School-Related Violence: Definition, Scope, and Prevention Goals
Cite this chapter.
- Thomas W. Miller Ph.D. 2 &
- Robert F. Kraus M.D. 2
4431 Accesses
6 Citations
The purpose of this book is to provide a compendium of papers addressing school violence and the critical ingredients in prevention interventions that contribute to reducing and/or eliminating various forms of violence in the school setting. The Center for the Prevention of School Violence developed a research-based definition of “school violence” in 1997. The definition, which emerged from a detailed microanalysis, suggests that school violence is any behavior that violates a school’s educational mission or climate of respect or jeopardizes the intent of the school to be free of aggression against persons or property, drugs, weapons, disruptions, and disorder (Center for Prevention of School Violence, 2004). School violence involves a spectrum of crimes taking place within educational institutions. Ensuring safer schools requires establishing valid and reliable indicators of the current state of school crime and safety across the nation and periodically monitoring and updating such indicators. Two decades ago, the term “school violence” itself was widely used to describe violent and aggressive acts on school campuses. Today, the definition is much broader in scope.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Durable hardcover edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Arias, E., Anderson, R. N., Kung, H. C., Murphy, S. L., & Kochanek, K. S. (2003). Deaths: Final data. National Vital Statistics Report s, 52, 1–100.
PubMed Google Scholar
Blum, R. W., Beuhring, T., & Rinehart, P. M. (2000). Protecting Teens: Beyond Race, Income and Family Structure. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota.
Google Scholar
Boxer, P., Goldstein, S., Musher-Eizenman, D., Gubow, E. F., & Heretick, D. (2005). Developmental issues in school based aggression prevention. The Journal of Primary Prevention , 26(5), 383–400.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brener, N. D., Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Barrios, L. C., & Small, M. L. (2004). Effect of the incident at Columbine on students’ violence- and suicide-related behaviors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 22, 146–150.
Article Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control (2001). CDC School Health Guidelines to Prevent Unintentional Injuries and Violence MMWR 2001, 50 No. RR-22.
CDC (2004). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS ™ ). Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2004. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars .
Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. (2004). Blueprints for Violence Prevention. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado. Available at http://www.colorado.edu/scpv/blueprints .
Denmark, F., Krauss, H. H., Wesner, R. W., Midlarsky, E., & Gielen, U. P. (2006). Violence in Schools: Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Perspectives . New York: Springer Publishers Inc.
Edwards, D., Hunt, M., Meyers, J., Grogg, K., & Jarrett, O. (2005). Acceptability and student outcomes of a violence prevention curriculum. The Journal of Primary Prevention , 26(5), 401–418.
Elliott, D. S. (Ed.) (2001). Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, GA: Office of the Surgeon General.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2003). Age-Specific Arrest Rates and Race-Specific Arrest Rates for Selected Offenses: 1965–1992 . Washington, DC: Author.
Garbarino, J. (1999). Lost Boys: Why Our Sons Turn Violent and How We Can Save Them . New York: Free Press.
Herrenkohl, T. I., Magiun, E., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2000). Developmental risk factors for youth violence. Journal of Adolescent Health , 26, 176–186.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Howell, J. C. (2000). Youth Gang Programs and Strategies . Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
McCord, J., Widom, C. S., & Crowell, N. A. (Eds.) (2001). Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Miller, T. W., Veltkamp, L. J., & Kraus, R. F. (2005). Character education as a prevention strategy in school related violence. The Journal of Primary Prevention , 26(5), 455–467.
Murphy, S. L. (2000). Deaths: Final Data for 1998 . Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
National Consortium of School Violence Prevention Researchers and Practitioners (2006). School Shootings Position Statement October 27, 2006. Author.
National School Safety Center (2007). The National School Safety Center serves as an advocate for safe, secure and peaceful schools worldwide and as a catalyst for the prevention of school crime and violence. Available at http://www.schoolsafety.us
Office of Juvenile Justice and Violence Prevention (2004). Promising Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence . Washington, DC: Author.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Reiss, A. J. & Roth, J. A. (Eds.) (1993). Understanding and Preventing Violence . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rennison, C. M. (2000). Criminal Victimization 1999: Changes 1998–99 with Trends 1993–99 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Rodney, L., Johnson, D., & Srivastava, E. P. (2005). Impact of culturally relevant violence prevention models on school aged youth. Developmental issues in school based aggression prevention. The Journal of Primary Prevention , 26(5), 439–454.
