quantitative research title starts with

Write my thesis
Thesis writers
Buy thesis papers
Bachelor thesis
Master's thesis
Thesis editing services
Thesis proofreading services
Buy a thesis online
Write my dissertation
Dissertation proposal help
Pay for dissertation
Custom dissertation
Dissertation help online
Buy dissertation online
Cheap dissertation
Dissertation editing services
Write my research paper
Buy research paper online
Pay for research paper
Research paper help
Order research paper
Custom research paper
Cheap research paper
Research papers for sale
Thesis subjects
How It Works

100+ Quantitative Research Topics For Students

Quantitative research is a research strategy focusing on quantified data collection and analysis processes. This research strategy emphasizes testing theories on various subjects. It also includes collecting and analyzing non-numerical data.

Quantitative research is a common approach in the natural and social sciences , like marketing, business, sociology, chemistry, biology, economics, and psychology. So, if you are fond of statistics and figures, a quantitative research title would be an excellent option for your research proposal or project.

How to Get a Title of Quantitative Research

How to make quantitative research title, what is the best title for quantitative research, amazing quantitative research topics for students, creative quantitative research topics, perfect quantitative research title examples, unique quantitative research titles, outstanding quantitative research title examples for students, creative example title of quantitative research samples, outstanding quantitative research problems examples, fantastic quantitative research topic examples, the best quantitative research topics, grade 12 quantitative research title for students, list of quantitative research titles for high school, easy quantitative research topics for students, trending topics for quantitative research, quantitative research proposal topics, samples of quantitative research titles, research title about business quantitative.

Finding a great title is the key to writing a great quantitative research proposal or paper. A title for quantitative research prepares you for success, failure, or mediocre grades. This post features examples of quantitative research titles for all students.

Putting together a research title and quantitative research design is not as easy as some students assume. So, an example topic of quantitative research can help you craft your own. However, even with the examples, you may need some guidelines for personalizing your research project or proposal topics.

So, here are some tips for getting a title for quantitative research:

Consider your area of studies
Look out for relevant subjects in the area
Expert advice may come in handy
Check out some sample quantitative research titles

Making a quantitative research title is easy if you know the qualities of a good title in quantitative research. Reading about how to make a quantitative research title may not help as much as looking at some samples. Looking at a quantitative research example title will give you an idea of where to start.

However, let’s look at some tips for how to make a quantitative research title:

The title should seem interesting to readers
Ensure that the title represents the content of the research paper
Reflect on the tone of the writing in the title
The title should contain important keywords in your chosen subject to help readers find your paper
The title should not be too lengthy
It should be grammatically correct and creative
It must generate curiosity

An excellent quantitative title should be clear, which implies that it should effectively explain the paper and what readers can expect. A research title for quantitative research is the gateway to your article or proposal. So, it should be well thought out. Additionally, it should give you room for extensive topic research.

A sample of quantitative research titles will give you an idea of what a good title for quantitative research looks like. Here are some examples:

What is the correlation between inflation rates and unemployment rates?
Has climate adaptation influenced the mitigation of funds allocation?
Job satisfaction and employee turnover: What is the link?
A look at the relationship between poor households and the development of entrepreneurship skills
Urbanization and economic growth: What is the link between these elements?
Does education achievement influence people’s economic status?
What is the impact of solar electricity on the wholesale energy market?
Debt accumulation and retirement: What is the relationship between these concepts?
Can people with psychiatric disorders develop independent living skills?
Children’s nutrition and its impact on cognitive development

Quantitative research applies to various subjects in the natural and social sciences. Therefore, depending on your intended subject, you have numerous options. Below are some good quantitative research topics for students:

The difference between the colorific intake of men and women in your country
Top strategies used to measure customer satisfaction and how they work
Black Friday sales: are they profitable?
The correlation between estimated target market and practical competitive risk assignment
Are smartphones making us brighter or dumber?
Nuclear families Vs. Joint families: Is there a difference?
What will society look like in the absence of organized religion?
A comparison between carbohydrate weight loss benefits and high carbohydrate diets?
How does emotional stability influence your overall well-being?
The extent of the impact of technology in the communications sector

Creativity is the key to creating a good research topic in quantitative research. Find a good quantitative research topic below:

How much exercise is good for lasting physical well-being?
A comparison of the nutritional therapy uses and contemporary medical approaches
Does sugar intake have a direct impact on diabetes diagnosis?
Education attainment: Does it influence crime rates in society?
Is there an actual link between obesity and cancer rates?
Do kids with siblings have better social skills than those without?
Computer games and their impact on the young generation
Has social media marketing taken over conventional marketing strategies?
The impact of technology development on human relationships and communication
What is the link between drug addiction and age?

Need more quantitative research title examples to inspire you? Here are some quantitative research title examples to look at:

Habitation fragmentation and biodiversity loss: What is the link?
Radiation has affected biodiversity: Assessing its effects
An assessment of the impact of the CORONA virus on global population growth
Is the pandemic truly over, or have human bodies built resistance against the virus?
The ozone hole and its impact on the environment
The greenhouse gas effect: What is it and how has it impacted the atmosphere
GMO crops: are they good or bad for your health?
Is there a direct link between education quality and job attainment?
How have education systems changed from traditional to modern times?
The good and bad impacts of technology on education qualities

Your examiner will give you excellent grades if you come up with a unique title and outstanding content. Here are some quantitative research examples titles.

Online classes: are they helpful or not?
What changes has the global CORONA pandemic had on the population growth curve?
Daily habits influenced by the global pandemic
An analysis of the impact of culture on people’s personalities
How has feminism influenced the education system’s approach to the girl child’s education?
Academic competition: what are its benefits and downsides for students?
Is there a link between education and student integrity?
An analysis of how the education sector can influence a country’s economy
An overview of the link between crime rates and concern for crime
Is there a link between education and obesity?

Research title example quantitative topics when well-thought guarantees a paper that is a good read. Look at the examples below to get started.

What are the impacts of online games on students?
Sex education in schools: how important is it?
Should schools be teaching about safe sex in their sex education classes?
The correlation between extreme parent interference on student academic performance
Is there a real link between academic marks and intelligence?
Teacher feedback: How necessary is it, and how does it help students?
An analysis of modern education systems and their impact on student performance
An overview of the link between academic performance/marks and intelligence
Are grading systems helpful or harmful to students?
What was the impact of the pandemic on students?

Irrespective of the course you take, here are some titles that can fit diverse subjects pretty well. Here are some creative quantitative research title ideas:

A look at the pre-corona and post-corona economy
How are conventional retail businesses fairing against eCommerce sites like Amazon and Shopify?
An evaluation of mortality rates of heart attacks
Effective treatments for cardiovascular issues and their prevention
A comparison of the effectiveness of home care and nursing home care
Strategies for managing effective dissemination of information to modern students
How does educational discrimination influence students’ futures?
The impacts of unfavorable classroom environment and bullying on students and teachers
An overview of the implementation of STEM education to K-12 students
How effective is digital learning?

If your paper addresses a problem, you must present facts that solve the question or tell more about the question. Here are examples of quantitative research titles that will inspire you.

An elaborate study of the influence of telemedicine in healthcare practices
How has scientific innovation influenced the defense or military system?
The link between technology and people’s mental health
Has social media helped create awareness or worsened people’s mental health?
How do engineers promote green technology?
How can engineers raise sustainability in building and structural infrastructures?
An analysis of how decision-making is dependent on someone’s sub-conscious
A comprehensive study of ADHD and its impact on students’ capabilities
The impact of racism on people’s mental health and overall wellbeing
How has the current surge in social activism helped shape people’s relationships?

Are you looking for an example of a quantitative research title? These ten examples below will get you started.

The prevalence of nonverbal communication in social control and people’s interactions
The impacts of stress on people’s behavior in society
A study of the connection between capital structures and corporate strategies
How do changes in credit ratings impact equality returns?
A quantitative analysis of the effect of bond rating changes on stock prices
The impact of semantics on web technology
An analysis of persuasion, propaganda, and marketing impact on individuals
The dominant-firm model: what is it, and how does it apply to your country’s retail sector?
The role of income inequality in economy growth
An examination of juvenile delinquents’ treatment in your country

Excellent Topics For Quantitative Research

Here are some titles for quantitative research you should consider:

Does studying mathematics help implement data safety for businesses
How are art-related subjects interdependent with mathematics?
How do eco-friendly practices in the hospitality industry influence tourism rates?
A deep insight into how people view eco-tourisms
Religion vs. hospitality: Details on their correlation
Has your country’s tourist sector revived after the pandemic?
How effective is non-verbal communication in conveying emotions?
Are there similarities between the English and French vocabulary?
How do politicians use persuasive language in political speeches?
The correlation between popular culture and translation

Here are some quantitative research titles examples for your consideration:

How do world leaders use language to change the emotional climate in their nations?
Extensive research on how linguistics cultivate political buzzwords
The impact of globalization on the global tourism sector
An analysis of the effects of the pandemic on the worldwide hospitality sector
The influence of social media platforms on people’s choice of tourism destinations
Educational tourism: What is it and what you should know about it
Why do college students experience math anxiety?
Is math anxiety a phenomenon?
A guide on effective ways to fight cultural bias in modern society
Creative ways to solve the overpopulation issue

An example of quantitative research topics for 12 th -grade students will come in handy if you want to score a good grade. Here are some of the best ones:

The link between global warming and climate change
What is the greenhouse gas impact on biodiversity and the atmosphere
Has the internet successfully influenced literacy rates in society
The value and downsides of competition for students
A comparison of the education system in first-world and third-world countries
The impact of alcohol addiction on the younger generation
How has social media influenced human relationships?
Has education helped boost feminism among men and women?
Are computers in classrooms beneficial or detrimental to students?
How has social media improved bullying rates among teenagers?

High school students can apply research titles on social issues or other elements, depending on the subject. Let’s look at some quantitative topics for students:

What is the right age to introduce sex education for students
Can extreme punishment help reduce alcohol consumption among teenagers?
Should the government increase the age of sexual consent?
The link between globalization and the local economy collapses
How are global companies influencing local economies?

There are numerous possible quantitative research topics you can write about. Here are some great quantitative research topics examples:

The correlation between video games and crime rates
Do college studies impact future job satisfaction?
What can the education sector do to encourage more college enrollment?
The impact of education on self-esteem
The relationship between income and occupation

You can find inspiration for your research topic from trending affairs on social media or in the news. Such topics will make your research enticing. Find a trending topic for quantitative research example from the list below:

How the country’s economy is fairing after the pandemic
An analysis of the riots by women in Iran and what the women gain to achieve
Is the current US government living up to the voter’s expectations?
How is the war in Ukraine affecting the global economy?
Can social media riots affect political decisions?

A proposal is a paper you write proposing the subject you would like to cover for your research and the research techniques you will apply. If the proposal is approved, it turns to your research topic. Here are some quantitative titles you should consider for your research proposal:

Military support and economic development: What is the impact in developing nations?
How does gun ownership influence crime rates in developed countries?
How can the US government reduce gun violence without influencing people’s rights?
What is the link between school prestige and academic standards?
Is there a scientific link between abortion and the definition of viability?

You can never have too many sample titles. The samples allow you to find a unique title you’re your research or proposal. Find a sample quantitative research title here:

Does weight loss indicate good or poor health?
Should schools do away with grading systems?
The impact of culture on student interactions and personalities
How can parents successfully protect their kids from the dangers of the internet?
Is the US education system better or worse than Europe’s?

If you’re a business major, then you must choose a research title quantitative about business. Let’s look at some research title examples quantitative in business:

Creating shareholder value in business: How important is it?
The changes in credit ratings and their impact on equity returns
The importance of data privacy laws in business operations
How do businesses benefit from e-waste and carbon footprint reduction?
Organizational culture in business: what is its importance?

We Are A Call Away

Interesting, creative, unique, and easy quantitative research topics allow you to explain your paper and make research easy. Therefore, you should not take choosing a research paper or proposal topic lightly. With your topic ready, reach out to us today for excellent research paper writing services .

How to Start a Research Title? Examples from 105,975 Titles

I analyzed a random sample of 105,975 full-text research papers, uploaded to PubMed Central between the years 2016 and 2021, in order to explore common ways to start a research title.

I used the BioC API to download the data (see the References section below).

Common ways to start a title

The most common 3-word phrases to start a title, the most common 2-word phrases to start a title, the most common words to start a title, can a title start with “how”.

In our sample, 289 titles out of 105,975 (0.27%) started with the word “How”.

Here are some examples:

How Useful are Systematic Reviews for Informing Palliative Care Practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane Systematic Reviews Link to the article on PubMed

How the Leopard Hides Its Spots: ASIP Mutations and Melanism in Wild Cats Link to the article on PubMed

How Do Red Blood Cells Know When to Die? Link to the article on PubMed

Can a title start with “Why”?

In our sample, 68 titles out of 105,975 (0.06%) started with the word “Why”.

Why Don’t All Infants Have Bifidobacteria in Their Stool? Link to the article on PubMed

Why Women Bleed and How They Are Saved: A Cross-Sectional Study of Caesarean Section Near-Miss Morbidity Link to the article on PubMed

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Link to the article on PLOS MEDICINE

Comeau DC, Wei CH, Islamaj Doğan R, and Lu Z. PMC text mining subset in BioC: about 3 million full text articles and growing, Bioinformatics , btz070, 2019.

200+ Research Title Ideas To Explore In 2024

Choosing a compelling research title is a critical step in the research process, as it serves as the gateway to capturing the attention of readers and potential collaborators. A well-crafted research title not only encapsulates the essence of your study but also entices readers to delve deeper into your work.

In this blog post, we will explore the significance of research title ideas, the characteristics of an effective title, strategies for generating compelling titles, examples of successful titles, common pitfalls to avoid, the importance of iterative refinement, and ethical considerations in title creation.

Characteristics of a Good Research Title

Table of Contents

Clarity and Precision

A good research title should communicate the core idea of your study clearly and precisely. Avoid vague or overly complex language that might confuse readers.

Relevance to the Research Topic

Ensure that your title accurately reflects the content and focus of your research. It should provide a clear indication of what readers can expect from your study.

Conciseness and Avoidance of Ambiguity

Keep your title concise and to the point. Avoid unnecessary words or phrases that may add ambiguity. Aim for clarity and directness to make your title more impactful.

