research topics for law and society

Center for the Study of Law and Society

Established in 1961, the Center for the Study of Law and Society (CSLS)  provides a global home for the multidisciplinary study of law and society.  Our goal is to raise awareness and engagement with the empirical study of law and society and build community among multidisciplinary socio-legal scholars.  CSLS brings together U.C. Berkeley faculty and graduate students as well as visiting scholars from across the United States and abroad to examine empirically important issues in law and society and influence policy and public dialogue. 

The Center convenes scholarly presentations, conferences, and workshops designed to exchange ideas and explore new concepts and perspectives.  It also encourages and supports empirical research and theoretical analysis of the social consequences of law, including legal institutions and processes, the impact of law on individuals and groups, and social, political, and intellectual influences on law.  It supports scores of graduate students from across the Berkeley campus through small grants and fellowships to support their original research.  In recent years, the Center’s primary substantive focus has been on criminal justice, inequality, and democracy and civil society.  

Research Programs

• Empirical Legal Studies : CSLS has long been an intellectual home for empirical studies focused on the intersection of law and society. Today, empirical legal studies at UC Berkeley are characterized by a rich interdisciplinary approach that grounds empirical analysis in socio-legal theory and embraces a broad range of methods, both quantitative and qualitative. As interest in empirical legal studies grew throughout the legal academy, CSLS and Berkeley Law began the Berkeley Empirical Legal Studies (BELS) Program in 2006. Its multiple aspects include: Grant Writing; Workshops and Conferences; Technical Assistance; and the BELS Graduate Fellows Program.
• Litigation, Courts, and Criminal Justice : The study of litigation, courts, and criminal justice processes has been central to the work of CSLS since its beginning.  Affiliated scholars study comparative judicial behavior, the development of European Union law, penal policy and patterns of incarceration, the privatization of corrections, prison conditions litigation, historical and contemporary police, and criminal justice system processes.
• Legal Profession :  Several CSLS-affiliated scholars are engaged in empirical work about the legal profession both in the United States and abroad.  These projects include investigating the factors related to law students choosing public interest careers and staying in public interest work over the long term, the role of public interest law firms in democracy and civil society, legal mobilization and lawyers in contemporary China, and the expansion of authoritarian legality through courts and the legal profession in China.
• Gender, Social Policy, and the Law : CSLS has administered several externally funded projects on law, teenage pregnancy, sex education policy, and work and family policy. Affiliated faculty are examining the decline of families under globalization and its implications for law, as well continuing historical research on women and crime.  Affiliated faculty also are studying gendered dynamics around work and family policy, including judicial and organizational responses to these policies and bias against mothers and leave takers in the workplace.
• Civil Rights and Racial Justice : Many CSLS projects involve inquiries into civil rights and racial justice.  Current work examines whether the negative effects of unemployment vary with race; the public health consequences of police violence; the experience of Black women, men, and youth with the criminal justice system, policing, and various forms of violence; the development of legal mechanisms to create conditions for eliminating health disparities; public opinion and survey research about racial variation in attitudes and voting; and considering race in theories of deliberative and participatory democracy.
• Legal History : CSLS has a rich tradition of supporting historical studies, working with UC Berkeley's distinguished group of scholars who specialize in the history of law, courts, and legal processes. Areas of research include economic history and the history of federalism, civil liberties and the welfare state, the experience of African Americans with the legal system after Reconstruction, as well as Asian-American encounters with the American legal system.  Affiliates are conducting research on colonial and 19th century legal history; African Americans’ encounter  with the law from the Civil War to the modern civil rights movement; and the history of organized labor and labor law at the turn of the twentieth century.
• Law, Organizations, Employment and Schools : Research on law and organizations has become a major focus of scholarship at CSLS.  Affiliated scholars conduct research on the role of organizational institutions in judicial construction of civil rights law, the legal consciousness of employees and employers, public interest law firms as advocacy organizations, and the social psychology of discrimination and legal consciousness in schools.  CSLS also hosts the Center for Law and the Workplace (CLAW), which provides a core institutional center for student and faculty professional and scholarly development around the law of work and promotes cross-disciplinary scholarship to address pressing, contemporary  employment-related policy concerns.  Faculty affiliated with CLAW and CSLS are empirically studying issues related to employment in academia, including whether biases exist in STEM faculty hiring and possible interventions to improve equity and inclusion in university hiring, as well as the gendered effects of the COVID19 pandemic on faculty experiences and productivity. 
• Regulatory Studies : CSLS actively supports and encourages research and scholarly interaction concerning the politics and implementation of regulatory and administrative regimes. Recent areas of study include globalization and regulation, ocean law, and policy and corporate compliance and organization theory.  Externally funded research projects have included major studies of comparative regulatory methods, comparative environmental regulation, corporate environmental performance, and the response to strong legal penalties in U.S. environmental law.
• Jurisprudential Studies : The intellectual life of CSLS is enriched by a commitment to interaction among legal philosophers and empirically-oriented socio-legal scholars.  In this respect, the Center is advancing the intellectual agenda of the late Professor Emeritus Philip Selznick, its "founding father," who promoted a normatively and philosophically-inspired vision of socio-legal studies. This combined emphasis remains one of the striking features of Berkeley's CSLS.

CSLS Speaker Series

The Center for the Study of Law and Society hosts the CSLS Speaker Series, a weekly series of lunchtime presentations.  Each year an average of 25 lectures and talks are presented by scholars engaged in socio-legal research from UC Berkeley, other U.S. universities and abroad.

Berkeley Empirical Legal Studies (BELS) Graduate Fellowship

BELS fellows are doctoral students drawn from a wide range of disciplines across the UC Berkeley campus, including (but not limited to) those in the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Biological Sciences, International Studies and Area Studies, Schools of Public Health, Business, and Public Policy, Colleges of Natural Sciences and Engineering, as well as from the School of Law (PhD, JD and JSD).  Fellows receive up to $1,000 dollars for research related expenses, attend monthly workshops with other BELS fellows to present and discuss their research, participate in CSLS activities, such as the Empirical Research Methods Workshops, the CSLS Speaker Series, and other conferences and events. 

Conferences and Workshops

CSLS sponsors special academic meetings, workshops, and conferences, often in collaboration with other campus units, and often resulting in books and other publications.  In recent years, conference topics have included: environmental protection and deterrence; law and society in China; the work of Martin Shapiro; the work of Harry N. Scheiber; Virtues and Vices of Legalism, honoring the work of Robert A. Kagan; and Building Theory Through Empirical Legal Studies.  CSLS organizes a series of Workshops on Empirical Research Methods, a series of interviews with founders and leading scholars in the field entitled Conversations in Law and Society, and a year-long seminar for graduate student fellows, the Berkeley Empirical Legal Studies (BELS) Graduate Fellowship.  CSLS also sponsors conferences and workshops for the dissemination and discussion of research, the exploration of new ideas for research, and the promotion of new multidisciplinary and cross-national collaborations.

Empirical Research Methods Workshops

Students interested in conducting empirical research on law are trained on a wide range of empirical methods, both quantitative and qualitative.  Leading experts, including some of our own faculty, facilitate occasional workshops on particular methodologies.  Past workshops are archived on our web page.

Conversations in Law and Society

Taped in front of a live audience at Berkeley Law School, this online video archive displays engaging conversations with the founders and leading figures of the field of law and society.

Publications and Blogs

CSLS along with the doctoral program, Jurisprudence and Social Policy, publishes two electronic Working Paper Series in the University of California eScholarship Repository.

CSLS Library

The Center maintains a small non-circulating library of interdisciplinary socio-legal journals (and some disciplinary journals), books, and house bound copies of most of the doctoral dissertations of graduates of the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program.

Catherine Albiston Email [email protected] Telephone (510) 642-0493

Pamela Erickson Email [email protected] Telephone (510) 642-4038

2240 Piedmont Ave (JSP Bldg), Berkeley, CA 94720 - 2150 (510) 642-4038

• Topical Reference Works
• Research Methods
• Social Theory
• ASA Publications
• Search Tips
• Google Scholar
• Reviews of Research
• Data and Statistics
• Organizational Tools
• Internet Resources
• Ethics and Research Involving Human Subjects
• Juvenile Justice
• Intersectionality and the Law

Related Guides

• Mass Incarceration A research guide on mass incarceration and the prison industrial complex.
• Gender and Sexuality Studies A guide that provides an overview of gender and sexuality studies resources and materials available through NYU Libraries and beyond.
• NYU Law Library Guides Research guides on various specialized legal topics, which are maintained by the staff at the NYU Law Library.
• Data Sources: Crime A round up of major data sources on crime.

Databases for Finding Law Review Articles and Related Literature

Use the databases listed on this page in addition to core sociology and criminology databases, depending on your topic.

• Law Journal Library This link opens in a new window Law Journal Library is a collection of more than 1,250 law and law-related periodicals. Coverage is from the first issue published for all periodicals and goes through the most current issue allowed.
• Law Library Microform Consortium Digital (LLMC) This link opens in a new window Law Library Microform Consortium (LLMC) is a non-profit cooperative of libraries dedicated to preserving legal titles and government documents while making copies available digitally through its on-line service LLMC-Digital. Users can access scanned copies of newsletters and legal documents.
• Legal Source (EBSCO) This link opens in a new window Legal Source provides access to an extensive range of full-text legal content. It offers information centered on the discipline of law and legal topics, such as criminal justice, international law, federal law, organized crime, medical law, labor and human resource law, ethics, and the environment. Legal Source includes the Index to Legal Periodicals Retrospective and the Index to Legal Periodicals & Books.
• Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals This link opens in a new window Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals is a multilingual index to articles and book reviews in publications appearing worldwide. The collection provides in-depth coverage of public and private international law, comparative and foreign law, and the law of all jurisdictions other than the United States, the U.K., Canada, and Australia. IFLP also analyzes the contents of individually published collections of legal essays, Festschriften, Mélanges, and congress reports each year. Dates of coverage: 1985 to present.

Databases for Finding Case Laws, Legislation, and Government Documents

• Legislative Insight This link opens in a new window Legislative Insight contains access to all of the various publications that become available as as a bill moves through the legislative process on its way to becoming a law. These include the full text of the Public Law itself, all versions of related bills, law-specific Congressional Record excerpts, committee hearings, reports, and prints. Legislative Insight offers a research citation page that not only links to the full text of the associated primary source publications, but also allows the user to search within these documents.
• Lexis Advance This link opens in a new window Lexis Advance gives you access to more than 60,000 legal, news and public records sources, breaking legal news, and access to the latest federal decisions. More information less... Please clear your browser's cache and cookies before attempting to access this resource.
• Thomson Reuters Westlaw Campus Research This link opens in a new window TR Westlaw Campus Research provides access to a comprehensive and widely-used indexing system for caselaw materials to make legal research easier, more accurate, and more relevant.

Background Information

• Handbook of Law and Society The Handbook of Law and Society presents a comprehensive overview of key research findings, theoretical developments, and methodological controversies in the field of law and society.
• Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law This unique research handbook maps the historical, theoretical, and methodological concepts in sociology of law, exploring the rich and complex nature of this area of research. It argues that sociology of law flourishes due to its strong capacity for interdisciplinary engagement and links to other scientific concepts, methodologies and research fields.
• Routledge Handbook of Law and Society This innovative handbook provides a comprehensive, and truly global, overview of the main approaches and themes within law and society scholarship or social-legal studies. The authors were carefully chosen to achieve a diverse and non-Eurocentric view of socio-legal studies.
• Routledge Handbook of Law and Theory This handbook sets out an innovative approach to the theory of law, reconceptualising it in a material, embodied, socially contextualised and politically radical way. The book brings the law into active discussion with other disciplines, as well as supra-disciplinary debates on the areas of spatiality, temporality, materiality, corporeality and sensorial studies, capturing the most exciting developments in current legal theory, and anticipating future research in the area.
• Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods Drawing on a range of approaches from the social sciences and humanities, this handbook explores theoretical and empirical perspectives that address the articulation of law in society, and the social character of the rule of law. Rather than seeking to define the field of socio-legal studies, this book takes up the experiences of researchers within the field. First-hand accounts of socio-legal research projects allow the reader to engage with diverse theoretical and methodological approaches within this fluid interdisciplinary area.
• Oxford Bibliographies: Law and Society Cites a multidisciplinary literature -- while privileging sociological titles -- on the mutual relationship between law and society with its different actors, institutions, and processes.
• Oxford Bibliographies: Sociology of Law Summarizes the evolution of the sociology of law from its early classical writings to its modern theoretical and methodological approaches.
• Foreign Law Guide This link opens in a new window The Foreign Law Guide (FLG) offers information on sources of foreign law, including complete bibliographic citations to legislation, the existence of English translations, and selected references to secondary sources in one virtual destination. Broad in content and global in scope, the FLG is an indispensable resource for comparative law research and a fundamental tool for developing a foreign and comparative law collection.

Nonprofit Organizations

• Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (CFSY) envisions the United States becoming a society that respects all children’s human rights and nurtures their capacity to become leaders, responding to any harm they cause in ways that are rooted in their dignity and unique potential for change. CFSY seeks a response to the harm caused by children that is conscientious of childhood traumas, restorative and empowering to all parties, and equitable, especially with regard to race and ethnicity.
• Center for Children’s Law and Policy The Center for Children’s Law and Policy (CCLP) is focused on reform of juvenile justice and other systems that affect troubled and at-risk children, and protection of the rights of children in those systems. CCLP is working to create a world where the response to youth who get in trouble with the law is developmentally appropriate, free of racial and ethnic bias, and focused on building strengths that help youth thrive in their own communities.
• Coalition for Juvenile Justice The Coalition for Juvenile Justice (CJJ) is a nationwide coalition of State Advisory Groups (SAGs) and allies dedicated to preventing children and youth from becoming involved in the courts and upholding the highest standards of care when youth are charged with wrongdoing and enter the justice system.
• Equal Justice Initiative The Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) is committed to ending mass incarceration and excessive punishment in the United States, to challenging racial and economic injustice, and to protecting basic human rights for the most vulnerable people in American society. Founded in 1989 by Bryan Stevenson, a widely acclaimed public interest lawyer and bestselling author of Just Mercy , EJI provides legal representation to people who have been illegally convicted, unfairly sentenced, or abused in state jails and prisons, challenging the death penalty and excessive punishment and providing re-entry assistance to formerly incarcerated people.
• The Innocence Project The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck at Cardozo School of Law, exonerates the wrongly convicted through DNA testing and reforms the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. Its mission is to free the staggering number of innocent people who remain incarcerated, and to bring reform to the system responsible for their unjust imprisonment.
• The Marshall Project The Marshall Project is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news organization that seeks to create and sustain a sense of national urgency about the U.S. criminal justice system. It has an impact on the system through journalism, rendering it more fair, effective, transparent and humane. Although not an advocate, The Marshall Project often spurs change. Its journalism exposes wrongs, bringing them to the attention of officials who can take action. It gives visibility to proposals and critiques from the criminal justice community. And it tries to set an example for other media to cover criminal justice issues fairly and responsibly.
• National Center for Juvenile Justice The National Center for Juvenile Justice (NCJJ) is the oldest juvenile justice research group in the United States. NCJJ's mission is effective justice for children and families through research and technical assistance. For four decades, NCJJ has conducted research and provided objective, factual information that professionals and decision makers in the juvenile and family justice system use to increase effectiveness.
• National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform The National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (NICJR) works to reduce incarceration and violence, improve the outcomes of system-involved youth and adults, and increase the capacity and expertise of the organizations that serve these individuals. NICJR provides technical assistance, consulting, research, organizational development, and advocacy in the fields of juvenile and criminal justice, youth development, and violence prevention. NICJR works with an array of organizations, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and philanthropic foundations.
• National Juvenile Justice Network The National Juvenile Justice Network (NJJN) leads a membership community of 58 state-based organizations and numerous individuals across 42 states and DC. NJJN seeks to shrink our youth justice systems and transform the remainder into systems that treat youth and families with dignity and humanity.
• REFORM Alliance REFORM Alliance aims to transform probation and parole by changing laws, systems and culture to create real pathways to work and wellbeing. A justice system that holds people accountable and redirects back to work and wellbeing leads to stronger families and safer communities. Instead of keeping people trapped in a revolving door from probation/parole to prison — which costs taxpayers billions of dollars — REFORM is working to move people from the justice system into stability.
• The Sentencing Project The Sentencing Project promotes effective and humane responses to crime that minimize imprisonment and criminalization of youth and adults by promoting racial, ethnic, economic, and gender justice. Its policy priorities envision the full inclusion in society of people with criminal records and an end to extreme punishments. Its aim is to center the leadership, voices, vision, and experience of those directly affected by mass incarceration to make the rationale for systemic change vivid, credible and compelling.
• Vera Institute of Justice The Vera Institute of Justice's mission is to end the overcriminalization and mass incarceration of people of color, immigrants, and people experiencing poverty to create safe, healthy, empowered communities and a fair, accountable justice system.

Data Sources

• Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) This link opens in a new window Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), a research center at Syracuse University, has developed a web-based data warehouse/data mining application that makes it possible to produce useful information from previously inaccessible data. The TRACFed data warehouse includes among its many offerings transactional data from the US Federal government concerning its enforcement and prosecution activities, staffing, federal expenditures, and more. It focuses on the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, IRS, DEA and the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
• << Previous: Ethics and Research Involving Human Subjects
• Next: Juvenile Justice >>
• Last Updated: Apr 13, 2024 9:14 PM
• URL: https://guides.nyu.edu/sociology

Center for the Study of Law and Society

Welcome to the center for the study of law and society (csls).

Criminal Justice

Hank Willis Thomas 'Raise Up' Statue, National Memorial for Peace and Justice, Montgomery Alabama (Getty Images)

Democracy and Civil Society

Lighting the World Protesting Darkness, Fayek Tasneem Khan (Getty Images)

Martin Luther King Jr's speech 'I Have A Dream' at the Lincoln Memorial (public domain)

The Center supports theoretically-based, empirical research on new developments at the interplay of law and society in contemporary and historical contexts.  While part of Berkeley's School of Law, the Center fosters a multidisciplinary context in which UC Berkeley faculty and graduate students from many departments interact and engage with visiting socio-legal scholars from universities in the United States and abroad.

Please consider making a  donation  to support CSLS.   Donate $100 dollars or more and you will receive a CSLS t-shirt!   Funds will support BELS Fellows, JSP Students, 60th anniversary conference, and crucial and timely programming focused on our three pillars of Criminal Justice, Inequality, and Democracy and Civil Society. 

See our full CSLS Spring Speaker Series line up here! (events are in-person and livestreamed via Zoom with lunch provided)

April 15, 2024 CSLS Speaker Series Event

"How Threat, Apathy, and Antipathy Influence Support for Policies that Harm Low Status Groups"

Sa-kiera Tiarra Jolynn Hudson Assistant Professor of Management of Organizations, UC Berkeley

Give to CSLS

Join our mailing list.

Click here.

The 2024-2025 Berkeley Empirical Legal Studies Graduate Fellowship (BELS) Application Period Is Now Open!

Applications will be accepted until April 9th, 2024. Click here for more information about the program and application process.

We are now accepting submissions for the 2024 CSLS Graduate Student Paper Prize!

Papers will be accepted until May 3, 2024. Click here for more information about the award and nomination requirements.

190 Unique Law Research Topics for Students to Consider

Table of Contents

If you are a law student, then obviously as a part of your studies you must write an excellent academic paper on any top law research topics. Right now, do you want to write a brilliant law research paper? Are you searching for the best law research topic ideas? If yes, then continue reading this blog post and get interesting law topics for your academic writing.

Law Research Paper Writing

A law research paper is a type of research paper that focuses on any legal topic in the world. The legal topics are nothing but the topic that deals with the legal issues that are resolved in the court.

In general, every country will have its own legal regulations and policies. More commonly, the basic rights and humanity will be the same for all the countries in the world, but specifically, you need to consider the cultural and historical peculiarities of a country while writing a law research paper.

Remember, the law is a sensitive subject and hence, when writing legal research papers, utmost care should be given. You shouldn’t add too much philosophy to it. Your research paper should answer your law essay topics properly with pure black-and-white facts.

You may think that writing a law research paper is easy. But actually, it is not. For writing an intense legal research paper, you must have a unique legal research topic. Particularly, when writing law papers, you should first research and find the legal questions relevant to your topic, analyze the various legal precedents, and present the answer to your legal question in the form of a memo by properly citing all the sources you have used for references.

Law Research Paper Topic Selection Tips

If you want to write a law research paper, then a good law research topic is what you need. Basically, the law is a complex subject, and hence choosing the right research topic from them is challenging. While selecting the legal research topic, be sure to keep the following tips in mind.

• Your topic should not be too broad.
• It should be informative to your audience.
• The topic should be catchy and relevant to modern law.
• It should contain relevant supporting materials online or in local libraries.
• The topic should deal with relevant legal precedents.
• It should answer all the legal essay questions.
• Your topic should have real-life cases to illustrate your points.

List of the Best Law Research Paper Topics

Law is a popular discipline among humanitarian sciences that have a wide range of research areas. Some common law research areas include business law, commercial law, environmental law, international law, medical law, constitutional law, cyber law, family law and so on.

As law is a broad subject with endless research topics, it might be difficult for you to choose the most interesting idea from them. So, to make things easier, we have sorted different categories of law and listed some outstanding law research topics for you.

Have a look at the below-mentioned list of law research paper topic ideas and identify aprofound legal research topic of your choice.

Business Law Research Topics

• What’s the true nature of business law?
• Equity and the doctrines of business law
• Morality and its relation to business law
• Business laws and the parliament
• The formulation of business regulations in Islam
• Why are business regulations essential for institutions and organizations?
• Business laws in Africa
• How crucial is the constitution for the creation of business law?
• Business law as a profession
• The classification of the business regulations
• Describe the Law of Contracts in the United States
• Discuss the fundamentals of UK contract law for businesses
• Critical evaluation of the role of the judiciary bodies in corporate law
• Disclose an insight into contract laws with respect to the application of verbal and non-verbal agreements
• Importance of collective bargaining agreements and laws on labor relations
• How to deal with corruption in business law?
• Discuss the difference between the EU and the UK after the implementation of the Brexit Contract Law
• Discuss the protections provided to the minority shareholders in the corporate law regime of India
• Compare and contrast the legal aspects of corporate M&A (mergers and acquisitions) in the United States and Australia
• Analysis of the role of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition in regulating the anti-competitive practices in the market
• Compare and contrast the legal aspects of e-commerce in the US and the UK
• Critical analysis of the role played by the Arbitration and conciliation act in resolving business disputes
• Compare and contrast the company law act in Australia and Canada
• Discuss how anti-money laundering laws of a country impact businesses
• Describe the implications of digital payment systems

Commercial Law Research Paper Topics

• What are the dangers and potential results of commercial partnerships?
• A comprehensive analysis of pre-incorporation contracts: How do they work?
• Reviewing the use of international commercial law in energy projects across the globe.
• Assessing the mediating role of corporate social responsibility in companies’ performance.
• Evaluating the commercial laws that should be used against dishonest managers.
• Reviewing the US commercial laws: What should be changed or added?
• Evaluating the regulations aimed at stopping corruption: A case study of the UK.
• Reviewing the implications of international commercial law in UK commercial laws.
• Assessing the effectiveness of international commercial law programs in UK universities.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of commercial law to support commercial transactions in the US.
• Critical analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• Discuss the benefits of Commercial Law
• Analyze the difficulties faced by businesses due to pursuing Regular or Commercial Lease
• Describe the effect of business law on commercial transactions and licensing
• Critical analysis of the labor law in Tanzania
• Develop a comparative study on international labor standards that regulate multinational companies in developing countries

Constitutional Law Research Topics

• The Internet and its impact on Free Speech
• The pros and cons of federalism
• What’s the freedom of the press?
• The desecration and flag burning
• A comparison between constitutions and state laws
• What are the rights of victims of self-incrimination?
• The pros and cons of Constitutionalism
• All about gun control and its history in the US
• What are the key changes that the First Amendment has brought?
• What changes did the Bill of Rights bring?

Criminal Law Research Topics

• Why does one crime have a set of different punishments?
• The roots of criminologists’ work and their work in modern times
• Can sociology have an impact on preventing crime?
• The ethical and legal issues related to criminal activity in your country.
• The real truth behind domestic violence
• What is quantitative criminology, and how does it differ from other types of crime?
• When does the international criminal court come into play?
• Analyzing the use of lie detectors in criminal justice: How effective are the lie detectors?
• A deeper look at the history of the death penalty.
• The key differences between male and female rape legislation
• Evaluating crime-related factors that should not be presented in a court of law.
• A thematic review of criminal theory: Exploring the link between crime and morality.
• What are the best ways to protect witnesses from retaliation in criminal cases?
• Is criminal profiling by law enforcement truly helpful in identifying serial killers?
• How does the criminal justice system keep an eye on police with body cameras?

