thesis statement ocean pollution

Home — Essay Samples — Environment — Human Impact — Ocean Pollution

Essays on Ocean Pollution

Ocean pollution essay topics and outline examples, essay title 1: the silent crisis: understanding the causes and consequences of ocean pollution.

Thesis Statement: This essay delves into the multifaceted issue of ocean pollution, exploring its root causes, the devastating impacts on marine ecosystems and biodiversity, and the urgent need for global action to mitigate and prevent further harm to our oceans.

• Introduction
• Sources of Ocean Pollution: Industrial, Agricultural, and Urban Contributors
• The Ecological Crisis: Impact on Marine Life and Ecosystems
• Human Health Concerns and Economic Implications
• Solutions and International Collaboration: Strategies for Ocean Conservation

Essay Title 2: Plastics in Our Seas: Investigating the Pervasive Threat of Plastic Pollution

Thesis Statement: This essay focuses on the global issue of plastic pollution in oceans, examining the prevalence of plastic waste, its detrimental effects on marine ecosystems, and efforts to reduce plastic consumption and promote responsible waste management.

• The Scale of Plastic Pollution: Microplastics, Macroplastics, and Ghost Nets
• The Impact on Marine Fauna and the Food Web
• Legislation and Initiatives: Bans, Recycling, and Alternatives
• Consumer Awareness and Responsible Consumption

Essay Title 3: Ocean Pollution and Climate Change: The Interconnected Threats to Our Oceans

Thesis Statement: This essay explores the complex relationship between ocean pollution and climate change, investigating how pollution exacerbates climate-related challenges such as ocean acidification and rising sea levels, and the need for holistic solutions to protect marine environments.

• Ocean Acidification: The Consequences of Increased Carbon Emissions
• Warming Seas and Coral Bleaching: The Role of Pollution
• Sea Level Rise and Coastal Communities: Pollution's Contribution to Climate Impacts
• Adaptive Strategies and Policy Integration for Ocean Resilience

Balancing Development and Conservation for Sustainable Oceans

Understanding and addressing water and ocean pollution, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Ocean Pollution: a Threat to Marine Ecosystems

The causes of ocean pollution and the need for humans to save marine life, how ocean pollution impacts earth, a study of plastic pollution in the pacific ocean, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

The Environmental Quandary of The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

The actions p.u.f.f will be taking to clean the oceans, the historical & current characteristics of western ireland coastlines & galway bay, pakistan united nations environmental program leveraging emerging technologies to combat ocean pollution, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

The Effects of Water Pollution on People and Animals

Ocean acidification: solutions, impact and causes, ocean acidification: solutions to the grave environmental concern, ocean acidification: solutions and threats, addressing the urgent issue of ocean acidification, tackling a global crisis: marine plastic pollution, the impact of pollution on marine ecosystems, protecting marine life and coastal ecosystems.

Ocean pollution, or marine pollution, occurs when substances used or spread by humans, such as industrial, agricultural and residential waste, particles, noise, excess carbon dioxide or invasive organisms enter the ocean and cause harmful effects there.

Marine debris pollution, plastic pollution, ocean acidification, nutrient pollution, toxins, underwater noise, and other.

There are many ways to categorize and examine the inputs of pollution into marine ecosystems. There are three main types of inputs of pollution into the ocean: direct discharge of waste into the oceans, runoff into the waters due to rain, and pollutants released from the atmosphere.

Ocean pollution has many consequences, such as: harm to marine animals (cancer, behavioral changes and inability to reproduce), depletion of oxygen in seawater, threats to human health (cancer and birth defects).

100 million marine animals die each year from plastic waste alone. The largest trash site on the planet is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, twice the surface area of Texas, it outnumbers sea life there 6 to 1. 70% of our debris sinks into the ocean's ecosystem, 15% floats, and 15% lands on our beaches. 80% of global marine pollution comes from agriculture runoff, untreated sewage, discharge of nutrients and pesticides.

Relevant topics

• Deforestation
• Water Pollution
• Fast Fashion
• Air Pollution
• Climate Change
• Global Warming
• Natural Disasters

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Ocean Pollution

1 menace of ocean pollution and its impact on ecosystems and human health.

Introduction The Earth is covered by oceans. The ocean covers more than 70% of the Earth’s surface, holds 97% of the world’s water, hosts some of the planet’s most diverse ecosystems, and supports economies in countries around the world. There are many causes of why our oceans are becoming toxic. Ocean pollution is widespread, becoming […]

2 The Urgent Need to Address Ocean Pollution: Effects, Causes, and Solutions

Introduction Hello everyone, and welcome back to my blog page. There’s a very serious topic I’d like to discuss this week, and that is Ocean Pollution. More recently than ever, ocean pollution has become a MAJOR problem. Its effects have become much more serious and hurtful to ocean life and our own as well. The […]

3 Ocean Pollution: Mitigating the Impending Destruction of Ocean Life

Introduction Millions of ocean species are soon to face mass extinction due to pollution. Pollution is everywhere we look, even the Ocean. All the trash that does not end up in the trash lands on the ground and eventually in the Ocean. Ocean life is on the verge of destruction by humans. The Looming Threat […]

Get Qualified Writing Assistance and an Original Paper.

A qualified writer will create a clear, plagiarism-free essay for you!

4 The Harmful Effects of Ocean Pollution and the Urgent Need for Action

Introduction Have you ever been to the beach and expected to see a beautiful, refreshing, and clean environment? Instead, you find a beach that is covered with plastic waste, pieces of metal, and chemicals. For example, in the North Pacific Ocean sits a massive patch. It has been famously known as The Great Pacific Garbage […]

5 Ocean Pollution: Challenges, Efforts, and Impact

Introduction The focus of my group’s project was ocean conservation. The oceans are one of Earth’s best gifts to humans, beautiful ecosystems growing with life that provide fresh food to jobs that millions of people can enjoy. These oceans may seem perfectly fine, and there wouldn’t be any major difficulties and concerns, but that’s not […]

ENCYCLOPEDIC ENTRY

Marine pollution.

Marine pollution is a combination of chemicals and trash, most of which comes from land sources and is washed or blown into the ocean. This pollution results in damage to the environment, to the health of all organisms, and to economic structures worldwide.

Biology, Ecology, Earth Science, Oceanography

Loading ...

Learning materials

Instructional links.

• Marine Pollution (Google Doc)

Marine pollution is a growing problem in today’s world. Our ocean is being flooded with two main types of pollution: chemicals and trash.

Chemical contamination, or nutrient pollution, is concerning for health, environmental, and economic reasons. This type of pollution occurs when human activities, notably the use of fertilizer on farms, lead to the runoff of chemicals into waterways that ultimately flow into the ocean. The increased concentration of chemicals, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, in the coastal ocean promotes the growth of algal blooms , which can be toxic to wildlife and harmful to humans. The negative effects on health and the environment caused by algal blooms hurt local fishing and tourism industries.

Marine trash encompasses all manufactured products—most of them plastic —that end up in the ocean. Littering, storm winds, and poor waste management all contribute to the accumulation of this debris , 80 percent of which comes from sources on land. Common types of marine debris include various plastic items like shopping bags and beverage bottles, along with cigarette butts, bottle caps, food wrappers, and fishing gear. Plastic waste is particularly problematic as a pollutant because it is so long-lasting. Plastic items can take hundreds of years to decompose.

This trash poses dangers to both humans and animals. Fish become tangled and injured in the debris , and some animals mistake items like plastic bags for food and eat them. Small organisms feed on tiny bits of broken-down plastic , called micro plastic , and absorb the chemicals from the plastic into their tissues. Micro plastics are less than five millimeters (0.2 inches) in diameter and have been detected in a range of marine species, including plankton and whales. When small organisms that consume micro plastics are eaten by larger animals, the toxic chemicals then become part of their tissues. In this way, the micro plastic pollution migrates up the food chain , eventually becoming part of the food that humans eat.

Solutions for marine pollution include prevention and cleanup. Disposable and single-use plastic is abundantly used in today’s society, from shopping bags to shipping packaging to plastic bottles. Changing society’s approach to plastic use will be a long and economically challenging process. Cleanup, in contrast, may be impossible for some items. Many types of debris (including some plastics ) do not float, so they are lost deep in the ocean. Plastics that do float tend to collect in large “patches” in ocean gyres. The Pacific Garbage Patch is one example of such a collection, with plastics and micro plastics floating on and below the surface of swirling ocean currents between California and Hawaii in an area of about 1.6 million square kilometers (617,763 square miles), although its size is not fixed. These patches are less like islands of trash and, as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says, more like flecks of micro plastic pepper swirling around an ocean soup. Even some promising solutions are inadequate for combating marine pollution. So-called “ biodegradable ” plastics often break down only at temperatures higher than will ever be reached in the ocean.

Nonetheless, many countries are taking action. According to a 2018 report from the United Nations, more than sixty countries have enacted regulations to limit or ban the use of disposable plastic items. The National Geographic Society is making this content available under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-SA license . The License excludes the National Geographic Logo (meaning the words National Geographic + the Yellow Border Logo) and any images that are included as part of each content piece. For clarity the Logo and images may not be removed, altered, or changed in any way.

Media Credits

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Production Managers

Program specialists, last updated.

February 22, 2024

User Permissions

For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.

If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.

Text on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service .

Interactives

Any interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.

Related Resources

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Ann Glob Health
• v.86(1); 2020

Human Health and Ocean Pollution

Philip j. landrigan.

1 Boston College, US

John J. Stegeman

2 Woods Hole Center for Oceans and Human Health, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, US

Lora E. Fleming

3 European Centre for Environment and Human Health, GB

4 University of Exeter Medical School, GB

Denis Allemand

5 Centre Scientifique de Monaco, MC

Donald M. Anderson

Lorraine c. backer.

6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US

Françoise Brucker-Davis

7 Université Côte d’Azur, FR

8 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Inserm, C3M, FR

Nicolas Chevalier

Lilian corra.

9 International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE), CH

10 Health and Environment of the Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP), AR

Dorota Czerucka

Marie-yasmine dechraoui bottein.

11 Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, FR

12 IOC Science and Communication Centre on Harmful Algae, University of Copenhagen, DK

13 Ecotoxicologie et développement durable expertise ECODD, Valbonne, FR

Barbara Demeneix

14 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, FR

15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, FR

Michael Depledge

Dimitri d. deheyn.

16 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, US

Charles J. Dorman

17 Trinity College Dublin, IE

Patrick Fénichel

Samantha fisher, françoise gaill, françois galgani.

18 Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation des Mers, FR

William H. Gaze

19 University of Exeter, GB

Laura Giuliano

20 CIESM The Mediterranean Science Commission, MC

Philippe Grandjean

21 Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, US

Mark E. Hahn

Amro hamdoun.

22 University of California at San Diego, US

Philipp Hess

Bret judson, amalia laborde.

23 Universidad de la República, UY

Jacqueline McGlade

24 Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London, GB

25 Strathmore University Business School, Nairobi, KE

Adetoun Mustapha

26 Nigerian Institute for Medical Research, Lagos, NG

27 Imperial College London, GB

Maria Neira

28 World Health Organization, CH

Rachel T. Noble

29 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US

Maria Luiza Pedrotti

30 Sorbonne Université, FR

Christopher Reddy

31 Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, US

Joacim Rocklöv

32 Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, Umeå, SE

Ursula M. Scharler

33 University of KwaZulu-Natal, ZA

Hariharan Shanmugam

Gabriella taghian, jeroen a.j.m. van de water, luigi vezzulli.

34 University of Genoa, IT

Pál Weihe

35 University of the Faroe Islands and Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, FO

Ariana Zeka

36 Brunel University London, GB

Hervé Raps

37 WHO Collaborating Centre for Health and Sustainable Development, MC

Patrick Rampal

Associated data, background:.

Pollution – unwanted waste released to air, water, and land by human activity – is the largest environmental cause of disease in the world today. It is responsible for an estimated nine million premature deaths per year, enormous economic losses, erosion of human capital, and degradation of ecosystems. Ocean pollution is an important, but insufficiently recognized and inadequately controlled component of global pollution. It poses serious threats to human health and well-being. The nature and magnitude of these impacts are only beginning to be understood.

(1) Broadly examine the known and potential impacts of ocean pollution on human health. (2) Inform policy makers, government leaders, international organizations, civil society, and the global public of these threats. (3) Propose priorities for interventions to control and prevent pollution of the seas and safeguard human health.

Topic-focused reviews that examine the effects of ocean pollution on human health, identify gaps in knowledge, project future trends, and offer evidence-based guidance for effective intervention.

Environmental Findings:

Pollution of the oceans is widespread, worsening, and in most countries poorly controlled. It is a complex mixture of toxic metals, plastics, manufactured chemicals, petroleum, urban and industrial wastes, pesticides, fertilizers, pharmaceutical chemicals, agricultural runoff, and sewage. More than 80% arises from land-based sources. It reaches the oceans through rivers, runoff, atmospheric deposition and direct discharges. It is often heaviest near the coasts and most highly concentrated along the coasts of low- and middle-income countries. Plastic is a rapidly increasing and highly visible component of ocean pollution, and an estimated 10 million metric tons of plastic waste enter the seas each year. Mercury is the metal pollutant of greatest concern in the oceans; it is released from two main sources – coal combustion and small-scale gold mining. Global spread of industrialized agriculture with increasing use of chemical fertilizer leads to extension of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) to previously unaffected regions. Chemical pollutants are ubiquitous and contaminate seas and marine organisms from the high Arctic to the abyssal depths.

Ecosystem Findings:

Ocean pollution has multiple negative impacts on marine ecosystems, and these impacts are exacerbated by global climate change. Petroleum-based pollutants reduce photosynthesis in marine microorganisms that generate oxygen. Increasing absorption of carbon dioxide into the seas causes ocean acidification, which destroys coral reefs, impairs shellfish development, dissolves calcium-containing microorganisms at the base of the marine food web, and increases the toxicity of some pollutants. Plastic pollution threatens marine mammals, fish, and seabirds and accumulates in large mid-ocean gyres. It breaks down into microplastic and nanoplastic particles containing multiple manufactured chemicals that can enter the tissues of marine organisms, including species consumed by humans. Industrial releases, runoff, and sewage increase frequency and severity of HABs, bacterial pollution, and anti-microbial resistance. Pollution and sea surface warming are triggering poleward migration of dangerous pathogens such as the Vibrio species. Industrial discharges, pharmaceutical wastes, pesticides, and sewage contribute to global declines in fish stocks.

Human Health Findings:

Methylmercury and PCBs are the ocean pollutants whose human health effects are best understood. Exposures of infants in utero to these pollutants through maternal consumption of contaminated seafood can damage developing brains, reduce IQ and increase children’s risks for autism, ADHD and learning disorders. Adult exposures to methylmercury increase risks for cardiovascular disease and dementia. Manufactured chemicals – phthalates, bisphenol A, flame retardants, and perfluorinated chemicals, many of them released into the seas from plastic waste – can disrupt endocrine signaling, reduce male fertility, damage the nervous system, and increase risk of cancer. HABs produce potent toxins that accumulate in fish and shellfish. When ingested, these toxins can cause severe neurological impairment and rapid death. HAB toxins can also become airborne and cause respiratory disease. Pathogenic marine bacteria cause gastrointestinal diseases and deep wound infections. With climate change and increasing pollution, risk is high that Vibrio infections, including cholera, will increase in frequency and extend to new areas. All of the health impacts of ocean pollution fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations in the Global South – environmental injustice on a planetary scale.

Conclusions:

Ocean pollution is a global problem. It arises from multiple sources and crosses national boundaries. It is the consequence of reckless, shortsighted, and unsustainable exploitation of the earth’s resources. It endangers marine ecosystems. It impedes the production of atmospheric oxygen. Its threats to human health are great and growing, but still incompletely understood. Its economic costs are only beginning to be counted.

Ocean pollution can be prevented. Like all forms of pollution, ocean pollution can be controlled by deploying data-driven strategies based on law, policy, technology, and enforcement that target priority pollution sources. Many countries have used these tools to control air and water pollution and are now applying them to ocean pollution. Successes achieved to date demonstrate that broader control is feasible. Heavily polluted harbors have been cleaned, estuaries rejuvenated, and coral reefs restored.

Prevention of ocean pollution creates many benefits. It boosts economies, increases tourism, helps restore fisheries, and improves human health and well-being. It advances the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). These benefits will last for centuries.

Recommendations:

World leaders who recognize the gravity of ocean pollution, acknowledge its growing dangers, engage civil society and the global public, and take bold, evidence-based action to stop pollution at source will be critical to preventing ocean pollution and safeguarding human health.

Prevention of pollution from land-based sources is key. Eliminating coal combustion and banning all uses of mercury will reduce mercury pollution. Bans on single-use plastic and better management of plastic waste reduce plastic pollution. Bans on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) have reduced pollution by PCBs and DDT. Control of industrial discharges, treatment of sewage, and reduced applications of fertilizers have mitigated coastal pollution and are reducing frequency of HABs. National, regional and international marine pollution control programs that are adequately funded and backed by strong enforcement have been shown to be effective. Robust monitoring is essential to track progress.

Further interventions that hold great promise include wide-scale transition to renewable fuels; transition to a circular economy that creates little waste and focuses on equity rather than on endless growth; embracing the principles of green chemistry; and building scientific capacity in all countries.

Designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) will safeguard critical ecosystems, protect vulnerable fish stocks, and enhance human health and well-being. Creation of MPAs is an important manifestation of national and international commitment to protecting the health of the seas.

Introduction

The oceans are vast. They cover more than 70% of the earth’s surface, hold 97% of the world’s water, host some of the planet’s most diverse ecosystems, and support economies in countries around the world [ 1 , 2 ]. Microscopic organisms in the seas are a major source of atmospheric oxygen [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. By absorbing more than 90% of the excess heat released into the earth’s environment and nearly one-third of carbon dioxide emissions, the oceans slow planetary warming and stabilize the global climate [ 7 ].

The oceans are essential to human health and well-being [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. They provide food to billions, livelihoods for millions and are the source of multiple essential medicines [ 14 ]. They have traditional cultural value and are a source of joy, beauty, peace, and recreation [ 15 , 16 ]. The oceans are particularly important to the health and well-being of people in small island nations [ 17 ], the high Arctic, and coastal communities, especially those in the Global South [ 1 ]. The very survival of these vulnerable populations depends on the health of the seas [ 10 , 12 ].

Despite their vast size, the oceans are under threat, and human activity is the main source of the threat [ 1 , 2 ]. Climate change and other environmental disruptions of human origin have caused sea surface temperatures to rise, glaciers to melt, and harmful algal species and pathogenic bacteria to migrate into waters that were previously uncontaminated. Rising seas and increasingly violent coastal storms endanger the 600 million people worldwide who live within 10 m of sea level [ 1 ]. Rising concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 have caused acidification of the oceans, which in turn destroys coral reefs, impairs development of oysters and other shellfish, and dissolves calcium-containing microorganisms at the base of the food web [ 1 , 18 , 19 ]. The oceans are losing oxygen [ 1 ]. Fish stocks are declining [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Dredging, mechanized trawling, oil exploration, and planned deep undersea metal mining threaten the seabeds [ 23 ].

Pollution – unwanted, often hazardous waste material released into the environment by human activity – is one of the existential challenges of the present age [ 24 ]. Like climate change, biodiversity loss, and depletion of the world’s fresh water supply, pollution endangers the stability of the earth’s support systems and threatens the continuing survival of human societies [ 8 ].

Pollution is also a great and growing threat to human health. It is the largest environmental cause of disease in the world today, responsible for an estimated 9 million premature deaths per year [ 24 ]. It causes enormous economic losses, undermines national trajectories of economic development, and impedes attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [ 22 ].

Pollution has until recently been overlooked in international development planning and largely neglected in the global health agenda [ 25 ]. For too long, pollution has been regarded as the unavoidable price of economic progress [ 25 ], a view that arose out of the experience of the 19th and 20th centuries when combustion of fossil fuels – coal in particular – was the engine of economic growth and pollution was seen as unavoidable. Today, however, the claim that pollution is inevitable and that pollution control costs jobs and stifles economies is no longer tenable. It has been disproven by the experience of the many countries that have more than doubled their GDPs in the past half century while greatly reducing pollution [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. It has become irrelevant with the increasing availability of low-cost, renewable sources of energy and advances in green chemistry.

Ocean pollution is a critically important but underrecognized component of global pollution [ 26 , 27 ]. It has multiple direct and indirect impacts on human health [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. The nature and magnitude of these effects are only beginning to be understood.

The purpose of this review is to examine the impacts of ocean pollution on human health and well-being, identify gaps in knowledge, project future trends, and offer scientifically based guidance for effective interventions. Information presented in this review will guide attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular, SDG 14, which calls for prevention and significant reduction of all marine pollution, and SDG 3, which calls for improvement of human health and well-being.

The ultimate aim of this report is to increase awareness of ocean pollution among policy makers, elected leaders, civil society and the public and to catalyze global action to monitor, control, and prevent pollution of the seas.

By focusing our analysis on human impacts, we underscore the fact that pollution of the oceans poses a clear and present danger to human health. It is causing disease, disability, and premature death in countries around the world today.

On the positive side, pollution of the oceans is not inevitable. It is a problem of human origin, and the successes in pollution control that have been achieved in many countries show that it can be controlled and prevented.

World leaders who recognize the great magnitude of ocean pollution, acknowledge its grave dangers to human health, engage civil society and the global public, and take bold, evidence-based action will be key to stop ocean pollution at its source and safeguarding human health.

This report consists of a series of topic-focused reviews that critically examine current knowledge of each ocean pollutant – its sources, magnitude, geographic extent, populations at greatest risk, and its known and potential effects on human health. We examine the strength of the evidence linking pollutants to health effects [ 29 ].

To the extent possible, we consider health effects not only of individual pollutants, but also of the complex mixtures of chemical pollutants and biological contaminants found in the seas today. We examine interactions and synergies among pollution, climate change and ocean acidification. Because the effects of pollution are disproportionately concentrated in low-income countries in the Global South, small island nations, and indigenous populations in the far north [ 12 ], we specifically examine ocean pollution’s impacts on these vulnerable populations. Finally, we consider the prospects for prevention and control of ocean pollution and present case studies of success in pollution control.

The Current State of Ocean Pollution

Pollution of the oceans is widespread, it is worsening, and its geographic extent is expanding [ 26 , 27 , 30 ]. Ocean pollution is a complex and ever-changing mixture of chemicals and biological materials that includes plastic waste, petroleum-based pollutants, toxic metals, manufactured chemicals, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and a noxious stew of nitrogen, phosphorus, fertilizer, and sewage (Figure ​ (Figure1 1 ).

Ocean Pollution – A Complex Mixture.

Some ocean pollutants are “legacy” pollutants, materials deposited in the seas decades ago, while others are new. The relative concentrations of pollutants vary in different regions of the oceans and at different seasons of the year. Plastic pollution is the most visible component of ocean pollution. It is growing rapidly, but it is only the obvious tip of a much larger problem.

Land-based sources account for approximately 80% of ocean pollution, while discharges from marine shipping, offshore industrial operations, and waste disposal at sea account for the remaining 20% [ 26 ]. Pollution is most severe along coastlines and in bays, harbors, and estuaries where wastewater discharges, industrial releases, agricultural runoff, and riverine pollution cause massive in-shore contamination. Some of the world’s worst ocean pollution is seen along the coasts of rapidly developing countries in the Global South [ 26 ].

The European Environment Agency (EEA) reports that pollution by toxic metals, industrial chemicals and plastic wastes is at problem levels in 96% of the Baltic Sea, in 91% of the Black Sea, in 87% of the Mediterranean Sea, and in 75% of the North-East Atlantic Ocean [ 27 ]. Pollution by plastic waste has become a global threat [ 31 ].

The drivers of ocean pollution are rapid industrialization; continuing increases in the manufacture and release into the environment of chemicals and plastics; expansion of chemically intensive agriculture; massive releases of liquid and solid waste into rivers, harbors, and estuaries; and insufficient re-use and recycling of feedstock materials [ 16 , 32 ]. Specific sources of ocean pollution are:

• Coal combustion and gold-mining are the two main sources of marine mercury pollution [ 33 ].
• Exponential growth in chemical production coupled with inadequate controls on chemical releases are the main drivers of pollution of the oceans by manufactured chemicals [ 34 ].
• Marine pollution by plastic waste reflects massive global growth in plastic production, which now exceeds 420 million tons per year [ 35 ].
• Uncontrolled economic development and rapid population growth along the world’s coasts has led to pollution of in-shore waters by industrial releases, agricultural runoff and sewage [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Many populated coastal areas are now covered by buildings and impervious surfaces, which increases runoff. This runoff as well as discharges of wastewater and storm water, much of it inadequately treated, further increases pollution. The consequences are increasing abundance of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites [ 40 ], eutrophication, and increased frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms (HABs) – “red tides”, “brown tides”, and “green tides” – some of which produce potent disease-causing toxins.

Despite the great magnitude of ocean pollution and growing recognition of its effects on human and ecosystem health, great gaps remain in knowledge about pollution sources, levels of pollution in many areas of the seas, the sizes of high-risk populations, the extent of human exposure, and the magnitude of health effects. Because of these gaps, the impacts of ocean pollution on human health and well-being are underestimated, and it is not yet possible to fully quantify the contribution of ocean pollution to the global burden of disease [ 41 ].

Climate Change, Global Warming, Ocean Acidification, and Pollution

Since the 1970s, the oceans have warmed steadily in concert with global climate change [ 42 ]. They have taken up more than 90% of the excess heat released into the climate system [ 1 ]. Mean sea surface temperature is rising by 0.13°C per decade [ 43 ]. The frequency of marine heatwaves has more than doubled [ 1 ].

Further impacts of climate change on the oceans are increases in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events such as heat waves, heavy rainstorms, and major hurricanes, and changes in large-scale planetary phenomena such as El Niño events [ 44 ] and the Indian Ocean Dipole [ 1 , 45 , 46 ].

Ocean acidification is another consequence of climate change. The oceans absorb nearly one-third of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emitted into the atmosphere, and the amount of CO 2 absorbed by the seas has increased in recent decades as CO 2 emissions of human origin have increased. Ocean acidification is the result [ 7 ]. Since the late 1980s, the surface pH of the open ocean has declined by about 0.1 pH units relative to preindustrial time (i.e., a 26% increase in acidity [hydrogen ion concentration]), and the rate of increase is 0.017–0.027 pH units per decade [ 1 ].

