Literature Review of Corporate Social Responsibility
- First Online: 01 January 2014
Cite this chapter
- Shuo Wang 4 , 5
Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))
1864 Accesses
4 Citations
The early roots of corporate social responsibility can be traced back to 1917, when Henry Ford announced that the aim of Ford Motor company is that “To do as much as possible for everybody concerned, to make money and use it, give employment, and send out the car where the people can use it… and incidentally to make money” (Lee 2008, p. 54). Eighty years later, Henry Ford’s great-grandson, William Clay Ford Jr emphasised that Ford company valued all stakeholders’ interests as well as the social welfare of employees and shareholders, as he said that “we want to find ingenious new ways to delight consumers, provide superior returns to shareholders and make the world a better place for us” (Meredith 1999, p. 157).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Abbott WF, Monsen RJ (1979) On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Acad Manag J 22(3):501–515
Article Google Scholar
Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad Manag J 42(5):507–525
Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):836–863
Alexander GJ, Buchholz RA (1978) Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Acad Manag J 21(3):479–486
Arya B, Zhang G (2009) Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: evidence from an emerging economy. J Manag Stud 46(7):1089–1112
Aupperle KE (1991) The use of forced-choice survey procedures in assessing corporate social orientation. Res Corpo Soc Perform Policy 12:269–280
Google Scholar
Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD (1985) An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad Manag J 28(2):446–463
Backman J (1975) Social responsibility and accountability. New York University Press, New York
Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):794–816
Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 27(11):1101–1122
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99
Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: market and nonmarket components. Calif Manag Rev 37(2):47–65
Barone MJ, Miyazaki AD, Taylor KA (2000) The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another? J Acad Mark Sci 28(2):248–262
Bass BM, Steidlmeier P (1999) Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadersh Q 10(2):181–217
Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136
Berens G, Riel CBM, Bruggen GH (2005) Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. J Mark 69(3):35–48
Bhambri A, Sonnenfeld J (1988) Organization structure and corporate social performance: a field study in two contrasting industries. Acad Manag J 31(3):642–662
Biehal GJ, Sheinin DA (2007) The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. J Mark 71(2):12–25
Boal KB, Peery N (1985) The cognitive structure of corporate social responsibility. J Manag 11(3):71–82
Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper, New York
Brammer S, Millington A (2004) The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: a stakeholder analysis. J Manag Stud 41(8):1411–1434
Brammer S, Millington A (2008) Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 29(12):1325–1343
Brammer S, Pavelin S (2006) Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit. J Manag Stud 43(3):435–455
Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark 61(1):68–84
Buchholz RA (1977) An alternative to social responsibility. MSU Bus Top 3(25):12–16
Budd RW, Thorp RK, Donohew L (1967) Content analysis of communications. Macmillan, New York
Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):946–967
Carmeli A (2005) Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organ Stud 26(3):443–464
Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505
Caruana R, Crane A (2008) Constructing consumer responsibility: exploring the role of corporate communications. Organ Stud 29(12):1495–1519
Cascio WF, Aguinis H (2008) Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: changes, choices, and trends. J Appl Psychol 93(5):1062–1081
Chaganti R, Damanpour F (1991) Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 12(7):479–491
Choi J, Wang H (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strateg Manag J 30(8):895–907
Clarkson MBE (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):92–117
Cochran PL, Wood RA (1984) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Acad Manag J 27(1):42–56
Crouch C (2006) Modelling the firm in its market and organizational environment: methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organ Stud 27(10):1533–1551
David P, Bloom M, Hillman AJ (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strateg Manag J 28(1):91–100
Davis K (1973) The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Acad Manag J 16(2):312–322
De la Cruz Deniz-Deniz M, Saa-Perez D (2003) A resource-based view of corporate responsiveness toward employees. Organ Stud 24(2):299–319
Deckop JR, Merriman KK, Gupta S (2006) The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. J Manag 32(3):329–342
Doh JP, Guay TR (2006) Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: an institutional-stakeholder perspective. J Manag Stud 43(1):47–73
Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91
Ellen PS, Webb DJ, Mohr LA (2006) Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):147–157
