chapter 3 results and discussion sample qualitative research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

Chapter 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Related papers

Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal

The study attempted to determine the level of achievement of the selected education students in Assessment of Student Learning. It was also tested if there existed a significant differences between and among the achievement of the four groups of respondents. The samples of the study were education students enrolled in Assessment of Student Learning. The first group of respondents were the Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) students. The second group were the Bachelor in Elementary Education (BEED) group. The third were the students enrolled in Bachelor in Industrial Education (BSIE) students. A 25-item test which was adopted from assessment books was used check the level of achievement of the respondents. Mean, Standard Deviation, ANOVA, and Sheffe’s Test were used as a statistical tools to treat and analyze the data gathered. The Bachelor in Industrial Education and Bachelor of Elementary Education groups performed very good while the Bachelor of Secondary Education and Bachelo...

the Technical University of Sofia has been developed and implemented with a module supporting the educational process with the ability to create and fulfill tests in different subjects. Later different test modules were developed and implemented. These modules realize the assessment of the students ’ knowledge in different way and also gather in a different way the test results of the students. The subjects in the Technology school “Electronic systems ” are various. That is why the requirements towards the tools for test work – assessment and results analysis are different. Also the individual characteristics of the lecturers are important. The assessment of the students ’ knowledge is basically calculated in percentage of correct answers towards the sum of correct answers. The wrong answers are calculated as zero. From the point of view to motivate the student to give answer even when he is not quite sure in his own knowledge it is positive but in some cases it is required to punis...

Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 2019

This research is aimed; (a) to give a description about Arabic final semester test questions arrangements procedure at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. (b) to give a description about the quality of the test as seen from its validity, reliability, difficulty, and differentiation capacity. (c) to give a description that the lecturers never did an exam questions analysis of Arabic exam subject at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This research uses the descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data. The population within this research is the college students of Tadris major in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training who follows the final semester exam of 2017-2018 tenet years, especially in Arabic test subject. The sample taken during this research is the college students from the Tadris major, who followed the final semester exam on Arabic subject, by using the purpose sampling technique. The data co...

English Education Journal, 2018

This research is aimed at analyzing the quality of entrance test conducted by STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena year 2016-2017 in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty index, discrimination index, and the effectiveness of distractors. Content analysis was employed as research method in this study. Document analysis is a technique carried out to collect the data. The objects of this study were 25 multiple-choice items used in entrance test, with five options for each item. The data were analyzed manually. The result showed that English entrance test of STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena year 2016-2017 has a low predictive validity with correlation coefficient 0.044. Secondly, the r-value was 0.664, which is higher than r-table = 0.396. It is considered that the test has good reliability. Thirdly, the difficulty index was obtained that 4% of the test was easy with index 0.71-1.00, 64% was moderate with index 0.31-0.71, and 32% was difficult with index 0.00-0.31. Fourthly, most of items cons...

Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 2020

This study aimed at investigating the quality of multiple-choice items test created by teachers of mathematics on the topic of logical mathematic for tenth graders at Pangeran Antasari Senior High School in Medan. The test consisted of 40 multiple-choice items, and the classical theory analysis was carried out. The results turned out that 22 out of 40 items were valid and 18 items were not. The coefficient reliability resulted in 0,88196 meaning that it had higher reliability and consistency over time. Furthermore, the item-difficulty test revealed that 17 items were easy, 4 items were moderate, and 1 item was difficult. The distractor analysis indicated that 21 items were good and 1 item was very good. Of 22 valid items, there were good and tricky items existed. It was reasonable to conclude that 22 out of 40 items created by the mathematic teachers were categorized as good. Preliminary Bruce, Weil and Calhoun (Sumiati and Asra: 2008) states that learning is essentially a complex process (complex), but with the same purpose of providing learning experiences to students in accordance with the objectives. The goal is actually a reference in the implementation of the learning process. To determine the achievement of learning objectives it is necessary to evaluate learning outcomes. According to Tyler (Rashid and Mansour: 2008), the evaluation is the process of determining the extent to which educational goals have been achieved. Broader definition put forward by the other two experts, the Cronbach and Stufflebeam (2000), the additional definition is that the evaluation process is not simply measure the extent to which the objectives are achieved, but it is used to make decisions. One way to evaluate learning outcomes is to use the test results of learning. In order to learn the test results can be used as its function is to measure the achievement of learning objectives, one of the teacher's task is to evaluate the device tests that have been made, such as with the test item analysis to determine the quality of the tests that have been made. But in reality, not many are doing so. Event analyze the test item is an activity that must be done to improve the quality of teachers that have been written test. Darwyan Shah et al. (Arifin: 2009) defines the test item analysis as an investigation or a study of a part of the whole thing must be answered by learners. Nana Sudjana (2009) define that test item analysis or item analysis is assessment test questions in order to obtain a device that has the question of adequate quality. From the definition above can be concluded that the analysis of items that is a process that is carried out to investigate, researching and reviewing the test questions in order to obtain a device that has the question of adequate quality. There are several reasons why the analysis of test items required. According to (Asmawi Zainul, et al: 1997) these reasons, among others: a. To know the strengths and weaknesses of test items, so do the selection and revision of items. b. To provide information on the specifications of items in full, so that will make it easier for device makers in formulating questions about the exam that will meet the needs in the field and a certain degree.

The entry test to University are a hybrid of level tests, survey tests, diagnostic tests and selective ones. In fact some of them (those relating to planned access degree courses) determines a ranking which will allow, within the limits of available places, registration for the course. The other, even if compulsory, determine scores not affecting the inscription but to highlight the deficiencies to be recovered or, in some cases, give negative opinion about inscription. The “number of pre-registrations” problem, which might be irrelevant for a planned access degree, poses serious problems for an unscheduled access degree. In fact, while the test of degree courses in Primary Education and for Childhood and Preadolescence Training can ensure the objectivity and selectivity of the test, for the degree course in Science of Education there is a vital need for the construction of test, in addition to the required reliability and validity, it can find any deficiencies which, if not remedied, could invalidate future studies (Marlow, 2000; Cheung, Bucat, 2002). In other words, high numbers of registrations to unscheduled access course degree affect the quality of students learning path (Notti, 2010). If entry tests do not find and use any instrument relating to the recovery of any debt, the productivity parameter of the CdL and the faculty will suffer heavily. It is clear that it is necessary and useful to check the instruments built, without any presumptions of infallibility, especially since a bad test provides unreliable results (Steven et al., 1990; 1991). For this reason every effort should be made to build valid and reliable tests. The objectives of the research have been, in summary, the following: check the validity and the reliability of entry tests of the degree course in Science of Education; show any kind of problem emerged from statistical analysis; suggest, if possible, solutions to be adopted to make tests congruent with the purposes for which they were built. After obtaining the necessary authorizations, the documentation in electronic form concerning tests given to the students and the corresponding tabs of results were acquired. Then, the following statistical processes were made considering the objectives of the research to check if entry tests are able to select students considering their preparation level; to check the ability of the test to measure the skills for which it was constructed and, consequently, its internal coherence. The test is quite selective, not particularly difficult and with many unreliable items. The study of results examination reveals that the 1133 participant students had more difficulties especially in the two test areas called “Linguistics and literature” and “Geography”. In them there is a good level of selectivity. A strong criticism is emerged from the distractors quality. The results we received, show a sufficient quality of test and a capacity to place in a reliable ranking of student results.

Academia Letters, 2021

REVISTAS UNIMETA, 2021

Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie, 2010

European Journal of Cultural Studies , 2024

HTS Theological Studies, 2017

Revista Enunciação (8.2, 41-64), 2023

AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 2019

Gender a výzkum, 2017

Organohalogen …, 2003

Ciência e Natura, 2016

European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2017

Inverse Problems, 2009

Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2017

Mediterranean Marine Science, 2019

Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 2014

Memoires du XXe siecle. 1900-1909, 1991

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

How To Write The Results/Findings Chapter

S o, you’ve collected and analysed your qualitative data, and it’s time to write up your results chapter. But where do you start? In this post, we’ll guide you through the qualitative results chapter (also called the findings chapter), step by step.

