does it cost money to publish a research paper

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• News Feature
• Published: 27 March 2013

Open access: The true cost of science publishing

• Richard Van Noorden  

Nature volume  495 ,  pages 426–429 ( 2013 ) Cite this article

40k Accesses

267 Citations

1935 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Peer review
• Research management

A Correction to this article was published on 03 July 2013

A Correction to this article was published on 10 April 2013

This article has been updated

Cheap open-access journals raise questions about the value publishers add for their money.

Michael Eisen doesn't hold back when invited to vent. “It's still ludicrous how much it costs to publish research — let alone what we pay,” he declares. The biggest travesty, he says, is that the scientific community carries out peer review — a major part of scholarly publishing — for free, yet subscription-journal publishers charge billions of dollars per year, all told, for scientists to read the final product. “It's a ridiculous transaction,” he says.

Eisen, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, argues that scientists can get much better value by publishing in open-access journals, which make articles free for everyone to read and which recoup their costs by charging authors or funders. Among the best-known examples are journals published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS), which Eisen co-founded in 2000. “The costs of research publishing can be much lower than people think,” agrees Peter Binfield, co-founder of one of the newest open-access journals, PeerJ , and formerly a publisher at PLoS.

But publishers of subscription journals insist that such views are misguided — born of a failure to appreciate the value they add to the papers they publish, and to the research community as a whole. They say that their commercial operations are in fact quite efficient, so that if a switch to open-access publishing led scientists to drive down fees by choosing cheaper journals, it would undermine important values such as editorial quality.

These charges and counter-charges have been volleyed back and forth since the open-access idea emerged in the 1990s, but because the industry's finances are largely mysterious, evidence to back up either side has been lacking. Although journal list prices have been rising faster than inflation, the prices that campus libraries actually pay to buy journals are generally hidden by the non-disclosure agreements that they sign. And the true costs that publishers incur to produce their journals are not widely known.

The past few years have seen a change, however. The number of open-access journals has risen steadily, in part because of funders' views that papers based on publicly funded research should be free for anyone to read. By 2011, 11% of the world's articles were being published in fully open-access journals 1 (see 'The rise of open access'). Suddenly, scientists can compare between different publishing prices. A paper that costs US$5,000 for an author to publish in Cell Reports , for example, might cost just $1,350 to publish in PLoS ONE — whereas PeerJ offers to publish an unlimited number of papers per author for a one-time fee of $299. “For the first time, the author can evaluate the service that they're getting for the fee they're paying,” says Heather Joseph, executive director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition in Washington DC.

The variance in prices is leading everyone involved to question the academic publishing establishment as never before. For researchers and funders, the issue is how much of their scant resources need to be spent on publishing, and what form that publishing will take. For publishers, it is whether their current business models are sustainable — and whether highly selective, expensive journals can survive and prosper in an open-access world.

The cost of publishing

Data from the consulting firm Outsell in Burlingame, California, suggest that the science-publishing industry generated $9.4 billion in revenue in 2011 and published around 1.8 million English-language articles — an average revenue per article of roughly $5,000. Analysts estimate profit margins at 20–30% for the industry, so the average cost to the publisher of producing an article is likely to be around $3,500–4,000.

Most open-access publishers charge fees that are much lower than the industry's average revenue, although there is a wide scatter between journals. The largest open-access publishers — BioMed Central and PLoS — charge $1,350–2,250 to publish peer-reviewed articles in many of their journals, although their most selective offerings charge $2,700–2,900. In a survey published last year 2 , economist Bo-Christer Björk of the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki and psychologist David Solomon of Michigan State University in East Lansing looked at 100,697 articles published in 1,370 fee-charging open-access journals active in 2010 (about 40% of the fully open-access articles in that year), and found that charges ranged from $8 to $3,900. Higher charges tend to be found in 'hybrid' journals, in which publishers offer to make individual articles free in a publication that is otherwise paywalled (see 'Price of prestige'). Outsell estimates that the average per-article charge for open-access publishers in 2011 was $660.

