descriptive essay on economics

Researching and writing for Economics students

3 economics: methods, approaches, fields and relevant questions, 3.1 economic theory and empirical work: what is it.

What is economic theory and what can it do?

Unlike “theory” in some other social science disciplines, economic theory is mostly based on mathematical modelling and rigorous proof that certain conclusions or results can be derived from certain assumptions. But theory alone can say little about the real world.

In Economics: Models = Theory = Mathematics… for the most part.

What is empirical work and what can it do?

In contrast, empirical work gathers evidence from the real world, usually organized into systematic data sets.

It tries to bring evidence to refute or substantiate economics theory,

It tries to estimate parameters such as price elasticity or the government spending multiplier in specific contexts

It rigorously presents broad “stylized facts”, providing a clear picture of a market, industry, or situation

Much empirical work itself relies on assumptions, either assumptions from economic theory, or assumptions about the data itself, or both. But empirical work does not “prove” anything. Instead, it presents evidence in favour of or against certain hypotheses, estimates parameters, and can, using the classical statistical framework, reject (or fail to reject) certain null hypotheses. What “rejecting” means is “if the assumptions underlying my estimation technique are correct, then it is highly unlikely that the null hypothesis holds.”

3.2 Normative vs. Positive

The word ‘Normative’, also called ‘prescriptive’, often refers to what ought to be, what an ideal policy would be, or how to think about judging whether this is a justifiable welfare function.

“Positive” work claims to be value-neutral and to address what is or what must be going on in the real world. Most modern economists would probably claim their work is “positive”, and in this sense, “prescriptive” is often used as a pejorative, In my experience. However, prescriptive papers can be very valuable if done well.

Note: There is also another context in which you will hear the expression ‘normative analysis.’ This may also be used to describe microeconomic analysis derived from the axioms of rational optimising behavior; this describes much of what you have covered in your textbook. This dual meaning of the word ‘normative’ is admittedly confusing!

3.3 Theoretical vs. Empirical (techniques)

Papers that use theory (modeling) as a technique typically start from a series of assumptions and try to derive results simply from these assumptions. They may motivate their focus or assumptions using previous empirical work and anecdotes, but these papers do not use themselves data nor do they do what we call “econometrics”. Remember that in Economics “theory papers” are usually highly mathematical and formal.

Empirical papers use evidence from the real world, usually to test hypotheses, but also to generate description and help formulate ideas and hypotheses.

3.4 Theoretical vs. Applied (focus)

“Theoretical” can also be used to describe a paper’s focus; a theoretical paper in this sense will address fundamentals of economic modeling. In theory, these may be widely applied across a range of fields, but they do not typically address any single issue of policy or focus on a specific industry. These papers are often very difficult to read and there is argument about whether many such papers will ultimately “trickle-down” to having practical use. These papers typically used theory and modeling techniques rather than empirics. However some empirical papers may be aimed at addressing fundamental theoretical issues and parameters.

Papers with an “applied” focus will directly target a policy issue or a puzzle or question about the functioning of certain market or nonmarket interactions. Nearly all of the papers you will read and work on as an undergraduate are “applied” in this sense.

3.5 Categories of empirical approaches

“causal” vs. “descriptive”.

“Causal” papers try to get at whether one factor or event “A” can be seen to directly “cause” an outcome “B”. For example, “does an individual getting more years of schooling lead him or her to have higher income, on average?” A good way to think about this conception of causality is to consider the counterfactual: if a typical person who received a university degree had been randomly selected to not get this education, would her income have been lower than it now is? Similarly (but not identically) if the typical person without his education had been randomly input into a university program, would her income now be greater?

Since the real world does not usually present such clean experiments, “causal” empirical researchers rely on various techniques which usually themselves depend on" identification assumptions." See, for example, control strategies, difference in difference, and instrumental variables techniques.

“Descriptive” papers essentially aim to present a picture of “what the data looks like” in an informative way. Causal relationships may be suggested but the authors are not making a strong claim that they can identify these. They may present a data-driven portrait of an industry, of wealth and inequality in a country or globally over time, of particular patterns and trends in consumption, of a panel of governments’ monetary and fiscal policy, etc. They may focus on the ‘functional form’ of relationships in the data and the ‘residual’ or ‘error structure. They may hint at causal relationships or propose a governing model. They may identify a ’puzzle’ in the data (e.g., the ‘equity premium puzzle’) and propose potential explanations. They may use the data to ‘provide support’ for these explanations. 5 They may devote much of the paper to providing a theoretical explanation (remember, in Economics these are usually mathematical models) for the pattern. They may also run statistical tests and report confidence intervals; one can establish a ‘statistically significant’ relationship between two variables even if the relationship is not (necessarily) causal. This is particular important when one sees the data as subject to measurement error and/or as a sample from a larger population. E.g., just because age and wealth (or height and head-size, or political affiliation and food-preference) are strongly related to one another in a random representative sample of 10 people does not mean they are strongly related to one another in the entire population . 6

Structural vs. Reduced Form

This is a rather complicated issue, and there are long debates over the merits of each approach.

In brief, structural empirical papers might be said to use theory to derive necessary relationships between variables and appropriate functional forms, often as part of a system of questions describing a broad model. They then “take this model to the data”, and estimate certain parameters; these estimates rely on the key structural assumptions and the chosen functional form (which is often selected for convenience) holding in the real world. They may also try to check how “robust” the estimates are to alternate assumptions and forms. Structural estimates can then be used to make precise predictions and welfare calculations.

Reduced form work may begin with some theoretical modeling but it will not usually try to estimate the model directly. Reduced form work often involves estimating single equations which may be “partial equilibrium”, and they may often use linear regression and interpret it as a “best linear approximation” to the true unknown functional form. Reduced form researchers often claim that results are “more robust” than structural work, while proponents of structural work may claim that reduced form econometrics is not theoretically grounded and thus meaningless.

Most of you are likely to focus on reduced form empirical work.

Quantitative vs. qualitative (the latter is rare in economics)

Quantitative research deals with data that can be quantified, i.e., expressed in terms of numbers and strict categories, often with hierarchical relationships.

Qualitative research is rarely done in modern economics. It relies on “softer” forms of data like interviews that cannot be reduced to a number or parameter, and cannot be dealt with using statistical techniques.

3.6 Methodological research

Methodological research is aimed at producing and evaluating techniques and approaches that can be used by other researchers. Most methodological research in economics is done by econometricians, who develop and evaluate techniques for estimating relationships using data.

3.7 Fields of economics, and some classic questions asked in each field

Economics is about choices under conditions of scarcity, the interaction of individuals governments and firms, and the consequences of these. [citation needed]

Microeconomics

Preferences and choices under constraints ; e.g., “how do risk-averse individuals choose among a set of uncertain gambles?” … “How does consumption of leisure change in response to an increase in the VAT?”

Game theory, interactions ; … “How do individuals coordinate in ‘stag hunt’ games, and are these equilibria robust to small errors?”

Mechanism design and contract theory ; … “How can a performance scheme be designed to induce the optimal level of effort with asymmetric information about ability?”

Equilibrium ; … “Is the general equilibrium of an economy with indivisible goods Pareto optimal?”

Macroeconomics

Stabilisation ; … “how do changes in the level of government spending affect the changes in the rate of unemployment?”

Growth ; …“Why did GDP per capita increase in Western Europe between 1950 and 1980?”

Aggregates, stocks, and flows ; … “Does a trade deficit lead to the government budget deficit, or vice/versa, (or both, or neither)?”

Money and Banking … “Does deposit insurance decrease the likelihood of a bank run?”

Financial Economics (not as broad as the first two)

“Can an investor use publicly-available information be used to systematically earn supernormal profits?” (the Efficient Markets Hypothesis)

Econometrics (methods/technique)

“What is the lowest mean squared error unbiased estimator of a gravity equation?”

Experimental economics (a technique)

Do laboratory subjects (usually students) coordinate on the efficient equilibrium in `stag hunt’ games? Do stronger incentives increase their likelihood this type of play?

Behavioural economics (an alternate approach to micro)

“Can individual choices over time be rationalised by standard exponential discounting, or do they follow another model, such as time inconsistent preferences and hyperbolic discounting?”

Applied fields

Development.

“Has the legacy of British institutions increased or decrease the level of GDP in former colonies?”

“Do greater unemployment benefits increase the length of an unemployment spell, and if so, to what extent?”

“Does public support for education increase or decrease income inequality?”

“Why did the industrial revolution first occur in Britain rather than in another country?”

“Are protectionist infant industry policies’ usually successful in fostering growth?”

International

“Do floating (rather than fixed) exchange rates lead to macroeconomic instability?”

Environmental

“What is the appropriate discount rate to use for considering costly measures to reduce carbon emissions?”

Industrial Organization

“Do firms innovate more or less when they have greater market power in an industry?”

“Do ‘single payer’ health care plans like the NHS provide basic health care services more or less efficiently then policies of mandated insurance and regulated exchanges like in the Netherlands?”

