Fern Fort University

Bp amoco (b): financing development of the caspian oil fields change management analysis & solution, hbr change management solutions, finance & accounting case study | benjamin c. esty, michael kane, case study description.

British Petroleum and Amoco were the two largest members of the Azerbaijan International Oil Consortium (AIOC), an 11-firm consortium that was spending $10 billion to develop oil fields in the Caspian Sea. As of March 1999, AIOC had completed a $1.9 billion development project known as Early Oil. The two companies, however, had financed their shares of this project in different ways: BP used internal funds (traditional, on-balance sheet corporate finance), whereas Amoco was one of five AIOC partners that raised $400 million of project finance. Following the BP/Amoco merger in December 1998, managers in the combined firm's finance group had to reassess the Early Oil financing strategy and determine the best way to finance its share of the $8 billion Full Field Development Project. Should it use internal funds, project finance, or a mixture of the two?

Change Management, Costs, Mergers & acquisitions, Project management, Risk management , Case Study Solution, Term Papers

Order a BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields case study solution now

What is Change Management Definition & Process? Why transformation efforts fail? What are the Change Management Issues in BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields case study?

According to John P. Kotter – Change Management efforts are the major initiatives an organization undertakes to either boost productivity, increase product quality, improve the organizational culture, or reverse the present downward spiral that the company is going through. Sooner or later every organization requires change management efforts because without reinventing itself organization tends to lose out in the competitive market environment. The competitors catch up with it in products and service delivery, disruptors take away the lucrative and niche market positioning, or management ends up sitting on its own laurels thus missing out on the new trends, opportunities and developments in the industry.

What are the John P. Kotter - 8 Steps of Change Management?

Eight Steps of Kotter's Change Management Execution are -

  • 1. Establish a Sense of Urgency
  • 2. Form a Powerful Guiding Coalition
  • 3. Create a Vision
  • 4. Communicate the Vision
  • 5. Empower Others to Act on the Vision
  • 6. Plan for and Create Short Term Wins
  • 7. Consolidate Improvements and Produce More Change
  • 8. Institutionalize New Approaches

Are Change Management efforts easy to implement? What are the challenges in implementing change management processes?

According to authorlist Change management efforts are absolutely essential for the surviving and thriving of the organization but they are also extremely difficult to implement. Some of the biggest obstacles in implementing change efforts are –

  • Change management efforts are made when the organization is in dire need and have fewer resources. This creates silos protection mentality within the organization.
  • Change efforts are often targeted at making fundamental aspects in the business – operations and culture. Change management disrupts are status quo thus face opposition from both within and outside the organization.
  • Change efforts are often made by new leaders because they are chosen by board to do so. These leaders often have less trust among the workforce compare to the people with whom they were already working with over the years.
  • Change efforts create an environment of uncertainty in the organization that impacts not only the productivity in the organization but also the level of trust in the organization.
  • Change management is often a lengthy, time consuming, and resource consuming process. Managements try to avoid them because they reflect negatively on the short term financial balance sheet of the organization.

BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, Weighted SWOT Case Study Solution & Analysis

How you can apply Change Management Principles to BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields case study?

Leaders can implement Change Management efforts in the organization by following the “Eight Steps Method of Change Management” by John P. Kotter.

Step 1 - Establish a sense of urgency

What are areas that require urgent change management efforts in the “ BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields “ case study. Some of the areas that require urgent changes are – organizing sales force to meet competitive realities, building new organizational structure to enter new markets or explore new opportunities. The leader needs to convince the managers that the status quo is far more dangerous than the change efforts.

Step 2 - Form a powerful guiding coalition

As mentioned earlier in the paper, most change efforts are undertaken by new management which has far less trust in the bank compare to the people with whom the organization staff has worked for long period of time. New leaders need to tap in the talent of the existing managers and integrate them in the change management efforts . This will for a powerful guiding coalition that not only understands the urgency of the situation but also has the trust of the employees in the organization. If the team able to explain at the grass roots level what went wrong, why organization need change, and what will be the outcomes of the change efforts then there will be a far more positive sentiment about change efforts among the rank and file.

Step 3 - Create a vision

The most critical role of the leader who is leading the change efforts is – creating and communicating a vision that can have a broader buy-in among employees throughout the organization. The vision should not only talk about broader objectives but also about how every little change can add up to the improvement in the overall organization.

Step 4 - Communicating the vision

Leaders need to use every vehicle to communicate the desired outcomes of the change efforts and how each employee impacted by it can contribute to achieve the desired change. Secondly the communication efforts need to answer a simple question for employees – “What it is in for the them”. If the vision doesn’t provide answer to this question then the change efforts are bound to fail because it won’t have buy-in from the required stakeholders of the organization.

Step 5 -Empower other to act on the vision

Once the vision is set and communicated, change management leadership should empower people at every level to take decisions regarding the change efforts. The empowerment should follow two key principles – it shouldn’t be too structured that it takes away improvisation capabilities of the managers who are working on the fronts. Secondly it shouldn’t be too loosely defined that people at the execution level can take it away from the desired vision and objectives.

BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields PESTEL / PEST / STEP & Porter Five Forces Analysis

Step 6 - Plan for and create short term wins

Initially the change efforts will bring more disruption then positive change because it is transforming the status quo. For example new training to increase productivity initially will lead to decrease in level of current productivity because workers are learning new skills and way of doing things. It can demotivate the employees regarding change efforts. To overcome such scenarios the change management leadership should focus on short term wins within the long term transformation. They should carefully craft short term goals, reward employees for achieving short term wins, and provide a comprehensive understanding of how these short term wins fit into the overall vision and objectives of the change management efforts.

Step 7 - Consolidate improvements and produce more change

Short term wins lead to renewed enthusiasm among the employees to implement change efforts. Management should go ahead to put a framework where the improvements made so far are consolidated and more change efforts can be built on the top of the present change efforts.

Step 8 - Institutionalize new approaches

Once the improvements are consolidated, leadership needs to take steps to institutionalize the processes and changes that are made. It needs to stress how the change efforts have delivered success in the desired manner. It should highlight the connection between corporate success and new behaviour. Finally organization management needs to create organizational structure, leadership, and performance plans consistent with the new approach.

