• Mechanical Engineering
  • NOC:Engineering Mechanics (Video) 
  • Co-ordinated by : IIT Madras
  • Available from : 2019-07-25
  • Intro Video
  • Introduction to Engineering Mechanics I
  • Introduction to Engineering Mechanics II
  • Force Systems I
  • Force Systems II
  • Equilibrium of Rigid bodies I
  • Equilibrium of Rigid bodies II
  • Trusses III
  • Virtual Work I
  • Virtual Work II
  • Energy Relations
  • Review Before Quiz I
  • Friction II
  • Friction III
  • Particle Dynamics
  • Circular Motion
  • Absolute Motion
  • Relative Motion I
  • Relative Motion II
  • Relative Motion III and Instantaneous Center
  • Rotating frame of reference I- Velocity
  • Rotating frame of reference II- Acceleration
  • Rotating frame of reference III- Choice of rotating frame of reference
  • RFR- IV Crank and slotted bar
  • RFR-V Understanding Coriolis Acceleration
  • Kinetics II
  • Kinetics III
  • 3D Kinematics I
  • 3D Kinematics II
  • 3D Kinematics III
  • Watch on YouTube
  • Assignments
  • Download Videos
  • Transcripts

Video Transcript:

Browse Course Material

Course info, instructors.

  • Prof. Carol Livermore
  • Prof. Henrik Schmidt
  • Prof. James H. Williams
  • Prof. Simona Socrate

Departments

  • Mechanical Engineering

As Taught In

  • Materials Science and Engineering
  • Solid Mechanics

Learning Resource Types

Mechanics & materials i, assignments.

Problem Set 1 ( PDF )

Problem Set 2 ( PDF )

Problem Set 3 ( PDF )

Problem Set 4 ( PDF )

Problem Set 5 ( PDF )

Problem Set 6 ( PDF )

Problem Set 7 ( PDF )

Problem Set 8 ( PDF )

Problem Set 9 ( PDF )

Problem Set 10 ( PDF )

Problem Set 11 ( PDF )

facebook

You are leaving MIT OpenCourseWare

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Welcome to the Purdue Online Writing Lab

OWL logo

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Online Writing Lab at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects. Teachers and trainers may use this material for in-class and out-of-class instruction.

The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives. The Purdue OWL offers global support through online reference materials and services.

A Message From the Assistant Director of Content Development 

The Purdue OWL® is committed to supporting  students, instructors, and writers by offering a wide range of resources that are developed and revised with them in mind. To do this, the OWL team is always exploring possibilties for a better design, allowing accessibility and user experience to guide our process. As the OWL undergoes some changes, we welcome your feedback and suggestions by email at any time.

Please don't hesitate to contact us via our contact page  if you have any questions or comments.

All the best,

Social Media

Facebook twitter.

A New Prediction Model for Cutting Depth of Hard Rock Using High-Pressure Water Jets

  • Original Paper
  • Published: 05 May 2024

Cite this article

engineering mechanics assignment 1

  • Fuwei Liu 1 ,
  • Yansen Wang 1 , 2 ,
  • Xin Huang 1 ,
  • Guoxuan Song 1 &
  • Yuning Wang 1  

52 Accesses

Explore all metrics

High-pressure pure water jet has been widely used in breaking soft rocks and medium–hard rocks, but its research on cutting hard rocks is very limited. The cutting depth, as the most important index for evaluating the effectiveness of rock breaking by water jet, is difficult to be predicted accurately because of numerous influencing factors. This article aims to establish a concise and universal prediction model for the cutting depth of hard rock, including all variables that affect the cutting depth. Firstly, four types of granite and sandstone, which are difficult to break in engineering, are selected to investigate their cutting depth under the action of high-pressure continuous water jets. The rock physico-mechanical parameter that has the highest correlation with the cutting depth is found to be the shear modulus through tests. In order to reasonably evaluate the energy utilization rate of cutting depth of rock by water jet, the concept of cutting depth energy index (CDEI) is proposed. The jet pressure corresponding to the maximum value of CDEI is approximately 40–60% of the rock compressive strength. The idea of “moderate nozzle diameter, high traverse speed, multiple cuts” is put forward for cutting hard rock more efficiently using high-pressure water jet. Then, a new prediction model of cutting depth for high-pressure water jet cutting hard rock is established using similarity theory and dimensional analysis method, and the accuracy and reliability of the model are verified through experimental testing. The results of the study can help to improve the breakage efficiency of hard rock, and at the same time, provide a theoretical basis for the rational selection of high-pressure water jet parameters.

