Joanna Briggs
- Best practice information sheets
- Evidence summaries
- Recommended practices
- Systematic review protocols
- Systematic reviews
- << Previous: Internet materials
- Next: Journal articles >>
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Affiliations.
- 1 Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 2 School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 3 The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 4 Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- 5 Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Management, Policy, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- 6 Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence Kingston, ON, Canada.
- 7 JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- 8 School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
- 9 The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence Aberdeen, Scotland.
- 10 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, GT, South Africa.
- 11 The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group Johannesburg, GT, South Africa.
- 12 School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
- 13 School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
- 14 The Queensland Centre of Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- PMID: 33038124
- DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).
Introduction: Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to informing decision-making and research based on the identification and examination of the literature on a given topic or issue. Scoping reviews draw on evidence from any research methodology and may also include evidence from non-research sources, such as policy. In this manner, scoping reviews provide a comprehensive overview to address broader review questions than traditionally more specific systematic reviews of effectiveness or qualitative evidence. The increasing popularity of scoping reviews has been accompanied by the development of a reporting guideline: the PRISMA-ScR. In 2014, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group developed guidance for scoping reviews that received minor updates in 2017 and was most recently updated in 2020. The updates reflect ongoing and substantial developments in approaches to scoping review conduct and reporting. As such, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group recognized the need to revise the guidance to align with the current state of knowledge and reporting standards in evidence synthesis.
Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group expanded its membership; extensively reviewed the literature; engaged via annual face-to-face meetings, regular teleconferences, and email correspondence; sought advice from methodological experts; facilitated workshops; and presented at scientific conferences. This process led to updated guidance for scoping reviews published in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The updated chapter was endorsed by JBI's International Scientific Committee in 2020.
Results: The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research. Furthermore, it is aligned with the PRISMA-ScR to ensure consistent reporting.
Conclusions: The latest JBI guidance for scoping reviews provides up-to-date guidance that can be used by authors when conducting a scoping review. Furthermore, it aligns with the PRISMA-ScR, which can be used to report the conduct of a scoping review. A series of ongoing and future methodological projects identified by the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group to further refine the methodology are planned.
Publication types
- Systematic Review
- Publications*
- Research Design*
- Surveys and Questionnaires
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This version of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis includes changes that correspond to the latest methodological developments determined by JBI Methodology Groups and approved by the JBI Scientific Committee, the latest developments in the JBI SUMARI software and feedback from end users. Please contact [email protected] for ...
The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is designed to provide authors with a comprehensive guide to conducting JBI systematic reviews. It describes in detail the process of planning, undertaking and writing up a systematic review using JBI methods. ... How to cite. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020 ...
How to cite. Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available from ...
The first three editions of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis were published in book format; subsequent editions have been published online since 2017. This manual is presented in an online wiki format to facilitate rapid inclusion of developments and updates to the JBI methodologies and methods for evidence synthesis that are presented. A ...
JBI Evidence Synthesis uses the Vancouver citation style.Authors should format references in accordance with the guidance listed below, and in all other cases follow the standards outlined in the National Library of Medicine's Citing Medicine .We recommend the use of a tool such as EndNote or Reference Manager for reference management and formatting.
stay connected ... ...
The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is designed to provide authors with a comprehensive guide to conducting JBI systematic reviews. It describes in detail the process of planning, undertaking and writing up a systematic review using JBI methods. ... How to cite. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.
JBI Evidence Synthesis is an international peer-reviewed, online journal that publishes manuscripts encompassing evidence synthesis and healthcare. JBI Evidence Synthesis seeks to disseminate rigorous, high-quality research that provides the best available evidence to inform policy and practice through the science and conduct of systematic and scoping reviews.
JBI's Evidence Synthesis Critical Appraisal Tools Assist in Assessing the ... How to cite. COPY. Associated publication(s) Case ... Diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Associated publication(s) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Chapter 9: Diagnostic ...
The scoping reviews chapter in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis provides a comprehensive framework for conducting a scoping review, and covers: why you should conduct a scoping review; how to develop a scoping review protocol; search strategies, data extraction and how to present the results ...
From January 2020 (Volume 18 Issue 1), the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports has changed its name to JBI Evidence Synthesis. The journal may also appear as JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, or JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports. Use the name that appears on the article you are citing.
The core of evidence synthesis is the systematic review of literature of a particular intervention, condition. or issue. The systematic review is essentially an analysis of the available literature (that is, evidence) and a. judgment of the effectiveness or otherwise of a practice, involving a series of complex steps. JBI takes a.
The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Individual journal requirements; ... It is appropriate to cite it if you refer to it in your work. Below is an example of an acceptable citation in APA 7th format: Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). ...
This process led to updated guidance for scoping reviews published in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The updated chapter was endorsed by JBI's International Scientific Committee in 2020. Results: The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is ...
JBI Evidence Synthesis accepts manuscript submissions through a submission service on another website.. JBI Evidence Synthesis has specific instructions and guidelines for submitting articles. Those instructions and guidelines can be found on this page. Please read and review them carefully.Articles that are not submitted in accordance with our instructions and guidelines are more likely to be ...
State and appropriately cite the JBI methodology that was employed in the conduct of the review and synthesis. Refer to and cite the a priori protocol that was either publicly available, published, or accepted for publication/'in press' (e.g. in JBI Evidence Synthesis) and/or if the protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, provide ...
The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual^ provides guidance to ... How to Cite the Online Manual ... 1.2 JBI scoping reviews The synthesis of evidence in the form of the systematic review is ...
Chapter 1 of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis introduces the concept and types of JBI systematic reviews, which are rigorous and transparent methods to synthesize evidence from various sources. It also explains the roles and responsibilities of review authors, editors and peer reviewers in the JBI review process.
How to cite. Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors).JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658 ...
The first three editions of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis were published in book format, since 2017 subsequent editions have been published online. This Manual is presented in an online wiki format to facilitate rapid inclusion of developments and updates to JBI methodologies and methods for evidence synthesis. A PDF version of the JBI ...
How to cite: Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 1: JBI Systematic Reviews. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.
<p>Health care workers face the possibility of encountering occupational violence from patients, visitors, and others. This may include physically or verbally aggressive behavior ranging from threats to assault. The emotional and physical trauma resulting from these incidents negatively affects both individuals and organizations. Many health care institutions are implementing educational ...
The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is designed to provide authors with a comprehensive guide to conducting JBI systematic reviews. It describes in detail the process of planning, undertaking and writing up a systematic review using JBI methods. The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis should be used in conjunction with the support and tutorials ...
JBI Methodology Groups are continuously working to improve, update and further the science of JBI Evidence Syntheses. JBI Methodology chapters are updated when there have been significant changes to a methodology, as determined by the JBI Scientific Committee.