Overview: Qualitative Results Chapter

• What (exactly) the qualitative results chapter is
• What to include in your results chapter
• How to write up your results chapter
• A few tips and tricks to help you along the way
• Free results chapter template

What exactly is the results chapter?

The results chapter in a dissertation or thesis (or any formal academic research piece) is where you objectively and neutrally present the findings of your qualitative analysis (or analyses if you used multiple qualitative analysis methods ). This chapter can sometimes be combined with the discussion chapter (where you interpret the data and discuss its meaning), depending on your university’s preference.  We’ll treat the two chapters as separate, as that’s the most common approach.

In contrast to a quantitative results chapter that presents numbers and statistics, a qualitative results chapter presents data primarily in the form of words . But this doesn’t mean that a qualitative study can’t have quantitative elements – you could, for example, present the number of times a theme or topic pops up in your data, depending on the analysis method(s) you adopt.

Adding a quantitative element to your study can add some rigour, which strengthens your results by providing more evidence for your claims. This is particularly common when using qualitative content analysis. Keep in mind though that qualitative research aims to achieve depth, richness and identify nuances , so don’t get tunnel vision by focusing on the numbers. They’re just cream on top in a qualitative analysis.

So, to recap, the results chapter is where you objectively present the findings of your analysis, without interpreting them (you’ll save that for the discussion chapter). With that out the way, let’s take a look at what you should include in your results chapter.

What should you include in the results chapter?

As we’ve mentioned, your qualitative results chapter should purely present and describe your results , not interpret them in relation to the existing literature or your research questions . Any speculations or discussion about the implications of your findings should be reserved for your discussion chapter.

In your results chapter, you’ll want to talk about your analysis findings and whether or not they support your hypotheses (if you have any). Naturally, the exact contents of your results chapter will depend on which qualitative analysis method (or methods) you use. For example, if you were to use thematic analysis, you’d detail the themes identified in your analysis, using extracts from the transcripts or text to support your claims.

While you do need to present your analysis findings in some detail, you should avoid dumping large amounts of raw data in this chapter. Instead, focus on presenting the key findings and using a handful of select quotes or text extracts to support each finding . The reams of data and analysis can be relegated to your appendices.

While it’s tempting to include every last detail you found in your qualitative analysis, it is important to make sure that you report only that which is relevant to your research aims, objectives and research questions .  Always keep these three components, as well as your hypotheses (if you have any) front of mind when writing the chapter and use them as a filter to decide what’s relevant and what’s not.

Need a helping hand?

How do I write the results chapter?

Now that we’ve covered the basics, it’s time to look at how to structure your chapter. Broadly speaking, the results chapter needs to contain three core components – the introduction, the body and the concluding summary. Let’s take a look at each of these.

Section 1: Introduction

The first step is to craft a brief introduction to the chapter. This intro is vital as it provides some context for your findings. In your introduction, you should begin by reiterating your problem statement and research questions and highlight the purpose of your research . Make sure that you spell this out for the reader so that the rest of your chapter is well contextualised.

The next step is to briefly outline the structure of your results chapter. In other words, explain what’s included in the chapter and what the reader can expect. In the results chapter, you want to tell a story that is coherent, flows logically, and is easy to follow , so make sure that you plan your structure out well and convey that structure (at a high level), so that your reader is well oriented.

The introduction section shouldn’t be lengthy. Two or three short paragraphs should be more than adequate. It is merely an introduction and overview, not a summary of the chapter.

Pro Tip – To help you structure your chapter, it can be useful to set up an initial draft with (sub)section headings so that you’re able to easily (re)arrange parts of your chapter. This will also help your reader to follow your results and give your chapter some coherence.  Be sure to use level-based heading styles (e.g. Heading 1, 2, 3 styles) to help the reader differentiate between levels visually. You can find these options in Word (example below).