The concept of cutting depth energy index (CDEI) of rock subjected to water jet is proposed.

The most effective cutting technology method for cutting hard rock by water jet is proposed taking into account the cutting effect and specific energy consumption.

A new prediction model of cutting depth for high-pressure water jet cutting hard rock was established using similarity theory and dimensional analysis method

The primary variables affecting the cutting depth of hard rock are the jet pressure and the shear modulus of the rock

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

engineering mechanics assignment 1

Similar content being viewed by others

engineering mechanics assignment 1

Cutting efficiency of extremely hard granite by high-pressure water jet and prediction model of cutting depth based on energy method

engineering mechanics assignment 1

Experimental Study on the Performance and Mechanism of High-Pressure Abrasive Waterjet Cutting Hard Rock

Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet.

Averin E (2017) Universal method for the prediction of abrasive waterjet performance in mining. Engineering-Prc 3:888–891

CAS   Google Scholar  

Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2011) An investigation on surface roughness of granite machined by abrasive waterjet. Bull Mater Sci 34:985–992

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K (2013) Prediction of the cut depth of granitic rocks machined by abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1223–1235

Article   Google Scholar  

Berberan-Santos MN, Pogliani L (1999) Two alternative derivations of Bridgman’s theorem. J Math Chem 26:255–261

Buckingham E (1914) On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations. Phys Rev 4:345–376

Cheng JL, Wang YX, Wang LG, Li YH, Hu B, Jiang, Z.H., 2021. Penetration behaviour of TBM disc cutter assisted by vertical precutting free surfaces at various depths and confining pressures. Arch Civil Mech Eng 21

Crow SC (1973) A theory of hydraulic rock cutting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts 10:567–584

de Martins RA (1981) The origin of dimensional analysis. J Franklin Inst 311:331–337

Dehkhoda S, Bourne NK (2014) Production of a high-velocity water slug using an impacting technique. Rev Sci Instrum 85

Dehkhoda S, Hood M (2014) The internal failure of rock samples subjected to pulsed water jet impacts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 66:91–96

Enever JR, Tooley SM (1985) Laboratory assessment of the hydraulic cuttability of an Australian black coal. Aust Inst Min Metall Bull Proc 290

Engin IC (2012) A correlation for predicting the abrasive water jet cutting depth for natural stones. S Afr J Sci 108:1–11

Ge Z, Shangguan J, Zhou Z, Li Z, Liu L, Chen C, Shao C (2023) Investigation of fracture damage and breaking energy consumption of hard rock repeatedly cut by abrasive water jet. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56:3215–3230

Gryc R, Hlavac LM, Mikolas M, Sancer J, Danek T (2014) Correlation of pure and abrasive water jet cutting of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:149–152

Hagan P (1992) The cuttability of rock using a high pressure water jet, Western Australia conference on mining geomechanics. Proceedings of the Western Australian conference on mining geomechanics, pp. 8–10

Hashish M (1984) A modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive waterjets. J Eng Mater Technol 106:88–100

Hashish M, duPlessis MP (1978) Theoretical and experimental investigation of continuous jet penetration of solids. J Manuf Sci Eng 1:88–94

Google Scholar  

Jiang T, Huang Z, Li J, Li H (2021) Effect of parameters on threshold pressure of sandstone tested by water jet. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 139

Jiang YL, Zeng JJ, Xu CJ, Xiong FY, Pan YC, Chen XS, Lei ZX (2022) Experimental study on TBM cutter penetration damage process of highly abrasive hard rock pre-cut by high-pressure water jet. B Eng Geol Environ 81

Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K (2012) An experimental study on the depth of cut of granite in abrasive waterjet cutting. Mater Manuf Processes 27:538–544

Kim JG, Song JJ (2015) Abrasive water jet cutting methods for reducing blast-induced ground vibration in tunnel excavation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:147–158

Li D (2016) A new technology for the drilling of long boreholes for gas drainage in a soft coal seam. J Pet Sci Eng 137:107–112

