection; time 2: 2014 data collection. Reference group: 1 = Group 1; 2 = time 1; 3 = Group 3 × time 1; 4 = Group 2 × time 1.
The students’ mean post-test scores for the competency information analysis, execution, and life-long learning increased by 0.151–0.175 points compared with the pre-test score ( p = 0.013–0.032). In addition, the mean score of Group 3 for these competencies significantly increased by 0.262–0.352 points compared with Group 1 ( p < 0.000–0.006), and the mean score of Group 2 significantly increased by 0.183–0.264 points compared with Group 1 ( p = 0.002–0.034; Table 4 ).
However, after controlling for the interaction of exposure and group, there were no significant differences between the mean pre-and post-test scores for the competencies of learning attitude and problem identification ( p = 0.154–0.343). However, the mean learning attitude score of Group 3 significantly increased by 0.223 points compared with Group 1 ( p = 0.004), and the mean learning attitude score of Group 2 significantly increased by 0.159 points compared with Group 1 ( p = 0.033). However, the mean problem identification competency score was only significantly different between Group 3 compared with Group 1, with an increase of 0.347 points in Group 3 ( p < 0.000; Table 4 ).
The study aimed to explore the effects of PBL strategies on nursing students’ self-evaluation of core competencies. Nursing educators needed to evaluate the effects of PBL teaching strategies on students. These study results would help nursing educators develop curricula and improve teaching strategies. We found that the students with the longest exposure to PBL (Group 3) had more significant improvements in their self-evaluation scores for all competencies than the shorter exposure groups (groups 1 and 2). Thus, this study demonstrates that nursing students’ self-evaluations of their core competencies improved each grade, which indicates PBL strategies effectively help students build core competencies. The PBL model advocates that a paradigm shift is required in nursing education [ 3 ]. Yet, despite the number of teaching experiences reported to date with PBL, almost no studies in Taiwan have assessed self-evaluations of the core competencies of students educated using this strategy. Most research has focused on the impact of PBL on individual capabilities, including critical thinking [ 29 , 31 ], problem-solving [ 26 ], and metacognitive awareness [ 31 ]. Other studies have focused on learner satisfaction [ 32 , 33 ]. This study found that nursing students studying a PBL curriculum gradually improved their total core competencies as their exposure to PBL increased. Specifically, our study shows that students’ execution and life-long learning competencies were improved by the end of the sophomore year. In addition, the students’ self-evaluations of the learning attitude, problem identification, and information analysis competencies were significantly improved by the end of their junior year. Researchers have indicated that the PBL strategy encourages students to discuss and cooperate to solve problems through self-directed study [ 21 , 28 , 34 ]. Cultivation of these abilities is necessary to accumulate knowledge and, combined with exposure to clinical situations, prepare nursing students to adapt to the reality of the workplace [ 3 , 28 ].
Learning strategies are essential components of a curriculum and could help students to learn more efficiently and effectively [ 13 ]. In addition, new learning strategies should emerge spontaneously to address the increasingly complex clinical environment and rapidly changing clinical patient problems [ 30 , 35 ]. Therefore, PBL strategies are one option [ 10 , 36 ]. Many studies have recently discussed the effectiveness of this learning strategy in health discipline educational programs [ 6 ]. However, how students self-evaluate their development of core competencies in nursing education was poorly understood [ 37 ]. Therefore, more research from the perspective of nursing students’ self-evaluations of their progression in terms of core competencies is necessary to confirm the effectiveness of PBL strategies [ 37 , 38 ]. This study showed that exposure to PBL strategies improved the students’ self-evaluations of their core competencies, and the differences between grades and individual progression between years were significant.
Research has indicated that the strengths of PBL include its ability to promote the integration of knowledge, problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills, group collaboration, and self-autonomous learning [ 13 , 30 , 39 ]. Our students experienced a series of PBL teaching courses and their self-evaluation scores revealed that PBL increased the students’ perceptions of their core competencies. The improvements in the information analysis, execution, and life-long learning competencies were directly proportional to the grade of the students, and hence the duration of their exposure to PBL. However, the scores for the core competencies of learning attitude and problem identification only increased significantly after the junior year, indicating that the PBL teaching strategy could lead to the accumulation of skills, especially in the learning attitude and problem identification competencies. Thus, the results of this study show that PBL teaching provides a strategy that allows students to become self-directed learners and cooperate with other members of a team. The benefits of the PBL teaching strategy were previously demonstrated by students’ responses in three areas of cognitive, emotional, and social skills [ 40 ].
Despite PBL being widely used in professional healthcare courses, few studies have assessed the effectiveness of PBL using specific instruments. Most studies have only assessed outcomes based on qualitative data [ 27 , 28 ], students’ ability to perform a single skill [ 3 , 5 , 41 ], learner satisfaction [ 12 , 42 ], or evaluations by faculty or the academic performance of students [ 30 , 43 ]. The present study used an instrument to assess the effectiveness of PBL by measuring nursing students’ self-evaluation of their competency in five domains: learning attitude, problem identification, information analysis, execution, and life-long learning. Thus, in contrast to other studies that only assessed a single ability or where only faculty evaluation of students’ performance was used, our study represents a more comprehensive program evaluation method that includes both faculty evaluation and students’ self-assessment.
