short speech on books are better than movies

2 Minute Speech On Why Books Are Better Than Movies In English

Good morning to everyone in this room. I would like to thank the principal, the teachers, and my dear friends for allowing me to speak to you today about why books are better than movies. In most cases, books are superior to movies. Reading a book might help you visualize the scene or the actions taking place. They are also more thorough than movies, which can skip important facts. Some movies change the characters since they are completely different and the reverse in the novel.

The characters in a book often appear different from how we see them in our minds, and the same is evident in movies. It let us down in a lot of ways. I’ve read books previously with a surprising twist at the conclusion, but the movie never includes it.

Books take their time and are lengthier in length than movies, which typically run two hours. Movies hurry things up so they can get to the finish quickly. Books can be borrowed from a friend or the library if you don’t have access to them or the money to go to the movies.

Books may be read anywhere and at any time online. We get more information and develop our vocabulary when we read books. Character descriptions are significantly more accurate and thorough. Books contain more background information than movies do, which is an important feature that movies lack. Thank you.

Howl Poem By Allen Ginsberg Summary, Notes and Line by Line Explanation in English
Michael Poem by William Wordsworth Summary, Notes and Line by Line Explanation in English
Random Funny Joke Generator [with Answers]
Common Conversational Phrases in English [List of 939]
Random Address Generator [United States]
Random Compound Word Generator

short speech on books are better than movies

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Meet top uk universities from the comfort of your home, here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

Speech Writing /

Speech on Why Books are Better Than Movies?

Updated on
Dec 22, 2023

Speech on Why Books are Better Than Movies

What would be your choice – Detailed information, character development, intricate plots, or just some animation on screen? Arguments for and against the idea that books are better than movies depend on the individual.

Johannes Gutenberg, a German Goldsmith, invented the printing press in 1436, which paved the way for publishing books. Today, more than 100 million books exist in multiple fields. Books are often considered our best friend because of the knowledge they offer us. In recent years, there has been a debate on ‘Whether are books better than movies, what can we learn from books which movies lack, etc.’ Today, we will provide you with a speech on why books are better than their movies.

10 Lines on Books Are Better Than Movies

Here are 10 lines on why books are better than movies. Feel free to use them in your school topics.

Books offer an extensive exploration of characters, providing in-depth insights into their thoughts, feelings, and backgrounds.
Reading books allows us to personalize and imagine experiences.
Reading books helps us to visualize scenes and characters according to our interpretations and preferences.
The literary format allows authors to delve into intricate details, nuanced emotions, and complex plots that may be challenging to convey in a condensed movie format.
Books empower us to use our creativity, filling in gaps and envisioning the story in our minds, fostering a deeper connection to the narrative.
Books offer a more leisurely and comprehensive exploration of the story, subplots, and character arcs.
Internal dialogues and character introspection are more effectively conveyed in books.
Books provide a richer understanding of the character’s motivations and growth throughout the narrative.
The reader has the flexibility to pause, reflect, and return to any part of the story,
Books foster a more immersive and contemplative reading experience.

Books are better than movies because you design the set the way you want it to look pic.twitter.com/pImXogDi0i — MobiQuotes (@mobiquotes) December 20, 2023

2-Minute Speech on Books Are Better Than Movies

‘Good morning my classmates and teacher. Today, I would like to express my speech on why books are better than movies. From our imagination to language skills, books offer a more comprehensive understanding of the subject. Books provide us with detailed information, character development, and complicated plots.’

‘Reading the written words allows us a deep exploration of the character’s thoughts, emotions, and motivation that is more challenging to convey through a movie. We can visualize the character through our imaginations. Books can delve into the internal thoughts and monologues of characters, providing insights into their minds.’

‘The visualization power offered by books does not judge characters based on their looks, something which movies do. In a movie, only a selected character can play a role, but in books, no such thing exists.’

‘As readers, we can control the pace at which we want to consume a story. we can linger over a beautifully written passage, reread sections for better understanding, or skip ahead if we are eager to know what happens next. Movies, on the other hand, have a fixed pace set by the director and editors.’

‘Movies have time constraints because of which certain elements of a story are omitted or skipped. Reading books requires active mental participation, as we need to interpret the text, imagine the scenes, and connect the dots.’

‘Books can offer multiple perspectives, internal dialogues, and diverse narrative styles that may not be as easily conveyed in a visual medium.

‘Books possess a transformative power, which moves lack. This power goes beyond time and technology, through which we can embark on our personal growth, self-discovery and exploration.’

‘Whether we are reading academic or non-academic books, it’s always a great experience to understand it from our perspective. Whether books are better than movies depends on individual preferences, and both mediums have their strengths and unique ways of storytelling.

Thank you.’

Ans: Books offer in-depth details about the characters, their personalities, thoughts, emotions, and background. Almost every movie has time constraints, where we are required to finish it in the given time frame. On the other hand, books offer us the flexibility to read anything and anywhere. To watch movies, we need proper resources like a TV, laptop or cell phone with an internet connection. Books are easy to carry and don’t need any resources.

Ans: Books keep our minds active and engaged, and offer is diverse range of words and expressions which enhance our vocabulary. Reading books reduces stress levels, improves focus and concentration, enhances imagination and creativity, etc.

Ans: Books provide us with detailed information, character development, and complicated plots. Reading the written words allows us a deep exploration of the character’s thoughts, emotions, and motivation which is more challenging to convey through a movie. We can visualize the character through our imaginations. Books can delve into the internal thoughts and monologues of characters, providing insights into their minds.

For more information on such interesting speech topics for your school, visit our speech writing page and follow Leverage Edu .

Shiva Tyagi

With an experience of over a year, I've developed a passion for writing blogs on wide range of topics. I am mostly inspired from topics related to social and environmental fields, where you come up with a positive outcome.

Connect With Us

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

January 2024

September 2024

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

Have something on your mind?

Make your study abroad dream a reality in January 2022 with

India's Biggest Virtual University Fair

Essex Direct Admission Day

Why attend .

Don't Miss Out

Find a blog post

Books vs. movies: the age-old debate.

The Mountain Between Us , It , Murder on the Orient Express , Wonder , My Cousin Rachel . These films released in 2017 have one thing in common, and you may have guessed it already: They were all books that were later adapted into movies.

Similar to its affinity for sequels and remakes , it seems to me like Hollywood is increasingly looking to books for inspiration for the next blockbuster hits. From a business standpoint, it makes total sense because producers can draw on the popularity of a certain book and use that to their advantage when it comes to marketing the film’s release.

As an avid reader, I am always excited at the news that a book is being adapted as a feature film. My mind is occupied by thoughts of who the actors/actresses are going to be (and if I approve), if the film will stay true to the book, and most importantly, if the movie will be just as good as the book. The thought of finally being able to visualize what has only previously been limited to my imagination is always an exciting prospect.

However, I am usually underwhelmed after watching a certain film based on a book, and if you asked me a year ago which one I would prefer: the movie or the book, I would have immediately chosen the book.

Hands down. No doubt. However, within the past year, I have come to appreciate movie adaptations of books more because I have realized that comparing books to their counterpart movies isn’t fair; at the end of the day, the two mediums of storytelling have different advantages and different qualifications for what makes them good. Like Stephen King once said, comparing one to the other is like comparing apples to oranges. They are both great sources of entertainment, but they aren’t comparable. For those still reluctant to accept this theory, I’ll be delving more into this age-old question: “What’s better: books or movies?” I’ll make a case for each argument and let you make the final call.

The popular belief is that books are often a hundred times better than their movie counterparts; if you need any further proof, just take a look at the following Washington Post visual.

Books are great because they allow the reader to be a part of the story; we are the observers that have insight into the character’s thoughts and feelings, and all the nuances that create three-dimensional characters. With books, there’s just more. More detail, more focus on character development, and more depth to the meaning of the artwork. It’s also the more time-consuming form of the two, and after finishing a novel, after a couple of hours of being immersed into a different world and mind space, it seems like you have suddenly been thrust back into reality.

On the other hand, the great thing about movies is their ability to show, and the overall experience of watching one. While reading a book, I often have a movie reel playing in my head. I can map out the setting, I can see the characters’ expressions, and I can empathize with their emotions.

However, watching the same story unfold on the big screen is a different experience. While reading spurs your imagination, a movie helps you visualize all the elements of the books that were previously confined to your imagination. It immerses you into the story in a different way than a book.

For example, instead of reading about the magical world of Harry Potter, while watching the movie, I can actually see what J.K. Rowling means by “He was almost twice as tall as a normal man and at least five times as wide. He looked simply too big to be allowed, and so wild – long tangles of bushy black hair and beard hid most of his face, he had hands the size of dustbin lids and his feet in their leather boots were like baby dolphins.” To put it simply, movies make it easier for us to just lean back and enjoy the show.

An added benefit of movies is the music and visual designs that enhance the experience of watching a film. Imagine, for example, that you are watching an emotional scene. It’s the climax of the story, and in the background plays a gentle orchestra, that eventually swells into a big crescendo as the story reaches its resolution. In that moment, you feel exactly what the characters feel, and your heart races along with the melody of the music. So although (in some cases) the audience might not have a play by play of the characters’ thoughts and emotions, movies have another way of conveying the emotion and tone of a certain scene.

If you feel like further exploring this age-old debate personally, come down to Media Services to check out movies even the worst critic would have to admit are just as good as the books. Don’t know where to start? Try Pride and Prejudice, Psycho, Jaws, The Godfather, etc.

Until next time! RE

Robiati Endashaw is a sophomore studying public policy analysis in KSB with a minor in Economics. In her spare time, she enjoys reading non-fiction and watching crime documentaries.

Robiati Endashaw offers a balanced perspective on the age-old debate between books and their movie adaptations. As an avid reader, she acknowledges the initial skepticism toward films based on beloved books. However, she also appreciates the unique advantages of both mediums of storytelling. While books allow for deeper immersion and detailed character development, movies excel in visual storytelling and immersive experiences. Endashaw emphasizes that comparing books and movies is like comparing apples to oranges; they serve different purposes and offer distinct pleasures. Her insights encourage readers to appreciate the merits of both forms of storytelling and explore adaptations with an open mind.

Oh gee thanks so much . I also feel quite the same way too when it comes to books as in they are so much enjoyable because they allow us as the reader to explore the depths of my imagination and every thing happening Is felt dearly. 😊

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Social media

Instagram for Herman B Wells Library
Facebook for IU Libraries

Additional resources

Featured databases.

Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) OneSearch@IU
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) Academic Search (EBSCO)
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) ERIC (EBSCO)
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) Nexis Uni
Resource available without restriction HathiTrust Digital Library
Databases A-Z
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) Google Scholar
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) JSTOR
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) Web of Science
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) Scopus
Resource available to authorized IU Bloomington users (on or off campus) WorldCat

IU Libraries

Diversity Resources
About IU Libraries
Alumni & Friends
Departments & Staff
Jobs & Libraries HR
IU Libraries Blog
Intranet (Staff)
Login (Blogs admin)

Non-Fiction
Author’s Corner
Reader’s Corner
Writing Guide
Book Marketing Services
Write for us

Why Books Are Better Than Movies

Companions, Not Replacements

Remember that feeling? You’ve been devouring this incredible book for weeks, getting utterly lost in its world. The characters have become like friends; their struggles and triumphs giving you all the feels. Their adventures have been unfolding so vividly in your mind’s eye thanks to the author’s brilliant descriptions. But now the final page has turned, and you’re not ready to let them go just yet.

So, of course, you rush out to see the big, shiny new film adaptation the moment it hits theaters. You’re practically vibrating with excitement to see these beloved characters brought to life before your eyes. You eagerly grab your popcorn…and then, crushing disappointment. What gives? Why did the movie feel so pale and shallow compared to the book’s rich experience?

I’ve lived that head-scratching letdown more times than I care to admit, most recently with the new Netflix series adapting Liu Cixin’s mind-twisting sci-fi epic The Three-Body Problem . Don’t get me wrong, I’m always stoked to see stories I love get the Hollywood treatment – there’s a special thrill in watching a familiar world literally move and breathe in live-action.

But if I’m being honest, movies and shows rarely manage to capture the depth and imaginative richness of a truly great book. While adaptations immerse us through dazzling visuals and soundscapes, the written word engages our creativity to an infinitely more profound degree. Films show us other worlds, but books let us co-create them.

Directing From the Armchair

Think about it – whenever you dive into a new novel, you’re handed the ultimate director’s chair. Sure, the author provides the descriptive blueprint, but crafting the actual setting, character appearances, and emotional vibes? That all falls to your one-of-a-kind imagination.

Was Professor McGonagall’s stern bun even tighter in your Harry Potter brainscape? Did the gnarly branches of the Whomping Willow seem even more menacing and violently thrashing compared to the movies? Maybe the landscapes of Middle-Earth felt lusher and more primordial in your Lord of the Rings visions.

That’s the special magic of getting deliciously lost in a good book. You’re awash in an intimately imaginative process that not even the most cutting-edge CGI spectacle can replicate. As cinematic as the latest franchise blockbuster looks, the visuals were still created by someone else’s artistic team and budget constraints. But when you’re reading, the only limit is your own artistic creativity.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ll always be first in line for those big-budget page-to-screen epics. There’s an undeniable thrill in watching the wizarding world or Pandora’s lush alien landscapes brought to vivid life. But part of me also longs for my own mind’s distinctive interpretation, before the movies colored my imagination.

The Sky’s The Limit

Speaking of budgets, here’s where books really flex their artistic muscles over movies. To conjure truly expansive, fantastical settings and high-concept plot lines on the big screen requires blockbuster budgets and pushing the boundaries of special effects. With the written word, you can go as massive and mind-bending as your imagination can fathom without overtaxing a studio’s CGI team.

The cosmic scale and theoretical physics baked into The Three-Body Problem easily make Liu Cixin’s book one of the most bracingly original and outright trippy works of sci-fi I’ve ever experienced. I mean, humanity’s first contact with a truly alien intelligence that defies all our puny assumptions about the nature of reality? Entire dimensions and civilizations existing in different realms of physics and perception? Just try translating that brilliantly weird headiness into a few hours of Hollywood visuals. Good luck!

Novels like The Three-Body Problem remind me that books don’t have the same limitations as movies. No matter how cutting-edge the CGI or A-list the director, films inevitably have to rein in sprawling world-building and high-concept ideas to keep the run time somewhat sane. But writers have the entire infinite space of the imagination to construct mind-bending realms more fantastical than our puny brains could fathom. That freedom opens up entire new dimensions of creativity simply impossible to fully capture on the screen.

The Inner Lives Movies Can’t Reach

Of course, it’s not just the scenery and ideas where novels reign supreme. The true magic of books lies in how they transport you directly into the interior minds and souls of the characters you’re following for those few hundred delicious pages. Sure, actors use tools like body language and line delivery to hint at inner life. But no performance, no matter how talented the thespian, can quite match the raw intimacy of straight-up inner monologue.

Think of any iconic character whose journey you got deliciously, unflinchingly consumed by while turning pages. Holden Caulfield spiraling through his angst-ridden coming-of-age in The Catcher in the Rye . Frankie Addams wrestling with themes of race, gender, and identity in The Member of the Wedding. Raskolnikov’s feverish descent into guilt and moral chaos in Crime and Punishment.

As you followed them chapter by chapter, you were essentially a captive audience to their every fleeting thought, bitter rant, soul-searching rumination, and private struggle with the world spinning around them. Their narrative voice became so distinct and ingrained that by the final pages, you felt like you truly knew these characters on a deeper level than some actual people in your life.

Movies can try their damnedest to expose that interiority, but they’re shooting in the dark compared to books. All they have to work with are carefully calculated cinematography, editing, and whatever psychological magic the actors can mine from the script. It’s all educated guesswork about someone’s inner experience. But books take you straight to the source, allowing you to marinate in a character’s unspoken musings and unpack their every messy motivation from the inside out. That’s soul-binding intimacy no visual medium can quite emulate.

The Writer’s Touch

And then there’s the simple matter of authorial style and literary technique that add so much rich texture and meaning to the very fabric of a good book. I’m talking about the masterful wordsmiths who bend the tools of language – specific phrasings, rhythmic cadences, cultural metaphors, and all the rest – into a signature poetic voice that resonates beyond surface-level storytelling.

Can you even imagine the lyrical verses of Cormac McCarthy or Toni Morrison being adapted to the screen with their essence and subtext intact? Those authors’ poignant yet sparse words about the brutal realities of the American frontier and Black experience are literary languages unto themselves. They evoke layers of emotion and social commentary just through the very stylistic DNA of their prose.

As cinematic as a talented director might try to be, the visual-based nature of moviemaking inevitably strips away those subtle layers of historical echoes and thematic provocations that authors could convey with a single precisely-chosen turn of phrase. Films are wonderful at spectacle and grandeur. But books engage our hearts, minds, and souls through the sheer poetic artistry of language.

On Your Own Schedule

Then there’s the simple pleasure of being able to dictate your own creative journey in a book versus getting dragged along at the predetermined pace of a movies. Have you ever stopped to linger over a lyrical sentence or meaningful passage that hit you right in the soul? Unless you paused that movie, good luck re-reading and meditating on its nuances during the actual screening – you’ll get immediately shunted forward.

Conversely, how many times have you impatiently muttered “Okay, I get it already!” as interminable scenes dragged on long after you were ready to find out what happens next? With a book, you have the luxury of speeding up or slowing down to your own desired pace. Marathon through chapters during thrilling action or suspenseful rises in the plot. Lazily stretch out and bask in the beautiful calmer passages that speak to you.