Although these fees seem refreshingly transparent, they are not the only way that open-access publishers can make money. As Outsell notes, the $660 average, for example, does not represent the real revenue collected per paper: it includes papers published at discounted or waived fees, and does not count cash from the membership schemes that some open-access publishers run in addition to charging for articles. Frequently, small open-access publishers are also subsidized, with universities or societies covering the costs of server hosting, computers and building space. That explains why many journals say that they can offer open access for nothing. One example is Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , a respected open-access palaeontology journal, the costs of which are mostly covered by government subsidies to the Institute of Paleobiology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw; it charges nothing for papers under 10 pages. Another is eLife , which is covered by grants from the Wellcome Trust in London; the Max Planck Society in Munich, Germany; and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland. And some publishers use sets of journals to cross-subsidize each other: for example, PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine receive subsidy from PLoS ONE , says Damian Pattinson, editorial director at PLoS ONE .

Neither PLoS nor BioMed Central would discuss actual costs (although both organizations are profitable as a whole), but some emerging players who did reveal them for this article say that their real internal costs are extremely low. Paul Peters, president of the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association and chief strategy officer at the open-access publisher Hindawi in Cairo, says that last year, his group published 22,000 articles at a cost of $290 per article. Brian Hole, founder and director of the researcher-led Ubiquity Press in London, says that average costs are £200 (US$300). And Binfield says that PeerJ 's costs are in the “low hundreds of dollars” per article.

The picture is also mixed for subscription publishers, many of which generate revenue from a variety of sources — libraries, advertisers, commercial subscribers, author charges, reprint orders and cross-subsidies from more profitable journals. But they are even less transparent about their costs than their open-access counterparts. Most declined to reveal prices or costs when interviewed for this article.

The few numbers that are available show that costs vary widely in this sector, too. For example, Diane Sullenberger, executive editor for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Washington DC, says that the journal would need to charge about $3,700 per paper to cover costs if it went open-access. But Philip Campbell, editor-in-chief of Nature , estimates his journal's internal costs at £20,000–30,000 ($30,000–40,000) per paper. Many publishers say they cannot estimate what their per-paper costs are because article publishing is entangled with other activities. ( Science , for example, says that it cannot break down its per-paper costs; and that subscriptions also pay for activities of the journal's society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington DC.)

Scientists pondering why some publishers run more expensive outfits than others often point to profit margins. Reliable numbers are hard to come by: Wiley, for example, used to report 40% in profits from its scientific, technical and medical (STM) publishing division before tax, but its 2013 accounts noted that allocating to science publishing a proportion of 'shared services' — costs of distribution, technology, building rents and electricity rates — would halve the reported profits. Elsevier's reported margins are 37%, but financial analysts estimate them at 40–50% for the STM publishing division before tax. ( Nature says that it will not disclose information on margins.) Profits can be made on the open-access side too: Hindawi made 50% profit on the articles it published last year, says Peters.

Commercial publishers are widely acknowledged to make larger profits than organizations run by academic institutions. A 2008 study by London-based Cambridge Economic Policy Associates estimated margins at 20% for society publishers, 25% for university publishers and 35% for commercial publishers 3 . This is an irritant for many researchers, says Deborah Shorley, scholarly communications adviser at Imperial College London — not so much because commercial profits are larger, but because the money goes to shareholders rather than being ploughed back into science or education.

But the difference in profit margins explains only a small part of the variance in per-paper prices. One reason that open-access publishers have lower costs is simply that they are newer, and publish entirely online, so they don't have to do print runs or set up subscription paywalls (see 'How costs break down'). Whereas small start-ups can come up with fresh workflows using the latest electronic tools, some established publishers are still dealing with antiquated workflows for arranging peer review, typesetting, file-format conversion and other chores. Still, most older publishers are investing heavily in technology, and should catch up eventually.

Costly functions

The publishers of expensive journals give two other explanations for their high costs, although both have come under heavy fire from advocates of cheaper business models: they do more and they tend to be more selective. The more effort a publisher invests in each paper, and the more articles a journal rejects after peer review, the more costly is each accepted article to publish.