A more extensive definition and discussion of fields is in Appendix A of “Writing Economics”

Do you know?…

Which type of analysis typically uses the most ‘difficult, formal’ maths? 7

• Microeconomic theory
• Applied econometric analysis
• Descriptive macroeconomics

Another use of data: ‘calibrating’ models aka ‘calibration exercises’; I will not discuss this at the moment. ↩

Sometimes this can be confusing, particularly when the data seems to represent the entire ‘population’ of interest, such as an industry’s price and sales data in a relevant period. Without getting into an extensive discussion of the meaning of probability and statistics, I will suggest that we can see this as a ‘sample of the prices and sales that could have ocurred in any possible universe, or over a period of many years’. Ouch, this gets thorny, and there are strong debates in the Statistics world about this stuff. ↩

Answer: 1. Microeconomic theory ↩

1.1 What Is Economics, and Why Is It Important?

Learning objectives.

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Discuss the importance of studying economics
• Explain the relationship between production and division of labor
• Evaluate the significance of scarcity

Economics is the study of how humans make decisions in the face of scarcity. These can be individual decisions, family decisions, business decisions or societal decisions. If you look around carefully, you will see that scarcity is a fact of life. Scarcity means that human wants for goods, services and resources exceed what is available. Resources, such as labor, tools, land, and raw materials are necessary to produce the goods and services we want but they exist in limited supply. Of course, the ultimate scarce resource is time- everyone, rich or poor, has just 24 expendable hours in the day to earn income to acquire goods and services, for leisure time, or for sleep. At any point in time, there is only a finite amount of resources available.

Think about it this way: In 2015 the labor force in the United States contained over 158 million workers, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The total land area was 3,794,101 square miles. While these are certainly large numbers, they are not infinite. Because these resources are limited, so are the numbers of goods and services we produce with them. Combine this with the fact that human wants seem to be virtually infinite, and you can see why scarcity is a problem.

Introduction to FRED

Data is very important in economics because it describes and measures the issues and problems that economics seek to understand. A variety of government agencies publish economic and social data. For this course, we will generally use data from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank's FRED database. FRED is very user friendly. It allows you to display data in tables or charts, and you can easily download it into spreadsheet form if you want to use the data for other purposes. The FRED website includes data on nearly 400,000 domestic and international variables over time, in the following broad categories:

• Money, Banking & Finance
• Population, Employment, & Labor Markets (including Income Distribution)
• National Accounts (Gross Domestic Product & its components), Flow of Funds, and International Accounts
• Production & Business Activity (including Business Cycles)
• Prices & Inflation (including the Consumer Price Index, the Producer Price Index, and the Employment Cost Index)
• International Data from other nations
• U.S. Regional Data
• Academic Data (including Penn World Tables & NBER Macrohistory database)

For more information about how to use FRED, see the variety of videos on YouTube starting with this introduction.

If you still do not believe that scarcity is a problem, consider the following: Does everyone require food to eat? Does everyone need a decent place to live? Does everyone have access to healthcare? In every country in the world, there are people who are hungry, homeless (for example, those who call park benches their beds, as Figure 1.2 shows), and in need of healthcare, just to focus on a few critical goods and services. Why is this the case? It is because of scarcity. Let’s delve into the concept of scarcity a little deeper, because it is crucial to understanding economics.

The Problem of Scarcity

Think about all the things you consume: food, shelter, clothing, transportation, healthcare, and entertainment. How do you acquire those items? You do not produce them yourself. You buy them. How do you afford the things you buy? You work for pay. If you do not, someone else does on your behalf. Yet most of us never have enough income to buy all the things we want. This is because of scarcity. So how do we solve it?

Visit this website to read about how the United States is dealing with scarcity in resources.

Every society, at every level, must make choices about how to use its resources. Families must decide whether to spend their money on a new car or a fancy vacation. Towns must choose whether to put more of the budget into police and fire protection or into the school system. Nations must decide whether to devote more funds to national defense or to protecting the environment. In most cases, there just isn’t enough money in the budget to do everything. How do we use our limited resources the best way possible, that is, to obtain the most goods and services we can? There are a couple of options. First, we could each produce everything we each consume. Alternatively, we could each produce some of what we want to consume, and “trade” for the rest of what we want. Let’s explore these options. Why do we not each just produce all of the things we consume? Think back to pioneer days, when individuals knew how to do so much more than we do today, from building their homes, to growing their crops, to hunting for food, to repairing their equipment. Most of us do not know how to do all—or any—of those things, but it is not because we could not learn. Rather, we do not have to. The reason why is something called the division and specialization of labor , a production innovation first put forth by Adam Smith ( Figure 1.3 ) in his book, The Wealth of Nations .

The Division of and Specialization of Labor

The formal study of economics began when Adam Smith (1723–1790) published his famous book The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Many authors had written on economics in the centuries before Smith, but he was the first to address the subject in a comprehensive way. In the first chapter, Smith introduces the concept of division of labor , which means that the way one produces a good or service is divided into a number of tasks that different workers perform, instead of all the tasks being done by the same person.

To illustrate division of labor, Smith counted how many tasks went into making a pin: drawing out a piece of wire, cutting it to the right length, straightening it, putting a head on one end and a point on the other, and packaging pins for sale, to name just a few. Smith counted 18 distinct tasks that different people performed—all for a pin, believe it or not!

Modern businesses divide tasks as well. Even a relatively simple business like a restaurant divides the task of serving meals into a range of jobs like top chef, sous chefs, less-skilled kitchen help, servers to wait on the tables, a greeter at the door, janitors to clean up, and a business manager to handle paychecks and bills—not to mention the economic connections a restaurant has with suppliers of food, furniture, kitchen equipment, and the building where it is located. A complex business like a large manufacturing factory, such as the shoe factory ( Figure 1.4 ), or a hospital can have hundreds of job classifications.

Why the Division of Labor Increases Production

When we divide and subdivide the tasks involved with producing a good or service, workers and businesses can produce a greater quantity of output. In his observations of pin factories, Smith noticed that one worker alone might make 20 pins in a day, but that a small business of 10 workers (some of whom would need to complete two or three of the 18 tasks involved with pin-making), could make 48,000 pins in a day. How can a group of workers, each specializing in certain tasks, produce so much more than the same number of workers who try to produce the entire good or service by themselves? Smith offered three reasons.

First, specialization in a particular small job allows workers to focus on the parts of the production process where they have an advantage. (In later chapters, we will develop this idea by discussing comparative advantage .) People have different skills, talents, and interests, so they will be better at some jobs than at others. The particular advantages may be based on educational choices, which are in turn shaped by interests and talents. Only those with medical degrees qualify to become doctors, for instance. For some goods, geography affects specialization. For example, it is easier to be a wheat farmer in North Dakota than in Florida, but easier to run a tourist hotel in Florida than in North Dakota. If you live in or near a big city, it is easier to attract enough customers to operate a successful dry cleaning business or movie theater than if you live in a sparsely populated rural area. Whatever the reason, if people specialize in the production of what they do best, they will be more effective than if they produce a combination of things, some of which they are good at and some of which they are not.

Second, workers who specialize in certain tasks often learn to produce more quickly and with higher quality. This pattern holds true for many workers, including assembly line laborers who build cars, stylists who cut hair, and doctors who perform heart surgery. In fact, specialized workers often know their jobs well enough to suggest innovative ways to do their work faster and better.

A similar pattern often operates within businesses. In many cases, a business that focuses on one or a few products (sometimes called its “ core competency ”) is more successful than firms that try to make a wide range of products.

Third, specialization allows businesses to take advantage of economies of scale , which means that for many goods, as the level of production increases, the average cost of producing each individual unit declines. For example, if a factory produces only 100 cars per year, each car will be quite expensive to make on average. However, if a factory produces 50,000 cars each year, then it can set up an assembly line with huge machines and workers performing specialized tasks, and the average cost of production per car will be lower. The ultimate result of workers who can focus on their preferences and talents, learn to do their specialized jobs better, and work in larger organizations is that society as a whole can produce and consume far more than if each person tried to produce all of their own goods and services. The division and specialization of labor has been a force against the problem of scarcity.

Trade and Markets

Specialization only makes sense, though, if workers can use the pay they receive for doing their jobs to purchase the other goods and services that they need. In short, specialization requires trade.

You do not have to know anything about electronics or sound systems to play music—you just buy an iPod or MP3 player, download the music, and listen. You do not have to know anything about artificial fibers or the construction of sewing machines if you need a jacket—you just buy the jacket and wear it. You do not need to know anything about internal combustion engines to operate a car—you just get in and drive. Instead of trying to acquire all the knowledge and skills involved in producing all of the goods and services that you wish to consume, the market allows you to learn a specialized set of skills and then use the pay you receive to buy the goods and services you need or want. This is how our modern society has evolved into a strong economy.

Why Study Economics?

Now that you have an overview on what economics studies, let’s quickly discuss why you are right to study it. Economics is not primarily a collection of facts to memorize, although there are plenty of important concepts to learn. Instead, think of economics as a collection of questions to answer or puzzles to work. Most importantly, economics provides the tools to solve those puzzles.