Ocean acidification threatens the integrity of coral reefs. It impairs the development of oysters and other commercially important shellfish, thus impacting commercial fisheries. It endangers the survival of calcium-containing microorganisms at the base of the marine food web [ 1 , 47 ]. Ocean acidification may also increase the toxicity of certain heavy metals and organic pollutants [ 1 , 48 ].

Global warming liberates legacy pollutants from ice and permafrost, alters the geographic distribution of chemical pollutants in the oceans, and increases exposures of previously unexposed populations. All of these effects have potential to magnify the ocean pollution’s impacts on human health [ 49 ].

Rising sea surface temperatures and increasing ocean pollution result in greater abundance and expanded geographic ranges of naturally occurring marine pathogens, such as Vibrio species, among them Vibrio cholerae , the causative agent of cholera [ 50 , 51 ] (Figure ​ (Figure2). 2 ). The likely consequences will be increases in the frequency of Vibrio- associated illnesses and spread of these infections to new, previously unaffected areas. Risk is especially high in low-income countries where coastal development is intense and sanitation systems are dysfunctional due to civil unrest, conflict, sea level rise, coastal over-development, and natural disasters [ 52 ].

Areas considered suitable for Vibrio cholerae [ 50 ].

Source : Escobar et al., (2015) ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.028 ) CC BY 4.0.

In a similar manner, climate change, sea surface warming, and ocean pollution appear to be increasing the frequency, severity, and global geographic extent of harmful algal blooms (HABs) [ 53 , 54 ]. Some dangerous algal species are moving poleward in response to the warming of coastal waters [ 54 , 55 ], changes in ocean stratification, alteration of currents, changes in nutrient upwelling, and changes in land runoff and micronutrient availability [ 56 , 57 ]. The likely consequences will be the occurrence of HABs in previously unaffected areas and exposures of previously unexposed populations in the circumpolar regions to HAB toxins.

Impacts of Ocean Pollution on Human Health

Chemical pollutants, toxic metal pollutants.

Releases of toxic metals to the environment began millennia ago with the inception of mining and smelting. These releases have increased since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and risen especially in the past two centuries [ 58 , 59 , 60 ].

Mercury is the metal pollutant in the oceans of greatest concern for human health [ 34 ]. Over the past 500 years, human activities have increased total environmental mercury loading by about 450% above natural background. About 70% of the mercury circulating in the environment today consists of mercury emitted from human sources in the past, termed legacy mercury [ 61 ] (Figure ​ (Figure3). 3 ). The presence of large quantities of legacy mercury in the global environment and the potential for climate change to remobilize this mercury complicate projections of future exposures and health impacts.

Total global mercury releases and relevant historical factors, 1510–2010.

Source : Street et al., (2019) ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab281f ) CC BY 3.0.

Current Sources of Mercury Pollution

An estimated 2,220 tons of mercury are currently emitted to the environment each year as the direct result of human activity. These emissions account for about 30% of current mercury emissions. Another 60% of current mercury emissions result from environmental recycling of anthropogenic mercury previously deposited in soils and water. The remaining 10% comes from natural sources such as volcanoes.

Combustion of coal and artisanal/small-scale gold-mining (ASGM) are the two principal human sources of current mercury emissions. All coal contains mercury and when coal is burned, mercury is released into the atmosphere where it can travel for long distances until ultimately it precipitates into rivers, and lakes and the oceans.

In ASGM, mercury is used to form an amalgam to separate gold from rock. The amalgam is heated to boil off the mercury leaving the gold behind. ASGM operations release mercury to the environment through vaporization and through runoff of spilled mercury into waterways [ 34 ]. Metal mining and oil and gas exploration can be additional sources of mercury release. In rivers, lakes and the oceans, the metallic, inorganic mercury released to the environment from these sources is converted by marine microorganisms into methylmercury, an organic form of mercury that is a potent neurotoxicant.

The largest fraction of global mercury emissions – about 49% – originate today in East and South-East Asia. Coal combustion and industrial releases are the major sources there. South America accounts for 18% of global mercury emissions and Sub-Saharan Africa for 16%. In both of these regions, ASGM is the major source of mercury releases.

Methylmercury is a persistent pollutant in the marine environment. It bioconcentrates as it moves up the food web, so that top predator species such as tuna, striped bass and bluefish as well as marine mammals can accumulate concentrations of methylmercury in their tissues that are 10 million or more times greater than those in surrounding waters [ 34 ].

Mercury levels vary substantially in different regions of the ocean. This variation is seen in a recent survey of methylmercury concentrations in yellowfin tuna, in which levels differed by 26-fold around the world. Highest levels were found in tuna from the North Pacific Ocean (Figure ​ (Figure4), 4 ), and these high concentrations reflect mercury releases from coal-fired power plants and steel mills in Asia that are carried northeastward across the Pacific on the prevailing winds [ 62 , 63 ].

Geographic differences in methylmercury concentrations of yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ).

Source : Reprinted from Nicklish et al., Mercury levels of yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) are associated with capture location. Environmental Pollution 2017: 87–93, doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.070 with permission from Elsevier.

Human exposure to methylmercury occurs primarily through consumption of contaminated fish and marine mammals [ 34 , 64 ] Populations in the circumpolar region are heavily exposed to mercury in their diets – principally in the form of methylmercury – as a consequence of their traditional consumption of a diet rich in fish and marine mammals. Most of the mercury to which these populations are exposed originates from sources far away.

Neurobehavioral Toxicity of Methylmercury

The brain is the organ in the human body most vulnerable to methylmercury. This vulnerability is greatest during periods of rapid brain growth – the nine months of pregnancy and the first years of postnatal life [ 65 ].

There appears to be no safe level of methylmercury exposure in early human development.

Prospective epidemiological cohort studies undertaken in the Faroe Islands demonstrate that children exposed to methylmercury in utero exhibit decreased motor function, shortened attention span, reduced verbal abilities, diminished memory and reductions in other mental functions. Follow-up of these children to age 22 years indicates that these deficits persist and appear to be permanent [ 66 ].

A similar study conducted in Nunavik of child development at age 11 years showed that methylmercury exposure in early life is associated with slowed processing of visual information, decreased IQ, diminished comprehension and perceptual reasoning, impaired memory, shortened attention span, and increased risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [ 67 , 68 ]. Other prospective studies have also reported neurobehavioral deficits in children with elevated prenatal exposure to methylmercury [ 69 ].

Mercury exposure later in childhood and also in adolescence can also cause damage because the human brain continues to develop throughout this time [ 70 ]. Genetic factors may increase vulnerability to methylmercury in some individuals [ 71 ].

Accelerated Loss of Neurocognitive Function in Adults Exposed to Methylmercury

Recent studies have shown that adult exposures to methylmercury can also have negative effects on brain function [ 72 ]. Thus, in a cross-sectional study of 129 men and women living in six villages on the Cuiaba River in Brazil, elevations in hair mercury concentrations were associated with reductions in motor speed, manual dexterity, and concentration [ 73 ]. Some aspects of verbal learning and memory were also impaired. The magnitude of these effects increased with increasing concentrations of mercury in hair. The brain functions disrupted in adults by methylmercury – attention span, fine-motor function, and verbal memory – are similar to those previously reported in children with prenatal exposures but appear to occur at substantially higher levels of exposure.

Cardiovascular Effects of Methylmercury Pollution

Elevated concentrations of methylmercury in blood and tissue samples are associated with increased risk for acute coronary events, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular disease [ 74 ]. The US National Research Council concluded in 2000 that methylmercury accumulation in the heart leads to blood pressure alterations and abnormal cardiac function [ 75 ].

Subsequent research has strengthened these findings. An expert panel convened by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 2011 concluded that methylmercury is directly linked to acute myocardial infarction and to increases in cardiovascular risk factors such as oxidative stress, atherosclerosis, decreased heart rate variability, and to a certain degree, hypertension [ 76 ]. Likewise, a 2017 systematic review found that methylmercury enhances production of free radicals resulting in a long-lasting range of effects on cardiac parasympathetic activity that increase risk for hypertension, myocardial infarction, and death [ 77 ]. Further research has confirmed these findings [ 78 , 79 ].

The Contribution of Marine Mercury Pollution to the Global Burden of Disease

Efforts have begun to estimate the contribution of mercury pollution of the oceans to the global burden of disease (GBD). A recent estimate finds that between 317,000 and 637,000 babies are born in the United States each year with losses of cognitive function that are the consequence of prenatal exposures to methylmercury resulting from consumption of mercury-contaminated fish by their mothers during pregnancy. These losses range in magnitude from 0.2 to 5.13 IQ points depending on the severity of exposure. These authors found additionally that population-wide downward shifts in IQ caused by widespread exposure to methylmercury are associated with excess cases of mental retardation (IQ below 70), amounting to 3.2% (range: 0.2–5.4%) of all cases of mental retardation in the United States [ 80 ].

Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Metals Toxicity

The alterations of carbonate chemistry in the seas – i.e. decrease in pH, decrease in [CO 3 2– ] and increase in [HCO 3 – ]) – that are the consequences of increasing CO 2 absorption induce changes in the speciation of metals that alter their solubility and bioavailability and therefore their toxicity [ 48 , 81 ].

For example, by 2100, the projected pH of the oceans will be approximately 7.7, resulting in a 115% increase in the mean free ionic form of copper (Cu 2+ ) in certain estuaries [ 82 ]. Consequently, the biotoxicity of copper to invertebrates [ 83 ] and to plankton photosynthesis and productivity will be enhanced. At the same time, however, ocean acidification will increase the concentration of dissolved iron, which could partially alleviate the inhibitory effect of copper on photosynthesis [ 84 ]. Ocean acidification appears in some instances to mitigate [ 85 ] or even reduce [ 86 ] the toxicity of mercury. As metals may play a role in the biodegradation of organic pollutants, changes in metal speciation could slow these processes and therefore potentiate the toxicity of some organic pollutants [ 87 ].

Prevention of Mercury Pollution

Evidence has shown that two actions will be key to preventing further addition of mercury to the oceans. These are a cessation of coal combustion and reduction of mercury use in artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM). Cessation of coal combustion will not only slow the pace of climate change and reduce particulate air pollution, but will also greatly reduce atmospheric emissions of mercury and thus reduce additional deposition of mercury into the oceans. ASGM is a major source of mercury pollution of the oceans in the Global South. Actions underway under the aegis of the Minamata Convention are seeking to identify and control major sources of mercury pollution from ASGM [ 34 ].

Plastic Pollution of the Oceans

Plastic waste represents approximately 80% of all marine litter [ 88 ]. An estimated 10 million metric tons of plastics – range of estimate, 4.8 to 12.7 million – are released to the oceans each year [ 89 ]. The total amount of plastic waste circulating in the world’s oceans is projected to be 150 million tons by 2025 [ 89 , 90 ]. Marine plastic waste ranges in size from floating barrels, plastic bottles and plastic sheets down to sub-microscopic particles and fibers.

Recent increases in marine plastic pollution reflect massive growth in plastic production (Figure ​ (Figure5), 5 ), which now exceeds 420 million tons per year. Much of this plastic goes into consumer products, and over 40% is used in products that are discarded within one year of purchase – often after only a single use [ 91 ]. The consequence is massive global accumulation of plastic waste [ 92 ].

Cumulative Plastic Production since 1960. Calculated as the sum of annual global polymer resin, synthetic fiber, and plastic additive production. Most of this plastic still exists.

Source : Our World in Data ( https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution ), CC BY 4.0).

Plastics are produced by the polymerization of highly reactive and often toxic chemical monomers, 98% of them derived from fossil fuels. They are designed to be stable, durable and resistant to degradation [ 93 ]. Because of these properties, discarded plastic that reaches the marine environment can persist for decades and travel long distances. Plastic waste is now ubiquitous in surface waters, on the coasts, in estuaries, on the high seas, and even in the deepest and most remote parts of the ocean [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ].

Sources of Plastic Pollution

The United Nations Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP) [ 101 ] estimates that land-based sources account for up to 80% of the world’s marine pollution with 60–95% of this waste comprised plastic debris.

Rivers are a major source of plastic waste in the oceans, and riverine input is estimated to be between 1.15 and 2.41 metric tons per year, corresponding to between 9 and 50% of all plastic transported to the oceans. Rivers draining densely populated, rapidly developing coastal regions with weak waste collection systems are particularly important sources [ 102 ], and it is estimated that between 88–95% of marine plastic comes from only 10 rivers [ 103 ]. Largest inputs, accounting for approximately 86% of the plastic waste entering the marine environment, are from the coasts of Asia, mainly China [ 89 , 104 ]. Additional sources include aquaculture, fishing and shipping [ 27 ].

Plastic wastes are gathered by oceanic currents and collect in five large, mid-ocean gyres located in the North Pacific, South Pacific, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Indian Oceans. The North Pacific gyre is a relatively stationary area twice the size of France that has waste from across the North Pacific Ocean, including material from the coastal waters of North America and from Japan.

Marine Pollution by Plastic Microparticles

Weathering, mechanical abrasion, and photodegradation break plastic waste in the oceans down into smaller particles termed microplastics (<5 mm in diameter) and still smaller particles termed nanoplastics (<1μm in diameter; defined as <100 nm by some authors) [ 105 , 106 , 107 ]. The size distribution of ocean microplastics is highly skewed, with increasing numbers of particles at smaller particle sizes [ 108 , 109 ]. Microplastic particles can sink downward through the water column and accumulate on the ocean floor. In contrast to microplastics, which have been measured widely in the marine environment (e.g., Text Box 1 ) and in marine organisms, concentrations of nanoplastics are poorly defined [ 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 ].

TEXT BOX 1: Microplastic contamination in Massachusetts beaches and blue mussels, Mytilus edulis .

Background. Microplastic particles have been increasing in prevalence in the oceans since the late 1900s and are found today on beaches across the world [ 101 , 182 ]. The majority are produced through weathering and fragmentation of larger macroplastics. Toxic and endocrine disrupting chemicals such as phthalates and bisphenol A may be incorporated into plastics during manufacture, and microplastics can also absorb toxic chemicals from seawater. Because of their small size, microplastics are easily absorbed by microscopic marine organisms and thus can enter the food chain where they bioconcentrate [ 101 ]. Current studies are examining the possible effects of microplastics on ecosystem dynamics and also on the health of humans who consume fish and shellfish.

Goal. The two goals of this study were to examine (1) the physical characteristics, spatial distribution and abundance of microplastics on Massachusetts beaches, and (2) the characteristics of microplastics in wild blue mussels harvested in Massachusetts.

Methods. Six Massachusetts beaches were targeted – beaches in and around Boston (high urban density) and in more remote areas (Provincetown, Cape Cod, low population density). Sediment samples were collected from representative beaches and microplastics were prepared by density separation [ 183 ]. Blue mussel ( Mytilus edulis ) samples were collected from Provincetown. Samples were prepared following tissue digestion with concentrated KOH [ 184 ]. All samples were visualized by standard light microscopy and select samples were further analyzed by Raman spectroscopy.

Findings. Microplastics were found in all beach samples examined and in most mussels screened. Microplastics in select blue mussel samples showed Raman spectra similar in appearance to those associated with polycarbonate plastics.

Conclusion. This study demonstrates that microplastics are ubiquitous on Massachusetts beaches and that they can enter the human food chain through consumption of blue mussels.

Further studies. Future studies are targeting additional beaches (including freshwater beaches) and examining species higher on the food chain (crustaceans and fish). Laboratory-based weathering studies are underway to examine the processes involved in microplastic generation. Studies in Drosophila melanogaster are examining the effects of off-the-shelf and laboratory-generated microplastic exposure via feeding on behavior, phenotype and gene expression.

Microplastics are also manufactured. They are produced in the form of microplastic beads – polystyrene spheres 0.5 to 500 μm in diameter. These beads are used in industrial processes such as 3D printing. They also have multiple applications in human and veterinary medical products to enhance drug delivery to tissues, and in cosmetics such as toothpaste, abrasive scrubbers and sunscreen. Manufactured microplastic beads are released to the environment from these products. They enter the oceans by way of urban runoff, sewage discharge, and direct wash-off of cosmetics and sunscreens from the skin of swimmers and surfers.

Microplastics degrade in the marine environment at varying rates depending on the core material and weathering conditions. Some petroleum-based plastics can take hundreds of years to degrade, although under some circumstances photochemical degradation can be significant [ 97 , 116 , 117 ].

Microplastic particles contain substantial quantities of toxic chemicals. Toxic chemical additives are incorporated into plastics during their manufacture to convey specific properties such as flexibility, UV protection, water repellence, or color [ 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 ]. These additives can comprise as much as 60% of the total weight of plastic products. They include plasticizers such as phthalates, brominated flame retardants, antioxidants, UV stabilizers, and pigments [ 106 , 123 ]. Due to their large surface-to-volume ratio, microplastic particles can also adsorb toxic chemical pollutants from the marine environment – polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), PCBs, DDT, and toxic metals [ 106 ].

Some plastic additives such as synthetic dyes, are classified as mutagens and carcinogens [ 124 , 125 , 126 ]. Others such as bisphenol A and phthalates are endocrine disruptors – chemicals that can mimic, block, or alter the actions of normal hormones. Perfluorinated additives, widely used in plastic to make them water-repellent, are deleterious to human reproduction. Still other plastic additives can reduce male fertility and damage the developing human brain [ 127 , 128 ]. Also of concern are residual unreacted monomers and toxic chemical catalysts that may be trapped in plastic during its manufacture.

Chemical additives and adsorbed chemicals can leach out of microplastic and nanoplastic particles. They can enter the tissues of marine organisms that ingest these particles, including species consumed by humans as seafood. Concentrations of some chemical additives have been found to be orders of magnitude higher in microplastic particles than in surrounding seawater [ 129 ].

Marine Pollution by Plastic Microfibers and Tire-Wear Particles

Microfibers and tire-wear particles are distinct sub-categories of microplastics. Microfibers originate mainly from the clothing and textile industries [ 130 , 131 , 132 ]. Tire-wear particles are formed by the abrasion of car and truck tires. These materials reach surface waters and ultimately the oceans through runoff from roadways [ 133 , 134 , 135 ].

Plastic microfibers are distributed globally in both water and air [ 129 , 136 , 137 , 138 ]. They have become ubiquitous in all ecosystems. They are found in seafood [ 139 , 140 ]. Humans can be exposed to microfibers through consumption of contaminated fish or shellfish. Inhalation of airborne microfibers may represent an even greater source of human exposure [ 141 , 142 ].

Effects of Plastic Pollution on Marine Species

Elucidation of the toxicological impacts of microplastics, including microfibers, is challenging because of their heterogeneity and great complexity [ 106 ]. Microplastics span a wide range of sizes and shapes, they are comprised of various polymer materials, and as noted above they contain myriad chemical additives, the identity of which may be proprietary and therefore not generally known. Once in the marine environment, plastics undergo weathering and adsorb additional contaminants, further enhancing their complexity. Finally, marine species exhibit a range of sensitivity to microplastics [ 143 ]. All of these factors complicate assessments of toxicity and health hazard [ 144 , 145 ].

Although there is evidence for transfer of additives and adsorbed chemicals from plastics to organisms, the relative contribution of plastics to total chemical exposure by all pathways is thought in most situations to be minor [ 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 ]. Likewise, although some additives and sorbed contaminants are able to bioaccumulate and biomagnify in aquatic food webs, there is not yet strong evidence that plastic particles themselves are able to undergo biomagnification [ 153 ].

Microplastics have potential to harm living organisms through several mechanisms:

Physical toxicity . Macroscopic plastic wastes, such as bottle caps, small bottles, and food packaging, can be ingested by fish, seabirds, and marine mammals that mistake them for food. Undigested plastic accumulates in these animals’ gastrointestinal tracts where it can cause obstruction that leads to malnutrition, reproductive impairment and death [ 129 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 ]. Marine species can also be harmed and killed by becoming entangled in abandoned fishing gear, plastic nets and plastic rings that are caught on reefs or drifting in the water column. An estimated 5.7% of all fishing nets, 8.6% of all traps, and 29% of all lines are lost each year [ 161 , 162 ]. Plastic pollution is a threat to coral reefs [ 163 ]. Large plastic debris such as plastic bags and sheeting can smother coral colonies by preventing light from reaching the phototrophic organisms that build reefs and can also cause physical damage. Particle effects. Microplastics can harm living organisms by virtue of their ability to damage cells, injure tissues, and cause inflammation [ 164 ]. While microplastics cannot easily pass through cell membranes, nanoplastic particles can cross the gut lining and accumulate in tissues [ 165 , 166 , 167 ] where they may have the potential to cause deleterious effects [ 168 ]. Leachates containing tire-wear particles have been associated with storm water-associated mortality in salmon [ 169 ]. Chemical Toxicity. The toxic chemical additives and the sorbed pollutants in and on microplastics and nanoplastics can leach from plastic particles and enter the tissues of marine organisms [ 123 , 170 , 171 , 172 ]. Although plastic particles may not be a major source of chemical exposure [ 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 ], there is evidence that in some instances they can be significant contributors to chemical body burden [ 173 ].

The challenges associated with assessing the impacts of microplastics on marine organisms are evident in the divergent results of studies reported to date. A recent meta-analysis and review of published research on the effects of microplastics and macroplastics found similar numbers of positive and negative results [ 174 ]. A major conclusion from this and other reviews is that most of the experimental work to date has been done using concentrations of microplastics that are not environmentally relevant [ 144 , 174 , 175 ]. Future research should be conducted under more environmentally relevant conditions [ 174 ].

Microplastics as Vectors for Microbial Pathogens

An additional hazard of microplastic particles and fibers in the marine environment is that they can transport and shelter hazardous microorganisms, including vectors for human disease [ 176 ]. Pathogenic bacteria have been detected on sub-surface microplastics comprised of polyethylene fibers, in plastic-containing sea surface films, and in polypropylene fragments sampled in a coastal area of the Baltic Sea [ 177 ]. Similarly, E. coli and other potentially pathogenic species have been found on plastics in coastal waters [ 178 ] and on public beaches [ 179 ]. Algal species involved in HABs [ 180 ] and ciliates implicated in coral diseases [ 181 ] have also been found attached to marine microplastics.

These findings suggest that harmful microbes and algae that colonize plastics in the marine environment may use microplastic particles to expand their geographical range (‘hitch-hiking’). Adhesion to marine plastic may also enable pathogens to increase their anti-microbial resistance thus facilitating their spread to new areas where they may cause disease and death in previously unexposed populations [ 177 ].

Human Exposure to Plastic Pollution in the Oceans

Consumption of contaminated fish and shellfish is a major route of human exposure to marine microplastics and their chemical contaminants [ 140 , 184 , 185 ]. Microplastic and nanoplastic particles are ingested by filter-feeders such as oysters and mussels that are then consumed by humans. Microplastic particles are found also in finfish that have consumed smaller organisms below them in the food web whose tissues are contaminated by microplastics and nanoplastics [ 123 ]. Greatest risks of human exposure are associated with consumption of small fish such as sardines that are eaten whole, including the gut [ 186 ]. The risk of microplastic ingestion may be especially great in fishing communities and in indigenous populations who rely heavily on seafood and marine mammals for their diet.

A recent study based on assessment of commonly consumed food items estimates that an average person consumes between 74,000 and 121,000 microplastic particles per year [ 161 ]. Particle consumption varies by age, sex and diet. Microplastic particles have been detected in human stool samples with about 20 particles detected per 10g of stool, indicating that these particles can reach the human gut [ 187 ]. Ingestion of contaminated drinking water and inhalation of airborne microplastic fibers are additional sources of human exposure, and inhalation may be an especially important source [ 138 , 141 ].

Human Health Effects of Plastic Pollution in the Oceans

The risks that marine microplastics may pose to human health are not yet well understood and uncertainty about their potential hazard is high [ 125 , 186 , 188 , 189 ]. A recent review by SAPEA, an arm of the European Academies of Science, concluded that at present there is “no evidence of widespread risk to human health” of marine plastic pollution [ 124 ]. This report goes on to state, however, that as disposal of plastic waste into the oceans continues to increase and more knowledge becomes available, the assessment could change [ 125 , 126 , 128 ].

Protection of human health against the potential hazards of marine plastic requires a precautionary approach. While current knowledge of health hazards is incomplete, there is sufficient information to justify urgent action to prevent the continuing discharge of plastic waste into the oceans [ 190 , 191 ].

Pollution of the Oceans by Manufactured Chemicals

More than 140,000 new chemicals have been invented and manufactured in the past 75 years. These synthetic chemicals are largely produced from fossil fuels – coal, oil, and increasingly, gas. Some are used in the manufacture of plastics. Others are incorporated into millions of consumer goods and industrial products ranging from foods and food packaging to clothing, building materials, motor fuels, cleaning compounds, pesticides, cosmetics, toys, and baby bottles [ 37 ].

Global chemical manufacture is increasing by about 3.5% per year and is on track to double by 2045 (Figure ​ (Figure6). 6 ). More than 60% of current chemical production is in low- and middle-income countries [ 192 ], where health and environmental protections are often scant and waste disposal not well controlled.

Global Chemical Production and Capacity Index (%) 1987–2020.

Source : The pH Report, American Chemistry Council.

Manufactured chemicals have become widely disseminated in the environment and are found today in the most remote reaches of the planet [ 193 ]. Humans are exposed to these chemicals. In national surveys conducted across the United States by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, measurable quantities of more than 200 manufactured chemicals are routinely detected in human tissues [ 194 ].

The majority of manufactured chemicals have never been tested for safety or toxicity. Their potential to damage ecosystems or harm human health is therefore not known. In most countries, manufactured chemicals are allowed to enter markets with little scrutiny. Some are found belatedly – sometimes only after years or even decades of use – to have caused damage to planetary support systems ( Text Box 2 ), or injury to health. Examples include DDT, asbestos, tetraethyl lead, and the chlorofluorocarbons. Even less is known about the possible combined effects of exposures to mixtures of manufactured chemicals [ 1 , 2 , 34 , 195 ].

The thousands of manufactured chemicals that pollute the world’s oceans are variously classified by source (e.g. industrial), chemical structure (e.g. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs]), intended use (e.g. pesticides; flame-retardants; pharmaceuticals), and environmental and biological properties (e.g., persistent, bioaccumulative), and by mode of toxicity (e.g., endocrine disruptors) [ 196 ]. Many are “legacy” pollutants, deposited in the seas over decades, while others are newly recognized.