Publishers may administer the peer-review process, which includes activities such as finding peer reviewers, evaluating the assessments and checking manuscripts for plagiarism. They may edit the articles, which includes proofreading, typesetting, adding graphics, turning the file into standard formats such as XML and adding metadata to agreed industry standards. And they may distribute print copies and host journals online. Some subscription journals have a large staff of full-time editors, designers and computer specialists. But not every publisher ticks all the boxes on this list, puts in the same effort or hires costly professional staff for all these activities. For example, most of PLoS ONE 's editors are working scientists, and the journal does not perform functions such as copy-editing. Some journals, including Nature , also generate additional content for readers, such as editorials, commentary articles and journalism (including the article you are reading). “We get positive feedback about our editorial process, so in our experience, many scientists do understand and appreciate the value that this adds to their paper,” says David Hoole, marketing director at Nature Publishing Group.

The costs of research publishing can be much lower than people think.

The key question is whether the extra effort adds useful value, says Timothy Gowers, a mathematician at the University of Cambridge, UK, who last year led a revolt against Elsevier (see Nature http://doi.org/kwd ; 2012 ). Would scientists' appreciation for subscription journals hold up if costs were paid for by the authors, rather than spread among subscribers? “If you see it from the perspective of the publisher, you may feel quite hurt,” says Gowers. “You may feel that a lot of work you put in is not really appreciated by scientists. The real question is whether that work is needed, and that's much less obvious.”

Many researchers in fields such as mathematics, high-energy physics and computer science do not think it is. They post pre- and post-reviewed versions of their work on servers such as arXiv — an operation that costs some $800,000 a year to keep going, or about $10 per article. Under a scheme of free open-access 'Episciences' journals proposed by some mathematicians this January, researchers would organize their own system of community peer review and host research on arXiv, making it open for all at minimal cost (see Nature http://doi.org/kwg ; 2013 ).

These approaches suit communities that have a culture of sharing preprints, and that either produce theoretical work or see high scrutiny of their experimental work — so it is effectively peer reviewed before it even gets submitted to a publisher. But they find less support elsewhere — in the highly competitive biomedical fields, for instance, researchers tend not to publish preprints for fear of being scooped and they place more value on formal (journal-based) peer review. “If we have learned anything in the open-access movement, it's that not all scientific communities are created the same: one size doesn't fit all,” says Joseph.

The value of rejection

Tied into the varying costs of journals is the number of articles that they reject. PLoS ONE (which charges authors $1,350) publishes 70% of submitted articles, whereas Physical Review Letters (a hybrid journal that has an optional open-access charge of $2,700) publishes fewer than 35%; Nature published just 8% in 2011.

The connection between price and selectivity reflects the fact that journals have functions that go beyond just publishing articles, points out John Houghton, an economist at Victoria University in Melbourne, Australia. By rejecting papers at the peer-review stage on grounds other than scientific validity, and so guiding the papers into the most appropriate journals, publishers filter the literature and provide signals of prestige to guide readers' attention. Such guidance is essential for researchers struggling to identify which of the millions of articles published each year are worth looking at, publishers argue — and the cost includes this service.

A more-expensive, more-selective journal should, in principle, generate greater prestige and impact. Yet in the open-access world, the higher-charging journals don't reliably command the greatest citation-based influence, argues Jevin West, a biologist at the University of Washington in Seattle. Earlier this year, West released a free tool that researchers can use to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of open-access journals (see Nature http://doi.org/kwh ; 2013 ).

And to Eisen, the idea that research is filtered into branded journals before it is published is not a feature but a bug: a wasteful hangover from the days of print. Rather than guiding articles into journal 'buckets', he suggests, they could be filtered after publication using metrics such as downloads and citations, which focus not on the antiquated journal, but on the article itself (see page 437).

Alicia Wise, from Elsevier, doubts that this could replace the current system: “I don't think it's appropriate to say that filtering and selection should only be done by the research community after publication,” she says. She argues that the brands, and accompanying filters, that publishers create by selective peer review add real value, and would be missed if removed entirely.

PLoS ONE supporters have a ready answer: start by making any core text that passes peer review for scientific validity alone open to everyone; if scientists do miss the guidance of selective peer review, then they can use recommendation tools and filters (perhaps even commercial ones) to organize the literature — but at least the costs will not be baked into pre-publication charges.

These arguments, Houghton says, are a reminder that publishers, researchers, libraries and funders exist in a complex, interdependent system. His analyses, and those by Cambridge Economic Policy Associates, suggest that converting the entire publishing system to open access would be worthwhile even if per-article-costs remained the same — simply because of the time that researchers would save when trying to access or read papers that were no longer lodged behind paywalls.