Overall, this study indicates PBL has cumulative effects on core competencies as nursing students progress through their academic years. Therefore, teaching strategies could be designed according to the grade and maturity of students, as well as the sequence of formation of core competencies. PBL teaching strategies can provide students with experience of actual cases and promote deep self-learning and the development of core competencies. Using this approach, nursing students will be able to adapt to the changing clinical environment of the future and solve diverse health problems.
This study highlights the ability of PBL strategies to promote the development of core competencies in an undergraduate nursing course. Therefore, PBL appears to have a favorable effect on nursing education. The differences in the self-evaluation scores between groups indicate PBL strategies effectively improve nursing students’ core competencies. The students with the longest exposure to PBL had higher self-evaluation scores than the other groups, especially for competency information analysis, execution, and life-long learning. The difference in progress between groups was most obvious in Group 3, which suggests that a PBL curriculum design has a cumulative effect on students’ development of core competencies.
However, this study only sampled students studying at a single school using the same curriculum and measured the student’s self-evaluations of their core competencies using a single questionnaire. Thus, the results of this study may not be generalizable to other schools or curricula. Consequently, it is necessary to expand this curricular design to other schools and assess a larger sample size to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL teaching strategies and further research is recommended to confirm the reliability and validity of the core competency measurement tool used in this study. A follow-up outcome study will be conducted to examine the long-term effects of PBL on the core competencies of graduates. We believe that extending the time for data collection would enable an analysis of the trajectory of the long-term effects and provide more specific data on the effectiveness of PBL.
This research received no external funding.
Conceptualization, S.-H.L., H.-L.C. and C.-P.K.; methodology, S.-H.L., M.-Y.H. and C.-P.K.; investigation, F.-F.S., P.-C.L. and C.-Y.H. (Ching-Yen Hung); writing—original draft, C.-Y.H. (Cheng-Yi Huang) and H.-L.C.; writing—review & editing, Y.-C.A.L.; project administration, Y.-C.A.L. and W.-J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted according to the Chung Shan Medical University guidelines and approved by the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (No: CS2-21113).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
NURSING.com is the BEST place to learn nursing. With over 2,000+ clear, concise, and visual lessons, there is something for you!
Critical thinking can seem like such an abstract term that you don’t practically use. However, this could not be farther from the truth. Critical thinking is frequently used in nursing. Let me give you a few examples from my career in which critical thinking helped me take better care of my patient.
The truth is, that as nurses we can’t escape critical thinking . . . I know you hate the word . . . but let me show you how it actually works!
I had a patient that was scheduled to go to get a pacemaker placed at 0900. The physician wanted the patient to get 2 units of blood before going downstairs for the procedure. I administered it per protocol. About 30 minutes after that second unit got started, I noticed his oxygen went from 95% down to 92% down to 90%. I put 2L of O2 on him and it came up to 91%. But it just sort of hung around the low 90s on oxygen.
I stopped. And thought. What the heck is going on?
I looked at his history. Congestive heart failure.
I looked at his intake and output. He was positive 1.5 liters.
I thought about how he’s got extra fluid in general, and because of his CHF, he can’t really pump out the fluid he already has, let alone this additional fluid. Maybe I should listen to his lungs..
His lungs were clear earlier. I heard crackles throughout both lungs.
OK, so he’s got extra fluid that he can’t get out of his body. What do I know that will get rid of extra fluid and make him pee? Maybe some Lasix?
I ran over my thought process with a coworker before calling the doc. They agreed. I called the doc and before I could suggest anything, he said “Give him 20 mg IV Lasix one time, and I’ll put the order in.” CLICK.
I gave the Lasix. He peed like a racehorse (and was NOT happy with me for making that happen!). And he was off of oxygen before he went down to get his pacemaker.
Badda Bing Bada Boom!
My patient just had her right leg amputated above her knee. She was on a Dilaudid PCA and still complaining of awful pain. She maxed it out every time, still saying she was in horrible pain. She told the doctor when he rounded that morning that the meds weren’t doing anything. He added some oral opioids as well and wrote an order that it was okay for me to give both the oral and PCA dosings, with the goal of weaning off PCA.
“How am I going to do that?” I thought. She kept requiring more and more meds and I’m supposed to someone wean her off?
I asked her to describe her pain. She said it felt like nerve pain. Deep burning and tingling. She said the pain meds would just knock her out and she’d sleep for a little while but wake up in even worse pain. She was at the end of her rope.
I thought about nerve pain. I thought about other patients that report similar pain. Diabetics with neuropathy would talk about similar pain… “What did they do for it? ” I thought. Then I remembered that many of my patients with diabetic neuropathy were taking gabapentin daily for pain.
