toni morrison nobel prize speech rhetorical analysis

Lit. Summaries

• Biographies

The Dancing Mind: A Critical Analysis of Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

• Toni Morrison

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a remarkable piece of literature that has been analyzed by scholars and literary enthusiasts alike. In this article, we will delve deep into Morrison’s speech and critically analyze the key themes, metaphors, and rhetorical devices used by the author to convey her message. We will explore how Morrison’s speech reflects her unique writing style and how her words continue to inspire and resonate with readers around the world.

The Significance of Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a powerful and thought-provoking piece of literature that has resonated with readers and scholars alike. In her speech, Morrison reflects on the role of literature in society and the importance of storytelling in shaping our understanding of the world. She also addresses issues of race, identity, and the legacy of slavery in America, challenging her audience to confront the uncomfortable truths of our history. The significance of Morrison’s speech lies in its ability to inspire and provoke, to challenge us to think critically about the world around us and to imagine a better future. As we continue to grapple with issues of inequality and injustice, Morrison’s words remain as relevant and urgent as ever.

The Rhetorical Strategies Employed in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison employs various rhetorical strategies to convey her message effectively. One of the most prominent strategies she uses is repetition. Morrison repeats the phrase “narrative imagination” throughout her speech to emphasize the importance of storytelling and imagination in shaping our understanding of the world. She also repeats the phrase “oppressive language” to highlight the power dynamics at play in language and the need to challenge oppressive systems. Additionally, Morrison uses metaphor and imagery to create vivid and memorable descriptions of her ideas. For example, she compares the act of writing to “a kind of peeling back, of allowing oneself to be seen” and describes the power of language as “a vital force, an energy, desire, a freedom that can push and shove and move and create.” By employing these rhetorical strategies, Morrison effectively communicates her message and inspires her audience to think critically about the power of language and storytelling.

The Role of Memory in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the importance of memory in shaping our understanding of the world. She argues that memory is not just a personal experience, but a collective one that shapes our cultural identity. Morrison’s own memories of growing up in a racially divided America inform her writing and her belief in the power of literature to challenge dominant narratives and give voice to marginalized communities. By acknowledging the role of memory in shaping our understanding of the world, Morrison highlights the importance of preserving and sharing our collective histories.

The Importance of Language in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the importance of language in shaping our understanding of the world. She argues that language is not just a tool for communication, but a means of creating and defining our reality. Morrison’s own use of language in her novels is a testament to this belief, as she often employs poetic and metaphorical language to convey complex ideas and emotions. By recognizing the power of language, Morrison challenges us to be more mindful of the words we use and the stories we tell, and to strive for a more inclusive and compassionate world.

The Concept of Otherness in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison explores the concept of otherness and its impact on society. She argues that the idea of otherness is often used to justify oppression and marginalization of certain groups. Morrison suggests that we must recognize the humanity in all individuals, regardless of their differences, in order to create a more just and equitable world. She states, “We die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives.” Morrison’s powerful words remind us of the importance of language and its ability to shape our understanding of the world and those around us.

The Role of Literature in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the importance of literature in shaping our understanding of the world. She argued that literature has the power to challenge dominant narratives and offer alternative perspectives that can help us to see beyond our own limited experiences. Morrison also highlighted the role of literature in promoting empathy and understanding between different cultures and communities. By exploring the complexities of human experience, literature can help us to recognize our shared humanity and bridge the gaps that divide us. Ultimately, Morrison’s speech underscores the vital role that literature plays in shaping our individual and collective identities, and in fostering a more just and equitable society.

The Theme of Responsibility in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the theme of responsibility. She argues that writers have a responsibility to tell the truth about the world, even if it is painful or uncomfortable. Morrison believes that literature can be a powerful tool for social change, and that writers must use their platform to address issues of injustice and inequality. She also emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility, urging her audience to take action in their own lives to make the world a better place. Overall, Morrison’s speech highlights the idea that responsibility is not just a personal obligation, but a collective one that we all share as members of society.

The Role of History in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the importance of history in shaping our understanding of the world. She argued that history is not just a collection of facts and dates, but a living, breathing force that shapes our present and future. Morrison’s own work is deeply rooted in history, and she has often explored the ways in which the past continues to influence the present. In her speech, she spoke about the role of literature in helping us to understand and confront the legacy of slavery and racism in America. She also emphasized the importance of storytelling in preserving our collective memory and ensuring that we do not forget the lessons of the past. Overall, Morrison’s speech was a powerful reminder of the vital role that history plays in shaping our lives and our understanding of the world around us.

The Power of Storytelling in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the power of storytelling and its ability to shape our understanding of the world. She spoke about the importance of recognizing and valuing the stories of all people, especially those who have been historically marginalized and silenced. Morrison argued that storytelling is not just a form of entertainment, but a means of survival and resistance. She urged her audience to listen to the stories of others and to use their own stories to create a more just and equitable society. Through her powerful words, Morrison demonstrated the transformative potential of storytelling and its ability to inspire empathy, understanding, and social change.

The Influence of African American Culture in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a powerful testament to the influence of African American culture on her life and work. Throughout her speech, Morrison draws on the rich traditions of African American storytelling, music, and spirituality to convey her message of the importance of literature in shaping our understanding of the world. From the opening lines, where she invokes the memory of her ancestors and the “unbroken line of struggle” that has brought her to this moment, to the closing words, where she calls on writers to “keep the world safe for diversity,” Morrison’s speech is a celebration of the resilience and creativity of African American culture. By weaving together personal anecdotes, historical references, and literary allusions, Morrison creates a tapestry of meaning that speaks to the universal human experience while also honoring the particularity of her own cultural heritage. In doing so, she demonstrates the power of literature to bridge divides and bring people together, and reminds us of the vital role that African American culture has played in shaping the American literary tradition.

The Role of the Writer in Society in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the importance of the writer in society. She argued that writers have a responsibility to use their craft to address the issues that affect their communities. According to Morrison, writers should not shy away from difficult topics such as racism, poverty, and inequality. Instead, they should use their writing to shed light on these issues and to inspire change. Morrison’s speech highlights the role of the writer as a social commentator and a catalyst for change. It also underscores the power of literature to shape our understanding of the world and to inspire us to take action.

The Significance of Toni Morrison’s Personal Narrative in Her Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a powerful personal narrative that sheds light on the significance of her work and the struggles she faced as a black woman writer. In her speech, Morrison reflects on her journey as a writer and the importance of storytelling in shaping our understanding of the world. She also addresses the issue of race and the need for greater representation and diversity in literature. Morrison’s personal narrative is a testament to the power of storytelling and the importance of recognizing and celebrating diverse voices in literature. Her speech is a call to action for writers and readers alike to embrace the richness and complexity of our shared human experience.

The Role of the Imagination in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the importance of imagination in shaping our understanding of the world. She argues that imagination allows us to see beyond the limitations of our own experiences and to empathize with others who may be different from us. Morrison also suggests that imagination is essential for creating a more just and equitable society, as it enables us to envision a world that is different from the one we currently inhabit. By emphasizing the role of imagination in her speech, Morrison challenges her audience to think beyond the status quo and to imagine a better future for all.

The Importance of Diversity in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the importance of diversity in literature and society. She argued that the lack of diversity in literature and the arts has led to a narrow and limited understanding of the world. Morrison stated that “the absence of any critical attention to the work of women and people of color is a debilitating omission in the arts and in our culture.” She urged writers and artists to embrace diversity and to create works that reflect the richness and complexity of human experience. Morrison’s speech highlights the need for greater representation and inclusivity in all aspects of society, including the arts.

The Role of Women in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison highlighted the role of women in shaping the world and the importance of their voices being heard. She spoke about the struggles and triumphs of women throughout history, from the suffragettes to the civil rights movement. Morrison emphasized the need for women to continue to fight for their rights and to be recognized as equal members of society. She also acknowledged the unique challenges faced by women of color and the need for their experiences to be included in the larger narrative. Morrison’s speech was a powerful reminder of the vital role that women play in shaping our world and the importance of their voices being heard.

The Concept of Freedom in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison explores the concept of freedom and its significance in the lives of individuals and societies. She argues that true freedom is not just the absence of physical constraints, but also the ability to think and express oneself freely. Morrison emphasizes the importance of language and storytelling in achieving this kind of freedom, as they allow individuals to create their own narratives and challenge dominant cultural norms. She also highlights the role of literature in promoting empathy and understanding between different groups, which is essential for building a more just and equitable society. Overall, Morrison’s speech offers a powerful reflection on the meaning and value of freedom, and its potential to transform individuals and communities.