Major Classes of Marine Chemical Pollutants

PCBs are mixtures of related chemicals that are resistant to extreme temperature and pressure. In the past, PCBs were used widely in electrical capacitors and transformers, in hydraulic fluids, as heat transfer fluids, lubricants, and as plasticizers. Although production has been banned since the 1970s and 1980s, massive quantities are still present in electrical generators and capacitors and still larger amounts persist in the environment as legacy pollutants. PBBs and PBDEs have been used as flame retardants.

Dioxins, including the highly toxic 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p -dioxin (TCDD), and furans are by-products formed in the synthesis of chlorinated industrial chemicals and formed also in the incineration of PCBs, polyvinyl plastics, and other manufactured chemicals containing halogens.

Although the HAHs of greatest concern are manufactured chemicals, the marine environment is also a rich source of naturally occurring HAHs, including hydroxylated PBDEs, halogenated bipyrroles, and halogenated indoles [ 200 ].

• Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): This group contains hundreds of related compounds, all containing fluorine atoms on a carbon backbone. They are used in manufacture of a wide range of products, including non-stick cookware, stain-repellant carpets and furniture, water-repellent clothing, and firefighting foam. PFAS chemicals are highly persistent in the environment. They have caused extensive contamination of surface waters and groundwater, especially near airports and military bases where large quantities were used in firefighting foams. PFAS compounds have entered the oceans in substantial quantities and like other persistent chemicals have been incorporated into the marine food chain.
• Organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs): As the persistence and toxicity of first-generation flame retardants such as PBBs and then PBDEs became known, manufacturers turned to OPFRs, which have now also come to be contaminants in marine ecosystems.
• Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): These are multi-ring compounds that occur naturally in petroleum and oil products and also are generated as soot during incomplete combustion of organic material. Alkylated PAHs are common in petroleum.
• Pesticides: The term ‘pesticides’ encompasses insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides. These are a large and diverse group of manufactured chemicals designed to be toxic to target organisms (“pests”). Common classes of insecticides are organochlorines (e.g., DDT, and its metabolite DDE), organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids. Herbicides include phenoxyacetic acids (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T), atrazine, and glyphosate.
• Organometals: Alkylated tin products, especially phenyltin compounds, were commonly used as antifouling agents added to marine paints used on the hulls of ships to prevent growth of barnacles.

Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Marine Chemical Pollutants

The oceans are the ultimate sink for chemical pollutants, and persistent pollutants that enter the seas from land-based sources will stay in the oceans for years and even centuries [ 201 ].

Concentrations of contaminants vary in different parts of the oceans. Therefore, tracking the levels, fate and geographic distribution of chemical pollutants is a fundamental prerequisite to predicting patterns of exposure, evaluating health effects, and designing evidence-based strategies for pollution control and disease prevention.

With the exception of crude oil, almost all of the chemical contaminants considered in this report originate on land and are transported to the ocean through atmospheric transport, river deposition, runoff, and direct discharges to the seas. In the oceans, pollutant concentrations are influenced by proximity to source, global transport patterns, and marine ecology. Highest concentrations tend to occur near population centers, industrial areas, and centers of industrialized agriculture such as concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFOs). Large-scale changes in ocean temperature and circulation induced by global climate change appear to be important drivers of pollutant distribution [ 202 ].

Atmospheric transport is a major factor governing the movement of certain manufactured chemicals from land-based sources to the sea [ 203 ]. For example, several classes of persistent organohalogen compounds, such as PCBs and fluorinated compounds volatilize at equatorial and temporal latitudes, move poleward in the atmosphere, and then precipitate to land and in water in the cool air of the polar regions, a phenomenon termed “atmospheric distillation” [ 204 , 205 ]. The consequences are high concentrations of persistent pollutants in marine microorganisms in the circumpolar regions as well as in top predator fish species and marine mammals. Indigenous peoples in the far north who rely heavily on marine species for food are therefore placed at high risk of exposure to POPs.

Direct dumping of industrial wastes into the sea is another source of pollution by toxic chemicals. For example, an estimated 336,000–504,000 barrels of acid sludge waste generated in the production of DDT have been dumped into the Southern California Bight [ 206 ]. The disposal process was sloppy and the contents of the barrels readily leaked leading to localized contamination. Once they are in the seas, chemical wastes can be further mobilized through natural or human-caused disturbances. For example, PCBs [ 207 ] in the Southern California Bight [ 206 ] have been mobilized by dredging of contaminated sediments from San Diego Bay.

Leaching from plastic waste is another route by which toxic chemical pollutants can enter the seas. As was described in the preceding section of this report, a wide range of toxic chemicals can leach out of the 10 million tons of plastic waste deposited in the oceans each year. These manufactured chemicals can enter the marine food chain, thus potentially resulting in ecosystem effects and human exposure.

Global efforts to reduce or eliminate pollution have resulted in some successes in control of ocean pollution, for example in reductions in PCBs and mercury in the seas surrounding Europe (EEA) [ 27 , 208 ]. In general, however, halogenated organic compounds, such as those governed by the Stockholm Convention, are highly resistant to degradation in the marine environment, and these persistent legacy pollutants remain widespread in marine environments.

Human Exposure to Marine Chemical Pollutants

An estimated 1–3 billion people depend on seafood as their principal source of dietary protein. Thus, contaminated seafood is the major route of human exposure to marine pollutants. The chemical pollutants most often identified in seafood are methylmercury, PCBs, dioxins, brominated flame retardants, perfluorinated substances, and pesticides.

Factors that influence concentrations of chemical pollutants in fish include geographic origin, fish age, fish size, and species. Geographic origin is a highly important determinant of pollutant load [ 209 , 210 , 211 ] and often outweighs the influence of other factors (Figure ​ (Figure7). 7 ). Thus, fish that live and are caught near cities and major points of pollutant discharge typically contain highly elevated concentrations of POPs and other chemicals [ 193 ].

Impact of geographic variation on risk-based fish consumption advisories. Ranges of risk-based consumption limits for 11 sites, calculated in meals per month and based on multiple contaminant exposure with cancerogenic health endpoints, including total PCBs (n = 209), toxaphene and dieldrin. The red hollow spheres to the left of each box plot display the individual fish values. Letters in parenthesis represent subgroups of the sample population with means that were significantly different from each other using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Heart Association (AHA) recommended minimum monthly fish consumption levels and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) threshold for unrestricted (>16) fish meals per month are shown as dashed lines. Note: GOM, Gulf of Mexico, IO, Indian Ocean; NCS, North China Sea; NEAO, Northeast Atlantic Ocean; NEPO, Northeast Pacific Ocean; NPO, Northern Pacific Ocean; NWAO, Northwest Atlantic Ocean; NWPO, Northwest Pacific Ocean; SCS, South China Sea; SEPO, Southeast Pacific Ocean; SWPO, Southwest Pacific Ocean.

Source : Nicklisch et al. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP518 .

Predator fish species at the top of the food web generally accumulate higher concentrations of chemical pollutants than fish at lower trophic levels. Therefore, fish consumption advisories typically focus on limiting consumption of predator species. However, given the vast scale of the oceans and wide geographic variation in pollutant concentrations, it is perhaps not surprising that that these advisories do not always adequately protect consumers. For instance, one survey found that sardines, a species relatively low on the marine food web, can have higher concentrations of PCBs than cod or salmon [ 212 ].

Human Health Consequences of Marine Chemical Pollutants

Toxic chemical pollutants in the oceans have been shown capable of causing a wide range of diseases in humans. Toxicological and epidemiological studies document that toxic metals, POPs, dioxins [ 213 ], plastics chemicals, and pesticides can cause cardiovascular effects, developmental and neurobehavioral disorders, metabolic disease, endocrine disruption, and cancer (detailed references are provided in the following paragraphs). Effects in humans and laboratory animals are generally similar. Independent, systematic reviews undertaken by the US National Academy of Medicine and the International Agency for Research on Cancer confirm and validate these findings [ 214 , 215 ].

Appendix Table ​ Table1 1 in the Supplementary Appendix to this report summarizes the known links between exposures to toxic chemicals in the oceans and a range of human health outcomes. Key associations are the following:

Major Oil Spills [ 299 ].

• Cardiovascular disease. Multiple toxicological and epidemiologic studies indicate that PCBs, dioxins, PBDEs, OPs, OCs, PAHs and petroleum pollutants, can increase cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension and atherosclerosis [ 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 ], and increase prevalence of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and heart failure. Powerful prospective cohort studies, such as the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study [ 220 ] provide compelling evidence that POPs exposures in humans are associated with a broad range of cardiovascular conditions.

The first well-described example of the unique susceptibility of infants and children to toxic chemicals in the environment was in the Minamata disaster in post-war Japan. In Minamata, prenatal exposures of human infants in utero to high concentrations of methylmercury in contaminated fish consumed by their mothers during pregnancy caused profound neurological impairment. The mothers, by contrast, sustained little or no physical toxicity [ 227 ].

Manufactured chemicals now recognized to be developmental toxicants include:

• PCBs and dioxins, which have been linked to neurological, behavioral, and metabolic effects [ 228 , 229 ] and also to reduced fetal growth and low birth weight [ 230 ].
• PBDEs, which have been linked to cognitive impairment in children [ 231 ].
• Phthalates, which are linked to reduced birth weight [ 232 ], behavioral abnormalities resembling attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), reproductive abnormalities in baby boys and decreased male fertility [ 233 , 234 ].
• Bisphenol A, which is linked to behavioral disturbances in childhood [ 235 ].
• Organophosphate compounds, which are associated with reduced head circumference at birth (a measure of delayed brain development), developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [ 236 , 237 , 238 ].
• Perfluorinated compounds, such as PFOA and PFOS, which have been linked to decreased fetal growth [ 239 , 240 ], decreased birth weight, reduced head circumference in newborn infants and increased risk of ADHD [ 241 ]. Exposures to PFAS compounds are associated additionally with hepatic toxicity, increases in serum lipid levels, increased risk of thyroid disease, suppression of immune function [ 242 ], and decreased fertility [ 239 , 240 , 243 ].
• p, p’- DDE, the principal metabolite of the insecticide, DDT, which affects birth weight [ 232 ].
• Organotin compounds, used extensively in anti-fouling marine paints, have been linked to neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and renal toxicity as well as to ecosystem harm [ 244 ].

Analysis of NHANES data suggests that PBDE exposure in early life is a major contributor to the burden of intellectual disability in children, resulting in loss of 162 million IQ points and more than 738,000 cases of intellectual disability [ 249 ] in the United States each year.

Prenatal and adult exposures to PCBs are linked to a series of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes related to cognition – IQ loss and deficits in language, memory and learning – as well as to problems in attention, behavior, executive function, and social behavior. Early-life exposures to PCBs have been associated also with increased risk for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [ 215 ].

The consequences of developmental neurotoxicity in early life appear to persist across childhood and adolescence and even into adult life [ 250 ]. Thus, the association between prenatal PBDE exposure and attention problems persists at least to age seven years [ 251 ]. Likewise, early exposures to PCB 153, DDE, β-HCH, and PFOS are associated with hyperactivity up to at least age 13 years [ 241 , 252 ]. Postnatal exposures may also contribute to these effects and post-natal exposure to PCBs are linked to deficits in fine motor function in Inuit children at age 11 years [ 253 ].

Many POPs are EDCs. Because they are environmentally persistent, these chemicals can continue cause damage to living organisms for years or even decades after their release to the environment [ 255 ]. Two examples are DDE, the stable metabolite of DDT and PCBs. Both DDT and PCBs have been banned for several decades, but both are still identified in most human blood, milk, and adipose tissues as well as in top predator fish species and marine mammals.

• Immune toxicity: Halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, in particular dioxin and dioxin-like compounds have long been known to have harmful effects on the immune system in animals and humans, especially in the embryonic/developing stages [ 256 , 257 , 258 ]. Evidence suggests that these effects may persist into adolescence and adult life [ 259 ]. Some of the less highly persistent PAHs may also have immune effects [ 260 ]. Recent evidence indicates that PBDEs and PFAS also have negative effects on human immune function [ 261 , 262 ]. Thus, deficient vaccine antibody responses at age five years were associated with PFAS exposures prenatally and during early infancy [ 242 ]. Susceptibility to infectious diseases may also be increased.
• Increased Risks of Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes: Consistent associations have been reported between several POPs and increased risk for diabetes and the metabolic disorder [ 263 ]. Altered lipid metabolism is another outcome linked to several POPs. A review of health effects linked to PFAS exposure identified dyslipidemia as the strongest metabolic outcome [ 262 ]. PCBs have been identified as possibly diabetogenic in the Nurses’ Health Study II [ 264 ]. A study in young adults examined changes in metabolism over a 23-year follow-up from exposure [ 265 ]. The findings suggest that PCBs and OCPs effects on glucose homeostasis may worsen after decades of exposure to background environmental levels.
• Carcinogenesis: Numerous toxicological and epidemiological studies have established that many PAHs are carcinogenic, and these studies have also elucidated many of the underlying biochemical mechanisms [ 266 , 267 ]. PAHs are proven human carcinogens and are linked to multiple human cancers, including lung cancer, skin cancer, and bladder cancer [ 268 ]. Rodent bioassays conducted by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) have concluded that PCBs and dioxins are carcinogenic. Occupational and military exposures to these compounds are linked to increased incidence rates of lymphatic cancers, especially Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), and also to diabetes [ 269 ]. Meta-analysis of results from the Yusho and Yu-Cheng cohorts report elevated lung, liver, and all cancers 30 to 40 years after prenatal poisoning by PCBs, chlorinated dioxins, and furans [ 270 ].
• Mortality: Studies in the PIVUS cohort suggest that mortality due to CVD is associated with higher body burdens of POPs [ 220 ]. In the US NHANES survey, some organochlorine pesticides have been found to be associated with increased all-cause mortality and others with increased non-cancer, non-cardiovascular mortality [ 271 ]. Higher concentrations of POPs in plasma are associated with decreased survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [ 272 ]. Kim et al. found that an interaction between POPs concentrations and total body fat mass affected risk of mortality from chronic diseases [ 273 ]. Massive exposures in early life to PCBs, dioxins, and furans in the Yusho and Yu-Cheng episodes in Japan and Taiwan have been linked to increased risk of mortality from chronic diseases [ 273 ] and to elevated all-cause mortality [ 234 , 270 ].

Ocean Pollution by Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs)

More than 10,000 chemicals are used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). These products include therapeutic drugs with both medical and veterinary applications, cosmetics, and cleaning products. They are a subset of the manufactured chemicals discussed in the preceding section. Like pesticides, pharmaceuticals are specifically designed to have biological effects, and thus even low-dose exposures can affect living organisms, including humans.

With increasing manufacture and use of pharmaceuticals by a growing global population, pharmaceutical wastes have entered ecosystems in increasing quantities. Pharmaceutical and cosmetic manufacturing plants, hospitals, nursing homes, confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), and aquaculture can all release PPCPs into wastewater systems, rivers, and eventually the oceans. Environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants (EPPPs) have been recognized as a “new and emerging issue” under the United Nations’ Strategic Approach to the International Management of Chemicals (SAICM) since 2015.

Therapeutic drugs commonly found in measurable quantities in urban wastewater and coastal waters include ibuprofen and other painkillers, anti-depressants, steroids, caffeine, estrogens and other hormone-containing products, anti-epileptics, cancer drugs, antimicrobials such as triclosan, and antibiotics [ 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 ]. Many pharmaceutical and cosmetic products in current use contain manufactured plastic nanoparticles [ 278 ].

Some PPCPs have potential to accumulate in fish and shellfish species consumed by humans and thus have potential to affect human health [ 279 ]. Concern is growing that pharmaceutical chemicals and their metabolites can damage marine species through a range of toxicological mechanisms, including endocrine disruption and neurotoxicity. A recent case study suggests that the widely used sunscreen chemical, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) may have toxic effects on the larval forms of several coral species [ 280 ]. The study reports that these effects include transformation of coral larvae from a motile state to a deformed, sessile condition; increased coral bleaching; leading to deformed skeleton formation; and DNA lesions.

Hazards of Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemical Pollutants

Manufactured chemicals are rarely present in the environment in isolation, but instead are found in complex mixtures. This complicates assessment of health impacts, because toxicological tests most often are conducted on one chemical at a time, thus potentially missing additive, antagonistic, or synergistic actions that could result from simultaneous exposures to mixtures of POPs and other manufactured chemicals that occur together in the oceans as “chemical cocktails” [ 281 , 282 ]. Future public health studies should pay additional attention to complex mixtures and cumulative risk assessment. The possibility of interaction among multiple POPs raises the question as to whether any one chemical that shows an association with disease is really acting a “proxy” for the combined effect of all the chemicals [ 283 , 284 ].

Consideration of the susceptibility of exposed populations is also important. The safe limit for exposure at sensitive life stages of development, in utero or in nursing infants, will be lower than for adults. And in the adult population, underlying disease may modify risk. Finally, “safe” levels for one pollutant may not pertain to the combined risk from simultaneous exposure to the many pollutants to which a person may be exposed.

Balancing Risks and Benefits of Exposure to Chemical Pollutants in the Oceans

Because of widespread pollution of the oceans by toxic metals and POPs and contamination by HAB toxins (discussed in the next section of this report), it is necessary to balance the risks of chemical pollutants in seafood against the benefits derived from nutrients unique to fish and shellfish. Thus, the benefits of essential fatty acids (EPA and DHA) in farmed and wild fish must be balanced against the risks for adverse health outcomes from chemical contaminants in those same fish [ 285 , 286 ].

To assess whether the beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids in seafood may mitigate the adverse effects of methylmercury on brain development, IQ was measured in 282 school-age Inuit children in Arctic Québec whose umbilical cord blood samples had been analysed for mercury and DHA [ 287 , 288 ]. The investigators found that prenatal mercury exposure was associated with lower IQ after adjustment for potential confounding variables. Incorporation of DHA into the model significantly strengthened the association with mercury, supporting the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of DHA intake can at least partially offset the harmful effects of mercury [ 65 ].

Similarly, some studies have noted that the beneficial effect of fish consumption on the cardiovascular system appears to be reduced by co-exposure to PCBs [ 289 ]. The risk differential between wild and farmed salmon is a prime example of these concerns. While the abundance of omega-3 as well as omega-6 fatty acids differ between wild and farmed fish, both contain high levels of these beneficial compounds. However, farmed fish tend to have higher levels of PCBs and other contaminants than wild fish, and contaminant burdens differ between fish farmed in different parts of world. Determining risk of those contaminants depends in part on which outcome is considered, and whether the risk is from one or many chemicals.

Studies comparing relative risk of cancer and other health outcomes associated with dioxin-like compounds in salmon concluded that consumption of farmed salmon would need to be limited to many fewer meals per month than for wild salmon, to reduce cancer risk to a level near the WHO “tolerable daily intake” for dioxin-like compounds [ 290 , 291 ].

A review examining the health risks and benefits of seafood consumption and the impact of fish consumption on sustainability of fish stocks concluded that “few, if any, fish consumption patterns optimize all domains”, but called for development of “comprehensive advice … to describe the multiple impacts of fish consumption” [ 292 ]. Several groups have disseminated such guidance [ 293 , 294 , 295 ].

Chemical Pollutants in the Oceans and the Global Burden of Disease

Despite extensive knowledge of the toxicology of many ocean pollutants, the contribution of chemical pollutants in the marine environment to the global burden of disease (GBD) is, with the exception of mercury [ 296 , 297 ], largely unknown. A major impediment to developing these estimates is that detailed, population-level studies of human exposures to ocean pollutants have not been conducted, although it is unarguable that fish and other seafood are a major source of human exposure. Moreover, POPs and other toxic chemicals that are found in terrestrial meat sources can in fact originate in the oceans, because fish meal, containing POPs, is often used in animal feeds [ 298 ].

Crude oil and petroleum products are complex mixtures of light and heavy hydrocarbons, toxic metals, and other chemicals. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a particularly hazardous component. When oil spills and leaks release these toxic chemicals into the marine environment, they can bioaccumulate in the food web; kill fish, birds and marine mammals; destroy commercial fisheries, aquaculture operations, and shellfish beds; release toxic volatile toxic chemicals such as benzene to the atmosphere; and foul shorelines.

Oil spills range in magnitude and visibility from massive releases such as the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico or the Amoco Cadiz Oil Spill off the coast of France down to chronic, slow leaks from pipelines and aging tankers. Petroleum in the marine environment can be either fresh or highly weathered, meaning that it has undergone a variety of chemical and photochemical processes that change its composition and toxicity.

Oil spills have occurred with increasing frequency in recent years as the result of growing global demand for petroleum. These spills have resulted in direct release of millions of tons of crude oil and other petroleum products into the oceans (Table ​ (Table1, 1 , Figure ​ Figure8 8 ).

Major Oil Spills, 1967–2010. From: World Ocean Review 3, maribus gGmbH, Hamburg 2015.

Source : Bücker et al. 2014 [ 314 ]. See also ITOPF 2019 [ 315 ].

Ecosystem effects of oil spills include disruption of food sources, destruction of fragile habitats such as estuaries and coral reefs, and fouling of beaches [ 300 ]. Marine and coastal wildlife, including birds and mammals, can be exposed to petroleum-based pollutants through ingestion, absorption, and inhalation. Ingestion of these materials can lead to digestive problems, ulcers, and bleeding; kidney and liver damage; reproductive failure; and anemia. Inhalation can lead to lung problems [ 301 ] that appear to persist long after initial exposures [ 302 ]. Effects on immune systems of fish predispose them to infections [ 303 ]. PAHs contained in oil spills have been shown to cause DNA damage in marine species and have been associated with hepatic, pulmonary and cardiac lesions in Arctic seals [ 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 ].

Human health and well-being also can be seriously affected by oil spills. Heaviest exposures and the most severe health consequences occur among occupationally exposed populations such as oil industry workers and workers involved in cleanup efforts. Cohort studies suggest that respiratory effects may persist for 2+ years post spill in some responders [ 308 ]. DNA damage has been documented in cleanup workers [ 309 , 310 ]. Community residents can be exposed through consumption of contaminated seafood and inhalation of volatile petrochemicals. Some studies have suggested little long-term health risk for consumption of fish or shellfish after the Deep Water Horizon spill. However, assessments of the possible health hazards of abundant alkylated PAHs have not been included in such studies [ 311 ].

In addition to their effects on physical health, major oil spills, like other disasters, can have serious impacts on mental health. Populations in areas with lower income are often at heightened vulnerability to such effects [ 312 ]. There is need for cohort studies on resilience to disasters as well as on chemical stressors [ 312 , 313 ].

Biological Contamination of the Oceans

Many toxin-producing algae, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa are native to marine and estuarine environments. Other species can be introduced to the oceans as the result of human activity.

Marine Algae and Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)

Algae, microscopic and macroscopic, are the foundation of the aquatic food web. They are the invaluable primary producers of fixed carbon, a vital nutrient that supports aquatic ecosystems, and of oxygen. Free-living planktonic algal species dominate the world’s oceans, and a small number of species account for the great majority of the global algal biomass. In coastal and estuarine systems, cyanobacteria, as well as dinoflagellates, diatoms, and cryptophytes emerge seasonally and are vital components of these ecosystems. Floating tropical beds of brown macroalgae (e.g., Sargassum ) serve as habitats and nurseries for many marine species. They also sequester CO 2 and thus mitigate global warming and ocean acidification [ 316 , 317 ].

Marine microalgae are of great importance to human health and well-being not only because they support the marine food web upon which all commercial fisheries depend, but also because they provide food for aquaculture, produce a range of pharmaceutical compounds [ 14 ], and are potentially a source of renewable biofuels [ 318 ].

On the negative side, some algal species are noxious [ 319 ] and produce powerful toxins have potential to cause great harm [ 320 ]. When high densities of these species accumulate in an area of the ocean, they can form harmful algal blooms (HABs) – described as “red tides”, “green tides”, or “brown tides”. In these blooms, the great masses of algae that have accumulated in an area of the sea exhaust inorganic nutrients in the water column allowing bacteria move in and decompose the senescing organic material. The consequences are reduced dissolved oxygen in the ocean, dead zones, fish kills, and a broad range of adverse ecological impacts [ 321 , 322 , 323 ] (Figure ​ (Figure9 9 ).

Frequency of Bottom-Water Hypoxia (‘Dead Zones’), Gulf of Mexico, 1985–2014.

Source : Rabalais et al., 2019, CC BY 4.0 [ 327 ].

HABs directly harm human health by producing toxins, potent natural compounds that can cause disease and death, most commonly through consumption of contaminated seafood [ 32 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326 ].

Causes and Drivers of HAB Events

HABs are not a new phenomenon and some occur naturally. However, the frequency and magnitude of HAB events appears to be increasing [ 328 ]. These increases have been linked to three factors:

• Increasing pollution of the oceans, and especially of coastal waters by nitrogen and phosphorus which leads to eutrophication. Sources of nitrogen include agricultural runoff, septic tank leachate and effluent from municipal deep injection wells [ 329 , 330 , 331 ];
• Sea surface warming; and
• Ocean acidification.

Increases in frequency and severity of HAB events have been linked to increasing coastal pollution in the Seto Inland Sea of Japan in the mid-1970s [ 332 ] and in the northwestern Black Sea in the 1970s and 1980s [ 333 ]. Both of these situations have subsequently been remediated, and case studies describing these and other successful remediation efforts are presented in the section of this report on Successes in Prevention and Control of Ocean Pollution [ 334 ].

A current example of the effect of increasing coastal pollution on HAB frequency is seen at the mouth of the Changjiang River in China, where nitrate concentrations have increased four-fold in the past 40 years and phosphate concentrations have increased by 30%. The main drivers are increases in population size and agricultural production. Significant increases in algal biomass and a change in the composition of the phytoplankton community have resulted. The frequency of local HABs has increased dramatically [ 335 ].

Climate Change and HABs

Increases in the frequency and severity of HABs have been linked to changing weather patterns such as major warming events, increased runoff, and changes in ocean currents (Figure ​ (Figure10). 10 ). Examples include recent Alexandrium blooms in the northeastern United States [ 336 ] and massive blooms of Pseudonitzschia on the US west coast associated with a mesoscale warm-water anomaly termed “the blob” [ 337 ]. These events presage projected future climate scenarios [ 54 , 338 , 339 ].

Geographical Distribution of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Events, 1970 and 2017.

Source : US National Office for HABs, Woods Hole, MA.