Consider the complex and critical issue of education barriers on national and regional levels, which affect millions of people and result in widespread poverty and inequality. Governments, aid organizations, and wealthy individuals spend billions of dollars each year trying to address these issues. Nations announce the revitalization of their education programs; tech companies donate devices and infrastructure, and celebrities and charities build schools and sponsor students. Yet the problems remain, sometimes almost as pronounced as they were before the intervention. Why is that the case? In 2019, three economists—Esther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee, and Michael Kremer—were awarded the Nobel Prize for their work to answer those questions. They worked diligently to break the widespread problems into smaller pieces, and experimented with small interventions to test success. The award citation credited their work with giving the world better tools and information to address poverty and improve education. Esther Duflo, who is the youngest person and second woman to win the Nobel Prize in Economics, said, "We believed that like the war on cancer, the war on poverty was not going to be won in one major battle, but in a series of small triumphs. . . . This work and the culture of learning that it fostered in governments has led to real improvement in the lives of hundreds of millions of poor people.”

As you can see, economics affects far more than business. For example:

• Virtually every major problem facing the world today, from global warming, to world poverty, to the conflicts in Syria, Afghanistan, and Somalia, has an economic dimension. If you are going to be part of solving those problems, you need to be able to understand them. Economics is crucial.
• It is hard to overstate the importance of economics to good citizenship. You need to be able to vote intelligently on budgets, regulations, and laws in general. When the U.S. government came close to a standstill at the end of 2012 due to the “fiscal cliff,” what were the issues? Did you know?
• A basic understanding of economics makes you a well-rounded thinker. When you read articles about economic issues, you will understand and be able to evaluate the writer’s argument. When you hear classmates, co-workers, or political candidates talking about economics, you will be able to distinguish between common sense and nonsense. You will find new ways of thinking about current events and about personal and business decisions, as well as current events and politics.

The study of economics does not dictate the answers, but it can illuminate the different choices.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/principles-economics-3e/pages/1-introduction

• Authors: Steven A. Greenlaw, David Shapiro, Daniel MacDonald
• Publisher/website: OpenStax
• Book title: Principles of Economics 3e
• Publication date: Dec 14, 2022
• Location: Houston, Texas
• Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/principles-economics-3e/pages/1-introduction
• Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/principles-economics-3e/pages/1-1-what-is-economics-and-why-is-it-important

© Jan 23, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.

The Young Economist’s Short Guide to Writing Economic Research

Attributes of writing economics.

• The discourse is often mathematical, with lots of formulas, lemmas, and proofs.
• Writing styles vary widely. Some authors are very dry and technical while a few are quite eloquent.

Economics writing is different from many other types of writing. It is essentially technical, and the primary goal is to achieve clarity. A clear presentation will allow the strength of your underlying analysis and the quality of your research to shine through.

Unlike prose writing in other disciplines, economics research takes time. Successful papers are not cranked out the night before a due date.

General Guidelines for Quality Research

Getting started.

The hardest part of any writing assignment is starting. Economics research usually begins with a strong understanding of literature, and papers require a section that summarizes and applies previous literature to what the paper at hand. This is the best way to start.

Your writing will demonstrate that you understand the findings that relate to the topic.

Economists use the first few paragraphs to set up research questions and the model and data they use to think about it. Sure, it can be dry, but this format ensures the write and reader have strong grasp on the subject and structure of the work that follows.

Clear and Concise Work

Clarity is hard to achieve, but revising and reworking a paper ensures it is easy to read

• Organize your ideas into an argument with the help of an outline.
• Define the important terms you will use
• State your hypothesis and proceed deductively to reach your conclusions
• Avoid excess verbiage
• Edit yourself, remove what is not needed, and keep revising until you get down to a simple, efficient way of communicating
• Use the active voice
• Put statements in positive form
• Omit needless words (concise writing is clear writing)
• In summaries, generally stick to one tense

Time Management

Poor time management can wreck the best-planned papers. Deadlines are key to successful research papers.

• Start the project by finding your topic
• Begin your research
• Start and outline
• Write a draft
• Revise and polish

The Language of Economic Analysis

Economic theory has become very mathematical. Most PhD students are mathematicians, not simply economics majors. This means most quality economic research requires a strong use of mathematical language. Economic analysis is characterized by the use of models, simplified representations of how economic phenomena work. A model’s predictions about the future or the past are essentially empirical hypotheses. Since economics is not easily tested in controlled experiments, research requires data from the real world (census reports, balance sheets), and statistical methods (regressions and econometrics) to test the predictive power of models and hypotheses based on those models.

The Writing Process

Finding a topic.

There are a million ways to find a topic. It may be that you are writing for a specific subfield of economics, so topics are limited and thus easier to pick. However, must research starts organically, from passive reading or striking news articles. Make sure to find something that interests you. Be sure to find a niche and make a contribution to the subfield.

You will also need a project that can be done within the parameters of the assignment (length, due date, access to research materials). A profoundly interesting topic may not be manageable given the time and other constraints you face. The key is to just be practical.

Be sure to start your research as soon as possible. Your topic will evolve along the way, and the question you begin with may become less interesting as new information draws you in other directions. It is perfectly fine to shape your topic based on available data, but don’t get caught up in endlessly revising topics.

Finding and Using Sources

There are two types of economic sources: empirical data (information that is or can be easily translated into numerical form), and academic literature (books and articles that help you organize your ideas).

Economic data is compiled into a number of useful secondary sources:

• Economic Report of the President
• Statistical Abstract of the United States
• National Longitudinal Survey
• Census data
• Academic journals

The Outline

A good outline acts as an agenda for the things you want to accomplish:

• Introduction: Pose an interesting question or problem
• Literature Review: Survey the literature on your topic
• Methods/Data: Formulate your hypothesis and describe your data
• Results: Present your results with the help of graphs and charts
• Discussion: Critique your method and/or discuss any policy implications
• Conclusions: Summarize what you have done; pose questions for further research

Writing a Literature Review

The literature review demonstrates your familiarity with scholarly work on your topic and lays the foundations for your paper. The particular issues you intent to raise, the terms you will employ, and the approach you will take should be defined with reference to previous scholarly works.

Presenting a Hypothesis

Formulate a question, problem or conjecture, and describe the approach you will take to answer, solve, or test it. In presenting your hypothesis, you need to discuss the data set you are using and the type of regression you will run. You should say where you found the data, and use a table, graph, or simple statistics to summarize them. In term papers, it may not be possible to reach conclusive results. Don’t be afraid to state this clearly and accurately. It is okay to have an inconclusive paper, but it is not okay to make overly broad and unsupported statements.

Presenting Results

There are essentially two decisions to make: (1) How many empirical results should be presented, and (2) How should these results be described in the text?

• Focus only on what is important and be as clear as possible. Both smart and dumb readers will appreciate you pointing things out directly and clearly.
• Less is usually more: Reporting a small group of relevant results is better than covering every possible statistical analysis that could be made on the data.
• Clearly and precisely describe your tables, graphs, and figures in the text of your results section. The first and last sentence in a paragraph describing a result should be “big picture” statements, describing how the results in the table, graph or figure fit into the overall theme of the paper.

Discussing Results

The key to discussing results is to stay clear of making value judgments, and rely instead on economic facts and analyses. It is not the job of an economist to draw policy conclusions, even if the research supports strong evidence in a particular direction.

Referencing Sources

As with any research paper, source referencing depends on the will of a professor a discourse community. However, economists generally use soft references in the literature review section and then cite sources in conventional formats at the end of papers.

This guide was made possible by the excellent work of Robert Neugeboren and Mireille Jacobson of Harvard University and Paul Dudenhefer of Duke University.

Mailing Address

Pomona College 333 N. College Way Claremont , CA 91711

Get in touch

Give back to pomona.

Part of   The Claremont Colleges

Economics Essay Examples

Ace Your Essay With Our Economics Essay Examples

Published on: Jun 6, 2023

Last updated on: Jan 31, 2024

Share this article

Are you struggling to understand economics essays and how to write your own?

It can be challenging to grasp the complexities of economic concepts without practical examples.

But don’t worry! 

We’ve got the solution you've been looking for. Explore quality examples that bridge the gap between theory and real-world applications. In addition, get insightful tips for writing economics essays.

So, if you're a student aiming for academic success, this blog is your go-to resource for mastering economics essays.

Let’s dive in and get started!

On This Page On This Page -->

What is an Economics Essay?

An economics essay is a written piece that explores economic theories, concepts, and their real-world applications. It involves analyzing economic issues, presenting arguments, and providing evidence to support ideas. 

The goal of an economics essay is to demonstrate an understanding of economic principles and the ability to critically evaluate economic topics.

Why Write an Economics Essay?

Writing an economics essay serves multiple purposes:

• Demonstrate Understanding: Showcasing your comprehension of economic concepts and their practical applications.
• Develop Critical Thinking: Cultivating analytical skills to evaluate economic issues from different perspectives.
• Apply Theory to Real-World Contexts: Bridging the gap between economic theory and real-life scenarios.
• Enhance Research and Analysis Skills: Improving abilities to gather and interpret economic data.
• Prepare for Academic and Professional Pursuits: Building a foundation for success in future economics-related endeavors.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

If you’re wondering, ‘how do I write an economics essay?’, consulting an example essay might be a good option for you. Here are some economics essay examples:

Short Essay About Economics

A Level Economics Essay Examples

Here is an essay on economics a level structure:

Band 6 Economics Essay Examples

Here are some downloadable economics essays:

Economics essay pdf

Economics essay introduction

Economics Extended Essay Examples

In an economics extended essay, students have the opportunity to delve into a specific economic topic of interest. They are required to conduct an in-depth analysis of this topic and compile a lengthy essay. 