Steinberg, L. (2000). Youth violence: Do parents and families make a difference? National Institute of Justice Journal , 243, 30–38.
Thompson, S. & Kyle, K. (2005). Understanding mass shootings: Links between personhood and power in the competitive school environment. Developmental issues in school based aggression prevention. The Journal of Primary Prevention , 26(5), 419–438.
Thornton, T. N., Craft, C. A., Dahlberg, L. L., Lynch, B. S., & Baer, K. (2000). Best Practices of Youth Violence: A Sourcebook for Community Action. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (1996). Guide to Clinical Preventative Services , 2nd edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
U.S. Department of Education (2005). 2005 Annual Report on School Safety . Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and National Institutes of Health.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health , 2nd edition (2 vols.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Violence Institute of New Jersey (2001). Source Book of Drug and Violence Prevention Programs for Children and Adolescents. New Brunswick: State of New Jersey, USA.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Kentucky, KY, USA
Thomas W. Miller Ph.D. & Robert F. Kraus M.D.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
University of Kentucky, Kentucky, KY, USA
Thomas W. Miller
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Miller, T.W., Kraus, R.F. (2008). School-Related Violence: Definition, Scope, and Prevention Goals. In: Miller, T.W. (eds) School Violence and Primary Prevention. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77119-9_2
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77119-9_2
Publisher Name : Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN : 978-0-387-75660-8
Online ISBN : 978-0-387-77119-9
eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
- Open access
- Published: 27 June 2019
Physical, psychological and social impact of school violence on children
- Pietro Ferrara ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-3464 1 , 2 ,
- Giulia Franceschini 2 ,
- Alberto Villani 3 &
- Giovanni Corsello 4
Italian Journal of Pediatrics volume 45 , Article number: 76 ( 2019 ) Cite this article
96k Accesses
36 Citations
18 Altmetric
Metrics details
Violence against children includes all forms of violence against people under 18 years old whether perpetrated by parents or other caregivers, peers, partners, teacher or strangers. This is a public health, human rights, and social problem: levels of violence against children are frightfully high and it is estimated that up to 1 billion children aged 2–17 years, have experienced a type of violence. Very few studies provided physical violence perpetrated at school but it can have a physical impact, causing psychological distress, permanent physical disability and long-term physical or mental ill-health. Children who experienced any type of violence at school may develop reactive attachment disorder, modest physical inactivity, overweight or obesity, diabetes, smoking habits, heavy alcohol use, poor self-rated health, cancer, heart disease, and respiratory disease and other negative outcomes. Evidence from international studies clearly shows that nonviolent, positive discipline delivers better results, while any type of violence is associated with many negative one.
Introduction
Violence against children is a public health, human rights, and social problem, with potentially devastating and costly consequences. [ 1 ] Globally, levels of violence against children are frightfully high and it is estimated that up to 1 billion children aged 2–17 years, have experienced physical, sexual, or emotional violence or neglect. [ 2 ]
Violence against children includes all forms of violence against people under 18 years old whether perpetrated by parents or other caregivers, peers, partners, or strangers. This wide definition of violence includes not only the more obvious violent acts of commission: at least one of six main types of interpersonal violence that tend to occur at different stages in a child’s development.
Maltreatment (including violent punishment): physical, sexual and psychological/emotional violence.
Bullying (including cyber-bullying).
Youth violence: concentrated among children and young adults aged 10–29 years, occurs most often in community settings between acquaintances and strangers.
Intimate partner violence (or domestic violence): physical, sexual and emotional violence by an intimate partner or ex-partner.
Sexual violence: non-consensual completed or attempted sexual contact and acts of a sexual nature not involving contact.