Financial Accounting Standards Board (1993) Accounting for contributions received and contributions made. Financial Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk
Fogler HR, Nutt F (1975) A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Acad Manag J 18(1):155–160
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder perspective. Pitman, Boston
Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. N Y Times Mag 32(13):122–126
Gardberg NA, Fombrun CJ (2006) Corporate citizenship: creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Acad Manag Rev 31(2):329–346
Garriga E, Mel D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53(1):51–71
Gelb BD, Brien RH (1971) Survival and social responsibility: themes for marketing education and management. J Mark 35(2):3–9
Gephart RP Jr (1991) Multiple methods for tracking corporate social performance: insights from a study of major industrial accidents. Res Corp Soc Perform Policy 12:359–385
Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manag Rev 30(4):777–798
Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strateg Manag J 30(4):425–445
Graves SB, Waddock SA (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 37(4):1034–1046
Greening DW, Gray B (1994) Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad Manag J 37(3):467–498
Hall R (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strateg Manag J 13(2):135–144
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206
Handelman JM, Arnold SJ (1999) The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. J Mark 63(3):33–48
Hansen GS, Wernerfelt B (1989) Determinants of firm performance: the relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strateg Manag J 10(5):399–411
Harrison JS, Freeman RE (1999) Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Acad Manag J 42(5):479–485
Harzing AW (2011) Journal Quality List
Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22(2):125–139
Holderness CG, Sheehan DP (1988) The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: an exploratory analysis. J Financ Econ 20(1–2):317–346
Hunt SD, Wood VR, Chonko LB (1989) Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing. J Mark 53(3):79–90
Husted BW, Allen DB (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):838–849
Johnson RA, Greening DW (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 42(5):564–576
Jones TM (1980) Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. Calif Manag Rev 22(3):59–67
Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strateg Manag J 30(3):261–285
Klassen RD, Whybark DC (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad Manag J 42(6):599–615
Klein KI, Tosi H, Cannella AA (1999) Multilevel theory building: benefits, barriers, and new developments. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):243–248
Kolbe RH, Burnett MS (1991) Content-analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. J Consum Res 18(2):243–250
Laplume AO, Sonpar K, Litz RA (2008) Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. J Manag 34(6):1152–1189
Lawton T (2011) Corporate political activity: a literature review and research agenda. Working paper.
Lee MDP (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manag Rev 10(1):53–73
Lev B, Petrovits C, Radhakrishnan S (2009) Is doing good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strateg Manag J 31(2):182–200
Lev B, Petrovits C, Radhakrishnan S (2010) Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strateg Manag J 31(2):182–200
Lichtenstein DR, Drumwright ME, Braig BM (2004) The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. J Mark 68(4):16–32
Lockett A, Moon J, Visser W (2006) Corporate social responsibility in management research: focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. J Manag Stud 43(1):115–136
Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J Mark 70(4):1–18
Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2009) The debate over doing good: corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. J Mark 73(6):198–213
Maak T, Pless NM (2006) Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society – a relational perspective. J Bus Ethics 66(1):99–115
Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):817–835
Maignan I, Ferrell OC (2004) Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. J Acad Mark Sci 32(1):3–19
Maignan I, Ralston DA (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):497–515
Marcus AA, Anderson MH (2006) A general dynamic capability: does it propagate business and social competencies in the retail food industry? J Manag Stud 43(1):19–46
Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q 48(2):268–305
Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):166–179
Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424
McGee J, Rugman AM, Verbeke A (1998) Commentary on corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strateg Manag J 19(4):377–387
McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T (1988) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 31(4):854–872
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21(5):603–609
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127
McWilliams A, Siegel DS (2011) Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. J Manag 37(5)
McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43(1):1–18
Menon A, Menon A (1997) Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. J Mark 61(1):51–67
Meredith R (1999) The newest Ford generation takes the company spotlight. New York Times, 14 May, C6.