Having that freedom to dictate your own pacing and focus creates an experience that syncs far more personally with your individual engagement in the moment. It helps you internalize the story and its messages on a deeper, more meaningful level than movie’s one-speed-fits-all structure ever could.

And let’s be real here – half the dang fun of picking up a new book is slowly piecing together tantalizing hints to build anticipation for what’s coming next, right? But movies have a nasty tendency to spoil at least some major plot points through heavy-handed marketing and trailers teasing action sequences that your favorite characters clearly survive. Nothing erodes the thrill of literary suspense and delicious guesswork quite like dramatic third-act previews.

With a good book, you’re left free to build steadily spiraling excitement and theory-crafting about how those subtle character moments or shocking chapter cliffhangers could possibly resolve. And when you finally do turn that no-spoiler final page? Reading allows you to experience the climactic twists and cathartic payoffs in their purest, most viscerally shocking form.

The Companion, Not The Replacement

Listen, I’m not here to claim movies are some big bad evil demolishing the sanctity of literature. At their best, film adaptations can be downright inspiring works of art and storytelling in their own right. Anyone who’s gotten goosebumps at Middle-Earth’s sweeping grandeur in the The Lord of the Rings films or felt genuine chills at the eldritch horror of the Demogorgons in Stranger Things knows the magic that cinema can conjure.

But my core thesis here is simply this: Even the most ambitious and artistically-accomplished of book-to-screen adaptations should be viewed as celebratory companions to the source material, not definitive replacements for it. An adaptation can absolutely put its own clever creative spin on the blueprint while still faithfully capturing its essence and spirit.

However, trying to properly translate an entire author’s deliciously sprawling fictional universe and all its rich thematic underpinnings into a two or three-hour visual narrative will inevitably mean some serious corners get cut. Key characters get shafted for brevity. Complex subplots or details get omitted. Grand ideas and timeless observations about the human condition get watered down or lost entirely in favor of watchable pacing and blockbuster bombast.

So please, grab those movie tickets and have an absolute blast watching the latest beloved book hit the big screen! But don’t make the mistake of assuming you’ve now experienced that story’s full imaginative richness and depths. For that, you’ll need to find a cozy reading nook and rediscover the original tale on your own intimate terms.

If a particularly mind-blowing film adaptation hooked its claws in your imagination, phenomenal! Now pick up the printed version and truly lose yourself in the journey from page one. Savor the author’s subtle genius of character work, wordsmithing, and profound thematic resonance that no director, no matter how talented, could quite capture. Because here’s the simple truth: As immersive and moving as your favorite movies might be, books remain the truest channel for our imaginations to roam unfettered and co-create entire worlds with each empathetic flight into fiction.

So library card or e-reader, whichever your poison, books will forever be the purest and most personal form of transportive storytelling humanity has yet conceived. Their magic quite literally springs eternally from our own creative minds – didn’t you know you were part of the spell all along?

E-reader vs. Paperbacks: The Ultimate Showdown for Bookworms!

Top 6 books about cricket for every enthusiast, the rise of ai-generated literature: awesome or awful, what is the meaning of a “number 8” in football, buy tiktok views to expand your reach, more like this related, book marketing and promotion services.

We provide genuine and custom-tailored book marketing services and promotion strategies. Our services include book reviews and social media promotion across all possible platforms, which will help you in showcasing the books, sample chapters, author interviews, posters, banners, and other promotional materials. In addition to book reviews and author interviews, we also provide social media campaigning in the form of contests, events, quizzes, and giveaways, as well as sharing graphics and book covers. Our book marketing services are very efficient, and we provide them at the most competitive price.

The Book Marketing and Promotion Plan that we provide covers a variety of different services. You have the option of either choosing the whole plan or customizing it by selecting and combining one or more of the services that we provide. The following is a list of the services that we provide for the marketing and promotion of books.

Book Reviews

Book Reviews have direct impact on readers while they are choosing their next book to read. When they are purchasing book, most readers prefer the books with good reviews. We’ll review your book and post reviews on Amazon, Flipkart, Goodreads and on our Blogs and social-media channels.

Author Interviews

We’ll interview the author and post those questions and answers on blogs and social medias so that readers get to know about author and his book. This will make author famous along with his book among the reading community.

Social Media Promotion

We have more than 170K followers on our social media channels who are interested in books and reading. We’ll create and publish different posts about book and author on our social media platforms.

Social Media Set up

Social Media is a significant tool to reaching out your readers and make them aware of your work. We’ll help you to setup and manage various social media profiles and fan pages for your book.

We’ll provide you our social media marketing guide, using which you may take advantage of these social media platforms to create and engage your fan base.

Website Creation

One of the most effective and long-term strategies to increase your book sales is to create your own website. Author website is must have tool for authors today and it doesn’t just help you to promote book but also helps you to engage with your potential readers. Our full featured author website, with blog, social media integration and other cool features, is the best marketing tool you can have. You can list each of your titles and link them to buy from various online stores.

Google / Facebook / Youtube Adverts

We can help you in creating ad on Google, Facebook and Youtube to reach your target audience using specific keywords and categories relevant to your book.

With our help you can narrow down your ads to the exact target audience for your book.

For more details mail us at [email protected]

The Bookish Elf is your single, trusted, daily source for all the news, ideas and richness of literary life. The Bookish Elf is a site you can rely on for book reviews, author interviews, book recommendations, and all things books. Contact us: [email protected]

Quick Links

10 Reasons Why Are Books Better Than Movies

There’s no doubt that movies are a dominant form of entertainment these days. They seem to be constantly evolving and getting more and more complex, with higher production values and bigger budgets. However, there’s one problem with movies: they’re not books. Books have been around for centuries, and they show no signs of going away. In fact, books are better than movies in many ways.

Table of Contents

Are movies better than books?

There are a lot of people who would say that movies are better than books. After all, movies provide an experience that is more immediate and visceral than reading a book. They can be more exciting, and they can take you to worlds that you could never visit in real life.

However, there are also a lot of people who would say that books are better than movies. Books can provide a more in-depth and nuanced experience than movies can, and they can often be more emotionally powerful. They can also be more intellectually stimulating, teaching you things that you could never learn from a movie.

Ultimately, it’s up to each individual to decide which is better: books or movies. However, it’s hard to deny that both have their own unique benefits and drawbacks.

In this post, we will talk about why books are better than movies but before that, let’s not forget about the good things movies offer and why movies are better than books(in some aspects).

Why Movies Are Better Than Books?

There are a few reasons why movies are better than books.

First, movies are visual. You can see the characters and the setting, and it’s all in one place. With a book, you have to imagine everything yourself.

Second, movies are more exciting. They have music and sound effects, and they move quickly.

Third, movies are more social. You can watch them with other people and talk about them.

Fourth, movies are easier to understand. You don’t have to read the book to know what’s going on.

These are the reasons stand out for movies over books.

Why Are Books Better Than Movies?

Now let’s move into the benefits of reading books over movies. Here are a few reasons why books are better than movies.

Books provide a more in-depth and well-rounded experience than movies

Books allow readers to use their imaginations and create their own images instead of being restricted to what is shown on the screen. This also means that books can be interpreted in different ways, depending on the reader’s perspective, while movies are generally more one-dimensional.

Books also allow for a greater level of detail than movies. For example, a book can describe a character’s appearance in great detail, while a movie would only be able to show a snapshot of that character. Books can also explore complex topics and ideas that movies cannot handle.

Books can be paused, reread, and analyzed more thoroughly than movies

One of the biggest advantages that books have over movies is that they can be paused. This may not seem like a big deal, but it actually allows for a lot more analysis and reflection. For example, when watching a movie, if something confusing or surprising happens, you only have a few seconds to try and figure out what’s going on before it moves on(In case you are watching a movie in a theater). With a book, you can take your time to digest what’s happening and think about how it fits into the rest of the story.

Additionally, books tend to be more analytical than movies. This is because books are often slower-paced and allow for more description. Movies, on the other hand, are more action-packed and rely more on visuals. As a result, books often provide a more in-depth look at characters and plotlines than movies do.

Books Allow for Imagination

Movies are a visual medium. They show you what the director wants you to see. They are limited by what is possible on screen. With books, your imagination is engaged. You can see anything in your head that you want to. This leads to a more personal experience with the story. As a result, readers can create their own images in their minds based on the author’s description.

Books can be more detailed

Books are more detailed than movies. This means that readers can get a better understanding of the story and all of its intricacies. In movies, it’s often difficult to fit in all of the necessary details, which can leave viewers feeling confused.

There are a lot of movie adaptations of books where you will feel like the movie isn’t much detailed compared to the books you read.

Books have pages after pages to explore a topic, while movies are limited by the runtime. This means that readers can learn more about the story and the characters. In addition, books allow for more complex storylines and character development, which isn’t always possible in a movie.

Books can be interpreted differently

Every person who reads a book will interpret it differently. This is due to the number of different perspectives that books offer. With movies, it’s often more difficult to create a variety of interpretations due to the visual nature of the storytelling. This means that people may not have as much of an opportunity to connect with a movie on a personal level.

Books can stay with you for a long time

Movies come and go. You might see a movie once and never think about it again. But a book can stay with you for a long time. You can keep rereading it, thinking about it, and getting something new out of it every time.

So, books can stay with you for a long time. Most of the time, when you watch a movie you might forget about it within a few days. But a good book will stick with you for weeks, months, or even years.

Stories can be ruined by bad acting

One of the biggest problems with movies is that they can be ruined by bad acting. Actors can completely change the feel of a story through their poor performances.

This is not a problem with books, as the reader can always imagine the characters in their own way.

Books improve your vocabulary

Books can improve your vocabulary. Sure, you can learn new words from movies too, but there’s something about reading that makes them stick in your mind better. A lot of time, books will use words that you wouldn’t hear in everyday conversation. This is a great way to improve your vocabulary and learn new words!

Movies focus more on being commercial and compromise on quality

Books are more likely to be focused on telling a good story and providing exciting and valuable content rather than trying to make a quick buck. This is because books don’t rely on box office sales in order to make money – they can be sold at any time to any customer. Therefore, the focus can be on the story and the content rather than on trying to make the movie as flashy and commercial as possible. This often means that movies are more likely to compromise on quality in order to cram in more commercial elements.

For example, a movie might have a shorter running time in order to fit in more advertisements, or it might use well-known actors who might not be the best choice for the role. In contrast, a book is unlikely to have these same commercial pressures, so it can take time to develop the characters and the story. This often leads to a more satisfying experience for the reader.

Movies have limited storytelling time

Movies have a limited storytelling time. It’s not possible to put all the details of the book in a two hours movie. Hence, movies can miss out a lot of good parts because of it’s limited time.

On the other hand, books do not have any limited time to read. It depends on the reader how fast they can read.

A book can be picked up and put down, again and again, allowing the reader to take their time in consuming the story. Books allow for the imagination to run wild, picturing the characters and scenes in any way possible. This is not to say that movies are not powerful, but books allow for a more personal connection with the story.

Other reasons:

Books are more likely to lead to discussions than movies.

One of the great things about books is that they can lead to discussions. When you’re watching a movie, it’s a passive experience — you watch, and then you move on. But with a book, there are different interpretations, and people can have different reactions. This can lead to some really interesting conversations.

Books can provide new insights with each reading

Whereas movies are typically watched just once, books can be read multiple times and provide new insights with each reading. This is due to the level of detail that books can provide as well as their ability to allow readers to interpret the text in their own way.

In contrast, movies are limited by what can be shown on screen and cannot provide the same level of detail as a book. As a result, movies may not always provide an accurate portrayal of the story that is being told.

Conclusion:

Though movies can be great, they often cannot compare to the experience of reading a book. Books allow for more immersion in the story and can provide a richer experience because readers can visualize what is happening in their minds.

Additionally, books tend to have better storylines and characters than movies do. For these reasons, I believe that books are better than movies. Have you ever read a book that was better than a movie? Let me know in the comments.

Books Vs Movies: Which Is Better? The Debate Settled!

Last Updated on August 18, 2023 by Louisa

Books and movies are two of the most popular forms of entertainment, but which is better? This age-old debate of books vs movies has been causing a stir for decades, so I’ve decided it’s time to settle the score once and for all.

While both offer unique ways to experience stories, there are pros and cons for each. When determining which is better, reading books or watching movies, the answer really is determined by a number of factors.

If you ask any reader, they will of course tell you all the reasons why books are better than movies, but if you ask a movie buff, you will receive a strong counter-argument for why movies are better.

In this guide, I’ve listed the reasons why you would want to choose a book over a movie, or a movie over a book, and in doing so, settle the debate once and for all.

To be clear, in this guide, we are concentrating on books that have been adapted into movies.

Books vs Movies Pros and Cons

If you need a quick summary of whether reading books or watching movies is better, then check out the below table which summarizes the points in this article.

Keep reading for a detailed analysis of reading books vs watching movies.

Pros of reading books over movies

There is more depth to a book, scenes are described in more detail, and have more plot-setting scenes.
A book allows the reader to use their imagination.
Readers follow the plot as it was intended by the author.

Cons of reading books over movies

Books take a long time to read, sometimes several days.
Some books can drag in the middle.
Dialogues can sometimes be unrealistic in books but come to life on the big screen.

Pros of watching movies over reading books

Movies are quicker than books.
You can watch a movie with a friend, but you can’t read a book with someone else.
You don’t have to concentrate on a movie and there is less need for your own imagination.
Acting is an art form.

Cons of watching movies over reading books

Scenes are often adapted or deleted based on what looks better visually.
Viewers are often left asking questions because scenes from the book not being included.
Characters can often be drastically changed.

Why books are better than movies?

If you’re a book enthusiast looking for arguments for books over movies, these are some of the reasons why books are better than movies.

#1. Books nurture the reader’s imagination

is reading books better than watching movies? A man reading a book

When it comes to reading books, readers have an unparalleled level of control in terms of how they visualize the story. When I first read The Hobbit, I pictured a very different-looking Bilbo Baggins to that seen on screen.

Readers can also move through a story at their own pace and use their imagination to create vivid scenes in their mind’s eye. Sometimes even filling in the blanks where there are questions that need answering.

Not only this, but you also get to experience the book in the way the author intended. When directors make a movie adaptation, they have to decide what scenes are the most action-packed and therefore keep the audience engaged.

This often means that some scenes are cut out from the plot that may seem important to the overall storyline.

The biggest example of this is how characters are described in books. Often characters in books look different in movies.

Frankenstein’s monster comes to mind here. In the book, he is described as:

“He is so gentle, yet so wise; his mind is so cultivated; and when he speaks, although his words are culled with the choicest art, yet they flow with rapidity and unparalleled eloquence.” Frankenstein, Victor Hugo, Letter 4

The monster was intended to be gentle. Frankenstein wanted to create a friend, not the brutish monster that we see in the movies.

#2. Books have more depth than movies

But the biggest argument as to why books might be better than movies is that books often have more depth than films due to the additional time they spend on character development and intricate plot points.

When I talk about depth, I am referring to descriptions. The reader gets more insight into how words are said, how characters look, and how scenes are created.

The small details in a book, such as short scenes or little descriptions, are the parts of a book that help readers ask the right questions, start to piece parts of the story together, and even predict what will happen next.

There are usually some key depth features that are missing in movies.

#3. Movie adaptations miss out on key points

If you think about the number of hours you spend reading a book compared to watching a movie, then you get an idea as to how much is missing.

Films tend to lack some of the detail and nuance found in books due to time constraints. This usually leads to unanswered questions after watching the movie.

One of the biggest examples of this is in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

In the movie, there is a scene in which Harry sees a patronus charm of a doe, which leads him to a pond covered in ice where he discovers the sword of Griffindor beneath the surface.

If you watch the movie without reading the book, this scene would be somewhat confusing.

While we do later learn that Severus Snape’s patronus is a doe, and therefore alludes to him placing the sword for Harry to find, the movie never answers the question: how does Snape find Harry?

We also don’t learn how Snape has the sword in the first instance and why it never fell into the ministry’s hands.

While I absolutely loved the movies, I can honestly say I loved it more because I had read the book prior to watching and was able to fill in the blanks.

My partner has never read the books (yes I know, a book blogger is dating someone who has not read Harry Potter. Dumpable offense? Let me know in the comments) and he was constantly badgering me with questions to which I always responded with “in the book, this happens”

#4. Reading has other benefits

There is more to reading books than just following a story. Reading helps to grow your knowledge, expand your creative horizons, and even helps improve your mood.

According to Healthline , reading books can help strengthen your brain, both cognitively and in terms of your mental health.

So you see, there are many reasons why reading is important , not just for something fun to do!

#5. Books allow the reader to think more deeply

Books often have an underlying theme or moral tone that allows the reader to think deeply about certain topics or situations.

The storylines can help you to empathize with certain characters, and reflect on how situations would be handled in our own world.

In classic literature books such as 1984 , for example, there are a lot of areas in which the reader can think about how political influences shape society, but in the movie, you do get a sense of this but it is less developed than in the book.

Why are movies better than books?

If you’re looking for arguments for movies being better than books, here are some reasons why you may prefer a film vs a book.

#1. Movies help bring hard-to-visualize scenes to life

Movies offer a unique cinematic experience that allows viewers to sit back and enjoy a story without having to actively think about it.

This is great for those who don’t have a vivid imagination or struggle to see a clear picture of what an author is describing in their mind.

Movies provide visuals that can often be breathtakingly beautiful or incredibly intense, sometimes more so than written in a book.

One great example of this is in The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies.

In the book, Bilbo is hit on the head and knocked out for the whole battle. Only when he awakes does Gandalf fill him in on what happens, but it’s short and to the point.

When you watch the movie, you see all these incredible stunts and action-packed scenes.