Here are some potential economics extended essay question examples:

• How does foreign direct investment impact economic growth in developing countries?
• What are the factors influencing consumer behavior and their effects on market demand for sustainable products?
• To what extent does government intervention in the form of minimum wage policies affect employment levels and income inequality?
• What are the economic consequences of implementing a carbon tax to combat climate change?
• How does globalization influence income distribution and the wage gap in developed economies?

IB Economics Extended Essay Examples 

IB Economics Extended Essay Examples

Economics Extended Essay Topic Examples

Extended Essay Research Question Examples Economics

Tips for Writing an Economics Essay

Writing an economics essay requires specific expertise and skills. So, it's important to have some tips up your sleeve to make sure your essay is of high quality:

• Start with a Clear Thesis Statement: It defines your essay's focus and argument. This statement should be concise, to the point, and present the crux of your essay.
• Conduct Research and Gather Data: Collect facts and figures from reliable sources such as academic journals, government reports, and reputable news outlets. Use this data to support your arguments and analysis and compile a literature review.
• Use Economic Theories and Models: These help you to support your arguments and provide a framework for your analysis. Make sure to clearly explain these theories and models so that the reader can follow your reasoning.
• Analyze the Micro and Macro Aspects: Consider all angles of the topic. This means examining how the issue affects individuals, businesses, and the economy as a whole.
• Use Real-World Examples: Practical examples and case studies help to illustrate your points. This can make your arguments more relatable and understandable.
• Consider the Policy Implications: Take into account the impacts of your analysis. What are the potential solutions to the problem you're examining? How might different policies affect the outcomes you're discussing?
• Use Graphs and Charts: These help to illustrate your data and analysis. These visual aids can help make your arguments more compelling and easier to understand.
• Proofread and Edit: Make sure to proofread your essay carefully for grammar and spelling errors. In economics, precision and accuracy are essential, so errors can undermine the credibility of your analysis.

These tips can help make your essay writing journey a breeze. Tailor them to your topic to make sure you end with a well-researched and accurate economics essay.

To wrap it up , writing an economics essay requires a combination of solid research, analytical thinking, and effective communication. 

You can craft a compelling piece of work by taking our examples as a guide and following the tips.

However, if you are still questioning "how do I write an economics essay?", it's time to get professional help from the best essay writing service -  CollegeEssay.org.

Our economics essay writing service is always ready to help students like you. Our experienced economics essay writers are dedicated to delivering high-quality, custom-written essays that are 100% plagiarism free.

Also try out our AI essay writer and get your quality economics essay now!

Barbara P (Literature)

Barbara is a highly educated and qualified author with a Ph.D. in public health from an Ivy League university. She has spent a significant amount of time working in the medical field, conducting a thorough study on a variety of health issues. Her work has been published in several major publications.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Legal & Policies

• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Policy
• Terms of Use
• Refunds & Cancellations
• Our Writers
• Success Stories
• Our Guarantees
• Affiliate Program
• Referral Program
• AI Essay Writer

Disclaimer: All client orders are completed by our team of highly qualified human writers. The essays and papers provided by us are not to be used for submission but rather as learning models only.

How to Write Economics Research Paper: Ultimate Guide

Everything You Need to Know about Economics Research Paper

Whether you are a student, a doctor, or a dancer, we have all engaged in economic activities. Bartering or exchanging money for food and services has been a part of human life for millennia, and we are proud heirs of the tradition.

As society grows, economic issues become bigger, and they call for research and study. We debate whether certain economic systems are the best fit, whether we should have a shared currency, how cryptocurrencies can revolutionize modern economics, etc. Such an inquiry aims to find solutions to the economic crises humanity faces. Poverty, famine, and homelessness are some of the major problems experienced by millions around the world.

Professional researchers and students write research papers for economics to share their analysis and findings about the major economic topics, trends, policies, or theories. Some academics prefer to work with primary data, such as surveys or experiments, while others analyze secondary data, such as historical records or existing statistics.

This article will explore the steps to writing an exceptional economics research paper. Below you will find an ultimate economics research paper outline and plenty of topics to explore in your study. Our thoughtful essay service team has also prepared a research paper economics sample to simplify your writing process.

Economics Research Paper Example

Just as we promised in the beginning, our writers took the extra mile and wrote an economics research paper example for you. Check out what makes an essay exceptional and how the paper ensures the readers stay engaged all the way through. Explore the structure, format, and language with which our writers achieve the main purpose of economics research papers.

How to Write an Economics Research Paper: Easy Steps

Our professional dissertation writers know the six holy elements of crafting a compelling economics paper, do you?

Let's put the writing aside for a second and take time to learn how to write an economics research paper. We have prepared an ultimate guide with easy steps for you to impress the reader. Remember, a strong foundation and compatible building blocks keep the skyscrapers standing tall.

Economics Research Paper Outline

First, you need to master the structure of an economics research paper. Often students skip this part leading to a mess of information that is not readable or understandable, and hours of work go in vain. To avoid such problems below, we discuss six holy elements of an excellent economics paper.

Introduction - To impress the reader, start by offering a relevant and cutting-edge topic. There are endless amounts of research paper topics in economics; choose the one you feel passionate about and make it interesting for the audience.

Literature Review - Take your time to research information around the chosen topic. Sometimes our beliefs and prejudices blur our judgment, but we must remain unbiased. Secondary sources are there to guide you in the right direction.

Methods/data - describe the methodologies with which you plan to explore the topic and provide conclusions. Here you need to formulate your thesis and describe the data you gathered.

Results - Don't shy away from charts and graphs when presenting your study results. They are a great way to visualize large amounts of information.

Discussion - you can and need to challenge the methods you used for the research paper for economics. Credibility is as important as air when it comes to economic research.

Conclusion - Shortly restate your findings. Use clear and concise sentences. Emphasize why your study is important and what some questions are for future research.

Creating an Economics Research Paper Introduction

By an unwritten rule, an introduction is the first element of the economics research paper format. It aims to provide an overview of your study, explain its importance, explain why people should spend time thinking about the issue, and explain what value your research adds to the conversation.

Ensure that your introduction includes the research hypothesis and the objectives you aim to cover in your research paper economics study. You must also provide background information and a brief overview of your findings. Be sharp and stick to the point. The goal is to give the audience a clear understanding of what the paper is about and what problems it could solve.

Our team of custom research paper writing services can free you from worrying about writing a compelling introduction or providing a thorough statistical analysis. Let us know what is required, and we will return with an A+ essay.

Discussing the Existing Literature Review for Your Economics Research Paper

Everything in life has its context, and economic events are no exception to the rule. Before you start discussing your results, it is appropriate to provide a piece of background information, what we know from previous studies, and how that knowledge relates to your thesis statement.

According to the economics research paper outline, an introduction should be followed by a literature review section. Besides establishing the state of knowledge around the topic, the literature review can help you and the audience identify gaps, highlight the parts where further research is needed and put your research question in the larger scheme of things.

Literature reviews should include a critical analysis of relevant literature, reports, policy documents, etc. It should provide an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each source, showing gaps in information and proving the importance of your scholarly work.

We know this is a lot. If you prefer learning by example, our professional writers have crafted an economics research paper example for you. You can find it below.

Explaining the Methodology for Your Economics Research Paper

For your hard labor to be appreciated, your study must be credible. Readers must be able to see where you derived your conclusions from. This is why explaining the methodologies and techniques used is such an important section of the economics research paper outline.

Research methodologies for economics are various, and you need to be aware of which one could be the best fit for your study. Not every topic can be examined with identical tools; you need to find the one that helps you provide unbiased, trustworthy results.

Here you can find some research methodologies that could be useful for your research paper for economics:

Econometric Analysis : Use of statistical techniques to analyze economic data and test hypotheses.

Experimental Design : Conducting controlled experiments to test economic theories

Case Study : An in-depth analysis of a particular case

Historical Analysis : Use of historical data and documents to analyze economic trends

Mathematical Modeling : Use of math models to analyze economic behavior and predict outcomes

Are You Struggling With Academic Writing?

Let our economics essay writing service remove all your academic stress and get you at the top of your class!

Presenting the Results in Your Economics Research Paper

Even though every section in the outline is equally important, the part where you present the results is the most interesting and anticipated. Here you need to get creative and focus on delivering the main points. Avoid passive voice; instead, take ownership of your work, rely on yourself, and use active voice. Use the following paragraphs to impress your audience.

The way you present the results depends on the type of data you collected and the analytical techniques you used. Some research papers need a numerical answer, and others focus on ideas.

Below you can see several techniques you can use in the results section of your economics research paper:

Tables : Effective way to present numerical data. Tables can be used to present descriptive statistics, regression results, and other types of quantitative data.

Figures : Effective way to demonstrate relationships between variables and trends over time.

Narrative Forms : Effective way to analyze non-numerical data such as surveys, interviews, or case studies.