Sea surface warming leads to range extensions of HAB species and to the appearance of algal toxins in previously unaffected areas [ 53 , 55 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 342 ]. An example is seen in the recent, first ever detection of HAB toxins in Arctic waters [ 343 ]. The movement of harmful algae into the Arctic coupled with northern indigenous peoples’ lack of experience with HAB toxins put these populations at high risk of exposure and disease. This risk is compounded by lack of knowledge about uptake of HAB toxins by species such as whales, walruses, seals, and seabirds used by northern indigenous people as food sources.

Another example of climate-driven change in HAB range that has already occurred is poleward extension in the geographic ranges of the benthic dinoflagellates responsible for ciguatera poisoning into warm-temperate habitats, for example from the Caribbean Sea northward into the Gulf of Mexico [ 55 , 342 , 344 ]. This range extension appears to be associated with warming sea surface temperatures and higher storm frequencies, and destruction of coral reefs [ 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 ]. It is reflected in increased numbers of calls about ciguatera poisoning to poison control centers in the United States.

An impact on HAB biology that appears to reflect synergy between global climate change and ocean acidification is the observation that HAB toxins can become more potent at higher temperatures or under more acidic conditions [ 350 , 351 ]. This change may reflect temperature-induced shifts in the relative abundance of dinoflagellate species [ 340 , 352 , 353 ].

Pathways of Human Exposure to HAB Toxins

Consumption of fish and shellfish that have ingested toxic algae is a major route of human exposure to HAB toxins. Filter-feeding shellfish such as oysters and mussels pose an especially high risk because these species ingest toxic algae and then accumulate algal toxins to high concentrations that can cause acute disease and sudden death in shellfish eaters. The poisoning syndromes caused by HABs in shellfish include paralytic, neurotoxic, amnesic, diarrhetic, and other gastrointestinal poisoning [ 354 , 355 ]. Consumption of finfish and shellfish containing ciguatera toxin may also result in ciguatera poisoning.

Human exposure to HAB toxins can also occur through skin or respiratory contact via swimming or visiting beaches during algal blooms. People have reported skin rashes, respiratory irritation such as sneezing, and a burning or itching in the nose or throat while swimming, visiting, or working at the beach during Karenia brevis red tide events [ 356 , 357 ]. People with asthma appear to be at particular risk [ 358 ]. Karenia brevis blooms are associated additionally with increases in emergency room admissions for respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurologic illnesses [ 359 , 360 , 361 ]. There is evidence that people experience adverse effects also during Sargassum blooms [ 362 ] and from exposures to algal-derived palytoxins [ 363 ].

Macroalgal blooms, can harm human health by causing massive accumulations of algae in bays and on beaches. When these piles of algae decompose, they can release foul-smelling and hazardous gases, including hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptans, and dimethyl sulfide [ 364 ]. Coastal populations exposed to decomposing algal mats have reported eye and respiratory tract irritation.

Syndromes Associated with HAB Toxins

HABs cause a variety of human diseases, some of them extremely serious ( Text Box 3 ). HAB-related illnesses are for the most part acute, and acute reference doses (ARfD) have been derived to protect the public against these acute exposure events (See Appendix Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix). Little research has been done to evaluate chronic illness after either acute or chronic exposures to HAB toxins, and information on long-term health effects is still insufficient to allow determination of tolerable long-term daily intakes (EFSA opinions or FAO/WHO/IOC ad hoc expert consultation).

TEXT BOX 2: Chemical Pollution of the Oceans and Reduced Generation of Oxygen .

A novel mechanism by which petrochemical pollutants in the oceans may endanger human and ecosystem health is through reducing production of oxygen [ 197 ]. Beneficial marine microorganisms such as cyanobacteria of the genus Prochlorococcus are major producers of oxygen. Through photosynthesis, the billions of these organisms in the earth’s oceans remove CO 2 from the atmosphere and convert it to oxygen.

Recent experimental findings from the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans have found that mixtures of POPs and aromatic hydrocarbons in seawater at concentrations only two times above usual background levels can reduce expression of photosynthetic genes in Prochlorococcus and thus impede oxygen generation [ 6 , 198 ]. The photosynthetic toxicity of pollutant mixtures exceeds that of single chemicals by as much as three orders of magnitude [ 5 ].

TEXT BOX 3: A Primer on Poisonings by HAB Toxins.

Consumption of contaminated seafood is the major route of human exposure to HAB toxins. Many thousands of poisoning episodes occur worldwide each year.

Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) is caused by saxitoxins (STX), potent neurotoxins that act on voltage-gated sodium channels as well on other nervous system receptors [ 366 , 367 ]. PSP typically begins with tingling sensations or numbness of face, neck, fingers, and toes. These symptoms progress within 30 minutes to weakness, limb incoordination, and respiratory difficulty. In severe cases, respiratory paralysis, cardiovascular shock, and death may ensue. There is no antidote to PSP, and the only available treatment consists of artificial respiration by ventilator [ 368 , 369 ] and removal of non-absorbed toxins from the gut with activated charcoal. STX is listed as a Schedule 1 chemical intoxicant by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) [ 370 ]. The lethal oral dose is 1–4 mg [ 371 ].

Amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) is caused by domoic acid (DA) , a potent toxin produced by planktonic diatoms that targets glutamate receptors in the central nervous system [ 372 , 373 ]. After initial gastrointestinal symptoms, affected persons develop confusion, lethargy, disorientation, and short-term memory loss. Severe cases evolve to coma. Deaths have occurred [ 368 , 369 ]. A persistent toxicity syndrome has been defined consisting of episodic seizures and permanent loss of spatial memory [ 374 ].

Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) is associated with exposures to okadaic acid and dinophysis toxins. The syndrome presents with diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Symptoms may be confused with infectious intestinal diseases. No lethal cases have been reported [ 368 , 369 ].

The azaspiracid group of HAB toxins also results in diarrhetic symptoms. Its mechanism of action is not yet known, but recent evidence suggests that mitochondrial dehydrogenase may be a major target of this toxin group [ 375 ].

The yessotoxins are a group of lipophilic HAB toxins. Although never associated with human illness, they are controlled in seafood based on an acute reference dose established through oral administration of yessotxins in toxicological studies in experimental animals.

Neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) is caused by brevetoxins (BTX), neurotoxins that target voltage-gated sodium channels and cause depolarization of neuronal, muscular and cardiac cells [ 376 ]. NSP produces a mixture of gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms – nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal cramps as well as paresthesia, paralysis, convulsions, and coma [ 377 ]. Symptoms begin within 30 minutes to three hours following consumption of contaminated seafood.

Ciguatera Fish Poisoning (CFP) is caused by consumption of fish and shellfish that have accumulated ciguatoxins (CTX) in their tissues [ 378 , 379 , 380 ]. CTXs are neurotoxins that target voltage-gated sodium channels. They are produced by benthic dinoflagellate plankton of the genera Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa that live on coral surfaces and also by bottom-dwelling algae.

CFP is associated with higher sea surface temperatures and the El Nino Southern Oscillation. In the United States, the number of CFP-related calls to poison control centers appears to correlate with warmer sea surface temperatures and higher storm frequencies.

CFP is estimated to affect 50,000 to 200,000 people per year. It is the most commonly reported of the HAB-associated illnesses globally. It an important health problem in the Caribbean and Pacific regions and more recently has been reported in the Mediterranean.

Symptoms of CFP include gastrointestinal distress that may occur before or simultaneously with peripheral neurological symptoms, neuropsychiatric, and cardiovascular symptoms [ 381 ]. Symptoms generally appear within 12 hours after eating contaminated seafood [ 382 , 383 ]. Although rarely fatal, CFP symptoms have been reported to persist in about 20% of cases, lasting days, months or even years, with worsening symptoms of anxiety or depression [ 381 , 384 ].

Clupeotoxism is a form of HAB-related human poisoning caused by consumption of contaminated fish and crustaceans contaminated by palytoxin (PTX) [ 385 ]. Exposure can also occur through handling zoanthid corals in either private homes or aquarium shops [ 386 ]. Symptoms include gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular symptoms, as well as weakness, cough, and muscle pain.

Children may be more likely than adults to be affected by HAB toxins due to a combination of greater exposure, riskier behaviors, and sensitive developmental stage. Children also consume more food per unit body weight than do adults and thus may receive higher relative doses [ 365 ].

Prevention of HABs

The frequency and severity of some HAB events can be controlled by reducing releases of nitrogen, phosphorus, animal wastes, and human sewage into coastal waters. (See Text Boxes 9–13 ). Additional actions that can be taken to mitigate HABs are the following:

• Increase freshwater flows and tidal exchanges in coastal waters to increase flushing, prevent stagnation, and enhance the composition of coastal phytoplankton communities. In some instances, this will require modifying built structures such as breakwaters, jetties, and dams that impede flow of fresh and salt water [ 387 ] (See Text Box 4 ).
• Restrict activities that might result in the accidental transfer of harmful algal species into environments where they do not naturally occur (e.g., ballast water discharge) [ 388 , 389 ].

TEXT BOX 4: Reduced Water Flow and Increased Frequency of HABs.

An example of an area where changes in freshwater flow may be affecting HAB incidence is in the Bohai Sea of China. The Bohai is one of several regions in China where the number of HABs has increased in recent years. Due to droughts and water diversions for drinking water and agriculture, several of the rivers that used to flow freely into the Bohai are now dry for many days every year. This reduces the dilution of pollution loads in nearshore waters and also reduces stratification.

Dams are another factor that can increase frequency of HABs by altering fresh water flow into the ocean. Dams decrease turbidity and the availability of silicate to downstream waters due to sediment trapping within impounded waters. A decrease in the amount of silicate reaching coastal waters, concurrent with increases in water transparency can lead to shifts in the nutrient ratios that regulate phytoplankton community composition [ 390 ]. An increase in HAB frequency has been observed downstream of the massive Three Gorges Dam in China, and this increase is linked to a decrease in sedimentation and turbidity [ 391 ].

Prevention of HAB Poisoning

Routine monitoring for HAB toxins in shellfish is key to the prevention of human illness caused by these toxins. Monitoring programs are typically embedded within comprehensive shellfish safety programs. Details are presented in the Monitoring of Ocean Pollution section of this report.

Another strategy for mitigating the impact of HAB toxins on human health is to process harvested shellfish in such a way as to reduce toxicity to an acceptable level. An example is the removal of scallop viscera and marketing of only the adductor muscle, which generally contains little or no HAB toxins [ 389 ].

Economic and Social Consequences of HAB Poisoning

HABs have multiple negative economic and social effects. In the US, it is conservatively estimated that the average annual cost of marine HABs is USD $95million [ 392 ]. Health impacts are responsible for the largest component of these economic loses [ 331 ]. Economic losses attributable to HABs are estimated to $850 million (USD) annually in Europe and over $1 billion (USD) in Asia [ 392 ]. The costs of individual catastrophic HAB events can be overwhelming. Mexico, for example, spent $17 million in 2018 to remove 500,000 tons of Sargassum from its Caribbean beaches and declared a state of emergency. Another large HAB resulted in the largest fish farm mortality ever recorded and a loss of USD $800 million [ 339 ]. Increased frequency of respiratory ailments, aerosolized toxins, noxious gas, dead fish, proliferation of biting sand fleas from decaying piles of macroalgae, and discolored waters drive tourists away from beaches, change recreational habits, and thus reduce income from tourism in coastal communities [ 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 ].

Ocean Bacteria, Viruses, and Protozoa

Bacteria are abundant in the oceans. Every cubic centimeter of seawater contains, on average, one million microbial cells and the global ocean harbor an estimated 4–6 × 10 30 microbial cells [ 397 ]. Although the majority of bacteria in the oceans are harmless to humans, some are pathogenic. Naturally occurring marine pathogens of great significance for human health include Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio vulnificus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus , and Mycobacterium marinum .

With climate change, sea surface warming, and worsening marine pollution, the geographic ranges of naturally occurring marine pathogens as well as of microorganisms introduced to the oceans from land-based sources are expanding. Harmful bacteria are moving into estuaries, bays, and regions of the oceans they did not previously inhabit and moving poleward into cold, previously uncontaminated waters [ 22 ].

Microbial infections are contributing to degradation of fragile marine environments such as coral reefs [ 398 , 399 ]. They contribute to shellfish mortality in both wild and farmed areas, thereby affecting economies [ 400 , 401 ]. Widening geographic ranges of human diseases caused by marine microorganisms and the appearance of disease in previously unaffected populations are additional consequences [ 402 ].

Marine Vibrio Species and Human Disease

Marine bacteria of the genus Vibrio are particularly important causes of disease and death [ 403 ]. Vibrio cholerae , the causative agent of cholera, is the species of greatest concern. Vibrio species exhibit strong seasonality, and warmer water temperatures result in increased concentrations in estuarine and coastal waters [ 50 , 51 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 ]. Further warming of coastal waters caused by climate change is likely to further increase abundance of Vibrio bacteria and expand their geographic range [ 409 ]. These changes will likely result in increased frequency of Vibrio infections in coming decades and possibly to appearance of Vibrio infections in previously unaffected areas [ 52 ]. There is some indication that after extreme weather events such as hurricanes, droughts, and tropical storms shifts occur in the composition of Vibrio species and that these shifts are driven by discharges of sewage and inorganic nutrients into coastal waters [ 410 ].

Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus are two additional Vibrio species that pose grave risks to human health [ 412 , 413 ]. These organisms are now appearing for the first time in previously cold waters at northern latitudes with major peaks occurring during warm summers (Figure ​ (Figure11) 11 ) [ 411 ]. This trend is particularly well documented for the Baltic Sea, where the annual incidence of Vibrio infections is reported to almost double for every one-degree increase in sea surface temperature (Figure ​ (Figure12) 12 ) [ 402 , 414 ]. Similar trends have been reported in the United States where incidence of infections by Vibrio species has increased by 115% in the past decade, especially along the Gulf, Northeast, and Pacific Northwest coasts [ 50 , 414 , 415 ].

Trends in conditions favorable to Vibrio outbreaks in selected world regions [ 411 ].

Source : Reprinted from Watts et al. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. Lancet 392: 2479–2514, 2018, with permission from Elsevier.

Sea surface temperature and relative risk of clinically notified cases of Vibrio infection, Sweden, 2006–2014 [ 416 ].

Source : Semenza et al. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2198 .

Vibrio vulnificus can enter the human body either through ingestion of contaminated seafood or through open wounds [ 417 ]. When V. vulnificus , known colloquially as ‘flesh-eating bacteria’, enters an open wound it can cause severe infections such as necrotizing fasciitis ( Text Box 5 ).

TEXT BOX 5: Case Studies of Vibrio Wound Infection.

Vibrio wound infections are generally rare, even though the bacteria are quite common in brackish, mesohaline estuarine systems [ 424 ]. Unfortunately, these infections can be very severe resulting in some cases in amputation of infected limbs and loss of life. The great majority occur in males, especially in men over 40 years of age, presumably reflecting occupational and recreational activities [ 425 , 426 ].

Case study . In 2011, a report was presented of three elderly men in New Caledonia who developed severe gastrointestinal illness after consumption of raw oysters during a period of particularly heavy rainfall, and regional flooding. V. vulnificus was confirmed as the causative agent through PCR amplification of the hemolysin gene.

Case study . In 2005, 18 cases of confirmed wound infections with V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus were observed following Hurricane Katrina. Five of the patients died [ 427 ].

Case study . Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to diagnose V. vulnificus infection in a 55-year old man who was admitted to a hospital in Wenzhou, China hospital with severe wound infection. The man had been selecting fish at the market at 6:00 AM and developed a skin infection on his hand. The infection progressed rapidly, and the patient was admitted to hospital 11 hours later. Even though blister fluids, and wound and blood samples returned negative results by bacterial culture, tissue analyses using NGS were able to confirm Vibrio infection and guide treatment. After two weeks of hospitalization, the man was released.

These cases and other published literature on the emergence of pathogenic forms of Vibrio following flooding and tropical events indicate the need for improved warning systems in anticipation of the increased frequency of extreme weather events that is expected to accompany climate change [ 428 , 429 , 430 ].

Ingestion of shellfish contaminated by V. vulnificus , especially oysters, causes more than 90% of cases of V. vulnificus gastroenteritis [ 418 , 419 ]. This reflects the fact that filter-feeding shellfish such as oysters, clams, and mussels can concentrate Vibrio by several orders of magnitude over concentrations in seawater [ 412 , 418 ].

Vibrio vulnificus gastroenteritis can progress very rapidly to septicemia – sometimes within 24 hours after ingestion of contaminated seafood [ 418 , 420 ]. Even with aggressive medical treatment, the case-fatality ratio for Vibrio vulnificus septicemia is greater than 50%. Vibrio vulnificus thus has the unlovely distinction of having the highest case-fatality ratio of any foodborne pathogen [ 418 , 420 ]. It is the cause of 95% of seafood-borne deaths in the USA [ 420 ].

Recent data suggest that rising sea surface temperature may expand not only the temporal and spatial distribution of Vibrio species, but also increase the virulence and antimicrobial resistance of some Vibrio strains [ 421 , 422 , 423 ].

Salinity is another factor that affects the abundance of Vibrio species in marine environments. Typically, V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus are not prevalent in waters where salinity exceeds 25 parts per thousand. Recent anecdotal reports from the UK, EU, and Brazil indicate, however, that shifts in the composition of Vibrio communities in estuarine systems and increases in Vibrio infections are now being recorded in waters where salinity is greater than 30 parts per thousand [ 431 ], possibly reflecting an interaction between salinity and sea surface warming. A decade-long study of Vibrio conducted in the Neuse River Estuary in North Carolina, USA, has shown the temperature is not increasing in that system, and that temperature increase cannot therefore explain the significant increase observed in Vibrio concentrations (Figure ​ (Figure13) 13 ) [ 424 ].

Seasonal abundance of Vibrio species, Neuse River Estuary, NC, USA, 2003–2017. (Autoregressive integrated moving average of mean monthly abundance at a mid-water station). Dots are actual measurements. Red line represents model abundance. Blue lines are 95% confidence intervals.

Source : Froelich et al. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215254 , Creative Commons, license CC BY 4.0.

In some major river basins (i.e., the Amazon, the Ganges, the Brahmaputra, and the Congo), increased incidence of Vibrio infection is reported to coincide with high sea surface temperatures and high discharge events, events that typically are associated with abnormal phytoplankton growth [ 432 ]. In other marine coastal areas, the global abundance of Vibrio has been shown to correlate with chlorophyll, acidity, maximum sea surface temperature, and salinity [ 50 ].

Allochthonous Bacterial Pathogens in Marine Environments

Allochthonous bacteria are microorganisms not native to marine environments that are introduced into coastal waters from land-based sources. Allochthonous pathogens of greatest concern include virulent Enterococcus species, Escherichia coli serotypes (e.g., O157:H7), Campylobacter species, Clostridium species, Shigella species, and Salmonella species [ 433 ].

Pathogenic bacteria can enter coastal waters through sewage effluent, agriculture and storm water runoff and wastewater discharges from ships [ 434 ]. Rivers, especially those near major population centers, are an important source [ 434 ]. Through horizontal gene transfer, allochthonous bacteria can introduce harmful new genetic traits into indigenous marine microorganisms thus increasing their virulence and their capacity for anti-microbial resistance [ 435 ].

Climate change is accelerating the introduction, dispersion, and growth of allochthonous bacteria in coastal waters. For example, rising sea surface temperatures have been shown to increase the abundance of Salmonella species in Hawaiian coastal streams [ 436 ]. Warming may also increase the variability of salinity gradients along coastlines [ 437 ] thus affecting the growth and persistence of fecal-oral pathogens and increasing risk for major outbreaks of diarrheal disease [ 438 ].

Fecal-derived bacteria in marine environments tend to bind to particle surfaces (sediment, sand, plastics) where they form biofilms that enhance their survival. In estuarine environments, for example, the concentration of fecal bacteria is generally one or more orders of magnitude higher in surface sediments (per 100 g dry weight) than in the water column (100 ml). The survival of fecal bacteria in the oceans is thus positively linked to concentrations of pollutants and other suspended matter in the water column [ 439 , 440 , 441 ].

Human Diseases Caused by Allochthonous Bacterial Pathogens

Bacterial pathogens in the marine environment are responsible for a wide range of acute and chronic diseases. These include diarrhea and gastroenteritis, ocular and respiratory infections, hepatitis, and wound infection. Transmission of disease occurs mainly through ingestion of contaminated water and consumption of contaminated seafood [ 433 ].

From 1973 to 2006, 188 outbreaks of seafood-associated infections causing 4,020 illnesses were reported to the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System in the United States [ 442 ]. Most of these outbreaks were due to bacterial agents (76.1%), a significant proportion of them linked to pathogens with a human reservoir such as Salmonella and Shigella [ 443 , 444 ] (Table ​ (Table2 2 ).

Optimal Temperature and Salinity Fecal-Oral Pathogens in Sea-Water [ 445 ].

Antimicrobial Resistance in Coastal and Ocean Environments

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is likely to have been present for millions or billions of years in marine microbial communities as the result of resistance mechanisms that bacteria have evolved in response to naturally occurring threats [ 446 ].

More recently, however, the prevalence of AMR has been increasing in marine environments, especially in coastal waters. These increases appear to reflect increasing introductions from land-based sources of allochthonous bacteria that carry resistance genes that can be passed to marine bacteria through horizontal gene transfer [ 16 , 447 ]. Such exchanges may account for the acquisition of AMR by indigenous pathogens such as Vibrio .

The development of confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) to enhance livestock production and increase the profits in the poultry, beef, and swine industries have further promoted the development of AMR bacteria. These facilities are associated with poor waste treatment practices, and the vast quantities of effluent they release into waterways and directly into the ocean are associated with increased genetic encounters across “promiscuous” bacterial species able to transfer resistance genes horizontally.

An increasing body of evidence documents that significant human exposure to AMR bacteria can occur in coastal environments. A study in the UK reports that an estimated 6 million exposures occur per year to cefotaxime-resistant E. coli [ 448 ]. Another study found an increased probability of gut colonization by cefotaxime-resistant E. coli , a known risk factor for infection, in persons such as swimmers and surfers heavily exposed to contaminated recreational waters [ 449 ]. Recent studies of near-bottom waters from the Polish coastal zone reported multiple antibiotics at ng/L concentrations, with enrofloxacin reported at >200 ng/L [ 450 , 451 ].

Marine Viral Pathogens and Human Health

Viruses in coastal and estuarine systems that pose serious threats to human health include the Picornaviridae (enteroviruses, e.g., poliovirus, coxsackievirus, and echovirus), Adenoviridae (adenovirus), Astroviridae (astrovirus), Reoviridae (reovirus, rotavirus) and most significantly the Caliciviridae , a genus that includes norovirus and calicivirus [ 452 ]. Norovirus infections represented 21% of enteric virus infections reported from recreational water exposures across the USA from 2000–2014 [ 453 ]. Noroviruses enter coastal waters through stormwater, flooding, illicit boat discharges, and sewage system leaks and spills (E.g., Text Box 6 ).

TEXT BOX 6: Case Studies of Gastrointestinal Illness among Swimmers and Surfers Caused by Viruses in Polluted Marine Environments.

A recent study of gastrointestinal infections among surfers on the beaches near San Diego, California, USA, found that during rainy weather there was increased abundance of norovirus contamination in storm water runoff along the beaches [ 454 ]. Rates of gastrointestinal illness were increased among surfers during these periods of high contamination [ 455 ].

Other studies of gastrointestinal illness among swimmers during periods of heavy storm water discharge to coastal environments have found strong relationships between disease incidence and proximity to storm water pipes [ 36 , 37 ].

Dramatic improvements have been made in the past decade in diagnostic technologies for direct quantification of viral pathogens in marine environmental samples. These include new molecular approaches such as digital droplet PCR [ 454 ].

Marine Parasites and Human Health

Parasitic infections associated of marine origin are increasing in number and geographic range in response to climate change [ 456 ]. Cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, and salt water schistosomiasis are the most common of these infections [ 453 , 457 , 458 , 459 ].

Two emerging human parasitic diseases of particular concern in the ocean environment are Anisakiasis (a zoonosis caused by the fish parasitic nematode, Anisakis ) and Diphyllobothriasis (caused by the adult tapeworm, Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense ) [ 460 ]:

• Thousands of cases of anisakiasis have been reported, primarily from Japan but also from Europe and other parts of the world since the first case was reported in the 1960 [ 461 , 462 ]. An extensive survey carried out in the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus showed that rates of infection are as high as 70% among anchovy taken from fishing grounds in the Mediterranean Sea [ 463 ]. Spain is currently considered to have the highest incidence of anisakiasis in Europe [ 464 ].
• Diphyllobothriasis is associated with the consumption of raw Pacific salmon and is the most frequently occurring foodborne parasitic infection in Japan. Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense , the causative agent, can grow to lengths of up to 10 meters in the human digestive tract and lay millions of eggs that are excreted in feces [ 460 ].

Impacts of Ocean Pollution on Fish Stocks and Fisheries

Increasing pollution of the oceans, climate change and ocean acidification can cause changes in the marine food web and these changes can influence the abundance and geographic distribution of commercially significant fish species that are important human food sources. Species that are intolerant of pollution will decrease in number under the pressure of pollution and climate change, while more pollution-tolerant species will increase ( Text Boxes 7 and 8 ).

TEXT BOX 7: Climate-related collapse of a South African prawn fishery.

A modelling study conducted off the coast of eastern South Africa showed that compromised production of penaeid prawns in the St Lucia estuary, an important nursery area, and eventual collapse of this shallow water fishery was associated with prolonged closure of an inlet [ 479 ].

The problem was that prolonged closure of an inlet to the estuary hindered the movement of post-larval shrimp into the nursery area and also blocked movement of juveniles out of the estuary to the trawling ground. Through feedback loops within the food web, these changes had knock-on effects on other commercially exploited species in the same fishing grounds, even on species that did not directly depend on estuaries, lowering their biomass and potential for commercial exploitation [ 480 ].

Source : CF MacKay, Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

This case study illustrates that food security for humans can depend on the indirect effects of pollution and climate change that extend over several ecosystem types and are influenced by the geographical distribution of species across their life stages. In countries where subsistence fishers are reliant on fishing in estuaries, the effects on human food security can be devastating.

TEXT BOX 8: Marine Viruses and Declines in Salmon Populations. Interaction with Pollution?

The last three decades have seen large declines in salmon populations in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Recent studies investigating these declines using in situ hybridization, epidemiological surveys, and sequencing technologies have led to discovery of multiple new viruses. These viruses have been associated with disease among both wild and farmed salmon from different populations [ 495 ].