Miles RH (1987) Managing the corporate social environment: a grounded theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886
Murray KB, Montanari JR (1986) Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: integrating management and marketing theory. Acad Manag Rev 11(4):815–827
Neubaum DO, Zahra SA (2006) Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: the moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. J Manag 32(1):108–131
Noda T, Bower JL (1996) Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strateg Manag J 17(Special issue):159–192
Organ DW (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books, Lexington
Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441
Post JE, Waddock SA (1995) Strategic philanthropy and partnerships for economic progress. In: Philanthropy and economic development. Greenwood Pub Group, Westport
Pound J (1992) Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control. Harv Bus Rev 70(2):83–93
Priem RL, Butler JE (2001) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad Manag Rev 26(1):22–40
Reimann BC (1975) Organizational effectiveness and management’s public values: a canonical analysis. Acad Manag J 18(2):224–241
Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strateg Manag J 23(12):1077–1093
Robin DP, Reidenbach RE (1987) Social responsibility, ethics, and marketing strategy: closing the gap between concept and application. J Mark 51(1):44–58
Ruf BM, Muralidhar K, Paul K (1998) The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. J Manag 24(1):119–133
Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559
Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility – business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1096–1120
Schuler DA, Cording M (2006) A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers’. Acad Manag Rev 31(3):540–558
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res 38(2):225–243
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):158–166
Sethi SP (1979) A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Acad Manag Rev 4(1):63–74
Simmons CJ, Becker-Olsen KL (2006) Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. J Mark 70(4):154–169
Smith NC (2003) Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? Calif Manag Rev 45(4):52–76
Starkey K, Crane A (2003) Toward green narrative: management and the evolutionary epic. Acad Manag Rev 28(2):220–237
Steiner GA, Richman BM (1971) Business and society. Random House, New York
Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):506–521
Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672
Tuzzolino F, Armandi BR (1981) A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 6(1):21–28
Van Dyne L, Graham JW, Dienesch RM (1994) Organizational citizenship behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J 37(4):765–802
Varadarajan PR, Menon A (1988) Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. J Mark 52(3):58–74
Vlachos PA, Tsamakos A, Vrechopoulos AP, Avramidis PK (2009) Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. J Acad Mark Sci 37(2):170–180
Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–319
Wagner T, Lutz RJ, Weitz BA (2009) Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. J Mark 73(6):77–91
Waldman DA, Galvin BM (2008) Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organ Dyn 37(4):327
Waldman DA, Siegel D (2008) Defining the socially responsible leader. Leadersh Q 19(1):117–131
Waldman DA, de Luque MS, Washburn N, House RJ, Adetoun B, Barrasa A et al (2006) Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):823
Wartick SL, Cochran PL (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):758–769
Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad Manag J 42(5):539–552
Werther WB, Chandler D (2006) Strategic corporate social responsibility-stakehoders in a global environment. Sage, London
Wolfe R, Aupperle K (1991) Introduction to corporate social performance: methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Res Corp Soc Perform Policy 12:265–268
Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16(4):691–718
Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):50–84
World Economic Forum (2003) Global competitiveness report. Paper presented at the World Economic Forum, New York.
Zeithaml CP, Zeithaml VA (1984) Environmental management: revising the marketing perspective. J Mark 48(2):46–53
Zenisek TJ (1979) Corporate social responsibility: a conceptualization based on organizational literature. Acad Manag Rev 4(3):359–368
Peloza J (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J Manag 35(6):1518–1541
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Economics and Management, School of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Postdoctoral Programme, China Huarong Asset Management, CO., LTD., Beijing, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Wang, S. (2015). Literature Review of Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Chinese Strategic Decision-making on CSR. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44997-4_2
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44997-4_2
Published : 26 September 2014
Publisher Name : Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN : 978-3-662-44996-7
Online ISBN : 978-3-662-44997-4
eBook Packages : Business and Economics Business and Management (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
To read this content please select one of the options below:
Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, corporate social responsibility decoupling: a systematic literature review and future research agenda.
