Renewable-energy development in a net-zero world

The rapid maturation of wind and solar power has been nothing short of astonishing. Not long ago, the development of new solar and wind farms was typically driven by small regional players, and the cost was significantly higher than that of a coal plant. Today, the cost of renewables has plummeted, and many solar and wind projects are undertaken by large multinational companies, which often also announce staggering development targets.

About the authors

This article is a collaborative effort by Florian Heineke, Nadine Janecke, Holger Klärner, Florian Kühn , Humayun Tai , and Raffael Winter , representing views from McKinsey’s Electric Power & Natural Gas Practice.

Over the past decade, the growth of renewable energy has consistently and dramatically outperformed nearly all expectations (Exhibit 1). Upward corrections of estimates have become something of a ritual.

But this growth story is just getting started. As countries aim to reach ambitious decarbonization targets, renewable energy—led by wind and solar—is poised to become the backbone of the world’s power supply. Along with capacity additions from major energy providers, new types of players are entering the market (Exhibit 2). Today’s fast followers include major oil and gas companies, which aim to shift their business models to profit from the increased demand for renewables and the electrification of vehicles, and private-equity players and institutional investors that make renewable energy a central component of their investment strategy. Leaders in the shipping industry are investing in renewables to enable the production of hydrogen and ammonia as zero-emission fuel sources; steel manufacturers are eyeing green hydrogen to decarbonize their steel production, with renewables providing the green electricity for the process. Car manufacturing companies are also striking renewable-energy deals to help power their operations and manufacturing, as well as making investments in wind and solar projects.

McKinsey estimates that by 2026, global renewable-electricity capacity will rise more than 80 percent from 2020 levels (to more than 5,022 gigawatts). 1 Global Energy Perspective 2022 , McKinsey, April 2022. Of this growth, two-thirds will come from wind and solar, an increase of 150 percent (3,404 gigawatts). By 2035, renewables will generate 60 percent of the world’s electricity. 2 Global Energy Perspective 2022 , McKinsey, April 2022. But even these projections might be too low. Three years ago, we looked at advances made by renewable energy and asked, “How much faster can they grow?” 3 “ Rethinking the renewable strategy for an age of global competition ,” McKinsey, October 11, 2019. The answer is: faster than you think they can.

Three core capabilities for wind and solar developers

This race to build additional solar and wind capacity increases the pressure on developers to execute efficiently and heightens competition for finite resources. Still, the three winning capabilities we identified three years ago as important for building or expanding a renewables business are even more critical now. They form the bedrock required to tackle upcoming challenges:

  • Value-chain excellence. As competition intensifies and government support for renewables subsides, strong capabilities across the entire value chain are the required cost of admission. For instance, gaining access to scarce amounts of attractive land will require differentiation in project origination and development. As margins squeeze and operators’ exposure to risk increases, ambitious companies will want to explore new, profitable offtake markets for their electricity, such as data centers or hydrogen electrolyzers for industrial production.
  • Economies of scale and skill. Driven by the rapid scaling of the renewables industry, many players have built efficient operating models. However, finding employees with the necessary skills and capabilities, particularly in high-demand areas such as project development and engineering, is becoming a bottleneck for growth ambitions.
  • Agile operating model. Agility and speed will be key in finding innovative ways to integrate partners and in establishing robust, high-performing supply chains. They will also enable businesses to shift resources quickly to the biggest value pools and respond to changes in the landscape, such as shifting regulations or price volatility.

Four challenges that will define the new era of renewable energy

Leveraging these capabilities as a strong foundation, successful renewables developers must navigate an increasingly complex and competitive landscape. Specifically, they will have to focus on and address four emerging challenges:

  • A scarcity of top-quality land. Developers are in a constant scramble to identify new sites with increasing speed. Our analysis in Germany, a country aiming to nearly double its share of electricity coming from renewables by 2030, offers a glimpse into the constraints. Of the 51 percent of the country’s land that is potentially suitable for onshore wind farms, regulatory, environmental, and technical constraints eliminate all but 9 percent. 4 McKinsey land use optimization model. Meeting capacity targets will mean adding wind turbines to 4 to 6 percent of the country, giving developers very little room for error.
  • A blue-collar and white-collar labor shortage. Across economies, the “Great Attrition” is making it difficult for companies to find and keep employees. Since April 2021, 20 million to 25 million US workers have quit their jobs, and 40 percent of employees globally say they are at least somewhat likely to leave their current position in the next three to six months. 5 Aaron De Smet, Bonnie Dowling, Bryan Hancock, and Bill Schaninger, “ The Great Attrition is making hiring harder. Are you searching the right talent pools? ,” McKinsey Quarterly , July 13, 2022; Table 4. Quits levels and rates by industry and region, seasonally adjusted, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, updated October 4, 2022. This environment presents a particularly acute challenge for industries such as renewable energy, where specific technical expertise and experience are crucial elements of success. For instance, our analysis suggests that between now and 2030, the global renewables industry will need an additional 1.1 million blue-collar workers to develop and construct wind and solar plants, and another 1.7 million to operate and maintain them. 6 Renewable energy benefits: Leveraging local capacity for onshore wind , International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2017; Renewable energy benefits: Leveraging local capacity for offshore wind , IRENA, 2018; Renewable energy benefits: Leveraging local capacity for solar PV , IRENA, 2017. This includes construction laborers, electricians, truck and semitrailer drivers, and operating engineers.
  • Supply chain pressures. The soaring cost of steel, manufacturing disruptions caused by extended lockdowns in China, and transportation backlogs at ports are already making it difficult for wind and solar developers to complete projects in their pipeline on time and on budget. Some of these pressures will abate as others move to the forefront. For instance, many of the raw materials needed to manufacture solar panels and wind turbines are projected to be in short supply. This includes nickel, copper, and rare earth metals such as neodymium and praseodymium, which are indispensable for the creation of magnets used in wind turbine generators.
  • Pressure on profits and volatility of returns in the short term. The increasing number of players moving into the renewable-development space, combined with reduced levels of government support and higher costs of materials, technology, and financing, is putting pressure on returns. At the same time, an all-time-high price volatility creates uncertainty and market risk.

Renewables developers will need to act decisively to prepare for these upcoming challenges. In a series of future articles, we provide detailed insights on each of these pressures and share potential ways players can take action.

Florian Heineke is a consultant in McKinsey’s Frankfurt office; Nadine Janecke is an associate partner in the Hamburg office; Holger Klärner is a partner in the Berlin office; Florian Kühn is a partner in the Oslo office; Humayun Tai is a senior partner in the New York office; and Raffael Winter is a partner in the Düsseldorf office.

The authors wish to thank Nadia Christakou, Florent Erbar, David Frankel, Emil Hosius, Anna Kemp, Nadine Palmowski, Andreas Schlosser, Sophia Spitzer, Christian Staudt, and Jakub Zivansky for their contributions to this article.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Building resilient supply chains for the European energy transition

Building resilient supply chains for the European energy transition

Global Energy Perspective 2022

Global Energy Perspective 2022

Net-Zero Power Sector

The power sector’s net-zero transition: Scaling up renewables and infrastructure

AIP Publishing Logo

  • Previous Article
  • Next Article

A case study on developing renewable battery energy storage

  • Split-Screen
  • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Supplementary Data
  • Peer Review
  • Open the PDF for in another window
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Cite Icon Cite
  • Search Site

Mara Johnson-Groh; A case study on developing renewable battery energy storage. Scilight 14 April 2023; 2023 (15): 151106. https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0017887

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • Reference Manager

graphic

When the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine, renewable power producers have to rely on stored energy. Battery energy storage helps suppliers through peak demand times and increases power grid stability. However, current power markets often do not incentivize storage, which has different costs and physical constraints than non-renewables generators.

The United States, China, Australia, and the United Kingdom have all successfully developed renewable energy storage systems. Sun et al. conducted a study of these countries to determine the policies and market mechanisms that could help other countries promote their own energy storage deployments.

“Energy storage development is an essential regulating resource for future intermittent renewables with high penetration to the grid,” said author Huihong Yuan. “We conducted this study in the hope that it can provide useful references for energy storage development in various countries in terms of policy and market-based development.”

The researchers studied the installed capacity and development plans, and analyzed the impact of energy storage policies and business models. From their analysis, the researchers summarized the challenges in each country and proposed targeted solutions.

“We found that the market-oriented development of energy storage has made the best progress in the United States at present,” Yuan said. “I believe that further analyzing the reason for this progress would be helpful to other countries looking to develop energy storage.”

The researchers hope their results will be a useful reference for policymakers, investors, and operators in countries developing energy storage in conjunction with renewables. The researchers intend to continue studying the economics of energy storage, which remains a major challenge to development.

Source: “Development status, policy and market mechanisms for battery energy storage in the US, China, Australia and the UK,” by Jin Sun, Jing Liu, Yangguang Wang, Huihong Yuan, and Ze Yan, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (2023). The article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0146184 .

Citing articles via

Sign up for alerts.

case study on renewable energy development

  • Online ISSN 2572-7907
  • For Researchers
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Our Publishing Partners  
  • Physics Today
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Special Topics

pubs.aip.org

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Connect with AIP Publishing

This feature is available to subscribers only.

Sign In or Create an Account

National Renewable Energy Laboratory Logo

Renewable Energy Data, Analysis, and Decisions Viewed through a Case Study in Bangladesh: Preprint

  • Accelerated Deployment and Decision Support
  • Strategic Energy Analysis Center

Research output : Contribution to conference › Paper

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/CP-7A40-74147
  • decision making
  • developing countries
  • renewable energy data
  • Renewable Energy Data Explorer
  • renewable energy resource data

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

  • https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/74147.pdf

Fingerprint

  • Renewable Energy Social Sciences 100%
  • Case Study Social Sciences 100%
  • Energy Sector Economics, Econometrics and Finance 100%
  • Developing Countries Economics, Econometrics and Finance 100%
  • Renewable Energy Resource Social Sciences 60%
  • Power Generation Engineering 60%
  • Renewable Energy Resources Engineering 60%
  • Sustainable Energy Supply Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50%

T1 - Renewable Energy Data, Analysis, and Decisions Viewed through a Case Study in Bangladesh: Preprint

AU - Watson, Andrea

AU - Jacobson, Mark

AU - Cox, Sarah

N2 - Many developing countries around the world have signaled their intention to transition their energy sectors to rely on cleaner sources of electricity generation for a variety of reasons that may include complying with their Nationally Determined Contributions (in support of the Paris Climate Agreement), increasing energy security, or reducing air pollution. Renewable energy resources are increasingly a cost competitive option for new electricity generation; however, nations must consider renewable energy potential if they wish to increase these technologies in their electricity generation mix. Yet, goal setting, policymaking, grid modeling, and investment decisions that will enable renewable energy development all depend on the existence and quality of renewable energy resource data. This paper aims to summarize the relationship between renewable energy data, analysis, and decision making for developing countries seeking to transition their energy sector and to consider Bangladesh as a case study of a country that has worked with development organizations and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to develop a national inventory of renewable energy resource data to enable critical decision making.

AB - Many developing countries around the world have signaled their intention to transition their energy sectors to rely on cleaner sources of electricity generation for a variety of reasons that may include complying with their Nationally Determined Contributions (in support of the Paris Climate Agreement), increasing energy security, or reducing air pollution. Renewable energy resources are increasingly a cost competitive option for new electricity generation; however, nations must consider renewable energy potential if they wish to increase these technologies in their electricity generation mix. Yet, goal setting, policymaking, grid modeling, and investment decisions that will enable renewable energy development all depend on the existence and quality of renewable energy resource data. This paper aims to summarize the relationship between renewable energy data, analysis, and decision making for developing countries seeking to transition their energy sector and to consider Bangladesh as a case study of a country that has worked with development organizations and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to develop a national inventory of renewable energy resource data to enable critical decision making.

KW - analysis

KW - decision making

KW - developing countries

KW - renewable energy data

KW - Renewable Energy Data Explorer

KW - renewable energy resource data

T2 - 2019 Decision Analysis Conference

Y2 - 19 July 2019 through 21 July 2019

Monash University Logo

  • Help & FAQ

A case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar: challenges and potential solutions

Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Myanmar has one of the lowest electrification rates in the world, and most of its inhabitants, who lack access to electricity, live off-grid in rural areas. Despite Myanmar having abundant sun and wind energy resources, which could potentially generate electricity for rural communities, renewable energy growth in Myanmar is stunted. In this article, we examine the case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar to better understand the factors that influence renewable energy development and deployment in a developing country context. Our analysis reveals that there are numerous reasons for the lack of solar, wind, and biomass energy growth in Myanmar, such as regressive electricity tariffs, problematic hydropower contracts, low levels of social acceptance and awareness of clean technologies, and a lack of institutional policy framework for renewable energy. To reduce energy poverty and increase the share of electricity generation from renewable resources in Myanmar, we recommend tariff reforms and the establishment of a transparent, effective national policy framework. Increasing access to financial resources in rural areas, gaining public trust and support from local communities, and promoting their involvement in decision making in renewable energy projects should also be prioritised. Disseminating knowledge on clean technologies is also recommended to increase environmental awareness and encourage long-term behavioural change.

  • Developing countries
  • Electrification
  • Renewable energy development
  • Solar energy
  • Wind energy

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

  • 10.1525/cse.2020.1109204

Other files and links

  • Link to publication in Scopus

T1 - A case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar

T2 - challenges and potential solutions

AU - Hlaing, Ei Hnin

AU - Dargusch, Paul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 by the Regents of the University of California.

PY - 2020/10/28

Y1 - 2020/10/28

N2 - Myanmar has one of the lowest electrification rates in the world, and most of its inhabitants, who lack access to electricity, live off-grid in rural areas. Despite Myanmar having abundant sun and wind energy resources, which could potentially generate electricity for rural communities, renewable energy growth in Myanmar is stunted. In this article, we examine the case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar to better understand the factors that influence renewable energy development and deployment in a developing country context. Our analysis reveals that there are numerous reasons for the lack of solar, wind, and biomass energy growth in Myanmar, such as regressive electricity tariffs, problematic hydropower contracts, low levels of social acceptance and awareness of clean technologies, and a lack of institutional policy framework for renewable energy. To reduce energy poverty and increase the share of electricity generation from renewable resources in Myanmar, we recommend tariff reforms and the establishment of a transparent, effective national policy framework. Increasing access to financial resources in rural areas, gaining public trust and support from local communities, and promoting their involvement in decision making in renewable energy projects should also be prioritised. Disseminating knowledge on clean technologies is also recommended to increase environmental awareness and encourage long-term behavioural change.

AB - Myanmar has one of the lowest electrification rates in the world, and most of its inhabitants, who lack access to electricity, live off-grid in rural areas. Despite Myanmar having abundant sun and wind energy resources, which could potentially generate electricity for rural communities, renewable energy growth in Myanmar is stunted. In this article, we examine the case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar to better understand the factors that influence renewable energy development and deployment in a developing country context. Our analysis reveals that there are numerous reasons for the lack of solar, wind, and biomass energy growth in Myanmar, such as regressive electricity tariffs, problematic hydropower contracts, low levels of social acceptance and awareness of clean technologies, and a lack of institutional policy framework for renewable energy. To reduce energy poverty and increase the share of electricity generation from renewable resources in Myanmar, we recommend tariff reforms and the establishment of a transparent, effective national policy framework. Increasing access to financial resources in rural areas, gaining public trust and support from local communities, and promoting their involvement in decision making in renewable energy projects should also be prioritised. Disseminating knowledge on clean technologies is also recommended to increase environmental awareness and encourage long-term behavioural change.

KW - Developing countries

KW - Electrification

KW - Myanmar

KW - Renewable energy development

KW - Solar energy

KW - Wind energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104191570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/cse.2020.1109204

DO - 10.1525/cse.2020.1109204

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85104191570

SN - 2473-9510

JO - Case Studies in the Environment

JF - Case Studies in the Environment

M1 - 1109204

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Brief Communication
  • Published: 08 March 2024

Aligning renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts

  • Uzma Ashraf   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-9315 1 , 2 ,
  • Toni Lyn Morelli   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-5294 3 ,
  • Adam B. Smith   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6420-1659 4 &
  • Rebecca R. Hernandez   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-2949 1 , 2  

Nature Climate Change volume  14 ,  pages 242–246 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1981 Accesses

147 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Climate-change impacts
  • Conservation biology
  • Decision making
  • Power stations
  • Sustainability

Fossil fuel dependence can be reduced, in part, by renewable energy expansion. Increasingly, renewable energy siting seeks to avoid significant impacts on biodiversity but rarely considers how species ranges will shift under climate change. Here we undertake a systematic literature review on the topic and overlay future renewable energy siting maps with the ranges of two threatened species under future climate scenarios to highlight this potential conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

195,33 € per year

only 16,28 € per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

case study on renewable energy development

Similar content being viewed by others

case study on renewable energy development

Quantifying biodiversity trade-offs in the face of widespread renewable and unconventional energy development

case study on renewable energy development

Mapping global development potential for renewable energy, fossil fuels, mining and agriculture sectors

case study on renewable energy development

Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation

Data availability.

Datasets are available in the DRYAD repository, accessible at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bnzs7h4j0 (ref. 57 ). Private access link to download the data files: https://datadryad.org/stash/share/G6ZVrB6TIqhDxNj1_N7IWob-2Opt269EwgnsQKgMMmg .

Code availability

Code for dispersal simulations and species distribution model analysis used in this study are adopted from https://github.com/fmachados/grinnell (ref. 50 ) and https://github.com/marlonecobos/kuenm (ref. 54 ).

Bouckaert, S. et al. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (International Energy Agency, 2021).

Schachat, S. R. & Labandeira, C. C. Are insects heading toward their first mass extinction? Distinguishing turnover from crises in their fossil record. Ann. Entomol. Soc. 114 , 99–118 (2021).

Article   Google Scholar  

Horváth, Z., Ptacnik, R., Vad, C. F. & Chase, J. M. Habitat loss over six decades accelerates regional and local biodiversity loss via changing landscape connectance. Ecol. Lett. 22 , 1019–1027 (2019).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Weiskopf, S. R. et al. Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services and natural resource management in the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 733 , 137782 (2020).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Lovering, J., Swain, M., Blomqvist, L. & Hernandez, R. R. Land-use intensity of electricity production and tomorrow’s energy landscape. PLoS ONE 17 , e0270155 (2022).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Morelli, T. L. et al. Climate-change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18 , 228–234 (2020).

Erfanian, M. B., Sagharyan, M., Memariani, F. & Ejtehadi, H. Predicting range shifts of three endangered endemic plants of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province under global change. Sci. Rep. 11 , 9159 (2021).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Troia, M. J., McManamay, R. A., Kao, S.-C. & O’Connor, P. W. A heuristic tool to assess regional impacts of renewable energy infrastructure on conservation areas. Biol. Conserv. 263 , 109334 (2021).

Grodsky, S. M. & Hernandez, R. R. Reduced ecosystem services of desert plants from ground-mounted solar energy development. Nat. Sustain. 3 , 1036–1043 (2020).

Hernandez, R. R. et al. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 29 , 766–779 (2014).

Walston, L. J. et al. Examining the potential for agricultural benefits from pollinator habitat at solar facilities in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 , 7566–7576 (2018).

Grodsky, S. M., Campbell, J. W. & Hernandez, R. R. Solar energy development impacts flower-visiting beetles and flies in the Mojave Desert. Biol. Conserv. 263 , 109336 (2021).

Sawyer, H. et al. Trade-offs between utility-scale solar development and ungulates on western rangelands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20 , 345–351 (2022).

Conkling, T. J. et al. Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9 , 211558 (2022).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Levin, M. O. et al. Solar energy-driven land-cover change could alter landscapes critical to animal movement in the continental United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 , 11499–11509 (2023).

Pérez-García, J. M. et al. Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2204505119 (2022).

Hernandez, R. R., Jordaan, S. M., Kaldunski, B. & Kumar, N. Aligning climate change and sustainable development goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Front. Sustain. 1 , 11 (2020).

Dhunny, A. Z., Allam, Z., Lobine, D. & Lollchund, M. R. Sustainable renewable energy planning and wind farming optimization from a biodiversity perspective. Energy 185 , 1282–1297 (2019).

Jager, H. I., Efroymson, R. A. & McManamay, R. A. Renewable energy and biological conservation in a changing world. Biol. Conserv. 263 , 109354 (2021).

Mulvaney, D. Identifying the roots of Green Civil War over utility-scale solar energy projects on public lands across the American Southwest. J. Land Use Sci. 12 , 493–515 (2017).

Miranda, L. et al. Combining connectivity and species distribution modeling to define conservation and restoration priorities for multiple species: a case study in the eastern Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 257 , 109148 (2021).

Xing, L. & Wang, Y. A practical wind farm siting framework integrating ecosystem services—a case study of coastal China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 90 , 106636 (2021).

González, A. & Connell, P. Developing a renewable energy planning decision-support tool: stakeholder input guiding strategic decisions. Appl. Energy 312 , 118782 (2022).

G7 Climate and Environment: Ministers’ Communiqué, London, 21 May 2021 (UK Government, 2021).

Hernandez, R. R. et al. Techno–ecological synergies of solar energy for global sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 2 , 560–568 (2019).

Kruitwagen, L. et al. A global inventory of photovoltaic solar energy generating units. Nature 598 , 604–610 (2021).

Dunnett, S., Holland, R. A., Taylor, G. & Eigenbrod, F. Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2104764119 (2022).

Bernstein, J. M. Climate change, industrial solar, and the globalized local in joshua tree, California. Yearb. Assoc. Pac. Coast Geogr. 78 , 80–93 (2016).

Google Scholar  

Lovich, J. E. & Ennen, J. R. Wildlife conservation and solar energy development in the desert southwest, United States. BioScience 61 , 982–992 (2011).

Chock, R. Y. et al. Evaluating potential effects of solar power facilities on wildlife from an animal behavior perspective. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3 , e319 (2021).

Gibson, L., Wilman, E. N. & Laurance, W. F. How green is ‘green’ energy? Trends Ecol. Evol. 32 , 922–935 (2017).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Agha, M., Lovich, J. E., Ennen, J. R. & Todd, B. D. Wind, sun, and wildlife: do wind and solar energy development ‘short-Circuit’ conservation in the western United States? Environ. Res. Lett. 15 , 075004 (2020).