Section 2: Body

Before we get started on what to include in the body of your chapter, it’s vital to remember that a results section should be completely objective and descriptive, not interpretive . So, be careful not to use words such as, “suggests” or “implies”, as these usually accompany some form of interpretation – that’s reserved for your discussion chapter.

The structure of your body section is very important , so make sure that you plan it out well. When planning out your qualitative results chapter, create sections and subsections so that you can maintain the flow of the story you’re trying to tell. Be sure to systematically and consistently describe each portion of results. Try to adopt a standardised structure for each portion so that you achieve a high level of consistency throughout the chapter.

For qualitative studies, results chapters tend to be structured according to themes , which makes it easier for readers to follow. However, keep in mind that not all results chapters have to be structured in this manner. For example, if you’re conducting a longitudinal study, you may want to structure your chapter chronologically. Similarly, you might structure this chapter based on your theoretical framework . The exact structure of your chapter will depend on the nature of your study , especially your research questions.

As you work through the body of your chapter, make sure that you use quotes to substantiate every one of your claims . You can present these quotes in italics to differentiate them from your own words. A general rule of thumb is to use at least two pieces of evidence per claim, and these should be linked directly to your data. Also, remember that you need to include all relevant results , not just the ones that support your assumptions or initial leanings.

In addition to including quotes, you can also link your claims to the data by using appendices , which you should reference throughout your text. When you reference, make sure that you include both the name/number of the appendix , as well as the line(s) from which you drew your data.

As referencing styles can vary greatly, be sure to look up the appendix referencing conventions of your university’s prescribed style (e.g. APA , Harvard, etc) and keep this consistent throughout your chapter.

Section 3: Concluding summary

The concluding summary is very important because it summarises your key findings and lays the foundation for the discussion chapter . Keep in mind that some readers may skip directly to this section (from the introduction section), so make sure that it can be read and understood well in isolation.

In this section, you need to remind the reader of the key findings. That is, the results that directly relate to your research questions and that you will build upon in your discussion chapter. Remember, your reader has digested a lot of information in this chapter, so you need to use this section to remind them of the most important takeaways.

Importantly, the concluding summary should not present any new information and should only describe what you’ve already presented in your chapter. Keep it concise – you’re not summarising the whole chapter, just the essentials.

Tips for writing an A-grade results chapter

Now that you’ve got a clear picture of what the qualitative results chapter is all about, here are some quick tips and reminders to help you craft a high-quality chapter:

• Your results chapter should be written in the past tense . You’ve done the work already, so you want to tell the reader what you found , not what you are currently finding .
• Make sure that you review your work multiple times and check that every claim is adequately backed up by evidence . Aim for at least two examples per claim, and make use of an appendix to reference these.
• When writing up your results, make sure that you stick to only what is relevant . Don’t waste time on data that are not relevant to your research objectives and research questions.
• Use headings and subheadings to create an intuitive, easy to follow piece of writing. Make use of Microsoft Word’s “heading styles” and be sure to use them consistently.
• When referring to numerical data, tables and figures can provide a useful visual aid. When using these, make sure that they can be read and understood independent of your body text (i.e. that they can stand-alone). To this end, use clear, concise labels for each of your tables or figures and make use of colours to code indicate differences or hierarchy.
• Similarly, when you’re writing up your chapter, it can be useful to highlight topics and themes in different colours . This can help you to differentiate between your data if you get a bit overwhelmed and will also help you to ensure that your results flow logically and coherently.

If you have any questions, leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help. If you’d like 1-on-1 help with your results chapter (or any chapter of your dissertation or thesis), check out our private dissertation coaching service here or book a free initial consultation to discuss how we can help you.

Learn More About Qualitative:

Triangulation: The Ultimate Credibility Enhancer

Triangulation is one of the best ways to enhance the credibility of your research. Learn about the different options here.

Structured, Semi-Structured & Unstructured Interviews

Learn about the differences (and similarities) between the three interview approaches: structured, semi-structured and unstructured.

Qualitative Coding Examples: Process, Values & In Vivo Coding

See real-world examples of qualitative data that has been coded using process coding, values coding and in vivo coding.