Yes, it does feature some gravity-defying performances from Legolas who does not appear in the books, which is something Peter Jackson decided to add to the storyline to make the Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit franchise more connected.

But in the book, you don’t get any of that.

#2. Acting is an art form

Something that readers may not appreciate about movie adaptations is the acting.

Acting is an art form, and by watching movies, audiences can appreciate acting performances as well as special effects such as CGI or stunts that would be much more difficult to experience in a book.

#3. Movies are quicker than books

Reading often requires more time and effort than watching a movie. Reading a book from start to finish usually takes a few days with breaks in between.

If you do sit down to read from start to finish, you can take several hours to get through the entire story.

One reason why you wouldn’t want to do this is that you will instantly forget what happens or you won’t appreciate the detail enough.

Reading should be savored like a fine wine, allowing you to digest information and ponder on the themes, morals, and messages.

If you don’t have time on your side, then movies are your saving grace.

#4. Social interactions are more relatable in movies

Often times when I am reading the dialogue in a book, I feel it’s too staged, or unnatural.

When dialogue is spoken in a movie, it can feel more authentic, as often actors will improvise the script and make it feel more real.

#5. You can watch a film with friends

While you can always go to a book club to talk about a book you love, this is really an activity that hardcore readers enjoy more.

When you go to the cinema, it becomes a larger social outing that can bring together people with all different hobbies and interests.

Should Books Be Made Into Movies?

So while you can now see there are many pros and cons to books and movies, the question remains; should books be made into movies?

Absolutely.

While we can all agree that there is less detail in a movie than in a book, I personally feel that when a book I love has been made well on the big screen, I love the book more.

The best example of this is Lord of the Rings. It doesn’t matter how many times I watch the movies or read the books, I fall in love with the story and characters all over again.

I also find that when I’m not in the mood to read, watching a movie brings back fond memories of the book and helps me get out of a reading slump and inspired to read again.

And it’s not just me that thinks this. According to a study by SuperSummary , 82% of people agree that movie adaptations bring a book to life.

Books vs Movies: The Verdict

Ultimately, which form is better comes down to personal preference as both offer unique experiences that shouldn’t be compared side by side.

While books allow you to use your imagination to its fullest, movies allow the viewer to follow a story without concentrating.

You get more depth to a plot from a book, but you spend less time watching a movie.

Whichever way you choose, whether it’s curling up with a good book or settling into your couch for some movie night fun, there can be no doubt that both will result in an enjoyable escape from reality.

Like this post? Don’t forget to save it on Pinterest!

About Louisa Smith

Editor/Founder - Epic Book Society

Louisa is the Founder, Editor, and Head Honcho of Epic Book Society. She was born and raised in the United Kingdom and graduated from the University for the Creative Arts with a degree in Journalism. Louisa began her writing career at the age of 7 when her poetry was published in an anthology of poems to celebrate the Queen's Jubilee. Upon graduating university, she spent several years working as a journalist writing about books before transitioning to become a Primary School Teacher. Louisa loves all genres of books, but her favorites are Sci-Fi, Romance, Fantasy, and Young Adult Fiction. Read more Louisa's story here .

Why Books Are Better Than Movies: 9 Reasons To Prefer Reading

Books vs movies? When it comes to the debate between books and movies, the answer is clear: books are simply better . While movies offer stunning visuals, thrilling action, and unforgettable performances, they simply can’t match the depth and detail that books provide.

Books have the unique ability to immerse readers in a world of imagination and emotion, offering insights into characters’ thoughts, motivations, and experiences in a way that movies cannot. Through careful use of language and structure, books can create a level of complexity and nuance that is simply impossible to capture on screen.

This is not to say that movies are without merit. They offer their own unique strengths and can provide a different kind of immersive experience. However, we believe that the power of books to captivate and engage readers on a deep, personal level is unmatched.

Without further ado, lets explore 9 reasons why books are better than movies .

Why Books Are Better Than Movies

1. books offer more detail and depth.

One of the primary reasons why books are better than movies is that they offer more detail and depth. Unlike movies, which are can be more limited by time constraints, books can delve deeper into the story, the characters, and the world-building. With books, readers can get lost in a fully-realized world that is rich with detail and nuance.

2. Books Encourage Imagination

When reading a book, readers are required to use their imagination to create images in their minds. This is a powerful and rewarding experience that allows readers to become fully immersed in the story. By using their imagination, readers can create their own unique interpretation of the characters and the world they inhabit.

3. Books Can Be Read Anywhere

Another reason why books are better than movies is that they can be read anywhere. Whether on a plane, a train, or in the comfort of one’s own home, books can be enjoyed at any time, in any place, without any additional equipment or technology . This convenience makes books a great option for anyone who wants to escape into a good story.

4. Books Offer a Sense of Control

Reading a book offers a sense of control that is not available when watching a movie. With books, readers can control the pace of the story, reread favorite passages, and pause to consider a character’s motivations. This level of control can be highly satisfying and empowering.

5. Books Offer More Emotional Depth

Because books can explore characters and their inner worlds in greater depth, readers are often able to form a deeper emotional connection with them. This can lead to a more profound and lasting emotional impact compared to what can be achieved on the big screen.

6. Books Are More Inclusive

Books offer greater inclusivity than movies. While the filming industry has made strides in recent years with representation and telling the stories from diverse perspectives, books have the potential to be more inclusive in their storytelling because they are not limited by the same constraints as movies. Books can be self-published, they can be distributed digitally, and there is a wide range of genres and styles that cater to diverse audiences. This means that there is a greater accessibility for diverse voices to be heard and for readers to access stories that are not often represented in mainstream media.

7. Books Are Timeless

Books are timeless and can be enjoyed for generations to come. Unlike movies, which can quickly become dated, books arguably maintain longer relevance.

For example, the classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird, written by Harper Lee, was first published in 1960, but the themes it explores such as racial injustice, prejudice, and the loss of innocence are still relevant and resonant today. Similarly, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, first published in 1813, explores themes of love, social class, and the challenges of finding one’s place in society, which remain relevant today.

The timelessness of books is a testament to their enduring power and relevance. They offer a window into the past, present, and future, and can be enjoyed by people of all ages and backgrounds, making them a valuable and important part of our cultural heritage.

8. Books Can Be More Affordable In The Long-Term

Reading books can be more affordable than going to the movies. Sure, streaming services may offer a large selection of movies, they often have limited availability of new releases or popular titles. This means that if a viewer wants to watch a specific movie, they may need to rent or purchase it separately, adding additional costs.

Additionally, the cost of streaming subscriptions can add up over time. While one subscription may be affordable, many people have multiple streaming subscriptions to access a wider variety of content. This can result in a monthly expense that is higher than the cost of buying or borrowing books.

In contrast, books are often more affordable in the long-term. While the initial cost of buying a new book may be higher than the cost of renting a movie, a book can be read multiple times and passed on to others. Additionally, libraries offer free access to books, allowing readers to enjoy great stories without spending any money.

9. Books Stimulate the Brain

Reading has been shown to stimulate the brain in a way that is not possible when watching a movie. Studies have shown that reading can increase vocabulary, improve memory, and enhance cognitive function.

Throughout this article, we have presented several compelling reasons why we believe books to be a superior form of storytelling to movies. Although movies have their own unique strengths, there are a multitude of ways in which books outshine them. From their ability to offer intricate details and spark the imagination, to their provision of a deeper experience and greater emotional depth, books are a truly immersive and rewarding medium. They are also more inclusive, timeless, affordable, and can even stimulate the brain.

Of course, this is not to say that movies are without merit; they offer a different type of entertainment and can be a great way to unwind or learn something new. Ultimately, the choice between books and movies is a personal one, and both mediums have their place in our lives. However, the next time you are looking for an unforgettable story or a chance to escape reality, we encourage you to consider the unique pleasures of a good book.

CheckReads.com

A novel idea: is the book always better than the film?

It’s a cliche as old as cinema itself. But dismissing film-making as the weak sibling of the arts is often rooted in snobbery

In the Guide’s weekly Solved! column, we look into a crucial pop-culture question you’ve been burning to know the answer to – and settle it, once and for all

Saturday afternoon, any given multiplex, pre-Covid. The credits roll. We rise and shuffle, still brushing popcorn husks off our fronts. And it’s about now that you’ll hear the braying of the literati in the row behind: “Well, obviously, the book is always better than the film.”

It is a viewpoint as old as cinema itself. I wasn’t at the premiere of Alice in Wonderland’s silent-film adaptation in 1903, but it’s a safe bet that someone piped up afterwards to say that it wasn’t fit to stitch the leather binding of Lewis Carroll’s 1865 novel. They probably weren’t sure about the casting of the White Rabbit, either. And so, this cultural snipe has echoed through the ages. The book is always better than the film. It just is.

But is it, really? Firstly, if you have already read the book, of course the film won’t seem as good. You’ve already travelled along the narrative arc. The characters have already taken form in your mind’s eye, and they look nothing like Tom Cruise’s platform-heeled Jack Reacher or Sean Connery’s “overgrown stuntman” Bond (as Ian Fleming would have it). You have already experienced the rug-pulling twists, too, such as Fight Club’s Tyler Durden turning out to be the embodiment of the narrator’s schizophrenia. Oh, sorry. You knew that, right?

Whereas, if you watch the film first, the book loses its page-turning power, because we see it all coming: the Hogwarts Express; the Wizard of Oz’s unmasking; Boo Radley saving the day. But you don’t see cinephiles tossing literary classics from their shelves: “Yeah, yeah, there’s a mad woman in the attic. Change the record, Brontë … ”

Perhaps there is another factor at play here. When we say the book is better, we’re announcing that we read, we’re cultured, we feed our brains something loftier than big, colourful moving images. This is rooted in the stubborn snobbism that film is the weak sibling of the arts. “Over the years, I’ve grown used to seeing the cinema dismissed as an artform,” wrote Martin Scorsese in 2017 . “It’s tainted by commercial considerations … there are too many people involved in its creation … it ‘leaves nothing to the imagination’.”

Nobody has ever said the book is better than the play. We’d be terrified of someone countering that we’ve just misunderstood Sir Trevor Nunn’s mise-en-scène. The best a film adaptation can hope for is that it’s deemed better than the rollercoaster, like Pirates of the Caribbean.

Actually, when you line them up, the film often leaves the book for dust. Would you rather slog through Peter Benchley’s Jaws (in which, boringly, the shark slowly succumbs to its wounds)? Or choose Mario Puzo’s The Godfather over Brando’s hamster-pouching charisma? Has any child ever laughed harder at Beatrix Potter’s finger-wagging tales than when James Corden’s Peter Rabbit pumped Mr McGregor with 10,000 volts?

And Tolkien fans might toss me into Mount Doom for saying this, but if you would rather digest marathon descriptions of irritatingly named dwarves, instead of being sprayed with the glorious multisensory spectacle of Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit, then God help you.

So, no, the written word is not always better than the silver screen. If you disagree, you can throw the book at me in the comments.

Comments (…)

Arts and Entertainment

Why books are better than movies.

Ivette Gonzalez

Most of the time books are better than movies. Books can let you imagine the setting or events happening in the story. They are also more detailed than movies because movies sometimes leave out some important details.

In some movies, they switch up the characters because in the book they are different and totally the opposite.

When we read a book, we tend to visualize the characters a certain way and in movies they don’t look like the way we want them too. It disappoints us in many ways. I’ve read books before that have a plot twist at the end and in the movie it never happens.

Movies tend to last about two hours and books take their time and last longer. Movies rush things so that they can end it fast and there. Not everyone has access to movies or can afford going to movie theatres but books can be borrowed at the library or from a friend.

Books are portable and can be read online as well, anytime. When reading books, we get more knowledge and it helps us improve our vocabulary. Characters are described much better and with more detail.

One important thing that books do have and movies don’t is that they provide more background information than a movie does.

Visual Credits: reallylaterviews.com

From Script to Screen: Traveling through the Doctor Who Universe

by donnaenayati | Arts and Entertainment , Featured , News

The new season of “Doctor Who” produced by Bad Wolf, with BBC Studios for Disney Branded Television and BBC, premiered on Disney+ on May 10, 2024. The first episode of "Doctor Who" was premiered in 1963, and has been running for over sixty years. The show follows the...

Column: Second Language Struggles

by Karina Yue | Education , Featured , Schools

I took four years of Mandarin at school, but I can barely speak or understand it. Ironic remarks similar to these are, unfortunately, a common occurrence made by second language learners across learning platforms like Quora and Reddit. While we might jump to...

Opinion: March Madness 2024

by James Lew | Opinion , Sports

In each single elimination bracket, the 68 best men's and women's teams in the country compete for a National Championship. This year, there have been many intriguing storylines and upsets in both the men's and women's brackets of March Madness. As always, both...

Discover more from HS Insider

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Best Fountain Pens
How to Smoke a Cigar
Best nerf guns for adults
The best Netflix movies
Best Ernest Hemingway books

The Manual may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.

Movie vs. book: Which is better? 6 adaptations taken to task

From the shining to the silence of the lambs, we're looking at some iconic book-to-movie adaptations.

Film adaptations of novels earn up to 53% more at the box office than original screenplays, according to Forbes . For whatever reason, moviegoers worldwide are more obsessed with books that get turned into movies, even over original cinematic creations. Even so, not all movies based on books are created equal (they’re almost all better than your average video game movie , though).

Although the novel and the feature-length film are starkly different artistic mediums, cinephiles have endless conversations about the successes or failures of certain adaptations. Snobs will resort to the conclusion that the book is always better, but is that really true?

Before you invest several hours into scouring the original texts on which your favorite movie s are based, we’re giving you a bit of a warning: Sometimes, you’re better off skipping hundreds of pages and just sticking with what’s on screen.

The 11 best Robert De Niro movies to stream right now
Ranked: The best Jack Nicholson movies ever made
The 14 best Western movies to watch right now

Here’s our analysis of which books that were also adapted into hugely successful films are actually worth your time.

The Shining (1980)

The book: Stephen King’s more logophilic tendencies are in full force with this approximately 500-page novel. Telling the story of a family torn asunder both by mental illness and otherworldly forces (the latter as a metaphor for the former), King explores a harrowing world of psychic turmoil and childhood trauma. It’s an impactful novel for sure, but King’s penchant for going into insanely specific detail with regard to minor characters and irrelevant subplots makes it an occasionally boring and tedious read.

The movie: Kubrick’s ominous vision of the Overlook Hotel is stunningly designed, gorgeously shot, and impeccably acted. The film is widely believed to be one of the greatest examples of modern horror cinema ever made. The director’s menacing creation of an oppressive, spectral atmosphere is somewhat unparalleled in the history of horror. It’s probably as close to a perfect movie as you can get.

Key differences: King gives a lot more depth to Jack and Danny Torrence in the book than we’re given in the movie, and the world of the novel is more filled out and developed. King famously hated the movie for simplifying his story into something less emotionally complex. The end is a bit different too: in the book, Jack is ultimately defeated by the Overlook’s sentient topiary, in the movie he freezes to death. Is the magical aspect of the novel meant to be taken at face value or is it a metaphor for internal strife? Depends on who you ask.

Final verdict: The movie is better . Despite King’s hatred of the film, the movie actually handles the source material better than King could do himself, especially considering his own disastrous attempt at adapting the text into a miniseries almost two decades later. Kubrick’s version does lack some of the psychological insights of the book, but it cuts through the excesses of King’s novel to produce something far sleeker and more impactful.

Drive (2011)

The book: James Sallis’ novel is a minimalist, existential crime drama about a nameless getaway driver. The short tale is filled with gorgeously world-weary prose and lines like: “Time went by, which is what time does, what it is.” The stark world of the book is painted in broad strokes and the characters are sort of Sartre-influenced shadow people more so than fully three-dimensional characters.

The movie: Nicholas Winding Refn takes up the existential themes of the novel in a sort of roundabout way, choosing to depict the characters in sleek fashions and neon-drenched lighting while they speak in short, pithy sentences. Critics complained the movie was all style and no substance, but a quickly growing faction of Refn-cultists countered that style is substance. Either way: whether you like the minimalist dialogue and understated acting, it’s hard to deny the impact of the film’s impossibly earworm-y soundtrack and gorgeous cinematography.

Key differences: We get a little bit more information on the background characters in the book, but Sallis’s original text certainly leaves a lot to the imagination, in the sense that these characters represent existential ideas rather than actual tangible people. The implications of Driver’s actions are also seen in the novel’s 2011 sequel, which changes a lot about the ways the events of the first book can be viewed — but none of that is present in the movie.

Final verdict: Both are great . The movie is excellent if you like lush visuals and cool music, and the novel is excellent if you want something a bit more cerebral. If you’re easily irritated by Ryan Gosling’s non-acting and ultra-violence, maybe skip the movie. If sparse, philosophical crime fables aren’t for you, skip the book.

Wild at Heart (1990)

The book : Barry Gifford’s Wild at Heart novella is a sweet love-on-the-run story about a goofy teenager named Sailor and his endearingly dopey girlfriend Lula. It’s a sort of classic Romeo and Juliet story of foolish, young romance. The dialogue is hilarious throughout and there’s some really poignant poetic language in the prose here and there. All of it is set against the backdrop of a magically real version of the American South, making it deeply charming.

The movie: David Lynch’s loose adaptation of the novel is so deeply unhinged that it barely makes any sense — which isn’t necessarily a bad thing! The acting from Nicolas Cage and Laura Dern is at times absurdly campy and at other times heartbreakingly sincere. Lynch’s version has several totally surreal sequences that are basically non-sequiturs to the actual story. There’s something deeply sleazy about the whole thing that is either charming or repugnant, depending on who you ask.