Is change management a process or event?

What many leaders and managers at the Amoco Aioc fails to recognize is that – Change Management is a deliberate and detail oriented process rather than an event where the management declares that the changes it needs to make in the organization to thrive. Change management not only impact the operational processes of the organization but also the cultural and integral values of the organization.

MBA Admission help, MBA Assignment Help, MBA Case Study Help, Online Analytics Live Classes

Previous change management solution.

  • Risk Management at Apache, Spanish Version Change Management Solution
  • Fortune Minerals - Adoption of IFRS Change Management Solution
  • Aubrey McClendon's Special Incentive Compensation at Chesapeake Energy B Change Management Solution
  • Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Change Management Solution
  • Dow Chemical's Bid for the Privatization of PBB in Argentina, Spanish Version Change Management Solution

Next 5 Change Management Solution

  • Consolidated Edison Co. (Abridged) Change Management Solution
  • Zeta Mining: Walking the Dragline Change Management Solution
  • Dividend Policy at FPL Group, Inc. (B) Change Management Solution
  • Ocean & Oil Holdings and the Leveraged Buyout of Agip Nigeria (C) Change Management Solution
  • Enman Oil, Inc. (D) Change Management Solution

Special Offers

Order custom Harvard Business Case Study Analysis & Solution. Starting just $19

Amazing Business Data Maps. Send your data or let us do the research. We make the greatest data maps.

We make beautiful, dynamic charts, heatmaps, co-relation plots, 3D plots & more.

Buy Professional PPT templates to impress your boss

Nobody get fired for buying our Business Reports Templates. They are just awesome.

  • More Services

Feel free to drop us an email

  • fernfortuniversity[@]gmail.com
  • (000) 000-0000

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

CASE STUDY: BP AMOCO (A): POLICY STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PROJECT FINANCE

Profile image of Parviz Miralamli

Related Papers

Mazen Labban

bp amoco case study

Dennis Tourish

Tuncay BABALI, Ph.D

The Caspian region is considered to be one of the next oil and gas frontiers. Along with the re-distribution of political power and the emergence of new balances after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the continuous waves of change also have had significant effects on the prospects for development of energy resources in the region. The objective of this study is to develop a model in order to understand and predict the outcome of the policies of the major actors (governments and companies) in the development and marketing of Caspian Sea energy resources. More specifically, the purpose is to identify the principal factors and their interactions in selecting export routes for the energy resources of the Caspian Basin. My hypothesis in this study is that political factors are dominant in the region. In the final analysis, the political process is more important than economics in determining which pipeline is to be built. The principal inputs to the development of the model will be detailed analyses of; (1) the development of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline project, and (2) the determination of the export route for Kazakhstan’s giant Kashagan offshore oil field. Such a predictive model can then be applied to other countries in the region, or other similar resource-rich regions of the world. After studying the developments leading to BTC’s success, the promising oil and gas developments in Kazakhstan shall be examined. How will the Kashagan oil field be developed? What alternatives are available to the Kazakh government other than the Russian oil pipeline network? With regard to this question, I put forward the most likely outcome. My methodology will modify Bruce Bueno de Mesquita’s (BDM) model of predicting political events in an attempt to find an answer to the abovementioned central question. Applicability of the BDM model will be tested in the context of energy development, which is different from the original and traditional fields of application for this model.

Vugar Gojayev

Third World Quarterly

Edoardo Bertinelli

Samuel Lussac

In 1993, Azerbaijan was a country at war, suffering heavy human and economic losses. It was then the very example of a failing country in the post-soviet in the aftermath of the collapse of the USSR. More than 15 years after, it is one of the main energy partners of the European Union and is a leading actor in the Eurasian oil sector. How did such a change happen? How can Azerbaijan have become so important in the South Caucasian region in such a short notice? This paper will focus on the Azerbaijani oil transportation network. It will investigate how the Azerbaijani oil company SOCAR and the Azerbaijani presidency are progressively taking over this network, perceived as the main tool of the foreign policy of Azerbaijan. Dealing with the inner dynamics of the network, this paper will highlight the role of clanic and crony capitalist structures in the makings of a foreign policy and in the diversification of an emerging oil company.

Witold Olejnik

This article outlines the principles of energy diplomacy and power of balance in main directions of country's foreign policy. The first section of this article demonstrates the way in Azerbaijan derived many habits from the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, the first Muslim democracy in the world. Even though world is differentiated nowadays, some of today's tendencies are acquired from those stated by Fatali Khan Khoyski, the first prime minister of ADR. The study examines principles and main directions of Azerbaijan foreign policy demonstrated by National Security Concept of the Republic of Azerbaijan, adopted in 2007, and Statement made by H.E. Mr. Elmar Mammadyarov, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan at the General debate of the Sixty-Ninth Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The second section of this article shows the directions Azerbaijan evolved from struggling for independence and territorial integrity to act as a relatively strong international actor today. This section studies tendencies in  country's Western-oriented foreign policy associated with oil diplomacy and contracting some multinational oil companies, showing that some of strategic economic steps were not only pure business-wise, but also pivotal for reaching country's political goals.

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

British Petroleum Merger with Amoco

  • First Online: 30 November 2018

Cite this chapter

bp amoco case study

  • B. Rajesh Kumar 2  

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

5750 Accesses

During 1998, BP merged with Amoco in a deal valued at $48.2 billion. At that time, it was billed as the largest oil industry merger ever. The deal was also the largest takeover of an American company by a foreign company. After the merger, BP Amoco became the largest company in Britain with more than $140 billion in market capitalization and one of the world’s top three oil majors. The merger deal was a share swap deal whereby Amoco shareholders were offered 3.97 BP shares for each share of Amoco common stock. The deal involved exchange of American depository receipts equivalent to 3.97 of its shares for each Amoco share. There were a lot of operational synergies from the deal as a result of complementary strengths. BP’s strength lays in its exploration skills, while the company was weak in the business of refining oil into products and chemicals as well as in areas of marketing and distribution. Amoco had strong marketing and distribution network. The merger consolidated the combined company’s spending on exploration which exceeded that of Exxon and Royal Dutch Shell. The combined entity obtained oil leadership position in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, and the Caspian Sea. The merger was a strategic fit as both BP and Amoco operations were purely complementary in nature. It made Amoco less sensitive to natural gas and chemicals and BP less sensitive to crude oil. Though the deal was stated as merger, in fact it had been a friendly acquisition whereby BP controlled 60% of the new merged company. The cumulative returns for BP during the 253-day merger period (−10 to +242) interval were approximately 39%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