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Solar Impacts on Wildlife and Ecosystems: Request for Information Response Summary (DOE, 2020).

Leskova, O. V., Frakes, R. A. & Markwith, S. H. Impacting habitat connectivity of the endangered Florida panther for the transition to utility-scale solar energy. J. Appl. Ecol. 59 , 822–834 (2022).

Martín, B., Perez-Bacalu, C., Onrubia, A., De Lucas, M. & Ferrer, M. Impact of wind farms on soaring bird populations at a migratory bottleneck. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 64 , 33 (2018).

Wiens, J. D. Spatial demographic models to inform conservation planning of golden eagles in renewable energy landscapes. J. Raptor Res. 51 , 234–257 (2017).

Pruett, C. L., Patten, M. A. & Wolfe, D. H. Avoidance behavior by prairie grouse: implications for development of wind energy. Conserv. Biol.: J. Soc. Conserv. Biol. 23 , 1253–1259 (2009).

Lloyd, J. D. et al. Prairie grouse and wind energy: the state of the science and implications for risk assessment. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 46 , e1305 (2022).

Thaxter, C. B. et al. Bird and bat species’ global vulnerability to collision mortality at wind farms revealed through a trait-based assessment. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 284 , 20170829 (2017).

Song, N. et al. Effects of wind farms on the nest distribution of magpie ( Pica pica ) in agroforestry systems of Chongming Island. China Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 27 , e01536 (2021).

Asar, S., Jalalpour, S., Ayoubi, F., Rahmani, M. R. & Rezaeian, M. PRISMA; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. J. Rafsanjan Univ. Med. Sci. 15 , 68–80 (2016).

Jeroen, O. pdftools: Text extraction, rendering and converting of pdf documents. R package version 2.3 (2019).

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).

Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11 , 989–1000 (2021).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Telenius, A. Biodiversity information goes public: GBIF at your service. Nord. J. Bot. 29 , 378–381 (2011).

Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-Km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37 , 4302–4315 (2017).

Jenkins, J. D., Mayfield, E. N., Larson, E. D., Pacala, S. W. & Greig, C. Mission Net-Zero America: the nation-building path to a prosperous, net-zero emissions economy. Joule 5 , 2755–2761 (2021).

Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B. & Anderson, R. P. spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38 , 541–545 (2015).

Barve, N. et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 222 , 1810–1819 (2011).

Machado-Stredel, F., Cobos, M. E. & Peterson, A. T. A simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ecological niche models and species distribution models. Front. Biogeogr. 13 , e48814 (2021).

Ashraf, U. et al. Ecological niche model comparison under different climate scenarios: a case study of Olea spp. in Asia. Ecosphere 8 , e01825 (2017).

Bede-Fazekas, Á. & Somodi, I. The way bioclimatic variables are calculated has impact on potential distribution models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11 , 1559–1570 (2020).

Janžekovič, F. & Novak, T. in Principal Component Analysis—Multidisciplinary Applications (ed. Sanguansat, P.) 127–142 (Intech Open, 2012).

Cobos, M. E., Peterson, A. T., Barve, N. & Osorio-Olvera, L. Kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7 , e6281 (2019).

Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. Jr A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36 , 1058–1069 (2013).

Peterson, A. T., Papeş, M. & Soberón, J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 213 , 63–72 (2008).

Ashraf, U.,Morelli, T. L., Smith, A.B. & Hernandez, R. H. Aligning renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts [Dataset]. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bnzs7h4j0 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for U.A., A.B.S. and R.R.H. was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s Energy and Environment Program G-2022-17177. Funding for R.R.H. was also provided by the Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch projects CA-R-A-6689-H and CA-D-LAW-2352-H, the Energy and Efficiency Institute, the Institute of the Environment and the Department of Land, Air & Water Resources at the University of California Davis (UCD). A.B.S. was partially supported by the Alan Graham Fund in Global Change. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. We also thank the Global Ecology and Sustainability Lab (UCD) for their valuable comments that improved the manuscript. Icons for the taxonomic groups in Figs. 1 and 2 were retrieved from Noun Project (creator credits: E. Boatman, G. Lonescu, Aleks, J. Meysmans, Corpus Delicti, N. Smith, Vectors Market, M. Livolsi, G. Chicco, B. Agustín Amenábar Larraín and E. Harrison). Photos were retrieved from iNaturalist (creator credits: Chilipossum, Nmoorhatch, Opisska, Douggoldman, Jbartelett79, Johnkrampl, Milliebasden, Codrin_bucur, Ognevit and Euqirneto) and USGS (photographer credit: P. Leitner).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Wild Energy Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

Uzma Ashraf & Rebecca R. Hernandez

Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

U.S. Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, Amherst, MA, USA

Toni Lyn Morelli

Center for Conservation & Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint Louis, MO, USA

Adam B. Smith

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors conceived the idea for this manuscript. U.A. collected the data and conducted the analysis. U.A. and R.R.H. developed the figures and manuscript text draft. R.R.H., T.L.M. and A.B.S. edited the manuscript text and figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca R. Hernandez .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Climate Change thanks Henriette Jager and Andrea Santangeli for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended data fig. 1 analysis of renewable energy siting and biodiversity-related academic articles..

Cumulative number (n = 157) of renewable energy siting- and biodiversity-related academic articles published over time, categorized by tier (a, b, c) and meeting criteria for inclusion in the systematic literature review. Articles that met criteria were allocated to a three-tiered, non-exclusive classification of increasing depth if it documented the: (a) concept of biodiversity, for example, the inclusion of wildlife and other taxa, protected areas for conservation and similar overlapping topics (n = 146, 93%), (b) role of climate change on biodiversity and/or the taxonomic group(s) and/or the species of interest (n = 12, 18.4%) and (c) role of climate change as a driver of range shifts for biodiversity and/or the taxonomic group(s) and/or the species of interest (n = 2, 1.9%).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Frequency of specific keywords within the corpus.

The x-axis represents the key terms used in the search, including the six key terms per category were: (1) Biodiversity - “biodiversity,” “climate change,” “protected area,” “endangered,” “species,” and “wildlife,”; (2) Methods - “multiple criteria decision analysis,” “criteria,” “analytic hierarchy process,” “overlay analysis”, “suitability prediction,” and “maxent;” (3) Renewable Energy Siting - “energy,” “solar,” “wind,” “site,” “plan,” and “planning.” The y-axis shows the mean number of appearances of these keywords in all the articles (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Alignment of renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts workflow.

An example workflow showing major action steps (a) to align renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts. First, research activities (for example, systematic literature review, interviews) are conducted to inform and identify an appropriate list of species that are threatened by climate change and require mitigation action. Diverse research activities (for example, systematic literature review, interviews) that capture the full knowledge system of actors and entities for a specific context and/or geography (for example, wind development in Texas) will reduce the chances of omitting a species of interest. Next, individual or batch species distribution modelling (SDM) is performed for each species and overlaid with spatially explicit models of renewable energy (RE) scenarios. Subsequent analyses are conducted to identify “Optimal RE Siting Pathways” (that is, spatial datasets) and ultimately, a set of decision outcomes that minimize conflicts with species impacted by climate change (“Decision Outcomes”). We provide a more detailed example of “Core Alignment Analyses” in (b).

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Supplementary Fig. 1 and Text 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Ashraf, U., Morelli, T.L., Smith, A.B. et al. Aligning renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14 , 242–246 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01941-3

Download citation

Received : 13 March 2023

Accepted : 24 January 2024

Published : 08 March 2024

Issue Date : March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01941-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

case study on renewable energy development

case study on renewable energy development

Renewable Energy Policy in Cities: Selected Case Studies

Browse by theme.

  • Dezhou, China   which has actively supported the establishment of renewable energy industries with the Dezhou Economic Development Zone for solar technology
  • Chemnitz, Germany  where the local government enabled the formulation of strategies to use renewable sources and in 2008 developed the Integrated Climate Protection Programme (Integriertes Klimaschutzprogramm).
  • Belo Horizonte, Brazil which has reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emission substantially and, since 2007, turning a closed landfill site into a waste-to-energy facility.
  • Austin, US where the GreenChoice Program active since 2001 has stimulated the initial demand for renewable-based electricity, facilitating municipal and commu­nity procurement of renewable energy.
  • Sydney, Australia, and Nagpur, India where energy efficiency and renewable energy have reduced emissions from public street lights.
  • Sao Paolo, Brazil where a local regulation requires new residential, commercial and industrial buildings to install solar water heating systems (SWH) to cover at least 40% of the energy used for heating water.
  • Malmo, Sweden which set targets significantly more ambitious than either the European Union target for Sweden (49% by 2020) or the national plan (50% by 2020), so that the city is expected to be climate neutral with municipal operations run on 100% renewable energy by 2030.

Additional analyses

100% renewable energy scenarios: supporting ambitious policy targets, green hydrogen for sustainable industrial development: a policy toolkit for developing countries, north africa: policies and finance for renewable energy, renewable energy market analysis: mano river union region, the breakthrough agenda report 2022, related content.

case study on renewable energy development

Record Growth in Renewables, but Progress Needs to be Equitable

case study on renewable energy development

Innovative Policymaking is Crucial to Drive Green Hydrogen Market and Ensure its Sustainable Production

case study on renewable energy development

Renewables Jobs Nearly Doubled in Past Decade, Soared to 13.7 Million in 2022

case study on renewable energy development

G7 Communiqué Echoes IRENA's Call for Rapid Deployment of Renewables

case study on renewable energy development

Under IRENA's ETAF, Masdar and AIIB Reach Financial Close on 3 Uzbek Solar Projects

Tethys Logo: Environmental Effects of Wind and Marine Renewable Energy

Energy justice & coastal communities: The case for Meaningful Marine Renewable Energy Development

Global climate change has prompted many national plans for rapid emissions reductions. For example, the United States recently committed to transitioning to 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035 and net-zero emissions economy-wide by 2050. Parallel to conversations surrounding emissions reductions is the call for energy justice, or the demand for more equitable distribution of energy-related burdens and benefits among communities. To date, energy justice has evolved as a mostly academic conversation, which may limit its utility to praxis. In response, we offer an interdisciplinary framework that aims to organize existing knowledge and lessons learned from energy development. Specifically, we developed the  Meaningful Marine Renewable Energy  (MRE) Development Framework  and conducted a literature review using MRE as a case study. MRE was chosen because it is a nascent renewable energy technology in the US with projects mostly in demonstration stages and no commercial deployment, making it a useful case study to apply lessons learned from other energy sectors and other countries. Discussion of current resources being developed among the MRE community and their implications for furthering energy justice priorities are also explored. We conclude the review with a compiled list of questions meant to support stakeholders in translating theoretical concepts of Meaningful MRE Development to practice. Although the Meaningful MRE framework was developed using MRE as a use case, our interdisciplinary theoretical framework can be applied beyond MRE to other sustainable and renewable energy projects.

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .

Renewable Energy Project Development Toolbox

Explore our full directory of project development resources in the table below. To help refine your search results, you may use the filter and sorting table features.

Please select one or both of the search filters to return the desired results. To select more than one option in a search filter, hold down the Control key on the keyboard while selecting the options. You can then sort the results by selecting the desired column heading. To start over, select "Reset Filters."

No results found

  • Get involved

case study on renewable energy development

  • Energy Access Case Study 6 – Going Renewable: China’s Success Story in Capacity Development

Related Publications

  • Towards an 'Energy Plus' Approach for the Poor
  • Towards an ‘Energy Plus’ Approach for the Poor: An agenda for action for Asia and the Pacific
  • English pdf (0.2 MB)
  • View All Publications in the Series

Energy Access Case Study 06 – Going Renewable: China’s Success Story in Capacity Development

July 27, 2015.

This case study documents the Capacity Building for the Rapid Commercialization of Renewable Energy project (CRE) in China. The CRE has promoted widespread adoption of renewable energy technologies by strengthening the capacities of public and private organizations, facilitating and supporting new policy initiatives, developing a regulatory system, and providing technical and co-financing support for high-value commercial pilot projects.

Document Type

Regions and countries, publications, poverty and the household economy of myanmar: a disappear....

The decline in incomes and limited income-generating capacity are pushing households to adopt negative coping mechanisms, such as cutting non-food expenditure. ...

Guidebook on how to Access Climate Finance for Member Sta...

The technical guidebook provides an overview of climate finance in the region and sources of climate finance flows, as well as the project development process t...

People and Planet: Addressing the Interlinked Challenges ...

Despite being at the halfway point for achieving the SDGs, progress has stalled, achieving only 15 per cent of the targets under the 17 Goals. Most worryingly, ...

SDG 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions: promote p...

SDG 16 (highlights the need for peaceful societies, access to justice and effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. Its realization is es...

Making Our Future: New Directions for Human Development i...

The 2024 Asia-Pacific Human Development Report Making our Future: New Directions for Human Development in Asia and the Pacific, argues that unmet aspirations, h...

Japan and UNDP in Asia and the Pacific: Investing togethe...

The Government of Japan has been a longstanding and key partner of UNDP in Asia and the Pacific region. This report provides a snapshot of results achieved toge...

  • Open access
  • Published: 07 January 2020

Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities

  • Charles Rajesh Kumar. J   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-6463 1 &
  • M. A. Majid 1  

Energy, Sustainability and Society volume  10 , Article number:  2 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

424k Accesses

260 Citations

83 Altmetric

Metrics details

The primary objective for deploying renewable energy in India is to advance economic development, improve energy security, improve access to energy, and mitigate climate change. Sustainable development is possible by use of sustainable energy and by ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for citizens. Strong government support and the increasingly opportune economic situation have pushed India to be one of the top leaders in the world’s most attractive renewable energy markets. The government has designed policies, programs, and a liberal environment to attract foreign investments to ramp up the country in the renewable energy market at a rapid rate. It is anticipated that the renewable energy sector can create a large number of domestic jobs over the following years. This paper aims to present significant achievements, prospects, projections, generation of electricity, as well as challenges and investment and employment opportunities due to the development of renewable energy in India. In this review, we have identified the various obstacles faced by the renewable sector. The recommendations based on the review outcomes will provide useful information for policymakers, innovators, project developers, investors, industries, associated stakeholders and departments, researchers, and scientists.

Introduction

The sources of electricity production such as coal, oil, and natural gas have contributed to one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions. It is essential to raise the standard of living by providing cleaner and more reliable electricity [ 1 ]. India has an increasing energy demand to fulfill the economic development plans that are being implemented. The provision of increasing quanta of energy is a vital pre-requisite for the economic growth of a country [ 2 ]. The National Electricity Plan [NEP] [ 3 ] framed by the Ministry of Power (MoP) has developed a 10-year detailed action plan with the objective to provide electricity across the country, and has prepared a further plan to ensure that power is supplied to the citizens efficiently and at a reasonable cost. According to the World Resource Institute Report 2017 [ 4 , 5 ], India is responsible for nearly 6.65% of total global carbon emissions, ranked fourth next to China (26.83%), the USA (14.36%), and the EU (9.66%). Climate change might also change the ecological balance in the world. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) have been submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement. The latter has hoped to achieve the goal of limiting the rise in global temperature to well below 2 °C [ 6 , 7 ]. According to a World Energy Council [ 8 ] prediction, global electricity demand will peak in 2030. India is one of the largest coal consumers in the world and imports costly fossil fuel [ 8 ]. Close to 74% of the energy demand is supplied by coal and oil. According to a report from the Center for monitoring Indian economy, the country imported 171 million tons of coal in 2013–2014, 215 million tons in 2014–2015, 207 million tons in 2015–2016, 195 million tons in 2016–2017, and 213 million tons in 2017–2018 [ 9 ]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find alternate sources for generating electricity.

In this way, the country will have a rapid and global transition to renewable energy technologies to achieve sustainable growth and avoid catastrophic climate change. Renewable energy sources play a vital role in securing sustainable energy with lower emissions [ 10 ]. It is already accepted that renewable energy technologies might significantly cover the electricity demand and reduce emissions. In recent years, the country has developed a sustainable path for its energy supply. Awareness of saving energy has been promoted among citizens to increase the use of solar, wind, biomass, waste, and hydropower energies. It is evident that clean energy is less harmful and often cheaper. India is aiming to attain 175 GW of renewable energy which would consist of 100 GW from solar energy, 10 GW from bio-power, 60 GW from wind power, and 5 GW from small hydropower plants by the year 2022 [ 11 ]. Investors have promised to achieve more than 270 GW, which is significantly above the ambitious targets. The promises are as follows: 58 GW by foreign companies, 191 GW by private companies, 18 GW by private sectors, and 5 GW by the Indian Railways [ 12 ]. Recent estimates show that in 2047, solar potential will be more than 750 GW and wind potential will be 410 GW [ 13 , 14 ]. To reach the ambitious targets of generating 175 GW of renewable energy by 2022, it is essential that the government creates 330,000 new jobs and livelihood opportunities [ 15 , 16 ].

A mixture of push policies and pull mechanisms, accompanied by particular strategies should promote the development of renewable energy technologies. Advancement in technology, proper regulatory policies [ 17 ], tax deduction, and attempts in efficiency enhancement due to research and development (R&D) [ 18 ] are some of the pathways to conservation of energy and environment that should guarantee that renewable resource bases are used in a cost-effective and quick manner. Hence, strategies to promote investment opportunities in the renewable energy sector along with jobs for the unskilled workers, technicians, and contractors are discussed. This article also manifests technological and financial initiatives [ 19 ], policy and regulatory framework, as well as training and educational initiatives [ 20 , 21 ] launched by the government for the growth and development of renewable energy sources. The development of renewable technology has encountered explicit obstacles, and thus, there is a need to discuss these barriers. Additionally, it is also vital to discover possible solutions to overcome these barriers, and hence, proper recommendations have been suggested for the steady growth of renewable power [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Given the enormous potential of renewables in the country, coherent policy measures and an investor-friendly administration might be the key drivers for India to become a global leader in clean and green energy.

Projection of global primary energy consumption

An energy source is a necessary element of socio-economic development. The increasing economic growth of developing nations in the last decades has caused an accelerated increase in energy consumption. This trend is anticipated to grow [ 25 ]. A prediction of future power consumption is essential for the investigation of adequate environmental and economic policies [ 26 ]. Likewise, an outlook to future power consumption helps to determine future investments in renewable energy. Energy supply and security have not only increased the essential issues for the development of human society but also for their global political and economic patterns [ 27 ]. Hence, international comparisons are helpful to identify past, present, and future power consumption.

Table 1 shows the primary energy consumption of the world, based on the BP Energy Outlook 2018 reports. In 2016, India’s overall energy consumption was 724 million tons of oil equivalent (Mtoe) and is expected to rise to 1921 Mtoe by 2040 with an average growth rate of 4.2% per annum. Energy consumption of various major countries comprises commercially traded fuels and modern renewables used to produce power. In 2016, India was the fourth largest energy consumer in the world after China, the USA, and the Organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD) in Europe [ 29 ].

The projected estimation of global energy consumption demonstrates that energy consumption in India is continuously increasing and retains its position even in 2035/2040 [ 28 ]. The increase in India’s energy consumption will push the country’s share of global energy demand to 11% by 2040 from 5% in 2016. Emerging economies such as China, India, or Brazil have experienced a process of rapid industrialization, have increased their share in the global economy, and are exporting enormous volumes of manufactured products to developed countries. This shift of economic activities among nations has also had consequences concerning the country’s energy use [ 30 ].

Projected primary energy consumption in India

The size and growth of a country’s population significantly affects the demand for energy. With 1.368 billion citizens, India is ranked second, of the most populous countries as of January 2019 [ 31 ]. The yearly growth rate is 1.18% and represents almost 17.74% of the world’s population. The country is expected to have more than 1.383 billion, 1.512 billion, 1.605 billion, 1.658 billion people by the end of 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively. Each year, India adds a higher number of people to the world than any other nation and the specific population of some of the states in India is equal to the population of many countries.

The growth of India’s energy consumption will be the fastest among all significant economies by 2040, with coal meeting most of this demand followed by renewable energy. Renewables became the second most significant source of domestic power production, overtaking gas and then oil, by 2020. The demand for renewables in India will have a tremendous growth of 256 Mtoe in 2040 from 17 Mtoe in 2016, with an annual increase of 12%, as shown in Table 2 .

Table 3 shows the primary energy consumption of renewables for the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) from 2016 to 2040. India consumed around 17 Mtoe of renewable energy in 2016, and this will be 256 Mtoe in 2040. It is probable that India’s energy consumption will grow fastest among all major economies by 2040, with coal contributing most in meeting this demand followed by renewables. The percentage share of renewable consumption in 2016 was 2% and is predicted to increase by 13% by 2040.

How renewable energy sources contribute to the energy demand in India

Even though India has achieved a fast and remarkable economic growth, energy is still scarce. Strong economic growth in India is escalating the demand for energy, and more energy sources are required to cover this demand. At the same time, due to the increasing population and environmental deterioration, the country faces the challenge of sustainable development. The gap between demand and supply of power is expected to rise in the future [ 32 ]. Table 4 presents the power supply status of the country from 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 (until October 2018). In 2018, the energy demand was 1,212,134 GWh, and the availability was 1,203,567 GWh, i.e., a deficit of − 0.7% [ 33 ].

According to the Load generation and Balance Report (2016–2017) of the Central Electricity Authority of India (CEA), the electrical energy demand for 2021–2022 is anticipated to be at least 1915 terawatt hours (TWh), with a peak electric demand of 298 GW [ 34 ]. Increasing urbanization and rising income levels are responsible for an increased demand for electrical appliances, i.e., an increased demand for electricity in the residential sector. The increased demand in materials for buildings, transportation, capital goods, and infrastructure is driving the industrial demand for electricity. An increased mechanization and the shift to groundwater irrigation across the country is pushing the pumping and tractor demand in the agriculture sector, and hence the large diesel and electricity demand. The penetration of electric vehicles and the fuel switch to electric and induction cook stoves will drive the electricity demand in the other sectors shown in Table 5 .

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), a quarter of India’s energy demand can be met with renewable energy. The country could potentially increase its share of renewable power generation to over one-third by 2030 [ 35 ].