The path to open access

But a total conversion will be slow in coming, because scientists still have every economic incentive to submit their papers to high-prestige subscription journals. The subscriptions tend to be paid for by campus libraries, and few individual scientists see the costs directly. From their perspective, publication is effectively free.

Of course, many researchers have been swayed by the ethical argument, made so forcefully by open-access advocates, that publicly funded research should be freely available to everyone. Another important reason that open-access journals have made headway is that libraries are maxed out on their budgets, says Mark McCabe, an economist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. With no more library cash available to spend on subscriptions, adopting an open-access model was the only way for fresh journals to break into the market. New funding-agency mandates for immediate open access could speed the progress of open-access journals. But even then the economics of the industry remain unclear. Low article charges are likely to rise if more-selective journals choose to go open access. And some publishers warn that shifting the entire system to open access would also increase prices because journals would need to claim all their revenue from upfront payments, rather than from a variety of sources, such as secondary rights. “I've worked with medical journals where the revenue stream from secondary rights varies from less than 1% to as much as one-third of total revenue,” says David Crotty of Oxford University Press, UK.

Some publishers may manage to lock in higher prices for their premium products, or, following the successful example of PLoS, large open-access publishers may try to cross-subsidize high-prestige, selective, costly journals with cheaper, high-throughput journals. Publishers who put out a small number of articles in a few mid-range journals may be in trouble under the open-access model if they cannot quickly reduce costs. “In the end,” says Wim van der Stelt, executive vice president at Springer in Doetinchem, the Netherlands, “the price is set by what the market wants to pay for it.”

In theory, an open-access market could drive down costs by encouraging authors to weigh the value of what they get against what they pay. But that might not happen: instead, funders and libraries may end up paying the costs of open-access publication in place of scientists — to simplify the accounting and maintain freedom of choice for academics. Joseph says that some institutional libraries are already joining publisher membership schemes in which they buy a number of free or discounted articles for their researchers. She worries that such behaviour might reduce the author's awareness of the price being paid to publish — and thus the incentive to bring costs down.

And although many see a switch to open access as inevitable, the transition will be gradual. In the United Kingdom, portions of grant money are being spent on open access, but libraries still need to pay for research published in subscription journals. In the meantime, some scientists are urging their colleagues to deposit any manuscripts they publish in subscription journals in free online repositories. More than 60% of journals already allow authors to self-archive content that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, says Stevan Harnad, a veteran open-access campaigner and cognitive scientist at the University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada. Most of the others ask authors to wait for a time (say, a year), before they archive their papers. However, the vast majority of authors don't self-archive their manuscripts unless prompted by university or funder mandates.

As that lack of enthusiasm demonstrates, the fundamental force driving the speed of the move towards full open access is what researchers — and research funders — want. Eisen says that although PLoS has become a success story — publishing 26,000 papers last year — it didn't catalyse the industry to change in the way that he had hoped. “I didn't expect publishers to give up their profits, but my frustration lies primarily with leaders of the science community for not recognizing that open access is a perfectly viable way to do publishing,” he says.

Change history

26 june 2013.

The scale on the y-axis of ‘The rise of open access’ was originally mislabelled. This has now been corrected.

05 April 2013

This article originally described David Solomon as an economist; he is a psychologist. It also wrongly defined STM as ‘science, technology and mathematics’ instead of ‘scientific, technical and medical’. These errors have been corrected.

Laakso, M. & Björk, B.-C. BMC Medicine 10 , 124 (2012).

Article   Google Scholar  

Solomon, D. J. & Björk, B.-C. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63 , 1485–1495 (2012).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Cambridge Economic Policy Associates Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK (Research Information Network, 2008).

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Additional information

Tweet Follow @NatureNews

Related links

Related links in nature research.

The future of publishing: A new page 2013-Mar-27

Gold on hold 2013-Feb-26

Price doesn't always buy prestige in open access 2013-Jan-22

Britain aims for broad open access 2012-Jun-19

Open access comes of age 2011-Jun-21

Nature special: The future of publishing

Related external links

Cost-effectiveness for open-access journals

A study of open-access journals using article-processing charges

Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Van Noorden, R. Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature 495 , 426–429 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/495426a

Download citation

Published : 27 March 2013

Issue Date : 28 March 2013

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/495426a

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling.