BBC News (1998) Business: the company file BP and Amoco in oil mega merger. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/149139.stm . Accessed 22 January 2018

Ibrahim Y (1998) British Petroleum is buying Amoco in a $48.2 billion deal. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/12/business/british-petroleum-is-buying-amoco-in-48.2-billion-deal.html . Accessed 22 January 2018

Oil and Gas Journal (1998) BP Amoco merger creates third supermajor. https://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-96/issue-33/in-this-issue/general-interest/bp-amoco-merger-creates-third-39supermajor39.html . Accessed 22 January 2018

Oil and Gas Journal (1999) BP Amoco finish merger after FTC approval. https://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-97/issue-2/in-this-issue/general-interest/bp-amoco-finish-merger-after-ftc-approval.html . Accessed 22 January 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Management Technology, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

B. Rajesh Kumar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Kumar, B.R. (2019). British Petroleum Merger with Amoco. In: Wealth Creation in the World’s Largest Mergers and Acquisitions. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02363-8_24

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02363-8_24

Published : 30 November 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-02362-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-02363-8

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research
  • Harvard Business School →
  • Faculty & Research →
  • January 2001 (Revised May 2010)
  • HBS Case Collection

BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields

  • Format: Print
  • | Pages: 15

About The Author

bp amoco case study

Benjamin C. Esty

More from the authors.

  • January 2024
  • Faculty Research

Pioneer Natural Resources: Enhancing the Capital Return Strategy with Variable Dividends

  • January 2024 (Revised May 2024)
  • December 2023 (Revised April 2024)

Yellow Corporation: On the Verge of Bankruptcy

  • Pioneer Natural Resources: Enhancing the Capital Return Strategy with Variable Dividends  By: Benjamin C. Esty, Elisabeth Kempf and Scott Mayfield
  • Yellow Corporation: On the Verge of Bankruptcy  By: Benjamin C. Esty and Edward A. Meyer

How they do it at BP Amoco

Talking to the award-winning IR team at a transatlantic giant

You need to register to access 3 free deep dive articles per month. To continue reading please register or login below..

  • Unlimited deep dives
  • Data-driven research around key topics
  • Buy-side insights
  • Benchmarking reports

bp amoco case study

Ian Williams

Stay informed and ahead on the latest trends and activities in the fast-moving world of investor relations by signing up for our popular newsletters today. Our weekly and monthly updates give you topical updates, expert analysis and comprehensive coverage of market changes, regulatory updates, IR trends and best practices, careers and much more.

Topic-related

Ir rankings – canada top 50 2024, ir rankings – us top 100 2024.

bp amoco case study

Global Investor Relations Practice Report 2023 – regional overview

bp amoco case study

Global Investor Relations Practice Report 2023 – Overview

bp amoco case study

Investor Perception Study – Europe 2023

bp amoco case study

Investor Events report 2023

bp amoco case study

IR Goals & Challenges

bp amoco case study

Investor Perception Study – Canada 2023

bp amoco case study

Investor Perception Study – US 2023

HBR.ORG - Prod

  • Business Case Studies

Finance & Accounting

BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance ^ 201054

BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance

bp amoco case study

BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance ^ 201054

Want to buy more than 1 copy? Contact: [email protected]

Product Description

Publication Date: January 09, 2001

Source: Harvard Business School

Following the BP/Amoco merger in December 1998, CFO David Watson asked Bill Young to recommend when and under what circumstances the firm should use external project finance instead of internal corporate funds to finance new capital investments. As part of this assignment, Young and his team must review each firm's current policy regarding project finance and evaluate the various rationales used to justify its use. Following this review, his team created a new policy statement recommending that BP Amoco finance capital expenditures using corporate funds except in three special circumstances: mega projects, projects in politically volatile areas, and joint ventures with heterogeneous partners. Whether the general rule of using corporate funds and whether the specific exceptions to the rule are appropriate for the merged entity are subjects for class discussion.

bp amoco case study

This Product Also Appears In

Buy together, related products.

BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields ^ 201067

BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields

The BP-Amoco Merger: Executive Compensation ^ UV1696

The BP-Amoco Merger: Executive Compensation

Harmonized Savings Plan at BP Amoco ^ 201052

Harmonized Savings Plan at BP Amoco

Copyright permissions.

If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity.

Order for your team and save!

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, british petroleum, ltd..

Publication date: 20 January 2017

Teaching notes

This case is one of a pair of cases used in a merger negotiation. It is designed to be used with “Amoco Corporation” (UVA-F-1262). One-half of the class prepares only the Amoco case, and one-half uses this case. BP and Amoco are considering a merger, and are in the process of negotiating a merger agreement. Macroeconomic assumptions, particularly forecasting future oil prices in an uncertain environment, and assumptions about Amoco's ability to reduce exploration and production costs make Amoco's future cash flows difficult to predict.

  • Mergers and acquisitions bargaining and negotiating valuation

Chaplinsky, S. , Lynch, L.J. and Doherty, P. (2017), "British Petroleum, Ltd.", . https://doi.org/10.1108/case.darden.2016.000051

University of Virginia Darden School Foundation

Copyright © 2000 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA. All rights reserved.

You do not currently have access to these teaching notes. Teaching notes are available for teaching faculty at subscribing institutions. Teaching notes accompany case studies with suggested learning objectives, classroom methods and potential assignment questions. They support dynamic classroom discussion to help develop student's analytical skills.