“So if this works for their nerve pain, could it work for a patient who has had an amputation?” I thought.
I called the PA for the surgeon and asked them what they thought about trying something like gabapentin for her pain after I described my patient’s type of pain and thought process.
“That’s a really good idea, Kati. I’ll write for it and we’ll see if we can get her off the opioids sooner. ”
She wrote for it. I gave it. It takes a few days to really kick in and once it did, the patient’s pain and discomfort were significantly reduced. She said to get rid of those other pain meds because they “didn’t do a damn thing,” and to “just give her that nerve pain pill because it’s the only thing that works”.
And that we did!
She was able to work with therapy more because her pain was tolerable and was finally able to get rest.
What your nursing professor won’t tell you about critical thinking .
by Ashely Adkins RN BSN
When I started nursing school, I remember thinking, “how in the world am I going to remember all of this information, let alone be able to apply it and critically think?” You are not alone if you feel like your critical thinking skills need a little bit of polishing.
Let’s step back for a moment, and take a walk down memory lane. It was my first semester of nursing school and I was sitting in my Fundamentals of Nursing course. We were learning about vital signs, assessments, labs, etc. Feeling overwhelmed with all of this new information (when are you not overwhelmed in nursing school?), I let my mind wonder to a low place…
Am I really cut out for this? Can I really do this? How can I possibly retain all of this information? Do they really expect me to remember everything AND critically think at the same time?
One of my first-semester nursing professors said something to me that has stuck with me throughout my nursing years. It went a little something like this:
“Critical thinking does not develop overnight . It takes time. You don’t learn to talk overnight or walk overnight. You don’t learn to critically think overnight .”
My professor was absolutely right.
As my journey throughout nursing school, and eventually on to being a “real nurse” continued, my critical thinking skills began to BLOSSOM. With every class, lecture, clinical shift, lab, and simulation, my critical thinking skills grew.
You may ask…how?
Well, let me tell you…
These are the key ingredients to growing your critical thinking skills.
Time. Critical thinking takes time. As I mentioned before, you do not learn how to critically think overnight. It is important to set realistic expectations for yourself both in nursing school and in other aspects of your life.
Exposure. It is next to impossible to critically think if you have never been exposed to something. How would you ever learn to talk if no one ever talked to you? The same thing applies to nursing and critical thinking.
Over time, your exposure to new materials and situations will cause you to think and ask yourself, “why?”
This leads me to my next point. Questioning. Do not be afraid to ask yourself…
“Why is this happening?”
“Why do I take a blood pressure and heart rate before I give a beta-blocker?”
“Why is it important to listen to a patient’s lung sounds before and after they receive a blood transfusion?”
It is important to constantly question yourself. Let your mind process your questions, and discover answers.
Confidence. We always hear the phrase, “confidence is key!” And as cheesy as that phrase may be, it really holds true. So many times, we often times sell ourselves short.
YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU THINK YOU KNOW.
In case you did not catch it the first time…
Be confident in your knowledge, because trust me, it is there. It may be hiding in one single neuron in the back of your brain, but it is there.
It is impossible to know everything. Even experienced nurses do not know everything.
And if they tell you that they do…they are wrong!
The key to critical thinking is not about knowing everything ; It is about how you respond when you do not know something .
How do you reason through a problem you do not know the answer to? Do you give up? Or do you persevere until you discover the answer?
If you are a nursing student preparing for the NCLEX, you know that the NCLEX loves critical thinking questions. NRSNG has some great tips and advice on critical thinking when it comes to taking the NCLEX .
There are so many pieces to the puzzle when it comes to nursing, and it is normal to feel overwhelmed. The beauty of nursing is when all of those puzzle pieces come together to form a beautiful picture.
That is critical thinking.
Critical thinking is something you’ll do every day as a nurse and honestly, you probably do it in your regular non-nurse life as well. It’s basically stopping, looking at a situation, identifying a solution, and trying it out. Critical thinking in nursing is just that but in a clinical setting.
We’ve written a MASSIVE lesson on Care Plans and Critical Thinking :
4 "real world" examples of using clinical judgement to figure out what to do first as a nurse | nursing.com, 12 study tips for how to study for pharmacology in nursing school | nursing.com, similar blog posts.
Learning Materials
Dive deep into the multifaceted world of nursing management with a special focus on problem-solving. This comprehensive guide presents a detailed look at the process, importance, and challenges of problem-solving in nursing management. By highlighting essential skills, neurologically based frameworks, and the relationship with decision-making, it offers both theoretical understanding and practical solutions. Explore real-life case studies, leadership's role, and the link with critical thinking. This is an enriching journey towards developing strategic competencies and achieving effective problem-solving in a vital healthcare sector.
Millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies
What do the algorithm-based and intuition-driven approaches to problem-solving in nursing management entail?
What is the first stage of problem solving in nursing practice?
What is problem solving in nursing management and how is it different from decision making?
What is the relationship between critical thinking and problem solving in nursing?