Reviewing the Findings for Economics Research Paper

Our guide on how to write an economics research paper is nearing its end. Before concluding, you need to review the results of your study. This step might seem unnecessary, but it's vital for economics writing.

A critical analysis of one's writing can validate the research results even more. It is an excellent way to find out whether the original hypothesis is now supported by data. Reviewing can also help you identify the strength and weaknesses of the study, including the limitations in data or methods used.

It will also help you write a more comprehensive conclusion. Reviewing and interpreting the results will help you link the findings of your research paper for economics to the broader picture and also identify areas for further research.

Concluding Your Economics Research Paper

Like other disciplines, the economics research paper format also requires a comprehensive conclusion. Remember conclusion is not where you introduce new ideas; you simply have to restate your findings in a slightly different manner.

Explain the reasoning behind the results, and make it intuitive and engaging. Discuss what mechanisms could drive them and what obstacles you had to overcome during research. Let the reader know if there were any limitations to your approach.

Remember that other scholars will use your report as a secondary source just like you used other researchers' concepts and ideas, so make room and give enough time for future research and policy implications.

We understand that college is hard and following an economics research paper outline is not the easiest job. All you have to write to our college essay writing service and expert writers will come back with research writing that will put you at the top of your class.

30 Research Paper Topics in Economics

The tips above will help you write an excellent economics research paper. Now you have to select a cutting-edge topic. Below you will find the hottest economics topics for research paper:

• The benefits and drawbacks of a carbon tax
• The toll of immigration on economics
• The impact of AI on employment and wages
• Private insurance VS universal coverage
• The benefits and drawbacks of Free Trade Agreements
• The role of government in the Economy: Keynesian VS Neoliberal perspectives
• Should education be free?
• The impact of income inequality economic growth
• The cost of an aging population
• The role of big tech in economics
• The impact of covid-19 on the global economy
• Universal Basic Income: Does it fix poverty?
• The gig economy: a new threat to traditional employment
• Crime economics: the costs of punishment and rehabilitation
• Bioeconomy: Pros and cons of biodegradable plastics
• Small governments with big impact: Benefits of minimalist economic policy
• Silicon Valley and the Tech industry: Is it innovation or monopoly?
• Does Apple Inc. hold a monopoly in the tech business?
• The role of the economic model in policy discussion and decision-making
• The contribution of abstract economic models to real-world analysis and policy-making
• Describing the quality of life: Measuring economic and social well-being beyond GDP
• The role of abstract economic concepts in shaping policy and practice
• Subjectivity in economics paper: Can there be a single 'correct' answer to economic questions?
• The future of economics papers: embracing interdisciplinary approaches and open access publishing
• Social entrepreneurship: Innovations in Economic and Social Development
• Social welfare policies and economic outcomes
• The impact of tech companies on small business growth
• The economics of consumer behavior: links between consumer decisions and economics outcomes
• The economics of customer satisfaction: the drivers of loyalty and retention
• The economics of social influence: Social networks and decision-making

A Brief Afterword

Writing economics research papers is a lot of work. You must plan, research and analyze excessively to achieve the best quality. You'll need to find an attention-grabbing research question, come up with a methodology, and turn complex ideas into one paragraph.

But writing research could be much easier. All you have to say is, ' write paper for me ,' and our team of professionals will take care of the rest. You can relax while we select the best research topic and turn dense ideas into short sentences, honoring the process and structure of economic research. A+ is just a click away!

Is College Stressing You Out?

Our finance essay writing service can help you achieve your academic goals

Related Articles

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to write a descriptive essay | Example & tips

How to Write a Descriptive Essay | Example & Tips

Published on July 30, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on August 14, 2023.

A descriptive essay gives a vivid, detailed description of something—generally a place or object, but possibly something more abstract like an emotion. This type of essay , like the narrative essay , is more creative than most academic writing .

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Descriptive essay topics, tips for writing descriptively, descriptive essay example, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about descriptive essays.

When you are assigned a descriptive essay, you’ll normally be given a specific prompt or choice of prompts. They will often ask you to describe something from your own experience.

• Describe a place you love to spend time in.
• Describe an object that has sentimental value for you.

You might also be asked to describe something outside your own experience, in which case you’ll have to use your imagination.

• Describe the experience of a soldier in the trenches of World War I.
• Describe what it might be like to live on another planet.

Sometimes you’ll be asked to describe something more abstract, like an emotion.

If you’re not given a specific prompt, try to think of something you feel confident describing in detail. Think of objects and places you know well, that provoke specific feelings or sensations, and that you can describe in an interesting way.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

The key to writing an effective descriptive essay is to find ways of bringing your subject to life for the reader. You’re not limited to providing a literal description as you would be in more formal essay types.

Make use of figurative language, sensory details, and strong word choices to create a memorable description.

Use figurative language

Figurative language consists of devices like metaphor and simile that use words in non-literal ways to create a memorable effect. This is essential in a descriptive essay; it’s what gives your writing its creative edge and makes your description unique.

Take the following description of a park.

This tells us something about the place, but it’s a bit too literal and not likely to be memorable.

If we want to make the description more likely to stick in the reader’s mind, we can use some figurative language.

Here we have used a simile to compare the park to a face and the trees to facial hair. This is memorable because it’s not what the reader expects; it makes them look at the park from a different angle.

You don’t have to fill every sentence with figurative language, but using these devices in an original way at various points throughout your essay will keep the reader engaged and convey your unique perspective on your subject.

Use your senses

Another key aspect of descriptive writing is the use of sensory details. This means referring not only to what something looks like, but also to smell, sound, touch, and taste.

Obviously not all senses will apply to every subject, but it’s always a good idea to explore what’s interesting about your subject beyond just what it looks like.

Even when your subject is more abstract, you might find a way to incorporate the senses more metaphorically, as in this descriptive essay about fear.

Choose the right words

Writing descriptively involves choosing your words carefully. The use of effective adjectives is important, but so is your choice of adverbs , verbs , and even nouns.

It’s easy to end up using clichéd phrases—“cold as ice,” “free as a bird”—but try to reflect further and make more precise, original word choices. Clichés provide conventional ways of describing things, but they don’t tell the reader anything about your unique perspective on what you’re describing.

Try looking over your sentences to find places where a different word would convey your impression more precisely or vividly. Using a thesaurus can help you find alternative word choices.

• My cat runs across the garden quickly and jumps onto the fence to watch it from above.
• My cat crosses the garden nimbly and leaps onto the fence to survey it from above.

However, exercise care in your choices; don’t just look for the most impressive-looking synonym you can find for every word. Overuse of a thesaurus can result in ridiculous sentences like this one:

• My feline perambulates the allotment proficiently and capers atop the palisade to regard it from aloft.

An example of a short descriptive essay, written in response to the prompt “Describe a place you love to spend time in,” is shown below.

Hover over different parts of the text to see how a descriptive essay works.

On Sunday afternoons I like to spend my time in the garden behind my house. The garden is narrow but long, a corridor of green extending from the back of the house, and I sit on a lawn chair at the far end to read and relax. I am in my small peaceful paradise: the shade of the tree, the feel of the grass on my feet, the gentle activity of the fish in the pond beside me.

My cat crosses the garden nimbly and leaps onto the fence to survey it from above. From his perch he can watch over his little kingdom and keep an eye on the neighbours. He does this until the barking of next door’s dog scares him from his post and he bolts for the cat flap to govern from the safety of the kitchen.

With that, I am left alone with the fish, whose whole world is the pond by my feet. The fish explore the pond every day as if for the first time, prodding and inspecting every stone. I sometimes feel the same about sitting here in the garden; I know the place better than anyone, but whenever I return I still feel compelled to pay attention to all its details and novelties—a new bird perched in the tree, the growth of the grass, and the movement of the insects it shelters…

Sitting out in the garden, I feel serene. I feel at home. And yet I always feel there is more to discover. The bounds of my garden may be small, but there is a whole world contained within it, and it is one I will never get tired of inhabiting.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

The key difference is that a narrative essay is designed to tell a complete story, while a descriptive essay is meant to convey an intense description of a particular place, object, or concept.

Narrative and descriptive essays both allow you to write more personally and creatively than other kinds of essays , and similar writing skills can apply to both.

If you’re not given a specific prompt for your descriptive essay , think about places and objects you know well, that you can think of interesting ways to describe, or that have strong personal significance for you.

The best kind of object for a descriptive essay is one specific enough that you can describe its particular features in detail—don’t choose something too vague or general.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, August 14). How to Write a Descriptive Essay | Example & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved April 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/descriptive-essay/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, how to write a narrative essay | example & tips, how to write a literary analysis essay | a step-by-step guide, how to write an expository essay, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Essay on Economics

In this essay we will discuss about Economics. After reading this essay you will learn about: 1. Subject Matter of Economics 2. Economics as a Science 3. Economics as an Art 4. Neo-Classical View of Marshall 5. The Classical View of Adam Smith 6. Basic Concepts of Economics 7. Types of Goods in Economics 8. Utility in Economics.