The Role of Education in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasized the importance of education in shaping one’s perspective and understanding of the world. She spoke about how education can help individuals break free from the limitations of their own experiences and broaden their understanding of the human experience. Morrison also highlighted the role of literature in education, stating that it allows individuals to see the world through the eyes of others and gain empathy and understanding for different perspectives. Overall, Morrison’s speech emphasized the transformative power of education and the importance of continually seeking knowledge and understanding.

The Significance of Toni Morrison’s Message of Hope in Her Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a powerful message of hope that resonates with readers even today. In her speech, Morrison speaks about the importance of literature in shaping our understanding of the world and our place in it. She emphasizes the need for writers to tell stories that reflect the diversity of human experience and to challenge the dominant narratives that perpetuate inequality and injustice.

Morrison’s message of hope is particularly significant in today’s world, where we are constantly bombarded with news of violence, hatred, and division. Her words remind us that literature has the power to inspire empathy, compassion, and understanding, and that it is through these qualities that we can build a better world.

Morrison’s speech also speaks to the importance of perseverance and resilience in the face of adversity. She acknowledges the struggles that writers face in trying to tell their stories, but encourages them to keep going, to keep writing, and to keep fighting for their voices to be heard.

Overall, Morrison’s message of hope is a powerful reminder of the transformative power of literature and the importance of telling stories that reflect the full range of human experience. Her words inspire us to keep striving for a better world, to keep telling our stories, and to keep dancing with our minds.

The Role of Identity in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the importance of identity in shaping one’s experiences and perspectives. She argues that the dominant culture often imposes a narrow and limiting definition of identity, which can lead to feelings of exclusion and marginalization for those who do not fit into this mold. Morrison suggests that it is crucial for individuals to embrace their unique identities and to resist the pressure to conform to societal norms. By doing so, they can reclaim their agency and assert their own narratives, rather than being defined solely by external forces. This emphasis on the role of identity in shaping one’s worldview is a recurring theme in Morrison’s work, and it underscores the importance of recognizing and celebrating diversity in all its forms.

The Importance of Community in Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech

In her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Toni Morrison emphasizes the importance of community in shaping one’s identity and experiences. She acknowledges the role of her community in providing her with a sense of belonging and support, stating that “the vitality of language lies in its ability to limn the actual, imagined and possible lives of its speakers, readers, writers.” Morrison recognizes that language is not just a tool for communication, but a means of expressing one’s cultural and personal experiences. She emphasizes the need for diverse voices and perspectives in literature, stating that “the world is before you and you need not take it or leave it as it was when you came in.” Morrison’s speech highlights the power of community in shaping individual identity and the importance of embracing diverse perspectives in literature.

• Newsletters

Site search

• Israel-Hamas war
• Home Planet
• 2024 election
• Supreme Court
• TikTok’s fate
• All explainers
• Future Perfect

Filed under:

Toni Morrison’s transcendent Nobel Prize speech is key to understanding what made Morrison so great

Toni Morrison understood how powerful language was and the human privilege to wield it.

Share this story

• Share this on Facebook
• Share this on Twitter
• Share this on Reddit
• Share All sharing options

Share All sharing options for: Toni Morrison’s transcendent Nobel Prize speech is key to understanding what made Morrison so great

Toni Morrison died on Monday, August, 5, at the age of 88. Morrison’s books changed lives, capturing American life and its history in a peerless way — her works are so loved and resonant that they often (rightfully) eclipse the awards and recognition we bestow upon them.

But it was in 1993 that Morrison was awarded the most prestigious one on the planet. Morrison was the first African American woman to be awarded the Nobel Prize, for “novels characterized by visionary force and poetic import, gives life to an essential aspect of American reality.”

In accepting that award, Morrison, keenly and so eloquently, described the importance of language in our lives. The lecture — an audio recording of which is available on the Nobel Prize website — is a fable about the power of language to elucidate and cloud, to oppress and liberate, to honor and sully, and to both quantify and be incapable of capturing a human experience.

It’s the way humans wield this powerful tool of language that makes any form of expression so magical, Morrison explains:

It is the deference that moves her, that recognition that language can never live up to life once and for all. Nor should it. Language can never “pin down” slavery, genocide, war. Nor should it yearn for the arrogance to be able to do so. Its force, its felicity is in its reach toward the ineffable. Be it grand or slender, burrowing, blasting, or refusing to sanctify; whether it laughs out loud or is a cry without an alphabet, the choice word, the chosen silence, unmolested language surges toward knowledge, not its destruction.

Morrison quotes Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address as an example, specifically this simple sentence: “The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.”

Morrison explains that trying to sum up the destruction and pain of the Civil War would be fruitless. Instead, Lincoln’s focus on the impossibility of capturing the human life lost moves us toward deeper mourning and lasting respect for those lives.

“We die,” Morrison says. “That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives.”

Perhaps there’s no better way to remember Morrison than how clearly and beautifully she understood the power of language, and how she was able to harness that knowledge to capture American life and reality like no one else.

Will you support Vox today?

We believe that everyone deserves to understand the world that they live in. That kind of knowledge helps create better citizens, neighbors, friends, parents, and stewards of this planet. Producing deeply researched, explanatory journalism takes resources. You can support this mission by making a financial gift to Vox today. Will you join us?

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via

Next Up In Culture

Sign up for the newsletter today, explained.

Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day.

Thanks for signing up!

Check your inbox for a welcome email.

Oops. Something went wrong. Please enter a valid email and try again.

The Kristi Noem puppy-killing scandal, explained

Drake vs. everyone, explained

How today’s antiwar protests stack up against major student movements in history

Could bird flu cause a human pandemic?

The astonishing radicalism of Florida’s new ban on abortion

What the backlash to student protests over Gaza is really about

Things you buy through our links may earn  Vox Media  a commission.

Listen to Toni Morrison’s Remarkable, Transcendent Nobel Prize Lecture

As we mourn the death of author and cultural titan Toni Morrison , one quote has been used repeatedly to summarize her legacy and her worldview. “We die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives.”

That line comes from Morrison’s Nobel Prize lecture, a speech she gave in 1993 while accepting a Nobel Prize in Literature for her novels, which the committee praised at the time for their “visionary force and poetic import, giv[ing] life to an essential aspect of American reality.”

Morrison’s lines about death and language are beautiful on their own, but they’re part of a much longer, more nuanced story Morrison sketches over the course of the speech. She begins with a folk story about an old blind woman known for her wisdom. In Morrison’s telling, the woman is approached by a group of children, who tell her that they’re holding a bird in their hands. “‘Is the bird I am holding living or dead?’” one child asks the woman.

From that sparse outline of a narrative, Morrison spins the story outward. “I choose to read the bird as language and the woman as a practiced writer,” Morrison begins, before diving into what she imagines as the old woman’s anxiety about language in the hands of those who could kill it or use it for violent ends. “The question the children put to her: ‘Is it living or dead?’ is not unreal because she thinks of language as susceptible to death, erasure; certainly imperiled and salvageable only by an effort of the will.” The woman, in the first section of Morrison’s speech, feels the threat of those who have the power to wield language unwisely, or to kill it or loot it or use it to oppress. “Oppressive language,” Morrison says, “does more than represent violence; it is violence, does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge.”

But once Morrison has outlined the woman’s worldview and implicitly aligned her own anxieties with those of this nameless old woman, she uses the second portion of her speech to shift perspective. “Who are they, these children?” Morrison asks. What if the question about the bird isn’t meant to trick the old woman, but is instead “a straightforward question worthy of the attention of a wise one?” “If the old and wise who have lived life and faced death cannot describe either, who can?”

The transcript of the speech is available here , and it’s worth reading in its entirety. It is a gorgeous, astonishing microcosm of Morrison’s worldview, but also her craft as a storyteller; her capacity for weaving simple stories together with radical, foundational, complicated ideas; and her ability to wield language in a way that somehow names and describes ineffable concepts. The excerpt that begins “We die” may be the line that we turn to the most while mourning Morrison’s death, but the full speech will help you appreciate how Morrison ended her story. It was not with language or with death. “Look,” she says in closing. “How lovely it is, this thing we have done — together.”

Listen to the audio of the full speech below:

• toni morrison
• nobel prize

Most Viewed Stories

• The 2024 Tony Award Nominations
• Cinematrix No. 47: April 30, 2024
• 18 Jokes That Would Get Jerry Seinfeld Canceled Today
• Kendrick Really Hates That Man
• The Stalker Puzzle
• Below Deck Recap: For the ’Gram

Editor’s Picks

Most Popular

What is your email.