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

The Case Centre logo

Product details

bp amoco case study

About Stanford GSB

  • The Leadership
  • Dean’s Updates
  • School News & History
  • Commencement
  • Business, Government & Society
  • Centers & Institutes
  • Center for Entrepreneurial Studies
  • Center for Social Innovation
  • Stanford Seed

About the Experience

  • Learning at Stanford GSB
  • Experiential Learning
  • Guest Speakers
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Social Innovation
  • Communication
  • Life at Stanford GSB
  • Collaborative Environment
  • Activities & Organizations
  • Student Services
  • Housing Options
  • International Students

Full-Time Degree Programs

  • Why Stanford MBA
  • Academic Experience
  • Financial Aid
  • Why Stanford MSx
  • Research Fellows Program
  • See All Programs

Non-Degree & Certificate Programs

  • Executive Education
  • Stanford Executive Program
  • Programs for Organizations
  • The Difference
  • Online Programs
  • Stanford LEAD
  • Seed Transformation Program
  • Aspire Program
  • Seed Spark Program
  • Faculty Profiles
  • Academic Areas
  • Awards & Honors
  • Conferences

Faculty Research

  • Publications
  • Working Papers
  • Case Studies

Research Hub

  • Research Labs & Initiatives
  • Business Library
  • Data, Analytics & Research Computing
  • Behavioral Lab

Research Labs

  • Cities, Housing & Society Lab
  • Golub Capital Social Impact Lab

Research Initiatives

  • Corporate Governance Research Initiative
  • Corporations and Society Initiative
  • Policy and Innovation Initiative
  • Rapid Decarbonization Initiative
  • Stanford Latino Entrepreneurship Initiative
  • Value Chain Innovation Initiative
  • Venture Capital Initiative
  • Career & Success
  • Climate & Sustainability
  • Corporate Governance
  • Culture & Society
  • Finance & Investing
  • Government & Politics
  • Leadership & Management
  • Markets & Trade
  • Operations & Logistics
  • Opportunity & Access
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Political Economy
  • Social Impact
  • Technology & AI
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Email Newsletter

Welcome, Alumni

  • Communities
  • Digital Communities & Tools
  • Regional Chapters
  • Women’s Programs
  • Identity Chapters
  • Find Your Reunion
  • Career Resources
  • Job Search Resources
  • Career & Life Transitions
  • Programs & Services
  • Career Video Library
  • Alumni Education
  • Research Resources
  • Volunteering
  • Alumni News
  • Class Notes
  • Alumni Voices
  • Contact Alumni Relations
  • Upcoming Events

Admission Events & Information Sessions

  • MBA Program
  • MSx Program
  • PhD Program
  • Alumni Events
  • All Other Events
  • Operations, Information & Technology
  • Classical Liberalism
  • The Eddie Lunch
  • Accounting Summer Camp
  • Videos, Code & Data
  • California Econometrics Conference
  • California Quantitative Marketing PhD Conference
  • California School Conference
  • China India Insights Conference
  • Homo economicus, Evolving
  • Political Economics (2023–24)
  • Scaling Geologic Storage of CO2 (2023–24)
  • A Resilient Pacific: Building Connections, Envisioning Solutions
  • Adaptation and Innovation
  • Changing Climate
  • Civil Society
  • Climate Impact Summit
  • Climate Science
  • Corporate Carbon Disclosures
  • Earth’s Seafloor
  • Environmental Justice
  • Operations and Information Technology
  • Organizations
  • Sustainability Reporting and Control
  • Taking the Pulse of the Planet
  • Urban Infrastructure
  • Watershed Restoration
  • Junior Faculty Workshop on Financial Regulation and Banking
  • Ken Singleton Celebration
  • Marketing Camp
  • Quantitative Marketing PhD Alumni Conference
  • Presentations
  • Theory and Inference in Accounting Research
  • Stanford Closer Look Series
  • Quick Guides
  • Core Concepts
  • Journal Articles
  • Glossary of Terms
  • Faculty & Staff
  • Researchers & Students
  • Research Approach
  • Charitable Giving
  • Financial Health
  • Government Services
  • Workers & Careers
  • Short Course
  • Adaptive & Iterative Experimentation
  • Incentive Design
  • Social Sciences & Behavioral Nudges
  • Bandit Experiment Application
  • Conferences & Events
  • Get Involved
  • Reading Materials
  • Teaching & Curriculum
  • Energy Entrepreneurship
  • Faculty & Affiliates
  • SOLE Report
  • Responsible Supply Chains
  • Current Study Usage
  • Pre-Registration Information
  • Participate in a Study

The BP Amoco/ARCO Merger: Alaskan Crude Oil

The merger of British Petroleum and Atlantic Richfield as proposed would have made BP the sole operator and 70 percent owner of Alaskas oil fields. The Federal Trade Commission challenged the merger partly out of concern for higher West Coast gasoline prices, and required a divestiture ARCOs entire Alaskan business. However, West Coast crude prices are governed by the cost of the marginal source of supply to the region, imported oil. Because any cutback in sales of Alaskan oil on the West Coast could be offset with higher imports, with minimal impact on the import price, the merger would have raised crude prices by tenths of a penny per gallon at the most. The impact on consumer prices was even more tenuous. More serious concerns, which were given less attention, were that BP might gain monopsony power in bidding for oil leases and perhaps in negotiating with suppliers.