Read more: Criminal Justice Research Topics Idea for students

Research Topics on Family Law

• Evaluating the impacts of the law on divorce: Has it increased the cases of divorce or reduced them?
• Review the important implications and reasons for changes to family law in the last 20 years.
• Assessing the factors that hinder couples from pursuing a divorce.
• The global issues and legal aspects of marriage and divorce of mentally unstable individuals.
• Explore divorce and social consequences across family law and religious perspectives.
• Analyze the legal foundations of parenting and civil partnerships.
• Assessing human rights in states that follow religious laws for families: A case study of India.
• Compare the divorce rights for women in Pakistan and the UK.
• How does culture impact decision-making on transgender marriages and divorce in the US?
• Evaluating the compatibility of child justice with family justice: A case study of the UK.

Cyber Law Research Topics

• The main cyber laws and enforcement today
• What are the skills of an excellent cyber lawyer?
• How can the government impact cyberterrorism?
• Cybercrime and cyberterrorism
• The penalties for cybercrime
• All about private data, revenge porn, blackmailing, and our internet privacy
• Is it the government’s job to analyze the flow of network traffic?
• Cyberlaw trends and how the online community sticks to them.
• The Internet Era and identity theft: Is it a crime of modern times?
• Categories of cybercrime and the main cybersecurity strategies against violators.

Read more: Interesting Cybercrime Research Topics To Deal With your paper

Research Ideas on Environmental Law

• The environmental influence on the rate of crime
• How has global environmental law changed today?
• The importance of environmental law for the health of current generations.
• Biological weapons and their regulations by international environmental law.
• Will the Uber industry impact the ecology in America?
• The current environmental regulations in the United States
• Sustainability and environmental compliance due to environmental law and economic reality.
• All about the environmental regulations in Canada
• Waste management in countries with a high economic level.
• Environmental law in Australia and climate change

Employment Law Research Topics

• A comprehensive review of employment contracts and job contracts in the US manufacturing industry.
• A legal viewpoint of employee mobility between European Union countries.
• Equal employment opportunities: Comparing gender differences in the UK and US regulations.
• Compare the UK laws before and after exiting the European Union.
• Reviewing legal perspectives of social work employment: A case study of California, USA.
• A comparative analysis of employment laws in the automotive industry in the US and UK.
• Analyze the impact of trade unions and their work in the UK.
• The convergence of employment laws and religion in the USA: A literature review.
• Evaluating the efficiency of workplace sexual harassment: A case study of the US and UK.
• A critical evaluation of the employment law of disabled individuals in the US.

Law Research Topics on Intellectual Property

• Evaluating laws for intellectual property rights protection on the internet.
• A comprehensive assessment of the economic impacts of intellectual property rights
• Evaluating the fair dealing in terms of copyright law: A case study of the US.
• How has EU law impacted the intellectual property regime in the UK?
• Can the emerging technological advancements operate smoothly with the current intellectual property laws in the US?
• Demystifying the relationship between intellectual property laws and EU regulations?
• Comparing and contrasting the intellectual property regimes in the UK and the US.
• Evaluating the implications of Brexit on the protection of intellectual property rights in the UK.
• Is the EU intellectual property law safe and fair for users and owners?
• Does the EU copyright law provide ample balance between the needs of inventors and users?
• Comparison of the institutions and regulations governing intellectual property in China and India
• An in-depth analysis of the UK’s invention and patenting system: Can the existing, rigid system stimulate innovation?
• Critical analysis of the development of copyright and moral rights in the legal system of Europe
• Infringement of foreign copyright and jurisdiction of the European Court
• Critical analysis of the economic rationale of Trademarks
• Analyze the emerging role of patents in innovation and intellectual property protection in the software industry
• Peer-to-Peer Technology: Analysis of contributory infringement and fair use
• Trademark protection is and ought to be the need of businesses to protect their brand value: Explain
• What do fair pricing and fair dealing with copyright regulations mean?
• Trade-Related Aspects of IP Rights: A Workable Instrument for Enforcing Benefit Sharing

International Law Research Paper Topics

• The principles used to formulate international criminal laws.
• Ethical systems and international relations
• Problems of code-based ethics
• How do different countries deal with false confessions?
• Different treatment of terrorism as a crime in different countries
• Diplomats and their protection of international morality.
• Did the US involvement in Iraq provide justice or violate the law?
• Laws on mental health in different countries
• The issues of traditional justification
• The question of ethics in the international legal context.
• International Human Rights Court Hearings: Evaluating the importance of precedence.
• What are the problems of enforcing international law in developing countries?
• Evaluating the efficiency of International Tribunals in solving war crimes.
• Digital and internet legislation: Forecasting the future.
• Assessing the relationship between public safety and civil liberties in international laws.

Medical Law Research Topics

• The common law towards refusal of medical treatment.
• Evaluating the laws governing organ transplantation: A case study of the US .
• How do ethics and medical law coexist?
• Ethics and Medical Laws in World War II
• Law application in medicine: Exploring the antecedents and practice.
• Evaluating the ethical and legal challenges of using biobanks.
• Exploring the legal aspects of electronic fetal monitoring.
• How do lawsuits affect medical practitioners’ commitment to offering lifesaving treatments?
• Unregistered medical intervention in the UK: What are the legal implications?
• Morality and law in the abortion debate.
• In accordance with international environmental law, biological weapons are prohibited.
• Will the Uber industry have an impact on American ecology?
• United States environmental laws are in effect today.
• Due to environmental legislation and economic reality, sustainability, and environmental compliance.
• anything about Canadian environmental laws.
• evaluating aspects of crime that shouldn’t be discussed in court.
• What are the best strategies for shielding witnesses in criminal cases from reprisals?
• A more thorough examination of the death penalty’s past
• Examining the connection between crime and morality is the focus of this examination of criminal theory.
• A case study of London’s examination into the difficulties in determining the type and distribution of crime.

A Few More Medical Law Research Ideas

• How to balance the rights of defendants and victims when using anonymity in sexual offense litigation.
• Slavery, prostitution, and human trafficking. the methods used globally to eradicate it.
• Is identity theft a modern-day crime? prevention of identity theft in the post-Internet era.
• criminality and psychology. Are some people more likely than others to breach the law?
• Social control theory against the self-control hypothesis
• False confessions and how they are handled in various nations.
• The environment’s impact on crime rates is one of the theories behind shattered windows.
• Similarities and disparities between mental diseases and crime in various nations.
• education, criminal behavior, and intelligence.
• From the beginning to the present, criminologists’ fieldwork.
• How does quantitative criminology differ from other types of crime? What is it?
• When is the use of the international criminal court appropriate?
• Examining the effectiveness of lie detectors in the criminal justice system:
• A more thorough investigation of the death penalty’s past.
• The main distinctions between male and female rape laws
• Assessing criminal-related variables that shouldn’t be brought up in court.
• What effects has EU law had on the UK’s system of intellectual property?
• Can the advancing technologies coexist peacefully with the US’s current intellectual property laws?
• Explaining the connection between EU rules and intellectual property laws?

Trending Law Research Topics

• Discuss the role of genetics in criminal justice proceedings.
• Write about the recent changes in tax laws and their impact on India.
• Differences between state and federal regulations regarding gun control.
• Discuss the growing influence of artificial intelligence on the legal profession.
• Explain the role of technology in criminal trials.
• Analyze international human rights policies.
• Write about the Freedom of expression and censorship issues.
• Discuss the Legal issues related to school safety and security.
• Analyze the regulation of online gaming platforms from a legal perspective.
• Write about the Legal implications of celebrity endorsements.

Wrapping Up

In order to get top grades for your law research paper, a peculiar topic is mainly needed. Especially, by choosing an idea from the list of 150+ law research topics suggested in this blog post, you can write a top-quality academic paper and make your work stand out in the crowd. In case you find it difficult to write a legal research paper, then immediately reach out to us for professional  Law assignment help . We have a team of academic writers who are experts in the field of law to assist you in completing your law research paper on any impressive topic as per requirements.

Simply, book your order and get an original law research paper beyond your expectations.

Related Post

220 Amazing Religious Research Paper Topics and Ideas

Read and Understand How to Write a Research Proposal

100+ Controversial Research Topics and Ideas to Focus On

About author.

Jacob Smith

I am an Academic Writer and have affection to share my knowledge through posts’. I do not feel tiredness while research and analyzing the things. Sometime, I write down hundred of research topics as per the students requirements. I want to share solution oriented content to the students.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Featured Posts

140 Unique Geology Research Topics to Focus On

200+ outstanding world history topics and ideas 2023, 190 excellent ap research topics and ideas, 150+ trending group discussion topics and ideas, 170 funny speech topics to blow the minds of audience, who invented exams learn the history of examination, how to focus on reading 15 effective tips for better concentration, what is a rhetorical analysis essay and how to write it, primary school teacher in australia- eligibility, job role, career options, and salary, 4 steps to build a flawless business letter format, get help instantly.

Raise Your Grades with Assignment Help Pro

• Search Menu
• Browse content in Arts and Humanities
• Browse content in Archaeology
• Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
• Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
• Archaeology by Region
• Archaeology of Religion
• Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
• Biblical Archaeology
• Contemporary and Public Archaeology
• Environmental Archaeology
• Historical Archaeology
• History and Theory of Archaeology
• Industrial Archaeology
• Landscape Archaeology
• Mortuary Archaeology
• Prehistoric Archaeology
• Underwater Archaeology
• Urban Archaeology
• Zooarchaeology
• Browse content in Architecture
• Architectural Structure and Design
• History of Architecture
• Residential and Domestic Buildings
• Theory of Architecture
• Browse content in Art
• Art Subjects and Themes
• History of Art
• Industrial and Commercial Art
• Theory of Art
• Biographical Studies
• Byzantine Studies
• Browse content in Classical Studies
• Classical History
• Classical Philosophy
• Classical Mythology
• Classical Literature
• Classical Reception
• Classical Art and Architecture
• Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
• Greek and Roman Epigraphy
• Greek and Roman Law
• Greek and Roman Archaeology
• Greek and Roman Papyrology
• Late Antiquity
• Religion in the Ancient World
• Digital Humanities
• Browse content in History
• Colonialism and Imperialism
• Diplomatic History
• Environmental History
• Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
• Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
• Historical Geography
• History by Period
• History of Agriculture
• History of Education
• History of Emotions
• History of Gender and Sexuality
• Industrial History
• Intellectual History
• International History
• Labour History
• Legal and Constitutional History
• Local and Family History
• Maritime History
• Military History
• National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
• Oral History
• Political History
• Public History
• Regional and National History
• Revolutions and Rebellions
• Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
• Social and Cultural History
• Theory, Methods, and Historiography
• Urban History
• World History
• Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
• Language Learning (Specific Skills)
• Language Teaching Theory and Methods
• Browse content in Linguistics
• Applied Linguistics
• Cognitive Linguistics
• Computational Linguistics
• Forensic Linguistics
• Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
• Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
• History of English
• Language Acquisition
• Language Variation
• Language Families
• Language Evolution
• Language Reference
• Lexicography
• Linguistic Theories
• Linguistic Typology
• Linguistic Anthropology
• Phonetics and Phonology
• Psycholinguistics
• Sociolinguistics
• Translation and Interpretation
• Writing Systems
• Browse content in Literature
• Bibliography
• Children's Literature Studies
• Literary Studies (Asian)
• Literary Studies (European)
• Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
• Literary Studies (Modernism)
• Literary Studies (Romanticism)
• Literary Studies (American)
• Literary Studies - World
• Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
• Literary Studies (19th Century)
• Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
• Literary Studies (African American Literature)
• Literary Studies (British and Irish)
• Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
• Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
• Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
• Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
• Literary Studies (History of the Book)
• Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
• Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
• Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
• Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
• Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
• Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
• Literary Studies (War Literature)
• Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
• Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
• Mythology and Folklore
• Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
• Browse content in Media Studies
• Browse content in Music
• Applied Music
• Dance and Music
• Ethics in Music
• Ethnomusicology
• Gender and Sexuality in Music
• Medicine and Music
• Music Cultures
• Music and Religion
• Music and Culture
• Music and Media
• Music Education and Pedagogy
• Music Theory and Analysis
• Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
• Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
• Musicology and Music History
• Performance Practice and Studies
• Race and Ethnicity in Music
• Sound Studies
• Browse content in Performing Arts
• Browse content in Philosophy
• Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
• Epistemology
• Feminist Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy
• Metaphysics
• Moral Philosophy
• Non-Western Philosophy
• Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Law
• Philosophy of Religion
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Perception
• Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
• Practical Ethics
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Browse content in Religion
• Biblical Studies
• Christianity
• East Asian Religions
• History of Religion
• Judaism and Jewish Studies
• Qumran Studies
• Religion and Education
• Religion and Health
• Religion and Politics
• Religion and Science
• Religion and Law
• Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
• Religious Studies
• Browse content in Society and Culture
• Cookery, Food, and Drink
• Cultural Studies
• Customs and Traditions
• Ethical Issues and Debates
• Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
• Lifestyle, Home, and Garden
• Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
• Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
• Sports and Outdoor Recreation
• Technology and Society
• Travel and Holiday
• Visual Culture
• Browse content in Law
• Arbitration
• Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
• Commercial Law
• Company Law
• Browse content in Comparative Law
• Systems of Law
• Competition Law
• Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
• Government Powers
• Judicial Review
• Local Government Law
• Military and Defence Law
• Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
• Construction Law
• Contract Law
• Browse content in Criminal Law
• Criminal Procedure
• Criminal Evidence Law
• Sentencing and Punishment
• Employment and Labour Law
• Environment and Energy Law
• Browse content in Financial Law
• Banking Law
• Insolvency Law
• History of Law
• Human Rights and Immigration
• Intellectual Property Law
• Browse content in International Law
• Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
• Public International Law
• IT and Communications Law
• Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
• Law and Politics
• Law and Society
• Browse content in Legal System and Practice
• Courts and Procedure
• Legal Skills and Practice
• Primary Sources of Law
• Regulation of Legal Profession
• Medical and Healthcare Law
• Browse content in Policing
• Criminal Investigation and Detection
• Police and Security Services
• Police Procedure and Law
• Police Regional Planning
• Browse content in Property Law
• Personal Property Law
• Study and Revision
• Terrorism and National Security Law
• Browse content in Trusts Law
• Wills and Probate or Succession
• Browse content in Medicine and Health
• Browse content in Allied Health Professions
• Arts Therapies
• Clinical Science
• Dietetics and Nutrition
• Occupational Therapy
• Operating Department Practice
• Physiotherapy
• Radiography
• Speech and Language Therapy
• Browse content in Anaesthetics
• General Anaesthesia
• Neuroanaesthesia
• Browse content in Clinical Medicine
• Acute Medicine
• Cardiovascular Medicine
• Clinical Genetics
• Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
• Dermatology
• Endocrinology and Diabetes
• Gastroenterology
• Genito-urinary Medicine
• Geriatric Medicine
• Infectious Diseases
• Medical Oncology
• Medical Toxicology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Medicine
• Rehabilitation Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
• Rheumatology
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports and Exercise Medicine
• Clinical Neuroscience
• Community Medical Services
• Critical Care
• Emergency Medicine
• Forensic Medicine
• Haematology
• History of Medicine
• Browse content in Medical Dentistry
• Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Paediatric Dentistry
• Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
• Surgical Dentistry
• Medical Ethics
• Browse content in Medical Skills
• Clinical Skills
• Communication Skills
• Nursing Skills
• Surgical Skills
• Medical Statistics and Methodology
• Browse content in Neurology
• Clinical Neurophysiology
• Neuropathology
• Nursing Studies
• Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
• Gynaecology
• Occupational Medicine
• Ophthalmology
• Otolaryngology (ENT)
• Browse content in Paediatrics
• Neonatology
• Browse content in Pathology
• Chemical Pathology
• Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
• Histopathology
• Medical Microbiology and Virology
• Patient Education and Information
• Browse content in Pharmacology
• Psychopharmacology
• Browse content in Popular Health
• Caring for Others
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Self-help and Personal Development
• Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
• Cell Biology
• Molecular Biology and Genetics
• Reproduction, Growth and Development
• Primary Care
• Professional Development in Medicine
• Browse content in Psychiatry
• Addiction Medicine
• Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• Forensic Psychiatry
• Learning Disabilities
• Old Age Psychiatry
• Psychotherapy
• Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
• Epidemiology
• Public Health
• Browse content in Radiology
• Clinical Radiology
• Interventional Radiology
• Nuclear Medicine
• Radiation Oncology
• Reproductive Medicine
• Browse content in Surgery
• Cardiothoracic Surgery
• Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
• General Surgery
• Neurosurgery
• Paediatric Surgery
• Peri-operative Care
• Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• Surgical Oncology
• Transplant Surgery
• Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
• Vascular Surgery
• Browse content in Science and Mathematics
• Browse content in Biological Sciences
• Aquatic Biology
• Biochemistry
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology and Conservation
• Evolutionary Biology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Microbiology
• Molecular and Cell Biology
• Natural History
• Plant Sciences and Forestry
• Research Methods in Life Sciences
• Structural Biology
• Systems Biology
• Zoology and Animal Sciences
• Browse content in Chemistry
• Analytical Chemistry
• Computational Chemistry
• Crystallography
• Environmental Chemistry
• Industrial Chemistry
• Inorganic Chemistry
• Materials Chemistry
• Medicinal Chemistry
• Mineralogy and Gems
• Organic Chemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Polymer Chemistry
• Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
• Theoretical Chemistry
• Browse content in Computer Science
• Artificial Intelligence
• Computer Architecture and Logic Design
• Game Studies
• Human-Computer Interaction
• Mathematical Theory of Computation
• Programming Languages
• Software Engineering
• Systems Analysis and Design
• Virtual Reality
• Browse content in Computing
• Business Applications
• Computer Security
• Computer Games
• Computer Networking and Communications
• Digital Lifestyle
• Graphical and Digital Media Applications
• Operating Systems
• Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
• Atmospheric Sciences
• Environmental Geography
• Geology and the Lithosphere
• Maps and Map-making
• Meteorology and Climatology
• Oceanography and Hydrology
• Palaeontology
• Physical Geography and Topography
• Regional Geography
• Soil Science
• Urban Geography
• Browse content in Engineering and Technology
• Agriculture and Farming
• Biological Engineering
• Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
• Electronics and Communications Engineering
• Energy Technology
• Engineering (General)
• Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
• History of Engineering and Technology
• Mechanical Engineering and Materials
• Technology of Industrial Chemistry
• Transport Technology and Trades
• Browse content in Environmental Science
• Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
• Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Environmental Sustainability
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
• Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
• History of Science and Technology
• Browse content in Materials Science
• Ceramics and Glasses
• Composite Materials
• Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
• Nanotechnology
• Browse content in Mathematics
• Applied Mathematics
• Biomathematics and Statistics
• History of Mathematics
• Mathematical Education
• Mathematical Finance
• Mathematical Analysis
• Numerical and Computational Mathematics
• Probability and Statistics
• Pure Mathematics
• Browse content in Neuroscience
• Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
• Development of the Nervous System
• Disorders of the Nervous System
• History of Neuroscience
• Invertebrate Neurobiology
• Molecular and Cellular Systems
• Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
• Neuroscientific Techniques
• Sensory and Motor Systems
• Browse content in Physics
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
• Biological and Medical Physics
• Classical Mechanics
• Computational Physics
• Condensed Matter Physics
• Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
• History of Physics
• Mathematical and Statistical Physics
• Measurement Science
• Nuclear Physics
• Particles and Fields
• Plasma Physics
• Quantum Physics
• Relativity and Gravitation
• Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
• Browse content in Psychology
• Affective Sciences
• Clinical Psychology
• Cognitive Neuroscience
• Cognitive Psychology
• Criminal and Forensic Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Educational Psychology
• Evolutionary Psychology
• Health Psychology
• History and Systems in Psychology
• Music Psychology
• Neuropsychology
• Organizational Psychology
• Psychological Assessment and Testing
• Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
• Psychology Professional Development and Training
• Research Methods in Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Browse content in Social Sciences
• Browse content in Anthropology
• Anthropology of Religion
• Human Evolution
• Medical Anthropology
• Physical Anthropology
• Regional Anthropology
• Social and Cultural Anthropology
• Theory and Practice of Anthropology
• Browse content in Business and Management
• Business Strategy
• Business History
• Business Ethics
• Business and Government
• Business and Technology
• Business and the Environment
• Comparative Management
• Corporate Governance
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Entrepreneurship
• Health Management
• Human Resource Management
• Industrial and Employment Relations
• Industry Studies
• Information and Communication Technologies
• International Business
• Knowledge Management
• Management and Management Techniques
• Operations Management
• Organizational Theory and Behaviour
• Pensions and Pension Management
• Public and Nonprofit Management
• Strategic Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
• Criminal Justice
• Criminology
• Forms of Crime
• International and Comparative Criminology
• Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
• Development Studies
• Browse content in Economics
• Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
• Asian Economics
• Behavioural Finance
• Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
• Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
• Economic Systems
• Economic Methodology
• Economic History
• Economic Development and Growth
• Financial Markets
• Financial Institutions and Services
• General Economics and Teaching
• Health, Education, and Welfare
• History of Economic Thought
• International Economics
• Labour and Demographic Economics
• Law and Economics
• Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
• Microeconomics
• Public Economics
• Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
• Welfare Economics
• Browse content in Education
• Adult Education and Continuous Learning
• Care and Counselling of Students
• Early Childhood and Elementary Education
• Educational Equipment and Technology
• Educational Strategies and Policy
• Higher and Further Education
• Organization and Management of Education
• Philosophy and Theory of Education
• Schools Studies
• Secondary Education
• Teaching of a Specific Subject
• Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
• Teaching Skills and Techniques
• Browse content in Environment
• Applied Ecology (Social Science)
• Climate Change
• Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environment)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
• Browse content in Human Geography
• Cultural Geography
• Economic Geography
• Political Geography
• Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
• Communication Studies
• Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
• Browse content in Politics
• African Politics
• Asian Politics
• Chinese Politics
• Comparative Politics
• Conflict Politics
• Elections and Electoral Studies
• Environmental Politics
• European Union
• Foreign Policy
• Gender and Politics
• Human Rights and Politics
• Indian Politics
• International Relations
• International Organization (Politics)
• International Political Economy
• Irish Politics
• Latin American Politics
• Middle Eastern Politics
• Political Methodology
• Political Communication
• Political Philosophy
• Political Sociology
• Political Theory
• Political Behaviour
• Political Economy
• Political Institutions
• Politics and Law
• Public Administration
• Public Policy
• Quantitative Political Methodology
• Regional Political Studies
• Russian Politics
• Security Studies
• State and Local Government
• UK Politics
• US Politics
• Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
• African Studies
• Asian Studies
• East Asian Studies
• Japanese Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Middle Eastern Studies
• Native American Studies
• Scottish Studies
• Browse content in Research and Information
• Research Methods
• Browse content in Social Work
• Addictions and Substance Misuse
• Adoption and Fostering
• Care of the Elderly
• Child and Adolescent Social Work
• Couple and Family Social Work
• Developmental and Physical Disabilities Social Work
• Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
• Emergency Services
• Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
• International and Global Issues in Social Work
• Mental and Behavioural Health
• Social Justice and Human Rights
• Social Policy and Advocacy
• Social Work and Crime and Justice
• Social Work Macro Practice
• Social Work Practice Settings
• Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
• Welfare and Benefit Systems
• Browse content in Sociology
• Childhood Studies
• Community Development
• Comparative and Historical Sociology
• Economic Sociology
• Gender and Sexuality
• Gerontology and Ageing
• Health, Illness, and Medicine
• Marriage and the Family
• Migration Studies
• Occupations, Professions, and Work
• Organizations
• Population and Demography
• Race and Ethnicity
• Social Theory
• Social Movements and Social Change
• Social Research and Statistics
• Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
• Sociology of Religion
• Sociology of Education
• Sport and Leisure
• Urban and Rural Studies
• Browse content in Warfare and Defence
• Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
• Land Forces and Warfare
• Military Administration
• Military Life and Institutions
• Naval Forces and Warfare
• Other Warfare and Defence Issues
• Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
• Weapons and Equipment

• < Previous chapter
• Next chapter >

15 Law and Society

Lynn Mather is Professor of Law and Political Science and Director of the Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy at the State University of New York at Buffalo.

• Published: 05 September 2013
• Cite Icon Cite
• Permissions Icon Permissions

The study of law and society rests on the belief that legal rules and decisions must be understood in context. Law is not autonomous, standing outside of the social world, but is deeply embedded within society. While political scientists recognize the fundamentally political nature of law, the law and society perspective takes this assumption several steps further by pointing to ways in which law is socially and historically constructed, how law both reflects and impacts culture, and how inequalities are reinforced through differential access to, and competence with, legal procedures and institutions. This article discusses the key characteristics of a law and society perspective, some of the major research contributions of this field, and recent developments in law and society that hold particular promise for scholars of law and politics today. In particular, it examines three broad areas of law and society scholarship: disputing, decision making, and legal ideology and consciousness.