This email will be used to sign into all New York sites. By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy and to receive email correspondence from us.

Sign In To Continue Reading

Create your free account.

Password must be at least 8 characters and contain:

• Lower case letters (a-z)
• Upper case letters (A-Z)
• Numbers (0-9)
• Special Characters (!@#$%^&*)

As part of your account, you’ll receive occasional updates and offers from New York , which you can opt out of anytime.

• NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMS
• American RadioWorks Award winning documentaries
• As It Happens The stories behind current affairs
• On Being Conversations on religion and life
• The Dinner Party Win your next dinner party
• Marketplace Business news for the rest of us
• Marketplace Money How money makes the world go 'round
• Marketplace Morning Report 8 minutes you can't afford to miss
• Marketplace Tech Report A guide to the modern world
• A Prairie Home Companion Variety show with Garrison Keillor
• The Splendid Table Public radio's show about food
• The Story The human side of news and issues
• The Writer's Almanac Today in history and a poem or two
• CLASSICAL MUSIC
• Carnegie Hall Live 12 "must-have" classical music events
• Classical Live The best concert events of the year
• Composers Datebook Profiles of composers in history
• Holiday Specials Programs to celebrate the season
• Performance Today America's classical conversation
• Pipedreams Celebrating the King of instruments
• Saint Paul Sunday In-studio music and conversation
• SymphonyCast The great orchestras in concert

Stockholm, Sweden - December 7, 1993

Toni Morrison

Toni Morrison is a prolific and celebrated writer whose fictional accounts of African American life are part of the canon of great American literature. In 1993, Morrison became the first African American to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. The Nobel Committee said, "Toni Morrison is a literary artist of the first rank. She delves into the language itself, a language she wants to liberate from the fetters of race. And she addresses us with the luster of poetry." 1

Morrison's mission has been to tell the stories of "the people who in all literature were always peripheral – little black girls who were props, background." As Morrison says, "those people were never center stage and those people were me." 2 She published her first novel, The Bluest Eye, in 1970. The book's main character, Pecola Breedlove, longs for blue eyes, believing they would make her beautiful. The story is a haunting exploration of racism's deep wounds. Tragedy, neglect and abuse drive Pecola to become psychotic. Morrison says that as she began the book, "There was just one thing that I wanted to write about, which was the true devastation of racism on the most vulnerable, the most helpless unit in the society – a black female and a child. I wanted to write about what it was like to be the subject of racism. It had a specificity that was damaging." 3

By the time Morrison became a Nobel Laureate, she had already won other prestigious awards for her fiction, including a Pulitzer Prize in 1988 for the novel Beloved. The story centers on an escaped slave who kills her baby daughter to spare the child from slavery. In Beloved, Morrison was again intent on depicting the visceral experience of racial oppression. In a 1994 interview, she explained, "I wanted to say 'Let's get rid of these words like "the slave woman" and "the slave child," and talk about people with names like you and like me, who were there.'" 4 In another interview, she said, "I wanted to show the reader what slavery felt like, rather than how it looked." 5

Since 1970, Morrison has published nine novels, a series of children's stories with her son Slade, and numerous works of nonfiction that explore literature, politics, the arts and censorship. Morrison has also spent decades teaching, editing and lecturing. She held an endowed chair in the Humanities at Princeton University from 1989 to 2006.

Toni Morrison was born Chloe Anthony Wofford in 1931. She was raised in Lorain, Ohio, a small steel town near Cleveland. Her father, George, worked at various jobs, including as a ship welder. Her mother, Ramah, was a homemaker. Morrison grew up in a racially and ethnically mixed community that she describes as "tight and…unhostile." 6 But her father grew up in the Jim Crow South and hated white people. As a child, Morrison says, "I knew he was wrong." Morrison went to school with white children and, mostly, they were her friends. "There was no awe, no fear" of whites, she says. 7 Even so, Morrison still experienced racism in Ohio. As she told one interviewer, "I remember in the fifth grade, a smart little boy who had just arrived and didn't speak any English. He sat next to me. I read well, and I taught him to read just by doing it. I remember the moment he found out that I was black – a nigger." Morrison says it took the boy six months to learn the town's racial caste system. Once he learned it he could feel a sense of belonging by looking down at the one group below his: black people. "Every immigrant knew he would not come as [a member of] the very bottom [stratum]. He had to come above at least one group – and that was us." 8

Within the Morrison family, as she remembers it, there was no sense of belonging to a lower caste. "My parents made all of us feel as though there were these rather extraordinary deserving people within us," she says. "I felt like an aristocrat – or what I think an aristocrat is. I always knew we were very poor. But that was never degrading." 9 Morrison grew up in a family rich with music, books and storytelling. Her parents spun exhilarating ghost stories at night; her grandmother interpreted dreams. As Morrison says, "We were intimate with the supernatural." 10 The music, the ghosts and the folk tales are all powerful elements that run through Morrison's fiction.

Morrison graduated with honors from high school, and in 1953 earned her B.A in English from Howard University. She adopted the nickname "Toni" in college. Her professors included poet Sterling Brown and philosopher Alain Locke. Morrison received an M.A. in American Literature from Cornell University and launched her academic career at Texas Southern University in Houston. In 1957, Morrison returned to Howard to teach. She married a Jamaican architect, Harold Morrison and the couple had two sons, Harold Ford and Slade Kevin. The Morrisons divorced in 1964.

Toni Morrison supported her young family by working as a textbook editor in Syracuse. In 1968, Random House hired Morrison as a senior editor at its headquarters in New York City. Over the next 16 years, she made her mark in publishing by nurturing the careers of an array of popular black writers. They included Angela Davis, Lucille Clifton and Toni Cade Bambara. One of the authors whose work she edited, former U.S. Ambassador Andrew Young, said, "Toni has done more to encourage and publish other black writers than anyone I know." 11

While working full time and raising her two boys alone, Morrison began to squeeze in time to write when the children were asleep. After The Bluest Eye in 1970, she produced several more critically acclaimed books. Morrison had been writing for a solid decade before she began to really think of herself as a writer. She recalls that after her 1977 publication of Song of Solomon, which won the National Book Critics Circle Award, someone said to her, "This is probably what you do." Morrison said, "You mean, this is what I'm going to be when I grow up?" And the person replied, "Yeah." 12 Morrison resigned from Random House in 1984 to focus on writing.

Morrison delivered the Nobel Lecture in the Grand Hall of the Swedish Academy in Stockholm. The audience gave her a standing ovation as she entered the 18th century room. Her close friend, theologian and writer Cornel West, was there. "You talk about grace, dignity, class, elegance – when Toni walked down that aisle on the arm of King Gustav of Sweden!" he recalled. "But what I could really see was these millions and millions of black folk who had come and gone. I could see it in her walk, I could see it in her face. All kinds of humiliation and cruelty coming their way. And they just kept comin' on!" 13

Morrison's lecture takes the form of a parable that illuminates the power of language as both a force of life and a tool of destruction. As Morrison says, "Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." Morrison returns to this idea in her 2009 edited volume, Burn This Book, a collection of essays on writing and censorship by a variety of influential authors. Morrison writes, "Certain kinds of trauma visited on peoples are so deep, so cruel, that unlike money, unlike vengeance, even unlike justice, or rights, or the goodwill of others, only writers can translate such trauma and turn sorrow into meaning, sharpening the moral imagination." Morrison continues, "A writer's life and work are not a gift to mankind; they are its necessity." 14