In these studies, fish were screened against a viral disease detection biomarker panel (VDD) that elucidates a conserved transcriptional pattern indicative of immune response to active RNA viral infection. Individual fish that were strongly VDD positive, but negative for any known salmon virus were subject to metatranscriptomic sequencing. This sequencing revealed viral transcripts belonging to members of the Arenaviridae (Salmon pescarenavirus: SPAV-1and 2), the Reoviridae (Chinook aquareovirus: CAV), and the Nidovirales (Pacific salmon nidovirus: PsNV), three divergent groups of highly pathogenic RNA viruses.

The distributions of the three viruses were markedly different:

• Both SPAV-1 and 2 were relatively widespread along the coast of southwestern British Columbia in ocean-caught Chinook and Sockeye salmon.
• CAV was not detected in any juvenile wild or hatchery Chinook salmon, but was detected in farmed fish on both the west and east coast of Vancouver Island.
• PsNV distribution was strongly associated with salmon-enhancement hatcheries, but was also detected in 18% of aquaculture Chinook and 3% wild Chinook. In hatchery fish, infection by PsNV was primarily localized to gill tissue, a pattern reminiscent of the respiratory disease caused by the related mammalian coronaviruses, such as MERS, SARS or COVID-19.

An unresolved question is whether spread of these viruses to salmon or severity of disease is enhanced by marine pollution.

A principal mechanism through which pollution alters the marine food web and affects fisheries is by causing changes in the abundance and composition of microalgae and other species that are the foundation of the marine food web [ 155 , 298 , 465 , 466 ]. Pollution that enters coastal waters through agricultural runoff and sewage discharges is typically rich in nutrients – nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic chemicals. Increased abundance of these materials results in proliferation of some, but not all species of microalgae. If the proliferating species are not the preferred food source of species above them, the composition of the entire food web can be altered and follow-on adjustments in the relative abundances of grazers and predators can ripple through multiple trophic levels [ 467 ]. If the end result is decreased species diversity, and the productivity of the few pollution-tolerant species that remain can seldom sustain food web, sharp reductions in catches of commercially important fish and food shortages can result.

Estuaries are highly sensitive to marine pollution. Estuaries are also vital nurseries for many commercially important fish species. In South Africa, for instance, 60% of exploited fish species inhabit estuaries as juveniles, and small invertebrates, which are abundant in estuaries, are the juveniles’ main food stock there [ 468 ]. The small invertebrates that populate estuaries are well able to cope with changing conditions of salinity and temperature caused by riverine and marine tidal influences [ 469 ]. However, these organisms can be highly susceptible to pollution, and coastal pollution can reduce invertebrate abundance and remove intolerant species entirely [ 470 , 471 ]. In these circumstances, the food security of the juveniles becomes precarious, and stocks of key fish species can decline. These estuarine effects are particularly important when pollution is widespread.

Short-term, high-impact pollution events can also result in food web alterations and reductions in seafood productivity. The most famous of these events in recent times have been the Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan. Both direct effects to individual species and indirect effects on the food web were apparent in these two events [ 472 ].

Climate change can also affect the health of estuaries and fish stocks. It can exert synergistic effects on marine ecosystems in concert with pollution. Climate change causes changes in rainfall that, in turn, alter runoff to estuaries and nearshore environments. In nutrient-poor areas, nutrients delivered from the land to the oceans via rivers are very important to sustain local food webs and fish production [ 473 , 474 ]. With changes in the global climate, estuaries in arid and semi-arid regions may receive less freshwater runoff, or receive large rainfalls over fewer days or in the wrong season. All of these changes compromise the nursery function of estuaries. These changes can result in increased or decreased salinity, more frequent or less frequent flooding, changes in energy supplies, frequent closures of inlets that hinder migration of marine species in and out of estuaries, and changes in the timing of inlet closure and opening such that they no longer synchronize with fish life stages [ 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 ].

Coastal marine ecosystems in and near cities, especially near rapidly growing megacities in developing countries and those with emerging economies are constantly exposed to pollution and other environmental stressors of human origin [ 481 , 482 ]. Losses and changes of habitat, increasing light and noise levels, and industrial chemical discharges impact fish populations in these areas, modifying their behavior and ultimately reducing the amounts of fish available to feed humans [ 483 , 484 ]. Dredging and coastal pollution increase turbidity, change the light regime in the water column, impact primary production, and affect migration and predator-prey interactions [ 481 ]. Increased foraging activity in artificially lit areas increases predation pressure on one trophic level, and in turn releases predation pressure on the next trophic level [ 485 ]. Noise pollution may affect fish and marine mammal communication, as well as the behavior of invertebrates. Artificial hard structures change habitat that might originally have been comprised of soft sediment. Such changes in habitat provide opportunities for invasive species [ 481 , 481 ]. All such modifications, especially when they are of large scale, cause changes in the food web, resulting in changed productivity patterns that alter ecosystem services to humans. Although human modifications can occasionally enhance habitat and increase fishery production (e.g., around artificial reefs), the negative impacts of human activity far outweigh their positive benefits on a global scale [ 481 ].

Reduced content of dissolved oxygen in seawater – ocean hypoxia – is another consequence of pollution and climate change that has negative impacts on fish stocks [ 486 , 487 ]. Ocean hypoxia is the result of terrestrial runoff that introduces nutrients to the seas, increases frequency of HABs, and leads to eutrophication and the formation of dead zones. Vast releases of organic matter from industry and waste water systems further compound these effects. Hypoxic areas and dead zones are increasing in seas across the globe [ 488 ]. Additional contributory factors are sea surface warming, which reduces oxygen solubility in the oceans and changes stratification patterns that, in turn, may reduce ocean mixing and prevent re-oxygenation [ 489 ]. All of these effects are most pronounced in coastal and continental shelf areas of the oceans – the regions of the seas that produce 90% of commercially exploited fish species [ 490 ].

Ocean acidification, a direct consequence of increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 , is another environmental factor of human origin that can affect fish stocks. By inhibiting the growth of calcified primary producers (calcified phytoplankton such as coccolithophores or foraminifera) or zooplankton (krill, pteropods) at the base of the food web, ocean acidification may alter the food chain production [ 491 , 492 , 493 ].

In addition to decreasing seafood production, ocean acidification may also alter seafood quality. Researchers asked 30 volunteer testers to assess the gustatory quality (appearance, texture, and taste) of shrimp raised at different pH levels [ 494 ]. The test was conducted under the supervision of a chef. Decreased pH significantly reduced appearance and taste scores. Thus shrimp maintained at a pH of 8.0 had a 3.4 times higher likelihood of being scored as the best shrimp on the plate, whereas shrimp maintained at a pH of 7.5 had a 2.6 times higher likelihood of being scored as the least desirable shrimp on the plate, a result that may have socio-economic implications.

Increased bioaccumulation of pollutants in the food web will be a further impact of pollution, ocean acidification, and climate change on fisheries. Concentrations of PCB and MeHg in top predators such as killer whales are projected to increase by 3% to 8% by 2100 under a high-carbon-emission scenario compared to a control scenario [ 496 ]. MeHg accumulation is particularly sensitive to variations in emission scenarios with a trophic amplification factor generally ten times higher than for PCBs.

Most of the world’s fish stocks are already either fully or over-exploited [ 497 ]. Pollution, ocean warming and ocean acidification add to these pressures. The warming of the marine environment during the last two decades has reduced the productivity of marine fisheries worldwide and contributed to a 4.1% decrease of maximum sustainable yield of several fish populations, with some regions showing losses of as much as 15 to 35% [ 498 ] (Figure ​ (Figure14). 14 ). Almost 90% of the large predator fish species have been removed from all seas around the globe leading to the collapse of certain species, such as Newfoundland Cod [ 499 ]. Increasing global demand for fish as a food source has driven rapid increase of aquaculture, which has resulted in high demands on capture of large wild fish used for feeding of farmed fish [ 500 ].

Global changes in maximum fish catch potential.

Source : IPCC.

Reductions in fish stocks have direct impacts on human health by jeopardizing food security in coastal communities in low-resource countries [ 501 ]. Declines in fish catches deprive people of protein, as fish is a highly important source for nearly 20–30% of the human population [ 502 ]. Reduced fish consumption results not only in protein malnutrition, but also in reduced consumption of essential micronutrients, including Vitamin A, iron, Vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids among vulnerable populations [ 502 ]. These impacts fall most heavily on poor countries [ 503 ], but negative impacts are seen also in areas of economically developed nations where shellfish make up a substantial part of the commercial and traditional subsistence fisheries such as Alaska, USA [ 504 ].

Continuing reductions in fish stocks and in the productivity of the oceans may be anticipated in future years due to the combined effects of pollution, sea surface warming, ocean acidification, and other wide-scale ecological impacts. Poleward migration of many commercially important marine species towards higher latitudes is occurring already and will increase further. Ocean acidification and pollution will damage tropical and subtropical coral reefs thus reducing the abundance of reef fish species [ 502 ].

Additional effects on fish stocks could be mediated through changes in major ocean currents. Thus, there is growing concern that climate change could disrupt the highly productive Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems, such as the Humboldt and Benguela currents in the South Atlantic Ocean that rely on the upwelling of nutrient-rich water to stimulate productivity and produce large fish yields. These changes could jeopardize the security of coastal fishing communities that depend on them for their food and their livelihoods [ 505 ]. These grave dangers justify the proactive policy of designating Marine Protected Areas in critical areas of the seas.

Impacts of Ocean Pollution on Vulnerable Human Populations

Ocean pollution, like all forms of pollution, has disproportionately severe health impacts in low-income and middle-income countries [ 24 ]. It especially affects coastal communities in low-income countries that are dependent on the oceans for their food and livelihood. The effects of pollution and climate change fall especially heavily on these populations because they do not have the resources or the infrastructure to buffer diminished ecosystem services. Thus they are highly vulnerable to the increasingly frequent HAB events and HAB toxin exposures that are the consequences of worsening coastal pollution. Poignant examples are seen in small island nations [ 17 ] and in the countries of the Western Indian Ocean region – Comoros, Mauritius, Mozambique, and Somalia [ 506 ].

Indigenous peoples are another group highly vulnerable to ocean pollution and its health effects. Their heightened vulnerability to ocean pollution reflects the fact that these groups consume up to 15 times more seafood per year as non-indigenous peoples [ 20 , 507 ]. They are also at high risk of exposure to plastic particles, methyl mercury, POPS, and manufactured chemicals that concentrate in marine species.

Populations in the circumpolar regions – indigenous peoples as well as non-indigenous populations such as the people of the Faroe Islands [ 66 ] – are yet another group placed at high risk by worsening ocean pollution. The increasingly heavy atmospheric deposition in northern waters of mercury, PCBs, and other POPs transported poleward on the winds from distant population centers has led to accumulations of hazardous chemicals in the tissues of the predator fish species and marine mammals that are major components of these populations’ diets. This, in turn, has led to increasing toxicity – toxicity that has been well documented through epidemiologic studies [ 67 , 68 , 508 , 509 , 510 ].

Dietary Change. As seafood becomes increasingly scarce and more contaminated by chemical pollutants [ 66 ] and HAB toxins [ 343 ], people in low-income countries, indigenous areas, and the circumpolar regions are forced to turn away from their traditional fish-based diets and to eat more meat and poultry. This dietary change places them at risk of all the health consequences of the “Western” diet – obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. This trend is evident in Alaska native populations and appears to have contributed to the deteriorating health status of these groups [ 511 ].

In high-income countries, consumers’ perception of the safety of seafood has led to a reduction in demand for shellfish, and this change has had severe economic consequences for the shellfish industry [ 512 ]. The lack of diagnostic tools and treatment options for HAB-related illnesses leads to increased psychological stress in fishing communities [ 513 , 514 ].

Ocean Pollution as a Risk factor for Migration. Migration is another consequence of ocean pollution, climate change and declining fish stocks. Study of environmentally induced migration has grown in recent years [ 515 ]. Of particular importance has been emergence of the concept of “environmental refugees” [ 516 ], people who have been forced to leave their homes because of pressures created directly or indirectly by anthropogenic environmental, ecological and climate change [ 517 ]. Migration and conflict are now considered key mechanisms through which climate change and other environmental stressors increase frequency of migration and thus create environmental refugees [ 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 ].

The 2015 Rockefeller- Lancet Commission on Planetary Health has identified migration as a major concern for human health and development and a priority area of research [ 2 ]. Ocean pollution and other ecosystem changes are already triggering environmental migration and will continue to do so over the coming decades [ 497 , 521 , 522 ].

While global ecological trends and climate change impacts have been a priority of the research community, complex implications at local scales are less well understood. Climate-induced triggers for migration include sea level rise, salinization of fresh water supplies, changing patterns of flooding and draughts, pest and alien species invasion, changing weather patterns, and ocean acidification [ 523 ]. These drivers can act concurrently and produce synergistic effects on human health and well-being. In combination with pollution, changes in land use, loss of biodiversity, mismanagement of resources, and collapse of the fisheries on which coastal populations rely for food and economic security [ 2 , 524 , 525 ], are multiple drivers that lead to vulnerability, threatened livelihoods, culture and political instability, and social injustice [ 523 ]. They reduce food and water security and increase risk of starvation [ 8 , 526 , 527 ]. These factors lead also to loss of property, shelter and human life [ 504 , 528 , 529 , 503 , 530 ].

The Critical Importance of Ocean Monitoring

Robust monitoring of ocean pollution is important for protecting human health and safeguarding marine ecosystems. Need for monitoring will become increasingly great as the global climate continues to change, seas continue to warm, extreme weather events become more frequent, and human impacts on coastal, estuarine, and deep-ocean environments continue to grow.

Monitoring provides information on background levels of pollution, tracks trends, maps geographical variation, identifies ‘hot spots’, provides early warning of impending crises, guides interventions against pollution, and evaluates the effectiveness of interventions. Monitoring of chemical and physical processes in the oceans is essential to tracking sea surface warming, ocean acidification, and the consequences of these phenomena on marine ecosystems, including their impacts on the frequency of HABs and the spread of marine pathogens.

The great importance of ocean monitoring in guiding the protection of human and ecosystem health was recognized in a seminal 2002 report that recommended establishing programs to monitor ocean pollution [ 531 ]. That report called for the establishment of multidisciplinary research programs to address the intersection between ocean and human health. Such programs have now been established in the United States and Europe. They provide an essential complement to ocean monitoring.

The Health of the Oceans (HOTO) Module of the Global Ocean Observing Systems (GOOS) is a key international initiative in ocean monitoring [ 532 ]. HOTO employs a range of sampling strategies across a variety of temporal and spatial scales using agreed standards and methodologies to track the effects of anthropogenic activities, ocean pollution in particular, on human health and marine resources. HOTO and other global and regional ocean monitoring systems are generating data showing the impacts of maritime and navigation activities; trends in ocean acidification and coral reef destruction; trends in fish stocks; introductions of invasive species; changes in sea surface temperature; the spread of life-threatening bacteria and harmful algae, and trends in plastic pollution [ 533 , 534 ].

Improved monitoring of all forms of ocean pollution and better documentation of pollution-related patterns of human exposure and disease will improve estimates of the contribution of ocean pollution to the Global Burden of Disease [ 41 ].

Monitoring Toxic Chemicals and Plastics in the Ocean Environment

Monitoring of chemical and plastic pollution in the oceans has been ongoing for decades. One approach has been direct measurement of discharges of pollutants such as waste plastics into the seas from land-based sources, and tabulation of the number and frequency of discharge events such as oil spills. Under the aegis of the Horizon 2020 Initiative for a Cleaner Mediterranean, the European Environment Agency, and UNEP-MAP have defined a set of indicators that will potentially enable an integrated assessment of key land-based sources of pollution in European seas, including solid waste and marine litter.

A key monitoring strategy for toxic chemical pollutants is to measure concentrations of indicator pollutants in seawater or in organisms that are “sentinel species”. Since the 1970s, the U.S., the European Environment Agency, and the International Mussel Watch Program have measured geographic patterns and temporal trends in concentrations of organic chemical and heavy metal pollutants along the coasts, through analysis of residues in bivalve mollusks [ 535 ]. These programs have identified locations where heavy metals, POPs, and pesticides are most highly abundant and have highest potential to contaminate seafood. These programs have documented that pollutant concentrations are highest near urban areas [ 536 ].

Evaluation of molecular biomarkers of exposure to chemical contaminants is an important complement to direct measurement of chemicals [ 531 , 537 ]. Biomarkers have been used to assess exposures and early biological effects of exposures to oil spills, PCBs, dioxins, toxic metals, and endocrine disruptors [ 538 ]. Pollutant levels in broad areas of the open ocean can be inferred by analysis of tissue levels in large ocean species that serve as biological monitors. Thus, measurement of levels of chemical pollutants and of molecular biomarkers of exposure has been done by analysis of skin biopsies of sperm whale [ 536 ]. Studies in tissues of large sharks and finfish (yellowfin tuna) provide similar data [ 210 , 539 ].

Future Directions in Monitoring of Chemical and Plastic Pollution in the Oceans.

• Airborne and satellite sensors hold great promise for advancing the science of chemical and plastic pollution monitoring. There now exist many platforms and sensor technologies with the potential to scan large areas of the oceans continuously and to provide information on a range of conditions in nearly real-time. These sensors can map and track the distribution of pollutants such as oil spills and plastic waste. Plastic monitoring may be a proxy for monitoring POPs and other toxic chemicals associated with plastic. Remote sensors can also detect HABs [ 540 , 541 ].
• To track ocean pollution by mercury and POPs, the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) has developed the Global Observation System for Mercury (GOS4M) and is developing a Global Observation System for Persistent Organic Pollutants (GOS4POPS).
• To store and analyze data on POPs levels in marine biota, the Global Monitoring Plan (GMP) Data Warehouse established under the auspices of the Stockholm convention is a growing resource. It could be expanded and linked to data on POP levels in human milk and serum in high-risk populations such as people in the circumpolar regions.
• Systematic measurement of pollutant levels in mesopelagic or midwater fishes could be a means for assessing the global status of ocean pollution in the future, as a companion to studies of large fish and marine mammals. Midwater fishes live in the seas at intermediate depths, 200–1,000 m below the surface, and are present in all the oceans of the world.
• Passive samplers and sensors are being developed and applied to assess the distribution and concentrations of pollutants in waters around the world, and to detect new pollutant chemicals [ 540 , 541 ].

Monitoring HABs

Several international and European systems currently capture and disseminate information about HAB events, their predisposing factors, and HAB- related illnesses [ 542 , 543 ]. Other initiatives are being coordinated by the Intergovernmental Panel for Harmful Algal Blooms (UNESCO, IPHAB) collaboration. Specific initiatives are summarized in the following, Tables ​ Tables3 3 and ​ and4 4 :

European Ocean Monitoring Programs.

United States Ocean Monitoring Programs.

Monitoring Bacterial, Viral, and Parasitic Pathogens

Serious challenges impede the detection, quantification and prediction of viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens in seafood, shellfish, and oceanic waters as well as in aquaculture operations. Although molecular diagnostics and other tools have improved dramatically over the past two decades [ 454 , 551 ], additional advances are required to better detect and quantify pathogens in water, seafood products, aquaculture facilities, and shellfish meats [ 552 ].

The significant relationships observed between pollution concentrations, rising sea surface temperatures, Vibrio infections and HABs have catalyzed the development of modeling efforts. These models incorporate multiple layers of geocoded data and are designed to generate predictive forecasts [ 553 ]. New technologies such molecular and bioinformatics-based diagnostics [ 410 , 425 , 554 ], metabarcoding, “big data” mining and machine learning may be expected to contribute to further development of these efforts [ 40 , 555 , 556 ]. Implementation of real-time PCR-based approaches has already been shown to be a useful tool for diagnosing V. vulnificus wound infections [ 554 ].

A mapping tool developed by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) [ 416 ] is now operational and is providing 24-hour updated Vibrio risk data freely available to the community. However, this system has not yet been implemented by all EU Member States. Also, it needs to be further developed to incorporate relevant variables associated to major climatic events that have been proven to have an impact.

Successes in Prevention and Control of Ocean Pollution

A key finding of the 2018 Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health is that much pollution can be controlled and pollution-related disease prevented [ 24 ]. The Commission noted that most high-income countries and an increasing number of middle-income countries have curbed their most flagrant forms of pollution by enacting environmental legislation and developing regulatory policies. These policies are based on science and are backed by strict regulation. They set targets and timetables, they are adequately funded, and they are based on the “polluter-pays principle”. Air and fresh water in these countries are now cleaner, health has improved, and longevity has increased. The Lancet Commission concluded that pollution control is “a winnable battle” [ 24 ].

An additional benefit of pollution control is that it is highly cost-effective. Rather than stifle economic growth and depress job markets, as is often claimed, pollution control has, in fact, been shown to boost economies, increase human capital and create prosperity. It creates these gains by preventing disease and premature death, reducing productivity losses, and preventing environmental degradation. In the United States, air pollution has declined by 70% since passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970, and every $1 (USD) invested in control of air pollution has returned an estimated benefit of $30 (USD) (range of estimate, $4–88 USD) [ 24 ]. Likewise, the removal of lead from gasoline has boosted economies in countries around the world by increasing the intelligence of billions of children who have come of age in relatively lead-free environments and who are thus more intelligent and productive [ 24 ].

The strategies used to control pollution of air and fresh water are beginning to be applied to the prevention and control of ocean pollution. Key to the effectiveness of these efforts has been the recognition that 80% of ocean pollution arises from land-based sources [ 29 ]. Accordingly, successful marine pollution control programs have identified, targeted, and reduced releases from important land-based polluters. They have been guided by multi-scale monitoring that tracks pollutant discharges, measures pollutant levels in the seas and in marine biota, and assesses human exposures and health outcomes. They have been backed by strict enforcement. They have engaged civil society and the public by making their strategies, their data, and their progress reports available on open-source platforms.

These strategies are beginning to make a difference. As is described in the case studies presented below ( Text Boxes 9–13 ), industrial discharges have been reduced in some areas, plastic pollution reduced, agricultural runoff mitigated, and sewage more effectively treated. Coastal contamination has been reduced, levels of toxic chemicals in marine organisms have declined, the frequency and severity of HABs have been reduced, polluted harbors have been cleaned, estuaries have been rejuvenated, shellfish beds [ 557 ] and aquaculture operations [ 558 ] have been protected, fish stocks have rebounded, and coral reefs have been restored. The successes in control of ocean pollution achieved to date demonstrate that broader prevention is possible.

TEXT BOX 9: Control of Plastic Pollution in the Mediterranean.

Plastic pollution is one of the most pervasive and highly visible threats to the health of the oceans today. Once discharged into the natural environment, plastic can take up to 500 years to disappear. The Mediterranean Sea is particularly vulnerable to plastic pollution because of its semi-enclosed geographical location, and the intensity of its maritime transport, fishing, industry, and tourism. With more than 3000 billion microplastic particles estimated to be in its waters, the Mediterranean is the most polluted sea in the world.

In 2015, the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, the Tara Ocean Foundation, Surfrider Foundation Europe, the MAVA Foundation and the IUCN joined forces to launch the Beyond Plastic Med (BeMed) Initiative. BeMed’s objectives are to bring together and support the stakeholders involved in the fight against plastic pollution in the Mediterranean, implement sustainable solutions, encourage the search for new solutions, and mobilize stakeholders and the general public through knowledge and sharing of best practices.

To achieve its objectives, BeMed supports projects every year that aim to reduce plastic pollution at source by minimizing the use of plastic, finding alternatives, improving waste collection systems, raising awareness, collecting data, and helping to implement new regulations. To date, 53 projects in 15 countries have been supported.

In addition to providing financial support to these efforts, BeMed works to build and coordinate the network of active Mediterranean stakeholders by facilitating the sharing of experience and knowledge and by creating links between organizations. Principal Investigators of the projects supported by BeMed are gathered every year for a day of exchange during Monaco Ocean Week. In addition, stakeholders working on similar topics or in the same region are put in contact with one another to foster collaborations, share knowledge, and thus reinforce the effectiveness of their actions. Replication of successful actions is strongly encouraged.

Since early 2020, BeMed has also engaged the private sector in the fight against plastic pollution by forming of a consortium of companies committed to preventing plastic pollution of the Mediterranean. This consortium includes players at every stage in the plastics value chain – producers of plastic raw materials, plastic manufacturers, producers of plastic-containing consumer products, retailers, and waste management companies – in order to draw companies into a common dynamic of pollution reduction on a Mediterranean-wide scale. Activities of this consortium are structured around two working groups: a group promoting dialogue between scientists and industrialists to clarify the key issues, and a group dedicated to implementing pilot projects in the field. An advisory committee of scientific experts ensures the effectiveness and sustainability of the proposed solutions.

TEXT BOX 10: Control of Persistent Organic and Metal Pollutants in European Waters.

The European Environmental Agency [ 27 ] tracks concentrations of eight indicator pollutants in the waters surrounding Europe. These include three metals – mercury, lead, cadmium, and five persistent organic pollutants (POPs) – hexachlorobenzene (HCB), lindane, PCBs, DDT (using DDE as a proxy), and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) BAP (benzo[ a ]pyrene).

The first seven of these substances have been banned from use in Europe, and their discharges into the seas have declined, in some cases sharply. Thus mercury concentrations in North Sea blue mussels have fallen, as have PAH and PCB concentrations in monitored areas in the North Atlantic [ 27 , 208 ]. (See Figure)

Concentrations of PCBs in archived herring gull eggs from three locations on the North German coast, 1988–2008 [ 208 ]

Source : Fleidner et al. (2012), https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-7 , Creative Commons, license CC BY 2.0.

These trends document the power of bans on hazardous chemicals in reducing chemical pollution of the oceans. However, despite these successes, levels of all eight of these pollutants remain elevated in European waters and are anticipated to remain unacceptably high for many decades to come. Pollutant levels will be especially slow to decline in Arctic waters where cold temperatures slow chemical degradation [ 208 ].

TEXT BOX 11: Successful Control of Harmful Algal Blooms in Japan’s Inland Sea.

A striking example of successful control of HABs through a science-based prevention program is seen in the case of the Seto Inland Sea in Japan.

In the Seto Inland Sea, the number of visible “red tides” (high biomass blooms) increased seven-fold between 1960 and the mid 1970s. This increase paralleled increases in industrial production and in chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic and industrial wastes discharged into the sea.