Table 6 presents the estimated contribution of renewable energy sources to the total energy demand. MoP along with CEA in its draft national electricity plan for 2016 anticipated that with 175 GW of installed capacity of renewable power by 2022, the expected electricity generation would be 327 billion units (BUs), which would contribute to 1611 BU energy requirements. This indicates that 20.3% of the energy requirements would be fulfilled by renewable energy by 2022 and 24.2% by 2027 [ 36 ]. Figure 1 shows the ambitious new target for the share of renewable energy in India’s electricity consumption set by MoP. As per the order of revised RPO (Renewable Purchase Obligations, legal act of June 2018), the country has a target of a 21% share of renewable energy in its total electricity consumption by March 2022. In 2014, the same goal was at 15% and increased to 21% by 2018. It is India’s goal to reach 40% renewable sources by 2030.

figure 1

Target share of renewable energy in India’s power consumption

Estimated renewable energy potential in India

The estimated potential of wind power in the country during 1995 [ 37 ] was found to be 20,000 MW (20 GW), solar energy was 5 × 10 15 kWh/pa, bioenergy was 17,000 MW, bagasse cogeneration was 8000 MW, and small hydropower was 10,000 MW. For 2006, the renewable potential was estimated as 85,000 MW with wind 4500 MW, solar 35 MW, biomass/bioenergy 25,000 MW, and small hydropower of 15,000 MW [ 38 ]. According to the annual report of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) for 2017–2018, the estimated potential of wind power was 302.251 GW (at 100-m mast height), of small hydropower 19.749 GW, biomass power 17.536 GW, bagasse cogeneration 5 GW, waste to energy (WTE) 2.554 GW, and solar 748.990 GW. The estimated total renewable potential amounted to 1096.080 GW [ 39 ] assuming 3% wasteland, which is shown in Table 7 . India is a tropical country and receives significant radiation, and hence the solar potential is very high [ 40 , 41 , 42 ].

Gross installed capacity of renewable energy in India

As of June 2018 reports, the country intends to reach 225 GW of renewable power capacity by 2022 exceeding the target of 175 GW pledged during the Paris Agreement. The sector is the fourth most attractive renewable energy market in the world. As in October 2018, India ranked fifth in installed renewable energy capacity [ 43 ].

Gross installed capacity of renewable energy—according to region

Table 8 lists the cumulative installed capacity of both conventional and renewable energy sources. The cumulative installed capacity of renewable sources as on the 31 st of December 2018 was 74081.66 MW. Renewable energy (small hydropower, wind, biomass, WTE, solar) accounted for an approximate 21% share of the cumulative installed power capacity, and the remaining 78.791% originated from other conventional sources (coal, gas diesel, nuclear, and large hydropower) [ 44 ]. The best regions for renewable energy are the southern states that have the highest solar irradiance and wind in the country. When renewable energy alone is considered for analysis, the Southern region covers 49.121% of the cumulative installed renewable capacity, followed by the Western region (29.742%), the Northern region (18.890%), the Eastern region (1.836%), the North-Easter region 0.394%, and the Islands (0.017%). As far as conventional energy is concerned, the Western region with 33.452% ranks first and is followed by the Northern region with 28.484%, the Southern region (24.967%), the Eastern region (11.716%), the Northern-Eastern (1.366%), and the Islands (0.015%).

Gross installed capacity of renewable energy—according to ownership

State government, central government, and private players drive the Indian energy sector. The private sector leads the way in renewable energy investment. Table 9 shows the installed gross renewable energy and conventional energy capacity (percentage)—ownership wise. It is evident from Fig. 2 that 95% of the installed renewable capacity derives from private companies, 2% from the central government, and 3% from the state government. The top private companies in the field of non-conventional energy generation are Tata Power Solar, Suzlon, and ReNew Power. Tata Power Solar System Limited are the most significant integrated solar power players in the country, Suzlon realizes wind energy projects, and ReNew Power Ventures operate with solar and wind power.

figure 2

Gross renewable energy installed capacity (percentage)—Ownership wise as per the 31.12.2018 [ 43 ]

Gross installed capacity of renewable energy—state wise

Table 10 shows the installed capacity of cumulative renewable energy (state wise), out of the total installed capacity of 74,081.66 MW, where Karnataka ranks first with 12,953.24 MW (17.485%), Tamilnadu second with 11,934.38 MW (16%), Maharashtra third with 9283.78 MW (12.532%), Gujarat fourth with 10.641 MW (10.641%), and Rajasthan fifth with 7573.86 MW (10.224%). These five states cover almost 66.991% of the installed capacity of total renewable. Other prominent states are Andhra Pradesh (9.829%), Madhya Pradesh (5.819%), Telangana (5.137%), and Uttar Pradesh (3.879%). These nine states cover almost 91.655%.

Gross installed capacity of renewable energy—according to source

Under union budget of India 2018–2019, INR 3762 crore (USD 581.09 million), was allotted for grid-interactive renewable power schemes and projects. As per the 31.12.2018, the installed capacity of total renewable power (excluding large hydropower) in the country amounted to 74.08166 GW. Around 9.363 GW of solar energy, 1.766 GW of wind, 0.105 GW of small hydropower (SHP), and biomass power of 8.7 GW capacity were added in 2017–2018. Table 11 shows the installed capacity of renewable energy over the last 10 years until the 31.12.2018. Wind energy continues to dominate the countries renewable energy industry, accounting for over 47% of cumulative installed renewable capacity (35,138.15 MW), followed by solar power of 34% (25,212.26 MW), biomass power/cogeneration of 12% (9075.5 MW), and small hydropower of 6% (4517.45 MW). In the renewable energy country attractiveness index (RECAI) of 2018, India ranked in fourth position. The installed renewable energy production capacity has grown at an accelerated pace over the preceding few years, posting a CAGR of 19.78% between 2014 and 2018 [ 45 ] .

Estimation of the installed capacity of renewable energy

Table 12 gives the share of installed cumulative renewable energy capacity, in comparison with the installed conventional energy capacity. In 2022 and 2032, the installed renewable energy capacity will account for 32% and 35%, respectively [ 46 , 47 ]. The most significant renewable capacity expansion program in the world is being taken up by India. The government is preparing to boost the percentage of clean energy through a tremendous push in renewables, as discussed in the subsequent sections.

Gross electricity generation from renewable energy in India

The overall generation (including the generation from grid-connected renewable sources) in the country has grown exponentially. Between 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, it achieved 1110.458 BU and 1173.603 BU, respectively. The same was recorded with 1241.689 BU and 1306.614 BU during 2015–2016 and 1306.614 BU from 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, respectively. Figure 3 indicates that the annual renewable power production increased faster than the conventional power production. The rise accounted for 6.47% in 2015–2016 and 24.88% in 2017–2018, respectively. Table 13 compares the energy generation from traditional sources with that from renewable sources. Remarkably, the energy generation from conventional sources reached 811.143 BU and from renewable sources 9.860 BU in 2010 compared to 1.206.306 BU and 88.945 BU in 2017, respectively [ 48 ]. It is observed that the price of electricity production using renewable technologies is higher than that for conventional generation technologies, but is likely to fall with increasing experience in the techniques involved [ 49 ].

figure 3

The annual growth in power generation as per the 30th of November 2018

Gross electricity generation from renewable energy—according to regions

Table 14 shows the gross electricity generation from renewable energy-region wise. It is noted that the highest renewable energy generation derives from the southern region, followed by the western part. As of November 2018, 50.33% of energy generation was obtained from the southern area and 29.37%, 18.05%, 2%, and 0.24% from Western, Northern, North-Eastern Areas, and the Island, respectively.

Gross electricity generation from renewable energy—according to states

Table 15 shows the gross electricity generation from renewable energy—region-wise. It is observed that the highest renewable energy generation was achieved from Karnataka (16.57%), Tamilnadu (15.82%), Andhra Pradesh (11.92%), and Gujarat (10.87%) as per November 2018. While adding four years from 2015–2016 to 2018–2019 Tamilnadu [ 50 ] remains in the first position followed by Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.

Gross electricity generation from renewable energy—according to sources

Table 16 shows the gross electricity generation from renewable energy—source-wise. It can be concluded from the table that the wind-based energy generation as per 2017–2018 is most prominent with 51.71%, followed by solar energy (25.40%), Bagasse (11.63%), small hydropower (7.55%), biomass (3.34%), and WTE (0.35%). There has been a constant increase in the generation of all renewable sources from 2014–2015 to date. Wind energy, as always, was the highest contributor to the total renewable power production. The percentage of solar energy produced in the overall renewable power production comes next to wind and is typically reduced during the monsoon months. The definite improvement in wind energy production can be associated with a “good” monsoon. Cyclonic action during these months also facilitates high-speed winds. Monsoon winds play a significant part in the uptick in wind power production, especially in the southern states of the country.

Estimation of gross electricity generation from renewable energy

Table 17 shows an estimation of gross electricity generation from renewable energy based on the 2015 report of the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog) [ 51 ]. It is predicted that the share of renewable power will be 10.2% by 2022, but renewable power technologies contributed a record of 13.4% to the cumulative power production in India as of the 31st of August 2018. The power ministry report shows that India generated 122.10 TWh and out of the total electricity produced, renewables generated 16.30 TWh as on the 31st of August 2018. According to the India Brand Equity Foundation report, it is anticipated that by the year 2040, around 49% of total electricity will be produced using renewable energy.

Current achievements in renewable energy 2017–2018

India cares for the planet and has taken a groundbreaking journey in renewable energy through the last 4 years [ 52 , 53 ]. A dedicated ministry along with financial and technical institutions have helped India in the promotion of renewable energy and diversification of its energy mix. The country is engaged in expanding the use of clean energy sources and has already undertaken several large-scale sustainable energy projects to ensure a massive growth of green energy.

1. India doubled its renewable power capacity in the last 4 years. The cumulative renewable power capacity in 2013–2014 reached 35,500 MW and rose to 70,000 MW in 2017–2018.

2. India stands in the fourth and sixth position regarding the cumulative installed capacity in the wind and solar sector, respectively. Furthermore, its cumulative installed renewable capacity stands in fifth position globally as of the 31st of December 2018.

3. As said above, the cumulative renewable energy capacity target for 2022 is given as 175 GW. For 2017–2018, the cumulative installed capacity amounted to 70 GW, the capacity under implementation is 15 GW and the tendered capacity was 25 GW. The target, the installed capacity, the capacity under implementation, and the tendered capacity are shown in Fig. 4 .

4. There is tremendous growth in solar power. The cumulative installed solar capacity increased by more than eight times in the last 4 years from 2.630 GW (2013–2014) to 22 GW (2017–2018). As of the 31st of December 2018, the installed capacity amounted to 25.2122 GW.

5. The renewable electricity generated in 2017–2018 was 101839 BUs.

6. The country published competitive bidding guidelines for the production of renewable power. It also discovered the lowest tariff and transparent bidding method and resulted in a notable decrease in per unit cost of renewable energy.

7. In 21 states, there are 41 solar parks with a cumulative capacity of more than 26,144 MW that have already been approved by the MNRE. The Kurnool solar park was set up with 1000 MW; and with 2000 MW the largest solar park of Pavagada (Karnataka) is currently under installation.

8. The target for solar power (ground mounted) for 2018–2019 is given as 10 GW, and solar power (Rooftop) as 1 GW.

9. MNRE doubled the target for solar parks (projects of 500 MW or more) from 20 to 40 GW.

10. The cumulative installed capacity of wind power increased by 1.6 times in the last 4 years. In 2013–2014, it amounted to 21 GW, from 2017 to 2018 it amounted to 34 GW, and as of 31st of December 2018, it reached 35.138 GW. This shows that achievements were completed in wind power use.

11. An offshore wind policy was announced. Thirty-four companies (most significant global and domestic wind power players) competed in the “expression of interest” (EoI) floated on the plan to set up India’s first mega offshore wind farm with a capacity of 1 GW.

12. 682 MW small hydropower projects were installed during the last 4 years along with 600 watermills (mechanical applications) and 132 projects still under development.

13. MNRE is implementing green energy corridors to expand the transmission system. 9400 km of green energy corridors are completed or under implementation. The cost spent on it was INR 10141 crore (101,410 Million INR = 1425.01 USD). Furthermore, the total capacity of 19,000 MVA substations is now planned to be complete by March 2020.

14. MNRE is setting up solar pumps (off-grid application), where 90% of pumps have been set up as of today and between 2014–2015 and 2017–2018. Solar street lights were more than doubled. Solar home lighting systems have been improved by around 1.5 times. More than 2,575,000 solar lamps have been distributed to students. The details are illustrated in Fig. 5 .

15. From 2014–2015 to 2017–2018, more than 2.5 lakh (0.25 million) biogas plants were set up for cooking in rural homes to enable families by providing them access to clean fuel.

16. New policy initiatives revised the tariff policy mandating purchase and generation obligations (RPO and RGO). Four wind and solar inter-state transmission were waived; charges were planned, the RPO trajectory for 2022 and renewable energy policy was finalized.

17. Expressions of interest (EoI) were invited for installing solar photovoltaic manufacturing capacities associated with the guaranteed off-take of 20 GW. EoI indicated 10 GW floating solar energy plants.

18. Policy for the solar-wind hybrid was announced. Tender for setting up 2 GW solar-wind hybrid systems in existing projects was invited.

19. To facilitate R&D in renewable power technology, a National lab policy on testing, standardization, and certification was announced by the MNRE.

20. The Surya Mitra program was conducted to train college graduates in the installation, commissioning, operations, and management of solar panels. The International Solar Alliance (ISA) headquarters in India (Gurgaon) will be a new commencement for solar energy improvement in India.

21. The renewable sector has become considerably more attractive for foreign and domestic investors, and the country expects to attract up to USD 80 billion in the next 4 years from 2018–2019 to 2021–2022.

22. The solar power capacity expanded by more than eight times from 2.63 GW in 2013–2014 to 22 GW in 2017–2018.

23. A bidding for 115 GW renewable energy projects up to March 2020 was announced.

24. The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) acting for system/components of solar PV was established.

25. To recognize and encourage innovative ideas in renewable energy sectors, the Government provides prizes and awards. Creative ideas/concepts should lead to prototype development. The Name of the award is “Abhinav Soch-Nayi Sambhawanaye,” which means Innovative ideas—New possibilities.

figure 4

Renewable energy target, installed capacity, under implementation and tendered [ 52 ]

figure 5

Off-grid solar applications [ 52 ]

Solar energy

Under the National Solar Mission, the MNRE has updated the objective of grid-connected solar power projects from 20 GW by the year 2021–2022 to 100 GW by the year 2021–2022. In 2008–2009, it reached just 6 MW. The “Made in India” initiative to promote domestic manufacturing supported this great height in solar installation capacity. Currently, India has the fifth highest solar installed capacity worldwide. By the 31st of December 2018, solar energy had achieved 25,212.26 MW against the target of 2022, and a further 22.8 GW of capacity has been tendered out or is under current implementation. MNRE is preparing to bid out the remaining solar energy capacity every year for the periods 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 so that bidding may contribute with 100 GW capacity additions by March 2020. In this way, 2 years for the completion of projects would remain. Tariffs will be determined through the competitive bidding process (reverse e-auction) to bring down tariffs significantly. The lowest solar tariff was identified to be INR 2.44 per kWh in July 2018. In 2010, solar tariffs amounted to INR 18 per kWh. Over 100,000 lakh (10,000 million) acres of land had been classified for several planned solar parks, out of which over 75,000 acres had been obtained. As of November 2018, 47 solar parks of a total capacity of 26,694 MW were established. The aggregate capacity of 4195 MW of solar projects has been commissioned inside various solar parks (floating solar power). Table 18 shows the capacity addition compared to the target. It indicates that capacity addition increased exponentially.

Wind energy

As of the 31st of December 2018, the total installed capacity of India amounted to 35,138.15 MW compared to a target of 60 GW by 2022. India is currently in fourth position in the world for installed capacity of wind power. Moreover, around 9.4 GW capacity has been tendered out or is under current implementation. The MNRE is preparing to bid out for A 10 GW wind energy capacity every year for 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, so that bidding will allow for 60 GW capacity additions by March 2020, giving the remaining two years for the accomplishment of the projects. The gross wind energy potential of the country now reaches 302 GW at a 100 m above-ground level. The tariff administration has been changed from feed-in-tariff (FiT) to the bidding method for capacity addition. On the 8th of December 2017, the ministry published guidelines for a tariff-based competitive bidding rule for the acquisition of energy from grid-connected wind energy projects. The developed transparent process of bidding lowered the tariff for wind power to its lowest level ever. The development of the wind industry has risen in a robust ecosystem ensuring project execution abilities and a manufacturing base. State-of-the-art technologies are now available for the production of wind turbines. All the major global players in wind power have their presence in India. More than 12 different companies manufacture more than 24 various models of wind turbines in India. India exports wind turbines and components to the USA, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and other Asian countries. Around 70–80% of the domestic production has been accomplished with strong domestic manufacturing companies. Table 19 lists the capacity addition compared to the target for the capacity addition. Furthermore, electricity generation from the wind-based capacity has improved, even though there was a slowdown of new capacity in the first half of 2018–2019 and 2017–2018.

The national energy storage mission—2018

The country is working toward a National Energy Storage Mission. A draft of the National Energy Storage Mission was proposed in February 2018 and initiated to develop a comprehensive policy and regulatory framework. During the last 4 years, projects included in R&D worth INR 115.8 million (USD 1.66 million) in the domain of energy storage have been launched, and a corpus of INR 48.2 million (USD 0.7 million) has been issued. India’s energy storage mission will provide an opportunity for globally competitive battery manufacturing. By increasing the battery manufacturing expertise and scaling up its national production capacity, the country can make a substantial economic contribution in this crucial sector. The mission aims to identify the cumulative battery requirements, total market size, imports, and domestic manufacturing. Table 20 presents the economic opportunity from battery manufacturing given by the National Institution for Transforming India, also called NITI Aayog, which provides relevant technical advice to central and state governments while designing strategic and long-term policies and programs for the Indian government.

Small hydropower—3-year action agenda—2017

Hydro projects are classified as large hydro, small hydro (2 to 25 MW), micro-hydro (up to 100 kW), and mini-hydropower (100 kW to 2 MW) projects. Whereas the estimated potential of SHP is 20 GW, the 2022 target for India in SHP is 5 GW. As of the 31st of December 2018, the country has achieved 4.5 GW and this production is constantly increasing. The objective, which was planned to be accomplished through infrastructure project grants and tariff support, was included in the NITI Aayog’s 3-year action agenda (2017–2018 to 2019–2020), which was published on the 1st of August 2017. MNRE is providing central financial assistance (CFA) to set up small/micro hydro projects both in the public and private sector. For the identification of new potential locations, surveys and comprehensive project reports are elaborated, and financial support for the renovation and modernization of old projects is provided. The Ministry has established a dedicated completely automatic supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)—based on a hydraulic turbine R&D laboratory at the Alternate Hydro Energy Center (AHEC) at IIT Roorkee. The establishment cost for the lab was INR 40 crore (400 million INR, 95.62 Million USD), and the laboratory will serve as a design and validation facility. It investigates hydro turbines and other hydro-mechanical devices adhering to national and international standards [ 54 , 55 ]. Table 21 shows the target and achievements from 2007–2008 to 2018–2019.

National policy regarding biofuels—2018

Modernization has generated an opportunity for a stable change in the use of bioenergy in India. MNRE amended the current policy for biomass in May 2018. The policy presents CFA for projects using biomass such as agriculture-based industrial residues, wood produced through energy plantations, bagasse, crop residues, wood waste generated from industrial operations, and weeds. Under the policy, CFA will be provided to the projects at the rate of INR 2.5 million (USD 35,477.7) per MW for bagasse cogeneration and INR 5 million (USD 70,955.5) per MW for non-bagasse cogeneration. The MNRE also announced a memorandum in November 2018 considering the continuation of the concessional customs duty certificate (CCDC) to set up projects for the production of energy using non-conventional materials such as bio-waste, agricultural, forestry, poultry litter, agro-industrial, industrial, municipal, and urban wastes. The government recently established the National policy on biofuels in August 2018. The MNRE invited an expression of interest (EOI) to estimate the potential of biomass energy and bagasse cogeneration in the country. A program to encourage the promotion of biomass-based cogeneration in sugar mills and other industries was also launched in May 2018. Table 22 shows how the biomass power target and achievements are expected to reach 10 GW of the target of 2022 before the end of 2019.

The new national biogas and organic manure program (NNBOMP)—2018

The National biogas and manure management programme (NBMMP) was launched in 2012–2013. The primary objective was to provide clean gaseous fuel for cooking, where the remaining slurry was organic bio-manure which is rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Further, 47.5 lakh (4.75 million) cumulative biogas plants were completed in 2014, and increased to 49.8 lakh (4.98 million). During 2017–2018, the target was to establish 1.10 lakh biogas plants (1.10 million), but resulted in 0.15 lakh (0.015 million). In this way, the cost of refilling the gas cylinders with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) was greatly reduced. Likewise, tons of wood/trees were protected from being axed, as wood is traditionally used as a fuel in rural and semi-urban households. Biogas is a viable alternative to traditional cooking fuels. The scheme generated employment for almost 300 skilled laborers for setting up the biogas plants. By 30th of May 2018, the Ministry had issued guidelines for the implementation of the NNBOMP during the period 2017–2018 to 2019–2020 [ 56 ].

The off-grid and decentralized solar photovoltaic application program—2018

The program deals with the energy demand through the deployment of solar lanterns, solar streetlights, solar home lights, and solar pumps. The plan intended to reach 118 MWp of off-grid PV capacity by 2020. The sanctioning target proposed outlay was 50 MWp by 2017–2018 and 68 MWp by 2019–2020. The total estimated cost amounted to INR 1895 crore (18950 Million INR, 265.547 million USD), and the ministry wanted to support 637 crores (6370 million INR, 89.263 million USD) by its central finance assistance. Solar power plants with a 25 KWp size were promoted in those areas where grid power does not reach households or is not reliable. Public service institutions, schools, panchayats, hostels, as well as police stations will benefit from this scheme. Solar study lamps were also included as a component in the program. Thirty percent of financial assistance was provided to solar power plants. Every student should bear 15% of the lamp cost, and the ministry wanted to support the remaining 85%. As of October 2018, lantern and lamps of more than 40 Lakhs (4 million), home lights of 16.72 lakhs (1.672 million) number, street lights of 6.40 lakhs (0.64 million), solar pumps of 1.96 lakhs (0.196 million), and 187.99 MWp stand-alone devices had been installed [ 57 , 58 ].