Use of Keywords

Incorporating relevant keywords in your title can enhance its visibility and accessibility. Consider the terms that researchers in your field are likely to search for and integrate them into your title.

Reflecting the Research Methodology or Approach

If your research employs a specific methodology or approach, consider incorporating that information into your title. This helps set expectations for readers and indicates the uniqueness of your study.

What are the Strategies for Generating Research Title Ideas?

Brainstorming
Individual Brainstorming: Set aside time to generate title ideas on your own. Consider different angles, perspectives, and aspects of your research.
Group Brainstorming: Collaborate with peers or mentors to gather diverse perspectives and insights. Group brainstorming can lead to innovative and multidimensional title ideas.
Keyword Analysis
Identifying Key Terms and Concepts: Break down your research into key terms and concepts. These will form the foundation of your title.
Exploring Synonyms and Related Terms: Expand your search by exploring synonyms and related terms. This can help you discover alternative ways to express your research focus.
Literature Review
Examining Existing Titles in the Field: Review titles of relevant studies in your field to identify common patterns and effective strategies.
Analyzing Successful Titles for Inspiration: Analyze successful research titles to understand what makes them stand out. Look for elements that resonate with your own research.
Consultation with Peers and Mentors
Seek feedback from peers and mentors during the title creation process. External perspectives can offer valuable insights and help refine your ideas.
Use of Online Tools and Title Generators
Explore online tools and title generators designed to aid in the generation of creative and relevant research titles. While these tools can be helpful, exercise discretion and ensure the generated titles align with the essence of your research.

200+ Research Title Ideas: Category-Wise

Technology and computer science.

“Cybersecurity Measures in the Age of Quantum Computing”
“Machine Learning Applications for Predictive Maintenance”
“The Impact of Augmented Reality on Learning Outcomes”
“Blockchain Technology: Enhancing Supply Chain Transparency”
“Human-Computer Interaction in Virtual Reality Environments”

Environmental Science and Sustainability

“Evaluating the Efficacy of Green Infrastructure in Urban Areas”
“Climate Change Resilience Strategies for Coastal Communities”
“Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Rainforests”
“Renewable Energy Adoption in Developing Economies”
“Assessing the Environmental Impact of Plastic Alternatives”

Health and Medicine

“Precision Medicine Approaches in Cancer Treatment”
“Mental Health Interventions for Youth in Urban Settings”
“Telemedicine: Bridging Gaps in Rural Healthcare Access”
“The Role of Gut Microbiota in Metabolic Disorders”
“Ethical Considerations in Genetic Editing Technologies”

Social Sciences and Psychology

“Social Media Influence on Body Image Perception”
“Impact of Cultural Diversity on Team Performance”
“Psychological Resilience in the Face of Global Crises”
“Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement in Adolescents”
“Exploring the Dynamics of Online Communities and Identity”

Business and Economics

“Sustainable Business Practices and Consumer Behavior”
“The Role of Big Data in Financial Decision-Making”
“Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Markets”
“Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Loyalty”
“Economic Implications of Remote Work Adoption”

Education and Pedagogy

“Inclusive Education Models for Diverse Learning Needs”
“Gamification in STEM Education: A Comparative Analysis”
“Online Learning Effectiveness in Higher Education”
“Teacher Training for Integrating Technology in Classrooms”
“Assessment Strategies for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills”

Psychology and Behavior

“The Influence of Social Media on Adolescent Well-being”
“Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making: A Cross-Cultural Study”
“The Role of Empathy in Conflict Resolution”
“Positive Psychology Interventions for Workplace Satisfaction”
“Exploring the Relationship Between Sleep Patterns and Mental Health”

Biology and Genetics

“Genetic Markers for Predisposition to Neurodegenerative Diseases”
“CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: Ethical Implications and Future Prospects”
“Evolutionary Adaptations in Response to Environmental Changes”
“Understanding the Microbiome’s Impact on Immune System Function”
“Epigenetic Modifications and Their Role in Disease Development”

Urban Planning and Architecture

“Smart Cities: Balancing Technological Innovation and Privacy”
“Revitalizing Urban Spaces: Community Engagement in Design”
“Sustainable Architecture: Integrating Nature into Urban Designs”
“Transit-Oriented Development and Its Impact on City Dynamics”
“Assessing the Cultural Significance of Urban Landscapes”

Linguistics and Communication

“The Influence of Language on Cross-Cultural Communication”
“Language Development in Multilingual Environments”
“The Impact of Nonverbal Communication on Interpersonal Relationships”
“Digital Communication and the Evolution of Language”
“Language Processing in Bilingual Individuals: A Neuroscientific Approach”

Political Science and International Relations

“The Role of Social Media in Political Mobilization”
“Global Governance in the Era of Transnational Challenges”
“Human Rights and the Ethics of Intervention in International Affairs”
“Political Polarization: Causes and Consequences”
“Climate Change Diplomacy: Assessing International Agreements”

Physics and Astronomy

“Dark Matter: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe”
“Quantum Entanglement and Its Potential Applications”
“The Search for Exoplanets in Habitable Zones”
“Astrophysical Phenomena: Exploring Black Holes and Neutron Stars”
“Advancements in Quantum Computing Algorithms”

Education Technology (EdTech)

“Adaptive Learning Platforms: Personalizing Education for Every Student”
“The Impact of Virtual Reality Simulations on STEM Education”
“E-Learning Accessibility for Students with Disabilities”
“Gamified Learning: Enhancing Student Engagement and Retention”
“Digital Literacy Education: Navigating the Information Age”

Sociology and Anthropology

“Cultural Shifts in Modern Society: An Anthropological Exploration”
“Social Movements in the Digital Age: Activism and Connectivity”
“Gender Roles and Equality: A Cross-Cultural Perspective”
“Urbanization and Its Effects on Traditional Societal Structures”
“Cultural Appropriation: Understanding Boundaries and Respect”

Materials Science and Engineering

“Nanostructured Materials: Innovations in Manufacturing and Applications”
“Biodegradable Polymers: Towards Sustainable Packaging Solutions”
“Materials for Energy Storage: Advancements and Challenges”
“Smart Materials in Healthcare: From Diagnosis to Treatment”
“Robust Coatings for Extreme Environments: Applications in Aerospace”

History and Archaeology

“Digital Reconstruction of Historical Sites: Preserving the Past”
“Trade Routes in Ancient Civilizations: A Comparative Study”
“Archaeogenetics: Unraveling Human Migrations Through DNA Analysis”
“Historical Linguistics: Tracing Language Evolution Over Millennia”
“The Archaeology of Conflict: Studying War through Artifacts”

Marketing and Consumer Behavior

“Influencer Marketing: Impact on Consumer Trust and Purchasing Decisions”
“The Role of Brand Storytelling in Consumer Engagement”
“E-commerce Personalization Strategies: Balancing Customization and Privacy”
“Cross-Cultural Marketing: Adapting Campaigns for Global Audiences”
“Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Market Analysis”

Neuroscience and Cognitive Science

“Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Rehabilitation: Implications for Therapy”
“The Neuroscience of Decision-Making: Insights from Brain Imaging”
“Cognitive Aging: Understanding Memory Decline and Cognitive Resilience”
“The Role of Neurotransmitters in Emotional Regulation”
“Neuroethical Considerations in Brain-Computer Interface Technologies”

Public Health and Epidemiology

“Epidemiological Trends in Infectious Diseases: Lessons from Global Outbreaks”
“Public Health Interventions for Reducing Non-Communicable Diseases”
“Health Disparities Among Marginalized Communities: Addressing the Gaps”
“The Impact of Climate Change on Vector-Borne Diseases”
“Community-Based Approaches to Promoting Health Equity”

Robotics and Automation

“Human-Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing: Enhancing Productivity and Safety”
“Autonomous Vehicles: Navigating the Path to Mainstream Adoption”
“Soft Robotics: Engineering Flexibility for Real-World Applications”
“Ethical Considerations in the Development of AI-powered Robotics”
“Bio-Inspired Robotics: Learning from Nature to Enhance Machine Intelligence”

Literature and Literary Criticism

“Postcolonial Narratives: Deconstructing Power Structures in Literature”
“Digital Storytelling Platforms: Changing the Landscape of Narrative Arts”
“Literature and Cultural Identity: Exploring Representations in Global Contexts”
“Eco-Critical Perspectives in Contemporary Literature”
“Feminist Literary Criticism: Reinterpreting Classic Texts Through a New Lens”

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

“Green Chemistry: Sustainable Approaches to Chemical Synthesis”
“Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery: Innovations in Biomedical Applications”
“Chemical Process Optimization: Towards Energy-Efficient Production”
“The Chemistry of Taste: Molecular Insights into Food Flavors”
“Catalytic Converters: Advancements in Pollution Control Technologies”

Cultural Studies and Media

“Media Representations of Social Movements: Framing and Impact”
“Pop Culture and Identity: Exploring Trends in a Globalized World”
“The Influence of Social Media on Political Discourse”
“Reality Television and Perceptions of Reality: A Cultural Analysis”
“Media Literacy Education: Navigating the Digital Information Age”

Astronomy and Astrophysics

“Gravitational Waves: Probing the Cosmos for New Discoveries”
“The Life Cycle of Stars: From Birth to Supernova”
“Astrobiology: Searching for Extraterrestrial Life in the Universe”
“Dark Energy and the Accelerating Expansion of the Universe”
“Cosmic Microwave Background: Insights into the Early Universe”

Social Work and Community Development

“Community-Based Mental Health Interventions: A Social Work Perspective”
“Youth Empowerment Programs: Fostering Resilience in Vulnerable Communities”
“Social Justice Advocacy in Contemporary Social Work Practice”
“Intersectionality in Social Work: Addressing the Complex Needs of Individuals”
“The Role of Technology in Enhancing Social Services Delivery”

Artificial Intelligence and Ethics

“Ethical Considerations in AI Decision-Making: Balancing Autonomy and Accountability”
“Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning Algorithms: A Critical Examination”
“Explainable AI: Bridging the Gap Between Complexity and Transparency”
“The Social Implications of AI-Generated Content: Challenges and Opportunities”
“AI and Personal Privacy: Navigating the Ethical Dimensions of Data Usage”

Linguistics and Computational Linguistics

“Natural Language Processing: Advancements in Understanding Human Communication”
“Multilingualism in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities”
“Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Relationship Between Language and Thought”
“Speech Recognition Technologies: Applications in Everyday Life”
“Syntax and Semantics: Unraveling the Structure of Language”

Geology and Earth Sciences

“Geological Hazards Assessment in Urban Planning: A Case Study”
“Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Past Climate Patterns for Future Predictions”
“Geomorphological Processes in Coastal Landscapes: Implications for Conservation”
“Volcanic Activity Monitoring: Early Warning Systems and Mitigation Strategies”
“The Impact of Human Activities on Soil Erosion: An Ecological Perspective”

Political Economy and Global Governance

“Global Trade Agreements: Assessing Economic Impacts and Equity”
“Political Economy of Energy Transition: Policies and Socioeconomic Effects”
“The Role of International Organizations in Global Governance”
“Financial Inclusion and Economic Development: A Comparative Analysis”
“The Political Economy of Pandemics: Governance and Crisis Response”

Food Science and Nutrition

“Nutrigenomics: Personalized Nutrition for Optimal Health”
“Functional Foods: Exploring Health Benefits Beyond Basic Nutrition”
“Sustainable Food Production: Innovations in Agriculture and Aquaculture”
“Dietary Patterns and Mental Health: A Comprehensive Review”
“Food Allergies and Sensitivities: Mechanisms and Management Strategies”

Sociology and Technology

“Digital Inequalities: Examining Access and Usage Patterns Across Demographics”
“The Impact of Social Media on Social Capital and Community Building”
“Technological Surveillance and Privacy Concerns: A Sociological Analysis”
“Virtual Communities: An Exploration of Identity Formation in Online Spaces”
“The Social Dynamics of Online Activism: Mobilization and Participation”

Materials Science and Nanotechnology

“Nanomaterials for Biomedical Imaging: Enhancing Diagnostic Precision”
“Self-Healing Materials: Advances in Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure”
“Smart Textiles: Integrating Nanotechnology for Enhanced Functionality”
“Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery: Targeted Therapies and Beyond”
“Nanocomposites for Energy Storage: Engineering Efficient Capacitors”

Communication and Media Studies

“Media Convergence: The Evolution of Content Delivery in the Digital Age”
“The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Behavior”
“Crisis Communication in a Hyperconnected World: Lessons from Global Events”
“Media Framing of Environmental Issues: A Comparative Analysis”
“Digital Detox: Understanding Media Consumption Patterns and Well-being”

Developmental Psychology

“Early Childhood Attachment and Its Long-Term Impact on Adult Relationships”
“Cognitive Development in Adolescence: Challenges and Opportunities”
“Parenting Styles and Academic Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Perspective”
“Identity Formation in Emerging Adulthood: The Role of Social Influences”
“Interventions for Promoting Resilience in At-Risk Youth Populations”

Aerospace Engineering

“Advancements in Aerodynamics: Redefining Flight Efficiency”
“Space Debris Management: Mitigating Risks in Earth’s Orbit”
“Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Supersonic Flight”
“Hypersonic Propulsion Technologies: Pushing the Boundaries of Speed”
“Materials for Space Exploration: Engineering Solutions for Harsh Environments”

Political Psychology

“Political Polarization and Public Opinion: Exploring Cognitive Biases”
“Leadership Styles and Public Perception: A Psychological Analysis”
“Nationalism and Identity: Psychological Factors Shaping Political Beliefs”
“The Influence of Emotional Appeals in Political Communication”
“Crisis Leadership: The Psychological Dynamics of Decision-Making in Times of Uncertainty”

Marine Biology and Conservation

“Coral Reef Restoration: Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation”
“Ocean Plastic Pollution: Assessing Impacts on Marine Ecosystems”
“Marine Mammal Communication: Insights from Bioacoustics”
“Sustainable Fisheries Management: Balancing Ecological and Economic Concerns”
“The Role of Mangrove Ecosystems in Coastal Resilience”