In 1973, Japan instituted the Seto Inland Sea Law to reduce COD loadings to half of the 1974 levels over a three-year period. As a result, the number of red tides began to decrease in 1977, dropping to, and remaining at levels approximately one-third of peak frequency [ 332 , 559 ]. These data demonstrate an increase in phytoplankton abundance due to over-enrichment of coastal waters, followed by a proportional decrease in blooms when that loading was reduced. Importantly, toxic blooms (in this instance, those that caused fish mortalities or other fisheries damage) also decreased after the loadings were reduced.

The legislative or policy changes implemented in the Seto Inland Sea demonstrate that control of sewage and industrial discharges has the potential to prevent some HABs. Nevertheless, there are other important sources of nutrients to coastal waters, and these are more difficult to control, given the increased population pressures and the need to feed a growing world population. In particular, the steady expansion in the use of fertilizers for agricultural production represents a significant and worrisome source of plant nutrients to coastal waters.

TEXT BOX 12: Boston Harbor Restoration: From a “Harbor of Shame” [ 560 ] to a “Great American Jewel” [ 561 ].

Background. Boston Harbor is an estuary of Massachusetts Bay that provides services worth $30–100 billion to society [ 562 ]. Beginning in the nineteenth century, industrialization, urban development, and population growth led to heavy pollution of the harbor [ 560 , 562 ]. The construction of wastewater treatment plants at Deer Island in the 1950s and Nut Island in the 1960s further exacerbated this problem. The amount of wastewater delivered to these plants often exceeded the plants’ capacities, and by the 1980s, they discharged 350 million gallons of untreated wastewater into the harbor daily. The wastewater devastated water quality, marine habitats, and recreational activities [ 562 ]. Boston Harbor became one of the most polluted harbors in the US [ 560 ].

Solution. Local organizations had already begun advocating for a cleaner Boston Harbor when Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972 [ 562 ]. This law catalyzed the cleanup of the polluted harbor. The City of Quincy and the Conservation Law Foundation sued the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for failing to comply with the Clean Water Act, and in 1986, a court-ordered cleanup began [ 563 ].

The cleanup strategy consisted of several steps, including [ 563 ]:

• + Improvements to the 1950s-era treatment plant on Deer Island
• + Construction of a new Deer Island Treatment Plant
• + Transfer of Nut Island Treatment Plant flows to Deer Island
• + Creation of a 9.5-mile outfall to discharge treated effluent from Deer Island into Massachusetts Bay
• + Conversion of sludge into fertilizer, rather than discharge
• + Combined Sewer Overflow projects to protect sensitive waters from overflows.

Results. The Boston Harbor cleanup strategy has had many accomplishments. Most notably, sewage waste that had previously undergone little or no treatment before discharge into the Harbor is now subjected to state-of-the-art treatment [ 561 ]. As a result, the harbor has steadily become cleaner, as illustrated by data taken from 70 locations throughout the harbor since 1989 [ 561 ]. The cleanup resulted additionally in elimination of hepatic neoplasia in winter flounder in the harbor, which had previously been highly prevalent [ 564 ].

Conclusion. The cleanup of Boston Harbor was effective, and the Harbor is now known as the “Great American Jewel” [ 561 ]. To continue the work, policymakers are now addressing current threats to the health of the harbor, including sea level rise, habitat destruction, and invasive species [ 560 ].

TEXT BOX 13: Restoration of Coral Reefs in American Samoa.

Background. American Samoa is a US territory consisting of seven islands in the South Pacific [ 565 ]. The territory contains coral reefs that are both diverse and essential: 2,700 marine species depend on the reefs for shelter, and 55,000 people depend on the reefs for sustenance and employment. Over the past several decades, several disturbances have threatened the reefs (Craig et al., 2005). In the latter half of the 20th century, tuna canneries regularly released nutrient-rich wastewater to Samoan coastal waters leading to an increase in coral-eating plankton and a decrease in corals. By the late 1970s, after an outbreak of crown-of-thorn starfish, only 10% of the corals remained. The problem was further exacerbated by the overfishing of parrotfish, which typically protect corals by consuming harmful algae [ 565 ].

Solution. To address the problems confronting the reefs of American Samoa, a suite of solutions was implemented. In 1986, the Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary was created, thereby imposing restrictions on pollution and fishing. Then, in 1991, the government diverted wastewater pipes to combat the increase in coral-eating plankton. In 2000, spearfishing was banned to protect parrotfish [ 565 ].

Results. The reefs of American Samoa have slowly but surely recovered. In the past nine years, the reefs’ coral cover (proportion of the reef’s surface covered in coral) has increased from 25 to 36%. Compared to the Great Barrier Reef’s coral cover of 14%, the American Samoa reefs are faring well [ 565 ].

Conclusion. The reefs of American Samoa are considered to be in “good” condition [ 566 ], but they continue to face ongoing threats, such as pollution, red tides, coastal sedimentation, and ocean acidification [ 565 , 566 , 567 ]. To protect the reefs, these threats should be addressed.

Programs for the control of ocean pollution create multiple benefits. They boost economies, increase tourism, bring back commercial fisheries, and improve human health and well-being. These benefits will last for centuries.

The following Text Boxes ( Text Boxes 9–13 ) present case studies of successes in control of ocean pollution. A central element in each of these examples has been careful documentation of progress against pollution through robust monitoring. Five case studies are presented here and additional studies are presented in the Supplementary Appendix to this report.

Conclusions

Ocean pollution is a global problem. It arises from multiple sources and crosses national boundaries. It is worsening and in most countries poorly controlled. More than 80% arises from land-based sources.

Plastic waste is the most visible component of ocean pollution and has deservedly attracted much attention. It kills seabirds, fish, whales and dolphins. It breaks down into plastic microparticles and nanoparticles and fibers containing myriad toxic and carcinogenic chemicals. These chemical-laden particles are absorbed by fish and shellfish, enter the marine food chain, and can ultimately be consumed by humans. Their dangers to human health are only beginning to be assessed.

Additional components of ocean pollution include mercury released by the combustion of coal and from small-scale gold mining; petroleum discharges from oil spills and pipeline leaks; persistent organic pollutants, such as PCBs and DDT; thousands of manufactured chemicals, many of unknown toxicity; pesticides, nitrogen, and phosphorus from animal waste and agricultural runoff; and sewage discharges containing multiple microbial contaminants. In concert with sea surface warming and ocean acidification, ocean pollution leads to increasing frequency and severity of HABs, destruction of coral reefs, and spread of life-threatening infections.

Pollution of the oceans can be directly ascribed to the “take-make-use-dispose” economic paradigm that Pope Francis has termed, “the throwaway culture” [ 568 ]. This linear, economic paradigm focuses single-mindedly on gross domestic product (GDP) and on endless economic growth [ 569 ]. It views natural resources and human capital as abundant and expendable and gives little heed to the consequences of their reckless exploitation [ 2 , 8 ]. It ignores the precepts of planetary stewardship [ 102 , 568 , 570 ]. It is not sustainable [ 571 ].

Leaders at every level of government - city, regional and national – as well as sustained engagement by the international community and civil society will be key to the control of ocean pollution and the prevention of pollution-related disease.

Eight key conclusions that emerge from this analysis are the following:

• Ocean pollution is a complex mixture of plastic waste, toxic metals, manufactured chemicals, oil spills, urban and industrial wastes, pesticides, fertilizers, pharmaceutical chemicals, agricultural runoff, and sewage. More than 80% arises from land-based sources. Chemical and plastic pollutants have become ubiquitous in the earth’s oceans and contaminate seas and marine organisms from the high Arctic to the abyssal depths.
• Consumption of contaminated seafood is the main route of human exposure to chemical pollutants, HAB toxins, and plastic microparticles and microfibers in the oceans.
• Coal combustion is a major source of marine mercury pollution.
• Artisanal, small-scale gold mining is a second source of mercury pollution.
• Omega-3 fatty acids and other beneficial nutrients unique to seafood can partially mitigate the injuries caused by mercury and POPs. Several groups have disseminated guidance on safe, sustainable seafood consumption [ 293 , 294 , 295 ].
• Manufactured chemical pollutants – phthalates, bisphenol A, flame retardants, organophosphorus compounds, organotin compounds, and perfluorinated chemicals, many of them released into the oceans via plastic waste – are known to have multiple negative effects on human health that include cardiovascular disease, developmental disorders, endocrine disruption, depression of immune function, decreased fertility, and cancer.
• Plastic microbeads and microfibers formed by the breakdown of plastic waste and manufactured as plastic microbeads contain many of the above-listed manufactured chemicals. These chemical-laden microscopic particles appear capable of entering the marine food web and concentrating in species consumed by humans. The burden of disease associated with human exposures to these chemical-laden particles and fibers is not yet known.
• Coastal pollution by industrial discharges, agricultural waste, and human sewage leads to increasing frequency and severity of HABs – “red”, “green”, and “brown tides”. These blooms produce potent natural toxins such as ciguatera toxin and domoic acid that can concentrate to high levels in fish and shellfish. When ingested, these toxins can cause severe neurological disease and rapid death. HAB toxins can also become airborne and trigger asthma and other respiratory diseases.
• Coastal pollution in concert with sea surface warming stimulates overgrowth of dangerous pathogens, most notably Vibrio species. Coastal pollution also increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in marine pathogens. With worsening coastal pollution and rising sea surface temperatures, concern is great that diseases caused by marine pathogens could spread into new, previously unaffected areas, especially places in the Global South where infrastructure is poorly developed and public health systems are weak.
• Declines in seafood stocks caused by pollution, ocean warming, ocean acidification and overfishing threaten the health and well-being of the millions of people worldwide who depend on the seas for their food and their livelihood.
• Ocean pollution has multiple harmful effects on marine ecosystems. These effects can have negative impacts on human health. Plastic pollution kills fish, seabirds, whales, and dolphins. Pharmaceutical waste contributes to the destruction of coral reefs. Increasing absorption of carbon dioxide into the oceans causes ocean acidification, destroys coral reefs and dissolves calcium-containing plankton at the base of the marine food web. Petroleum-based pollutants and POPs impede the production of oxygen by beneficial marine microorganisms.
• Ocean pollution is deeply unjust. Ocean pollution and all its negative impacts fall disproportionately on people in small island nations, indigenous communities, coastal communities in the Global South, and fishing communities worldwide. These are populations that create only miniscule amounts of pollution. Most of the pollution to which they are exposed arises from sources far away. This is environmental injustice on a global scale.
• Ocean pollution is inadequately charted. Current knowledge of ocean pollution and its impacts on human health is still at a relatively early stage. Information on the geographic distribution and concentrations of pollutants in the oceans is fragmentary and confined mostly to the seas that border high-income countries. Likewise, information on the sizes of the human populations exposed to ocean pollution and their levels of exposure is scant. Data that could support the development of estimates of the contribution of ocean pollution to the global burden of disease (GBD) are only beginning to be developed.

Prevention is achieved through identifying and quantifying pollution sources and then deploying data-driven control strategies that are based on law, policy, and technology and backed by enforcement. Many countries have used these tools to successfully control air and water pollution, and these programs have proven effective as well as cost-effective. The same strategies are now being applied to prevention and control of ocean pollution. The case studies in successful control of marine pollution presented in this report demonstrate that broader control is feasible.

Prevention of ocean pollution will require recognition by policy-makers and the global public that pollution can indeed be prevented – that it is not the unavoidable price of economic progress. It will require understanding additionally that pollution control creates many benefits. Control of ocean pollution improves the health of the oceans, boosts economies, enhances tourism, restores fish stocks, prevents disease, extends longevity, and enhances well-being. These benefits will last for centuries.

Ultimate and sustainable prevention of chemical pollution of the oceans will be achieved through wide-scale adoption of non-polluting, renewable fuels, transition to a circular economy, and adoption of the principles of green chemistry ( Text Box 15 ).

Other remediation strategies have explored breaking down synthetic microplastic polymers in the oceans through the use of microorganisms [ 576 ]. A number of fungal and bacterial strains possess biodegradation capabilities and have been found capable of breaking down polystyrene, polyester polyurethane, and polyethylene. A specialized bacterium is able, for example, to degrade poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) [ 577 ]. Such microorganisms could potentially be applied to sewage discharges in highly localized environments, but scrupulous due diligence will be required prior to their wider deployment to avoid unintended consequences [ 578 ].

Bloom control – actions taken to suppress or destroy HABs – has been proposed, but is challenging and controversial. The science in this area is rudimentary [ 331 ]. Physical removal of algal cells from the water column using clay flocculation is currently the only strategy in routine use. In South Korea a clay called “yellow loess” has been used since 1996 to control HAB blooms that threaten aquaculture [ 579 ]. Likewise the Chinese have used clay to control algal blooms for over 20 years, with wide-scale applications covering up to 100 km 2 [ 580 ].

In sum, it is far more effective and also more cost-effective to prevent the entry of pollutants into the world’s oceans than to try to remove them from the seas after they have become dispersed.

• Most directly, control of ocean pollution will advance SDG 14, which calls on all countries to “prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution of all kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including marine debris and nutrient pollution” by 2025.
• Control of ocean pollution will advance SDG 3, which calls for improvement of human health and well-being;
• SDG1, which calls for an end to poverty;
• SDG2, which calls for an end to hunger;
• SDG 6, which calls for clean water and sanitation;
• SDG 8, which calls for decent work and sustainable economic growth; and
• SDG12, which calls for responsible consumption and production.

Recommendations – The Way Forward

Policy priorities.

• Cessation of coal combustion; and
• Control of inorganic mercury, especially in artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM).

Cessation of coal combustion will not only slow the pace of climate change and reduce particulate air pollution, but will also greatly reduce the atmospheric emissions of mercury, thus reducing deposition of mercury into the oceans. Actions ongoing under the Minamata Convention on Mercury are seeking to identify and control major sources of mercury pollution [ 34 ].

• End Plastic Pollution of the Oceans and Consider a Global Ban on Production of Single-Use Plastic. Marine plastic pollution has become one of three top priorities in global pollution identified by UN Environment [ 581 ]. Many countries have taken regulatory and social actions to control the use and disposal of plastics and reduce plastic waste. These include bans of single-use articles such as plastic bags and straws and bans on the use of cosmetic microbeads. In 2015, the United States banned the manufacture and distribution of cosmetic products containing plastic microbeads. The EU parliament has voted to ban several single-use plastic categories (cutlery, cotton buds, straws and stirrers) by 2021.
• Promote Effective Waste Management. Improvement in collection and management of solid waste is a key strategy for prevention and control of marine plastic pollution. UNESCO reports that seven of the EU Member States plus Norway and Switzerland now recover more than 80% of their used plastics. These countries have adopted integrated waste and resource management strategies to address each waste stream with the best options. Rwanda, Kenya, and some jurisdictions in the United Sates have banned single-use plastic bags. These are model programs and have potential to extend to other countries.
• Reduce Releases of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Animal Waste, Industrial Discharges and Human Sewage into Coastal Waters. Proper management of coastal pollution can reduce the frequency of HABs, prevent eutrophication, and alleviate the burden of disease associated with HABs and marine pathogens. Monitoring seafood, including farmed fish, for human pathogens is a proven strategy for tracking the efficacy these control efforts and reducing risk of disease. The UNESCO Blueprint for Ocean and Coastal Sustainability includes proposals to green the nutrient economy and achieve these goals [ 578 ].
• Create Marine Protected Areas. Designation of new Marine Protected Areas around the world will safeguard critical ecosystems, protect vulnerable fish stocks, and enhance human health and well-being [586–588]. Creation of Marine Protected Areas is an important manifestation of national and international commitment to protecting the health of the seas.
• Assist countries with the establishment and certification of monitoring programs for chemical pollutants, algal toxins, microplastics, and microbial pathogens in seafood products.
• Build and sustain strong transdisciplinary teams of scientists and strengthen analytical capabilities at the national level to provide countries with capability to respond to new and unexpected marine pollutants.
• Develop new monitoring capabilities using networks of in situ sensors that can detect toxic chemical pollutants, HAB cells and their toxins, microplastics and pathogenic bacteria.
• Support the global efforts of the IOC-UNESCO Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms (IPHAB) [ 389 ].
• Enhance communication, literacy and outreach efforts so that the risks of human illness and death from ocean pollutants is recognized and understood throughout all levels of society.

TEXT BOX 16: Regional and International Marine Pollution Control Programs.

• The London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (1975) and its Protocol (1996)
• The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
• The OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (1992)
• The Bucharest Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea against Pollution (1992)
• The Helsinki Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area (1992) and its Action Plan (2007)
• The Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (1995) and its Protocols (2005)
• The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (2001)
• The Strategic Action Plan for the Environmental Protection and Rehabilitation of the Black Sea (2009)
• The Minamata Convention on Mercury (2013)
• The United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030)

TEXT BOX 14: Principles of a Circular Economy

In a circular economy, economic, and social development is decoupled from the consumption of non-renewable resources. The generation of pollution and other forms of waste is minimized and replaced by recycling and reuse [ 2 ]. The focus is on stability and equity rather than endless growth.

The core principles of a circular economy are preservation of natural capital by reducing use of non-renewable resources and ecosystem management; optimization of resource yields by circulating products and materials so that they are shared and their lifecycles extended; and fostering system effectiveness by designing out pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and toxic materials that damage health [ 2 ].

Evidence of global movement towards a circular economy is seen in policy-related recommendations to control plastic pollution of the oceans that have been proposed by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP). These bold and visionary strategies call for sweeping change in current, highly wasteful practices of plastic production and consumption and for a global move toward biodegradable, non-persistent polymers [ 572 ]. They provide a model for interventions against other marine pollutants.

TEXT BOX 15: The Promise of Green Chemistry

Green chemistry is “the design of chemical products and processes to reduce and eliminate the use and generation of hazardous compounds” [ 573 ].

Adoption of the principles of green chemistry will require a paradigm shift away from narrow consideration of the properties and economic viability of new molecules and chemical products towards consideration and avoidance of their potential negative impacts on humans, ecosystems, and society. This reorientation will need to take place in every stage in the design and development of new chemicals and new chemical products from their earliest inception.

Green chemistry takes special note of the potential of new chemicals to cause low-dose toxicity through mechanisms such as endocrine disruption and developmental toxicity, and it avoids new products that will persist in the environment or in living organisms. The goal is to create safe, nontoxic materials and technologies and thus prevent future health and environmental catastrophes while building a sustainable chemical economy [ 574 ].

Wide-scale adoption of the principles and practices of green chemistry coupled with broad movement towards a circular economy could reduce pollution of the world’s oceans by manufactured chemicals and plastic waste and end the need to balance the dangers of toxic chemicals in seafood against the clear benefits of seafood for human health.

Research Priorities

The overall goal of the following research recommendations is to increase knowledge of the extent, severity, and human health impacts of ocean pollution. A second goal is to better quantify the contributions of ocean pollution to the global burden of disease (GBD). Findings from the GBD study have become powerful shapers of health and environmental policy and are used by international agencies and national governments to set health and environmental priorities and guide the allocation of resources. It is therefore critically important that accurate information on the disease burden attributable to ocean pollution be accurately and fully captured in the GBD analysis and made available to policy-makers. Specific recommendations are the following:

Monitoring for all of the chemical and biological hazards in the oceans should increase in scope and be coordinated globally. It is possible to monitor for some biological hazards, ocean pH, and temperature in sensors that are part of the Global Ocean Observing system (GOOS) within the UN system. Enhancing this capability and adding sensors for chemical hazards that incorporate new technologies and capabilities is an objective that may be achieved by partnering with programs such as the Partnership for Observation of the Global Ocean (POGO).

• Enhanced sampling of pollutant concentrations in fish, shellfish, and marine mammals. Because consumption of contaminated seafood is the major route by which chemical pollutants in the ocean as well as HAB toxins reach humans, better information is needed on concentrations of key pollutants in seafood. High-quality data are available from high-income countries, but much less information is available from the countries of the Global South.
• Improved tracking of biomarkers that are early indicators of damage caused to human health and marine ecosystems by chemical pollutants.
• Expanded coverage of ocean sampling for marine pathogens. Techniques have been developed for monitoring the global spread of pathogenic bacteria, such as Vibrio species, but these techniques have been deployed to date in only a few areas of the world. Expanded geographic coverage of marine bacterial sampling – especially into areas important for commercial fishing, shellfish harvesting and aquaculture – coupled with real-time information on sea surface temperature will be important for tracking, and predicting the spread of life-threatening bacteria and for mobilizing early responses to new outbreaks of diseases.
• Improved studies of human exposure to ocean pollutants. A major impediment to developing estimates of the GBD attributable to ocean pollutants is lack of detailed, population-level studies of human exposures to marine pollutants. Conducting such studies in a number of countries will elucidate the importance of such factors as geographic variation in background exposure to pollutants, in seafood consumption, in pollutant concentrations in seafood, and in exposures to toxic chemicals via routes other than consumption of contaminated seafood.
• Improved assessments of combined effects of exposures to multiple ocean pollutants. Humans are seldom exposed to pollutants one at a time. Instead, people are typically exposed to complex mixtures of pollutants. The limited available evidence indicates that these combined exposures can produce additive, synergistic, and antagonistic effects.
• Implementation research. Transdisciplinary international cooperative implementation research is needed to identify best practices and feasible, cost-effective solutions to prevention and control of ocean pollution. This research will build upon and codify the findings that have emerged from the case studies in success against ocean pollution presented in this report. Continuing research and development into biodegradable polymers will be an important component of this research [ 572 ].
• Build and sustain strong teams of scientists at the national level to provide each country with capacity to respond to new and unexpected marine pollutants and assess their health impacts.
• Establish lines of communication and collaboration between marine scientists and public health agencies and institutions [ 531 ].
• Support the global efforts of the IOC-UNESCO Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms (IPHAB), which coordinates actions at a policy level and that relies on the work of institutions in many countries, and contributes to achieve the SDGs.
• Develop new monitoring capabilities using networks of in situ sensors that can detect toxic chemical pollutants, HAB cells and their toxins, microplastics, and pathogenic bacteria.
• Deploy improved analytical capabilities to document health and economic benefits of programs to control and prevent ocean pollution.
• Assist countries with the establishment and certification of monitoring programs for chemical pollutants, algal toxins, microplastics, and pathogenic bacteria in seafood products.
• Strengthen analytical capabilities at the national level.
• Support research and application of technologies for control of marine pollutants.

Additional Files

The additional files for this article can be found as follows:

Supplementary Appendix.

This Supplementary Appendix contains additional references and documentation supporting the information presented in the report, Human Health and Ocean Pollution.

Declaration of Monaco.

This Declaration summarizes the key findings and conclusions of the Monaco Commission on Human Health and Ocean Pollution. It is based on the recognition that all life on Earth depends on the health of the seas. It presents a Call to Action – an urgent message addressed to leaders in all countries and to all citizens of Earth urging us to safeguard human health and preserve our Common Home by acting now to end pollution of the ocean.

Special Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the generous assistance of Drs. Jennifer De France and Bruce Allen Gordon of the World Health Organization in reviewing this manuscript.

The authors acknowledge the outstanding illustrations by Dr. Will Stahl-Timmins, Data Graphics Designer.

The following authors contributed to the design and planning of this study:

Philip J. Landrigan, Patrick Rampal, Hervé Raps, Marie-Yasmine Dechraoui Bottein, Françoise Gaill, Laura Giuliano, Amro Hamdoun, Christopher Reddy, Joacim Rocklöv, Luigi Vezzulli, Pál Weihe, Ariana Zeka.

Funding Statement

The Centre Scientifique de Monaco, the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and the Government of the Principality of Monaco John J. Stegeman is supported by U.S. Oceans and Human Health Program (NIH grant P01ES028938 and National Science Foundation grant OCE-1840381). Lora E. Fleming is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 774567 (H2020 SOPHIE Project) and No 666773 (H2020 BlueHealth Project). Plastic toxicity research for Dimitri Deheyn is supported by the BEST Initiative ( https://deheynlab.ucsd.edu/best-2/ ). Barbara Demeneix is supported by grants from the program H2020. Charles J. Dorman is supported by Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award 13/IA/1875. William H. Gaze is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Knowledge Exchange Fellowship NE/S006257/1 on the environmental dimension of antimicrobial resistance. Philippe Grandjean is supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) of the NIH (grant No. ES027706), a Superfund center grant for the Sources, Transport, Exposure and Effects of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (STEEP) Center. Mark E. Hahn is supported by U.S. Oceans and Human Health Program (NIH grant P01ES028938 and National Science Foundation grant OCE-1840381). Amro Hamdoun is supported by NIH and NSF Program on Oceans and Human Health Grants NIH ES030318 and NSF 1840844. Philipp Hess is supported by the IAEA Core Research Project K41014, by the European H2020 program for funding the EMERTOX project (grant number 778069), by the Atlantic Interreg (grant number Alertox-Net EAPA-317-2016) and by EFSA for the project EUROCIGUA (framework partnership agreement GP/EFSA/AFSCO/2015/03). Rachel T. Noble was supported by the US National Science Foundation Accelerating Innovations in Research #1602023 and the NOAA NERRS Science Collaborative. Maria Luiza Pedrotti is supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). Luigi Vezzulli is supported by the following grants: European FP7 Program Grant AQUAVALENS 311846 and European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program Grant VIVALDI 678589. Pál Weihe is supported by the Danish EPA programme: Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic and by the Faroese Research Council.

Funding Information

Research supported by:

• The Centre Scientifique de Monaco, the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and the Government of the Principality of Monaco
• John J. Stegeman is supported by U.S. Oceans and Human Health Program (NIH grant P01ES028938 and National Science Foundation grant OCE-1840381).
• Lora E. Fleming is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 774567 (H2020 SOPHIE Project) and No 666773 (H2020 BlueHealth Project).
• Plastic toxicity research for Dimitri Deheyn is supported by the BEST Initiative ( https://deheynlab.ucsd.edu/best-2/ ).
• Barbara Demeneix is supported by grants from the program H2020.
• Charles J. Dorman is supported by Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award 13/IA/1875.
• William H. Gaze is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Knowledge Exchange Fellowship NE/S006257/1 on the environmental dimension of antimicrobial resistance.
• Philippe Grandjean is supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) of the NIH (grant No. ES027706), a Superfund center grant for the Sources, Transport, Exposure and Effects of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (STEEP) Center.
• Mark E. Hahn is supported by U.S. Oceans and Human Health Program (NIH grant P01ES028938 and National Science Foundation grant OCE-1840381).
• Amro Hamdoun is supported by NIH and NSF Program on Oceans and Human Health Grants NIH ES030318 and NSF 1840844.
• Philipp Hess is supported by the IAEA Core Research Project K41014, by the European H2020 program for funding the EMERTOX project (grant number 778069), by the Atlantic Interreg (grant number Alertox-Net EAPA-317-2016) and by EFSA for the project EUROCIGUA (framework partnership agreement GP/EFSA/AFSCO/2015/03).
• Rachel T. Noble was supported by the US National Science Foundation Accelerating Innovations in Research #1602023 and the NOAA NERRS Science Collaborative.
• Maria Luiza Pedrotti is supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).
• Luigi Vezzulli is supported by the following grants: European FP7 Program Grant AQUAVALENS 311846 and European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program Grant VIVALDI 678589.
• Pál Weihe is supported by the Danish EPA programme: Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic and by the Faroese Research Council.