Emotional or psychological violence: restricting a child’s movements, denigration, ridicule, threats and intimidation, discrimination, rejection and other non-physical forms of hostile treatment. [ 3 ]
Violence may take place in homes, orphanages, residential care facilities, on the streets, in the workplace, in prisons and other place of detention and lastly at schools. Hardly any studies provided age-specific and sex-specific period prevalence estimates for physical violence perpetrated by teachers. [ 4 ]
Whereas children spend more time in the care of adults in schools and other places of learning than they do anywhere else outside of their homes; because of that violence that occurs at school should be under investigation for the physical, psychological and social problems arising from that. These consequences can be prompt, as well as latent, and can last for years after the initial violence.
In Italy a study conducted in the last 5 years reported 78 cases of school violence against children with a total of 156 investigated teachers (154 women and 2 males).
The number of teachers involved was various during those years: from 2016 to 2017 tripled, in 2018 a further 30% of episodes was reported. The phenomenon is still growing,also refers to the number the media’s alerts.
Geographical distribution analysis verified 23 cases in the North of Italy (30%), while 20 (25%) in the Center, and 35 (45%) in the South and in the Islands. Most cases 51 (65%) were found in provincial countries, while the remainder took place in urban centers 27 (35%).
The crime hypothesized was in 63 cases (81%) a maltreatment and 15 cases (19%) that of psychological violence. [ 5 ]
Plan International estimates that at least 246 million boys and girls suffer from school violence every year. [ 6 ]
Type of violence at school
Violence in schools is one of the most visible forms of violence against children: it includes physical, psychological and sexual violence and bullying that are related to causes such as gender and social norms and wider structural and contextual factors such as income inequality, deprivation, marginalisation and conflict. [ 6 ]
Violence can be any form of physical aggression with intention to hurt(corporal punishment and physical bullying) by adults and other children. Corporal punishment is any punishment in which physical force is used and that is intended to cause some degree of pain or discomfort; it is often used to punish poor academic performance or to correct misbehaviour.
Psychological violence includes verbal and emotional abuse: isolating, rejecting, ignoring, insults, spreading rumours, making up lies, name calling, ridicule, humiliation and threats, and psychological punishment.
Psychological punishment are not physical but that humiliate, denigrate, scapegoat, threaten, scare or ridicule a child or adolescent. Sexual violence includes intimidation of a sexual nature, sexual harassment, unwanted touching, sexual coercion and rape, and it affects both girls and boys. Violence in schools creates insecurity and fear which harm the general school climate and infringe pupils’ right to learn in a safe, unthreatening environment.
Schools cannot fulfil their role as places of learning and socialisation if children are not in an environment free of violence. [ 7 ]
Violence, in particular physical one among learners, and physical violence perpetuated by teachers and other staff, can happen in sight of other learners for example, in playgrounds or classrooms or in the context of school sports. Teachers may also not recognise bullying or the codes, languages and practices children and adolescents use in harassing each other, and bullying that takes place out of their sight is difficult to identify. In some cases, teachers permit or engage in violent and bullying behaviour themselves. [ 8 ]
Children and adolescents at risk of school violence
Violence against children is widespread and must be addressed to improve children’s health and well-being. [ 4 ] All children and adolescents could be at risk of school violence: but those who are vulnerable because of factors such poverty, social status associated with ethnicity, linguistic or cultural differences and migration or displacement, and disabilities, who are orphans or from households affected by HIV, may be more likely to be targeted. [ 9 ]
Punishment by teachers may be more likely to target children and adolescents from stigmatised and marginalised populations, for example, refugee and migrant children may be punished for not being able to speak the language of instruction, and the UN Study on Violence against Children notes that in India, higher caste teachers may be more likely to denigrate and humiliate children from lower castes. [ 10 , 11 ]
Boys, especially younger children, are more likely to be punished physically at school, while the percentage of children verbally punished is pretty much equal for boys and girls. [ 12 ]
Where school violence occurs
School violence can occur inside and outside the classroom, around schools, on the way to and from school. Violence, in particular physical violence among learners, and physical violence perpetuated by teachers and other staff, can happen in sight of other learners for example, in playgrounds or classrooms or in the context of school sports. [ 13 ]
All forms of violence in schools infringe the fundamental right to education and unsafe.
learning environments reduce the quality of education for all learners.
