dissertation methodology literature

How To Write The Methodology Chapter

The what, why & how explained simply (with examples).

By: Jenna Crossley (PhD) | Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | September 2021 (Updated April 2023)

So, you’ve pinned down your research topic and undertaken a review of the literature – now it’s time to write up the methodology section of your dissertation, thesis or research paper . But what exactly is the methodology chapter all about – and how do you go about writing one? In this post, we’ll unpack the topic, step by step .

Overview: The Methodology Chapter

  • The purpose  of the methodology chapter
  • Why you need to craft this chapter (really) well
  • How to write and structure the chapter
  • Methodology chapter example
  • Essential takeaways

What (exactly) is the methodology chapter?

The methodology chapter is where you outline the philosophical underpinnings of your research and outline the specific methodological choices you’ve made. The point of the methodology chapter is to tell the reader exactly how you designed your study and, just as importantly, why you did it this way.

Importantly, this chapter should comprehensively describe and justify all the methodological choices you made in your study. For example, the approach you took to your research (i.e., qualitative, quantitative or mixed), who  you collected data from (i.e., your sampling strategy), how you collected your data and, of course, how you analysed it. If that sounds a little intimidating, don’t worry – we’ll explain all these methodological choices in this post .

Free Webinar: Research Methodology 101

Why is the methodology chapter important?

The methodology chapter plays two important roles in your dissertation or thesis:

Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of research theory, which is what earns you marks. A flawed research design or methodology would mean flawed results. So, this chapter is vital as it allows you to show the marker that you know what you’re doing and that your results are credible .

Secondly, the methodology chapter is what helps to make your study replicable. In other words, it allows other researchers to undertake your study using the same methodological approach, and compare their findings to yours. This is very important within academic research, as each study builds on previous studies.

The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to identify and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research limitations ), and to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these. Every research project has its limitations , so it’s important to acknowledge these openly and highlight your study’s value despite its limitations . Doing so demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. We’ll discuss limitations in a bit more detail later in this post, so stay tuned!

Need a helping hand?

dissertation methodology literature

How to write up the methodology chapter

First off, it’s worth noting that the exact structure and contents of the methodology chapter will vary depending on the field of research (e.g., humanities, chemistry or engineering) as well as the university . So, be sure to always check the guidelines provided by your institution for clarity and, if possible, review past dissertations from your university. Here we’re going to discuss a generic structure for a methodology chapter typically found in the sciences.

Before you start writing, it’s always a good idea to draw up a rough outline to guide your writing. Don’t just start writing without knowing what you’ll discuss where. If you do, you’ll likely end up with a disjointed, ill-flowing narrative . You’ll then waste a lot of time rewriting in an attempt to try to stitch all the pieces together. Do yourself a favour and start with the end in mind .

Section 1 – Introduction

As with all chapters in your dissertation or thesis, the methodology chapter should have a brief introduction. In this section, you should remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research aims . As we’ve discussed many times on the blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research questions. Therefore, it’s useful to frontload this component to remind the reader (and yourself!) what you’re trying to achieve.

In this section, you can also briefly mention how you’ll structure the chapter. This will help orient the reader and provide a bit of a roadmap so that they know what to expect. You don’t need a lot of detail here – just a brief outline will do.

The intro provides a roadmap to your methodology chapter

Section 2 – The Methodology

The next section of your chapter is where you’ll present the actual methodology. In this section, you need to detail and justify the key methodological choices you’ve made in a logical, intuitive fashion. Importantly, this is the heart of your methodology chapter, so you need to get specific – don’t hold back on the details here. This is not one of those “less is more” situations.

Let’s take a look at the most common components you’ll likely need to cover. 

Methodological Choice #1 – Research Philosophy

Research philosophy refers to the underlying beliefs (i.e., the worldview) regarding how data about a phenomenon should be gathered , analysed and used . The research philosophy will serve as the core of your study and underpin all of the other research design choices, so it’s critically important that you understand which philosophy you’ll adopt and why you made that choice. If you’re not clear on this, take the time to get clarity before you make any further methodological choices.

While several research philosophies exist, two commonly adopted ones are positivism and interpretivism . These two sit roughly on opposite sides of the research philosophy spectrum.

Positivism states that the researcher can observe reality objectively and that there is only one reality, which exists independently of the observer. As a consequence, it is quite commonly the underlying research philosophy in quantitative studies and is oftentimes the assumed philosophy in the physical sciences.

Contrasted with this, interpretivism , which is often the underlying research philosophy in qualitative studies, assumes that the researcher performs a role in observing the world around them and that reality is unique to each observer . In other words, reality is observed subjectively .

These are just two philosophies (there are many more), but they demonstrate significantly different approaches to research and have a significant impact on all the methodological choices. Therefore, it’s vital that you clearly outline and justify your research philosophy at the beginning of your methodology chapter, as it sets the scene for everything that follows.

Private Coaching

Methodological Choice #2 – Research Type

The next thing you would typically discuss in your methodology section is the research type. The starting point for this is to indicate whether the research you conducted is inductive or deductive .

Inductive research takes a bottom-up approach , where the researcher begins with specific observations or data and then draws general conclusions or theories from those observations. Therefore these studies tend to be exploratory in terms of approach.

Conversely , d eductive research takes a top-down approach , where the researcher starts with a theory or hypothesis and then tests it using specific observations or data. Therefore these studies tend to be confirmatory in approach.

Related to this, you’ll need to indicate whether your study adopts a qualitative, quantitative or mixed  approach. As we’ve mentioned, there’s a strong link between this choice and your research philosophy, so make sure that your choices are tightly aligned . When you write this section up, remember to clearly justify your choices, as they form the foundation of your study.

Methodological Choice #3 – Research Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your research strategy (also referred to as a research design ). This methodological choice refers to the broader strategy in terms of how you’ll conduct your research, based on the aims of your study.

Several research strategies exist, including experimental , case studies , ethnography , grounded theory, action research , and phenomenology . Let’s take a look at two of these, experimental and ethnographic, to see how they contrast.

Experimental research makes use of the scientific method , where one group is the control group (in which no variables are manipulated ) and another is the experimental group (in which a specific variable is manipulated). This type of research is undertaken under strict conditions in a controlled, artificial environment (e.g., a laboratory). By having firm control over the environment, experimental research typically allows the researcher to establish causation between variables. Therefore, it can be a good choice if you have research aims that involve identifying causal relationships.

Ethnographic research , on the other hand, involves observing and capturing the experiences and perceptions of participants in their natural environment (for example, at home or in the office). In other words, in an uncontrolled environment.  Naturally, this means that this research strategy would be far less suitable if your research aims involve identifying causation, but it would be very valuable if you’re looking to explore and examine a group culture, for example.

As you can see, the right research strategy will depend largely on your research aims and research questions – in other words, what you’re trying to figure out. Therefore, as with every other methodological choice, it’s essential to justify why you chose the research strategy you did.

Methodological Choice #4 – Time Horizon

The next thing you’ll need to detail in your methodology chapter is the time horizon. There are two options here: cross-sectional and longitudinal . In other words, whether the data for your study were all collected at one point in time (cross-sectional) or at multiple points in time (longitudinal).

The choice you make here depends again on your research aims, objectives and research questions. If, for example, you aim to assess how a specific group of people’s perspectives regarding a topic change over time , you’d likely adopt a longitudinal time horizon.

Another important factor to consider is simply whether you have the time necessary to adopt a longitudinal approach (which could involve collecting data over multiple months or even years). Oftentimes, the time pressures of your degree program will force your hand into adopting a cross-sectional time horizon, so keep this in mind.

Methodological Choice #5 – Sampling Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your sampling strategy . There are two main categories of sampling, probability and non-probability sampling.

Probability sampling involves a random (and therefore representative) selection of participants from a population, whereas non-probability sampling entails selecting participants in a non-random  (and therefore non-representative) manner. For example, selecting participants based on ease of access (this is called a convenience sample).

The right sampling approach depends largely on what you’re trying to achieve in your study. Specifically, whether you trying to develop findings that are generalisable to a population or not. Practicalities and resource constraints also play a large role here, as it can oftentimes be challenging to gain access to a truly random sample. In the video below, we explore some of the most common sampling strategies.

Methodological Choice #6 – Data Collection Method

Next up, you’ll need to explain how you’ll go about collecting the necessary data for your study. Your data collection method (or methods) will depend on the type of data that you plan to collect – in other words, qualitative or quantitative data.

Typically, quantitative research relies on surveys , data generated by lab equipment, analytics software or existing datasets. Qualitative research, on the other hand, often makes use of collection methods such as interviews , focus groups , participant observations, and ethnography.

So, as you can see, there is a tight link between this section and the design choices you outlined in earlier sections. Strong alignment between these sections, as well as your research aims and questions is therefore very important.

Methodological Choice #7 – Data Analysis Methods/Techniques

The final major methodological choice that you need to address is that of analysis techniques . In other words, how you’ll go about analysing your date once you’ve collected it. Here it’s important to be very specific about your analysis methods and/or techniques – don’t leave any room for interpretation. Also, as with all choices in this chapter, you need to justify each choice you make.

What exactly you discuss here will depend largely on the type of study you’re conducting (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods). For qualitative studies, common analysis methods include content analysis , thematic analysis and discourse analysis . In the video below, we explain each of these in plain language.

For quantitative studies, you’ll almost always make use of descriptive statistics , and in many cases, you’ll also use inferential statistical techniques (e.g., correlation and regression analysis). In the video below, we unpack some of the core concepts involved in descriptive and inferential statistics.

In this section of your methodology chapter, it’s also important to discuss how you prepared your data for analysis, and what software you used (if any). For example, quantitative data will often require some initial preparation such as removing duplicates or incomplete responses . Similarly, qualitative data will often require transcription and perhaps even translation. As always, remember to state both what you did and why you did it.

Section 3 – The Methodological Limitations

With the key methodological choices outlined and justified, the next step is to discuss the limitations of your design. No research methodology is perfect – there will always be trade-offs between the “ideal” methodology and what’s practical and viable, given your constraints. Therefore, this section of your methodology chapter is where you’ll discuss the trade-offs you had to make, and why these were justified given the context.

Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study, ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints to issues of sample or selection bias . For example, you may find that you didn’t manage to draw in enough respondents to achieve the desired sample size (and therefore, statistically significant results), or your sample may be skewed heavily towards a certain demographic, thereby negatively impacting representativeness .

In this section, it’s important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. There’s no use trying to hide them (your marker will be aware of them regardless). By being critical, you’ll demonstrate to your marker that you have a strong understanding of research theory, so don’t be shy here. At the same time, don’t beat your study to death . State the limitations, why these were justified, how you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how your study still provides value despite these limitations .

Section 4 – Concluding Summary

Finally, it’s time to wrap up the methodology chapter with a brief concluding summary. In this section, you’ll want to concisely summarise what you’ve presented in the chapter. Here, it can be a good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your university recommends using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ).

Importantly, this section needs to be brief – a paragraph or two maximum (it’s a summary, after all). Also, make sure that when you write up your concluding summary, you include only what you’ve already discussed in your chapter; don’t add any new information.

Keep it simple

Methodology Chapter Example

In the video below, we walk you through an example of a high-quality research methodology chapter from a dissertation. We also unpack our free methodology chapter template so that you can see how best to structure your chapter.

Wrapping Up

And there you have it – the methodology chapter in a nutshell. As we’ve mentioned, the exact contents and structure of this chapter can vary between universities , so be sure to check in with your institution before you start writing. If possible, try to find dissertations or theses from former students of your specific degree program – this will give you a strong indication of the expectations and norms when it comes to the methodology chapter (and all the other chapters!).

Also, remember the golden rule of the methodology chapter – justify every choice ! Make sure that you clearly explain the “why” for every “what”, and reference credible methodology textbooks or academic sources to back up your justifications.

If you need a helping hand with your research methodology (or any other component of your research), be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through every step of the research journey. Until next time, good luck!

Research Methodology Bootcamp

55 Comments

DAUDI JACKSON GYUNDA

highly appreciated.

florin

This was very helpful!

Nophie

This was helpful

mengistu

Thanks ,it is a very useful idea.

Thanks ,it is very useful idea.

Lucia

Thank you so much, this information is very useful.

Shemeka Hodge-Joyce

Thank you very much. I must say the information presented was succinct, coherent and invaluable. It is well put together and easy to comprehend. I have a great guide to create the research methodology for my dissertation.

james edwin thomson

Highly clear and useful.

Amir

I understand a bit on the explanation above. I want to have some coach but I’m still student and don’t have any budget to hire one. A lot of question I want to ask.

Henrick

Thank you so much. This concluded my day plan. Thank you so much.

Najat

Thanks it was helpful

Karen

Great information. It would be great though if you could show us practical examples.

Patrick O Matthew

Thanks so much for this information. God bless and be with you

Atugonza Zahara

Thank you so so much. Indeed it was helpful

Joy O.

This is EXCELLENT!

I was totally confused by other explanations. Thank you so much!.

keinemukama surprise

justdoing my research now , thanks for the guidance.

Yucong Huang

Thank uuuu! These contents are really valued for me!

Thokozani kanyemba

This is powerful …I really like it

Hend Zahran

Highly useful and clear, thank you so much.

Harry Kaliza

Highly appreciated. Good guide

Fateme Esfahani

That was helpful. Thanks

David Tshigomana

This is very useful.Thank you

Kaunda

Very helpful information. Thank you

Peter

This is exactly what I was looking for. The explanation is so detailed and easy to comprehend. Well done and thank you.

Shazia Malik

Great job. You just summarised everything in the easiest and most comprehensible way possible. Thanks a lot.

Rosenda R. Gabriente

Thank you very much for the ideas you have given this will really help me a lot. Thank you and God Bless.

Eman

Such great effort …….very grateful thank you

Shaji Viswanathan

Please accept my sincere gratitude. I have to say that the information that was delivered was congruent, concise, and quite helpful. It is clear and straightforward, making it simple to understand. I am in possession of an excellent manual that will assist me in developing the research methods for my dissertation.

lalarie

Thank you for your great explanation. It really helped me construct my methodology paper.

Daniel sitieney

thank you for simplifieng the methodoly, It was realy helpful

Kayode

Very helpful!

Nathan

Thank you for your great explanation.

Emily Kamende

The explanation I have been looking for. So clear Thank you

Abraham Mafuta

Thank you very much .this was more enlightening.

Jordan

helped me create the in depth and thorough methodology for my dissertation

Nelson D Menduabor

Thank you for the great explaination.please construct one methodology for me

I appreciate you for the explanation of methodology. Please construct one methodology on the topic: The effects influencing students dropout among schools for my thesis

This helped me complete my methods section of my dissertation with ease. I have managed to write a thorough and concise methodology!

ASHA KIUNGA

its so good in deed

leslie chihope

wow …what an easy to follow presentation. very invaluable content shared. utmost important.

Ahmed khedr

Peace be upon you, I am Dr. Ahmed Khedr, a former part-time professor at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. I am currently teaching research methods, and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found that despite my long experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for evaluating the material for students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated most of what was written into Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. Thank you all… Everything I posted on my page is provided with the names of the writers of Grad coach, the title of the article, and the site. My best regards.

Daniel Edwards

A remarkably simple and useful guide, thank you kindly.

Magnus Mahenge

I real appriciate your short and remarkable chapter summary

Olalekan Adisa

Bravo! Very helpful guide.

Arthur Margraf

Only true experts could provide such helpful, fantastic, and inspiring knowledge about Methodology. Thank you very much! God be with you and us all!

Aruni Nilangi

highly appreciate your effort.

White Label Blog Content

This is a very well thought out post. Very informative and a great read.

FELEKE FACHA

THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA

Chandika Perera

I love you Emma, you are simply amazing with clear explanations with complete information. GradCoach really helped me to do my assignment here in Auckland. Mostly, Emma make it so simple and enjoyable

Zibele Xuba

Thank you very much for this informative and synthesised version.

Yusra AR. Mahmood

thank you, It was a very informative presentation, you made it just to the point in a straightforward way .

Chryslin

Help me write a methodology on the topic “challenges faced by family businesses in Ghana

Kajela

Well articulated, clear, and concise. I got a lot from this writings. Thanks

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

dissertation methodology literature

  • Print Friendly

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

  • Knowledge Base

Methodology

  • How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

  • Search for relevant literature
  • Evaluate sources
  • Identify themes, debates, and gaps
  • Outline the structure
  • Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

upload-your-document-ai-proofreader

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

  • Quick Run-through
  • Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

  • Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
  • Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
  • Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
  • Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
  • Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Literature review guide

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

dissertation methodology literature

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

  • Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
  • Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
  • Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
  • Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

  • Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
  • Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
  • Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

  • Your university’s library catalogue
  • Google Scholar
  • Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
  • Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
  • EconLit (economics)
  • Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

  • What question or problem is the author addressing?
  • What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
  • What are the key theories, models, and methods?
  • Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
  • What are the results and conclusions of the study?
  • How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

  • Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
  • Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
  • Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
  • Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
  • Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

  • Most research has focused on young women.
  • There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
  • But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

  • Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
  • Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
  • Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

  • Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
  • Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
  • Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
  • Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

  • Sampling methods
  • Simple random sampling
  • Stratified sampling
  • Cluster sampling
  • Likert scales
  • Reproducibility

 Statistics

  • Null hypothesis
  • Statistical power
  • Probability distribution
  • Effect size
  • Poisson distribution

Research bias

  • Optimism bias
  • Cognitive bias
  • Implicit bias
  • Hawthorne effect
  • Anchoring bias
  • Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

  • To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
  • To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
  • To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
  • To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
  • To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

  • HOW WE WORK
  • THESIS WRITING
  • DISSERTATION PROCESS

How to Write a Dissertation Methodology with Examples

Home >> Blog >> How to Write a Dissertation Methodology with Examples

The methodology builds the skeleton of the research work. It gives a reader a clear roadmap and outline of the research methods.

Moreover, the dissertation methodology is linked back to the literature review. It explains why you chose a certain data collection method for your dissertation.