Artificial Intelligence and Creativity

“Generative AI in Creative Industries: Challenges and Innovations”
“AI-Enhanced Creativity Tools: Empowering Artists and Designers”
“Machine Learning for Music Composition: Bridging Art and Technology”
“Creative AI in Film and Entertainment: Transforming Storytelling”
“Ethical Considerations in AI-Generated Art and Content”

Cultural Anthropology

“Cultural Relativism in Anthropological Research: Opportunities and Challenges”
“Rituals and Symbolism: Unraveling Cultural Practices Across Societies”
“Migration and Cultural Identity: An Ethnographic Exploration”
“Material Culture Studies: Understanding Societies through Objects”
“Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Preserving and Promoting Cultural Heritage”

Quantum Computing and Information Science

“Quantum Information Processing: Algorithms and Applications”
“Quantum Cryptography: Securing Communication in the Quantum Era”
“Quantum Machine Learning: Enhancing AI through Quantum Computing”
“Quantum Computing in Finance: Opportunities and Challenges”
“Quantum Internet: Building the Next Generation of Information Networks”

Public Policy and Urban Planning

“Smart Cities and Inclusive Urban Development: A Policy Perspective”
“Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development: Lessons Learned”
“The Impact of Transportation Policies on Urban Mobility Patterns”
“Housing Affordability: Policy Approaches to Addressing Urban Challenges”
“Data-Driven Decision-Making in Urban Governance: Opportunities and Risks”

Gerontology and Aging Studies

“Healthy Aging Interventions: Promoting Quality of Life in Older Adults”
“Social Isolation and Mental Health in Aging Populations: Interventions and Support”
“Technology Adoption Among Older Adults: Bridging the Digital Divide”
“End-of-Life Decision-Making: Ethical Considerations and Legal Frameworks”
“Cognitive Resilience in Aging: Strategies for Maintaining Mental Sharpness”

Examples of Effective Research Titles

Illustrative Examples from Various Disciplines

Here are examples of effective research titles from different disciplines:

“Unlocking the Mysteries of Neural Plasticity: A Multidisciplinary Approach”
“Sustainable Urban Development: Integrating Environmental and Social Perspectives”
“Quantum Computing: Navigating the Path to Practical Applications”

Analysis of What Makes Each Title Effective

Clear indication of the research focus.
Inclusion of key terms relevant to the field.
Incorporation of a multidisciplinary or integrated approach where applicable.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Research Title Creation

A. Vagueness and Ambiguity

Vague or ambiguous titles can deter readers from engaging with your research. Ensure your title is straightforward and leaves no room for misinterpretation.

B. Overuse of Jargon

While technical terms are essential, excessive jargon can alienate readers who may not be familiar with the specific terminology. Strike a balance between precision and accessibility.

C. Lack of Alignment with Research Objectives

Your title should align seamlessly with the objectives and findings of your research. Avoid creating titles that misrepresent the core contributions of your study.

D. Lengthy and Complicated Titles

Lengthy titles can be overwhelming and may not effectively convey the essence of your research. Aim for brevity while maintaining clarity and informativeness.

E. Lack of Creativity and Engagement

A bland title may not capture the interest of potential readers. Inject creativity where appropriate and strive to create a title that sparks curiosity.

Ethical Considerations in Research Title Creation

Avoiding Sensationalism and Misleading Titles

Ensure that your title accurately represents the content of your research. Avoid sensationalism or misleading language that may compromise the integrity of your work.

Ensuring Accuracy and Integrity in Representing Research Content

Your title should uphold the principles of accuracy and integrity. Any claims or implications in the title should be supported by the actual findings of your research.

Crafting a captivating research title is a nuanced process that requires careful consideration of various factors. From clarity and relevance to creativity and ethical considerations, each element plays a crucial role in the success of your title.

By following the outlined strategies and avoiding common pitfalls for research title ideas, researchers can enhance the visibility and impact of their work, contributing to the broader scholarly conversation. Remember, your research title is the first impression readers have of your work, so make it count.

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

A Quick Guide to Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences

(11 reviews)

Christine Davies, Carmarthen, Wales

Last Update: 2021

Publisher: University of Wales Trinity Saint David

Language: English

Formats Available

Conditions of use.

Learn more about reviews.

Reviewed by Tiffany Kindratt, Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Arlington on 3/9/24

Comprehensiveness rating: 3 see less

The text provides a brief overview of quantitative research topics that is geared towards research in the fields of education, sociology, business, and nursing. The author acknowledges that the textbook is not a comprehensive resource but offers references to other resources that can be used to deepen the knowledge. The text does not include a glossary or index. The references in the figures for each chapter are not included in the reference section. It would be helpful to include those.

Content Accuracy rating: 4

Overall, the text is accurate. For example, Figure 1 on page 6 provides a clear overview of the research process. It includes general definitions of primary and secondary research. It would be helpful to include more details to explain some of the examples before they are presented. For instance, the example on page 5 was unclear how it pertains to the literature review section.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 4

In general, the text is relevant and up-to-date. The text includes many inferences of moving from qualitative to quantitative analysis. This was surprising to me as a quantitative researcher. The author mentions that moving from a qualitative to quantitative approach should only be done when needed. As a predominantly quantitative researcher, I would not advice those interested in transitioning to using a qualitative approach that qualitative research would enhance their research—not something that should only be done if you have to.

Clarity rating: 4

The text is written in a clear manner. It would be helpful to the reader if there was a description of the tables and figures in the text before they are presented.

Consistency rating: 4

The framework for each chapter and terminology used are consistent.

Modularity rating: 4

The text is clearly divided into sections within each chapter. Overall, the chapters are a similar brief length except for the chapter on data analysis, which is much more comprehensive than others.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 4

The topics in the text are presented in a clear and logical order. The order of the text follows the conventional research methodology in social sciences.

Interface rating: 5

I did not encounter any interface issues when reviewing this text. All links worked and there were no distortions of the images or charts that may confuse the reader.

Grammatical Errors rating: 3

There are some grammatical/typographical errors throughout. Of note, for Section 5 in the table of contents. “The” should be capitalized to start the title. In the title for Table 3, the “t” in typical should be capitalized.

Cultural Relevance rating: 4

The examples are culturally relevant. The text is geared towards learners in the UK, but examples are relevant for use in other countries (i.e., United States). I did not see any examples that may be considered culturally insensitive or offensive in any way.

I teach a course on research methods in a Bachelor of Science in Public Health program. I would consider using some of the text, particularly in the analysis chapter to supplement the current textbook in the future.

Reviewed by Finn Bell, Assistant Professor, University of Michigan, Dearborn on 1/3/24

For it being a quick guide and only 26 pages, it is very comprehensive, but it does not include an index or glossary. read more

For it being a quick guide and only 26 pages, it is very comprehensive, but it does not include an index or glossary.

Content Accuracy rating: 5

As far as I can tell, the text is accurate, error-free and unbiased.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 5

This text is up-to-date, and given the content, unlikely to become obsolete any time soon.

Clarity rating: 5

The text is very clear and accessible.

Consistency rating: 5

The text is internally consistent.

Modularity rating: 5

Given how short the text is, it seems unnecessary to divide it into smaller readings, nonetheless, it is clearly labelled such that an instructor could do so.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5

The text is well-organized and brings readers through basic quantitative methods in a logical, clear fashion.

Easy to navigate. Only one table that is split between pages, but not in a way that is confusing.

Grammatical Errors rating: 5

There were no noticeable grammatical errors.

The examples in this book don't give enough information to rate this effectively.

This text is truly a very quick guide at only 26 double-spaced pages. Nonetheless, Davies packs a lot of information on the basics of quantitative research methods into this text, in an engaging way with many examples of the concepts presented. This guide is more of a brief how-to that takes readers as far as how to select statistical tests. While it would be impossible to fully learn quantitative research from such a short text, of course, this resource provides a great introduction, overview, and refresher for program evaluation courses.

Reviewed by Shari Fedorowicz, Adjunct Professor, Bridgewater State University on 12/16/22

Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less

The text is indeed a quick guide for utilizing quantitative research. Appropriate and effective examples and diagrams were used throughout the text. The author clearly differentiates between use of quantitative and qualitative research providing the reader with the ability to distinguish two terms that frequently get confused. In addition, links and outside resources are provided to deepen the understanding as an option for the reader. The use of these links, coupled with diagrams and examples make this text comprehensive.

The content is mostly accurate. Given that it is a quick guide, the author chose a good selection of which types of research designs to include. However, some are not provided. For example, correlational or cross-correlational research is omitted and is not discussed in Section 3, but is used as a statistical example in the last section.

Examples utilized were appropriate and associated with terms adding value to the learning. The tables that included differentiation between types of statistical tests along with a parametric/nonparametric table were useful and relevant.

The purpose to the text and how to use this guide book is stated clearly and is established up front. The author is also very clear regarding the skill level of the user. Adding to the clarity are the tables with terms, definitions, and examples to help the reader unpack the concepts. The content related to the terms was succinct, direct, and clear. Many times examples or figures were used to supplement the narrative.

The text is consistent throughout from contents to references. Within each section of the text, the introductory paragraph under each section provides a clear understanding regarding what will be discussed in each section. The layout is consistent for each section and easy to follow.

The contents are visible and address each section of the text. A total of seven sections, including a reference section, is in the contents. Each section is outlined by what will be discussed in the contents. In addition, within each section, a heading is provided to direct the reader to the subtopic under each section.

The text is well-organized and segues appropriately. I would have liked to have seen an introductory section giving a narrative overview of what is in each section. This would provide the reader with the ability to get a preliminary glimpse into each upcoming sections and topics that are covered.

The book was easy to navigate and well-organized. Examples are presented in one color, links in another and last, figures and tables. The visuals supplemented the reading and placed appropriately. This provides an opportunity for the reader to unpack the reading by use of visuals and examples.

No significant grammatical errors.

Cultural Relevance rating: 5

The text is not offensive or culturally insensitive. Examples were inclusive of various races, ethnicities, and backgrounds.

This quick guide is a beneficial text to assist in unpacking the learning related to quantitative statistics. I would use this book to complement my instruction and lessons, or use this book as a main text with supplemental statistical problems and formulas. References to statistical programs were appropriate and were useful. The text did exactly what was stated up front in that it is a direct guide to quantitative statistics. It is well-written and to the point with content areas easy to locate by topic.

Reviewed by Sarah Capello, Assistant Professor, Radford University on 1/18/22

The text claims to provide "quick and simple advice on quantitative aspects of research in social sciences," which it does. There is no index or glossary, although vocabulary words are bolded and defined throughout the text. read more

Comprehensiveness rating: 4 see less

The content is mostly accurate. I would have preferred a few nuances to be hashed out a bit further to avoid potential reader confusion or misunderstanding of the concepts presented.

The content is current; however, some of the references cited in the text are outdated. Newer editions of those texts exist.

The text is very accessible and readable for a variety of audiences. Key terms are well-defined.

There are no content discrepancies within the text. The author even uses similarly shaped graphics for recurring purposes throughout the text (e.g., arrow call outs for further reading, rectangle call outs for examples).

The content is chunked nicely by topics and sections. If it were used for a course, it would be easy to assign different sections of the text for homework, etc. without confusing the reader if the instructor chose to present the content in a different order.

The author follows the structure of the research process. The organization of the text is easy to follow and comprehend.

All of the supplementary images (e.g., tables and figures) were beneficial to the reader and enhanced the text.

There are no significant grammatical errors.

I did not find any culturally offensive or insensitive references in the text.

This text does the difficult job of introducing the complicated concepts and processes of quantitative research in a quick and easy reference guide fairly well. I would not depend solely on this text to teach students about quantitative research, but it could be a good jumping off point for those who have no prior knowledge on this subject or those who need a gentle introduction before diving in to more advanced and complex readings of quantitative research methods.

Reviewed by J. Marlie Henry, Adjunct Faculty, University of Saint Francis on 12/9/21

Considering the length of this guide, this does a good job of addressing major areas that typically need to be addressed. There is a contents section. The guide does seem to be organized accordingly with appropriate alignment and logical flow of thought. There is no glossary but, for a guide of this length, a glossary does not seem like it would enhance the guide significantly.

The content is relatively accurate. Expanding the content a bit more or explaining that the methods and designs presented are not entirely inclusive would help. As there are different schools of thought regarding what should/should not be included in terms of these designs and methods, simply bringing attention to that and explaining a bit more would help.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 3

This content needs to be updated. Most of the sources cited are seven or more years old. Even more, it would be helpful to see more currently relevant examples. Some of the source authors such as Andy Field provide very interesting and dynamic instruction in general, but they have much more current information available.

The language used is clear and appropriate. Unnecessary jargon is not used. The intent is clear- to communicate simply in a straightforward manner.

The guide seems to be internally consistent in terms of terminology and framework. There do not seem to be issues in this area. Terminology is internally consistent.

For a guide of this length, the author structured this logically into sections. This guide could be adopted in whole or by section with limited modifications. Courses with fewer than seven modules could also logically group some of the sections.

This guide does present with logical organization. The topics presented are conceptually sequenced in a manner that helps learners build logically on prior conceptualization. This also provides a simple conceptual framework for instructors to guide learners through the process.

Interface rating: 4

The visuals themselves are simple, but they are clear and understandable without distracting the learner. The purpose is clear- that of learning rather than visuals for the sake of visuals. Likewise, navigation is clear and without issues beyond a broken link (the last source noted in the references).

This guide seems to be free of grammatical errors.

It would be interesting to see more cultural integration in a guide of this nature, but the guide is not culturally insensitive or offensive in any way. The language used seems to be consistent with APA's guidelines for unbiased language.

Reviewed by Heng Yu-Ku, Professor, University of Northern Colorado on 5/13/21

The text covers all areas and ideas appropriately and provides practical tables, charts, and examples throughout the text. I would suggest the author also provides a complete research proposal at the end of Section 3 (page 10) and a comprehensive... read more

For the most part, the content is accurate and unbiased. However, the author only includes four types of research designs used on the social sciences that contain quantitative elements: 1. Mixed method, 2) Case study, 3) Quasi-experiment, and 3) Action research. I wonder why the correlational research is not included as another type of quantitative research design as it has been introduced and emphasized in section 6 by the author.

I believe the content is up-to-date and that necessary updates will be relatively easy and straightforward to implement.

The text is easy to read and provides adequate context for any technical terminology used. However, the author could provide more detailed information about estimating the minimum sample size but not just refer the readers to use the online sample calculators at a different website.