Major government initiatives for renewable energy

Technological initiatives.

The Technology Development and Innovation Policy (TDIP) released on the 6th of October 2017 was endeavored to promote research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) in the renewable energy sector [ 59 ]. RD&D intended to evaluate resources, progress in technology, commercialization, and the presentation of renewable energy technologies across the country. It aimed to produce renewable power devices and systems domestically. The evaluation of standards and resources, processes, materials, components, products, services, and sub-systems was carried out through RD&D. A development of the market, efficiency improvements, cost reductions, and a promotion of commercialization (scalability and bankability) were achieved through RD&D. Likewise, the percentage of renewable energy in the total electricity mix made it self-sustainable, industrially competitive, and profitable through RD&D. RD&D also supported technology development and demonstration in wind, solar, wind-solar hybrid, biofuel, biogas, hydrogen fuel cells, and geothermal energies. RD&D supported the R&D units of educational institutions, industries, and non-government organizations (NGOs). Sharing expertise, information, as well as institutional mechanisms for collaboration was realized by use of the technology development program (TDP). The various people involved in this program were policymakers, industrial innovators, associated stakeholders and departments, researchers, and scientists. Renowned R&D centers in India are the National Institute of Solar Energy (NISE), Gurgaon, the National Institute of Bio-Energy (NIBE), Kapurthala, and the National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE), Chennai. The TDP strategy encouraged the exploration of innovative approaches and possibilities to obtain long-term targets. Likewise, it efficiently supported the transformation of knowledge into technology through a well-established monitoring system for the development of renewable technology that meets the electricity needs of India. The research center of excellence approved the TDI projects, which were funded to strengthen R&D. Funds were provided for conducting training and workshops. The MNRE is now preparing a database of R&D accomplishments in the renewable energy sector.

The Impacting Research Innovation and Technology (IMPRINT) program seeks to develop engineering and technology (prototype/process development) on a national scale. IMPRINT is steered by the Indian Institute of Technologies (IITs) and Indian Institute of science (IISCs). The expansion covers all areas of engineering and technology including renewable technology. The ministry of human resource development (MHRD) finances up to 50% of the total cost of the project. The remaining costs of the project are financed by the ministry (MNRE) via the RD&D program for renewable projects. Currently (2018–2019), five projects are under implementation in the area of solar thermal systems, storage for SPV, biofuel, and hydrogen and fuel cells which are funded by the MNRE (36.9 million INR, 0.518426 Million USD) and IMPRINT. Development of domestic technology and quality control are promoted through lab policies that were published on the 7th of December 2017. Lab policies were implemented to test, standardize, and certify renewable energy products and projects. They supported the improvement of the reliability and quality of the projects. Furthermore, Indian test labs are strengthened in line with international standards and practices through well-established lab policies. From 2015, the MNRE has provided “The New and Renewable Energy Young Scientist’s Award” to researchers/scientists who demonstrate exceptional accomplishments in renewable R&D.

Financial initiatives

One hundred percent financial assistance is granted by the MNRE to the government and NGOs and 50% financial support to the industry. The policy framework was developed to guide the identification of the project, the formulation, monitoring appraisal, approval, and financing. Between 2012 and 2017, a 4467.8 million INR, 62.52 Million USD) support was granted by the MNRE. The MNRE wanted to double the budget for technology development efforts in renewable energy for the current three-year plan period. Table 23 shows that the government is spending more and more for the development of the renewable energy sector. Financial support was provided to R&D projects. Exceptional consideration was given to projects that worked under extreme and hazardous conditions. Furthermore, financial support was applied to organizing awareness programs, demonstrations, training, workshops, surveys, assessment studies, etc. Innovative approaches will be rewarded with cash prizes. The winners will be presented with a support mechanism for transforming their ideas and prototypes into marketable commodities such as start-ups for entrepreneur development. Innovative projects will be financed via start-up support mechanisms, which will include an investment contract with investors. The MNRE provides funds to proposals for investigating policies and performance analyses related to renewable energy.

Technology validation and demonstration projects and other innovative projects with regard to renewables received a financial assistance of 50% of the project cost. The CFA applied to partnerships with industry and private institutions including engineering colleges. Private academic institutions, accredited by a government accreditation body, were also eligible to receive a 50% support. The concerned industries and institutions should meet the remaining 50% expenditure. The MNRE allocated an INR 3762.50 crore (INR 37625 million, 528.634 million USD) for the grid interactive renewable sources and an INR 1036.50 crore (INR 10365 million, 145.629 million USD) for off-grid/distributed and decentralized renewable power for the year 2018–2019 [ 60 ]. The MNRE asked the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), attempting to build renewable power projects under “priority sector lending” (priority lending should be done for renewable energy projects and without any limit) and to eliminate the obstacles in the financing of renewable energy projects. In July 2018, the Ministry of Finance announced that it would impose a 25% safeguard duty on solar panels and modules imported from China and Malaysia for 1 year. The quantum of tax might be reduced to 20% for the next 6 months, and 15% for the following 6 months.

Policy and regulatory framework initiatives

The regulatory interventions for the development of renewable energy sources are (a) tariff determination, (b) defining RPO, (c) promoting grid connectivity, and (d) promoting the expansion of the market.

Tariff policy amendments—2018

On the 30th of May 2018, the MoP released draft amendments to the tariff policy. The objective of these policies was to promote electricity generation from renewables. MoP in consultation with MNRE announced the long-term trajectory for RPO, which is represented in Table 24 . The State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC) achieved a favorable and neutral/off-putting effect in the growth of the renewable power sector through their RPO regulations in consultation with the MNRE. On the 25th of May 2018, the MNRE created an RPO compliance cell to reach India’s solar and wind power goals. Due to the absence of implementation of RPO regulations, several states in India did not meet their specified RPO objectives. The cell will operate along with the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) and SERCs to obtain monthly statements on RPO compliance. It will also take up non-compliance associated concerns with the relevant officials.

Repowering policy—2016

On the 09th of August 2016, India announced a “repowering policy” for wind energy projects. An about 27 GW turnaround was possible according to the policy. This policy supports the replacing of aging wind turbines with more modern and powerful units (fewer, larger, taller) to raise the level of electricity generation. This policy seeks to create a simplified framework and to promote an optimized use of wind power resources. It is mandatory because the up to the year 2000 installed wind turbines were below 500 kW in sites where high wind potential might be achieved. It will be possible to obtain 3000 MW from the same location once replacements are in place. The policy was initially applied for the one MW installed capacity of wind turbines, and the MNRE will extend the repowering policy to other projects in the future based on experience. Repowering projects were implemented by the respective state nodal agencies/organizations that were involved in wind energy promotion in their states. The policy provided an exception from the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for wind farms/turbines undergoing repowering because they could not fulfill the requirements according to the PPA during repowering. The repowering projects may avail accelerated depreciation (AD) benefit or generation-based incentive (GBI) due to the conditions appropriate to new wind energy projects [ 61 ].

The wind-solar hybrid policy—2018

On the 14th of May 2018, the MNRE announced a national wind-solar hybrid policy. This policy supported new projects (large grid-connected wind-solar photovoltaic hybrid systems) and the hybridization of the already available projects. These projects tried to achieve an optimal and efficient use of transmission infrastructure and land. Better grid stability was achieved and the variability in renewable power generation was reduced. The best part of the policy intervention was that which supported the hybridization of existing plants. The tariff-based transparent bidding process was included in the policy. Regulatory authorities should formulate the necessary standards and regulations for hybrid systems. The policy also highlighted a battery storage in hybrid projects for output optimization and variability reduction [ 62 ].

The national offshore wind energy policy—2015

The National Offshore Wind Policy was released in October 2015. On the 19th of June 2018, the MNRE announced a medium-term target of 5 GW by 2022 and a long-term target of 30 GW by 2030. The MNRE called expressions of Interest (EoI) for the first 1 GW of offshore wind (the last date was 08.06.2018). The EoI site is located in Pipavav port at the Gulf of Khambhat at a distance of 23 km facilitating offshore wind (FOWIND) where the consortium deployed light detection and ranging (LiDAR) in November 2017). Pipavav port is situated off the coast of Gujarat. The MNRE had planned to install more such equipment in the states of Tamil Nadu and Gujarat. On the 14 th of December 2018, the MNRE, through the National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE), called tender for offshore environmental impact assessment studies at intended LIDAR points at the Gulf of Mannar, off the coast of Tamil Nadu for offshore wind measurement. The timeline for initiatives was to firstly add 500 MW by 2022, 2 to 2.5 GW by 2027, and eventually reaching 5 GW between 2028 and 2032. Even though the installation of large wind power turbines in open seas is a challenging task, the government has endeavored to promote this offshore sector. Offshore wind energy would add its contribution to the already existing renewable energy mix for India [ 63 ] .

The feed-in tariff policy—2018

On the 28th of January 2016, the revised tariff policy was notified following the Electricity Act. On the 30th May 2018, the amendment in tariff policy was released. The intentions of this tariff policy are (a) an inexpensive and competitive electricity rate for the consumers; (b) to attract investment and financial viability; (c) to ensure that the perceptions of regulatory risks decrease through predictability, consistency, and transparency of policy measures; (d) development in quality of supply, increased operational efficiency, and improved competition; (e) increase the production of electricity from wind, solar, biomass, and small hydro; (f) peaking reserves that are acceptable in quantity or consistently good in quality or performance of grid operation where variable renewable energy source integration is provided through the promotion of hydroelectric power generation, including pumped storage projects (PSP); (g) to achieve better consumer services through efficient and reliable electricity infrastructure; (h) to supply sufficient and uninterrupted electricity to every level of consumers; and (i) to create adequate capacity, reserves in the production, transmission, and distribution that is sufficient for the reliability of supply of power to customers [ 64 ].

Training and educational initiatives

The MHRD has developed strong renewable energy education and training systems. The National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT) develops course modules, and a Modular Employable Skilling program (MES) in its regular 2-year syllabus to include SPV lighting systems, solar thermal systems, SHP, and provides the certificate for seven trades after the completion of a 2-year course. The seven trades are plumber, fitter, carpenter, welder, machinist, and electrician. The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) worked out a national skill development policy in 2015. They provide regular training programs to create various job roles in renewable energy along with the MNRE support through a skill council for green jobs (SCGJ), the National Occupational Standards (NOS), and the Qualification Pack (QP). The SCGJ is promoted by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the MNRE. The industry partner for the SCGJ is ReNew Power [ 65 , 66 ].

The global status of India in renewable energy

Table 25 shows the RECAI (Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index) report of 40 countries. This report is based on the attractiveness of renewable energy investment and deployment opportunities. RECAI is based on macro vitals such as economic stability, investment climate, energy imperatives such as security and supply, clean energy gap, and affordability. It also includes policy enablement such as political stability and support for renewables. Its emphasis lies on project delivery parameters such as energy market access, infrastructure, and distributed generation, finance, cost and availability, and transaction liquidity. Technology potentials such as natural resources, power take-off attractiveness, potential support, technology maturity, and forecast growth are taken into consideration for ranking. India has moved to the fourth position of the RECAI-2018. Indian solar installations (new large-scale and rooftop solar capacities) in the calendar year 2017 increased exponentially with the addition of 9629 MW, whereas in 2016 it was 4313 MW. The warning of solar import tariffs and conflicts between developers and distribution firms are growing investor concerns [ 67 ]. Figure 6 shows the details of the installed capacity of global renewable energy in 2016 and 2017. Globally, 2017 GW renewable energy was installed in 2016, and in 2017, it increased to 2195 GW. Table 26 shows the total capacity addition of top countries until 2017. The country ranked fifth in renewable power capacity (including hydro energy), renewable power capacity (not including hydro energy) in fourth position, concentrating solar thermal power (CSP) and wind power were also in fourth position [ 68 ].

figure 6

Globally installed capacity of renewable energy in 2017—Global 2018 status report with regard to renewables [ 68 ]

The investment opportunities in renewable energy in India

The investments into renewable energy in India increased by 22% in the first half of 2018 compared to 2017, while the investments in China dropped by 15% during the same period, according to a statement by the Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), which is shown in Table 27 [ 69 , 70 ]. At this rate, India is expected to overtake China and become the most significant growth market for renewable energy by the end of 2020. The country is eyeing pole position for transformation in renewable energy by reaching 175 GW by 2020. To achieve this target, it is quickly ramping up investments in this sector. The country added more renewable capacity than conventional capacity in 2018 when compared to 2017. India hosted the ISA first official summit on the 11.03.2018 for 121 countries. This will provide a standard platform to work toward the ambitious targets for renewable energy. The summit will emphasize India’s dedication to meet global engagements in a time-bound method. The country is also constructing many sizeable solar power parks comparable to, but larger than, those in China. Half of the earth’s ten biggest solar parks under development are in India.

In 2014, the world largest solar park was the Topaz solar farm in California with a 550 MW facility. In 2015, another operator in California, Solar Star, edged its capacity up to 579 MW. By 2016, India’s Kamuthi Solar Power Project in Tamil Nadu was on top with 648 MW of capacity (set up by the Adani Green Energy, part of the Adani Group, in Tamil Nadu). As of February 2017, the Longyangxia Dam Solar Park in China was the new leader, with 850 MW of capacity [ 71 ]. Currently, there are 600 MW operating units and 1400 MW units under construction. The Shakti Sthala solar park was inaugurated on 01.03.2018 in Pavagada (Karnataka, India) which is expected to become the globe’s most significant solar park when it accomplishes its full potential of 2 GW. Another large solar park with 1.5 GW is scheduled to be built in the Kadappa region [ 72 ]. The progress in solar power is remarkable and demonstrates real clean energy development on the ground.

The Kurnool ultra-mega solar park generated 800 million units (MU) of energy in October 2018 and saved over 700,000 tons of CO 2 . Rainwater was harvested using a reservoir that helps in cleaning solar panels and supplying water. The country is making remarkable progress in solar energy. The Kamuthi solar farm is cleaned each day by a robotic system. As the Indian economy expands, electricity consumption is forecasted to reach 15,280 TWh in 2040. With the government’s intent, green energy objectives, i.e., the renewable sector, grow considerably in an attractive manner with both foreign and domestic investors. It is anticipated to attract investments of up to USD 80 billion in the subsequent 4 years. The government of India has raised its 175 GW target to 225 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2022. The competitive benefit is that the country has sun exposure possible throughout the year and has an enormous hydropower potential. India was also listed fourth in the EY renewable energy country attractive index 2018. Sixty solar cities will be built in India as a section of MNRE’s “Solar cities” program.

In a regular auction, reduction in tariffs cost of the projects are the competitive benefits in the country. India accounts for about 4% of the total global electricity generation capacity and has the fourth highest installed capacity of wind energy and the third highest installed capacity of CSP. The solar installation in India erected during 2015–2016, 2016–2017, 2017–2018, and 2018–2019 was 3.01 GW, 5.52 GW, 9.36 GW, and 6.53 GW, respectively. The country aims to add 8.5 GW during 2019–2020. Due to its advantageous location in the solar belt (400 South to 400 North), the country is one of the largest beneficiaries of solar energy with relatively ample availability. An increase in the installed capacity of solar power is anticipated to exceed the installed capacity of wind energy, approaching 100 GW by 2022 from its current levels of 25.21226 GW as of December 2018. Fast falling prices have made Solar PV the biggest market for new investments. Under the Union Budget 2018–2019, a zero import tax on parts used in manufacturing solar panels was launched to provide an advantage to domestic solar panel companies [ 73 ].

Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in the renewable energy sector of India between April 2000 and June 2018 amounted to USD 6.84 billion according to the report of the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP). The DIPP was renamed (gazette notification 27.01.2019) the Department for the Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). It is responsible for the development of domestic trade, retail trade, trader’s welfare including their employees as well as concerns associated with activities in facilitating and supporting business and startups. Since 2014, more than 42 billion USD have been invested in India’s renewable power sector. India reached US$ 7.4 billion in investments in the first half of 2018. Between April 2015 and June 2018, the country received USD 3.2 billion FDI in the renewable sector. The year-wise inflows expanded from USD 776 million in 2015–2016 to USD 783 million in 2016–2017 and USD 1204 million in 2017–2018. Between January to March of 2018, the INR 452 crore (4520 Million INR, 63.3389 million USD) of the FDI had already come in. The country is contributing with financial and promotional incentives that include a capital subsidy, accelerated depreciation (AD), waiver of inter-state transmission charges and losses, viability gap funding (VGF), and FDI up to 100% under the automated track.

The DIPP/DPIIT compiles and manages the data of the FDI equity inflow received in India [ 74 ]. The FDI equity inflow between April 2015 and June 2018 in the renewable sector is illustrated in Fig. 7 . It shows that the 2018–2019 3 months’ FDI equity inflow is half of that of the entire one of 2017–2018. It is evident from the figure that India has well-established FDI equity inflows. The significant FDI investments in the renewable energy sectors are shown in Table 28 . The collaboration between the Asian development bank and Renew Power Ventures private limited with 44.69 million USD ranked first followed by AIRRO Singapore with Diligent power with FDI equity inflow of 44.69 USD million.

figure 7

The FDI equity inflow received between April 2015 and June 2018 in the renewable energy sector [ 73 ]

Strategies to promote investments

Strategies to promote investments (including FDI) by investors in the renewable sector:

Decrease constraints on FDI; provide open, transparent, and dependable conditions for foreign and domestic firms; and include ease of doing business, access to imports, comparatively flexible labor markets, and safeguard of intellectual property rights.

Establish an investment promotion agency (IPA) that targets suitable foreign investors and connects them as a catalyst with the domestic economy. Assist the IPA to present top-notch infrastructure and immediate access to skilled workers, technicians, engineers, and managers that might be needed to attract such investors. Furthermore, it should involve an after-investment care, recognizing the demonstration effects from satisfied investors, the potential for reinvestments, and the potential for cluster-development due to follow-up investments.

It is essential to consider the targeted sector (wind, solar, SPH or biomass, respectively) for which investments are required.

Establish the infrastructure needed for a quality investor, including adequate close-by transport facilities (airport, ports), a sufficient and steady supply of energy, a provision of a sufficiently skilled workforce, the facilities for the vocational training of specialized operators, ideally designed in collaboration with the investor.

Policy and other support mechanisms such as Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) play an influential role in underpinning returns and restricting uncertainties for project developers, indirectly supporting the availability of investment. Investors in renewable energy projects have historically relied on government policies to give them confidence about the costs necessary for electricity produced—and therefore for project revenues. Reassurance of future power costs for project developers is secured by signing a PPA with either a utility or an essential corporate buyer of electricity.

FiT have been the most conventional approach around the globe over the last decade to stimulate investments in renewable power projects. Set by the government concerned, they lay down an electricity tariff that developers of qualifying new projects might anticipate to receive for the resulting electricity over a long interval (15–20 years). These present investors in the tax equity of renewable power projects with a credit that they can manage to offset the tax burden outside in their businesses.

Table 29 presents the 2018 renewable energy investment report, source-wise, by the significant players in renewables according to the report of the Bloomberg New Energy Finance Report 2018. As per this report, global investment in renewable energy was USD of 279.8 billion in 2017. The top ten in the total global investments are China (126.1 $BN), the USA (40.5 $BN), Japan (13.4 $BN), India (10.9 $BN), Germany (10.4 $BN), Australia (8.5 $BN), UK (7.6 $BN), Brazil (6.0 $BN), Mexico (6.0 $BN), and Sweden (3.7 $BN) [ 75 ]. This achievement was possible since those countries have well-established strategies for promoting investments [ 76 , 77 ].

The appropriate objectives for renewable power expansion and investments are closely related to the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) objectives, the implementation of the NDC, on the road to achieving Paris promises, policy competence, policy reliability, market absorption capacity, and nationwide investment circumstances that are the real purposes for renewable power expansion, which is a significant factor for the investment strategies, as is shown in Table 30 .

The demand for investments for building a Paris-compatible and climate-resilient energy support remains high, particularly in emerging nations. Future investments in energy grids and energy flexibility are of particular significance. The strategies and the comparison chart between China, India, and the USA are presented in Table 31 .

Table 32 shows France in the first place due to overall favorable conditions for renewables, heading the G20 in investment attractiveness of renewables. Germany drops back one spot due to a decline in the quality of the global policy environment for renewables and some insufficiencies in the policy design, as does the UK. Overall, with four European countries on top of the list, Europe, however, directs the way in providing attractive conditions for investing in renewables. Despite high scores for various nations, no single government is yet close to growing a role model. All countries still have significant room for increasing investment demands to deploy renewables at the scale required to reach the Paris objectives. The table shown is based on the Paris compatible long-term vision, the policy environment for renewable energy, the conditions for system integration, the market absorption capacity, and general investment conditions. India moved from the 11th position to the 9th position in overall investments between 2017 and 2018.

A Paris compatible long-term vision includes a de-carbonization plan for the power system, the renewable power ambition, the coal and oil decrease, and the reliability of renewables policies. Direct support policies include medium-term certainty of policy signals, streamlined administrative procedures, ensuring project realization, facilitating the use of produced electricity. Conditions for system integration include system integration-grid codes, system integration-storage promotion, and demand-side management policies. A market absorption capacity includes a prior experience with renewable technologies, a current activity with renewable installations, and a presence of major renewable energy companies. General investment conditions include non-financial determinants, depth of the financial sector as well, as an inflation forecast.

Employment opportunities for citizens in renewable energy in India

Global employment scenario.