The study of law and society rests on the belief that legal rules and decisions must be understood in context. Law is not autonomous, standing outside of the social world, but is deeply embedded within society. While political scientists recognize the fundamentally political nature of law, the law and society perspective takes this assumption several steps further by pointing to ways in which law is socially and historically constructed, how law both reflects and impacts culture, and how inequalities are reinforced through differential access to, and competence with, legal procedures and institutions.

The interdisciplinary field of law and society dates to the late 1950s/mid-1960s, and the story of its early development has been told before (e.g. Levine 1990 ; Schlegel 1995 ; Garth and Sterling 1998 ). Its philosophical roots lie in the jurisprudential writings of the legal realists, who saw law as a vehicle for social engineering and challenged depictions of law as apolitical and autonomous. Likewise, social scientists were highly optimistic and confident about the potential of their work to solve social problems. Law and society scholars of the 1960s were also responding to many of the burning issues (literally—from riots in Los Angeles, Detroit, and elsewhere) of the day. Dismayed and frustrated by the formalism of the legal academy and the irrelevance and narrowness of much social science, a number of legal scholars and social scientists sought to engage in research that would address current policy debates over racial discrimination, poverty, and crime. Substantial funding for empirical research on these topics from the Ford Foundation, Russell Sage, and others provided further impetus for studies that would combine social science and law. Responding to the availability of research funds and their own political and intellectual agendas, a multidisciplinary group of scholars created the Law and Society Association in 1964. Its members were drawn primarily from sociology, political science, and law, with some representation from anthropology, psychology, history, and occasionally economics.

The law and society field welcomed a wide range of subject areas for study. At the same time, President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty attempted to underscore the rule of law by creating federally funded legal aid programs to increase access to justice and address problems of the urban poor. Politicians and scholars recognized that what happened in local agencies or in trial courts could be as important as what happened in Washington, DC. This opened up new topics for empirical research on legal processes and resulted in law and society studies of public defender offices, legal aid, lower courts, administrative agencies, juries, police, and prosecutors. Political scientists authored many of these works and they enjoyed the feedback from sociologists and law professors they received in the law and society community. Constitutional law scholars who supported law and society in its early days had also turned their attention away from formal doctrinal analysis of Supreme Court decisions. They focused instead on interest groups and the lower courts in an effort to understand the political and organizational dynamics in test case litigation, the difficulties of implementing the decisions of the Supreme Court, the politics of administrative agencies, and the politics of judicial selection.

With this early history in mind, what are the key characteristics of a law and society perspective? What are some of the major research contributions of this field? And what recent developments in law and society hold particular promise for scholars of law and politics today?

1 Key Characteristics

Law and society scholarship has typically been multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary . Although most law and society scholars have been trained in one or another established discipline, they have frequently borrowed from other disciplines in their research. For example, early empirical analyses of plea bargaining in criminal courts reflected multiple methods and theories. The studies drew upon organization theory ( Blumberg 1967 ; Eisenstein and Jacob 1977 ; Feeley 1979 ), social learning theory ( Heumann 1978 ), ethnography ( Mather 1979 ), ethnomethodology ( Sudnow 1965 ), history ( Alschuler 1979 ; Friedman 1979 ), and discourse analysis ( Maynard 1984 ). As general law and society theories emerged, for example, to explain trial courts ( Shapiro 1981 ; Boyum and Mather 1983 ), legal mobilization ( McCann 1994 ), or “why the ‘haves’ come out ahead” ( Galanter 1974 ), these theories sought to integrate the perspectives of different disciplines. Such interdisciplinary work has been more common in recent years. It reflects the maturity and growth of the field as well as the development of graduate and undergraduate programs in law and society.

Second, in terms of epistemology and methodology , law and society emerged during the 1960s, a time of the behavioral revolution in the social sciences and an optimistic embrace of positivism. Scholars focused their work on legal processes and individual and group decision-making. The study of rules was passé, as was the study of formal institutions. Empirical studies of behavior could be qualitative or quantitative, with the former defined broadly to encompass historical or anthropological methods. Methodological debates that were fierce in political science at this time were, by contrast, relatively muted within law and society. This tendency has continued to characterize the field, with greater focus on theory and substantive results than on sophistication of the methods or an insistence on the superiority of any particular method ( Engel 1999 ).

By the 1980s, law and society critics of positivism raised serious challenges to the paradigm and articulated postrealist, interpretive, and constitutive approaches to law ( Brigham and Harrington 1989 ; Harrington and Yngvesson 1990 ; Hunt 1993 ). Scholars reclaimed an interest in institutions ( Smith 1988 ; Heydebrand and Seron 1990 ) as well as embracing an interest in legal ideology and legal discourse ( Mather and Yngvesson 1980–1 ; Conley and O’Barr 1990 ; Merry 1990 ). Contemporary law and society scholarship encompasses a wide range of epistemological perspectives, from the cultural studies approach of law and humanities to empirical legal studies—and everything in between.

Third, normative, policy-relevant concerns for justice and equality that initially drove the field remain significant even as debate continues over the best way that scholars can realize that normative commitment. Sarat and Silbey (1988) urged law and society colleagues to reject the “pull of the policy audience” in order to produce broader, more critical scholarship and to avoid reinforcing the status quo. Levine (1990) noted the long history of tension between basic and applied research in sociolegal studies, but suggested that both could be realized; theoretical work can provide policy insights and studies of specific policy reforms can generate theory. In an important exchange over postmodernism and political change, Handler (1992) chastised the new postmodern scholarship for its inattention to power structures, collective identity, and the possibilities of transformative politics (but see responses by Calavita and Seron 1992 ; McCann 1992 ). A decade later, Munger (2001) called for renewed activism along with scholarly inquiry. He observed that as the law and society “field goes global, I see a reawakening of the earlier interest in justice and equality, and in power, class, race, ethnicity, and religion” (2001, 8).

Fourth, comparative approaches to research questions in law and society have been a long-standing commitment of the field, even as they have sometimes been honored in the breach more than the practice ( Mather 2003 ). The very first volume of the Law and Society Review contained articles on comparative family law, one by a sociologist ( Cicourel 1967 ) and the other by anthropologists ( Bohannan and Huckleberry 1967 ). Other important sociolegal studies examined comparative disputing processes ( Abel 1974 ; Moore 1978 ; Nader and Todd 1978 ), comparative lawyers ( Abel and Lewis 1988 ; Epp 1998 ), comparative courts ( Shapiro 1981 ; Jacob et al. 1996 ), comparative regulation ( Hawkins 1992 ; Gunningham and Rees 1997 ; Kagan 2001 ), and comparative lay participation in legal decisions ( Hans 2003 ).

One quarter of the membership of the Law and Society Association (LSA) is non-American, and the LSA leadership has been committed to holding its annual meetings in outside of the U.S. on a regular basis. Meetings in Amsterdam (1991), Glasgow (1996), Budapest (2001), and Berlin (2007) were held jointly with the Research Committee on the Sociology of Law (the last meeting was also supported by three other non-U.S. associations). LSA meetings held in Vancouver (2002) and Montreal (2008) are cosponsored by the Canadian Law and Society Association. Political scientists in the United States regularly suggest that the field of “American politics” should really be a subset of “comparative politics,” but old habits die hard. The American politics subfield operates quite independently and scholars infrequently cite across subfields. By contrast, the law and society field actively seeks connections to the empirical scholarship on law being done in other countries, connections that are facilitated by LSA networks.

Finally, while law is the central concern of law and society scholars, it is not seen as residing in a formal, separate sphere, apart from society. Law is in society , and most now agree with the argument Laura Nader made initially that the field should have been named “Law in Society” rather than law and society ( Nader 1969 ). Just as political scientists have long recognized the political nature of law, sociolegal scholars add that law is also social, cultural, economic, linguistic, and ideological. Researchers engaged in empirical and theoretical work on law in society thus confront the extraordinarily messy (and some would say futile) question of how to say anything interesting or disciplined at all if in fact “the law is all over” ( Sarat 1990 ). Scholars in the field do not agree in their response. But most identify a particular question or problem about the creation, maintenance, or change in law and seek to answer it wherever the question leads. What is important is to be self-aware in drawing the boundaries for study, as opposed to limiting a priori the scope, and to draw on other disciplines for relevant concepts, methods, or insights.

It is difficult to strictly define “the” law and society perspective for a political science audience. Some of what falls under this umbrella (e.g. courts and public policy, law and social change, regulation, judicial decision-making) is mainstream law and politics. Other law and society work may seem less so because of the individual topics studied (border patrol, divorce lawyers, film, science laboratories, lawyer jokes) or the methods used (narrative, experiments, network analysis, ethnography). Over the years law and society scholars have attempted to define the field through textbooks or edited collections; these underscore the editors’ quite different perspectives on the field ( Kidder 1983 ; Lempert and Sanders 1986 ; Macaulay, Friedman, and Stookey 1995 ; Sarat 2004 ).

2 Major Contributions to Law and Society Scholarship

A recent symposium of the Law and Courts Newsletter (Winter 2007) featured summaries of the law and society field and its relation to political science, written by seven political scientists who have long been active in this area. Readers should consult this issue for excellent descriptions of this large and robust field of study. I will concentrate on three broad areas of law and society scholarship: disputing; decision-making; and legal ideology and consciousness. I will then briefly mention other areas, while acknowledging that I am still omitting many others.

2.1 Disputing

Studies of disputing ask how disputes become court cases and what occurs to cases once they are in court. What are the alternatives to courts for resolving problems or disputes? Why do some conflicts become legal cases but most do not? How does understanding disputing help to explain conflict resolution and the impact of law? Both criminal and civil conflicts in the U.S. fill out a pyramid with vast numbers of grievances or injuries at the bottom, a smaller number that become disputes, even fewer that contain some kind of informal recourse to law (calling the police or a lawyer), an even smaller number with two-party legal activity (plea bargaining or negotiated settlement), and only a tiny fraction resolved by trial ( Trubek 1980–1 ; Felstiner, Abel, and Sarat 1980–1 ). A large survey done in the late 1970s by the Civil Litigation Research Project (CLRP) showed that different types of civil grievances (e.g. post-divorce) were likelier than others (e.g. discrimination) to reach higher on the pyramid of legal action ( Miller and Sarat 1980–1 ; Kritzer 1991 ). The empirical results of the CLRP scholars have been reported in myriad judicial process textbooks but this important, forty-year-old study has not been replicated.

Galanter’s (1974) comprehensive theory exploring the use of courts by repeat players vs. one-shotters suggested multiple ways in which those experienced in legal procedures are advantaged in the legal process. Galanter also showed how disparities in the legal profession (specialization, relations with clients, legal training, etc.) further exacerbated the advantages of the repeat players. Galanter’s study in the Law and Society Review is one of the most frequently cited law review articles of all time. A number of empirical studies since then have supported his theory (see Kritzer and Silbey 2003 ).

One aspect of Galanter’s theory centers on the differential use of formal vs. informal mechanisms for dispute settlement by repeat players and one-shotters. That is, parties who are more familiar with legal processes know when to settle out of court and when to press on to formal trial, according to the likelihood of gain in the legal rule as opposed to a win or loss in the immediate conflict. This argument, powerfully supported by Albiston’s (1999) research on litigation outcomes after the Family and Medical Leave Act, shows an important link between disputing and change in the law. Employers who were sued by employees seeking family leave ultimately “won” even when they “lost” by settling some cases out of court because employers gained important rule-making opportunities in other cases that ultimately weakened the legislation.

Another way in which disputing can be linked to change in law is through the expansion or reframing of a dispute into a new normative framework, and through the support for that expansion that parties may obtain. As Mather and Yngvesson (1980–1) suggest, legal cases are not objective events, but are socially constructed to reflect the interests of supporters of disputants, to appeal to a particular audience, and to incorporate the values and language of law. The language of law is inherently political, ordering facts and invoking norms to support one set of interests or another. By constructing claims in certain ways, one can expand the law and mobilize others in support of the new interpretation. Groups lacking in political power may succeed in attracting support for legal change through reframing issues and mobilizing support, as shown in litigation over comparable worth ( McCann 1994 ), tobacco control ( Mather 1998 ), and sexual harassment ( Marshall 2005 ). A victory in litigation, even if later reversed on appeal, can aid in agenda setting and serve as a catalyst for further change.

The linkage among litigation, political order, and political change also emerges in empirical research on the use of courts over time. Filing disputes in court should be seen as an alternative to traditional forms of political participation, as Zemans (1983) argued, and indeed longitudinal study of court usage in the U.S. by McIntosh (1983) supports this view. Nevertheless, courts are not passive institutions waiting for disputes to percolate up the pyramid to become fodder for judicial decisions. Courts are institutions of the state and as such, they (or other arms of government) can and do exercise power to shape the nature and amount of litigation ( Munger 1990 ; Harrington and Ward 1995 ). This general point about the power of institutions was made in law and society research some time ago. Recent battles over tort reform illustrate it well, as actions by state legislatures, Congress, and the U.S. Supreme Court have all sought to curb what business interests saw as an “explosion” of litigation.

2.2 Decision-making

A second major area of law and society research focuses on decision-making . Scholarship on judicial decision-making is hardly news to those interested in the politics of law, but those in law and society broadened the terrain in several ways. They examined decision-making by judges at all levels of court including nonlawyer judges on justice of the peace courts, those on small claims courts, misdemeanor and felony courts, civil courts, and occasionally appellate courts. Research revealed differences in sentencing severity across courts and in patterns of judicial interaction with prosecutors ( Eisenstein and Jacob 1977 ; Eisenstein, Flemming, and Nardulli 1988 ). Questions about racial discrimination in trial court sentencing have been investigated numerous times, initially with some mixed results. More recently, an overview of forty different sentencing studies that controlled for offense and defendant’s prior record showed clear evidence of significant race effects in judicial decisions in state and federal courts ( Spohn 2000 ).

The impact of race has also been shown in numerous state studies of jury and prosecutorial decisions to recommend the death penalty. Jury decision-making has received a great deal of attention from sociolegal scholars. They have explored, for example, the impact of decision rules and jury size on verdicts, differences in evidence-driven vs. verdict-driven processes of deliberation, how juries compare to judges, juror assessments of credibility by race and gender of witnesses, jury assessments of corporate defendants, jury awards over time, and jury nullification ( Levine 1992 ; Hans 2000 ; 2006 ; Sunstein et al. 2002 ).

Second, recognizing that over 95 percent of trial court cases settle through plea negotiations or settlement talks, without trial, sociolegal researchers examined decision-making by lawyers. They asked, for example, how, why, and when do prosecutors and defense attorneys engage in plea bargaining? Do decisions by defense attorneys vary according to whether they are privately employed or public defenders? How are lawyers’ decisions to recommend particular dispositions affected by the views of their clients? The rich literature on these questions found in earlier research on plea bargaining would benefit from reexamination in order to see how legal changes on sentencing and jury selection, demographic changes in lower court personnel, increased punitiveness in the cultural and political climate, and the impact of federal anti-immigration measures on local officials, have affected the processes of negotiation in criminal courts.

Lawyers in civil cases also play important roles in dispute settlement and in the production of law. Research on lawyers representing personal injury plaintiffs ( Rosenthal 1974 ; Genn 1987 ; Kritzer 2004 ) and divorce clients ( Sarat and Felstiner 1995 ; Mather, McEwen, and Maiman 2001 ) has revealed much about lawyers’ screening decisions in agreeing to represent clients, their interactions with clients, and their negotiating strategies and decisions on settlements. We also know a good deal about the strategies, problems, and goals of cause lawyers ( Sarat and Scheingold 1998 ; Scheingold and Sarat 2004 ). By contrast, we know much less about decision-making in the work of corporate lawyers, and this is also an area that deserves more research.

Research that began by simply analyzing individual decision-making soon moved to consider (and to incorporate into theory building) the context in which those decisions were made. Relevant aspects of context include, for example, institutional features, legal rules, economic structures, social networks and organization, and shared cultural values. The literature thus moved from its original behavioral focus to reflect institutional and cultural theories. Understanding and explaining the work of lawyers involves studying them within their communities of practice, including the law firm as a community or important cultural space ( Kelly 1994 ; Mather, McEwen, and Maiman 2001 ). Empirical research that has demonstrated collegial influence on lawyers’ decisions has been done in the areas of divorce, personal injury, criminal defense, and most recently, occupational safety and health ( Schmidt 2005 ).

Heinz and Laumann (1982) first reported the significant differences in lawyers according to what they called the two hemispheres of the legal profession: lawyers who represent organizations or corporate entities and those who represent individual clients (and see Heinz et al. 2005 for more recent findings). Lawyers representing organizations not only have higher incomes and prestige than those representing individuals, but they work in larger firms, have fewer clients, spend less time in court, and have different educational backgrounds, social characteristics, and political values. The bifurcated profession has enormous implications for the creation and enforcement of law. For example, law and politics scholars should examine how lawyers exercise influence on law through particular communities of legal practice (Mather forthcoming). Specialization by legal field, coupled with the social stratification of the profession (with disproportionate representation in different fields by gender, race, class, and religion) and observed differences in political values by field, provide rich data for political scientists who are willing to go to lawyers’ offices, rather than to courts, to see where law is made.

Finally, sociolegal scholars broadened their scope beyond judges, juries, and lawyers to include the work of less visible legal actors such as court clerks ( Yngvesson 1993 ), health and safety inspection officers ( Hawkins 2002 ), immigration officials ( Coutin 2000 ), probation officers, and police ( Skolnick 1994 ; Bell 2002 ). Every decision of a low-level legal official helps to shape a pattern of law interpretation and enforcement, and to construct ideas about law for the public they encounter.

Even further, law and society researchers have explored the decisions and work of private actors, those without official legal status but who also contribute to lawmaking and law enforcement through private ordering. Who are some of these actors? They include: real estate agents and mortgage brokers who maintain a color line in urban housing; security guards with badges and uniforms who patrol malls and parking lots; human resource officers who define the parameters of civil rights laws through their routine advice and actions in employee disputes; mediators who help parties resolve conflicts without the expense of trial or the constraints of law. Political scientists studying the legislative process are accustomed to paying close attention to the role of private interest groups in lawmaking and administrative enforcement and have developed theories of specialized influence (e.g. the “iron triangle” for congressional subcommittees). Similarly, law and courts scholars should build on the empirical work on private ordering to better understand connections between powerful private interests and law (see e.g. Edelman and Suchman 1999 ).

2.3 Legal Ideology and Consciousness

Legal ideology and consciousness comprises a third major area of law and society scholarship. Decisions by the street-level bureaucrats, legal officials, and private actors discussed above matter in part because of the direct effect of their actions on people’s lives: denying a mortgage; stopping and frisking a suspicious character; channeling personnel conflicts away from law. But from an ideological perspective, what is even more important for the law is the meaning conveyed by those decisions. What values reside in the categories of “suspicious” and “not suspicious” and how are they conveyed in each encounter? Law and society research reminds us that law is constructed through such categories for classification. When the clerk of a local court dismisses a citizen’s grievance as not “really” a legal matter, he is making law for the court ( Yngvesson 1993 ). Similarly, with every passage through airport security, government agents are communicating that the law of the U.S. border is different than it was before September 11; the state is more powerful, scrutinizing not only our passports and suitcases, but our belt buckles, toothpaste, and nail files.

Studies of the actuarial practices of insurance companies, for example, underline the power that comes from the rhetoric of granting or denying insurance ( Simon 1988 ; Glenn 2000 ). Researchers have examined different areas of law to uncover the hidden assumptions, as in the racial bias of insurance, that privilege some people and interests over others. Numerous works document race and gender disparities that emerge from ostensibly neutral concepts or principles. As the title of one article says, “Is the ‘reasonable person’ a reasonable standard in a multicultural world?” ( Minow and Rakoff 1998 ). Focus on legal ideology looks at the categories of law and how they are used, in order to reveal the process by which legal meaning is constructed. While political scientists readily acknowledge the ideology of constitutional constructs, law and society scholars analyze the narratives, taken for granted assumptions, and values in other areas of law—contracts and tort ( Engel 1984 ), employment, property, family, and so forth.

If knowledge is power, then how do people obtain their knowledge of law? Examining the “litigation crisis” in tort law and the media coverage of the hot coffee and antitobacco lawsuits, Haltom and McCann (2004) found that the institutional conventions of news reporting combined with cultural values about the importance of personal responsibility to muffle the voices of litigation scholars and the plaintiffs’ bar. Interest groups on different legal issues battle for the hearts and minds of jurors and the public. While the tort reformers played their hand in the mass media, the plaintiffs’ bar chose an insider strategy of legislative and judicial lobbying. In addition to the newspapers’ images of legal issues or cases, television and film provide ample material for the cultural production of law. The drama of trials, conflict between good and evil, guilt and innocence, chaos and order, all convey legal meaning that may find its way into law. Survey research on the “ CSI effect,” for example, has not revealed clear results, yet some trial attorneys are convinced that the TV show is shaping popular legal ideas. Prosecutors worry that avid watchers of CSI , when asked to serve on a jury, are more reluctant to convict unless there is scientific evidence.

Studies of legal consciousness explore how people’s experiences and understandings of law translate into actions and how social action in turn constitutes their relation to law. For example, Ewick and Silbey (1998) conducted detailed interviews with people of diverse backgrounds and found three distinct narratives about law, each with its own normative value and structure: law as impartial, objective, and remote; law as a game shaped by self-interest and individual resources; law as a power to be resisted. Other research on legal consciousness, which examined people’s experiences and understandings of how the law should respond to offensive public speech, found interesting variation in responses by race and gender ( Nielsen 2004 ). Engel and Munger (2003) examined how people with disabilities understood and used the new rights conferred by the American for Disabilities Act. The authors concluded that individual identity was key to perceptions of, and experience with, legal rights. Scholars of law and politics should find intriguing material here to integrate with research on political participation, framing of issues, critical race theory, or feminist jurisprudence.

2.4 Other Areas of Law and Society Scholarship

Other areas of law and society scholarship may be more familiar to those in law and politics so I will mention them only briefly.

2.4.1 Regulation and Compliance

Studies of regulation and compliance have been a mainstay of law and society scholarship, encompassing research on compliance with Supreme Court decisions on prayer in schools, implementation of lower court orders on school busing, compliance with environmental, health and safety, or business regulations. Once a legal rule is announced, judicial decision is made, or new regulations go into effect, how do officials secure compliance? Whereas legal scholars try to draw a bright line between law and discretion, many sociolegal scholars would challenge the distinction. Law, it is argued, is constituted by the discretionary decisions that give it meaning. Instead of conceptualizing discretion as “the hole in a doughnut,” surrounded by legal form, as Dworkin (1977) suggested, critics have challenged the very distinction between the two ( Hawkins 1992 ; Pratt 1999 ).

Similarly, the notion of law as purely governmental regulation breaks down entirely with the proliferation of private and quasi-public actors whose support is critical for the success of any regulatory regime. In place of command and control models of regulation, some point to the empirical and normative advantages of self-regulation ( Gunningham and Rees 1997 ). Important comparative work on regulation by Kagan (2001) identifies the very different approaches of Britain and the U.S. and critiques what he calls the “adversarial legalism” of the American system.

2.4.2 Legal History

One of the critical influences on the development of law and society was Willard Hurst and his focus on legal history . His view of law as deeply grounded in the social and economic context of its time shaped generations of scholars studying particular laws, judicial decisions, or legal movements ( Simon 1999 ). The notion of law and society as mutually constitutive emerges clearly in much of the sociolegal historical scholarship (e.g. Gordon 1988 ; Hartog 2000 ), and especially in work on race and the law ( Gomez 2004 ).

Friedman and Ladinsky’s (1967) well-known account of the rise of workman’s compensation law in the early twentieth century reflects a critical eye toward the autonomy of law. After charting the demise of the common law tort doctrine of the fellow-servant rule, they ask whether law was simply “lagging” behind society. Their answer, quite familiar to law and society scholars forty years later, was a resounding “NO.” What was seen as “lag” to some was simply vested interests claiming their power. The old tort doctrine lasted as long as it did because there was no stable compromise behind its replacement. Many similar legal changes would benefit from reexamination by political scientists who have studied American political development and could bring new understandings of the political contexts for change as well as informing law and politics scholars about important areas of the common law they have overlooked.

2.4.2 Procedural Justice

Procedural justice questions have also been explored for decades by those interested in integrating philosophical questions of justice with psychological research and people’s experiences with law. Applying the philosophical distinction between procedural and substantive justice to the legal system, psychologists hypothesized that providing fair and transparent court procedures would result in greater satisfaction and compliance regardless of the substantive outcome of their case. Tyler’s (1990) work on Why People Obey the Law generated a large body of research testing this idea, and finding considerable support. Other researchers extended the research to litigant satisfaction in felony cases according to the perceived fairness of the procedures ( Casper, Tyler, and Fisher 1988 ) and to acceptance of unpopular decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court ( Gibson 1989 ; cf. Tyler and Rasinski 1991 ).