• Essay on Utility in Economics

Essay # Subject Matter of Economics :

Broadly speaking, the formulation of a definition is a precise procedure of explaining the subject matter. The majority of economic thinkers from Adam Smith to Pigou have defined the subject matter of economics as the study of the causes of material welfare or as the science of wealth.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Marshall, in particular, confined it to the consumption, production, exchange and distribution of wealth by men engaged in the ordinary business of life. Men who are rational beings and act under the existing social, legal and institutional set up. It excludes the behaviour and activities of socially undesirable and abnormal persons like drunkards, misers, thieves, etc.

Professor Robbins, however, finds this subject matter as too restricted in scope to embrace all the facts. He cites numerous examples to show that certain human activities possess a definite economic significance but have little or no connection with material welfare.

The same good or service may promote material welfare at one time and less than one set of circumstances and not at another time under different circumstances. Robbins is, therefore, of the view that for a good or service to have economic significance it must command a price.

And for a good or service to command a price, it is not essential that it must promote material welfare, rather it must be scarce and capable of being put to alternative uses. Thus economics is not concerned so much with the analysis of the consumption, production, exchange and distribution of wealth as with a special aspect of human behaviour-that of allocating scarce means among competing ends.

This fundamental problem is ever present in all times and places and in all sets of circumstances. Thus the subject matter of economics includes the daily activities of the household, of the competitive business world and the administration of public resources in order to solve the problem of scarcity of resources.

The subject matter of economics includes the study of the problems of consumption, production, exchange and distribution of wealth, as well as the determination of the values of goods and services, the volume of employment and the determinants of economic growth. Besides, it includes the study of the causes of poverty, unemployment, underdevelopment, inflation, etc. and steps for their removal.

Essay # Economics as a Science :

There is considerable disagreement among economists whether economics is a science and if it is so, is it a positive or a normative science? In order to answer these questions, it is essential to know what science is and to what extent the characteristics of science are applicable to economics.

A science is a systematized body of knowledge ascertainable by observation and experimentation. It is a body of generalisations, principles, theories or laws which traces out a causal relationship between cause and effect.

For any discipline to be a science:

(i) It must be a systematized body of knowledge;

(ii) Have its own laws or theories;

(iii) Which can be tested by observation and experimentation?

(iv) Can make predictions;

(v) Be self-corrective; and

(vi) Have universal validity. If these features of a science are applied to economics, it can be said that economics is a science.

Economics is a systematized body of knowledge in which economic facts are studied and analysed in a systematic manner. For instance, economics is divided into consumption, production, exchange, distribution and public finance which have their laws and theories on whose basis these departments are studied and analysed in a systematic manner.

Like any other science, the generalisations, theories or laws of economics trace out a causal relationship between two or more phenomena. A definite result is expected to follow from a particular cause in economics like all other sciences.

An example of a principle in chemistry is that, all other things being equal, a combination of hydrogen and oxygen in the proportion of 2: 1 will form water. In physics, the law of gravitation states that things coming from above must fall to the ground at a specific rate, other things being equal.

Similarly, in economics, the law of demand tells us that other things remaining the same, a fall in price leads to extension in demand and a rise in price to contraction in demand. Here rise or fall in price is the cause and, contraction or extension is its effect. Hence economics is a science like any other science which has its own theories and laws which establish a relation between cause and effect.

Economics is also a science because its laws possess universal validity such as the law of diminishing returns, the law of diminishing marginal utility, the law of demand, Gresham’s law, etc. Again, economics is a science because of its self-corrective nature.

It goes on revising its conclusions in the light of new facts based on observations. Economic theories or principles are being revised in the fields of macroeconomics, monetary economics, international economics, public finance and economic development. But certain economists do not accord economics the status of a science because it does not possess the other features of a science.

Science is not merely a collection of facts by observation. It also involves testing of facts by experimentation. Unlike natural sciences, there is no scope for experimentation in economics because economics is related to man, his problems and activities.

Economic phenomena are very complex as they relate to man whose activities are bound by his tastes, habits, and social and legal institutions of the society in which he lives. Economics is thus concerned with human beings who act irrationally and there is no scope for experimentation in economics.

Even though economics possesses statistical, mathematical and econometric methods of testing its phenomena but these are not so accurate as to judge the true validity of economic laws and theories. As a result, exact quantitative prediction is not possible in economics. For instance, a rise in price may not lead to contraction in demand rather it may expand it if people fear a shortage in anticipation of war.

Even if demand contracts as a result of the rise in price, it is not possible to predict accurately how much the demand will contract. Thus, as opined by Marshall: “In sciences that relate to man exactness is less attainable.” But this does not mean that economics is not a science.

It is definitely a science like any other science. Biology and Meteorology are those sciences in which the scope for predictability is less. The law of tides explains why the tide is strong at a new and full moon and weak at the moon’s first quarter.

At the same time, it is possible to predict the exact hour when the tide will rise. But it may not happen so. The tide may rise earlier or later than the predicted time due to some unforeseen circumstances. Marshall, therefore, compared the laws of economics with the laws of tides rather than with the simple and exact law of gravitation.

For the actions of men are so various and uncertain, that the best statement of tendencies, which we can make in a science of human conduct, must needs be inexact and faulty.

Essay # Economics as an Art:

Art is the practical application of scientific principles. According to J. N.Keynes, “An art is a system of rules for the attainment of given ends.” Science lays down certain principles while art puts these principles into practical use.

To analyse the causes and effects of poverty falls within the purview of science and to lay down principles for the removal of poverty is art. Art facilitates the verification of economic theories. As pointed out by the Italian economist Cossa, “Art directs, art un-poses, predicts or proposes rules. It solves general economic problems.” Economics is thus both a science and an art in this sense.

However, certain economists do not consider it advisable to treat economics as both a science and an art. For the pressure of practical problems will hinder the development of economics as a science. This will, in turn, react on the effectiveness of the corresponding art.

Therefore, any attempt to solve a particular economic problem in full will so complicate the problem that the work may become hopeless. For this reason, Marshall regarded economics as “a science pure and applied, rather than a science and an art.”

Economists today are realising more and more the need for practical application of the conclusions reached on important economic problems. Therefore, “Economics should not be considered as a tyrannical oracle whose word is final. But when the preliminary work has been truly done, Applied Economics will at certain times on certain subjects speak with the authority to which it is entitled.”

Economics is thus regarded both a science and an art, though economists prefer to use the term applied economics in place of the latter. Samuelson opines, “Economics is the oldest of the arts, the newest of sciences indeed the queen of all the social sciences.”

Economics—Positive or Normative Science :

Before we discuss whether economics is a positive or normative science, let us understand their meanings which are best described by J.N. Keynes (father of Lord Keynes) in these words:

“A positive science may be defined as a body of systematized knowledge concerning what is, a normative science as a body of systematized knowledge relating to criteria of what ought to be, and concerned with the ideal as distinguished from the actual.” Thus positive economics is concerned with “what is” and normative economics with “what ought to be.”

Economics as a Positive Science :

It was Robbins who in his An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science brought into sharp focus the controversy as to whether economics is a positive or a normative science.

Robbins’ View:

Robbins regards economics as a pure science of what is, which is not concerned with moral or ethical questions. Economics is neutral between ends. The economist has no right to pass judgment on the wisdom or folly of the ends itself.

He is simply concerned with the problem of scarce resources in relation to the ends desired. The manufacture and sale of cigarettes and wine may be injurious to health and therefore morally unjustifiable, but the economist has no right to pass judgment on this, since both satisfy human wants and involve economic activity.

Following the classical economists, Robbins regards the propositions involving the verb ought as different in kind from the proposition involving the verb is. He finds a ‘logical gulf’ between the positive and normative fields of enquiry as they “are not on the same plane of discourse.”

Since “Economics deals with ascertainable facts” and “ethics with valuations and obligations,” he finds no reason for “not keeping them separate, or failing to recognise their essential difference.” He, therefore, opines that “the function of economists consists in exploring and not advocating and condemning.”

Thus an economist should not select an end, but remain neutral, and simply point out the means by which the ends can be achieved.

Friedman’s View:

Like Robbins, Friedman also considers economics as a positive science. According to him, “the ultimate goal of a positive science is the development of a ‘theory’ or ‘hypothesis’ that yields valid and meaningful (not truistic) predictions about phenomena not yet observed.” In this context, economics provides systematic generalisations which can be used for making correct predictions.

Since the predictions of economics can be tested, economics is a positive science like physics which should be free from value judgments. According to Friedman, the aim of an economist is like that of a true scientist who formulates new hypotheses.

Hypotheses permit us to predict about future events or to explain only what happened in the past. But predictions of such hypotheses may or may not be limited by events. Thus economics claims to be a positive science like any other natural science.

Conclusion:

Thus economics is a positive science. It seeks to explain what actually happens and not what ought to happen. This view was held even by the nineteenth century economists. Almost all leading economists from Nassau Senior and J.S. Mill onwards had declared that the science of economics should be concerned with what is and not with what ought to be.

Economics as a Normative Science :

Economics is a normative science of “what ought to be.” As a normative science, economics is con­cerned with the evaluation of economic events from the ethical viewpoint. Marshall, Pigou, Hawtrey, Frazer and other economists do not agree that economics is only a positive science.

They argue that economics is a social science which involves value judgments’ and value judgments cannot be verified to be true or false. It is not an objective science like natural sciences. This is due to the following reasons.