Li BA, Zhang B, Hu MM, Liu B, Cao WZ, Xu B (2022a) Full-scale linear cutting tests to study the influence of pre-groove depth on rock-cutting performance by TBM disc cutter. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 122:104366

Li HS, Liu SY, Zhou FY, Jiang HX, Wang FC, Guo CW (2022b) Experimental investigation on concrete rock breaking performance of self-excited oscillation pulsed waterjet. Eng Fracture Mech 268:108502

Liu X, Liu S, Ji H (2015) Numerical research on rock breaking performance of water jet based on SPH. Powder Technol 286:181–192

Liu S, Zhou F, Li H, Chen Y, Wang F, Guo C (2020) Experimental investigation of hard rock breaking using a conical pick assisted by abrasive water jet. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:4221–4230

Liu F, Wang Y, Song G (2023) Damage evolution law and failure mechanism of rock impacted by high-pressure water jet under in-situ stress condition. Sci Prog 106

Llanto JM, Tolouei-Rad M, Vafadar A, Aamir M (2021) Recent progress trend on abrasive waterjet cutting of metallic materials: a review. Appl Sci-Basel 11:3344

Lu Y, Tang J, Ge Z, Xia B, Liu Y (2013) Hard rock drilling technique with abrasive water jet assistance. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:47–56

Lu Y, Huang F, Liu X, Ao X (2015) On the failure pattern of sandstone impacted by high-velocity water jet. Int J Impact Eng 76:67–74

Mendoza C (1994) A theorem for Rayleigh’s method of dimensional analysis and its proof. Mech Res Commun 21:103–107

Mostofa MG, Kil KY, Hwan AJ (2010) Computational fluid analysis of abrasive waterjet cutting head. J Mech Sci Technol 24:249–252

Oh TM, Cho GC (2016) Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1059–1072

Polyakov A, Zhabin A, Averin E, Polyakov A (2019) Generalized equation for calculating rock cutting efficiency by pulsed water jets. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11:867–873

Powell JH, Simpson SP (1969) Theoretical study of the mechanical effects of water jets impinging on a semi-infinite elastic solid. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts 6(4):353–364

Rehbinder G (1977) Slot cutting in rock with a high speed water jet. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts 14:229–234

Rehbinder G (1978) Measurement of the average pore velocity of water flowing through a rock specimen. Rock Mech 11:19–28

Rehbinder G (1980) A theory about cutting rock with a water jet. Rock Mech 12:247–257

Sedov LI, Friedman M, Holt M, Cole JD (1982) Similarity and dimensional methods in mechanics. J Appl Mech 28:159

Srivastava M, Hloch S, Tripathi R, Kozak D, Chattopadhyaya S, Dixit AR, Foldyna J, Hvizdos P, Fides M, Adamcik P (2018) Ultrasonically generated pulsed water jet peening of austenitic stainless-steel surfaces. J Manuf Process 32:455–468

Stoxreiter T, Martin A, Teza D, Galler R (2018) Hard rock cutting with high pressure jets in various ambient pressure regimes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 108:179–188

Tripathi R, Hloch S, Chattopadhyaya S, Klichova D, Scucka J, Das AK (2020) Application of the pulsating and continous water jet for granite erosion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 126

Wang J (2009) A new model for predicting the depth of cut in abrasive waterjet contouring of alumina ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 209:2314–2320

Wang G, Qiao SF, Wang G, Jiang H, Singh J (2022) Cutting depth of pile materials subjected to the abrasive waterjet and its prediction model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 124:104473

Xu H, Gong Q, Zhou X, Yang F, Han B (2023) Influence of the assisted kerf depth on cracks pattern and cutting performance of TBM cutter. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 170

Yang Z, Dou L, Liu C, Xu M, Lei Z, Yao Y (2016) Application of high-pressure water jet technology and the theory of rock burst control in roadway. Int J Min Sci Technol 26:929–935

Zhang JL, Yang FW, Cao ZG, Xia YM, Li YC (2022) In situ experimental study on TBM excavation with high-pressure water-jet-assisted rock breaking. J Central South Univ 29:4066–4077

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant no. 2022YFC3005902), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no.2021GJZPY15), the Graduate Innovation Program of China University of Mining and Technology (Grant no.2023WLKXJ189), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. KYCX23_2748).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