3 Recent Developments

Although the law and society field lacks clear boundaries to separate its interdisciplinary perspective from the other disciplines, it has significantly aided our understanding of law and politics through the various areas of research discussed here. I have already referred to some promising avenues for future research on law and politics. Let me just outline a few others.

Look beyond appellate courts. There has been little recent research on American trial courts, despite huge changes in the balance of federal to local legal power, a massive increase in incarceration, a wealth of quantitative data on state courts available from the National Center for State Courts, and the creation of new types of specialized courts for drugs or mental health. Further study of trial courts and tribunals in other countries would add greatly to our comparative knowledge of courts. Law and society work on international disputing through arbitration ( Dezalay and Garth 1998 ) and on the international Tuna Court (“the world’s premier fish market;” Feldman 2006 , 313) show the potential for integrating norms, disputing, and law. Numerous other regional and international bodies could be studied as well to help us understand processes of law and globalization.

Broaden the range of legal actors to study beyond judges and beyond the arena of public law. Integrate studies of the legal profession with our understanding of courts and lawmaking. By combining the specialization of the bar with the sorting process of legal education that shapes the class, race, and gender of who enters (and remains) in corporate law, one might gain new understanding of the outcomes in different legal areas. The phrase “public law” is highly misleading given the range of public policy concerns and effects that emerge from areas of “private” law ( Shapiro 1972 ). Private law areas of tort, property, contracts, labor, and family contain a wealth of interesting law and politics questions that would benefit from the scrutiny of political science. In punitive damages, for example, juries and trial judges were completely free (until very recent constitutional limits were imposed) to impose civil punishments for fraud or negligence. Why not do the same kind of rigorous investigation of damage awards that has been done for criminal sentencing to explore the determinants of punitive damages?

Examine how people use courts, harking back to a view of litigation as a form of political participation. Integrate perspectives from identity politics, legal consciousness, critical race theory, and feminist jurisprudence, with knowledge of legal institutions and processes. Examine test case litigation to see how changed conditions and new modes of communication have altered the strategies of interest groups.

Popular culture involves framing problems, events, and people. Law is increasingly seen as a set of visual images in popular culture. How do those visuals affect law? Political scientists with an interest in capital punishment should consider Haney’s (2005) excellent book on the death penalty. Haney combines decades of psychological research on jury decision-making in death cases with research on popular culture and public opinion to present a disturbing look at the forces that maintain capital punishment in law.

In sum, the field of law and society continues to develop in response to new restarch questions and new scholars. Political scientists contribute to, and learn from, this interdisciplinary approach to law and politics.

Abel, R. L.   1974 . A comparative theory of dispute institutions in society. Law and Society Review , 8: 217–347.

—and Lewis, P. S. C. (eds.) 1988 . Lawyers in Society , 3 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Google Scholar

Google Preview

Albiston, C.   1999 . The rule of law and the litigation process: the paradox of losing by winning.   Law and Society Review , 33: 869–910.

Alschuler, A.   1979 . Plea bargaining and its history.   Law and Society Review , 13: 211–46.

Bell, J.   2002 . Policing Hatred: Law Enforcement, Civil Rights, and Hate Crime . New York: New York University Press.

Blumberg, A. S.   1967 . The practice of law as a confidence game: organizational cooptation of a profession. Law and Society Review , 1: 15–39.

Bohannan, P. and Huckleberry, K.   1967 . Institutions of divorce, family and the law. Law and Society Review , 1: 81–102.

Boyum, K. O. and Mather, L.   1983 . Empirical Theories About Courts . New York: Longman.

Brigham, J. and Harrington, C.   1989 . Realism and its consequences: an inquiry into contemporary sociological research. International Journal of the Sociology of Law , 17: 41–62.

Calavita, K. and Seron, C.   1992 . Postmodernism and protest: recovering the sociological imagination.   Law and Society Review , 26:765–72.

Casper, J. D. , Tyler, T. , and Fisher, B.   1988 . Procedural justice in felony cases.   Law and Society Review , 22: 483–507.

Cicourel, A. V.   1967 . Kinship, marriage, and divorce in comparative family law.   Law and Society Review , 1: 103–29.

Conley, J. M. and O’Barr, W. M.   1990 . Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Coutin, S. B.   2000 . Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants’ Struggle for U.S. Residency . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G.   1998 . Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dworkin, R.   1977 . Taking Rights Seriously . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Edelman, L. and Suchman, M.   1999 . When the “haves” hold court: speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law and Society Review , 33:941–92.

Eisenstein, J. B. , Flemming, R. B. , and Nardulli, P. F.   1988 . The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts . Boston: Little, Brown.

—and Jacob, H.   1977 . Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts . Boston: Little, Brown.

Engel, D. M.   1984 . The oven bird’s song: insiders, outsiders, and personal injuries in an American community. Law and Society Review , 18: 551–82.

— 1999 . Presidential Address—making connections: law and society researchers and their subjects. Law and Society Review , 33: 3–16.

—and Munger, F. W.   2003 . Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Epp, C. R.   1998 . The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. S.   1998 . The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Feeley, M. M.   1979 . The Process is the Punishment . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Feldman, E. A.   2006 . The Tuna Court: law and norms in the world’s premier fish market.   California Law Review , 94: 313–70.

Felstiner, W. L. F. , Abel, R. L. , and Sarat, A.   1980 –1. The emergence and tranformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming.… Law and Society Review , 15: 631–54.

Friedman, L. M.   1979 . Plea bargaining in historical perspective.   Law and Society Review , 13:247–60.

—and Ladinsky, J.   1967 . Social change and the law of industrial accidents.   Columbia Law Review , 67: 50–82.

Galanter, M.   1974 . Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change.   Law and Society Review , 9: 95–160.

Garth, B. and Sterling, J.   1998 . From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state. Law and Society Review , 32:409–71.

Genn, H.   1987 . Hard Bargaining: Out of Court Settlement in Personal Injury Actions . Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gibson, J.   1989 . Understandings of justice: institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and critical race theory. Law and Society Review , 23: 469–96.

Glenn, B.   2000 . The shifting rhetoric of insurance denial. Law and Society Review , 34: 779–808.

Gomez, L.   2004 . A tale of two genres: on the real and ideal links between law and society and critical race theory. Pp. 453–70 in Sarat 2004 .

Gordon, R. W.   1988 . The independence of lawyers.   Boston University Law Review , 68: 1–83.

Gunningham, N. and Rees, J. (eds.) 1997 . Special issue.   Law and Policy , 19(4).

Haltom, W. and McCann, M.   2004 . Distorting the Law: Politics, the Media, and the Litigation Crisis . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Handler, J. F.   1992 . Presidential address—postmodernism, protest, and the new social movement.   Law and Society Review , 26:697–731.

Haney, C.   2005 . Death by Design: Capital Punishment as a Social Psychological System . New York: Oxford University Press.

Hans, V. P.   2000 . Business on Trial: The Civil Jury and Corporate Responsibility . New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

—(ed.) 2003 . Special issue on lay participation in legal decision making. Law and Policy , 25(2).

—(ed). 2006 . The Jury System: Contemporary Scholarship . Aldershot: Ashgate.

Harrington, C. B. and Ward, D. S. 1995 . Patterns of appellate litigation, 1945–1990. Pp. 206–26 in Contemplating Courts , ed. L. Epstein. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

—and Yngvesson, B.   1990 . Interpretive sociolegal research. Law and Social Inquiry , 15: 135–48.

Hartog, H.   2000 . Man and Wife in America: A History . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Hawkins, K. (ed.) 1992 . The Uses of Discretion . New York: Oxford University Press.

— 2002 . Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heinz, J. P. and Laumann, E. O.   1982 . Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

— Nelson, R. L. , Sandefur, R. L. , and Laumann, E. O.   2005 . Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heumann, M.   1978 . Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heydebrand, W. and Seron, C.   1990 . Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of Federal District Courts . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hunt, A.   1993 . Explorations in Law and Society: Toward A Constitutive Theory of Law . New York: Routledge.

Jacob, H. et al. 1996 . Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective . New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Kagan, R. A.   2001 . Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Kelly, M. J.   1994 . Lives of Lawyers . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kidder, R. I.   1983 . Connecting Law and Society: An Introduction to Research and Theory . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kritzer, H. M.   1991 . Let’s Make A Deal . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

— 2004 . Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the United States . Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

—and Silbey, S. S. (eds.) 2003 . In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Lempert, R. and Sanders, J.   1986 . An Invitation to Law and Social Science . New York: Longman.

Levine, F. J.   1990 . Presidential address—goose bumps and “the search for signs of intelligent life” in sociolegal studies: after twenty-five years. Law and Society Review , 24: 7–33.

Levine, J. P.   1992 . Juries and Politics . Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.

Macaulay, S. , Friedman, L. M. , and Stookey, J. (eds.) 1995 . Law and Society: Readings on the Social Study of Law . New York: W. W. Norton.

McCann, M. W.   1992 . Resistance, reconstruction, and romance in legal scholarship.   Law and Society Review , 26: 733–50.

— 1994 . Rights at Work . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McIntosh, W.   1983 . Private use of a public forum: a long range view of the dispute processing role of courts. American Political Science Review , 77: 991–1010.

Marshall, A.-M.   2005 . Confronting Sexual Harassment: The Law and Politics of Everyday Life . Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.

Mather, L.   1979 . Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal Case Disposition . Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Press.

— 1998 . Theorizing about trial courts: lawyers, policymaking, and tobacco litigation.   Law and Social Inquiry , 23: 897–940.

— 2003 . Presidential address—reflections on the reach of law (and society) post 9/11: an American superhero? Law and Society Review , 37: 263–82.

— forthcoming . Bringing the lawyers back in. In Exploring Judicial Politics , ed. M. C. Miller . New York: Oxford University Press.

— McEwen, C. A. , and Maiman, R. J.   2001 . Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice . New York: Oxford University Press.

—and Yngvesson, B.   1980 –1. Language, audience, and the transformation of disputes.   Law and Society Review , 15: 775–822.

Maynard, D.   1984 . Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation . New York: Plenum.

Merry, S. E.   1990 . Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miller, R. E. and Sarat, A.   1980 –1. Grievances, claims, and disputes: assessing the adversary culture.   Law and Society Review , 15: 525–66.

Minow, M. and Rakoff, T.   1998 . Is the “reasonable person” a reasonable standard in a multicultural world? Pp. 68–108 in Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases: Fundamental Issues in Law and Society Research: Volume 2 , ed. A. Sarat , M. Constable , D. Engel , V. Hans , and S. Lawrence . Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Moore, S. F.   1978 . Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Munger, F. (ed.) 1990 . Special issue on longitudinal studies of trial courts.   Law and Society Review , 24(2).

— 2001 . Presidential address: inquiry and activism in law and society.   Law and Society Review , 35: 7–20.

Nader, L.   1969 . Introduction. Pp. 1–10 in Law in Culture and Society , ed. L. Nader . Chicago: Aldine Press.

—and Todd, H.   1978 . The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies . New York: Columbia University Press.

Nielsen, L. B.   2004 . License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pratt, A. C.   1999 . Dunking the doughnut: discretionary power, law and the administration of the Canadian Immigration Act. Social and Legal Studies , 8: 199–226.

Rosenthal, D. E.   1974 . Lawyer and Client: Who’s In Charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Sarat, A.   1990 . “The law is all over:” power, resistance, and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities , 2: 348–79.

— 2004 . The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society . Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

—and Felstiner, W. L. F.   1995 . Divorce Lawyers and their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process . New York: Oxford University Press.

—and Scheingold, S. A. (eds.) 1998 . Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities . New York: Oxford University Press.

—and Silbey, S.   1988 . The pull of the policy audience. Law and Policy , 10: 97–166.

Scheingold, S. A. and Sarat, A.   2004 . Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering . Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Schlegel, J. H.   1995 . American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science . Durham: University of North Carolina Press.

Schmidt, P.   2005 . Lawyers and Regulation: The Politics of the Administrative Process . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shapiro, M.   1972 . From public law to public policy, or the “public” in “public law.” PS , 5: 410–18.

— 1981 . Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Simon, J.   1988 . The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law and Society Review , 22:771–800.

— 1999 . Law after society. Law and Social Inquiry , 24: 143–94.

Skolnick, J. H.   1994 . Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democractic Society , 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.

Smith, R. M.   1988 . Political jurisprudence, the “new institutionalism,” and the future of public law. American Political Science Review , 82: 89–108.

Spohn, C. C.   2000 . Thirty years of sentencing reform: the quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice , 3:27–501.

Sudnow, D.   1965 . Normal crimes: sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems , 12: 255–76.

Sunstein, C. R. et al. 2002 . Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Trubek, D. M.   1980 –1. The construction and deconstruction of a disputes-focused approach: an afterword. Law and Society Review, 15: 485–501.

Tyler, T. R.   1990 . Why People Obey the Law . New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

—and Rasinski, K.   1991 . Procedural justice, institutional legitimacy, and the acceptance of unpopular U.S. Supreme Court decisions: a reply to Gibson. Law and Society Review , 25: 621–30.

Yngvesson, B.   1993 . Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court . New York: Routledge.

Zemans, F. K.   1983 . Legal mobilization: the neglected role of the law in the political system. American Political Science Review , 77: 690–703.

• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

• A Research Guide
• Research Paper Topics

120 Law Research Paper Topics

How to choose a topic for your law research paper:.

Business Law Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of intellectual property laws on innovation in the technology industry
• The legal implications of data breaches and cybersecurity in the business sector
• The role of corporate social responsibility in shaping business law and regulations
• The legal challenges of international business transactions and cross-border disputes
• The impact of antitrust laws on competition and market dynamics
• The legal framework for protecting consumer rights in e-commerce
• The legal implications of employee privacy rights in the digital age
• The role of business law in regulating corporate governance and preventing corporate misconduct
• The legal challenges of regulating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain
• The legal implications of environmental regulations on business operations and sustainability
• The role of business law in promoting fair trade and preventing unfair business practices
• The legal challenges of regulating online platforms and the sharing economy
• The impact of labor laws on employee rights and workplace regulations
• The legal implications of international trade agreements and their impact on domestic businesses
• The role of business law in protecting intellectual property rights in the creative industries

Criminal Law Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of mandatory minimum sentencing laws on the criminal justice system
• The role of forensic evidence in criminal investigations and trials
• The effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in reducing recidivism rates
• The ethical implications of using plea bargaining in criminal cases
• The relationship between mental illness and criminal behavior
• The use of technology in preventing and investigating cybercrimes
• The impact of racial profiling on the criminal justice system
• The legal and ethical considerations of the death penalty
• The role of eyewitness testimony in criminal trials
• The impact of drug policies on crime rates and public health
• The legal and social implications of juvenile justice reform
• The use of DNA evidence in exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals
• The role of criminal law in addressing domestic violence
• The impact of hate crime legislation on preventing and prosecuting hate crimes
• The legal and ethical considerations of surveillance and privacy rights in criminal investigations

International Law Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of international human rights law on state sovereignty
• The role of international criminal law in addressing war crimes and crimes against humanity
• The effectiveness of international environmental law in combating climate change
• The legal implications of cyber warfare in the context of international law
• The challenges and opportunities of international trade law in the era of globalization
• The role of international humanitarian law in protecting civilians during armed conflicts
• The legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage in times of armed conflict
• The legal implications of state-sponsored terrorism under international law
• The role of international law in addressing the refugee crisis and protecting the rights of refugees
• The legal aspects of territorial disputes and the role of international law in resolving them
• The impact of international investment law on foreign direct investment and economic development
• The legal framework for the protection of indigenous peoples’ rights under international law
• The role of international law in addressing transnational organized crime
• The legal implications of the use of force in self-defense under international law
• The challenges and opportunities of international law in regulating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons

Law Enforcement Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of community policing on crime rates
• Racial profiling and its effects on law enforcement practices
• The use of body-worn cameras in improving police accountability
• The role of technology in modern law enforcement
• The effectiveness of intelligence-led policing in preventing terrorism
• Police use of force: examining policies and training methods
• The relationship between mental health and law enforcement interactions
• The impact of social media on law enforcement investigations
• Police corruption and strategies for prevention
• The role of law enforcement in addressing domestic violence
• The use of predictive policing algorithms in crime prevention
• The challenges and benefits of implementing restorative justice in law enforcement
• The role of law enforcement in combating human trafficking
• The impact of drug decriminalization on law enforcement efforts
• The effectiveness of community-based alternatives to incarceration in reducing recidivism rates

Constitutional Law Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of the First Amendment on freedom of speech in the digital age
• Analyzing the constitutionality of affirmative action policies in higher education
• The role of the Supreme Court in shaping the interpretation of the Second Amendment
• Exploring the constitutionality of warrantless surveillance programs in the United States
• The constitutional implications of the death penalty in the context of cruel and unusual punishment
• Analyzing the constitutionality of presidential executive orders and their limits
• The constitutional rights of non-citizens and the balance between national security and civil liberties
• The impact of the Fourth Amendment on privacy rights in the era of technological advancements
• The constitutionality of restrictions on religious freedom in the United States
• Analyzing the constitutional implications of the war on drugs and its impact on individual rights
• The role of the judiciary in protecting reproductive rights and the constitutionality of abortion laws
• The constitutional implications of the use of military force and executive power in times of war
• Analyzing the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations and their impact on free speech
• The constitutional rights of LGBTQ+ individuals and the evolution of marriage equality
• The balance between national security and civil liberties in the context of surveillance and intelligence gathering

Environmental Law Research Paper Topics:

• The role of international environmental law in addressing climate change
• The effectiveness of environmental impact assessments in ensuring sustainable development
• Legal implications of biodiversity conservation and protection
• The legal framework for regulating pollution from industrial activities
• The role of environmental justice in addressing environmental inequalities
• Legal challenges and opportunities in transitioning to renewable energy sources
• The legal implications of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture
• The role of environmental law in protecting and managing water resources
• Legal frameworks for addressing marine pollution and protecting marine ecosystems
• The legal aspects of waste management and recycling
• The role of environmental law in promoting sustainable urban development
• Legal challenges in regulating and mitigating air pollution
• The legal framework for protecting indigenous rights and traditional knowledge in environmental conservation
• The role of environmental law in addressing deforestation and promoting sustainable forestry practices
• Legal implications of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, in environmental governance

Family Law Research Paper Topics:

• The impact of divorce on children’s mental health
• The role of domestic violence in child custody disputes
• Same-sex marriage and adoption rights: A comparative analysis
• The legal implications of surrogacy and assisted reproductive technologies
• Parental alienation syndrome: Legal and psychological perspectives
• The effectiveness of prenuptial agreements in protecting individual assets
• The legal rights of grandparents in child custody battles
• The impact of substance abuse on child custody determinations
• The legal and ethical considerations of international child abduction cases
• The role of family courts in protecting victims of domestic violence
• The legal implications of cohabitation and common-law relationships
• The impact of social media on divorce proceedings and child custody disputes
• The legal rights of unmarried fathers in child custody cases
• The role of child support in ensuring the financial well-being of children
• The legal and ethical considerations of assisted suicide in cases of terminal illness within families

Employment Law Research Paper Topics:

• Discrimination in the workplace: Analyzing the impact of anti-discrimination laws on employment practices
• The gig economy and its implications for employment law: Examining the legal challenges faced by gig workers
• Workplace harassment and its legal consequences: Investigating the effectiveness of anti-harassment policies
• The role of social media in employment law: Exploring the legal boundaries of monitoring employees’ online activities
• Employee privacy rights in the digital age: Analyzing the balance between employers’ interests and employees’ privacy expectations
• The impact of minimum wage laws on employment rates: Evaluating the economic effects of minimum wage legislation
• Non-compete agreements and their enforceability: Assessing the legal limitations and implications of non-compete clauses
• Workplace safety regulations and their enforcement: Examining the effectiveness of occupational health and safety laws
• The legal implications of workplace drug testing: Analyzing the balance between employers’ interests and employees’ privacy rights
• The rights of employees with disabilities: Investigating the legal obligations of employers to accommodate disabled workers
• Whistleblower protection laws and their effectiveness: Assessing the legal safeguards for employees who report wrongdoing
• The legal implications of employee surveillance: Analyzing the boundaries of workplace monitoring and its impact on employee rights
• Employment contracts and their enforceability: Examining the legal requirements and limitations of employment agreements
• The legal obligations of employers in cases of workplace violence: Investigating the duty of employers to provide a safe working environment
• The impact of technology on employment law: Exploring the legal challenges posed by automation, artificial intelligence, and robotics in the workplace

• Writing a Research Paper
• Research Paper Title
• Research Paper Sources
• Research Paper Problem Statement
• Research Paper Thesis Statement
• Hypothesis for a Research Paper
• Research Question
• Research Paper Outline
• Research Paper Summary
• Research Paper Prospectus
• Research Paper Proposal
• Research Paper Format
• Research Paper Styles
• AMA Style Research Paper
• MLA Style Research Paper
• Chicago Style Research Paper
• APA Style Research Paper
• Research Paper Structure
• Research Paper Cover Page
• Research Paper Abstract
• Research Paper Introduction
• Research Paper Body Paragraph
• Research Paper Literature Review
• Research Paper Background
• Research Paper Methods Section
• Research Paper Results Section
• Research Paper Discussion Section
• Research Paper Conclusion
• Research Paper Appendix
• Research Paper Bibliography
• APA Reference Page
• Annotated Bibliography
• Bibliography vs Works Cited vs References Page
• Research Paper Types
• What is Qualitative Research

Receive paper in 3 Hours!

• Choose the number of pages.
• Select your deadline.
• Complete your order.

Number of Pages

550 words (double spaced)

Deadline: 10 days left

By clicking "Log In", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.

Sign Up for your FREE account

Forget about ChatGPT and get quality content right away.

• Harvard Library
• Research Guides
• Guides by Subject

Specialized Research Topics in Law

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given. For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy ©2021 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.

Constitutional Law Research Paper Topics

This page presents a comprehensive exploration of constitutional law research paper topics designed to assist law students in their academic pursuits. As aspiring legal scholars, students are often tasked with crafting research papers that delve into various aspects of constitutional law. To aid them in this endeavor, this page offers a well-structured approach to understanding constitutional law research paper topics, providing valuable insights into the diverse range of subjects within this field. Whether students seek to analyze landmark cases, constitutional amendments, or contemporary issues, this page equips them with the necessary tools to embark on their constitutional law journey with confidence and excellence.