Journal of Applied Accounting Research
ISSN : 0967-5426
Article publication date: 13 January 2023
This paper aims to synthesize the corporate social responsibility decoupling (CSRD) literature, CSRD's causes and consequences and discuss other organizational attributes examined by CSRD scholars during 2010 and 2020. The authors provide suggestions for a future research agenda in this domain.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors' systematic literature review (SLR) uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework to extract CSRD studies. The authors filter collected articles against quality and relevancy criteria and finally review 175 published articles.
A theme analysis identifies and structures the many themes related to CSRD. The authors discuss the drivers of CSRD and reveal the consequences companies face after CSRD. The authors also provide a comprehensive CSRD discussion in the context of developed and developing economies. CSR communication is also identified as a tool for decoupling and recoupling.
Research limitations/implications
The identified themes provide a thorough illustration of CSRD literature for new CSRD scholars. The authors also provide suggestions for future research, such as examining country-level policy-making and implications of CSRD variance and identifying cultural and economic hurdles to achieving core CSR purposes.
Practical implications
Policymakers and scholars may adopt the approach that CSRD is a misreporting of information similar to accounting fraud. This is particularly relevant given that an increasing number of CSRD scandals indicate that the purpose of bringing change through corporate CSR has not been adopted well by corporations.
Originality/value
The authors' study offers a comprehensive literature review for the period of 2010–2020. The studies identified are structured into meaningful themes which can provide groundwork for future researchers.
- CSR decoupling
- CSR walk and talk
- Greenwashing
- Systematic literature review
Talpur, S. , Nadeem, M. and Roberts, H. (2023), "Corporate social responsibility decoupling: a systematic literature review and future research agenda", Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2022-0223
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited
Related articles
We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….
Report bugs here
All feedback is valuable
Please share your general feedback
Join us on our journey
Platform update page.
Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates
Questions & More Information
Answers to the most commonly asked questions here
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
V ol. 4, No. 2, 2017, 30 - 48. ISSN 2289 6856 (Print), 22898018 (Online) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): A Literature Review. Hussam Al Halbusi a*& Shehnaz Tehseenb. a PhD Candidate ...
There is a long and varied history associated with the evolution of the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). However, a historical review is missing in the academic literature that portrays the evolution of the academic understanding of the concept alongside with the public and international events that influenced the social expectations with regards to corporate behavior.
Our literature review on CSR meta-analyses indicates that the majority of included studies has focussed on the CSR-financial performance-link. In view of the key corpo-rate governance-related determinants, we note that board independence, board gender diversity and board size have a positive impact on CSR performance.
ABSTRACT. The study offers a comprehensive and critical systematic literature review (SLR) alongside an analysis of recent literature regarding the significance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the hotel industry.The study utilizes the SLR method to consolidate the relevant literature on CSR initiatives in the hotel industry context.
Defining CSR Implementation. The first step of a systematic review entertains a repetitive process of defining, clarifying, and refining (Tranfield et al., 2003).As such, we scoured the CSR implementation literature to find any existing conceptual definitions that can support our review process.
Some previous systematic reviews of the literature have already addressed some very specific questions about CSR communication: Ali et al. (2017) and Dienes et al. (2016) carried out a systematic review on the drivers of CSR [23, 24]; García-Sánchez (2021) studied the relationships between CSR disclosure predictors, individual, organizational ...
This literature review has three main purposes: firstly, to fill a gap in the review of the CSR literature; secondly, to identify the milestones in CSR development and further understand the evolution of CSR theory; thirdly, to encourage the development of CSR studies and practices at organisational level. As the adoption of a CSR orientation ...