• Allana G. LeBlanc
• Joel D. Barnes
• Jean-Philippe Chaput

Research Integrity and Peer Review (2023)

What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide

• Olivia S. Kowalczyk
• Alexandra Lautarescu
• Samuel J. Westwood

BMC Research Notes (2022)

Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education

• Lauren A. Maggio
• Stefanie Haustein
• Anthony R. Artino

Perspectives on Medical Education (2022)

Higher Author Fees in Gastroenterology Journals Are Not Associated with Faster Processing Times or Higher Impact

• Daniel S. Jamorabo
• Vasilios Koulouris
• Benjamin D. Renelus

Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2022)

Microwave effect: analyzing citations from classic theories and their reinventions—a case study from a classic paper in aquatic ecology—Brooks & Dodson, 1965

• Rayanne Barros Setubal
• Daniel da Silva Farias
• Reinaldo Luiz Bozelli

Scientometrics (2022)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

PublishingState.com

Understanding Journal Publication Fees: A Compact Guide

Table of contents, introduction to journal publishing, traditional publishing model, open access publishing model, impact on journal publication fees, peer review and editorial services, system management and digital hosting, maintaining quality and integrity, detailed breakdown of typical journal publishing fees, why some publishers charge high journal publication fees to publish, understanding open access journal publication fees, the pros and cons of open access fees, tips for authors to afford publication costs, balance between journal publication fees and prestige, call-to-action.

As someone who works on academic publishing, I often get a popular question, especially from young and aspiring researchers:

How much do I pay for the journal publication fees to publish my paper in your journal?

The article discusses the cost of publishing in an academic journal, delving into journal publishing models, revenue generation methods of publishers, and why some publishers charge high journal publication fees that deter authors from submitting.

Academic journal publishing is an essential part of the scholarly communication process. Its primary purpose is disseminating research findings, ideas, and theories to the global community of scholars, researchers, and practitioners.

By publishing their work in academic journals, authors contribute to the existing body of knowledge in their respective fields, stimulate further research, and advance human understanding.

But this important endeavor comes with a cost.

A publisher running a scholarly journal needs to cover operation costs. These costs cover system maintenance (manuscript management system), archiving host, editorial services, editorial remuneration, salary, bills, etc. Institutional academic publishers may get (some) funding, whereas commercial publishers need to fork money to cover the overhead.

The total cost can vary significantly between journals and depending on the chosen publishing model. Where the journal publishing fees are concerned, this financial aspect of journal publishing can influence an author’s decision on where to submit their work.

When considering journal publication fees and cost, it’s crucial to understand its importance, purpose, and associated costs. These costs enable journals to maintain high editorial standards, manage the peer review process, and ensure the work’s accessibility to readers worldwide.

While these costs may sometimes seem high, they’re integral to ensuring the quality, integrity, and accessibility of published research. Therefore, it’s essential for authors to factor them into their publishing decisions.

Understanding Journal Publishing Models

Delving into the world of journal publishing, you’ll encounter two primary models: traditional and open access. Remember that we are probably talking about more than 30,000 academic journals worldwide.

Each journal model operates differently, and understanding these differences is key as they significantly impact the costs associated with publishing.

The traditional publishing model, which has existed for centuries, operates on a subscription-based system. In this setup, readers or their institutions pay a fee (subscription) to access the content of the journals. The subscription mechanism has been the primary publishing model, but the number continues declining as many have adopted the open access model.

The revenue from these subscriptions covers production costs, peer review management, and distribution. Authors may or may not be charged to publish in these types of journals, but even when they are, the fees are generally lower than those of open access journals.

On the other hand, the open access model is a more recent development in the realm of academic publishing. This model allows anyone to read and download the articles for free, promoting wider dissemination of research.

However, there is a catch.

The authors or their institutions typically bear the publishing costs under this model. These fees, known as Article Processing Charges (APCs), cover the same services as traditional publishing – editorial work, peer review management, and distribution. APCs can vary widely, with some journals charging hundreds of dollars while others may charge several thousand.

In between the traditional subscription and open access models, there is the hybrid model, in which a journal offers both options.

The choice between traditional and open access models fundamentally influences the cost of publishing. As mentioned earlier, traditional publishing often incurs fewer upfront costs for the authors as reader subscriptions primarily cover the expenses.