Listen to the speech Thank you. My sincere thanks to the Swedish Academy. And thank you all for this very warm welcome. Fiction has never been entertainment for me. It has been the work I have done for most of my adult life. I believe that one of the principal ways in which we acquire, hold, and digest information is via narrative. So I hope you will understand when the remarks I make begin with what I believe to be the first sentence of our childhood that we all remember – the phrase "Once upon a time...." "Once upon a time there was an old woman, blind but wise." Or was it an old man? A guru, perhaps. Or a griot soothing restless children. I've heard this story, or one exactly like it, in the lore of several cultures. "Once upon a time there was an old woman, blind...wise...." In the version I know the woman is the daughter of slaves, black, American, and lives alone in a small house outside of town. Her reputation for wisdom is without peer and without question. Among her people she is both the law and its transgression. The honor she is paid and the awe in which she is held reach beyond her neighborhood to places far away; to the city where the intelligence of rural prophets is the source of much amusement. One day the woman is visited by some young people who seem bent on disproving her clairvoyance and showing her up for the fraud they believe she is. Their plan is simple: They enter her house and ask the one question the answer to which rides solely on her difference from them, a difference they regard as a profound disability – her blindness. They stand before her, and one of them says, "Old woman, I hold in my hand a bird. Tell me whether it is living or dead." She doesn't answer, and the question is repeated. "Is the bird I am holding living or dead?" She still doesn't answer. She's blind. She can't see her visitors, let alone what is in their hands. She doesn't know their color, their gender, or their homeland. She only knows their motive. The old woman's silence is so long, the young people have trouble holding their laughter. Finally she speaks and her voice is soft but stern. "I don't know," she says. "I don't know whether the bird you are holding is dead or alive, but what I do know is that it is in your hands. It is in your hands." Her answer can be taken to mean: If it's dead, you have either found it that way or you have killed it. If it is alive, you can still kill it. Whether it is to stay alive, it's your decision. Whatever the case, it's your responsibility. For parading their power and her helplessness, the young visitors are reprimanded, told they are responsible not only for the act of mockery but also for the small bundle of life sacrificed to achieve its aims. The blind woman shifts attention away from assertions of power to the instrument through which that power is exercised. Speculation on what (other than its own frail body) that bird-in-the-hand might signify has always been attractive to me, but especially so now – thinking, as I have been – about the work I do that has brought me to this company. So I choose to read the bird as language and the woman as a practiced writer. She's worried about how the language she dreams in, given to her at birth, is handled, put into service, even withheld from her for certain nefarious purposes. Being a writer she thinks of language partly as a system, partly as a living thing over which one has control, but mostly as agency – as an act with consequences. So the question the children put to her: "Is it living or dead?" is not unreal because she thinks of language as susceptible to death, erasure; certainly imperiled and salvageable only by an effort of the will. She believes that if the bird in the hands of her visitors is dead the custodians are responsible for the corpse. For her a dead language is not only one no longer spoken or written, it is unyielding language content to admire its own paralysis. Like statist language, censored and censoring. Ruthless in its policing duties, it has no desire or purpose other than maintaining the free range of its own narcotic narcissism, its own exclusivity and dominance. However moribund, it is not without effect for it actively thwarts the intellect, stalls conscience, suppresses human potential. Unreceptive to interrogation, it cannot form or tolerate new ideas, shape other thoughts, tell another story, fill baffling silences. Official language smitheryed to sanction ignorance and preserve privilege is a suit of armor polished to shocking glitter, a husk from which the knight departed long ago. Yet there it is: dumb, predatory, sentimental – exciting reverence in schoolchildren, providing shelter for despots, summoning false memories of stability, harmony among the public. She is convinced that when language dies, out of carelessness, disuse, and absence of esteem, indifference, or killed by fiat, not only she herself, but all users and makers are accountable for its demise. In her country children have bitten their tongues off and use bullets instead to iterate the voice of speechlessness, of disabled and disabling language, of language adults have abandoned altogether as a device for grappling with meaning, providing guidance, or expressing love. But she knows tongue-suicide is not only the choice of children. It's common among the infantile heads of state and power merchants whose evacuated language leaves them with no access to what is left of their human instincts for they speak only to those who obey, or in order to force obedience. The systematic looting of language can be recognized by the tendency of its users to forgo its nuanced, complex, mid-wifery properties for menace and subjugation. Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge. Whether it is obscuring state language or the faux-language of mindless media; whether it is the proud but calcified language of the academy or the commodity driven language of science; whether it is the malign language of law-without-ethics, or language designed for the estrangement of minorities, hiding its racist plunder in its literary cheek – it must be rejected, altered, and exposed. It is the language that drinks blood, laps vulnerabilities, tucks its fascist boots under crinolines of respectability and patriotism as it moves relentlessly toward the bottom line and the bottomed-out mind. Sexist language, racist language, theistic language – all are typical of the policing languages of mastery, and cannot, do not permit new knowledge or encourage the mutual exchange of ideas. The old woman is keenly aware that no intellectual mercenary, nor insatiable dictator, no paid-for politician or demagogue; no counterfeit journalist would be persuaded by her thoughts. There is and will be rousing language to keep citizens armed and arming; slaughtered and slaughtering in the malls, courthouses, post offices, playgrounds, bedrooms and boulevards; stirring, memorializing language to mask the pity and waste of needless death. There will be more diplomatic language to countenance rape, torture, assassination. There is and will be more seductive, mutant language designed to throttle women, to pack their throats like pâté-producing geese with their own unsayable, transgressive words; there will be more of the language of surveillance disguised as research; of politics and history calculated to render the suffering of millions mute; language glamorized to thrill the dissatisfied and bereft into assaulting their neighbors; arrogant pseudo-empirical language crafted to lock creative people into cages of inferiority and hopelessness. Underneath the eloquence, the glamour, the scholarly associations, however stirring or seductive, the heart of such language is languishing, or perhaps not beating at all – if the bird is already dead. She has thought about what could have been the intellectual history of any discipline if it had not insisted upon, or been forced into, the waste of time and life that rationalizations for and representations of dominance required – lethal discourses of exclusion blocking access to cognition for both the excluder and the excluded. The conventional wisdom of the Tower of Babel story is that the collapse was a misfortune. That it was the distraction, or the weight of many languages that precipitated the tower's failed architecture. That one monolithic language would have expedited the building and heaven would've been reached. Whose heaven, she wonders? And what kind? Perhaps the achievement of Paradise was premature, a little hasty if no one could take the time to understand other languages, other views, other narratives. Had they, the heaven they imagined might have been found at their feet. Complicated, demanding, yes, but a view of heaven as life; not heaven as post-life. She wouldn't want to leave her young visitors with the impression that language should be forced to stay alive merely to be. The vitality of language lies in its ability to limn the actual, imagined and possible lives of its speakers, readers, and writers. Although its poise is sometimes in displacing experience, it's not a substitute for it. It arcs toward the place where meaning may lie. When a President of the United States thought about the graveyard his country had become, and said, "The world will little note nor long remember what we say here; but it will never forget what they did here," his simple words are exhilarating in their life-sustaining properties, because they refused to encapsulate the reality of 600 thousand dead men in a cataclysmic race war. Refusing to monumentalize, disdaining the "final word," the precise "summing up," acknowledging their "poor power to add or detract", his words signal deference to the uncapturability of the life it mourns. It is the deference that moves her, the recognition that – that recognition that language can never live up to life once and for all – nor should it. Language can never "pin down" slavery, genocide, war. Nor should it yearn for the arrogance to be able to do so. Its force, its felicity is in its reach toward the ineffable. Be it grand or slender, burrowing, blasting, or refusing to sanctify; whether it laughs out loud or is a cry without an alphabet, the choice word, the chosen silence, unmolested language surges toward knowledge, not its destruction. But who doesn't know of literature banned, because it is interrogative; discredited because it is critical; erased because alternate? And how many are outraged by the thought of a self-ravaged tongue? Word-work is sublime, she thinks, because it's generative; it makes meaning that secures our difference, our human difference – the way in which we are like no other life. We die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives. "Once upon a time, ..." visitors ask an old woman a question. Who are they, these children? And what did they make of that encounter? What did they hear in those final words: "The bird is in your hands"? A sentence that gestures toward possibility or one that drops a latch? Perhaps what the children heard was "It's not my problem. I'm old, female, black, blind. What wisdom I have now is in knowing I cannot help you. The future of language is yours." They stand there. Suppose nothing was in their hands? Suppose the visit was only a ruse, a trick to get to be spoken to, taken seriously as they have not been before? A chance to interrupt, to violate the adult world, its miasma of discourse about them, for them, but never to them? Urgent questions are at stake, including the one they have asked: "Is the bird we hold living or dead?" Perhaps the question meant: "Could someone tell us what is life? What is death?" No trick at all; no silliness. A straightforward question worthy of the attention of a wise one, an old one. And if the old and the wise who have lived life and faced death cannot describe either, who can? But she doesn't. She keeps her secret, her good opinion of herself, her gnomic pronouncements, her art without commitment. She keeps her distance, reinforces it and retreats into the singularity of isolation, in sophisticated, privileged space. Nothing, no word follows her declarations of transfer. That silence is deep, deeper than the meaning available in the words she has spoken. It shivers, this silence, and the children, annoyed, fill it with language invented on the spot. "Is there no speech," they ask her, "no words you can give us that helps us break through your dossier of failures? Through the education you have just given us that is no education at all, because we are paying close attention to what you have done as well as to what you have said, to the barrier you have erected between generosity and wisdom. "We have no bird in our hands, living or dead. We have only you and our important question. Is the nothing in our hands something you couldn't bear to contemplate, to even guess? Don't you remember being young when language was magic without meaning? When what you could say, could not mean? When the invisible was what imagination strove to see? When questions and demands for answers burned so brightly you trembled with fury at not knowing? "Do we have to begin our consciousness with a battle heroines and heroes like you have already fought and lost leaving us with nothing in our hands except what you imagined is there? Your answer is artful, but its artfulness embarrasses us and ought to embarrass you. Your answer is indecent in its self-congratulation, a made-for-television script that makes no sense if there is nothing in our hands. "Why didn't you reach out, touch us with your soft fingers, delay the soundbite, the lesson, until you knew who we were? Did you so despise our trick, our modus operandi you could not see that we were baffled about how to get your attention? We are young, unripe. We've heard all our short lives that we have to be responsible. What could that possibly mean in the catastrophe this world has become; where, as a poet said, "nothing needs to be exposed since it's already barefaced." Our inheritance is an affront. You want us to have your old, blank eyes and see only cruelty and mediocrity. Do you think we are stupid enough to perjure ourselves again and again with the fiction of nationhood? How dare you talk to us of duty when we stand waist deep in the toxin of your past? "You trivialize us and you trivialize the bird that is not in our hands. Is there no context for our lives, no song, no literature, no poem full of vitamins, no history connected to experience that you can pass along to help us start strong? You are an adult; the old one, the wise one. Stop thinking about saving your face. Think of our lives and tell us your particularized world. Make up a story. Narrative is radical, creating us at the very moment it is being created. We will not blame you if your reach exceeds your grasp; if love so ignites your words they go down in flames and nothing is left but their scald. Or if, with the reticence of a surgeon's hands, your words suture only the places where blood might flow. We know you can never do it properly – once and for all. Passion is never enough; neither is skill. But try. For our sake and yours forget your name in the street; tell us what the world has been to you in the dark places and the light. Don't tell us what to believe, what to fear. Show us belief's wide skirt and the stitch that unravels fear's caul. You, old woman, blessed with blindness, can speak the language that tells us what only language can: how to see without pictures. Language alone protects us from the scariness of things with no names. Language alone is meditation. "Tell us what it is to be a woman, so that we may know what it is to be a man; what moves at the margin; what it is to have no home in this place; to be set adrift from the one you knew; what it is to live at the edge of towns that cannot bear your company." "Tell us about ships turned away from shorelines at Easter, placenta in a field. Tell us about a wagonload of slaves, how they sang so softly their breath was indistinguishable from the falling snow; how they knew from the hunch of the nearest shoulder that the next stop would be their last; how, with hands prayered in their sex, they thought of heat, then suns; lifting their faces as though it was there for the taking, turning as though there for the taking. They stop at an inn. The driver and his mate go in with the lamp, leaving them humming in the dark. The horse's void steams into the snow beneath its hooves, and its hiss and melt is the envy of the freezing slaves." "The inn door opens. A girl and a boy step away from its light. They climb into the wagon bed. The boy will have a gun in three years, but now he carries a lamp and a jug of warm cider. They pass it from mouth to mouth. The girl offers bread, pieces of meat and something more: a glance into the eyes of the one she serves. One helping for each man, two for each woman. And a look. They look back. The next stop will be their last. But not this one. This one is warmed." It's quiet again when the children finish speaking, until the woman breaks into the silence. "Finally", she says, "I trust you now. I trust you with the bird that is not in your hands, because you have truly caught it. How lovely it is, this thing we have done – together." Thank you. [applause]