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was usually referred to as a concept where companies initiate voluntary action towards social and environmental concerns in the context of business operations related to the stakeholders of the company prior to the CSR Act 2013 in India. ... The literature review gave a mixed response on the direction of ...
5.2 CSR decoupling proxies. Our literature review illustrates that most studies on CSR decoupling have included one or two external CSR databases to gain the relevant CSR reporting and performance measures (e.g., Gull, Hussain, Khan, Khan, & Saeed, 2022). These researchers mainly compared reporting items as external or symbolic figures with ...
Corporate social responsibility has been an important theme in management at least since the 1960s. International business became a recognized subfield in management around the same time. Logically, there might have been much dialogue about corporate social responsibility in international business research and publication, yet previous reviews of the literature indicate relatively little such ...
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management : a ... Rather, this literature review contributes to the concept "when it pays to be green." The corporate sustainability and financial performance (CSFP) relationship has been researched for several decades gaining momentum in the recent past. The main reason for such an ...
In this review, we take a wider perspective and review the CSR-employee literature from both management and employee perspectives. We conducted a systematic review based on the search words "employee" and "CSR/sustainability" in the Web of Science. Such comprehensive understanding is important due to the strong role employees have in ...
See, for example, Christensen et al. (2018) for a review of CSR and sustainability reporting standards, Servaes and Tamayo (2017) for a review of the importance of social capital, Renneboog, Ter Horst, and Zhang (2008a, b) for a review of the SRI literature, and Margolis et al. (2007) for a meta-analysis of results in top management journals on ...
The increased interest in CSR among capital market participants is accompanied by the expansion of academic research related to CSR in the accounting literature In Appendix A we provide a summary of all CSR-related publications up to 2021 published in the Accounting, Organizations and Society, British Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Economics, Journal ...
This paper aims to synthesize the corporate social responsibility decoupling (CSRD) literature, CSRD's causes and consequences and discuss other organizational attributes examined by CSRD scholars during 2010 and 2020. ... The authors provide suggestions for a future research agenda in this domain.,The authors' systematic literature review (SLR ...
contributes to the current understanding of CSR by in-cluding a review of the development of CSR in the early twenty-first century, a period that has not been reviewed as much as earlier periods of the development of the concept. Research method The formal publications and literature on CSR begun as early as the 1930's and continues to be ...
2.1. CSR to environment. It is discussed in different kinds of literature such as Turker (Citation 2009), Farooq et al. (Citation 2014), Shahzad et al. (Citation 2020) CSR to the environment is specifically the activities organization performs to save the environment, climate, wastages and reduce the wastage releases.Today, the corporate bodies are more focused on saving the environment in ...
Abstract Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been gaining relevance in the academic, business, and political worlds, the relationship between CSR and performance remains unclear. ... In the second literature review, Cunha et al. assert that the literature on sustainable finance is excessively fragmented, making it difficult to ...
The study offers a comprehensive and critical systematic literature review (SLR) alongside an analysis of recent literature regarding the significance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the hotel industry.The study utilizes the SLR method to consolidate the relevant literature on CSR initiatives in the hotel industry context.
2.2. Corporate social responsibility. The proposed a fairly well-known definition of CSR as an aggregation of corporate obligations expected by the whole community (Carroll, Citation 1979; L. Zhao et al., Citation 2022).Elkington (Citation 1998) saw that the concept of modern CSR is based on so-called the triple bottom line principle, namely the balanced relationship between profit, people and ...
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management : a journal focused on the social & environmental accountability of business in the context of sustainability Abstract Based on a survey and content analysis of 76 empirical research articles, this article reviews the factors driving Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in ...
Long-term CSR has a stronger insurance-like effect than short-term CSR. Additionally, the insurance-like effect of CSR still exists during repeated environmental violation events. This paper contributes to the literature on the insurance-like effect of CSR and provides a reference for corporate CSR practice and investors' CSR decisions.