Key differences: While Gifford’s novel is actually the first in a seven-part series, Lynch’s movie has a definitive and totally confusing conclusion: Before being apprehended by police, Sailor and Lula are inexplicably saved by Sheryl Lee — dressed as Glinda the Good Witch — descending from the heavens. This bizarre sequence is nowhere to be found in the original text. Aside from that: typical Lynchian nightmare scenarios are strewn throughout the film, often having almost no connection to the source material.

The verdict: The book is better (but the movie is also excellent). It’s true that in the year it debuted, Wild at Heart won the Palme d’Or at Cannes — and it’s not hard to see why, considering how original and unprecedented the film truly was at the time — but as an adaptation, it’s sort of incoherent. The over-the-top strangeness of the movie is simply too alienating and surreal for average audiences, but the book’s a splendid little escape from reality.

American Psycho (2000)

The book: Brett Easton Ellis’s description of a sort of a nightmare version of New York City borders on the totally surreal: the ultra-fancy restaurants have impossibly decadent meals, every yuppie is totally interchangeable, people don’t know each other’s names, everyone is on the verge of a psychotic break. The prose of this novel is reminiscent of the Marquis De Sade, but with endless lists of designer garments instead of (or sometimes alongside) descriptions of brutal torture. Patrick Bateman’s slow descent into schizophrenia is often hilarious, but mostly quite dark — and several chapters show him totally out of control, running through department stores and grocery aisles barely able to control his own body. It’s a frightening novel about the loss of individual identity caused by capitalist greed.

The movie: Female-directed horror films are unfortunately few and far between — and Mary Harron’s interpretation of the original text deserves lots of praise. Patrick Bateman, played by an impossibly fit Christian Bale, hits a perfect balance between charming and menacing, and the book’s witty dialogue is transformed into something slightly less unnerving on film. It’s sad that Bateman’s most caustic dialogue has been unironically adopted by the yuppies the book had been excoriating, but that’s not the movie’s fault.

Key differences : Ellis’s book is intentionally difficult and irritating to read, but Harron’s adaptation is sleek and accessible. Because the more avant-garde parts of the book (long chapters depicting violent rape and murder, even longer chapters painstakingly detailing Bateman’s skincare regimen) are whittled down to witty montages, the movie is inherently more appetizing to mainstream audiences than the novel. The tone is also entirely different: It’s true that Ellis’s story is sometimes funny, but the message and mood are ultimately deeply nihilistic. Harron’s film, on the other hand, is quite obviously meant to be laughed at — even at its most gory moments.

The verdict: The movie is better . The book is definitely a literary triumph, but it’s impossible to imagine most people having the patience to sit through the endless and densely postmodern passages.

The Silence of the Lambs (1991)

The book: Thomas Harris’s Silence of the Lambs is a tensely wound suspense novel that traces the over-eager Agent Clarice Starling’s hunting of a serial killer nicknamed Buffalo Bill. In her quest, she attempts to align herself with Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a notorious cannibal who also happens to be a mega-genius. Harris’s language is surprisingly poetic despite the absurd material, and there are some truly breathtaking descriptions of Clarice’s inner world. It’s a stunning mystery story, even if it’s wildly implausible.

The movie: Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster are jaw-droppingly talented during every second of Johnathan Demme’s masterpiece. The movie, for the most part, is a pretty faithful retelling of the book, but some of the most compelling details and side stories had to be taken out for brevity’s sake.

Key differences : One key difference between the two texts is that queer people rightly criticized the film for its insensitivy around transgender identity. The book, impressively, handles this subject with much more detail and sensitivity than could feasibly be tackled in a movie. Certain over-the-top aspects of Dr. Lecter’s mythology are toned down for the movie as well: In the book he’s got red eyes and six fingers on one hand, for example.

The verdict: The book is better , but not by much. Both are truly excellent, but Harris’s skill with language simply can’t be captured on film, and some of the movie’s biggest weaknesses are handled better in the novel. Be careful though: If you travel too far down the hole into Harris’s original books on which the other Hannibal movies are based you might be disappointed: The later entries into that quadrilogy are truly off the rails.

To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)

The book: Harper Lee’s story of a young girl who begins to understand the world she lives in is a seminal coming-of-age novel, and a crucial reminder that many people always knew how wrong the Jim Crow South was. Lee’s evocative use of Scout’s perspective allows us to see Atticus Finch from a distance, understanding him as a heroic figure whose motivations are sometimes hard to discern.

The movie: Almost out of necessity, the movie version of To Kill a Mockingbird recenters the story more firmly on Atticus. As a result, it becomes a more conventional story about a white lawyer trying to save the life of a Black man accused of a crime he didn’t commit. It’s still a seminal film, but undoubtedly more conventional than the novel on which it’s based.

Key differences: The movie goes out of its way to be quite faithful to the book throughout, but the loss of Scout’s perspective is an important change. All of the sudden, the novel becomes less about a young girl’s growing understanding of the complexities of the world and much more about her father’s heroic effort to save a single man.

The verdict: The book is better. Both the book and the movie are deservedly regarded as classics, but Harper Lee’s novel is intentionally much more messy and muddled than the Hollywood treatment it eventually received.

More adaptions to consider

The above list could go on and on, so we’ll add a few more book-movie adaptions. When looking for a good adaptation, things you’ll want to consider are how well the film captures the tone and spirit of the book, as well as how well it translates the story to the screen. Here are a few more you may enjoy:

The Godfather
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy
The Shawshank Redemption

Editors' Recommendations

The 12 best Adam Sandler movies (they’re not all comedies)
The 12 best Sean Connery movies of all time
The 10 best movies to fall asleep to – from Pineapple Express to Friday
Obsessed with Only Murders in the Building? The 11 best Steve Martin movies and shows, ranked
Ranked: The best Taylor Sheridan movies and TV shows

There's a lot of competition out there in the streaming world, and it can be hard to shuffle through the services to find the best movies to stream right now. Though there are plenty of great movies on Netflix and Amazon still has the platform beat in terms of overall quality, many of the movies on Hulu can't be streamed anywhere else. The best movies on Hulu can be gritty, family-friendly, and even sci-fi-oriented. So if you're looking to expand your binge-watching horizons, we've found the best movies to watch on Hulu right now.

White Men Can't Jump (2023)

Now that HBO Max has rebranded as Max, it's the right time to get acquainted with all of the great movies to watch on the streaming service. In addition to large portions of the Warner Bros. catalog, it also has tons of seminal, classic films, as well as plenty of foreign releases. Because the catalog is so big and rich, there are about 250 titles that could go on this list. There's a wealth of options to choose from whether you're into action movies or comedies, and you shouldn't feel limited by the selection below. Instead, you should treat it as a jumping-off point of HBO Max movies, one that will hopefully allow you to explore many of the titles that didn't quite make the cut. Max has great movies in every genre and from every period of film history. This is just a sampling of the best movies on Max. And if you're looking for more Max content, we've rounded up the best shows on Max to watch right now.

The Dark Knight (2008)

Disney is arguably the most iconic entertainment brand in the world. The company's properties, both original and acquired, combine to produce content that transcends age demographics. Disney has built a brand that's beloved by children, and those children eventually age into adults who introduce their kids to the films they loved when they were young. Disney's animation alone has made it iconic, but in recent years, the company has also acquired some of the biggest pieces of intellectual property there are. And, with Disney Plus available on any device, you can watch all these movies whenever you want.

Between its acquisitions of both Marvel and Star Wars, there's a good chance that whatever you love is being shepherded to screens both large and small by Disney. When they launched Disney+, the company was sure to fill it with both those nostalgic animated classics and plenty of new stuff as well. It's meant to be a streaming service for all ages, which is why the selection of movies available there is so diverse. These Disney Plus movies will make you laugh and cry and leave you eager for a rewatch. Here's a look at the best movies on Disney Plus.

Best Fredrik Backman Books To Read & Understand Life! 📚

Best Monster Books To Read And Get Thrilled! 📚

Best Hercule Poirot Books To Read Agatha Christie

Best Hercule Poirot Books To Start Reading First! 🕵️‍♂️ 📚

Best Agatha Christie Audiobooks To Listen

Best Agatha Christie Audiobooks You Should Listen! 🕵️ 🎧

Best Book Depository Alternatives – 12 Affordable Sites! 📚

🎬&url=https://bookwritten.com/?p=6519"> Tweet
🎬&url=https://bookwritten.com/?p=6519" target="_blank">
🎬→ https://bookwritten.com/?p=6519" target="_blank">

Learn Why Books Are Better Than Movies/Series! 📚 > 🎬

⏳ [read_meter]

Famous Comedian and American TV Star Groucho Marz once quipped, “I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book.”

Like eyes, books are windows to the soul of the writer. But that is just the beginning of it. Books offer their readers something to call their own because as they are reading or peeking into the castle of the author’s imagination, they are also building their own castles to live in. And what is best, it is a forever home. Books are nothing short of love letters to the soul of an aching heart, which stays with you forever. Ask any older person (or soul), and they will tell you the pleasure of seeking the company of books over people – their libraries tend to become their favorite resting place while they breathe on mother earth.

Books vs. Movies And TV Series 🆚

Happy Teenage Girl Sitting At The Library

The brilliance of a room of one’s own where they remain besotted in the solitude of their thoughts made richer by the written word is an experience that language can only aspire to express. From heady smells that conjure memories of childhood or last season’s rain to anything intensely intimate, books open up a universe that an audio-visual medium simply does not replicate. Here are the best reasons why books are not just better but simply transcendental of any other medium, especially Films and TV shows of the present-day culture. The benefits of novels are not just individual but also social and emotional. Even the people who watched the Harry Potter movies ended up reading the books because they loved the wizarding world so much that they wanted to know about the story. This article will also be helpful for your school/college debates, group discussions, or even for writing essays.

1️⃣ Books Are Original Texts.

Books offer authenticity and unmediated originality, unlike films that are generally adaptations of written texts or an audio-visual rendering of the scripts. Because of this reason alone, books have a personality that is difficult to recreate. The authors burn their midnight oil, and we know from the history of the greatest authors that they even sacrifice their lives and relationships to serve the gods of literature. The product of it is often a gift to mother earth unlike any other.

Films, at least the mainstream cinema, are uniquely commercial undertakings that compromise the originality of both ideas and their narration. They are more interested in cheap thrills and glitziness to maximize returns at the box office. They are also known to substitute action for drama to build popular appeal. However, there are still some great movies and series adaptations that stayed loyal to the books and gave us a wonderful visual experience; we listed some of them here .

2️⃣ Books Offer Better Detail.

Books are more complex and in-depth works than movies and series and offer more nuanced and engaging visualization. There are wonderful books with an “Exquisite Writing” style that adds more power to the words. The celebrated author and celebrity Paulo Coelho once famously said, “The book is a film that takes place in the mind of the reader.” Translating the complexity of character development in books to the screen is difficult. Books give more space for character development.

One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest 1975 Movie

Secondly, as long as they are in it, one gets an opportunity to get into every character’s head – no matter how relevant to the story or not. It is a camera’s equivalent to a 360-degree experience. A small example of it is Ken Kesey’s book “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”. Chief Bromden is a relatively minor character in the film. But on the other hand, when we read the book, we find that he had narrated it himself, and the readers get a deep exposure to his thoughts, which the film fails to do.

3️⃣ Books Are Lasting And Evolve With You.

Unlike films and series that work on an average tight runtime of two and a half hours, books have the luxury of finding more space and time; therefore, they last longer. It also helps authors of books to give more depth and detail to the story and characters and their contexts. Books can span several decades without any loss of detail. Likewise, books also provide people with the choice of time that they need to absorb them. Readers rarely finish a book in two or three hours.

People have the luxury to read at their own pace and finish it in days, weeks, or months. Slowly but steadily, something exciting happens in the long term. Books evolve with us. We can read the same book at different points in our lives and find something new almost every time. The magic of the books is that they speak differently to other people, or even the same people on a trajectory of experiences, in many different ways. Like good wine, books evolve with us.

4️⃣ Books Inspire Creativity And Help You Find A Voice.

Books amplify the imagination of their readers and continuously push them to the edge of their curiosities and sense of wonder. Because of this, avid readers have highly creative inner lives, most of whom are also artists of one form or another. When we read books, we become authors and storytellers ourselves. It helps us develop a special connection with language and improves our vocabulary and feelings about the written realm. In the same way, Books help us find our voice, that is, the flair for speaking, writing, and thinking about the world. These are things one does not derive from an experience of cinematic forms.

5️⃣ Books Are Collector’s Items.

One cannot miss the rare beauty of an imposing library racked from end to end by handsome hardbound originals. The sensory delights of the book are too many to count. They appeal to the sense of touch with their crispy pages and canvas or leather covers. It resembles holding your beloved in your arms. The fragrance of books sets you off on a voyage of memories and rapture. The appearance of a space filled with books also refines the appearance, not just the individual who inhabits it.

6️⃣ They Are Souvenirs Of A Life Well-Lived. They Are Personal.

At forty-five, do you remember the stories of Arabian Nights narrated by mom as you lay tucked in bed next to a bowl of soupy noodles, and she asked you to sleep as there was school the next day? Your elder sister shared with you her favorite atlas and told you where the ice age began. That John Keats classic with your college crush’s signature and phone number on its back page that they secretly sneaked into your college bag?

Are your father’s first book of the beat generation poetry or your mom’s inaugural Simone de Beauvoir now resting in your attic? Years later, when you have left home only to find your own habitat in this pale blue dot called Earth, you carefully collect and store these priceless possessions as an inheritance of a bond, an heirloom. They are not just physical matter that stores information or knowledge; books also communicate love and care.

Books bring us back home and keep us fused together with our best memories of thinking and doing things. Books narrate stories not just of their contents but also of people who have owned them and passed them on. In this way, they are mementos and bespoke portals of lives and histories that matter. On the other hand, movies and series lack personalization and appear as commodities that have little to offer in terms of intimacies and memory.

7️⃣ Books Bring People Together.

Books don’t just bind the pages between their covers. They also keep people fused together in common interests. Whether it is holy books such as the Quran and Bible, epics such as Mahabharata, or books of philosophy and Arts, people spend a better part of their lives in proximity to the communities that develop around books. Religions, cults, artists, scholars, fan fiction communities, homemakers, children, and the elderly come together in their own niche groups to make meaning and find their feet in the world around them. The continued existence of literary clubs and reading groups bear testimony that books facilitate social bonds.

8️⃣ Books Mean Independence From Electricity, The Internet, And Subscriptions.

Economic calculations suggest that investing in books has a better return on entertainment per dollar when compared to expenditure incurred in cinema halls. People spend more on theatre visits, popcorn and beverages, and commuting to and from home than on a book. But this is not all. So many hidden costs do not come to mind until making a conscious comparison.

If we assume that people watch content at home, then to have a truly immersive experience will require access to a stable internet connection, paid access to OTT streaming platforms that might need to be many, good quality audio devices, and quality hardware such as 4K resolution screens and monitors. These commodities are prohibitively expensive and also require a subscription, insurance, maintenance costs, and service schedules.

Books represent freedom from the consumerism required for the above and can be read with your eyes closed. Well, not literally. Whether you are traveling to an African desert in a caravan or flying above the Antarctic peninsula, you have no bother in the world about the accessories needed to enjoy the content enclosed between your book cover. It is as close to freedom as one can get.

9️⃣ Books Are Attention-Friendly And Do Not Come With Advertisements.

This is an advantage to which the young generation will especially relate. People in their twenties and thirties struggle to make ends meet in the unsparing economies of the world. More often than not, they are short on financial resources to afford premium subscriptions to streaming services. The result is an unspeakably pesky experience of unwanted advertisements that hound them like prison dogs from pillar to post.

Attention span is a rare and short-lived gift of homo sapiens, and we lose it in the sea of promotional messaging. However, when it comes to a book, there is a distinctness of privacy and focus that is quite simply inimitable. You do not have to purchase the silence you need to immerse yourself in your favorite fiction or non-fiction. Just take out your favorite hardcover and lose yourself in it. You can be sure that no car loans and make-up advertisements will ever gnaw at your grey matter again.

🔟 Reading Is A Life Skill.

It is one of the lesser-discussed facts about reading. It is like a muscle that grows when you work it. Reading develops reading. And it is a phenomenal life skill. It helps children in school feel more confident and allows scholars to wade through the bottomless sea of literature in which they must find their own subsistence. For people not enrolled in academic setups to earn their livelihoods, the reading acumen developed by reading books comes in handy to guide children in academic and non-academic pursuits. Overall, one can say that it helps parents provide a better upbringing to their children, and it helps them cultivate better personalities for their wards.

This article contains affiliate links. BookWritten may earn a commission when you buy using these links.

BookWritten Newsletter 📧 📖

Join 10,000 plus subscribers. Get updates about the best books to read, special content, and exclusive offers online! 📚

You might also like these!

Ameen is an artist and traveller who prefers a minimalist life amidst nature. He is deeply drawn to animals, music and mindfulness in human relationships.

Follow author

Let's discuss here - Share your thoughts and queries!

Do You Have Any Questions or Thoughts? 💬

13 Adaptations Better Than the Books They’re Based On

Most of the time, when a beloved book is adapted into a film, or even into a television show, a form with a little more elbow room, shall we say, the magic doesn’t quite translate. Which isn’t to say the adaptations aren’t themselves good —it’s just that the books are usually better. Even very very good adaptations, like The Talented Mr. Ripley , can often only manage to be second fiddle to their source material.

But not always. Sometimes the movie really is better than the book. Below, the Lit Hub staff will argue the case for 13 adaptations which (in our humble/expert/individual opinions) manage to eclipse the books they’re based on. Add your own—or tell us why we’re wrong—in the comments.

