how to write literature review faster

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• CAREER FEATURE
• 04 December 2020
• Correction 09 December 2020

How to write a superb literature review

Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some practice in writing. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Even picking the appropriate software to use can be an involved decision (see ‘Tools and techniques’). So Nature asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03422-x

Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Updates & Corrections

Correction 09 December 2020 : An earlier version of the tables in this article included some incorrect details about the programs Zotero, Endnote and Manubot. These have now been corrected.

Hsing, I.-M., Xu, Y. & Zhao, W. Electroanalysis 19 , 755–768 (2007).

Article   Google Scholar  

Ledesma, H. A. et al. Nature Nanotechnol. 14 , 645–657 (2019).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Solid State Commun. 215–216 , 54–62 (2015).

Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Nature Rev. Chem . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w (2020).

Download references

Related Articles

• Research management

‘I saw that discrimination wasn’t hearsay or rumours — it really did exist’

Career Q&A 05 JUN 24

Need a policy for using ChatGPT in the classroom? Try asking students

Career Column 05 JUN 24

Why China has been a growing study destination for African students

Nature Index 05 JUN 24

How I run a virtual lab group that’s collaborative, inclusive and productive

Career Column 31 MAY 24

Researcher parents are paying a high price for conference travel — here’s how to fix it

Career Column 27 MAY 24

How researchers in remote regions handle the isolation

Career Feature 24 MAY 24

China seeks global impact and recognition

Chinese research collaborations shift to the Belt and Road

A guide to the Nature Index

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Warmly Welcomes Talents Abroad

Qiushi Chair Professor; Qiushi Distinguished Scholar; ZJU 100 Young Researcher; Distinguished researcher

No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang (CN)

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated with Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Proteomics expert (postdoc or staff scientist)

We are looking for a (senior) postdoc or postdoc-level staff scientist from all areas of proteomics to become part of our Proteomics Center.

Frankfurt am Main, Hessen (DE)

Goethe University (GU) Frankfurt am Main - Institute of Molecular Systems Medicine

Tenured Position in Huzhou University School of Medicine (Professor/Associate Professor/Lecturer)

※Tenured Professor/Associate Professor/Lecturer Position in Huzhou University School of Medicine

Huzhou, Zhejiang (CN)

Huzhou University

Electron Microscopy (EM) Specialist

APPLICATION CLOSING DATE: July 5th, 2024 About the Institute Human Technopole (HT) is an interdisciplinary life science research institute, created...

Human Technopole

Post-Doctoral Fellow in Chemistry and Chemical Biology

We are seeking a highly motivated, interdisciplinary scientist to investigate the host-gut microbiota interactions that are associated with driving...

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Harvard University - Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process. 

Table of Contents

• What is the purpose of literature review? 
• a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction: 
• b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes: 
• c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs: 
• d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts: 

How to write a good literature review 

• Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question: 
• Decide on the Scope of Your Review: 
• Select Databases for Searches: 
• Conduct Searches and Keep Track: 
• Review the Literature: 
• Organize and Write Your Literature Review: 
• How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal? 
• Frequently asked questions 

What is a literature review?

A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.

What is the purpose of literature review?

A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2  

1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge. 

2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field. 

Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal  

3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research. 

4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered. 

5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research. 

6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature. 

Literature review example

Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic. 

Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:

Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: 

a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:

Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements. 

b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:

Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources. 

c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:

The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. 

d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:

Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning. 

Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!    

Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements. 

Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review. 

• Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field. 
• Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address. 
• Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research. 
• Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic. 
• Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review. 

Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. 

• Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement. 
• Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic. 
• Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature. 
• Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps. 
• Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review. 

Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free.   

Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research. 

• Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective. 
• Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field. 
• Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice. 
• Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field. 
• Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community. 

Conducting a literature review

Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1  

Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:

• Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study. 
• Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? 

Decide on the Scope of Your Review:

• Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview? 
• Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region? 
• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude? 

Select Databases for Searches:

• Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. 
• Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic. 

Conduct Searches and Keep Track:

• Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques. 
• Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability. 
• Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references. 

Review the Literature:

• Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies. 
• Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research. 
• Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives. 
• Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions. 
• Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research? 

Organize and Write Your Literature Review:

• Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches. 
• Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered. 
• Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). 
• Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research. 

Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!  

How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?

Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.   

Here’s how to use the Research feature:  

• Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations. 
• Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access. 
• Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review. 

The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.  

Frequently asked questions

A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.

Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.  

Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic. 

Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods. 

Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers.  Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved.  Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic.  Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings.  Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject.  It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.

The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review:  Introduction:   Provide an overview of the topic.  Define the scope and purpose of the literature review.  State the research question or objective.  Body:   Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology.  Critically analyze and evaluate each source.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies.  Highlight any methodological limitations or biases.  Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research.  Conclusion:   Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review.  Highlight the research gap.  Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.  Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.

Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows: 

References 

• Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.  Journal of criminal justice education ,  24 (2), 218-234. 
• Pan, M. L. (2016).  Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis. 
• Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.  San José State University Writing Center . 

Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.  

Try it for free or upgrade to  Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. It’s like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.  Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!

Related Reads:

• Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics 
• How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps 
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?
• How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?

6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level

Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to ace grant writing for research funding..., powerful academic phrases to improve your essay writing , how to write a high-quality conference paper, how paperpal’s research feature helps you develop and..., how paperpal is enhancing academic productivity and accelerating..., how to write a successful book chapter for..., academic editing: how to self-edit academic text with..., 4 ways paperpal encourages responsible writing with ai.

Writing A High-Quality Literature Review

5 Time-Saving Tips & Tools

By: David Phair (PhD) and Amy Murdock (PhD) | May 2022

One of the fundamental chapters of any dissertation or thesis is the literature review . However, students often struggle to write this chapter, especially if it’s their first time engaging in a formal research project. At Grad Coach, we’ve worked with thousands of students to help them craft their literature reviews. In this article, we’ll share five time-saving tips and tools to help you approach this chapter the smart way.

Overview: Writing The Literature Review

• Develop a (rough) outline before you start writing
• Look at existing literature reviews in your topic area
• Write first , then edit and clean up
• Insert your citations and references as you write
• Ask a (non-expert) friend to review your writing

1. Develop an outline before you start writing

As with all chapters in your dissertation or thesis, it’s a good idea to create a rough outline or structure of the literature review, before you really start writing. The purpose of this is to ensure that the foundation of your literature review is solid in terms of the topics, key points identified, and the order in which they’re presented.

If you start writing from the very beginning without an idea of the overall structure, you’re likely to end up with a muddled mess . This practice is sometimes also sometimes referred to as creating the skeleton outline because you are organizing the bones of your chapter which you’ll later flesh out with the content of the chapter.

Broadly speaking, a literature review chapter will usually take the following shape:

• Introduction – This short section should outline the purpose and content of your chapter.
• If you haven’t already included it in your introduction chapter, then you should next provide the definitions of any jargon/specialist terminology and key variables  and constructs .
• Chronological , which is based on the date of the publications. This is good for showing how the topic has evolved over time.
• Thematic , where the chapter’s structure is grouped by variables of interest or core themes. This is appropriate when identifying and discussing variables of interest and is most commonly used.
• Methodological – when the chapter is grouped based on methodologies, such as quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.
• Conclusion – Here you’ll provide the key takeaways from the chapter and highlight the research gap that provides the basis for your study.

Although creating a loosely structured outline of the literature review before you start writing is important, remember that it is just there to guide you and help you stay organized. That is, you don’t have to stick with the structure you’ve created at the beginning, and you can change things up, add, expand or rearrange as you go.

PS – check out our free literature review template to help fast-track your outline.

2. Look at existing literature reviews in your area  

As a general rule of thumb, it’s always wise to look at existing literature reviews that cover similar topics to yours to check how they’ve been organized and presented. Doing this will help you further develop a suitable structure because it will give you ideas and help you identify the “norms” in your discipline. 

There are a few common ways to find these existing literature reviews. For example, you can look at existing dissertations and theses from your own university’s dissertation database /library. Doing so will give you valuable insight into the style and structural norms of your university. Similarly, you can search through public dissertation databases such as EBSCO, Open Access, and Proquest , and many university libraries offer access to these public databases, too. 

Next, you can search for literature review-type journal articles such as narrative , systematic literature review ( SLR ) or meta-analyses . To find some of these articles you can go to Google Scholar and search using the terms “review” + your topic – for example, “review organizational performance”. 

Another benefit of working through existing literature reviews is that it can help ensure that you’ve covered as much relevant material as possible to develop your own literature review. In other words, it can help you spot any studies you’ve missed. However, be cautious about choosing articles that are old or dated beyond the past five years, as the topic of study may have developed since then and those findings may no longer be accurate or relevant. 

Need a helping hand?

3. Write first. Clean up later.

Once you’ve digested all the literature and have a loose outline planned, it’s important to not get stuck in the mindset of only being able to write the literature review once you’ve figured it all out and know exactly what you’re going to say. This will only land you up with writer’s block .

#4. Insert citations and references as you write

As you start writing, remember that the literature review chapter needs to be extremely rich with sources (i.e. references to high-quality journal articles and studies). In fact, it should be the most citation-intense chapter in your dissertation or thesis. To this end, it’s prudent to always incorporate the citations as you write up your chapter. Don’t leave it until later, because if you leave it too long, you’re likely to end up missing key references, forget who said what, and your literature review chapter will be short on sources, which will limit the rigor of the chapter. 

One way to make this activity easier is to use a reference manager such as Mendeley or Zotero . Reference management software will help ensure that your in-text citations are aligned between the chapter and the reference list , and that everything’s in the correct format (e.g. Harvard, APA , etc). 

5. Ask a (non-expert) friend to review your writing

As you spend more time writing your chapters, it’s easy to start confusing the trees for the forest. Therefore, it’s always wise to ask a friend (that’s not a subject expert) to review your drafts and give you feedback, particularly regarding the readability of the work. While your literature review will likely get quite technical, you need to make sure that it’s written at a level that a non-expert can follow. In other words, you need to write for the “intelligent layman” . This is where a friend’s feedback can really help. 

When having a friend review your draft, it’s a good idea to ask them to highlight the parts that are difficult to follow in the chapter. Ideally, you should also ask them to give you a summary of what they understood, in their own words. This will help you identify which points are well-articulated or coherent and which aren’t. This activity has similarities to the document reviews that we conduct at Grad Coach, and it’s particularly helpful for catching overly tech nical jargon that may not be comprehensible to a non-expert. 

In short, be sure to seek feedback on your writing from outsiders. Since you’ll be shoulder-deep in your topic, it’s easy to write up a literature review chapter that is difficult for the reader to follow. You’ll often make assumptions about what the reader knows and is thinking, which can make the chapter hard to digest. People see things differently and can help you uncover your blind spots , identify important questions, etc. Therefore, an outsider’s input can greatly help you improve the readability, clarity , and comprehensibility of your literature review.

Let’s Recap…

In this article, we covered 5 time-saving tips for writing a literature review:

Be sure to also check out our literature review chapter example , where we walk you through a sample literature review, step by step. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment. Alternatively, if you’d like hands-on help with your literature review, be sure to check out our 1-on-1 coaching service .

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Literature Review Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

Published on 22 February 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 7 June 2022.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarise sources – it analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate

You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.

The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions .

If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications.

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search:

Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out.

You probably won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the topic – you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its key insights and arguments?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can find out how many times an article has been cited on Google Scholar – a high citation count means the article has been influential in the field, and should certainly be included in your literature review.

The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time).

Remember that you can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using!

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations.

To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly-visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat – this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organising the body of a literature review. You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order.

Try to analyse patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”).

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, make sure to follow these tips:

• Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole.
• Analyse and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole.
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources.
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts.

In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance.

If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. This can lead directly into your methodology section.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a dissertation , thesis, research paper , or proposal .

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarise yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your  dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, June 07). What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to write a systematic literature review [9 steps]

What is a systematic literature review?

Where are systematic literature reviews used, what types of systematic literature reviews are there, how to write a systematic literature review, 1. decide on your team, 2. formulate your question, 3. plan your research protocol, 4. search for the literature, 5. screen the literature, 6. assess the quality of the studies, 7. extract the data, 8. analyze the results, 9. interpret and present the results, registering your systematic literature review, frequently asked questions about writing a systematic literature review, related articles.

A systematic literature review is a summary, analysis, and evaluation of all the existing research on a well-formulated and specific question.

Put simply, a systematic review is a study of studies that is popular in medical and healthcare research. In this guide, we will cover:

• the definition of a systematic literature review
• the purpose of a systematic literature review
• the different types of systematic reviews
• how to write a systematic literature review

➡️ Visit our guide to the best research databases for medicine and health to find resources for your systematic review.

Systematic literature reviews can be utilized in various contexts, but they’re often relied on in clinical or healthcare settings.

Medical professionals read systematic literature reviews to stay up-to-date in their field, and granting agencies sometimes need them to make sure there’s justification for further research in an area. They can even be used as the starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines.

A classic systematic literature review can take different approaches:

• Effectiveness reviews assess the extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. They’re the most common type of systematic literature review.
• Diagnostic test accuracy reviews produce a summary of diagnostic test performance so that their accuracy can be determined before use by healthcare professionals.
• Experiential (qualitative) reviews analyze human experiences in a cultural or social context. They can be used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention from a person-centric perspective.
• Costs/economics evaluation reviews look at the cost implications of an intervention or procedure, to assess the resources needed to implement it.
• Etiology/risk reviews usually try to determine to what degree a relationship exists between an exposure and a health outcome. This can be used to better inform healthcare planning and resource allocation.
• Psychometric reviews assess the quality of health measurement tools so that the best instrument can be selected for use.
• Prevalence/incidence reviews measure both the proportion of a population who have a disease, and how often the disease occurs.
• Prognostic reviews examine the course of a disease and its potential outcomes.
• Expert opinion/policy reviews are based around expert narrative or policy. They’re often used to complement, or in the absence of, quantitative data.
• Methodology systematic reviews can be carried out to analyze any methodological issues in the design, conduct, or review of research studies.

Writing a systematic literature review can feel like an overwhelming undertaking. After all, they can often take 6 to 18 months to complete. Below we’ve prepared a step-by-step guide on how to write a systematic literature review.

• Decide on your team.
• Formulate your question.
• Plan your research protocol.
• Search for the literature.
• Screen the literature.
• Assess the quality of the studies.
• Extract the data.
• Analyze the results.
• Interpret and present the results.

When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. A minimum of two is a good rule of thumb, with a third to serve as a tiebreaker if needed.

You may also need to team up with a librarian to help with the search, literature screeners, a statistician to analyze the data, and the relevant subject experts.

Define your answerable question. Then ask yourself, “has someone written a systematic literature review on my question already?” If so, yours may not be needed. A librarian can help you answer this.

You should formulate a “well-built clinical question.” This is the process of generating a good search question. To do this, run through PICO:

• Patient or Population or Problem/Disease : who or what is the question about? Are there factors about them (e.g. age, race) that could be relevant to the question you’re trying to answer?
• Intervention : which main intervention or treatment are you considering for assessment?
• Comparison(s) or Control : is there an alternative intervention or treatment you’re considering? Your systematic literature review doesn’t have to contain a comparison, but you’ll want to stipulate at this stage, either way.
• Outcome(s) : what are you trying to measure or achieve? What’s the wider goal for the work you’ll be doing?

Now you need a detailed strategy for how you’re going to search for and evaluate the studies relating to your question.

The protocol for your systematic literature review should include:

• the objectives of your project
• the specific methods and processes that you’ll use
• the eligibility criteria of the individual studies
• how you plan to extract data from individual studies
• which analyses you’re going to carry out

For a full guide on how to systematically develop your protocol, take a look at the PRISMA checklist . PRISMA has been designed primarily to improve the reporting of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.

When writing a systematic literature review, your goal is to find all of the relevant studies relating to your question, so you need to search thoroughly .

This is where your librarian will come in handy again. They should be able to help you formulate a detailed search strategy, and point you to all of the best databases for your topic.

➡️ Read more on on how to efficiently search research databases .

The places to consider in your search are electronic scientific databases (the most popular are PubMed , MEDLINE , and Embase ), controlled clinical trial registers, non-English literature, raw data from published trials, references listed in primary sources, and unpublished sources known to experts in the field.

➡️ Take a look at our list of the top academic research databases .

Tip: Don’t miss out on “gray literature.” You’ll improve the reliability of your findings by including it.

Don’t miss out on “gray literature” sources: those sources outside of the usual academic publishing environment. They include:

• non-peer-reviewed journals
• pharmaceutical industry files
• conference proceedings
• pharmaceutical company websites
• internal reports

Gray literature sources are more likely to contain negative conclusions, so you’ll improve the reliability of your findings by including it. You should document details such as:

• The databases you search and which years they cover
• The dates you first run the searches, and when they’re updated
• Which strategies you use, including search terms
• The numbers of results obtained

➡️ Read more about gray literature .

This should be performed by your two reviewers, using the criteria documented in your research protocol. The screening is done in two phases:

• Pre-screening of all titles and abstracts, and selecting those appropriate
• Screening of the full-text articles of the selected studies

Make sure reviewers keep a log of which studies they exclude, with reasons why.

➡️ Visit our guide on what is an abstract?

Your reviewers should evaluate the methodological quality of your chosen full-text articles. Make an assessment checklist that closely aligns with your research protocol, including a consistent scoring system, calculations of the quality of each study, and sensitivity analysis.

The kinds of questions you'll come up with are:

• Were the participants really randomly allocated to their groups?
• Were the groups similar in terms of prognostic factors?
• Could the conclusions of the study have been influenced by bias?

Every step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency and replicability. Create a data extraction form and set your reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified studies.

Here’s a free detailed template for recording data extraction, from Dalhousie University. It should be adapted to your specific question.

Establish a standard measure of outcome which can be applied to each study on the basis of its effect size.

Measures of outcome for studies with:

• Binary outcomes (e.g. cured/not cured) are odds ratio and risk ratio
• Continuous outcomes (e.g. blood pressure) are means, difference in means, and standardized difference in means
• Survival or time-to-event data are hazard ratios

Design a table and populate it with your data results. Draw this out into a forest plot , which provides a simple visual representation of variation between the studies.

Then analyze the data for issues. These can include heterogeneity, which is when studies’ lines within the forest plot don’t overlap with any other studies. Again, record any excluded studies here for reference.

Consider different factors when interpreting your results. These include limitations, strength of evidence, biases, applicability, economic effects, and implications for future practice or research.

Apply appropriate grading of your evidence and consider the strength of your recommendations.

It’s best to formulate a detailed plan for how you’ll present your systematic review results. Take a look at these guidelines for interpreting results from the Cochrane Institute.

Before writing your systematic literature review, you can register it with OSF for additional guidance along the way. You could also register your completed work with PROSPERO .

Systematic literature reviews are often found in clinical or healthcare settings. Medical professionals read systematic literature reviews to stay up-to-date in their field and granting agencies sometimes need them to make sure there’s justification for further research in an area.

The first stage in carrying out a systematic literature review is to put together your team. You should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. A minimum of two is a good rule of thumb, with a third to serve as a tiebreaker if needed.

Your systematic review should include the following details:

A literature review simply provides a summary of the literature available on a topic. A systematic review, on the other hand, is more than just a summary. It also includes an analysis and evaluation of existing research. Put simply, it's a study of studies.

The final stage of conducting a systematic literature review is interpreting and presenting the results. It’s best to formulate a detailed plan for how you’ll present your systematic review results, guidelines can be found for example from the Cochrane institute .

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

Write a Literature Review in a Day: Yes, It’s Possible, and It’s Actually Fun

Literature reviews: they are every writer’s least favorite part of writing.

Still, they are a fundamental aspect of scholarly work. They prove that a writer has scoured previous research on a topic, evaluated it, and demonstrated why their own research has merit.

After writing enough of these in grad school, I’ve decided to create a guide to help writers answer the question of “how to write a literature review in a day.”

I’ve also gathered helpful info from other academic and educational sources to further inspire.

After reading this article, you will know how to:

• Find the right, relevant literature.
• Properly organize and catalog works you gather.
• Develop a pattern out of and find gaps in accumulated research.
• Write a stellar review.

Now let’s get down to it.

First Things First: What Is a Literature Review?

A literature review proves that an individual is aware of what other researchers, or “giants” in their field have said on the subject.

As such, lit reviews will consist of literature from other researchers discussing a chosen topic. This literature can come from books, articles, reports, or websites.

As this YouTube video proclaims, academic writing involves “ standing on the shoulders of giants .”

But a lit review will not just be a list of academic references. That can fall into plagiarism territory, which you can learn about in this article .

Okay, but What Is Its Purpose?

Basically, they help you prove your point. That’s why I see them as jigsaw puzzles whose pieces are scattered across other scholarly work.

When you are scanning through other works, you are looking for those jigsaw pieces or patterns and gaps in prior research that you will address. When you finish writing, your puzzle will represent what other researchers have missed.

Structure of a Literature Review

Fortunately, they follow the typical format of intro-body-conclusion .

The intro of a lit review will introduce the paper’s topic and the key concepts the writer will explore.

The body is where all the jigsaw puzzles will be addressed, including:

• What have other researchers said about this topic?
• What is your interpretation of their findings?
• How does the prior research add to the topic’s significance?
• Is there a pattern? Or is there a gaping hole in the research?

And the conclusion will wrap up your arguments.

5 Steps to Write a Literature Review in a Day

1. Find the Relevant Literature

Estimated time: 1 hour

First up is finding a few relevant texts.

My favorite databases are Google Scholar, my library’s database, JSTOR, and Scorpus.

It’s important to distinguish formal vs. informal works, which you can read about here .

I consider effective keywords when searching for sources. These will be words similar to my topic.

2. Read SMARTLY

Estimated time: 1-2 hours

Yes, you’ll need to read, but the trick is to read smartly .

When you type in your keywords and are brought to an article, skim through the abstract and look for:

• The key concepts
• The overall findings
• The gap in the research (or the jigsaw pieces)

This will cut down your reading time tremendously!

In this video, the researcher shares a tough truth: “You HAVE to do reading.”

Some people are very restless and it can be difficult for them to focus. Reading smartly can reduce the time you spent studying.

3. Organize Your Findings

Estimated time: 1-2 hours (combined with step 2)

New Zealand ecologist and researcher Francis J. Burdon claims that a “ poorly executed ” lit review is one that has no “ adequate guidance .” Your material has no worth if not organized!

Often PhD candidates will begin their thesis with a literature review, but this can be poorly executed without adequate guidance. A new guide @MethodsEcolEvol looks to be a very useful resource providing a roadmap for scientists at all career stages https://t.co/k1yjQEF9td — Francis J. Burdon (@frank_burdon) July 1, 2021

While you’re going through articles, pull up either a Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets document to log all of your findings. Include the author and title for all works.

Another good tip is to add additional columns that categorize the findings by relevant keyword, methodology used, and key concept.

The last column for the organized sheet is the “main argument” of the article. Here, summarize the article’s findings in a few sentences.

4. Synthesize!

Estimated time: 2 hours

Now here comes the fun part (at least, to me!). It’s time to synthesize , a fancy word for putting those jigsaw pieces together.

Look over the main arguments and search for any common themes, patterns, contradictions, and weaknesses.

To help you settle on a structure from your findings, literature reviews are usually structured in the following ways:

Chronologically: These are written from when the research began to where it is now.

Thematic: These are organized by common sub themes found in research.

Methodological: These are structured by different academic frameworks used, including different styles of research (i.e., quantitative vs. qualitative).

In this YouTube video the online writing professor, David Taylor, makes a comforting point: “The answers are already out there.”

Everything you need is already written; your job is to put it all together.

5. Write It!

Estimated time: 3+ hours (depending on experience)

All you need to do now is write! I find that crafting a brief outline of which author I’ll mention first and then next helps me start.

In addition, Amina Yonis, a PhD graduate at University of College London, lays out a good format to remember when writing your lit review: background, narrower categories, focus and then hypothesis.

First release of the week! Here is a snippet of how to write a literature review from my new course lauching next week. I go through the precise lit review structure, a topic that students notoriously struggle with when writing. Watch – RT – Save https://t.co/GgdR3CODWm pic.twitter.com/UBl90GE9D2 — Amina Yonis (@DrAminaYonis) November 1, 2020

Useful Resources

• How to write a movie review
• Literature review vs. annotated bibliography vs. research paper… What’s the difference?
• American literature & culture: American literature
• List of academic databases and search engines

It’s not so bad, is it?

See? Writing a literature review doesn’t have to be a scary task!

The only other thing to keep in mind with lit reviews is plagiarism, as you will be referencing many other authors’ work.

Don’t worry, though — you can use this handy plagiarism tool here to make sure your content is 100% original.

Take these steps into account pre-writing and you’ll have a stellar review!

A Meta-analysis of Effects of Automated Writing Evaluation on Anxiety, Motivation, and Second Language Writing Skills

• Regular Article
• Published: 29 May 2024

Cite this article

• Xiaoli Huang   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-4782-0446 1 ,
• Wei Xu   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-1116 2 ,
• Fan Li   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-6733-6795 3 &
• Zhonggen Yu   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-980X 4  

61 Accesses

Explore all metrics

With the rapid advancement of information technologies, automated writing evaluation technologies have developed so fast that they can be applied to writing assessments. However, scanty studies have pooled the effects of automated writing evaluation on writing performance. Through a PRISMA protocol-based meta-analysis, this study concludes that automated writing evaluation technologies can significantly reduce anxiety such as writing anxiety and computer anxiety compared with those without the assistance of automated writing evaluation. Automated writing evaluation can also significantly improve writing motivation and second language (L2) writing skills. Educators and designers should highlight how to combine automated writing evaluation with human rating methods and maximize the improvements in L2 writing skills. In the future, artificial intelligence may be integrated into automated writing evaluation to develop advanced automated writing evaluation to address higher-level issues in writing practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A systematic review of automated writing evaluation systems

The Effect of Online Collaborative Prewriting via DingTalk Group on EFL Learners’ Writing Anxiety and Writing Performance

Writing scale effects on raters: an exploratory study

Data availability.

We make sure that all data and materials support our published claims and comply with field standards.

Abas, A., Arifin, K., Ali, M. A. M., & Khairil, M. (2023). A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development, 46 , 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853

Article   Google Scholar  

Abbas, M., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023). A data-driven approach for the identification of features for automated feedback on academic essays. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16 (6), 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3320877

Abdullah, A. T. H., Alsohbo, K. S. I., & Hassan, I. (2022). Gender differences in written communication anxiety among Libyan Postgraduates in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 13 (3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.18

Akbarzadeh, M., Tajadini, M., & Narafshan, M. H. (2020). Metacognitive awareness instruction: A mixed method study on high school EFL learners’ writing development and intrinsic motivation. Apuntes Universitarios, 10 (4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v10i4.504

Alberto Benitez, R. (2019). Perceptions on the automated assessment of written discourse. Enunciacion, 24 (2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.14483/22486798.14311

Aldosemani, T., Assalahi, H., Lhothali, A., & Albsisi, M. (2023). Automated writing evaluation in EFL contexts: A review of effectiveness, impact, and pedagogical implications. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching . https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.329962

Al-nakhle, H. (2022). The effectiveness of scenario-based virtual laboratory simulations to improve learning outcomes and scientific report writing skills. PLoS ONE, 17 (11), e0277359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277359

Azmi, A. M., Al-Jouie, M. F., & Hussain, M. (2019). AAEE – Automated evaluation of students’ essays in Arabic language. Information Processing & Management, 56 (5), 1736–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.008

Beach, R. (1979). The effects of between-draft teacher evaluation versus student selfevaluation on high school students’ revising of rough drafts. Research in the Teaching of English, 13 (2), 111–119.

Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50 , 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446

Benavides-Varela, S., Zandonella Callegher, C., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., AltoÃ, G., & Lucangeli, D. (2020). Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 157 , 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953

Biglari, A., Izadpanah, S., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). The effect of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy and writing skills. Education Research International, 2021 , 4106882. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4106882

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing . Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Cao, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). Exploring learning outcomes, communication, anxiety, and motivation in learning communities: A systematic review. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10 (1), 866. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02325-2

Chen, L., Leong, C. W., Feng, G., Lee, C. M., & Somasundaran, S. (2015). Utilizing Multimodal Cues to Automatically Evaluate Public Speaking Performance. 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) , 394–400. Xi’an, China, 2015, pp. 394–400, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344601

Chen, M.-R.A., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022). Effects of experiencing authentic contexts on English speaking performances, anxiety and motivation of EFL students with different cognitive styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 30 (9), 1619–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734626

Cheng, J. (2001). Writing for communication: A proposal for reform in teaching English writing in China (PQDT:65454716). Doctoral Dissertation of Xiamen University (People’s Republic of China).

Cheng, G., Law, E., & Wong, T. L. (2016).  Investigating effects of automated feedback on EFL students’ reflective learning skills. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). 7–9 December 2016, Dusit Thani Bangkok Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/tale.2016.7851798

Conijn, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Van Waes, L., & van Zaanen, M. (2022). How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35 (8), 1838–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503

Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S., & Lee, I. (2022). Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 WCF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58 , 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934

Derakhshan, A., Setiawan, S., & Ghafouri, M. (2024a). Modeling the interplay of Indonesian and Iranian EFL teachers’ apprehension, resilience, organizational mattering, and psychological well-being. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 12 (1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2024.121416

Derakhshan, A., Karimpour, S., & Nazari, M. (2024b). Exploring the professional role identities of English for academic purposes practitioners: A qualitative study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) . https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0126

Derakhshan, A., Molana, K., & Nazari, M. (2024c). I wonder who I am when my assessment ideas are not respected”: A case-study inquiry into the role of institutional policies in English language teachers’ assessment identity. Asia Pacific Journal of Education . https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2328237

Derakhshan, A., Moradi, F., & Nazari, M. (2024). Conceptualising the role of practice level in language teacher identity construction: An identities-in-practice study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics . https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12533

Ebadi, S., Gholami, M., & Vakili, S. (2023). Investigating the effects of using Grammarly in EFL writing: The case of articles. Computers in the Schools, 40 (1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2150067

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315 , 629–634.

Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., & Dooley, S. (2005). Summary Street®: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33 (1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.2190/DH8F-QJWM-J457-FQVB

Gee, T. C. (1972). Students’ responses to teacher comments. Research in the Teaching of English, 6 (2), 212–221.

Gibbons, J., & Li, M. (2021). Doctoral dissertations on second language writing and technology in the USA (2010–2019). Language Teaching, 54 (2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000403

Gollnitz, D.L. (2010). Improvement of writing at Grades 10 and 11: Does automated essay scoring software help students improve their writing skills? Oakland University Doctiral Dissertation.

Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2023). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0

Han, T., & Sari, E. (2022). An investigation on the use of automated feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning . https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067179

Han, Y. X., Zhao, S., & Ng, L. L. (2021). How technology tools impact writing performance, lexical complexity, and perceived self-regulated learning strategies in EFL academic writing: A comparative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 752793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793

Hassanzadeh, M., & Fotoohnejad, S. (2021). Implementing an automated feedback program for a foreign language writing course: A learner-centric study Implementing an AWE tool in a L2 class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37 (5), 1494–1507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12587

Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (2021). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. 2021 Available from https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/

Hoffman, B. (2019). The influence of peer assessment training on assessment knowledge and reflective writing skill. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11 (4), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2019-0004

Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14 (1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083

Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21 (1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105

Ibishi, A., Xhaferri, G., & Ivanovska, B. (2023). Error analysis by using the prepositive complement-a study with Albanian-speaking German learners in North Macedonia. Folia Linsguistica Et Litteraria, 44 , 103–130. https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.44.2023.6

Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Horbach, A., Keller, S., & Moeller, J. (2024). Individualizing goal-setting interventions using automated writing evaluation to support secondary school students’ text revisions. Learning and Instruction, 89 , 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101847

Kaya, B., Ates, S., Yildirim, K., & Rasinski, T. (2020). Effect of feedback on Turkish fourth-grade elementary school students’ fluent writing skills. Education and Science, 45 (201), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.8413

Kepes, S., McDaniel, M. A., Brannick, M. T., & Banks, G. C. (2013). Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the Meta-Analytic Reporting Standards). Journal of Business and Psychology, 28 (2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9300-2

Khoii, R., & Doroudian, A. (2014). Automated Scoring of EFL Learners’ Written Performance: A Torture of a Blessing? EDULEARN14. In: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. 7–9 July, 2014. Barcelona, Spain

Li, R. (2023). Still a fallible tool? Revisiting effects of automated writing evaluation from activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54 (3), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13294

Li, W.-Y., Kau, K., & Shiung, Y.-J. (2023). Pedagogic exploration into adapting automated writing evaluation and peer review integrated feedback into large-sized university writing classes. SAGE Open, 13 (4), 21582440231209090. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231209087

Li, W., Lu, Z., & Liu, Q. (2020). Syntactic complexity development in college students’ essay writing based on AWE. In K.-M. Frederiksen, S. Larsen, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL for widening participation: short papers from EUROCALL 2020 (pp. 190–194). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1187

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Liao Calvin, C. Y., Li, Y., & Cheng Hercy, N. H. (2019). Examining the Effects of Automatic Comment Classification on Comment Types in Peer Review for Graduate Students’ Academic Writing. In: Proceedings - 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2019, p. 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00050

Lin, Y. P., & Yu, Z. G. (2023). Extending technology acceptance model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education . https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8

Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35 (4), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323

Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211 , 104977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977

Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x

Mohsen, M. A. (2022). Computer-mediated corrective feedback to improve L2 writing skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60 (5), 1253–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211064066

Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7 (1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.105

Nazar, R., & Renau, I. (2023). ESTILECTOR: An automatic evaluation system for academic writing in Spanish. Perspectiva Educacional, 62 (2), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.62-Iss.2-Art.1427

Ngo, T. T. N., Chen, H. H. J., & Lai, K. K. W. (2022). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: A three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments . https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096642

Nunes, A., Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., & Castro, S. (2022). Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems in school settings: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2020. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38 (2), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12635

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ-British Medical Journal, 372 , n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Parra, G. L., & Calero, S. X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a

Passonneau, R. (2018). EAGER: Collaborative Research: Automated Instruction Assistant for Argumentative Essays . National Science Foundation, Cyberlearn & Future Learn Tech (Grant NUMBER: 1847853).

Prichard, J. R. (2005). Writing to learn: An evaluation of the calibrated peer review program in two neuroscience courses. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE: A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 4 (1), A34–A39.

Google Scholar  

Reynolds, B. L., Kao, C. W., & Huang, Y. Y. (2021). Investigating the effects of perceived feedback source on second language writing performance: A quasi-experimental study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30 (6), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00597-3

Rudner, L. M., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An evaluation of IntelliMetricTM essay scoring system. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4 (4), 1–21.

Sahin, I., & Yagiz, O. (2024). An exploratory investigation into the graduate supervisors’ cognitions of academic writing in English (AWE). Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 14 (1), 66–84.

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8 (2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

Sedgwick, P.M., & Marston, L. (2013). Meta-analyses: standardised mean differences. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 347 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7257

Shadiev, R., Feng, Y., Zhussupova, R., & Huang, Y.-M. (2023). Intercultural competence development through a tele-collaborative project supported by speech-enabled corrective feedback technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning . https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12906

Shehab, A., Elhoseny, M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2016). A hybrid scheme for automated essay grading based on LVQ and NLP techniques. ICENCO 2016 12th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), Cairo, Egypt, 2016, pp. 65-70, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2016.7856447

Shermis, M. D., & Hamner, B. (2012). Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: Analysis . Presented at the National Council of Measurement in Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203122761.CH19Corpus

Shermis, M. D., & Hamner, B. (2013). Contrasting state-of-the-art in machine scoring of essays. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation (pp. 313–346). Routledge.

Smith, B., & Caputi, P. (2001). Cognitive interference in computer anxiety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20 , 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110069392

Solhi, M., Derakhshan, A., Pawlak, M., & Ünsal, B. (2024). Exploring the interplay between EFL learners’ L2 writing boredom, writing motivation, and boredom coping strategies. Language Teaching Research . https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239178

Sun, B., & Fan, T. (2022). The effects of an AWE-aided assessment approach on business English writing performance and writing anxiety: A contextual consideration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72 , 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101123

Türkben, T. (2019). The effect of self-regulation based strategic reading education on comprehension, motivation, and self-regulation skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15 (4), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.3

Tashu, T. M., & Horváth, T. (2019). A layered approach to automatic essay evaluation using word-embedding. Communications in computer and information science (pp. 77–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21151-6_5

Taskiran, A., Yazici, M., & Erdem Aydin, I. (2024). Contribution of automated feedback to the English writing competence of distance foreign language learners. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21 (1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221139579

Waer, H. (2021). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching . https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1914062

Waer, H. (2023). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17 (1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1914062

Wang, H., & Troia, G. A. A. (2023). Writing quality predictive modeling: Integrating register-related factors. Written Communication, 40 (4), 1070–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883231185287

Wang, Y. J., Shang, H. F., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26 (3), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.655300

Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40 (1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113

Wei, P., Wang, X., & Dong, H. (2023). The impact of automated writing evaluation on second language writing skills of Chinese EFL learners: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 14 , 1249991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249991

Weigle, S. C. (2010). Validation of automated scores of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing ability. Language Testing, 27 , 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364406

Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100 , 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004

Wilson, J., Huang, Y., Palermo, C., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. A. (2021). Automated feedback and automated scoring in the elementary grades: Usage, attitudes, and associations with writing outcomes in a districtwide implementation of MI Write. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31 (2), 234–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00236-w

Woodworth, J., & Barkaoui, K. (2020). Perspectives on using automated writing evaluation systems to provide written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 37 (2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1340

Yaghi, H. M., & Abu-Saba, M. B. (1998). Teachers’ computer anxiety: An international perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 14 , 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00010-7

Yao, Y., Wang, W. J., & Yang, X. P. (2021). Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study. Assessing Writing, 50 , 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100568

Yu, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Online Automatic Evaluation on College English Writing. In Y. Zhang, X. Zang, & T. Volodina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Education, Language, Art, and Inter-Cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019) (Vol. 378, pp. 109–111). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.024

Yu, Z. (2019b). Identifying student satisfaction in the flipped English class enhanced with clickers. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 15 (4), 4. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019100103

Yu, Z. (2023). Learning outcomes, motivation, and satisfaction in gamified English vocabulary learning. SAGE Open . https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158332

Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35 (9), 2817–2842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019

Zhang, M., & Chen, W. (2022). Assessing collaborative writing in the digital age: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100868

Download references

This work is supported by Key Research and Application Project of the Key Laboratory of Key Technologies for Localization Language Services of the State Administration of Press and Publication, “Research on Localization and Intelligent Language Education Technology for the ‘Belt and Road Initiative” (Project Number: CSLS 20230012), and Special fund of Beijing Co-construction Project-Research and reform of the “Undergraduate Teaching Reform and Innovation Project” of Beijing higher education in 2020-innovative “multilingual + ” excellent talent training system (202010032003).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of English, Zhejiang Yuexiu University, 428 Kuaiji Road, Yuecheng District, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China

Xiaoli Huang

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China

Foreign Languages School, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, China

Faculty of Foreign Studies, Academy of International Language Services, National Base for Language Service Export, Beijing Language and Culture University, Haidian District, 15 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China

Zhonggen Yu

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Xiaoli Huang: Methodology, Writing-Original Draft, Revising and Editing, Xu Wei: Data Curation and Revising, Fan Li: Investigation and Editing; Zhonggen Yu: Conceptualization.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Xu or Zhonggen Yu .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Beijing Language and Culture University. All researchers can provide written informed consents.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Huang, X., Xu, W., Li, F. et al. A Meta-analysis of Effects of Automated Writing Evaluation on Anxiety, Motivation, and Second Language Writing Skills. Asia-Pacific Edu Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00865-y

Download citation

Accepted : 13 May 2024

Published : 29 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00865-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Automated writing evaluation
• L2 writing skills
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research