1 . Press release, "The Nobel Prize in Literature," Swedish Academy, October 7, 1993, www.nobelprize.org. 2 . Dick Russell, Black Genius and the American Experience, (New York: Carroll & Graf, 1998), 235. 3 . Claudia Dreifus, "Chloe Wofford Talks about Toni Morrison," The New York Times, September 11, 1994. 4 . Ibid. 5 . Elissa Schappell, "Toni Morrison: The Art of Fiction," in Toni Morrison: Conversations, ed. Carolyn C. Denard, (Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 2008), 76. 6 . Russell, Black Genius, 233. 7 . Ibid., 230. 8 . Bonnie Angelo, "The Pain of Being Black: An Interview with Toni Morrison," in Conversations with Toni Morrison, ed. Danille Taylor-Guthrie, (Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 1994), 255. 9 . Dreifus, "Chloe Wofford Talks About Toni Morrison." 10 . Russell, Black Genius, 231. 11 . Russell, Black Genius, 237. 12 . Unitarian Universalist Association, "A Bench by the Road: Beloved by Toni Morrison," in Toni Morrison: Conversations, ed. Carolyn C. Denard, (Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 2008), 46. 13 . Ibid., 227. 14 . Toni Morrison, Burn this book: PEN Writers Speak Out on the Power of the Word, (New York: Harper Collins, 2009), 4.

The best free cultural &

educational media on the web

• Online Courses
• Certificates
• Degrees & Mini-Degrees
• Audio Books

Hear Toni Morrison’s Poetic Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech on the Radical Power of Language (1993)

in Literature | June 2nd, 2015 1 Comment

Since her first nov­el, 1970’s The Bluest Eye , Toni Mor­ri­son has daz­zled read­ers with her com­mand­ing language—colloquial, mag­i­cal, mag­is­te­r­i­al, even fan­ci­ful at times, but held firm to the earth by a com­mit­ment to his­to­ry and an unspar­ing explo­ration of racism, sex­u­al abuse, and vio­lence. Read­ing Mor­ri­son can be an exhil­a­rat­ing expe­ri­ence, and a har­row­ing one. We nev­er know where she is going to take us. But the jour­ney for Mor­ri­son has nev­er been one of escapism or art for art’s sake. In a 1981 inter­view , she once said, “the books I want­ed to write could not be only, even mere­ly, lit­er­ary or I would defeat my pur­pos­es, defeat my audi­ence.” As she put it then, “my work bears wit­ness and sug­gests who the out­laws were, who sur­vived under what cir­cum­stances and why.”

She has sus­tained such a weighty mis­sion not only with a love of lan­guage, but also with a crit­i­cal under­stand­ing of its power—to seduce, to manip­u­late, con­found, wound, twist, and kill. Which brings us to the record­ed speech above, deliv­ered in 1993 at her accep­tance of the  Nobel Prize for Lit­er­a­ture . After briefly thank­ing the Swedish Acad­e­my and her audi­ence, she begins, “Fic­tion has nev­er been enter­tain­ment for me.” Wind­ing her speech around a para­ble of “an old woman, blind but wise,” Mor­ri­son illus­trates the ways in which “oppres­sive lan­guage does more than rep­re­sent vio­lence; it is vio­lence; does more than rep­re­sent the lim­its of knowl­edge; it lim­its knowl­edge.”

Anoth­er kind of lan­guage takes flight, “surges toward knowl­edge, not its destruc­tion.” In the folk­tale at the cen­ter of her speech, lan­guage is a bird, and the blind seer to whom it is pre­sent­ed gives us a choice: “I don’t know whether the bird you are hold­ing is dead or alive, but what I do know is that it is in your hands. It is in your hands.”

Lan­guage, she sug­gests, is in fact our only human pow­er, and our respon­si­bil­i­ty. The con­se­quences of its mis­use we know all too well, and Mor­ri­son does not hes­i­tate to name them. But she ends with a chal­lenge for her audi­ence, and for all of us, to take our own mea­ger lit­er­ary resources and put them to use in heal­ing the dam­age done. You should lis­ten to, and read, her entire speech , with its maze-like turns and folds. Near its end, the dis­cur­sive­ness flow­ers into exhor­ta­tion, and—though she has said she dis­likes hav­ing her work described thus—poetry. “Make up a sto­ry,” she says, “Nar­ra­tive is rad­i­cal, cre­at­ing us at the very moment it is being cre­at­ed.”