100 Constitutional Law Research Paper Topics

In the realm of constitutional law, students encounter a diverse array of topics that shape the legal landscape and impact societies worldwide. To aid law students in their research paper endeavors, this section presents a comprehensive list of constitutional law research paper topics, categorized to provide a structured approach for exploration. Whether you are passionate about historical constitutional developments, contemporary legal challenges, or comparative constitutional systems, this extensive list covers a broad spectrum of subjects within constitutional law.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

Foundational Constitutional Principles

• Separation of Powers: Analyzing the Doctrine’s Evolution and Application in Different Jurisdictions
• Checks and Balances: Assessing Its Efficacy in Safeguarding Constitutional Rights
• Judicial Review: Exploring the Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation
• Federalism: Examining the Division of Powers between Central and Regional Governments
• Supremacy of the Constitution: Investigating Its Impact on National Legislation and Judicial Decisions
• Rule of Law: Understanding Its Significance in Upholding Constitutional Order and Individual Liberties
• Due Process: Evaluating Its Application in Criminal and Civil Proceedings
• Equal Protection: Analyzing the Concept’s Role in Combating Discrimination and Promoting Social Justice
• Constitutional Amendments: Investigating the Process and Impact of Amending Fundamental Law
• Living Constitution vs. Originalism: Comparing Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation

Rights and Liberties

• Freedom of Speech: Balancing the Right with Societal Interests and Protecting against Hate Speech
• Freedom of Religion: Examining the Boundaries of Religious Freedom in a Pluralistic Society
• Right to Privacy: Analyzing the Constitutional Basis and Its Implications on Modern Issues
• Second Amendment: Exploring the Right to Bear Arms and Its Interpretation over Time
• Voting Rights: Investigating the Evolution and Contemporary Challenges in Ensuring Electoral Equity
• Equal Protection and Discrimination: Analyzing Constitutional Remedies for Racial, Gender, and LGBTQ+ Discrimination
• Right to Education: Assessing the Intersection of Constitutional Law and Access to Quality Education
• Right to Health: Exploring the Constitution’s Role in Ensuring Health Care Equity
• Search and Seizure: Investigating Constitutional Limits on Police Power and Surveillance
• Right to Privacy in the Digital Age: Addressing Challenges in an Era of Technological Advancements

Comparative Constitutional Law

• Comparative Constitutional Systems: Analyzing the Structures and Functions of Different Legal Frameworks
• Federal vs. Unitary States: Comparing the Distribution of Powers and Governance Models
• Parliamentary vs. Presidential Systems: Assessing the Executive Branch’s Role and Accountability
• Constitutional Courts: Evaluating the Role and Impact of Specialized Judicial Bodies
• Civil Law vs. Common Law Traditions: Analyzing the Influence of Legal Traditions on Constitutional Interpretation
• Bill of Rights: Exploring the Inclusion and Protection of Fundamental Rights in Different Constitutions
• Constitutional Evolution: Examining the Process of Drafting and Amending Constitutions in Various Countries
• Constitutional Crisis: Investigating Historical and Modern Instances of Constitutional Crises and Resolutions
• Human Rights Protections: Comparing Constitutional Guarantees for Human Rights across Nations
• Indigenous Rights: Analyzing Constitutional Recognition and Protection of Indigenous Communities

Constitutionalism in Historical Context

• Magna Carta and Its Influence on Modern Constitutionalism
• The U.S. Constitution: Evolution, Interpretation, and Impact on American Society
• The French Revolution and Its Impact on Constitutional Developments
• The Weimar Constitution: Lessons and Challenges in Constitution-Making
• Constitutions of Former Colonies: Analyzing the Post-Colonial Struggles and Achievements
• Reconstruction Amendments: Analyzing the Post-Civil War Constitutional Reforms in the United States
• The Interwar Period: Constitutional Challenges and Responses in Europe
• The Role of Constitutions in Decolonization Movements
• The Evolution of Constitutional Law in Post-Communist States
• The Impact of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on Constitutional Developments

Constitutional Law and International Relations

• International Human Rights Law: Analyzing Its Interaction with National Constitutions
• Treaty Supremacy and Constitutionalism: Examining the Challenges of International Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems
• Constitutional Courts and International Law: The Role of Domestic Courts in Adjudicating International Disputes
• The European Convention on Human Rights: Impact on Constitutional Law in Europe
• The Role of International Organizations in Shaping Constitutional Developments
• The UN Charter and Its Influence on National Constitutions
• Constitutional Law in Multinational Organizations: Analyzing the European Union’s Constitutional Structure
• International Trade and Constitutional Law: Balancing Economic Interests with Constitutional Protections
• The Impact of International Criminal Tribunals on National Constitutions
• The Role of Constitutional Law in Shaping Diplomatic Immunities and State Immunity Laws

Constitutional Law and Emerging Technologies

• Constitutional Implications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
• Cybersecurity and Constitutional Protections: Balancing National Security and Civil Liberties
• Biotechnology and the Right to Privacy: Ethical and Legal Challenges
• Data Protection and Constitutional Rights: The Intersection of Privacy and Information Security
• Surveillance Technologies and Fourth Amendment Concerns: Navigating Constitutional Boundaries
• Constitutional Law and Genetic Engineering: The Ethics and Regulation of Human Genome Editing
• Blockchain Technology and Constitutional Governance: Exploring Decentralization and Security
• Constitutional Implications of Cryptocurrencies and Digital Finance
• Digital Democracy: Constitutional Challenges in the Age of E-Governance
• The Role of Constitutional Law in Addressing Technological Advancements and Their Societal Impact

Constitutional Law and Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

• Constitutional Protections and Criminal Justice: Analyzing Differences in Legal Safeguards
• Miranda Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Police Interrogation Procedures
• The Death Penalty and Constitutional Law: Perspectives from Different Legal Systems
• Extradition and Constitutional Rights: Balancing the Interests of States and Individuals
• Criminal Justice Reforms and Constitutional Implications in Various Nations
• Plea Bargaining and Constitutional Due Process: A Comparative Study
• Constitutional Approaches to Juvenile Justice: Examining Legal Protections for Youth Offenders
• Bail and Pretrial Detention: Comparing Constitutional Guarantees in Different Jurisdictions
• Constitutional Rights of the Accused: A Comparative Review of Criminal Proceedings
• Constitutional Challenges in Combatting Cybercrime: A Global Perspective

Constitutional Law and Social Justice

• Affirmative Action: Constitutional Debates and Societal Implications
• Economic Rights and Constitutional Law: Analyzing the Protection of Socioeconomic Interests
• Environmental Protection and Constitutional Guarantees: The Role of Constitutions in Safeguarding the Planet
• Constitutional Law and Gender Equality: Examining Legal Frameworks to Address Gender Discrimination
• Indigenous Rights and Constitutional Recognition: Balancing Historical Justice and Cultural Preservation
• Constitutional Law and Disability Rights: Ensuring Inclusivity and Accessibility
• Reproductive Rights and Constitutional Protections: Analyzing the Intersection of Individual Liberties and State Interests
• Constitutional Safeguards for LGBTQ+ Rights: The Journey Towards Inclusivity and Equality
• Homelessness and Constitutional Law: Addressing Social Justice Issues Through Legal Frameworks
• Constitutional Implications of Income Inequality: Examining Legal Responses to Economic Disparities

Constitutional Law and Political Systems

• Presidential Powers and Constitutional Checks: Analyzing Executive Authority and Accountability
• Parliamentary Privileges and Constitutional Limits: Balancing Legislative Immunities with Public Interest
• Constitutional Law and Political Parties: The Role of Political Organizations in Democratic Systems
• Electoral Law and Constitutional Implications: Examining Voting Regulations and Democratic Governance
• The Constitutional Role of the Judiciary in Political Decision-Making
• The Influence of Political Ideologies on Constitutional Law and Interpretation
• Constitutional Amendments and Political Processes: The Mechanisms of Constitutional Change
• The Role of Constitutional Law in Political Campaign Finance and Election Spending
• Constitutional Law and Governmental Transparency: Ensuring Openness and Accountability
• The Impact of Constitutional Law on Political Ethics and Anti-Corruption Measures

Constitutional Law and Global Challenges

• National Emergencies and Constitutional Law: Balancing Security Measures with Civil Liberties
• Constitutional Responses to Pandemics: Analyzing Legal Frameworks for Public Health Crises
• Climate Change and Constitutional Protections: The Role of Constitutions in Environmental Crisis
• Constitutional Law and Terrorism: Addressing Security Threats While Upholding Human Rights
• Migration and Constitutional Law: Examining Legal Protections for Immigrants and Refugees
• Cybersecurity Threats and Constitutional Responses: Safeguarding Digital Infrastructure and Data Privacy
• Constitutional Challenges in Addressing Global Disputes and International Conflicts
• Constitutional Law and Armed Conflicts: The Balance Between Security and Humanitarian Concerns
• The Role of Constitutional Law in Combatting Corruption and Organized Crime
• Constitutional Law and Emerging Global Challenges: Navigating Complexities in an Interconnected World

This comprehensive list of constitutional law research paper topics offers students a vast array of engaging and thought-provoking subjects to explore in their academic pursuits. Constitutional law, as a dynamic and evolving field, addresses crucial issues shaping legal systems, societal values, and governance structures. By delving into these diverse research topics, law students can develop a deeper understanding of constitutional principles, legal developments, and their implications on human rights, political systems, and global challenges. From historical foundations to cutting-edge technological advancements, each topic offers unique insights into the intricate fabric of constitutional law. As students embark on their research journey, this comprehensive list seeks to inspire critical thinking, foster scholarly inquiry, and empower future legal scholars to contribute meaningfully to the field of constitutional law.

Constitutional Law: Exploring the Range of Research Paper Topics

Constitutional law is a foundational pillar of any legal system, shaping the fundamental principles that govern a nation. As the bedrock of rights, liberties, and governmental structures, constitutional law plays a crucial role in safeguarding individual freedoms, promoting social justice, and upholding the rule of law. This field of law is dynamic and constantly evolving, with new challenges and complexities emerging in the face of societal changes, technological advancements, and global developments. For students of law, delving into the realm of constitutional law offers an exciting opportunity to explore a vast range of research paper topics that are not only intellectually stimulating but also highly relevant to contemporary legal and societal issues.

Historical Foundations of Constitutional Law

To understand the present, one must study the past. Exploring the historical foundations of constitutional law offers valuable insights into the evolution of legal systems, the drafting of constitutions, and the shaping of early governmental structures. Topics in this category could include the Magna Carta’s influence on constitutional principles, the American Revolution’s impact on constitutionalism, or the role of historical legal documents in modern constitutional interpretation.

Comparative constitutional law examines the constitutions of different countries, identifying similarities and differences in their legal frameworks. Students can explore how diverse legal systems address common challenges, such as human rights protection, separation of powers, and federalism. Topics may encompass a comparison of constitutional rights in different jurisdictions, the impact of cultural factors on constitutional design, or the role of international law in influencing domestic constitutions.

Constitutional Interpretation and Judicial Review

Constitutional interpretation is a complex and fundamental aspect of constitutional law. Analyzing how courts interpret constitutional provisions and exercise judicial review is a topic of immense scholarly interest. Students can delve into landmark court cases that have shaped constitutional jurisprudence, examine different methods of interpretation (textualism, originalism, living constitution), and assess the judiciary’s role in balancing individual rights and government interests.

Protection of Fundamental Rights and Liberties

Constitutional law places a strong emphasis on safeguarding individual rights and liberties. Students can explore specific rights, such as freedom of speech, privacy, or equality, and analyze how courts balance these rights against competing societal interests. Topics may include the tension between free speech and hate speech regulations, the right to privacy in the digital age, or the constitutionality of affirmative action policies.

Constitutionalism and Rule of Law

Constitutionalism is the principle that the government’s powers should be limited by a constitution, and the rule of law ensures that all individuals, including government officials, are subject to the law’s authority. Students can explore how constitutionalism and the rule of law contribute to a stable and just society, examining the significance of constitutional supremacy and the separation of powers.

Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations

Federal systems divide power between central and regional governments. Research topics in this area may involve studying the balance of power between federal and state governments, exploring the impact of federalism on policy-making, or analyzing intergovernmental disputes.

Constitutional Amendments and Reform

Constitutions are not static documents; they can be amended or reformed to adapt to changing circumstances. Students can explore the procedures and challenges associated with constitutional amendments, analyze historical amendments, and assess the need for constitutional reforms in response to modern challenges.

Advancements in technology bring new legal challenges. Students can investigate how constitutional law addresses issues related to data privacy, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and online freedom of expression.

Constitutional law plays a critical role in promoting social justice. Topics in this category could include the constitutional implications of affirmative action, the right to education, or the right to healthcare.

Global Constitutionalism and International Law

The impact of international law on domestic constitutions and global constitutionalism is a compelling area of study. Students can examine the incorporation of international treaties into domestic law, the role of international courts in shaping constitutional jurisprudence, or the constitutional implications of global challenges like climate change.

The realm of constitutional law offers an expansive landscape of research paper topics for students to explore. From historical foundations to contemporary challenges, each topic presents an opportunity to deepen one’s understanding of constitutional principles, legal systems, and their relevance to contemporary issues. Whether delving into the protection of fundamental rights, the dynamics of federalism, or the impact of emerging technologies, students can engage in critical analysis and contribute to the ongoing discourse on constitutional law. By exploring this diverse range of research topics, students can unlock the potential of constitutional law to shape just and equitable societies while strengthening their skills as future legal scholars and practitioners.

How to Choose Constitutional Law Research Paper Topics

Selecting a research paper topic is a critical first step in the journey of writing a compelling and impactful paper in constitutional law. With the vast array of constitutional law issues to explore, students may find it challenging to narrow down their focus and identify a topic that is not only engaging but also aligns with their interests and academic goals. This section aims to provide valuable insights and practical tips on how to choose constitutional law research paper topics that will spark curiosity, foster intellectual growth, and enable students to make meaningful contributions to the field of law.

• Identify Your Interests and Passions : Passion fuels intellectual curiosity and motivates students to delve deeper into their chosen research topic. Start by identifying the aspects of constitutional law that genuinely interest you. Whether it’s fundamental rights, the separation of powers, or constitutional amendments, selecting a topic that resonates with your interests will make the research process more enjoyable and rewarding.
• Explore Current Legal and Social Issues : Constitutional law is continuously evolving in response to contemporary legal and social challenges. Stay up-to-date with current events and legal developments to identify pressing issues that warrant in-depth examination. Topics such as constitutional implications of technology, civil liberties during emergencies, or constitutional responses to pandemics are examples of relevant and timely research areas.
• Review Course Materials and Textbooks : Reviewing your course materials and textbooks can provide valuable inspiration for research paper topics. Professors often highlight key constitutional law debates, landmark cases, and emerging issues in their lectures and readings. Revisiting these materials may help you identify potential research topics that build upon class discussions.
• Consult with Professors and Legal Experts : Seeking guidance from professors and legal experts can offer valuable insights and mentorship in selecting an appropriate research topic. Professors may have expertise in specific areas of constitutional law and can provide recommendations or suggestions based on your academic strengths and interests.
• Analyze Constitutional Court Decisions : Examining landmark constitutional court decisions can serve as a starting point for research paper topics. Analyze how courts have interpreted constitutional provisions, resolved conflicts, or addressed societal challenges. Investigating dissenting opinions can also provide a unique perspective for exploration.
• Consider Comparative Approaches : Comparative constitutional law allows for the examination of different legal systems and how they address similar issues. You can compare constitutional approaches between countries, regions, or continents, which can yield valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different constitutional frameworks.
• Evaluate the Research Feasibility : Before finalizing your research topic, consider its feasibility in terms of available resources, data, and literature. Ensure that there is sufficient scholarly material to support your research and that you have access to relevant legal texts, court decisions, and academic articles.
• Focus on Originality and Contribution : Strive for originality in your research paper topic by exploring less-trodden paths or emerging areas in constitutional law. Topics that contribute new insights, propose novel solutions, or address unexplored legal issues can stand out and make a significant impact in the field.
• Consider Multidisciplinary Perspectives : Constitutional law intersects with various other disciplines, such as political science, sociology, economics, and history. Considering multidisciplinary perspectives can enrich your research and provide a broader context for understanding constitutional issues.
• Refine and Narrow Down Your Topic : Once you have identified a preliminary topic, refine and narrow it down to a specific research question. A well-defined research question will guide your investigation and maintain focus throughout the writing process.

Choosing the right constitutional law research paper topic is a crucial step that requires thoughtful consideration and exploration of various avenues. By identifying your interests, analyzing current legal developments, and seeking guidance from experts, you can select a research topic that not only aligns with your passions but also contributes meaningfully to the field of constitutional law. Remember to refine and narrow down your topic, ensuring it is feasible and original, and be prepared to embark on an enriching journey of intellectual inquiry and discovery. With a well-chosen research topic, you can engage in a rewarding academic exploration and make valuable contributions to the ever-evolving field of constitutional law.

How to Write a Constitutional Law Research Paper

Writing a constitutional law research paper requires meticulous planning, critical analysis, and a thorough understanding of legal principles and arguments. A well-structured and thought-provoking research paper not only showcases your knowledge of constitutional law but also contributes to the broader legal discourse. In this section, we will provide a comprehensive guide on how to write a compelling constitutional law research paper that captures the essence of the subject and engages readers with its rigor and insights.

• Understand the Research Requirements : Before delving into the writing process, carefully review the research paper guidelines provided by your instructor or institution. Understand the specific requirements regarding length, formatting, citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.), and submission deadline. Pay attention to any specific research questions or themes your paper should address.
• Choose a Clear and Focused Thesis : A strong research paper revolves around a clear and focused thesis statement. The thesis should succinctly convey the main argument or point of your paper. Ensure that your thesis is specific, well-defined, and supported by relevant evidence and legal analysis.
• Conduct In-Depth Research : Constitutional law research papers require extensive research from reputable sources, including law journals, court decisions, academic books, and reputable online databases. Utilize libraries, academic databases, and online resources to gather relevant and up-to-date information.
• Organize Your Research : Organize your research materials in a logical and coherent manner. Create an annotated bibliography or research outline to keep track of the sources you plan to use and their relevance to your thesis. This step will help you maintain focus and structure during the writing process.
• Craft a Compelling Introduction : The introduction is the gateway to your research paper. Start with a compelling hook or a thought-provoking statement to capture readers’ attention. Provide context for your research topic, introduce your thesis, and outline the key arguments you will explore in the paper.
• Develop a Clear and Logical Structure : A well-structured research paper ensures that your arguments flow logically and coherently. Divide your paper into sections or chapters, each focusing on a specific aspect of your thesis. Use subheadings to guide readers through different sections of the paper.
• Analyze and Cite Legal Authorities : Constitutional law research papers rely heavily on legal authorities, including court decisions, statutes, and academic writings. Analyze the legal principles and arguments presented in these sources and use proper citation to give credit to the original authors.
• Provide Strong Supporting Evidence : Back your arguments with solid evidence from case law, legal doctrines, and constitutional principles. Incorporate direct quotes, paraphrases, and legal analysis to support your points effectively. Avoid relying solely on secondary sources and prioritize primary legal materials.
• Address Counterarguments : Acknowledge and address counterarguments to strengthen the credibility of your research. Anticipate potential objections to your thesis and present well-reasoned responses, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the subject.
• Craft a Persuasive Conclusion : The conclusion should summarize the main findings of your research and reiterate your thesis. Offer insights into the broader implications of your research and highlight any recommendations or areas for further study.

Writing a constitutional law research paper is a demanding yet intellectually rewarding endeavor. By understanding the research requirements, choosing a focused thesis, conducting in-depth research, and crafting a logical structure, you can produce a compelling and influential paper. Remember to support your arguments with strong evidence and legal analysis, and address counterarguments to demonstrate the depth of your understanding. With diligence and attention to detail, your constitutional law research paper will be an authoritative contribution to the legal scholarship and a testament to your expertise in the field.

iResearchNet’s Custom Research Paper Writing Services

At iResearchNet, we understand the significance of writing a high-quality constitutional law research paper that meets academic standards and showcases your expertise in the field of law. We recognize that students often face challenges in conducting in-depth research, crafting compelling arguments, and adhering to strict formatting and citation guidelines. That’s why we offer custom constitutional law research paper writing services tailored to meet your specific needs and requirements. With a team of expert degree-holding writers and a commitment to delivering top-quality, original, and well-researched papers, we are here to support you throughout your academic journey.

• Expert Degree-Holding Writers : Our team of writers comprises legal experts with advanced degrees in constitutional law and related disciplines. They possess extensive knowledge and experience in crafting research papers that demonstrate a deep understanding of legal principles and concepts.
• Custom Written Works : We believe in delivering unique and original research papers tailored to your specific research questions and academic requirements. Each paper is custom-written from scratch, ensuring authenticity and originality.
• In-Depth Research : Conducting comprehensive and in-depth research is a cornerstone of our writing services. Our writers have access to reputable legal databases and academic resources, allowing them to gather relevant and up-to-date information for your research paper.
• Custom Formatting : We are well-versed in various formatting styles, including APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, and Harvard. Our writers will format your research paper according to your institution’s guidelines and citation preferences.
• Top Quality : Quality is our utmost priority. We employ a rigorous quality assurance process to ensure that each research paper meets high academic standards and adheres to your specific instructions.
• Customized Solutions : We understand that each research paper is unique, and we tailor our services to meet your specific requirements. Whether you need assistance with a specific section or a complete research paper, we offer customized solutions to suit your needs.
• Flexible Pricing : We offer competitive and transparent pricing for our services. Our pricing structure is flexible, considering factors such as the complexity of the research paper, word count, and deadline.
• Short Deadlines : We understand that students often face tight deadlines. Our writers are skilled at working under pressure and can deliver high-quality research papers within short time frames, even as quick as 3 hours.
• Timely Delivery : Punctuality is a core value at iResearchNet. We are committed to delivering your research paper within the agreed-upon deadline, ensuring you have sufficient time for review and revisions.
• 24/7 Support : Our customer support team is available round-the-clock to assist you with any inquiries, concerns, or updates related to your research paper.
• Absolute Privacy : We value your privacy and confidentiality. Your personal information and research paper details are treated with the utmost confidentiality and are never shared with third parties.
• Easy Order Tracking : We provide a user-friendly platform that allows you to track the progress of your research paper, communicate with your assigned writer, and receive regular updates on your order.
• Money Back Guarantee : Our commitment to customer satisfaction is backed by a money-back guarantee. If you are not satisfied with the quality of the research paper or if it does not meet your requirements, we offer a refund.

iResearchNet’s custom constitutional law research paper writing services are designed to provide students with the support and assistance they need to excel in their academic pursuits. With expert writers, in-depth research, and a commitment to delivering top-quality papers, we aim to empower you to succeed in your constitutional law studies. Whether you need help with topic selection, research, writing, or formatting, our team is here to guide you every step of the way. Trust iResearchNet to unleash the full potential of your constitutional law research and achieve academic excellence in your legal journey.

Empower Your Constitutional Law Journey with iResearchNet

Are you feeling overwhelmed by the prospect of writing a compelling constitutional law research paper? Do you struggle with finding the right research paper topics or crafting persuasive arguments? Look no further! iResearchNet is here to empower your constitutional law journey and provide you with the academic support you need. Our custom research paper writing services are tailored to meet the unique needs of law students like you, ensuring that your research papers stand out and make a lasting impact.

Your constitutional law journey is an opportunity to explore the depths of legal scholarship and make a meaningful contribution to the field. With iResearchNet’s custom constitutional law research paper writing services, you can embrace this journey with confidence, knowing that you have the support of expert writers, in-depth research, and a commitment to excellence. Empower yourself to excel in your academic pursuits and unleash the power of your constitutional law research with iResearchNet. Trust us to be your partner in success, and let us help you achieve your academic goals in the fascinating world of constitutional law. Place your order today and take the first step towards a successful and fulfilling legal career!

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Slots Open for Interview Growthcamp | Enroll Now

Admissions Open for Six Weeks' Holistic Development Growthcamp- Click To Know More | Admissions Open for Six Weeks' Holistic Development Growthcamp- Click To Know More | Admissions Open for Six Weeks' Holistic Development Growthcamp- Click To Know More

50 Research Topics For Law Students In August 2022: Read Now!

If you are a law student and love research, here’s our flagship article. Our team has meticulously prepared a list of 50 top contemporary topics  for research in August 2022 across a number of legal subjects . Happy Researching!

Military law 1. Military Law v. Martial Law: A Comparative Study. 2. Authorities under Military Law in India. 3. Punishments under Military Law v. Civil Law: A Comparative Study. 4. Evolution of Military Law in India. Admiralty (Maritime) Law 1. Local laws v. Maritime Law: Which shall prevail? 2. Suez Canal crisis: What it cost the world? 3. 10 Things to Know Before Becoming A Maritime Lawyer 4. Enforcement of Maritime Law: A Critical Analysis 5. Relevance of South China Sea Globally. Bankruptcy Law 1. Efficiency of Fast track Resolution Process in India. 2. Authorities governing Insolvency and Bankruptcy in India: An Analysis 3. Cross-Border Insolvency in India. 4. Evolution of insolvency and bankruptcy laws in India: Landmark Judgments Business (Corporate) Law 1. Corporate Law Journals to Publish Your Research Paper. 2. Effective corporate governance laws: A Review 3. Top Research Journals for Corporate Law in India.

Civil Rights Law 1. Beef in India: A Study into Religious aspect 2. Drug abuse in India: A Critical analysis of Sushant Singh Rajput case. 3. Females of Islam: A Study 4. A critical analysis of Niqah Halala in Islam. 5. Maintenance to wives, children and parents in India: A Study through Landmark cases. Criminal law 1. Constitutional perspective of Criminal Procedure Code. 2. A critical Analysis of Plea bargaining Procedure. 3. Sex work in India: Morality v. Legality 4. Appeal, Review, Revision of Cases in India. 5. Rationale behind Death Penalty in India: A Critical Analysis. Entertainment law 1. Entertainment Law in India: A Jurisprudential Study. 2. An Introduction to Entertainment Law: A Basic Study. 3. Regulation of Pornography in OTT Platforms. 4. Royalties of Artistic Works in India: A Study 5. Regulations on Piracy and Pirated Works. Environment law 1. Indian environmental law for the sustainability of the resources and management: A critical assessment. 2. Politics v. Environment Law: A Study. 3. Important International Treaties on Climate Change. 4. Kyoto Protocol: Landmark Treaty on Climate Change.

Health law 1. Analysis of Insanity in Law. 2. Regulation of Donation of Organs in India and Globally. 3. Jurisprudence of Health law. 4. Right to Die: Law and Legislation. 5. Law and Biotechnology. Sports law 1. Sports Industry Law and Regulation: A Need of the Hour. 2. Relevance of sports law in India. 3. India’s Draft National Air Sports Policy 2022: A brief analysis. 4. Sports law and its aspect of Intellectual Property Rights. 5. Analysing the future of Sports Law in India. Moneylaundering law 1. Analysing India’s money laundering and anti-money laundering (AML) laws and regulations. 2. Hasan Ali Khan v Union of India: Case Analysis. 3. Analysing the legal issues in JKCA money laundering case. 4. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India: Case Analysis. 5. The powers of the Directorate of Enforcement in Anti-Money Laundering cases.