Physical impact of school violence on children
Violence in school can have a physical impact and it can cause psychological distress, permanent physical disability and long-term physical or mental ill-health. Physical impacts are the most obvious and may include mild or serious wounds, bruises, fractures, and deaths by homicide or suicide. A number of studies have shown correlations between corporal punishment and poor mental health. [ 14 ] While most have focused on corporal punishment within families, some have focused on corporal punishment in schools with a social impacts invariably negative. Victims of corporal punishment are likely to become passive and overly cautious, and to fear free expression of their ideas and feelings while, at the same time, they may become perpetrators of psychological violence. Children who are physically punished are less likely than other children to internalise moral values and they are less inclined to resist temptation, to engage in altruistic behaviour, to empathise with others or to exercise moral judgement of any kind. They are more inclined to develop disorderly and aggressive conduct such as hitting their siblings, parents, schoolmates and boyfriends or girlfriends. And they may become adults who are prone to punishment against their own children, and so pass on the habits of violence. [ 15 ]
Reactive attachment disorder and other social problems
Children who experienced any type of violence at school may develop reactive attachment disorder that is classified by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th Edition (DSM-5) as a trauma- and stressor-related condition of early childhood caused by social neglect and maltreatment. Affected children have difficulty forming emotional attachments to others, show a decreased ability to experience positive emotion, cannot seek or accept physical or emotional closeness, and may react violently when held, cuddled, or comforted. Behaviourally, affected children are unpredictable, difficult to console, and difficult to discipline. They have a strong desire to control their environment and make their own decisions. Changes in routine, attempts to control, or unsolicited invitations to comfort may elicit rage, violence, or self-injurious behaviour. In the classroom, these challenges inhibit the acquisition of core academic skills and lead to rejection from teachers and peers alike. Abuse in childhood has been correlated with difficulties in working memory and executive functioning, while severe neglect is associated with underdevelopment of the left cerebral hemisphere and the hippocampus. Children are more likely than their neuro-typical peers to engage in high-risk sexual behaviour, substance abuse, have an involvement with the legal system, and experience incarceration [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ] Children may respond to inter-linkages with aggression, fear, defiance, or rage; they develop a negative self-schema, and experience somatic symptoms of distress. Psychomotor restlessness is common, as is hyperactivity and stereotypic movements, such as hand flapping or rocking. It is confirmed an increased risk of anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, and reduces frustration tolerance. [ 17 , 18 ]
Researches identifies the harmful effects that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) occurring during childhood or adolescence; eg, child maltreatment or exposure to domestic violence) have on health throughout life.
Exposure to ACEs is associated with a host of harmful outcomes, including increased risk for cancer. [ 19 , 20 ] Individuals with at least four ACEs were at increased risk of all health outcomes compared with individuals with no ACEs. Associations were weak or modest for physical inactivity, overweight or obesity, and diabetes (ORs of less than two); moderate for smoking, heavy alcohol use, poor self-rated health, cancer, heart disease, and respiratory disease (ORs of two to three), strong for sexual risk taking, mental ill health, and problematic alcohol use (ORs of more than three to six), and strongest for problematic drug use and interpersonal and self-directed violence (ORs of more than seven). [ 20 ] Psychosocial adversity in childhood (e.g. abuse) is demonstrated to be related to DNA methylation age acceleration: suggesting a potential mechanism linking violence with adverse outcomes. [ 21 ] Evidence suggests that adverse experiences in childhood (particularly exposure to multiple adversities involving hostility and threat), in some people, contribute to the onset of psychotic experiences and psychotic disorders are associated with psychosis too. [ 22 ] Recent work demonstrates severity of child maltreatment, as well as presence of childhood physical and sexual abuse, are associated with adolescent cannabis use (any use versus non-use) and heavy cannabis use during adolescence. Research has demonstrated that experiences of childhood maltreatment are prevalent in the life histories of youth with substance use problems; however, most of this research has focused on sexual or physical abuse. [ 23 , 24 ]
The educational effects on victims of school violence are significant. Violence at the hands of teachers or other students may make children and adolescents afraid to go to school and interfere with their ability to concentrate in class or participate in school activities. It can also have similar effects on bystanders. The consequences include missing classes, avoiding school activities, playing truant or dropping out of school altogether. This in turn has an adverse impact on academic achievement and attainment and on future education and employment prospects. Children and adolescents who are victims of violence may achieve lower grades and may be less likely to anticipate going on to higher education. Analyses of international learning assessments highlight the impact of violence and bullying on learning outcomes. These analyses clearly show that it is reduced students’ achievement in key subjects such as mathematics and other studies have also documented the negative impact of school violence and bullying on educational performance. [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]
Violence against children is a significant cause of physical problems, psychological distress, permanent physical disability and long-term physical or mental ill-health.