According to the 2018 Annual review of the IRENA [ 78 ], global renewable energy employment touched 10.3 million jobs in 2017, an improvement of 5.3% compared with the quantity published in 2016. Many socio-economic advantages derive from renewable power, but employment continues to be exceptionally centralized in a handful of countries, with China, Brazil, the USA, India, Germany, and Japan in the lead. In solar PV employment (3.4 million jobs), China is the leader (65% of PV Jobs) which is followed by Japan, USA, India, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Germany, Philippines, and Turkey. In biofuels employment (1.9 million jobs), Brazil is the leader (41% of PV Jobs) followed by the USA, Colombia, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, China, and India. In wind employment (1.1 million jobs), China is the leader (44% of PV Jobs) followed by Germany, USA, India, UK, Brazil, Denmark, Netherlands, France, and Spain.

Table 33 shows global renewable energy employment in the corresponding technology branches. As in past years, China maintained the most notable number of people employed (3880 million jobs) estimating for 43% of the globe’s total which is shown in Fig. 8 . In India, new solar installations touched a record of 9.6 GW in 2017, efficiently increasing the total installed capacity. The employment in solar PV improved by 36% and reached 164,400 jobs, of which 92,400 represented on-grid use. IRENA determines that the building and installation covered 46% of these jobs, with operations and maintenance (O&M) representing 35% and 19%, individually. India does not produce solar PV because it could be imported from China, which is inexpensive. The market share of domestic companies (Indian supplier to renewable projects) declined from 13% in 2014–2015 to 7% in 2017–2018. If India starts the manufacturing base, more citizens will get jobs in the manufacturing field. India had the world’s fifth most significant additions of 4.1 GW to wind capacity in 2017 and the fourth largest cumulative capacity in 2018. IRENA predicts that jobs in the wind sector stood at 60,500.

figure 8

Renewable energy employment in selected countries [ 79 ]

The jobs in renewables are categorized into technological development, installation/de-installation, operation, and maintenance. Tables 34 , 35 , 36 , and 37 show the wind industry, solar energy, biomass, and small hydro-related jobs in project development, component manufacturing, construction, operations, and education, training, and research. As technology quickly evolves, workers in all areas need to update their skills through continuing training/education or job training, and in several cases could benefit from professional certification. The advantages of moving to renewable energy are evident, and for this reason, the governments are responding positively toward the transformation to clean energy. Renewable energy can be described as the country’s next employment boom. Renewable energy job opportunities can transform rural economy [ 79 , 80 ]. The renewable energy sector might help to reduce poverty by creating better employment. For example, wind power is looking for specialists in manufacturing, project development, and construction and turbine installation as well as financial services, transportation and logistics, and maintenance and operations.

The government is building more renewable energy power plants that will require a workforce. The increasing investments in the renewable energy sector have the potential to provide more jobs than any other fossil fuel industry. Local businesses and renewable sectors will benefit from this change, as income will increase significantly. Many jobs in this sector will contribute to fixed salaries, healthcare benefits, and skill-building opportunities for unskilled and semi-skilled workers. A range of skilled and unskilled jobs are included in all renewable energy technologies, even though most of the positions in the renewable energy industry demand a skilled workforce. The renewable sector employs semi-skilled and unskilled labor in the construction, operations, and maintenance after proper training. Unskilled labor is employed as truck drivers, guards, cleaning, and maintenance. Semi-skilled labor is used to take regular readings from displays. A lack of consistent data on the potential employment impact of renewables expansion makes it particularly hard to assess the quantity of skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled personnel that might be needed.

Key findings in renewable energy employment

The findings comprise (a) that the majority of employment in the renewable sector is contract based, and that employees do not benefit from permanent jobs or security. (b) Continuous work in the industry has the potential to decrease poverty. (c) Most poor citizens encounter obstacles to entry-level training and the employment market due to lack of awareness about the jobs and the requirements. (d) Few renewable programs incorporate developing ownership opportunities for the citizens and the incorporation of women in the sector. (e) The inadequacy of data makes it challenging to build relationships between employment in renewable energy and poverty mitigation.

Recommendations for renewable energy employment

When building the capacity, focus on poor people and individuals to empower them with training in operation and maintenance.

Develop and offer training programs for citizens with minimal education and training, who do not fit current programs, which restrict them from working in renewable areas.

Include women in the renewable workforce by providing localized training.

Establish connections between training institutes and renewable power companies to guarantee that (a) trained workers are placed in appropriate positions during and after the completion of the training program and (b) training programs match the requirements of the renewable sector.

Poverty impact assessments might be embedded in program design to know how programs motivate poverty reduction, whether and how they influence the community.

Allow people to have a sense of ownership in renewable projects because this could contribute to the growth of the sector.

The details of the job being offered (part time, full time, contract-based), the levels of required skills for the job (skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled), the socio-economic status of the employee data need to be collected for further analysis.

Conduct investigations, assisted by field surveys, to learn about the influence of renewable energy jobs on poverty mitigation and differences in the standard of living.

Challenges faced by renewable energy in India

The MNRE has been taking dedicated measures for improving the renewable sector, and its efforts have been satisfactory in recognizing various obstacles.

Policy and regulatory obstacles

A comprehensive policy statement (regulatory framework) is not available in the renewable sector. When there is a requirement to promote the growth of particular renewable energy technologies, policies might be declared that do not match with the plans for the development of renewable energy.

The regulatory framework and procedures are different for every state because they define the respective RPOs (Renewable Purchase Obligations) and this creates a higher risk of investments in this sector. Additionally, the policies are applicable for just 5 years, and the generated risk for investments in this sector is apparent. The biomass sector does not have an established framework.

Incentive accelerated depreciation (AD) is provided to wind developers and is evident in developing India’s wind-producing capacity. Wind projects installed more than 10 years ago show that they are not optimally maintained. Many owners of the asset have built with little motivation for tax benefits only. The policy framework does not require the maintenance of the wind projects after the tax advantages have been claimed. There is no control over the equipment suppliers because they undertake all wind power plant development activities such as commissioning, operation, and maintenance. Suppliers make the buyers pay a premium and increase the equipment cost, which brings burden to the buyer.

Furthermore, ready-made projects are sold to buyers. The buyers are susceptible to this trap to save income tax. Foreign investors hesitate to invest because they are exempted from the income tax.

Every state has different regulatory policy and framework definitions of an RPO. The RPO percentage specified in the regulatory framework for various renewable sources is not precise.

RPO allows the SERCs and certain private firms to procure only a part of their power demands from renewable sources.

RPO is not imposed on open access (OA) and captive consumers in all states except three.

RPO targets and obligations are not clear, and the RPO compliance cell has just started on 22.05.2018 to collect the monthly reports on compliance and deal with non-compliance issues with appropriate authorities.

Penalty mechanisms are not specified and only two states in India (Maharashtra and Rajasthan) have some form of penalty mechanisms.

The parameter to determine the tariff is not transparent in the regulatory framework and many SRECs have established a tariff for limited periods. The FiT is valid for only 5 years, and this affects the bankability of the project.

Many SERCs have not decided on adopting the CERC tariff that is mentioned in CERCs regulations that deal with terms and conditions for tariff determinations. The SERCs have considered the plant load factor (PLF) because it varies across regions and locations as well as particular technology. The current framework does not fit to these issues.

Third party sale (TPS) is not allowed because renewable generators are not allowed to sell power to commercial consumers. They have to sell only to industrial consumers. The industrial consumers have a low tariff and commercial consumers have a high tariff, and SRCS do not allow OA. This stops the profit for the developers and investors.

Institutional obstacles

Institutes, agencies stakeholders who work under the conditions of the MNRE show poor inter-institutional coordination. The progress in renewable energy development is limited by this lack of cooperation, coordination, and delays. The delay in implementing policies due to poor coordination, decrease the interest of investors to invest in this sector.

The single window project approval and clearance system is not very useful and not stable because it delays the receiving of clearances for the projects ends in the levy of a penalty on the project developer.

Pre-feasibility reports prepared by concerned states have some deficiency, and this may affect the small developers, i.e., the local developers, who are willing to execute renewable projects.

The workforce in institutes, agencies, and ministries is not sufficient in numbers.

Proper or well-established research centers are not available for the development of renewable infrastructure.

Customer care centers to guide developers regarding renewable projects are not available.

Standards and quality control orders have been issued recently in 2018 and 2019 only, and there are insufficient institutions and laboratories to give standards/certification and validate the quality and suitability of using renewable technology.

Financial and fiscal obstacles

There are a few budgetary constraints such as fund allocation, and budgets that are not released on time to fulfill the requirement of developing the renewable sector.

The initial unit capital costs of renewable projects are very high compared to fossil fuels, and this leads to financing challenges and initial burden.

There are uncertainties related to the assessment of resources, lack of technology awareness, and high-risk perceptions which lead to financial barriers for the developers.

The subsidies and incentives are not transparent, and the ministry might reconsider subsidies for renewable energy because there was a sharp fall in tariffs in 2018.

Power purchase agreements (PPA) signed between the power purchaser and power generators on pre-determined fixed tariffs are higher than the current bids (Economic survey 2017–2018 and union budget on the 01.02.2019). For example, solar power tariff dropped to 2.44 INR (0. 04 USD) per unit in May 2017, wind power INR 3.46 per unit in February 2017, and 2.64 INR per unit in October 2017.

Investors feel that there is a risk in the renewable sector as this sector has lower gross returns even though these returns are relatively high within the market standards.

There are not many developers who are interested in renewable projects. While newly established developers (small and local developers) do not have much of an institutional track record or financial input, which are needed to develop the project (high capital cost). Even moneylenders consider it risky and are not ready to provide funding. Moneylenders look exclusively for contractors who have much experience in construction, well-established suppliers with proven equipment and operators who have more experience.

If the performance of renewable projects, which show low-performance, faces financial obstacles, they risks the lack of funding of renewable projects.

Financial institutions such as government banks or private banks do not have much understanding or expertise in renewable energy projects, and this imposes financial barriers to the projects.

Delay in payment by the SERCs to the developers imposes debt burden on the small and local developers because moneylenders always work with credit enhancement mechanisms or guarantee bonds signed between moneylenders and the developers.

Market obstacles

Subsidies are adequately provided to conventional fossil fuels, sending the wrong impression that power from conventional fuels is of a higher priority than that from renewables (unfair structure of subsidies)

There are four renewable markets in India, the government market (providing budgetary support to projects and purchase the output of the project), the government-driven market (provide budgetary support or fiscal incentives to promote renewable energy), the loan market (taking loan to finance renewable based applications), and the cash market (buying renewable-based applications to meet personal energy needs by individuals). There is an inadequacy in promoting the loan market and cash market in India.

The biomass market is facing a demand-supply gap which results in a continuous and dramatic increase in biomass prices because the biomass supply is unreliable (and, as there is no organized market for fuel), and the price fluctuations are very high. The type of biomass is not the same in all the states of India, and therefore demand and price elasticity is high for biomass.

Renewable power was calculated based on cost-plus methods (adding direct material cost, direct labor cost, and product overhead cost). This does not include environmental cost and shields the ecological benefits of clean and green energy.

There is an inadequate evacuation infrastructure and insufficient integration of the grid, which affects the renewable projects. SERCs are not able to use all generated power to meet the needs because of the non-availability of a proper evacuation infrastructure. This has an impact on the project, and the SERCs are forced to buy expensive power from neighbor states to fulfill needs.

Extending transmission lines is not possible/not economical for small size projects, and the seasonality of generation from such projects affect the market.

There are few limitations in overall transmission plans, distribution CapEx plans, and distribution licenses for renewable power. Power evacuation infrastructure for renewable energy is not included in the plans.

Even though there is an increase in capacity for the commercially deployed renewable energy technology, there is no decline in capital cost. This cost of power also remains high. The capital cost quoted by the developers and providers of equipment is too high due to exports of machinery, inadequate built up capacity, and cartelization of equipment suppliers (suppliers join together to control prices and limit competition).

There is no adequate supply of land, for wind, solar, and solar thermal power plants, which lead to poor capacity addition in many states.

Technological obstacles

Every installation of a renewable project contributes to complex risk challenges from environmental uncertainties, natural disasters, planning, equipment failure, and profit loss.

MNRE issued the standardization of renewable energy projects policy on the 11th of December 2017 (testing, standardization, and certification). They are still at an elementary level as compared to international practices. Quality assurance processes are still under starting conditions. Each success in renewable energy is based on concrete action plans for standards, testing and certification of performance.

The quality and reliability of manufactured components, imported equipment, and subsystems is essential, and hence quality infrastructure should be established. There is no clear document related to testing laboratories, referral institutes, review mechanism, inspection, and monitoring.

There are not many R&D centers for renewables. Methods to reduce the subsidies and invest in R&D lagging; manufacturing facilities are just replicating the already available technologies. The country is dependent on international suppliers for equipment and technology. Spare parts are not manufactured locally and hence they are scarce.

Awareness, education, and training obstacles

There is an unavailability of appropriately skilled human resources in the renewable energy sector. Furthermore, it faces an acute workforce shortage.

After installation of renewable project/applications by the suppliers, there is no proper follow-up or assistance for the workers in the project to perform maintenance. Likewise, there are not enough trained and skilled persons for demonstrating, training, operation, and maintenance of the plant.

There is inadequate knowledge in renewables, and no awareness programs are available to the general public. The lack of awareness about the technologies is a significant obstacle in acquiring vast land for constructing the renewable plant. Moreover, people using agriculture lands are not prepared to give their land to construct power plants because most Indians cultivate plants.

The renewable sector depends on the climate, and this varying climate also imposes less popularity of renewables among the people.

The per capita income is low, and the people consider that the cost of renewables might be high and they might not be able to use renewables.

The storage system increases the cost of renewables, and people believe it too costly and are not ready to use them.

The environmental benefits of renewable technologies are not clearly understood by the people and negative perceptions are making renewable technologies less prevalent among them.

Environmental obstacles

A single wind turbine does not occupy much space, but many turbines are placed five to ten rotor diameters from each other, and this occupies more area, which include roads and transmission lines.

In the field of offshore wind, the turbines and blades are bigger than onshore wind turbines, and they require a substantial amount of space. Offshore installations affect ocean activities (fishing, sand extraction, gravel extraction, oil extraction, gas extraction, aquaculture, and navigation). Furthermore, they affect fish and other marine wildlife.

Wind turbines influence wildlife (birds and bats) because of the collisions with them and due to air pressure changes caused by wind turbines and habitat disruption. Making wind turbines motionless during times of low wind can protect birds and bats but is not practiced.

Sound (aerodynamic, mechanical) and visual impacts are associated with wind turbines. There is poor practice by the wind turbine developers regarding public concerns. Furthermore, there are imperfections in surfaces and sound—absorbent material which decrease the noise from turbines. The shadow flicker effect is not taken as severe environmental impact by the developers.

Sometimes wind turbine material production, transportation of materials, on-site construction, assembling, operation, maintenance, dismantlement, and decommissioning may be associated with global warming, and there is a lag in this consideration.

Large utility-scale solar plants require vast lands that increase the risk of land degradation and loss of habitat.

The PV cell manufacturing process includes hazardous chemicals such as 1-1-1 Trichloroethene, HCL, H 2 SO 4 , N 2 , NF, and acetone. Workers face risks resulting from inhaling silicon dust. The manufacturing wastes are not disposed of properly. Proper precautions during usage of thin-film PV cells, which contain cadmium—telluride, gallium arsenide, and copper-indium-gallium-diselenide are missing. These materials create severe public health threats and environmental threats.

Hydroelectric power turbine blades kill aquatic ecosystems (fish and other organisms). Moreover, algae and other aquatic weeds are not controlled through manual harvesting or by introducing fish that can eat these plants.

Discussion and recommendations based on the research

Policy and regulation advancements.

The MNRE should provide a comprehensive action plan or policy for the promotion of the renewable sector in its regulatory framework for renewables energy. The action plan can be prepared in consultation with SERCs of the country within a fixed timeframe and execution of the policy/action plan.

The central and state government should include a “Must run status” in their policy and follow it strictly to make use of renewable power.

A national merit order list for renewable electricity generation will reduce power cost for the consumers. Such a merit order list will help in ranking sources of renewable energy in an ascending order of price and will provide power at a lower cost to each distribution company (DISCOM). The MNRE should include that principle in its framework and ensure that SERCs includes it in their regulatory framework as well.

SERCs might be allowed to remove policies and regulatory uncertainty surrounding renewable energy. SERCs might be allowed to identify the thrust areas of their renewable energy development.

There should be strong initiatives from municipality (local level) approvals for renewable energy-based projects.

Higher market penetration is conceivable only if their suitable codes and standards are adopted and implemented. MNRE should guide minimum performance standards, which incorporate reliability, durability, and performance.

A well-established renewable energy certificates (REC) policy might contribute to an efficient funding mechanism for renewable energy projects. It is necessary for the government to look at developing the REC ecosystem.

The regulatory administration around the RPO needs to be upgraded with a more efficient “carrot and stick” mechanism for obligated entities. A regulatory mechanism that both remunerations compliance and penalizes for non-compliance may likely produce better results.

RECs in India should only be traded on exchange. Over-the-counter (OTC) or off-exchange trading will potentially allow greater participation in the market. A REC forward curve will provide further price determination to the market participants.

The policymakers should look at developing and building the REC market.

Most states have defined RPO targets. Still, due to the absence of implemented RPO regulations and the inadequacy of penalties when obligations are not satisfied, several of the state DISCOMs are not complying completely with their RPO targets. It is necessary that all states adhere to the RPO targets set by respective SERCs.

The government should address the issues such as DISCOM financials, must-run status, problems of transmission and evacuation, on-time payments and payment guarantees, and deemed generation benefits.

Proper incentives should be devised to support utilities to obtain power over and above the RPO mandated by the SERC.

The tariff orders/FiTs must be consistent and not restricted for a few years.

Transmission requirements

The developers are worried that transmission facilities are not keeping pace with the power generation. Bays at the nearest substations are occupied, and transmission lines are already carrying their full capacity. This is due to the lack of coordination between MNRE and the Power Grid Corporation of India (PGCIL) and CEA. Solar Corporation of India (SECI) is holding auctions for both wind and solar projects without making sure that enough evacuation facilities are available. There is an urgent need to make evacuation plans.

The solution is to develop numerous substations and transmission lines, but the process will take considerably longer time than the currently under-construction projects take to get finished.

In 2017–2018, transmission lines were installed under the green energy corridor project by the PGCIL, with 1900 circuit km targeted in 2018–2019. The implementation of the green energy corridor project explicitly meant to connect renewable energy plants to the national grid. The budget allocation of INR 6 billion for 2018–2019 should be increased to higher values.

The mismatch between MNRE and PGCIL, which are responsible for inter-state transmission, should be rectified.

State transmission units (STUs) are responsible for the transmission inside the states, and their fund requirements to cover the evacuation and transmission infrastructure for renewable energy should be fulfilled. Moreover, STUs should be penalized if they fail to fulfill their responsibilities.

The coordination and consultation between the developers (the nodal agency responsible for the development of renewable energy) and STUs should be healthy.

Financing the renewable sector

The government should provide enough budget for the clean energy sector. China’s annual budget for renewables is 128 times higher than India’s. In 2017, China spent USD 126.6 billion (INR 9 lakh crore) compared to India’s USD 10.9 billion (INR 75500 crore). In 2018, budget allocations for grid interactive wind and solar have increased but it is not sufficient to meet the renewable target.

The government should concentrate on R&D and provide a surplus fund for R&D. In 2017, the budget allotted was an INR 445 crore, which was reduced to an INR 272.85 crore in 2016. In 2017–2018, the initial allocation was an INR 144 crore that was reduced to an INR 81 crore during the revised estimates. Even the reduced amounts could not be fully used, there is an urgent demand for regular monitoring of R&D and the budget allocation.

The Goods and Service Tax (GST) that was introduced in 2017 worsened the industry performance and has led to an increase in costs and poses a threat to the viability of the ongoing projects, ultimately hampering the target achievement. These GST issues need to be addressed.

Including the renewable sector as a priority sector would increase the availability of credit and lead to a more substantial participation by commercial banks.

Mandating the provident funds and insurance companies to invest the fixed percentage of their portfolio into the renewable energy sector.

Banks should allow an interest rebate on housing loans if the owner is installing renewable applications such as solar lights, solar water heaters, and PV panels in his house. This will encourage people to use renewable energy. Furthermore, income tax rebates also can be given to individuals if they are implementing renewable energy applications.

Improvement in manufacturing/technology

The country should move to domestic manufacturing. It imports 90% of its solar cell and module requirements from Malaysia, China, and Taiwan, so it is essential to build a robust domestic manufacturing basis.

India will provide “safeguard duty” for merely 2 years, and this is not adequate to build a strong manufacturing basis that can compete with the global market. Moreover, safeguard duty would work only if India had a larger existing domestic manufacturing base.

The government should reconsider the safeguard duty. Many foreign companies desiring to set up joint ventures in India provide only a lukewarm response because the given order in its current form presents inadequate safeguards.

There are incremental developments in technology at regular periods, which need capital, and the country should discover a way to handle these factors.

To make use of the vast estimated renewable potential in India, the R&D capability should be upgraded to solve critical problems in the clean energy sector.

A comprehensive policy for manufacturing should be established. This would support capital cost reduction and be marketed on a global scale.

The country should initiate an industry-academia partnership, which might promote innovative R&D and support leading-edge clean power solutions to protect the globe for future generations.

Encourage the transfer of ideas between industry, academia, and policymakers from around the world to develop accelerated adoption of renewable power.

Awareness about renewables

Social recognition of renewable energy is still not very promising in urban India. Awareness is the crucial factor for the uniform and broad use of renewable energy. Information about renewable technology and their environmental benefits should reach society.

The government should regularly organize awareness programs throughout the country, especially in villages and remote locations such as the islands.

The government should open more educational/research organizations, which will help in spreading knowledge of renewable technology in society.

People should regularly be trained with regard to new techniques that would be beneficial for the community.

Sufficient agencies should be available to sell renewable products and serve for technical support during installation and maintenance.

Development of the capabilities of unskilled and semiskilled workers and policy interventions are required related to employment opportunities.

An increase in the number of qualified/trained personnel might immediately support the process of installations of renewables.

Renewable energy employers prefer to train employees they recruit because they understand that education institutes fail to give the needed and appropriate skills. The training institutes should rectify this issue. Severe trained human resources shortages should be eliminated.

Upgrading the ability of the existing workforce and training of new professionals is essential to achieve the renewable goal.