We will not blame you if your reach exceeds your grasp; if love so ignites your words they go down in flames and noth­ing is left but their scald. Or if, with the ret­i­cence of a sur­geon’s hands, your words suture only the places where blood might flow. We know you can nev­er do it prop­er­ly — once and for all. Pas­sion is nev­er enough; nei­ther is skill. But try. For our sake and yours for­get your name in the street; tell us what the world has been to you in the dark places and the light. Don’t tell us what to believe, what to fear. Show us belief’s wide skirt and the stitch that unrav­els fear’s caul. You, old woman, blessed with blind­ness, can speak the lan­guage that tells us what only lan­guage can: how to see with­out pic­tures. Lan­guage alone pro­tects us from the scari­ness of things with no names. Lan­guage alone is med­i­ta­tion

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter,  please find it here . Or fol­low our posts on Threads , Face­book , BlueSky or Mastodon .

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site . It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal , Patre­on , and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Toni Mor­ri­son Dis­pens­es Writ­ing Wis­dom in 1993 Paris Review Inter­view

7 Nobel Speech­es by 7 Great Writ­ers: Hem­ing­way, Faulkn­er, and More

Toni Mor­ri­son, Nora Ephron, and Dozens More Offer Advice in Free Cre­ative Writ­ing “Mas­ter Class”

Josh Jones  is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at  @jdmagness .

by Josh Jones | Permalink | Comments (1) |

Related posts:

Comments (1), 1 comment so far.

Thank you for shar­ing this!

Add a comment

Leave a reply.

Name (required)

Email (required)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Click here to cancel reply.

• 1,700 Free Online Courses
• 200 Online Certificate Programs
• 100+ Online Degree & Mini-Degree Programs
• 1,150 Free Movies
• 1,000 Free Audio Books
• 150+ Best Podcasts
• 800 Free eBooks
• 200 Free Textbooks
• 300 Free Language Lessons
• 150 Free Business Courses
• Free K-12 Education
• Get Our Daily Email

Free Courses

• Art & Art History
• Classics/Ancient World
• Computer Science
• Data Science
• Engineering
• Environment
• Political Science
• Writing & Journalism
• All 1500 Free Courses
• 1000+ MOOCs & Certificate Courses

Receive our Daily Email

Free updates, get our daily email.

Get the best cultural and educational resources on the web curated for you in a daily email. We never spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

FOLLOW ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Free Movies

• 1150 Free Movies Online
• Free Film Noir
• Silent Films
• Documentaries
• Martial Arts/Kung Fu
• Free Hitchcock Films
• Free Charlie Chaplin
• Free John Wayne Movies
• Free Tarkovsky Films
• Free Dziga Vertov
• Free Oscar Winners
• Free Language Lessons
• All Languages

Free eBooks

• 700 Free eBooks
• Free Philosophy eBooks
• The Harvard Classics
• Philip K. Dick Stories
• Neil Gaiman Stories
• David Foster Wallace Stories & Essays
• Hemingway Stories
• Great Gatsby & Other Fitzgerald Novels
• HP Lovecraft
• Edgar Allan Poe
• Free Alice Munro Stories
• Jennifer Egan Stories
• George Saunders Stories
• Hunter S. Thompson Essays
• Joan Didion Essays
• Gabriel Garcia Marquez Stories
• David Sedaris Stories
• Stephen King
• Golden Age Comics
• Free Books by UC Press
• Life Changing Books

Free Audio Books

• 700 Free Audio Books
• Free Audio Books: Fiction
• Free Audio Books: Poetry
• Free Audio Books: Non-Fiction

Free Textbooks

• Free Physics Textbooks
• Free Computer Science Textbooks
• Free Math Textbooks

K-12 Resources

• Free Video Lessons
• Web Resources by Subject
• Quality YouTube Channels
• Teacher Resources
• All Free Kids Resources

Free Art & Images

• All Art Images & Books
• The Rijksmuseum
• Smithsonian
• The Guggenheim
• The National Gallery
• The Whitney
• LA County Museum
• Stanford University
• British Library
• Google Art Project
• French Revolution
• Getty Images
• Guggenheim Art Books
• Met Art Books
• Getty Art Books
• New York Public Library Maps
• Museum of New Zealand
• Smarthistory
• Coloring Books
• All Bach Organ Works
• All of Bach
• 80,000 Classical Music Scores
• Free Classical Music
• Live Classical Music
• 9,000 Grateful Dead Concerts
• Alan Lomax Blues & Folk Archive

Writing Tips

• William Zinsser
• Kurt Vonnegut
• Toni Morrison
• Margaret Atwood
• David Ogilvy
• Billy Wilder
• All posts by date

Personal Finance

• Open Personal Finance
• Amazon Kindle
• Architecture
• Artificial Intelligence
• Beat & Tweets
• Comics/Cartoons
• Current Affairs
• English Language
• Entrepreneurship
• Food & Drink
• Graduation Speech
• How to Learn for Free
• Internet Archive
• Language Lessons
• Most Popular
• Neuroscience
• Photography
• Pretty Much Pop
• Productivity
• UC Berkeley
• Uncategorized
• Video - Arts & Culture
• Video - Politics/Society
• Video - Science
• Video Games

Great Lectures

• Michel Foucault
• Sun Ra at UC Berkeley
• Richard Feynman
• Joseph Campbell
• Jorge Luis Borges
• Leonard Bernstein
• Richard Dawkins
• Buckminster Fuller
• Walter Kaufmann on Existentialism
• Jacques Lacan
• Roland Barthes
• Nobel Lectures by Writers
• Bertrand Russell
• Oxford Philosophy Lectures

Receive our newsletter!

Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.

Great Recordings

• T.S. Eliot Reads Waste Land
• Sylvia Plath - Ariel
• Joyce Reads Ulysses
• Joyce - Finnegans Wake
• Patti Smith Reads Virginia Woolf
• Albert Einstein
• Charles Bukowski
• Bill Murray
• Fitzgerald Reads Shakespeare
• William Faulkner
• Flannery O'Connor
• Tolkien - The Hobbit
• Allen Ginsberg - Howl
• Dylan Thomas
• Anne Sexton
• John Cheever
• David Foster Wallace

Book Lists By

• Neil deGrasse Tyson
• Ernest Hemingway
• F. Scott Fitzgerald
• Allen Ginsberg
• Patti Smith
• Henry Miller
• Christopher Hitchens
• Joseph Brodsky
• Donald Barthelme
• David Bowie
• Samuel Beckett
• Art Garfunkel
• Marilyn Monroe
• Picks by Female Creatives
• Zadie Smith & Gary Shteyngart
• Lynda Barry

Favorite Movies

• Kurosawa's 100
• David Lynch
• Werner Herzog
• Woody Allen
• Wes Anderson
• Luis Buñuel
• Roger Ebert
• Susan Sontag
• Scorsese Foreign Films
• Philosophy Films
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• December 2020
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• December 2017
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• February 2016
• January 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• December 2014
• November 2014
• October 2014
• September 2014
• August 2014
• February 2014
• January 2014
• December 2013
• November 2013
• October 2013
• September 2013
• August 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• August 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• December 2008
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
• August 2007
• February 2007
• January 2007
• December 2006
• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006

©2006-2024 Open Culture, LLC. All rights reserved.

• Advertise with Us
• Copyright Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use

• Study Guides
• Homework Questions

Rhetorical Analysis Rubric Toni Morrison

The Nobel Lecture in Literature

By toni morrison, the nobel lecture in literature metaphors and similes, dead language as a suit of armor (metaphor).

Morrison gives official, statist discourse as an example of what she calls "dead language," or "unyielding language content to admire its own paralysis." This kind of language is like a suit of armor in that it is designed as decoration, and yet remains empty. Both are rigid and unable to accommodate difference or nuance.

Words as surgeon's hands (metaphor)

The children in the fable ask for the old woman to use her words with care and purpose, like a surgeon uses his or her hands.

Belief as a wide skirt (metaphor)

The children ask the old woman to "show [them] belief's wide skirt" with her stories. In other words, they want the old woman to use her words to broaden and diversify their knowledge of human experience.

The old woman's answer as a television script (metaphor)

The children accuse the old woman of giving them a deceptive answer, one that reveals nothing and contains no meaning. They liken it to "a made-for-television script."

Words that pack women's throats (simile)

Morrison says that the old woman knows that there will be more violent language in the world. Specifically, she cites words designed for violence against women, "to pack their throats like pate-producing geese with their own unsayable, transgressive words..."

The Nobel Lecture in Literature Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer section for The Nobel Lecture in Literature is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

Study Guide for The Nobel Lecture in Literature

The Nobel Lecture In Literature study guide contains a biography of Toni Morrison, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

• About The Nobel Lecture in Literature
• The Nobel Lecture in Literature Summary
• Character List

Literary and Critical Theory

• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Toni Morrison

Introduction, general overviews.

