best interview questions to ask for critical thinking

Critical Thinking Interview Questions: 15 Interview Questions to Identify Top Candidates

Critical thinking goes beyond technical expertise and is essential in a wide range of professions. It’s a skill that enables employees to analyze information, solve problems, and make informed decisions. You can gauge critical thinking using assessment tests, practical problem solving, or through crafting interview questions highlighting critical thinking abilities.

In this blog, we’ll be going through questions you can ask your candidates to figure out if they have the critical thinking skills you require for your open position. But first, let’s talk about why critical thinking skills are so important.  

Why Are Critical Thinking Skills Necessary?

Critical thinkers are especially necessary positions that require problem solving skills, juggling various priorities, and analyzing data. Although many jobs and industries require a certain level of critical thinking ability, these skills are essential for some job roles and industries, including:

• K-12 : The best teachers are creative problem solvers. Between classroom management and learning fatigue, critical thinking skills help teachers find the best way to connect with their students.
• Leadership Positions : Effective leaders must make strategic decisions, often in ambiguous situations. Critical thinking is crucial in leadership roles.
• Creative Fields : In industries such as design, advertising, and content creation, the ability to think critically allows individuals to come up with innovative and unique solutions and ways to attract prospective customers.
• Healthcare : Medical professionals must critically assess patient conditions, interpret test results, and make decisions that can have a significant impact on a patient’s well-being.
• Technology : IT professionals, software developers, and data analysts rely on critical thinking to troubleshoot, create algorithms, and analyze data.

Now, let’s dive into a list of interview questions that can help you evaluate a candidate’s critical thinking abilities.  

Interview Questions to Assess Critical Thinking:

Note: Feel free to mix and match these questions based on the specific role and the level of critical thinking required. Also–to expand on questions like these, you can use tools like AI Question Assist . interviewstream’s Ethical AI tool helps you come up with position and industry-based questions using community knowledge from a large language

• Tell me about a situation where you faced a complex problem at work? How did you approach it, and what was the outcome?
• How do you typically approach a new project or task? What steps do you take to understand the problem and develop a plan?
• Give an example of a situation where you had to think on your feet and adapt to unexpected challenges.
• Describe a project where you had to evaluate multiple options before making a decision. How did you assess the pros and cons?
• Provide an instance where you identified a problem in your current or previous role that others might have overlooked? What did you do about it?
• What methods do you use to gather and evaluate information when solving complex issues?
• Tell me about a situation where you had to analyze data to make a decision. What tools or methodologies did you use?
• Describe a project where you had to anticipate potential obstacles and develop contingency plans. How did your proactive thinking benefit the project?
• Provide an example of a time when you identified a solution that significantly improved a process or operation at your company?
• Describe a situation where you had to explain a complex concept or solution to someone who had little to no knowledge of the subject. How did you ensure effective communication?
• How do you prioritize tasks and allocate your time when dealing with multiple projects or assignments?
• Explain your process for identifying the root cause of a problem. Can you provide an example from your experience?
• Describe a project where you had to innovate and think outside the box to overcome a challenge or reach a goal?
• Tell me about a time when you had to analyze financial data or budgets to make recommendations or decisions for your department or company.
• How do you approach a project that requires you to think long-term and consider the potential future implications of your decisions?

How to Use Critical Thinking Interview Questions in your Interviewing Process

The ability to think critically and solve complex problems is relevant across a wide range of job roles and industries. You can use the questions above to assess the critical thinking abilities of your candidates. And you can assess those skills even better if you ask these questions in an in-person or video interview .

Especially if you are using these questions in screening interviews , video screening is an effective way to see the candidate process critical thinking questions in real time. For more information on interview questions, we wrote an article on the best interview questions to ask for team players , or you can fill out this form to chat with us today about how interviewstream can help you ask the right questions, every time.

About The Author

Caroline Chessia is the Marketing Operations Specialist at interviewstream. She loves color-coordinated graphs, hiking in the mountains, and every dog she meets—especially the Golden Retrievers.

For over 20 years, interviewstream has been committed to driving hiring success for a diverse range of clients, including K-12 school districts, healthcare organizations, government agencies, emerging businesses, mid-sized companies, large enterprises, and institutions of higher education.

• Building Interview Process
• On Demand Interviews
• Interview Scheduling
• Hiring Event Interview Scheduling
• Live Video Interviews
• Interview Insights
• Continuity Plan
• Terms of Service
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Single Sign-On

877-773-3164 (USA Only) [email protected] Support

Top 20 Critical Thinking Interview Questions & Answers

Master your responses to Critical Thinking related interview questions with our example questions and answers. Boost your chances of landing the job by learning how to effectively communicate your Critical Thinking capabilities.

Critical thinking is a skill highly sought after in today’s complex and fast-paced world. It’s not merely about thinking clearly or rationally; it’s about analyzing and evaluating information to guide action, making it pivotal across all professions and industries. Whether you are applying for a role that explicitly lists critical thinking as a job requirement or you’re looking to enhance your problem-solving prowess in your current position, demonstrating strong critical thinking skills can set you apart from the competition.

This article aims to illuminate the significance of critical thinking in the professional realm by delving into interview questions designed to test this indispensable skill. We’ll provide insights into what employers are looking for when they assess critical thinking abilities and offer strategies for crafting responses that showcase your analytical acumen.

Common Critical Thinking Interview Questions

1. how would you differentiate between a problem that requires critical thinking and one that does not.

Navigating ambiguous situations and analyzing information objectively are key components of effective critical thinking. This skill is crucial for solving complex problems where standard protocols may not apply, and outcomes are unpredictable. Conversely, routine problems often have established methods and clear-cut solutions that don’t demand extensive analysis or creative thought. The question aims to assess a candidate’s ability to recognize when a nuanced approach is necessary versus when efficiency can be prioritized by following standard procedures. It also evaluates a candidate’s judgment in identifying the scale and impact of a problem, which is crucial for resource management and prioritization within a role.

When responding, a candidate should outline their thought process for assessing problems, highlighting their ability to identify key factors such as the complexity of the issue, potential risks, and the level of uncertainty involved. An effective response would include examples demonstrating how they have distinguished between routine and complex problems in past experiences, along with the strategies they employed to address each effectively. This showcases their problem-solving abilities and their understanding of when to leverage critical thinking skills.

Example: “ Differentiating between a problem that requires critical thinking and one that does not hinges on the analysis of several dimensions of the problem at hand. For instance, a problem that is routine, well-defined, and has a clear set of procedures or historical precedents for its resolution typically may not necessitate critical thinking. In contrast, a problem that is complex, ambiguous, involves multiple stakeholders with conflicting interests, or has significant consequences depending on the outcome, demands a critical thinking approach.

In practice, I assess the need for critical thinking by evaluating the problem’s novelty, the scope of impact, the level of uncertainty, and the interdependencies among variables. For example, when faced with a new market trend that could potentially disrupt our business model, I recognized this as a critical thinking scenario due to its complexity and high stakes. I systematically gathered and analyzed data, questioned assumptions, and explored alternative solutions. This involved not just an analytical breakdown of the problem but also creative synthesis to develop innovative strategies, demonstrating the application of critical thinking to navigate through the intricacies of the issue effectively.”

2. Describe an instance when your initial hypothesis about a complex issue was incorrect.

When it comes to critical thinking, the ability to form hypotheses and adjust them when presented with new information or evidence is fundamental. This question delves into a candidate’s flexibility of thought, their willingness to admit and learn from mistakes, and their capacity to approach problems from multiple angles. A well-rounded candidate will not only recognize when they are wrong but will also see it as an opportunity for growth rather than a setback. It’s a test of humility and intellectual integrity, key traits for roles demanding analytical prowess and decision-making.

In your response, recount a specific situation where you had to pivot from your original assumption. Briefly outline the context and the stakes involved. Then, focus on the process you underwent to re-evaluate the situation: the additional information you considered, the way you integrated new data, and how you ultimately arrived at a different conclusion. Emphasize your thought process and the lessons learned, ensuring you highlight your adaptability and continuous improvement mindset.

Example: “ In analyzing a complex issue within a project, my initial hypothesis was that the bottleneck was caused by an inefficiency in the operational workflow. Upon deeper analysis, however, I discovered that the issue was not the workflow itself but rather a mismatch in team skill sets and resource allocation. By incorporating data analytics and soliciting cross-departmental feedback, I realized that the workflow was designed optimally but was being executed by team members who were not best suited for their roles.

To address this, I facilitated a realignment of tasks to match individual strengths and brought in additional training for areas where the team was lacking expertise. This pivot not only resolved the bottleneck but also improved overall team performance and morale. The experience underscored the importance of a data-driven approach and the value of looking beyond surface-level symptoms to underlying causes. It also reinforced the necessity of maintaining a flexible mindset and being willing to challenge my own assumptions in the face of new evidence.”

3. What strategies do you employ to identify biases in your decision-making process?

Awareness of personal biases is a critical component of effective critical thinking. Recognizing and mitigating these biases ensures that decisions are based on objective analysis rather than subjective preference. This question aims to assess whether a candidate is self-aware and actively engaged in personal development, as well as their ability to maintain objectivity in professional scenarios. It also speaks to a candidate’s commitment to fairness and their potential for leadership, where unbiased decision-making is essential for team cohesion and trust.

When responding, candidates should articulate the specific techniques they use to keep their biases in check. This might include seeking diverse perspectives, consulting with colleagues, relying on data and evidence, or engaging in reflective practices such as journaling or meditation. Candidates should provide concrete examples of when they’ve identified a bias in their thinking and how they adjusted their approach to ensure a more balanced outcome. Demonstrating a proactive approach to personal growth and a dedication to fair decision-making will signal to interviewers a candidate’s suitability for roles requiring sound judgment.

Example: “ To identify biases in my decision-making process, I employ a combination of reflective practices and evidence-based evaluation. I actively engage in self-reflection to question my initial assumptions and consider the origins of my perspectives. This often involves journaling, which helps to externalize and critically assess my thought patterns. Additionally, I prioritize the collection and analysis of data to inform my decisions, ensuring that they are rooted in objective evidence rather than subjective intuition.

When I detect a potential bias, I seek out diverse viewpoints to challenge my preconceptions. This involves consulting with colleagues who may have different experiences or expertise, which provides a broader perspective and mitigates the risk of echo chambers. In a recent project, I recognized a confirmation bias in my analysis, where I was favoring information that supported my initial hypothesis. By acknowledging this, I revisited the data and actively searched for disconfirming evidence, which led to a more nuanced understanding and ultimately a more robust decision-making process. This approach not only enhances the quality of my decisions but also fosters a culture of critical thinking and continuous improvement.”

4. In what ways have you used critical thinking to improve a process at your previous job?

Dissecting a process, analyzing its components with a sharp eye, and envisioning a more efficient or effective method are all aspects of critical thinking that drive process improvement and innovation. This ability to objectively evaluate and enhance systems is not just about fixing what’s broken, but also about preempting potential issues and maximizing productivity. By asking this question, interviewers are looking for evidence of a candidate’s analytical skills and their initiative to bring about positive change within an organization.

When responding to this question, provide a concrete example of a time you identified a problem or area for improvement. Break down the steps you took to analyze the situation, emphasizing how you gathered data, considered various solutions, and weighed the pros and cons. Then, explain the action you took, the implementation of the new process, and most importantly, the outcome. Illustrate how your critical thinking led to tangible benefits for the company, such as time savings, cost reductions, increased revenue, or improved employee satisfaction.

Example: “ In a previous role, I identified a bottleneck in our project reporting process, which was causing delays in decision-making. I initiated a thorough analysis of the existing workflow and discovered that the report consolidation was the primary issue, as it relied on manual data entry from multiple departments. To tackle this, I conducted a root cause analysis to understand the underlying issues and engaged with stakeholders to gather insights and validate findings.

Armed with this information, I proposed and implemented an automated data aggregation tool that interfaced with our existing systems. This solution not only streamlined the data collection process but also reduced the potential for human error. By critically evaluating the process and considering the technological resources available, I was able to re-engineer the workflow, resulting in a 30% reduction in the time taken to generate reports. This improvement led to faster strategic decisions and a significant increase in overall team productivity.”

5. Can you provide an example of how you’ve dissected a multifaceted argument to assess its validity?

Breaking down complex issues into their component parts to understand the underlying logic and reasoning is a hallmark of effective critical thinking. This skill is particularly valuable as it allows for a nuanced approach to problem-solving, where the thinker can identify biases, logical fallacies, and the strength of the evidence presented. Employers seek individuals who can navigate through layers of information, differentiate between correlation and causation, and make informed decisions based on a sound analysis of available data. This question aims to reveal whether the candidate has a systematic approach to addressing intricate arguments and can remain objective while evaluating differing viewpoints.

When responding to this question, begin by outlining a specific scenario where you were faced with a challenging argument or problem. Walk the interviewer through your process step-by-step, explaining how you identified key issues, researched relevant information, and applied logical reasoning to each part. Highlight how you remained impartial, even if the argument related to a topic you felt strongly about, and conclude by sharing the outcome of your analysis. This approach not only demonstrates your critical thinking abilities but also shows that you can communicate complex ideas clearly and effectively.

Example: “ In one instance, I was presented with an argument that a particular business strategy would significantly increase market share. The argument was supported by a variety of data points and expert opinions. To assess its validity, I first deconstructed the argument into its core components: the underlying assumptions, the evidence provided, and the logical connections between the two.

I then conducted an independent evaluation of the evidence, scrutinizing the methodology behind the data collection and the credibility of the sources. Simultaneously, I challenged the assumptions by considering alternative scenarios and seeking out information that could either confirm or refute them. Throughout this process, I maintained an objective stance, ensuring that my personal biases did not color the analysis.

The outcome of this rigorous examination was a nuanced understanding of the strategy’s potential. I concluded that while the strategy had merit, it also carried risks that were not initially apparent. This comprehensive analysis allowed for a more informed decision-making process that considered both the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed strategy.”

6. Outline the steps you take when confronted with conflicting data points.

When presented with conflicting data, the ability to discern, analyze, and integrate information is paramount. This question not only assesses a candidate’s analytical skills but also evaluates their approach to uncertainty and complexity. It inspects the candidate’s methodology for handling information that doesn’t readily align, testing their intellectual rigor and commitment to evidence-based decision-making.