Fuwei Liu, Yansen Wang, Xin Huang, Guoxuan Song & Yuning Wang

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

Yansen Wang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yansen Wang .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Liu, F., Wang, Y., Huang, X. et al. A New Prediction Model for Cutting Depth of Hard Rock Using High-Pressure Water Jets. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03919-1

Download citation

Received : 13 September 2023

Accepted : 03 February 2024

Published : 05 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03919-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • High-pressure water jet
  • Cutting depth
  • Prediction model
  • Dimensional analysis
  • Cutting depth energy index
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

engineering mechanics assignment 1

ST Engineering mechanics need wage increase | Guestview

V olkswagen auto workers voted for union representation at a Chattanooga plant recently with 2,628 workers voting for union representation, or 73 percent, and 985 against. This is the first foreign-owned auto plant in the South form a union, and it is a great win for working women and men in America.

Volkswagen can afford to pay fair wages, provide competitive benefits and honor union-worker protections after making $75 billion in profits the past three years.

What about the airplane mechanics at Singapore-owned ST Engineering in Pensacola?

I understand reluctance to embrace unions, as I have spent an aviation career having union dues routinely deducted from my paycheck. A wise man once said: “everybody hates unions, until they need one.”

The average annual salary for aircraft mechanics is $76,260, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Florida has the second highest employment rate for aircraft mechanics in the country, where the average annual salary is $70,290.

Even though the city, county and state have handed out tens of millions in economic incentives to ST Engineering, we learned the median pay for employees was $47,109.40 – 40% below the national average – as ST Engineering sought more public funding for an expansion project that approved by the Pensacola City Council.

In case you missed it: PSC, Triumph could invest $12.3M into filling 'huge void' in aerospace workers

Aircraft mechanics are undercompensated in Pensacola. ST Engineering needs to increase wages to align with the importance of the work performed, job requirements and increased cost of living here. This is a highly skilled trade. Home prices in Tennessee, Florida and Alabama have increased significantly, and young people can barely afford to live as housing affordability dramatically impacts the middle class. The South is no longer an inexpensive place to live.

Volkswagen thanked workers for voting in the election. In Germany, corporations collaborate with unions and often include union representatives on corporate boards to assist with strategic corporate decisions.

Will a Singapore corporation take the same collaborative position? Better yet, will ST Engineering consider competitive wages and improved work rules for Pensacola-based employees?

This is a breakthrough moment for workers in the South.

Not surprisingly, there has been hostility from some elected officials. A few Southern governors signed a joint statement the week of the organizing vote, ironically, using scare tactics to oppose “misinformation and scare tactics (unions) brought into our states.”

It is no surprise to see this sort of labor hostility, which serves as a reminder of a long hostility toward basic worker rights in the South. But angst against labor unions is out of date and out of touch.

Workers and their families know wages have declined when adjusted for inflation. Job security and work rules seem non-existent in the gig economy. American workers deserve better, and there needs to be a change of mindset towards workers and their families. Workers should not be treated merely like full-time equivalents (FTE) balanced on spreadsheets against shareholder profits.

I know the benefits of unions. So do passengers on Cactus Flight 1549, a plane flown by Sully and Jeff Skiles that was forced to land in the Hudson River in 2009. Every trade in that miraculous landing and rescue was represented by a union – the pilots, flight attendants, and ferry crews. The police, firefighters and air traffic controllers. They all responded with the professionalism their unions insured they were trained for. The Miracle on the Hudson was union made.

Now more than ever, we need unions. They need to be more cooperative than in the past and interact with communities promoting the benefits of a healthy and appropriately compensated workforce. And we need corporations too. Executives need to be more humanistic and recognize people over profits.

John Herron is an airline pilot and was a legislative affairs representative and labor negotiator on behalf of airline pilots. He resides in Pensacola where he was a Navy flight instructor. He earned a Juris Doctorate from the Temple University School of Law and is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy.

This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: ST Engineering mechanics need wage increase | Guestview

Pensacola ST Engineering facility workers conduct heavy maintenance on an Airbus jet on Tuesday, April 9, 2024. Pensacola State College (PSC) is requesting a $12,372,935 Triumph grant to create an Airframe & Powerplant (A&P) industry certification program at the Pensacola International Airport. PSC plans to use the grant to construct a 25,000-square-foot training facility, personnel, state-of-the-art equipment, supplies, and tuition waivers.