Governments should provide that the law provides children and protects their human dignity. Evidence from international studies clearly shows that nonviolent, positive discipline delivers better results, while any type of violence is associated with many bad outcomes. The adoption of the most effective teaching approach across the education system, by supporting teachers to develop non-violent, positive discipline strategies could be the right way to step closer to realising children’s right to protection from all forms of violence in all settings, included the school.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
Adverse childhood experiences
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th Edition
World Health Organization, United nations. Global status report on violence prevention. 2014.
United Nations, World Health Organization. Violence against children.2018.
Hillis S, Mercy J, Amobi A, Kress H. Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: a systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3).
Article Google Scholar
Lodolo D’Oria V. Ricerca 2014–2019 sui presunti maltrattamenti a scuola. Studio Maltra. 2019.
Devries K, Knight L, Petzold M, Merrill KG, Maxwell L, William, et al. Who perpetrates violence against children? A systematic analysis of age-specific and sex-specific data. BMJ paediatrics open. 2018;2:1.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics .Global education digest 2011: comparing education statistics across the world. 2011.
UNESCO. School violence and bullying: global status report (PDF), vol. 9. Paris: UNESCO; 2017. p. 110–1.
Google Scholar
Roman M, Murillo F. Latin America: school bullying and academic achievement. CEPAL Rev. 2011.
Violence against primary school children with disabilities in Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
Devries K, Kyegombe N, Zuurmond M, Parkes J, Child JC, Walakira EJ, Naker D. Violence against primary school children with disabilities in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1017.
UNICEF. Hidden in plain sight: a statistical analysis of violence against children. 2014.
Maynard BR, Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn S. Bullying victimization among school-aged immigrant youth in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58:337–44.
Blanco F, Breglia MG, Guarcello L, Valdivia C. Violence against children: preliminary evidence from Colombia. El Salvador: Cambodia and Working Paper; 2008.
Korean Ministry of Education. The results of the 2nd survey on school violence in 2015.2015.
Durrant JE. Corporal punishment: prevalence, predictors and implications for Child behaviour and development. In: Hart SN, editor. Eliminating corporal punishment. Paris: UNESCO; 2005.
Csorba J, Rózsa S, Vetró A, Gádoros J, Makra J, Somogyi E, Kaczvinszky E, Kapornay K. Family- and school-related stresses in depressed Hungarian children. European Psychiatry. 2001;16:18–26.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Milot T, Ethier LS, St-Laurent D, Provost MA. The role of trauma symptoms in the development of behavioral problems in maltreated preschoolers. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34(4):225–34.
Moran K, McDonald J, Jackson A, Turnbull S, Minnis H. A study of attachment disorders in young offenders attending specialist services. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;65:77–87.
Braun K, Bock J. The experience-dependent maturation of prefronto-limbic circuits and the origin of developmental psychopathology: implications for the pathogenesis and therapy of behavioural disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:14–8.
Ports KA, Holman DM, Guinn AS, Pampati S, Dyer KE, Merrick MT, Lunsford NB, Metzler M. Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Presence of Cancer Risk Factors in Adulthood: Scoping Review of the Literature From 2005 to 2015. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;44:81–96.
Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, Jones L, Dunne MP. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e356–66.
Bick J, Naumova O, Hunter S, et al. Childhood adversity and DNA methylation of genes involved in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune system: whole-genome and candidate-gene associations. Dev Psychopathol. 2012;24:1417–25.
Morgan C, Gayer-Anderson C. Childhood adversities and psychosis: evidence, challenges, implications. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):93–102.
Gomez J, Becker S, O'Brien K, Spirito A. Interactive effect of Child maltreatment and substance use on depressed mood among adolescents presenting to community-based substance use treatment. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51(7):833–40.
Winston R, Chicot R. The importance of early bonding on the long-term mental health and resilience of children. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2016;8(1):12–4.
Ferrara P, Ianniello F, Cutrona C, Quintarelli F, Vena F, Del Volgo V, et al. A focus on recent cases of suicides among Italian children and adolescents and a review of literature. Ital J Pediatr. 2014;40:69.
Ferrara P, Corsello G, Basile MC, Nigri L, Campanozzi A, Ehrich J, Pettoello-Mantovani M. The economic burden of child maltreatment in high income countries. J Ped. 2015;167(6):1457–9.
Ferrara P, Corsello G, Sbordone A, Nigri L, Ehrich J, Pettoello-Mantovani M. Foster care: a fragile reality needing social attention, and economic investments. J Pediatr. 2016;173:270–1.
Download references
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors declare no conflict of interests and that no funding was received in relation to this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Institute of Pediatrics, Catholic University Medical School, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
Pietro Ferrara
Service of Pediatrics, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
Pietro Ferrara & Giulia Franceschini
Pediatric and Infectious Disease Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Alberto Villani
Institute of Pediatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Giovanni Corsello
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
The following Authors: PF, GF, AV, GC have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; they have also all contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. All listed Authors have approved the submitted version of the manuscript and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Pietro Ferrara .
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
This study was conducted in accordance with the regulatory standards of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Ferrara, P., Franceschini, G., Villani, A. et al. Physical, psychological and social impact of school violence on children. Ital J Pediatr 45 , 76 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-019-0669-z
Download citation
Received : 01 April 2019
Accepted : 17 June 2019
Published : 27 June 2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-019-0669-z
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Consequences
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
ISSN: 1824-7288
- Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
- General enquiries: [email protected]
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
how school violence is conceptualized, and recommendations for future research. The report takes a comprehensive look at the state of the research on school violence and includes additional discussions about research on serious violence and studies that were funded by NIJ's Comprehensive School Safety Initiative (CSSI). It is based on an ...
Abstract. No school violence prevention or safety program can be succeeded without the inclusion of the related parties' meaning-making. strategies. This qualitative study examines how school ...
Abstract and Figures. The multifaceted construct of "school violence" includes a wide variety of acts, such as physical assault and battery, physical aggression, noncontact aggression (e.g ...
She is also co-editor of The Handbook of School Violence and School Safety: International Research and Practice 2nd Edition (2012, Routledge), coauthor of School Crisis Prevention and Intervention: The PREPaRE Model (2009, 2016, National Association of School Psychologists), and lead author of Assessing, Identifying, and Treating Posttraumatic ...
Statistics, 1998; Hazler, 1994) suggests that bully-related behaviors may closely link to other school violence, the focus is on bully-related school violence and its relationship with other school violence. The task is set to identify the critical factors that influence bully/victim issues. The objectives of this paper are twofold.
Rationale, Purpose, and Significance of the Proposed Study. The purpose of this paper is to review and critically. analyze the research and literature pertaining to school violence. and zero tolerance policies as a precursor to a proposed study. examining teacher perceptions of the zero tolerance policy. The.
Correspondence: Don R. Kelly, School of S ocial Work, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA. Tel: 1-575-571-6849. E-mail: [email protected]. This systematic review examines prog ...
The Journal of School Violence is a multi-disciplinary, quarterly journal that publishes peer-reviewed empirical studies related to school violence and victimization. Accepting a variety of social science methodologies, this international journal explores the broad range of contemporary issues centering on violence in the school environment.