What is the final stage of problem solving in nursing practice?
What is the significance of problem-solving in nursing management?
What are the key skills required for effective problem-solving in nursing management?
How can critical thinking skills be enhanced for effective problem solving in nursing management?
What are the key steps involved in the problem-solving process in nursing management?
What does the neurological framework in nursing management involve?
What is decision making in nursing management?
Review generated flashcards
to start learning or create your own AI flashcards
Start learning or create your own AI flashcards
Problem solving in nursing management is a crucial process that you need to grasp as a prospective or current nurse. This involves using a logical, systematic approach to resolving issues encountered in a nursing environment, focusing on maintaining quality patient care .
Problem Solving: This is identifying and overcoming obstacles to achieving a goal. In nursing, this generally revolves around improving patient health outcomes and ensuring efficient healthcare facility operations.
Nursing professionals are constantly faced with intricate issues that require decisive and effective solutions. The ability to implement problem-solving is crucial in maintaining optimal patient care , operational efficiency , and fostering team collaboration.
For instance, suppose a sudden shortage of resources like catheters or syringes is experienced in a healthcare facility. In such a case, the nursing manager will need to swiftly solve the problem either by reallocating resources, timely ordering supplies, or finding a temporary alternative, ensuring the patients' needs are continually met.
Effective problem-solving in nursing management is anchored on a set of key skills. These abilities equip you to navigate complex situations and formulate impactful solutions. They include:
These skills are interconnected. For example, your ability to think critically informs your decisiveness. Your decisions are then made clear to your team through effective communication, and together, through collaboration, the problem is solved.
In your nursing management journey, you will come across multiple challenges when attempting to solve problems. These obstacles might occur due to several factors, such as resource limitations, personnel issues, and complex patient needs .
Resource Constraints | Shortage of essential medical supplies or understaffing. |
Personnel Issues | Conflicts among team members or unforeseen absence of staff. |
Complex | Patients with rare medical conditions that require specialized care. |
While these challenges can be daunting, equipping yourself with robust problem-solving skills will help you navigate these complications and maintain high standards of patient care.
Delving deeper into the problem-solving process in nursing management, you get to navigate its intricacies and mechanisms. This exploration can bolster your abilities to resolve complex situations in your nursing career.
Problem-solving in nursing management is a multifaceted task that often involves several steps. To understand how to tackle issues expertly, you will need a clear understanding of each stage.
Problem-Solving Process: A systematic approach used to address complications and make decisions. In nursing, it’s composed of several steps, each essential to the resolution of issues.
Here are the key steps:
Many problem-solving methods exist, but one valuable perspective is through understanding the neurological framework in nursing management. This biological approach delves into how your brain processes information and develops solutions.
Neurological Framework: A biological perspective that explains how a nurse's brain processes, analyses, and responds to problems encountered in the nursing environment.
This framework refers to cognitive processes which involve:
Nursing management often involves complex and unique problems. To effectively tackle these challenges, it's crucial to breed creativity in the problem-solving process.
Imagine there's a sudden surge in patient intake due to a local health crisis, resulting in a bed shortage. A creative solution might be to convert other non-critical spaces such as conference rooms temporarily into patient monitoring units, thereby managing the surge effectively.
In a nursing environment, you are not working in isolation. Collaboration is a critical aspect of problem-solving in nursing management, as diverse insights can lead to innovative and effective solutions.
Consider a scenario where there's a need to implement a new system for managing patient records. To effectively solve potential issues in system implementation, you might need input from various team members including nursing staff, IT specialists, and data management experts. Each member's contribution, based on their expertise and perspective, is crucial in charting a comprehensive problem-solving strategy, ensuring the successful implementation and integration of the new system.
Decision making and problem-solving are two interconnected aspects in the realm of nursing management. Understanding their correlation and distinctiveness is key to effectively managing issues and improving patient outcomes in a healthcare setting.
The connection between decision making and problem solving in nursing management is truly significant. In almost every situation where a problem arises, decision making is an inseparable component of the problem-solving process.
Decision Making in Nursing: This involves selecting a course of action from different alternatives. It is the bridge connecting problem analysis with implementing solutions, and it requires evaluation of information, predicaments, and possible outcomes.
Once you have identified and defined a problem, analysed it, and developed potential solutions, the next step involves decision making. This is where you select the most suitable solution among the alternatives.
For instance, if you are dealing with a bed shortage problem in your healthcare facility, some possible solutions could be outsourcing to other healthcare facilities, using other spaces such as conference rooms as makeshift wards, or deploying portable hospital beds.
Each of these solutions has its pros and cons, and it's here that decision-making skills come into play. You'll need to compare and contrast each option, considering factors like cost, time, resources available, and the overall impact on patient care. The chosen solution is then implemented, and the effects are evaluated for future reference.
Though inherently connected, problem solving and decision making are distinct processes within nursing management. Where problem-solving is a comprehensive process that entails identifying, analysing, and solving issues, decision making is a component nested within this process, acting as the transition point from analysis to action.