The text is internally consistent in terms of terminology and framework. The author provides the right amount of information with additional information or resources for the readers.

The text includes seven sections. Therefore, it is easier for the instructor to allocate or divide the content into different weeks of instruction within the course.

Yes, the topics in the text are presented in a logical and clear fashion. The author provides clear and precise terminologies, summarizes important content in Table or Figure forms, and offers examples in each section for readers to check their understanding.

The interface of the book is consistent and clear, and all the images and charts provided in the book are appropriate. However, I did encounter some navigation problems as a couple of links are not working or requires permission to access those (pages 10 and 27).

No grammatical errors were found.

No culturally incentive or offensive in its language and the examples provided were found.

As the book title stated, this book provides “A Quick Guide to Quantitative Research in Social Science. It offers easy-to-read information and introduces the readers to the research process, such as research questions, research paradigms, research process, research designs, research methods, data collection, data analysis, and data discussion. However, some links are not working or need permissions to access them (pages 10 and 27).

Reviewed by Hsiao-Chin Kuo, Assistant Professor, Northeastern Illinois University on 4/26/21, updated 4/28/21

As a quick guide, it covers basic concepts related to quantitative research. It starts with WHY quantitative research with regard to asking research questions and considering research paradigms, then provides an overview of research design and process, discusses methods, data collection and analysis, and ends with writing a research report. It also identifies its target readers/users as those begins to explore quantitative research. It would be helpful to include more examples for readers/users who are new to quantitative research.

Its content is mostly accurate and no bias given its nature as a quick guide. Yet, it is also quite simplified, such as its explanations of mixed methods, case study, quasi-experimental research, and action research. It provides resources for extended reading, yet more recent works will be helpful.

The book is relevant given its nature as a quick guide. It would be helpful to provide more recent works in its resources for extended reading, such as the section for Survey Research (p. 12). It would also be helpful to include more information to introduce common tools and software for statistical analysis.

The book is written with clear and understandable language. Important terms and concepts are presented with plain explanations and examples. Figures and tables are also presented to support its clarity. For example, Table 4 (p. 20) gives an easy-to-follow overview of different statistical tests.

The framework is very consistent with key points, further explanations, examples, and resources for extended reading. The sample studies are presented following the layout of the content, such as research questions, design and methods, and analysis. These examples help reinforce readers' understanding of these common research elements.

The book is divided into seven chapters. Each chapter clearly discusses an aspect of quantitative research. It can be easily divided into modules for a class or for a theme in a research method class. Chapters are short and provides additional resources for extended reading.

The topics in the chapters are presented in a logical and clear structure. It is easy to follow to a degree. Though, it would be also helpful to include the chapter number and title in the header next to its page number.

The text is easy to navigate. Most of the figures and tables are displayed clearly. Yet, there are several sections with empty space that is a bit confusing in the beginning. Again, it can be helpful to include the chapter number/title next to its page number.

Grammatical Errors rating: 4

No major grammatical errors were found.

There are no cultural insensitivities noted.

Given the nature and purpose of this book, as a quick guide, it provides readers a quick reference for important concepts and terms related to quantitative research. Because this book is quite short (27 pages), it can be used as an overview/preview about quantitative research. Teacher's facilitation/input and extended readings will be needed for a deeper learning and discussion about aspects of quantitative research.

Reviewed by Yang Cheng, Assistant Professor, North Carolina State University on 1/6/21

It covers the most important topics such as research progress, resources, measurement, and analysis of the data. read more

It covers the most important topics such as research progress, resources, measurement, and analysis of the data.

The book accurately describes the types of research methods such as mixed-method, quasi-experiment, and case study. It talks about the research proposal and key differences between statistical analyses as well.

The book pinpointed the significance of running a quantitative research method and its relevance to the field of social science.

The book clearly tells us the differences between types of quantitative methods and the steps of running quantitative research for students.

The book is consistent in terms of terminologies such as research methods or types of statistical analysis.

It addresses the headlines and subheadlines very well and each subheading should be necessary for readers.

The book was organized very well to illustrate the topic of quantitative methods in the field of social science.

The pictures within the book could be further developed to describe the key concepts vividly.

The textbook contains no grammatical errors.

It is not culturally offensive in any way.

Overall, this is a simple and quick guide for this important topic. It should be valuable for undergraduate students who would like to learn more about research methods.

Reviewed by Pierre Lu, Associate Professor, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley on 11/20/20

As a quick guide to quantitative research in social sciences, the text covers most ideas and areas. read more

As a quick guide to quantitative research in social sciences, the text covers most ideas and areas.

Mostly accurate content.

As a quick guide, content is highly relevant.

Succinct and clear.

Internally, the text is consistent in terms of terminology used.

The text is easily and readily divisible into smaller sections that can be used as assignments.

I like that there are examples throughout the book.

Easy to read. No interface/ navigation problems.

No grammatical errors detected.

I am not aware of the culturally insensitive description. After all, this is a methodology book.

I think the book has potential to be adopted as a foundation for quantitative research courses, or as a review in the first weeks in advanced quantitative course.

Reviewed by Sarah Fischer, Assistant Professor, Marymount University on 7/31/20

It is meant to be an overview, but it incredibly condensed and spends almost no time on key elements of statistics (such as what makes research generalizable, or what leads to research NOT being generalizable). read more

Content Accuracy rating: 1

Contains VERY significant errors, such as saying that one can "accept" a hypothesis. (One of the key aspect of hypothesis testing is that one either rejects or fails to reject a hypothesis, but NEVER accepts a hypothesis.)

Very relevant to those experiencing the research process for the first time. However, it is written by someone working in the natural sciences but is a text for social sciences. This does not explain the errors, but does explain why sometimes the author assumes things about the readers ("hail from more subjectivist territory") that are likely not true.

Clarity rating: 3

Some statistical terminology not explained clearly (or accurately), although the author has made attempts to do both.

Very consistently laid out.

Chapters are very short yet also point readers to outside texts for additional information. Easy to follow.

Generally logically organized.

Easy to navigate, images clear. The additional sources included need to linked to.

Minor grammatical and usage errors throughout the text.

Makes efforts to be inclusive.

The idea of this book is strong--short guides like this are needed. However, this book would likely be strengthened by a revision to reduce inaccuracies and improve the definitions and technical explanations of statistical concepts. Since the book is specifically aimed at the social sciences, it would also improve the text to have more examples that are based in the social sciences (rather than the health sciences or the arts).

Reviewed by Michelle Page, Assistant Professor, Worcester State University on 5/30/20

This text is exactly intended to be what it says: A quick guide. A basic outline of quantitative research processes, akin to cliff notes. The content provides only the essentials of a research process and contains key terms. A student or new researcher would not be able to use this as a stand alone guide for quantitative pursuits without having a supplemental text that explains the steps in the process more comprehensively. The introduction does provide this caveat.

Content Accuracy rating: 3

There are no biases or errors that could be distinguished; however, it’s simplicity in content, although accurate for an outline of process, may lack a conveyance of the deeper meanings behind the specific processes explained about qualitative research.

The content is outlined in traditional format to highlight quantitative considerations for formatting research foundational pieces. The resources/references used to point the reader to literature sources can be easily updated with future editions.

The jargon in the text is simple to follow and provides adequate context for its purpose. It is simplified for its intention as a guide which is appropriate.

Each section of the text follows a consistent flow. Explanation of the research content or concept is defined and then a connection to literature is provided to expand the readers understanding of the section’s content. Terminology is consistent with the qualitative process.

As an “outline” and guide, this text can be used to quickly identify the critical parts of the quantitative process. Although each section does not provide deeper content for meaningful use as a stand alone text, it’s utility would be excellent as a reference for a course and can be used as an content guide for specific research courses.

The text’s outline and content are aligned and are in a logical flow in terms of the research considerations for quantitative research.

The only issue that the format was not able to provide was linkable articles. These would have to be cut and pasted into a browser. Functional clickable links in a text are very successful at leading the reader to the supplemental material.

No grammatical errors were noted.

This is a very good outline “guide” to help a new or student researcher to demystify the quantitative process. A successful outline of any process helps to guide work in a logical and systematic way. I think this simple guide is a great adjunct to more substantial research context.

Section 1: What will this resource do for you?
Section 2: Why are you thinking about numbers? A discussion of the research question and paradigms.
Section 3: An overview of the Research Process and Research Designs
Section 4: Quantitative Research Methods
Section 5: the data obtained from quantitative research
Section 6: Analysis of data
Section 7: Discussing your Results

Ancillary Material

About the book.

This resource is intended as an easy-to-use guide for anyone who needs some quick and simple advice on quantitative aspects of research in social sciences, covering subjects such as education, sociology, business, nursing. If you area qualitative researcher who needs to venture into the world of numbers, or a student instructed to undertake a quantitative research project despite a hatred for maths, then this booklet should be a real help.

The booklet was amended in 2022 to take into account previous review comments.

About the Contributors

Christine Davies , Ph.D

Contribute to this Page

Skip to main content
Skip to primary sidebar
Skip to footer
QuestionPro

Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Quantitative Research: What It Is, Practices & Methods

Quantitative research involves analyzing and gathering numerical data to uncover trends, calculate averages, evaluate relationships, and derive overarching insights. It’s used in various fields, including the natural and social sciences. Quantitative data analysis employs statistical techniques for processing and interpreting numeric data.

Research designs in the quantitative realm outline how data will be collected and analyzed with methods like experiments and surveys. Qualitative methods complement quantitative research by focusing on non-numerical data, adding depth to understanding. Data collection methods can be qualitative or quantitative, depending on research goals. Researchers often use a combination of both approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of phenomena.

What is Quantitative Research?

Quantitative research is a systematic investigation of phenomena by gathering quantifiable data and performing statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques. Quantitative research collects statistically significant information from existing and potential customers using sampling methods and sending out online surveys , online polls , and questionnaires , for example.

One of the main characteristics of this type of research is that the results can be depicted in numerical form. After carefully collecting structured observations and understanding these numbers, it’s possible to predict the future of a product or service, establish causal relationships or Causal Research , and make changes accordingly. Quantitative research primarily centers on the analysis of numerical data and utilizes inferential statistics to derive conclusions that can be extrapolated to the broader population.

An example of a quantitative research study is the survey conducted to understand how long a doctor takes to tend to a patient when the patient walks into the hospital. A patient satisfaction survey can be administered to ask questions like how long a doctor takes to see a patient, how often a patient walks into a hospital, and other such questions, which are dependent variables in the research. This kind of research method is often employed in the social sciences, and it involves using mathematical frameworks and theories to effectively present data, ensuring that the results are logical, statistically sound, and unbiased.

Data collection in quantitative research uses a structured method and is typically conducted on larger samples representing the entire population. Researchers use quantitative methods to collect numerical data, which is then subjected to statistical analysis to determine statistically significant findings. This approach is valuable in both experimental research and social research, as it helps in making informed decisions and drawing reliable conclusions based on quantitative data.

Quantitative Research Characteristics

Quantitative research has several unique characteristics that make it well-suited for specific projects. Let’s explore the most crucial of these characteristics so that you can consider them when planning your next research project:

Structured tools: Quantitative research relies on structured tools such as surveys, polls, or questionnaires to gather quantitative data . Using such structured methods helps collect in-depth and actionable numerical data from the survey respondents, making it easier to perform data analysis.
Sample size: Quantitative research is conducted on a significant sample size representing the target market . Appropriate Survey Sampling methods, a fundamental aspect of quantitative research methods, must be employed when deriving the sample to fortify the research objective and ensure the reliability of the results.
Close-ended questions: Closed-ended questions , specifically designed to align with the research objectives, are a cornerstone of quantitative research. These questions facilitate the collection of quantitative data and are extensively used in data collection processes.
Prior studies: Before collecting feedback from respondents, researchers often delve into previous studies related to the research topic. This preliminary research helps frame the study effectively and ensures the data collection process is well-informed.
Quantitative data: Typically, quantitative data is represented using tables, charts, graphs, or other numerical forms. This visual representation aids in understanding the collected data and is essential for rigorous data analysis, a key component of quantitative research methods.
Generalization of results: One of the strengths of quantitative research is its ability to generalize results to the entire population. It means that the findings derived from a sample can be extrapolated to make informed decisions and take appropriate actions for improvement based on numerical data analysis.

Quantitative Research Methods

Quantitative research methods are systematic approaches used to gather and analyze numerical data to understand and draw conclusions about a phenomenon or population. Here are the quantitative research methods:

Primary quantitative research methods
Secondary quantitative research methods

Primary Quantitative Research Methods

Primary quantitative research is the most widely used method of conducting market research. The distinct feature of primary research is that the researcher focuses on collecting data directly rather than depending on data collected from previously done research. Primary quantitative research design can be broken down into three further distinctive tracks and the process flow. They are:

A. Techniques and Types of Studies

There are multiple types of primary quantitative research. They can be distinguished into the four following distinctive methods, which are:

01. Survey Research

Survey Research is fundamental for all quantitative outcome research methodologies and studies. Surveys are used to ask questions to a sample of respondents, using various types such as online polls, online surveys, paper questionnaires, web-intercept surveys , etc. Every small and big organization intends to understand what their customers think about their products and services, how well new features are faring in the market, and other such details.

By conducting survey research, an organization can ask multiple survey questions , collect data from a pool of customers, and analyze this collected data to produce numerical results. It is the first step towards collecting data for any research. You can use single ease questions . A single-ease question is a straightforward query that elicits a concise and uncomplicated response.

This type of research can be conducted with a specific target audience group and also can be conducted across multiple groups along with comparative analysis . A prerequisite for this type of research is that the sample of respondents must have randomly selected members. This way, a researcher can easily maintain the accuracy of the obtained results as a huge variety of respondents will be addressed using random selection.

Traditionally, survey research was conducted face-to-face or via phone calls. Still, with the progress made by online mediums such as email or social media, survey research has also spread to online mediums.There are two types of surveys , either of which can be chosen based on the time in hand and the kind of data required:

Cross-sectional surveys: Cross-sectional surveys are observational surveys conducted in situations where the researcher intends to collect data from a sample of the target population at a given point in time. Researchers can evaluate various variables at a particular time. Data gathered using this type of survey is from people who depict similarity in all variables except the variables which are considered for research . Throughout the survey, this one variable will stay constant.