In Vivo Coding 101: Full Explainer With Examples

Learn about in vivo coding, a popular qualitative coding technique ideal for studies where the nuances of language are central to the aims.

Process Coding 101: Full Explainer With Examples

Learn about process coding, a popular qualitative coding technique ideal for studies exploring processes, actions and changes over time.

📄 FREE TEMPLATES

Research Topic Ideation

Proposal Writing

Literature Review

Methodology & Analysis

Academic Writing

Referencing & Citing

Apps, Tools & Tricks

The Grad Coach Podcast

24 Comments

This was extremely helpful. Thanks a lot guys

Hi, thanks for the great research support platform created by the gradcoach team!

I wanted to ask- While “suggests” or “implies” are interpretive terms, what terms could we use for the results chapter? Could you share some examples of descriptive terms?

I think that instead of saying, ‘The data suggested, or The data implied,’ you can say, ‘The Data showed or revealed, or illustrated or outlined’…If interview data, you may say Jane Doe illuminated or elaborated, or Jane Doe described… or Jane Doe expressed or stated.

I found this article very useful. Thank you very much for the outstanding work you are doing.

What if i have 3 different interviewees answering the same interview questions? Should i then present the results in form of the table with the division on the 3 perspectives or rather give a results in form of the text and highlight who said what?

I think this tabular representation of results is a great idea. I am doing it too along with the text. Thanks

That was helpful was struggling to separate the discussion from the findings

this was very useful, Thank you.

Very helpful, I am confident to write my results chapter now.

It is so helpful! It is a good job. Thank you very much!

Very useful, well explained. Many thanks.

Hello, I appreciate the way you provided a supportive comments about qualitative results presenting tips

I loved this! It explains everything needed, and it has helped me better organize my thoughts. What words should I not use while writing my results section, other than subjective ones.

Thanks a lot, it is really helpful

Thank you so much dear, i really appropriate your nice explanations about this.

Thank you so much for this! I was wondering if anyone could help with how to prproperly integrate quotations (Excerpts) from interviews in the finding chapter in a qualitative research. Please GradCoach, address this issue and provide examples.

what if I’m not doing any interviews myself and all the information is coming from case studies that have already done the research.

Very helpful thank you.

This was very helpful as I was wondering how to structure this part of my dissertation, to include the quotes… Thanks for this explanation

This is very helpful, thanks! I am required to write up my results chapters with the discussion in each of them – any tips and tricks for this strategy?

For qualitative studies, can the findings be structured according to the Research questions? Thank you.

Do I need to include literature/references in my findings chapter?

This was very helpful

this was very helpful. Now I am relieved from the stress I encountered not knowing where to start.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

• Print Friendly

How Do I Write the Discussion Chapter?

Reflecting on and Comparing Your Data, Recognising the Strengths and Limitations

• First Online: 19 October 2023

Cite this chapter

• Sue Reeves   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-0559 3 &
• Bartek Buczkowski   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-3664 4  

953 Accesses

The Discussion chapter brings an opportunity to write an academic argument that contains a detailed critical evaluation and analysis of your research findings. This chapter addresses the purpose and critical nature of the discussion, contains a guide to selecting key results to discuss, and details how best to structure the discussion with subsections and paragraphs. We also present a list of points to do and avoid when writing the discussion together with a Discussion chapter checklist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Braun V, Clarke V (2013) Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications, London

Google Scholar  

McGregor SLT (2018) Understanding and evaluating research: a critical guide. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA

Book   Google Scholar  

PLOS (2023) Author resources. How to write discussions and conclusions. Accessed Mar 3, 2023, from https://plos.org/resource/how-to-write-conclusions/ . Accessed 3 Mar 2023

Further Reading

Cottrell S (2017) Critical thinking skills: effective analysis, argument and reflection, 3rd edn. Palgrave, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Roehampton, London, UK

Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

Bartek Buczkowski

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Reeves, S., Buczkowski, B. (2023). How Do I Write the Discussion Chapter?. In: Mastering Your Dissertation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41911-9_9

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41911-9_9

Published : 19 October 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-41910-2

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-41911-9

eBook Packages : Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research