To respond, outline a systematic approach: begin by verifying the sources of the data for credibility. Next, cross-examine the information for errors or biases. If the data remains conflicting, consider alternative perspectives or additional research to provide context. Explain how you would weigh the evidence, perhaps employing specific analytical tools or consulting with knowledgeable colleagues. Conclude by describing how you would form a reasoned conclusion or make a recommendation, emphasizing your flexibility and openness to changing your stance as new information arises.

Example: “ When confronted with conflicting data points, my initial step is to authenticate the sources, ensuring their reliability and validity. I scrutinize the methodologies used to gather the data, looking for potential errors or methodological inconsistencies that could explain the discrepancies. If the sources and methods are sound, I proceed to examine the data for any inherent biases or contextual factors that might influence the results.

Following this critical evaluation, I explore additional research or data that could provide further insight, often utilizing statistical analysis or predictive modeling to discern patterns or anomalies. This process may also involve seeking expertise from colleagues who can offer alternative perspectives or specialized knowledge. Throughout this investigative phase, I maintain a balanced approach, considering all evidence on its merit.

Ultimately, I synthesize the findings, weighing the evidence carefully. My recommendation or conclusion is based on the most comprehensive and robust understanding of the data, with an acknowledgment of any remaining uncertainties. I remain adaptable, ready to adjust my position in light of new evidence or insights that may emerge.”

7. When evaluating evidence, how do you determine its relevance and reliability?

Analyzing information and making informed decisions hinge on determining the relevance and reliability of evidence. The question delves into the candidate’s thought process and methodology for discerning the quality and applicability of information. It also reveals their capacity for skepticism and due diligence, as well as their understanding of the sources and contexts that may affect the integrity of evidence. Employers ask this to ensure the potential employee can effectively sift through data, recognize biases, and draw conclusions that are not only logical but also empirically sound.

When responding to this question, a candidate should outline a systematic approach, starting with the assessment of the source’s credibility, including its origin, authorship, and purpose. They should then discuss the process of cross-referencing the information with other reliable sources and the importance of considering the context in which the evidence was produced. Demonstrating an awareness of one’s own cognitive biases and the potential for these to influence decision-making is also valuable. Lastly, articulating a clear, practical example of how they have applied these principles in a previous situation can help to solidify their response.

Example: “ In evaluating evidence, the first step is to scrutinize the source’s credibility. This includes examining the author’s qualifications, the publication’s reputation, and the methodology used to gather the information. I then assess the purpose of the evidence, looking for any signs of bias or intent to persuade rather than inform. To establish reliability, I cross-reference the evidence with other sources, ensuring they are independent and authoritative. This triangulation helps to confirm the consistency and validity of the information.

Context is paramount; understanding the circumstances under which the evidence was produced allows for a more nuanced interpretation. For instance, in a previous situation where I had to evaluate data from a study, I considered the sample size, the controls in place, and the study’s funding sources. Moreover, I remain vigilant about my cognitive biases, actively seeking disconfirming evidence to challenge my initial conclusions. This disciplined approach ensures that my decisions are based on robust and objective assessments of the evidence at hand.”

8. Share an experience where you had to make a decision without all the desired information.

Acting with confidence even when not all the facts are present is a common requirement in fast-paced environments where waiting for perfect information could lead to missed opportunities or compounded issues. The question aims to assess a candidate’s risk assessment capabilities, their comfort with ambiguity, and their problem-solving skills. It evaluates whether the candidate can pull from their knowledge, past experiences, and available resources to make an informed decision that could potentially affect the outcome of a project or the direction of a company.

When responding to this question, candidates should focus on a specific example that showcases their thought process during an uncertain situation. They should detail the steps they took to gather as much information as possible, weigh the potential risks and benefits, consider the impact of their decision, and explain how they arrived at their conclusion. It’s also beneficial to reflect on the outcome of the decision and what they learned from the experience, demonstrating an ability to learn and adapt from less-than-ideal situations.

Example: “ In a project where time-sensitive decisions were crucial, I encountered a situation where critical data was incomplete due to unforeseen circumstances. Understanding the urgency, I initiated a rapid but thorough risk assessment to evaluate potential impacts of various decision scenarios. I leveraged historical data, parallel case studies, and consulted with subject matter experts to fill in informational gaps to the greatest extent possible.

After synthesizing this information, I employed a decision matrix to prioritize options based on the project’s strategic objectives and stakeholder interests. I chose a course of action that balanced risk with potential reward, ensuring that the most critical project deliverables remained on track. The decision was successful, resulting in minimal disruption to the project timeline and budget. This experience reinforced the importance of a structured approach to decision-making under uncertainty and the value of drawing on diverse information sources to inform such decisions.”

9. Detail a situation in which your critical analysis led to a significant change in strategy or direction.

Strategic planning and problem-solving are areas where critical thinking is indispensable. When interviewers pose this question, they’re looking for evidence of your ability to dissect complex issues, consider diverse perspectives, and foresee potential outcomes. The ability to pivot and adapt strategies based on new information reflects an agile mindset, which is highly valued in dynamic business environments. It reveals your capacity to influence meaningful change and demonstrates foresight, adaptability, and the courage to challenge the status quo when necessary.

When responding, outline a specific scenario succinctly, emphasizing the complexity of the situation and the critical thinking processes you employed. Discuss the rationale behind your analysis, the different options you considered, and why you advocated for a particular change in strategy or direction. Highlight the impact of your decision—how it benefited the organization, improved efficiency, increased revenue, or mitigated risks. Your response should convey confidence in your judgment, an analytical approach to problem-solving, and a proactive stance in driving innovation or improvement.

Example: “ In a project where the initial strategy was to expand market share through aggressive pricing, I conducted a critical analysis of market trends, consumer behavior, and competitive responses. My analysis revealed that such a pricing strategy would trigger a price war with competitors that our company was not financially positioned to sustain. Instead, I proposed a value-added approach, focusing on differentiating our products through enhanced features and customer service rather than competing solely on price.

I presented a comprehensive business case to the leadership team, outlining the potential long-term consequences of the original strategy, including market erosion and reduced profitability. I contrasted this with the projected outcomes of the value-added strategy, which included increased customer loyalty, brand strength, and sustainable profit margins. The leadership adopted my recommendation, leading to a 15% increase in customer retention and a 10% rise in profit margins within the following fiscal year, validating the shift in strategy and demonstrating the importance of thorough critical analysis in strategic decision-making.”

10. How do you handle situations where team members resist your critical evaluations?

Providing feedback that may not be readily accepted, especially when it challenges established ideas or practices within a team, involves effective critical thinking. The ability to navigate resistance is a testament to one’s diplomatic skills and emotional intelligence. It reflects an understanding that critique is not a personal attack but a necessary part of growth and innovation. Employers value candidates who can diplomatically deliver critical evaluations and facilitate a constructive dialogue that leads to improved performance and collaboration, rather than discord and division.

When responding to this question, it’s important to emphasize your approach to communication and conflict resolution. Detail specific strategies you employ to ensure that your evaluations are objective, evidence-based, and presented in a way that underscores their intention to improve the team’s output. Highlight your ability to listen to and address concerns, foster an open environment for discussion, and ultimately guide the team towards a consensus or compromise that upholds the project’s best interests.

Example: “ In situations where team members resist critical evaluations, my approach is to first ensure that the feedback is grounded in objective data and aligns with predefined goals or standards. I present my evaluations with clarity, focusing on the issue at hand rather than personal attributes, to minimize defensiveness. When resistance occurs, I actively listen to the team members’ perspectives, acknowledging their viewpoints and concerns. This demonstrates respect for their expertise and fosters an environment of mutual trust.

I then facilitate a constructive dialogue, guiding the team towards understanding the evaluation’s rationale and the potential benefits of addressing the identified issues. By encouraging an open exchange of ideas, I often find that resistance gives way to collaborative problem-solving. If a consensus is not immediately reached, I propose incremental steps to test the recommended changes, allowing the team to see empirical results. This method not only validates the evaluation’s findings but also empowers the team to be part of the solution, ensuring that the critical evaluation serves as a catalyst for positive change rather than a point of contention.”

11. What is your approach to prioritizing issues requiring immediate critical thought over routine tasks?

Distinguishing between tasks that need immediate attention and those that follow a routine is often a critical component of professional critical thinking. Employers are looking for candidates who can swiftly analyze situations, recognize the urgency and potential impact of each task, and act accordingly to ensure efficiency and effectiveness. The ability to prioritize reflects a person’s judgment, time management skills, and ultimately their capability to contribute to the organization’s success without becoming overwhelmed or sacrificing quality.

When responding to this question, you should demonstrate your decision-making process by providing a clear and structured approach. Outline how you assess the importance of tasks, perhaps by considering factors such as deadlines, potential outcomes, and resources required. You could also mention any tools or techniques you use to stay organized, such as to-do lists or project management software. Giving concrete examples from past experiences where you successfully prioritized critical issues will illustrate your methodology in action and reassure the interviewer of your proficiency in this area.

Example: “ When faced with multiple tasks, my approach to prioritization begins with a swift evaluation of each issue’s potential impact and urgency. I consider the consequences of delayed action, weighing the risks against the benefits of immediate attention. Critical issues that could escalate into larger problems or have a significant negative impact on the project or organization take precedence. For instance, if a critical issue has the potential to disrupt service delivery or cause financial loss, it becomes the top priority.

I utilize a combination of Eisenhower’s Matrix for categorizing tasks by urgency and importance, and project management tools for tracking progress and deadlines. This method allows me to maintain a clear overview of the landscape of responsibilities and make informed decisions quickly. In practice, this approach has enabled me to effectively intervene in situations that required immediate critical thought, such as resolving a bottleneck in a project that threatened to derail the timeline, while ensuring that routine tasks are rescheduled appropriately and do not fall by the wayside.”

12. Could you give an example of a time when you had to challenge conventional wisdom using critical thinking?

The ability to step outside the norm, question the status quo, and innovate is a key aspect of critical thinking. This question aims to unearth a candidate’s ability to recognize when a widely accepted approach is flawed or inadequate and their courage and skill in devising and implementing a more effective alternative. It reveals their capability to not only recognize when a widely accepted approach is flawed or inadequate but also their courage and skill in devising and implementing a more effective alternative.

To respond effectively, choose a specific instance where you identified a problem that others had accepted as unsolvable or ignored due to traditional thinking. Explain your thought process in evaluating the situation, how you identified a novel approach, and the steps you took to challenge the prevailing wisdom. Highlight the outcome, what you learned, and how it demonstrates your critical thinking prowess. Be sure to convey confidence in your decision-making process while also acknowledging the risk and resistance that often accompanies going against the grain.

Example: “ In a project where the prevailing approach was to incrementally improve an existing product, I noticed that our incremental changes were no longer yielding significant benefits to the customer. Conventional wisdom suggested we continue with minor improvements, but my analysis of customer feedback and market trends indicated a plateau in satisfaction and a shift in consumer needs.

Using critical thinking, I dissected the core functions of our product, reevaluated our assumptions, and proposed a radical redesign that aligned more closely with emerging user preferences. I presented a data-driven case to stakeholders, illustrating the long-term benefits and potential market capture that a bold move could offer. Despite initial resistance, the evidence was compelling, and we pivoted to the new strategy.

The redesigned product not only reinvigorated the brand but also captured a new customer segment, leading to a substantial increase in market share. This experience underscored the importance of questioning the status quo and reinforced my belief in the power of critical thinking to drive innovation and strategic redirection.”

13. How do you maintain objectivity when critically assessing emotionally charged issues?

Detaching oneself from personal biases and emotional influences to arrive at logical, fair conclusions is a demand of critical thinking, especially in emotionally charged situations. Employers ask this question to discern whether a candidate possesses the self-awareness and strategies necessary to navigate emotionally-laden terrain without compromising their decision-making process. It’s a subtle test of a candidate’s professionalism and their capacity to handle workplace conflicts or sensitive projects with a level head.

When responding, illustrate with examples where you’ve successfully maintained impartiality during heated discussions or decisions. Emphasize techniques you use, such as stepping back to analyze the facts, seeking diverse perspectives, or employing established frameworks to guide your thought process. Your answer should reassure the interviewer that you can uphold the integrity of your role, even when emotions run high.

Example: “ Maintaining objectivity in emotionally charged situations hinges on a disciplined adherence to evidence and a structured analytical framework. For instance, during a contentious project debate, I anchor my assessment in data-driven criteria, ensuring that decisions are rooted in quantifiable metrics rather than subjective sentiments. This approach not only clarifies the decision-making process but also provides a common language for all stakeholders, facilitating a more rational discourse.

Additionally, I actively seek out diverse perspectives to challenge my own biases and broaden my understanding of the issue at hand. By engaging with viewpoints that differ from my own, I can construct a more comprehensive analysis that transcends personal emotions. This method was particularly effective when navigating a high-stakes negotiation, where synthesizing the various interests led to a consensus that balanced emotional concerns with strategic objectives. Employing these techniques consistently has proven to be instrumental in upholding impartiality and ensuring that critical thinking prevails in emotionally intense scenarios.”

14. What techniques do you use to foster critical thinking skills within a team environment?

Cultivating an environment where team members are encouraged to think deeply and challenge assumptions is a reflection of critical thinking in a team setting. When interviewers pose this question, they are looking for insight into how you foster intellectual growth and collaborative problem-solving. It reveals your leadership style and your ability to facilitate intellectual growth and collaborative problem-solving. The question also serves to understand if you can balance the need for diverse perspectives while steering the team towards cohesive, well-reasoned outcomes.

When responding, you should outline specific strategies you’ve employed to encourage critical thinking. This could include fostering open discussions, posing challenging problems for the team to solve, encouraging team members to question the status quo, and facilitating debates. Highlight examples from your experience where these techniques have led to innovative solutions or improved decision-making. Mention how you ensure all voices are heard and how you guide discussions to remain constructive and focused on the end goal.

Example: “ To cultivate critical thinking within a team, I implement a structured approach to problem-solving that encourages divergent thinking followed by convergent analysis. Initially, I facilitate brainstorming sessions that promote the free flow of ideas without immediate judgment, allowing team members to explore various perspectives and challenge preconceived notions. This openness fosters an environment where creativity is valued, and unconventional ideas can surface.