Cross-sectional surveys are popular with retail, SMEs, and healthcare industries. Information is garnered without modifying any parameters in the variable ecosystem.
Multiple samples can be analyzed and compared using a cross-sectional survey research method.
Multiple variables can be evaluated using this type of survey research.
The only disadvantage of cross-sectional surveys is that the cause-effect relationship of variables cannot be established as it usually evaluates variables at a particular time and not across a continuous time frame.

Longitudinal surveys: Longitudinal surveys are also observational surveys , but unlike cross-sectional surveys, longitudinal surveys are conducted across various time durations to observe a change in respondent behavior and thought processes. This time can be days, months, years, or even decades. For instance, a researcher planning to analyze the change in buying habits of teenagers over 5 years will conduct longitudinal surveys.

In cross-sectional surveys, the same variables were evaluated at a given time, and in longitudinal surveys, different variables can be analyzed at different intervals.
Longitudinal surveys are extensively used in the field of medicine and applied sciences. Apart from these two fields, they are also used to observe a change in the market trend analysis , analyze customer satisfaction, or gain feedback on products/services.
In situations where the sequence of events is highly essential, longitudinal surveys are used.
Researchers say that when research subjects need to be thoroughly inspected before concluding, they rely on longitudinal surveys.

02. Correlational Research

A comparison between two entities is invariable. Correlation research is conducted to establish a relationship between two closely-knit entities and how one impacts the other, and what changes are eventually observed. This research method is carried out to give value to naturally occurring relationships, and a minimum of two different groups are required to conduct this quantitative research method successfully. Without assuming various aspects, a relationship between two groups or entities must be established.

Researchers use this quantitative research design to correlate two or more variables using mathematical analysis methods. Patterns, relationships, and trends between variables are concluded as they exist in their original setup. The impact of one of these variables on the other is observed, along with how it changes the relationship between the two variables. Researchers tend to manipulate one of the variables to attain the desired results.

Ideally, it is advised not to make conclusions merely based on correlational research. This is because it is not mandatory that if two variables are in sync that they are interrelated.

Example of Correlational Research Questions :

The relationship between stress and depression.
The equation between fame and money.
The relation between activities in a third-grade class and its students.

03. Causal-comparative Research

This research method mainly depends on the factor of comparison. Also called quasi-experimental research , this quantitative research method is used by researchers to conclude the cause-effect equation between two or more variables, where one variable is dependent on the other independent variable. The independent variable is established but not manipulated, and its impact on the dependent variable is observed. These variables or groups must be formed as they exist in the natural setup. As the dependent and independent variables will always exist in a group, it is advised that the conclusions are carefully established by keeping all the factors in mind.

Causal-comparative research is not restricted to the statistical analysis of two variables but extends to analyzing how various variables or groups change under the influence of the same changes. This research is conducted irrespective of the type of relationship that exists between two or more variables. Statistical analysis plan is used to present the outcome using this quantitative research method.

Example of Causal-Comparative Research Questions:

The impact of drugs on a teenager. The effect of good education on a freshman. The effect of substantial food provision in the villages of Africa.

04. Experimental Research

Also known as true experimentation, this research method relies on a theory. As the name suggests, experimental research is usually based on one or more theories. This theory has yet to be proven before and is merely a supposition. In experimental research, an analysis is done around proving or disproving the statement. This research method is used in natural sciences. Traditional research methods are more effective than modern techniques.

There can be multiple theories in experimental research. A theory is a statement that can be verified or refuted.

After establishing the statement, efforts are made to understand whether it is valid or invalid. This quantitative research method is mainly used in natural or social sciences as various statements must be proved right or wrong.

Traditional research methods are more effective than modern techniques.
Systematic teaching schedules help children who struggle to cope with the course.
It is a boon to have responsible nursing staff for ailing parents.

B. Data Collection Methodologies

The second major step in primary quantitative research is data collection. Data collection can be divided into sampling methods and data collection using surveys and polls.

01. Data Collection Methodologies: Sampling Methods

There are two main sampling methods for quantitative research: Probability and Non-probability sampling .

Probability sampling: A theory of probability is used to filter individuals from a population and create samples in probability sampling . Participants of a sample are chosen by random selection processes. Each target audience member has an equal opportunity to be selected in the sample.

There are four main types of probability sampling:

Simple random sampling: As the name indicates, simple random sampling is nothing but a random selection of elements for a sample. This sampling technique is implemented where the target population is considerably large.
Stratified random sampling: In the stratified random sampling method , a large population is divided into groups (strata), and members of a sample are chosen randomly from these strata. The various segregated strata should ideally not overlap one another.
Cluster sampling: Cluster sampling is a probability sampling method using which the main segment is divided into clusters, usually using geographic segmentation and demographic segmentation parameters.
Systematic sampling: Systematic sampling is a technique where the starting point of the sample is chosen randomly, and all the other elements are chosen using a fixed interval. This interval is calculated by dividing the population size by the target sample size.

Non-probability sampling: Non-probability sampling is where the researcher’s knowledge and experience are used to create samples. Because of the researcher’s involvement, not all the target population members have an equal probability of being selected to be a part of a sample.

There are five non-probability sampling models:

Convenience sampling: In convenience sampling , elements of a sample are chosen only due to one prime reason: their proximity to the researcher. These samples are quick and easy to implement as there is no other parameter of selection involved.
Consecutive sampling: Consecutive sampling is quite similar to convenience sampling, except for the fact that researchers can choose a single element or a group of samples and conduct research consecutively over a significant period and then perform the same process with other samples.
Quota sampling: Using quota sampling , researchers can select elements using their knowledge of target traits and personalities to form strata. Members of various strata can then be chosen to be a part of the sample as per the researcher’s understanding.
Snowball sampling: Snowball sampling is conducted with target audiences who are difficult to contact and get information. It is popular in cases where the target audience for analysis research is rare to put together.
Judgmental sampling: Judgmental sampling is a non-probability sampling method where samples are created only based on the researcher’s experience and research skill .

02. Data collection methodologies: Using surveys & polls

Once the sample is determined, then either surveys or polls can be distributed to collect the data for quantitative research.

Using surveys for primary quantitative research

A survey is defined as a research method used for collecting data from a pre-defined group of respondents to gain information and insights on various topics of interest. The ease of survey distribution and the wide number of people it can reach depending on the research time and objective makes it one of the most important aspects of conducting quantitative research.

Fundamental levels of measurement – nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio scales

Four measurement scales are fundamental to creating a multiple-choice question in a survey. They are nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio measurement scales without the fundamentals of which no multiple-choice questions can be created. Hence, it is crucial to understand these measurement levels to develop a robust survey.

Use of different question types

To conduct quantitative research, close-ended questions must be used in a survey. They can be a mix of multiple question types, including multiple-choice questions like semantic differential scale questions , rating scale questions , etc.

Survey Distribution and Survey Data Collection

In the above, we have seen the process of building a survey along with the research design to conduct primary quantitative research. Survey distribution to collect data is the other important aspect of the survey process. There are different ways of survey distribution. Some of the most commonly used methods are:

Email: Sending a survey via email is the most widely used and effective survey distribution method. This method’s response rate is high because the respondents know your brand. You can use the QuestionPro email management feature to send out and collect survey responses.
Buy respondents: Another effective way to distribute a survey and conduct primary quantitative research is to use a sample. Since the respondents are knowledgeable and are on the panel by their own will, responses are much higher.
Embed survey on a website: Embedding a survey on a website increases a high number of responses as the respondent is already in close proximity to the brand when the survey pops up.
Social distribution: Using social media to distribute the survey aids in collecting a higher number of responses from the people that are aware of the brand.
QR code: QuestionPro QR codes store the URL for the survey. You can print/publish this code in magazines, signs, business cards, or on just about any object/medium.
SMS survey: The SMS survey is a quick and time-effective way to collect a high number of responses.
Offline Survey App: The QuestionPro App allows users to circulate surveys quickly, and the responses can be collected both online and offline.

Survey example

An example of a survey is a short customer satisfaction (CSAT) survey that can quickly be built and deployed to collect feedback about what the customer thinks about a brand and how satisfied and referenceable the brand is.

Using polls for primary quantitative research

Polls are a method to collect feedback using close-ended questions from a sample. The most commonly used types of polls are election polls and exit polls . Both of these are used to collect data from a large sample size but using basic question types like multiple-choice questions.

C. Data Analysis Techniques

The third aspect of primary quantitative research design is data analysis . After collecting raw data, there must be an analysis of this data to derive statistical inferences from this research. It is important to relate the results to the research objective and establish the statistical relevance of the results.

Remember to consider aspects of research that were not considered for the data collection process and report the difference between what was planned vs. what was actually executed.

It is then required to select precise Statistical Analysis Methods , such as SWOT, Conjoint, Cross-tabulation, etc., to analyze the quantitative data.

SWOT analysis: SWOT Analysis stands for the acronym of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threat analysis. Organizations use this statistical analysis technique to evaluate their performance internally and externally to develop effective strategies for improvement.
Conjoint Analysis: Conjoint Analysis is a market analysis method to learn how individuals make complicated purchasing decisions. Trade-offs are involved in an individual’s daily activities, and these reflect their ability to decide from a complex list of product/service options.
Cross-tabulation: Cross-tabulation is one of the preliminary statistical market analysis methods which establishes relationships, patterns, and trends within the various parameters of the research study.
TURF Analysis: TURF Analysis , an acronym for Totally Unduplicated Reach and Frequency Analysis, is executed in situations where the reach of a favorable communication source is to be analyzed along with the frequency of this communication. It is used for understanding the potential of a target market.

Inferential statistics methods such as confidence interval, the margin of error, etc., can then be used to provide results.

Secondary Quantitative Research Methods

Secondary quantitative research or desk research is a research method that involves using already existing data or secondary data. Existing data is summarized and collated to increase the overall effectiveness of the research.

This research method involves collecting quantitative data from existing data sources like the internet, government resources, libraries, research reports, etc. Secondary quantitative research helps to validate the data collected from primary quantitative research and aid in strengthening or proving, or disproving previously collected data.

The following are five popularly used secondary quantitative research methods:

Data available on the internet: With the high penetration of the internet and mobile devices, it has become increasingly easy to conduct quantitative research using the internet. Information about most research topics is available online, and this aids in boosting the validity of primary quantitative data.
Government and non-government sources: Secondary quantitative research can also be conducted with the help of government and non-government sources that deal with market research reports. This data is highly reliable and in-depth and hence, can be used to increase the validity of quantitative research design.
Public libraries: Now a sparingly used method of conducting quantitative research, it is still a reliable source of information, though. Public libraries have copies of important research that was conducted earlier. They are a storehouse of valuable information and documents from which information can be extracted.
Educational institutions: Educational institutions conduct in-depth research on multiple topics, and hence, the reports that they publish are an important source of validation in quantitative research.
Commercial information sources: Local newspapers, journals, magazines, radio, and TV stations are great sources to obtain data for secondary quantitative research. These commercial information sources have in-depth, first-hand information on market research, demographic segmentation, and similar subjects.

Quantitative Research Examples

Some examples of quantitative research are:

A customer satisfaction template can be used if any organization would like to conduct a customer satisfaction (CSAT) survey . Through this kind of survey, an organization can collect quantitative data and metrics on the goodwill of the brand or organization in the customer’s mind based on multiple parameters such as product quality, pricing, customer experience, etc. This data can be collected by asking a net promoter score (NPS) question , matrix table questions, etc. that provide data in the form of numbers that can be analyzed and worked upon.
Another example of quantitative research is an organization that conducts an event, collecting feedback from attendees about the value they see from the event. By using an event survey , the organization can collect actionable feedback about the satisfaction levels of customers during various phases of the event such as the sales, pre and post-event, the likelihood of recommending the organization to their friends and colleagues, hotel preferences for the future events and other such questions.

What are the Advantages of Quantitative Research?

There are many advantages to quantitative research. Some of the major advantages of why researchers use this method in market research are:

Collect Reliable and Accurate Data:

Quantitative research is a powerful method for collecting reliable and accurate quantitative data. Since data is collected, analyzed, and presented in numbers, the results obtained are incredibly reliable and objective. Numbers do not lie and offer an honest and precise picture of the conducted research without discrepancies. In situations where a researcher aims to eliminate bias and predict potential conflicts, quantitative research is the method of choice.

Quick Data Collection:

Quantitative research involves studying a group of people representing a larger population. Researchers use a survey or another quantitative research method to efficiently gather information from these participants, making the process of analyzing the data and identifying patterns faster and more manageable through the use of statistical analysis. This advantage makes quantitative research an attractive option for projects with time constraints.

Wider Scope of Data Analysis:

Quantitative research, thanks to its utilization of statistical methods, offers an extensive range of data collection and analysis. Researchers can delve into a broader spectrum of variables and relationships within the data, enabling a more thorough comprehension of the subject under investigation. This expanded scope is precious when dealing with complex research questions that require in-depth numerical analysis.

Eliminate Bias:

One of the significant advantages of quantitative research is its ability to eliminate bias. This research method leaves no room for personal comments or the biasing of results, as the findings are presented in numerical form. This objectivity makes the results fair and reliable in most cases, reducing the potential for researcher bias or subjectivity.

In summary, quantitative research involves collecting, analyzing, and presenting quantitative data using statistical analysis. It offers numerous advantages, including the collection of reliable and accurate data, quick data collection, a broader scope of data analysis, and the elimination of bias, making it a valuable approach in the field of research. When considering the benefits of quantitative research, it’s essential to recognize its strengths in contrast to qualitative methods and its role in collecting and analyzing numerical data for a more comprehensive understanding of research topics.

Best Practices to Conduct Quantitative Research

Here are some best practices for conducting quantitative research:

Differentiate between quantitative and qualitative: Understand the difference between the two methodologies and apply the one that suits your needs best.
Choose a suitable sample size: Ensure that you have a sample representative of your population and large enough to be statistically weighty.
Keep your research goals clear and concise: Know your research goals before you begin data collection to ensure you collect the right amount and the right quantity of data.
Keep the questions simple: Remember that you will be reaching out to a demographically wide audience. Pose simple questions for your respondents to understand easily.