IMAGES

  1. SOLUTION: Engineering mechanics assignment

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

  2. ME 101

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

  3. Assignment 1

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

  4. Engineering Mechanics Problem Sheet

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

  5. assignment 1 engg mechanics

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

  6. Engineering Mechanics assignment 1

    engineering mechanics assignment 1

VIDEO

  1. Engineering Mechanics||Revision||Unit-02&03||Session-02||1th Semester||Diploma||SBTE

  2. Engineering Mechanics: Centre of Gravity: L-Section Problem 1 (Tamil)Tutor No: 8.1

  3. Engineering Mechanics Lecture no1 MSBTE || Diploma || 2nd sem

  4. Engineering Mechanics Inclined Plane-Roller Problem No 3(Tamil) Tutor 6.4

  5. Engineering Mechanics: Support Reactions-Inclined Support-Problem No:5(Tamil) Tutor No 7.6

  6. Engineering mechanics assignment problem -2

COMMENTS

  1. Assignments

    8. Beam torsion and 1-D elasticity ( PDF ) 9. Beam elasticity ( PDF ) 10. Energy bounds in elasticity ( PDF ) 11. Energy bounds in elasticity (cont.) ( PDF ) This section provides information about the course assignments.

  2. PDF 1.050 Engineering Mechanics I

    1.050 Engineering Mechanics I Fall 2007. Notes and remarks Lecture Summary Slide Content Survey Lecture notes Homework assignments (weekly) Exams: 2 in-class quizzes, 1 final All exams are open-book Grading: Two quizzes (25%) Final (25%) Homework assignment (50%)

  3. PDF ME 101: Engineering Mechanics

    Mechanics: Newton's Three Laws of Motion. Second Law: A particle of mass "m" acted upon by an unbalanced force "F" experiences an acceleration "a" that has the same direction as the force and a magnitude that is directly proportional to the force. F = ma. Second Law forms the basis for most of the analysis in Dynamics.

  4. Assignment-1

    Assignment 1: Engineering Mechanics, B (Common) Rigid Bodies: Equivalent systems of forces. Instruction: Figure numbers correspond to the problem numbers. When the couple M is applied to the link in a mechanism, the resulting forces exerted on the link from a guide and the connecting links are as shown.

  5. NPTEL :: Mechanical Engineering

    Week_01_Assignment_1: Week_01_Assignment_1: Week_02_Assignment_2: Week_02_Assignment_2: Week_03_Assignment_3: Week_03_Assignment_3: Week_04_Assignment_4: ... 1: Introduction to Engineering Mechanics I: Download ; 2: Introduction to Engineering Mechanics II: Download ; 3: Force Systems I: Download ; 4: Force Systems II: Download ; 5:

  6. Engineering Mechanics Assignment 1

    Engineering Mechanics - Assignment 1. Name: Anthony Das Student Number: 13205291 Subject: Engineering Mechanics FREE BODY DIAGRAM. Loads With reference to the free body diagram, the most present loads would have to be the self weight (permanent load) of the bridge and the imposed (live) loads such as trucks, cars and people. The weight of the ...

  7. Engineering Mechanics

    Engineering Mechanics - Assignment 1 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. assignment

  8. Engineering Mechanics Assigment 1

    Sanjoe Huang 14270488 Engineering Mechanics Assignment 1: Draw a Free Body Diagram of your chosen structure. The first diagram shows the estimated dimensions of the structure, location, distribution, and direction of the estimated loads. The type of joint is also included. The second diagram is a FBD showing just the possible loads and dimensions.

  9. Engineering Mechanics: Statics

    Now, with expert-verified solutions from Engineering Mechanics: Statics 3rd Edition, you'll learn how to solve your toughest homework problems. Our resource for Engineering Mechanics: Statics includes answers to chapter exercises, as well as detailed information to walk you through the process step by step. With Expert Solutions for thousands ...

  10. Engineering Mechanics Assignemnt 1.docx

    View Essay - Engineering Mechanics Assignemnt 1.docx from ENGINEERIN 48321 at University of Technology Sydney. Daniel Davis - 13246145 Engineering Mechanics - Assignment 1 1. Identify an existing

  11. ENGG 1300 : Engineering Mechanics

    MMAN1300 Engineering Mechanics 1 Dynamics Lab Assignment - Handout Submission Individual: Due on 5pm Friday, November 11th, 2021 (Week 9) Assignment: You are to submit two PDF files, complete tasks regarding the experiments. ... ENGINEERING MECHANICS 1 Final Exam T3 2019 Instructions: • Time allowed: 120 minutes • Total number of questions ...