  • Priorities for the GSB's Future
  • See the Current DEI Report
  • Supporting Data
  • Research & Insights
  • Share Your Thoughts
  • Search Fund Primer
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Faculty Advisors
  • Louis W. Foster Resource Center
  • Defining Social Innovation
  • Impact Compass
  • Global Health Innovation Insights
  • Faculty Affiliates
  • Student Awards & Certificates
  • Changemakers
  • Dean Jonathan Levin
  • Dean Garth Saloner
  • Dean Robert Joss
  • Dean Michael Spence
  • Dean Robert Jaedicke
  • Dean Rene McPherson
  • Dean Arjay Miller
  • Dean Ernest Arbuckle
  • Dean Jacob Hugh Jackson
  • Dean Willard Hotchkiss
  • Faculty in Memoriam
  • Stanford GSB Firsts
  • Certificate & Award Recipients
  • Teaching Approach
  • Analysis and Measurement of Impact
  • The Corporate Entrepreneur: Startup in a Grown-Up Enterprise
  • Data-Driven Impact
  • Designing Experiments for Impact
  • Digital Business Transformation
  • The Founder’s Right Hand
  • Marketing for Measurable Change
  • Product Management
  • Public Policy Lab: Financial Challenges Facing US Cities
  • Public Policy Lab: Homelessness in California
  • Lab Features
  • Curricular Integration
  • View From The Top
  • Formation of New Ventures
  • Managing Growing Enterprises
  • Startup Garage
  • Explore Beyond the Classroom
  • Stanford Venture Studio
  • Summer Program
  • Workshops & Events
  • The Five Lenses of Entrepreneurship
  • Leadership Labs
  • Executive Challenge
  • Arbuckle Leadership Fellows Program
  • Selection Process
  • Training Schedule
  • Time Commitment
  • Learning Expectations
  • Post-Training Opportunities
  • Who Should Apply
  • Introductory T-Groups
  • Leadership for Society Program
  • Certificate
  • 2023 Awardees
  • 2022 Awardees
  • 2021 Awardees
  • 2020 Awardees
  • 2019 Awardees
  • 2018 Awardees
  • Social Management Immersion Fund
  • Stanford Impact Founder Fellowships and Prizes
  • Stanford Impact Leader Prizes
  • Social Entrepreneurship
  • Stanford GSB Impact Fund
  • Economic Development
  • Energy & Environment
  • Stanford GSB Residences
  • Environmental Leadership
  • Stanford GSB Artwork
  • A Closer Look
  • California & the Bay Area
  • Voices of Stanford GSB
  • Business & Beneficial Technology
  • Business & Sustainability
  • Business & Free Markets
  • Business, Government, and Society Forum
  • Second Year
  • Global Experiences
  • JD/MBA Joint Degree
  • MA Education/MBA Joint Degree
  • MD/MBA Dual Degree
  • MPP/MBA Joint Degree
  • MS Computer Science/MBA Joint Degree
  • MS Electrical Engineering/MBA Joint Degree
  • MS Environment and Resources (E-IPER)/MBA Joint Degree
  • Academic Calendar
  • Clubs & Activities
  • LGBTQ+ Students
  • Military Veterans
  • Minorities & People of Color
  • Partners & Families
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Student Support
  • Residential Life
  • Student Voices
  • MBA Alumni Voices
  • A Week in the Life
  • Career Support
  • Employment Outcomes
  • Cost of Attendance
  • Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program
  • Yellow Ribbon Program
  • BOLD Fellows Fund
  • Application Process
  • Loan Forgiveness
  • Contact the Financial Aid Office
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • GMAT & GRE
  • English Language Proficiency
  • Personal Information, Activities & Awards
  • Professional Experience
  • Letters of Recommendation
  • Optional Short Answer Questions
  • Application Fee
  • Reapplication
  • Deferred Enrollment
  • Joint & Dual Degrees
  • Entering Class Profile
  • Event Schedule
  • Ambassadors
  • New & Noteworthy
  • Ask a Question
  • See Why Stanford MSx
  • Is MSx Right for You?
  • MSx Stories
  • Leadership Development
  • Career Advancement
  • Career Change
  • How You Will Learn
  • Admission Events
  • Personal Information
  • Information for Recommenders
  • GMAT, GRE & EA
  • English Proficiency Tests
  • After You’re Admitted
  • Daycare, Schools & Camps
  • U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents
  • Requirements
  • Requirements: Behavioral
  • Requirements: Quantitative
  • Requirements: Macro
  • Requirements: Micro
  • Annual Evaluations
  • Field Examination
  • Research Activities
  • Research Papers
  • Dissertation
  • Oral Examination
  • Current Students
  • Education & CV
  • International Applicants
  • Statement of Purpose
  • Reapplicants
  • Application Fee Waiver
  • Deadline & Decisions
  • Job Market Candidates
  • Academic Placements
  • Stay in Touch
  • Faculty Mentors
  • Current Fellows
  • Standard Track
  • Fellowship & Benefits
  • Group Enrollment
  • Program Formats
  • Developing a Program
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Strategic Transformation
  • Program Experience
  • Contact Client Services
  • Campus Experience
  • Live Online Experience
  • Silicon Valley & Bay Area
  • Digital Credentials
  • Faculty Spotlights
  • Participant Spotlights
  • Eligibility
  • International Participants
  • Stanford Ignite
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Founding Donors
  • Location Information
  • Participant Profile
  • Network Membership
  • Program Impact
  • Collaborators
  • Entrepreneur Profiles
  • Company Spotlights
  • Seed Transformation Network
  • Responsibilities
  • Current Coaches
  • How to Apply
  • Meet the Consultants
  • Meet the Interns
  • Intern Profiles
  • Collaborate
  • Research Library
  • News & Insights
  • Program Contacts
  • Databases & Datasets
  • Research Guides
  • Consultations
  • Research Workshops
  • Career Research
  • Research Data Services
  • Course Reserves
  • Course Research Guides
  • Material Loan Periods
  • Fines & Other Charges
  • Document Delivery
  • Interlibrary Loan
  • Equipment Checkout
  • Print & Scan
  • MBA & MSx Students
  • PhD Students
  • Other Stanford Students
  • Faculty Assistants
  • Research Assistants
  • Stanford GSB Alumni
  • Telling Our Story
  • Staff Directory
  • Site Registration
  • Alumni Directory
  • Alumni Email
  • Privacy Settings & My Profile
  • Success Stories
  • The Story of Circles
  • Support Women’s Circles
  • Stanford Women on Boards Initiative
  • Alumnae Spotlights
  • Insights & Research
  • Industry & Professional
  • Entrepreneurial Commitment Group
  • Recent Alumni
  • Half-Century Club
  • Fall Reunions
  • Spring Reunions
  • MBA 25th Reunion
  • Half-Century Club Reunion
  • Faculty Lectures
  • Ernest C. Arbuckle Award
  • Alison Elliott Exceptional Achievement Award
  • ENCORE Award
  • Excellence in Leadership Award
  • John W. Gardner Volunteer Leadership Award
  • Robert K. Jaedicke Faculty Award
  • Jack McDonald Military Service Appreciation Award
  • Jerry I. Porras Latino Leadership Award
  • Tapestry Award
  • Student & Alumni Events
  • Executive Recruiters
  • Interviewing
  • Land the Perfect Job with LinkedIn
  • Negotiating
  • Elevator Pitch
  • Email Best Practices
  • Resumes & Cover Letters
  • Self-Assessment
  • Whitney Birdwell Ball
  • Margaret Brooks
  • Bryn Panee Burkhart
  • Margaret Chan
  • Ricki Frankel
  • Peter Gandolfo
  • Cindy W. Greig
  • Natalie Guillen
  • Carly Janson
  • Sloan Klein
  • Sherri Appel Lassila
  • Stuart Meyer
  • Tanisha Parrish
  • Virginia Roberson
  • Philippe Taieb
  • Michael Takagawa
  • Terra Winston
  • Johanna Wise
  • Debbie Wolter
  • Rebecca Zucker
  • Complimentary Coaching
  • Changing Careers
  • Work-Life Integration
  • Career Breaks
  • Flexible Work
  • Encore Careers
  • Join a Board
  • D&B Hoovers
  • Data Axle (ReferenceUSA)
  • EBSCO Business Source
  • Global Newsstream
  • Market Share Reporter
  • ProQuest One Business
  • Student Clubs
  • Entrepreneurial Students
  • Stanford GSB Trust
  • Alumni Community
  • How to Volunteer
  • Springboard Sessions
  • Consulting Projects
  • 2020 – 2029
  • 2010 – 2019
  • 2000 – 2009
  • 1990 – 1999
  • 1980 – 1989
  • 1970 – 1979
  • 1960 – 1969
  • 1950 – 1959
  • 1940 – 1949
  • Service Areas
  • ACT History
  • ACT Awards Celebration
  • ACT Governance Structure
  • Building Leadership for ACT
  • Individual Leadership Positions
  • Leadership Role Overview
  • Purpose of the ACT Management Board
  • Contact ACT
  • Business & Nonprofit Communities
  • Reunion Volunteers
  • Ways to Give
  • Fiscal Year Report
  • Business School Fund Leadership Council
  • Planned Giving Options
  • Planned Giving Benefits
  • Planned Gifts and Reunions
  • Legacy Partners
  • Giving News & Stories
  • Giving Deadlines
  • Development Staff
  • Submit Class Notes
  • Class Secretaries
  • Board of Directors
  • Health Care
  • Sustainability
  • Class Takeaways
  • All Else Equal: Making Better Decisions
  • If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society
  • Grit & Growth
  • Think Fast, Talk Smart
  • Spring 2022
  • Spring 2021
  • Autumn 2020
  • Summer 2020
  • Winter 2020
  • In the Media
  • For Journalists
  • DCI Fellows
  • Other Auditors
  • Academic Calendar & Deadlines
  • Course Materials
  • Entrepreneurial Resources
  • Campus Drive Grove
  • Campus Drive Lawn
  • CEMEX Auditorium
  • King Community Court
  • Seawell Family Boardroom
  • Stanford GSB Bowl
  • Stanford Investors Common
  • Town Square
  • Vidalakis Courtyard
  • Vidalakis Dining Hall
  • Catering Services
  • Policies & Guidelines
  • Reservations
  • Contact Faculty Recruiting
  • Lecturer Positions
  • Postdoctoral Positions
  • Accommodations
  • CMC-Managed Interviews
  • Recruiter-Managed Interviews
  • Virtual Interviews
  • Campus & Virtual
  • Search for Candidates
  • Think Globally
  • Recruiting Calendar
  • Recruiting Policies
  • Full-Time Employment
  • Summer Employment
  • Entrepreneurial Summer Program
  • Global Management Immersion Experience
  • Social-Purpose Summer Internships
  • Process Overview
  • Project Types
  • Client Eligibility Criteria
  • Client Screening
  • ACT Leadership
  • Social Innovation & Nonprofit Management Resources
  • Develop Your Organization’s Talent
  • Centers & Initiatives
  • Student Fellowships