Are you confused about writing a dissertation methodology? Are you stuck at the first step and can’t move forward? Then this blog is for you!

Read on and get to know about the dissertation methodology in detail.

What is Dissertation Methodology?

Types of dissertation methodology, dissertation methodology structure, how to write a dissertation methodology, dissertation methodology examples, what not to include in the dissertation methodology.

The dissertation methodology is one of the most challenging parts of the research project. In the methodology section, you will define the research question. Also, give a detailed review of the methods used within your research.

The main purpose of the dissertation methodology is to:

  • Describe the methods of a study.
  • Explain the data sources and sampling strategies.
  • Discuss the data collection and data analysis procedures.
  • Demonstrate the algorithms that you applied to analyze collected data.

Moreover, it helps the readers understand the broad philosophical approach behind the methods you used for your research work. Also, with methodology, you will be required to justify why you chose this method over others.

In the dissertation methodology, you should include:

  • Tools and materials used for conducting the research.
  • Data collection methods include quantitative methods, semi-structured interviews, surveys, groups of people, etc.
  • Data analyzing methods.
  • Research limitations.
  • Discuss the problems that you faced during conducting the research.
  • Details of when, where, and whom the research took place.

Normally, it comes after the literature review and explains data gathering techniques. Also, describe in which ways and how the research was conducted. It is a part of dissertation writing and it is an important part of it.

(back to top)

The dissertation methodology describes the philosophical research methods you use, their advantages, results, and how you conduct research. Also, it helps the readers to assess the validity and reliability of the research.

Also, the dissertation methodology has the following types:

  • Scientific Study

In this methodology type, you need to elaborate on the reliability and show close attention to detail more than anything else. However, if your methods have flaws, no one is impressed. Therefore, make sure that your chosen dissertation methodology is powerful.

Furthermore, the information should clearly state the procedure, setup, and equipment. Therefore, researchers of the same field of study can work with the same method in the future.

The statistical models that are part of your scientific study should be included in the methodology. Also, the variables expected to falsify your data must hold into the equation to avoid vagueness. Therefore, it is better to use a comprehensive strategy to deal with these variables when collecting and analyzing the data.

  • Behavioral or Social Sciences

The behavioral or social sciences methodology is built on the same lines as scientific or lab-based research. This type of methodology exhibits both firmness and reproducibility. Therefore, the other scientists can use your complete research methodology or recreate your examination according to their own research needs.

However, there are some inquiries to consider when working with human subjects. First, you need to decide if your analysis will be based on quantitative, qualitative, or blended research methodology.

The following are the questions that you need to consider:

  • Will you notice or watch the participants undertaking some activity or other?
  • Will you request them to fill a questionnaire or record their responses during the interview?
  • Will you abstain from examining human subjects and base your research on existing evidence?
  • What is the size of your information, and define its scope?
  • Is the data exceptionally explicit to the location or social setting in which you carried your study?

Therefore, you will be required to show that you have taken care of the above questions. Also, you must address your research study’s ethical issues.

However, you have to get formal approval for your research design from suitable ethical committees.

  • Humanities and Arts Dissertation

For humanities and arts-based dissertations, the thoroughness and dependability of the research methods employed remain unquestionable. However, the convincing strategy you will use to convince the readers is slightly different.

Furthermore, the humanities and arts-based dissertations must be directly linked to the literature review. However, the dissertation for humanities and arts is less complex, and there is no need to justify it in detail.

However, ensure that you have provided enough information about the theoretical frameworks your research methodology is based on.

  • Creative Arts Dissertation

Numerous degree programs in the arts allow the students to take the portfolio of artworks or creative writing. Other than presenting the long dissertation research work.

However, your creative research will be required to be submitted along with a comprehensive evaluative paper. Also, as a scholar, you will be expected to show the ability to analyze your methodology critically. Besides, you are capable of critically evaluating your creative work.

Therefore, keep these types of research methodology in mind and choose the one according to your needs.

There are several ways in which you can structure your dissertation methodology. Below are some steps that will help you structure the dissertation methodology.

  • 1. Give Research Overview

In this step, reiterate the topic of your research. You can also describe your data collection and analysis process. Also, discuss and answer the research question clearly in this section.

  • 2. Research Design

You have to explain which data collection method (interviews, surveys, etc.) you used for your research work. Also, include the sample size and any attempts to defeat bias.

  • 3. Data Analysis

In this step, you will have to describe what type of data you were working on. Also, your results are conclusive or not.

What to Include in Dissertation Methodology?

Here are the elements that you should include in the dissertation methodology.

  • Research questions
  • Design methods
  • Discuss the reasons why you choose this design method
  • Evaluation of your choice of method

Writing a dissertation methodology chapter is not difficult if you follow proper steps and guidelines. For your help, we compiled some steps that you will use to create a well-written dissertation methodology.

  • 1. Explain Your Methodological Approach

It is the first step of writing the dissertation methodology. In this step, you need to explain your methodological approach like qualitative research, quantitative research, or any other.

  • 2. Describe Data Collection Methods

After explaining the methodological approach, you should explain the data collection methods, such as interviews, surveys, etc., that you will use.

  • 3. Describe Data Analysis Methods

Now, discuss how you processed and analyzed the quantitative or qualitative data. However, do not give too much information and the results at this stage.

  • 4. Evaluate and Justify Your Methodological Choices

In this section of the dissertation, you describe why you chose these particular methods. Also, explain why other research methods were not suitable for your research goal and show how this approach contributes new knowledge.

Literature Based Dissertation Methodology

This type of methodology is also known as the secondary research methodology. The literature review dissertation methodology involves 4 steps:

  • 1. Develop your research question(s): Like any other type of research, you have to develop a research question first. Then specify the general research area in which you research will fall. Finally, aim to fill the gaps in your literature review.
  • 2. Identify a secondary data set: Look for some more past data that could be useful for your research. For example, you might need an author's permission to use their data.
  • 3. Evaluate a secondary data set: Address the following questions:
  • Aim of the original study?
  • Who collected the data?
  • When was the data collected?
  • What methods were used for data collection?
  • What is the final evaluation?
  • Prepare and analyze secondary data: You will prepare and analyze the secondary data by:
  • Outlining all variables
  • Addressing missing data
  • Recoding variables
  • Computing final scores
  • Crafting a questionnaire
  • Analyzing the data.

Following is an example that explains how to write a dissertation methodology of secondary research:

Read the next section for some more examples to understand the dissertation methodology.

Here are some examples of the dissertation methodology for your ease.

Related: Dissertation Examples for Different Academic Levels & Fields

You might get tempted to overlap between literature review and dissertation methodology. You will find yourself moving back and forth and editing between the literature review and methodology sections.

Resist the urge of including the following in your dissertation methodology:

  • Extensive Methodology Review: Do not extensively review the methodology based on practitioners’ or theorists' work. This review can be included in the literature review section.
  • Excessive Procedural Detail: Your methodology should retain your reader’s interest and not provide detailed information about the equipment and the procedures.
  • Raw Data: Do not provide any details of reproducing the data. You can present information regarding raw data in the appendix.

Hopefully, this blog must have helped in writing a great dissertation methodology. However, if you still have any issues in writing a dissertation methodology, you can contact GradSchoolGenius and get help from our professional writers.

Our professional writers will make your life easy and help you write a good dissertation methodology.

Similar Blogs

  • What Is A Dissertation
  • Thesis Format
  • Dissertation Proposal
  • Dissertation Examples
  • Literature Review Dissertation

GradSchoolGenius is a top-ranked academic writing service. We are home to high-quality academic thesis and dissertations for graduate and post-graduate students worldwide.

  • 100% Plagiarism-free Work
  • 100% Deadline Driven
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • 100% Money-back Guarantee
  • 15+ Years of Experience
  • 500+ Happy Clients
  • 500+ Projects Completed
  • 24/7 Customer Support

dissertation methodology literature

Writing the Dissertation - Guides for Success: Methodology

  • Writing the Dissertation Homepage
  • Overview and Planning
  • Research Question
  • Literature Review
  • Methodology
  • Results and Discussion
  • Getting Started
  • What to Avoid

Overview of writing the methodology

The methodology chapter precisely outlines the research method(s) employed in your dissertation and considers any relevant decisions you made, and challenges faced, when conducting your research. Getting this right is crucial because it lays the foundation for what’s to come: your results and discussion.

Disciplinary differences

Please note: this guide is not specific to any one discipline. The methodology can vary depending on the nature of the research and the expectations of the school or department. Please adapt the following advice to meet the demands of your dissertation and the expectations of your school or department. Consult your supervisor for further guidance; you can also check out our  Writing Across Subjects guide .

Guide contents

As part of the Writing the Dissertation series, this guide covers the most common conventions found in a methodology chapter, giving you the necessary knowledge, tips and guidance needed to impress your markers!  The sections are organised as follows:

  • Getting Started  - Defines the methodology and its core characteristics.
  • Structure  - Provides a detailed walk-through of common subsections or components of the methodology.
  • What to Avoid  - Covers a few frequent mistakes you'll want to...avoid!
  • FAQs  - Guidance on first- vs. third-person, secondary literature and more.
  • Checklist  - Includes a summary of key points and a self-evaluation checklist.

Training and tools

  • The Academic Skills team has recorded a Writing the Dissertation workshop series to help you with each section of a standard dissertation, including a video on writing the method/methodology .
  • For more on methods and methodologies, you can check out USC's methodology research guide  and Huddersfield's guide to writing the methodology of an undergraduate dissertation .
  • The dissertation planner tool can help you think through the timeline for planning, research, drafting and editing.
  • iSolutions offers training and a Word template to help you digitally format and structure your dissertation.

What is the methodology?

The methodology of a dissertation is like constructing a house of cards. Having strong and stable foundations for your research relies on your ability to make informed and rational choices about the design of your study. Everything from this point on – your results and discussion –  rests on these decisions, like the bottom layer of a house of cards.

The methodology is where you explicitly state, in relevant detail, how you conducted your study in direct response to your research question(s) and/or hypotheses. You should work through the linear process of devising your study to implementing it, covering the important choices you made and any potential obstacles you faced along the way.

Methods or methodology?

Some disciplines refer to this chapter as the research methods , whilst others call it the methodology . The two are often used interchangeably, but they are slightly different:

  • The methods chapter outlines the techniques used to conduct the research and the specific steps taken throughout the research process.
  • The methodology also outlines how the research was conducted, but is particularly interested in the philosophical underpinning that shapes the research process. As indicated by the suffix, -ology , meaning the study of something, the methodology is like the study of research, as opposed to simply stating how the research was conducted.

This guide focuses on the methodology, as opposed to the methods, although the content and guidance can be tailored to a methods chapter. Every dissertation is different and every methodology has its own nuances, so ensure you adapt the content here to your research and always consult your supervisor for more detailed guidance.

What are my markers looking for?

Your markers are looking   for your understanding of the complex process behind original (see definition) research. They are assessing your ability to...

  • Demonstrate   an understanding of the impact that methodological choices can have on the reliability and validity of your findings, meaning you should engage with ‘why’ you did that, as opposed to simply ‘what’ you did.
  • Make   informed methodological choices that clearly relate to your research question(s).

But what does it mean to engage in 'original' research? Originality doesn’t strictly mean you should be inventing something entirely new. Originality comes in many forms, from updating the application of a theory, to adapting a previous experiment for new purposes – it’s about making a worthwhile contribution.

Structuring your methodology

The methodology chapter should outline the research process undertaken, from selecting the method to articulating the tool or approach adopted to analyse your results. Because you are outlining this process, it's important that you structure your methodology in a linear way, showing how certain decisions have impacted on subsequent choices.

Scroll to continue reading, or click a link below to jump immediately to that section:

The 'research onion'

To ensure you write your methodology in a linear way, it can be useful to think of the methodology in terms of layers, as shown in the figure below.

Oval diagram with these layers from outside to in: philosophy, approach, methodological choice, strategies, time horizon, and techniques/procedures.

Figure: 'Research onion' from Saunders et al. (2007).

You don't need to precisely follow these exact layers as some won't be relevant to your research. However, the layered 'out to in' structure developed by Saunders et al. (2007) is appropriate for any methodology chapter because it guides your reader through the process in a linear fashion, demonstrating how certain decisions impacted on others. For example, you need to state whether your research is qualitative, quantitative or mixed before articulating your precise research method. Likewise, you need to explain how you collected your data before you inform the reader of how you subsequently analysed that data.

Using this linear approach from 'outer' layer to 'inner' layer, the next sections will take you through the most common layers used to structure a methodology chapter.

Introduction and research outline

Like any chapter, you should open your methodology with an introduction. It's good to start by briefly restating the research problem, or gap, that you're addressing, along with your research question(s) and/or hypotheses. Following this, it's common to provide a very condensed statement that outlines the most important elements of your research design. Here's a short example:

This study adopted qualitative research through a series of semi-structured interviews with seven experienced industry professionals.

Like any other introduction, you can then provide a brief statement outlining what the chapter is about and how it's structured (e.g., an essay map ).

Restating the research problem (or gap) and your research question(s) and/or hypotheses creates a natural transition from your previous review of the literature - which helped you to identify the gap or problem - to how you are now going to address such a problem. Your markers are also going to assess the relevance and suitability of your method and methodological choices against your research question(s), so it's good to 'frame' the entire chapter around the research question(s) by bringing them to the fore.

Research philosophy

A research philosophy is an underlying belief that shapes the way research is conducted. For this reason, as featured in the 'research onion' above, the philosophy should be the outermost layer - the first methodological issue you deal with following the introduction and research outline - because every subsequent choice, from the method employed to the way you analyse data, is directly influenced by your philosophical stance.

You can say something about other philosophies, but it's best to directly relate this to your research and the philosophy you have selected - why the other philosophy isn't appropriate for you to adopt, for instance. Otherwise, explain to your reader the philosophy you have selected (using secondary literature), its underlying principles, and why this philosophy, therefore, is particularly relevant to your research.

The research philosophy is sometimes featured in a methodology chapter, but not always. It depends on the conventions within your school or discipline , so only include this if it's expected.

The reason for outlining the research philosophy is to show your understanding of the role that your chosen philosophy plays in shaping the design and approach of your research study. The philosophy you adopt also indicates your worldview (in the context of this research), which is an important way of highlighting the role you, the researcher, play in shaping new knowledge.

Research method

This is where you state whether you're doing qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods research before outlining the exact instrument or strategy (see definition) adopted for research (interviews, case study, etc.). It's also important that you explain why you have chosen that particular method and strategy. You can also explain why you're not adopting an alternate form of research, or why you haven't used a particular instrument, but keep this brief and use it to reinforce why you have chosen your method and strategy.

Your research method, more than anything else, is going to directly influence how effectively you answer your research question(s). For that reason, it's crucial that you emphasise the suitability of your chosen method and instrument for the purposes of your research.                       

Data collection

The data collection part of your methodology explain the process of how you accessed and collected your data. Using an interview as a qualitative example, this might include the criteria for selecting participants, how you recruited the participants and how and where you conducted the interviews. There is often some overlap with data collection and research method, so don't worry about this. Just make sure you get the essential information across to your reader.

The details of how you accessed and collected your data are important for replicability purposes - the ability for someone to adopt the same approach and repeat the study. It's also important to include this information for reliability and consistency purposes (see  validity and reliability  on the next tab of this guide for more).

Data analysis

After describing how you collected the data, you need to identify your chosen method of data analysis. Inevitably, this will vary depending on whether your research is qualitative or quantitative (see note below).

Qualitative research tends to be narrative-based where forms of ‘coding’ are employed to categorise and group the data into meaningful themes and patterns (Bui, 2014). Quantitative deals with numerical data meaning some form of statistical approach is taken to measure the results against the research question(s).

Tell your reader which data analysis software (such as SPSS or Atlast.ti) or method you’ve used and why, using relevant literature. Again, you can mention other data analysis tools that you haven’t used, but keep this brief and relate it to your discussion of your chosen approach. This isn’t to be confused with the results and discussion chapters where you actually state and then analyse your results. This is simply a discussion of the approach taken, how you applied this approach to your data and why you opted for this method of data analysis.

Detail of how you analysed your data helps to contextualise your results and discussion chapters. This is also a validity issue (see next tab of guide), as you need to ensure that your chosen method for data analysis helps you to answer your research question(s) and/or respond to your hypotheses. To use an example from Bui (2014: 155), 'if one of the research questions asks whether the participants changed their behaviour before and after the study, then one of the procedures for data analysis needs to be a comparison of the pre- and postdata'.

Validity and reliability

Validity simply refers to whether the research method(s) and instrument(s) applied are directly suited to meet the purposes of your research – whether they help you to answer your research question(s), or allow you to formulate a response to your hypotheses.

Validity can be separated into two forms: internal and external. The difference between the two is defined by what exists inside the study (internal) and what exists outside the study (external).

  • Internal validity is the extent to which ‘the results obtained can be attributed to the manipulation of the independent variable' (Salkind, 2011: 147).
  • External validity refers to the application of your study’s findings outside the setting of your study. This is known as generalisability , meaning to what extent are the results applicable to a wider context or population.

Reliability

Reliability refers to the consistency with which you designed and implemented your research instrument(s). The idea behind this is to ensure that someone else could replicate your study and, by applying the instrument in the exact same way, would achieve the same results. This is crucial to quantitative and scientific based research, but isn’t strictly the case with qualitative research given the subjective nature of the data.

With qualitative data, it’s important to emphasise that data was collected in a consistent way to avoid any distortions. For example, let’s say you’ve circulated a questionnaire to participants. You would want to ensure that every participant receives the exact same questionnaire with precisely the same questions and wording, unless different questionnaires are required for different members of the sample for the purposes of the research.