Once a broad range of ideas is on the table, I guide the team through a critical evaluation process. This involves systematically assessing the feasibility, potential impact, and risks associated with each idea. I encourage team members to ask probing questions and consider the implications of each approach. By employing techniques such as the Six Thinking Hats or SWOT analysis, I ensure that the team examines issues from multiple angles, leading to more robust and well-rounded solutions. Moreover, I make a conscious effort to create an inclusive atmosphere where every member feels empowered to contribute, ensuring a diversity of thought and preventing groupthink. Through these methods, we’ve consistently achieved innovative outcomes and enhanced our collective decision-making capabilities.”

15. Illustrate how you balance quick decision-making with thorough critical analysis under pressure.

Thinking on one’s feet while ensuring that decisions are well-considered and not rash is a crucial aspect of critical thinking, especially in roles where the stakes are high and the cost of a mistake is significant. Employers ask this question to assess a candidate’s ability to think on their feet while also ensuring that their decisions are well-considered and not rash. It’s crucial in roles where the stakes are high and the cost of a mistake is significant. The interviewer is looking for a glimpse into your decision-making process, particularly how you weigh the urgency of a situation against the need for comprehensive analysis.

To respond, describe a scenario where you were faced with a time-sensitive decision. Walk through your thought process, highlighting how you identified the key issues, evaluated the information at hand, and prioritized actions while maintaining a commitment to making a sound, well-reasoned choice. Focus on demonstrating your ability to discern which decisions require immediate action and which can benefit from more extensive analysis. It’s important to convey that you can strike a balance between speed and precision, leveraging your critical thinking skills to deliver optimal outcomes efficiently.

Example: “ In a situation where rapid decision-making was crucial, I employed a tiered approach to critical analysis. Initially, I identified the core issue that demanded immediate attention, separating it from less urgent factors. I then quickly gathered the most relevant data, applying heuristic techniques to assess the situation’s urgency and potential impact. This allowed me to prioritize actions that would mitigate immediate risks or capitalize on fleeting opportunities.

Simultaneously, I maintained an awareness of the broader context, ensuring that my swift decisions aligned with long-term objectives and values. By leveraging a combination of deductive reasoning to address the immediate issue and inductive reasoning to consider the potential implications, I was able to make a well-reasoned decision that was both timely and thoughtful. This method has consistently proven effective in balancing the need for expediency with the commitment to thorough analysis, ensuring that the decisions I make under pressure are both strategic and sound.”

16. Have you ever encountered a groupthink scenario and how did you apply critical thinking to address it?

Recognizing the signs of groupthink—such as a homogenization of ideas, pressure to conform, and an illusion of unanimity—and challenging the status quo to ensure diverse perspectives are considered is important for preventing suboptimal outcomes. Employers value candidates who can maintain objectivity, apply analytical skills to evaluate different opinions, and foster a culture of open dialogue, even when it’s uncomfortable or goes against the grain. This question assesses a candidate’s ability to maintain objectivity, apply analytical skills to evaluate different opinions, and foster a culture of open dialogue, even when it’s uncomfortable or goes against the grain.

When responding, it’s important to provide a specific example that illustrates your awareness of a groupthink situation. Detail how you identified the issue, the steps you took to encourage alternative viewpoints, and the outcome of your intervention. Emphasize your communication skills, your respect for diverse opinions, and your commitment to making decisions based on evidence and sound reasoning. It’s also beneficial to reflect on what you learned from the experience and how it has influenced your approach to teamwork and problem-solving in subsequent situations.

Example: “ Yes, I encountered a groupthink scenario during a project where the team was prematurely converging on a solution without thoroughly vetting alternatives. Recognizing the signs of groupthink, such as the lack of debate and the quick dismissal of outside opinions, I intervened by orchestrating a structured brainstorming session. I introduced a “devil’s advocate” approach, assigning team members to purposely challenge the prevailing assumptions and propose contrarian viewpoints.

This strategy fostered a more open dialogue and encouraged critical evaluation of the proposed solution. By systematically dissecting each argument and examining the evidence, the team was able to identify potential flaws and biases in our initial approach. The outcome was a more robust and innovative solution that had the benefit of diverse perspectives. The experience reinforced the importance of vigilance against groupthink and has since shaped my commitment to fostering an environment where critical thinking and dissenting opinions are valued in the decision-making process.”

17. Describe a complex project where your critical thinking uncovered an overlooked solution.

Evaluating sources, such as data, facts, observable phenomena, and research findings, is part of the critical thinking process. In the context of a job interview, this question serves to evaluate not only a candidate’s problem-solving capabilities but also their initiative and innovation. It reveals how a candidate approaches a problem, breaks it down into components, and systematically tackles it. It’s about assessing the candidate’s ability to not just think, but to think outside the box and recognize patterns that are not immediately obvious, which can lead to innovative solutions that others might miss.

When responding to this question, you should outline the context of the project briefly, highlighting its complexity. Proceed to explain the thought process you employed, detailing how you identified the problem, the various solutions you considered, and why they were dismissed or pursued. Emphasize the critical thinking techniques you used, such as questioning assumptions, analyzing potential outcomes, and synthesizing information from various sources. Conclude with the impact of your solution, such as cost savings, time efficiency, or improved outcomes. Demonstrating a structured approach to problem-solving will show employers that you possess the analytical skills necessary to tackle complex projects effectively.

Example: “ In a recent complex project, the primary challenge was optimizing the resource allocation process to reduce waste and increase efficiency. The existing system was sophisticated but had a persistent issue with over-provisioning, leading to significant financial drain. Upon a deep dive into the data and processes, I employed root cause analysis and discovered that the algorithm driving the allocation was based on outdated assumptions about usage patterns.

By questioning these assumptions and conducting a series of predictive analyses, I proposed a dynamic allocation model that adjusted resources in real-time based on current demand rather than historical trends. I also integrated a feedback loop that allowed the system to learn and adapt over time. This solution required a nuanced understanding of both the technical aspects and the behavioral patterns of system users. The implementation of this model led to a 20% reduction in resource waste within the first quarter, validating the effectiveness of the critical thinking process in uncovering this overlooked solution.”

18. What methods do you utilize to ensure your conclusions are sound when dealing with abstract concepts?

Dissecting and navigating theoretical or complex ideas ensures that a candidate’s thought process is logical, thorough, and evidence-based. The question seeks to explore a candidate’s ability to handle abstract concepts that are not easily quantifiable or observable. It is a test of not just intelligence but of a systematic and disciplined approach to problem-solving that can greatly affect the outcomes of projects and tasks. The interviewer is looking for a glimpse into the candidate’s intellectual rigor and how they handle ambiguity and uncertainty.

When responding, it is vital to discuss a structured approach to critical thinking. One could highlight the importance of questioning assumptions, seeking out a variety of sources for information, and applying logical reasoning. Emphasize the use of specific strategies such as breaking down complex problems into smaller, more manageable parts, employing analogies to better understand unfamiliar concepts, or using decision-making frameworks like the Cynefin framework to categorize problems and respond appropriately. Sharing examples from past experiences where these methods were applied to reach a well-reasoned conclusion can illustrate your proficiency in critical thinking.

Example: “ To ensure my conclusions are sound when dealing with abstract concepts, I systematically employ a combination of deductive and inductive reasoning, while rigorously questioning underlying assumptions. I begin by dissecting the abstract concept into its fundamental elements, which allows me to analyze the problem more effectively. This process of decomposition helps to identify any logical inconsistencies and to understand the relationships between the various components of the concept.

I also draw upon diverse informational sources to inform my understanding, ensuring that my perspective is not limited by a single viewpoint. By integrating these perspectives, I can construct a more comprehensive understanding of the abstract concept. Additionally, I use analogies to create parallels with more familiar concepts, which aids in grasping the essence of the abstract idea and in communicating my reasoning to others. When synthesizing my conclusion, I apply decision-making frameworks like the Cynefin framework, which assists in categorizing the problem and determining the most suitable approach for resolution. This structured methodology ensures that my conclusions are not only logical but also pragmatic, taking into account the complexity and context of the situation at hand.”

19. How do you integrate critical thinking into your everyday work routines?

Anticipating challenges and mitigating them before they impact the workflow is a key aspect of critical thinking. Employers want to know that a candidate can not only solve problems when they arise but also anticipate challenges and mitigate them before they impact the workflow. They are looking for evidence of a proactive mindset that employs logic, creativity, and strategic planning as part of the daily work routine rather than reactive thinking that only addresses issues as they come up.

When responding, candidates should describe specific strategies they use to apply critical thinking in their work. This might involve breaking down complex projects into manageable parts, asking probing questions to fully understand a situation, employing data-driven decision-making, or conducting regular reviews of processes to identify potential improvements. Sharing concrete examples of past situations where critical thinking led to successful outcomes can also demonstrate the candidate’s ability to effectively integrate this skill into their work habits.

Example: “ In my daily work, I routinely employ a methodical approach to problem-solving that hinges on breaking down complex issues into their fundamental components. This dissection allows for a clearer understanding of the underlying factors and variables at play. By doing so, I can systematically evaluate each element, considering both short-term and long-term implications, which is critical for informed decision-making.

I also maintain a disciplined practice of asking probing questions, not only to clarify the specifics of a challenge but also to uncover any hidden assumptions or biases that might skew my analysis. This practice is complemented by a commitment to data-driven decisions, ensuring that my conclusions are grounded in empirical evidence rather than conjecture. To ensure continuous improvement, I conduct regular process reviews, identifying areas for refinement or innovation, thereby fostering a dynamic and responsive work environment that leverages critical thinking to overcome obstacles and enhance productivity.”

20. Reflect on a time when your critical thinking abilities significantly impacted the outcome of a project.

Determining if a candidate can discern complex situations and act in a manner that leads to effective and innovative solutions is a crucial part of the interview process. Employers ask this question to determine if a candidate can not only discern complex situations but also act in a manner that leads to effective and innovative solutions. They are looking for evidence of a methodical approach to tackling challenges and the ability to anticipate potential pitfalls. This question also serves to highlight the candidate’s capacity for reflection and learning from past experiences, which is essential for continuous improvement and adaptability in a dynamic work environment.

When responding to this question, it’s crucial to outline a specific situation that showcases your critical thinking process. Begin by setting the scene and describing the challenge or project at hand. Then, explain the steps you took to analyze the situation, including any data gathering, research, or consultation with experts. Highlight how you weighed different options, considered the consequences, and came to a reasoned decision. Conclude with the outcome, focusing on the positive impact of your critical thinking skills on the project’s success, and if applicable, what you learned from the experience that has influenced your approach to future challenges.

Example: “ In a recent project, we faced a critical decision point when unexpected data discrepancies threatened to derail our progress. The initial analysis suggested a significant flaw in our methodology, which could have led to a complete overhaul of the project. Instead of hastily jumping to conclusions, I initiated a systematic review of our data collection and analysis processes. By breaking down each step, I identified a subtle but consistent error in the way certain data points were being recorded, which skewed our results.

After pinpointing the issue, I proposed a recalibration of our data input protocols and a reanalysis of our dataset. This approach required additional time and resources, but it was a more measured response than starting from scratch. The recalibration not only corrected the discrepancies but also improved the overall robustness of our data. As a result, we not only met our project milestones but also enhanced the credibility of our findings. This experience reinforced the value of methodical problem-solving and has honed my ability to navigate complex challenges by focusing on evidence and systematic evaluation.”

Top 20 Restaurant Management Interview Questions & Answers

Top 20 typography interview questions & answers, you may also be interested in..., top 20 cross cultural interview questions & answers, top 20 construction management interview questions & answers, top 20 anesthesia interview questions & answers, top 20 sales leadership interview questions & answers.

17 critical thinking interview questions to find the perfect candidate

Find top critical thinkers for your open roles today.

Critical thinking is an important skill in any role, and its significance only increases the more complex responsibilities employees have.

The best way to ensure your candidates have the skills to tackle sophisticated problems is to screen applicants using a Critical Thinking skills test and create a shortlist of quantifiably competent interviewees.

The next step is to ask thought-provoking interview questions. This interview process is tricky, but to help you out, we’ve created a list of 17 critical thinking interview questions to ask candidates.

Table of contents

The importance of thought-provoking interview questions, 17 critical thinking interview questions and answers, summary of all 17 critical thinking interview questions, uncover critical thinking with talent assessments and in-depth interview questions, never miss great talent with our skills tests and critical thinking interview questions .

Research shows that the demand for critical thinking and analysis is growing at a faster rate than any other skill group, likely thanks to the increased need for critical analysis when navigating technological change.

To meet this demand, hiring managers need a robust system for assessing critical thinking skills for most positions. When we talk about critical thinking, we refer to a range of sub-skills, including:

Self-reflection

These skills are essential to many business processes , particularly for managers who must evaluate complex variables to make effective business decisions. 

For example, critical thinking skills are necessary to effectively re-evaluate processes during agile project management, which drives innovation.

The problem with critical thinking skills is that it’s difficult to identify them relying solely on resume evaluation. Anyone can write “critical thinking skills” on a resume, but it doesn’t make them critical thinkers.

That’s where talent assessments come in. Skills testing measures candidates’ critical thinking skills, ensuring shortlisted candidates meet a certain benchmark. Then, asking interview questions for critical thinking gives you a well-rounded understanding of a candidate’s aptitude for objective analysis. The questions should be thorough enough to give you insight into a candidate’s motivations, problem-solving style, and decision-making skills.

Asking interview questions about critical thinking gives you insight into a candidate’s thinking style as well as relevant sub-skills, such as: 

Decision-making

Problem-solving

Information processing

Deductive reasoning

Conflict resolution

In candidates’ answers to all these critical interview questions, look for their ability to: 

Give a clear, concise, structured answer – for example, using the STAR method , outlining the situation, task, action, and result

Illustrate their points with specific examples 

Reflect honestly on their strengths and weaknesses

Show self-awareness about areas for improvement

So, what are some critical thinking interview questions?

1. How do you go about completing a task without clear information?

Answers to this question should show how the candidate would perform in time-sensitive environments, where workers often make decisions with incomplete information. 