Open access, conversely, shifts the financial burden onto the authors, necessitating higher APCs. However, it’s important to note that the higher cost of open access publishing is offset by its benefit of wider accessibility and potential for greater citation rates.

Ultimately, the decision of where to publish—and thus how much to pay—lies in the hands of researchers and their institutions. It’s a balancing act between affordability, academic recognition, and the desire for research to reach as broad an audience as possible.

Who Do Publishers Incur Journal Publication Fees?

The cost of publishing a research paper often raises eyebrows, especially among first-time authors. You might ask, “Why do I have to pay to share my hard-earned knowledge with others?” The answer lies in the intricate process that your manuscript goes through before it gets published. This process involves several quality control steps, all meticulously managed by the journal.

The cornerstone of academic publishing is the peer review process. It ensures that the research being circulated is high quality, robust, and contributes to the existing body of knowledge. Organizing a thorough, unbiased peer review is no small task. Journals must engage experts in the relevant field, often multiple, and manage their feedback efficiently to maintain the integrity of the review process.

In addition to peer review, there are other editorial services like copy-editing, proofreading and typesetting. These processes help refine the language, correct errors, and format the manuscript as per the journal’s guidelines. The outcome is a polished, professional-looking article that reflects well on the author and the journal.

Beyond editorial work , journals also shoulder the responsibility of maintaining a stable digital platform for hosting published articles. This includes developing and updating the online submission system, managing the website, and ensuring 24/7 access to their digital archives. These technical aspects require significant ongoing investment.

Furthermore, journals must stay current with the latest advances in digital publishing. This means adopting new technologies, enhancing accessibility, and improving user experience, all involving additional costs.

All these processes collectively play a pivotal role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the published work. By paying the publishing fee, you’re essentially contributing to this meticulous system designed to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity. It’s an assurance that experts are scrutinizing your work, presented professionally, and hosted on a reliable platform.

While the cost may seem daunting initially, consider it an investment towards ensuring that your research reaches your community in the best possible manner. It’s about valuing the rigorous process that safeguards the reputation of scholarly research.

Decoding the Journal Publication Fee Structure

To understand why journal publication fees can be expensive, we need to break down the typical costs associated with it. It’s not just about printing on paper or hosting on a digital platform – several factors contribute to these fees.

Firstly, there is the cost of handling and processing the manuscript. This involves initial assessment, coordinating the peer review process, and editing the manuscript to meet the journal’s guidelines. These processes require skilled professionals who must be paid for their time and expertise.

A reputable journal also uses a reliable manuscript management system from a third party. This also incurs additional costs. When I was handling the journal department, maintaining the manuscript management system incurred one of the highest costs.

Secondly, there is the cost of production. After a manuscript is accepted for publication, it must be formatted, proofread, and typeset. Images and graphics might need to be enhanced, and sometimes videos or other multimedia elements must be incorporated into the digital version of the article. Again, this requires professional expertise.

Thirdly, there’s the cost of dissemination and archiving. The final article must be hosted on a website, distributed to various databases, and often printed and shipped to libraries or individual subscribers. Plus, the published article needs to be stored and made accessible indefinitely, which also incurs ongoing costs.

The fees charged by different journals can vary widely. Some journals charge high publishing fees because they offer more services or higher quality services. For example, they might employ more experienced editors, have more rigorous peer review processes, or provide more extensive marketing and distribution of published articles.

In addition, some journals specialize in fields where large grants typically fund research, and therefore authors can afford to pay higher publishing fees. Other journals target early-career researchers or researchers from low-income countries and try to keep fees as low as possible.

Furthermore, the prestige of a journal can also play a role in its pricing. Publishing in a highly respected journal can significantly increase a researcher’s reputation and career prospects so that these journals can afford higher fees.

It’s also worth noting that open access journals generally charge higher journal publishing fees than traditional subscription-based journals, as they don’t generate revenue from subscriptions or paywalls. We’ll explore this further in the next section.

Open Access Journal Fees

Transitioning from traditional publishing models, let’s delve into the realm of open access journals. These journals are freely accessible online to everyone without the need for subscription fees or paywalls. However, this doesn’t mean they’re free to publish – there are still costs associated with their operation.