YLCC would like to thank Akhila Sawan for her valuable contribution in this publication.

Related Posts

Job Opportunity (Recovery Officer) @ Varthana: Apply Now!

Job Opportunity (Head of Legal Role) @ Junglee Pictures: Apply Now!

Job opportunity (associate) @ abha singh law offices: apply now.

Internship Opportunity (Intern) @ Meesho: Apply Now!

Cookie policy, privacy overview.

Hit enter to search or ESC to close

WhatsApp Us

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

IResearchNet

Academic Writing Services

Law and society.

The concepts of law and society refer to macrostructural phenomena. Is there a macro-oriented theory of law and society or a macro sociolegal theory to guide this field? As an interdisciplinary endeavor, the sociology of law relies upon, or is influenced by, the intellectual assumptions and propositions of general sociology and legal theory. This article will therefore consider the relationship of this field to both parent disciplines.

Relationship to General Sociology

It is no exaggeration to state that the field of sociology lacks a systematically developed and precise theory of society. Although interest in macro-sociological theory building has been in evidence for the past two decades, particularly among those concerned with comparative sociology (Eisenstadt and Curelaru 1977), no such theory has yet been developed in sufficient detail and precision to guide empirical research. This is not to deny the fact that such macrotheorists as Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and Parsons have exerted a pervasive influence on various specialties within sociology, including the relationship between law and society.

Marx conceived of law as a component of the “superstructure” of a capitalist society. As an epiphenomenon of the superstructure, it provides a rationale or ideology for preserving the existing class relations in a capitalist economy. Concepts of property and contract, for example, become instrumentalities for maintaining and reproducing class hegemony. In other words, legal concepts and doctrines reinforce the position of the ruling class and, at the same time, become the constituents of the “false consciousness” from which the working class suffers. Implicit in this theory of law as a weapon wielded by the state in a capitalist society against the working class is the assumption that if private property were abolished and a classless socialist society were ushered in, the state would “wither away” and, with it, law would “wither away” as well.

As usually formulated, the Marxian theory of law and society is not empirically verifiable. It does not follow, however, that this theory is devoid of any empirical implications. Questions can be raised—and have been raised—concerning class bias in the adjudication of civil and criminal cases, in the emergence of significant legal norms—for example, those regarding inheritance—and in the recurrent failure of agrarian reform laws. Likewise, it is possible to investigate a proposition counter to the Marxian thesis, namely, that the passage of laws in a capitalist state can potentially diminish the power of the ruling class vis-a-vis the working class. A case in point is the enactment of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 in the United States, which institutionalized the rights of employees to unionize and to engage in collective bargaining with employers. Research questions such as those cited above would test the validity of some propositions derivable from the Marxian theory of law and society.

Turning to Durkheim’s contribution to this field, one of necessity reverts to his Division of Labor in Society (1933), in which he argued that in societies characterized by “mechanical solidarity” there is a predominance of repressive laws, whereas in societies characterized by ”organic solidarity” there is a predominance of restitutive laws. A number of social scientists have subjected Durkheim’s thesis to empirical tests and have found it wanting (Schwartz and Miller 1964). It is a testament, however, to the intriguing character of Durkheim’s thesis that it continues to evoke the interest of researchers (Baxi 1974; Schwartz 1974; Sheleff 1975). A more general formulation of Durkheim’s thesis would be that societies differing along various dimensions of societal develop-ment—of which the division of labor is but one— will exhibit systematic differences in their legal systems (Evan 1968).

In the course of developing his thesis that the division of labor is the principal source of social solidarity, Durkheim formulated his seminal idea of an “index” (Durkheim 1933, pp. 64-65). Apart from his fame as the “father of modern sociology,” Durkheim is the originator of the concept of an “index”, that is, an indirect and “external” measure of a complex dimension of social structure such as social solidarity. That he developed the concept of an index in connection with “juridical rules” and types of laws is of particular interest to sociologists of law and legal scholars. Under the circumstances, it is indeed surprising that to date, with few exceptions (Evan 1965, 1968, 1980; Merryman, Clark, and Friedman 1979; Lidz 1979), this facet of Durkheim’s work has been neglected. The concept of a “legal index” or a “legal indicator” merits systematic attention if we are to become more precise in our understanding of the role of law in social change.

In comparison with the work of Durkheim and Marx, Weber’s contributions to the sociology of law are appreciably more diverse and complex. Embedded in an intricate mosaic of ideal types and comparative and historical data on the emergence of legal rationality in Western civilization and on the role of law in the origins of capitalism (Weber 1950; Rheinstein 1954; Trubek 1972; Collins 1980), Weber’s welter of legal conceptualizations poses a difficult challenge to the empirically oriented researcher. For example, his famous typology of lawmaking and lawfinding suggests possible research leads for comparative and historical analysis. Rheinstein, who edited and translated Weber’s work on the sociology of law, lucidly summarizes his typology in the following manner:

• irrational, i.e., not guided by general rules
• formal: guided by means which are beyond the control of reason (ordeal, oracle, etc.)
• substantive: guided by reaction to the individual case
• rational, i.e., guided by general rules
• substantive: guided by the principles of an ideological system other than that of the law itself (ethics, religion, power, politics, etc.)

(1) extrinsically, i.e., ascribing significance to external acts observable by the senses

(2) logically, i.e., expressing its rules by the use of abstract concepts created by legal thought itself and conceived of as constituting a complete system.

(Rheinstein 1954, p. 1)

Assuming that the meaning of each of these ideal type categories can be clarified and that legal indicators can be developed for each of the types, a comparative study could be undertaken to explore differences in lawmaking and in lawfinding of such major legal systems as common law, civil law, socialist law, and Moslem law. Equally challenging would be a study of long-term trends within each of these legal systems. The findings of such an inquiry would shed light on the occurrence of the evolutionary stages postulated by Weber.

The general development of law and procedure may be viewed as passing through the following stages: first, charismatic legal revelation through “law prophets”; second, empirical creation and finding of law by legal honoratiores; . . . third, imposition of law by secular or theocratic powers; fourth and finally, systematic elaboration of law and professionalized administration of justice by persons who have received their legal training in a learned and formally logical manner. (Rheinstein 1954, p. 303)

Another significant thesis in Weber’s corpus of writings on law is the innovative role he attributes to “legal honoratiores” or “legal notables” (Bendix 1960). Is Weber’s thesis more valid for civil law systems, with its heavy immersion in Roman law, than it is for common law, let alone for socialist law or Moslem law? Once again it would be necessary to develop appropriate legal indicators to measure the degree to which legal notables—lawyers, judges, and high-level civil servants— introduce new rules and new interpretations of existing legal norms in the course of administering justice.

For decades, Parsons was the leading macrosociological theorist in the United States, making singular contributions to structural functionalism and to a general theory of action. Focusing on the action of social systems, Parsons developed a “four-function paradigm.” According to Parsons, every society faces four subsystem problems: adaptation, goal attainment, integration, and pattern maintenance or latency (AGIL). The societal subsystems associated with these four functional problems are, respectively, the economy, the polity, law, and religion and education.

Following Weber, Parsons treats law as a rational-legal system consisting of a set of prescriptions, proscriptions, and permissions. The legal system, especially in highly differentiated modern societies, performs the functions of a “generalized mechanism of social control” (Parsons 1962). This function is performed vis-a-vis the economy, the polity, and pattern maintenance or latency. The net effect of the pervasive normative regulation is the integration of society. As Parsons puts it: “The legal system . . . broadly constitutes what is probably the single most important institutional key to understanding . . . problems of societal integration” (Parsons 1978, p. 52).

With his four-function paradigm, Parsons addresses the nexus between law and society with the aid of “generalized media of interchange.” The economy in a developed and differentiated society uses the medium of money for transactions. Functionally analogous media of exchange operate in each of the other subsystems—power in the polity, value commitment in pattern maintenance, and influence in law.

Suggestive as Parsons’s framework is for understanding interinstitutional relations, the generalized media of interchange have not, as yet, been operationalized so as to explain how the legal system interacts with other societal subsystems. In other words, since Parsons has not explicated specific linkages between the legal and nonlegal subsystems, it is difficult to discern what hypotheses can be tested against any body of data. Hence, a reasonable conclusion is that Parsons’s macro-sociological theory, in its present form, is actually a metatheory.

The foregoing review of some sociological theories of law and society raises two common themes: (1) each of the theorists endeavored to comprehend the macrostructural relationships between law and other institutional systems of a society, and (2) if the hypotheses implicit in these theories are to be empirically tested, systematic attention would have to be devoted to the development of a body of legal indicators. The current generation of sociologists of law has yet to face up to the problems engendered by both of these themes.

Relationship to Legal Theory

Is the relationship between the sociology of law and the field of legal theory any less problematic than it is with general sociology? On its face, the question should be answered in the affirmative because the sociologist of law must take some of the legal scholars’ subjects as objects of inquiry. In actuality, because of the traditions of legal scholarship, legal scholars do not generally provide an analytical basis for sociological research. Legal scholarship tends to be preoccupied with legal rules, legal principles, and their application to a multitude of specific conflict situations. As a consequence, the scholarly literature—apart from being intellectually insular—is almost entirely verbal and idiographic, with virtually no interest in a nomothetic, let alone quantitative, analysis of legal phenomena. Furthermore, there is a high degree of specialization within legal scholarship such that most scholars tend to devote their entire careers to a particular body of law, be it labor law, criminal law, contract law, family law, and so forth, in their own country. Those scholars specializing in comparative law are inclined to study a particular specialty, for example, family law, by comparing case studies from two or more countries (Glendon 1975). Relatively few legal scholars seek to study the legal system of an entire society, such as the work of Hazard (1977) and Berman (1963) on the Soviet legal system. And fewer still have had the temerity to undertake systematic comparisons of total legal systems or families of legal systems, as exemplified in the work of David and Brierly (1968) and Wigmore (1928); and those who make no effort tolerate characteristics of total legal systems to the social-structural attributes of the societies in which they are embedded.

Surveying current legal theory, three distinct theoretical perspectives can be discerned: the theory of legal autonomy, critical legal studies, and autopoietic law. Each of these perspectives will be briefly reviewed and appraised for their implications for a theory of law and society.

Legal Autonomy

Traditional conceptions of the legal order and “sources of law” are based on two assumptions, the first being that the law is a “seamless web,” a relatively ”closed system.” Whatever processes of change occur in the law are generated from within the legal system, not from without. In other words, processes of change are immanent or endogenous and are not externally induced. The second assumption is that the legal system is, by definition, autonomous from other systems or institutions of a society. Therefore, it is unnecessary to inquire into how the legal system interacts with other subsystems of a society or into what degree of autonomy a given legal system actually has from other societal subsystems.

Perhaps the most quintessential articulation of the theory of legal autonomy in recent years can be found in the work of Watson, a renowned legal historian and comparative law scholar. Watson has repeated his thesis of legal autonomy in a number of monographs and articles (Watson 1974, 1978, 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987). He contends that the growth and evolution of the law is determined largely by an autonomous legal tradition, which exists and operates outside the sphere of societal needs.

To a large extent law possesses a life and vitality of its own; that is, no extremely close, natural or inevitable relationship exists between law, legal structures, institutions and rules on the one hand and the needs and desires and political economy of the ruling elite or of the members of the particular society on the other hand. If there was such a close relationship, legal rules, institutions and structures would transplant only with great difficulty, and their power of survival would be severely limited. (Watson 1978, pp. 314-315) Law is largely autonomous and not shaped by societal needs; though legal institutions will not exist without corresponding social institutions, law evolves from the legal tradition. (Watson 1985, p. 119).

Unlike the Marxist view of law, Watson’s is that the law does not advance the interests of the ruling class; instead, it reflects the “culture” of the legal elite. He bolsters his provocative thesis with a study of legal borrowing, which he refers to as “legal transplants” (1974). The fact that the individual statutes, legal doctrines, and entire codes have been borrowed by countries differing in cultural, political, economic, and other respects provides evidence, according to Watson, in support of his thesis of legal autonomy.

The concept of “legal transplant” has a naturalistic ring to it as though it occurs independent of any human agency. In point of fact, however, elites—legal and nonlegal—often act as “culture carriers” or intermediaries between societies involved in a legal transplant. Legal scholars who are associated with political elites may be instrumental in effecting a legal transplant. Moreover, many instances of legal borrowing involve the “imposition” of a foreign body of law by a colonial power (Burman and Harrell-Bond 1979). Hence, it is a mistake to describe and analyze the diffusion of law as if it were devoid of human agency. If human volition is involved, it is indeed questionable whether the borrowed legal elements do not perform a societal function—at the very least on behalf of the legal elite.

Critical Legal Studies

Unlike Watson’s internalist focus on the legal system and its autonomous development, the critical legal studies (CLS) movement appears to pursue a dual strategy: externalist as well as internalist. CLS is externalist in its critique of the social order and of the values dominating judicial decision making. It is internalist in its fundamental critique of traditional jurisprudence and legal reasoning.

The CLS movement emerged in the late 1970s in American law schools. It brought together a diverse group of scholars with a left-of-center ideology concerned about inequality and injustice in American society. Although lacking any consensus regarding societal transformation, CLS scholars sought to identify the impact of society’s dominant interests on the legal process and the impact of social and political values on legal decision making.

In his introduction to a volume of essays by CLS authors, David Kairys discusses the “basic elements” of the legal theory of this movement. Three of these elements are externalist in nature:

We place fundamental importance on democracy, by which we mean popular participation in the decisions that shape our society and affect our lives . . . We reject the common characterization of the law and the state as neutral, value-free arbiters, independent of and unaffected by social and economic relations, political forces, and cultural phenomena. The law’s ultimate mechanism for control and enforcement is institutional violence, but it protects the dominant system of social and power relations against political and ideological as well as physical challenges. (Kairys 1982, pp. 3-5)

These three externalist principles of the CLS movement have a familiar ring to them; namely, they are reminiscent of criticisms leveled by Marxists and neo-Marxists against the legal order of capitalist societies.

By far the most distinctive contribution of the CLS movement has been its elaborate internalist critique of legal reasoning and legal process. As Kairys puts it:

We reject . . . the notion that a distinctly legal mode of reasoning or analysis characterizes the legal process or even exists . . . There is no legal reasoning in the sense of a legal methodology or process for reaching particular, correct results. There is a distinctly legal and quite elaborate system of discourse and body of knowledge, replete with its own language and conventions of argumentation, logic, and even manners. In some ways these aspects of the law are so distinct and all-embracing as to amount to a separate culture; and for many lawyers the courthouse, the law firm, the language, the style, become a way of life. But in terms of a method or process for decision making—for determining correct rules, facts, or results—the law provides only a wide and conflicting variety of stylized rationalizations from which courts pick and choose. Social and political judgments about the substance, parties, and context of a case guide such choices, even when they are not the explicit or conscious basis of decision. (Kairys 1982, p. 3)

Not only do critical legal scholars reject the notion of legal reasoning, they also reject other idealized components constituting a ”legal system,” in particular, that law is a body of doctrine, that the doctrine reflects a coherent view of relations between persons and the nature of society, and that social behavior reflects norms generated by the legal system (Trubek 1984, p. 577).

The general conclusion CLS writers draw from ”unmasking” the legal system, ”trashing” mainstream jurisprudence, and ”deconstructing” legal scholarship (Barkan 1987) is that ”law is simply politics by other means” (Kairys 1982, p. 17). Such a conclusion, on its face, does not hold out any promise for developing a new, let alone heuristic, approach to a theory of law and society. On the contrary, its antipositivism combined with its search for a transformative political agenda has prompted CLS writers to view with increasing skepticism the sociology of law and research into the relationship between law and society (Trubek and Esser 1989).

Autopoietic Law

Similar in some respects to Watson’s theory of legal autonomy, but fundamentally different from the theory of the CLS movement, autopoietic law claims to be a challenging new theory of law and society (Teubner 1988a). For the past few years several continental social theorists, who are also legal scholars, have enthusiastically developed and propagated the theory of autopoietic law. A complex cluster of ideas, this theory is derived from the work of two biologists, Maturana and Varela (Varela 1979; Maturana and Varela 1980).

In the course of their biological research, Maturana and Varela arrived at some methodological realizations that led them to generalize about the nature of living systems. Maturana coined the term autopoiesis to capture this new “scientific epistemology” (Maturana and Varela 1980, p. xvii).

“This was a word without a history, a word that could directly mean what takes place in the dynamics of the autonomy proper to living systems.” Conceptualizing living systems as machines, Maturana and Varela present the following rather complex and abstract definition:

Autopoietic machines are homeostatic machines. Their peculiarity, however, does not lie in this but in the fundamental variable which they maintain constant . . . an autopoietic machine continuously generates and specifies its own organization through its operation as a system of production of its own components, and does this in an endless turnover of components under conditions of continuous perturbations and compensation of perturbations. (Maturana and Varela 1980, pp. 78-79)

Another definition of autopoiesis is presented by Zeleny, one of the early advocates of this new theory:

An autopoietic system is a distinguishable complex of component-producing processes and their resulting components, bounded as an autonomous unity within its environment, and characterized by a particular kind of relation among its components, and component-producing processes: the components, through their interaction, recursively generate, maintain, and recover the same complex of processes which produced them. (Zeleny 1980, p. 4)

Clearly, these definitions and postulates are rather obscure and high-level generalizations that, from a general systems theory perspective (Bertalanffy 1968), are questionable. Especially suspect is the assertion that autopoietic systems do not have inputs and outputs. The authors introduce further complexity by postulating second- and third-order autopoietic systems, which occur when autopoietic systems interact with one another and, in turn, generate a new autopoeitic system (Maturana and Varela 1980, pp. 107-111). Toward the end of their provocative monograph, Maturana and Varela raise the question of whether the dynamics of human societies are determined by the autopoiesis of its components. Failing to agree on the answer to this question, the authors postpone further discussion (Maturana and Varela 1980, p. 118). Zeleny, however, hastens to answer this question and introduces the notion of ”social autopoiesis” to convey that human societies are autopoietic (Zeleny 1980, p. 3).

Luhmann, an outstanding German theorist and jurist, has also gravitated to the theory of autopoiesis. According to Luhmann, ”social systems can be regarded as special kinds of autopoietic systems” (1988b, p. 15). Influenced in part by Parsons and general systems theory, Luhmann applied some systems concepts in analyzing social structures (1982). In the conclusion to the second edition of his book A Sociological Theory of Law (1985), Luhmann briefly refers to new developments in general systems theory that warrant the application of autopoiesis to the legal system. Instead of maintaining the dichotomy between closed and open systems theory, articulated by Bertalanffy, Boulding, and Rapoport (Buckley 1968), Luhmann seeks to integrate the open and closed system perspectives. In the process he conceptualizes the legal system as self-referential, self-reproducing, ”normatively closed,” and ”cognitively open”—a theme he has pursued in a number of essays (1985, 1986, 1988c).

This formulation is, to say the least, ambiguous. Given normative closure, how does the learning of the system’s environmental changes, expectations, or demands get transmitted to the legal system? Further complicating the problem is Luhmann’s theory of a functionally differentiated modern society in which all subsystems—including the legal system—tend to be differentiated as self-referential systems, thereby reaching high levels of autonomy (Luhmann 1982). Although Luhmann has explicitly addressed the issue of integrating the closed and open system perspectives of general systems theory, it is by no means evident from his many publications how this is achieved.

Another prominent contributor to autopoietic law is the jurist and sociologist of law Gunther Teubner. In numerous publications, Teubner discusses the theory of autopoiesis and its implications for reflexive law, legal autonomy, and evolutionary theory (Teubner 1983a, 1983b, 1988a, 1988b). One essay, ”Evolution of Autopoietic Law” (1988a), raises two general issues: the pre-requi-sites of autopoietic closure of a legal system, and legal evolution after a legal system achieves autopoietic closure. With respect to the first issue, Teubner applies the concept of hypercycle, which he has borrowed from others but which he does not explicitly define. Another of his essays (Teubner 1988b) reveals how Teubner is using this concept. For Teubner, all self-referential systems involve, by definition, ”circularity” or ”recursivity” (1988b, p. 57). Legal systems are preeminently self-referential in the course of producing legal acts or legal decisions. However, if they are to achieve autopoietic autonomy their cyclically constituted system components must become interlinked in a ”hypercycle,” ”i.e., the additional cyclical linkage of cyclically constituted units” (Teubner 1988b, p. 55). The legal system components—as conceptualized by Teubner, ”element, structure, process, identity boundary, environment, performance, function” (1988b, p. 55)—are general terms not readily susceptible to the construction of legal indicators.

The second question Teubner addresses, legal evolution after a legal system has attained autopoietic closure, poses a similar problem. The universal evolutionary functions of variation, selection, and retention manifest themselves in the form of legal mechanisms.

In the legal system, normative structures take over variation, institutional structures (especially procedures) take over selection and doctrinal structures take over retention. (Teubner 1988a, p. 228)

Since Teubner subscribes to Luhmann’s theory of a functionally differentiated social system, with each subsystem undergoing autopoietic development, he confronts the problem of intersubsystem relations as regards evolution. This leads him to introduce the intriguing concept of co-evolution.

The environmental reference in evolution however is produced not in the direct, causal production of legal developments, but in processes of co-evolution. The thesis is as follows: In co-evolutionary processes it is not only the autopoiesis of the legal system which has a selective effect on the development of its own structures; the autopoiesis of other subsystems and that of society also affects-in any case in a much more mediatory and indirect way-the selection of legal changes. (Teubner 1988a, pp. 235-236)

Given the postulate of “autopoietic closure,” it is not clear by what mechanisms nonlegal subsystems of a society affect the evolution of the legal system and how they “co-evolve.” Once again, we confront the unsolved problem in the theory of autopoiesis of integrating the closed and open systems perspectives. Nevertheless, Teubner, with the help of the concept of co-evolution, has drawn our attention to a critical problem even if one remains skeptical of his proposition that “the historical relationship of ‘law and society’ must, in my view, be defined as a co-evolution of structurally coupled autopoietic systems” (Teubner 1988a, p. 218).

At least three additional questions about autopoietic law can be raised. Luhmann’s theory of a functionally differentiated society in which all subsystems are autopoietic raises anew Durkheim’s problem of social integration. The centrifugal forces in such a society would very likely threaten its viability. Such a societal theory implies a highly decentralized social system with a weak state and a passive legal system. Does Luhmann really think any modern society approximates his model of a functionally differentiated society?

A related problem is the implicit ethnocentrism of social scientists writing against the background of highly developed Western societies where law enjoys a substantial level of functional autonomy, which, however, is by no means equivalent to autopoietic closure. In developing societies and in socialist countries, many of which are developing societies as well, this is hardly the case. In these types of societies legal systems tend to be subordinated to political, economic, or military institutions. In other words, the legal systems are decidedly allopoietic. To characterize the subsystems of such societies as autopoietic is to distort social reality.

A third problem with the theory of autopoietic law is its reliance on the “positivity” of law. This fails to consider a secular legal trend of great import for the future of humankind, namely, the faltering efforts—initiated by Grotius in the seventeenth century—to develop a body of international law. By what mechanisms can autopoietic legal systems incorporate international legal norms? Because of the focus on “positivized” law untainted by political, religious, and other institutional values, autopoietic legal systems would have a difficult time accommodating themselves to the growing corpus of international law.

Stimulating as is the development of the theory of legal autopoiesis, it does not appear to fulfill the requirements for a fruitful theory of law and society (Blankenburg 1983). In its present formulation, autopoietic law is a provocative metatheory. If any of its adherents succeed in deriving empirical propositions from this metatheory (Blankenburg 1983), subject them to an empirical test, and confirm them, they will be instrumental in bringing about a paradigm shift in the sociology of law.

The classical and contemporary theories of law and society, reviewed above, all fall short in providing precise and operational guidelines for uncovering the linkages over time between legal and nonlegal institutions in different societies. Thus, the search for a scientific macro sociolegal theory will continue. To further the search for such a theory, a social-structural model will now be outlined.

A Social-Structural Model

A social-structural model begins with a theoretical amalgam of concepts from systems theory with Parsons’ four structural components of social systems: values, norms, roles, and collectivities (Parsons 1961, pp. 41-44; Evan 1975, pp. 387-388). Any subsystem or institution of a societal system, whether it be a legal system, a family system, an economic system, a religious system, or any other system, can be decomposed into four structural elements: values, norms, roles, and organizations. The first two elements relate to a cultural or normative level of analysis and the last two to a social-structural level of analysis. Interactions between two or more subsystems of a society are mediated by cultural as well as by social-structural elements. As Parsons has observed, law is a generalized mechanism for regulating behavior in the several subsystems of a society (Parsons 1962, p. 57). At the normative level of analysis, law entails a “double institutionalization” of the values and norms embedded in other subsystems of a society (Bohannan 1968). In performing this reinforcement function, law develops “cultural linkages” with other subsystems, thus contributing to the degree of normative integration that exists in a society. As disputes are adjudicated and new legal norms are enacted, a value from one or more of the nonlegal subsystems is tapped. These values provide an implicit or explicit justification for legal decision making.