Problem Solving in Nursing: This is a broader process involving the identification of an issue or obstacle, systematic analysis to understand it, devising potential solutions, choosing the most suitable through decision making, implementing it, and finally reviewing the effectiveness of the implemented solution.
Consider a real-life scenario such as medication errors. If these errors are occurring frequently in your healthcare setup, the problem-solving process will involve identifying the issue (increased medication errors), defining and analysing it (finding the root causes, such as miscommunication or system glitches). This would then lead to brainstorming potential solutions, like improved communication systems or enhanced employee training. The decision-making process would then come into play when choosing the best solution to implement.
Effective decision making underpins successful problem solving in nursing management. Implementing the right techniques can enhance your decision-making process, thus leading to more effective problem resolution.
Some proven techniques include:
Working collaboratively to brainstorm and analyse solutions promotes critical thinking and creativity, ensuring that the chosen solution maximises the use of resources and improves patient outcomes .
In unavoidable circumstances where decisions have to be made rapidly and with limited information, using intuition, a nurse's experience, and insights combined with analytical thinking can be beneficial. This is where the balanced blend of clinical expertise and effective risk-taking come into play.
Decision making is never static in nursing management. The cyclic nature of the decision-making process, where outcomes of decisions are continually assessed and feedback is used to improve future decision making, showcases its dynamic and iterative nature. This reinforces the vital role decision making plays in the problem-solving process.
By exploring various examples and case studies, you gain a practical view of problem-solving in nursing management. These insights can better equip you to tackle real-life challenges in a healthcare setting.
Case studies provide a thorough view of how problem-solving strategies are applied in various nursing management scenarios. Analysing such cases exposes you to diverse methods and solutions and encourages you to think critically and innovatively.
Case Study Analysis: A detailed examination of a particular instance or event to draw conclusions, develop solutions, or learn from the situation.
Let's investigate a case concerning patient waiting times. In a healthcare facility, it is observed that patients often have to wait for prolonged periods to receive care, leading to dissatisfaction and affecting the overall quality of service. The problem-solving steps might look like this:
Case study analysis provides a rich source of knowledge and transferable insights that can be helpful in similar or entirely different scenarios. Drawing parallels from varying contexts and understanding how solutions are adapted to unique situations helps bolster your problem-solving skills and adaptability in nursing management.
Different nursing scenarios call for diverse problem-solving strategies. Understanding the varying approaches, from algorithm-based to intuition-driven, equips you to manage multidimensional and intricate issues effectively.
Algorithm-based Approach: This involves following a clearly defined set of rules or procedures to solve a problem. It can be applicable in situations with defined parameters and scope, such as diagnosing a health condition based on a specific set of symptoms.
Intuition-driven Approach: This combines a nurse's experience, knowledge, and instinct to solve a problem. It applies to ambiguous scenarios where conventional rules may not be applicable, such as managing a patient's fear or anxiety.
Problem-solving in nursing management is all about adapting to the environment and the situation. The right approach may vary, calling for flexibility, creativity, critical thinking, and a deep understanding of the issue for successful resolution.
The real world of nursing is complex and dynamic, and various problem-solving strategies can apply on any given day. To navigate smoothly, you need to understand how the various approaches can be adapted to specific situations.
Consider solving a recurrent communication issue within your nursing team. The algorithmic approach might involve establishing clear communication protocols or using digital tools to streamline interaction. However, the intuition-driven approach might involve informal team-building meetings to foster better personal connections. In this situation, the best solution might be a blend of the two approaches to ensure both procedural clarity and improved team relationships.
The key takeaway here is that there is no "one-size-fits-all" solution in nursing management. Problem-solving requires flexibility, openness, and the ability to judge which strategy will perform best in a particular scenario.
Problem-solving strategies in nursing management form the backbone of effective healthcare services. By ensuring that nursing personnel can tackle issues with aplomb and proficiency, these strategies contribute significantly to patient satisfaction and positive outcomes.
The first step towards demystifying problem-solving processes in nursing management is the development of strategic problem-solving competencies. The journey from novice to expert involves honing these skills and integrating them into your practical work.
Strategic Problem-Solving Competencies: These are a set of core skills that facilitate effective problem-solving in nursing management, including critical thinking, innovative thinking, collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and decision-making.
Acquiring these skills involves both academic learning and practical experiences. Gaining theoretical knowledge lays the foundation, while integrating this knowledge within a clinical context enriches and refines these competencies.
The role of leadership in implementing problem-solving strategies must not be understated. Effective leadership not only guides teams through problem-solving processes but also fosters a supportive environment where team members feel safe to contribute ideas and question assumptions.
Leadership in Nursing: This involves guiding, motivating, and supporting nursing staff to deliver quality healthcare services. Also, it encompasses enhancing team cooperation, improving communication, and fostering a culture of continuous learning.