Ethical considerations

Any research involving human participants needs to consider ethical factors. In response, you need to show your markers that you have implemented the necessary measures to cover the relevant ethical issues. These are some of the factors that are typically included:

  • How did you gain the consent of participants, and how did you formally record this consent?
  • What measures did you take to ensure participants had enough understanding of their role to make an informed decision, including the right to withdraw at any stage?
  • What measures did you take to maintain the confidentiality of participants during the research and, potentially, for the write-up?
  • What measures did you take to store the raw data and protect it from external access and use prior to the write-up?

These are only a few examples of the ethical factors you need to write about in your methodology. Depending on the nature of your research, ethical considerations might form a significant part of your methodology chapter, or may only constitute a few sentences. Either way, it’s imperative that you show your markers that you’ve considered the relevant ethical implications of your research.

Limitations

Don’t make the mistake of ignoring the limitations of your study (see the next tab, 'What to Avoid', for more on this) – it’s a common part of research and should be confronted. Limitations of research can be diverse, but tend to be logistical issues relating to time, scope and access . Whilst accepting that your study has certain limitations, the key is to put a positive spin on it, like the example below:

Despite having a limited sample size compared to other similar studies, the number of participants is enough to provide sufficient data, whilst the in-depth nature of the interviews facilitates detailed responses from participants.

  • Bui, Y. N. (2014) How to Write a Master’s Thesis. 2dn Edtn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, N. S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 105-117.
  • Salkind, N. J. (2011) ‘Internal and external validity’, in Moutinho, L. and Hutchenson, G. D. (eds.) The SAGE Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 147-149.
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007) Research Methods for Business Students . 4th Edtn. Harlow: Pearson.

What to avoid

This portion of the guide will cover some common missteps you should try to avoid in writing your methodology.

Ignoring limitations

It might seem instinctive to hide any flaws or limitations with your research to protect yourself from criticism. However, you need to highlight any problems you encountered during the research phase, or any limitations with your approach. Your markers are expecting you to engage with these limitations and highlight the kind of impact they may have had on your research.

Just be careful that you don’t overstress these limitations. Doing so could undermine the reliability and validity of your results, and your credibility as a researcher.

Literature review of methods

Don’t mistake your methodology chapter as a detailed review of methods employed in other studies. This level of detail should, where relevant, be incorporated in the literature review chapter, instead (see our Writing the Literature Review guide ). Any reference to methodological choices made by other researchers should come into your methodology chapter, but only in support of the decisions you made.

Unnecessary detail

It’s important to be thorough in a methodology chapter. However, don’t include unnecessary levels of detail. You should provide enough detail that allows other researchers to replicate or adapt your study, but don’t bore your reader with obvious or extraneous detail.

Any materials or content that you think is worth including, but not essential in the chapter, could be included in an appendix (see definition). These don’t count towards your word count (unless otherwise stated), and they can provide further detail and context for your reader. For instance, it’s quite common to include a copy of a questionnaire in an appendix, or a list of interview questions.

Q: Should the methodology be in the past or present tense?

A: The past tense. The study has already been conducted and the methodological decisions have been implemented, meaning the chapter should be written in the past tense. For example...

Data was collected over the course of four weeks.

I informed participants of their right to withdraw at any time.

The surveys included ten questions about job satisfaction and ten questions about familial life (see Appendix).

Q: Should the methodology include secondary literature?

A: Yes, where relevant. Unlike the literature review, the methodology is driven by what you did rather than what other people have done. However, you should still draw on secondary sources, when necessary, to support your methodological decisions.

Q: Do you still need to write a methodology for secondary research?

A: Yes, although it might not form a chapter, as such. Including some detail on how you approached the research phase is always a crucial part of a dissertation, whether primary or secondary. However, depending on the nature of your research, you may not have to provide the same level of detail as you would with a primary-based study.

For example, if you’re analysing two particular pieces of literature, then you probably need to clarify how you approached the analysis process, how you use the texts (whether you focus on particular passages, for example) and perhaps why these texts are scrutinised, as opposed to others from the relevant literary canon.

In such cases, the methodology may not be a chapter, but might constitute a small part of the introduction. Consult your supervisor for further guidance.

Q: Should the methodology be in the first-person or third?

A: It’s important to be consistent , so you should use whatever you’ve been using throughout your dissertation. Third-person is more commonly accepted, but certain disciplines are happy with the use of first-person. Just remember that the first-person pronoun can be a distracting, but powerful device, so use it sparingly. Consult your supervisor for further guidance.

It’s important to remember that all research is different and, as such, the methodology chapter is likely to be very different from dissertation to dissertation. Whilst this guide has covered the most common and essential layers featured in a methodology, your methodology might be very different in terms of what you focus on, the depth of focus and the wording used.

What’s important to remember, however, is that every methodology chapter needs to be structured in a linear, layered way that guides the reader through the methodological process in sequential order. Through this, your marker can see how certain decisions have impacted on others, showing your understanding of the research process.

Here’s a final checklist for writing your methodology. Remember that not all of these points will be relevant for your methodology, so make sure you cover whatever’s appropriate for your dissertation. The asterisk (*) indicates any content that might not be relevant for your dissertation. You can download a copy of the checklist to save and edit via the Word document, below.

  • Methodology self-evaluation checklist
Aspect of Methodology Chapter Yes/Unsure/No
I have structured my methodology in a that guides the reader through the research process in sequential order.  
I have ensured that my chosen method and methodological decisions  
I have engaged with the of my study.  
I have addressed any relevant  
I have only included that allows my study to be  
I have briefly explained certain methodological were made.  

Decorative

  • << Previous: Literature Review
  • Next: Results and Discussion >>
  • Last Updated: Sep 5, 2024 12:49 PM
  • URL: https://library.soton.ac.uk/writing_the_dissertation

University of Derby

Dissertations

  • Where to start
  • Research Proposal

Primary Research

Literature Review

  • Methodology
  • Guest Blog: How to publish your research paper
  • Downloadable Resources
  • Further Reading

What is it?

A methodology describes in detail how a study was completed.

Why do I need it?

Including a methodology in your dissertation allows for the study to be replicated. Your ethical considerations are usually also considered around your dissertation section to show that you have thought carefully about the impact your research might have on others.

How do I do it?

Even if you are writing a literature review you will be expected to include a methodology section to explain how you conducted your searches. Have a look in the downloadable resources section to find a PDF  that poses questions to help you think about what you might need to include in your methodology.

There are many methods of primary research, as it is a broad term used to describe any research collected from a primary source. Primary research is usually split into qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

Qualitative

Qualitative research is usually chosen when conducting research which is related to the social sciences (Wisker, 2009). It includes methods such as interviews, focus groups and observations. These may come under terms such as ethnography, phenomenology or grounded theory. The data gathered is usually in-depth and it is likely, when conducting qualitative research, that the theory will emerge or adapt, as data is being collected (Rudestam and Newton, 2014). The downloadable resources provide more information on qualitative methods and the PDF poses questions to assist you in writing your methodology.

Quantitative

Quantitative research is analysed objectively, it assumes there are facts which can be gathered (Whisker, 2009), usually using numbers or statistics. Don't be put off by the word statistics, this can simply mean in percentages or pie charts (and we've all used them at some point). Using a quantitative method allows a researcher to gather a large amount of data. It includes methods such as questionnaires, surveys, and observations.  

Mixed Methods

A mixed methods study may include both a qualitative and quantitative approach. For example, someone might want to collect quantitative data from a questionnaire, whilst also conducting interviews to gain the depth of understanding from qualitative results.

Rudestam and Newton (2014) describe the differences between qualitative and quantitative data:

Quantitative

Qualitative

Cover Art

  • << Previous: Literature Review
  • Next: Results >>
  • Last Updated: Aug 30, 2023 1:11 PM
  • URL: https://libguides.derby.ac.uk/dissertations

Dissertations & projects: Literature-based projects

  • Research questions
  • The process of reviewing
  • Project management
  • Literature-based projects

On these pages:

“As a general rule, the introduction is usually around 5 to 10 per cent of the word limit; each chapter around 15 to 25 per cent; and the conclusion around 5 per cent.” Bryan Greetham, How to Write Your Undergraduate Dissertation

This page gives guidance on the structure of a literature-based project.   That is, a project where the data is found in existing literature rather than found through primary research. They may also include information from primary sources such as original documents or other sources.

How to structure a literature-based project

The structure of a literature-based dissertation is usually thematic, but make sure to check with your supervisor to make sure you are abiding by your department’s project specifications. A typical literature-based dissertation will be broken up into the following sections:

Abstract or summary

Acknowledgments, contents page, introduction, themed chapters.

  • Bibliography/Reference list

Use this basic structure as your document plan . Remember that you do not need to write it in the order it will finally be written in. 

For more advice on managing the order of your project, see our section on Project Management.   

If you use the template provided on our Formatting page, you will see that it already has a title page included. You just need to fill in the appropriate boxes by typing or choosing from the drop-down-lists. The information you need to provide is: 

Title page

  • Type of assignment (thesis, dissertation or independent project)
  • Partial or full fulfilment information
  • Subject area
  • Your name (and previous qualifications if applicable)
  • Month and year of submission

This may not always be required - check with your tutor.

Abstract - single page, one paragraph

  • It is  independent  of the rest of the report - it is a mini-report, which needs to make sense completely on its own.
  • References should  not  be included.
  • Nothing should appear in the abstract that is not in the rest of the report.
  • Usually between 200-300 words.
  • Write as a  single  paragraph.

It is recommended that you write your abstract  after  your report.

Contents page with list of headings and page numbers

If you choose not to use the template, then you will need to go through the document after it is written and create a list showing which heading is on which page of your document.

Purpose: To thank those who were directly involved in your work .

  • Do not confuse the acknowledgements section with a dedication - this is not where you thank your friends and relatives unless they have helped you with your manuscript.
  • Acknowledgments are about courtesy, where you thank those who were directly involved in your work, or were involved in supporting your work (technicians, tutors, other students, financial support etc).
  • This section tends to be  very brief , a few lines at the most. Identify those who provided you with the most support, and thank them appropriately.
  • At the very least, make sure you acknowledge your supervisor!!

Purpose: To state the research problem and give a brief introduction to the background literature, provide justification for your research questions and explain your methodology and main findings.

dissertation methodology literature

  • Explain what the problem you will be addressing is, what your research questions are, and why they will help address the issue.
  • Explain (and justify) your methodology - where you searched, what your keywords were, what your inclusion and exclusion criteria were,
  • Define the scope of the dissertation, explaining any limitations.
  • Lay out the structure of the dissertation, taking the reader through each section and providing any key definitions.
  • Very briefly describe what your main findings are - but leave the detail for the sections below.

It is good practice to come back to the introduction after you have finished writing up the rest of the document to ensure it sets the appropriately scene for subsequent sections.

Should you have a separate literature review chapter?

Not usually , as your project is basically a big literature review, it isn't necessary to have a separate chapter. You would normally introduce background literature in your introduction instead.

However, if your supervisor suggests a separate chapter then it could go at this point, after the main introduction (which would then not include background literature). 

For more advice on writing a literature review see the Literature Review pages on this guide.

Purpose: To present the themes you have identified in your research and explain how they contribute to answering your research questions

You will typically have 3-5 themed chapters. Each one should contain:

  • An introduction to the theme - what things it means and what it incorporates.
  • How the theme was addressed within the literature - this should be analytical not just descriptive.
  • A conclusion which shows how the theme relates to the research question(s).

Ensuring your themed chapters flow

Choosing the order of your theme chapters is an important part of the structure to your project. For example, if you study History and your project covers a topic that develops over a large time period, it may be best to order each chapter chronologically. Other subjects may have a natural narrative running through the themes. Think about how your reader will be able to follow along with your overall argument.

Although each chapter must be dedicated to a particular theme, it must link back to previous chapters and flow into the following chapter. You need to ensure they do not seem like they are unrelated to each other. There will be overlaps, mention these.

Some literature-based projects will focus on primary sources. If yours does, make sure primary sources are at the core of your paragraphs and chapters, and use secondary sources to expand and explore the theme further. 

Purpose: To present the conclusion that you have reached as a result of both the background literature review and the analysis in your thematic chapters

Conclusion in separate chapter

A conclusion summarises all the points you have previously made and it  should not  include any evidence or topics you have not included in your introduction or themed chapters. There should be no surprises.

It should be about 5-10% of your word limit so make sure you leave enough words to do it justice. There will be marks in the marking scheme specifically allocated to the strength of your conclusion which cannot be made up elsewhere.

Some conclusions will also include recommendations for practice or ideas for further research. Check with your supervisor to see if they are expecting either or both of these.

Reference list

dissertation methodology literature

It is good practice to develop a reference list whilst  writing the project, rather than leaving it until the end. This prevents a lot of searching around trying to remember where you accessed a particular source. If using primary sources, it also allows you to monitor the balance between primary and secondary sources included in the project. There is software available to help manage your references and the university officially supports RefWorks and EndNote. 

For more advice on reference management, see our Skills Guide: Referencing Software

Appendices showing appendix 1, 2 etc

  • Transcriptions
  • Correspondence
  • Ethical approval forms

If you have information that you would like to include but are finding it disrupts the main body of text as its too cumbersome, or would distract from the main arguments of your dissertation, the information can be included in the appendix section. Each appendix should be focused on one item. 

Appendices  should not include any information that is key to your topic or overall argument. 

  • << Previous: Structure
  • Next: Scientific >>
  • Last Updated: Apr 24, 2024 1:09 PM
  • URL: https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/dissertations
  • Login to LibApps
  • Library websites Privacy Policy
  • University of Hull privacy policy & cookies
  • Website terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Report a problem

The University of Hull

  • USC Libraries
  • Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

  • 6. The Methodology
  • Purpose of Guide
  • Design Flaws to Avoid
  • Independent and Dependent Variables
  • Glossary of Research Terms
  • Reading Research Effectively
  • Narrowing a Topic Idea
  • Broadening a Topic Idea
  • Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
  • Academic Writing Style
  • Applying Critical Thinking
  • Choosing a Title
  • Making an Outline
  • Paragraph Development
  • Research Process Video Series
  • Executive Summary
  • The C.A.R.S. Model
  • Background Information
  • The Research Problem/Question
  • Theoretical Framework
  • Citation Tracking
  • Content Alert Services
  • Evaluating Sources
  • Primary Sources
  • Secondary Sources
  • Tiertiary Sources
  • Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
  • Qualitative Methods
  • Quantitative Methods
  • Insiderness
  • Using Non-Textual Elements
  • Limitations of the Study
  • Common Grammar Mistakes
  • Writing Concisely
  • Avoiding Plagiarism
  • Footnotes or Endnotes?
  • Further Readings
  • Generative AI and Writing
  • USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
  • Bibliography

The methods section describes actions taken to investigate a research problem and the rationale for the application of specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information applied to understanding the problem, thereby, allowing the reader to critically evaluate a study’s overall validity and reliability. The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? And, how was it analyzed? The writing should be direct and precise and always written in the past tense.

Kallet, Richard H. "How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004): 1229-1232.

Importance of a Good Methodology Section

You must explain how you obtained and analyzed your results for the following reasons:

  • Readers need to know how the data was obtained because the method you chose affects the results and, by extension, how you interpreted their significance in the discussion section of your paper.
  • Methodology is crucial for any branch of scholarship because an unreliable method produces unreliable results and, as a consequence, undermines the value of your analysis of the findings.
  • In most cases, there are a variety of different methods you can choose to investigate a research problem. The methodology section of your paper should clearly articulate the reasons why you have chosen a particular procedure or technique.
  • The reader wants to know that the data was collected or generated in a way that is consistent with accepted practice in the field of study. For example, if you are using a multiple choice questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents a reasonable range of answers to choose from.
  • The method must be appropriate to fulfilling the overall aims of the study. For example, you need to ensure that you have a large enough sample size to be able to generalize and make recommendations based upon the findings.
  • The methodology should discuss the problems that were anticipated and the steps you took to prevent them from occurring. For any problems that do arise, you must describe the ways in which they were minimized or why these problems do not impact in any meaningful way your interpretation of the findings.
  • In the social and behavioral sciences, it is important to always provide sufficient information to allow other researchers to adopt or replicate your methodology. This information is particularly important when a new method has been developed or an innovative use of an existing method is utilized.

Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Psychology Writing Center. University of Washington; Denscombe, Martyn. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects . 5th edition. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2014; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Groups of Research Methods

There are two main groups of research methods in the social sciences:

  • The e mpirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences . This type of research focuses on objective knowledge, research questions that can be answered yes or no, and operational definitions of variables to be measured. The empirical-analytical group employs deductive reasoning that uses existing theory as a foundation for formulating hypotheses that need to be tested. This approach is focused on explanation.
  • The i nterpretative group of methods is focused on understanding phenomenon in a comprehensive, holistic way . Interpretive methods focus on analytically disclosing the meaning-making practices of human subjects [the why, how, or by what means people do what they do], while showing how those practices arrange so that it can be used to generate observable outcomes. Interpretive methods allow you to recognize your connection to the phenomena under investigation. However, the interpretative group requires careful examination of variables because it focuses more on subjective knowledge.

II.  Content

The introduction to your methodology section should begin by restating the research problem and underlying assumptions underpinning your study. This is followed by situating the methods you used to gather, analyze, and process information within the overall “tradition” of your field of study and within the particular research design you have chosen to study the problem. If the method you choose lies outside of the tradition of your field [i.e., your review of the literature demonstrates that the method is not commonly used], provide a justification for how your choice of methods specifically addresses the research problem in ways that have not been utilized in prior studies.

The remainder of your methodology section should describe the following:

  • Decisions made in selecting the data you have analyzed or, in the case of qualitative research, the subjects and research setting you have examined,
  • Tools and methods used to identify and collect information, and how you identified relevant variables,
  • The ways in which you processed the data and the procedures you used to analyze that data, and
  • The specific research tools or strategies that you utilized to study the underlying hypothesis and research questions.