Quantitative Research vs Qualitative Research

Quantitative research and qualitative research are two distinct approaches to conducting research, each with its own set of methods and objectives. Here’s a comparison of the two:

Quantitative Research

Objective: The primary goal of quantitative research is to quantify and measure phenomena by collecting numerical data. It aims to test hypotheses, establish patterns, and generalize findings to a larger population.
Data Collection: Quantitative research employs systematic and standardized approaches for data collection, including techniques like surveys, experiments, and observations that involve predefined variables. It is often collected from a large and representative sample.
Data Analysis: Data is analyzed using statistical techniques, such as descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, and mathematical modeling. Researchers use statistical tests to draw conclusions and make generalizations based on numerical data.
Sample Size: Quantitative research often involves larger sample sizes to ensure statistical significance and generalizability.
Results: The results are typically presented in tables, charts, and statistical summaries, making them highly structured and objective.
Generalizability: Researchers intentionally structure quantitative research to generate outcomes that can be helpful to a larger population, and they frequently seek to establish causative connections.
Emphasis on Objectivity: Researchers aim to minimize bias and subjectivity, focusing on replicable and objective findings.

Qualitative Research

Objective: Qualitative research seeks to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying motivations, behaviors, and experiences of individuals or groups. It explores the context and meaning of phenomena.
Data Collection: Qualitative research employs adaptable and open-ended techniques for data collection, including methods like interviews, focus groups, observations, and content analysis. It allows participants to express their perspectives in their own words.
Data Analysis: Data is analyzed through thematic analysis, content analysis, or grounded theory. Researchers focus on identifying patterns, themes, and insights in the data.
Sample Size: Qualitative research typically involves smaller sample sizes due to the in-depth nature of data collection and analysis.
Results: Findings are presented in narrative form, often in the participants’ own words. Results are subjective, context-dependent, and provide rich, detailed descriptions.
Generalizability: Qualitative research does not aim for broad generalizability but focuses on in-depth exploration within a specific context. It provides a detailed understanding of a particular group or situation.
Emphasis on Subjectivity: Researchers acknowledge the role of subjectivity and the researcher’s influence on the Research Process . Participant perspectives and experiences are central to the findings.

Researchers choose between quantitative and qualitative research methods based on their research objectives and the nature of the research question. Each approach has its advantages and drawbacks, and the decision between them hinges on the particular research objectives and the data needed to address research inquiries effectively.

Quantitative research is a structured way of collecting and analyzing data from various sources. Its purpose is to quantify the problem and understand its extent, seeking results that someone can project to a larger population.

Companies that use quantitative rather than qualitative research typically aim to measure magnitudes and seek objectively interpreted statistical results. So if you want to obtain quantitative data that helps you define the structured cause-and-effect relationship between the research problem and the factors, you should opt for this type of research.

At QuestionPro , we have various Best Data Collection Tools and features to conduct investigations of this type. You can create questionnaires and distribute them through our various methods. We also have sample services or various questions to guarantee the success of your study and the quality of the collected data.

FREE TRIAL LEARN MORE

Quantitative research is a systematic and structured approach to studying phenomena that involves the collection of measurable data and the application of statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques for analysis.

Quantitative research is characterized by structured tools like surveys, substantial sample sizes, closed-ended questions, reliance on prior studies, data presented numerically, and the ability to generalize findings to the broader population.

The two main methods of quantitative research are Primary quantitative research methods, involving data collection directly from sources, and Secondary quantitative research methods, which utilize existing data for analysis.

1.Surveying to measure employee engagement with numerical rating scales. 2.Analyzing sales data to identify trends in product demand and market share. 4.Examining test scores to assess the impact of a new teaching method on student performance. 4.Using website analytics to track user behavior and conversion rates for an online store.

1.Differentiate between quantitative and qualitative approaches. 2.Choose a representative sample size. 3.Define clear research goals before data collection. 4.Use simple and easily understandable survey questions.

MORE LIKE THIS

Customer Experience Automation: Benefits and Best Tools

Apr 1, 2024

7 Best Market Segmentation Tools in 2024

In-App Feedback Tools: How to Collect, Uses & 14 Best Tools

Mar 29, 2024

11 Best Customer Journey Analytics Software in 2024

Other categories.

Academic Research
Artificial Intelligence
Assessments
Brand Awareness
Case Studies
Communities
Consumer Insights
Customer effort score
Customer Engagement
Customer Experience
Customer Loyalty
Customer Research
Customer Satisfaction
Employee Benefits
Employee Engagement
Employee Retention
Friday Five
General Data Protection Regulation
Insights Hub
Life@QuestionPro
Market Research
Mobile diaries
Mobile Surveys
New Features
Online Communities
Question Types
Questionnaire
QuestionPro Products
Release Notes
Research Tools and Apps
Revenue at Risk
Survey Templates
Training Tips
Uncategorized
Video Learning Series
What’s Coming Up
Workforce Intelligence

Quantitative and Qualitative Research

I NEED TO . . .

What is Quantitative Research?

What is Qualitative Research?
Quantitative vs Qualitative
Step 1: Accessing CINAHL
Step 2: Create a Keyword Search
Step 3: Create a Subject Heading Search
Step 4: Repeat Steps 1-3 for Second Concept
Step 5: Repeat Steps 1-3 for Quantitative Terms
Step 6: Combining All Searches
Step 7: Adding Limiters
Step 8: Save Your Search!
What Kind of Article is This?
More Research Help This link opens in a new window

Quantitative methodology is the dominant research framework in the social sciences. It refers to a set of strategies, techniques and assumptions used to study psychological, social and economic processes through the exploration of numeric patterns . Quantitative research gathers a range of numeric data. Some of the numeric data is intrinsically quantitative (e.g. personal income), while in other cases the numeric structure is imposed (e.g. ‘On a scale from 1 to 10, how depressed did you feel last week?’). The collection of quantitative information allows researchers to conduct simple to extremely sophisticated statistical analyses that aggregate the data (e.g. averages, percentages), show relationships among the data (e.g. ‘Students with lower grade point averages tend to score lower on a depression scale’) or compare across aggregated data (e.g. the USA has a higher gross domestic product than Spain). Quantitative research includes methodologies such as questionnaires, structured observations or experiments and stands in contrast to qualitative research. Qualitative research involves the collection and analysis of narratives and/or open-ended observations through methodologies such as interviews, focus groups or ethnographies.

Coghlan, D., Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (Vols. 1-2). London, : SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446294406

What is the purpose of quantitative research?

The purpose of quantitative research is to generate knowledge and create understanding about the social world. Quantitative research is used by social scientists, including communication researchers, to observe phenomena or occurrences affecting individuals. Social scientists are concerned with the study of people. Quantitative research is a way to learn about a particular group of people, known as a sample population. Using scientific inquiry, quantitative research relies on data that are observed or measured to examine questions about the sample population.

Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc doi: 10.4135/9781483381411

How do I know if the study is a quantitative design? What type of quantitative study is it?

Quantitative Research Designs: Descriptive non-experimental, Quasi-experimental or Experimental?

Studies do not always explicitly state what kind of research design is being used. You will need to know how to decipher which design type is used. The following video will help you determine the quantitative design type.

<< Previous: I NEED TO . . .
Next: What is Qualitative Research? >>
Last Updated: Dec 8, 2023 10:05 PM
URL: https://libguides.uta.edu/quantitative_and_qualitative_research

University of Texas Arlington Libraries 702 Planetarium Place · Arlington, TX 76019 · 817-272-3000

Internet Privacy
Accessibility
Problems with a guide? Contact Us.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

Knowledge Base

Methodology

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods

Published on April 12, 2019 by Raimo Streefkerk . Revised on June 22, 2023.

When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings. Both are important for gaining different kinds of knowledge.

Common quantitative methods include experiments, observations recorded as numbers, and surveys with closed-ended questions.

Quantitative research is at risk for research biases including information bias , omitted variable bias , sampling bias , or selection bias . Qualitative research Qualitative research is expressed in words . It is used to understand concepts, thoughts or experiences. This type of research enables you to gather in-depth insights on topics that are not well understood.

Common qualitative methods include interviews with open-ended questions, observations described in words, and literature reviews that explore concepts and theories.

The differences between quantitative and qualitative research, data collection methods, when to use qualitative vs. quantitative research, how to analyze qualitative and quantitative data, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative and quantitative research.

Quantitative and qualitative research use different research methods to collect and analyze data, and they allow you to answer different kinds of research questions.

Quantitative and qualitative data can be collected using various methods. It is important to use a data collection method that will help answer your research question(s).

Many data collection methods can be either qualitative or quantitative. For example, in surveys, observational studies or case studies , your data can be represented as numbers (e.g., using rating scales or counting frequencies) or as words (e.g., with open-ended questions or descriptions of what you observe).

However, some methods are more commonly used in one type or the other.

Quantitative data collection methods

Surveys : List of closed or multiple choice questions that is distributed to a sample (online, in person, or over the phone).
Experiments : Situation in which different types of variables are controlled and manipulated to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Observations : Observing subjects in a natural environment where variables can’t be controlled.

Qualitative data collection methods

Interviews : Asking open-ended questions verbally to respondents.
Focus groups : Discussion among a group of people about a topic to gather opinions that can be used for further research.
Ethnography : Participating in a community or organization for an extended period of time to closely observe culture and behavior.
Literature review : Survey of published works by other authors.

A rule of thumb for deciding whether to use qualitative or quantitative data is:

Use quantitative research if you want to confirm or test something (a theory or hypothesis )
Use qualitative research if you want to understand something (concepts, thoughts, experiences)

For most research topics you can choose a qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods approach . Which type you choose depends on, among other things, whether you’re taking an inductive vs. deductive research approach ; your research question(s) ; whether you’re doing experimental , correlational , or descriptive research ; and practical considerations such as time, money, availability of data, and access to respondents.

Quantitative research approach

You survey 300 students at your university and ask them questions such as: “on a scale from 1-5, how satisfied are your with your professors?”

You can perform statistical analysis on the data and draw conclusions such as: “on average students rated their professors 4.4”.

Qualitative research approach

You conduct in-depth interviews with 15 students and ask them open-ended questions such as: “How satisfied are you with your studies?”, “What is the most positive aspect of your study program?” and “What can be done to improve the study program?”

Based on the answers you get you can ask follow-up questions to clarify things. You transcribe all interviews using transcription software and try to find commonalities and patterns.

Mixed methods approach

You conduct interviews to find out how satisfied students are with their studies. Through open-ended questions you learn things you never thought about before and gain new insights. Later, you use a survey to test these insights on a larger scale.

It’s also possible to start with a survey to find out the overall trends, followed by interviews to better understand the reasons behind the trends.

Qualitative or quantitative data by itself can’t prove or demonstrate anything, but has to be analyzed to show its meaning in relation to the research questions. The method of analysis differs for each type of data.

Analyzing quantitative data

Quantitative data is based on numbers. Simple math or more advanced statistical analysis is used to discover commonalities or patterns in the data. The results are often reported in graphs and tables.

Applications such as Excel, SPSS, or R can be used to calculate things like:

Average scores ( means )
The number of times a particular answer was given
The correlation or causation between two or more variables
The reliability and validity of the results

Analyzing qualitative data

Qualitative data is more difficult to analyze than quantitative data. It consists of text, images or videos instead of numbers.

Some common approaches to analyzing qualitative data include:

Qualitative content analysis : Tracking the occurrence, position and meaning of words or phrases
Thematic analysis : Closely examining the data to identify the main themes and patterns
Discourse analysis : Studying how communication works in social contexts

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Chi square goodness of fit test
Degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis
Discourse analysis
Control groups
Mixed methods research
Non-probability sampling
Quantitative research
Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research bias

Rosenthal effect
Implicit bias
Cognitive bias
Selection bias
Negativity bias
Status quo bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .

If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts and meanings, use qualitative methods .
If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how it is generated, collect primary data.
If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:

Prepare and organize your data.
Review and explore your data.
Develop a data coding system.
Assign codes to the data.
Identify recurring themes.

The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Streefkerk, R. (2023, June 22). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Raimo Streefkerk

Other students also liked, what is quantitative research | definition, uses & methods, what is qualitative research | methods & examples, mixed methods research | definition, guide & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 27–49 Cite as

Quantitative Research

Leigh A. Wilson 2 , 3
Reference work entry
First Online: 13 January 2019

4050 Accesses

4 Citations

Quantitative research methods are concerned with the planning, design, and implementation of strategies to collect and analyze data. Descartes, the seventeenth-century philosopher, suggested that how the results are achieved is often more important than the results themselves, as the journey taken along the research path is a journey of discovery. High-quality quantitative research is characterized by the attention given to the methods and the reliability of the tools used to collect the data. The ability to critique research in a systematic way is an essential component of a health professional’s role in order to deliver high quality, evidence-based healthcare. This chapter is intended to provide a simple overview of the way new researchers and health practitioners can understand and employ quantitative methods. The chapter offers practical, realistic guidance in a learner-friendly way and uses a logical sequence to understand the process of hypothesis development, study design, data collection and handling, and finally data analysis and interpretation.

Quantitative
Epidemiology
Data analysis
Methodology
Interpretation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

Available as PDF
Read on any device
Instant download
Own it forever
Available as EPUB and PDF
Durable hardcover edition
Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Babbie ER. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage; 2016.

Google Scholar

Descartes. Cited in Halverston, W. (1976). In: A concise introduction to philosophy, 3rd ed. New York: Random House; 1637.

Doll R, Hill AB. The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits. BMJ. 1954;328(7455):1529–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1529 .

Article Google Scholar

Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017.

McNabb DE. Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: quantitative and qualitative approaches. 2nd ed. New York: Armonk; 2007.

Merriam-Webster. Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com . Accessed 20th December 2017.

Olesen Larsen P, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2010;84(3):575–603.

Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc .

Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Publishing; 2009.

Sheehan J. Aspects of research methodology. Nurse Educ Today. 1986;6:193–203.

Wilson LA, Black DA. Health, science research and research methods. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

Leigh A. Wilson

Faculty of Health Science, Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leigh A. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Wilson, L.A. (2019). Quantitative Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_54

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_54

Published : 13 January 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-10-5250-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-10-5251-4

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List
HHS Author Manuscripts

Appraising Quantitative Research in Health Education: Guidelines for Public Health Educators

Leonard jack, jr..

Associate Dean for Research and Endowed Chair of Minority Health Disparities, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5345; Fax: 504-520-7971

Sandra C. Hayes

Central Mississippi Area Health Education Center, 350 West Woodrow Wilson, Suite 3320, Jackson, MS 39213; Telephone: 601-987-0272; Fax: 601-815-5388

Jeanfreau G. Scharalda

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Nursing, 1900 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112; Telephone: 504-568-4140; Fax: 504-568-5853

Barbara Stetson

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 317 Life Sciences Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292; Telephone: 502-852-2540; Fax: 502-852-8904

Nkenge H. Jones-Jack

Epidemiologist & Evaluation Consultant, Metairie, Louisiana 70002. Telephone: 678-524-1147; Fax: 504-267-4080

Matthew Valliere

Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Bureau of Primary Care and Rural Health, Office of the Secretary, 628 North 4th Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3118; Telephone: 225-342-2655; Fax: 225-342-2652

William R. Kirchain

Division of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, Room 121, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5395; Fax: 504-520-7971

Michael Fagen

Co-Associate Editor for the Evaluation and Practice section of Health Promotion Practice , Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., M/C 923, Chicago, IL 60608-1260, Telephone: 312-355-0647; Fax: 312-996-3551

Cris LeBlanc

Centers of Excellence Scholar, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5345; Fax: 504-520-7971

Many practicing health educators do not feel they possess the skills necessary to critically appraise quantitative research. This publication is designed to help provide practicing health educators with basic tools helpful to facilitate a better understanding of quantitative research. This article describes the major components—title, introduction, methods, analyses, results and discussion sections—of quantitative research. Readers will be introduced to information on the various types of study designs and seven key questions health educators can use to facilitate the appraisal process. Upon reading, health educators will be in a better position to determine whether research studies are well designed and executed.

Appraising the Quality of Quantitative Research in Health Education

Practicing health educators often find themselves with little time to read published research in great detail. Some health educators with limited time to read scientific papers may get frustrated as they get bogged down trying to understand research terminology, methods, and approaches. The purpose of appraising a scientific publication is to assess whether the study’s research questions (hypotheses), methods and results (findings) are sufficiently valid to produce useful information ( Fowkes and Fulton, 1991 ; Donnelly, 2004 ; Greenhalgh and Taylor, 1997 ; Johnson and Onwuegbuze, 2004 ; Greenhalgh, 1997 ; Yin, 2003; and Hennekens and Buring, 1987 ). Having the ability to deconstruct and reconstruct scientific publications is a critical skill in a results-oriented environment linked to increasing demands and expectations for improved program outcomes and strong justifications to program focus and direction. Health educators do must not solely rely on the opinions of researchers, but, rather, increase their confidence in their own abilities to discern the quality of published scientific research. Health educators with little experience reading and appraising scientific publications, may find this task less difficult if they: 1) become more familiar with the key components of a research publication, and 2) utilize questions presented in this article to critically appraise the strengths and weaknesses of published research.

Key Components of a Scientific Research Publication

The key components of a research publication should provide important information that is needed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the research. Key components typically include the: publication title , abstract , introduction , research methods used to address the research question(s) or hypothesis, statistical analysis used, results , and the researcher’s interpretation and conclusion or recommended use of results to inform future research or practice. A brief description of these components follows:

Publication Title

A general heading or description should provide immediate insight into the intent of the research. Titles may include information regarding the focus of the research, population or target audience being studied, and study design.

An abstract provides the reader with a brief description of the overall research, how it was done, statistical techniques employed, key results,and relevant implications or recommendations.

Introduction

This section elaborates on the content mentioned in the abstract and provides a better idea of what to anticipate in the manuscript. The introduction provides a succinct presentation of previously published literature, thus offering a purpose (rationale) for the study.

This component of the publication provides critical information on the type of research methods used to conduct the study. Common examples of study designs used to conduct quantitative research include cross sectional study, cohort study, case-control study, and controlled trial. The methods section should contain information on the inclusion and exclusion criteria used to identify participants in the study.

Quantitative data contains information that is quantifiable, perhaps through surveys that are analyzed using statistical tests to determine if the results happened by chance. Two types of statistical analyses are used: descriptive and inferential ( Johnson and Onwuegbuze, 2004 ). Descriptive statistics are used to describe the basic features of the study data and provide simple summaries about the sample and measures. With inferential statistics, researchers are trying to reach conclusions that extend beyond the immediate data alone. Thus, they use inferential statistics to make inferences from the data to more general conditions.

This section presents the reader with the researcher’s data and results of statistical analyses described in the method section. Thus, this section must align closely with the methods section.

Discussion (Conclusion)

This section should explain what the data means thereby summarizing main results and findings for the reader. Important limitations (such as the use of a non-random sample, the absence of a control group, and short duration of the intervention) should be discussed. Researchers should discuss how each limitation can impact the applicability and use of study results. This section also presents recommendations on ways the study can help advance future health education and practice.

Critically Appraising the Strengths and Weaknesses of Published Research

During careful reading of the analysis, results, and discussion (conclusion) sections, what key questions might you ask yourself in order to critically appraise the strengths and weaknesses of the research? Based on a careful review of the literature ( Greenhalgh and Taylor, 1997 ; Greenhalgh, 1997 ; and Hennekens and Buring, 1987 ) and our research experiences, we have identified seven key questions around which to guide your assessment of quantitative research.

1) Is a study design identified and appropriately applied?

Study designs refer to the methodology used to investigate a particular health phenomenon. Becoming familiar with the various study designs will help prepare you to critically assess whether its selection was applied adequately to answer the research questions (or hypotheses). As mentioned previously, common examples of study designs frequently used to conduct quantitative research include cross sectional study, cohort study, case-control study, and controlled trail. A brief description of each can be found in Table 1 .

Definitions of Study Designs

2) Is the study sample representative of the group from which it is drawn?

The study sample must be representative of the group from which it is drawn. The study sample must therefore be typical of the wider target audience to whom the research might apply. Addressing whether the study sample is representative of the group from which it is drawn will require the researcher to take into consideration the sampling method and sample size.

Sampling Method

Many sampling methods are used individually or in combination. Keep in mind that sampling methods are divided into two categories: probability sampling and non-probability sampling ( Last, 2001 ). Probability sampling (also called random sampling) is any sampling scheme in which the probability of choosing each individual is the same (or at least known, so it can be readjusted mathematically to be equal). Non-probability sampling is any sampling scheme in which the probability of an individual being chosen is unknown. Typically, researchers should offer a rationale for utilizing non-probability sampling, and when utilized, be aware of its limitations. For example, use of a convenience sample (choosing individuals in an unstructured manner) can be justified when collecting pilot data around which future studies employing more rigorous sampling methods will be utilized.

Sample Size

Established statistical theories and formulas are used to generate sample size calculations—the recommended number of individuals necessary in order to have sufficient power to detect meaningful results at a certain level of statistical significance. In the methods section, look for a statement or two confirming whether steps where taken to obtain the appropriate sample size.

3) In research studies using a control group, is this group adequate for the purpose of the study?

Source of controls.

In case-control and cohort studies, the source of controls should be such that the distribution of characteristics not under investigation are similar to those in the cases or study cohort.

In case-control studies both cases and controls are often matched on certain characteristics such as age, sex, income, and race. The criteria used for including and excluding study participants must be adequately described and examined carefully. Inclusion and exclusion criteria may include: ethnicity, age of diagnosis, length of time living with a health condition, geographic location, and presence or absence of complications. You should critically assess whether matching across these characteristics actually occurred.

4) What is the validity of measurements and outcomes identified in the study?

Validity is the extent to which a measurement captures what it claims to measure. This might take the form of questions contained on a survey, questionnaire or instrument. Researchers should address one or more of the following types of validity: face, content, criterion-related, and construct ( Last, 2001 ; William and Donnelly, 2008).

Face validity

Face validity assures that, upon examination, the variable of interest can measure what it intends to measure. If the researcher has chosen to study a variable that has not been studied before, he/she usually will need to start with face validity.

Content validity

Content validity involves comparing the content of the measurement technique to the known literature on the topic and validating the fact that the tool (e.g., survey, questionnaire) does represent the literature accurately.

Criterion-related validity

Criterion-related validity involves making sure the measures within a survey when tested proves to be effective in predicting criterion or indicators of a construct.

Construct validity

Construct validity deals with the validation of the construct that underlies the research. Here, researchers test the theory that underlies the hypothesis or research question.

5) To what extent is a common source of bias called blindness taken into account?

During data collection, a common source of bias is that subjects and/or those collecting the data are not blind to the purpose of the research. This can likely be the result of researchers going the extra mile to make sure those in the experimental group benefit from the intervention ( Fowkes and Fulton, 1991 ). Inadequate blindness can be a problem in studies utilizing all types of study designs. While total blindness is not possible, appraising whether steps were taken to be sure issues related to ensure blindness occurred is essential.

6) To what extent is the study considered complete with regard to drop outs and missing data?

Regardless of the study design employed, one must assess not only the proportion of drop outs in each group, but also why they dropped out. This may point to possible bias, as well as determine what efforts were taken to retain participants in the study.

Missing data

Despite the fact that missing data are a part of almost all research, it should still be appraised. There are several reasons why the data may be missing. The nature and extent to which data is missing should be explained.

7) To what extent are study results influenced by factors that negatively impact their credibility?

Contamination.

In research studies comparing the effectiveness of a structured intervention, contamination occurs when the control group makes changes based on learning what those participating in the intervention are doing. Despite the fact that researchers typically do not report the extent to which contamination occurs, you should nevertheless try to assess whether contamination negatively impacted the credibility of study results.

Confounding factors

A confounding factor in a study is a variable which is related to one or more of the measurements (measures or variables) defined in a study. A confounding factor may mask an actual association or falsely demonstrate an apparent association between the study variables where no real association between them exists. If confounding factors are not measured and considered, study results may be biased and compromised.

The guidelines and questions presented in this article are by no means exhaustive. However, when applied, they can help health education practitioners obtain a deeper understanding of the quality of published research. While no study is 100% perfect, we do encourage health education practitioners to pause before taking researchers at their word that study results are both accurate and impressive. If you find yourself answering ‘no’ to a majority of the key questions provided, then it is probably safe to say that, from your perspective, the quality of the research is questionable.

Over time, as you repeatedly apply the guidelines presented in this article, you will become more confident and interested in reading research publications from beginning to end. While this article is geared to health educators, it can help anyone interested in learning how to appraise published research. Table 2 lists additional reading resources that can help improve one’s understanding and knowledge of quantitative research. This article and the reading resources identified in Table 2 can serve as useful tools to frame informative conversations with your peers regarding the strengths and weaknesses of published quantitative research in health education.

Publications on How to Read, Write and Appraise Quantitative Research

Contributor Information

Leonard Jack, Jr., Associate Dean for Research and Endowed Chair of Minority Health Disparities, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5345; Fax: 504-520-7971.

Sandra C. Hayes, Central Mississippi Area Health Education Center, 350 West Woodrow Wilson, Suite 3320, Jackson, MS 39213; Telephone: 601-987-0272; Fax: 601-815-5388.

Jeanfreau G. Scharalda, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Nursing, 1900 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112; Telephone: 504-568-4140; Fax: 504-568-5853.

Barbara Stetson, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 317 Life Sciences Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292; Telephone: 502-852-2540; Fax: 502-852-8904.

Nkenge H. Jones-Jack, Epidemiologist & Evaluation Consultant, Metairie, Louisiana 70002. Telephone: 678-524-1147; Fax: 504-267-4080.

Matthew Valliere, Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Bureau of Primary Care and Rural Health, Office of the Secretary, 628 North 4th Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3118; Telephone: 225-342-2655; Fax: 225-342-2652.

William R. Kirchain, Division of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, Room 121, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5395; Fax: 504-520-7971.

Michael Fagen, Co-Associate Editor for the Evaluation and Practice section of Health Promotion Practice , Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., M/C 923, Chicago, IL 60608-1260, Telephone: 312-355-0647; Fax: 312-996-3551.

Cris LeBlanc, Centers of Excellence Scholar, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, 1 Drexel Drive, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125; Telephone: 504-520-5345; Fax: 504-520-7971.

Fowkes FG, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. British Medical Journal. 1991; 302 :1136–40. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Donnelly RA. The Complete Idiots Guide to Statistics. Alpha Books; New York, NY: 2004. pp. 6–7. [ Google Scholar ]
Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) British Medical Journal. 1997; 315 :740–743. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers. British Medical Journal. 315 :305–308. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuze AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 2004; 33 :14–26. [ Google Scholar ]
Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Little, Brown and Company; Boston, Massachusetts: 1987. pp. 106–108. [ Google Scholar ]
Last JM. A dictionary of epidemiology. 4. Oxford University Press, Inc; New York, New York: 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
Trochim WM, Donnelly J. Research methods knowledge base. 3. Atomic Dog; Mason, Ohio: 2008. pp. 6–8. [ Google Scholar ]

Writing a Good Research Title: Things to Avoid

When writing manuscripts , too many scholars neglect the research title. This phrase, along with the abstract, is what people will mostly see and read online. Title research of publications shows that the research paper title does matter a lot . Both bibliometrics and altmetrics tracking of citations are now, for better or worse, used to gauge a paper’s “success” for its author(s) and the journal publishing it. Interesting research topics coupled with good or clever yet accurate research titles can draw more attention to your work from peers and the public alike.

It would be helpful to have a list of what should never go into the title of a journal article. With this “don’ts” list, authors could have a handy tool to maximize the impact of their research. Titles for research manuscripts need not be complex. It can even have style. They can state the main result or idea of the paper (i.e., declarative). Alternatively, they can indicate the subject covered by the paper (i.e., descriptive). A third form, which should be used sparingly, conveys the research in the form of an open question.