Back Home

  • Search Search Search …
  • Search Search …

BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance

Subjects Covered Capital budgeting Capital expenditures Mergers Project finance Risk management

by Benjamin C. Esty, Michael Kane

Source: Harvard Business School

19 pages. Publication Date: Jan 09, 2001. Prod. #: 201054-PDF-ENG

BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project FinanceHarvard Case Study Solution and HBR and HBS Case Analysis

Related Posts

American Fast Food in Korea

You may also like

Best Buy (B): The Journey Accelerates

Best Buy (B): The Journey Accelerates

Subjects Covered Creativity Employee development Implementing strategy Organizational learning by Dorothy Leonard, Brian J. Delacey Source: Harvard Business School 4 pages. Publication […]

Note on Compensation Research

Note on Compensation Research

Subjects Covered Compensation Databases by Robert G. Eccles, Boris Groysberg, Ann Cullen 22 pages. Publication Date: Feb 29, 2008. Prod. #: 408114-PDF-ENG […]

Yogurt Mamas: Probiotics in Tanzania

Yogurt Mamas: Probiotics in Tanzania

Subjects Covered Business growth Emerging markets Entrepreneurial management Marketing Organizational development by Oana Branzei, David J. Sharp, Jessica Kelly, Osama Siddiqui Source: […]

Betfair vs. UK Bookmakers

Betfair vs. UK Bookmakers

Subjects Covered Business models Network effects Platforms Strategic thinking by Ramon Casadesus – Masanell, Neil Campbell Source: Harvard Business School 23 pages. […]

  • Today's news
  • Reviews and deals
  • Climate change
  • 2024 election
  • Fall allergies
  • Health news
  • Mental health
  • Sexual health
  • Family health
  • So mini ways
  • Unapologetically
  • Buying guides