First, the assumptions on which economic laws, theories or principles are based relate to man and his problems. When we try to test and predict economic events on their basis, the subjectivity element always enters.

Second, economics being a social science, economic theories are influenced by social and political factors. In testing them, economists are likely to use subjective value judgements.

Third, in natural sciences, experiments are conducted which lead to the formulation of laws. But in economics experimentation is not possible. Therefore, the laws of economics are at best tendencies.

Conclusion :

Thus the view that economics is only a positive science is divorced from reality. The science of econom­ics cannot be separated from the normative aspect. Economics as a science is concerned with human welfare and involves ethical considerations. Therefore, economics is also a normative science.

As pointed out by Pigou, Marshall believed that “economic science is chiefly neither valuable neither as an intellectual gymnastics nor even as a means of winning truth for its own sake, but as a handmaid of ethics and a servant of practice.”

On these considerations, economics is not only “light-bearing,” but also “fruit- bearing.” Economists cannot afford to be mere spectators and arm-chair academicians. “An economist who is only an economist,” said Fraser “is a poor pretty fish.”

In this age of planning when all nations aspire to be welfare states, it is only the economist who is in a position to advocate, condemn and remedy the economic ills of the modern world. “When we elect to watch the play of human motives that are ordinary—that are something mean and dismal and ignoble,” wrote Prof. Pigou, “our impulse is not the philosopher’s impulse, knowledge for the sake of knowledge but rather the physiologist’s knowledge for the healing that knowledge may help to bring.” It is not enough for the economist to explain and analyse the problems of unequal distribution of wealth, industrial peace, social security, etc. Rather his work is to offer suggestions for the solution of such problems.

Had he remained a mere theoretician, poverty and misery and class-conflicts would have been the lot of mankind. The fact that economists are called upon to pronounce judgements and tender advice on economic problems shows that the normative aspect of the economic science has been gaining ground ever since the laissez-faire spirit became dead.

Wootton is right when she says, “It is very difficult for economists to divest their discussions completely of all normative significance.” Myrdal is more forthright when he says that economics is necessarily value-loaded and “a ‘disinterested social science’ has never existed and, for logical reasons, cannot exist.”

About the relation between normative and positive economics, Friedman observes: “The conclusions of positive economics seem to be, and are, immediately relevant to important normative problems, to questions of what ought to be done and how any given goal can be attained.”

Normative economics cannot be independent of positive economics, though positive economics is free from value judgements. Economics is, therefore, not only a positive science of “what is” but also a normative science of “what ought to be.”

Essay # Robbins Scarcity Definition of Economics:

It was Lord Robbins who with the publication of his Nature and Significance of Economic Science in 1932 not only revealed the logical inconsistencies and inadequacies of the earlier definitions but also formulated his own definition of economics. According to Robbins, “Economics is the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.”

This definition is based on the following related postulates:

1. Economics is related to one aspect of human behaviour, of maximising satisfaction from scarce resources.

2. Ends or wants are scarce. When a particular want is satisfied others crop up to take its place. Multiplicity of wants makes it imperative for human beings to work ceaselessly for their satisfaction but they are usable to satisfy all.

3. The obvious reason for the non-satisfaction of unlimited wants is the scarcity of means at the disposal of mankind. The time and means available for satisfying these ends are scarce or limited.

4. The scarce means are capable of alternative uses. Land is capable of being used for growing rice, sugarcane, wheat, maize, etc. Likewise, coal can be made use of in factories, railways, for generation of electricity, etc. At a time, the use of a scarce resource for one end prevents its use for any other purpose.

5. The ends are of varying importance which necessarily leads to the problem of choice—of selecting the uses to which scarce resources can be put.

6. Economics is related to all kinds of behaviour that involve the problem of choice. This clearly distinguishes economics from technical, political, historical or other aspects. The problem of how to build a college building with given resources is technical.

But the problem of choosing the best combination of resources or the problem of allocating given building resources between an auditorium, library, laboratory, and lecture rooms, cycle-shed and canteen is economic. Thus economics is related to the valuation process which studies the production and distribution of goods and services for fulfilling the needs of mankind.

To conclude, economics is essentially a valuation process which is concerned with multiple ends and scarce means being put to alternative uses in order of their importance. In the ultimate analysis, the economic problem is one of economizing scarce means in relation to numerous ends.

Superiority of Robbins’ Definition :

Robbins’ definition is superior to the earlier definitions in more than one way.

Firstly, it does not contain such vague expressions as ‘material welfare’ and ‘material requisites of well are being’ which had made the neo-classical formulations classificatory. His definition, therefore, is analytical for it does not attempt to pick out certain kinds of behaviour, but focuses attention on a particular aspect of behaviour, the form imposed by the influence of scarcity.

Secondly, Robbins emphasizes that economics is a science. It is a systematized body of knowledge which gives its proud possessor a framework within which to analyse the problems associated with the study. Like other pure sciences, economics is neutral between ends.

The ends may be noble or ignoble, material or immaterial, economic or non-economic, economics is not concerned with them as such. Economics has thus nothing to do with Ethics. For, according to Robbins, “Economics deals with ascertainable facts. Ethics with valuation and obligations. The two Fields of inquiry are not on the same plane of discourse.”

Thirdly, Robbins has made economics a valuation process. Whenever the ends are unlimited and the means are scarce, they give rise to an economic problem. In such a situation, there is little need for defining economics as the study of the causes of material welfare. The problems of production and distribution of wealth are also of economizing scarce resources in relation to varied ends.

Lastly, there is universality in Robbin’s scarcity definition of economics. It is as much applicable to a Robinson Crusoe economy as to a communist economy and a capitalist economy. Its laws are like the laws of life and are independent of all legal and political frameworks. All this led economists to describe Robbins’ definition as the “dominant academic doctrine” of the times.

Criticisms of Robbins’ Definition :

Many economists have criticized Robbins’ definition on the following grounds:

1. Artificial Relation between Ends and Means:

Some critics characterize the relationship between ends and scarce means as presented by Robbins as “artificial schemaIn his definition, Robbins fails to explain fully the nature of ‘ends’ and the difficulties associated with it.”

2. Difficult to Separate Ends from Means:

Robbins’ assumption of definite ends is also unacceptable because immediate ends may act as intermediaries to further ends. In fact, it is difficult to separate ends from means distinctly. Immediate ends may be the means to the achievement of further ends, and means by themselves may be the ends of earlier actions.

3. Economics not Neutral between Ends:

Economists have criticized Robbins’ definition for its ethical neutrality. Robbins’ contention that “Economics is neutral between ends” is unwarranted. Unlike physical sciences, economics is concerned not with matter but with human behaviour. It is, therefore, not possible for economists to dissociate economics from Ethics.

4. Neglects the Study of Welfare:

Robbins’ formulation of economizing scarce means in relation to ends for the solution of all economic problems is simply a valuation problem. This has tended to narrow the jurisdiction of economics. According to Boulding, “Prof. Robbins in defining economics as a valuation problem seems to deprive economics of the right to study welfare.” Economics will be an incomplete body of knowledge without the study of welfare which Robbins neglects.

5. Economics not Merely a Positive but also a Normative Science:

By concentrating exclusively on the valuation problem, Robbins has made economics a positive science. But economists like Souter, Parsons, Wootton, and Macfie regard it not only a positive science but also a normative science. According to Macfie, “Economics is fundamentally a normative science, not merely a positive science like chemistry.”

6. Robbins’ Definition too Narrow and too Wide:

Robertson regards Robbins’ definition “at once too narrow and too wide.” It is too narrow since it does not include organisational defects which lead to idle resources. On the other hand, the problem of allocating scarce means among given ends is such that it may arise even in fields which lie outside the jurisdiction of economics.

The captain of a team in a playground or an army commander in battlefield may be faced with the problem of scarce resources in the event of a member being injured. Thus, Robbins’ scarcity formulation is applicable even to non-economic problems thereby making the scope of economics too wide.

7. Economics Concerned with Social Behaviour rather than Individual Behaviour:

Robbins’ concep­tion of economics is essentially a micro analysis. It is concerned with individual behaviour, of economizing ends with the limited means at his disposal. But economics is not concerned with individualistic ends and means alone.

It has nothing to do with a Robinson Crusoe economy. Our economic problems are related to social rather than individual behaviour. Robbins’ definition is, therefore, steeped in classical tradition and fails to emphasize the macro-economic character of economics.

8. Fails to Analyse the Problems of Unemployment of Resources:

Robbins’ scarcity formulation pos­sesses little practical usefulness as it fails to analyse the causes of general unemployment of resources. Unemployment is caused not by scarcity of resources but by their abundance. It is, therefore, only in a fully employed economy that the problem of allocating scarce resources among alternative uses arises.

Thus the scarcity definition of Robbins, applicable as it is to a fully employed economy, is unrealistic for analysing the economic problems of the real world.

9. Does not Offer Solutions to the Problems of LDCs:

Robbins’ conception of economics offers no solution to the problems of underdeveloped countries. The problems of underdeveloped countries are con­cerned with the development of unused resources. Resources are in abundance in such economies but they are either unutilized, or underutilised or misutilised.