Hybrid utilization of renewables

The country should focus on hybrid power projects for an effective use of transmission infrastructure and land.

India should consider battery storage in hybrid projects, which support optimizing the production and the power at competitive prices as well as a decrease of variability.

Formulate mandatory standards and regulations for hybrid systems, which are lagging in the newly announced policies (wind-solar hybrid policy on 14.05.2018).

The hybridization of two or more renewable systems along with the conventional power source battery storage can increase the performance of renewable technologies.

Issues related to sizing and storage capacity should be considered because they are key to the economic viability of the system.

Fiscal and financial incentives available for hybrid projects should be increased.

The renewable sector suffers notable obstacles. Some of them are inherent in every renewable technology; others are the outcome of a skewed regulative structure and marketplace. The absence of comprehensive policies and regulation frameworks prevent the adoption of renewable technologies. The renewable energy market requires explicit policies and legal procedures to enhance the attention of investors. There is a delay in the authorization of private sector projects because of a lack of clear policies. The country should take measures to attract private investors. Inadequate technology and the absence of infrastructure required to establish renewable technologies should be overcome by R&D. The government should allow more funds to support research and innovation activities in this sector. There are insufficiently competent personnel to train, demonstrate, maintain, and operate renewable energy structures and therefore, the institutions should be proactive in preparing the workforce. Imported equipment is costly compared to that of locally manufactured; therefore, generation of renewable energy becomes expensive and even unaffordable. Hence, to decrease the cost of renewable products, the country should become involve in the manufacturing of renewable products. Another significant infrastructural obstacle to the development of renewable energy technologies is unreliable connectivity to the grid. As a consequence, many investors lose their faith in renewable energy technologies and are not ready to invest in them for fear of failing. India should work on transmission and evacuation plans.

Inadequate servicing and maintenance of facilities and low reliability in technology decreases customer trust in some renewable energy technologies and hence prevent their selection. Adequate skills to repair/service the spare parts/equipment are required to avoid equipment failures that halt the supply of energy. Awareness of renewable energy among communities should be fostered, and a significant focus on their socio-cultural practices should be considered. Governments should support investments in the expansion of renewable energy to speed up the commercialization of such technologies. The Indian government should declare a well-established fiscal assistance plan, such as the provision of credit, deduction on loans, and tariffs. The government should improve regulations making obligations under power purchase agreements (PPAs) statutorily binding to guarantee that all power DISCOMs have PPAs to cover a hundred percent of their RPO obligation. To accomplish a reliable system, it is strongly suggested that renewables must be used in a hybrid configuration of two or more resources along with conventional source and storage devices. Regulatory authorities should formulate the necessary standards and regulations for hybrid systems. Making investments economically possible with effective policies and tax incentives will result in social benefits above and beyond the economic advantages.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Accelerated depreciation

Billion units

Central Electricity Authority of India

Central electricity regulatory commission

Central financial assistance

Expression of interest

Foreign direct investment

Feed-in-tariff

Ministry of new and renewable energy

Research and development

Renewable purchase obligations

State electricity regulatory

Small hydropower

Terawatt hours

Waste to energy

Chr.Von Zabeltitz (1994) Effective use of renewable energies for greenhouse heating. Renewable Energy 5:479-485.

Article   Google Scholar  

Charles Rajesh Kumar. J, Vinod Kumar.D, M.A. Majid (2019) Wind energy programme in India: emerging energy alternatives for sustainable growth. Energy & Environment 30(7):1135-1189.

National electricity plan (2016), Volume 1, Generation, Central Electricity Authority (CEA),Ministry of Power, GOI . Available at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/committee/nep/nep_dec.pdf .Accessed 31 Jan 2018.

Canadian environmental sustainability indicators (2017), Global greenhouse gas emissions. Available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/54C061B5-44F7-4A93-A3EC-5F8B253A7235/GlobalGHGEmissions_EN.pdf . Accessed 27 June.2017.

Pappas D (2017) Energy and Industrial Growth in India: The Next Emissions Superpower? Energy procedia 105:3656–3662

Agreement P (2015) Available at ttps://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.Accessed 20. Aug 2017

Aggarwal P (2017) 2 °C target, India’s climate action plan and urban transport sector. Travel Behavior and Society 6:110–116

World Energy Scenarios Composing energy futures to 2050 (2013), World energy Council. https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/World-Energy-Scenarios_Composing-energy-futures-to-2050_Full-report.pdf .Accessed 01 Jan 2017.

Blondeel M, Van de Graaf T (2018) Toward a global coal mining moratorium? A comparative analysis of coal mining policies in the USA, China, India and Australia. Climatic Change 150(1-2):89–101

Kumar S (2016) CO2 emission reduction potential assessment using renewable energy in India. Energy 97:273–282

Charles Rajesh Kumar. J, Mary Arunsi. B, Jenova. R, M.A.Majid (2019) Sustainable waste management through waste to energy technologies in India—opportunities and environmental impacts .International journal of renewable energy research 9(1): 309-342.

National Institution for Transforming India(2015), Government of India, Report of the Expert group on 175 GW RE by 2022,Available at http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/writereaddata/files/document_publication/report-175-GW-RE.pdf.Accessed 31 Dec 2016.

Sholapurkar RB, Mahajan YS (2015) Review of wind energy development and policy in India. Energy Technology & Policy 2:122–132

India Energy scenarios 2047 (2015), ISGF for planning commission. Available at http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/ISGF_IES%202047%20Documentation.pdf.Accessed 01 Jan 2017].

Harrison T, Kostka G (2014) Balancing priorities, aligning interests: developing mitigation capacity in China and India. Comparative Political Studies 47:450-480

Akash KumarShukl (2017) Renewable energy resources in South Asian countries: challenges, policy and recommendations.Resource-Efficient Technologies 3: 342-346.

Schmid G (2012) The development of renewable energy power in India: which policies have been effective? Energy Policy 45:317–326

Vikas Khare, SavitaNema,PrashantBareda (2013) Status of solar wind renewable energy in India, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 27: 1-10

Singh R (2015) India's renewable energy targets: How to overcome a $200 billion funding gap. Renewable Energy Focus. 16(4):60–61

T.Blenkinsopp, S.RColes ,K.Kirwan (2013) Renewable energy for rural communities in Maharashtra, India, Energy Policy .60:192-199

Kandp TC, Garg HP (1998) Renewable energy education for technicians/mechanics. Renewable Energy . (14(1–4):393–400

Subhes C,Bhattacharyya , Shaping a sustainable energy future for India: management challenges, Energy Policy .38(8):4173-4185

Swaran Singh, BoparaiK.C.Secretary, India and renewable energy: a future challenge, Renewable Energy . 15(1–4 ): 16-21.

Rehman S, Hussain Z (2017) Renewable energy governance in India: challenges and prospects for achieving the 2022 energy goals Journal of Resources, Energy and Development . 14(1):13–22

K Kaygusuz, S. BilgenEnergy related environmental policies in Turkey Energy Sources Part B, 3 (2008), pp. 396-410.

Y Chang, J Lee, H. Yoon Alternative projection of the world energy consumption-in comparison with the 2010 international energy outlook Energy Policy, 50 (2010), pp. 154-160.

Wang W (2014) M Zhang. P. Li Exploring temporal and spatial evolution of global energy production and consumption Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30:943–949

Google Scholar  

BP Energy Outlook country and regional insights-India (2018) https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018-country-insight-india.pdf.Accessed 30 Jun 2018.

EIA Energy outlook 2019 with projections to 2050 (2019), Available at https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/aeo2019.pdf . .

International energy outlook 2018 (IEO2018), EIA Energy outlook 2018(2018), Available at https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/capuano_07242018.pdf .Accessed 30.07.2018.

World meters (2019).Available at http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population.Accessed 24 Jan 2019.

Inaki Arto (2016) The energy requirements of a developed world", Energy for Sustainable Development.33: 1-13.

Power sector at a glance all India (2019), Ministry of Power, Government of India. Available at https://powermin.nic.in/en/content/power-sector-glance-all-india.Accessed 31 Oct 2018

VikasKhare (2013) Status of solar wind renewable energy in India Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.27:1-10.

REMAP, renewable energy prospects for India (2017), The International renewable energy agency (IRENA). Available at https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/May/IRENA_REmap_India_paper_2017.pdf.Accessed 23 Aug 2017.

Draft national electricity plan, Volume 1, Generation, Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Ministry of Power, GOI Report 2016. http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/committee/nep/nep_dec.pdf .Accessed 26.06.2017.

BSK Naidu,Indian scenario of renewable energy for sustainable development, Energy policy ,Vol 24 ,N0 6,pp 575-581,1996.

Ashwani Kumar,Kapil Kumar, Naresh Kaushik, Satyawati Sharma,Saroj Mishra, Renewable energy in India:Current status and future potentials,Journal of renewable and sustainable energy reviews,14(2010),2434-2442

Bandyopadhyay S (2017) Renewable targets for India. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 19(2):293–294

Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (2017),Annual report 2016-17,Available at http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/annual-report/2016-2017/EN/pdf/1.pdf.Accessed 31 April 2017.

Nimish Kumar, Nitai Pal, The existence of barriers and proposed recommendations for the development of renewable energy in Indian perspective, Environment, Development and Sustainability ,pp1-19.2018.

Yearend review (2017), Government of India, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. Available at https://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/akshay-urja/april-2018/Images/44-45.pdf.Accessed 27 Jan 2018.

Central Electricity authority of India (2018), Government of India. Available at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/executivesummary/2018/exe_summary-12.pdf.Accessed 31 Jan 2018.

The growth of Electricity sector in India from 1947-2017(2017), Central Electricity Authority of India, Government of India. Available at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/others/planning/pdm/growth_2017.pdf . Accessed 31 June 2017.

Renewable energy, Indian brand equity foundation (2018). Available at https://www.ibef.org/download/renewable-energy-dec-2018.pdf.Accessed 05 Jan 2019.

Prayas energy group (2018) .Available at http://www.prayaspune.org/peg/re-capacity.html.Accessed 31 June 2018.

Subhojit Dawn, Prashant Kumar Tiwari, Arup Kumar Goswami, Ankit Kumar, Singh Rajesh Panda (2019) Wind power: Existing status, achievements and government's initiative towards renewable power dominating India Energy Strategy Reviews.23:178-199.

Generation monthly reports, Central electricity Authority of India (2018) Available at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/renewable/2018/overview-11.pdf . .

Ian Partridge (2013) Renewable electricity generation in India—a learning rate analysis Energy Policy.60:906:915.

J. Jeslin Drusila Nesamalar, P. Venkatesh, S. Charles Raja (2017) The drive of renewable energy in Tamilnadu: Status, barriers and future prospect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.73:115-124.

A Report on Energy Efficiency and Energy Mix in the Indian Energy System (2030) Using India Energy Security Scenarios 2047 (2017), Available at http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Energy_Efficiency.pdf.Accessed 06 April 2017.

Initiatives and achievements, MNRE (2018).Available at https://mnre.gov.in/sites/default/files/uploads/MNRE-4-Year-Achievement-Booklet.pdf . .

Acheievements of ministry of new and renewable energy during 2018. (2019).Available at https://pibindia.wordpress.com/2018/12/11/achievements-of-ministry-of-new-renewable-energy-during-2018/.Accessed 09 Jan 2019.

Standing committee on energy (2017-18), sixteenth lok sabha, MNRE, demands for grands (2018-19), 39th (2018). Available at http://164.100.47.193/lsscommittee/Energy/16_Energy_39.pdf . .

Mukesh KumarMishra, NilayKhare,Alka BaniAgrawa (2015) Small hydro power in India: Current status and future perspectives Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews .51:101-115.

Tara Chandra Kandpal, Bharati Joshi , Chandra ShekharSinha (1991) Economics of family sized biogas plants in India Energy Conversion and Management .32:101-113.

Sravanthi Choragudi (2013) Off-grid solar lighting systems: a way align India's sustainable and inclusive development goals Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews .28:890-899.

Abhigyan Singh,Alex T.Stratin,N.A.Romero Herrera,Debotosh Mahato,David V.Keyson,Hylke W.van Dijk (2018) Exploring peer-to-peer returns in off-grid renewable energy systems in rural India: an anthropological perspective on local energy sharing and trading Energy Research & Social Science .46:194-213.

Draft Technology Development and Innovation Policy (TDIP) for New &Renewable Energy, MNRE (2017). Available at https://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/UserFiles/Draft-TDIP_RE.pdf .Accessed 31 Jan 2018.

Demands for grants (2018-19), MNRE, Standing committee on energy, 16 th lok sabha, 39th Report (2018). Available at http://164.100.47.193/lsscommittee/Energy/16_Energy_39.pdf.Accessed 31 Oct 2018.

Mohit Goyal (2010) Repowering—next big thing in India Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.1 4(5):1400-1409.

B.N.Prashanth,R.Pramod,G.B. VeereshKumar (2018) Design and development of hybrid wind and solar energy system for power generation. 5(5):11415-11422.

Swaminathan mani,Tarun Dhingra (2013) Policies to accelerate the growth of offshore wind energy sector in India Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews . 24 : 473-482

Draft amendments to tariff policy, MNRE (2018). Available at https://powermin.nic.in/sites/default/files/webform/notices/Proposed_amendments_in_Tariff_Policy_0.pdf . .

T.C.Kandpal, H.P.Garg (1998) Renewable energy education for technicians/mechanics Renewable Energy . Volume 14(1–4 ): 393-400.

T.Blenkinsopp, S.RColes K.Kirwan (2013) Renewable energy for rural communities in Maharashtra, India Energy policy.60:192-199.

Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) (2018), Available at https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-recai-issue-52-index-scores/$File/ey-recai-issue-52-index-scores.pdf . .

Renewables 2018, global status report, Renewable energy policy network for the 21 st century (REN21) (2018). Available at http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/17-8652_GSR2018_FullReport_web_final_.pdf . .

Clean Energy Investment trends, 2Q 2018, BloombergNEF (2018) .Available at https://data.bloomberglp.com/bnef/sites/14/2018/07/BNEF-Clean-Energy-Investment-Trends-1H-2018.pdf .Accessed 12 Dec 2018.

Rolf Wüstenhagen, Emanuela Menichetti (2012) Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research Energy Policy.40:1-10.

Longayanxia dam solar park, earth observatory (NASA) (2017). Available at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/89668/longyangxia-dam-solar-park . .

Dawn, Subhojit Dawn, Prashant Kumar Tiwari,Arup Kumar Goswami, Manash Kumar Mishra. (2016).Recent developments of solar energy in India: perspectives, strategies and future goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.62:215-235.

Press information Bureau, MNRE FDI in renewable energy sector (2018). Available at http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=186849.Accessed 01 Feb 2019.

Renewable energy, India brand equity foundation, Report August 2018. https://www.ibef.org/download/Renewable-Energy-Report-August-2018.pdf . Accessed 31.12.2018.

Global trends in renewable energy investment 2018, Bloomberg new energy (2018).Available at http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2018/renewable_trends.pdf . .

Deep dive –Allianz climate and energy monitor (2017).Available at https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/allianz-climate-and-energy-monitor-deep-dive-2017.pdf . .

Allianz climate and energy monitor (2018), Available at https://www.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/azcom/Allianz_com/sustainability/documents/Allianz_Climate_and_Energy_Monitor_2018.pdf . .

Renewable energy and Jobs –Annual review 2018 (2018). Available at https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/May/IRENA_RE_Jobs_Annual_Review_2018.pdf .Accessed Jan 2019.

A. Bergmann, N. Hanley, R. Wright Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments .Energy Policy, 34 (9) (2006), pp. 1004-1014

József Benedek, Tihamér-Tibor Sebestyén, BlankaBartók (2018) Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews . 90 :516-535.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Research Consultancy Institute (RCI) and the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Effat University, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Effat University, Box 34689, Jeddah, PO, 21478, Saudi Arabia

Charles Rajesh Kumar. J & M. A. Majid

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

CRK conceptualized the research, undertook fieldwork, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MAM conceptualized the research, wrote the manuscript, and supervised the research. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Rajesh Kumar. J .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kumar. J, C.R., Majid, M.A. Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energ Sustain Soc 10 , 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1

Download citation

Received : 15 September 2018

Accepted : 27 November 2019

Published : 07 January 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Sustainable
  • Renewable energy
  • Achievements
  • Initiatives
  • Recommendations
  • Policymakers

Energy, Sustainability and Society

ISSN: 2192-0567

case study on renewable energy development

Case study: reducing heating energy consumption in a high tunnel greenhouse with renewable energy and microclimate control by bench-top root-zone heating, bench covers, and under-bench insulation

  • Open access
  • Published: 11 May 2024
  • Volume 5 , article number  86 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

case study on renewable energy development

  • Hei-Young Kim   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-8490-9565 1 ,
  • Ok-Youn Yu 2 &
  • Jeremy Ferrell 2  

122 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Appalachian State University's Nexus project designed an efficient greenhouse heating system that integrated renewable energy and root zone heating technology to reduce the greenhouse heating energy burden on local farmers and installed it at local cooperative farms. This study analyzed 5 years of data from 2018 to 2022 to investigate the energy savings and microclimate control effectiveness of the Nexus heating system installed at Springhouse Farm in North Carolina, USA. By varying bench cover materials, bottom insulation, and the number of loops of root zone tubing, the different soil temperatures required for plant types and growth stages were achieved with a single temperature controller. A root zone heating fluid of 32.2 ℃ satisfactorily maintained the germination soil between 20 and 25 ℃ in March 2019 with an average outside temperature of 4.8 ℃ and an average low temperature of − 0.4 ℃. Growing soil maintained an average temperature of 15 ℃ with bottom insulation and an average of 11–12 ℃ without bottom insulation. Compared to the conventional heating system (a forced-air propane unit heater alone), weather-adjusted propane consumption (propane usage divided by heating degree days) was reduced by 65% with the Nexus system alone and 45% with the Nexus system and unit heater together. It shows that the Nexus system has significantly reduced greenhouse heating energy consumption and maintained productive conditions. The renewable energy fraction ranged only 9–13% of the total thermal energy used due to the high inlet temperature entering the solar thermal collector. This can be improved by separating the heat storage and backup heat source.

Similar content being viewed by others

case study on renewable energy development

A hot-blast warming facility for simulating global warming in low-stature crop systems and its application case to assess elevated temperature effects on rice in Central China

case study on renewable energy development

Potential reduction in water consumption of greenhouse evaporative coolers in arid areas via earth-tube heat exchangers

case study on renewable energy development

Dynamic modeling and techno-economic assessment of hybrid renewable energy and thermal storage systems for a net-zero energy greenhouse in South Korea

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Research conducted by the Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project (ASAP) revealed that demand for locally grown produce exceeds current spending by 260% in western North Carolina (NC) [ 1 ]. This unmet demand for locally grown food indicates that the potential exists for increasing rural farmers’ income in the region [ 1 , 2 ]. However, regional barriers, including a relatively short growing season and mountainous terrain, hinder this benefit by limiting the availability of locally grown produce along with consistency and access [ 3 , 4 ]. Many farmers in the region are small-scale, family-owned, and struggle to maintain profitability with limited resources, resulting in low farming income and high rates of off-farm income sources [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. In Southern Central Appalachia, which includes the area this study focuses on, 64% of farms had an average net loss of $10,734 per farm in 2017 [ 4 ].

Growing season extension through greenhouse production has been proposed as a key solution that simultaneously meets the demand for productivity improvement and local produce in the region [ 1 , 2 ]. High tunnels’ relatively inexpensive installation cost ($32–47/m 2 ) attracts small-scale farmers, so they are commonly used for growing season extension either by passive means or with active heating and ventilation systems [ 7 ]. However, the high heat loss rate (U-value: 6.4 W/m 2 ·K) of polyethylene, the main material of the high tunnel, does not assure its envelope thermal insulation [ 8 , 9 ]. In addition, the requisite energy costs exclude many rural farmers from being able to afford a heated greenhouse [ 10 , 11 ]. Therefore, farmers in this region, with the late frost/freeze and cold snaps in spring, struggle to balance the economic viability of high tunnel crop production with energy costs.

Heating energy is one of the main overhead costs in greenhouse production in temperate climate regions and thus serves as a key factor in increasing agricultural productivity [ 12 , 13 ]. Forced-air unit heaters are chosen by many growers because they are easy to install and have low initial costs, but the heated air rises upward, increasing the temperature difference between the inside and outside of the greenhouse ceiling, causing large heat loss [ 13 ]. Additionally, unit heaters are frequently installed high up in the greenhouse to secure cultivation space, and energy is wasted by heating the entire greenhouse rather than the plant areas.

Local heating and temperature control are efficient ways to save energy. Because each organ of a plant has a different sensitivity to heat, uniform temperature control of the entire greenhouse is not necessary [ 14 ]. Root zone heating (RZH) has been suggested as an effective heating method that simultaneously enhances plant health and saves heating energy [ 14 ]. Maintaining root zone temperatures within the optimal range, even at low greenhouse air temperatures, promotes root growth, activity, and nutrient uptake, leading to improved aboveground biomass and increased yields with reduced disease risk in studies of tomato crops [ 15 , 16 ]. On the other hand, because root growth is sensitive to temperature, low root zone temperature restricts the growth of the entire plant even when optimal greenhouse air temperatures are provided [ 14 , 17 , 18 ].

Compared to conventional heating systems that heat air, RZH lowers the temperature difference between the greenhouse surface and the outside air, resulting in reduced conductive heat loss through the greenhouse plastic [ 19 ]. As warm roots allow lower ambient temperature, nighttime air temperature can be lowered by 2.8 to 5.6 ℃ when using RZH [ 13 , 15 , 20 ]. Several RZH methods, such as carbon crystal electrothermal film, hydronic tubing system, electric heating mats, and heated hydroponic system, have been investigated by researchers, demonstrating that RZH effectively controls soil temperature and provides a favorable environment [ 15 , 16 , 21 , 22 ].