Adaptation (2002) dir. Spike Jonze

based on: The Orchid Thief by Susan Orlean (1998)

I saw Adaptation in the theater in 2002. I didn’t get it, and my high school boyfriend got mad at me because of that. But twenty years and several re-viewings later, I can now say that Spike Jonze’s film is not only the best adaptation of a book to the screen, it’s also (sorry, Susan) better than the book for all the ways it elevates the themes of the book without privileging the book over the movie.

Here’s the gist: “Charlie Kaufman,” played by Nicholas Cage, struggles to adapt Susan Orlean’s 1998 nonfiction book, The Orchid Thief , but he has writer’s block. Charlie’s twin brother Donald, also played by Nicholas Cage, wants to be a screenwriter too, even though he’s an idiot—but, in a cruel twist, he finds success just as Charlie’s depression spirals and failure seems inevitable. Charlie decides to visit Susan (Meryl Streep) in New York to talk about the script, but his social anxiety means Donald ends up taking his place. But Susan is evasive, acts strange, and, it turns out, is hiding a secret romance with John Laroche (Chris Cooper), the book’s subject. Absolute madcappery ensues—a spy trip to Florida, drugs, sex, shootings, and an alligator.

The book has none of that. Instead, the Laroche of Orlean’s New Yorker piece-turned-book is a horticulturalist who searches for a rare ghost orchid to clone to sell, and had hired Seminole natives in an attempt to circumvent laws that allowed people to remove endangered species from Florida swaps. It’s an exploration of obsession and passion, but there are no secret affairs or shoot outs.

In an interview with GQ, Orlean said of the movie:

[Reading the screenplay] was a complete shock. My first reaction was “Absolutely not!” They had to get my permission and I just said: “No! Are you kidding? This is going to ruin my career!” Very wisely, they didn’t really pressure me. They told me that everybody else had agreed and I somehow got emboldened. It was certainly scary to see the movie for the first time. It took a while for me to get over the idea that I had been insane to agree to it, but I love the movie now. What I admire the most is that it’s very true to the book’s themes of life and obsession, and there are also insights into things which are much more subtle in the book about longing, and about disappointment.

It’s a hysterical and bizarre movie, upsetting and strange. It reminds us that books are not movies and movies are not books, and to create one based on the other is to reimagine something that never existed in the first place. While The Orchid Thief is a work of nonfiction, the storytelling is dictated by Orlean’s calm and trusting voice. She reveals Laroche to us in such a way that we never truly believe his lies, but always his point of view. In the movie, there are so many layers of POV and truth (Kaufman vs. “Charlie” vs. “Donald” vs. Orlean!) that the idea of truth (non-fiction vs. reality vs. fantasy) is of little consequence.

–Emily Firetog, Deputy Editor

All the President’s Men (1976) dir. Alan J. Pakula

based on: All the President’s Men by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward (1974)

I’m not saying the book isn’t a classic: a genuinely important, history-shifting narrative that manages to weave together a wildly complex sequence of modern politics into a compelling, page-turning story. I’m just saying the movie is even better. William Goldman has told the story of turning the book into the movie, providing some nice juicy behind-the-scenes anecdotes about Redford, Bernstein, and co., while also giving a masterclass in screenplay craft and storytelling structure, so maybe I’m a bit biased in the film’s favor, but for me, seeing all that research, all those phone calls, all that typing (so much typing) brought to the screen in a way that somehow feels magical and larger-than-life is a trick few in the annals of adaptation have ever surpassed. Again, the book is more than respectable.

But how do you compete with Jason Robards throwing his feet up on the desk and taking a red pen to that copy, telling them they don’t have the story? Or with Hoffman drinking all those cups of coffee, frantically taking notes before he gets kicked out without finally getting that scoop he’s been after? Or just the sheer visual madness of the Post newsroom in those heady days? Director Alan J. Pakula had a knack for capturing odd slices of Americana and immortalizing them on the screen. (My God, we haven’t even discussed the overhead shot in the Library of Congress.) But for me it comes back to Goldman’s script, and the knack he had, perhaps better than any other modern screenwriter, for capturing the energy and the passion of a quest.

–Dwyer Murphy, CrimeReads Editor-in-Chief

The Handmaiden (2016) dir. Park Chan-wook

based on: Fingersmith by Sarah Waters (2002)

Don’t get me wrong: I’m a fan of Sarah Waters’ Fingersmith , which is a sexy, twisty, and sumptuous novel set in Victorian England. I didn’t even know what I didn’t like about it until I saw Park Chan-wook’s equally sexy, twisty, and sumptuous reimagining, which transposes the action to 1930s colonial Korea—an impressive feat on its own. Appropriately (considering the themes at play here), it was only when The Handmaiden satisfied my secret wish that I even became aware of it.

Now is the time when I must warn: spoilers . OK? Onward:

Fingersmith starts as a classic double-cross story: in it, in part one, Sue, raised into the business of thievery by her adoptive mother Mrs. Sucksby, is recruited by a non-gentleman they call Gentleman to pose as a maid and convince a naïve but wealthy heiress to fall in love with him, at which point he will marry her, throw her in an insane asylum, and run off with her fortune, except for the portion that he’ll give to Sue. Easy enough—except Sue falls in love with the heiress, whose name is Maud. But she goes through with the plan anyway, only to find, when they arrive at the asylum, that it is she who is being shoved toward the doors—Gentleman and Maud have tricked her into taking Maud’s place.

In part two, we learn about Maud’s life, and how her uncle raised her to care for his collection of pornographic texts, and perform readings of them for his lascivious colleagues. We learn about her side of the plot—committing Sue in her place will allow her to escape her uncle and live freely—and that she has also fallen in love. But like Sue, she goes through with it anyway. Once the deed is done, Gentleman takes Maud to Mrs. Sucksby, who reveals that Sue is actually the noblewoman and Maud an orphan, switched at birth for Sue’s protection, and keeps Maud in her home as a prisoner, so that she and Gentleman might keep the fortune, which had been willed to both of the girls together. Until almost the very end, both Sue and Maud are brought low, betrayed by those they thought cared for them, ruined and hating one another.

The first part of The Handmaiden is very similar to the original plot of the novel. But in the second part, something else happens: instead of plunging forward despite their feelings, the two women find they cannot do so. Instead, they confess their plots to one another. And then they turn the tables—with the help of Mrs. Sucksby, no longer a villain. The class tension remains, but the baby swap twist is gone. Where Fingersmith unravels into a tragedy until the final pages, The Handmaiden spends its last third triumphant, joyous. (I’m reminded of the end of Inglourious Basterds .) Both horrible men are punished, our heroines are free (and rich), and they even manage to reclaim some of the tools of their oppression. You know, sexually! It was the ending that I didn’t know I always wanted from the novel, and I’m so glad I got to see it play out in such glorious fashion.

–Emily Temple, Managing Editor

The Maltese Falcon (1941) dir. John Huston

based on: The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett (1930)

There’s really no need to read The Maltese Falcon, for the film captures everything good about the book and adds even more in terms of nuance and context. The dialogue from the novel makes its way near-verbatim into the film’s script, and the plot adheres faithfully enough, with cuts and changes for practical, rather than aesthetic, purposes. The 1931 pre-code adaptation is quite a bit more salacious, but the 1941 version tries as hard as it can to subtly code the more overt references to sex and sexuality from the novel and prior adaptation. The acting is impeccable, with career-defining turns from Humphrey Bogart, Peter Lorre, Sidney Greenstreet, and Mary Astor, and the craft behind the production shines in every detail, with John Huston’s direction keeping all the parts moving smoothly.

–Molly Odintz, CrimeReads Senior Editor

Station Eleven (2021-2022) cr. Patrick Somerville

based on: Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel (2014)

In my two-plus years at Lit Hub, I’ve managed to avoid making any claim controversial enough to get me angry emails, but my time may have come. Let me start by saying the obvious: Emily St. John Mandel’s 2014 novel is very, very good. Readers loved the fresh idea of a “quiet apocalypse,” and also a hopeful one, in which Art is Still Valued (perhaps more so than today…?) and people mostly take care of each other. I read the book in 2014, and my memory of it is mostly vibes: longing and nostalgia, fear and unease, punctuated by moments of profundity.

HBO’s ten-episode series adaptation, led by Patrick Somerville ( The Leftovers , Made for Love ), while still plenty vibey, is grounded in incredibly human performances from its superb cast, whose stories are even more interconnected than in the book. I don’t want to say too much, but it’s clear from the trailers that Jeevan (Himesh Patel) and Kirsten (Mackenzie Davis), who only briefly interact at the beginning of the novel, become much more important to each other in the series. (We also see more of young Kirsten, played stunningly by child actor Matilda Lawler.) The Prophet, who is all Villain in the book, is given a more complex storyline, though Daniel Zovatto’s interpretation is still haunting as hell. Other characters—Clark (David Wilmot), Elizabeth (Caitlin FitzGerald), Miranda (Danielle Deadwyler), and the Conductor (Lori Petty)—ground the story as well.

Also, let’s be honest: I’m a sucker for melodrama. While the novel often feels artfully restrained, the series feels artfully liberated in its ability to provoke Big Feelings. Attribute it to the orchestral swells, the Shakespearean monologues, Mackenzie Davis’s expressive eyebrows. (The fact that we’ve been experiencing our own flu-like pandemic probably factors in as well.) As Sigrid Nunez wrote in her review of the novel for the New York Times Book Review , as much as she appreciated the book, “The hairs never rose on the back of [her] neck; [her] eyes never filled with tears.” (Which is fine! Arguably, that wasn’t St. John Mandel’s project.) However, when going into Station Eleven the series, expect the hair-raising and tears. (Or in my case, sobs.)

–Eliza Smith, Special Projects Editor

American Gods (2017-2021) cr. Bryan Fuller and Michael Green

based on: American Gods by Neil Gaiman (2001)

Who am I to tell Neil effing Gaiman that the American Gods show was better than his book? Obviously no one, just a sharp-tongued, decaying lump of flesh whose arm is about to fall off. But what I’m arguing is that it’s a better experience taking in the cluttered American landscape of cranky gods—old and new—through Bryan Fuller and Michael Green’s minds than it is through my own while reading the original source material. For one, as vivid as Wednesday is in the book, my own imagination doesn’t come close to seeing Ian McShane’s combining the Gaiman outline with a bit of Deadwood’s Al Swearengen to make the ultimate amoral world builder and dad-god. He’s perfect . As Mr. Nancy tells Shadow (Ricky Whittle) when they take the psychedelic carousel ride, “We should have done this in my mind, not his.”

The TV adaptation also gives us a perfect circle of story between Mad Sweeney (Pablo Schreiber’s piskie/leprechaun) and Laura Moon (Emily Browning, whom Mad Sweeney calls “Dead Wife”; touching) that doesn’t exist in the book—a self-contained piece of poetic justice that doesn’t rely on the bigger, sprawling problem. Lastly, America works best in visuals—the shitty motels and cornfields and throwaways of Jesus trying to cross the Rio Grande—and the TV show translates that most easily, turning us all into disciples, however we’ve come to it. “Nobody’s American,” says Wednesday. “Not originally. That’s my point.” Also my point! The show is better, join me here.

–Janet Manley, Contributing Editor

A Simple Favor (2018) dir. Paul Feig

based on: A Simple Favor by Darcey Bell (2017)

Even the author of A Simple Favor wasn’t expecting how incredibly charming this adaptation would turn out to be, as she wrote in a piece for CrimeReads . The folks behind the movie understood that preserving the humor of the original was key, and the two leads, Anna Kendrick and Blake Lively, brought attitude and chemistry. I don’t know if anyone has ever had more fun adapting a novel than the people involved in A Simple Favor.

Jaws (1975) dir. Steven Spielberg

based on: Jaws by Peter Benchley (1974)

The movie Jaws is one of the greatest works of storytelling of all time. Everything that contributes to the development of the narrative (from Steven Spielberg’s direction to Peter Benchley and Carl Gottlieb’s screenplay to Verna Fields’s editing to John Williams’s music, etc) is absolutely perfect. It’s perfect. It has a flawless three-act structure, balanced character development and clear character motivation, a coterie of excellent minor villains and a believably omnipotent antagonist. While I am very glad that it won Oscars for Sound, Music, and Editing, I’m constantly very angry that it didn’t dominate the 1975 Oscars. It’s a perfect movie!

Right, anyway… Benchley’s original novel is a fascinating book, but it doesn’t have things straightened out the way the movie does. There’s too much going on—like Martin Brody’s history as a bad cop, Ellen Brody’s missing her NYC life, Matt Hooper’s hubris. Actually, everyone is such a mess that it’s hard to root for them, or care if they get eaten or not. But the movie Jaws is streamlined and efficient; it is in the creation of characters with clear personalities that incredibly complex, symbolic, analytically-rich situations can arise between them. You don’t need all the drama from the get-go—the shark coaxes out enough!

–Olivia Rutigliano, CrimeReads Associate Editor

The Leftovers (2014-2017) cr. Damon Lindelof and Tom Perrotta

based on: The Leftovers by Tom Perrotta (2011)

The Leftovers is God-tier television, superior to all but a handful of other series, and there’s no shame in having your source material play second fiddle to what, I would argue, is one of the most significant artistic achievements of the 21 st century. It’s probably an even easier pill to swallow if you co-created and steered the adaptation, as Perrotta did alongside Damon Lindelof in 2014. In fact, I can imagine few greater thrills for a novelist than being given the opportunity to reinhabit, and wildly expand through an entirely new medium, a fictional universe so recently pried away from you.

The Leftovers is set in upstate New York, then small town Texas, then southern Australia, in the years following the “Sudden Departure”—the inexplicable, simultaneous disappearance of 140 million people, or 2% of the world’s population—and focuses on police chief Kevin Garvey (a ripped and furrowed Justin Theroux) and his fractured family, grieving widow Nora Durst (Carrie Coon), and her disintegrating brother Reverend Matt Jamison (Christopher Eccleston) as they try to process their feelings and adjust to life in a what is, at least in an emotional sense, a post-apocalyptic world.

Across three wildly different seasons, The Leftovers is a protracted study of grief, “a phantasmagoric meditation on the terror inherent in having a family at all, not because you might lose them but because you almost certainly will,” as Emily Nussbaum so wonderfully encapsulated it ahead of the (perfect) series finale back in 2017, but it’s also just a really weird, really fun, really beautiful show, full of terrific performances (Coon’s in particular is a revelation), that defies classification at every turn. For the uninitiated, I would urge you not to be turned off by the admittedly dour pilot and instead (like the chain-smoking members of the Guilty Revenant cult) surrender yourself to what is, essentially, a trilogy of strange tragicomic novels brought vividly and tenderly to life.

–Dan Sheehan, Book Marks Editor-in-Chief

The Godfather (1972) dir. Francis Ford Coppola

based on: The Godfather by Mario Puzo (1969)

Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather is one of the other greatest works of storytelling of all time, and, like Jaws , it’s another instance of a screenplay actually being a much-needed edit of the book. As was the case with Benchley and Gottlieb, Mario Puzo based his screenplay for The Godfather off his book, and Francis Ford Coppola took that and molded it, shaping Puzo’s ideas into the cinematic classic we have today. It’s one of the best examples of “adaptation” as a continuation, rather than a replacement, of the initial work.

Cruising (1980) dr. William Friedkin

based on: Cruising by Gerald Walker (1970)

To be honest I’ve only thumbed Gerald Walker’s 1970 novel in passing, more as a curiosity in an old paperback section of a used bookshop, a little surprised to realize that it was the source material for the 1980 fever dream written and directed by William Friedkin. My memories of that somewhat abbreviated reading experience are pretty hazy, but I remember finding it a fairly unremarkable crime story about a serial killer preying on the Manhattan gay leather scene, which of course is also what the movie is about…sort of. This is one of those cases where it’s pretty clear that the adaptation, in today’s speech, was an IP grab. Friedkin wanted to make a movie about a subculture, in particular the hard-core leather sub-culture in downtown Manhattan, and this was the material at hand.

So it probably shouldn’t be a surprise that the movie surpasses the book, though not without some contention. Cruising , starring Al Pacino as a young cop assigned to work his way into the world of gay S&M clubs in order to be bait for a serial killer who liked that look (that young Pacino look), stirred up a lot of debate in its day. The protests got in the way of production, and I’m sure modern viewers coming to the movie for the first time will still feel supremely uncomfortable about its sexual politics. But as an aesthetic achievement, it’s really quite breathtaking. The movement of the camera through the clubs, across the city, across the faces of young man after young man, each one of them exuding something quite different and wildly complex…there’s just nothing simple about Cruising . The psychological layers peel back one after another and what we’re left with is something raw and utterly human.

Die Hard (1988) dir. John McTiernan

based on: Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorp (1979)

First, let us note that Nothing Lasts Forever , Roderick Thorp’s 1979 novel that provided the blueprints for the first Die Hard movie, is good! It’s a great book. An introduction to the version I have describes its prequel, The Detective, as “the first serious claim in 20 years for the detective story as literature”; let’s not get too carried away about NLF , but it is, as a friend notes, a nice old piece of Christmas Eve lit.

Thorp’s action sequences are copied beat for beat in the film (“Geronimo, motherf*ckers”), but the setup is a little bit different: In the book, Joe Leland is a World War II veteran turned cop whose marriage failed, following which his wife died. He is headed to Los Angeles to see his daughter Steffie and her children at her company’s Christmas party, and the general feeling is a bit more depressing than the onscreen version which adds biceps and giant perms and Christmas lights to every scene possible. For Bruce Willis’ bloody singlet alone, we have to hand it to the movie.