Competing Interests

All authors declare no Conflict of Interest in regard to the work presented in this paper with the following exceptions.

• – Author William H. Gaze declares no conflict of interest although he has received co-funding for PhD studentships from AstraZeneca.
• – Author Philippe Grandjean has provided paid expert assistance in legal cases involving populations exposed to PFAS.
• – Author Barbara Demeneix is an inventor of “Transgenic clawed frog embryos and used as detectors of endocrine disruption in the environment”, a French patent application filed in 2002 (n°FR0206669), that was extended through a PCT application filled in 2003. Applicants: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN). Inventors: B. Demeneix and N. Turque. The patent has been extended worldwide: France (2007), Japan (2011), United States (2013), Canada (2013) and Europe (2015). There has been no financial compensation for the patent.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Developing Strong Thesis Statements

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

These OWL resources will help you develop and refine the arguments in your writing.

The thesis statement or main claim must be debatable

An argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on. If your thesis is something that is generally agreed upon or accepted as fact then there is no reason to try to persuade people.

Example of a non-debatable thesis statement:

This thesis statement is not debatable. First, the word pollution implies that something is bad or negative in some way. Furthermore, all studies agree that pollution is a problem; they simply disagree on the impact it will have or the scope of the problem. No one could reasonably argue that pollution is unambiguously good.

Example of a debatable thesis statement:

This is an example of a debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree with it. Some people might think that this is how we should spend the nation's money. Others might feel that we should be spending more money on education. Still others could argue that corporations, not the government, should be paying to limit pollution.

Another example of a debatable thesis statement:

In this example there is also room for disagreement between rational individuals. Some citizens might think focusing on recycling programs rather than private automobiles is the most effective strategy.

The thesis needs to be narrow

Although the scope of your paper might seem overwhelming at the start, generally the narrower the thesis the more effective your argument will be. Your thesis or claim must be supported by evidence. The broader your claim is, the more evidence you will need to convince readers that your position is right.

Example of a thesis that is too broad:

There are several reasons this statement is too broad to argue. First, what is included in the category "drugs"? Is the author talking about illegal drug use, recreational drug use (which might include alcohol and cigarettes), or all uses of medication in general? Second, in what ways are drugs detrimental? Is drug use causing deaths (and is the author equating deaths from overdoses and deaths from drug related violence)? Is drug use changing the moral climate or causing the economy to decline? Finally, what does the author mean by "society"? Is the author referring only to America or to the global population? Does the author make any distinction between the effects on children and adults? There are just too many questions that the claim leaves open. The author could not cover all of the topics listed above, yet the generality of the claim leaves all of these possibilities open to debate.

Example of a narrow or focused thesis:

In this example the topic of drugs has been narrowed down to illegal drugs and the detriment has been narrowed down to gang violence. This is a much more manageable topic.

We could narrow each debatable thesis from the previous examples in the following way:

Narrowed debatable thesis 1:

This thesis narrows the scope of the argument by specifying not just the amount of money used but also how the money could actually help to control pollution.

Narrowed debatable thesis 2:

This thesis narrows the scope of the argument by specifying not just what the focus of a national anti-pollution campaign should be but also why this is the appropriate focus.

Qualifiers such as " typically ," " generally ," " usually ," or " on average " also help to limit the scope of your claim by allowing for the almost inevitable exception to the rule.

Types of claims

Claims typically fall into one of four categories. Thinking about how you want to approach your topic, or, in other words, what type of claim you want to make, is one way to focus your thesis on one particular aspect of your broader topic.

Claims of fact or definition: These claims argue about what the definition of something is or whether something is a settled fact. Example:

Claims of cause and effect: These claims argue that one person, thing, or event caused another thing or event to occur. Example:

Claims about value: These are claims made of what something is worth, whether we value it or not, how we would rate or categorize something. Example:

Claims about solutions or policies: These are claims that argue for or against a certain solution or policy approach to a problem. Example:

Which type of claim is right for your argument? Which type of thesis or claim you use for your argument will depend on your position and knowledge of the topic, your audience, and the context of your paper. You might want to think about where you imagine your audience to be on this topic and pinpoint where you think the biggest difference in viewpoints might be. Even if you start with one type of claim you probably will be using several within the paper. Regardless of the type of claim you choose to utilize it is key to identify the controversy or debate you are addressing and to define your position early on in the paper.

• Environment
• Information Science
• Social Issues
• Argumentative
• Cause and Effect
• Classification
• Compare and Contrast
• Descriptive
• Exemplification
• Informative
• Controversial
• Exploratory
• What Is an Essay
• Length of an Essay
• Generate Ideas
• Types of Essays
• Structuring an Essay
• Outline For Essay
• Essay Introduction
• Thesis Statement
• Body of an Essay
• Writing a Conclusion
• Essay Writing Tips
• Drafting an Essay
• Revision Process
• Fix a Broken Essay
• Format of an Essay
• Essay Examples
• Essay Checklist
• Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Research Paper
• Write My Research Paper
• Write My Essay
• Custom Essay Writing Service
• Admission Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Essay
• Academic Ghostwriting
• Write My Book Report
• Case Study Writing Service
• Dissertation Writing Service
• Coursework Writing Service
• Lab Report Writing Service
• Do My Assignment
• Buy College Papers
• Capstone Project Writing Service
• Buy Research Paper
• Custom Essays for Sale

Can’t find a perfect paper?

• Free Essay Samples
• Ocean Pollution

Essays on Ocean Pollution

Once you learn the figures of ocean pollution you can't help but feel devastated, but this means that you found a highly relevant essay topic – ocean pollution essay writing is increasingly popular nowadays. We all know that oceans are polluted with plastic, but do you know to what extent? The answer is beyond insane – in the year 2020 there are over 5 trillion pieces of plastic in the oceans. It's hard to even imagine such a vast amount, so realizing just how polluted our oceans are is heartbreaking. Ocean pollution essays explore this issue in great detail and offer ways to reduce pollution. There are a lot of great essays on ocean pollution out there, so we compiled some ocean pollution essay samples for you to shuffle through. Our samples will make writing essays faster and easier!

Plastics have been an integral part of human life. It is one of the most prevalent materials in the world. Plastics are commonly used by industries for packaging purposes (Fanshawe Parsons 5). The Impact on Oceans Studies show that the marine environment carried the biggest mass of the plastic debris...

Words: 1962

Found a perfect essay sample but want a unique one?

Request writing help from expert writer in you feed!

In the current years, the oceans have experienced very high stages of pollution. Ocean pollution is an issue that is now not only difficult to describe however also extremely difficult to solve. Research conducted by Upstream, an organisation that addresses waste management practices, indicated intensive plastic production and disposal poses huge...

Related topic to Ocean Pollution

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

There Might Be Less Plastic in the Sea Than We Thought. But Read On.

A new study has some good news, but there’s a problem: Ocean pollution appears to be growing fast.

By Delger Erdenesanaa

There’s less plastic pollution flowing into the ocean from land than scientists previously thought, according to a study published Monday in the journal Nature Geoscience.

The researchers estimated that about 500,000 metric tons of plastic end up in the ocean each year, with about half from land. The other half comes from the fishing industry in the form of nets, ropes, buoys and other equipment.

An earlier, widely publicized study in 2015 estimated that about eight million metric tons of plastic were entering the ocean each year from rivers alone. The new research might seem like good news, but the full picture is complicated: The amount of plastic in the ocean is still increasing by about 4 percent every year, according to the study.

Even a small increase each year adds up to a huge accumulation over time. Within 20 years, the amount of plastic on the sea surface could double, the authors found.

“We’re accumulating more and more plastics in the environment,” said Mikael Kaandorp, the study’s lead author and a postdoctoral researcher at Forschungszentrum Jülich, a research institute based in Jülich, Germany.

Why It Matters : Plastic pollution harms marine wildlife, and humans.

Wildlife can become tangled in discarded nets, ropes and packaging. Many animals also become sick or injured from ingesting plastic. Some even starve to death because their digestive systems become blocked.

Very small pieces, called microplastics, can easily make their way up the food web to humans from fish and other seafood. Sometimes, these microplastics have absorbed or become coated in toxic chemicals.

Onshore, plastic that doesn’t enter the ocean still pollutes rivers, lakes, beaches and land.

Background : Early estimates of ocean pollution left open questions.

The 2015 study was one of the first comprehensive research efforts to tally up how much plastic ends up in the ocean. But there was a large discrepancy between its estimate of eight million metric tons and the amount of plastic observed in the ocean. Newer studies have tried to address this gap.

The paper published on Monday combined data from many earlier studies that sampled smaller plastics in the ocean using net trawls or observed larger plastics from ships and from shore. The researchers fed this data into a computer model of how objects move around the ocean in order to estimate both how much plastic is entering the ocean each year and how much total plastic pollution there is floating on the sea surface.

Most of the total plastic pollution in the ocean is floating plastic, and that’s what’s most problematic for marine life because it can readily be eaten.

The new study estimated that in 2020, approximately 3.2 million metric tons of plastic debris were floating on the sea surface and suggested this offshore pollution remains on the surface for longer than previously thought.

What’s Next : Controlling pollution at the source is key, scientists say.

Plastic pollution is difficult to clean up once it’s in the ocean. Trying to do so would be both a logistical and an ecological challenge: There’s no way to collect the plastic without also sweeping up and harming wildlife in the process. And humans are adding more plastic all the time.

Dr. Kaandorp said his study’s estimates of this continued accumulation highlighted the importance of stopping the flow. “It really shows we need to take measures,” he said. “It’s going to take a really long time before these plastics actually are removed from our seas.”

This year, countries agreed to start writing a global treaty to curb plastic pollution .

“The policy’s not keeping up with the pace of the problem,” said Marcus Eriksen, a co-founder of 5 Gyres, a nonprofit group that focuses on reducing plastic pollution. Dr. Eriksen published a separate study in March that estimated similar amounts of floating plastic in the ocean and found that this type of pollution had rapidly increased since 2005.

“The U.N. treaty could change that,” he said, if it regulates what kinds of plastic products can be made, puts more of the onus of recycling on manufacturers and is legally binding.

Learn More About Climate Change

Have questions about climate change? Our F.A.Q. will tackle your climate questions, big and small .

“Buying Time,” a new series from The New York Times, looks at the risky ways  humans are starting to manipulate nature  to fight climate change.

Big brands like Procter & Gamble and Nestlé say a new generation of recycling plants will help them meet environmental goals, but the technology is struggling to deliver .

The Italian energy giant Eni sees future profits from collecting carbon dioxide and pumping it  into natural gas fields that have been exhausted.

New satellite-based research reveals how land along the East Coast is slumping into the ocean, compounding the danger from global sea level rise . A major culprit: the overpumping of groundwater.

Did you know the ♻ symbol doesn’t mean something is actually recyclable ? Read on about how we got here, and what can be done.

Mobile Menu Overlay

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500

FACT SHEET: Biden- ⁠ Harris Administration Takes Critical Action to Protect Communities from PFAS Pollution in Drinking   Water

EPA Announces First-Ever National Standard to Address PFAS in Drinking Water, Delivers an Additional $1 Billion through President Biden’s Investing in America Agenda to Combat PFAS Pollution

President Biden believes every community has the right to clean, safe drinking water, free of pollutants that harm people’s health and wellbeing. That is why the President launched a comprehensive action plan and provided billions in funding to protect communities from toxic “forever chemicals” that are linked to a range of severe health problems, including cancers, liver and heart damage, and developmental impacts in children. Found in drinking water, soil, air, and our food supply, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) persist in the environment for long periods of time, posing a serious health threat across rural, suburban, and urban areas.

Today the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the first-ever national legally enforceable drinking water standard for PFAS , which will protect 100 million people from PFAS exposure , prevent tens of thousands of serious illnesses, and save lives. This action complements the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to combatting PFAS pollution and delivering clean water.

President Biden has secured historic levels of funding to meet this new standard. Today, the Biden-Harris Administration is also announcing an additional $1 billion through President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to help every state and territory fund PFAS detection and treatment systems to meet the new standard . This funding is part of the $9 billion in dedicated funding through the President’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to address PFAS and other emerging contaminants in drinking water – the largest-ever investment in tackling PFAS pollution. An additional $12 billion in funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law supports general drinking water investments, including PFAS treatment. The investments are part of the  Justice40 Initiative , which aims to ensure that 40 percent of the overall benefits of certain federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities.

These actions will help tackle PFAS pollution that has devastated communities like Oakdale, outside of St. Paul, Minnesota, where decades of PFAS-containing waste dumped by a chemical plant has contaminated the community’s drinking water. In this area, cancer was found to be a far more likely cause of death in children than in neighboring areas. The funding announced today will build on funding from the President’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that is already helping communities address PFAS contamination, including a $33 million award for Tucson, Arizona to treat its PFAS-contaminated drinking water wells.

This funding also builds on President Biden’s action plan  to address PFAS pollution , safeguard public health, and advance environmental justice – all while advancing the Biden Cancer Moonshot goal of cutting the cancer death rate by at least half by 2047 and preventing cancer before it starts by protecting communities from known risks associated with PFAS exposure.

As the first-ever Safe Drinking Water Act standard for PFAS – and the first for any new contaminants since 1996 – this rule sets health safeguards and will require public water systems to monitor and reduce the levels of PFAS in our nation’s drinking water, and notify the public of any exceedances of those levels. The rule sets drinking water limits for five individual PFAS, including the most frequently found PFOA and PFOS. Because PFAS can often be found together in mixtures, EPA is also setting a limit for any combination of four PFAS, including GenX Chemicals. This standard will reduce PFAS exposure in our drinking water to the lowest levels that are feasible for effective nationwide implementation.

Today’s announcements advance President Biden’s broader commitment to deliver clean water for every American. The President’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law invests over $50 billion to upgrade water infrastructure – the largest investment in clean water in American history. This includes a historic $15 billion to replace toxic lead pipes and protect children from brain damage, as part of President Biden’s goal of replacing every lead pipe in the country within a decade.

Recent Federal Actions to Protect Communities from PFAS

Under President Biden’s leadership, nearly two dozen federal agencies and offices have made systematic and substantive progress to safeguard public health and protect the environment from PFAS in drinking water and beyond. This work is coordinated by the White House Council on Environmental Quality, which leads the Interagency Policy Committee on PFAS. Other new actions the Biden-Harris Administration has advanced to combat PFAS pollution over the past year include:

Protecting Firefighters from PFAS : The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to protecting firefighters from the harmful effects of PFAS contained in fire suppressing agents and firefighter gear. The Department of Defense is offering PFAS blood tests to military firefighters. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s U.S. Fire Administration is working to reduce PFAS exposure and promoting access to early cancer screenings and participation in the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer led by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health as part of President Biden’s mission to end cancer as we know it.

Reducing PFAS in Fire Suppressants: The Department of Defense (DoD) qualified three fluorine-free foams to replace fluorinated Aqueous Film Forming Foam for shore-based firefighting activities at military installations, which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has authorized for civilian airports. The FAA is assisting airports to transition to these new foams , and funding foam testing systems for airports that prevent environmental discharge. These changes will reduce the release of PFAS in the environment and protect the health of firefighters and local communities.

Supporting Healthcare Providers: The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released the PFAS: Information for Clinicians resource guide. This information gives clinicians up-to-date resources and information they need to help patients with questions and concerns about PFAS exposure and health effects.

Phasing Out PFAS in Food Packaging: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the completion of the voluntary market phase-out of PFAS used on paper and paperboard food packaging, eliminating the primary source of dietary exposure to PFAS . FDA can now also test for 30 PFAS in a variety of foods to further protect people from dietary PFAS exposure.

Testing for and Cleaning Up PFAS Pollution: EPA continues to take key actions to address PFAS . For example, EPA is gathering data on 29 PFAS in the nation’s drinking water systems has collaborated with DoD to develop a method to test for 40 PFAS in various media including biosolids, groundwater, and fish tissue. EPA also updated its interim PFAS disposal and destruction guidance and has released a new method to test for 30 volatile fluorine-containing compounds in air including potential products of incomplete combustion of PFAS. DoD recently identified 40 installations where interim cleanup actions to prevent further PFAS migration are underway or will start in FY2024. These actions will address PFAS in groundwater to protect public health and the environment.  

Reducing PFAS in Federal Procurement: EPA and the U.S. General Services Administration announced this week that custodial contracts for federal buildings will now only use cleaning products certified to ecolabels such as EPA’s Safer Choice and certain Green Seal standards, thereby avoiding products that contain intentionally added PFAS. This shift will protect the environment, federal custodial workers, other federal employees, and those visiting government buildings.

Stay Connected

We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better.

Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden.

• Follow UNSW on LinkedIn
• Follow UNSW on Instagram
• Follow UNSW on Facebook
• Follow UNSW on WeChat
• Follow UNSW on TikTok

PFAS 'forever chemicals' above drinking water guidelines in global source water

Photo: Getty Images.

We’re likely underestimating the future impact of PFAS in the environment, a new UNSW Sydney-led study shows.

Per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances – commonly known as PFAS – are a group of over 14,000 human-made chemicals that have been popular since the 1950s for their diverse uses in resisting heat, water, grease and stains.  

They’ve been commonly found in household products like non-stick frying pans, clothing, cosmetics, insecticides, and food packaging, as well as specialty industry products, like firefighting foam. 

But despite their broad skillset, the chemicals have a dark side: they’re known as ‘forever chemicals’ because once they’re in the environment – or our bodies – they don’t degrade further.  

PFAS have been linked to environmental and health issues, including some cancers, but a lot remains unknown about the true scale and potential impacts of the problem – including how much is in our water supply. 

A new UNSW-led international study, published today in Nature Geoscience , assessed the levels of PFAS contamination in surface and ground water around the globe.  

It found that much of our global source water exceeds PFAS safe drinking limits. 

“Many of our source waters are above PFAS regulatory limits,” says senior author of the study, UNSW Engineering Professor Denis O’Carroll. 

“We already knew that PFAS is pervasive in the environment, but I was surprised to find out the large fraction of source waters that are above drinking water advisory recommendations,” he says.

“We're talking above 5 per cent, and it goes over 50 per cent in some cases.” 

Media enquiries

For enquiries about this story and to arrange interviews, please contact Sherry Landow .

Phone: + 61 2 9065 4039 Email: [email protected]

The research team pulled together PFAS measurements from sources around the world, including government reports, databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Altogether, they collated more than 45,000 data points, which span roughly 20 years.  

It’s the first study to quantify the environmental burden of PFAS on a global scale.

The study also found high concentrations of PFAS in Australia, with many locations above recommended drinking water levels. This tended to be in areas where firefighting foams had been used in the past, such as military institutions and fire training facilities.  

Prof. O’Carroll stresses that these PFAS traces are found in source water, such as dams, and not drinking water itself – drinking water goes through treatment plants, some of which are designed to reduce the amount of chemicals such as PFAS in our water before it comes out of the tap.  

But some water providers – for example, Sydney Water – don’t routinely measure the broad range of PFAS potentially in our drinking water, says Prof. O’Carroll.

“Drinking water is largely safe, and I don't hesitate drinking it,” he says. “I also don’t suggest that bottled water is better, because it doesn’t mean that they’ve done anything differently than what comes out of the tap.

“But I certainly think that monitoring PFAS levels and making the data easily available is worthwhile.”

A contentious debate: how much PFAS is too much?

Most people in Australia – and in many places around the world – are likely to have low levels of PFAS in their bodies. 

But the potential health risks of PFAS chemicals are poorly understood and haven’t been agreed on universally. 

According to an Australian Government expert health panel, there is limited to no evidence that PFAS poses clinically significant harm to human health – although further afield, peak bodies in the US and Europe suggest that PFAS is linked to adverse health outcomes, such as lower birth weight in babies, higher levels of cholesterol, reduced kidney function, thyroid disease, altered sex hormone levels, reduced vaccine response, and liver, kidney, and testicular cancers.

In 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared PFOA, a type of PFAS, a category one human carcinogen. 

While PFAS has been linked to many of these health outcomes, they haven’t necessarily been shown to cause them – but given the potential risks and ‘forever’ nature of these chemicals, many regulatory bodies have tightened PFAS use and introduced safe drinking water limits as a precaution.

“Two forms of PFAS initially raised of concerns about 20 years ago: PFOS and PFOA,” says Prof. O’Carroll. 

“These chemicals are regulated to different extents around the world. In the US, the proposed drinking water limits for PFOS and PFOA are four nanograms per litre.”

A third PFAS is also regulated in Australia, called PFHxS. Here, the sum of PFOS and PFHxS is limited to 70 nanograms per litre – well above the four nanograms per litre combined PFOS and PFOA limit in the US. 

But our acceptable levels for PFOA in drinking water is even higher. 

“PFOA, on the other hand, is regulated in Australia at 560 nanograms per litre, which is two orders of magnitude higher than in the US,” says Prof. O’Carroll. 

We’re likely underestimating the environmental burden posed by PFAS. Prof. Denis O'Carroll

While Australia’s limits seem relaxed compared to the US, both countries’ recommended drinking water guidelines pale when compared to Canada’s: here, rather than limiting only two or three forms of PFAS in drinking water, Canada tallies up the sum of all 14,000 PFAS and limits the overall number to 30 nanograms per litre.

The study found that 69 per cent of global groundwater samples with no known contamination source exceeded Health Canada’s safe drinking water criteria, while 32 per cent of the same samples exceeded the US’s proposed drinking water hazard index. 

“There’s debate about what level PFAS should be regulated to,” says Prof. O’Carroll. “Australia has much higher limits than the US, but the question is why.

“Both health bodies would have different reasoning for that, and there’s not a really strong consensus here.” 

An underestimated risk

The study suggests that actual PFAS pollution in global water resources could be higher than suspected. 

This is, in part, due to us only monitoring and regulating a limited number of the 14,000 PFAS in existence, and also because the levels of PFAS in consumer products are higher than expected.

“There’s a real unknown amount of PFAS that we’re not measuring in the environment,” says Prof. O’Carroll. “Commercial products like garments and food packaging have a lot more PFAS in them than we realise.  

“This means we’re likely underestimating the environmental burden posed by PFAS.”

Prof. O’Carroll and his team are now trying to develop their research by quantifying these levels of PFAS from commercial products in the environment.  

They’re also working to develop technologies that can degrade PFAS in drinking water systems, and looking at developing predictive models that determine where PFAS will go in the environment.

“Part of this is figuring out how PFAS will associate with different parts of the environment and our bodies – proteins, for example,” says Prof. O’Carroll. 

These studies will be in progress over the next two years and aim to be completed by 2026.

In the meantime, Prof. O’Carroll says manufacturers and consumers alike need to be careful and do our due diligence when using products containing PFAS. 

“We manufacture and distribute a lot of chemicals without having a full assessment on their potential health impacts,” he says.

“We should have judicious use of some of these chemicals. Just because they’re available, doesn't mean that we should use them.”

Share this story

• Share this page on Email
• Share this page on Facebook
• Share this page on Twitter
• Share this page on LinkedIn
• Share this page on WhatsApp
• Share this page on FacebookMessenger
• Share this page on WeChat
• Share this page on Copy

Related stories

Trying to solve the 'forever problem' of PFAS pollution

Tracing water contaminants back to the source

Why urban greening isn’t a panacea for extreme weather under climate change

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .

• Headquarters | Water (OW)

Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes First-Ever National Drinking Water Standard to Protect 100M People from PFAS Pollution

As part of the Administration’s commitment to combating PFAS pollution, EPA announces $1B investment through President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to address PFAS in drinking water

April 10, 2024

WASHINGTON - Today, April 10, the Biden-Harris Administration issued the first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking water standard to protect communities from exposure to harmful per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as ‘forever chemicals.’ Exposure to PFAS has been linked to deadly cancers, impacts to the liver and heart, and immune and developmental damage to infants and children. This final rule represents the most significant step to protect public health under EPA’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap . The final rule will reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people, prevent thousands of deaths, and reduce tens of thousands of serious illnesses. Today’s announcement complements President Biden’s government-wide action plan to combat PFAS pollution.                                                                         

Through President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, EPA is also making unprecedented funding available to help ensure that all people have clean and safe water. In addition to today’s final rule, EPA is announcing nearly $1 billion in newly available funding through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to help states and territories implement PFAS testing and treatment at public water systems and to help owners of private wells address PFAS contamination. This is part of a $9 billion investment through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to help communities with drinking water impacted by PFAS and other emerging contaminants – the largest-ever investment in tackling PFAS pollution. An additional $12 billion is available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for general drinking water improvements, including addressing emerging contaminants like PFAS.

EPA Administrator Michael Regan will join White House Council on Environmental Quality Chair Brenda Mallory to announce the final standard today at an event in Fayetteville, North Carolina. In 2017, area residents learned that the Cape Fear River, the drinking water source for 1 million people in the region, had been heavily contaminated with PFAS pollution from a nearby manufacturing facility. Today’s announcements will help protect communities like Fayetteville from further devastating impacts of PFAS.

“Drinking water contaminated with PFAS has plagued communities across this country for too long,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan . “That is why President Biden has made tackling PFAS a top priority, investing historic resources to address these harmful chemicals and protect communities nationwide. Our PFAS Strategic Roadmap marshals the full breadth of EPA’s authority and resources to protect people from these harmful forever chemicals. Today, I am proud to finalize this critical piece of our Roadmap, and in doing so, save thousands of lives and help ensure our children grow up healthier.”  

“President Biden believes that everyone deserves access to clean, safe drinking water, and he is delivering on that promise,” said Brenda Mallory, Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality . “The first national drinking water standards for PFAS marks a significant step towards delivering on the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to advancing environmental justice, protecting communities, and securing clean water for people across the country.”

“Under President Biden’s leadership, we are taking a whole-of-government approach to tackle PFAS pollution and ensure that all Americans have access to clean, safe drinking water. Today’s announcement by EPA complements these efforts and will help keep our communities safe from these toxic ‘forever chemicals,’” said Deputy Assistant to the President for the Cancer Moonshot, Dr. Danielle Carnival . “Coupled with the additional $1 billion investment from President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to help communities address PFAS pollution, the reductions in exposure to toxic substances delivered by EPA’s standards will further the Biden Cancer Moonshot goal of reducing the cancer death rate by at least half by 2047 and preventing more than four million cancer deaths — and stopping cancer before it starts by protecting communities from known risks associated with exposure to PFAS and other contaminants, including kidney and testicular cancers, and more.”

EPA is taking a signature step to protect public health by establishing legally enforceable levels for several PFAS known to occur individually and as mixtures in drinking water. This rule sets limits for five individual PFAS: PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, and HFPO-DA (also known as “GenX Chemicals”). The rule also sets a limit for mixtures of any two or more of four PFAS: PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and “GenX chemicals.” By reducing exposure to PFAS, this final rule will prevent thousands of premature deaths, tens of thousands of serious illnesses, including certain cancers and liver and heart impacts in adults, and immune and developmental impacts to infants and children.

This final rule advances President Biden’s commitment to ending cancer as we know it as part of the Biden Cancer Moonshot, to ensuring that all Americans have access to clean, safe, drinking water, and to furthering the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to environmental justice by protecting communities that are most exposed to toxic chemicals.

EPA estimates that between about 6% and 10% of the 66,000 public drinking water systems subject to this rule may have to take action to reduce PFAS to meet these new standards. All public water systems have three years to complete their initial monitoring for these chemicals. They must inform the public of the level of PFAS measured in their drinking water. Where PFAS is found at levels that exceed these standards, systems must implement solutions to reduce PFAS in their drinking water within five years.

The new limits in this rule are achievable using a range of available technologies and approaches including granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange systems. For example, the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, serving Wilmington, NC – one of the communities most heavily impacted by PFAS contamination – has effectively deployed a granular activated carbon system to remove PFAS regulated by this rule. Drinking water systems will have flexibility to determine the best solution for their community.

EPA will be working closely with state co-regulators in supporting water systems and local officials to implement this rule. In the coming weeks, EPA will host a series of webinars to provide information to the public, communities, and water utilities about the final PFAS drinking water regulation. To learn more about the webinars, please visit EPA’s PFAS drinking water regulation webpage . EPA has also published a toolkit of communications resources to help drinking water systems and community leaders educate the public about PFAS, where they come from, their health risks, how to reduce exposure, and about this rule.

“We are thankful that Administrator Regan and the Biden Administration are taking this action to protect drinking water in North Carolina and across the country,” said North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper . “We asked for this because we know science-based standards for PFAS and other compounds are desperately needed.”

“For decades, the American people have been exposed to the family of incredibly toxic ‘forever chemicals’ known as PFAS with no protection from their government. Those chemicals now contaminate virtually all Americans from birth. That’s because for generations, PFAS chemicals slid off of every federal environmental law like a fried egg off a Teflon pan — until Joe Biden came along,” said Environmental Working Group President and Co-Founder Ken Cook . “We commend EPA Administrator Michael Regan for his tireless leadership to make this decision a reality, and CEQ Chair Brenda Mallory for making sure PFAS is tackled with the ‘whole of government’ approach President Biden promised. There is much work yet to be done to end PFAS pollution. The fact that the EPA has adopted the very strong policy announced today should give everyone confidence that the Biden administration will stay the course and keep the president’s promises, until the American people are protected, at long last, from the scourge of PFAS pollution.”

“We learned about GenX and other PFAS in our tap water six years ago. I raised my children on this water and watched loved ones suffer from rare or recurrent cancers. No one should ever worry if their tap water will make them sick or give them cancer. I’m grateful the Biden EPA heard our pleas and kept its promise to the American people. We will keep fighting until all exposures to PFAS end and the chemical companies responsible for business-related human rights abuses are held fully accountable,” said Emily Donovan, co-founder of Clean Cape Fear.

More details about funding to address PFAS in Drinking Water

Through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, EPA is making an unprecedented $21 billion available to strengthen our nation’s drinking water systems, including by addressing PFAS contamination. Of that, $9 billion is specifically for tackling PFAS and emerging contaminants. The financing programs delivering this funding are part of President Biden’s Justice40 Initiative , which set the goal that 40% of the overall benefits of certain federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities that have been historically marginalized by underinvestment and overburdened by pollution.

Additionally, EPA has a nationwide Water Technical Assistance program to help small, rural, and disadvantaged communities access federal resources by working directly with water systems to identify challenges like PFAS; develop plans; build technical, managerial, and financial capacity; and apply for water infrastructure funding. Learn more about EPA’s Water Technical Assistance programs .

More details about the final PFAS drinking water standards:

• For PFOA and PFOS, EPA is setting a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal, a non-enforceable health-based goal, at zero. This reflects the latest science showing that there is no level of exposure to these contaminants without risk of health impacts, including certain cancers.
• EPA is setting enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels at 4.0 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, individually. This standard will reduce exposure from these PFAS in our drinking water to the lowest levels that are feasible for effective implementation.
• For PFNA, PFHxS, and “GenX Chemicals,” EPA is setting the MCLGs and MCLs at 10 parts per trillion.
• Because PFAS can often be found together in mixtures, and research shows these mixtures may have combined health impacts, EPA is also setting a limit for any mixture of two or more of the following PFAS: PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and “GenX Chemicals.”

EPA is issuing this rule after reviewing extensive research and science on how PFAS affects public health, while engaging with the water sector and with state regulators to ensure effective implementation. EPA also considered 120,000 comments on the proposed rule from a wide variety of stakeholders.

Background:

PFAS, also known as ‘forever chemicals,’ are prevalent in the environment. PFAS are a category of chemicals used since the 1940s to repel oil and water and resist heat, which makes them useful in everyday products such as nonstick cookware, stain resistant clothing, and firefighting foam. The science is clear that exposure to certain PFAS over a long period of time can cause cancer and other illnesses.  In addition, PFAS exposure during critical life stages such as pregnancy or early childhood can also result in adverse health impacts.

Across the country, PFAS contamination is impacting millions of people’s health and wellbeing. People can be exposed to PFAS through drinking water or food contaminated with PFAS, by coming into contact with products that contain PFAS, or through workplace exposures in certain industries.

Since EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan announced the PFAS Strategic Roadmap in October 2021, EPA has taken action – within the Biden-Harris Administration’s whole-of-government approach – by advancing science and following the law to safeguard public health, protect the environment, and hold polluters accountable. The actions described in the PFAS Strategic Roadmap each represent important and meaningful steps to protect communities from PFAS contamination. Cumulatively, these actions will build upon one another and lead to more enduring and protective solutions. In December 2023, the EPA released its second annual report on PFAS progress . The report highlights significant accomplishments achieved under the EPA’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap.

• Resources for Residents Resources for Residents collapsed link
• Drinking Water & Wells Drinking Water & Wells collapsed link
• Investigations & Sites Investigations & Sites collapsed link
• Fish & Wildlife Fish & Wildlife collapsed link
• Public Engagement Public Engagement collapsed link
• About About collapsed link
• PFAS basics
• Take action
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Home Filters
• Home Sampling Guidance
• Laboratories Offering Home Testing
• Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
• Statewide PFAS Survey of Public Water Supplies
• Compliance Monitoring in Public Water Supplies

Home Sampling

PFAS MCLs and Drinking Water

Statewide Testing Initiative

• PFAS Sites and Areas of Interest
• Sampling in Lakes and Streams
• Firefighting Foam and PFAS
• Sampling Guidance
• Wastewater Treatment Plants / IPP

There are two major classes of firefighting foam: Class A and Class B. Class B is also called Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) and is usually created using PFAS. It is a highly effective foam used for fighting high-hazard flammable liquid fires, like gasoline, oil, and jet fuel.

• PFAS Minimum Laboratory Analyte List

Wastewater Treatment Plants / Industrial Pretreatment Program

• PFAS in Deer
• PFAS in Fish
• PFAS in Wildlife
• Citizen's Advisory Workgroup
• Non-site specific presentations
• Educational Videos
• Advisory Groups
• Letters and Congressional Testimonies
• Tools and Reports
• MPART Workgroups
• Local Public Health Department Advisory Committee
• Science Advisory Workgroup

Official Correspondence

MPART Tools and Reports

• Resources for Residents
• Drinking Water & Wells
• Investigations & Sites
• Fish & Wildlife
• Public Engagement

Search is currently unavailable. Please try again later.

Popular on michigan.gov

• Agriculture and Rural Development
• Civil Rights
• Environment
• Health and Human Services
• Natural Resources
• Secretary of State

How Do I...

• Register to Vote
• Renew My License Plate
• View assistance programs

The web Browser you are currently using is unsupported, and some features of this site may not work as intended. Please update to a modern browser such as Chrome, Firefox or Edge to experience all features Michigan.gov has to offer. 

• Google Chrome
• Microsoft Edge

Attorney General Dana Nessel Statement in Support of EPA Proposed PFAS Drinking Water Standards

April 10, 2024

LANSING –  This morning, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the final version of proposed national standards for PFAS – per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – in drinking water. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel issued the following statement in support of this welcome development for national consistency in protecting Americans from these toxic “forever chemicals.”  

“The day I took office as Attorney General, I made the PFAS problem a top priority,” Nessel said. “I will use the full authority of my office to uphold these important protections, and my department will continue to pursue the manufacturers of these toxic chemicals to force their contributions toward the cleanup of their chemicals that ended up in our environment.”  

Michigan is a leader in the fight to protect our residents and our environment from PFAS contamination, and Michigan has had its own state-level drinking water standards in place for PFAS since 2020. As a result of Michigan’s proactive efforts to protect drinking water supplies, all of Michigan’s public water suppliers have been sampling for PFAS for years and maintaining compliance with state PFAS standards.  

The Department of Attorney General is currently defending Michigan’s PFAS drinking water standards in court against a legal challenge brought by 3M, a major PFAS manufacturer, against the rules establishing these standards.  

“My office has tirelessly defended the sound, science-based limits on PFAS developed by the State to protect our drinking water supplies,” said Attorney General Nessel. “EPA’s new standards support what we have been saying all along – the PFAS limits in drinking water are important and defensible – and 3M’s self-serving challenge to our rules is meritless.”  

In the case filed by 3M seeking to invalidate Michigan’s PFAS drinking water rules, Michigan courts rejected all of 3M’s attacks on the substance of the rules, leaving only a procedural issue to be decided. The courts also directly acknowledged the importance of protecting public health and ruled that the Michigan rules stay in effect while the procedural issue is decided.  

The Department of Attorney General will continue to defend these important rules against challenges, both in their current form and once the EPA standards are integrated into Michigan’s regulatory structure. The EPA proposed drinking water levels are similar but not identical to Michigan’s existing standards, so the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) is working to integrate the new federal standards into the state’s rules and programs.  Some of the EPA standards are more restrictive than Michigan’s, and some are less restrictive. The EPA provided five years for public water supplies to undertake sampling and reach compliance with the new standards. In that time frame, Michigan will work with public water supplies to develop and implement changes needed to meet or exceed federal requirements.  

Danny Wimmer

Press Secretary

[email protected]

Related News

Michigan supreme court to hear ag nessel’s appeal on rule limiting pfas contamination to drinking water, federal court remands ag’s pfas lawsuit against gerald r. ford international airport authority back to state court.

Monday, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan granted the State’s motion to remand its lawsuit against the Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority (GFIAA) for PFAS contamination in nearby drinking water sources back to state court in the 17th Circuit Court in Kent County.

EGLE establishes new surface water values for two additional PFAS chemicals

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) today announced that it has established new water quality values (WQVs) for the PFAS compounds Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) and Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA). PFHxS and PFNA are members of the larger group of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

AG Nessel Sues Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority for PFAS Contamination of Drinking Water

Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a lawsuit in the Kent County 17th Judicial Circuit Court against the Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority following repeated warnings and demands for action from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) related to the Airport’s PFAS contamination. Attorney General Nessel is suing the Airport Authority for, among other issues, PFAS releases into the below-ground water supply and seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, past and future remediation and monitoring costs, and damages for the loss and destruction of natural resources.

Gov. Whitmer Celebrates PFAS Clean Up at Wurtsmith Base After Yearslong Effort to Fight Contamination

Ag nessel announces landmark settlement in first pfas case, ag nessel continues action to fight pfas contamination.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel continued her push for accountability against those who expose residents to hazardous materials and contaminate Michigan’s environment today by filing a lawsuit in Kent County Circuit Court against a company that left Michigan after contaminating multiple properties in West and Southwest Michigan with PFAS and other hazardous materials.

EGLE establishes new surface water values for two PFAS chemicals

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) has established a new Water Quality Value (WQV) for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) and has revised the existing WQV for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Following the risk assessment method provided in Rule 323.1057 (“Rule 57”), a PFBS concentration of 670,000 parts per trillion (ppt; or nanograms per liter) was set for surface water to be broadly protective of human health and 8,300 ppt for surface water specifically protected as a drinking water source. The revised human health values for PFOA are 170 ppt for surface water (from 12,000 ppt previously) and 66 ppt for surface water protected as a drinking water source (from 420 ppt, previously).

AG Nessel Joins Multistate Letter Urging Continued Resources to Combat PFAS Pollution

102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Water pollution essays are an excellent way to demonstrate your awareness of the topic and your position on the solutions to the issue. To help you ease the writing process, we prepared some tips, essay topics, and research questions about water pollution.

🌎 Air and Water pollution: Essay Writing Tips

🏆 best water pollution essay topics & examples, 📌 remarkable air and water pollution research topics, 👍 good research topics about water pollution, ❓ research questions about water pollution.

Water’s ready availability in many locations makes it an easy choice for a variety of purposes, from cleaning to manufacturing to nuclear reactor cooling. However, many companies will then dump water, now mixed with waste, back into rivers or lakes without adequate cleaning, leading to significant environmental pollution.

However, there are other types of harm, such as noise pollution, which are less obvious but also dangerous to sea life. It is critical that you understand what you should and should not do during your writing process.

The stance that big manufacturing industries are the sole culprits of the damage done to the world’s rivers and oceans is a popular one. However, do not neglect the effects of other water pollution essay topics such as microorganisms.

Microbes can spread dangerous illnesses, making them a danger for both water inhabitants and the people who then use that water. Furthermore, they can eat up oxygen if left unchecked, starving fish and other water organisms and eventually making them die out.

Such situations usually result from agricultural practices, which can lead to powerful nutrients entering the water and enabling algae and other microorganisms to grow excessively. An overly lively environment can be as harmful as one where everything is threatened.

With that said, industrial manufacturers deserve much of the attention and blame they receive from various communities. Construction of dedicated waste-cleaning facilities is usually possible, but companies avoid doing so because the process will increase their costs.

You should advocate for green practices, but be mindful of the potential impact of a significant price increase on the global economy. Also, be sure to mention more exotic pollution variations in your types of water pollution essay.

Provide examples of noise pollution or suspended matter pollution to expand on the topic of the complexity of the harm humanity causes to the ecosphere.

You should show your understanding that there are many causes, and we should work on addressing all of them, a notion you should repeat in your water pollution essay conclusions.

However, you should try to avoid being sidetracked too much and focus on the titles of pollution and its immediate causes.

If you stretch far enough, you may connect the matter to topics such as the status of a woman in Islam. However, doing so contributes little to nothing to your point and deviates from the topic of ecology into social and religious studies.

Leave the search for connections to dedicated researchers and concentrate on discussing the major causes that are known nowadays. By doing this, you will be able to create an excellent and powerful work that will demonstrate your understanding of the topic.

Here are some tips for your writing:

• Be sure to discuss the different types of pollution that is caused by the same source separately. Surface and groundwater pollution are different in their effects and deserve separate discussions.
• Focus on the issues and not on solutions, as an essay does not provide enough space to discuss the latter in detail.
• Be sure to discuss the effects of pollution on people and other land inhabitants as well as on water creatures.

Check IvyPanda to get more water pollution essay titles, paper ideas, and other useful samples!

• Water Pollution: Causes, Effects and Possible Solutions This is why clean water is required in all the places to make sure the people and all the living creatures in the planet live a good and healthy life.
• Air and Water Pollution in the Modern World The high number of vehicles in the city has greatly promoted air pollution in the area. Poor sewerage system, high pollution from industries and automobiles are among the major causes of air and water pollutions […]
• Water Pollution: Causes, Effects, and Prevention Farmers should be encouraged to embrace this kind of farming which ensures that the manure used is biodegradable and do not end up accumulating in the water bodies once they are washed off by floods.
• Water Pollution in the Philippines: Metropolitan Manila Area In this brief economic analysis of water pollution in Metro Manila, it is proposed to look at the industrial use of waters and the household use to understand the impact that the population growth and […]
• Coca-Cola India and Water Pollution Issues The first difficulty that the representatives of the Coca-Cola Company happened to face due to their campaign in the territory of India was caused by the concerns of the local government.
• Cashion Water Quality: Spatial Distribution of Water Pollution Incidents This essay discusses the quality of water as per the report of 2021 obtained from the municipality, the quality issue and the source of pollution, and how the pollution impacts human health and the environment […]
• Water Pollution: OIL Spills Aspects The effects of the oil spill on a species of ducks called the Harlequin ducks were formulated and the author attempted to trace out the immediate and residual effects of the oil on the birds.
• Importance of Mercury Water Pollution Problem Solutions The severity of the mercury contamination consequences depends on the age of the person exposed to the contamination, the way of contamination, the health condition, and many other factors.
• Water Pollution as a Crime Against the Environment In particular, water pollution is a widespread crime against the environment, even though it is a severe felony that can result in harm to many people and vast territories.
• Newark Water Crisis: Water Pollution Problem The main problem was rooted in the fact that lead levels in the drinking water were highly elevated, which is dangerous and detrimental to the population’s health.
• Water Pollution in a Community: Mitigation Plan Though for the fact that planet earth is abundant with water and almost two-thirds of the planet is made up of water still it is viewed that in future years, a shortage of water may […]
• Food Distribution and Water Pollution Therefore, food distribution is one of the central reasons for water pollution. According to Greenpeace, one of the ways to improve the ecology of the planet is by creating healthy food markets.
• Water Pollution and Associated Health Risks The results of plenty of studies indicate the existence of the relation between the contamination of water by hazardous chemicals and the development of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, cancer, asthma, allergies, as well as reproductive […]
• Lake Erie Water Pollution There are worries among the members of the community that the lake could be facing another episode of high toxicity, and they have called for the authorities to investigate the main causes of the pollution […]
• Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan All players need to be trained in significant areas of business so as they can handle them with care and beware of the potential they have in causing damage.
• Water Pollution in the US: Causes and Control Although water pollution can hardly be ceased entirely, the current rates of water pollution can be reduced by resorting to the sustainable principle of water use in both the industrial area and the realm of […]
• Water Pollution and Management in the UAE The groundwater in UAE meets the needs of 51% of users in terms of quantity mainly for irrigation. Surface water is the source of groundwater and plays a major role in groundwater renewal.
• Water Pollution and Its Challenges Water pollution refers to a situation where impurities find way into water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and ground water. This is a form of pollution where impurities enter water bodies through distinct sources such […]
• Water Pollution Sources, Effects and Control Unfortunately, not all the users of water are responsible to ensure that proper disposal or treatment of the used water is done before the water is returned to the water bodies.
• Water in Crisis: Public Health Concerns in Africa In the 21st century, the world faces a crisis of contaminated water, which is the result of industrialization and is a major problem in developing countries.
• Air and Water Pollution Thus, it is classified as a primary pollutant because it is the most common pollutants in the environment. In the environment, the impact of carbon monoxide is felt overtime, since it leads to respiratory problems.
• Causes of Water Pollution and the Present Environmental Solution Prolonged pollution of water has even caused some plants to grow in the water, which pose danger to the living entities that have their inhabitants in the water.
• Water Pollution & Diseases (Undeveloped Nations) Restriction on movement and access to the affected area affects trade and the loss of human life and deteriorated health is a major blow on the economy and on the quality of human life.
• Water and Water Pollution in Point of Economics’ View This research tries to explain the importance of water especially in an economist’s perspective by explaining the uses of water in various fields, pollution of water and the agents of pollution.
• Environmental Justice Issues Affecting African Americans: Water Pollution Water pollution in the 1960s occurred due to poor sewage systems in the urban and rural areas. Unlike in the 1960s, there are reduced cases of water pollution today.
• Water Pollution and Wind Energy Chemical pollution of water is one of the leading causes of death of aquatic life. It is thus evident that chemical pollution of water not only has negative effects on health, but it also substantially […]
• Air and Water Pollution in Los Angeles One of the major problems facing major cities and towns in the world is pollution; wastes from firms and households are the major causes of pollution.
• Water Pollution Causes and Climate Impacts The biggest percentage of sewage waste consists of water, treating the wastes for recycling would help in maintaining a constant supply of water.
• Water Pollution Origins and Ways of Resolving The evidence provided by environmental agencies indicates that industrial agriculture is one of the factors that significantly contribute to the deterioration of water quality.
• Mud Lick Creek Project – Fresh Water Pollution This potential source of pollutants poses significant risks to the quality of water at the creek in terms altering the temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and the turbidity of the water.
• Water Pollution in the Jamaican Society
• Water Pollution and Abstraction and Economic Instruments
• Water Pollution and Individual Effects of Water Pollution
• Understanding What Causes Water Pollution
• An Analysis of Water Pollution as a Global Plague That Affects the People, Animals and Plants
• Water Pollution Through Urban and Rural Land Use and Freshwater Allocation in New Zealand
• Water Pollution: Globalization, One of the Causes and Part of the Solution
• Voluntary Incentives for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution
• The Impact of Water Pollution on Public Health in Flint, Michigan
• Understanding Water Pollution and Its Causes
• The Promises and Pitfalls of Devolution: Water Pollution Policies in the American States
• We Must Fight Against Water Pollution
• Transaction Costs and Agricultural Nonpoint-Source Water Pollution Control Policies
• Water Pollution and Drinking Water Quality
• Water Pollution: An Insight into the Greatest Environmental Risk
• US Water Pollution Regulation over the Past Half Century: Burning Waters to Crystal Springs
• Environmental Impact and Health Risks of Water Pollution to a Child
• Water Pollution Environment Effects Chemicals
• The Negative Effects of Water Pollution on Fish Numbers in America
• The Problem of Oil Spills and Water Pollution in Alaska
• Water Pollution in the United State: The Causes and Effects
• California Water Pollution Act Clean Laws
• The Need to Immediately Stop Water Pollution in the United States
• Water Pollution, Causes, Effects and Prevention
• The Water Pollution Prevention in Oceanic Areas
• Water Pollution and the Biggest Environmental Issues Today
• Fresh Water Pollution Assignment
• Water pollution in Southeast Asia and China
• Water Pollution Caused by Industrial Equipment
• The Impacts of Water Pollution on Economic Development in Sudan
• The Importance of Recycling to Prevent Water Pollution
• Water Pollution and Its Effects on The Environment
• The Sources, Environmental Impact, and Control of Water Pollution
• Water Quality and Contamination of Water Pollution
• Water Pollution and the World’s Worst Forms of Pollution
• The Problem of Water Pollution and the Solutions
• Comparing Contrast Legislative Approach Controlling Water Pollution Industrial
• An Analysis of the Water Pollution and it’s Effects on the Environment
• Water Pollution and The Natural Environment
• The Importance of Clean Drinking Water Pollution
• Water Pollution and Arsenic Pollution
• The Issue of Water Pollution in the Drinking Water in Brisbane
• What Are the Causes and Effects of Water Pollution?
• What Is the Effect of Water Pollution on Humanity?
• How Can Leaders Tackle with Water Pollution in China?
• What Is the Drinking Water Pollution Control Act?
• What Was the Social Water Pollution?
• How Non-Point Is Water Pollution Controlled in Agriculture?
• What Is Canada’s Water Pollution Dilemma?
• Water Pollution: Why Is There Trash in the Ocean?
• What Are the Problems Associated with Water Pollution?
• What Is the Connection Between Air and Water Pollution?
• How Water Pollution Effects Marine Life?
• What Are the Leading Factors of Water Pollution Around the World?
• Why Is Water Pollution an Important Issue Environmental Sciences?
• What Are the Factors That Causes Water Pollution and Its Effects on the World Today?
• What Are There Inorganic Chemicals Cause Water Pollution?
• How Does Drinking Water Pollution Impact the World Environmental Sciences?
• Is There a Connection Between Drinking Water Quality and Water Pollution?
• How to Deal with the Big Problem of Deforestation and Water Pollution in Brazil and the Colombian Amazon?
• Why Is China’s Water Pollution Challenge?
• What Is the Ground Water Pollution Assignment?
• How to Deal the Big Problem of Water Pollution in the World?
• How to Reduce Air and Water Pollution?
• What Is the Harmonizing Model with Transfer Tax on Water Pollution Across Regional Boundaries in China’s Lake Basin?
• Are the Causes and Effects of Water Pollution Determined in Lake Huron?
• Can Water Pollution Policy Be Efficient?
• What Are the Kinds of Water Pollution Environmental Sciences?
• What Causes Water Pollution and Its Effects?
• What Effect Does Water Pollution Have on KZN Citizens?
• How Is Water Pollution Managed in Viet Nam’s Craft Villages?
• What Should You Know About Water Pollution?
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, March 2). 102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/water-pollution-essay-examples/

"102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." IvyPanda , 2 Mar. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/water-pollution-essay-examples/.

IvyPanda . (2024) '102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples'. 2 March.

IvyPanda . 2024. "102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." March 2, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/water-pollution-essay-examples/.

1. IvyPanda . "102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." March 2, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/water-pollution-essay-examples/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "102 Water Pollution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." March 2, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/water-pollution-essay-examples/.

• Water Research Ideas
• Pollution Essay Ideas
• Ocean Pollution Titles
• Water Issues Research Ideas
• Environmental Protection Titles
• Air Pollution Research Ideas
• Noise Pollution Essay Titles
• Environment Research Topics
• Hazardous Waste Essay Topics
• Climate Change Titles
• Global Warming Essay Titles
• Environmentalism Essay Topics
• Greenhouse Gases Research Ideas
• Natural Gas Essay Ideas
• Overpopulation Topics