• Short Story
• Selected Pieces for Performance
• Edited Collections and Forewords
• Essay Collections on Two or More Morrison Texts, 1980s and 1990s
• Essay Collections on Two or More Morrison Texts since 2000
• Monographs on Two or More Morrison Texts in the 1980s
• Monographs on Two or More Morrison Texts in the 1990s
• Monographs on Two or More Novels by Morrison in the 2000s
• Monographs on Two or More Morrison Texts since 2010
• Articles and Chapters on Two or More Morrison Texts
• Essay Collections and Monographs on Single Novels
• Articles and Chapters on Single Novels
• Articles and Chapters on Performance Pieces
• Scholarship that Compares Morrison with Other Authors
• Special Issues of Journals
• Thematic Studies
• On Adaptations of Morrison’s Work for Screen and Stage
• Analysis of and Materials for Teaching Toni Morrison
• Festschrifts/Tributes/Retrospective
• Reference Works and Bibliographies

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Neo-Slave Narratives
• Race and Disability

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Black Atlantic
• Postcolonialism and Digital Humanities
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Toni Morrison by Tessa Roynon LAST REVIEWED: 26 July 2017 LAST MODIFIED: 26 July 2017 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0044

Toni Morrison (b. 18 February 1931), winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1993, is the author of eleven novels to date. Born in Lorain, Ohio, to working-class parents, and the first member of her family to graduate from college (Howard University in 1953), it is a striking paradox that her own life in some ways embodies the kind of “American dream” that both her novels and she herself call into question. Her best-known work is Beloved (1987), which won the Pulitzer Prize in 1988, but she is also acclaimed for The Bluest Eye (1970) and Song of Solomon (1977), both regularly taught at high schools in the United States. She has been championed in popular spheres such as Oprah’s Book Club, while at the same time attracting a vast following of scholars, who are drawn to the pertinence of her political engagement, the original beauty of her language and narrative technique, and the rewarding difficulty of novels such as Jazz (1992) and A Mercy (2008). She is also a noted literary critic in her own right, and her study of blackness in classic American literature by white authors, Playing in the Dark (1992), has had a lasting influence on the ways texts of all kinds are analyzed and taught. As this article documents, she is also the author of a number of paradigm-shifting essays, a short story, several pieces for performance (both sole- and co-authored), and numerous children’s books. Her Nobel Prize acceptance speech is itself a masterpiece, outlining her belief in the radical power of literature to challenge the dominant culture. Her novels, which together examine African American history through representations of individual lives that are both psychologically detailed and aesthetically experimental, epitomize that radical power. For this reason (among others), they are also valued as a rich site of theoretical exploration; hers is fiction that “does theory.” It has been translated into around thirty languages, and Morrison is studied across the globe from Japan to France, where she was awarded the Legion d’Honneur in 2010. Beloved by Barack Obama, in recent years she has become something of a celebrity public intellectual, often called upon to articulate her always-astute analysis of the realities of racial politics in the United States (and across the world). Scholars increasingly acknowledge the significance of her oeuvre as a major cultural intervention, and as a serious, enduring contribution to global intellectual thought.

The works in this section range from brief but useful assessments within larger studies ( Hill 2011 , Mobley McKenzie 2004 ) to more in-depth discussions of Morrison’s life, work, and the critical field (e.g., Goulimari 2011 ). The drawback to any overview of a living author is that it quickly becomes out of date or incomplete. None of the studies discussed here cover the novel God Help the Child (2015), for example. This does not invalidate the usefulness of relatively early studies, however, such as Matus 1998 or Kubitschek 1998 . The second of these two contains a detailed summary of each plot, whereas the first, in its comparatively in-depth discussions, assumes prior knowledge of each novel. Roynon 2013 gives an overview of the critical field, which Smith 2012 does not, but Smith’s perspective on African American culture and her discussion of the writing for children is not replicated anywhere else. Terry 2005 invaluably positions the first twenty-five years of scholarship on Morrison within broader theoretical movements.

Goulimari, Pelagia. Toni Morrison . New York: Routledge, 2011.

Longest, most detailed overview of Morrison’s novels, up to A Mercy , and the key nonfiction. Useful account of Morrison’s life interspersed with its historical context. Includes detailed close readings of key moments in the novels alongside comparison with other writers across the cultural spectrum. Discusses selected criticism thematically and from a range of theoretical perspectives, in relation to each novel. Useful bibliography.

Hill, Michael. “Toni Morrison and the Post–Civil Rights African American Novel.” In The Cambridge History of the American Novel . Edited by Leonard Cassuto, 1064–1083. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521899079.070

Reads Morrison as the preeminent African American novelist since 1970. Eschews comprehensive survey in favor of invaluable analyses of the first five novels in relation to numerous contemporaneous black American novelists and aesthetic/political movements (such as Black Arts). Includes only one sentence on Jazz and nothing on the novels that postdate this.

Kubitschek, Missy Denn. Toni Morrison: A Critical Companion . Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1998.

Standard overview of the first seven novels, including a short but clear discussion of the narrative technique and plot of each novel. Invaluable for its comprehensive list of newspaper and magazine reviews of each novel (from The Bluest Eye to Paradise ) on pages 189–192.

Matus, Jill. Toni Morrison . Contemporary World Writers. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1998.

Clear, detailed and highly readable overview of Morrison’s first six novels, with a postscript on Paradise . Chapters present a discussion of themes and technique without any overt summary of the plot. Chronology of Morrison’s life and the bibliography are rigorous and useful up to the year of the book’s publication.

Mobley McKenzie, Marilyn. “Spaces for Readers: The Novels of Toni Morrison.” In The Cambridge Companion to the African American Novel . Edited by Maryemma Graham, 221–232. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521815746.014

Overview of the novels from The Bluest Eye to Paradise that emphasizes the texts’ insistence on an active, creative role for the reader in the collaborative construction of meaning.

Roynon, Tessa. The Cambridge Introduction to Toni Morrison . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Clearly written overview of novels from The Bluest Eye to A Mercy , and a discussion of the nonfiction that is extensive relative to comparable works. Includes overview of the main contexts with which Morrison’s work engages, and of the critical field.

Smith, Valerie. Toni Morrison: Writing the Moral Imagination . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118326732

Relatively brief (136 pages) but engaged survey. Around ten pages of commentary on each of the first nine novels (longer on Beloved ); five pages as an epilogue on Home . No discrete section on criticism, but footnotes do cite a range of critics, particularly leading African American scholars such as Wall and Fultz. List of further reading.

Terry, Jennifer. “Reading Toni Morrison Critically.” Literature Compass 2.1 (2005).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2005.00147.x