Leadership employs a variety of approaches in implementing problem-solving strategies. Different leadership styles can be applied based on the nature of the problem and the team dynamics. Transformational leadership, for instance, inspires others to exceed their personal goals and work for a collective purpose. On the other hand, participative leadership encourages open discussions and collective decision-making, promoting a more inclusive and democratic problem-solving process.
Leadership is also instrumental in creating an environment that encourages the sharing of problems openly, without fear of judgment, hence facilitating early identification and efficient resolution of issues. By also ensuring that learning opportunities are provided to enhance team problem-solving capabilities, leadership positively influences problem-solving outcomes.
Effective resource utilization is a critical component of successful problem-solving strategies in nursing management. The term 'resources' in this context includes human resources such as nursing staff and doctors, as well as material resources like medical supplies, equipment, and facilities.
Resource Utilisation: This refers to the efficient and effective use of available resources to achieve desired outcomes. In nursing, it involves ensuring that staff, equipment, and supplies are optimally used to deliver quality healthcare services and solve arising problems.
Problem-solving often necessitates the optimal use of available resources. For example, if there is an issue of high patient-to-nurse ratio, one of the possible solutions could be redistributing nursing staff according to workload and patient needs, or hiring additional staff if finances permit.
Every solution should be weighed based on its resource implications. The best solution is often the one that optimally utilises available resources to provide the maximum benefit. For example, while hiring additional staff might solve the problem, it might not be the best solution if the budget is very limited. In such a case, reallocation of existing staff may be a more practical solution.
Similarly, if there is a shortage of a particular supply, then alternatives may need to be sought, or rationing implemented. A critical analysis of such situations is necessary to ensure that the solutions proposed and implemented do not create other problems related to resource allocation and use.
It's also important to remember to continuously evaluate the impact of your solutions on resource utilisation. This will not only help you ensure sustainable use of resources but also contribute to continuous improvement in problem-solving strategies.
Understanding the stages of problem-solving in nursing practice is fundamental to addressing various challenges that arise in the healthcare sector. These problem-solving stages enable you to identify issues, create and implement solutions, and review the outcomes for improvement purposes.
The initial phase of problem-solving in nursing management involves the assessment and identification of the issue at hand. This stage is critical as the correct identification of the problem lays the foundation for effective solution design and implementation.
Initial Assessment: This is the preliminary evaluation of the situation, leading to the recognition of existing problems. This stage involves observation, questioning, and data gathering to understand the issue better.
This initial step requires keen observation skills and critical thinking. While observation helps in gathering relevant details, critical thinking enables you to scrutinize this information and identify potential problems. You could also use feedback from your team and other relevant stakeholders to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
For instance, suppose you discover unusually high levels of patient discomfort during specific hours. The initial assessment might involve examining patient records during these hours, observing nursing practices in these time frames, and seeking feedback from both patients and nursing staff. This comprehensive approach could potentially reveal the issue, like a shortage of staff during peak hours, leading to delayed or inefficient care.
Once the problem is identified, the next phase is generating actionable solutions. The validity and effectiveness of these solutions significantly influence the problem-solving process's success, thus necessitating careful deliberation and thorough evaluation.
Actionable Solution: A practical, feasible strategy that can be implemented to resolve the problem. It's typically developed through brainstorming, analysis, and evaluation of various alternatives.
The process of formulating actionable solutions involves brainstorming potential remedies, evaluating these against a set criteria, and choosing the most viable option. Ideally, this should be a collaborative effort involving all relevant stakeholders. Collaborative problem-solving encourages diversity in ideas and promotes inclusivity.
Careful Analysis | Evaluation Against Set Criteria | Choosing Viable Option |
Gather as many potential solutions as possible through brainstorming sessions | Evaluate potential solutions based on criteria such as feasibility, efficiency, and impact | The most suitable solution is chosen after careful evaluation |
Innovation is a key driver in formulating actionable solutions. Traditional problem-solving methods might fail in the face of complex or unique problems, necessitating innovative ideas. Remember, the most effective solutions often result from 'thinking outside the box'.
The final stage of problem-solving is evaluation and reflection. After implementing the chosen solution, it is essential to assess its effectiveness in solving the identified problem. This stage offers an opportunity to learn from the implemented action and make necessary adjustments for future improvement.
Evaluation and Reflection: This stage involves reviewing the implemented solution to assess its effectiveness. Reflection involves learning from the process and experiences to ensure continuous improvement.
To achieve meaningful evaluation and reflection, a systematic approach must be adopted. Begin with the assessment of the effect of the solution on the original problem. Have the waiting times reduced following the staff adjustments? Is there an improved level of patient comfort? These are the kind of questions you need to address.
Following the evaluation, it's crucial to reflect on the entire process. Consider what worked well and what didn't. Reflecting on these experiences offers valuable insights that can be used to improve future problem-solving processes.
Take the earlier example of high levels of patient discomfort due to staff shortage during peak hours. Suppose, after implementing the solution of adjusting staff schedules, you find that there's a significant improvement in patient comfort levels. This shows that your solution worked. However, during reflection, you realise that the process took more time than necessary due to delayed decision-making. For future improvement, you could consider setting specific timelines for each stage of the problem-solving process.