The purpose of this book is to provide a compendium of papers addressing school violence and the critical ingredients in prevention interventions that contribute to reducing and/or eliminating various forms of violence in the school setting. The Center for the Prevention of School Violence developed a research-based definition
2.2. Importance of study: The importance of the study lies in attracting the attention of teachers, educational supervisors, and school counselors not to use violence against children, but instead to use positive and negative reinforcement, and school counseling to modify school children's behavior. 2.3. Study limitation: This study focuses on ...
Although youth violence in the United States continues to decline in communities and schools (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2015; Robers, Zhang, Morgan, & Musu-Gillette, 2015), media coverage of mass homicides has significantly increased public awareness, especially school shootings.Furthermore, although rates of youth violence have declined, it remains the second leading cause of death for ...
Violence against children includes all forms of violence against people under 18 years old whether perpetrated by parents or other caregivers, peers, partners, teacher or strangers. This is a public health, human rights, and social problem: levels of violence against children are frightfully high and it is estimated that up to 1 billion children aged 2-17 years, have experienced a type of ...
This special issue on School Safety and School Violence includes two "lead papers": A clinical-research summary of current understandings about school safety/violence trends as well as individual, instructional and school-wide prevention/health promotion recommendations; and a case study of a school threat situation and the resulting clinical process of understanding and addressing this ...
Journal of School Violence, Volume 23, Issue 2 (2024) See all volumes and issues. Volume 23, 2024 Vol 22, 2023 Vol 21, 2022 Vol 20, 2021 Vol 19, 2020 Vol 18, 2019 Vol 17, 2018 Vol 16, 2017 Vol 15, 2016 Vol 14, 2015 Vol 13, 2014 Vol 12, 2013 Vol 11, 2012 Vol 10, 2011 Vol 9, 2009-2010 Vol 8, 2008-2009 Vol 7, 2008 Vol 6, 2007 Vol 5, 2006 Vol 4 ...
book on workplace violence requires a chapter on school violence. Schools are where teachers and children work. One of the goals of the National Educational Goals Panel (2000), an independent agency of the executive branch of the federal government, is the following: Every local educational agency will develop and implement a policy to ensure ...
Contents Introduction 2 Section 1: Getting started: Develop leadership, school policies and coordination methods 12 Section 2: Collect data on violence and monitor changes over time 18 Section 3: Prevent violence through curriculum-based activities 24 Section 4: Work with teachers on values and beliefs and train them
SCHOOL VIOLENCE IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: Guidelines for the establishment of Health Promoting Schools ALAN GERT MEYER B.A., B.Ed. (Ed. Psychology) H.E.D. ... In order to unravel the phenomenon of violence in schools, a qualitative method of research was used, with data being collected by means of focus-group interviews, through intentional ...
Often overlooked was the influx of school violence within K-12 institutions across the nation and the impending effect this violence posed to mental health and academic achievement. The. school violence epidemic encompassed sexual harassment, bullying, gang violence, verbal. assault and harassment, and fighting.
PDF | This article aims to reveal experiences of absentee students related to classroom violence. ... economic standings and family types is the theme of this paper. A total of 500 children (12-18 ...
NASP Position Statement: School Violence Prevention-Revised. 1. harassment, or social exclusion. When violence occurs at school, trust is violated, which thereby diminishes schools' efforts to attain their primary mission of educating all students and helping them to reach their full potential. Research shows that victims of school violence ...
This policy paper argues that school-related gender-based violence (SRGBV) is a global concern preventing children, especially girls, exercising their right to a safe, inclusive and quality education.
School Violence in the Philippines: A Study on Programs and Policies. Inero V Ancho, Sae-Hoon Park. Published 11 December 2013. Education, Sociology. Education 3-13. Local and international studies have affirmed the alarming situation of bullying and school violence involving Filipino children. The intensity of violence has reached a disturbing ...
learners assaulting and stabbing other learners and educators. In his study of school violence in South African schools, Burton (2008) found that. about 1.8 m illion of all pupils between Grade 3 ...