The stakes—John McClane (Willis) getting that teddy bear to his wife and saving the marriage!—are much more spirited, and less nihilistic than the source material. Also, in the book, the chief villain is “Anton Gruber,” aka Little Tony; I can see the showrunners taking a pen out of their mouth with a diabolical smile and saying, “What if we called him Hans . Hans Gruber.” Improvements all around, no contest.

Big Fish (2003) dir. Tim Burton

based on: Big Fish by Daniel Wallace (1998)

I love Tim Burton’s surreal picaresque-in-flashbacks Big Fish so much that it was going to be impossible for me to bring the same ardor to Daniel Wallace’s first-person novel of the same name. I think Burton’s Big Fish balances the relationship between the larger-than-life raconteur Edward Bloom and his now-grown son Will very well, because it allows them each equal objectivity. Wallace’s novel is told from the perspective of Will, remembering his father’s stories; everything is filtered through him, meaning we’re alienated from Edward’s perspective somewhat. Both the book and the movie interrogate Edward’s unreliability as a narrator, but we’re asked to evaluate that of Will in the book, too. Indeed, the novel places most of the focus on him, through his reflections on his father. But the film allows the audience to experience Edward’s spectacular adventures straight from the horse’s mouth.

See also: LA Confidential , Fight Club , The Shining , Goodfellas , Thief , Friday Night Lights , The Magicians , etc.

Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)

Emily Temple

Previous article, next article, support lit hub..

Join our community of readers.

to the Lithub Daily

Follow us on Twitter

“It Was All in the Service of Not Wanting Queer People to Have to Justify Themselves.” Why Catherine Lacey Rewrote History in Biography of X

RSS - Posts

Literary Hub

Created by Grove Atlantic and Electric Literature

How to Pitch Lit Hub

Advertisers: Contact Us

Support Lit Hub - Become A Member

Become a Lit Hub Supporting Member : Because Books Matter

For the past decade, Literary Hub has brought you the best of the book world for free—no paywall. But our future relies on you. In return for a donation, you’ll get an ad-free reading experience , exclusive editors’ picks, book giveaways, and our coveted Joan Didion Lit Hub tote bag . Most importantly, you’ll keep independent book coverage alive and thriving on the internet.

Become a member for as low as $5/month

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

55 Writing about the Novel: Film Comparison

You began the process of writing your literary comparison paper in the Introduction to the Novel chapter by choosing an essay, reading it carefully, and writing a personal response. In this chapter, we will move through the remaining steps of writing your paper.

Step 3: Choose a Film for Comparison

The key to a good comparison essay is to choose two subjects that connect in a meaningful way. The purpose of conducting the comparison is not to state the obvious, but rather to illuminate subtle differences or unexpected similarities.

When writing a film comparison paper, the point is to make an argument that will make your audience think about your topic in a new and interesting way. You might explore how the novel and the film present the theme…or how the novel and the film explore the identity of a main character…or…the options are limitless. Here’s a quick video giving you a little overview of what a film vs novel comparison might look like:

To this end, your next goal is to choose a film adaptation of your novel. Some novels may only have one, but some have many that have been created over the last 100 years! Your adaptation could be a feature film, a YouTube short, or an indie film. Choose one that allows you to make an interesting point about the portrayal of the theme of the novel and the film.

Step 4: Research

Once you’ve chosen a second piece, it’s time to enter into the academic conversation to see what others are saying about the authors and the pieces you’ve chosen.

Regardless of the focus of your essay, discovering more about the author of the text you’ve chosen can add to your understanding of the text and add depth to your argument. Author pages are located in the Literature Online ProQuest database. Here, you can find information about an author and his/her work, along with a list of recent articles written about the author. This is a wonderful starting point for your research.

The next step is to attempt to locate articles about the text and the film themselves. For novels, it’s important to narrow down your database choices to the Literature category. For essays, you might have better luck searching the whole ProQuest library with the ProQuest Research Library Article Databases or databases like Flipster that include publications like newspapers and magazines.

Finally, you might look for articles pertinent to an issue discussed in the novel. For example, The Grapes of Wrath is about the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl, but it also contains an environmental theme. Depending on what aspect you want to highlight in your comparison, you might look for articles about the Great Depression or about farming and the environment.

Remember, it is helpful to keep a Research Journal to track your research. Your journal should include, at a minimum, the correct MLA citation of the source, a brief summary of the article, and any quotes that stick out to you. A note about how you think the article adds to your understanding of the topic or might contribute to your project is a good addition, as well.

Step 5: Thesis & Outline

Similar to other academic essays, the film comparison essay starts with a thesis that clearly introduces the two subjects that are to be compared and the reason for doing so.

This video highlights some of the key differences between novels and films:

Begin by deciding on your basis for comparison. The basis of comparison could include items like a similar theme, differences in the focus of the piece, or the way both pieces represent an important issue.

This article gives some helpful advice on choosing a topic.

Once you’ve decided on the basis of comparison, you should focus on the points of comparison between the two pieces. For example, if you are focusing on how the literary elements and the cinematic elements used impact the message, you might make a table of each of these elements. Then, you’d find examples of each element from each piece. Remember, a comparison includes both similarities and differences.

By putting together your basis of comparison and your points of comparison, you’ll have a thesis that both makes an argument and gives readers a map of your essay.

A good thesis should be:

Statement of Fact: “The novel and the film of Pride and Prejudice are similar in many ways.”
Arguable: “The film version of Pride and Prejudice changes key moments in the text that alter the portrayal of the theme.”
Personal Opinion: “‘The novel is definitely better than the movie.”
Provable by the Texts: “Both the novel and the film focus on the importance of identity.”
Obvious: “The movie provides a modern take on the novel.”
Surprising: “Though the movie stays true to the original themes of the novel, the modern version may lead viewers to believe that the characters in the book held different values than are portrayed in the novel.”
General: “Both the novel and the film highlight the plight of women.”
Specific: “The novel and the film highlight the plight of women by focusing on specific experiences of the protagonist. “

The organizational structure you choose depends on the nature of the topic, your purpose, and your audience. You may organize compare-and-contrast essays in one of the following two ways:

Block: Organize topics according to the subjects themselves, discussing the novel and then the film.
Woven: Organize according to individual points, discussing both the novel and the film point by point.

Exercises: Create a Thesis and Outline

You’ll want to start by identifying the theme of both pieces and deciding how you want to tie them together. Then, you’ll want to think through the points of similarity and difference in the two pieces.

In two columns, write down the points that are similar and those that are different. Make sure to jot down quotes from the two pieces that illustrate these ideas.

Following the tips in this section, create a thesis and outline for your novel/film comparison paper.

Here’s a sample thesis and outline:

Step 6: Drafting Tips

Once you have a solid thesis and outline, it’s time to start drafting your essay. As in any academic essay, you’ll begin with an introduction. The introduction should include a hook that connects your readers to your topic. Then, you should introduce the topic. In this case, you will want to include the authors and title of the novel and the director and title of the film. Finally, your introduction should include your thesis. Remember, your thesis should be the last sentence of your introduction.

In a film comparison essay, you may want to follow your introduction with background on both pieces. Assume that your readers have at least heard of either the novel or the film, but that they might not have read the novel or watched the film–or both–…or maybe it’s been awhile. For example, if you were writing about Pride and Prejudice , you might include a brief introduction to Austen and her novel and an introduction to the version of the film you’ve chosen. The background section should be no more than two short paragraphs.

In the body of the paper, you’ll want to focus on supporting your argument. Regardless of the organizational scheme you choose, you’ll want to begin each paragraph with a topic sentence. This should be followed by the use of quotes from your two texts in support of your point. Remember to use the quote formula–always introduce and explain each quote and the relationship to your point! It’s very important that you address both literary pieces equally, balancing your argument. Finally, each paragraph should end with a wrap up sentence that tells readers the significance of the paragraph.

Here are some transition words that are helpful in tying points together:

Finally, your paper will end with a conclusion that brings home your argument and helps readers to understand the importance/significance of your essay.

In this video, an instructor explains step by step how to write an essay comparing two films. Though you will be writing about a novel and a film, rather than two films, the same information applies.

Here’s another instructor explaining how to write a comparison essay about two poems. Note the similarities between the two videos.

Here’s a sample paper:

Attributions:

Content created by Dr. Karen Palmer. Licensed under CC BY NC SA .
Content adapted from “Comparison and Contrast” from the book Successful Writing licensed CC BY NC SA .

Share This Book

Start Reading
Action and Adventure
Detective and Mystery
Literary Fiction
Science Fiction
Short Stories
Children’s Book
pennbookcenter.com and its partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.

Top Reasons Why Books Are Better Than Movies 2024

Even though the novel and the feature length film are two very different artistic media, cinephiles always discuss the triumphs and failures of many adaptations.

The widely held notion is that books are sometimes a hundred times better than their film counterparts; if you need any more proof, consider the following. Why Are Books Better Than Movies? Read the article below.

Are Books Better Than Movies?

There is a general belief that books are superior to movies. Of course, that greatly depends on whom you ask, as some people may have a different viewpoint and may even have some evidence to support it.

Many believe that one of the telltale signs of our society’s demise is the fact that the majority of teenagers today would rather watch a movie than read a book. And there is undoubtedly some truth in it.

Reading has amazing advantages for our mental growth; it can help us become better persons, more compassionate, and generally wiser beings. Reading is important, and a society that doesn’t appreciate it can bring out the worst in most of its members.

In spite of the fact that both the book and the movie tell the same story, reading a book offers a lot more benefits for the reader than watching a movie does. Reading is clearly far better for us than watching movies, as evidenced by the comparison between the two activities.

Why Are Books Better Than Movies?

Free of time.

A book can take you a few days, weeks, months, or even several months to read. You can read at your own pace, in your own time. You can read during lunch or when you take a break throughout the day. That’s not possible with a movie. You must sit still for at least 2 to 3 hours if you see a movie in the cinema.

This is why it matters. Because of the short time frames for movies and our limited attention spans, the filmmaker doesn’t have the time to incorporate everything from the book into the movie. This will naturally make the book appear ‘better. The movie may not have everything, but a book does.

For blunting, you can only fit so much ‘stuff in a movie.

Because of their limited time, books are better than movies.

Books Can Span Decades In Great Detail

Let’s take the example of an epic novel and an epic movie or series of movies. Let’s take a look at J .R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings . This trilogy of books spawned a trilogy directed by Peter Jackson.

You don’t have to read the books, but I can provide some context on why the movies won’t be better than what you do. The trilogy spans over 100 years and covers decades. Tolkien gives great detail about each character’s thoughts, actions, and words, often going into the background of why they are doing it.

This is how you can do it in a movie. How do you capture every thought event and happening in a three hour movie? You can’t. Some people will be upset if things aren’t right. The books are more entertaining than the movies.

As you can’t include every event of the book in the movie the book will always feel like it’s better.

Movies Often Leave Out Personal Details

Many people complain that some characters or events in a book are not represented in a movie. They are upset because the missing part may have had a special resonance. It may be missing. This makes the movie feel incomplete.

The director can’t know every personal resonance that the book had for you.

Books Let Your Imagination Fills in The Gap

Because of your imagination, books are better than movies.

They enable the reader to picture the characters’ appearances, voices, and the setting of the story. Visualizing has a significant function in our brain growth and is a key component of the reading experience.

Reading a book is much more intimate than watching a movie because you can imagine each character in your own mind’s eye and hear how they speak. Our individual interpretation, which is personal to each of us, becomes our mental property. Simply put, movies don’t compare.

Your imagination is creating all things in the world.

Books Are Utterly Personal To You

We just saw this with my Booker Prize winning story. You are the one filling in the details when you read it. The world is made up of your experiences. The director dictates what the movie is about. It’s almost impossible for a movie or book to be as good.

The author tells a story. But, your imagination creates a world from your own experiences and interests

Tolkien could write thousands of words about the incredible scenery that the fellows were traversing. From the high peaks of the mountains down to the drops of water from the leaves, the detail is amazing.

It is pages upon pages. It’s a paradise for your imagination. A movie can’t make what your mind can create.

Reading Will Expand Your Vocabulary

Reading will increase your vocabulary far more than watching movies. This is because the language in movies must be limited. A moviegoer cannot pause the movie to research a word’s definition via context the way a reader can.

More significantly, reading improves your mental exercise. You should keep your brain engaged and busy to be healthy. According to neuroscientists, watching a movie requires more visual and linguistic processing from your brain than reading does.

Reading helps you think more clearly and expands your vocabulary. Other research demonstrates that:

Reduce stress : According to research, reading reduces tension more effectively than going for a walk, listening to music, or drinking coffee.
Improve your sleep : It is simpler to teach your brain to connect reading a book with sleep than it is to relate using electronic gadgets like TVs, which emit disruptive blue light, with sleep.

Simply, reading alters the way our brains function. You’ll learn more, improve your ability to see patterns, and develop empathy.

FAQs About Why Books Better Than Movies

Are books really better than movies?

You can read a book and interpret the plot and story to your heart’s content. You can be creative with books. Books are also more detailed than films. A film usually lasts around two hours, while a book can have hundreds (or even thousands) of pages.

Why are movies bad for you?

The University of Toledo’s Department of Health and Recreation conducted a 2017 study that found binge watching TV and movies can cause anxiety and disrupt sleep.

Is watching a lot of movies bad?

Bakris stated that intense movies could raise heart rate and, if you have coronary artery disease, they can cause chest pain and high blood pressure. Be aware that horror movies can increase adrenaline and cortisol levels.

Is watching a lot of movies good for you?

Oxford University research suggests that endorphins are produced when you watch a traumatic movie. This chemical is associated with greater pain tolerance and, paradoxically, increased feelings of well being. Movies can also help psychologically, so therapists often recommend movies as a treatment.

Books are better than movies because they offer a more immersive experience, provide more complex character development, and allow readers to use their imaginations more.

Books allow readers to immerse themselves in the story in a way that movies cannot. Readers can picture the characters and settings in their minds, making the experience more personal.

Additionally, books often provide more complex character development than movies. This is because books have more time to explore the characters’ thoughts and motivations.

Finally, books allow readers to use their imaginations more. This is because readers must create the images in their minds, which can be more enjoyable than watching someone else’s interpretation.

Thank you for reading!

PBC will help you choose the best book which you need. Let's go our website here ! We have been serving the academic community in University City for nearly fifty years. Our knowledgeable staff will help you find the book you want. If we don't have it in stock, we will be happy to order it for you.Follow us on Social Media: Facebook ; Twitter ; Youtube ;

Speech Topics For Kids

Speech on Books

“Books are the quietest and most constant of friends; they are the most accessible and wisest of counsellors and the most patient of teachers.” These are the words told by Charles W. Eliot. Do you agree with this statement? Read the article and realise the true power of books. Try to prepare an enlightening speech on books and let your friends reap some knowledge from you.

Top quotes to use in a speech on books, speech on importance of reading books, short speech on books, speech on types of books, frequently asked questions on books.

“Some books should be tasted, some devoured, but only a few should be chewed and digested thoroughly.” – Sir Francis Bacon.
“If you don’t like to read, you haven’t found the right book.” – J.K. Rowling.
“That’s the thing about books. They let you travel without moving your feet.” – Jhumpa Lahiri.
“There is more treasure in books than in all the pirate’s loot on Treasure Island.” – Walt Disney.
“No man can be called friendless who has God and the companionship of good books.” – Elizabeth Barrett Browning.
“If there is a book that you want to read, but it hasn’t been written yet, you must be the one to write it.” – Toni Morrison.
“Show me a family of readers, and I will show you the people who move the world.” – Napoleon Bonaparte.
“Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body.” – Joseph Addison.
“I read for pleasure, and that is the moment I learn the most.” – Margaret Atwood.
“A word after a word after a word is power.” – Margaret Atwood.

Sample Speeches on Books

A couple of sample speeches on books are given below. Take a dive into these speeches and utilise the resource to better understand the topic.

Books aid the evolution of human beings. It fosters character formation, builds confidence, and changes our lives’ perceptions. The practice of reading books increases the insight of individuals and helps to mould out the best personality. By reading books, a person can experience multiple emotions; it keeps one energetic and refreshed.

People can explore many wonderlands with the guidance of a book. That is the reason why many people consider books as their best companions. People can easily elope from solitude with the help of books. Books mark their appearance as a saviour from depression, anxieties, and emotional distress, and it fills our soul with wonderful ideas.

The inspirational and moral support provided by books is boundless. They enrich our minds with good thoughts. The true taste of wisdom can be experienced by reading books. Just like there are good things and bad things, books are also of two types. Try to pick out the best ones. We always have to be very cautious while selecting books, like the words of Malala Yousafzai, “One book, one pen, one child, and one teacher can change the world.”

Books play a very important role in the life of every individual. From the early age itself, books are introduced for assisting the child in bettering academics. Most of the basic information is taught to the children with the help of books. Books are a powerhouse of knowledge. People can gather information on different subjects and can improve their comprehensive knowledge by reading books. In today’s world, the empire of books is so vast, and everyone can easily enter it. Other than the typical print format, books are available to us online in the form of e-books and audiobooks.

The capability of books for influencing human lives is really high. They motivate, nourish, and charge us to be better. The habit of reading improves vocabulary, quality of thoughts and mental health of a person. They eventually help the transformation of our lives. Like the words of Walter Mosley, “A peasant that reads is a prince in waiting.”

Books can be broadly classified as fiction and non-fiction. A fictional book is a book that is completely based on the imagination of the writer. The types of stories developed with the creative talent of the writers are presented in the fictional stories. Rather than providing information, such books focus on entertaining the readers by offering imaginary experiences.