Another effort to save greenhouse energy is the application of renewable energy. Due to the rising cost, depletion, and negative environmental impact of fossil fuels, interest in the application of renewable energy in greenhouse production has increased, and technologies such as solar thermal systems and earth-air heat exchangers (EAHE) have been investigated for greenhouse [ 11 , 23 , 24 ]. These technologies include heat exchangers and heat storage such as soil, water, or phase change materials to increase greenhouse air temperature and maintain the appropriate temperature required for crops during the night [ 11 , 23 , 25 ]. Mehmet Esen [ 11 ] conducted an experimental study by designing a heating system that integrated biogas, solar thermal energy, and ground source heat pump under the winter climate conditions of eastern Turkey, and presented its potential as an efficient heating system [ 11 ]. However, most studies in greenhouse heating have been conducted in experimental greenhouses for short periods (usually less than a year) or through simulations, and few studies have been conducted on commercial greenhouses to demonstrate the effectiveness of their system design in a real production environment. In addition, only a few studies have investigated RZH performance in terms of greenhouse energy saving [ 14 ].

Appalachian State University’s sustainable energy project, the Nexus, developed an unique greenhouse heating system by integrating renewable energy and RZH to enhance energy savings and installed it at two local cooperative farms [ 26 ]. The heating system collects thermal energy from a solar thermal collector and a small-scale pyrolysis system (biochar kiln) and efficiently delivers heat to crops in a greenhouse through RZH system. We designed a biochar kiln and integrated it into the Nexus system. This innovative approach allows us to harness woody biomass, which is abundant in our region, for dual purposes: producing biochar as a valuable soil amendment and supplying heat energy during periods when solar energy is unavailable. [ 26 ]. This system was designed to be practical and capable of being added to an existing greenhouse.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of the Nexus greenhouse heating system at Springhouse Farm in North Carolina, USA on microclimate conditions in terms of soil temperature and energy savings over 5 years of operation. The effectiveness of the under-bench insulation and bench covers installed in reducing heat loss from RZH was explored. Energy savings (propane consumption) were compared considering weather conditions each year. This study holds significant importance as it conducted a long-term evaluation of the RZH system, which integrates renewable energy within a commercial greenhouse. The evaluation focused on energy savings, with adjustments made based on weather conditions.

2 Research questions

To evaluate the system in terms of energy savings and productive microclimate conditions, the following questions were established:

How efficient are RZH systems compared to conventional forced air heating?

What is the share of renewable energy in the energy saved through the Nexus pilot system?

Can the heating system with improved bench covers maintain productive growing conditions without running forced air heating?

How does the heat loss, which depends on the material of the bench cover, affect the soil temperature?

How does under-bench insulation affect soil temperature?

3 Methodology

3.1 description of greenhouse at springhouse farm and nexus heating system.

Springhouse Farm has a 6.1 m by 9.1 m high tunnel greenhouse consisting of double polyethylene (PE) film and air-inflated between the layers. Inside the greenhouse, there are four growing benches and one germination bench. The greenhouse is used primarily for germination and propagation with work beginning in late January to early March. Before the proposed heating system was installed, they used a propane forced-air unit heater and electric heat mats for early germination.

In late 2017, the Nexus team designed and installed a greenhouse heating system to reduce propane consumption through renewable energy and efficient RZH heat distribution [ 26 ]. The system includes a solar collector, a biochar kiln, a food dehydrator, heat storage, and an RZH system (Fig.  1 ).

figure 1

Nexus pilot system at Springhouse farm, Vilas, NC. a solar thermal collector and food dehydrator; b biochar kiln; c main plumbing and water heater (heat storage)

A heat transfer fluid, 50% propylene glycol–water solution, flows through the system to collect heat and deliver it to the plant rooting zone inside the greenhouse. The thermal collection components include a 30 evacuated-tube-solar thermal collector and a biochar kiln with a built-in heat exchanger. A differential controller controls circulation pumps to collect heat from renewable sources (e.g., sun or biomass) and delivers the heat to the heat storage, a 151.4-L propane water heater located inside the greenhouse. The propane water heater is a storage of heat collected from renewable energy system and is also used as a backup heat source.

The stored heat is distributed to crops on a germination bench and four growing benches through the RZH system (Figs.  2 and 3 ). All benches are 1.2 m wide and 2.4 m long. Christenbury’s report was referred for the RZH piping design of the Nexus system [ 20 ]. Manifold and main pipe were built with 25 mm, 19 mm, and 13 mm PVC pipes and fittings. The 25 mm main pipe was buried 0.3-m-deep in the ground. To distribute heat to the crop root zone (soil) on the benches, 6.35 mm PE drip irrigation tubing was installed due to its ease of acquisition and installation. The RZH tubing and the benches are connected in parallel to provide even flow rate (Fig.  3 ).

figure 2

a RZH tubing on growing benches; b RZH thermal image

figure 3

Schematic of the Nexus heating system at Springhouse Farm [ 26 ]

For sufficient heat transfer, the velocity must be kept below 2 m/s [ 20 ]. Flow rate is the product of velocity and pipe cross-sectional area, so a flow rate of 0.53 l/min or less in 6.35 mm PE tubing (4.32 mm ID) provides adequate heat to the soil. Based on the overall piping design, the total flow rate and friction loss were calculated to select a pump of an appropriate size for RZH circulation. Through preliminary experiments, we found that 37.8 ℃ water through 9 loops (4.9 m per loop) of 6.35 mm PE drip irrigation tubing on a 1.2 m by 2.4 m bench, the temperature of the soil in seedling trays were maintained at 12.8–15.6 ℃ evenly. Based on it, 9 loops of PE tubing were placed on each growing bench and 18 loops on the germination bench for a higher soil temperature.

The RZH circulation pump is regulated by the thermostat that senses the germination soil temperature. A mixing valve mixes the higher-temperature fluid from the heat storage (a 151.4-L propane water heater) with the lower-temperature fluid from the RZH return pipe to discharge the 32.2 ℃ mixed fluid to the RZH supply pipe. When all the heat collected from the renewable energy system is used up and the temperature of the fluid in the heat storage (water heater) drops below 32.2 ℃, the propane gas burner of the water heater ignites to maintain the temperature of the fluid above 32.2 ℃. The water heater has only two setpoints, 32.2 ℃ and 48.9 ℃, and it was set to the lower temperature of 32.2 ℃. During the warm season when heating is not needed in the greenhouse, the collected heat bypasses the water heater and is instead dumped into the food dehydrator where the heat can be used to dry food (Fig.  3 ).

3.2 Weather indicators and energy (propane gas) savings

Weather and propane gas usage data from 2016 through 2022 were compared. To compare each year’s weather conditions, heating degree days (HDDs) were calculated, and the number of days with freezing temperatures (below 0 ℃) was recorded. The HDDs is a measure of how much the outside temperature is below a certain level (base temperature) in degrees for given days and used to estimate the demand of heating energy in a building [ 27 ]. It is relative to a base temperature and obtained by subtracting the average temperature of the day from a base temperature:

where, HDDs is the sum of the differences between average temperature of day n (T n-a ) and a base temperature (T base ) over given days. In this study, the unit heater’s setpoint temperature of 12.8 ℃ in 2016 and 2017 before using the Nexus system was set as a base temperature. All the HDDs from the day the greenhouse heating started to the end of May were summed to measure how cold the temperature was during the heating system operation. Because the weather varies every year as well as the period of the greenhouse heating, we compared the total propane consumption of each year by dividing it by HDDs.

3.3 Overall renewable energy gains

The overall heat gain from the Nexus system’s collection components (the solar thermal collector and the biochar kiln) was calculated in kJs from 2018 through 2022. All the heat energy gained from the solar collector and the biochar kiln is stored in the water heater (heat storage). Therefore, the temperature rise of the water heater during daytime (or biochar kiln operation) was used to calculate the amount of renewable energy gained. We looked at the days with no solar energy gained, such as cloudy and rainy days, and then averaged the water heater temperature on those days. This was the baseline water heater temperature, whereby only propane was used to heat the fluid.

The difference between the baseline temperature and the maximum water heater temperature of each day is the temperature rise by solar radiation or biochar kiln burn. Therefore, the thermal energy gained from the renewable energy system can be calculated by multiplying the total degrees of rise, mass, and specific heat of 50% propylene glycol–water solution. Total heat gains for renewable energy system can be calculated as follows:

where, Q total is total heat gains for renewable energy system; m is a mass of 50% propylene glycol–water solution; C P50 is the specific heat of the solution; t n,max is maximum temperature of the water heater of day n; and t 0 is a baseline temperature of the water heater. We turned off the propane water heater when the daily low temperature outside was constantly above 10 ℃: May 8 in 2018, May 16 in 2019, May 14 in 2020, May 27 in 2021, and May 25 in 2022. After turning off the water heater, the water heater is not a backup heat source, and the soil is heated only with renewable energy at night. The minimum temperature of the water heater on each day was the baseline temperature after turning off the water heater.

The amount of thermal energy generated by a biochar kiln is influenced by many variables such as moisture content of the combustion chamber and biomass, so we refrained from using the biochar kiln during the greenhouse heating period to focus on the system’s solar energy collection for the reliable results.

3.4 Heat loss reduction with a lower U-value bench cover

Bench covers were used to trap heat. The bench cover used in 2018 was made of 0.15 mm thick polyethylene film. In 2019, we upgraded the bench covers to reduce heat loss (Fig.  4 ). We built zippered growing bench covers using 0.15 mm-thick polyethylene film for easy opening and closing, and they were placed over gable frames made of PVC pipes. The germination bench cover was constructed using wood frames and four 0.6 m by 1.2 m, 8 mm double wall polycarbonate panels. U-value, the overall heat transfer coefficient, of an 8 mm double wall polycarbonate panel is 3.03 W/m 2 ·K, which is smaller than half of the U-value of single polyethylene film, 6.4 W/m 2 ·K [ 8 , 9 ].

figure 4

Upgraded bench covers in 2019: a germination bench with polycarbonate cover; b growing bench with zippered polyethylene cover

The effect of the improved germination bench cover was evaluated by three methods: (1) the germination soil temperature, (2) the ignition time interval of the propane water heater, and (3) temperature difference between germination soil and greenhouse air. We compared the germination bench soil temperatures in March 2018 and March 2019. The temperature data collected every minute for March each year were converted into a daily distribution and depicted in one chart.

Since the RZH system is controlled by the germination soil temperature, we anticipated that the lower U-value of the upgraded germination cover would result in longer intervals between propane ignition in the water heater. We recorded the number of minutes that it took from one peak temperature to the next in the water heater between midnight and 8 a.m. on cold nights in March 2018 and March 2019.

3.5 Under-bench insulation

Heat transfer occurs through conduction, convection, and radiation and can be reduced by insulation and reflective film. Different insulators were installed under the RZH tubing (Fig.  5 ) of each bench using extruded polystyrene board (XPS) and reflective bubble insulation. XPS is a common insulation material for buildings that provides good resistance to thermal conduction and convection. The R-value, a measure of insulation ability, of the 1-inch XPS used in the project is rated 0.88 K m 2 /W [ 16 ]. The R-value of reflective bubble insulation varies depending on the installation location and conditions [ 28 ]. It has a small R-value in the material itself with air bubble wrap, but the level of insulation can be increased by minimizing convection and radiation with its low-emittance and almost leak-free reflective surface [ 29 ]. In addition, since there are reflective surfaces on both sides of the air layer, another reflective airspace can be formed when installed, which can enhance the overall insulation [ 28 , 29 ]. Reflective surfaces reflect heat radiated from surrounding heat sources. Thus, the reflective bubble insulation installed below the RZH tubing reflects radiant heat toward the plants located above the tubing.

figure 5

Growing bench insulation: a bench 1 with XPS and reflective bubble insulation; b bench 2 without insulation; c bench 3 with reflective bubble insulation; d bench 4 with XPS

The tubing on growing bench 1 is placed over both XPS and reflective bubble insulation, while bench 3 and bench 4 contain only reflective bubble insulation and XPS, respectively. Bench 2 has no insulation.

4 Results and discussion

4.1 setpoints of control systems.

Table 1 summarizes the setpoint temperatures of the unit heater, the RZH system, and the ventilation fan used from 2016 to 2022 to maintain the appropriate growing conditions at Springhouse Farm. In 2016 and 2017, before the Nexus system was installed, the unit heater was set to 12.8 ℃. RZH allows for lower greenhouse air temperature, we reduced unit heater setpoints [ 13 , 15 , 20 ]. After the Nexus system was installed, the unit heater was not operated (2019 and 2020) or was set to 8.9 ℃ (2018, 2021 and 2022), which is 3.9 ℃ lower than previous settings.

4.2 Weather indicators and energy (propane gas) savings

Table 2 shows each year’s HDDs the number of days when the outside temperature is below 0 ℃, and propane usage. Because the weather varies every year as well as the period of the greenhouse heating, the total propane consumption of each year was divided by HDDs (propane usage/HDDs) to compare the weather-adjusted propane gas consumption.

Since 2018, the year when the Nexus system started operation, weather-adjusted propane gas consumption has decreased significantly compared to 2016 and 2017. The average weather-adjusted propane gas consumption was 1.72 for the unit heater only (2016 and 2017), 0.6 for the Nexus system only (2019 and 2020), and 0.95 for both uses (2018, 2021, and 2022). It decreased by more than 65% when only using the Nexus system and by more than 45% when using both the Nexus system and the unit heater.

4.3 Overall renewable energy gains

Table 3 shows the properties of 50% propylene glycol–water solution and the renewable energy harvest (kJ) during the operation of the heating system. The renewable energy fraction, which represents the share of renewable energy in total thermal energy consumption, varies based on several factors. These factors include solar irradiation, the renewable energy collection period, and propane consumption, all of which are influenced by the weather conditions during the year. On average, this fraction ranged from 9 to 13% annually.

4.4 Heat loss reduction with a lower U-value bench cover

4.4.1 germination soil temperature.

Figure  6 plots the daily temperature distribution of germination soil in March 2018 and March 2019. The average outside temperature and average low temperature were 3.9 ℃ and − 0.2 ℃ in March 2018 and 4.8 ℃ and − 0.4 ℃ in March 2019, respectively.

figure 6

Comparison of daily temperature distribution of germination soil according to differences in bench covering materials (polyethylene in 2018 and polycarbonate double wall in 2019)

The RZH system is controlled by the germination soil temperature. It turns on when the germination soil temperature falls below the low bound of the controller and turns off when it reaches the high bound. Each year’s RZH setpoint temperatures are shown in Table  1 . To germinate various types of crops such as tomatoes, peppers, beans, peas, cucumbers, etc. on the germination table, the farmer requested to maintain soil temperature above 20 ℃ during the night. Despite the setpoint temperatures in 2018 being set at 23.3 ℃/25.6 ℃ (low bound/high bound), it frequently dropped below 20 ℃ due to heat loss through polyethylene film cover. In 2019, the overall germination soil temperature remained above 20 ℃ with the upgraded cover made of 8 mm double wall polycarbonate panels even with lower setpoints at 22.2 ℃/23.9 ℃ (low bound/high bound).

Note that the midday soil temperature is affected by the ventilation fan, as the temperature inside the greenhouse rises rapidly during the day. Because the farmer set the ventilation fan temperature to 32.2 ℃ in 2018 and 23.9 ℃ in 2019, the midday soil temperature in 2018 was relatively high.

4.4.2 Propane water heater ignition time intervals

For design simplicity, we designed a propane water heater as a renewable energy storage and backup heat source. In-tank water heaters heat and store fluid by igniting a propane burner to maintain the setpoint temperature. Therefore, the ignition time interval of the burner is an indicator of how much propane (backup heat) is consumed.

The ignition intervals of the propane burners were recorded to evaluate the effect of the upgraded covers on energy savings. The ignition interval is the number of minutes that it takes from one peak temperature to the next in the propane water heater between midnight and 8 a.m. Table 4 presents the comparison of the ignition intervals of the propane burner on cold nights in 2018 and 2019. Compared to 2018, the average intervals were longer in 2019 despite lower outside temperatures, meaning that the upgraded covers can maintain the germination bench temperature above 20 ℃ while burning less propane.

4.4.3 Temperature difference between soil and greenhouse air

Figure  7 plots how much the temperature of the germination soil remained higher than the air inside the greenhouse overnight (midnight to 7 a.m.). Two nights with similar outside temperatures were compared: March 7, 2018, and March 25, 2019. The average outside temperature and greenhouse air temperature during this period were − 0.9 ℃ and 5.3 ℃ on March 7, 2018, and 0.1 ℃ and 6.7 ℃ on March 25, 2019, respectively. On both days, the unit heater was turned off. On average, the germination soil was 16.5 ℃ higher than the greenhouse air with the ungraded covers, while it was 13.7 ℃ higher with the polyethylene film cover.

figure 7

Temperature differences between the germination soil and greenhouse interior on two nights (Mar 7, 2018 and Mar 25, 2019) when the outside temperatures were similar

4.5 Effects of under-bench insulation on soil temperature

Nighttime (midnight to 7 a.m.) soil temperature on the growing benches varied depending on whether an insulator was installed under the RZH tubing. Figure  8 shows average soil temperatures of the growing benches in March of 2018 and 2019. The average outside temperature and average low temperature were 3.9 ℃ and − 0.2 ℃ in March 2018, and 4.8 ℃ and − 0.4 ℃ in March 2019, respectively. In 2018, the unit heater was set to 8.9 degrees, and the unit heater was not used in 2019.

figure 8

Average soil temperatures on growing benches: a March in 2018; b March in 2019

In 2018, the average nighttime soil temperatures of benches 1, 2, and 3 were 15.4 ℃, 13 ℃, and 14.7 ℃, respectively. In 2019, they were 15 ℃, 11,5 ℃, and 15,4 ℃, respectively. The nighttime soil temperatures with no bottom insulation (bench 2) presented the lowest average temperature both with the unit heater running in 2018 and without running in 2019, compared to the other two benches with insulation (Fig.  8 ). Bench 2, which is open below the RZH tubing, undergoes convective heat loss due to the inflow of relatively cold greenhouse air and radiant heat transfer in the downward direction, resulting in greater heat loss compared to the other two benches where the bottom of the tubing is closed with insulation.

Single insulation (bench 1) and multi-layer insulation (bench 3) performed similarly. The thermal resistance of the single bubble insulation is assumed to be sufficient to prevent downward conductive heat transfer from the RZH tubing. On both benches, bottom insulation prevents the inflow of cold greenhouse air, reducing convective heat loss. The reflective surface reflects the radiant heat coming down from the RZH tubing and directs it towards the soil.

Running the unit heater did not significantly affect the nighttime soil temperature on benches with bottom insulation (benches 1&3). On the other hand, bench 2 (no insulation) had lower temperatures without the unit heater running in 2019 than in 2018 when greenhouse air temperature was maintained above 8.9 ℃ by the unit heater. Benches 2 and 3, where the convective inflow of greenhouse air is blocked by bottom insulation, are less affected by greenhouse air temperature. Note that bench 4 with XPS is excluded in this study since bench 4 was occasionally under different conditions according to the farmer’s needs.

4.6 Effect of bench covers on soil temperature

The bench cover forms a small greenhouse within the greenhouse, increasing the energy efficiency of the RZH system at night. Figure  9 compares the nighttime temperature difference between the soil and the greenhouse air on March 6 and 29, 2018. The average nighttime air temperature inside the greenhouse was 11.9 ℃ on both days. The benches were heated with RZH, but the unit heater was not running. Bench 1 was covered on both days. Benches 2 and 3 were covered on March 6 but uncovered on March 29.

figure 9

Temperature differences between soil and air inside the greenhouse on Mar 6, 2018, and Mar 29, 2018: a bench 1—covered on both days; b bench 2—covered on Mar 6 but uncovered on Mar 29; c bench 3—covered on Mar 6 but uncovered on Mar 29

The average temperature differences on covered bench 1 (XPS and reflective insulation) remained close on both days: 5.1 ℃ and 5.3 ℃. The soil temperature on bench 2 (no insulation) was on average 3.1 ℃ higher than the greenhouse air temperature when it was covered, while it was only 1.1 ℃ higher when it was not covered. Likewise, the soil temperature on bench 3 (reflective insulation) was on average 4.6 ℃ higher when covered but only 2.2 ℃ higher when uncovered. Because the bench cover prevents heat loss from the soil, the temperature difference between the soil and the air inside the greenhouse is greater when the bench is covered.

4.7 Temperature distributions during nighttime

The RZH, covers, and insulation on the benches create a microclimate of small greenhouses within the larger greenhouse. Figure  10 shows the temperatures of both the air and soil on benches 1 and 2, the greenhouse air, and the outside air during the nighttime (midnight to 7 a.m.) in March 2018 (from the 9th to the 31st) and March 2019 (from 1 to 31st). In 2018, data after the unit heater thermostat was replaced on March 8th was analyzed. The sensors were placed 0.2 m above the bench RZH tubing and 1.8 m above the ground, both inside and outside the greenhouse, to measure air temperature every minute. In 2018, the unit heater was set to 8.9 ℃, while it remained unused in 2019.

figure 10

Nighttime soil and air temperature distributions in March 2018 a and March 2019 b

In 2018, the average nighttime temperatures for the soil and air on benches 1 and 2, the greenhouse air, and the outside were 15.4 ℃, 15 ℃, 13 ℃, 12.3 ℃, 10.7 ℃, and 2.6 ℃, respectively. In 2019, these temperatures were 15 ℃, 12.3 ℃, 11.5 ℃, 10.5 ℃, 6.8 ℃, and 0.8 ℃, respectively. Notably, in 2019, when the unit heater was not used, the greenhouse air was influenced by the outside temperature. It increases the temperature difference between the bench cover surface and the greenhouse air, leading to increased conductive heat loss through the covers. As a result, the average nighttime bench temperatures were lower, and the temperature distribution was wider compared to 2018, except for the soil temperature of bench 1 with bottom insulation.

5 Conclusion

Appalachian State University’s Nexus Project has developed a sustainable greenhouse heating system that integrates renewable energy (solar thermal energy and biomass energy) and RZH as a solution to increase profitability. The Nexus system was installed and demonstrated at a local cooperative farm, Springhouse Farm in North Carolina, U.S.A. System performance was studied by analyzing data for 5 years (from 2018 to 2022). The system has been successfully operated without major defects while maintaining productive microclimate conditions. Because this study was conducted in a commercial greenhouse, we were unable to conduct quantitative studies comparing crop biomass or yield under rigorous experimental conditions, but feedback from Springhouse farmers supports that conditions were for healthy crop production: " The greenhouse has performed wonderfully over the years since changing our system. Our plant health and vitality have increased. I attribute it to the benefits associated with bottom heating. We sell some of our plant starts and the feedback has been very positive. Most customers comment that our plants surpass other big box store-bought plants in health and productivity. Saving money on propane is just an added bonus!".