Succinct overview of critical approaches to Morrison up to the year of this article’s publication, illuminating her position in relation to the shifting parameters of American, African American, postcolonial, and transatlantic studies. Useful for undergraduates and those new to these fields.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Literary and Critical Theory »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Achebe, Chinua
• Adorno, Theodor
• Aesthetics, Post-Soul
• Affect Studies
• Afrofuturism
• Agamben, Giorgio
• Anzaldúa, Gloria E.
• Apel, Karl-Otto
• Appadurai, Arjun
• Badiou, Alain
• Baudrillard, Jean
• Belsey, Catherine
• Benjamin, Walter
• Bettelheim, Bruno
• Bhabha, Homi K.
• Biopower, Biopolitics and
• Blanchot, Maurice
• Bloom, Harold
• Bourdieu, Pierre
• Brecht, Bertolt
• Brooks, Cleanth
• Caputo, John D.
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh
• Conversation Analysis
• Cosmopolitanism
• Creolization/Créolité
• Crip Theory
• Critical Theory
• Cultural Materialism
• de Certeau, Michel
• de Man, Paul
• de Saussure, Ferdinand
• Deconstruction
• Deleuze, Gilles
• Derrida, Jacques
• Dollimore, Jonathan
• Du Bois, W.E.B.
• Eagleton, Terry
• Eco, Umberto
• Ecocriticism
• English Colonial Discourse and India
• Environmental Ethics
• Fanon, Frantz
• Feminism, Transnational
• Foucault, Michel
• Frankfurt School
• Freud, Sigmund
• Frye, Northrop
• Genet, Jean
• Girard, René
• Global South
• Goldberg, Jonathan
• Gramsci, Antonio
• Greimas, Algirdas Julien
• Grief and Comparative Literature
• Guattari, Félix
• Habermas, Jürgen
• Haraway, Donna J.
• Hartman, Geoffrey
• Hawkes, Terence
• Hemispheric Studies
• Hermeneutics
• Hillis-Miller, J.
• Holocaust Literature
• Human Rights and Literature
• Humanitarian Fiction
• Hutcheon, Linda
• Žižek, Slavoj
• Imperial Masculinity
• Irigaray, Luce
• Jameson, Fredric
• JanMohamed, Abdul R.
• Johnson, Barbara
• Kagame, Alexis
• Kolodny, Annette
• Kristeva, Julia
• Lacan, Jacques
• Laclau, Ernesto
• Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe
• Laplanche, Jean
• Leavis, F. R.
• Levinas, Emmanuel
• Levi-Strauss, Claude
• Literature, Dalit
• Lonergan, Bernard
• Lotman, Jurij
• Lukács, Georg
• Lyotard, Jean-François
• Metz, Christian
• Morrison, Toni
• Mouffe, Chantal
• Nancy, Jean-Luc
• New Historicism
• New Materialism
• Partition Literature
• Peirce, Charles Sanders
• Philosophy of Theater, The
• Postcolonial Theory
• Posthumanism
• Postmodernism
• Post-Structuralism
• Psychoanalytic Theory
• Queer Medieval
• Rancière, Jacques
• Ransom, John Crowe
• Reader Response Theory
• Rich, Adrienne
• Richards, I. A.
• Ronell, Avital
• Rosenblatt, Louse
• Said, Edward
• Settler Colonialism
• Socialist/Marxist Feminism
• Stiegler, Bernard
• Structuralism
• Theatre of the Absurd
• Thing Theory
• Tolstoy, Leo
• Tomashevsky, Boris
• Translation
• Transnationalism in Postcolonial and Subaltern Studies
• Virilio, Paul
• Warren, Robert Penn
• White, Hayden
• Wittig, Monique
• World Literature
• Zimmerman, Bonnie
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [66.249.64.20|91.193.111.216]
• 91.193.111.216

Toni Morrison on How to Be Your Own Story and Reap the Rewards of Adulthood in a Culture That Fetishizes Youth

By maria popova.

Her extraordinary speech, included in the graduation compendium Take This Advice ( public library ), takes the art of the commencement address to the level of masterpiece — an art of taking what is and has always been true, rotating it 360 degrees with tremendous love and intellectual elegance, and coming back full-circle to the old truth that feels, suddenly, new and fresh and invigorating.

Morrison begins with a necessary nod to educators — a profession with a tryingly high risk of burnout :

I would remind the faculty and the administration of what each knows: that the work they do takes second place to nothing, nothing at all, and that theirs is a first order profession.

She then turns to one of the tritest, if truest, assertions of the commencement address genre — the idea that the future is the graduates’ for the taking:

The fact is it is not yours for the taking. And it is not whatever you make of it. The future is also what other people make of it, how other people will participate in it and impinge on your experience of it. But I’m not going to talk anymore about the future because I’m hesitant to describe or predict because I’m not even certain that it exists. That is to say, I’m not certain that somehow, perhaps, a burgeoning ménage à trois of political interests, corporate interests and military interests will not prevail and literally annihilate an inhabitable, humane future. Because I don’t think we can any longer rely on separation of powers, free speech, religious tolerance or unchallengeable civil liberties as a matter of course. That is, not while finite humans in the flux of time make decisions of infinite damage. Not while finite humans make infinite claims of virtue and unassailable power that are beyond their competence, if not their reach.

Although she argues that the past is rife with values “worthy of reverence and transmission” — this, after all, is a foundational premise here on Brain Pickings — Morrison considers the insufficiency of blindly turning to the past in remedying the present:

The past is already in debt to the mismanaged present. And besides, contrary to what you may have heard or learned, the past is not done and it is not over, it’s still in process, which is another way of saying that when it’s critiqued, analyzed, it yields new information about itself. The past is already changing as it is being reexamined, as it is being listened to for deeper resonances. Actually it can be more liberating than any imagined future if you are willing to identify its evasions, its distortions, its lies, and are willing to unleash its secrets.

Chief among these lies and distortions are the ideas our culture purveys about happiness. In a sentiment that calls to mind Ursula K. Le Guin’s devastatingly beautiful meditation on aging , Morrison issues an admonition to graduates, tucked into which is urgent wisdom for any breathing, dreaming human being in our world today:

I’m sure you have been told that this is the best time of your life. It may be. But if it’s true that this is the best time of your life, if you have already lived or are now living at this age the best years, or if the next few turn out to be the best, then you have my condolences. Because you’ll want to remain here, stuck in these so-called best years, never maturing, wanting only to look, to feel and be the adolescent that whole industries are devoted to forcing you to remain. One more flawless article of clothing, one more elaborate toy, the truly perfect diet, the harmless but necessary drug, the almost final elective surgery, the ultimate cosmetic-all designed to maintain hunger for stasis. While children are being eroticized into adults, adults are being exoticized into eternal juvenilia. I know that happiness has been the real, if covert, target of your labors here, your choices of companions, of the profession that you will enter. You deserve it and I want you to gain it, everybody should. But if that’s all you have on your mind, then you do have my sympathy, and if these are indeed the best years of your life, you do have my condolences because there is nothing, believe me, more satisfying, more gratifying than true adulthood. The adulthood that is the span of life before you. The process of becoming one is not inevitable. Its achievement is a difficult beauty, an intensely hard won glory, which commercial forces and cultural vapidity should not be permitted to deprive you of.

With a wistful eye to the damage her own generation has done in instilling these illusory ideals of commodified happiness, Morrison urges the next generation:

You don’t have to accept those media labels. You need not settle for any defining category. You don’t have to be merely a taxpayer or a red state or a blue state or a consumer or a minority or a majority.

To couple this rejection of old paradigms with a constructive reimagining of new and better ones, Morrison argues, requires learning to own your story — a notion nowhere more beautifully articulated than in her lucid and luminous closing words:

You are your own stories and therefore free to imagine and experience what it means to be human without wealth. What it feels like to be human without domination over others, without reckless arrogance, without fear of others unlike you, without rotating, rehearsing and reinventing the hatreds you learned in the sandbox. And although you don’t have complete control over the narrative (no author does, I can tell you), you could nevertheless create it. Although you will never fully know or successfully manipulate the characters who surface or disrupt your plot, you can respect the ones who do by paying them close attention and doing them justice. The theme you choose may change or simply elude you, but being your own story means you can always choose the tone. It also means that you can invent the language to say who you are and what you mean. But then, I am a teller of stories and therefore an optimist, a believer in the ethical bend of the human heart, a believer in the mind’s disgust with fraud and its appetite for truth, a believer in the ferocity of beauty. So, from my point of view, which is that of a storyteller, I see your life as already artful, waiting, just waiting and ready for you to make it art.

Take This Advice includes thirty-five more excellent addresses, including ones by Meryl Streep, Seamus Heaney, and Nora Ephron.

Not in the book but well worth devouring are Joseph Brodsky’s six rules for winning at the game of life (University of Michigan, 1988), George Saunders on the power of kindness (Syracuse University, 2013), Teresita Fernandez on what it really means to be an artist (Virginia Commonwealth University, 2013), Debbie Millman on courage and the creative life (San Jose State University, 2013), Kurt Vonnegut on boredom, belonging, and our human responsibility (Fredonia College, 1978), Bill Watterson on creative integrity (Kenyon College, 1990), Patti Smith on learning to count on yourself (Pratt University, 2010), John Waters on creative rebellion (RISD, 2015), and David Foster Wallace’s legendary This Is Water (Kenyon College, 2005).

— Published July 21, 2015 — https://www.themarginalian.org/2015/07/21/toni-morrison-wellesley-commencement/ —

www.themarginalian.org

PRINT ARTICLE

Email article, filed under, books commencement culture philosophy storytelling toni morrison, view full site.

The Marginalian participates in the Bookshop.org and Amazon.com affiliate programs, designed to provide a means for sites to earn commissions by linking to books. In more human terms, this means that whenever you buy a book from a link here, I receive a small percentage of its price, which goes straight back into my own colossal biblioexpenses. Privacy policy . (TLDR: You're safe — there are no nefarious "third parties" lurking on my watch or shedding crumbs of the "cookies" the rest of the internet uses.)

• Houston Community College
• Eagle Online

• Peggy Porter
• Reading Selections

Toni Morrison's Nobel Lecture in Literature (1993)

The link address is: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1993/morrison/lecture/