A non-fictional book is exactly the opposite of a fictional one. Non-fictional books are based on truth, real incidents, and facts. More than the essence of imagination, writers of non-fictional works add reality to it. Such types of books are produced with the major objective of providing information to the readers. Some of the popular types of non-fictional works are autobiographies, biographies, encyclopaedias, etc.

Multiple kinds of books are available to us; people can choose any genre based on their mood or interest. Some of the most popular genres of books are classics, tragedy, comedy, fantasy, fairy tales, detective and mystery, thriller, science fiction, historical fiction, horror, literary fiction, women’s fiction, romance, short stories, etc. The availability of these many options to read is a great boon to humankind. According to the words of George R. R. Martin, “A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies . . . The man who never reads lives only one.”

Two is always better than one, right? So utilise your options, read as many as you can, and start living your lives.

These speeches will prove to be one of the beneficial speech topics for kids who want help in composing a speech.

List some quotes to use in a speech on books.

“Some books should be tasted, some devoured, but only a few should be chewed and digested thoroughly.” – Sir Francis Bacon.
“If you don’t like to read, you haven’t found the right book.” – J.K. Rowling.
That’s the thing about books. They let you travel without moving your feet.” – Jhumpa Lahiri.

What are the benefits of reading books?

Books play a very important role in the life of every individual. People can gather information on different subjects and can improve their comprehensive knowledge by reading books. The practice of reading books increases the insight of an individual and moulds out the best personality. It helps for character formation, building confidence, and changing perception of our lives.

What are the different genres of books available to us?

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

The 10 Movies That Were Better Than the Book, According to Reddit

These directors took good books and made even better great movies.

Since the earliest days of cinema, filmmakers have found inspiration in books, from classic literature to comic books. While there have been plenty of examples where the film adaptation doesn't even come close to matching the book it was based on, there have been times when the movie goes above and beyond its source material.

The question of film adaptations that exceed the quality of the books they were based on was put to the r/AskReddit community, and it garnered an array of fascinating responses. Covering everything from iconic fantasy adventures to crime classics, timeless horror movies, and even Academy Award-winning dramas, these 10 films were improvements on their books in the eyes of Reddit users.

10 'Stand by Me' (1986)

A common trend through the subreddit was Redditors picking out exceptional movies based on already great books. Perhaps none embody that notion quite so accurately as Stand By Me , a classic coming-of-age drama that adapted Stephen King's The Body for the screen in a manner that delighted not only fans but the author himself .

Following a group of boys venturing into the woods to peer at a dead body, the film is celebrated as one of the most perfect adaptations the screen has ever seen. That sentiment was shared by many Redditors, with chernygal commenting, "The story is great, but the movie just DOES something to me."

9 'Fight Club' (1999)

A raw and sinister hit of violence and anti-consumerism, Fight Club remains every bit as gripping today as it was upon release. David Fincher's adaptation leans heavily on its source material, following an unnamed protagonist who has insomnia and meets the mysterious Tyler Durden ( Brad Pitt ) and creates an underground fighting club.

The big difference which led Reddit to favor the film over the book concerned the Tyler Durden character and how Pitt portrayed him. Racebannon64 highlighted this by saying, "Brad Pitt brought a level of charisma to Tyler that he doesn't have in the book. In the book, Tyler isn't likable at all." A similar point was made by fade_like_a_sigh , who preferred how Durden is used in the film to manipulate and trick audiences and the narrator.

8 'The Princess Bride' (1987)

An enduring fantasy classic that has transcended generations with its action, comedy, excitement, and romance, The Princess Bride is one of the greatest movies from the '80s. Interestingly, the book's author William Goldman was the person who fought hardest to get the movie made, and his presence may be an explanation for the film's ability to realize the novel so brilliantly.

Quiverjones garnered an interesting reaction from Reddit when they suggested it as a film that surpassed the book it was based on, leading many to celebrate both versions of Goldman's story in equal measure. In response, solarhawks said, "this is a rare case of both a book and its film being equally brilliant."

7 'The Mist' (2007)

A monster horror movie armed with social commentary, The Mist used the full force of the horror genre to deliver a compelling look into the human condition. It follows residents of a small town who find shelter in a grocery store when a mysterious mist cloaking a wave of deadly monsters descends upon them, but they soon realize the threat outside may be nothing compared to the evil they must face within.

Judging it against Stephen King's novella is no easy task, but Redditors agreed that the film had one great strength over its source material . AurelianoTampa proposed the film for consideration by stating, "The book is better for most of it, but the ending in the movie knocks the socks off the book ending."

6 'Shrek' (2001)

It may come as a shock to many to learn that DreamWorks' satirical fairy tale classic Shrek was based on a picture book released in 1990. While the book has a somewhat similar plot line to the film, many Redditors quickly pointed out the differences between the two versions of the story.

While the responses quickly became a medley of TIL posts and parodies of Smash Mouth's "All Star," some sang the film's praises as an adaptation. AWL_cow commented, "The book was so unhinged. I loved what they did with the movie adaptation!"

5 'The Shawshank Redemption' (1994)

Yet another exceptional film to be based on a Stephen King story, The Shawshank Redemption overcame a disappointing box office performance to become one of the defining films of the '90s. It follows an ordinary banker who, after being found guilty of murdering his wife and her lover, befriends his fellow inmates in Shawshank State Penitentiary to make for a bizarrely hopeful and beautiful movie about friendship.

While changes were made, the film largely stays true to the source material. In response to the Redditor who initially mentioned the movie, Gunslinger666 concurred, saying, "This is my [go-to] answer. Book is excellent. Movie manages to be better."

4 'Forrest Gump' (1994)

Robert Zemeckis' famous 1994 film blended elements of drama, comedy, adventure, and romance to make one of the most beloved films ever made. It focuses on the fascinating and perplexing life journey of a man with a low IQ as he documents his experiences, including meeting U.S. presidents, running across America, and serving in Vietnam.

While the movie goes on wild and wacky narrative tangents, it is nothing compared to what the character in the book goes through. However, the novel lacked the film's charm, as was pointed out by excaligirltoo , who simply stated, "The book was… something."

3 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' (1988)

A mesmerizing marriage of animation and live-action, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is a timeless comedy classic and one of the most iconic movies ever made. While loosely based on Gary K. Wolf's novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit , the fun fantasy film makes wholesale changes to depict a jaded but sympathetic cartoon-hating detective forced to protect a "toon" framed for murder.

As noted by Yakb0 , the original novel lacked much of the film's fun, with Valiant ( Bob Hoskins' character) being a hard-nosed thug without a motive and Roger being dead for the most part. The Redditor said, "The producers of the movie took the idea of a world with toons and humans and threw away the plot. They made the right choice; the movie turned out amazing."

2 'Jaws' (1975)

To this day, Jaws remains an iconic horror film that cemented Steven Spielberg as one of the greatest filmmakers of all time and has had audiences fearing the beach for the better part of 50 years. The film is so impressionable and renowned that it has completely overshadowed the novel of the same name that it was based upon.

While many Redditors maintained that the book was good, the community largely agreed that Spielberg's changes made for a better story. The user annieknowsall was the initial commenter, receiving over 2,000 upvotes for saying, "I think Spielberg was right to eliminate some of the subplots and to buff the characters up to be more likable/relatable. Also, the end of the book kinda sucked."

1 'The Godfather' (1972)

When it comes to Hollywood brilliance, there is hardly a film from any genre that can rival the reputation and prestige of The Godfather . Based on Mario Puzo's crime novel of the same name, the film tracks the transition of power in a New York crime family from an aging patriarch to his smart though reluctant son.

The film won three Academy Awards and has become one of the most well-known movies ever, surpassing Puzo's best-selling novel in the eyes of many. amerikanische_Frosch commented, "The book was obviously a best seller but it had some really – REALLY – cringey side plots… which Coppola wisely dropped from the film."

KEEP READING: The 10 Authors Who Have the Most Book-to-Movie Adaptations

20 movies that fans think are better than the books

Posted: February 4, 2024 | Last updated: February 4, 2024

<p>Based on the Chuck Palahniuk novel, David Fincher’s <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/?ref_=nv_sr_1" rel="noreferrer noopener">1999 cult classic</a> about a disillusioned office drone (Edward Norton) and a charismatic soap salesman (Brad Pitt) who start an underground fight club is all about men reclaiming their masculinity: just the message some guys need this Valentine’s. </p>

When it comes to movies based on books, avid and casual readers alike will often agree that the book is almost always slightly better. Perhaps it's because books go into more detail or because the images your mind creates are bound only by your imagination. In some cases, however, fans are adamant that the movie trumps the book. They may even recommend skipping the read altogether and going straight for the film.

The Godfather

Many consider the Academy Award-winning film The Godfather to be one of the greatest ever made. The book, however, doesn't receive quite the same degree of accolades. While the novel is considered good, there are elements of the movie that take the story to another level . The film keeps the focus more on the main characters and adds atmosphere and action to the mafia-centred plot.

<p>The book <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/126232.Jaws?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=5WOqiQx5ef&rank=1" title="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/126232.Jaws?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=5WOqiQx5ef&rank=1"><em>Jaws</em></a><em>,</em> written by Peter Benchley, is a New York Times Bestseller, but it never reached the same level of fame as <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073195/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0" title="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073195/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0">the eponymous film</a> co-written by Benchley and Carl Gottlieb and directed by Steven Spielberg. The story's eye-catching action likely explains this divide. Other differences include the film's portrayal of a friendlier relationship between <a href="https://scriptophobic.ca/2018/05/09/adaptations-jaws-and-the-rare-case-where-the-film-is-better/" title="https://scriptophobic.ca/2018/05/09/adaptations-jaws-and-the-rare-case-where-the-film-is-better/">Brody and Hooper </a>and the <a href="https://mythresults.com/mythbusters-vs-jaws" rel="noreferrer noopener">shark getting shot with an oxygen tank</a>.</p>

The book Jaws , written by Peter Benchley, is a New York Times Bestseller, but it never reached the same level of fame as the eponymous film co-written by Benchley and Carl Gottlieb and directed by Steven Spielberg. The story's eye-catching action likely explains this divide. Other differences include the film's portrayal of a friendlier relationship between Brody and Hooper and the shark getting shot with an oxygen tank .

Forrest Gump

Fans of the Academy Award-winning movie Forrest Gump might not even realize that this story is, in fact, based on a book written by Winston Groom. The book gets good ratings among readers, but isn't nearly as famous or beloved as the film, perhaps because the movie made many changes to the story . In the book, Forrest doesn't run, he's rougher around the edges and curses often, and he doesn't marry Jenny or raise their son.

<p><a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1046097/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0">This actress</a> was 26 when she played Regina George, Queen of The Plastics in <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0377092/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0"><em>Mean Girls</em></a>, while her character was ten years younger.</p>

Fans of the comedy film Mean Girls might be surprised to find out that it's based on a non-fiction, self-help book called Queen Bees and Wannabes . While many find the book informative, the film puts the concepts of cliques and bullying into a more memorable, engaging context. Many viewers found that the movie felt more realistic than the read, likely due to Tina Fey's reliance on personal experiences to flesh out the script.

<p>We’ve all known that student, that Mr. or Miss Know-It-All who’s always the one answering questions in class or running as a candidate for something—in this case, for student body president. With Tracy Flick (Reese Witherspoon), writer-director Alexander Payne targets the entire ruling class, those who have always believed themselves to be “destined” to succeed and to lead everyone else, as long as people like Jim McAllister (Matthew Broderick) don’t get in their way in an attempt to alleviate their own mediocre existential anxiety. In short, <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126886/" rel="noreferrer noopener">this film</a> serves as a wicked satire of an American society made up of both types of people.</p>

Readers still enjoy Tom Perrotta's Election . In fact, Perrotta is a New York Times bestselling author also credited with Little Children and The Leftovers . That said, Election's popularity increased notably after the film's release. Even Perotta admits that seeing Reese Witherspoon bring the story to life on screen took it to new heights.

The Princess Bride

The Princess Bride is a movie people of all ages have loved for decades. The book was published in 1973, but the film didn't come out until 1987. In fact, the book's author, William Goldman, already a successful screenwriter , adapted the story and wrote the screenplay, which may explain why the film was and continues to be so well received by fans of the book. The fact that Goldman changed plenty of details and omitted parts of the book when bringing the story to life on screen could be why the film has more fans.

Jurassic Park

When reading Jurassic Park , the mind naturally wonders what this experience might look like in person. The movie puts the action right in your face. You dare not take your eyes off the screen for fear of missing something. Written by Michael Crichton, the book has a solid fan base, but many find the film's action combined with Steven Spielberg's direction put the movie on a different level.

<p>Whatever name you call them—chief, captain, bigwig, or head honcho—the one thing these bosses have in common is being complete nightmares to work for. From the <a href="https://theindependentcritic.com/devil_wears_prada">“devilish aura”</a> Meryl Streep exudes in <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458352/"><em>The Devil Wears Prada</em></a> to the immature, impetuous and self-proclaimed <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaNpcgmj5qI&ab_channel=TheOfficeClips">“World’s Best Boss”</a> Michael Scott in <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386676/"><em>The Office</em></a>, these are the worst bosses to ever appear on TV and in film. Just be thankful you don’t report to any of them.</p>

The Devil Wears Prada

The book The Devil Wears Prada is well liked by fans, but the words on the page can't compete with Meryl Streep on screen. The film, a modern-day classic, varies only slightly from the book and features lines that are quoted to this day, 15 years after its release. On top of Streep's performance, the movie's makeovers and fashions might also play a role in its favoured status.

<p>For the most part, the movie version of <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054195/?ref_=ttawd_awd_tt" title="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054195/?ref_=ttawd_awd_tt"><em>Pollyanna</em></a> stays very true <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1000751.Pollyanna?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=qnf63JUkkR&rank=1" title="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1000751.Pollyanna?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=qnf63JUkkR&rank=1">to the book</a>. It tells the story of an optimistic orphan who's taken in by her strict aunt and soon brings joy to the people in her town. The book was a bestseller when published in 1913, and the film has remained popular with families ever since. Over time, however, the movie has had a <a href="https://books.google.ca/books?id=hfm2BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA119&lpg=PA119&dq=pollyanna+movie+better+than+book&source=bl&ots=ZAxoY92T-h&sig=ACfU3U0LpX9-Aq08jQeZC3Mepxb3jf94IA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi0lf-V4OjyAhVDm-AKHYwSBhQ4FBDoAXoECCQQAw#v=onepage&q=pollyanna%20movie%20better%20than%20book&f=false">more significant impact </a>than the book. First, <a href="https://people.com/movies/pollyanna-star-hayley-mills-writes-memoir-forever-young/" title="https://people.com/movies/pollyanna-star-hayley-mills-writes-memoir-forever-young/">Hayley Mills</a> lent a certain charm to the character of Pollyanna, who was written to be a little less chatty and annoying in the movie. Then, the film version of Pollyanna gets injured because of something she did, while in the book, her injury is accidental. Lastly, the tension and defiance between Pollyanna and her aunt Polly add another layer to the film.</p>

For the most part, the movie version of Pollyanna stays very true to the book . It tells the story of an optimistic orphan who's taken in by her strict aunt and soon brings joy to the people in her town. The book was a bestseller when published in 1913, and the film has remained popular with families ever since. Over time, however, the movie has had a more significant impact than the book. First, Hayley Mills lent a certain charm to the character of Pollyanna, who was written to be a little less chatty and annoying in the movie. Then, the film version of Pollyanna gets injured because of something she did, while in the book, her injury is accidental. Lastly, the tension and defiance between Pollyanna and her aunt Polly add another layer to the film.

<p>Bets, lies and other dubious deals are always the foundation of a solid relationship, right? If not in reality, then certainly in the <a href="https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a26238053/romantic-comedies-dupe-storyline/">world of rom-coms.</a> If main characters aren’t outright lying about who they are, then they might be doing their darndest to best one another, like Andie (Kate Hudson) and Ben (Matthew McConaughey) in the 2003 movie <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0251127/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1"><em>How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days.</em></a> The premise of writer Andie doing all she can to get a guy to break up with her for the sake of an assignment, while Ben pulls out all the stops to get her to love him to win a bet, is as ridiculous as it is predictable.</p>

How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days

While the book How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days , inspired the hit romantic comedy, fans of the film might be surprised to discover that the book is a humorous non-fiction guide on etiquette featuring comic-style drawings. Considered one of the best modern romantic comedies ever, the film ties the book's overall concept into its plot as magazine chronicler Andie (played by Kate Hudson) tries out all the things that should lose her a guy in 10 days.

<p>Steve Martin is at his curmudgeonly best as an exasperated dad helplessly watching as his daughter gets married in this winsome wedding movie (a remake of the 1950 version starring Spencer Tracy and Liz Taylor). Martin Short has a star turn playing incomprehensible and flamboyant wedding planner Franck, who was <a href="https://www.bustle.com/p/lisa-vanderpumps-party-planner-kevin-lee-has-worked-with-oprah-winfrey-barack-obama-but-his-cocktail-conversation-could-use-some-work-8128386" rel="noreferrer noopener">actually based on real L.A. planner and reality star Kevin Lee</a>. And the ceremony itself is pure suburban ‘90s grandeur, swans and all.</p>

Father of the Bride

The 1991 film Father of the Bride was an adaptation of a 1950 film and 1948 book of the same name. While the stories follow a similar plot about a father who's overwhelmed and unsure about his daughter's upcoming wedding, the 91 film has captivated audiences for the past 30 years, while the book is often discovered after enjoying the movie and Steve Martin 's charming and humorous portrayal of the at-times infuriating George Banks.