The conclusion and recommendations drawn from this study are summarized as follows:

The Nexus system significantly reduced greenhouse heating energy consumption. Compared to the conventional heating system (a forced-air propane unit heater alone), weather-adjusted propane consumption (propane usage/HDDs) was reduced by 65% when using the Nexus system alone and 45% when using the Nexus system and unit heater together.

The double-wall polycarbonate cover, which has lower thermal conductivity, maintained the temperature of the germination soil stably compared to the polyethylene film cover. Analysis of propane water heater ignition intervals confirmed that the upgraded germination bench cover reduced overall fuel consumption as RZH was controlled by the temperature of the germination soil.

Under-bench insulation helps reduce heat transfer between RZH tubing and greenhouse air through the bench bottom. However, the soil temperatures of the growing bench with single-layer reflective bubble insulation and the bench with multi-layer insulation with added XPS were similar when 32.2 ℃ fluid flowed through RZH tubing.

The combination of RZH, bench covers, and insulation creates a microclimate on small greenhouses within the larger greenhouse. This microclimate remains warm overnight, effectively reducing energy consumption. However, when the temperature inside the greenhouse was not maintained with the unit heater, heat loss through the bench cover increases, leading to more fluctuations in soil and air temperatures.

Varying the cover material, the presence of bottom insulation, and the number of RZH tubing loops resulted in different nighttime soil temperatures. When the soil temperature of the germination bench (double-wall polycarbonate cover, bottom insulation, and 18 loops) was maintained at 20–25 ℃, the growing bench (polyethylene film cover, insulation, and 9 loops) had about 15 ℃. On the growing bench without insulation, the soil was maintained at 11–12 ℃ in March 2019 with an average outside temperature of 4.8 ℃ and low temperature of − 0.4 ℃. The RZH benches at different temperatures can be filled with plants suited to those temperatures.

The bench covers helped the soil temperature higher. When uncovered, the soil temperature was only 1 to 2 ℃ higher than the greenhouse air, but when covered, the soil temperature was higher by 3 to 5 ℃.

The share of renewable energy used to heat the greenhouse ranged from 9 to 13% of the total thermal energy used. The amount of solar energy actually collected through the Nexus system was less than 50% of the harvestable solar energy in the region calculated through modeling. This is a limitation caused by the design of the system where heat storage is also used as a backup energy source, keeping the collector inlet temperature high. It can be improved by separating the backup heat source from heat storage (e.g., adding an on-demand water heater as a backup).

Parallel arrangement of RZH tubing loops and benches ensures uniform fluid flow rates on each bench. Scale-up can be achieved by adding identical RZH units to larger greenhouses.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are provided within the paper, and the corresponding raw data is available upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Local Food Research Center (LFRC). Food and Farm Assessment for a Five-County: Region in the Southern Appalachians: Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, Wilkes, and Johnson County. Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project; 2012.

Kirby LD, Jackson C, Perrett A. Growing local: expanding the western north carolina food and farm economy. Asheville: Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project; 2007.

Google Scholar  

Colyer D. Agriculture In the Appalachian Region: 1965–2000. Department of Agricultural Resource Economics Conference. West Virginia University; 2001.

Kerrick B, Sandusky E, Corte BD, Hostetler E. Agriculture and Local Food Eonomies in the Appalachian Region. Appalachian Regional Commission; 2022.

United States Department of Agriculture National Agriculture Statistics Service (USDA-NASS): 2017 Census of Agriculture. 2019. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/CDQT/chapter/1/table/1 . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.

Whitt C, Todd JE, MacDonald JM. 2020. Americas Diverse Family Farms 2020 Edition. US Department of Agriculture;

Giacomelli GA. Engineering principles impacting high-tunnel environments. HortTechnology. 2009;19(1):30–3.

Article   Google Scholar  

Kim HK, Lee SY, Kwon JK, Kim YH. Evaluating the effect of cover materials on greenhouse microclimates and thermal performance. Agronomy. 2022;12(1):143.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Fabrizio E. Energy reduction measures in agricultural greenhouses heating: Envelope, systems and solar energy collection. Energy Build. 2012;53:57–63.

Pena J. Greenhouse vegetable production economic considerations, marketing, and financing, in Aggie Horticulture. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension; 2005.

Esen M, Yuksel T. Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse. Energy Build. 2013;65:340–51.

Bibbiani C, Fantozzi F, Gargari C, Campiotti A, Schettini E, Vox G. Wood biomass as sustainable energy for greenhouses heating in Italy. Agric Agric Sci Proced. 2016;8:637–45.

Sanford S. Reducing greenhouse energy consumption-An overview. Energy; 2011. 3907 (01).

Kawasaki Y, Yoneda Y. Local temperature control in greenhouse vegetable production. Hortic J. 2019;88(3):305–14.

Kawasaki Y, Matsuo S, Kanayama Y, Kanahama K. Effect of root-zone heating on root growth and activity, nutrient uptake, and fruit yield of tomato at low air temperatures. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci. 2014;83(4):295–301.

He F, Hou Y, Li K, Wei X, Liu Y. Investigation of a root zone heating system for greenhouse seedling and its effects on micro-environment. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2020;13(6):47–52.

Hurewitz J, Janes HW. Effect of altering the root-zone temperature on growth, translocation, carbon exchange rate, and leaf starch accumulation in the tomato. Plant Physiol. 1983;73(1):46–50.

Shishido Y, Kumakura H. Effects of root temperature on photosynthesis, transpiration, translocation and distribution of 14C-photoassimilates and root respiration in tomato. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci. 1994;63(1):81–9.

Sachs RM, Sisto I, Jenkins BM, Foristeret GW. Plant response and energy savings for bench-top-heated greenhouses. Sci Hortic. 1992;49(1):135–46.

Christenbury GD. Energy management with root-zone heating. Cooperative extension service. Clemson: Clemson University; 1990.

He F, Tian J, Wang L, Hou Y, Qi F, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Li Z. Effects of different root zone heating systems on microclimate and crop development in solar greenhouses. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2022;15(6):67–72.

Ameen M, Xiaochan W, Yaseen M, Umair M, Yousaf K, Yang Z, Skakeel AS. Performance evaluation of root zone heating system developed with sustainable materials for application in low temperatures. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4130.

Hassanien RHE, Li M, Lin WD. Advanced applications of solar energy in agricultural greenhouses. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:989–1001.

Sethi VP, Sumathy K, Lee C, Pal DS. Thermal modeling aspects of solar greenhouse microclimate control: a review on heating technologies. Sol Energy. 2013;96:56–82.

Benli H, Durmuş A. Performance analysis of a latent heat storage system with phase change material for new designed solar collectors in greenhouse heating. Sol Energy. 2009;83(12):2109–19.

Ferrell J, Yu OK, Kim H. Case study: promoting sustainable energy greenhouse heating systems to small-scale local farms. J Agric Sci Technol A. 2020;10:165–80.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Fricker JM, Yarbrough D. Review of reflective insulation estimation methods. In: Proceedings of building simulation, 12th conference of international building performance simulation association; 2011.

US Energy Information Administration. Heating Degree Days.Glossary Web. https://www.eia.gov/tools/glossary/index.php?id=Heating%20Degree%20Days . Accessed 17 Feb 2024.

Lee SW, Lim CH. Reflective thermal insulation systems in building: a review on radiant barrier and reflective insulation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;65:643–61.

Alternatic eFuels Data Center: Fuel Properties Comparison. US Department of Energy Web. 2023. https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/properties . Accessed 1 Mar 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank local farmers for their assistance with this research, particularly Ms. Amy Fiedler, owner of Springhouse Farm. The information contained in this paper is part of the research projects entitled “Demonstration of root zone heating supported by the developed greenhouse heating system” sponsored by the USDA Southern SARE On-Farm research program (Project number OS18-123) and “Promoting Biomass Greenhouse Heating Systems” sponsored by the Bioenergy Research Initiative—North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Contract 17-078-4003). The authors thank all of the sponsors.

The information contained in this paper is part of the research projects sponsored by the USDA Southern SARE On-Farm research program (Project number OS18-123) and the Bioenergy Research Initiative—North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Contract 17-078-4003).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Appalachian Energy Center, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA

Hei-Young Kim

Department of Sustainable Technology and the Built Environment, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA

Ok-Youn Yu & Jeremy Ferrell

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to conceptualization, investigation, and design. H.K. performed methodology, data curation, analysis, visualization, and writing (original draft). O.Y. performed funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, methodology, and writing (review and editing). J.F. performed project administration, supervision, and writing (review and editing). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hei-Young Kim .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Kim, HY., Yu, OY. & Ferrell, J. Case study: reducing heating energy consumption in a high tunnel greenhouse with renewable energy and microclimate control by bench-top root-zone heating, bench covers, and under-bench insulation. Discov Sustain 5 , 86 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00276-5

Download citation

Received : 19 January 2024

Accepted : 06 May 2024

Published : 11 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00276-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Growing season extension
  • Greenhouse heating energy
  • Root zone heating
  • Bench covers
  • Under-bench insulation
  • On-Farm Renewable Energy
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

case study on renewable energy development

  • {{subColumn.name}}

Green Finance

case study on renewable energy development

  • {{newsColumn.name}}
  • Share facebook twitter google linkedin

case study on renewable energy development

Green finance for mitigating greenhouse gases and promoting renewable energy development: Case study in Taiwan

  • Wen-Tien Tsai , 
  • Graduate Institute of Bioresources, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan
  • Received: 31 January 2024 Revised: 27 March 2024 Accepted: 17 April 2024 Published: 14 May 2024

JEL Codes: E52, G38, Q28, Q48, Q54

  • Full Text(HTML)
  • Download PDF

In recent years, the tools of green finance have evolved to foster green economic growth like renewable energy and climate change mitigation. Taking a case study of Taiwan not yet reviewed in the literature, the present study aimed to conduct a preliminary analysis for exploring the amazing growth in renewable energy over the past fifteen years (2010–2023) in connection with the achievements of green finance promotion over the past five years (2018–2022). The updated database was accessed on the websites of Taiwan's competent authorities. This work was divided into the following main parts: Taiwan's carbon neutrality policy and sustainable development goals (SDGs) relevant to green finance, the regulatory promotion for green finance action plans in Taiwan, and the status of green finance measures and achievements in Taiwan. The findings supported the idea that the implications of green policies for unlocking green finance and green investment significantly enhanced a positive influence on green energy industry development in Taiwan. In this regard, it showed the amazing growth of renewable energy generation, particularly in solar photovoltaics (PV) power and offshore wind power, since 2010. These findings were similar to those in Asian countries like China and Japan. Responding to Taiwan's SDGs policy by 2030 and the net-zero emissions in 2050, aspects relevant to climate change mitigation and adaptation were investigated in order to focus on the use of green finance tools.

  • green finance ,
  • sustainable development goals ,
  • carbon neutrality policy ,
  • renewable energy development ,
  • regulatory promotion

Citation: Wen-Tien Tsai. Green finance for mitigating greenhouse gases and promoting renewable energy development: Case study in Taiwan[J]. Green Finance, 2024, 6(2): 249-264. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024010

Related Papers:

  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ -->

Supplements

Access history.

Reader Comments

  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 )

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

case study on renewable energy development

Article views( 73 ) PDF downloads( 22 ) Cited by( 0 )

Figures and Tables

case study on renewable energy development

Figures( 3 )  /  Tables( 3 )

case study on renewable energy development

Associated material

Other articles by authors.

  • Wen-Tien Tsai

Related pages

  • on Google Scholar
  • Email to a friend
  • Order reprints

Export File

shu

  • Figure 1. Number of CSR-submitted companies by TWSE/TPEx in Taiwan since 2013
  • Figure 2. Offshore wind power and solar PV power in terms of installed accumulation capacity in Taiwan since 2017
  • Figure 3. Electricity generation by offshore wind power and solar PV power in Taiwan since 2017

IMAGES

  1. The State of Renewable Energy

    case study on renewable energy development

  2. Case Studies of Renewable Thermal Energy

    case study on renewable energy development

  3. How ‘smart integrated renewable energy systems' can drive sustainable

    case study on renewable energy development

  4. Sustainability

    case study on renewable energy development

  5. Processes

    case study on renewable energy development

  6. Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development

    case study on renewable energy development

VIDEO

  1. Renewable Energy Revitalized By New Project

  2. Continuous Improvement case study: Renewable Parts Ltd

  3. Why I want to study Renewable Energy at EIT InnoEnergy Master School

  4. Investing in renewables: opportunities and challenges

  5. Why I deserve Scholarship to Study Renewable Energy at EIT InnoEnergy Master School

  6. Comparative Case Study of Green Energy Company

COMMENTS

  1. Strategic assessment for energy transitions: A case study of renewable

    Barriers to renewable energy development: a case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan, Canada Energy Policy , 42 ( 2012 ) , pp. 691 - 698 , 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.049 View PDF View article View in Scopus Google Scholar

  2. PDF Solving Energy Sprawl: Case Studies

    climate, the world must increase its renewable energy development dramatically as the centerpiece of this expansion. However, all energy sources present trade-offs. Without careful planning of the world's needed energy development, the resulting "energy sprawl"—the amount of new land and water area needed to produce energy—could cause

  3. A Case Study of Renewable Energy Development in Myanmar

    Myanmar has one of the lowest electrification rates in the world, and most of its inhabitants, who lack access to electricity, live off-grid in rural areas. Despite Myanmar having abundant sun and wind energy resources, which could potentially generate electricity for rural communities, renewable energy growth in Myanmar is stunted. In this article, we examine the case study of renewable ...

  4. PDF Fossil Fuel Transitions Framework: Case studies of the decision-making

    Case studies of the decision-making process for energy and economic development pathways Hyekyung Clarisse Kim1, Jingjing Zhang2, Joshua Sperling3, Erik Shuster4, Nicolas Stauff1, Anthony Armaly4, William Jenson5, Levi M. Larsen5, Riccardo Bracho3, Rebecca Efroymson6, Julie Doherty1, Naim Dargouth2, Keith Kline6, Nan Zhou2 1.

  5. An era of renewable energy growth and development

    2. McKinsey estimates that by 2026, global renewable-electricity capacity will rise more than 80 percent from 2020 levels (to more than 5,022 gigawatts). 1 Of this growth, two-thirds will come from wind and solar, an increase of 150 percent (3,404 gigawatts).

  6. Case Studies in Energy Transitions

    This requires moving away from a "one size fits all" approach. This case study is relevant to wind developers, energy regulators, local communities and renewable energy-focused non-government organizations. It is applicable beyond Australia to all contexts where wind farm development has encountered conflicted societal acceptance responses.

  7. Fundamental theory on multiple energy resources and related case studies

    1 Altmetric. Metrics. Herein, I methodically optimize a distributed energy resource in terms of the production, management, utilization, and/or transaction of renewable energies during the ...

  8. A case study on developing renewable battery energy storage

    The United States, China, Australia, and the United Kingdom have all successfully developed renewable energy storage systems. Sun et al. conducted a study of these countries to determine the policies and market mechanisms that could help other countries promote their own energy storage deployments. "Energy storage development is an essential ...

  9. Renewable Energy Data, Analysis, and Decisions Viewed through a Case

    This paper aims to summarize the relationship between renewable energy data, analysis, and decision making for developing countries seeking to transition their energy sector and to consider Bangladesh as a case study of a country that has worked with development organizations and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to develop a national ...

  10. A case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar: challenges and

    In this article, we examine the case study of renewable energy development in Myanmar to better understand the factors that influence renewable energy development and deployment in a developing country context. Our analysis reveals that there are numerous reasons for the lack of solar, wind, and biomass energy growth in Myanmar, such as ...

  11. PDF Linking Renewable Energy to Rural Development

    impact of renewable energy on rural development. Drawing on case studies of renewable energy in 16 rural regions across Europe and North America, the report shows that renewable energy does not automatically create employment in rural regions. For renewable energy to trigger rural economic growth requires a coherent policy framework and the ...

  12. Green finance, renewable energy development, and climate change

    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications - Green finance, renewable energy development, and climate change: evidence from regions of China. ... a case study of United Arab Emirates. J Clean ...

  13. Barriers to renewable energy development: A case study of large-scale

    There has been a significant amount of research focused on addressing particular barriers to renewable energy development (e.g., Jagadeesh, 2000, Ackermann and Söder, 2002, Dell and Rand, 2004, Eltham et al., 2008), but rather than focus on one particular issue, assuming that it is the underlying barrier to environmental action, the AKTESP ...

  14. Aligning renewable energy expansion with climate-driven range shifts

    Furthermore, only 1.9% of these (18.4%) RE-related articles documented the potential for conflicts between RE expansion and climate-driven range shifts 19, 20 (Extended Data Fig. 1 ). This dearth ...

  15. PDF A case study for the OECD, UN Environment, World Bank project

    Schwerhoff, G. and M. Sy (2017). "Financing renewable energy in Africa - Key challenge of the sustainable development goals" in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 75: 393-401. Sustainable Energy for All (SEforAll) and CPI (2018) Energizing Finance: Understanding the Landscape 2018. Sustainable Energy for All, Vienna and Washington DC.

  16. PDF Community Engagement and Equity in Renewable Energy Projects: A

    Regarding prevailing methods, 19 papers present literature reviews that seek to go beyond case studies to map trends in conceptual framings, methods, and empirical findings (Table 1). For example, Segreto et al. (2020) identify the key determinants of local and general social acceptance of renewable energy projects.

  17. Renewable Energy Policy in Cities Selected Case Studies

    Renewable Energy Policy in Cities: Selected Case Studies. Chemnitz, Germany where the local government enabled the formulation of strategies to use renewable sources and in 2008 developed the Integrated Climate Protection Programme (Integriertes Klimaschutzprogramm). Belo Horizonte, Brazil which has reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emission ...

  18. Energy justice & coastal communities: The case for Meaningful Marine

    In response, we offer an interdisciplinary framework that aims to organize existing knowledge and lessons learned from energy development. Specifically, we developed the Meaningful Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) Development Framework and conducted a literature review using MRE as a case study. MRE was chosen because it is a nascent renewable ...

  19. Case Study: Vietnam

    Highlights renewable energy (RE) development in Vietnam, where progress in the last 30 years has been reflected in the growth of electricity use and the electrification rate, and argues that Vietnam exemplifies success, even though it has refused thus far to provide subsidy for wind and biomass. The avoided cost tariff (ACT), along with related power purchase agreement (PPA) reforms, has ...

  20. Renewable Energy Project Development Toolbox

    The purpose of these case studies is to showcase working financial models for universities and other higher education institutions to invest in solar energy on campus. In this case study, we look at how Luther College uses donors and supporters to fund their renewable energy campus initiatives.

  21. Energy Access Case Study 06

    This case study documents the Capacity Building for the Rapid Commercialization of Renewable Energy project (CRE) in China. The CRE has promoted widespread adoption of renewable energy technologies by strengthening the capacities of public and private organizations, facilitating and supporting new policy initiatives, developing a regulatory system, and providing technical and co-financing ...

  22. Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status

    The primary objective for deploying renewable energy in India is to advance economic development, improve energy security, improve access to energy, and mitigate climate change. Sustainable development is possible by use of sustainable energy and by ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for citizens. Strong government support and the increasingly opportune ...

  23. Case study: reducing heating energy consumption in a high tunnel

    Appalachian State University's Nexus project designed an efficient greenhouse heating system that integrated renewable energy and root zone heating technology to reduce the greenhouse heating energy burden on local farmers and installed it at local cooperative farms. This study analyzed 5 years of data from 2018 to 2022 to investigate the energy savings and microclimate control effectiveness ...

  24. Development of renewable energy multi-energy complementary hydrogen

    In recent years, the rapid development of renewable energy hydrogen energy systems and the rise of the electric vehicle industry have increased the market's expectations for hydrogen technology, and China attaches great importance to the development of the hydrogen energy industry. ... and validated and applied the model through case studies of ...

  25. Low-carbon transition paths and benefits for the power sector at city

    The study also highlights that renewable energy development will significantly boost employment, with an estimated 1.19 million jobs in 2060 in the carbon neutrality scenario. Finally, the paper concludes with a sensitivity analysis and offers policy recommendations for the power sector's low-carbon transition.

  26. Research consortium seeks to optimize future grid

    With the support of the U.S. Department of Energy, a Stanford-led consortium of 22 research institutions seeks to help communities balance top priorities for a decarbonized grid. Electric ...

  27. Better renewable with economic growth without carbon growth: A

    The pursuit of sustainable development has become a prevalent goal in numerous countries. Therefore, renewable energy development is deemed the prime alternative, as it not only curtails CO2 emissions but also stimulates economic prosperity. Hence, there is a need to investigate rational options for renewable energy development. This paper utilises a research framework that combines linear and ...

  28. Green economy transition in Asia Pacific: A holistic ...

    This study explores the factors affecting renewable energy production (REP) in the Asia Pacific region, specifically focusing on China, Japan, and India from 2006 to 2022. This research shows impact of renewable energy, government policy and incentives, forest area, green technological innovations, and renewable energy investment on ecological footprints in the Asia Pacific, with a specific ...

  29. Green finance for mitigating greenhouse gases and promoting renewable

    In recent years, the tools of green finance have evolved to foster green economic growth like renewable energy and climate change mitigation. Taking a case study of Taiwan not yet reviewed in the literature, the present study aimed to conduct a preliminary analysis for exploring the amazing growth in renewable energy over the past fifteen years (2010-2023) in connection with the achievements ...

  30. Caribbean Renewable Energy Forum Awards ELM-Solar Island Energy Project

    The solar microgrid constructed on a private Exuma Cay in the Bahamas was done with a partnership of ELM, Solar Island Energy, Bahamas Energy and Solar, and Azimuth Energy. The Exuma Cay project comprises 1.6 MW in solar power and 5 MWh in energy storage capacity. More on Microgrids Shoring up Resilience in the Caribbean