In conclusion, problem-solving is a cyclical process. It doesn't end with implementing a solution; instead, it opens doors for continuous learning and improvement. Adapting to this cycle is key to honing your problem-solving proficiency in nursing management.
Problem solving in nursing management is underpinned by the practice of critical thinking. An understanding of the delicate interplay between these two capabilities is central to the enhancement of nursing management and the ultimate delivery of efficient patient care.
There is a strong relationship between critical thinking and problem solving in nursing, evidenced by the significant role each plays in the healthcare sector. Critical thinking provides the foundation upon which problem-solving strategies are built.
Critical Thinking: This is the disciplined process of analysing, interpreting, evaluating, and drawing conclusions from varying levels of data, information or experiences. It involves a deeper level of thinking to understand, evaluate and resolve complex issues or situations.
The process of problem-solving often begins with an evaluation of the situation, gathering data, appraising the data, and coming with strategic solutions. By applying critical thinking, you can get a clear understanding of the problem, which helps devise more effective solutions.
For example, in implementing new protocols in a nursing unit, critical thinking may involve evaluating the necessity of the change, the potential effect on the nursing staff’s workflow, and patient care. The ability to think critically facilitates well-informed decisions, thereby enhancing the problem-solving process.
Beyond problem identification and solution generation, critical thinking is also instrumental in the review phase of the problem-solving process. It allows you to reflect on the effectiveness of implemented solutions, the overall process, and areas that could be improved. Therefore, the integration of critical thinking not only enriches problem-solving but also contributes to continuous learning and improvement in nursing management.
Enhancing critical thinking skills in the nursing workforce enriches problem-solving efforts and ultimately results in improved patient outcomes and service delivery. This strengthening could be achieved through several strategies.
Enhancing Critical Thinking: The process of improving critical thinking skills to enhance one's ability to evaluate complex situations effectively and make informed decisions.
Firstly, continuous learning and professional development activities such as workshops, seminars, and online courses can provide essential tools for sharpening critical thinking skills.
Secondly, fostering a culture of open communication and collaborative problem-solving offers great benefits. These platforms facilitate the sharing of diverse perspectives, promoting deep analyses, and enriching the problem-solving process.
Lastly, reflective practice can also positively impact critical thinking abilities. Regular reflection on your practice, experiences, and learnings enables you to identify gaps in your thinking and areas of improvement. It encourages a deeper level of thinking that enriches the problem-solving process.
The application of critical thinking skills often results in improved problem-solving outcomes in nursing management. Several instances illustrate this relationship.
For instance, consider a situation where a nursing unit has seen a significant increase in medication errors. The nursing manager applies critical thinking to evaluate the situation, identify potential causes, and devise solutions. Through an in-depth review of pharmaceutical administration procedures, team collaboration, discussion, and data evaluation, the nursing manager identifies the root cause - an overly complicated method of logging medication.
Armed with this information, they innovate a simpler, more effective system. By cutting down on needless complexity, the nursing unit sees a drastic decrease in medication errors. This example shows how the application of critical thinking streamlined a complex process, providing an effective solution to the problem at hand.
Another instance could be changing patient demographics, with more elderly patients requiring care. A nursing manager applies critical thinking to understand the unique needs of these patients and the potential challenges that might arise in catering to these needs. As a result, they develop tailored care plans and training programmes for the nursing staff to better care for elderly patients, resulting in improved patient satisfaction.
These examples highlight how critical thinking can lead to effective problem solving in nursing management, ultimately resulting in better service delivery and patient care. Therefore, enhancing critical thinking should be seen as a vital strategy for improving problem-solving proficiency in nursing management.
The algorithm-based approach involves following a clear set of rules or procedures to solve a problem, often with defined parameters. The intuition-driven approach combines a nurse's experience, knowledge, and instinct to solve a problem, especially in ambiguous scenarios.
The first stage of problem solving in nursing practice is initial assessment and identification, which involves the evaluation of the situation to recognise existing problems. This stage requires observation, questioning, and data gathering.
Problem solving is a broader process involving the identification of an issue, systematic analysis to understand it, devising potential solutions, choosing the most suitable through decision making, implementing it, and finally reviewing the effectiveness of the implemented solution. Decision making, on the other hand, is a component nested within this process.
Critical thinking provides the foundation for problem-solving strategies in nursing. It involves the disciplined process of analysing, evaluating, and interpreting data, which allows for a clear understanding of the problem and thus the generation of effective solutions. Critical thinking also enriches the problem-solving process by facilitating review and continuous improvement.
The final stage of problem solving in nursing practice is evaluation and reflection, where the effectiveness of the implemented solution is assessed, and learnings are drawn from the process for future improvement.
Problem-solving in nursing management is crucial in maintaining optimal patient care, operational efficiency, and fostering team collaboration by resolving intricate issues with decisive and effective solutions.