The fees or the amount required to publish a paper in open access journals vary widely. Typically, these fees, known as Article Processing Charges (APCs), range from $100-$900 (lower tier), $1000-$5,000 (mid-tier) and over $6,000 (higher tier).

APCs cover the costs of peer review, editorial work, online hosting, and archiving. Additionally, some journals levy charges for supplementary materials, figures, or color pages. It’s important for authors to thoroughly investigate these charges before submitting them to an open access journal.

Despite the costs, there are certain advantages to publishing in open access journals. For one, your research becomes immediately available to readers worldwide, increasing its visibility and potential impact.

This can particularly appeal to researchers working on time-sensitive or highly relevant topics. Moreover, some studies have suggested that open access articles are more likely to be cited, which could boost your academic profile.

However, the high APCs can present a significant barrier to some researchers, particularly those without institutional support or access to funding. This raises concerns about the accessibility and equity of open access publishing.

Furthermore, there’s a risk of predatory journals exploiting the open access model, charging high fees without providing proper peer review or editorial services. In recent times, the rise of predatory journals has been unprecedented, causing worries.

Considering these benefits and drawbacks, the decision to publish in an open access journal ultimately depends on your circumstances and research goals. When making this choice, it’s crucial to consider the immediate financial cost and the potential long-term impacts on your research visibility and reputation.

Strategies to Manage Journal Publication Fees

As an academic researcher, you might be troubled by the steep costs of publishing your findings in scholarly journals. But don’t worry. There are several ways through which these costs can be managed effectively. This section will provide practical tips and advice to help you navigate the financial aspects of journal publishing.

One of the most common ways to manage journal publication fees is through grants. Several funding bodies, institutions, and even some governments offer grants specifically designed to cover the costs of research publication. It’s worth investing time to research these opportunities and apply for them.

Besides grants, many publishers offer waivers or discounts on journal publication fees. These waivers are typically need-based and may be offered to researchers from low-income countries or those experiencing financial hardship. It’s always a good idea to check the journal’s policy on fee waivers before submission.

Finally, while it might not sound like the most glamorous option, choosing lower-cost journals for publication is also a viable strategy. Many reputable publishers charge reasonable journal publication fees without compromising the quality of peer review or exposure.

While managing costs is crucial, it’s equally important not to let financial considerations entirely dictate your choice of publication venue.

Remember, the main goal of publishing research is to contribute to your field and boost your academic reputation. Hence, the prestige of the journal should also be taken into account.

Publishing in a prestigious journal ensures a wider audience for your work and adds weight to your academic portfolio. Therefore, it’s essential to strike a balance between cost and prestige. If a prestigious academic publisher charges higher journal publication fees, consider it an investment in your academic career and look for ways to secure funding or waivers.

In the end, remember that the best strategy is often balanced. Consider all factors—including cost, prestige, the journal’s audience, and its relevance to your work—when deciding where to publish your research.

Conclusion: Making Informed Decisions about Journal Publication Fees

As we reach the conclusion of this enlightening journey through the intricacies of journal publication fees, let’s recap the essential insights.

First, we delved into the world of journal publishing models, distinguishing between traditional and open access models, both of which impact the journal publication fees differently.

We also explored why paying for publishing in a journal is necessary, shedding light on various aspects managed by journals, such as peer review, editorial services, system management, and digital hosting.

These services play an instrumental role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published work, ensuring that the scientific community continues to operate on a foundation of rigorous, reliable research.

A comprehensive breakdown of typical journal publication fees was delivered, elucidating why some journals charge higher fees for their publishing services.

Open access journal fees and their unique benefits and drawbacks were also discussed, providing a more nuanced understanding of this publishing model’s financial implications.

Importantly, we also shared practical strategies to manage journal publication fees. Tips ranged from acquiring grants and waivers to selecting lower-cost journals without compromising the prestige associated with your chosen publication. Balancing these factors effectively can alleviate the financial burden while preserving your academic reputation.

We encourage you, as authors, to carefully weigh all these factors when deciding where to publish your research. Remember, knowledge is power. The more informed you are about the nuances of journal publishing, the better equipped you’ll be to make decisions that align with your financial capabilities and academic goals.