Parsons’s constituents of social structure (values, norms, roles, and organizations) are nested elements, as in a Chinese box, with values incorporated in norms, both of these elements contained in roles, and all three elements constituting organizations. When values, norms, roles, and organizations are aggregated we have a new formulation, different from Parsons’s AGIL paradigm, of the sociological concept of an institution. An institution of a society is composed of a configuration of values, norms, roles, and organizations. This definition is applicable to all social institutions, whether economic, political, religious, familial, educational, scientific, technological, or legal. In turn, the social structure of a society is a composite of these and other institutions.

Of fundamental importance to the field of the sociology of law is the question of how the legal institution is related to each of the nonlegal institutions. A preliminary answer to this question will be set forth in a model diagramming eight types of interactions or linkages between legal and nonlegal institutions (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. A Social-Structural Model of the Interactions of Legal and Nonlegal Institutions

On the left-hand side of the diagram are a set of six nonlegal institutions, each of which is composed of values, norms, roles, and organizations. If the norms comprising the nonlegal institutions are sufficiently institutionalized, they can have a direct regulatory impact on legal personnel as well on the citizenry (interaction 4, “Single institutionalization”). On the other hand, according to Bohannan (1968), if the norms of the nonlegal institutions are not sufficiently strong to regulate the behavior of the citizenry, a process of “double institutionalization” (interaction 1) occurs whereby the legal system converts nonlegal institutional norms into legal norms. This effect can be seen in the rise in the Colonial period of “blue laws,” which were needed to give legal reinforcement to the religious norms that held the Sabbath to be sacred (Evan 1980, pp. 517-518, 530-532). In addition, the legal system can introduce a norm that is not a component of any of the nonlegal institutions. In other words, the legal system can introduce an innovative norm (interaction 2) that does not have a counterpart in any of the nonlegal institutions (Bohannan 1968). An example of such an innovation is “no-fault” divorce (Weitzman 1985; Jacob 1988).

The legal system’s regulatory impact (interaction 3) may succeed or fail with legal personnel, with the citizenry, or with both. Depending on whether legal personnel faithfully implement the law, and the citizenry faithfully complies with the law, the effect on the legal system can be reinforcing (interaction 7) or subversive (interaction 5), and the effect on nonlegal institutions can be stabilizing (interaction 9) or destabilizing (interaction 6).

In systems-theoretic terms, the values of a society may be viewed as goal parameters in comparison with which the performance of a legal system may be objectively assessed. The inability of a legal system to develop “feedback loops” and “closed loop systems” to monitor and assess the efficacy of its outputs makes the legal system vulnerable to various types of failures. Instead of generating “negative feedback,” that is, self-corrective measures, when legal personnel or rank-and-file citizens fail to comply with the law, the system generates detrimental “positive feedback” (Laszlo, Levine, and Milsum 1974).

What are some implications of this social-structural model? In the first place, the legal system is not viewed as only an immanently developing set of legal rules, principles, or doctrines insulated from other subsystems of society, as expressed by Watson and to some extent by Luhmann and Teubner. Second, the personnel of the legal system, whether judges, lawyers, prosecutors, or administrative agency officials, activate legal rules, principles, or doctrines in the course of performing their roles within the legal system. Third, formally organized collectivities, be they courts, legislatures, law-enforcement organizations, or administrative agencies, perform the various functions of a legal system. Fourth, in performing these functions, the formally organized collectivities comprising a legal system interact with individuals and organizations representing interests embedded in the nonlegal subsystems of a society. In other words, each of the society’s institutions or subsystems— legal and nonlegal—has the same structural elements: values, norms, roles, and organizations.

Interinstitutional interactions involve an effort at coupling these structural elements across institutional boundaries. A major challenge to the sociologists of law is to discover the diverse coupling or linkages—cultural and social-structural—be-tween the legal system and the nonlegal systems in terms of the four constituent structural elements. Another challenge is to ascertain the impact of these linkages on the behavior of legal personnel and on the behavior of the citizenry, on the one hand, and to measure the impact of “double institutionalization” on societal goals, on the other.

A serendipitous outcome of this model is that it suggests a definition of law and society or the sociology of law, that is, that the sociology of law deals primarily with at least eight interactions or linkages identified in Figure 1. Whether researchers accept this definition will be determined by its heuristic value, namely, whether it generates empirical research concerning the eight linkages.

References:

• Abraham, David 1994 ‘‘Persistent Facts and Compelling Norms: Liberal Capitalism, Democratic Socialism, and the Law.’’ Law and Society Review 28:939–946.
• Barkan, Steven M. 1987 ‘‘Deconstructing Legal Research: A Law Librarian’s Commentary on Critical Legal Studies.’’ Law, Library Journal 79:617–637.
• Barnett, Larry D. 1993. Legal Construct, Social Concept: a Macrosociological Perspective On Law. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine De Gruyter.
• Baxi, U. 1974 ‘‘Comment—Durkheim and Legal Evolution: Some Problems of Disproof.’’ Law and Society Review 8:645–651.
• Bendix, Reinhard 1960 Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. New York: Doubleday.
• Berman, Harold J. 1963 Justice in the U.S.S.R: An Interpretation of the Soviet Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Bertalanffy, Ludwig von 1968 General System Theory. New York: G. Braziller.
• Blankenburg, Erhard 1983 ‘‘The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner’s Case for ‘Reflexive Law.’’’ Law and Society Review 18:273–289.
• Bohannan, Paul 1968 ‘‘Law and Legal Institutions.’’ In David L. Sills, ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
• Buckley, Walter (ed.) 1968 Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.
• Burman, Sandra, and Barbara E. Harrell-Bond (eds.) 1979 The Imposition of Law. New York: Academic Press.
• Chambliss, William J., and S. Zatz Marjorie 1993 Making Law: The State, the Law, and Structural Contradictions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Collins, Randall 1980 ‘‘Weber’s Last Theory of Capitalism: A Systemization’’ American Sociological Review 45:925–942.
• Cooney, Mark 1995 ‘‘Legal Sociology and the New Institutionalism.’’ Studies in Law Politics, and Society 15:85–101.
• Cotterell, Roger 1997 Law’s Community: Legal Theory In Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Cotterell, Roger 1988 ‘‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’’ Journal of Law and Society 25:171–192.
• David, Rene, and John E. C. Brierley 1968 Major Legal Systems in the World Today. London: Free Press and Collier-Macmillan.
• Durkheim, Emile 1933 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
• Eisenstadt, S. N., and M. Curelaru 1977 ‘‘Macro-Sociology: Theory, Analysis and Comparative Studies.’’ Current Sociology 25:1–112.
• Evan, William M. 1965 ‘‘Toward A Sociological Almanac of Legal Systems.’’ International Social Science Journal 17:335–338.
• Evan, William M. 1968 ‘‘A Data Archive of Legal Systems: A Cross- National Analysis of Sample Data.’’ European Journal of Sociology 9:113–125.
• Evan, William M. 1975 ‘‘The International Sociological Association and the Internationalization of Sociology.’’ International Social Science Journal 27:385–393.
• Evan, William M. 1980 The Sociology of Law. New York: Free Press.
• Evan, William M. 1990 Social Structure and Law: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
• Glendon, Mary Ann 1975 ‘‘Power and Authority in the Family: New Legal Patterns as Reflections of Changing Ideologies.’’ American Journal of Comparative Law 23:1–33.
• Habermans, Jurgen, and William Regh 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Hazard, John N. 1977 Soviet Legal System: Fundamental Principles and Historical Commentary, 3rd ed. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Press.
• Jacob, Herbert 1988 Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kairys, David (ed.) 1982 The Politics of Law. New York: Pantheon.
• Laszlo, C. A., M. D. Levine, and J. H. Milsum 1974 ‘‘A General Systems Framework for Social Systems.’’ Behavioral Science 19:79–92.
• Lidz, Victor 1979 ‘‘The Law as Index, Phenomenon, and Element: Conceptual Steps Towards a General Sociology of Law.’’ Sociological Inquiry 49:5–25.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1982 The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1985 A Sociological Theory of Law. trans. Elizabeth King and Martin Albrow. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1986 ‘‘The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits.’’ In Gunther Teubner, ed., Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1988a ‘‘The Sociological, Observation of the Theory and Practice of Law.’’ In Alberto Febrajo, ed., European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law. Milan: Giuffre Publisher.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1988b ‘‘The Unity of Legal Systems.’’ In Gunther Teubner, ed., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Luhmann, Niklas 1988c ‘‘Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of Law.’’ In Gunther Teubner, ed., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• McIntyre, Lisa J. 1994 Law in the Sociological Enterprise: a Reconstruction. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
• Maturana, Humberto R., and Francisco J. Varela 1980 Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.
• Merryman, John Henry, David S. Clark, and Lawrence M. Friedman 1979 Law and Social Change in Mediterranean Europe and Latin America. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Law School.
• Parsons, Talcott 1961 ‘‘An Outline of the Social System.’’ In Talcott Parsons, Edward Shils, Kasper D. Naegele, and Jesse R. Pitts, eds., Theories of Society. New York: Free Press.
• Parsons, Talcott 1962 ‘‘The Law and Social Control.’’ In William M. Evan, ed., Law and Sociology. New York: Free Press.
• Parsons, Talcott 1978 ‘‘Law as an Intellectual Stepchild.’’ In Harry M. Johnson, ed., Social System and Legal Process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Rheinstein, Max (ed.) 1954 Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Schwartz, R. D. 1974 ‘‘Legal Evolution and the Durkheim Hypothesis: A Reply to Professor Baxi.’’ Law and Society Review 8:653–668.
• Schwartz, R. D., and J. C. Miller 1964 ‘‘Legal Evolution and Social Complexity.’’ American Journal of Sociology 70:159–169.
• Sheleff, L. S. 1975 ‘‘From Restitutive Law to Repressive Law: Durkheim’s The Division of Labor in Society Revisited.’’ European Journal of Sociology 16:16–45.
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1996 ‘‘The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a ‘‘Practice’’ in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies.’’ Law and Society Review 30:163–204.
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1999 Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and A Social Theory of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Teubner, Gunther 1983a ‘‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law.’’ Law and Society Review 17:239–285.
• Teubner, Gunther 1983b ‘‘Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg.’’ Law and Society Review 18:291–301.
• Teubner, Gunther 1988a Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Teubner, Gunther 1988b ‘‘Hypercycle in Law and Organization: The Relationship Between Self-Observation, Self-Constitution, and Autopoiesis.’’ In Alberto Febrajo, ed., European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law. Milan: Giuffre Publisher.
• Teubner, Gunther 1997 ‘‘The King’s Many Bodies: The Self- Deconstruction of Law’s Hierarchy.’’ Law and Society Review 31:763–787.
• Travers, Max 1993 ‘‘Putting Sociology Back into the Sociology of Law.’’ Journal of Law and Society 20:438–451.
• Trubek, David M. 1972 ‘‘Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism.’’ Wisconsin Law Review 730:720–753.
• Trubek, David M. 1984 ‘‘Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies of Empiricism.’’ Stanford Law Review 36:575.
• Trubek, David M., and John Esser 1989 ‘‘’Critical Empiricism’ in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora’s Box?’’ Law and Social Inquiry 14:3–52.
• Varela, Francisco J. 1979 The Principle of Autonomy. New York: North-Holland.
• Watson, Alan 1974 Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
• Watson, Alan 1978 ‘‘Comparative Law and Legal Change.’’ Cambridge Law Journal 37:313–336.
• Watson, Alan 1981 The Making of the Civil Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Watson, Alan 1983 ‘‘Legal Change, Sources of Law, and Legal Culture.’’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 131:1,121–1,157.
• Watson, Alan 1985 The Evolution of Law. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Watson, Alan 1987 ‘‘Legal Evolution and Legislation.’’ Brigham Young University Law Review 1987:353–379.
• Weber, Max 1950 General Economic History. New York: Free Press.
• Weitzman, Lenore J. 1985 The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.
• Wigmore, John Henry 1928 A Panorama of the World’s Legal Systems. 3 vols. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.
• Zeleny, Milan 1980 Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures, and Spontaneous Social Orders. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Back to  Sociology of Law

Undergraduate Admissions

• Law and Society (Criminology)

Purdue University in West Lafayette

Law and society is a sociology major emphasizing concepts, theories, and research methods as applied to the study of law and law-related structures and processes. Coursework encompasses a variety of areas including deviant behavior, juvenile delinquency, the role of law in society, family law, and the sociology of police. These areas of study are intertwined with other crucial sociological concerns such inequality, power, social organization, social psychology, social change, race, gender, culture, and communication.

All liberal arts majors prepare students with the skills identified as contributing to managerial success:  communicating and listening well, possessing insights into others, creative/critical thinking, problem solving, and the ability to make connections across complex ideas.

Degree in 3

Plan of Study

Law and Society, BA

Transfer to Law and Society (Criminology)

Purdue admits to individual majors. Transfer students must meet Purdue's overall transfer criteria , as well as any major-specific requirements. Before you apply, check the closed programs page to confirm this major is open to transfer students. If it is, refer to the information below for major-specific transfer criteria.

Minimum GPA: 2.5

Contact Information

Undergraduate Student Recruitment Office (765) 494-6291 [email protected]

Careers in Law and Society (Criminology)

•   Attorney
•   Law Enforcement
•   Probation Officer
•   Public Policy
•   Mental Health Services
•   Crisis Work
•   Corrections
•   Security
•   Policy Analysis
•   Conservation Officer
• Public Service or Social Sciences
• Science and Research
• African American Studies
• American Studies
• Anthropology
• Art History
• Artificial Intelligence
• Asian Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Classical Studies
• Communication (multiple concentrations)
• Comparative Literature
• Creative Writing
• Digital Criminology
• Economics (Pre) (College of Liberal Arts)
• Film and Video
• Global Studies
• Industrial Design
• Integrated Studio Arts, BFA (Portfolio Required)
• Interior Design - Professional Program
• Italian Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Linguistics
• Political Science
• Pre-dentistry
• Pre-medicine
• Pre-occupational Therapy
• Pre-physical Therapy
• Pre-physician Assistant
• Professional Writing
• Religious Studies
• Sound for the Performing Arts (Portfolio Required)
• Studio Arts and Technology
• Visual Arts Design Education
• Visual Arts Education
• Visual Communication Design (Graphic Design)
• Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies
• College of Liberal Arts

Top 100 Law Project Topics [Updated 2024]

In the area of law studies, selecting the right project topic can be difficult to find the perfect puzzle piece – it’s essential for a cohesive and engaging academic journey. Whether you’re a budding legal scholar or just someone intrigued by the complexities of the legal world, understanding the plethora of options available in law project topics can open up a world of intellectual exploration.

How Can I Get Project Topics?

Table of Contents

Finding project topics can be approached in several ways:

• Academic Resources: Consult your course syllabus, textbooks, and academic journals related to your field of study. These sources often contain suggestions for potential project topics or can inspire ideas through their content.
• Online Databases: Explore online databases and repositories that specialize in academic research. Websites like JSTOR, Google Scholar, and PubMed offer a vast array of scholarly articles and research papers across various disciplines, providing ample inspiration for project topics.
• Faculty Guidance: Reach out to your professors, instructors, or academic advisors for guidance. They can give you helpful advice, recommend useful books and articles, and assist you in improving your ideas using what they know and have learned.
• Current Events: Stay updated on current events and societal issues relevant to your field of study. Newspapers, magazines, and online news platforms often cover legal developments, environmental challenges, and other topics that can serve as the basis for engaging project topics.
• Brainstorming Sessions: Organize brainstorming sessions with classmates or peers to generate ideas collaboratively. Discussing different perspectives and areas of interest can lead to innovative project topics and approaches.
• Personal Interests: Consider your own interests, hobbies, and experiences when selecting a project topic. Choosing a topic that resonates with you personally can make the research process more enjoyable and rewarding.
• Professional Networks: Connect with professionals or experts in your field through networking events, conferences, or online forums. Talking to experts in your field can help you learn about what’s happening right now, what problems people are facing, and what topics are interesting to study.

Top 100 Law Project Topics: Category Wise

Criminal law.

• The impact of technology on criminal investigations
• Restorative justice approaches in juvenile delinquency cases
• Rehabilitation programs for offenders: effectiveness and challenges
• Mental health issues in criminal law: addressing challenges and reforms
• Prosecutorial discretion: balancing justice and discretion
• Eyewitness testimony: reliability and legal implications
• Racial inequalities in the justice system: why they happen and how to fix them
• Dealing with new problems in cybercrime: laws and what we do about them
• How local police working closely with communities can help stop crime
• Sentencing disparities: addressing inequalities in the criminal justice system
• Criminal profiling and its reliability in law enforcement
• The legal implications of police use of force
• Mental health defenses in criminal trials: challenges and reforms
• Drug policy and criminal justice: exploring alternative approaches
• The intersection of race, poverty, and criminal justice
• Investigative interviewing techniques: legal and ethical considerations
• Bail reform: addressing disparities in pretrial detention
• Cybersecurity laws: protecting against digital threats and cybercrimes
• Criminal liability of corporations: holding entities accountable for wrongdoing
• Witness protection programs: effectiveness and ethical dilemmas

Constitutional Law

• Freedom of speech in the digital age: implications and limitations
• Judicial review and its role in safeguarding constitutional rights
• Federalism and states’ rights: contemporary issues and debates
• Separation of powers: balancing branches of government
• Privacy rights in the age of surveillance technology
• Equal protection under the law: challenges and progress
• The role of the Supreme Court in shaping constitutional interpretation
• Constitutional rights of marginalized groups: LGBTQ+, immigrants, etc.
• Religious freedom in a secular society: conflicts and resolutions
• The right to bear arms: interpreting the Second Amendment
• The right to privacy and emerging technologies: drones, surveillance, etc.
• Voting rights and voter suppression: legal challenges and protections
• Freedom of religion and state secularism: balancing competing interests
• Constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights: progress and challenges
• The legal status of undocumented immigrants: rights and immigration policies
• Environmental rights in constitutional law: the right to a healthy environment
• Access to justice: addressing barriers to legal representation
• Constitutional challenges to government surveillance programs
• The role of the judiciary in protecting civil liberties during times of crisis
• Campaign finance laws and the regulation of money in politics

International Law

• The legality of targeted drone strikes under international law
• Refugee rights and obligations: international perspectives
• International Humanitarian Law: Keeping People Safe in War: This is about rules to protect regular people during wars. It’s like having fair play rules, but for countries fighting each other.
• Climate Change and Global Environmental Rules: This is about making rules that all countries agree on to help with things like pollution and climate change. It’s like agreeing to clean up after ourselves to keep the Earth healthy.
• How Groups like the United Nations Help Keep Peace: This is about how big organizations, like the United Nations, work to stop fights between countries and make sure everyone is safe. It’s like having referees to stop a fight before it gets too serious.
• Human rights violations in conflict zones: accountability and justice
• The law of the sea: maritime disputes and legal frameworks
• International trade agreements and dispute resolution mechanisms
• Global governance and the challenge of state sovereignty
• International criminal law: prosecuting war crimes and crimes against humanity
• The legal status of refugees and asylum seekers: international obligations
• Human trafficking laws: combating modern-day slavery
• International humanitarian intervention: legal justifications and limitations
• The legal framework for addressing terrorism and extremist ideologies
• Dispute resolution mechanisms in international trade agreements
• International environmental governance: treaties and global cooperation
• The legal status of stateless persons: challenges and solutions
• Indigenous rights in international law: recognition and protection
• Cybersecurity norms and international law: preventing cyber conflicts
• The legality of targeted sanctions and their impact on human rights

Environmental Law

• Corporate responsibility for environmental damage: legal frameworks and challenges
• Indigenous rights and environmental conservation
• Climate change litigation: legal strategies and outcomes
• Environmental impact assessments: balancing development and conservation
• Wildlife protection laws: conservation efforts and challenges
• Clean air and water regulations: policy effectiveness and enforcement
• Renewable energy policies: promoting sustainability and reducing carbon emissions
• Environmental justice: addressing disparities in environmental protection
• The role of international agreements in addressing environmental challenges
• Urban planning and environmental sustainability: legal approaches and urban development
• Land use planning and sustainable development: legal frameworks and challenges
• Renewable energy incentives and subsidies: promoting clean energy adoption
• Environmental impact assessment in infrastructure projects
• Ecosystem-based approaches to climate adaptation and mitigation
• The legal framework for protecting biodiversity hotspots
• Corporate social responsibility and environmental stewardship
• Climate litigation against governments and corporations
• The role of indigenous knowledge in environmental conservation
• Carbon pricing mechanisms: cap and trade, carbon taxes, etc.
• International wildlife trafficking laws and enforcement efforts

Intellectual Property Law

• The impact of artificial intelligence on copyright law
• Biotechnology patents: ethical considerations and legal challenges
• Trademark law and global branding: protecting intellectual property rights
• Open access and intellectual property: challenges and opportunities
• Digital rights management: copyright protection in the digital age
• Genetic patents: legal implications and ethical concerns
• Copyright infringement in the age of digital piracy
• Intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry
• Patent trolls: legal strategies for combating patent litigation abuse
• Fair use doctrine: balancing copyright protection and creativity
• The legal implications of 3D printing on intellectual property rights
• Trade secrets protection and enforcement: legal challenges and strategies
• The intersection of copyright law and artificial intelligence-generated content
• Fashion law: intellectual property protection in the fashion industry
• Genetic privacy and the legal implications of genetic testing
• Digital rights and the legal framework for online privacy protection
• The legal status of virtual currencies and blockchain technology
• Patent pools and collaborative innovation: legal and antitrust considerations
• Geographical indications and the protection of traditional products
• Access to medicines and the balance between patent rights and public health

What Are The Legal Issues In Nigeria?

Nigeria, like any country, has a range of legal issues. Some common legal issues in Nigeria include:

• Corruption: Nigeria has been grappling with issues of corruption at various levels of government and society, which undermines the rule of law, economic development, and social cohesion.
• Security Challenges: Nigeria has faced security challenges, including terrorism, insurgency (such as Boko Haram in the northeast), communal violence, and kidnapping, which have legal ramifications in terms of law enforcement, human rights, and counter-terrorism measures.
• Human Rights Violations: People are worried because sometimes the police and other security forces break the rules. They might hurt or kill people without a fair trial, arrest people for no good reason, or even hurt them on purpose. These issues raise legal questions about accountability, due process, and access to justice.
• Electoral Integrity: Nigeria has a history of electoral irregularities, including voter intimidation, ballot stuffing, and manipulation of election results. Legal issues arise concerning the integrity of electoral processes, the independence of electoral bodies, and the resolution of electoral disputes.
• Legal Framework and Judicial System: People are talking about making the legal system work better by changing some rules. They want it to be faster, fairer, and more separate from other parts of the government. This includes issues such as delays in the dispensation of justice, inadequate legal representation for indigent individuals, and the need for clearer legal frameworks in areas such as business regulation and property rights.
• Cybercrime: With the increasing use of digital technologies, Nigeria faces challenges related to cybercrime, including online fraud, hacking, and identity theft. Legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms need to adapt to address these evolving threats.
• Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Making sure people’s ideas and inventions are safe is really important because it helps new ideas to grow and makes the economy stronger. However, Nigeria has faced challenges related to counterfeiting, piracy, and weak enforcement of IPR laws, which impact both local and international businesses.
• Land Disputes: Land tenure systems in Nigeria are complex, and disputes over land ownership and usage are common. Legal issues related to land rights, land acquisition, and land-use planning require effective legal mechanisms for resolution.
• Child Rights and Protection: Nigeria faces challenges related to child rights and protection, including issues such as child labor, child trafficking, and access to education. We need to make the rules and systems that protect kids stronger so that their rights are always looked after.

How Do You Write A Law Project?