Entertainment

  • How to Watch
  • My Portfolio
  • Latest News
  • Stock Market
  • Premium News
  • Biden Economy
  • EV Deep Dive
  • Stocks: Most Actives
  • Stocks: Gainers
  • Stocks: Losers
  • Trending Tickers
  • World Indices
  • US Treasury Bonds
  • Top Mutual Funds
  • Highest Open Interest
  • Highest Implied Volatility
  • Stock Comparison
  • Advanced Charts
  • Currency Converter
  • Basic Materials
  • Communication Services
  • Consumer Cyclical
  • Consumer Defensive
  • Financial Services
  • Industrials
  • Real Estate
  • Mutual Funds
  • Credit cards
  • Balance Transfer Cards
  • Cash-back Cards
  • Rewards Cards
  • Travel Cards
  • Personal Loans
  • Student Loans
  • Car Insurance
  • Morning Brief
  • Market Domination
  • Market Domination Overtime
  • Opening Bid
  • Stocks in Translation
  • Lead This Way
  • Good Buy or Goodbye?
  • Fantasy football
  • Pro Pick 'Em
  • College Pick 'Em
  • Fantasy baseball
  • Fantasy hockey
  • Fantasy basketball
  • Download the app
  • Daily fantasy
  • Scores and schedules
  • GameChannel
  • World Baseball Classic
  • Premier League
  • CONCACAF League
  • Champions League
  • Motorsports
  • Horse racing
  • Newsletters

New on Yahoo

  • Privacy Dashboard

Yahoo Finance

Amoco ultimate® with invigorate® can take you up to 300 miles farther per year¹.

Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® can take you up to 300 miles farther yearly, compared to regular fuel in top-selling sedans and car SUVs.

bp's "300 Miles Farther" campaign is an unmatched claim that enables drivers to cover more distance between fill-ups with confidence.

CHICAGO , May 20, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- bp (NYSE: BP) continues to push the boundaries of driving range thanks to the findings from new research, revealing that drivers can go up to 300 miles farther each year using Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® compared to regular fuel¹.

Completed in the fourth quarter of 2023, this comprehensive proprietary research included a range of late-model sedans and car SUVs, representing top-selling vehicles. The results were clear: Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® can take you up to 300 miles farther per year compared to regular fuel¹, delivering tangible benefits, and enabling drivers to cover more distance between fill-ups.

"Our consumers have long experienced the benefits of our fuels in their cars and SUVs. Continuous use of our premium fuel, Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate®, ensures optimal engine performance, providing cleaner engines and unlocking your engine's full potential²," said Mukta Tandon , VP US mobility marketing at bp. "The results of this testing are a testament to the ability to drive farther with fewer fill-ups with Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate®."

To help promote this new claim, bp is launching the "300 Miles Farther" campaign, which includes both traditional and digital advertising. This campaign showcases the results of the testing and highlights the tangible benefits of choosing Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® for drivers looking to turn their cars into clean, mean, driving machines, along with more miles between refueling stops.

As a pioneer in innovation, bp remains dedicated to discovering transformative solutions that drive progress and redefine fuel performance. By providing drivers with a reliable solution to meet their evolving needs on the road, bp reaffirms its commitment to shaping a sustainable and efficient future for transportation.

For more information about bp's latest advancements in fuel technology, please visit bp.com .

¹Claim is based on continuous use over 15,000 miles and using EPA's city/highway annual mileage estimate and driving cycles. Calculation uses average fuel economy difference between 93 octane Amoco Ultimate® and 87 octane Regular minimum detergent E10 fuels and fuel economy restoration through engine cleaning. A representative sample of late model sedans and car SUVs was used for testing. Results will vary based on what you drive, how you drive, and other factors. Use of Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® does not provide economic savings.

²Optimizes your engine's performance from the harmful effects of deposits caused by minimum detergent fuels. Requires continuous use. Results depend on what you drive and how you drive.

About bp: bp is investing in America's energy system as we transition from an international oil company to an integrated energy company. With $150 billion invested in the US since 2005, we employ more than 30,000 Americans and support more than 275,000 jobs. We have a bigger footprint here than anywhere else in the world, and we're proud to be a trusted partner for secure, affordable, and reliable energy. To learn more, please visit bpAmerica.com.

Contacts: bp press office, US [email protected]

View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/amoco-ultimate-with-invigorate-can-take-you-up-to-300-miles-farther-per-year-302149566.html

IMAGES

  1. Bp Amoco (case study)

    bp amoco case study

  2. Bp Amoco (case study)

    bp amoco case study

  3. BP Amoco Case Study

    bp amoco case study

  4. (PDF) Bp Amoco (case study)

    bp amoco case study

  5. Project Finance

    bp amoco case study

  6. (PDF) CASE STUDY: BP AMOCO (A): POLICY STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PROJECT

    bp amoco case study

VIDEO

  1. I WAKE UP 🕒 4:15 Am For Neet Study 📚✅

  2. Bache ko kisne chura lia ? #shorts #detectivemehul #logicalriddles

  3. Amoco/Standard Oil commercial 1969 "Mechanic"

  4. BP Amoco retirees looking to pass the torch

  5. Full Update Formal BP To New Amoco Our Famous Chicken Gas Station Car Wash @ Dallas Pike WV

  6. BP Animated Re-Branding Ad "Better Petroleum"

COMMENTS

  1. BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance

    Following the BP/Amoco merger in December 1998, CFO David Watson asked Bill Young to recommend when and under what circumstances the firm should use external project finance instead of internal corporate funds to finance new capital investments. As part of this assignment, Young and his team must review each firm's current policy regarding ...

  2. BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields Change

    HBR Change Management Solutions Finance & Accounting Case Study | Benjamin C. Esty, Michael Kane Case Study Description. British Petroleum and Amoco were the two largest members of the Azerbaijan International Oil Consortium (AIOC), an 11-firm consortium that was spending $10 billion to develop oil fields in the Caspian Sea.

  3. British Petroleum Merger with Amoco: Integrated Case Studies

    Request PDF | British Petroleum Merger with Amoco: Integrated Case Studies | During 1998, BP merged with Amoco in a deal valued at $48.2 billion. At that time, it was billed as the largest oil ...

  4. Case Study: Bp Amoco (A): Policy Statement on The Use of Project Finance

    BP AMOCO (A): POLICY STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PROJECT FINANCE MEMO TO: Mr. Bill Young, Mr. Adam Wilson, and Mr. Mike Wrenn FROM: Mr. Parviz Miralamli CC: Dr. Anar Valiyev DATE: December 10, 2017 SUBJECT: BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance As you know, with their complex and enormous organizational structure almost during a century, the British Petroleum Company p.l.c ...