In addition, an effectively written methodology section should:

  • Introduce the overall methodological approach for investigating your research problem . Is your study qualitative or quantitative or a combination of both (mixed method)? Are you going to take a special approach, such as action research, or a more neutral stance?
  • Indicate how the approach fits the overall research design . Your methods for gathering data should have a clear connection to your research problem. In other words, make sure that your methods will actually address the problem. One of the most common deficiencies found in research papers is that the proposed methodology is not suitable to achieving the stated objective of your paper.
  • Describe the specific methods of data collection you are going to use , such as, surveys, interviews, questionnaires, observation, archival research. If you are analyzing existing data, such as a data set or archival documents, describe how it was originally created or gathered and by whom. Also be sure to explain how older data is still relevant to investigating the current research problem.
  • Explain how you intend to analyze your results . Will you use statistical analysis? Will you use specific theoretical perspectives to help you analyze a text or explain observed behaviors? Describe how you plan to obtain an accurate assessment of relationships, patterns, trends, distributions, and possible contradictions found in the data.
  • Provide background and a rationale for methodologies that are unfamiliar for your readers . Very often in the social sciences, research problems and the methods for investigating them require more explanation/rationale than widely accepted rules governing the natural and physical sciences. Be clear and concise in your explanation.
  • Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure . For instance, if you propose to conduct interviews, how do you intend to select the sample population? If you are analyzing texts, which texts have you chosen, and why? If you are using statistics, why is this set of data being used? If other data sources exist, explain why the data you chose is most appropriate to addressing the research problem.
  • Provide a justification for case study selection . A common method of analyzing research problems in the social sciences is to analyze specific cases. These can be a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis that are either examined as a singular topic of in-depth investigation or multiple topics of investigation studied for the purpose of comparing or contrasting findings. In either method, you should explain why a case or cases were chosen and how they specifically relate to the research problem.
  • Describe potential limitations . Are there any practical limitations that could affect your data collection? How will you attempt to control for potential confounding variables and errors? If your methodology may lead to problems you can anticipate, state this openly and show why pursuing this methodology outweighs the risk of these problems cropping up.

NOTE:   Once you have written all of the elements of the methods section, subsequent revisions should focus on how to present those elements as clearly and as logically as possibly. The description of how you prepared to study the research problem, how you gathered the data, and the protocol for analyzing the data should be organized chronologically. For clarity, when a large amount of detail must be presented, information should be presented in sub-sections according to topic. If necessary, consider using appendices for raw data.

ANOTHER NOTE: If you are conducting a qualitative analysis of a research problem , the methodology section generally requires a more elaborate description of the methods used as well as an explanation of the processes applied to gathering and analyzing of data than is generally required for studies using quantitative methods. Because you are the primary instrument for generating the data [e.g., through interviews or observations], the process for collecting that data has a significantly greater impact on producing the findings. Therefore, qualitative research requires a more detailed description of the methods used.

YET ANOTHER NOTE:   If your study involves interviews, observations, or other qualitative techniques involving human subjects , you may be required to obtain approval from the university's Office for the Protection of Research Subjects before beginning your research. This is not a common procedure for most undergraduate level student research assignments. However, i f your professor states you need approval, you must include a statement in your methods section that you received official endorsement and adequate informed consent from the office and that there was a clear assessment and minimization of risks to participants and to the university. This statement informs the reader that your study was conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. In some cases, the approval notice is included as an appendix to your paper.

III.  Problems to Avoid

Irrelevant Detail The methodology section of your paper should be thorough but concise. Do not provide any background information that does not directly help the reader understand why a particular method was chosen, how the data was gathered or obtained, and how the data was analyzed in relation to the research problem [note: analyzed, not interpreted! Save how you interpreted the findings for the discussion section]. With this in mind, the page length of your methods section will generally be less than any other section of your paper except the conclusion.

Unnecessary Explanation of Basic Procedures Remember that you are not writing a how-to guide about a particular method. You should make the assumption that readers possess a basic understanding of how to investigate the research problem on their own and, therefore, you do not have to go into great detail about specific methodological procedures. The focus should be on how you applied a method , not on the mechanics of doing a method. An exception to this rule is if you select an unconventional methodological approach; if this is the case, be sure to explain why this approach was chosen and how it enhances the overall process of discovery.

Problem Blindness It is almost a given that you will encounter problems when collecting or generating your data, or, gaps will exist in existing data or archival materials. Do not ignore these problems or pretend they did not occur. Often, documenting how you overcame obstacles can form an interesting part of the methodology. It demonstrates to the reader that you can provide a cogent rationale for the decisions you made to minimize the impact of any problems that arose.

Literature Review Just as the literature review section of your paper provides an overview of sources you have examined while researching a particular topic, the methodology section should cite any sources that informed your choice and application of a particular method [i.e., the choice of a survey should include any citations to the works you used to help construct the survey].

It’s More than Sources of Information! A description of a research study's method should not be confused with a description of the sources of information. Such a list of sources is useful in and of itself, especially if it is accompanied by an explanation about the selection and use of the sources. The description of the project's methodology complements a list of sources in that it sets forth the organization and interpretation of information emanating from those sources.

Azevedo, L.F. et al. "How to Write a Scientific Paper: Writing the Methods Section." Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia 17 (2011): 232-238; Blair Lorrie. “Choosing a Methodology.” In Writing a Graduate Thesis or Dissertation , Teaching Writing Series. (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2016), pp. 49-72; Butin, Dan W. The Education Dissertation A Guide for Practitioner Scholars . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2010; Carter, Susan. Structuring Your Research Thesis . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012; Kallet, Richard H. “How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper.” Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004):1229-1232; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008. Methods Section. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Rudestam, Kjell Erik and Rae R. Newton. “The Method Chapter: Describing Your Research Plan.” In Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process . (Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2015), pp. 87-115; What is Interpretive Research. Institute of Public and International Affairs, University of Utah; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Methods and Materials. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College.

Writing Tip

Statistical Designs and Tests? Do Not Fear Them!

Don't avoid using a quantitative approach to analyzing your research problem just because you fear the idea of applying statistical designs and tests. A qualitative approach, such as conducting interviews or content analysis of archival texts, can yield exciting new insights about a research problem, but it should not be undertaken simply because you have a disdain for running a simple regression. A well designed quantitative research study can often be accomplished in very clear and direct ways, whereas, a similar study of a qualitative nature usually requires considerable time to analyze large volumes of data and a tremendous burden to create new paths for analysis where previously no path associated with your research problem had existed.

To locate data and statistics, GO HERE .

Another Writing Tip

Knowing the Relationship Between Theories and Methods

There can be multiple meaning associated with the term "theories" and the term "methods" in social sciences research. A helpful way to delineate between them is to understand "theories" as representing different ways of characterizing the social world when you research it and "methods" as representing different ways of generating and analyzing data about that social world. Framed in this way, all empirical social sciences research involves theories and methods, whether they are stated explicitly or not. However, while theories and methods are often related, it is important that, as a researcher, you deliberately separate them in order to avoid your theories playing a disproportionate role in shaping what outcomes your chosen methods produce.

Introspectively engage in an ongoing dialectic between the application of theories and methods to help enable you to use the outcomes from your methods to interrogate and develop new theories, or ways of framing conceptually the research problem. This is how scholarship grows and branches out into new intellectual territory.

Reynolds, R. Larry. Ways of Knowing. Alternative Microeconomics . Part 1, Chapter 3. Boise State University; The Theory-Method Relationship. S-Cool Revision. United Kingdom.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Methods and the Methodology

Do not confuse the terms "methods" and "methodology." As Schneider notes, a method refers to the technical steps taken to do research . Descriptions of methods usually include defining and stating why you have chosen specific techniques to investigate a research problem, followed by an outline of the procedures you used to systematically select, gather, and process the data [remember to always save the interpretation of data for the discussion section of your paper].

The methodology refers to a discussion of the underlying reasoning why particular methods were used . This discussion includes describing the theoretical concepts that inform the choice of methods to be applied, placing the choice of methods within the more general nature of academic work, and reviewing its relevance to examining the research problem. The methodology section also includes a thorough review of the methods other scholars have used to study the topic.

Bryman, Alan. "Of Methods and Methodology." Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3 (2008): 159-168; Schneider, Florian. “What's in a Methodology: The Difference between Method, Methodology, and Theory…and How to Get the Balance Right?” PoliticsEastAsia.com. Chinese Department, University of Leiden, Netherlands.

  • << Previous: Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
  • Next: Qualitative Methods >>
  • Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 9:40 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

  • Knowledge Base
  • Dissertation
  • What Is a Research Methodology? | Steps & Tips

What Is a Research Methodology? | Steps & Tips

Published on 25 February 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 10 October 2022.

Your research methodology discusses and explains the data collection and analysis methods you used in your research. A key part of your thesis, dissertation, or research paper, the methodology chapter explains what you did and how you did it, allowing readers to evaluate the reliability and validity of your research.

It should include:

  • The type of research you conducted
  • How you collected and analysed your data
  • Any tools or materials you used in the research
  • Why you chose these methods
  • Your methodology section should generally be written in the past tense .
  • Academic style guides in your field may provide detailed guidelines on what to include for different types of studies.
  • Your citation style might provide guidelines for your methodology section (e.g., an APA Style methods section ).

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

upload-your-document-ai-proofreader

Table of contents

How to write a research methodology, why is a methods section important, step 1: explain your methodological approach, step 2: describe your data collection methods, step 3: describe your analysis method, step 4: evaluate and justify the methodological choices you made, tips for writing a strong methodology chapter, frequently asked questions about methodology.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Your methods section is your opportunity to share how you conducted your research and why you chose the methods you chose. It’s also the place to show that your research was rigorously conducted and can be replicated .

It gives your research legitimacy and situates it within your field, and also gives your readers a place to refer to if they have any questions or critiques in other sections.

You can start by introducing your overall approach to your research. You have two options here.

Option 1: Start with your “what”

What research problem or question did you investigate?

  • Aim to describe the characteristics of something?
  • Explore an under-researched topic?
  • Establish a causal relationship?

And what type of data did you need to achieve this aim?

  • Quantitative data , qualitative data , or a mix of both?
  • Primary data collected yourself, or secondary data collected by someone else?
  • Experimental data gathered by controlling and manipulating variables, or descriptive data gathered via observations?

Option 2: Start with your “why”

Depending on your discipline, you can also start with a discussion of the rationale and assumptions underpinning your methodology. In other words, why did you choose these methods for your study?

  • Why is this the best way to answer your research question?
  • Is this a standard methodology in your field, or does it require justification?
  • Were there any ethical considerations involved in your choices?
  • What are the criteria for validity and reliability in this type of research ?

Once you have introduced your reader to your methodological approach, you should share full details about your data collection methods .

Quantitative methods

In order to be considered generalisable, you should describe quantitative research methods in enough detail for another researcher to replicate your study.

Here, explain how you operationalised your concepts and measured your variables. Discuss your sampling method or inclusion/exclusion criteria, as well as any tools, procedures, and materials you used to gather your data.

Surveys Describe where, when, and how the survey was conducted.

  • How did you design the questionnaire?
  • What form did your questions take (e.g., multiple choice, Likert scale )?
  • Were your surveys conducted in-person or virtually?
  • What sampling method did you use to select participants?
  • What was your sample size and response rate?

Experiments Share full details of the tools, techniques, and procedures you used to conduct your experiment.

  • How did you design the experiment ?
  • How did you recruit participants?
  • How did you manipulate and measure the variables ?
  • What tools did you use?

Existing data Explain how you gathered and selected the material (such as datasets or archival data) that you used in your analysis.

  • Where did you source the material?
  • How was the data originally produced?
  • What criteria did you use to select material (e.g., date range)?

The survey consisted of 5 multiple-choice questions and 10 questions measured on a 7-point Likert scale.

The goal was to collect survey responses from 350 customers visiting the fitness apparel company’s brick-and-mortar location in Boston on 4–8 July 2022, between 11:00 and 15:00.

Here, a customer was defined as a person who had purchased a product from the company on the day they took the survey. Participants were given 5 minutes to fill in the survey anonymously. In total, 408 customers responded, but not all surveys were fully completed. Due to this, 371 survey results were included in the analysis.

Qualitative methods

In qualitative research , methods are often more flexible and subjective. For this reason, it’s crucial to robustly explain the methodology choices you made.

Be sure to discuss the criteria you used to select your data, the context in which your research was conducted, and the role you played in collecting your data (e.g., were you an active participant, or a passive observer?)

Interviews or focus groups Describe where, when, and how the interviews were conducted.

  • How did you find and select participants?
  • How many participants took part?
  • What form did the interviews take ( structured , semi-structured , or unstructured )?
  • How long were the interviews?
  • How were they recorded?

Participant observation Describe where, when, and how you conducted the observation or ethnography .

  • What group or community did you observe? How long did you spend there?
  • How did you gain access to this group? What role did you play in the community?
  • How long did you spend conducting the research? Where was it located?
  • How did you record your data (e.g., audiovisual recordings, note-taking)?

Existing data Explain how you selected case study materials for your analysis.

  • What type of materials did you analyse?
  • How did you select them?

In order to gain better insight into possibilities for future improvement of the fitness shop’s product range, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 8 returning customers.

Here, a returning customer was defined as someone who usually bought products at least twice a week from the store.

Surveys were used to select participants. Interviews were conducted in a small office next to the cash register and lasted approximately 20 minutes each. Answers were recorded by note-taking, and seven interviews were also filmed with consent. One interviewee preferred not to be filmed.

Mixed methods

Mixed methods research combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. If a standalone quantitative or qualitative study is insufficient to answer your research question, mixed methods may be a good fit for you.

Mixed methods are less common than standalone analyses, largely because they require a great deal of effort to pull off successfully. If you choose to pursue mixed methods, it’s especially important to robustly justify your methods here.

Next, you should indicate how you processed and analysed your data. Avoid going into too much detail: you should not start introducing or discussing any of your results at this stage.

In quantitative research , your analysis will be based on numbers. In your methods section, you can include:

  • How you prepared the data before analysing it (e.g., checking for missing data , removing outliers , transforming variables)
  • Which software you used (e.g., SPSS, Stata or R)
  • Which statistical tests you used (e.g., two-tailed t test , simple linear regression )

In qualitative research, your analysis will be based on language, images, and observations (often involving some form of textual analysis ).

Specific methods might include:

  • Content analysis : Categorising and discussing the meaning of words, phrases and sentences
  • Thematic analysis : Coding and closely examining the data to identify broad themes and patterns
  • Discourse analysis : Studying communication and meaning in relation to their social context

Mixed methods combine the above two research methods, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches into one coherent analytical process.

Above all, your methodology section should clearly make the case for why you chose the methods you did. This is especially true if you did not take the most standard approach to your topic. In this case, discuss why other methods were not suitable for your objectives, and show how this approach contributes new knowledge or understanding.

In any case, it should be overwhelmingly clear to your reader that you set yourself up for success in terms of your methodology’s design. Show how your methods should lead to results that are valid and reliable, while leaving the analysis of the meaning, importance, and relevance of your results for your discussion section .

  • Quantitative: Lab-based experiments cannot always accurately simulate real-life situations and behaviours, but they are effective for testing causal relationships between variables .
  • Qualitative: Unstructured interviews usually produce results that cannot be generalised beyond the sample group , but they provide a more in-depth understanding of participants’ perceptions, motivations, and emotions.
  • Mixed methods: Despite issues systematically comparing differing types of data, a solely quantitative study would not sufficiently incorporate the lived experience of each participant, while a solely qualitative study would be insufficiently generalisable.

Remember that your aim is not just to describe your methods, but to show how and why you applied them. Again, it’s critical to demonstrate that your research was rigorously conducted and can be replicated.

1. Focus on your objectives and research questions

The methodology section should clearly show why your methods suit your objectives  and convince the reader that you chose the best possible approach to answering your problem statement and research questions .

2. Cite relevant sources

Your methodology can be strengthened by referencing existing research in your field. This can help you to:

  • Show that you followed established practice for your type of research
  • Discuss how you decided on your approach by evaluating existing research
  • Present a novel methodological approach to address a gap in the literature

3. Write for your audience

Consider how much information you need to give, and avoid getting too lengthy. If you are using methods that are standard for your discipline, you probably don’t need to give a lot of background or justification.

Regardless, your methodology should be a clear, well-structured text that makes an argument for your approach, not just a list of technical details and procedures.

Methodology refers to the overarching strategy and rationale of your research. Developing your methodology involves studying the research methods used in your field and the theories or principles that underpin them, in order to choose the approach that best matches your objectives.

Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect and analyse data (e.g. interviews, experiments , surveys , statistical tests ).

In a dissertation or scientific paper, the methodology chapter or methods section comes after the introduction and before the results , discussion and conclusion .

Depending on the length and type of document, you might also include a literature review or theoretical framework before the methodology.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population. Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research.

For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.

Statistical sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population. There are various sampling methods you can use to ensure that your sample is representative of the population as a whole.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, October 10). What Is a Research Methodology? | Steps & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved 9 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/methodology/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a literature review | guide, template, & examples, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide.

Banner Image

Library Guides

Dissertations 4: methodology: methodology.

  • Introduction & Philosophy
  • Methodology

Justification

Throughout your methodology chapter, and/or in a specific part of it, you should justify (identify the strengths) your methods: 

State why you think the methods you are using are the most appropriate for the research question(s)/hypothesis(es). 

Discuss not only the benefits of the methods used, but also the disadvantages or limitations, and how you overcame them. 

Possibly acknowledge alternative methods that were considered for the research and why these were disregarded. 

Include sources and references that support your choice of methods and procedures.   

Justification for your research project can stem from your literature review. For example: 

Methodologies used in other studies may contradict existing knowledge about the phenomenon, inspiring you to offer a new approach. 

The methodology another researcher employed did not adequately explain the phenomenon, leading you to develop a more accurate approach. 

The methodology other studies used was problematic in some way and you took the opportunity to rectify the issue. 

Limitations & Delimitations

At some point in your methodology chapter you should mention the delimitation and limitations of your study. 

Presenting delimitation and limitations is not a sign of weakness, rather, it's a sign of strength! It's very academic - and wise - to be aware of the limits of our own research, to know that there is only so much we can say with certainty, and to appreciate that our insights may not be applicable and generalisable to other contexts.  

Delimitation and limitations can be described as follows:  

Delimitation  = intentional choice of the researcher as to the boundary of the study - what it incudes and what it excludes. It can relate to population, location, sector, research objective, methods etc.  

Limitation = constraints that are outside the control of the researcher and will affect the outcome of the research in terms of generalisability, validity and reliability.  

Scope & Delimitations of Research

Check out this useful video on setting boundaries and narrowing down the scope of your inquiry.

In the concluding part of your methodology: 

Summarise the main factors of your research method and how these will then be employed to the analysis of the results. 

Be positive and address why, even with the limitations and weaknesses identified above, you have chosen this research method. 

You could recommend how to improve the research method in future, or what could be done in future to further this research. 

Offer a transition into the next chapter. 

Tips on Methodology Writing Style

Lastly... find below some tips on the writing style for your methodology:  

Write clearly and concisely. 

Do not stray into background info, interpretation, or irrelevant detail. 

Write from your reader’s perspective. You won’t need to explain things they already know, but you will need to paint a precise picture of your methods. 

Whilst not always possible, the methodology should be written in chronological order. 

You should use the past tense. 

Check with your supervisor if you can use the first person (“I” or “We”). Alternatively, you could state, for example “the researcher provided participants with…” 

For extra help with all aspects of study skills including how to approach methodology chapters,  appointments  are available with learning advisors on Engage. 

Appointments  are also available with an Academic Engagement Librarian to discuss any issues you might be having with research.

  • << Previous: Ethics
  • Last Updated: Sep 14, 2022 12:58 PM
  • URL: https://libguides.westminster.ac.uk/methodology-for-dissertations

CONNECT WITH US

SkillsYouNeed

  • LEARNING SKILLS
  • Writing a Dissertation or Thesis
  • Methodology

Search SkillsYouNeed:

Learning Skills:

  • A - Z List of Learning Skills
  • What is Learning?
  • Learning Approaches
  • Learning Styles
  • 8 Types of Learning Styles
  • Understanding Your Preferences to Aid Learning
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Decisions to Make Before Applying to University
  • Top Tips for Surviving Student Life
  • Living Online: Education and Learning
  • 8 Ways to Embrace Technology-Based Learning Approaches
  • Critical Thinking Skills
  • Critical Thinking and Fake News
  • Understanding and Addressing Conspiracy Theories
  • Critical Analysis
  • Study Skills
  • Exam Skills
  • How to Write a Research Proposal
  • Ethical Issues in Research
  • Dissertation: The Introduction
  • Researching and Writing a Literature Review
  • Writing your Methodology
  • Dissertation: Results and Discussion
  • Dissertation: Conclusions and Extras

Writing Your Dissertation or Thesis eBook

Writing a Dissertation or Thesis

Part of the Skills You Need Guide for Students .

  • Research Methods
  • Teaching, Coaching, Mentoring and Counselling
  • Employability Skills for Graduates

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter and start improving your life in just 5 minutes a day.

You'll get our 5 free 'One Minute Life Skills' and our weekly newsletter.

We'll never share your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Writing your Dissertation: Methodology

A key part of your dissertation or thesis is the methodology. This is not quite the same as ‘methods’.

The methodology describes the broad philosophical underpinning to your chosen research methods, including whether you are using qualitative or quantitative methods, or a mixture of both, and why.

You should be clear about the academic basis for all the choices of research methods that you have made. ' I was interested ' or ' I thought... ' is not enough; there must be good academic reasons for your choice.

What to Include in your Methodology

If you are submitting your dissertation in sections, with the methodology submitted before you actually undertake the research, you should use this section to set out exactly what you plan to do.

The methodology should be linked back to the literature to explain why you are using certain methods, and the academic basis of your choice.

If you are submitting as a single thesis, then the Methodology should explain what you did, with any refinements that you made as your work progressed. Again, it should have a clear academic justification of all the choices that you made and be linked back to the literature.

Common Research Methods for the Social Sciences

There are numerous research methods that can be used when researching scientific subjects, you should discuss which are the most appropriate for your research with your supervisor.

The following research methods are commonly used in social science, involving human subjects:

One of the most flexible and widely used methods for gaining qualitative information about people’s experiences, views and feelings is the interview.

An interview can be thought of as a guided conversation between a researcher (you) and somebody from whom you wish to learn something (often referred to as the ‘informant’).

The level of structure in an interview can vary, but most commonly interviewers follow a semi-structured format.  This means that the interviewer will develop a guide to the topics that he or she wishes to cover in the conversation, and may even write out a number of questions to ask.

However, the interviewer is free to follow different paths of conversation that emerge over the course of the interview, or to prompt the informant to clarify and expand on certain points. Therefore, interviews are particularly good tools for gaining detailed information where the research question is open-ended in terms of the range of possible answers.

Interviews are not particularly well suited for gaining information from large numbers of people. Interviews are time-consuming, and so careful attention needs to be given to selecting informants who will have the knowledge or experiences necessary to answer the research question.  

See our page: Interviews for Research for more information.

Observations

If a researcher wants to know what people do under certain circumstances, the most straightforward way to get this information is sometimes simply to watch them under those circumstances.

Observations can form a part of either quantitative or qualitative research.  For instance, if a researcher wants to determine whether the introduction of a traffic sign makes any difference to the number of cars slowing down at a dangerous curve, she or he could sit near the curve and count the number of cars that do and do not slow down.  Because the data will be numbers of cars, this is an example of quantitative observation.

A researcher wanting to know how people react to a billboard advertisement might spend time watching and describing the reactions of the people.  In this case, the data would be descriptive , and would therefore be qualitative.

There are a number of potential ethical concerns that can arise with an observation study. Do the people being studied know that they are under observation?  Can they give their consent?  If some people are unhappy with being observed, is it possible to ‘remove’ them from the study while still carrying out observations of the others around them?

See our page: Observational Research and Secondary Data for more information.

Questionnaires

If your intended research question requires you to collect standardised (and therefore comparable) information from a number of people, then questionnaires may be the best method to use.

Questionnaires can be used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, although you will not be able to get the level of detail in qualitative responses to a questionnaire that you could in an interview.

Questionnaires require a great deal of care in their design and delivery, but a well-developed questionnaire can be distributed to a much larger number of people than it would be possible to interview. 

Questionnaires are particularly well suited for research seeking to measure some parameters for a group of people (e.g., average age, percentage agreeing with a proposition, level of awareness of an issue), or to make comparisons between groups of people (e.g., to determine whether members of different generations held the same or different views on immigration).

See our page: Surveys and Survey Design for more information.

Documentary Analysis

Documentary analysis involves obtaining data from existing documents without having to question people through interview, questionnaires or observe their behaviour. Documentary analysis is the main way that historians obtain data about their research subjects, but it can also be a valuable tool for contemporary social scientists.

Documents are tangible materials in which facts or ideas have been recorded.  Typically, we think of items written or produced on paper, such as newspaper articles, Government policy records, leaflets and minutes of meetings.  Items in other media can also be the subject of documentary analysis, including films, songs, websites and photographs.

Documents can reveal a great deal about the people or organisation that produced them and the social context in which they emerged. 

Some documents are part of the public domain and are freely accessible, whereas other documents may be classified, confidential or otherwise unavailable to public access.  If such documents are used as data for research, the researcher must come to an agreement with the holder of the documents about how the contents can and cannot be used and how confidentiality will be preserved.

How to Choose your Methodology and Precise Research Methods

Your methodology should be linked back to your research questions and previous research.

Visit your university or college library and ask the librarians for help; they should be able to help you to identify the standard research method textbooks in your field. See also our section on Research Methods for some further ideas.

Such books will help you to identify your broad research philosophy, and then choose methods which relate to that. This section of your dissertation or thesis should set your research in the context of its theoretical underpinnings.

The methodology should also explain the weaknesses of your chosen approach and how you plan to avoid the worst pitfalls, perhaps by triangulating your data with other methods, or why you do not think the weakness is relevant.

For every philosophical underpinning, you will almost certainly be able to find researchers who support it and those who don’t.

Use the arguments for and against expressed in the literature to explain why you have chosen to use this methodology or why the weaknesses don’t matter here.

Structuring your Methodology

It is usually helpful to start your section on methodology by setting out the conceptual framework in which you plan to operate with reference to the key texts on that approach.

You should be clear throughout about the strengths and weaknesses of your chosen approach and how you plan to address them. You should also note any issues of which to be aware, for example in sample selection or to make your findings more relevant.

You should then move on to discuss your research questions, and how you plan to address each of them.

This is the point at which to set out your chosen research methods, including their theoretical basis, and the literature supporting them. You should make clear whether you think the method is ‘tried and tested’ or much more experimental, and what kind of reliance you could place on the results. You will also need to discuss this again in the discussion section.

Your research may even aim to test the research methods, to see if they work in certain circumstances.

You should conclude by summarising your research methods, the underpinning approach, and what you see as the key challenges that you will face in your research. Again, these are the areas that you will want to revisit in your discussion.

Your methodology, and the precise methods that you choose to use in your research, are crucial to its success.

It is worth spending plenty of time on this section to ensure that you get it right. As always, draw on the resources available to you, for example by discussing your plans in detail with your supervisor who may be able to suggest whether your approach has significant flaws which you could address in some way.

Continue to: Research Methods Designing Research

See Also: Dissertation: Results and Discussion Writing a Literature Review | Writing a Research Proposal Writing a Dissertation: The Introduction

  • Privacy Policy

Research Method

Home » Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Table of Contents

Dissertation

Dissertation

Definition:

Dissertation is a lengthy and detailed academic document that presents the results of original research on a specific topic or question. It is usually required as a final project for a doctoral degree or a master’s degree.

Dissertation Meaning in Research

In Research , a dissertation refers to a substantial research project that students undertake in order to obtain an advanced degree such as a Ph.D. or a Master’s degree.

Dissertation typically involves the exploration of a particular research question or topic in-depth, and it requires students to conduct original research, analyze data, and present their findings in a scholarly manner. It is often the culmination of years of study and represents a significant contribution to the academic field.

Types of Dissertation

Types of Dissertation are as follows:

Empirical Dissertation

An empirical dissertation is a research study that uses primary data collected through surveys, experiments, or observations. It typically follows a quantitative research approach and uses statistical methods to analyze the data.

Non-Empirical Dissertation

A non-empirical dissertation is based on secondary sources, such as books, articles, and online resources. It typically follows a qualitative research approach and uses methods such as content analysis or discourse analysis.

Narrative Dissertation

A narrative dissertation is a personal account of the researcher’s experience or journey. It typically follows a qualitative research approach and uses methods such as interviews, focus groups, or ethnography.

Systematic Literature Review

A systematic literature review is a comprehensive analysis of existing research on a specific topic. It typically follows a qualitative research approach and uses methods such as meta-analysis or thematic analysis.

Case Study Dissertation

A case study dissertation is an in-depth analysis of a specific individual, group, or organization. It typically follows a qualitative research approach and uses methods such as interviews, observations, or document analysis.

Mixed-Methods Dissertation

A mixed-methods dissertation combines both quantitative and qualitative research approaches to gather and analyze data. It typically uses methods such as surveys, interviews, and focus groups, as well as statistical analysis.

How to Write a Dissertation

Here are some general steps to help guide you through the process of writing a dissertation:

  • Choose a topic : Select a topic that you are passionate about and that is relevant to your field of study. It should be specific enough to allow for in-depth research but broad enough to be interesting and engaging.
  • Conduct research : Conduct thorough research on your chosen topic, utilizing a variety of sources, including books, academic journals, and online databases. Take detailed notes and organize your information in a way that makes sense to you.
  • Create an outline : Develop an outline that will serve as a roadmap for your dissertation. The outline should include the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
  • Write the introduction: The introduction should provide a brief overview of your topic, the research questions, and the significance of the study. It should also include a clear thesis statement that states your main argument.
  • Write the literature review: The literature review should provide a comprehensive analysis of existing research on your topic. It should identify gaps in the research and explain how your study will fill those gaps.
  • Write the methodology: The methodology section should explain the research methods you used to collect and analyze data. It should also include a discussion of any limitations or weaknesses in your approach.
  • Write the results: The results section should present the findings of your research in a clear and organized manner. Use charts, graphs, and tables to help illustrate your data.
  • Write the discussion: The discussion section should interpret your results and explain their significance. It should also address any limitations of the study and suggest areas for future research.
  • Write the conclusion: The conclusion should summarize your main findings and restate your thesis statement. It should also provide recommendations for future research.
  • Edit and revise: Once you have completed a draft of your dissertation, review it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and free of errors. Make any necessary revisions and edits before submitting it to your advisor for review.

Dissertation Format

The format of a dissertation may vary depending on the institution and field of study, but generally, it follows a similar structure:

  • Title Page: This includes the title of the dissertation, the author’s name, and the date of submission.
  • Abstract : A brief summary of the dissertation’s purpose, methods, and findings.
  • Table of Contents: A list of the main sections and subsections of the dissertation, along with their page numbers.
  • Introduction : A statement of the problem or research question, a brief overview of the literature, and an explanation of the significance of the study.
  • Literature Review : A comprehensive review of the literature relevant to the research question or problem.
  • Methodology : A description of the methods used to conduct the research, including data collection and analysis procedures.
  • Results : A presentation of the findings of the research, including tables, charts, and graphs.
  • Discussion : A discussion of the implications of the findings, their significance in the context of the literature, and limitations of the study.
  • Conclusion : A summary of the main points of the study and their implications for future research.
  • References : A list of all sources cited in the dissertation.
  • Appendices : Additional materials that support the research, such as data tables, charts, or transcripts.

Dissertation Outline

Dissertation Outline is as follows:

Title Page:

  • Title of dissertation
  • Author name
  • Institutional affiliation
  • Date of submission
  • Brief summary of the dissertation’s research problem, objectives, methods, findings, and implications
  • Usually around 250-300 words

Table of Contents:

  • List of chapters and sections in the dissertation, with page numbers for each

I. Introduction

  • Background and context of the research
  • Research problem and objectives
  • Significance of the research

II. Literature Review

  • Overview of existing literature on the research topic
  • Identification of gaps in the literature
  • Theoretical framework and concepts

III. Methodology

  • Research design and methods used
  • Data collection and analysis techniques
  • Ethical considerations

IV. Results

  • Presentation and analysis of data collected
  • Findings and outcomes of the research
  • Interpretation of the results

V. Discussion

  • Discussion of the results in relation to the research problem and objectives
  • Evaluation of the research outcomes and implications
  • Suggestions for future research

VI. Conclusion

  • Summary of the research findings and outcomes
  • Implications for the research topic and field
  • Limitations and recommendations for future research

VII. References

  • List of sources cited in the dissertation

VIII. Appendices

  • Additional materials that support the research, such as tables, figures, or questionnaires.

Example of Dissertation

Here is an example Dissertation for students:

Title : Exploring the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Academic Achievement and Well-being among College Students

This dissertation aims to investigate the impact of mindfulness meditation on the academic achievement and well-being of college students. Mindfulness meditation has gained popularity as a technique for reducing stress and enhancing mental health, but its effects on academic performance have not been extensively studied. Using a randomized controlled trial design, the study will compare the academic performance and well-being of college students who practice mindfulness meditation with those who do not. The study will also examine the moderating role of personality traits and demographic factors on the effects of mindfulness meditation.

Chapter Outline:

Chapter 1: Introduction

  • Background and rationale for the study
  • Research questions and objectives
  • Significance of the study
  • Overview of the dissertation structure

Chapter 2: Literature Review

  • Definition and conceptualization of mindfulness meditation
  • Theoretical framework of mindfulness meditation
  • Empirical research on mindfulness meditation and academic achievement
  • Empirical research on mindfulness meditation and well-being
  • The role of personality and demographic factors in the effects of mindfulness meditation

Chapter 3: Methodology

  • Research design and hypothesis
  • Participants and sampling method
  • Intervention and procedure
  • Measures and instruments
  • Data analysis method

Chapter 4: Results

  • Descriptive statistics and data screening
  • Analysis of main effects
  • Analysis of moderating effects
  • Post-hoc analyses and sensitivity tests

Chapter 5: Discussion

  • Summary of findings
  • Implications for theory and practice
  • Limitations and directions for future research
  • Conclusion and contribution to the literature

Chapter 6: Conclusion

  • Recap of the research questions and objectives
  • Summary of the key findings
  • Contribution to the literature and practice
  • Implications for policy and practice
  • Final thoughts and recommendations.

References :

List of all the sources cited in the dissertation

Appendices :

Additional materials such as the survey questionnaire, interview guide, and consent forms.

Note : This is just an example and the structure of a dissertation may vary depending on the specific requirements and guidelines provided by the institution or the supervisor.

How Long is a Dissertation

The length of a dissertation can vary depending on the field of study, the level of degree being pursued, and the specific requirements of the institution. Generally, a dissertation for a doctoral degree can range from 80,000 to 100,000 words, while a dissertation for a master’s degree may be shorter, typically ranging from 20,000 to 50,000 words. However, it is important to note that these are general guidelines and the actual length of a dissertation can vary widely depending on the specific requirements of the program and the research topic being studied. It is always best to consult with your academic advisor or the guidelines provided by your institution for more specific information on dissertation length.

Applications of Dissertation

Here are some applications of a dissertation:

  • Advancing the Field: Dissertations often include new research or a new perspective on existing research, which can help to advance the field. The results of a dissertation can be used by other researchers to build upon or challenge existing knowledge, leading to further advancements in the field.
  • Career Advancement: Completing a dissertation demonstrates a high level of expertise in a particular field, which can lead to career advancement opportunities. For example, having a PhD can open doors to higher-paying jobs in academia, research institutions, or the private sector.
  • Publishing Opportunities: Dissertations can be published as books or journal articles, which can help to increase the visibility and credibility of the author’s research.
  • Personal Growth: The process of writing a dissertation involves a significant amount of research, analysis, and critical thinking. This can help students to develop important skills, such as time management, problem-solving, and communication, which can be valuable in both their personal and professional lives.
  • Policy Implications: The findings of a dissertation can have policy implications, particularly in fields such as public health, education, and social sciences. Policymakers can use the research to inform decision-making and improve outcomes for the population.

When to Write a Dissertation

Here are some situations where writing a dissertation may be necessary:

  • Pursuing a Doctoral Degree: Writing a dissertation is usually a requirement for earning a doctoral degree, so if you are interested in pursuing a doctorate, you will likely need to write a dissertation.
  • Conducting Original Research : Dissertations require students to conduct original research on a specific topic. If you are interested in conducting original research on a topic, writing a dissertation may be the best way to do so.
  • Advancing Your Career: Some professions, such as academia and research, may require individuals to have a doctoral degree. Writing a dissertation can help you advance your career by demonstrating your expertise in a particular area.
  • Contributing to Knowledge: Dissertations are often based on original research that can contribute to the knowledge base of a field. If you are passionate about advancing knowledge in a particular area, writing a dissertation can help you achieve that goal.
  • Meeting Academic Requirements : If you are a graduate student, writing a dissertation may be a requirement for completing your program. Be sure to check with your academic advisor to determine if this is the case for you.

Purpose of Dissertation

some common purposes of a dissertation include:

  • To contribute to the knowledge in a particular field : A dissertation is often the culmination of years of research and study, and it should make a significant contribution to the existing body of knowledge in a particular field.
  • To demonstrate mastery of a subject: A dissertation requires extensive research, analysis, and writing, and completing one demonstrates a student’s mastery of their subject area.
  • To develop critical thinking and research skills : A dissertation requires students to think critically about their research question, analyze data, and draw conclusions based on evidence. These skills are valuable not only in academia but also in many professional fields.
  • To demonstrate academic integrity: A dissertation must be conducted and written in accordance with rigorous academic standards, including ethical considerations such as obtaining informed consent, protecting the privacy of participants, and avoiding plagiarism.
  • To prepare for an academic career: Completing a dissertation is often a requirement for obtaining a PhD and pursuing a career in academia. It can demonstrate to potential employers that the student has the necessary skills and experience to conduct original research and make meaningful contributions to their field.
  • To develop writing and communication skills: A dissertation requires a significant amount of writing and communication skills to convey complex ideas and research findings in a clear and concise manner. This skill set can be valuable in various professional fields.
  • To demonstrate independence and initiative: A dissertation requires students to work independently and take initiative in developing their research question, designing their study, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. This demonstrates to potential employers or academic institutions that the student is capable of independent research and taking initiative in their work.
  • To contribute to policy or practice: Some dissertations may have a practical application, such as informing policy decisions or improving practices in a particular field. These dissertations can have a significant impact on society, and their findings may be used to improve the lives of individuals or communities.
  • To pursue personal interests: Some students may choose to pursue a dissertation topic that aligns with their personal interests or passions, providing them with the opportunity to delve deeper into a topic that they find personally meaningful.

Advantage of Dissertation

Some advantages of writing a dissertation include:

  • Developing research and analytical skills: The process of writing a dissertation involves conducting extensive research, analyzing data, and presenting findings in a clear and coherent manner. This process can help students develop important research and analytical skills that can be useful in their future careers.
  • Demonstrating expertise in a subject: Writing a dissertation allows students to demonstrate their expertise in a particular subject area. It can help establish their credibility as a knowledgeable and competent professional in their field.
  • Contributing to the academic community: A well-written dissertation can contribute new knowledge to the academic community and potentially inform future research in the field.
  • Improving writing and communication skills : Writing a dissertation requires students to write and present their research in a clear and concise manner. This can help improve their writing and communication skills, which are essential for success in many professions.
  • Increasing job opportunities: Completing a dissertation can increase job opportunities in certain fields, particularly in academia and research-based positions.

About the author

' src=

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

References in Research

References in Research – Types, Examples and...

Critical Analysis

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

Informed Consent in Research

Informed Consent in Research – Types, Templates...

Research Approach

Research Approach – Types Methods and Examples

Purpose of Research

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Survey Instruments

Survey Instruments – List and Their Uses

  • +44 (0) 207 391 9032

Recent Posts

What is a literature review definition, types, and examples.

  • Why Is Your CV Getting Rejected and How to Avoid It
  • Where to Find Images for Presentations
  • What Is an Internship? Everything You Should Know
  • How Long Should a Thesis Statement Be?
  • How to Write a Character Analysis Essay
  • Best Colours for Your PowerPoint Presentation: Top Colour Combinations
  • How to Write a Nursing Essay – With Examples
  • Top 5 Essential Skills You Should Build As An International Student
  • How Professional Editing Services Can Take Your Writing to the Next Level
  • Academic News
  • Custom Essays
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Essay Marking
  • Essay Writing
  • Essay Writing Companies
  • Model Essays
  • Model Exam Answers
  • Oxbridge Essays Updates
  • PhD Writing
  • Significant Academics
  • Student News
  • Study Skills
  • University Applications
  • University Essays
  • University Life
  • Writing Tips

Since 2006, Oxbridge Essays has been the UK’s leading paid essay-writing and dissertation service

We have helped 10,000s of undergraduate, Masters and PhD students to maximise their grades in essays, dissertations, model-exam answers, applications and other materials. If you would like a free chat about your project with one of our UK staff, then please just reach out on one of the methods below.

A literature review is an essential part of any academic research paper, thesis, or dissertation. It provides a thorough examination of existing research on a particular topic, allowing the researcher to identify gaps, areas of agreement or disagreement, and emerging trends in the field. In this post, we’ll delve into the definition of a literature review, explore the different types of literature reviews, and provide examples of literature review structures that can guide your own work. Additionally, we’ll offer tips on how to craft a compelling literature review that strengthens the foundation of your research.

Literature Review Meaning

The term "literature review" refers to a comprehensive survey of the scholarly works, books, journal articles, and other sources relevant to a particular research topic. Its primary purpose is to offer a critical evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. The literature review helps set the context for the research question, showing what has already been explored and where gaps in knowledge or methodological limitations may exist. By examining various sources, you can assess how your research fits into the broader conversation within your field. The literature review also provides the foundation for your argument, helping to justify the importance of your research and explain how it contributes to the ongoing academic discussion.

Why Is a Literature Review Important?

A literature review is not just a summary of previous research but a critical analysis of the work that has been done in a particular area of study. It helps demonstrate your understanding of the topic and situates your work within the existing academic landscape. By conducting a literature review, you ensure that your research is not redundant and identify the unique contributions your study can make. Furthermore, the literature review informs your methodology, highlighting which methods have been successful in previous studies and which have encountered limitations. By understanding what has worked before, you can avoid potential pitfalls and build upon the successes of earlier researchers.

Literature Review Structure

The structure of a literature review can vary depending on the nature of your research and the field of study. However, the most common literature review structure includes several key components:

  • Introduction :This section outlines the scope of the literature review, defines the key terms, and states the overall purpose of the review. It provides the reader with an understanding of what the review will cover.
  • Thematic Organisation : The literature is often organised thematically, grouping together works that address similar aspects of the research topic. Themes can relate to theoretical approaches, methodologies, or different interpretations of key issues.
  • Critical Evaluation : The body of the literature review should not only summarise the existing research but also critically evaluate it. This might involve identifying strengths and weaknesses in methodologies, assessing the reliability of findings, and discussing how well the research supports the claims made.
  • Conclusion : The conclusion should summarise the main findings of the review, restate the key themes, and highlight gaps in the research that your study will address. It should also reflect on how the literature review has shaped your own research design.

Types of Literature Reviews

There are several different forms of literature reviews, each with a distinct focus and structure. Understanding these types can help you choose the approach that best fits your research needs. Here are some of the most common types of literature reviews:

  • Narrative Literature Review : This is the most traditional form of literature review. It provides a comprehensive summary and analysis of the literature on a particular topic. Narrative reviews are often broad in scope and provide an overview of key themes and trends.
  • Systematic Literature Review : This type of review involves a rigorous, structured process that aims to identify all relevant studies on a specific research question. Systematic reviews follow a clearly defined methodology, including specific criteria for selecting and analysing studies. They are commonly used in fields such as healthcare, where a comprehensive synthesis of evidence is needed.
  • Scoping Review : Clearly outline your main argument or position. This should guide the direction of your essay.
  • Scoping Review : A scoping review is used to map the key concepts, sources, and evidence in a research area. It is often the first step before a systematic review and is useful for identifying gaps in the literature and guiding further research.
  • Meta-Analysis : This is a form of literature review that uses statistical techniques to combine the results of multiple studies. Meta-analyses are typically used to provide an overall estimate of the effect size for a particular intervention or phenomenon.
  • Integrative Review : An integrative review synthesises qualitative and quantitative data to provide a more holistic view of the research on a particular topic. It aims to generate new perspectives by integrating findings from different types of studies.
  • Critical Review : This type of literature review goes beyond merely describing the literature. A critical review analyses and synthesises the research, evaluating its strengths and weaknesses and offering new insights and perspectives on the topic.

Short Example of a Literature Review

Below is an example of the literature review from a dissertation on climate change policies. The example demonstrates how to structure a literature review and critically engage with the literature:

Introduction of the Literature Review

Climate change has been a topic of growing concern over the past few decades, with numerous policies introduced globally to mitigate its effects. This review examines the existing literature on climate change policies, focusing on the effectiveness of carbon pricing, renewable energy subsidies, and regulatory approaches. The review aims to highlight the strengths and limitations of these policies and identify gaps in the research that future studies should address.

Thematic Organisation

The literature is organised into three main themes: carbon pricing mechanisms, renewable energy subsidies, and regulatory approaches to emissions reduction. Each theme is analysed in detail, examining the key findings of previous research and assessing the impact of these policies on greenhouse gas emissions.

Critical Evaluation

The review finds that while carbon pricing mechanisms have been effective in reducing emissions in some contexts, their success is heavily dependent on political and economic factors. Renewable energy subsidies have contributed to significant increases in renewable energy capacity, but their long-term sustainability remains in question. Regulatory approaches, while often politically contentious, have proven to be effective in certain jurisdictions.

The literature review concludes that although significant progress has been made in the development of climate change policies, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts of these policies and to explore new approaches that may be more effective in reducing emissions.

Key Considerations

Writing a literature review can be a complex task, but it is a vital part of the research process. By understanding the meaning of a literature review, familiarising yourself with different forms of literature reviews, and following a clear structure, you can create a review that enhances your research project and demonstrates your knowledge of the field.

Top 10 tips for writing a dissertation methodology

Advice for successfully writing a dissertation, how to structure your dissertation in 2024, writing services.

  • Essay Plans
  • Critical Reviews
  • Literature Reviews
  • Presentations
  • Dissertation Title Creation
  • Dissertation Proposals
  • Dissertation Chapters
  • PhD Proposals
  • Journal Publication
  • CV Writing Service
  • Business Proofreading Services

Editing Services

  • Proofreading Service
  • Editing Service
  • Academic Editing Service

Additional Services

  • Marking Services
  • Consultation Calls
  • Personal Statements
  • Tutoring Services

Our Company

  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Become a Writer

Terms & Policies

  • Fair Use Policy
  • Policy for Students in England
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Editing Service Examples
  • [email protected]
  • Contact Form

Payment Methods

Cryptocurrency payments.

Southern New Hampshire University

Online Students

For All Online Programs

International Students

On Campus, need or have Visa

Campus Students

For All Campus Programs

What a Thesis Paper is and How to Write One

A student sitting at her laptop working on her college thesis paper.

From choosing a topic and conducting research to crafting a strong argument, writing a thesis paper can be a rewarding experience.

It can also be a challenging experience. If you've never written a thesis paper before, you may not know where to start. You may not even be sure exactly what a thesis paper is. But don't worry; the right support and resources can help you navigate this writing process.

What is a Thesis Paper?

Shana Chartier,  director of information literacy at SNHU.

A thesis paper is a type of academic essay that you might write as a graduation requirement for certain bachelor's, master's or honors programs. Thesis papers present your own original research or analysis on a specific topic related to your field.

“In some ways, a thesis paper can look a lot like a novella,” said Shana Chartier , director of information literacy at Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU). “It’s too short to be a full-length novel, but with the standard size of 40-60 pages (for a bachelor’s) and 60-100 pages (for a master’s), it is a robust exploration of a topic, explaining one’s understanding of a topic based on personal research.”

Chartier has worked in academia for over 13 years and at SNHU for nearly eight. In her role as an instructor and director, Chartier has helped to guide students through the writing process, like editing and providing resources.

Chartier has written and published academic papers such as "Augmented Reality Gamifies the Library: A Ride Through the Technological Frontier" and "Going Beyond the One-Shot: Spiraling Information Literacy Across Four Years." Both of these academic papers required Chartier to have hands-on experience with the subject matter. Like a thesis paper, they also involved hypothesizing and doing original research to come to a conclusion.

“When writing a thesis paper, the importance of staying organized cannot be overstated,” said Chartier. “Mapping out each step of the way, making firm and soft deadlines... and having other pairs of eyes on your work to ensure academic accuracy and clean editing are crucial to writing a successful paper.”

How Do I Choose a Topic For My Thesis Paper?

Rochelle Attari, a peer tutor at SNHU.

What your thesis paper is for will determine some of the specific requirements and steps you might take, but the first step is usually the same: Choosing a topic.

“Choosing a topic can be daunting," said Rochelle Attari , a peer tutor at SNHU. "But if (you) stick with a subject (you're) interested in... choosing a topic is much more manageable.”

Similar to a thesis, Attari recently finished the capstone  for her bachelor’s in psychology . Her bachelor’s concentration is in forensics, and her capstone focused on the topic of using a combined therapy model for inmates who experience substance abuse issues to reduce recidivism.

“The hardest part was deciding what I wanted to focus on,” Attari said. “But once I nailed down my topic, each milestone was more straightforward.”

In her own writing experience, Attari said brainstorming was an important step when choosing her topic. She recommends writing down different ideas on a piece of paper and doing some preliminary research on what’s already been written on your topic.

By doing this exercise, you can narrow or broaden your ideas until you’ve found a topic you’re excited about. " Brainstorming is essential when writing a paper and is not a last-minute activity,” Attari said.

How Do I Structure My Thesis Paper?

An icon of a white-outlined checklist with three items checked off

Thesis papers tend to have a standard format with common sections as the building blocks.

While the structure Attari describes below will work for many theses, it’s important to double-check with your program to see if there are any specific requirements. Writing a thesis for a Master of Fine Arts, for example, might actually look more like a fiction novel.

According to Attari, a thesis paper is often structured with the following major sections:

Introduction

  • Literature review
  • Methods, results

Now, let’s take a closer look at what each different section should include.

A blue and white icon of a pencil writing on lines

Your introduction is your opportunity to present the topic of your thesis paper. In this section, you can explain why that topic is important. The introduction is also the place to include your thesis statement, which shows your stance in the paper.

Attari said that writing an introduction can be tricky, especially when you're trying to capture your reader’s attention and state your argument.

“I have found that starting with a statement of truth about a topic that pertains to an issue I am writing about typically does the trick,” Attari said. She demonstrated this advice in an example introduction she wrote for a paper on the effects of daylight in Alaska:

In the continental United States, we can always count on the sun rising and setting around the same time each day, but in Alaska, during certain times of the year, the sun rises and does not set for weeks. Research has shown that the sun provides vitamin D and is an essential part of our health, but little is known about how daylight twenty-four hours a day affects the circadian rhythm and sleep.

In the example Attari wrote, she introduces the topic and informs the reader what the paper will cover. Somewhere in her intro, she said she would also include her thesis statement, which might be:

Twenty-four hours of daylight over an extended period does not affect sleep patterns in humans and is not the cause of daytime fatigue in northern Alaska .

Literature Review

In the literature review, you'll look at what information is already out there about your topic. “This is where scholarly articles  about your topic are essential,” said Attari. “These articles will help you find the gap in research that you have identified and will also support your thesis statement."

Telling your reader what research has already been done will help them see how your research fits into the larger conversation. Most university libraries offer databases of scholarly/peer-reviewed articles that can be helpful in your search.

In the methods section of your thesis paper, you get to explain how you learned what you learned. This might include what experiment you conducted as a part of your independent research.

“For instance,” Attari said, “if you are a psychology major and have identified a gap in research on which therapies are effective for anxiety, your methods section would consist of the number of participants, the type of experiment and any other particulars you would use for that experiment.”

In this section, you'll explain the results of your study. For example, building on the psychology example Attari outlined, you might share self-reported anxiety levels for participants trying different kinds of therapies. To help you communicate your results clearly, you might include data, charts, tables or other visualizations.

The discussion section of your thesis paper is where you will analyze and interpret the results you presented in the previous section. This is where you can discuss what your findings really mean or compare them to the research you found in your literature review.

The discussion section is your chance to show why the data you collected matters and how it fits into bigger conversations in your field.

The conclusion of your thesis paper is your opportunity to sum up your argument and leave your reader thinking about why your research matters.

Attari breaks the conclusion down into simple parts. “You restate the original issue and thesis statement, explain the experiment's results and discuss possible next steps for further research,” she said.

Find Your Program

Resources to help write your thesis paper.

an icon of a computer's keyboard

While your thesis paper may be based on your independent research, writing it doesn’t have to be a solitary process. Asking for help and using the resources that are available to you can make the process easier.

If you're writing a thesis paper, some resources Chartier encourages you to use are:

  • Citation Handbooks: An online citation guide or handbook can help you ensure your citations are correct. APA , MLA and Chicago styles have all published their own guides.
  • Citation Generators: There are many citation generator tools that help you to create citations. Some — like RefWorks — even let you directly import citations from library databases as you research.
  • Your Library's Website: Many academic and public libraries allow patrons to access resources like databases or FAQs. Some FAQs at the SNHU library that might be helpful in your thesis writing process include “ How do I read a scholarly article? ” or “ What is a research question and how do I develop one? ”

It can also be helpful to check out what coaching or tutoring options are available through your school. At SNHU, for example, the Academic Support Center offers writing and grammar workshops , and students can access 24/7 tutoring and 1:1 sessions with peer tutors, like Attari.

"Students can even submit their papers and receive written feedback... like revisions and editing suggestions," she said.

If you are writing a thesis paper, there are many resources available to you. It's a long paper, but with the right mindset and support, you can successfully navigate the process.

“Pace yourself,” said Chartier. “This is a marathon, not a sprint. Setting smaller goals to get to the big finish line can make the process seem less daunting, and remember to be proud of yourself and celebrate your accomplishment once you’re done. Writing a thesis is no small task, and it’s important work for the scholarly community.”

A degree can change your life. Choose your program  from 200+ SNHU degrees that can take you where you want to go.

Meg Palmer ’18 is a writer and scholar by trade who loves reading, riding her bike and singing in a barbershop quartet. She earned her bachelor’s degree in English, language and literature at Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) and her master’s degree in writing, rhetoric and discourse at DePaul University (’20). While attending SNHU, she served as the editor-in-chief of the campus student newspaper, The Penmen Press, where she deepened her passion for writing. Meg is an adjunct professor at Johnson and Wales University, where she teaches first year writing, honors composition, and public speaking. Connect with her on LinkedIn .

Explore more content like this article

An icon of a college diploma wrapped in blue and yellow ribbon.

Dual Degree vs. Double Major: What's the Difference?

A person with a laptop and notebook, considering the difference between a bachelor's degree and a master's degree.

What is the Difference Between Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees?

 A student holding a stack of books in a library working on academic referencing for their research paper.

Academic Referencing: How to Cite a Research Paper

About southern new hampshire university.

Two students walking in front of Monadnock Hall

SNHU is a nonprofit, accredited university with a mission to make high-quality education more accessible and affordable for everyone.

Founded in 1932, and online since 1995, we’ve helped countless students reach their goals with flexible, career-focused programs . Our 300-acre campus in Manchester, NH is home to over 3,000 students, and we serve over 135,000 students online. Visit our about SNHU  page to learn more about our mission, accreditations, leadership team, national recognitions and awards.

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

dissertation methodology literature

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Agility and resilience in supply chains: investigating their roles in enhancing financial performance.

dissertation methodology literature

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. theoretical framework, 2.2. hypotheses development, 2.2.1. supply chain management (scm) and financial performance (fp), 2.2.2. the moderating role of agility in the relationship between scm and fp, 2.2.3. interaction of sca and scres in the relationship between scm and fp.

  • To ensure that the damaged system is restored to its desired state within an optimal period and at an optimal cost level;
  • To reduce the effects of a possible disturbance by changing the effectiveness level of a potential threat.

3. Methodology

3.1. research design, 3.2. data collection and sampling, 3.3. measurement of variables, 3.4. data analysis techniques, 4.1. descriptive statistics of the sample, 4.2. exploratory factor analysis results, 4.3. confirmatory factor analysis results, 4.4. hayes process macro model 3 results, 5. conclusions and discussion, limitations and recommendations for the future studies, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

Collaboration with suppliers
ALL1The company confirms communication openness with the basic suppliers.
ALL2The company deals with its suppliers based on the partnership.
ALL3The company works to engage the basic suppliers in process of developing its products and services.
ALL4The company’s strategy depends on building good relationships with the basic suppliers.
Customer Relationship Management
CRM1Customer satisfaction is a good which the company seeks for.
CRM2In the company there is a specialized division for the customer’s service.
CRM3The company deals with the customers notes and complaints in an appropriate way.
CRM4The company keeps a complete database about the customers.
Logistics
LOG1Does the company respond to the orders from time of receiving the order and during its transportation and till handling the bill and receiving the financial merits?
LOG2Is there a system in the company for accuracy and complete orders—the absence of returned orders?
LOG3Logistics management in the company includes planning, scheduling the productions, and monitoring them.
LOG4Logistic management includes all planning and implementation levels (The Executive and Tactical Strategy).
Flow Information and Knowledge Sharing
INF1The company possesses an electronic system to speed up the information exchange internally.
INF2The company uses the electronic networks for exchanging information with the customers.
INF3The company uses the electronic networks to exchange information with the suppliers.
INF4The company shares the knowledge and the information with the suppliers in building its plans.
SCA1Our supply chain is able to respond to changes in demand without overstock or lost sales.
SCA2Our supply chain is capable of forecasting market demand and responding to real market demand.
SCA3Joint planning with suppliers is important in purchasing, production, and logistics.
SCA4Information integration with suppliers, logistic service providers, and customers in the supply chain is important.
SCA5Improving our level of customer service is a high priority.
SCA6Improving delivery reliability is a high priority.
SCA7Improving responsiveness to changing market needs is a high priority.
SCA8Inventory and demand levels are visible throughout the supply chain
SCRES1We are able to cope with changes brought by the supply chain disruption.
SCRES2We are able to adapt to supply chain disruption easily.
SCRES3We are able to provide a quick response to supply chain disruption.
SCRES4We are able to maintain high situational awareness at all times.
FP1Over the past three years, our financial performance has been outstanding.
FP2Over the past three years, our financial performance has exceeded our competitors’.
FP3Over the past three years, our sales growth has been outstanding.
FP4Over the past three years, we have been more profitable than our competitors.
FP5Over the past three years, our sales growth has exceeded our competitors’.
  • Kazancoglu, I.; Ozbiltekin-Pala, M.; Kumar Mangla, S.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Jabeen, F. Role of Flexibility, Agility and Responsiveness for Sustainable Supply Chain Resilience during COVID-19. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 362 , 132431. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yu, W.; Jacobs, M.A.; Chavez, R.; Yang, J. Dynamism, Disruption Orientation, and Resilience in the Supply Chain and the Impacts on Financial Performance: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 218 , 352–362. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, Y.; Zobel, C.W. Exploring Supply Chain Network Resilience in the Presence of the Ripple Effect. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 228 , 107693. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yu, M.; Zhang, R. Understanding the Recent Sino-U.S. Trade Conflict. China Econ. J. 2019 , 12 , 160–174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gereffi, G. What Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Teach Us about Global Value Chains? The Case of Medical Supplies. J. Int. Bus. Policy 2020 , 3 , 287–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Craighead, C.W.; Ketchen, D.J., Jr.; Darby, J.L. Pandemics and Supply Chain Management Research: Toward a Theoretical Toolbox*. Decis. Sci. 2020 , 51 , 838–866. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • de Borba, J.C.R.; Trabasso, L.G.; Pessôa, M.V.P. Agile Management in Product Development. Res.-Technol. Manag. 2019 , 62 , 63–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Alsmairat, M.A.K.; AL-Shboul, M.A. Enabling Supply Chain Efficacy through Supply Chain Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity: Empirical Study from Middle East Region—A Moderated-Mediation Model. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2023 , 34 , 917–936. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Milewska, B.; Milewski, D. Implications of Increasing Fuel Costs for Supply Chain Strategy. Energies 2022 , 15 , 6934. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sodhi, M.S.; Tang, C.S. Extending AAA Capabilities to Meet PPP Goals in Supply Chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021 , 30 , 625–632. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Azadegan, A.; Mellat Parast, M.; Lucianetti, L.; Nishant, R.; Blackhurst, J. Supply Chain Disruptions and Business Continuity: An Empirical Assessment. Decis. Sci. 2020 , 51 , 38–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Birkie, S.E.; Trucco, P. Do Not Expect Others Do What You Should! Supply Chain Complexity and Mitigation of the Ripple Effect of Disruptions. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020 , 31 , 123–144. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Katsaliaki, K.; Galetsi, P.; Kumar, S. Supply Chain Disruptions and Resilience: A Major Review and Future Research Agenda. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022 , 319 , 965–1002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Swafford, P.M.; Ghosh, S.; Murthy, N. Achieving Supply Chain Agility through IT Integration and Flexibility. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008 , 116 , 288–297. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Yawson, D.E.; Yamoah, F.A. Review of Strategic Agility: A Holistic Framework for Fresh Produce Supply Chain Disruptions. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 14977. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Allaoui, H.; Guo, Y.; Sarkis, J. Decision Support for Collaboration Planning in Sustainable Supply Chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 229 , 761–774. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhou, H.; Benton, W.C. Supply Chain Practice and Information Sharing. J. Oper. Manag. 2007 , 25 , 1348–1365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chowdhury, A.H.M.Y.; Islam, N. Supply Chain Management and Operational Performance: A Critical Evaluation of Available Literature. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Manag. Sci. 2022 , 2 , 235–251. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Jahed, M.A.; Quaddus, M.; Suresh, N.C.; Salam, M.A.; Khan, E.A. Direct and Indirect Influences of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage in Fast Fashion Manufacturing Industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2022 , 33 , 598–617. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Mukhsin, M.; Suryanto, T. The Effect of Sustainable Supply Chain Management on Company Performance Mediated by Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 818. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Leuschner, R.; Rogers, D.S.; Charvet, F.F. A Meta-Analysis of Supply Chain Integration and Firm Performance. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2013 , 49 , 34–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pfohl, H.-C.; Köhler, H.; Thomas, D. State of the Art in Supply Chain Risk Management Research: Empirical and Conceptual Findings and a Roadmap for the Implementation in Practice. Logist. Res. 2010 , 2 , 33–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ponis, S.T.; Koronis, E. Supply Chain Resilience: Definition Of Concept And Its Formative Elements. J. Appl. Bus. Res. JABR 2012 , 28 , 921–930. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aldrighetti, R.; Battini, D.; Ivanov, D.; Zennaro, I. Costs of Resilience and Disruptions in Supply Chain Network Design Models: A Review and Future Research Directions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021 , 235 , 108103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Blecker, T.; Kersten, W.; Lüthje, C. Innovative Process Optimization Methods in Logistics: Emerging Trends, Concepts and Technologies ; Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG: Berlin, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-503-12683-5. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mason-Jones, R.; Naylor, B.; Towill, D.R. Engineering the Leagile Supply Chain. Int. J. Agile Manag. Syst. 2000 , 2 , 54–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aitken, J.; Christopher, M.; Towill, D. Understanding, Implementing and Exploiting Agility and Leanness. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2002 , 5 , 59–74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Martin, C.; Towill, D.R. Supply Chain Migration from Lean and Functional to Agile and Customised. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2000 , 5 , 206–213. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tufan, C.; Kılıç, Y. Borsa istanbul’da işlem gören lojistik işletmelerinin finansal performanslarinin topsis ve vikor yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmesi. Cumhur. Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilim. Derg. 2019 , 20 , 119–137. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Carvalho, H.; Azevedo, S.G.; Cruz-Machado, V. Agile and Resilient Approaches to Supply Chain Management: Influence on Performance and Competitiveness. Logist. Res. 2012 , 4 , 49–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Oh, S.; Ryu, Y.U.; Yang, H. Interaction Effects between Supply Chain Capabilities and Information Technology on Firm Performance. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2019 , 20 , 91–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shi, M.; Yu, W. Supply Chain Management and Financial Performance: Literature Review and Future Directions. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2013 , 33 , 1283–1317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kale, E.; Aknar, A.; Başar, Ö. Absorptive Capacity and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Strategic Agility. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019 , 78 , 276–283. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Penrose, E.T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm , 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1995; ISBN 978-0-19-828977-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Peteraf, M.A. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strateg. Manag. J. 1993 , 14 , 179–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hitt, M.A.; Ireland, R.D.; Hoskisson, R.E. Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization, Concepts , 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Mason, OH, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-324-58112-6. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Barney, J.B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. In Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management ; Baum, J.A.C., Dobbin, F., Eds.; Advances in Strategic Management; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bradford, UK, 2000; Volume 17, pp. 203–227. ISBN 978-1-84950-051-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998 , 23 , 660–679. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Oliver, C. Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997 , 18 , 697–713. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1990 , 68 , 79–91. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Antoni, D.; Jie, F.; Abareshi, A. Critical Factors in Information Technology Capability for Enhancing Firm’s Environmental Performance: Case of Indonesian ICT Sector. Int. J. Agile Syst. Manag. 2020 , 13 , 159. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Boxall, P. Achieving Competitive Advantage through Human Resource Strategy: Towards a Theory of Industry Dynamics. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 1998 , 8 , 265–288. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Helfat, C.E.; Finkelstein, S.; Mitchell, W.; Peteraf, M.; Singh, H.; Teece, D.; Winter, S.G. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations , 1st ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-4051-3575-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Luo, Y. Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion. J. World Bus. 2000 , 35 , 355–378. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997 , 18 , 509–533. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Eisenhardt, K.M.; Martin, J.A. Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strateg. Manag. J. 2000 , 21 , 1105–1121. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ferreira, J.; Coelho, A.; Moutinho, L. Dynamic Capabilities, Creativity and Innovation Capability and Their Impact on Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Technovation 2020 , 92–93 , 102061. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Khan, M.S.; Elahi, N.S.; Abid, G. Workplace Incivility and Job Satisfaction: Mediation of Subjective Well-Being and Moderation of Forgiveness Climate in Health Care Sector. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2021 , 11 , 1107–1119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Nguyen, P.V.; Huynh, H.T.N.; Lam, L.N.H.; Le, T.B.; Nguyen, N.H.X. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on SMEs’ Performance: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Factors. Heliyon 2021 , 7 , e07326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Peng, M.Y.-P.; Zhang, Z.; Yen, H.-Y.; Yang, S.-M. Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance in the High-Tech Industry: Quadratic and Moderating Effects under Differing Ambidexterity Levels. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 5004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pezeshkan, A.; Fainshmidt, S.; Nair, A.; Lance Frazier, M.; Markowski, E. An Empirical Assessment of the Dynamic Capabilities–Performance Relationship. J. Bus. Res. 2016 , 69 , 2950–2956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Matarazzo, M.; Penco, L.; Profumo, G.; Quaglia, R. Digital Transformation and Customer Value Creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2021 , 123 , 642–656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kryscynski, D.; Coff, R.; Campbell, B. Charting a Path between Firm-specific Incentives and Human Capital-based Competitive Advantage. Strateg. Manag. J. 2021 , 42 , 386–412. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Fainshmidt, S.; Wenger, L.; Pezeshkan, A.; Mallon, M.R. When Do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit. J. Manag. Stud. 2019 , 56 , 758–787. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Mikalef, P.; Boura, M.; Lekakos, G.; Krogstie, J. Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Innovation: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Effect of the Environment. Br. J. Manag. 2019 , 30 , 272–298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Linde, L.; Sjödin, D.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J. Dynamic Capabilities for Ecosystem Orchestration A Capability-Based Framework for Smart City Innovation Initiatives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021 , 166 , 120614. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Teece, D.J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007 , 28 , 1319–1350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Awwad, A.S.; Ababneh, O.M.A.; Karasneh, M. The Mediating Impact of IT Capabilities on the Association between Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: The Case of the Jordanian IT Sector. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2022 , 23 , 315–330. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Hamidu, Z.; Boachie-Mensah, F.O.; Issau, K. Supply Chain Resilience and Performance of Manufacturing Firms: Role of Supply Chain Disruption. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2023 , 34 , 361–382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Piprani, A.Z.; Jaafar, N.I.; Ali, S.M.; Mubarik, M.S.; Shahbaz, M. Multi-Dimensional Supply Chain Flexibility and Supply Chain Resilience: The Role of Supply Chain Risks Exposure. Oper. Manag. Res. 2022 , 15 , 307–325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhao, N.; Hong, J.; Lau, K.H. Impact of Supply Chain Digitalization on Supply Chain Resilience and Performance: A Multi-Mediation Model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023 , 259 , 108817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wong, C.W.Y.; Lirn, T.-C.; Yang, C.-C.; Shang, K.-C. Supply Chain and External Conditions under Which Supply Chain Resilience Pays: An Organizational Information Processing Theorization. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 226 , 107610. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lee, S.M.; Rha, J.S. Ambidextrous Supply Chain as a Dynamic Capability: Building a Resilient Supply Chain. Manag. Decis. 2016 , 54 , 2–23. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gibilaro, L.; Mattarocci, G. The Impact of Corporate Distress along the Supply Chain: Evidences from United States. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019 , 24 , 498–508. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ellinger, A.E.; Natarajarathinam, M.; Adams, F.G.; Gray, J.B.; Hofman, D.; O’Marah, K. Supply Chain Management Competency and Firm Financial Success. J. Bus. Logist. 2011 , 32 , 214–226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tamayo-Torres, I.; Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.; Ruiz-Moreno, A. Boosting Sustainability and Financial Performance: The Role of Supply Chain Controversies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019 , 57 , 3719–3734. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wagner, S.M.; Grosse-Ruyken, P.T.; Erhun, F. The Link between Supply Chain Fit and Financial Performance of the Firm⋆. J. Oper. Manag. 2012 , 30 , 340–353. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hendricks, K.B.; Singhal, V.R. The Effect of Supply Chain Glitches on Shareholder Wealth. J. Oper. Manag. 2003 , 21 , 501–522. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dehning, B.; Richardson, V.J.; Zmud, R.W. The Financial Performance Effects of IT-based Supply Chain Management Systems in Manufacturing Firms. J. Oper. Manag. 2007 , 25 , 806–824. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, Z.; Sarkis, J. Investigating the Relationship of Sustainable Supply Chain Management with Corporate Financial Performance. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2013 , 62 , 871–888. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Anantadjaya, S.P.; Nawangwulan, I.M.; Irhamsyah, M.; Carmelita, P.W. Supply Chain Management, Inventory Management & Financial Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms. Linguist. Cult. Rev. 2021 , 5 , 781–794. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zubairu, N.; Dinwoodie, J.; Govindan, K.; Hunter, L.; Roh, S. Supply Chain Strategies as Drivers of Financial Performance in Liquefied Natural Gas Networks. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2021 , 26 , 579–591. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhao, G.; Feng, T.; Wang, D. Is More Supply Chain Integration Always Beneficial to Financial Performance? Ind. Mark. Manag. 2015 , 45 , 162–172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sharma, A.; Adhikary, A.; Borah, S.B. COVID-19′s Impact on Supply Chain Decisions: Strategic Insights from NASDAQ 100 Firms Using Twitter Data. J. Bus. Res. 2020 , 117 , 443–449. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Helmold, M.; Terry, B. Operations and Supply Management 4.0: Industry Insights, Case Studies and Best Practices ; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; ISBN 978-3-030-68696-3. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Farida, I.; Setiawan, D. Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022 , 8 , 163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tatoglu, E.; Bayraktar, E.; Arda, O.A. Adoption of Corporate Environmental Policies in Turkey. J. Clean. Prod. 2015 , 91 , 313–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Christopher, M.; Ryals, L.J. The Supply Chain Becomes the Demand Chain. J. Bus. Logist. 2014 , 35 , 29–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Irfan, M.; Wang, M.; Akhtar, N. Impact of IT Capabilities on Supply Chain Capabilities and Organizational Agility: A Dynamic Capability View. Oper. Manag. Res. 2019 , 12 , 113–128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kumar, V.; Bak, O.; Guo, R.; Shaw, S.L.; Colicchia, C.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kumari, A. An Empirical Analysis of Supply and Manufacturing Risk and Business Performance: A Chinese Manufacturing Supply Chain Perspective. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2018 , 23 , 461–479. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Arokodare, M.A.; Asikhia, O.U. Strategic Agility: Achieving Superior Organizational Performance through Strategic Foresight. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 2020 , 20 , 7–16. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Akkaya, B.; Qaısar, I. Linking Dynamic Capabilities and Market Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Organizational Agility. Istanb. Bus. Res. 2021 , 50 , 197–214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shekarian, M.; Reza Nooraie, S.V.; Parast, M.M. An Examination of the Impact of Flexibility and Agility on Mitigating Supply Chain Disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 220 , 107438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sadikoglu, E.; Demirkesen, S. Agile Supply Chain Management. In The Palgrave Handbook of Supply Chain Management ; Sarkis, J., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-3-030-89822-9. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Omoush, M. Investigation the Relationship Between Supply Chain Management Activities and Operational Performance: Testing the Mediating Role of Strategic Agility-A Practical Study on the Pharmaceutical Companies. Int. Bus. Res. 2020 , 13 , 74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Betts, T.; Tadisina, S. Supply Chain Agility, Collaboration and Performance: How Do They Relate. In Proceedings of the POMS 20th Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 1–4 May 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chakravarty, A.; Grewal, R.; Sambamurthy, V. Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. Inf. Syst. Res. 2013 , 24 , 976–997. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Felipe, C.M.; Leidner, D.E.; Roldán, J.L.; Leal-Rodríguez, A.L. Impact of IS Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Roles of Organizational Agility and Industry Technology Intensity. Decis. Sci. 2020 , 51 , 575–619. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gerald, E.; Obianuju, A.; Chukwunonso, N. Strategic Agility and Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Financ. Account. Manag. 2020 , 2 , 41–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ofoegbu, O.E.; Akanbi, P.A. The Influence of Strategic Agility on the Perceived Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria. Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. IBER 2012 , 11 , 153–160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Men, F.; Yaqub, R.M.S.; Yan, R.; Irfan, M.; Haider, A. The Impact of Top Management Support, Perceived Justice, Supplier Management, and Sustainable Supply Chain Management on Moderating the Role of Supply Chain Agility. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023 , 10 , 1006029. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tallon, P.P.; Pinsonneault, A. Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model. MIS Q. 2011 , 35 , 463. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shin, H.; Lee, J.-N.; Kim, D.; Rhim, H. Strategic Agility of Korean Small and Medium Enterprises and Its Influence on Operational and Firm Performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015 , 168 , 181–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hussain, Z.N.; Abood, Z.A.R.; Talib, A.H. Strategic Agility and Its Impact on Organizational Supply Chain Success: Applied Research in a Sample of the Faculties of the University of Babylon. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2018 , 7 , 578–587. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Clauss, T.; Abebe, M.; Tangpong, C.; Hock, M. Strategic Agility, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021 , 68 , 767–784. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Suradi, S.; Ms, M.; Hasnawati, S. The Mediating Effect of Strategic Agility in the Relationship of Supply Chain Management Activities and Firm Performance of the Textile Industry of Indonesia. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2020 , 9 , 649–656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Inman, R.A.; Green, K.W. Environmental Uncertainty and Supply Chain Performance: The Effect of Agility. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021 , 33 , 239–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Salandri, L.; Cascio Rizzo, G.L.; Cozzolino, A.; De Giovanni, P. Green Practices and Operational Performance: The Moderating Role of Agility. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 375 , 134091. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hohenstein, N.-O.; Feisel, E.; Hartmann, E.; Giunipero, L. Research on the Phenomenon of Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Review and Paths for Further Investigation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2015 , 45 , 90–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Singh, C.S.; Soni, G.; Badhotiya, G.K. Performance Indicators for Supply Chain Resilience: Review and Conceptual Framework. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 2019 , 15 , 105–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ishak, A.W.; Williams, E.A. A Dynamic Model of Organizational Resilience: Adaptive and Anchored Approaches. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2018 , 23 , 180–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sheffi, Y.; Rice, J.; James, A. Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2005 , 47 , 41–48. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/a-supply-chain-view-of-the-resilient-enterprise/ (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  • Ivanov, D.; Sokolov, B.; Dolgui, A. The Ripple Effect in Supply Chains: Trade-off ‘Efficiency-Flexibility-Resilience’ in Disruption Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014 , 52 , 2154–2172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • De Treville, S.; Shapiro, R.D.; Hameri, A. From Supply Chain to Demand Chain: The Role of Lead Time Reduction in Improving Demand Chain Performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2004 , 21 , 613–627. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vencataya, L.; Seebaluck, A.K.; Doorga, D. Assessing the Impact of Supply Chain Management on Competitive Advantage and Operational Performance: A Case of Four Star Hotels of Mauritius. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 2016 , 6 , 61–69. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Meredith, S.; Francis, D. Journey towards Agility: The Agile Wheel Explored. TQM Mag. 2000 , 12 , 137–143. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Beck, T.E. Resilience Capacity and Strategic Agility: Prerequisites for Thriving in a Dynamic Environment. In Resilience Engineering Perspectives, Volume 2 ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-1-315-24438-9. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Christopher, M.; Peck, H. Building the Resilient Supply Chain. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2004 , 15 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ayan, B.; Güner, E.; Son-Turan, S. Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach. Logistics 2022 , 6 , 85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Alkhatib, S.F.; Momani, R.A. Supply Chain Resilience and Operational Performance: The Role of Digital Technologies in Jordanian Manufacturing Firms. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kim, M.; Chai, S. The Impact of Supplier Innovativeness, Information Sharing and Strategic Sourcing on Improving Supply Chain Agility: Global Supply Chain Perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017 , 187 , 42–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ambulkar, S.; Blackhurst, J.; Grawe, S. Firm’s Resilience to Supply Chain Disruptions: Scale Development and Empirical Examination. J. Oper. Manag. 2015 , 33–34 , 111–122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Powell, T.C.; Dent-Micallef, A. Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997 , 18 , 375–405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Behr, D.; Sha, M. Introduction: Translation of Questionnaires in Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Research. Transl. Interpret. 2018 , 10 , 1–4. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Black, B.; Babin, B. Multivariate Data Analysis ; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-0-13-379268-3. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach , 2nd ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1-4625-3465-4. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Walter, A.-T. Organizational Agility: Ill-Defined and Somewhat Confusing? A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptualization. Manag. Rev. Q. 2021 , 71 , 343–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chisnall, P.M. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. J. Advert. Res. 2007 , 47 , 207–208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

GroupsN%
GenderMale19564
Female11036
AgeLess than 25196.2
25–3512842
36–4511638
45+4213.8
EducationHigh school247.9
Bachelor24380
Master3812.5
Sectoral history of the company1–5 years144.6
6–10 years6822.2
11–20 years14949
20 years+7424.2
Time at work1–2 years6822.2
3-5 years8226.8
6–9 years11136.5
10 years+4414.5
Total work experience1–2 years289
3–5 years6220.2
6–9 years9430.8
10 years+12140
TOTAL 305100
ItemFactor LoadingMeanStd. Dev.
Supply Chain ManagementALLALL10.8934.6660.585
ALL20.9164.6560.598
ALL30.8874.6390.597
ALL4Removed due to low factor loading
CRMCRM10.8854.4790.623
CRM20.9004.4890.613
CRM30.9144.4750.618
CRM40.7054.4490.663
LOGLOG10.9064.2260.511
LOG20.8784.2160.518
LOG30.9084.2520.505
LOG4Removed due to low factor loading
Information SharingINF10.8794.2300.730
INF20.9204.2490.732
INF30.9204.2430.726
INF4Removed due to low factor loading
Supply Chain ResilienceSCRES10.8193.8360.963
SCRES20.8693.5341.016
SCRES30.8293.6660.977
SCRES40.7663.6330.954
Supply Chain AgilitySCA1Removed due to low factor loading
SCA20.7904.4820.689
SCA30.7074.4980.669
SCA40.9164.5020.689
SCA5Removed due to low factor loading
SCA60.8934.49180.703
SCA7Removed due to low factor loading
SCA80.8774.49180.689
Financial PerformanceFP10.8344.4100.643
FP20.8154.4100.663
FP30.8924.3900.680
FP4Removed due to low factor loading
FP50.8894.3640.731
Variableχ dfχ /dfGFICFINFITLIRMSEA
Criterion ≤5≥0.85≥0.90≥0.90≥0.90≤0.08
SCM161.318562.8810.9240.9650.9480.9510.079
SCRES0.5010.501.0001.0001.0001.0110.000
SCA11.61642.9040.9850.9920.9880.9800.079
FP0.58120.2900.9991.0000.9991.0040.000
VariableAVECRCronbach’s Alpha
SCM0.780.970.810
SCRES0.670.890.847
SCA0.710.920.912
FP0.780.930.918
RR-sqMSEFdf1df2p
0.40520.16420.25458.332872970.000
CoefficientStd. Errort-Valuep-ValueLLCIULCI
Constant−35.510514.2898−2.48500.0135−63.6326−7.3884
SCM37.599314.42032.60740.00969.220565.9782
SCA8.00883.28692.43660.01541.540314.4773
Int_1−7.59833.2861−2.31230.0214−14.0653−1.1314
SCRES9.75853.85712.53000.01192.167817.3492
Int_2−9.41813.9118−2.40760.0167−17.1165−1.7197
Int_3−2.10150.8910−2.35850.0190−3.8550−0.3480
Int_42.00260.89362.24100.02580.24403.7611
SCRESEffectFdf1df2p
2.3757−2.84095.522212970.0194
3.205−1.18034.291112970.0392
3.7815−0.02560.003612970.952
SCASCRESEffectStd. Errort-Valuep-ValueLLCIULCI
3.87142.37574.22670.91324.62850.00002.42966.0239
3.87143.20502.84560.53195.34960.00001.79883.8924
3.87143.78151.88540.59323.17820.00160.71793.0528
4.55222.37572.29250.76353.00270.00290.79003.7950
4.55223.20502.04210.55173.70110.00030.95623.1279
4.55223.78151.86790.68342.73330.00660.52303.2128
4.79452.37571.60410.90581.77080.0776−0.17863.3867
4.79453.20501.75600.62022.83130.00500.53552.9766
4.79453.78151.86170.74072.51350.01250.40413.3193
3.87143.20502.84560.53195.34960.00001.79883.8924
InteractionChange in R-SquareF-Valuedf1df2p-Value
SCM * SCA * SCRES0.01415.02211.0297.00.0258
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Tufan, C.; Çiğdem, Ş.; Kılıç, Y.; Sayar, G. Agility and Resilience in Supply Chains: Investigating Their Roles in Enhancing Financial Performance. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177842

Tufan C, Çiğdem Ş, Kılıç Y, Sayar G. Agility and Resilience in Supply Chains: Investigating Their Roles in Enhancing Financial Performance. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177842

Tufan, Cenk, Şemsettin Çiğdem, Yunus Kılıç, and Gökçen Sayar. 2024. "Agility and Resilience in Supply Chains: Investigating Their Roles in Enhancing Financial Performance" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177842

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

  1. How to Write Methodologies for a Dissertation

    dissertation methodology literature

  2. Literature based dissertation methodology help

    dissertation methodology literature

  3. The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation Methodology: Tips and

    dissertation methodology literature

  4. Dissertation Methodology Example

    dissertation methodology literature

  5. How to Write a Dissertation Methodology [Complete Guide]

    dissertation methodology literature

  6. Finding the Best Methodology for Literature Review Dissertation

    dissertation methodology literature

VIDEO

  1. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 08

  2. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 07

  3. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 06

  4. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 5

  5. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 11 Discussion

  6. Quantitative Dissertation Methodology Section: Video 12 Motivation

COMMENTS

  1. How To Write A Dissertation Or Thesis

    How To Write A Dissertation Or Thesis (+ Examples)

  2. Dissertation Methodology

    Where to Write Dissertation Methodology. In a dissertation or thesis, the Methodology section usually follows the Literature Review. This placement allows the Methodology to build upon the theoretical framework and existing research outlined in the Literature Review, and precedes the Results or Findings section.

  3. What Is a Research Methodology?

    What Is a Research Methodology? | Steps & Tips

  4. How To Write The Methodology Chapter

    How To Write The Methodology Chapter (With Examples)

  5. What Is a Dissertation?

    What Is a Dissertation? | Guide, Examples, & Template

  6. How to Write a Literature Review

    How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & ...

  7. Dissertation Methodology: A Comprehensive Guide

    Literature Based Dissertation Methodology. This type of methodology is also known as the secondary research methodology. The literature review dissertation methodology involves 4 steps: 1. Develop your research question(s): Like any other type of research, you have to develop a research question first. Then specify the general research area in ...

  8. Writing the Dissertation

    The Methodology - Writing the Dissertation - Guides for Success

  9. Methodology

    Planning Your Dissertation by Kate Williams This essential guide takes students through the planning for each stage of their dissertation, from hatching an idea to handing in their finished project. Short, succinct chapters cover everything from devising a research question and engaging with the literature to choosing a methodology and structuring an argument.

  10. Dissertations 4: Methodology: Start

    Dissertations 4: Methodology: Start

  11. Dissertations 4: Methodology: Methods

    Dissertations 4: Methodology: Methods

  12. PDF Writing Your Thesis Methods and Results

    Summary of Methods Chapter Strategies ! Most important: Explain each of your methodology choices by linking it to what you want to learn. Show how your methods are the best way to answer your research question - how various methodological choices you made (e.g., decision to do multiple site comparison) provided leverage for understanding

  13. Dissertations & projects: Literature-based projects

    A typical literature-based dissertation will be broken up into the following sections: Use this basic structure as your document plan. Remember that you do not need to write it in the order it will finally be written in. For more advice on managing the order of your project, see our section on Project Management.

  14. 6. The Methodology

    Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

  15. PDF A Complete Dissertation

    A Complete Dissertation

  16. What Is a Research Methodology?

    What Is a Research Methodology? | Steps & Tips - Scribbr

  17. Dissertations 4: Methodology: Methodology

    Conclusion. In the concluding part of your methodology: Summarise the main factors of your research method and how these will then be employed to the analysis of the results. Be positive and address why, even with the limitations and weaknesses identified above, you have chosen this research method. You could recommend how to improve the ...

  18. Writing your Dissertation: Methodology

    Writing your Dissertation: Methodology

  19. Dissertation Literature Review: Key Steps and Best Practices

    A literature review is a comprehensive and critically assessed summary of existing research focused on a specific topic or question.Unlike other types of literature reviews, the dissertation literature review requires depth and context, serving as an extensive examination of scholarly works, including articles, books, theses, and other authoritative sources.

  20. PDF The Thesis Writing Process and Literature Review

    Look at more recent work citing these works (e.g., Web of Science). In writing the review, chronology is often important. Capture the. essence of the works you draw on. See Turco's "Token Theory" section. Provide supporting quotes when necessary. Avoid citing aspects of the works that aren't central (common mistake!).

  21. Writing your dissertation methodology

    Writing your dissertation methodology

  22. Dissertation

    A narrative dissertation is a personal account of the researcher's experience or journey. It typically follows a qualitative research approach and uses methods such as interviews, focus groups, or ethnography. Systematic Literature Review. A systematic literature review is a comprehensive analysis of existing research on a specific topic.

  23. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines

    Literature review as a research methodology: An overview ...

  24. What is a Literature Review? Definition, Types, and Examples

    A literature review is an essential part of any academic research paper, thesis, or dissertation. It provides a thorough examination of existing research on a particular topic, allowing the researcher to identify gaps, areas of agreement or disagreement, and emerging trends in the field.

  25. What is a Thesis Paper and How to Write One

    Writing a thesis paper is a big task, often at the end of a bachelor's, master's or honors program. These steps and resources can help you write yours. ... The 5 components to a standard thesis typically include an introduction, literature review, methods and results, discussion and conclusion. Meg Palmer Sep 3, 2024 From choosing a topic and ...

  26. Sustainability

    The research methodology involved surveying white-collar employees within these companies. Factor analysis was employed to affirm the scale's validity, and the Hayes model 3 method was utilized to test hypotheses. ... The thesis that supply chain management has a substantial impact on financial performance was corroborated by the study's ...

  27. Impact of green supply chain integration management on business

    The literature also delves into GSCM's conceptual frameworks, discussing its comprehensive integration into supply chain processes and the development of performance metrics to assess its impact on organizational outcomes, as seen in studies by Govindan et al. (Citation 2015) and Kumar et al. (Citation 2015).