To write a law project, you need to do a few important things. First, pick a topic you like and do some research. Then, organize what you find and explain it in a clear way. Finally, share your ideas in a way that makes sense and convinces others. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to write a law project:

• Choose a Topic: Pick something you like and that fits with what you want to learn or do. Think about how big the topic is, if it’s important right now, and if you can find enough information about it.
• Do Research: Find good sources like books, articles, and laws that talk about your topic. Use libraries and online tools to find information that supports what you’re doing.
• Decide on Your Main Idea: Say clearly what you’re trying to prove or figure out with your project. Make sure it’s something specific, worth discussing, and related to your topic.
• Plan Your Project: Make a plan that lays out what you’ll talk about and how you’ll do it. Include parts like an introduction, background info, what others have said about your topic, how you did your research, what you found, and what it all means.
• Start with an Introduction: Start your project with a good intro that explains what your topic is about, what you’re going to say in your project, and what you think is the most important point.
• Look at What Others Have Written: Read what others have said about your topic to understand it better. Summarize the main ideas and arguments from what you read to help explain your own ideas later on.
• Develop Your Methodology: If your project involves empirical research or data analysis, outline your methodology in detail. Describe your research design, data collection methods , sampling techniques, and any ethical considerations.
• Present Your Findings: Present your research findings or analysis in a clear and organized manner. Use headings and subheadings to structure your content and guide the reader through your argument or analysis.
• Analyze Your Findings: Analyze your research findings in relation to your thesis or research question. Discuss the implications of your findings, evaluate their significance, and consider any limitations or challenges encountered during the research process.
• Provide Recommendations or Conclusions: Based on your analysis, provide recommendations for future research, policy implications, or practical applications. Summarize the key insights of your project and reiterate your main argument or findings in the conclusion.
• Cite Your Sources: Ensure that you properly cite all sources used in your project according to the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). Use footnotes, endnotes, or in-text citations to attribute ideas, quotes, and data to their respective sources.
• Proofread and Revise: Carefully proofread your project for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and clarity. Revise your writing to improve coherence, flow, and logical progression of ideas. Consider seeking feedback from peers, professors, or mentors for further refinement.
• Format Your Project: Make sure your project looks the way your teacher wants it to. This means adding things like a cover page, a list of what’s inside (like a book’s table of contents), and any other stuff your teacher says you need, like summaries, thank-yous, or extra information at the end.
• Submit Your Project: Once you have completed and reviewed your project, submit it according to the submission instructions provided by your instructor or institution. Ensure that you meet any deadlines and requirements for formatting, length, and citation style.

Exploring law project topics is not just an academic exercise; it’s a journey of intellectual discovery and growth.

Whether you’re drawn to the complexities of criminal law or the nuances of constitutional principles, there’s a wealth of fascinating topics waiting to be explored.

So, roll up your sleeves, delve into the realm of legal studies, and embark on a journey of learning and exploration that will expand your horizons and deepen your understanding of the world around you.

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Transforming Correctional Culture and Climate

People are sentenced to prison to be removed from society, where ideally, they are rehabilitated so that they lead productive and law-abiding lives upon their release. Unfortunately, prison environments are not always conducive to this goal. Some facilities have substandard and unsafe living conditions, where threats of violence are commonplace. And some have correctional cultures that establish an “us against them” relationship between correctional officers and the people in their custody and care.

The command-and-control culture of more traditionally operated correctional facilities can breed a mindset among officers that if they authentically engage with people who are incarcerated, they will become vulnerable to manipulation. Moreover, the operations of many correctional settings remove all agency from incarcerated individuals, making them ill-prepared to adopt healthy habits and made decisions upon their release. In addition, many traditional correctional environments have no means of constructively responding to those who violate rules and harm others in a restorative manner, rather than issuing infractions or using restrictive housing.

These types of environments are harmful for all who live and work in them. Correctional officers may experience high rates of stress that can affect their physical and mental health and can also adversely affect their behaviors and relationships in both their professional and personal lives. Incarcerated people may live in fear and experience both vicarious and direct trauma that could compromise their mental and physical health and their ability to benefit from prison programs, education, and treatment opportunities.

These environments not only increase the likelihood of trauma but also hinder the ability of people who are incarcerated to develop prosocial ways of thinking, living, and interacting with others. These factors likely influence the high recidivism rate in the United States, along with the alarmingly high rates of correctional officer attrition in jails and prisons.

Despite this dire picture, examples from other countries demonstrate that correctional facilities can establish safer, more humane, and more restorative environments. Correctional agencies in the United States are beginning to pilot these models, and early indications suggest that these transformative settings offer promising alternatives to traditional prison and jail environments and operations.

Looking outside the United States for inspiration

In recent years, some U.S. correctional systems have looked toward Western European and Scandinavian countries for models that can transform the culture in prisons, making for more rehabilitative environments and promoting greater safety for all.

Countries like Denmark, Germany, Norway, and Sweden view prison as an opportunity to promote rehabilitation and a successful return to the community. The goal is not to inflict further punishment but rather to create a supportive environment that mirrors life outside prison as much as possible. This is accomplished through intensive rehabilitative services, a well-trained correctional workforce, and more humane prison conditions.

In Norway, for example, corrections officers are trained to play an active role in the rehabilitation of people in their custody and care, engaging them in health-focused programming, providing intensive mentorship, and modeling positive socialization. Officers employ incentives and motivational interviewing, a counselling method designed to coach individuals to acknowledge and draw from their strengths and reconsider ways of thinking that lead to negative and harmful behaviors.

According to Synøve Andersen, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oslo and a principal investigator on the Scandinavian Prison project evaluation, the increased global attention on Scandinavian correctional policies can, in part, be attributed to the country’s reported recidivism rates of 20-30% — considerably lower than those in the United States — and media attention on Norway’s Bastøy and Halden prisons.

Following the example of their Scandinavian counterparts, corrections leaders in at least a dozen U.S. states have implemented programs that incorporate aspects of Norway’s and Sweden’s correctional policies. While it is too early to assess the impacts of these new programs, these pilots illustrate new strategies to establish improved cultures and climates within American prisons and jails, holding promise for yielding better outcomes for those who work and are confined in them.

The following discussions detail two programs based on the Scandinavian model. One, Little Scandinavia, aims to impact staff safety and wellness and is currently used at a state correctional institution. The other, Amend, focuses on training and assistance for U.S. corrections officials.

Little Scandinavia: Incorporating Scandinavian concepts into a state correctional facility

At Pennsylvania’s Chester State Correctional Institution, corrections officials have partnered with researchers from Drexel University and the University of Oslo to incorporate concepts from Scandinavian prisons and evaluate their impact on the wellness of staff and incarcerated individuals, prison culture, and recidivism.

The “Little Scandinavia” unit looks unlike any other in the medium- security prison, boasting single cells, custom furniture, a communal kitchen, and an outdoor green space. Corrections officers on the Little Scandinavia project have traveled to Norway to work alongside peer mentors in their facilities. They have also received training in conflict resolution, suicide prevention, and other relevant skills.

In 2020, six men moved into Little Scandinavia as part of the pilot program. Although the program was delayed due to COVID-19, more participants were moved into Little Scandinavia throughout 2022, and the unit reached full capacity in November 2022.

New residents of Little Scandinavia are chosen through a lottery system, which ensures that anyone housed in SCI Chester is eligible.

“This is not an honor block. This is not a specialized housing unit. This is a general population housing unit that employs a very different model of corrections,” said Jordan Hyatt, a criminology and justice studies professor at Drexel University and a principal investigator on the Scandinavian Prison project evaluation.

Following the Scandinavian model, the unit benefits from a low ratio of staff to incarcerated men, with an average of one officer per every 64 men versus the typical ratio for SCI Chester of one officer to every 128 men.

Little Scandinavia embodies an effort to create a more humane prison environment, including a dramatic shift in how staff and the incarcerated population interact. The program is intended to allow everyone living and working in the unit to focus on successful reintegration into society.

Hyatt credits local and state corrections leaders for their strong support of Little Scandinavia, noting that it was of critical importance in starting the project. When it comes to challenging long-held beliefs of what corrections should look like, Hyatt says it is the correctional officers involved in Little Scandinavia who have demonstrated that such programs hold potential.

“The staff at the front lines of this project really are the ones who are the most responsible for carrying forward the cultural change. They are the best ambassadors for this project,” he said.

Amend Program offers international exchange and officer training

Amend is a program of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) that supports international exchange, officer training, and technical assistance designed to help U.S. departments of correction learn about and adopt practices from the Norwegian Correctional Service. Amend supports programs in California, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, and North Dakota.

Because U.S. and Norwegian cultures differ, Amend does not directly apply Norwegian correctional policy or practice to its programs. Instead, it draws inspiration for potential reforms from Norway’s approach.

For example, North Dakota correctional officials and staff members traveled to Norway in 2015. Following the trip, North Dakota enacted policy changes that reduced the use of solitary confinement by nearly 75% between 2016 and 2020.

The initial feedback on these efforts to reduce solitary confinement has been positive, according to North Dakota officials. Both incarcerated individuals and correctional staff report that the reforms are responsible for increased trust and reduced antagonism between the two groups.

Corrections staff have also reported enhanced job satisfaction, reduced stress, and increased safety. Meanwhile, corrections leaders say violent infractions have remained stable or even improved following the change to the solitary confinement policy.

Restoring promise: A promising model based on the “Normalization Principle”

Perhaps the most well-established institutional reform effort is the Restoring Promise initiative, a project led by the Vera Institute of Justice (Vera) and the MILPA Collective (MILPA), is a national initiative that works to transform the living and working conditions for people in jails and prisons, especially young adults.

Restoring Promise creates prison housing units grounded in human dignity for young adults between 18 to 25 years old. Following the “normalization principle,” Restoring Promise partners with departments of corrections to create environments in which young adults are guided by specially trained staff and mentors (older incarcerated people serving long or life sentences) to hold each other accountable for following a daily routine inside a facility. The program mirrors life on the outside as closely as possible and includes connecting with family and community regularly for support, resolving conflict without violence, and using restorative practices instead of punishment when community agreements (prison rules) are broken.

Restoring Promise sites support corrections professionals and mentors working as teams to create a supportive community environment. Everyone on the unit develops workshops and educational opportunities that help the young adults navigate prison successfully and prepare them for returning to their communities. Mentors and staff equip the young adults with practical, social, and emotional skills to earn a living and lead law-abiding, productive lives both behind bars and after release.

Restoring Promise supports young adult housing units in prisons in Connecticut, South Carolina, Colorado, North Dakota, South Carolina, and Idaho (currently in the planning stages), and a county jail in Massachusetts ( see Table 2: Restoring Promise Pilot Sites ). Across all locations, young adults have been charged with or convicted of various crimes, including serious offenses such as armed robbery and homicide. Staff and mentors are trained in restorative justice, young adult development, family engagement, and international and national best practices.

The Vera and MILPA staff spearheading these pilots are careful to note that Restoring Promise is a philosophy not a model. This allows the incarcerated people and correctional staff in each facility to co-create the specific ways in which the environment will be transformed, allowing for differences in correctional environments and engendering buy-in from those who reside and work in each unit.

A three-year randomized controlled trial funded by the National Institute of Justice, led by Vera in partnership with the MILPA Collective and in collaboration with the South Carolina Department of Corrections, found that residents who participated in Restoring Promise were 73% less likely to be convicted of a violent infraction after one year. Participating in the program was also associated with an 83% decrease in the odds of placement in restrictive housing, and there was no significant increase in misconduct. Additionally, correctional officers assigned to the housing unit implementing Restoring Promise — the Community Opportunity Restoration Enhancement (CORE) — at Turbeville Correctional Institution reported lower stress and greater quality of work life.

Specifically:

• 88% felt less stress working in the unit.
• 89% reported an improved quality of life.
• 91% felt that they had grown professionally.

The evaluation also compared outcomes for the control group from the randomized controlled trial and a matched group from general population. Results of this comparison indicate that those who applied to be housed in Restoring Promise units but were ultimately not placed there experience similar outcomes to those who do not apply. This indicates that the differences in outcomes observed in the randomized controlled trial are due to the Restoring Promise housing units and not to characteristics of who chose to apply. This finding offers strong evidence to support a new, scalable, and replicable model for improving safety in correctional settings.

Review the final report describing the evaluation as submitted to NIJ.

Complementary initiatives support transforming correctional culture and climate

Correctional agencies in the United States are making important strides to establish safer, more humane, and more restorative environments. Beyond the programs described above, other initiatives exist to help identify and share evidence-based practices and experiences in an effort to meet that goal.

In recognition that these new ways of thinking about prison environments require the buy in and support of correctional leaders, programs that connect corrections professionals, like the Prison Fellowship’s Warden Exchange program can provide a helpful foundation for spreading knowledge about emerging transformational programs. This program convenes wardens, deputy wardens, associate wardens, top corrections specialists and subject matter experts in a nine month leadership training program that examines and applies best practices for creating safer and more rehabilitative prisons.

Additionally, the Urban Institute’s Prison Research and Innovation Initiative, an effort to build evidence and spur innovation to make prisons more humane, safe, and rehabilitative environments, could also complement these pilots. The Initiative employs research that actively and inclusively engages all people closest to the issue — both those in confinement and staff of all levels and roles — to identify the problems and develop solutions that are research-informed and most likely to produce the desired impacts.

While these programs are just two examples of initiatives that aim to transform correctional culture and climate, the continued piloting of more humane living environments works to support the rehabilitation and success of incarcerated individuals as well as the safety of those working in correctional environments. The programs described here are an important step in advancing restorative justice and enhancing public safety.

About the author

Nancy La Vigne, Ph.D., is the director of the National Institute of Justice and is an expert on corrections policy and practice and a researcher in the field.

Cite this Article

Read more about:.

Following the people and events that make up the research community at Duke

What Comes Next for the Law of the Sea Treaty?

By Gabrielle Douglas

On April 15, 2024

In History , Law , Lecture , Oceans , Policy

More than 40 years since its signing, the United States still has not ratified an international agreement known as the “constitution of the oceans.” In a webinar held April 2, two of the world’s leading ocean diplomacy scholars met to discuss its history, challenges, and the U.S.’s potential role in the future.

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was truly revolutionary for its time. Unraveling against the backdrop of decades of conflict pertaining to maritime affairs, the significance of this conference and its attempts at negotiating a comprehensive legal framework cannot be understated. Key figures in this development include the members of the United Nations, coastal and landlocked states, the scientific community, environmental community, and developing nations. Yet, with the conclusion of this unifying conference, a singular question remained: What comes next? 

This question is what David Balton , the executive director of the U.S. Artic Steering Committee, and David Freestone , a Professor at George Washington University and the Executive Secretary of the Sargasso Sea Commission, aimed to address in a webinar titled, “ The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea at 40 .” In this discussion a range of topics were discussed but the primary focus was providing viewers with a comprehensive understanding of the events of this convention and the way this history plays out in modern times. 

The 1982 convention was one of multiple attempts at setting parameters and guidelines for maritime control. In 1958, the council met for the first time to discuss growing concerns regarding the need for a comprehensive legal framework regarding ocean governance. In this they brought multiple representatives worldwide to discuss the breadth of territorial waters, the rights of coastal states, freedom of navigation, and the exploitation of marine resources. This conversation laid the groundwork for future discussions. However, it was largely ineffective at generating a treaty as they were unable to reach a consensus on the breadth of territorial waters. This first conference is referred to as UNCLOS I. 

Following 1958, in 1960 the members of the council and associated parties convened once again to discuss the issues brought forth by UNCLOS I. The purpose of this conference was to further discuss issues pertaining to the Law of the Sea and build a framework to begin ratification of a binding treaty to ensure that conflict regarding the sea diminishes greatly. This discussion was set in the context of the Cold War. This new setting complicated discussions as talks regarding the implementation of nuclear weapons under the deep seabed further elicited great debate and tensions. While the aim of this meeting was of course to reach a general agreement on these subjects, major differences between states and other parties prohibited UNCLOS II from producing said treaty. 

UNCLOS III served as the breadwinner of this development, yet this is not to say that results were immediate. Negotiations for UNCLOS III were the longest of the three as they spanned from 1973 to 1982. UNCLOS II was particularly special due to its ability to produce revolutionary concepts such as archipelagic status and the establishment of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), granting coastal states exclusive rights over fishing and economic resources within 200 miles of their shores. In addition, this led to the development of the International Seabed Authority and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Despite the limitations and unfinished agenda that preceded this, the treaty was officially ratified in 1994 at Montego Bay. The convention initially received 157 signatories and currently holds participation from 169 parties. Absent from this group are the United States, Turkey, and Venezuela. The convention was designed to work as a package deal and required nations to fully commit to the agreement or abstain entirely. For this reason, the United States retains a nonparty, observer status despite to their adherence to the rules and guidelines of the treaty. 

After this explanation, Balton and Freestone addressed the big question: What comes next? As of right now, the United States is still not a signatory of this treaty. However, this is not to say that they are in violation of this treaty either. The United States participates in discussions and negotiations related to UNCLOS issues, both within the United Nations and through bilateral and multilateral engagements. In addition, the Navy still upholds international law in dealings concerning navigational rights. The one factor many claims prohibits the United States from signing is the possibility of their sovereignty being challenged by certain provisions within the treaty. In spite of this, many continue to push to change this reality, advocating for the United States to ratify this agreement. 

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea remains a pivotal moment in the history of international maritime governance. This Convention led to many insightful and necessary developments which will continue to set precedent for generations to come. While imperfect, the efforts put forth by many nations and third parties to ensure that it remains consistent with modern day times is very telling of the hopeful development of this treaty. Furthermore, while the future of U.S. involvement in the treaty is uncertain, the frameworks established by the three UNCLOS’ provide a solid foundation for addressing contemporary challenges and furthering international cooperation. 

We Are Killing Birds. Solutions Exist. Research Can Help.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

Articles on Culture and society

Displaying all articles.

Foy & Gibson’s 8,100,000 miles of yarn: how Australians were sold ‘fashionable’ (and ‘healthy’) wool 100 years ago

Lorinda Cramer , Deakin University

50 years on, Advance Australia Fair no longer reflects the values of many. What could replace it?

Wendy Hargreaves , University of Southern Queensland

Will you be this year’s ‘April fish’? Businesses have a long history of using April Fools’ Day to try and prank us all

Gary Mortimer , Queensland University of Technology

Women have been excluded from men’s spaces for centuries. That’s why the MONA Ladies Lounge matters

Catharine Lumby , University of Sydney

Where’s Kate? Speculation over the ‘missing’ princess proves the Palace’s media playbook needs a  re-write

Naomi Smith , University of the Sunshine Coast and Amy Clarke , University of the Sunshine Coast

Jean-Luc Godard: how his prickly fragmented filmmaking asked all the right questions

Alison Smith , University of Liverpool

Related Topics

• April Fools’ Day
• Australian history
• Kate Middleton
• National anthem
• National identity
• Visual art and design

Top contributors

Lecturer, Cultural Heritage and Museum Studies, Deakin University

Senior Lecturer in History, specialising in built heritage and material culture, University of the Sunshine Coast

Senior Learning Advisor, University of Southern Queensland

Lecturer in European Film Studies, University of Liverpool

Professor of Media, Department of Media, University of Sydney

Professor of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour, Queensland University of Technology

Lecturer in Sociology, University of the Sunshine Coast

• X (Twitter)
• Unfollow topic Follow topic

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Best Practices for Optimizing Law Enforcement Job Descriptions to Recruit Diverse Candidates

This publication reports on research designed to explore the impacts of job descriptions on law enforcement job applications, especially among women; it describes the research methodology and findings, makes recommendations for job descriptions to attract more diverse candidates, and provides example content.

Research indicates that subtle wording choices can impact how prospective applicants perceive advertised jobs and can play a key role in socializing potential applicants to law enforcement agency culture. This document discusses a study conducted by RTI International that explores the impacts of variations on job descriptions that followed standard, diversity-oriented, or policy-oriented wording. The standard wording included the minimum information typically found in policing job descriptions; diversity-oriented wording included information in the standard description along with language that alluded to the agency’s commitment to recruiting diverse applicants and an equal opportunity employer statement; and the policy-oriented wording included information in the standard description along with highlighting the agency’s commitment to work-life balance, listed parental leave under the described benefits, and included academy programs that supported trainees meeting the physical requirements. Findings indicated that the content of the job description was related to several important aspects of applicant perceptions of policing jobs, and women were especially impacted by the changes in the job description language. The document provides six recommendations, followed by specific examples. to help agencies take immediate action regarding job description wording, based on the research findings.

Additional Details

Related topics, similar publications.

• Expert Algorithm for Substance Identification (EASI)
• Understanding What Works in the Identification, Investigation, and Prosecution of Labor Trafficking Cases in the United States: Improving Collaboration Between Law Enforcement Agencies and Departments of Labor Key Findings and Recommendations

Read our research on: Gun Policy | International Conflict | Election 2024

Regions & Countries

7 facts about americans and taxes.

Spring reliably brings a whirlwind of number-crunching and form-filing as Americans finish their tax returns. Altogether, the IRS expects to process more than 160 million individual and business tax returns this season.

Ahead of Tax Day on April 15, here are seven facts about Americans and federal taxes, drawn from Pew Research Center surveys and analyses of federal data.

Ahead of Tax Day 2024, Pew Research Center sought to understand Americans’ views of the federal tax system and outline some of its features.

The public opinion data in this analysis comes from Pew Research Center surveys. Links to these surveys, including details about their methodologies, are available in the text.

The external data comes from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and the IRS Data Book . Data is reported by fiscal year, which for the federal government begins Oct. 1 and ends Sept. 30. For example, fiscal 2024 began Oct. 1, 2023, and ends Sept. 30, 2024.

A majority of Americans feel that corporations and wealthy people don’t pay their fair share in taxes, according to a Center survey from spring 2023 . About six-in-ten U.S. adults say they’re bothered a lot by the feeling that some corporations (61%) and some wealthy people (60%) don’t pay their fair share.

Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to feel this way. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, about three-quarters say they’re bothered a lot by the feeling that some corporations (77%) and some wealthy people (77%) don’t pay their fair share. Much smaller shares of Republicans and GOP leaners share these views (46% say this about corporations and 43% about the wealthy).

Meanwhile, about two-thirds of Americans (65%) support raising tax rates on large businesses and corporations, and a similar share (61%) support raising tax rates on households with annual incomes over $400,000. Democrats are much more likely than Republicans to say these tax rates should increase.

Just over half of U.S. adults feel they personally pay more than what is fair, considering what they get in return from the federal government, according to the same survey.

This sentiment has grown more widespread in recent years: 56% of Americans now say they pay more than their fair share in taxes, up from 49% in 2021. Roughly a third (34%) say they pay about the right amount, and 8% say they pay less than their fair share.

Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say they pay more than their fair share (63% vs. 50%), though the share of Democrats who feel this way has risen since 2021. (The share among Republicans is statistically unchanged from 2021.)

Many Americans are frustrated by the complexity of the federal tax system, according to the same survey. About half (53%) say its complexity bothers them a lot. Of the aspects of the federal tax system that we asked about, this was the top frustration among Republicans – 59% say it bothers them a lot, compared with 49% of Democrats.

Undeniably, the federal tax code is a massive document, and it has only gotten longer over time. The printed 2022 edition of the Internal Revenue Code clocks in at 4,192 pages, excluding front matter. Income tax law alone accounts for over half of those pages (2,544).

The public is divided in its views of the IRS. In a separate spring 2023 Center survey , 51% of Americans said they have an unfavorable opinion of the government tax agency, while 42% had a favorable view of the IRS. Still, of the 16 federal agencies and departments we asked about, the IRS was among the least popular on the list.

Views of the IRS differ greatly by party:

• Among Republicans, 29% have a favorable view and 64% have an unfavorable view.
• Among Democrats, it’s 53% favorable and 40% unfavorable.

On balance, Democrats offer much more positive opinions than Republicans when it comes to most of the federal agencies we asked about. Even so, the IRS ranks near the bottom of their list.

Individual income taxes are by far the government’s largest single source of revenue, according to estimates from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The federal government expects to collect about $2.5 trillion in individual income taxes in fiscal year 2024. That accounts for nearly half (49%) of its total estimated receipts for the year. The next largest chunk comes from Social Security taxes (including those for disability and retirement programs), which are projected to pull in $1.2 trillion this fiscal year (24%).

By comparison, corporate income taxes are estimated to bring in $612.8 billion, or 12% of this fiscal year’s federal receipts. And excise taxes – which include things like transportation trust fund revenue and taxes on alcohol, tobacco and crude oil – are expected to come to $99.7 billion, or 2% of receipts.

American tax dollars mostly go to social services. Human services – including education, health, Social Security, Medicare, income security and veterans benefits – together will account for 66% ($4.6 trillion) of federal government spending in fiscal 2024, according to OMB estimates.

An estimated 13% ($907.7 billion) will go toward defense spending. Another 13% ($888.6 billion) will repay net interest on government debt, and 10% ($726.9 billion) will fund all other functions, including energy, transportation, agriculture and more.

Related: 6 facts about Americans’ views of government spending and the deficit

The vast majority of Americans e-file their taxes, according to IRS data . In fiscal 2022, 150.6 million individual federal income tax returns were filed electronically, accounting for 94% of all individual filings that year.

Unsurprisingly, e-filing has become more popular since the turn of the century. Fiscal 2000, the earliest year for which comparable data is available, saw 35.4 million individual income tax returns filed electronically (including those filed over the phone). These accounted for just 28% of individual filings that year.

By fiscal 2005, more than half of individual income tax returns (52%) were filed electronically.

Note: This is an update combining information from two posts originally published in 2014 and 2015.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivered Saturday mornings

Top tax frustrations for Americans: The feeling that some corporations, wealthy people don’t pay fair share

Growing partisan divide over fairness of the nation’s tax system, public has mixed expectations for new tax law, most popular.

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .