death penalty should be abolished ielts essay

Free IELTS lessons signup

• Academic practice
• General practice
• Task 1 Academic
• Task 1 General
• Task 2 (essay)

IELTS band 9 essay: death penalty

Here you can find advice how to structure IELTS essay and IELTS model answer for death penalty topic. Question type: advantages and disadvantages .

Here is the question card:

Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.

Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion.

So this is the advantage/disadvantage essay. In this essay you're asked about :

• Advantages of capital punishment
• Disadvantages of capital punishment
• Your opinion about it

Before writing this IELTS essay, you should decide what’s your opinion and then choose your arguments to describe pros and cons of death penalty. You don’t have to make up very complicate ideas. Even simple, but well-written arguments can often give you a band 9 for writing .

Some of the possible arguments :

• Disadvantages of capital punishment :
• we have no rights to kill other humans
• innocent people can be killed because of unfair sentences
• even criminals deserve a second chance
• Advantages of capital punishment :
• it prevents major crimes
• it restores equilibrium of justice
• it lessens expenses on maintenance of prisoners

How to structure my answer?

Surely, there are a lot of ways to organise this essay. But here is one possible way of structuring the answer to produce a band 9 essay :

Introduction : rephrase the topic and state your opinion.

Body paragraphs :

• paragraph 1: disadvantages of death penalty
• paragraph 2: advantages of death penalty

Conclusion : sum up the ideas from body paragraphs and briefly give your opinion.

Band 9 essay sample (death penalty)

Many people believe that death penalty is necessary to keep security system efficient in the society. While there are some negative aspects of capital punishment, I agree with the view that without it we will become more vulnerable to violence.

Death penalty can be considered unsuitable punishment for several reasons. The strongest argument is that we have no rights to kill other humans. Right to live is the basic right of any human being, and no one can infringe this right, irrespective of the person’s deeds. Moreover, innocent people can face wrongful execution. Such unfair sentences take away lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. And besides, sometimes criminals repent of their acts. In this case they should be given a second chance to improve themselves.

However, I believe that capital punishment is necessary in the society. Firstly, it is an effective deterrent of major crimes. The best method to prevent a person from committing crime is to show the consequences of his or her actions. For example, the government of Pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism by enforcing death penalties for the members of terrorist organisations. Secondly, the governments spend large sums of national budget on maintenance of prisoners. Instead, this money can be used for the development of the society and welfare of the people.

To sum up, although capital punishment has some disadvantages, I think that it proves to be the best way of controlling criminals, lessening governmental expenses and preventing other people from doing crimes.

(257 words)

Useful vocabulary

capital punishment = death penalty

to commit a crime - to do a crime

deterrent of major crimes - something that prevents big crimes

to face wrongful execution - to be mistaken for a criminal and killed for that

to infringe someone’s right - restrict someone’s right, hurt someone’s interests

innocent people - people who are not guilty or responsible for crimes

to repent of something - to feel sorry for something

right to live is basic right of any human being

unfair sentence - not fair judgement

May 11, 2024

The death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime. To what extent do you agree?

“the death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime. to what extent do you agree”, sample answer:.

The issue of whether the death penalty is an effective method for controlling and reducing serious crime is a highly contentious one. While some argue that it acts as a deterrent, others believe that it is inhumane and ineffective. In my opinion, I do not fully agree that the death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime.

Proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a strong deterrent to potential criminals. They believe that the fear of facing the ultimate punishment will dissuade individuals from committing heinous crimes. However, there is limited evidence to support this claim. Many studies have shown that the presence of the death penalty does not necessarily lead to a decrease in serious crime rates. In fact, countries that have abolished the death penalty have not experienced a surge in criminal activity.

Furthermore, the implementation of the death penalty raises serious ethical and moral concerns. The irreversible nature of the punishment means that there is always a risk of executing an innocent person. This goes against the fundamental principles of justice and human rights. Additionally, the death penalty does not address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education and opportunities. It is a simplistic solution to a complex issue.

Instead of relying on the death penalty, I believe that a more effective approach to controlling and reducing serious crime involves addressing the underlying social and economic factors that contribute to criminal behavior. This includes investing in education, providing support for at-risk individuals, and implementing rehabilitation programs for offenders. By addressing these root causes, we can create a society where crime is less prevalent and individuals are less likely to engage in criminal activities.

In conclusion, while the death penalty may seem like a quick fix for controlling serious crime, it is not the most effective or ethical solution. By addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior, we can create a safer and more just society for all.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Be First to Comment

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Death Penalty

IELTS WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words about the following topic:

Some people argue that the death penalty should be abolished because it is inhumane and ineffective. Others believe it is necessary to deter crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample Answer, C1 English Level, Advanced, Band Score 6.5-7.5

• Paraphrase of the topic: The death penalty is a contentious issue, with some arguing for its abolition due to inhumanity and ineffectiveness, while others advocate for its necessity as a crime deterrent.
• Main opinion or idea: The death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective crime prevention and punishment methods.
• Support for the main opinion: The death penalty is considered inhumane and violates the right to life.
• Personal experience and knowledge: As someone who values the sanctity of human life, I find it challenging to support a system that takes away a person’s fundamental right to live.
• Support for the main opinion: The death penalty may not effectively deter crime.
• Personal experience and knowledge: While proponents argue it deters criminals, I believe focusing on rehabilitation and addressing root causes of crime can be more effective in reducing criminal behavior.
• Summary of body paragraphs: The death penalty debate revolves around its perceived inhumanity and effectiveness as a deterrent.
• Restate the main opinion: Abolishing the death penalty is the more just and compassionate approach, emphasizing humane crime prevention and punishment methods.
• Closing thought: Prioritizing rehabilitation, education, employment opportunities, and mental health support can contribute to building a more equitable and safer society.

The topic of the death penalty has long been a subject of intense debate, with some advocating for its abolition due to its perceived inhumanity and lack of efficacy, while others argue for its necessity as a crime deterrent. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints and offer my opinion on the matter, drawing from personal experiences and knowledge.

Those in favor of abolishing the death penalty assert that it is a cruel and inhumane form of punishment that violates the right to life. Moreover, there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not serve as an effective deterrent against crime. As someone who believes in the sanctity of human life, I find it difficult to support a system that takes away the very essence of what it means to be human.

On the other hand, proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a necessary deterrent, preventing potential criminals from committing heinous acts out of fear of the ultimate consequence. They believe that the fear of facing the death penalty can dissuade individuals from engaging in violent and severe crimes. While I understand the intention behind this viewpoint, I believe that the death penalty fails to address the root causes of crime and does not effectively reduce criminal behavior.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective methods of punishment and crime prevention. Instead of focusing on punishment alone, society should invest in rehabilitation and social programs that address the underlying factors that lead individuals to commit crimes. Additionally, promoting education, employment opportunities, and mental health support can play a crucial role in reducing crime rates.

In conclusion, the debate over the death penalty is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. While some believe it is necessary for deterring crime, others argue for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and inefficacy. From my perspective, prioritizing humane and effective approaches to crime prevention and rehabilitation is essential for building a more just and compassionate society.

The death penalty has been a topic of debate, with some advocating for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and ineffectiveness, while others argue for its necessity as a deterrent against crime. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints and offer my opinion based on personal experiences and knowledge.

Those in favor of abolishing the death penalty argue that it is a cruel and inhumane punishment that violates the right to life. Moreover, studies suggest that it may not serve as an effective deterrent to crime. As someone who values the sanctity of human life, I am inclined to agree with this perspective. The idea of taking a person’s life as a form of punishment raises moral and ethical concerns, and there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not necessarily prevent crime from occurring.

However, proponents of the death penalty believe that it acts as a necessary deterrent, preventing potential criminals from committing serious offenses due to fear of the ultimate consequence. While I understand the intention behind this viewpoint, I remain skeptical of its effectiveness as a crime deterrent. From my observations, crime rates do not necessarily decrease in regions with the death penalty, indicating that other factors play a significant role in crime prevention.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of more humane and effective crime prevention methods. Rather than focusing solely on punishment, societies should invest in addressing the root causes of crime through education, rehabilitation programs, and social support. A comprehensive approach that emphasizes rehabilitation and prevention can be more conducive to reducing crime rates and fostering a safer society.

In conclusion, the debate over the death penalty revolves around its perceived inhumanity and efficacy as a crime deterrent. While some argue for its abolition to uphold human rights, others advocate for its necessity to deter potential criminals. From my perspective, prioritizing humane crime prevention measures and rehabilitation is a more progressive and just approach to building a safer and more compassionate society.

The death penalty has long been a contentious topic, with some advocating for its abolition due to concerns of inhumanity and inefficacy, while others assert its necessity as a crime deterrent. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and offer my opinion based on personal experiences and knowledge.

Supporters of abolishing the death penalty argue that it is a cruel and inhumane form of punishment that violates the right to life. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime. As someone who values human rights and believes in the sanctity of life, I am inclined to agree with this viewpoint. The idea of taking a life as a means of retribution raises ethical dilemmas and does not necessarily address the root causes of criminal behavior.

On the other hand, proponents of the death penalty believe that it serves as a necessary deterrent, discouraging potential offenders from committing heinous crimes. While I understand the intention behind this perspective, I find it challenging to support a system that relies on fear rather than focusing on rehabilitation and crime prevention. From my observations, crime rates do not necessarily decrease in regions with the death penalty, indicating the need for more comprehensive approaches to addressing criminal behavior.

In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished in favor of alternative forms of punishment and crime prevention. Rather than focusing on retribution, societies should prioritize rehabilitation programs that aim to address the underlying causes of criminal activity. Furthermore, investing in education, social support systems, and mental health resources can contribute to reducing crime rates more effectively.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the death penalty centers on its perceived inhumanity and effectiveness as a crime deterrent. While some argue for its abolition to uphold human rights, others believe in its necessity to deter potential offenders. From my perspective, shifting the focus from punitive measures to comprehensive crime prevention strategies is essential for building a more just and compassionate society.

QUICK LINKS

Speaking Part 1 Speaking Part 2 Speaking Part 3 Reading Mini Test Academic Reading Full Practice Test General Reading Full Practice Test Writing Task 1 Writing Task 2 Ielts Listening Practice Test Ielts Listening Full Practice Test

Single Lesson Complete IELTS Program Essential IELTS Package Quick IELTS Course Book With Us

IELTS PRESS

About Ielts About Us Testimonials Privacy Policy

Social Media Directory

©2021. IELTS PRESS. All Rights Reserved.

IELTS is a registered trademark held by IELTS Partners, encompassing the British Council, IELTS Australia Pty Ltd, and the University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. These entities were not engaged in the creation of, and do not support, this website.

Single Lesson with Master Shane Complete IELTS Program Essential IELTS Package Quick IELTS Course Book With Us

Rethinking Justice: why the Death Penalty should be Abolished

This essay about the reasons to abolish the death penalty discusses the ethical, practical, and financial implications of capital punishment. It argues that the irreversible nature of the death penalty, coupled with the risk of executing innocent people, raises serious moral concerns. The essay also points out the lack of evidence supporting the death penalty as a crime deterrent and highlights the biases in its application, which disproportionately affect minorities and those of lower socio-economic status. Additionally, it notes the higher costs of death penalty cases compared to life imprisonment. Finally, the essay emphasizes a shift in global norms, with a growing number of countries abolishing the death penalty in favor of more humane approaches to justice. This reflects a broader move toward upholding human rights and fostering a fair and equitable justice system.

How it works

The death penalty has always been a hot-button issue, sparking debates that cut deep into our moral and ethical fibers. But as society evolves, so too should our justice system. There are several powerful, human-centered reasons why the death penalty feels like an outdated relic in today’s legal landscape.

Let’s start with the moral quandary it presents. Taking a life, under any circumstance, raises a multitude of ethical questions. One of the most troubling aspects of capital punishment is the chilling possibility of executing an innocent person.

Since 1973, over 185 individuals on death row in the United States were exonerated. This isn’t just a statistic; it’s a glaring reminder of how irreversible and final the death penalty is. Mistakes in other areas of justice can often be rectified, but there is no undoing an execution.

Then there’s the argument about whether the death penalty actually deters crime. The evidence here is shaky at best. Numerous studies have shown that harsh penalties like execution do not effectively prevent crime more than life imprisonment. If deterrence is the goal, the death penalty misses the mark, which begs the question: why keep it?

Bias in the death penalty’s application adds another layer of concern. The system shows troubling disparities, particularly with racial biases and socioeconomic status influencing outcomes. Defendants accused of killing white victims are disproportionately sentenced to death, which speaks volumes about the prejudices skulking through the corridors of our courts. This isn’t just unfair; it’s a fundamentally flawed system that perpetuates inequality.

Financially, the death penalty doesn’t make much sense either. It’s far more expensive to execute someone than to keep them in prison for life. This is due to the lengthy and complex legal process required in capital cases, designed to minimize errors. Every dollar spent here is a dollar that could be used more effectively elsewhere within the criminal justice system.

Globally, the trend is also moving away from capital punishment, with over two-thirds of countries having abolished it in law or in practice. This global shift isn’t just about being progressive; it’s about adhering to international human rights standards that recognize the death penalty as a violation of the right to life.

In the end, abolishing the death penalty isn’t just about eliminating a punishment option. It’s about building a justice system that reflects our values of fairness, redemption, and humanity. It’s about acknowledging that the state shouldn’t sanction the irreversible act of taking a life. Moving away from the death penalty would signal a commitment to these values and contribute to a more equitable society.

So, as we ponder the path forward, let’s consider a justice system that upholds life and offers chances for redemption. That’s the kind of progress that aligns with our collective growth as a compassionate society.

Cite this page

Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished. (2024, May 12). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/

"Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished." PapersOwl.com , 12 May 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/ [Accessed: 21 May. 2024]

"Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished." PapersOwl.com, May 12, 2024. Accessed May 21, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/

"Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished," PapersOwl.com , 12-May-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/. [Accessed: 21-May-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Rethinking Justice: Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/rethinking-justice-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/ [Accessed: 21-May-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished Essay

(yes) nicole smith ­– an argument in favor of capital punishment, (no) stephen nathanson – why we should put the death penalty to rest, my evaluation, my opinions of the arguments, works cited.

The death penalty involves condemning a criminal to death due to a horrendous crime (Roberts-Cady 185). Its existence in the criminal justice system remains is a subject of contention. Stephen Nathanson advances an argument against the death penalty in his article, Why We Should Put the Death Penalty to Rest, by refuting the moral and legal grounds upon which its proponents base their arguments. In a separate article, An Argument in Favor of Capital Punishment, Nicole Smith shows that despite the mounting opposition towards the death penalty, there is reason to keep it in the penal code. These two articles form the core of this essay since its main concern is to determine which one of the two arguments is stronger.

The gist of Nicole Smith’s (Smith par. 1-8) argument is that the death penalty or capital punishment is necessary because it deters murder, thereby saving the victims’ families and friends the pain of losing loved ones. She further argues that in cases where a murder has occurred, the death penalty serves justice to the victim’s loved ones.

Smith’s position on the killing of innocent individuals is apparent. She esteems human life and strongly argues against the killing of innocent individuals. She argues that since victims die and are oblivious of what transpires afterwards, the point of concern is the agony that their loved ones undergo. According to Smith, these people deserve nothing less than retribution. Smith quotes a famous biblical expression, “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”, to support her argument (par. 2). Since the criminal takes away human life, the only punishment that is commensurate with such an act is to take their life as well. Although she recognizes that the criminal justice system may sometimes err and convict innocent people, she downplays such possibilities on grounds that the error margin is negligible.

Nathanson for his part presents two major arguments in support of his position. Firstly, he argues that the death penalty violates the same values it is supposed to promote (Nathanson 124). For instance, if a criminal receives a death sentence, the only circumstance under which the conviction can be justified, is when the justice system determines beyond any doubt that the convicted individual is the perpetrator of the said crime. Unfortunately, sometimes the system captures and convicts innocent individuals. According to Nathanson (124), the execution of just one innocent individual due to lapses within the justice system contradicts the value of justice.

Secondly, Nathanson refutes the claims that the death penalty preserves human life. Murderers are guilty of killing and so is the justice system when it sentences an individual to death (124). The ideal of respect for human life denies anyone authority over another person’s life under whatever circumstances. Therefore, even if one is guilty of murder, their life is equally important because they are also human. Executing such a person over claims of respect for the life of the victim is inconsistent with the principle of respect for human life.

I esteem ethics and I believe that matters of life and death, such as those presented in these arguments can only be evaluated adequately by the use of relevant ethical theories. The ethical theories that can best evaluate this issue include utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. In utilitarianism, the merit of an action is evaluated by its consequences. From this perspective, Smith’s argument seems plausible because she places emphasis on the effects of murder on the victim’s loved ones. To strengthen the argument further, she adds that it serves the greater good to execute a criminal to avoid the recurrence of murder cases by the same individual. Therefore, if a single individual is executed to save an entire society from pain, suffering, and mayhem such as that caused by serial killers; it is understandable (Berns and Bessette 1).

However, according to Kantian ethics, although it is wrong to kill, executing one person in an attempt to pay for the death of another is not plausible. Executing a criminal to pay for another death is tantamount to assuming that two wrongs can make a right (Gray 257). This assumption does not make sense at all. This position is consistent with Nathanson’s argument that executing a criminal for whatever reason is inconsistent with the belief in the sanctity of life. It is therefore hypocritical to assume that the criminal’s life is of less value in comparison to the victim’s life.

Additionally, the criminal justice system is notorious for some unforgivable lapses that often lead to the incarceration of innocent people (Nathanson 124). Even if only one out of every a thousand convicts is innocent, the system cannot claim to serve justice. The life of that single innocent individual is precious. Moreover, even the 999 who are rightfully convicted do not deserve to die. Their lives are equally important and should be protected by the same system.

While Smith’s argument seems plausible at the superficial level, it is not entirely ethical. It is equally unethical for a criminal to kill an innocent victim, but the idea of punishing murder by death is certainly outdated and has no place in modern society. Human society has advanced in many ways and has abandoned the wisdom of its ancient ancestors, which did not seem to make sense. It would, therefore, be plausible to apply the same standard to the death penalty debate. Even the bible, which is the source of the principle, cautions against it in the second testament. Therefore, using such a principle as the basis for dispensing capital punishment cannot be right by any standards.

Nathanson’s argument is, therefore, more endearing because it shows that no matter the angle of perception, the death penalty remains unreasonable. He points out an important issue in the debate about the death penalty by arguing that both sides cite justice and respect for human life as the values they seek to promote in their arguments. Then he proceeds to show that the death penalty does not serve justice in all cases and is therefore wrong.

He also shows beyond doubt that the death penalty undermines the sanctity of life. Therefore, it’s being part of the penal code allows some unscrupulous individuals to use it for their selfish gain. As such, it should be abolished altogether. Countries that do not have the death penalty, such as Britain have much lower murder cases compared to the U.S. Therefore, proponents of the death penalty, such as Smith, who claims that its removal will cause a rise in murder cases have no ground to make such claims.

In conclusion, both arguments seem to appeal to the sense of reason. However, based on one underlying belief, the distinction can be made as to which argument is more plausible. Although there are circumstances, under which I believe in utilitarianism, in this case, Kantian ethics carry the day. Nathanson’s arguments sound more reasonable to me because I believe that no human being has authority over the life of another whatsoever. Since no element of bias is identifiable in both arguments, my position is that the death penalty should be abolished.

Berns, Walter and Joseph Bessette. “Why the Death Penalty is Fair.” Wall Street Journal , Eastern edition ed.: 1. 1998. ProQuest. Web.

Gray, James P. “Essay: Facing Facts on the Death Penalty.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 44.3 (2011): 255-264. Academic Search Complete . Web.

Nathanson, Stephen. “Why We Should Put the Death Penalty to Rest.” Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics 15 (2005): 124.

Roberts-Cady, Sarah. “Against Retributive Justifications of the Death Penalty.” Journal of Social Philosophy 41.2 (2010): 185-193. Academic Search Complete . Web.

Smith, Nicole. An Argument in Favor of Capital Punishment. Article Myriad. 2011. Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, January 28). Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished. https://ivypanda.com/essays/death-penalty-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/

"Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished." IvyPanda , 28 Jan. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/death-penalty-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished'. 28 January.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished." January 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/death-penalty-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/.

1. IvyPanda . "Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished." January 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/death-penalty-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Death Penalty: Why the Death Penalty Should be Abolished." January 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/death-penalty-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished/.

• “Marriage Story” Film Analysis
• Fitzgerald’s “Hero” in “Tender Is the Night”
• Components of the disorder found in O.J. Simpson’s personality.
• Christopher Buckley’s “Supreme Courtship”
• Social Injustices in U.S Courts
• The Use of the Exclusionary Rule
• Psychiatric and Psychoanalytic Methodologies: The Problems of Use in Justice
• Restorative Justice: Justice Programs for Inmates, Parolees

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

student opinion

Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?

In its last six months, the United States government has put 13 prisoners to death. Do you think capital punishment should end?

By Nicole Daniels

Students in U.S. high schools can get free digital access to The New York Times until Sept. 1, 2021.

In July, the United States carried out its first federal execution in 17 years. Since then, the Trump administration has executed 13 inmates, more than three times as many as the federal government had in the previous six decades.

The death penalty has been abolished in 22 states and 106 countries, yet it is still legal at the federal level in the United States. Does your state or country allow the death penalty?

Do you believe governments should be allowed to execute people who have been convicted of crimes? Is it ever justified, such as for the most heinous crimes? Or are you universally opposed to capital punishment?

In “ ‘Expedited Spree of Executions’ Faced Little Supreme Court Scrutiny ,” Adam Liptak writes about the recent federal executions:

In 2015, a few months before he died, Justice Antonin Scalia said he w o uld not be surprised if the Supreme Court did away with the death penalty. These days, after President Trump’s appointment of three justices, liberal members of the court have lost all hope of abolishing capital punishment. In the face of an extraordinary run of federal executions over the past six months, they have been left to wonder whether the court is prepared to play any role in capital cases beyond hastening executions. Until July, there had been no federal executions in 17 years . Since then, the Trump administration has executed 13 inmates, more than three times as many as the federal government had put to death in the previous six decades.

The article goes on to explain that Justice Stephen G. Breyer issued a dissent on Friday as the Supreme Court cleared the way for the last execution of the Trump era, complaining that it had not sufficiently resolved legal questions that inmates had asked. The article continues:

If Justice Breyer sounded rueful, it was because he had just a few years ago held out hope that the court would reconsider the constitutionality of capital punishment. He had set out his arguments in a major dissent in 2015 , one that must have been on Justice Scalia’s mind when he made his comments a few months later. Justice Breyer wrote in that 46-page dissent that he considered it “highly likely that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment,” which bars cruel and unusual punishments. He said that death row exonerations were frequent, that death sentences were imposed arbitrarily and that the capital justice system was marred by racial discrimination. Justice Breyer added that there was little reason to think that the death penalty deterred crime and that long delays between sentences and executions might themselves violate the Eighth Amendment. Most of the country did not use the death penalty, he said, and the United States was an international outlier in embracing it. Justice Ginsburg, who died in September, had joined the dissent. The two other liberals — Justices Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — were undoubtedly sympathetic. And Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who held the decisive vote in many closely divided cases until his retirement in 2018, had written the majority opinions in several 5-to-4 decisions that imposed limits on the death penalty, including ones barring the execution of juvenile offenders and people convicted of crimes other than murder .

In the July Opinion essay “ The Death Penalty Can Ensure ‘Justice Is Being Done,’ ” Jeffrey A. Rosen, then acting deputy attorney general, makes a legal case for capital punishment:

The death penalty is a difficult issue for many Americans on moral, religious and policy grounds. But as a legal issue, it is straightforward. The United States Constitution expressly contemplates “capital” crimes, and Congress has authorized the death penalty for serious federal offenses since President George Washington signed the Crimes Act of 1790. The American people have repeatedly ratified that decision, including through the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 signed by President Bill Clinton, the federal execution of Timothy McVeigh under President George W. Bush and the decision by President Barack Obama’s Justice Department to seek the death penalty against the Boston Marathon bomber and Dylann Roof.

Students, read the entire article , then tell us:

Do you support the use of capital punishment? Or do you think it should be abolished? Why?

Do you think the death penalty serves a necessary purpose, like deterring crime, providing relief for victims’ families or imparting justice? Or is capital punishment “cruel and unusual” and therefore prohibited by the Constitution? Is it morally wrong?

Are there alternatives to the death penalty that you think would be more appropriate? For example, is life in prison without the possibility of parole a sufficient sentence? Or is that still too harsh? What about restorative justice , an approach that “considers harm done and strives for agreement from all concerned — the victims, the offender and the community — on making amends”? What other ideas do you have?

Vast racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty have been found. For example, Black people are overrepresented on death row, and a recent study found that “defendants convicted of killing white victims were executed at a rate 17 times greater than those convicted of killing Black victims.” Does this information change or reinforce your opinion of capital punishment? How so?

The Federal Death Penalty Act prohibits the government from executing an inmate who is mentally disabled; however, in the recent executions of Corey Johnson , Alfred Bourgeois and Lisa Montgomery , their defense teams, families and others argued that they had intellectual disabilities. What role do you think disability or trauma history should play in how someone is punished, or rehabilitated, after committing a crime?

How concerned should we be about wrongfully convicted people being executed? The Innocence Project has proved the innocence of 18 people on death row who were exonerated by DNA testing. Do you have worries about the fair application of the death penalty, or about the possibility of the criminal justice system executing an innocent person?

About Student Opinion

• Find all of our Student Opinion questions in this column . • Have an idea for a Student Opinion question? Tell us about it . • Learn more about how to use our free daily writing prompts for remote learning .

Students 13 and older in the United States and the United Kingdom, and 16 and older elsewhere, are invited to comment. All comments are moderated by the Learning Network staff, but please keep in mind that once your comment is accepted, it will be made public.

Nicole Daniels joined The Learning Network as a staff editor in 2019 after working in museum education, curriculum writing and bilingual education. More about Nicole Daniels

IELTS BAND7

Best coaching Tel:8439000086

Dehradun: 8439000086

capital punishment , you agree or disagree # IELTS Essay

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Crime and violence have existed and sustained in our world since centuries. In earlier times, all crimes were designated as one and there was no differentiation between heinous and petty crimes. Death penalty was awarded to all who committed crimes, irrespective of their seriousness but now it is awarded for those crimes which are heinous.

Capital punishment for certain crimes is essential as it deters the culprit to commit the offence again. It instils fear in the person to commit atrocious and brutal offences. If there was no death penalty for such crimes, criminals would walk around free without any fear and repeat such criminal acts of violence. It is only when a criminal or offender fears for one’s own life, does it dissuade him to commit offences. We have had a number of cases in India whereby the death penalty has been awarded. For instance, Kasab, the terrorist who was involved in the terrorist attack in which many people were killed in cold blood at the Hotel Taj in Mumbai, was awarded the sentence and was hanged till death last year. Apart from this, the victims and their families also feel a sense of justice and security which in turn makes them live peacefully.

Yet capital punishment does not always lead to less crime in society. If the crime statistics are given attention, it will be seen that crime has increased manifold over the years, despite the death penalty being awarded in many cases.  This can be supported by the recent rape case which occurred in Delhi, whereby two criminals were given the death penalty but the incidence of rapes have not decreased. In fact, the numbers are growing gradually and each year it surpasses the previous year.

It can be concluded that capital punishment does not necessarily control crime in a society and only has a deterrent effect but it is required in those cases where heinous and despicable crimes have been committed.

• Agree / Disagree
• IELTS Essay Type
• IELTS Writing

nice one writting.

Thank you for your nice words. Feel free to contact us for any query.

Awesomely written in a simplified manner

I like ur essay. I wnt to learn more vocab and essay from ur website.

the article should be big and it is very helpful to us

Nyc but capital punishment is on repeat mode .

It can fulfill my band score requirement…..

I do not understand the meaning of teh , TEMP, dat. is there any meaning for these?

WhatsApp us

• Writing Correction
• Online Prep Platform
• Online Course
• Speaking Assessment
• Ace The IELTS
• Target Band 7
• Practice Tests Downloads
• IELTS Success Formula
• Essays Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 samples – IELTS Band 9 essays
• Essays Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 8
• Essays Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 7
• Essays Band 6 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 6
• Essays Band 5 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 5
• Reports Band 9 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 9 (Academic Writing Task 1)
• Reports Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 8
• Reports Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 7
• Letters Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 1 – samples of IELTS letters of Band 9
• Letters Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 8
• Letters Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 7
• Speaking Samples
• Tests Samples
• 2023, 2024 IELTS questions
• 2022 IELTS questions
• 2021 IELTS questions
• 2020 IELTS questions
• High Scorer’s Advice IELTS high achievers share their secrets
• IELTS Results Competition
• IELTS-Blog App

IELTS Essay, topic: Capital punishment

• IELTS Essays - Band 7

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Those who are in favor of capital punishment mostly live in developing countries. However, this is not just an image of the Third World countries. Actually, the USA is one country where this kind of punishment has its rates of application. The state of Texas, in particular, is at the top, supporting this measure against crime, especially those involving serial killers and crimes against children. In a society dominated by fear and government control, it is foreseen that this penalty will continue .

Maybe this is not a simple question. As we can see there are several values here and of course cultural behavior. The roots of the question are religious, cultural, ethical and even geographical. The world is divided and the law systems show this division. The solutions, however can lead us to other questions concerning revenge and justice. better to kill a person because of his crimes? Can we admit that a life sentence could be a much better sentence? In fact, rehabilitation is the right way especially with an accurate psychological evaluation first. Some people are lost forever, and in my opinion some murderers and other criminals will suffer more in jail. In this sense, capital punishment is an easy way out.

This is a good essay, you should do well in the Task 2 Writing Test.

Related posts:

• IELTS essay, topic: Should school children be given homework (opinion)? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Having a salaried job is better than being self-employed (agree/disagree) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: What is the best motivation for workers – salary, job satisfaction or helping others? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Is studying at university better than getting a job straight after school (opinion)? This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Some people like to own their home while others prefer to rent it (discuss) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...

2 thoughts on “IELTS Essay, topic: Capital punishment”

I don\’t think the essay answers the question. It is not clear whether the writer agrees or disagree with the prompt. Maybe I\’m missing something on the matter but don\’t you have to clearly state your stance in opinion/argument essays?

You are correct to notice that the writer’s position isn’t apparent throughout the entire essay, it is only expressed in the conclusion, and that is why this essay would get a 6 for task response. To get a 7 for TR the writer’s position has to be clear throughout the essay. This essay, however, would get an 8 for lexical resource and 7’s for coherence/cohesion and grammatical range, so that makes the total score a 7.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

• Skip to content
• Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

• IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts writing task 2 sample 41 - by punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, by punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers..

• IELTS Essay

IELTS Materials

• IELTS Bar Graph
• IELTS Line Graph
• IELTS Table Chart
• IELTS Flow Chart
• IELTS Pie Chart
• IELTS Letter Writing
• Academic Reading

Useful Links

• IELTS Secrets
• Band Score Calculator
• Exam Specific Tips
• Useful Websites
• IELTS Preparation Tips
• Academic Reading Tips
• Academic Writing Tips
• GT Writing Tips
• Listening Tips
• Speaking Tips
• IELTS Grammar Review
• IELTS Vocabulary
• IELTS Cue Cards
• IELTS Life Skills
• Letter Types

• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Copyright Notice
• HTML Sitemap

• Listening Tests
• Academic Tests
• General Tests
• IELTS Writing Checker
• IELTS Writing Samples
• Speaking Club
• IELTS AI Speaking Test Simulator
• Latest Topics
• Vocabularying
• 2024 © IELTS 69

capital punishment should be abolished

IELTS essay capital punishment should be abolished

• Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
• ? One main idea per paragraph
• Include an introduction and conclusion
• Support main points with an explanation and then an example
• Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
• Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
• Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
• Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
• Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
• Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
• Check your writing for errors
• Answer all parts of the question
• ? Present relevant ideas
• Fully explain these ideas
• Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
• ? Currently is not available
• Meet the criteria
• Doesn't meet the criteria
• 6 band money is the important factor for happiness For some people, one of the most important things in someone’s happiness is money. This essay agrees that money is indeed a vital factor to be happy. We need money in everything we do. When we want to fulfill our biological or physiological requirements, which is to buy some food, clothes, drinks, ...
• 5 band It is generally Said that some people born with certain talents for instance of sports or music and others are not A few people believe that without god's gift, a person can gain talent. If a person works on something with concentration and hard work they can achieve great talent. Moreover, practice makes improvement and training helps one to become great sportsman or musician. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar fai ...
• The limits of my language are the limits of my world. Ludwig Wittgenstein
• 5 band East or West, home is the best Nowadays, people are more likely to enjoy exorbitant homestay services and luxury hotels but in the end, they realize that: “East or West, home is the best”. According to me, I completely and totally agree with that viewpoint, as now will be discussed. To begin with, home is where we are born and g ...
• 5.5 band There has been a lot of noise pollution in public places in cities. Suggest the possible causes and discuss the solutions for the Same The importance of pollution especially sound pollution has always been the beatable over the years and there has been a lot of controversy around the same. It generally affects an overwhelming proportion of people and has many ramifications. This essay will discuss the possible cause of this problem ...
• Knowledge of languages is the doorway to wisdom. Roger Bacon
• 5.5 band learning from the past is valuable for our living nowadays, the importance of the past has always been a controversial issue. some people think that it is unnecessary to learn anything from the past. in my opinion, I completely disagree with this statement. to begin with, there are several benefits of learning about the past. first and foremost, t ...
• 6 band BENEFITS OF HAVING A PART-TIME JOB FOR STUDENTS Part-time job is the kind of work a person does for a fewer hours per week allowing an individual to explore different other aspects of his or her character. While in many countries it is common for students to work part time allowing them the freedom to learn their course practically, allowing bett ...
• Language is not a genetic gift, it is a social gift. Learning a new language is becoming a member of the club – the community of speakers of that language. Frank Smith

Some people belive that the death penalty should be abolished. Other belive that it is necessary for certain crime. Discuss both sides and gives your opinio.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

• Restatement of thesis
• Prediction or recommendation

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

• In conclusion
• To conclude
• To summarize
• In a nutshell

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

• Check your IELTS essay »
• Find essays with the same topic
• View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
• Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

You have a Facebook friend living in another country and s/he is curious to learn about a major news item in your country. Write a letter to your Facebook friend. In your letter describe a news story in your country explain why people are interested in it say how the story personally relates to you

The most important aim of science ought to be to improve people’s lives. to what extent do you agree or disagree, some people think if students are afraid of the teacher it is better. other say that having a friendly relationship is better. discuss both points and give your opinion., many people today, especially in the developed world, are choosing to have fewer children, or none at all. why is this happening, and do you think it is a good trend, it is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Death Penalty — Should the Death Penalty be Abolished

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished

• Categories: Corporal Punishment Death Penalty

About this sample

Words: 967 |

Updated: 13 November, 2023

Words: 967 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Video Version

Capital punishment,Prison,Lethal injection,Crime,Murder,Death penalty

Death Penalty Essay: Hook Examples

• A Startling Statistic: Did you know that in the last decade, over 170 countries have abolished the death penalty or no longer practice it? It’s time for us to question why we haven’t joined this global trend.
• A Personal Story: As I stood witness to an execution, I couldn’t help but wonder if this act of state-sanctioned killing truly serves justice. Let me share my experience that led me to believe the death penalty should be abolished.
• An Ethical Dilemma: When we look into the eyes of a society that condemns murder but practices it in return, we confront a moral paradox. Is it time for us to reevaluate our stance on the death penalty?
• A Historical Perspective: Throughout history, societies have evolved, discarding practices that no longer align with their values. Is it not time for us to evolve beyond the death penalty, which has roots in a less enlightened era?
• An Expert Opinion: Renowned legal scholar Bryan Stevenson once said, “The opposite of poverty is not wealth; it’s justice.” Let’s explore why abolishing the death penalty is a crucial step toward achieving true justice in our society.
• Radelet, M. L., & Borg, M. J. (2000). The changing nature of death penalty debates. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 43-61. (https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.43)
• Hood, R. (2009). Abolition of the death penalty: China in world perspective. City UHKL Rev., 1, 1. (https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ciunhok1&div=3&id=&page=)
• Bedau, H. A., & Cassell, P. G. (Eds.). (2005). Debating the death penalty: Should America have capital punishment? The experts on both sides make their case. Oxford University Press. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14624745070090030505)
• Koenig, T. H., & Rustad, M. L. (2011). Deciding Whether the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished. Suffolk University Law Review, 44, 193. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1673468)
• Mathias, M. D. (2013). The sacralization of the individual: Human rights and the abolition of the death penalty. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1246-1283 (https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/669507)

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 694 words

3 pages / 1282 words

2 pages / 745 words

3 pages / 1531 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Death Penalty

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been a contentious issue in the United States for decades. The history of the death penalty in the US is fraught with controversy, and its current state continues to be a subject of [...]

The death of a moth may seem like a trivial event, but Virginia Woolf's essay "The Death of the Moth" suggests otherwise. Through her vivid and poetic language, Woolf portrays the inevitability of death and the fragility of [...]

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a highly debated and controversial topic. While some argue that it serves as a deterrent for heinous crimes and provides justice for victims and their families, others [...]

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has been a contentious issue around the world for centuries. This form of punishment involves the judicial execution of a convicted individual for committing a serious crime, [...]

I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. Discussing the death penalty pros and cons, there are many reasons as to why I think the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, [...]

The Death Penalty has been a widely controversial topic in America as it is illegal in 27 of the 50 states in America. Only 21 of the 50 states have been a part of this movement including Texas, Alabama, and more. During the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

IELTS essay Capital punishment is a brutal decision and should be abolished

IELTS essay: Capital punishment is a brutal decision and should be abolished.

Over a past few centuries, it has been considered that capital punishment is inhuman punishment. It should kick out from the laws. While many countries still stand with this law, because they have strong arguments for capital punishment. Therefore, this type of punishment is important for murderers. The governments of these countries think that the capital punishment generates the wave of fear to crime amongst citizens.

In many countries, where this punishment is implementing strictly. If a person want to kill someone in the society. Then, he will think many times before killing the person. Like in some Middle Eastern countries. Therefore, they have such a low murders rate.

Alternatively, capital punishment makes difference between murderer and other criminals. There should a big difference in imprisonments of murderers and robbers. No one has right to deprive some from his/her life and facilities.

But this punishment is of no use in some cases, for instance, a person has killed someone in his adulthood and then he surrender in old age. So, he will live his remaining life in largish and facilitate jails without any hard imprisonment. In many European countries, where these both types of crimes have same prison.

Therefore, it is not justified. There should a great boundary and capital punishment creates the boundary between murderer and robber. However, I think same punishment for both types of criminals is not a useful incentive to capital punishment.

In conclusion, majority of the world countries do not want to change their law of capital punishment becasue of their strong arguments. I think there is no appropriate exchange prison of capital punishment. So, it should remain implement.

• Log in or register to post comments

Sentence: If a person want to

Sentence: If a person want to kill someone in the society. Description: The fragment person want to is rare Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace want with verb, past tense

Sentence: But this punishment is of no use in some cases, for instance, a person has killed someone in his adulthood and then he surrender in old age. Description: The fragment he surrender in is rare Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace surrender with verb, past tense

Sentence: So, he will live his remaining life in largish and facilitate jails without any hard imprisonment. Error: largish Suggestion: ?

Sentence: In conclusion, majority of the world countries do not want to change their law of capital punishment becasue of their strong arguments. Error: becasue Suggestion: because

flaws: No. of Different Words: 145 200 Avg. Sentence Length: 12.5 21.0 Sentence Length SD: 5.492 7.5

Attribute Value Ideal Score: 7.0 out of 9 Category: Good Excellent No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2 No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2 No. of Sentences: 22 15 No. of Words: 275 350 No. of Characters: 1403 1500 No. of Different Words: 145 200 Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.072 4.7 Average Word Length: 5.102 4.6 Word Length SD: 2.793 2.4 No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100 No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80 No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40 No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20 Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0 Avg. Sentence Length: 12.5 21.0 Sentence Length SD: 5.492 7.5 Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12 Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35 Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50 Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07 Number of Paragraphs: 6 5