Whether you go down the traditional or open access route, aim to balance the cost and the journal’s prestige. And remember, many resources can help you manage these journal publication fees without sacrificing the quality and reach of your academic work. Your research deserves to be shared with the world, but it shouldn’t come at an unmanageable cost.

Keep exploring, keep questioning, and keep publishing. Your contribution to the world of knowledge is invaluable.

3 thoughts on “Understanding Journal Publication Fees: A Compact Guide”

• Pingback: Is Academic Publishing a Greedy Industry?
• Pingback: What are Article Processing Charges in Journal Publishing?
• Pingback: Academic Publishing: 9 Key Things You Should Know

Leave a comment Cancel reply

What Is the Real Cost of Scientific Publishing?

After spending years researching, scientific researchers publish their findings to share them with the larger scientific community. It is standard procedure that peer-reviewed scientific journals charge a significant publication fee for publishing a paper , especially traditional print journals. The cost of publishing can be very high, depending on the journal selected. Recently, these publication fees have come into question, with the scientific community wondering what the real cost to publishers is.

What Costs are Involved in Publishing?

Scientific publishing costs vary from journal to journal. Most journals are unwilling to disclose their publishing costs, so estimations are typically done based upon general industry statistics and revenues. There are costs involved in publishing an article , including the staff, distribution costs, and printing fees. There is also a significant amount of work done behind the scenes that takes a paper from submission to publication. Publishers often have to edit, proofread , check for plagiarism, and send the papers for peer review , all which increase the cost of publishing.

How Much Does it Cost to Publish?

Publishing costs for journals can be high. According to one study that analyzed industry data from the consulting firm Outsell, the typical profit margins for the academic publishing industry are around 20 to 30 percent. Estimating the final cost of publication per paper based upon revenue generated and the total number of published articles, they estimate that the average cost to publish an article is around $3500 to $4000. This estimate is most likely very high, especially for open access journals that typically only publish digital copies. The cost per paper in these journals could be as low as a few hundred dollars per article.

Who Pays to Publish in Journals?

A large percentage of the cost of publishing a research paper falls upon the researchers. Most journals charge a significant fee to those submitting a paper, sometimes in the thousands of dollars. The paper’s author might have to pay these fees, although sometimes his or her university or institution has a subscription fee or otherwise covers the cost of publishing. Some journals are able to provide a much lower fee for publication because the government, a university, or a society subsidizes them.

Journals with a higher publication fee defend their costs by saying they put more effort into reviewing and editing each article, and are more selective about the articles published. Researchers continue to publish in these journals because they provide a greater prestige to the author due to their long-standing, esteemed reputation.

The Future of Journal Costs

Until there is more clarity on exactly how much each publishing house spends on publishing each article, the research community will never know what the real cost of publication is. There is pressure to lower the amount charged to authors to have an article published, and some journals are making it easier for researchers to publish their work . However, it will be years before the most well-respected and often most expensive journals begin to lower their fees, both for submitting and reading articles, making it easier for the scientific community to publish, read, and share information on the latest findings.

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• Free Resources
• Trending Now

A Comprehensive Global Examination of Open Access Awareness, Attitudes, and Funding in Scholarly Publishing

The global proliferation of open-access (OA) publishing stands as a pivotal focus for researchers, institutions,…

• Thought Leadership

Knowledge Without Walls: Enago’s comprehensive global survey report on open-access publishing

In the ever-evolving landscape of scholarly communication, the global expansion of open-access (OA) publishing has…

• Publishing Research
• Submitting Manuscripts

Publishers Reimagining Open Access Funding and Publishing: APCs finally being replaced with innovative models

Recent years have seen a dynamic transformation in the academic publishing landscape, driven by the…

• Diversity and Inclusion

Democratizing Science: The power of open access in fostering diversity and inclusivity

Open access encompasses a set of principles and practices with the overarching goal of making…

Finding Safe Open Access Journals — Researcher’s guide for a smooth publishing journey

According to a study, it was found that there has been an increase of approximately…

Balancing Between Scalability and Openness: An interview with Ginny Hendricks

Author Perspectives on Open Access: Fostering community and equitable knowledge…

Open Access Week 2023 With Enago: Embracing “Community over Commercialization”

STM Trends Forecasts Substantial Increase of Open Access With its Theme — “The Beauty…

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

What should universities' stance be on AI tools in research and academic writing?