  5. British Petroleum Merger with Amoco

    The company had 18,300 service stations worldwide. BP merged with Amoco to become BP Amoco in the year 1998 and acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol in the year 2000. The company was renamed as BP plc in the year 2001. During the period 2003-2013, BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia.

  6. BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian Oil Fields

    Following the BP/Amoco merger in December 1998, managers in the combined firm's finance group had to reassess the Early Oil financing strategy and determine the best way to finance its share of the $8 billion Full Field Development Project. Should it use internal funds, project finance, or a mixture of the two? ... Harvard Business School Case ...

  7. BP Amoco: integrating competitive and financial strategy

    Part One of this Case Study considered BP Amoco's recent competitive strategies and performance. Using the framework of the `Four-Quadrant Value Proposition Model' (Thakor et al., 1999), it was observed that BP Amoco focused its strategies and resource allocation on efficiency/control and market awareness.Over the 10-year period studied however, the company swung the balance of these two areas ...

  8. BP AMOCO (A): POLICY STATEMENT ON THE USE OF PROJECT FINANCE

    SUBJECT: BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance. As you know, with their complex and enormous organizational structure almost. during a century, the British Petroleum Company ...

  9. BP Amoco (Case Study)

    BP Amoco (Case Study) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses BP Amoco's policy on the use of project finance versus corporate finance after the merger of BP and Amoco in 1998. It provides an overview of the two companies pre-merger and their centralized finance functions.

  10. BP Amoco: integrating competitive and financial strategy. Part one

    At the time of writing this Case Study (early 2000), the price had again increased dramatically in a short period to top the psychological barrier of $30 per barrel, a near three-fold increase from 1998. ... It avoided a costly court case, and in fact, BP Amoco sold ARCO's Alaskan interests at a good price ($7 billion). Originally, BP Amoco had ...

  11. How they do it at BP Amoco

    It was one of the first big privatizations initiated by the Thatcher government in the 1980s and, bar a bit of a blip in the early 1990s, has hardly looked back since. Last year it took a further voyage into the unknown when it embarked on the largest industrial merger in history with Amoco, building a $150 bn giant.

  12. BP Amoco

    This document discusses BP Amoco's investment in the Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC) which is developing oil fields in Azerbaijan. BP Amoco owns 34.1% of AIOC. The background provides details on a $1.9 billion early oil project and the need for $8-10 billion to fully develop the fields. The project faces political, financial, transportation and industry risks. The document ...

  13. BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance

    Following this review, his team created a new policy statement recommending that BP Amoco finance capital expenditures using corporate funds except in three special circumstances: mega projects, projects in politically volatile areas, and joint ventures with heterogeneous partners. Whether the general rule of using corporate funds and whether ...

  14. British Petroleum, Ltd.

    Abstract. This case is one of a pair of cases used in a merger negotiation. It is designed to be used with "Amoco Corporation" (UVA-F-1262). One-half of the class prepares only the Amoco case, and one-half uses this case. BP and Amoco are considering a merger, and are in the process of negotiating a merger agreement.

  15. BP /Amoco Paraxylene Crystallization Technology (Case Study)

    The BP/Amoco paraxylene process began as Amoco Heritage technology. Amoco commenced operation of its first pX unit (Texas City No. 1) in 1967 to provide feedstock for its pioneering and award winning purified terephthalic acid (PTA) process which ushered in the age of polyester. Amoco merged with BP in 1998.

  16. BP Amoco (B): Financing Development of the Caspian ...

    British Petroleum and Amoco were the two largest members of the Azerbaijan International Oil Consortium (AIOC), an 11-firm consortium that was spending USD10 billion to develop oil fields in the Caspian Sea. As of March 1999, AIOC had completed a USD1.9 billion development project known as Early Oil.

  17. The BP Amoco/ARCO Merger: Alaskan Crude Oil

    Download. The merger of British Petroleum and Atlantic Richfield as proposed would have made BP the sole operator and 70 percent owner of Alaskas oil fields. The Federal Trade Commission challenged the merger partly out of concern for higher West Coast gasoline prices, and required a divestiture ARCOs entire Alaskan business. However, West ...

  18. BP ‐Amoco Mid‐Century Process for Terephthalic Acid Production (Case Study)

    Summary Summarized within this chapter is a description of the BP-Amoco liquid phase, Mid-Century catalyzed oxidation of p -xylene to crude terephthalic acid, ... (Case Study) William H. Gong, William H. Gong. Origin Materials, 930 Riverside Pkwy #10, West Sacramento, CA, 95605 USA. Search for more papers by this author ...

  19. BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance Case Study

    https://caseism.comThis Case Is About BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance Case Study Help And AnalysisGet Your BP Amoco (A): Policy ...

  20. BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project Finance Case

    Subjects Covered Capital budgeting Capital expenditures Mergers Project finance Risk management. by Benjamin C. Esty, Michael Kane. Source: Harvard Business School. 19 pages. Publication Date: Jan 09, 2001. Prod. #: 201054-PDF-ENG. BP Amoco (A): Policy Statement on the Use of Project FinanceHarvard Case Study Solution and HBR and HBS Case Analysis

  21. BP Amoco Caspian Oilfields Financing Case Study

    Project Finance - BP Amoco Caspian Oilfields Financing Case Study. Jun 20, 2016 •. 2 likes • 1,530 views. B. Buvan Rajendra. 1 of 8. Download now. Download to read offline. Project Finance - BP Amoco Caspian Oilfields Financing Case Study - Download as a PDF or view online for free.

  22. BP Amoco Case Study

    Bp Amoco Case Study - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. A short case study of the BP Amoco project

  23. BP ‐Amoco Mid‐Century Process for Terephthalic Acid Production (Case Study)

    Download Citation | BP ‐Amoco Mid‐Century Process for Terephthalic Acid Production (Case Study) | Summarized within this chapter is a description of the BP‐Amoco liquid phase, Mid‐Century ...

  24. Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® Can Take You Up To 300 Miles Farther

    Amoco Ultimate® with Invigorate® can take you up to 300 miles farther yearly, compared to regular fuel in top-selling sedans and car SUVs. bp's "300 Miles Farther" campaign is an unmatched claim ...