A Handy List of Don’ts

The period generally has no place in a title (even a declarative phrase can work without a period)
Likewise, any kind of dashes to separates title parts (however, hyphens to link words is fine)
Chemical formula, like H 2 O, CH 4 , etc. (instead use their common or generic names)
Avoid roman numerals (e.g., III, IX, etc.)
Semi-colons, as in “;” (the colon, however, is very useful to make two-part titles)
The taxonomic hierarchy of species of plants, animals, fungi, etc. is not needed
Abbreviations (except for RNA, DNA which is standard now and widely known)
Initialisms and acronyms (e.g., “Ca” may get confused with CA, which denotes cancer)
Avoid question marks (this tends to decrease citations, but posing a question is useful in economics and philosophy papers or when the results are not so clear-cut as hoped for)
Uncommon words (a few are okay, but too many can influence altmetric scoring)
Numerical exponents, or units (e.g. km -1 or km/hr)
Vague terms (e.g., “with” could be re-written with a more specific verb; “amongst” rectified by simpler word ordering)
Cryptic/complex drug names (use the generic name if allowed to)
Obvious or non-specific openings with a conjunction: e.g., “Report on”, “A Study of”, “Results of”, “An Experimental Investigation of”, etc. (these don’t contribute meaning!)
Italics, unless it is used for the species names of studied organisms
Shorten scientific names (not coli , but write instead Escherichia coli )
Keep it short. Aim for 50 to 100 characters, but not more (shorter titles are cited more often) or less than 13 words

Related: Finished preparing your manuscript? Check out this post now for additional points to consider submitting your manuscript!

Use the List

Take some time out to look at a good research title example. It could be one that you liked or a recognized collection of best research titles. Discuss these with your colleagues and co-authors. Write several title drafts in various forms, either in the declarative or descriptive form, with or without a colon. Then use the list above as a guide to polish and winnow your sample research title down to an effective title for your manuscript.

A great title should interest the reader enough to make him/her want to download your paper and actually read it. Importantly, in selecting the words, aim to both pique the reader’s curiosity and sum up the research work done. Bear mind, too, that a good title should also ensure your publication is easily found. This is now crucial for digital indexing and archiving purposes.

Research Titles in the 21 st Century

Remember, a good research paper title is now essential. However, it is no substitute for good quality science and scholarship. Exaggerated or sensational titles, especially those that make unwarranted generalizations, may well get more attention from the media. Given the growing use of Twitter and other social media platforms, the research paper title is clearly gaining value and importance. Title research, therefore, is critical to understand what effect a given type or use of a research title has on its readership.

Did you like this post? Will it help you choose a good title for your next report/manuscript? Please share your comments in the section below.

Good article, but I think that before writing the title and the paper itself, you need to choose a topic for which to write and the topic should be simple and understandable for yourself.

Great post! Helped me in my research project title selection. Sharing it with my fellow classmates as well!

thank you. it helps me to choose my title as well.thanks

very useful and handy article

Yes its so very thankful to guided to me how to created research title

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

Career Corner
Infographic

Top 10 Tips on Choosing an Attractive Research Title

Choosing an appropriate research title is necessary to draw readers’ attention. It instantly helps readers…

Manuscripts & Grants
Reporting Research

6 Important Tips on Writing a Research Paper Title

When you are searching for a research study on a particular topic, you probably notice…

Do Declarative Titles in Research Articles Yield Increased Readership?

The titles of journal articles fall under three basic categories: Declarative – states main findings…

Does Your Article Title Matter?

You probably spend a fair amount of time searching for relevant journal articles to read…

Writing the Title Page (Part 1)

The title page is the first page of your article, and therefore it is important…

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

2000+ blog articles
50+ Webinars
10+ Expert podcasts
50+ Infographics
10+ Checklists
Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

What should universities' stance be on AI tools in research and academic writing?

Clinical Research Assistant

How to apply.

A cover letter is required for consideration for this position and should be attached as the first page of your resume. The cover letter should address your specific interest in the position and outline skills and experience that directly relate to this position.

Mission Statement

Michigan Medicine improves the health of patients, populations and communities through excellence in education, patient care, community service, research and technology development, and through leadership activities in Michigan, nationally and internationally. Our mission is guided by our Strategic Principles and has three critical components; patient care, education and research that together enhance our contribution to society.

Michigan Medicine Neuroscience Institute was established in 1955 to bring together investigators from across the University of Michigan campus to probe the mysteries of the brain on a cellular, molecular, and behavioral level. Its 140 faculty and affiliate members seek to understand the function and dysfunction of the human brain.

Responsibilities*

Manage REDCap database, send periodic REDCap questionaries and reminders.
Work with Excel data sheets.
Assist with Fitbit set-up and MyDataHelps set-up.
Assist with recruitment of participants into the study & substudies.
Email, schedule participants, schedule study panelists and maintain research schedule.
Assist with in-person research protocol and maintain compliance with lab safety.
Organize, transport, and possibly process saliva and/or blood samples.

Required Qualifications*

Bachelor's degree in Biology.
Proficient in REDcap and MyDataHelps and Excel.
Previous experience with the Trier Social Stress Test.
Experience assisting with IRB application and in the organization of longitudinal studies with human study participants,
Must be a team player, highly organized and detail oriented.
Experience advising/guiding undergraduate students.
Strong written and verbal communication and interpersonal skills.
Demonstrated ethical behavior and dedication to protecting subject privacy.
Willingness to learn protocols and follow directions.
Willingness to centrifuge and aliquot samples.

Background Screening

Michigan Medicine conducts background screening and pre-employment drug testing on job candidates upon acceptance of a contingent job offer and may use a third party administrator to conduct background screenings. Background screenings are performed in compliance with the Fair Credit Report Act. Pre-employment drug testing applies to all selected candidates, including new or additional faculty and staff appointments, as well as transfers from other U-M campuses.

Application Deadline

Job openings are posted for a minimum of seven calendar days. The review and selection process may begin as early as the eighth day after posting. This opening may be removed from posting boards and filled anytime after the minimum posting period has ended.

U-M EEO/AA Statement

The University of Michigan is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer.

IMAGES

quantitative research title examples for ict students
Quantitative Research Title
Sample Research Titles for Quantitative Research
Writing the Research Title and Background of the Study
How to Make a Research Title (Quantitative)
😂 Quantitative research title. Format for a quantitative research

VIDEO

Quantitative research process
Sample Qualitative and Quantitative Research Titles
Quantitative Research Title for TVL Students
Quantitative Research
Quantitative Research, Types and Examples Latest
Lecture 41: Quantitative Research

COMMENTS

500+ Quantitative Research Titles and Topics
Quantitative Research Topics. Quantitative Research Topics are as follows: The effects of social media on self-esteem among teenagers. A comparative study of academic achievement among students of single-sex and co-educational schools. The impact of gender on leadership styles in the workplace.
100+ Best Quantitative Research Topics For Students In 2023
Quantitative research is a common approach in the natural and social sciences, like marketing, business, sociology, chemistry, biology, economics, and psychology. So, if you are fond of statistics and figures, a quantitative research title would be an excellent option for your research proposal or project.
How to Start a Research Title? Examples from 105,975 Titles
The most common 3-word phrases to start a title. Three-word phrase. Number of occurrences. (in 105,975 titles) Percent of occurrences. The role of…. 412. 0.39%. The effect of….
200+ Research Title Ideas To Explore In 2024
200+ Research Title Ideas To Explore In 2024. Choosing a compelling research title is a critical step in the research process, as it serves as the gateway to capturing the attention of readers and potential collaborators. A well-crafted research title not only encapsulates the essence of your study but also entices readers to delve deeper into ...
How to write the title for a quantitative research?
To write a good title for a quantitative paper, you should follow these steps: List down the following items: The most important key words/concepts in your study. The methodology used. The samples/areas studied. Your most important finding. Draft a title that includes all the items you've listed (if you wish, do so in a sentence format).
A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research
INTRODUCTION. Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses.1,2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results.3,4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the ...
Quantitative research
Quantitative research is a research strategy that focuses on quantifying the collection and analysis of data. ... Quantitative research using statistical methods starts with the collection of data, based on the hypothesis or theory. Usually a big sample of data is collected - this would require verification, validation and recording before ...
A Quick Guide to Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences
About the Book. This resource is intended as an easy-to-use guide for anyone who needs some quick and simple advice on quantitative aspects of research in social sciences, covering subjects such as education, sociology, business, nursing. If you area qualitative researcher who needs to venture into the world of numbers, or a student instructed ...
Quantitative Methods
Definition. Quantitative method is the collection and analysis of numerical data to answer scientific research questions. Quantitative method is used to summarize, average, find patterns, make predictions, and test causal associations as well as generalizing results to wider populations.
Quantitative Research: What It Is, Practices & Methods
Quantitative research involves analyzing and gathering numerical data to uncover trends, calculate averages, evaluate relationships, and derive overarching insights. It's used in various fields, including the natural and social sciences. Quantitative data analysis employs statistical techniques for processing and interpreting numeric data.
What is Quantitative Research? Definition, Methods, Types, and Examples
Quantitative research is the process of collecting and analyzing numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest. This type of research helps in testing the causal relationships between variables, making predictions, and generalizing results to wider populations. The purpose of quantitative research is to test a predefined ...
Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise
Introduction. This article deals with drafting a suitable "title" and an appropriate "abstract" for an original research paper. Because the "title" and the "abstract" are the "initial impressions" or the "face" of a research article, they need to be drafted correctly, accurately, carefully, meticulously, and consume time and energy.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] Often, these ...
What Is Quantitative Research?
Revised on June 22, 2023. Quantitative research is the process of collecting and analyzing numerical data. It can be used to find patterns and averages, make predictions, test causal relationships, and generalize results to wider populations. Quantitative research is the opposite of qualitative research, which involves collecting and analyzing ...
Designing Research Proposal in Quantitative Approach
This chapter provides a comprehensive guideline for writing a research proposal in quantitative approach. It starts with the definition and purpose of writing a research proposal followed by a description of essential parts of a research proposal and subjects included in each part, organization of a research proposal, and guidelines for writing different parts of a research proposal including ...
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Social scientists are concerned with the study of people. Quantitative research is a way to learn about a particular group of people, known as a sample population. Using scientific inquiry, quantitative research relies on data that are observed or measured to examine questions about the sample population. Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia ...
How to Write a Research Paper Title with Examples
Make sure your research title describes (a) the topic, (b) the method, (c) the sample, and (d) the results of your study. You can use the following formula: [ Result ]: A [ method] study of [ topic] among [ sample] Example: Meditation makes nurses perform better: a qualitative study of mindfulness meditation among German nursing students. Avoid ...
How can I create a title that will reflect the quantitative research
The manuscript title is decided based on the focus or the novelty of your research. The research title is often supported with experimental design. Quasi-experimental research attempts to establish cause-effect relationships among the variables. An example of a quasi-experimental research can be the effect of gender on algebra achievement.
Writing Quantitative Research Studies
In quantitative research, the choice of study designs is often made at the start of the study when developing a research question and hypothesis. Study designs are broadly divided into two categories: descriptive and analytical (see Fig. 2). Descriptive studies are conducted with the aim to study the amount and distribution of the disease ...
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research
When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings. Both are important for gaining different kinds of knowledge. Quantitative research. Quantitative research is expressed in numbers and graphs. It is used to test or confirm theories and assumptions.
Quantitative Research
Quantitative research methods are concerned with the planning, design, and implementation of strategies to collect and analyze data. Descartes, the seventeenth-century philosopher, suggested that how the results are achieved is often more important than the results themselves, as the journey taken along the research path is a journey of discovery. . High-quality quantitative research is ...
Appraising Quantitative Research in Health Education: Guidelines for
This publication is designed to help provide practicing health educators with basic tools helpful to facilitate a better understanding of quantitative research. This article describes the major components—title, introduction, methods, analyses, results and discussion sections—of quantitative research. Readers will be introduced to ...
Writing a Good Research Title: Things to Avoid
A Handy List of Don'ts. The period generally has no place in a title (even a declarative phrase can work without a period) Likewise, any kind of dashes to separates title parts (however, hyphens to link words is fine) Chemical formula, like H 2 O, CH 4, etc. (instead use their common or generic names) Avoid roman numerals (e.g., III, IX, etc.)
Clinical Research Assistant
The review and selection process may begin as early as the eighth day after posting. This opening may be removed from posting boards and filled anytime after the minimum posting period has ended. ... Job Title. Clinical Research Assistant. Work Location. Ann Arbor Campus. Ann Arbor, MI. Full/Part Time. Full-Time. Regular/Temporary. Regular ...

100+ Quantitative Research Topics For Students

How to Get a Title of Quantitative Research

Excellent Topics For Quantitative Research

We Are A Call Away

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

How to Start a Research Title? Examples from 105,975 Titles

Common ways to start a title

Can a title start with “Why”?

Further reading

200+ Research Title Ideas To Explore In 2024

Characteristics of a Good Research Title

Clarity and Precision

Relevance to the Research Topic

Conciseness and Avoidance of Ambiguity

Use of Keywords

Reflecting the Research Methodology or Approach

What are the Strategies for Generating Research Title Ideas?

200+ Research Title Ideas: Category-Wise

Environmental Science and Sustainability

Health and Medicine

Social Sciences and Psychology

Business and Economics

Education and Pedagogy

Psychology and Behavior

Biology and Genetics

Urban Planning and Architecture

Linguistics and Communication

Political Science and International Relations

Physics and Astronomy

Education Technology (EdTech)

Sociology and Anthropology

Materials Science and Engineering

History and Archaeology

Marketing and Consumer Behavior

Neuroscience and Cognitive Science

Public Health and Epidemiology

Robotics and Automation

Literature and Literary Criticism

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Cultural Studies and Media

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Social Work and Community Development

Artificial Intelligence and Ethics

Linguistics and Computational Linguistics

Geology and Earth Sciences

Political Economy and Global Governance

Food Science and Nutrition

Sociology and Technology

Materials Science and Nanotechnology

Communication and Media Studies

Developmental Psychology

Aerospace Engineering

Political Psychology

Marine Biology and Conservation

Artificial Intelligence and Creativity

Cultural Anthropology

Quantum Computing and Information Science

Public Policy and Urban Planning

Gerontology and Aging Studies

Examples of Effective Research Titles

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Research Title Creation

Ethical Considerations in Research Title Creation

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

A Quick Guide to Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences

Formats Available

Table of Contents

Ancillary Material

About the Contributors

Contribute to this Page

Quantitative Research: What It Is, Practices & Methods

What is Quantitative Research?

Quantitative Research Characteristics

Quantitative Research Methods

Primary Quantitative Research Methods

A. Techniques and Types of Studies

01. Survey Research

02. Correlational Research

03. Causal-comparative Research