Based on the answers, gauge how the candidate would handle the lack of information in complex situations, including: 

How they review the information they have 

How they use creative thinking to fill in the blanks

What experiences, resources, or training they draw on to make educated guesses about missing data 

How they decide on a solution 

Whether they continually use analytical skills to re-evaluate their chosen solution as they receive more information

What the outcomes have been in past instances of doing tasks while missing information

2. What is the most difficult work-related decision you’ve had to make?

This critical thinking interview question probes candidates’ ability to make sound decisions under pressure. A good answer shows a clear thought process and measured judgment to select a course of action.

Look out for candidates who can: 

Lay out all the variables involved in the decision 

Explain why these factors were at odds with each other and what the stakes were

Reflect on how they handled the stress of the decision 

Show that they created a logical system for making the decision – and stuck to it 

Display willingness to take ownership of their decisions even in difficult circumstances, such as layoffs

3. How do you process new ideas and approaches?

Open-mindedness is central to critical thinking. Candidates shouldn’t fear abandoning traditional methodologies if a superior alternative emerges. Equally, they should exercise their judgment to evaluate whether a new method meets the bar. 

When a candidate answers this question, look out for: 

Awareness of new ideas and approaches emerging in their field – this is a sign that a candidate is proactive and engaged in their work

An established process for fact-checking or testing new approaches

Ongoing reevaluation of new methods and ideas

Adaptability and willingness to consider ideas that contradict their way of doing things 

4. How do you respond to opposing viewpoints?

Critical thinking depends on a person’s ability to weigh both sides of an argument. Even when one course of action is worse than another, candidates should be able to respond to opposing perspectives respectfully and constructively.

Candidates with strong critical thinking skills:

Show they understand opposing viewpoints

Practice active listening to ensure everyone feels heard

Identify the conflict between others’ ideas and their opinion 

Address this conflict respectfully and back up their views with hard evidence 

Where applicable, shift their viewpoint according to new information or reach a suitable compromise

5. How quickly do you make decisions?

In a fast-paced work environment, employees must act swiftly and decisively. This critical thinking interview question asks the candidate to expand on their decision-making process. Strong answers strike a balance between careful consideration and urgency, showing:

An understanding of decision-making timelines in their role or industry: quicker isn’t always better, and making snap decisions is often a sign of arrogance

An awareness of the time needed to make different types of decisions and which stakeholders are involved 

Methods for assessing how much time they have to make a decision and how they manage their tasks to stay on track

Variables they prioritize in decisions they have limited time to make

6. Have you ever anticipated a complex problem before it arose? How did you deal with it?

This critical thinking interview question separates the proactive thinkers from the passive ones, helping you spot candidates who plan and anticipate risks – an invaluable skill in any organization.

Good answers to this question show: 

A solid understanding of the key functions or outputs of their business and the resources these rely on 

Proactive evaluation of changes to this environment

Risk assessment and risk management skills , and knowing when to take action and when to hold off

7. What work-related advice would you give to former employers?

This question gauges a candidate’s propensity to voice criticism and whether they express it constructively or negatively. There’s no right or wrong answer here. Candidates simply need to thoughtfully explain suggestions for managers in their previous roles.

“Green flags” when looking at candidates’ answers to this question include: 

An awareness of the factors that went into their bosses’ decision-making 

A clear explanation of their disagreements or amendments to these policies 

Practical suggestions for improving the situation 

A “red flag” would be making personal or non-constructive remarks or failing to show understanding and respect for former employers.

8. How often do you ask coworkers for help?

Workers should know when to seek help from others while working on a project. They shouldn’t burden co-workers with work they could do themselves, nor should they be too stubborn to proceed without some outside opinion or help.

Keep an eye out for candidates who:

Understand which tasks in their role are suitable for collaboration and which require independence 

Show willingness to look for their own solution before asking others for help 

Know their limitations, particularly within time constraints – for example, when to ask for help from a colleague who can complete a task faster 

Awareness of and respect for their colleagues’ priorities 

A willingness to learn so this situation is less likely to repeat itself

9. How should friction between team members be dealt with?

Conflict resolution is a skill that’s hard to come by for hiring managers. In work environments with people with different opinions and values, it’s important to have someone who can defuse conflict situations with a proactive, patient, and impartial approach.

Look for candidates who: 

Know the difference between healthy and toxic conflict

Understand organizational or legal protocols for conflict resolution – for example, which situations should be dealt with formally 

Resolve conflicts using non-violent communication

Are familiar with processes for restabilizing the team after conflict resolution

10. What is the most innovative work-related idea you have come up with? How did it benefit the organization?

This question asks candidates to describe past experiences of thinking outside the box to deliver a new solution. Having proactive problem-solvers in your organization helps it stay ahead of the curve. 

A good answer to this critical thinking interview question shows that a candidate: 

Is on the lookout for opportunities to innovate or optimize processes

Comes up with practical ways to implement their solutions

Stands up for their ideas if they’re not met with enthusiasm initially

11. Describe a situation when you received negative feedback you didn’t understand.

If applicants have received negative feedback they didn’t understand, getting defensive should not be their first instinct. An employee who analyzes situations critically should know that the feedback could enhance the quality of their work and strive to understand it better.

Look out for candidates who show: 

A willingness to receive critical feedback 

The ability to restate what they heard and ask for clarifications on aspects that elude them

A keenness to follow up with the supervisor and ask about their progress since the feedback was given

12. Describe a time you made a serious mistake at work.

Owning up to past mistakes shows applicants’ integrity and honesty. How they describe the mistake and their subsequent actions should hint at the strength of their critical analysis ability. Ask yourself: 

Are they able to explain what they learned from the mistake? 

Can they describe how they took accountability for their errors?

Did they use the errors as learning opportunities?

Has the mistake reoccurred, or have they used this lesson to prevent it?

13. Describe a digital skill you need to improve.

Companies worldwide are experiencing massive shortages of digital skills, even among younger workers. One UK-based survey found that employers believed some of the top skills graduates lacked were:

Basic IT skills

Data ethics

Machine learning

Programming

Data communication skills

A good answer to this question should show that candidates understand the importance of mastering digital processes. 

It also shows that the candidate has the critical thinking skills needed to recognize these weaknesses in their digital know-how, particularly where they impact their job.

Ask them if they are taking courses or reading books to improve.

14. Do you have any methods for improving your problem-solving skills?

Problem-solving skills are an adjunct of critical thinking that prepares candidates for handling challenging assignments by prioritizing tasks, planning and executing strategies, and anticipating additional problems. 

To improve their problem-solving skills, candidates can: 

Share ideas with coworkers to learn new problem-solving strategies

Improve analytical skills to assess the root causes of problems

Practice creative and critical thinking

Assessing your applicants’ problem-solving skills is quick and simple with our Problem Solving and Critical Thinking tests. Use these tests for a data-driven hiring process.

Spot top problem-solvers without bias

Find out how our skills tests can help you find the best hire for your open position.

15. Have you ever received negative feedback from senior management?

Negative feedback from senior managers may seem jarring, but employees should see it as a wake-up call and an opportunity to improve performance. Your applicants should show their critical thinking aptitude by explaining:

How they accept negative comments from senior leadership 

What they do to implement the necessary changes to their work 

How they use it as a learning opportunity

Ask your candidates to provide an example of a time they received negative feedback and ask extra questions to see how the criticism improved their work.

 For instance, if a senior manager reproached an applicant for not motivating a team effectively, you may ask, “How did your motivational strategies change after that?”

16. How would you coach an employee who’s failing to meet targets?

Coaching enables underperforming team members to enhance their approach to the task and achieve their goals more efficiently. Successful coaching demands critical thinking skills on the mentor’s part to inform the best strategy. 

Consider whether your applicants have coaching experience and can provide an example of a situation when their coaching strategies helped an employee who was failing to meet targets.

Strategies they could mention include:

Scheduling one-on-one meetings to discuss company targets 

Using efficient communication to share their expectations with the employee

Evaluating the reasons why the team member is struggling 

Looking for ways to help them address challenges with training or mentorship

17. How do you ensure your team trusts your choices?

Team management requires strong critical thinking skills because managers must understand what motivates each of their team members, communicate their decisions in a way that resonates with them, and project reliable authority.

Examples of how candidates could do this include:

Being transparent in their decision-making process 

Admitting mistakes 

Communicating effectively

Using team-building activities

Holding regular team meetings

Whichever method they use, applicants should describe the outcomes of their processes to help you appraise their managerial expertise.

What are examples of critical thinking questions? Here’s our full list of critical thinking questions and answers.

In traditional hiring, the earliest you could assess critical thinking skills is during the interview. Hiring managers spend much time and effort inviting candidates to interviews and prepping the questions, only to find they aren’t suitable.

This situation doesn’t happen if you screen candidates using TestGorilla’s Critical Thinking test , which evaluates their basic critical thinking abilities with questions like this:

Using skills-based hiring during the shortlisting process lets you cut out the time you’d otherwise spend checking if candidates have critical thinking skills.

Instead, you can look more closely at how they approach problems with interview questions for strategic thinking. Then, you can evaluate whether their approach would work in your business environment.

This approach leads to better hires and a shorter time to hire. For example, the game development and publishing studio Visionaries FZ-LLC saves 15 hours per hire by only inviting candidates to interview if they score above 80% on TestGorilla’s assessment.

Don’t waste time finding skilled candidates.

Create your first multi-measure assessment for free with TestGorilla today.

Critical thinking is at the top of the list when deciding what to assess with your interview questions. In this article, we’ve broken down: 

Why critical thinking skills are so important 

A list of the best critical thinking questions for interview candidates

How skills testing can help you create even better thought-provoking questions for interviews

To learn how to get started with skills testing, sign up for a demo with one of our experts today. 

You can also look around our platform yourself by taking a product tour .

Or, if you’re ready to get started straight away, sign up for our Free forever plan now.

Related posts

IT support specialist job description template: Everything you need to include

Financial analyst job description template: Everything you need to include

Graphic designer job description template: Everything you need to include

You've scrolled this far

Why not try TestGorilla for free, and see what happens when you put skills first.

Latest posts

The best advice on pre-employment testing, in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

Hire the best. No bias. No stress.

Our screening tests identify the best candidates and make your hiring decisions faster, easier, and bias-free.

Free resources

This checklist covers key features you should look for when choosing a skills testing platform

This resource will help you develop an onboarding checklist for new hires.

How to assess your candidates' attention to detail.

Learn how to get human resources certified through HRCI or SHRM.

Learn how you can improve the level of talent at your company.

Learn how CapitalT reduced hiring bias with online skills assessments.

Learn how to make the resume process more efficient and more effective.

Improve your hiring strategy with these 7 critical recruitment metrics.

Learn how Sukhi decreased time spent reviewing resumes by 83%!

Hire more efficiently with these hacks that 99% of recruiters aren't using.

Make a business case for diversity and inclusion initiatives with this data.

The Best Interview Questions for Assessing Critical Thinking

Employers seek individuals who can analyze complex problems, make informed decisions, and navigate challenges with creativity and logic. Assessing a candidate's critical thinking abilities during the interview process is crucial to ensure they can contribute effectively to your organization's success. This article provides a comprehensive guide to the best interview questions for evaluating critical thinking, what to look for in candidate responses, and tips for effectively assessing this vital skill during hiring.

Critical Thinking Interview Questions

• Can you describe a challenging problem you faced at work and how you approached solving it?
• Tell me about a time when you had to analyze information from multiple sources to make a decision.
• How do you prioritize tasks when you have multiple deadlines to meet?
• Give an example of a situation where you identified a significant error or inefficiency in a process. What did you do about it?
• Describe a time when you had to think outside the box to achieve a goal.
• How do you handle situations where you don't have all the information you need to make a decision?
• Can you provide an example of how you evaluated the pros and cons of different solutions to a problem?
• Tell me about a time when you had to change your approach to a project based on new information or feedback.
• How do you ensure that your decisions are objective and free from personal bias?
• Describe a scenario where you had to persuade others to adopt your viewpoint or solution.

What to Look for in Answers

Problem-Solving Approach : Look for a clear, logical process the candidate used to address the issue. They should demonstrate methodical thinking and the ability to break down complex problems into manageable parts.

Analytical Skills : Candidates should show they can assess information critically, identify key factors, and evaluate different aspects before reaching a conclusion.

Creativity and Innovation : Effective critical thinkers often think outside the box. Look for examples where candidates proposed unique or unconventional solutions.

Decision-Making Ability : Assess how candidates weigh options, consider consequences, and make informed decisions based on available data.

Adaptability : Candidates should demonstrate flexibility in their thinking and the ability to adjust their strategies when faced with new information or changing circumstances.

Communication Skills : Strong critical thinkers can articulate their thought processes clearly and persuasively, making it easy for others to understand their reasoning.

Evidence of Bias Awareness : Look for indications that candidates are aware of their own biases and take steps to ensure their decisions are objective and fair.

Tips for Evaluating Critical Thinking During the Hiring Process

Use Behavioral Questions Behavioral interview questions, which ask candidates to describe past experiences, are effective for uncovering how they've demonstrated critical thinking in real situations. These questions encourage candidates to provide concrete examples that reveal their problem-solving and analytical skills.

Assess Problem-Solving Skills Incorporate problem-solving scenarios or case studies into the interview process. Observe how candidates approach these challenges, the methods they use to analyze information, and the solutions they propose. This hands-on approach provides valuable insights into their critical thinking abilities.

Listen for Logical Reasoning Pay attention to how candidates structure their responses. Effective critical thinkers present their ideas in a logical, coherent manner, showing clear connections between their thoughts and actions. Look for a step-by-step reasoning process in their answers.

Evaluate Their Ability to Reflect Candidates who engage in self-reflection demonstrate a high level of critical thinking. They can assess their own performance, recognize mistakes, and learn from their experiences. Ask follow-up questions to gauge their level of self-awareness and willingness to grow.

Look for Curiosity and Inquisitiveness Individuals with strong critical thinking skills often display a natural curiosity and a desire to understand how things work. Assess their willingness to ask questions, seek out information, and explore different perspectives during the interview.

Involve Multiple Interviewers Having several interviewers assess a candidate can provide a more balanced evaluation of their critical thinking skills. Different perspectives can help identify strengths and weaknesses that a single interviewer might miss.

Provide Time for Thoughtful Responses Allow candidates time to think through their answers rather than expecting immediate responses. This approach encourages more thoughtful, well-considered answers that better showcase their critical thinking capabilities.

Assessing critical thinking during the interview process is essential for identifying candidates who can navigate complex challenges, make informed decisions, and drive your organization forward. By incorporating thoughtfully crafted interview questions, understanding what to look for in responses, and applying effective evaluation techniques, you can accurately gauge a candidate's critical thinking abilities. Investing time in this aspect of the hiring process ensures you select individuals who not only fit the role but also contribute to a culture of innovation and excellence within your team.

Other resources

15 Critical Thinking Interview Questions To Ask Candidates

Identifying critical thinking skills is crucial during the recruitment process in any organization, regardless of its size. These skills are vital for tackling problems, driving innovation, and developing long-term strategies to meet organizational goals.

Candidates often face scenarios where they don’t have all the information needed to solve a problem, and solutions are rarely black and white . That’s why employers must prepare a curated list of critical thinking interview questions to better understand how the employees would handle complex situations and apply critical thinking abilities in the workplace.

The critical thinking interview questions would help you understand the candidate’s approach to solving a problem and how they would handle diverse work scenarios efficiently. 

Especially, when you pair this set of interview questions with Calibr.AI ’s soft skills assessment, you will be able to easily distinguish between the candidates and proactive thinkers who adopt a more passive problem-solving approach.

But first things first–

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively and make reasoned judgments. It involves evaluating evidence, considering different perspectives, and systematically solving problems. 

Rather than accepting information at face value, critical thinkers question assumptions, recognize biases , and use logical reasoning to reach well-supported conclusions . This skill is essential for effective decision-making and problem-solving in both personal and professional contexts.

Why Is It Important To Ask Critical Thinking Questions In The Interview?

Nowadays, the traditional methods of hiring to analyze whether the candidate is suitable for the role aren’t enough. The sudden rush in the hiring process leaves employees facing job abandonment. Due to this, employers end up going through the same hiring process again. 

Since most positions require candidates to think on their feet and quickly adapt to the situation, it can be difficult to assess the candidates, especially considering their previous job experiences, which may or may not be in favor of the position. 

This is why we have prepared a list of 15 critical thinking interview questions you must ask your candidates to find out the best-suited candidate for the role.

Top 15 Critical Thinking Interview Questions (With Answers)

1. Can you share an experience when a project didn’t go as expected? What steps could be taken to prevent similar issues in the future?

"In one project, our timeline was significantly delayed due to unexpected vendor issues. To avoid this in the future, I would implement more rigorous vendor vetting processes and establish contingency plans. Additionally, regular check-ins and risk assessments could help identify potential problems early and keep the project on track."

2. Can you describe a situation where you had to make a critical decision on short notice?

Yes, there was a time when a key team member unexpectedly left mid-project, and I had to quickly decide how to reassign their tasks to keep the project on schedule. I assessed the team’s strengths and redistributed the workload accordingly while communicating the changes clearly. This approach allowed us to meet our deadlines and maintain project momentum.

3. Can you provide an example of a time when you needed to persuade your manager that your solution to a problem was the best approach? How did you go about making your case?

Yes, I once proposed a new strategy for streamlining our workflow. I presented a detailed analysis showing potential efficiency gains and supported it with data from similar successful implementations. By clearly demonstrating the benefits and addressing potential concerns, I was able to gain my manager’s support.

4. Can you share an instance when you anticipated a problem before it arose? How did you address it to prevent the issue from occurring?

Yes, I noticed a potential bottleneck in our project timeline due to overlapping tasks. I proactively adjusted the schedule and communicated the changes to the team. This preemptive action helped us avoid delays and kept the project on track.

5. How would you handle a situation where a customer presents an issue while you’re in the middle of a crucial discussion with your manager?

I would politely acknowledge the customer's concern and assure them I’ll address it shortly. Then, I’d quickly wrap up my discussion with my manager and prioritize the customer’s issue to ensure it’s resolved promptly.

6. How would you describe the color green to someone who is blind?

I would describe green as a color that feels refreshing and calming, like the sensation of cool, soft grass underfoot or the smell of a fresh, leafy plant. It's often associated with growth and renewal, bringing a sense of tranquility and balance.

7. What’s your approach to assembling a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle?

I would start by sorting the pieces into groups based on color and edge pieces. Next, I’d build the border first to create a framework and then work on smaller sections of the puzzle, using the reference image to guide me. Regularly checking and adjusting pieces ensures a smoother assembly process.

8. If a co-worker proposes a solution during a meeting that you believe won’t work, how would you handle it?

I would respectfully express my concerns by offering a constructive critique and suggesting alternative solutions. I’d ensure my feedback is presented thoughtfully to foster a collaborative discussion, helping the team find the most effective approach.

9. Can you recall a time when someone proposed an idea you hadn’t thought of before? How did you respond?

Yes, there was a time when a team member suggested a new approach to a project that I hadn’t considered. I was open to their idea, took the time to understand their perspective, and ultimately integrated their suggestion, which led to an improved outcome.

10. What is your approach to tackling a problem?

I start by thoroughly understanding the problem and gathering relevant information. Then, I identify potential solutions and evaluate their pros and cons. Finally, I implement the most effective solution and monitor its impact to ensure the problem is resolved.

11. Can you provide an example of a time when you identified a problem at work and developed a solution?

I noticed that our team's project tracking was inefficient due to outdated tools. I proposed and implemented a new project management software that streamlined our workflow and improved communication. This change led to a noticeable increase in productivity and project accuracy.

12. Can you describe a time when you had to adjust your work style to align with a manager’s preferences? What changes did you make?

Yes, I had to adapt to a manager who preferred more frequent progress updates. I shifted to providing detailed weekly reports and scheduled regular check-ins to keep them informed. This adjustment improved our communication and helped ensure alignment with project goals.

13. How would you handle a situation where your manager made an error on a crucial document?

I would approach the situation tactfully by privately pointing out the mistake and suggesting a correction. I’d provide any necessary information or support to fix the error, ensuring it’s resolved discreetly and professionally.

14. Do you think it's more effective to raise prices for higher profit or lower prices to enhance customer satisfaction?

It depends on the context. Raising prices can boost profit if the value justifies it while lowering prices can attract more customers and increase volume. Ideally, finding a balance that maximizes profit while maintaining customer satisfaction is the best approach.

15. If you arrived at work to find 1,000 emails waiting and only had time to respond to 200, how would you prioritize which emails to address?

I’d prioritize emails based on urgency and importance, focusing on those from key stakeholders, critical issues, or deadlines. I’d also check for any flagged or high-priority messages and address those first to ensure I’m tackling the most pressing matters.

In Conclusion

These are some of the most strategic critical thinking interview questions you can ask your candidates to assess their critical and analytical thinking skills required for the job role. So next time, use this list to efficiently evaluate your candidates and choose the right person for the company.

To further enhance your recruitment process, consider investing in Calibr.AI . Our product provides advanced soft skills assessments that complement your interview questions, helping you identify proactive thinkers and differentiate between candidates more effectively. By integrating Calibr.AI into your hiring strategy, you'll be better equipped to find candidates who excel in critical thinking and contribute meaningfully to your organization’s success.

AI powered Course Authoring

Unlock the future of e-learning with Calibr

As an enthusiastic English literature graduate, Chandni enjoys writing as much as a toddler enjoys animation. She discovered her passion for writing and expressing thoughts through this form amidst the nail-biting months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ever since then, she has volunteered in various anthology books that have been published on Amazon. Her experience working on a diverse range of verticals has enabled her to excel in this domain and face new challenges as they come. With a contagious thrill and excitement at the workplace, Chandni embraces wearing different hats and soaks up information like a sponge.

All interview guides

Fundamental Interview Questions to Assess Critical Thinking

14 Aug 2024

Need help assessing

Critical Thinking

Watch a quick demo

You've found the perfect candidates whose CVs sparkle with impressive skills and experiences. But the real challenge lies in uncovering how they think and solve problems. This is where assessing critical thinking during interviews comes into play. Critical thinking helps you understand a candidate's ability to analyse, evaluate, and create solutions, providing a glimpse into their problem-solving prowess. Here, you'll discover what critical thinking entails, why it matters, and how you can effectively gauge it during interviews.

1. Understanding Critical Thinking in Interviews

1.1 what is critical thinking.

Critical thinking involves analysing facts to form a judgment. It's a key competency that means going beyond basic problem-solving, enabling candidates to comprehend complex issues and make reasoned decisions. They're not just taking information at face value; they’re evaluating it, comparing different data points, and synthesising a conclusion that is logical and well-founded.

In an interview, critical thinking can be represented by how well a candidate dissects a problem, recognising various facets and implications. It’s shown in their thought process, where they identify the core issue, ask pertinent questions, and arrive at a recommended solution. By focusing on a candidate’s critical thinking abilities, you ensure that you’re bringing onboard individuals who can adapt and think on their feet in a fast-paced work environment.

1.2 Why is Critical Thinking Important in Candidates?

Critical thinking is crucial as it translates directly into job performance. A candidate with strong critical thinking skills will approach problems methodically, avoiding snap judgments and instead drawing on a reasoned thought process. They will think about the long-term effects of their decisions, identify potential pitfalls, and propose strategies that are sustainable and effective.

Hiring someone with these skills means you're adding value to your team. You can count on them to:

Make informed decisions: They weigh the pros and cons and make choices based on sound reasoning.

Solve complex problems: They dissect the problem to understand it fully and create well-thought-out solutions.

Innovate within their role: They bring fresh ideas and an analytical mindset to drive continuous improvement.

1.3 How to Identify Critical Thinking During Interviews?

Identifying critical thinking during interviews requires asking the right questions. Focus on open-ended questions that encourage candidates to explain their thought processes. Look for evidence of their ability to break down issues, consider different perspectives, and draw logical conclusions.

Here’s what you can do:

Ask situational questions: Present hypothetical challenges relevant to the role.

Use past experiences: Request examples of when they tackled a significant problem.

Evaluate their reasoning: Pay attention to how they justify their decisions.

The key is to observe how candidates navigate through their explanations. Are they considering multiple factors? Do they articulate their thoughts clearly and logically? Their responses can reveal much about their capacity for critical thinking.

2. Top Interview Questions to Assess Critical Thinking

2.1 example scenario analysis.

As an interviewer, you can gauge a candidate's critical thinking by presenting a relevant real-world scenario they might face in your company. A good example could be: "Imagine you notice a recurring customer complaint about the same product issue. How would you approach this problem?" This question forces candidates to think critically about identifying the root cause and suggests proactive solutions.

Look for responses that use logical steps. Good answers might include:

Gathering Data: Collecting feedback from customers and employees.

Identifying Patterns: Analysing data to pinpoint recurring issues.

Proposing Solutions: Implementing fixes and monitoring outcomes.

Pro-tip: A candidate who collaborates with different departments to solve the issue indicates strong teamwork and critical thinking.

2.2 Problem-Solving Approach

Asking candidates about their problem-solving approach is essential. A question like, "Tell me about a time when you had to solve a difficult problem. What steps did you take?" helps identify how they handle pressure and think on their feet. This question is crucial for roles that frequently encounter unexpected challenges.

Look for these elements in their answers:

Understanding the Problem: Clearly defining the problem.

Brainstorming Solutions: Considering multiple solutions before deciding on one.

Implementing and Reflecting: Executing a plan and evaluating its effectiveness.

Pro-tip: Pay attention to candidates who mention learning from the process. This shows they can adapt and improve from past experiences.

2.3 Decision-Making Process

Another way to assess critical thinking is by asking about decision-making processes. For example, "How do you make important decisions, particularly when information is limited?" This reveals how a candidate copes with uncertainty and the methods they use to make sound decisions.

In their response, look for:

Information Gathering: Seeking out all available data.

Weighing Options: Considering the pros and cons of each option.

Justifying the Decision: Providing a clear rationale for the chosen path.

Pro-tip: Candidates who explain how they consider the impact on various stakeholders show foresight and comprehensive thinking.

2.4 Logical Reasoning Challenges

To test a candidate's logical reasoning, present them with a puzzle or complex problem: "Suppose you're given a task with ambiguous instructions. How would you clarify and proceed with the task?" This will test their ability to process information clearly and methodically.

Effective answers should:

Clarify Requirements: Ask pertinent questions to understand the task better.

Create a Plan: Outline a step-by-step process for approaching the task.

Assess Outcomes: Continuously evaluate progress to ensure alignment with goals.

Pro-tip: Select candidates who demonstrate patience and persistence in their approach—these qualities are indispensable in logical reasoning tasks.

2.5 Creativity and Innovation Queries

Understanding a candidate's creativity and innovation can be crucial. Ask, "Can you describe a time when you had to think outside the box to solve a problem?" This question assesses their ability to think beyond conventional methods and bring fresh ideas to the table.

Key aspects to look for include:

Identifying the Problem: Recognising an area where traditional solutions failed.

Creative Thinking: Coming up with unique and effective solutions.

Implementation and Results: Successfully applying the solution and achieving positive outcomes.

Pro-tip: Candidates who emphasize collaborative innovation signal that they can inspire and work well within teams to drive creative solutions.

3. Evaluating Answers for Insight into Critical Thinking

3.1 what to look for in responses.

To assess a candidate's critical thinking skills effectively, look for structured and logical responses . Strong answers will include a clear point, backed by evidence or rationale . For instance, when asked to solve a particular problem, the candidate should detail the steps they would take and explain why each step is necessary. They should also compare alternatives if relevant.

You should notice how they break down complex issues into manageable parts and describe their approach comprehensively. Highlight solutions or conclusions should be based on data or factual information. For example, if discussing a past project, they might reference specific metrics that guided their decision-making. Watch for signs of originality and flexibility , as these indicate a robust critical thinking ability.

Pro-tip: Pay attention to candidates who consistently ask clarifying questions before answering—this often signifies a thoughtful and thorough approach.

3.2 Interpreting Thought Processes and Reasoning

When interpreting a candidate's thought processes, focus on their ability to articulate their reasoning clearly . Good critical thinkers will not only present their conclusion but also walk you through the journey of how they arrived there. This might include describing their initial understanding, the intermediate steps, and any modifications to their strategy based on new information or insights.

Check for candidates who identify potential obstacles and their methods for overcoming them. This often signals proactive planning and an ability to foresee and mitigate future risks. Strong responses will highlight not only the what but also the why—showing that they understand the impact of their decisions and actions on the outcome.

Pro-tip: Look for candidates who reflect on their previous experiences and demonstrate how lessons learned influenced their problem-solving strategies.

3.3 Assessing the Depth of Critical Analysis

Evaluating the depth of a candidate's critical analysis involves looking beyond surface-level answers. Seek detailed responses that show consideration of multiple factors or viewpoints . For example, when asked about making a difficult decision, the candidate should discuss the pros and cons of each option, the stakeholders involved, and long-term implications.

Depth in analysis also means recognising ethical dimensions and broader consequences. Candidates who discuss not just immediate outcomes but the ripple effects of a decision exhibit strong critical thinking. Their answers should reflect an awareness of context and the potential for unforeseen issues.

Pro-tip: Candidates who reference specific frameworks or methodologies they use for analysis often bring a more disciplined approach to critical thinking.

In conclusion, assessing critical thinking in interviews requires focusing on detailed, logical, and structured responses. By posing scenario-based questions and seeking thorough explanations, you can gauge a candidate's analytical skills and their ability to navigate complex problems. Look for clear reasoning, consideration of multiple factors, and reflective insights to identify strong critical thinkers.

Want to run this type of interview?

Evidenced is packed with pre-built templates and questions to let you run perfectly structured interviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some good critical thinking interview questions.

How would you solve [specific problem]?

Describe a time you had to make a quick decision with limited information.

How do you prioritise tasks in a pressured situation?

What are some good critical thinking questions?

What criteria do you use to evaluate success?

Can you explain a challenging project you've managed?

How do you handle conflicting priorities?

What question would you ask to test the applicant's critical thinking skills?

How do you approach solving a problem when you don't have all the information?

How to assess critical thinking?

Ask scenario-based questions.

Look for structured, logical responses.

Evaluate the consideration of multiple factors.

Check for clear reasoning and insights.

Explore the guides

Top Interview Questions to Assess Time Management

Top Interview Questions to Assess Leadership

Top Interview Questions to Assess Creativity

Top Interview Questions to Hire a Content Designer

Key Interview Questions to Assess Conflict Resolution

The Top Interview Questions to Hire a Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)

Evidenced in 4 mins

Realtime guidance

Candidate experience

Interview builder

Interviewer performance

Training tools

AI assistance

Eliminate gut feel decisions

Improve candidate experience

Reduce hiring costs

Ensure consistency and compliance

Accelerate DE&I initiatives

Get faster feedback on candidates

Target your interview training

Why switch to Evidenced?

UnderwriteMe

All customers

Talent Acquisition

Hiring Managers

Interviewers

Integrations

All integrations

Interview Guides

Help and support

Book a demo

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved.

Data hosting compliant with ISO 27001 and SOC 2

Source: G2.com, Inc.

Add Evidenced to Chrome

Privacy policy

Terms of service

13 critical thinking interview questions to use

If you’re looking to fill a position that requires precise and rational decision-making skills, critical thinking interview questions are an essential component in your interview process .

Many hiring managers overlook this veiled job requirement and skill because it’s not always easily assessed. Some candidates have the technical skills and experience but might not have the emotional intelligence or critical thinking skills to succeed.

That’s where interview questions to assess problem-solving skills can come in handy.

What is critical thinking?

Critical thinking is a thought process that allows a person to evaluate and assess information objectively and calculate responses and judgment. Critical thinking can be compared to rash, reactive thought processes which generate immediate and purely emotional responses.

In the workplace, people with critical thinking skills are highly valued as they usually provide rational advice, thought-out solutions, and fair assessments.

It’s tough to establish the level of a candidate’s critical thinking skills unless you specifically look for it during the interview process. Critical thinking interview questions are one of the tools available to hiring managers to gauge how a candidate will handle unpredictable situations that may arise on the job.

Tailored critical thinking interview questions

There are plenty of examples of different types of interview questions available, but your questions must relate to the position and the environment in your company. For example, if the role requires critical decisions on a technical level, the questions must be structured around the relevant skill. If the role requires critical thinking around people (customers or staff), focus on people skills.

There’s a trend to ask brainteaser questions during interviews to measure a candidate’s response, but please don’t go that route. It’s pointless! Asking something like “Jo is one of three children. Her sisters are named May and June. What’s the third child’s name?” is meaningless.

Whether the candidate answers “Jo” correctly or says “probably April” tells you nothing about their critical thinking abilities or anything else.

Apart from potentially making a candidate feel confused and uncomfortable, you could have them questioning how genuine you are.

Plan every step in the recruitment process before the interviews start. If a role needs rational decision-making, a list of critical thinking interview questions must be compiled, preferably by the hiring team rather than just the hiring manager. Collaborative thinking and inclusive staff recruitment allow for different opinions and perspectives of the same role and its requirements.

Ensure that your interview questions are challenging

These questions aren’t intended to be easy. Questions must be thought-provoking. Make the candidate think about how they would respond to and react in specific, tricky situations. You’re not necessarily looking for the right or wrong answers or solutions. Instead, you’re evaluating the candidate’s response rather than skill.

Virtually every department has positions that profoundly impact outcomes for other team members, customers, production, sales, your company brand, etc. Staff who hold these positions require well-developed critical thinking skills.

When compiling your list of interview questions, go way beyond the job skills or experience needed. Analyze what the impact of poor decision making in this role will have on existing staff, customers, your brand, and your business as a whole.

Once you’ve isolated the areas of influence connected to the role, you can start compiling your list of questions. We’re splitting the question examples into technical roles and roles that involve people skills. Your vacancy might be a combination of both. There can never be a template for critical thinking interview questions because each position and company differs, so use these as a guide to inspire you.

Critical thinking interview questions for hard skills

• What would you do if you had a looming project/production deadline, but you didn’t yet have all the information/components to deliver on time?
• If you’ve figured out a quicker or more cost-effective solution to a problem, but your manager doesn’t get what you’re saying, what would you do?
• If there’s a weak link in your team or supply chain that’s impacting productivity, how would you approach the problem?
• What would you do if a customer or manager was trying to push a project through at the expense of other projects that already have confirmed delivery dates?
• When you’re in a team of specialists, you can easily find differences of opinions on what direction projects should take. How do you find consensus?
• Have you ever had to convince a manager to try out a different solution to solve a problem?

Critical thinking interview questions for soft skills

•  An order hasn’t been delivered to a customer on time, and they’re furious. They want you to cancel the order and close their account immediately. How would you repair the damage and keep the customer?
•  Business has slowed, and you’re in a sales brainstorming session. Someone suggests lowering prices and focusing more on customer satisfaction. What’s your reaction?
•  You have an employee who’s excellent at their job, but is blunt and abrasive with colleagues and that’s causing friction in your department. How do you resolve the matter?
•  You’re in a meeting, and your manager misquotes pricing or a process that can have a significant impact on your department or a project. What do you do?
•  You notice that your manager (or a colleague) is inclined to shift blame and not accept responsibility when under pressure. How do you approach the subject?
• If you had to make a decision based on incomplete information, how would you approach this?
• How would you handle a situation where you and your teammates disagree on how to move forward on a project?

What are you looking for when asking critical thinking interview questions?

You’ll notice that the issues listed above are very broad and there’s no right or wrong answer or outcome.

• What you’re looking for is how the candidate responds. Each question is a hypothetical situation that has the potential to become a big issue if not resolved properly.
• People who have high emotional intelligence and developed critical thinking skills won’t give you any old answer. Faced with a complicated situation, their critical thinking will kick in, and they’ll most likely ask you some questions for more clarity. Don’t be surprised if you get an “mmm, I’ll have to think about that…” response initially — people with developed critical thinking process information before reacting or responding.
• People who don’t ask for more details, and don’t think before responding, likely don’t have developed analytical skills. They’re also more inclined to poor, emotional decision making.

8 benefits of critical thinkers

Critical thinkers who are capable of unbiased and fair judgment all have the following abilities:

• Developed analytical skills: They analyze situations carefully.
• Good reasoning skills: They reason in a logical and fact-based way.
• Solid emotional perception: They can separate truths from lies and point them out.
• Social experience: They conduct further research or fall back on past experiences for reference. They apply known and accepted standards and limit bias.
• Comparative analysis: They distinguish between variances and make comparisons.
• Solution-oriented thinking: They envision a solution and its potential consequences.
• Calculating actions: They quantify their conclusions and take decisive action.
• Creative thinking: They convert the situation from a negative to a positive.

This process may be gradual, developing as a situation evolves, or decisions may be made quickly depending on their skill level. Whether they have to think on their feet or address long-standing problems, people with well-developed critical-thinking skills can face a given situation and resolve it in the best way possible. They also don’t hesitate to make unpopular decisions if it’s in the best interest of the company or people involved.

Use all interview and assessment tools available

For crucial positions, you’ll need more than just a list of critical thinking interview questions to establish if a candidate is a good fit for the role. Psychometric assessments can give you more insight into a candidate’s personality.

Past employment references are also an excellent tool to establish how a candidate has handled pressures in similar situations previously. Past behavior can be a predictor of future behavior, but is not foolproof either. As people mature and environments change, so can their attitude and their aptitude in the workplace.

Tania is the Head of SEO and Content at Tellent. She's been a hiring manager for over 8 years and enjoys learning about recruitment and people management topics, in addition to solving user pain points through content.

Get the MidWeekRead

Get the exclusive tips, resources and updates to help you hire better!

Hire better, faster, together!

Bring your hiring teams together, boost your sourcing, automate your hiring, and evaluate candidates effectively.

Nov 1, 2021

20 Critical Thinking Interview Questions to Ask Candidates

Markellos Diorinos

Co-founder and CEO of Bryq, Markellos has a simple vision: to empower every organization to hire, grow and retain talent more effectively using science backed data.

Identifying critical thinking skills is essential in the recruitment process. Candidates often encounter situations where they lack complete information or data to address an issue. Moreover, solutions to problems are rarely straightforward or dichotomous. Therefore, employees must possess the ability to think creatively and tackle complex challenges. Assessing a candidate's critical thinking capabilities, however, can be a daunting task. Incorporating critical thinking questions during interviews is an effective strategy. These questions, especially when combined with Bryq's cognitive skills assessment, are instrumental in differentiating between candidates who are proactive thinkers and those who take a more passive approach to their problem-solving methods. This combined approach is particularly valuable in refining the selection process during interviews.

What is Critical Thinking...and Why is it Important?

Critical thinking means thinking reasonably without too much emotion or subjectivity. People who think critically try to push all of that aside when making decisions. Instead, these individuals rely on objectivity, reason, and logic to solve problems. These may be considered “soft skills”, but they are becoming increasingly important in the global workforce. Some jobs might require more critical thinking skills than others, but critical thinking skills will need to be utilized in every job role, no matter how straightforward a job might seem.

Take, for instance, a cashier job. It might seem that the only responsibilities a cashier might have are scanning groceries and handling money. But what if there is a price discrepancy? What if the cashier notices that a customer might be stealing merchandise? What if the customer hands over a fake note? These are all possible situations in which a cashier will need to use critical thinking skills to solve problems.

20 Critical Thinking Interview Questions

Critical thinking skills can’t be assessed by reading resumes or looking at previous work experience. Asking a candidate open-ended questions that allow them to demonstrate their ability to think outside of the box and use logic to solve problems will give you a much better idea of how sharp a candidate’s creative thinking skills are. Even asking questions that seem like riddles is a great way to get your candidates thinking! You can also use these questions to check for both hard and soft skills.

Use the following 20 questions to see which of your candidates has both the brains and logic to stand out above the rest: 

Tell us about a time when a project did not go as planned. What can be done to avoid a similar problem in the future?

Have you ever needed to make an important decision quickly?

Has there ever been a time when you needed to decide without knowing all the details of a situation?

Imagine that you are the project manager of an important project. Two of your co-workers cannot get along, delaying the project. How do you go about solving this issue?

Have you ever had to convince your manager that your way of solving a problem was the best? How did you go about convincing them that you were right?

Imagine coming to work to see you have been sent 1,000 emails overnight. If you only have time to answer 200 of them, how would you decide which 200 emails to respond to?

Have you ever foreseen a problem before it happened? What did you do to prevent this from happening?

A customer has approached you with a problem while you are talking to your manager about something very important. How would you react to this?

Describe the color green to somebody who is blind.

How would you go about putting together a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle?

While in a meeting, your co-worker suggests a solution to a problem you know will not work. Do you voice your concern to the team in the meeting?

Has there ever been a time when somebody suggested an idea to you that you had not considered? If so, what was your reaction to this?

What steps do you take when addressing a problem?

Describe a time when you noticed a problem at work and came up with a solution.

Have you ever had to adapt your work style for a manager? What adjustments did you make?

Tell us about a time when you set a lofty goal for yourself and achieved it. What steps did you take to make it happen?

What is the one thing you would change about your previous job? How would you go about making these changes?

Has there ever been a time when you were dealt with an unexpected situation at work that caused you to change your approach? Tell us how you handled it.

If your manager made a mistake on an important document, how would you address it?

Is it better to increase prices to gain profit or lower prices to make customers happy?

How to Assess Critical Thinking Skills

The answers to these critical thinking interview questions can and should vary across candidates. The more creative and thought-out the response is, the better the candidate should be able to solve complex problems. However, there are some common characteristics critical thinkers have that you can look for while assessing candidates.

Critical Thinkers Are Logical

They don’t let bias or their typical way of thinking get into their decision-making. They can consider a situation from every angle and use logic to develop a solution to a problem.

Critical Thinkers Are Trustworthy

They make well-reasoned decisions based on fact and logic, not emotion. This means that they make decisions that you can trust. Additionally, they use problem-solving techniques without worrying much about the opinions of others.

Critical Thinkers Are Innovative

They are true innovators at heart. They look at problems from a different perspective. Additionally, critical thinkers offer fresh solutions to your company’s problems that you might not have thought of before.

Unexpected Answers

Candidates who possess critical thinking skills typically give creative solutions to problems. If a candidate gives a typical answer to a question or presents an obvious solution to a problem, they might lack critical thinking skills. Giving “black or white” answers suggests that these candidates don’t know how to think outside the box. You should be looking for answers and solutions that are creative yet backed by logic.

Complete Answers

Some candidates might not give detailed answers to interview questions. Alternatively, some might not even answer your question at all. It’s important to note that many critical thinking interview questions don’t have “right” or “wrong” answers. When we ask questions, we are trying to figure out whether or not the candidate has the capacity to at least try to give a fully thought-out answer backed by logical reasoning that makes sense. If a candidate tells you that the sky is actually green and not blue while presenting logical explanations as to why, you have a critical thinker on your hands. A critical thinker will convince you of things based on logic.

Check Facts

In the answers the candidates gave you, did they search for more information before moving forward in their decision-making process? When solving problems, a critical thinker prefers to find out as much information as they can before making a final decision. Make sure your candidates are making decisions based on facts and not feelings.

Logical Reasoning

In their responses, do candidates use logical reasoning to solve the issues at hand? Or do they jump to conclusions and skip logic in favor of taking action right away? When interviewing candidates, seek out logical reasoning in their answers to determine if they are critical thinkers.

How Bryq Can Help

It’s obvious that looking for critical thinking skills in the interview process is important. Of course, interview questions are only as helpful as the tools you’re using alongside them to find future hires. Bryq’s talent assessment software helps you find the perfect candidate based on personality assessments and assessment questions made to test a candidate’s cognitive abilities and critical thinking skills . Our product is based on Industrial & Organizational Psychology and measures four distinct skills - numerical skills, logical reasoning, verbal skills, and attention to detail.

Hiring employees who possess critical thinking skills can benefit your company tremendously. These employees will offer new solutions to ongoing problems and innovative ideas to improve your processes and will work hard to make sure things go smoothly. Using the critical thinking interview questions above in conjunction with Bryq’s talent assessment software is a surefire way to hire a team of critical thinkers who will get the job done.

Do you want to see our product live in action? We’d love to show you how the magic happens. Click here to book a demo with us today!

Related blog posts

Sourcing Strategies for Recruiters that work

How to Measure Content Validity in a Pre-Employment Test

What Are Cognitive Abilities and How to Hire Smart

Gain a competitive edge with data-informed talent decisions.

Request a demo and see how our platform is Shaping the Future of Work.

Request demo

Are you a talent looking to elevate your career?

Explore your strengths and weaknesses with our free Self-Discovery Assessment.

Join our community! Get the latest HR trends & tips delivered to your inbox.

Common critical thinking questions to ask and answers that guide you to top candidates

Posted on October 02nd, 2024

In an evolving business landscape, employers are no longer seeking candidates with just the right technical skills. They need individuals who can navigate challenges, solve problems creatively, and make informed decisions under pressure—skills that are hallmarks of critical thinking. As recruiters, it's essential to ask the right critical thinking questions during interviews to identify top candidates who possess these skills.

This blog will walk you through some key critical thinking interview questions, what to look for in candidate responses, and how these questions can help you assess the potential of your next hire.

What Is Critical Thinking and Why Is It Important?

Critical thinking is the ability to objectively analyze facts and situations, evaluate evidence, and make decisions or judgments based on reason rather than emotion or preconceived notions. In business, critical thinkers are highly valued because they:

• Approach problems logically.
• Consider multiple viewpoints before making decisions.
• Adapt to new information and changing circumstances.
• Provide solutions that are both creative and practical.

By incorporating critical thinking questions for interview into your hiring process, you ensure you're selecting candidates who possess these vital skills, increasing the likelihood of hiring someone who will add value to your organization in the long term.

Top Critical Thinking Interview Questions and What to Look For

1. can you tell me about a time when you had to make a difficult decision with incomplete information, what to look for:.

• The candidate’s process for gathering and evaluating information.
• How they balanced risk versus reward.
• Their ability to make a decision under pressure.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Strong candidates will describe a clear methodology for analyzing the situation, such as consulting experts or using available data. They should emphasize their ability to make a reasoned decision despite uncertainty and reflect on how the decision impacted the outcome.

2. Describe a time when you identified a major problem in your team or organization. How did you solve it?

• Their ability to recognize problems before they escalate.
• The steps they took to implement a solution.
• How they worked with others to resolve the issue.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Look for candidates who took ownership of the problem and approached the situation with a systematic, thoughtful approach. Ideal answers include collaboration, as critical thinkers rarely solve complex problems in isolation. Top candidates will provide examples of how their solution resulted in a positive outcome for the team or organization.

3. How do you prioritize your work when you have multiple deadlines and projects competing for your time?

• Time-management skills and ability to stay focused under pressure.
• Their approach to evaluating the importance of different tasks.
• Flexibility in adapting to new information or priorities.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: A critical thinker will describe a clear process, perhaps using tools like prioritization matrices or software to manage their workload. They should demonstrate the ability to make decisions on the fly while staying flexible enough to adjust when priorities shift.

4. Tell me about a time when you had to challenge a popular opinion within your team. How did you approach it, and what was the result?

• The candidate’s confidence in their reasoning and ability to support their ideas.
• How they handle confrontation or disagreements.
• Whether they can argue their point while remaining open to other perspectives.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Strong candidates will approach this with a balance of assertiveness and open-mindedness. They will explain how they built a compelling case, but also how they listened to and incorporated feedback from their team. Top candidates will also focus on the outcome, showcasing their ability to persuade others or adapt their viewpoint.

5. Give an example of a situation where you had to think creatively to solve a problem.

• Creativity and willingness to explore unconventional solutions.
• How they implemented their idea and whether it was successful.
• Whether they considered the potential risks of their solution.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Top candidates will describe how they went beyond standard approaches to find an innovative solution. They should also explain how they evaluated potential risks and modified their idea if needed. Look for candidates who can combine creativity with practicality, ensuring their solution is both effective and feasible.

6. How do you handle feedback, especially if you disagree with it?

• Emotional intelligence and the ability to accept constructive criticism.
• Their approach to understanding feedback, even when they disagree.
• How they use feedback to grow and improve.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Candidates who excel at critical thinking are open to feedback, seeing it as a learning opportunity rather than a personal attack. They will explain how they weigh the feedback and consider whether it's valid or relevant, but will also highlight how they maintain professionalism in situations where they may not agree.

7. Describe a time when you had to make an unpopular decision. How did you communicate and justify it?

• The candidate’s decision-making process and how they communicate difficult decisions.
• Whether they can remain diplomatic and composed under stress.
• Their focus on achieving the best outcome, even when it's not popular.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Look for candidates who can explain the reasoning behind their decision, considering both short-term and long-term impacts. Top candidates will demonstrate how they communicated this decision in a way that maintained trust and respect, even if it was not well received at first.

8. How do you stay objective when evaluating different ideas or solutions in a team setting?

• The ability to separate personal biases from the decision-making process.
• How they evaluate the merits of different ideas based on evidence.
• Willingness to consider diverse perspectives.

Answer that guides you to top candidates: Candidates with strong critical thinking skills will talk about how they rely on data, evidence, and logical reasoning to assess different ideas. They will also highlight the importance of considering different viewpoints and staying open to new insights, ensuring their final decision is well-rounded and informed.

Why Critical Thinking Is Key in Hiring Top Talent

Incorporating critical thinking questions in interviews allows recruiters to assess candidates beyond their technical qualifications. Critical thinkers excel in roles that require adaptability, problem-solving, and decision-making-traits that are essential in today's fast-paced work environment.

When hiring for positions that demand creativity, leadership, and strategic thinking, critical thinking questions give you a window into a candidate’s thought process and problem-solving skills. You can gain insights into how they handle pressure, how they approach complex challenges, and how they contribute to team success. In the end, these are the candidates who will rise to the top and make a lasting impact in your organization.

Identifying top candidates goes beyond checking boxes for qualifications and experience. By incorporating critical thinking questions into your interview process, you ensure that you’re evaluating a candidate’s ability to navigate challenges and provide value in a meaningful way. Use these questions as part of your strategy to uncover the most promising candidates who will not only excel in their role but also contribute to your organization’s growth and success.

At W3Global , we specialize in connecting employers with top-tier candidates who possess the critical thinking skills needed to thrive in today’s competitive market. Contact us today to streamline your hiring process and discover candidates who will lead your company to success.

Recent Blogs

10 Critical Thinking Interview Questions That You Can Use

• July 28, 2021

Wondering how to test a potential employee’s critical thinking abilities and rational decision-making skills? Look no further because, in this blog, we will give you a list of the top 10 critical thinking interview questions you can ask to quickly find the right candidate for your company. 

Some candidates may possess the necessary technical skills and expertise, but lack the emotional intelligence or critical thinking abilities to succeed. If you are looking to employ the right fit for your company, critical thinking interview questions should be an essential part of your interview process.

It must sound quite difficult to assess a candidate’s ability to analyze, evaluate and think independently. However, on the contrary, it’s not. A candidate’s logical reasoning skills can be effectively determined from the very beginning, with the right set of interview questions. 

The Importance Of Critical Thinking In The Workplace

Critical thinking is a thought process that allows a person to objectively evaluate and assess information using logic and reason, and to come up with rational responses. Therefore, the ability to utilize critical thinking and logical reasoning is a highly valued skill in the workplace. 

It is important that you hire employees who can provide sensible advice, well-thought-out solutions, and fair evaluations at every step of their employment. Critical thinkers are also considered to be active team players who take the time to process situations and work accordingly, in a way that benefits the entire office. 

Critical thinkers are known for their acute logic, strong emotional perception, and exceptional social skills in the workplace. When assigned a task at work, they meticulously envision a solution and its potential consequences and plan actions using out-of-the-box thinking.

Top Critical Thinking Interview Questions To Ask A Potential Candidate

You must be wondering which critical thinking questions are thought-provoking enough to separate the critical thinkers from the rest of the candidates. There are plenty of critical thinking interview questions to choose from, but to determine the perfect fit for your company, your questions must be relevant to the job role and the environment of your firm. Therefore, you need to tailor your interview questions to suit the nature of the job. 

Regardless, to help you kickstart your interview procedure, we bring you a detailed list of the top 10 critical thinking interview questions that you can use to quickly and effortlessly separate the most qualified candidates from the rest. 

1. Where Do You See Yourself In Five Years? 

This critical thinking interview question is probably one of the most popular ones that employers ask their potential employees. You will instantly be able to tell if the job candidate has long-term career goals and whether it aligns with your company long-term, based on their approach to this question. 

Their answer might also shed light on their dedication and loyalty towards their work and companies, and if they are planning to grow with your firm in the future. You should expect a realistic, rational answer that helps you determine the candidate’s interests, drive, ambitions, and expectations. 

2. How Would You Approach Important Decisions With Incomplete Information?

The way a candidate replies to this question will help you know whether he or she is capable of making good, rational decisions even when not given enough information. It will shed a light on the candidate’s abilities to work under pressure and take decisions despite limitations. The potential employee should be able to use logic and resourcefulness to come to a rational decision. 

3. How Do You Handle Disagreements Between Teammates?

The candidate should be able to evaluate opposing viewpoints and use them to form practical solutions. You should search for candidates who use their critical thinking to look into different perspectives of a situation and lead the team to better solutions with logical reasoning.

4. How Would You Present New Ideas To Your Team?

The nature of the job might require the employee to present new ideas or concepts or to the team and this type of question will help you understand whether he/she can effectively share information with others. You can test the candidate’s communication skills and influential behaviors to persuade others to follow them using proper reasoning and approach. 

5. What Is Your Thought Process For Split-second Decisions?

This is one of the top critical thinking interview questions that you must always ask your candidates because logical reasoning and decision-making are directly related. Candidates who have the ability to make smart, thoughtful decisions based on data and information, multiple perspectives, and anticipated outcomes should be considered for the job position. 

The potential employee should show signs that he will be able to take critical decisions under pressure and in challenging situations, while thoughtfully considering how his/her decision may impact the team and the company as a whole.  

6. How Do You Handle Someone Else’s Mistake At Work?

At times, the employee might have to correct the errors of his seniors at work and take responsibility. This critical thinking interview question will help you see whether the candidate has the skills to correct others’ mistakes as well as their own in an ethical manner. You can easily determine whether the interviewee would be able to handle a difficult and uncomfortable situation with an authority figure. 

7. How Would You Improve Your Relationship With A Dissatisfied Customer? 

There may be many possible answers to this particular question. Different candidates may approach this question with different perspectives. As an interviewer looking for the perfect fit employee for your firm, you need to look out for candidates who can logically explain their decision and get their idea through to you. 

8. How Would You React To Ideas Or Approaches If They Differ From Yours? 

It is important that the potential employee has the ability to consider new ideas and tactics while solving difficult problems. This type of question is helpful to understand how well of a team player the candidate will turn out to be in the future while working with different teams and members of your firm. 

9. Describe A Time When You Anticipated A Problem And Took Measures To Prevent It.

If a candidate can look at a given situation and anticipate potential challenges, you will be able to tell he has a good understanding and grasp of the job position or task at hand. This skill combines excellent observational and problem-solving abilities, both of which are essential to critical thinking.

10. Describe A Time When Your Work Was Criticized And How You Handled It.

Finally, with this important question, you will be able to get an insight into how the candidate reacts to constructive criticism under stressful situations. You should expect the applicant to be able to take suggestions with the correct attitude and the right levels of calmness. 

Analyze The Answers To Critical Thinking Questions To Select The Right Candidate

There is no right or wrong answer to the critical thinking interview questions mentioned above and can vary significantly among candidates. The more creative and thought-out the response is, the better the candidate should be able to solve complex problems. While carrying out your interview process, you should look for some common critical thinking characteristics to get to the right candidate for you. 

The candidates should be logical and analytical thinkers who will carefully analyze all perspectives and information while assessing a situation. The employees might not always have detailed plans or information, so look for candidates who strive to take a balanced approach and try to come up with fresh and innovative techniques to solve a problem. Look for candidates who give you complete answers to these critical thinking interview questions listed above, with unexpected answers by thinking outside the box. 

Bonus: How To Assess Candidates To Screen The Right Talent

Finding the right talent for your team can be challenging, especially when a single job posting draws a large number of qualified applicants. That is why, before making a hiring decision, you must examine candidates and test their talents. Take a look at our blog on how to assess job interview candidates to screen out using other methods along with critical thinking interview questions and select the right talent for your firm. 

If you find this blog helpful and plan to ask some of these critical thinking interview questions in the next interview you conduct at your firm, do let us know in the comments below. For more tips on recruitment and hiring, make sure to subscribe to our blog or join our friendly Facebook community to get all the latest updates.

Share This Story

[New] Easily Customize Career Page with Gutenberg Blocks in easy.jobs

[New] Integrate Testlify with easy.jobs: Simplify Hiring with Skill-Based Assessments

10 Best AI Payroll Software You Should Check-in 2024

[2024 Guide] Social Recruiting: Stop Wasting Time, Start Finding Talent

Products by wpdeveloper.

Essential Addons

Enhance your Elementor page building experience with 70+ elements.

NotificationX

Best FOMO, Social Proof, Sales Popup for WooCommerce, EDD and more.

Best Documentation & Knowledge Base Plugin for WordPress.

Join 15,000+

Remote Companies

Subscribe For The Latest Updates About Remote Works

No charge. Unsubscribe anytime.

For All Plans

See the demo for entire easy.jobs platform, select, hire, and onboard great talent.

• Documentation
• Terms and Condition
• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 | Brand From

Hosted with

Don’t Let This Haunt You!

Snatch best treats now, before they walk away.

Best Critical Thinking Interview Questions To Ask A Candidate

Bianca Decu

June 29, 2023

Measuring a candidate's critical thinking skills plays a key role. It can make the difference between choosing an employee who can adapt, solve problems and make good decisions, versus one who struggles with these skills.

We've prepared a set of critical thinking interview questions to help you identify the right person for the job.

1. Could you describe an instance where you had to make a decision without all the necessary information?

Asking this question allows you to assess a candidate's ability to think critically and make sound decisions when faced with incomplete information.

In many real-world scenarios, decisions need to be made based on limited or ambiguous data. By understanding how the candidate approached and resolved such a situation in the past, you can evaluate their analytical skills, problem-solving abilities, and ability to handle uncertainty.

2. Share a situation where your initial solution to a problem didn't work as expected. How did you handle it?

Asking this question allows you to evaluate a candidate's adaptability, resilience, and problem-solving approach in the face of unexpected outcomes.

It assesses their ability to recognize and learn from mistakes, adjust their strategies, and find alternative solutions.

3. Can you recall a time you solved a complex problem with a simple solution?

This question assesses a candidate's ability to simplify complex problems, think creatively, and find innovative solutions.

Candidates who can effectively communicate how they simplified a problem and achieved a successful outcome demonstrate critical thinking, resourcefulness, and an ability to think outside the box.

4. What was a thought-provoking book, article, or report you've recently read? Why?

Asking this question allows you to evaluate a candidate's intellectual curiosity, critical thinking abilities, and engagement with complex ideas.

It provides insights into their reading habits, interests, and their capacity to reflect on and apply concepts from their reading material.

5. Give an example of when you spotted a potential problem and took measures to stop it from escalating.

This question assesses a candidate's proactive thinking, problem-solving skills, and ability to take decisive action.

Their answer can demonstrate their critical thinking in terms of identifying potential issues, analyzing risks, and implementing preventative measures.

6. How do you gather the data necessary to make informed decisions?

This question allows you to assess a candidate's ability to collect and analyze relevant data before making decisions.

It demonstrates their critical thinking skills, information-gathering techniques, and their understanding of the importance of data-driven decision-making.

7. Describe a time when you had to persuade a team member or boss to accept an idea you had.

Asking this question helps you evaluate a candidate's persuasive and communication skills, as well as their ability to think critically to influence others.

You can gauge their capacity to articulate and present their ideas effectively, provide convincing arguments, and overcome resistance.

8. Explain a situation where you had to rethink a situation due to contrary evidence.

This question assesses a candidate's openness to new information, their ability to challenge their own assumptions, and their critical thinking skills.

Based on their answer, you can determine if a candidate is intellectually curious, adaptable, and willing to reconsider their positions when presented with conflicting information.

9. When have you had to present complex information? How did you ensure that the audience understood?

Asking this question allows you to assess a candidate's ability to analyze complex information, distill key points, and effectively communicate them to others.

A strong candidate will demonstrate their critical thinking skills in terms of organizing and presenting information in a clear and understandable manner.

10. Can you describe an instance where you had to analyze a significant amount of data?

This question gives candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their critical thinking in terms of processing and synthesizing information to derive meaningful insights.

You can evaluate a candidate's ability to prioritize information, use appropriate tools or techniques for analysis, and draw relevant conclusions from the data.

11. Could you provide an example of a project that required strategic planning?

This question allows you to assess a candidate's ability to think strategically and plan for long-term goals.

Look for answers that demonstrate a candidate's capacity to analyze the broader context, set priorities, and align their actions with strategic objectives.

12. How have you dealt with situations that required critical thinking under pressure?

Asking this question helps you evaluate a candidate's ability to think critically and make sound decisions in high-pressure or time-sensitive situations.

Candidates need to showcase their ability to remain composed, assess information quickly, and consider multiple perspectives to arrive at effective solutions.

13. Discuss a time when you had to solve a problem by identifying its root cause rather than treating symptoms.

By sharing an example of when they successfully identified and resolved the root cause, candidates demonstrate their capacity to think critically, analyze complex situations, and devise effective solutions.

This question allows interviewers to assess the candidate's problem-solving approach, attention to detail, and ability to tackle challenges holistically rather than merely treating symptoms.

14. Tell me about a time when you worked on a project or problem that required heavy analytical thinking.

This question provides insights into the candidate's approach to analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities, which are vital in many roles that require decision-making, data analysis, and critical evaluation of information.

It helps you evaluate a candidate's ability to apply analytical techniques, think systematically, and make evidence-based decisions when confronted with complex projects or problems.

15. Name a situation in which you had to consider a broader perspective or wider context than you were used to.

This critical thinking interview question assesses the candidate's ability to think beyond their immediate frame of reference and consider broader perspectives and contexts.

It is particularly relevant in a professional setting where individuals need to navigate diverse perspectives, understand complex systems, and make informed decisions that account for multiple factors.

Is there another way to assess critical thinking skills?

To complement the interview process and ensure a more comprehensive assessment, employers should also consider incorporating psychometric tests.

Psychometric tests, such as abstract reasoning tests , logical reasoning tests and diagrammatic reasoning tests , offer a data-driven and objective approach to evaluating critical thinking skills.

These tests provide standardized assessments that measure a candidate's ability to analyze patterns, draw logical conclusions, and solve complex problems.

By combining interview questions with psychometric tests, employers can obtain a well-rounded evaluation of a candidate's critical thinking capabilities.

Recommended articles

The Future of Recruitment: AI and Data Analytics

Data-Driven Approaches to Talent Development

How AI is Transforming Employee Onboarding Processes

How Data Analytics Can Improve Employee Engagement

Reading time.

• whatsapp icon
• linkedin icon
• twitter icon
• facebook icon

Boost your hiring power. Start using Neuroworx today.

Talk is cheap. We offer a 7-day free trial so you can see our platform for yourselves.

5 Effective Interview Questions to Measure Critical Thinking

Interview questions

This is part of the Test Partnership interview questions series to help get the highest quality candidates.

• Limitations

Other videos

Lead consultant at Test Partnership, Ben Schwencke , explains why Critical Thinking is worth measuring.

Effective critical thinking is an essential cognitive ability in today's fast-paced and complex business environment. Employers are looking for candidates who can analyse information, identify patterns, and make sound decisions based on evidence and logical reasoning. As a result, measuring critical thinking has become an important part of the hiring process.

While cognitive ability tests are effective, interviews remain an essential part of the hiring process, providing valuable insights into a candidate's critical thinking skills.

To measure critical thinking effectively during interviews, employers need to ask the right questions. This article will explore five effective interview questions that can help measure critical thinking skills in candidates. Each question is designed to assess a different aspect of critical thinking, such as problem-solving, decision-making, and creativity. In this article, we will provide five effective questions to measure critical thinking in interviews, along with advice on what constitutes a strong / weak answer.

How do you approach problems that have no clear solution or path forward?

Would showcase the candidate's ability to use critical thinking to approach complex problems. The candidate should be able to demonstrate their ability to break down a problem into smaller parts, identify potential solutions, and weigh different factors to arrive at a decision. Additionally, a strong answer should showcase the candidate's ability to adapt to new information and adjust their approach as needed.

Might lack structure or clarity. The candidate might struggle to articulate a clear approach to problem-solving, or they may provide vague or generic examples that don't showcase their ability to think critically. Additionally, a weak answer might lack concrete details or evidence to support the candidate's claims, suggesting that they may not have a strong track record of using critical thinking to solve complex problems. Finally, a weak answer might show an inability to adapt to new information or adjust their approach, suggesting that the candidate may struggle to work effectively in a dynamic or changing environment.

• 1. How do you break down the problem into smaller, more manageable parts?
• 2. What factors do you consider when evaluating potential solutions?
• 3. How do you prioritize and weigh different factors when making a decision?

How do you prioritize competing demands or conflicting goals when making decisions?

Would demonstrate the candidate's ability to use critical thinking to evaluate complex situations with conflicting demands or goals. The candidate should be able to articulate a clear approach to decision-making, including the factors they consider and how they weigh the importance of each factor. Additionally, a strong answer should showcase the candidate's ability to make data-driven decisions based on a thoughtful and strategic analysis of the situation.

• 1. What factors do you consider when evaluating competing demands or goals?
• 2. How do you weigh the importance of each factor?
• 3. Can you provide an example of a time when you had to make a decision with competing demands or goals? How did you arrive at a decision?

Can you walk me through a decision you made that involved weighing different options and their potential consequences?

Would showcase the candidate's ability to use critical thinking to evaluate complex situations and make data-driven decisions. The candidate should be able to articulate a clear approach to decision-making, including the factors they consider and how they weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of each option. Additionally, a strong answer should demonstrate the candidate's ability to analyse outcomes and reflect on their decisions, including whether they feel they made the right choice and what they would do differently in the future.

Might lack structure or clarity. The candidate might struggle to articulate a clear approach to decision-making, or they may provide vague or generic examples that don't showcase their ability to think critically. Additionally, a weak answer might lack concrete details or evidence to support the candidate's claims, suggesting that they may not have a strong track record of using critical thinking to evaluate complex situations. Finally, a weak answer might show an inability to analyse outcomes or reflect on decisions, suggesting that the candidate may struggle to learn from past experiences and improve their decision-making skills over time.

• 1. What factors did you consider when evaluating each option?
• 2. How did you weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of each option?
• 3. Can you discuss the outcome of the decision and whether you feel it was the right one?

How do you handle situations where there is no clear precedent or established process to follow?

Would demonstrate the candidate's ability to think critically and adapt to new and challenging situations. The candidate should be able to articulate a clear approach to problem-solving, including how they gather information, evaluate potential solutions, and make data-driven decisions. Additionally, a strong answer should showcase the candidate's ability to think creatively and outside the box, as critical thinking often involves finding new and innovative solutions to complex problems.

Might lack structure or clarity. The candidate might struggle to articulate a clear approach to problem-solving, or they may provide vague or generic examples that don't showcase their ability to think critically. Additionally, a weak answer might lack concrete details or evidence to support the candidate's claims, suggesting that they may not have a strong track record of adapting to new and challenging situations. Finally, a weak answer might show an inability to think creatively or outside the box, suggesting that the candidate may struggle to find new and innovative solutions to complex problems.

• 1. How do you go about gathering information and assessing the situation?
• 2. What factors do you consider when determining the best course of action?
• 3. Can you provide an example of a time when you had to make a decision without a clear precedent or established process? How did you approach the situation?

How do you ensure that your decision-making process is objective and data-driven?

Would demonstrate the candidate's ability to use critical thinking to make objective and data-driven decisions. The candidate should be able to articulate a clear approach to decision-making, including the sources of information they use and how they weigh conflicting data points. Additionally, a strong answer should showcase the candidate's ability to use data and analysis to inform their decision-making, rather than relying solely on intuition or personal biases.

Might lack structure or clarity. The candidate might struggle to articulate a clear approach to decision-making, or they may provide vague or generic examples that don't showcase their ability to think critically. Additionally, a weak answer might lack concrete details or evidence to support the candidate's claims, suggesting that they may not have a strong track record of using data and analysis to inform their decision-making. Finally, a weak answer might show an inability to weigh conflicting data points or make objective decisions, suggesting that the candidate may struggle to make effective decisions in a high-pressure or dynamic environment.

• 1. What sources of information do you use when making decisions?
• 2. How do you weigh conflicting information or data points?
• 3. Can you provide an example of a time when you made a decision based on data and analysis?

Limitations of interview questions for Critical Thinking

As a cognitive ability, critical thinking is sub-optimally measured using interviews. Many different factors can influence interview performance, many of which are behavioural and interpersonal in nature. Consequently, a skilled interviewee could easily convince an interviewer that they have strong critical thinking skills, but in reality, they are just charismatic. Instead, as with other aptitudes, cognitive ability tests should be used to assess critical thinking, providing a less biased and more reliable estimate of a candidate’s critical thinking.

Test Partnership's critical thinking test is the ideal assessment of critical thinking in the workplace. Research shows that aptitude tests, including critical thinking tests, rank among the most powerful predictors of performance known, making them invaluable recruitment tools. Our critical thinking test, in particular, allows you to capture this essential capability, without the need for extensive interviewing. For more information on our critical thinking test, please contact us directly or register for a free trial.

Construct Validity

Construct validity relates to whether a particular psychometric assessment...

Industriousness

Industriousness is a personality trait which determines how hardworking...

Sten scores are standardised 1-10 scores commonly used in psychometric testing...

View All Videos

Browse our library of videos and training material. Lead consultant Ben Schwencke...