<p>It's difficult to imagine the <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42225815" title="https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42225815">intoxicating singing and </a><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42225815" title="https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-42225815">dancing</a> of the film <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1981677/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0" title="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1981677/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0"><em>Pitch Perfect</em></a> translated onto the page. This is likely why many might not realize this movie is <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2376467.Pitch_Perfect?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=OeX6Mepo0U&rank=2" title="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2376467.Pitch_Perfect?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=OeX6Mepo0U&rank=2">based on a non-fiction book</a> that goes behind-the-scenes in the world of acapella. In contrast, the <a href="https://ew.com/article/2012/10/06/pitch-perfect-a-cappella-riff-off/" title="https://ew.com/article/2012/10/06/pitch-perfect-a-cappella-riff-off/">film tells the fictional story</a> of a group of girls trying to win an acapella competition at their university.</p>

Pitch Perfect

It's difficult to imagine the intoxicating singing and dancing of the film Pitch Perfect translated onto the page. This is likely why many might not realize this movie is based on a non-fiction book that goes behind-the-scenes in the world of acapella. In contrast, the film tells the fictional story of a group of girls trying to win an acapella competition at their university.

<p><a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36236124-fight-club?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=8ki0NuwiUs&rank=1" title="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36236124-fight-club?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=8ki0NuwiUs&rank=1"><em>Fight Club</em></a>, written by Chuck Palahniuk, was a popular book before <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0" title="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0">the film</a> took it to new levels of popularity. It's been more than 20 years since the film's release, yet it remains a cult classic. While <a href="https://screenrant.com/fight-club-book-movie-differences/" rel="noreferrer noopener">the ending of the movie differs from that of the book</a>, <em>seeing</em> the fighting in action has helped the <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-men-who-still-love-fight-club" title="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-men-who-still-love-fight-club">film's fandom</a> top the book's, not to mention the incredible star power that Brad Pitt and Edward Norton bring to the screen.</p>

Fight Club , written by Chuck Palahniuk, was a popular book before the film took it to new levels of popularity. It's been more than 20 years since the film's release, yet it remains a cult classic. While the ending of the movie differs from that of the book , seeing the fighting in action has helped the film's fandom top the book's, not to mention the incredible star power that Brad Pitt and Edward Norton bring to the screen.

Julie & Julia

The film Julie & Julia was inspired by a book , which was inspired by a blog. What puts the film above the book is how it transports you back and forth from late 1940s France with Julia Child to early 2000s Manhattan with Julie Powell. Plus, the book doesn't cover Child's background, only presenting Powell's experience of blogging and cooking her way through Child's recipes.

<p>It's hard not to picture Reese Witherspoon when you hear the title <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0250494/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0" title="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0250494/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0"><em>Legally Blonde</em></a><em>, </em>but the <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/386142.Legally_Blonde?ac=1&from_search=true&qid=8kT8FssRc1&rank=1" rel="noreferrer noopener">plot appeared first as a book</a> based on<a href="https://www.insider.com/legally-blonde-facts-2019-1" title="https://www.insider.com/legally-blonde-facts-2019-1"> a true story</a> by Amanda Brown. Many of the books reviews are from readers who revisited the story because they loved the movie. In the book, Elle goes to <a href="https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2016/12/133903/legally-blonde-book-elle-woods-harvard" title="https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2016/12/133903/legally-blonde-book-elle-woods-harvard">Stanford, not Harvard</a>, and her character is a <a href="https://www.cracked.com/article_29598_elle-woods-terrible-person-in-novel-legally-blonde-was-based-on.html" title="https://www.cracked.com/article_29598_elle-woods-terrible-person-in-novel-legally-blonde-was-based-on.html">lot less likable</a>, which could be part of the reason why fans tend to flock to the viewing rather than the reading experience for this one.</p>

Legally Blonde

It's hard not to picture Reese Witherspoon when you hear the title Legally Blonde , but the plot appeared first as a book based on a true story by Amanda Brown. Many of the books reviews are from readers who revisited the story because they loved the movie. In the book, Elle goes to Stanford, not Harvard , and her character is a lot less likable , which could be part of the reason why fans tend to flock to the viewing rather than the reading experience for this one.

Breakfast at Tiffany's

While depictions of Holly Golightly in the book and film versions of Breakfast at Tiffany's are similar, the stories take many different turns. Perhaps it's the 1960s versus the 1940s, a tidy romantic ending versus an unromantic, open-ended conclusion, or simply Audrey Hepburn's on-screen magnetism . Whatever the reason, the movie version has a much bigger fan base than the book. In fact, the film has become a classic enjoyed by each new generation, while the book has become something fans of the film check out after viewing.

<p>Created by American writer L. Frank Baum, the Land of Oz is a fictional country made famous in a collection of literary works, including the novel <em>The Wonderful Wizard of Oz </em>and its numerous <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032138/">film adaptations</a> produced throughout the 20<sup>th</sup> century. Dorothy Gale and her house travel to Oz after being swept up in a tornado. The Land of Oz, along with its witches, wizards, fairies, and other residents, have stirred hearts for over 100 years.</p>

The Wizard of Oz

The children's book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz , is certainly appreciated, but it can't compare with what is considered one of the greatest films of all time, Best Picture Academy Award-Winner The Wizard of Oz . While there are a few differences between the two, the storylines go in slightly different directions , the book is a little darker and more violent, and the movie, of course, brings music and vibrant colours into the story.

Mrs. Doubtfire

Mrs. Doubtfire , starring the late great Robin Williams, is an internationally beloved movie based on the book Madame Doubtfire , published in the late 80s. The book was intended for teenagers and while it was shortlisted for the Guardian Children's Fiction award, it never received the same level of adoration as the film.

He's Just Not That Into You

While the book He's Just Not That Into You is a non-fiction how-to guide of sorts inspired by an episode of Sex and the City , the film brings the concepts to life through romantic comedy. The film did well at the box office. Its star-studded cast , including Jennifer Aniston, Ben Affleck, Scarlett Johansen, and Bradley Cooper, made the book's concepts more entertaining and digestible.

The First Wives Club

The First Wives Club is one of the 90s most beloved romantic comedies . While the book is enjoyed by readers, Hollywood powerhouse actresses Goldie Hawn, Bette Midler, and Diane Keaton bring such charisma to the characters on screen that they elevate the story. The film and the book follow a similar storyline. In fact, the book's author, Olivia Goldsmith, was involved in the movie's production.

More for You

Caitlin Clark breaks unbelievable WNBA record in her debut with the Indiana Fever

12 Strange Facts About Redheads You Never Knew

5 Types of Homes That Will Plummet in Value in 2024

10 Fastest V-8 Powered Cars Ever Built

Angelina Jolie's Daughter Supports Her During Show

Angelina Jolie’s Daughter Vivienne Supports Her During “Today” Show Appearance

A 24-year-old spent $140,000 buying and converting a Mercedes van. Take a look inside the luxury home on wheels.

Beloved Heroines: 25 Memorable Female Characters in Fiction

Biden: 'You're the worst president America has ever had'

Cleveland Browns schedule 2024: Takeaways, predictions

Saham David Ahmed Ali, pictured speaking at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health graduation ceremony

Columbia students boo as graduation speaker’s mic cuts off when she starts to scolds college on Gaza

From Rocket V8s to Hemis, muscle cars have been driven by some of the most powerful engines known to man. Among these, only a few stand out as the most powerful of their time.

The Most Powerful Muscle Car of Each Decade

9 of the world’s most valuable coins

I quit my dream job at 32 and spent $34,000 to travel the world—here are my 4 biggest regrets

20 facts you might not know about 'Barbie'

Trump trial ends with star witness flipping - see Ari Melber’s courtroom breakdown

This man is helping kids by paying off thousands in school lunch debts

Elon Musk in California May 2024 - GettyImages-2151277355.jpg

Elon Musk fired nearly all of Tesla’s Supercharger team after argument with top executive

Georgia erupts in fury as 'Russian law' passes

‘I’m weary of repeating myself’: How do I deal with rich friends who take $22,000 cruises and book $800 hotel rooms? Prices are crazy enough already.

Legendary or notorious, the Cobra is a sports car that has always demanded attention.

In pictures: the story of the brilliant AC Cobra

IMAGES

How Books Are Better Than Movies Infographics by thomasrichard
Top Ten Reasons Why Books Are Better Than Movies
Speech on Why Books are Better Than Movies?
10 Main Reasons How Books Are Better Than Movies
A short speech on books are better than movies
(DOC) Books are better than movies. Discuss

VIDEO

why books are better than movies
Essay on Why books are better than their Movies
Write 2 minute speech on Why books are better than movies in English
Why books are better than movies short note 📝 || why books are better than movies
10 lines on why books are better than movies || books are better than movies 🔥
Why Books are better than Movies? Books Vs Movies

COMMENTS

2 Minute Speech On Why Books Are Better Than Movies In English
In most cases, books are superior to movies. Reading a book might help you visualize the scene or the actions taking place. They are also more thorough than movies, which can skip important facts. Some movies change the characters since they are completely different and the reverse in the novel. The characters in a book often appear different ...
Speech on Why Books are Better Than Movies?
Books provide a richer understanding of the character's motivations and growth throughout the narrative. The reader has the flexibility to pause, reflect, and return to any part of the story, Books foster a more immersive and contemplative reading experience. Books are better than movies because you design the set the way you want it to look ...
Books vs. Movies: The Age-Old Debate
Books are great because they allow the reader to be a part of the story; we are the observers that have insight into the character's thoughts and feelings, and all the nuances that create three-dimensional characters. With books, there's just more. More detail, more focus on character development, and more depth to the meaning of the artwork.
Books Vs Movies
Dive into the debate of why books are better than movies. Explore the immersive experience of reading, the power of imagination, and the depth of character exploration that books offer compared to their cinematic adaptations. Discover the unique ways in which novels engage readers and allow for a deeper connection to the story.
10 Reasons Why Are Books Better Than Movies
First, movies are visual. You can see the characters and the setting, and it's all in one place. With a book, you have to imagine everything yourself. Second, movies are more exciting. They have music and sound effects, and they move quickly. Third, movies are more social.
Scientific proof that the book is almost always better than the movie
Scientific proof that the book is almost always better than the movie. My dad used to say that most movies are better than most books, and a bad movie is better (or at least easier to sit through) than a bad book, but with the very best books, no movie could even come close. Especially not if it's the adaptation of that book.
Books Vs Movies: Which Is Better? The Debate Settled!
If you're looking for arguments for movies being better than books, here are some reasons why you may prefer a film vs a book. #1. Movies help bring hard-to-visualize scenes to life. Movies offer a unique cinematic experience that allows viewers to sit back and enjoy a story without having to actively think about it.
Eight reasons why books are better than movies
7. Books live longer. Not on the shelves but rather in your memory as you invest your own time, feelings and pace in reading. It is more of a personal experience that connects yourself with all ...
Are books better than films?
You can live as someone else, free of your own troubles, even if only for two hundred pages. Books are magic. Which is why I'm telling you all to forget about movie magic and get back to the pure ...
Books Versus Movies
A survey conducted by Super Summary about books and their movie adaptations has brought an end to this debate, showing that 34% of people prefer books over their movie counterparts, while 27% said that the movies were better. While this is a debate that will likely never have a conclusive result due to the varying viewpoints present, we cannot ...
Why Books Are Better Than Movies: 9 Reasons To Prefer Reading
1. Books Offer More Detail and Depth. One of the primary reasons why books are better than movies is that they offer more detail and depth. Unlike movies, which are can be more limited by time constraints, books can delve deeper into the story, the characters, and the world-building. With books, readers can get lost in a fully-realized world ...
A novel idea: is the book always better than the film?
We rise and shuffle, still brushing popcorn husks off our fronts. And it's about now that you'll hear the braying of the literati in the row behind: "Well, obviously, the book is always ...
Why books are better than movies
March 16, 2017. Most of the time books are better than movies. Books can let you imagine the setting or events happening in the story. They are also more detailed than movies because movies sometimes leave out some important details. In some movies, they switch up the characters because in the book they are different and totally the opposite.
Movie vs. book: Which is better? 6 adaptations taken to task
Film adaptations of novels earn up to 53% more at the box office than original screenplays, according to Forbes. For whatever reason, moviegoers worldwide are more obsessed with books that get ...
Learn Why Books Are Better Than Movies/Series!
2️⃣ Books Offer Better Detail. Books are more complex and in-depth works than movies and series and offer more nuanced and engaging visualization. There are wonderful books with an "Exquisite Writing" style that adds more power to the words. The celebrated author and celebrity Paulo Coelho once famously said, "The book is a film that ...
Books Vs Movies Essay
according to my opinion books are always the better option than movies. Books are much more detailed than movies, they improve your English skills, vocabulary and are proven to help you get better jobs. Meanwhile films are socially better, quicker to watch and made just for entertainment. Filed Under: Essay Writing.
13 Adaptations Better Than the Books They're Based On
Most of the time, when a beloved book is adapted into a film, or even into a television show, a form with a little more elbow room, shall we say, the magic doesn't quite translate. Which isn't to say the adaptations aren't themselves good—it's just that the books are usually better. Even very very good adaptations, like The Talented Mr. Ripley, can often only manage to be second ...
why books are better than movies
why books are better than movies | 2 minute speech | in english 🔥Hello lovely students, how are you in this video you will read about " why books are better...
Debate
Movies are better because they help you visualize the story, and great acting and effects can bring it to life. In the movie Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, you see a giant, blood-chilling snake on-screen. This helps you realize just how relieved Harry feels when Fawkes the phoenix saves him. Also, movies are meant to be seen with ...
Writing about the Novel: Film Comparison
Step 3: Choose a Film for Comparison. The key to a good comparison essay is to choose two subjects that connect in a meaningful way. The purpose of conducting the comparison is not to state the obvious, but rather to illuminate subtle differences or unexpected similarities. When writing a film comparison paper, the point is to make an argument ...
Top Reasons Why Books Are Better Than Movies 2024
Conclusion. Books are better than movies because they offer a more immersive experience, provide more complex character development, and allow readers to use their imaginations more. Books allow readers to immerse themselves in the story in a way that movies cannot. Readers can picture the characters and settings in their minds, making the ...
Speech on Books
Speech on Importance of Reading Books. Books aid the evolution of human beings. It fosters character formation, builds confidence, and changes our lives' perceptions. The practice of reading books increases the insight of individuals and helps to mould out the best personality. By reading books, a person can experience multiple emotions; it ...
What's Better: the Book or the Movie?
The movie wasn't the same. Plus, books help us sharpen our reading skills and become better writers. Movies are better because they help you visualize the story and bring it to life. In the movie Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, you see a giant, blood-chilling snake on screen. This helps show just how relieved Harry feels when Fawkes ...
10 Movies That Were Better Than the Book, According to Reddit
6 'Shrek' (2001) Image via DreamWorks Animation. It may come as a shock to many to learn that DreamWorks' satirical fairy tale classic Shrek was based on a picture book released in 1990. While the ...
20 movies that fans think are better than the books
The Devil Wears Prada. The book The Devil Wears Prada is well liked by fans, but the words on the page can't compete with Meryl Streep on screen. The film, a modern-day classic, varies only ...

2 Minute Speech On Why Books Are Better Than Movies In English

Related Posts:

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Speech on Why Books are Better Than Movies?

10 Lines on Books Are Better Than Movies

2-Minute Speech on Books Are Better Than Movies

Shiva Tyagi

Connect With Us

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.

Need help with?

Country Preference

Which English test are you planning to take?

When are you planning to take the exam?

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

What is your budget to study abroad?

Make your study abroad dream a reality in January 2022 with

Essex Direct Admission Day

Find a blog post

Leave a Reply

Social media

Additional resources

IU Libraries

Why Books Are Better Than Movies

Directing From the Armchair

The Sky’s The Limit

The Inner Lives Movies Can’t Reach

The Writer’s Touch

On Your Own Schedule

The Companion, Not The Replacement

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

E-reader vs. Paperbacks: The Ultimate Showdown for Bookworms!

Book Reviews

Author Interviews

Social Media Promotion

Social Media Set up

Website Creation

Google / Facebook / Youtube Adverts

For more details mail us at [email protected]

Quick Links

Recent Posts

10 Reasons Why Are Books Better Than Movies

Are movies better than books?

Why Movies Are Better Than Books?

Why Are Books Better Than Movies?

Books provide a more in-depth and well-rounded experience than movies

Books can be paused, reread, and analyzed more thoroughly than movies

Books Allow for Imagination

Books can be more detailed

Books can be interpreted differently

Books can stay with you for a long time

Stories can be ruined by bad acting

Books improve your vocabulary

Movies focus more on being commercial and compromise on quality

Movies have limited storytelling time

Other reasons:

Books can provide new insights with each reading

Conclusion:

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Books Vs Movies: Which Is Better? The Debate Settled!

Books vs Movies Pros and Cons

Pros of reading books over movies

Cons of reading books over movies

Pros of watching movies over reading books

Cons of watching movies over reading books

Why books are better than movies?

#1. Books nurture the reader’s imagination

#2. Books have more depth than movies

#3. Movie adaptations miss out on key points

#4. Reading has other benefits

#5. Books allow the reader to think more deeply

Why are movies better than books?

#1. Movies help bring hard-to-visualize scenes to life

#2. Acting is an art form

#3. Movies are quicker than books

#4. Social interactions are more relatable in movies

#5. You can watch a film with friends

Should Books Be Made Into Movies?

Books vs Movies: The Verdict

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Why Books Are Better Than Movies: 9 Reasons To Prefer Reading