We have 14,000 flashcards about Dynamic Landscapes.
Already have an account? Log in
Test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards.
Keep learning, you are doing great.
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Team Nursing Teachers
Create a free account to save this explanation..
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
By signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
COMMENTS
Learn what problem-solving in nursing is, why it is important, and how to improve your skills. This article explains the nursing process and provides examples of problem-solving scenarios in nursing.
They want to see your problem-solving style and get a sense of how you react and respond to the specific challenges nurses tend to face. Asking behavioral and situational questions is a great way for your interviewer to assess your response. STAR: The #1 Strategy for Answering Scenario-Based Nursing Interview Questions
Learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is essential for effective patient care. Find 18 tips to improve critical thinking skills and sample scenarios to apply them.
This web page provides 30 common nursing interview questions and answers based on behavioral-based themes. It does not include any problem solving scenarios or questions related to nursing problem solving skills.
Learning to provide safe and quality health care requires technical expertise, the ability to think critically, experience, and clinical judgment. The high-performance expectation of nurses is dependent upon the nurses' continual learning, professional accountability, independent and interdependent decisionmaking, and creative problem-solving abilities.
Learn why critical thinking is essential for nurses and how to improve it with case-based learning, self-reflection, questioning, self-awareness, and a process. Find out how nurses use critical thinking to make decisions, solve problems, and provide excellent care.
Learn how to identify, solve, and reflect on nursing problems using critical-thinking skills. Find out the elements, importance, and ways to improve your critical thinking in nursing practice.
Learn how to apply critical thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving skills in nursing practice. This course covers brainstorming, mapping, prioritizing, multivoting, and 7 steps to problem-solving with examples and exercises.
Key Nursing Critical Thinking Skills. Some of the most important critical thinking skills nurses use daily include interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. Interpretation: Understanding the meaning of information or events. Analysis: Investigating a course of action based on objective and subjective data.
Learn how to develop strong critical thinking skills for nursing practice with 24 strategies and examples. Explore techniques such as reflective journaling, concept mapping, Socratic questioning, clinical simulations, and more.
Learn how to use the nursing process and critical thinking skills to solve problems in health care. Find examples, tips, and exercises to develop problem-solving strategies for nurses and nurse managers.
Critical thinking is applied by nurses in the process of solving problems of patients and decision-making process with creativity to enhance the effect. It is an essential process for a safe, efficient and skillful nursing intervention. Critical thinking according to Scriven and Paul is the mental active process and subtle perception, analysis ...
Learn how to answer critical thinking nursing interview questions and showcase your skills for nursing school admission. Find out what types of questions to expect, why they are asked, and how to prepare with sample answers.
Modified Wabisabi Learning's 12 Solid Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking Skills, and its Application to Nursing Education, Training and Practice: 1. Practice on Eloquence in Question and Answer (Solution Fluency) Mastery requires ample amount of practice to become highly skilled in critical thinking.
Nurse leaders perceive their role as a problem-solver, which is a necessary step in advocacy. 27 Problem-solving is a process that contains the elements of decision-making and critical thinking. 28. The theory that emerged from the core categories explicitly focused on the central phenomenon of LHV in the nursing work environment.
Step 2: Analyze the Problem. Break down the problem to get an understanding of the problem. Determine how the problem developed. Determine the impact of the problem. Step 3: Develop Solutions. Brainstorm and list all possible solutions that focus on resolving the identified problem. Do not eliminate any possible solutions at this stage.
17. Situational Questions. 18. Teamwork Questions. 19. Tough Questions. Situational questions are asked so the interviewer can gain insight into your thought process, how you problem-solve, and how you communicate in the workplace. Situational nursing questions can include inquiries about drug dosages, procedures, or specific signs and symptoms ...
6 Steps to Replace Clinical Using Case Studies. 1. Watch the intro video as a group. Gather the entire class together and view the intro video. This video lays out the scenario for the given case study and helps them begin to consider the disease process. 2.
To respond to patients' increasing demands and strengthen nursing professionals' capabilities, nursing students are expected to develop problem-solving skills before they enter the workforce. Problem-based learning (PBL) is expected to provide effective simulation scenarios and realistic clinical conditions to help students achieve those ...
Critical thinking can seem like such an abstract term that you don't practically use.However, this could not be farther from the truth. Critical thinking is frequently used in nursing. Let me give you a few examples from my career in which critical thinking helped me take better care of my patient.
A problem-based learning scenario and Kirkpatrick's model for evaluation were used to address incivility and the "reality shock" between what students learn about the practice of nursing and the interactions they may experience in the workplace. ... Solving real nursing problems through problem-based learning.
Dive deep into the multifaceted world of nursing management with a special focus on problem-solving. This comprehensive guide presents a detailed look at the process, importance, and challenges of problem-solving in nursing management. By highlighting essential skills, neurologically based frameworks, and the relationship with decision-making, it offers both theoretical understanding and ...