  12. Engineering Mechanics Assignment-I

    Assignment-1, Sub: Engineering Mechanics (Module-1), 2ndSemester, Session: 2020-Answer the following questions: a) The greatest and the least resultant of two forces are respectively 11 N and 3 N. Find the magnitude of the two forces. b) The resultant of two equal forces P including an angle α is P. Find α.

  13. PDF Engineering Mechanics 1

    1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 3.2 2. Define engineering systems in a mechanically useful way and describe their equilibrium or motion in mathematical and graphical fashion and be able to relate this description to the principles of engineering mechanics. 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 3.2 3. Discern the relevant principles that must be applied to describe

  14. MAE201-Syllabus F2020 1 .pdf

    Course Syllabus, Fall 2020 MAE 201 - Mechanics of Particles and Rigid Bodies I: Statics Page 1 of 7 Description: Force vectors and force system resultants, equilibrium of particles, rigid bodies, and trusses, friction, and geometric properties of rigid bodies. Required for aerospace engineering and mechanical engineering. Prerequisites: PHY 121 University Physics I Mechanics, PHY 122 ...

  15. PDF CE 218: Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics

    Course Objectives: The course is taught to civil, agricultural, hydrologic, and geologic engineering students. As the first course in fluid mechanics, it aims to provide an introduction of fundamental principles governing fluid statics and dynamics and apply these theories to practical problems such as hydrostatics, open channel flow, and pipe ...

  16. Assignments

    Mechanics & Materials I. Menu. More Info Syllabus Readings ... Materials Science and Engineering. ... Learning Resource Types notes Lecture Notes. assignment Problem Sets. Download Course. Over 2,500 courses & materials Freely sharing knowledge with learners and educators around the world. Learn more

  17. Course Descriptions

    Engineering Problem Solving and Design. Fundamentals of the design process: engineering modeling, communication and problem-solving skills in a team environment. Emphasis on process-based improvements to the design process. Introduction to engineering as a profession. 2 credits, 4 periods. Prerequisites: ECE102 and (high school physics or PHY111)

  18. Mechanics of Particles and Rigid Bodies I: Statics (MAE 201)

    Ask your class to share their resources and study together! Invite your class. Studying MAE 201 Mechanics of Particles and Rigid Bodies I: Statics at Arizona State University? On Studocu you will find assignments, coursework and much more for.

  19. Welcome to the Purdue Online Writing Lab

    Mission. The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives.

  20. A New Prediction Model for Cutting Depth of Hard Rock Using ...

    With the growing requirement for energy and underground space, the fragmentation of hard rock has become a difficult problem in mining engineering, tunneling, petroleum engineering, civil construction and rock processing (Kim and Song 2015; Li 2016; Lu et al. 2013; Mostofa et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2016).Because of the high strength, there are issues such as low breaking efficiency and serious ...

  21. Eng Mech Assignment 1

    Engineering Mechanics Assignment 1; 2018 Spring Assignment 2 Questions & Answers; Assignment 2 Spring 2018; Assignment 2 Engineering Mechanics Feedback; Authentic assessment 1 Engineering Mechanics; 48321 A1 - Authentic Assesment (100%) Related Studylists eng mech assignment1 Eng mech. Preview text

  22. ST Engineering mechanics need wage increase

    The average annual salary for aircraft mechanics is $76,260, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Florida has the second highest employment rate for aircraft mechanics in the country ...

  23. Authentic assessment 1 Engineering Mechanics

    48321 ENGINEERING MECHANICS. (Spring 2021) ASSIGNMENT 1: AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT. Using a real-world example, prepare a Free Body Diagram report. The report should. professional standard, and following relevant. Australian Standards. The report must be submitted by. The nature and location of the overall structure.

  24. Engineering Mechanics(Tutorial on Equivalent Force Systems)

    Assignment 1: Engineering Mechanics, B (Common) Rigid Bodies: Equivalent systems of forces. Instruction: Figure numbers correspond to the problem numbers. When the couple M is applied to the link in a mechanism, the resulting forces exerted on the link from a guide and the connecting links are as shown. Determine (a) the values of M and α so ...