Robbins’ scarcity formulation, however, takes the resources as given and analyses their allocation among alternative uses.

10. Neglects the Problems of Growth and Stability:

Robbins’ scarcity definition neglects the problems of growth and stability which are the corner stone’s of the present day economics.

Of the two definitions of welfare and scarcity, it is not possible to say with precision which is better than the other.

As Boulding opines:

“To define it as a study of mankind in the ordinary business of life, is surely too broad. To define it as the study of material wealth is too narrow. To define it as the study of human valuation and choice is again probably too wide, and to define it as the study of that part of human activity subject to the measuring rod of money is again too narrow.” He, therefore, agrees with Jacob Viner that “Economics is what economists do.”

However, the truth is that keeping in view the present day trend of establishing welfare states in the world; the welfare definitions are more practicable whereas the scarcity definitions are more scientific.

A satisfactory definition must combine both these conceptions of economics. We may define economics as a social science concerned with the proper use and allocation of resources for the achievement and mainte­nance of growth and stability.

Essay # Neo-Classical View of Marshall :

It was, however, the neo-classical school led by Alfred Marshall which gave economics a respectable place among social sciences. Marshall laid emphasis on man and his welfare. Wealth was regarded as the source of human welfare, not an end in itself but a means to an end.

According to Marshall, “Political Economy or Economics is a study of mankind in the ordinary business of life; it examines that part of individual and social action which is most closely connected with the attainment and with the use of the material requisites of well­being. Thus it is on the one side a study of wealth; and on the other, and more important side, a part of the study of man.”

Certain logical inferences can be drawn from Marshall’s definition.

First, economics is concerned with man’s ordinary business of life. It is related to his wealth-getting and wealth-using activities. Or, as Marshall put it: It “deals with his [man’s] efforts to satisfy his wants, in so far as the efforts and wants are capable of being measured in terms of wealth or its general representative, i.e. money.”

Secondly, economics is a social science. It “is a study of men as they live and move and think in the ordinary business of life.” Thus, economics is concerned with the economic aspects of social life. It excludes the activities of socially undesirable and abnormal persons like thieves, misers, etc.

Thirdly, it is related to those economic activities which promote material welfare. Non-economic activities and activities having ignoble ends are excluded from the study of economics. Lastly, by using the broad term ‘Economics’ in place of the narrower term ‘Political Economy’, Marshall lifted economics to the realm of a science and divested it of all political influences.

Marshall, however, emphasised that economics is concerned with wealth simply by accident and its “true philosophic raison d’etre must be sought elsewhere.” Robbins, therefore, in his Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science finds fault with Cannan’s enunciation of the welfare conception of economics on the following grounds.

1. Distinction between Material and Non-Material things Faulty:

Robbins criticizes the distinction between material and non-material things as established by the neo-classical economists. The latter include only those activities within the scope of economics which lead to the production and consumption of material goods and services.

Robbins, however, regards all goods and services which command a price and enter into the circle of exchange as economic whether they are material or non-material.

The services of teachers, lawyers, actors, etc. have each their economic aspect, because they are scarce and possess value. To say that services are non-material “is not only perverse, it is also misleading. For it is not the materiality of even material means of gratification,” says Robbins, “which gives them their status as economic goods; it is their relation to valuations. The ‘materialist’ definition of Economics, therefore, misrepresents the science as we know it.”

2. Economics not concerned with Material Welfare:

Robbins also objects to the use of the word welfare along with material. For the neo-classical economists, economics is concerned with the causes of material welfare. To Robbins, however, there are certain material activities but they do not promote welfare.

For example, the manufacture and sale of wine is an economic activity but it is not conducive to human welfare. Such goods are significant from the economic point of view because they are scarce and have value.

3. Contradiction:

There is a contradiction in the “non-material definition of productivity”, used by Marshall. He regards the services of opera singers and dancers as productive so long as they are demanded by the people. But since they are non-material, they do not promote human welfare. As such, their services are not the subject matter of economics.

Robbins, however, points out that “the services of the opera dancer are wealth. Economics deals with the pricing of their services, equally with the pricing of the services of a cook. He, therefore, concludes: “Whatever Economics is concerned with, it is not concerned with the causes of material welfare as such.”

4. Concept of Economic Welfare Vague:

The idea of economic welfare is vague. Money cannot be regarded as an accurate measure of welfare, for the conception of welfare is subjective and relative. The idea of welfare varies with each individual. Wine may give pleasure to a drunkard, but it may be harmful for the novice.

Again, it may be useful for people living in Siberia and Iceland but injurious for those living in hot climates. This interpersonal comparison of utility implies value judgment, which transports economics to the realm of Ethics. But Robbins has nothing to do with Ethics. To him, Economics is entirely neutral between ends. The ends may be noble or base, the economist is not concerned with them as such.

5. Welfare Definition & Classificatory and Not Analytical:

Robbins criticizes the material welfare defini­tions as being classificatory rather than analytical. These definitions deal with certain kinds of human behaviour—those directed towards the procurement of material welfare.

But other kinds of activities concerned with a particular aspect of human behaviour lie outside the jurisdiction of economics. Whereas the neo­classical described certain activities being “economic” and “non-economic”, Robbins finds no valid reason for making this distinction as every human activity has an economic aspect when it is undertaken under the influence of scarcity.

6. Economics not a Social Science but a Human Science:

Robbins does not agree with Marshall that economics is a social science— “a study of men as they live and move and think in the ordinary business of life.” Rather he regards economics as a human science. Economics is as much concerned with an exchange economy as with a Robinson Crusoe economy. The central problem in economics, according to Robbins, is that of valuation which is one of allocation of scarce means among alternative ends.

Since the generalisations of the theory of value are as applicable to the behaviour of an isolated man or to the executive authority of a communist society, as to the behaviour of man in an exchange economy. Therefore, economics should be regarded as a human science.

Essay # The Classical View of Adam Smith :

The classical economists beginning with Adam Smith defined economics as the science of wealth. Adam Smith defined it as the “nature and causes of wealth of nations,” whereby it “proposes to enrich both the people and the sovereign.”

Among his followers, J.B. Say in France defined economics as “the study of the laws which govern wealth;” to Nassau Senior at Oxford, “the subject treated by political economists…is not happiness, but wealth;” whereas to F.A. Walker in America, “Economics is that body of knowledge which relates to wealth.”

According to J.S. Mill, “Writers on Political Economy profess to teach the nature of wealth and the laws which govern its production, distribution and exchange.” To J.E. Cairnes, “Political Economy is a science…it deals with the phenomena of wealth.” While B. Price declared in 1878 that “all are agreed that it is concerned with wealth.”

Its Criticisms :

The classical view was misleading and had serious defects. This conception of economics as a science of wealth laid exclusive stress on material wealth. Following Smith and Say, the Earl of Lauderdale (1804) and McCulloch (1827) regarded economics as related to material wealth, wealth being “the object of man’s desires.”

In an age when religious sentiments ran high, this conception of economics was interpreted as concerning only the acquisition of riches or money. This led economics to be branded as the science of Mormonism, of bread and butter, a dismal science, the science of getting rich.

Bailey called it “a mean, degrading, sordid inquiry.” To Carlyle it was a “pig-science.” Ruskin lamented in the Preface to his Unto the Last that economists were in “an entirely damned state of soul.” Even economists like Jevons and Edge worth were despaired of this wealth-oriented conception of economics. Edge worth regarded it as “dealing with the lower elements of human nature.”

The main drawback in wealth definition of economics had been its undue emphasis on wealth-producing activities. Wealth was considered to be an end in itself. Moreover, as pointed out by Macfie the “fatal word ‘material’ is probably more responsible for the ignorant slanders on the ‘dismal science’ than any other description.”

By stressing on the word ‘material wealth’ the classical economists narrowed the scope of economics by excluding all economic activities which are related to the production of non-material goods and services, such as of doctors, teachers, etc.

Essay # Basic Concepts of Economics:

Ordinarily, the concept of value is related to the concept of utility. Utility is the want satisfying quality of a thing when we use or consume it. Thus utility is the value-in-use of a commodity. For instance, water quenches our thirst. When we use water to quench our thirst, it is the value-in-use of water.

In economics, value means the power that goods and services have to exchange other goods and services, i.e. value-in-exchange. If one pen can be exchanged for two pencils, then the value of one pen is equal to two pencils. For a commodity to have value, it must possess the following three characteristics.

a. Utility:

It should have utility. A rotten egg has no utility because it cannot be exchanged for anything. It possesses no value-in-exchange.

b. Scarcity:

Mere utility does not create value unless it is scarce. A good or service is scarce (limited) in relation to its demand. All economic goods like pen, book, etc. are scarce and have value. But free goods like air do not possess value. Thus goods possessing the quality of scarcity have value.

c. Transferability:

Besides the above two characteristics, a good should be transferable from one place to another or from one person to another. Thus a commodity to have value-in-exchange must possess the qualities of utility, scarcity and transferability.

2. Value and Price :

In common language, the terms ‘value’ and ‘price’ are used as synonyms (i.e. the same). But in economics, the meaning of price is different from that of value. Price is value expressed in terms of money. Value is expressed in terms of other goods. If one pen is equal to two pencils and one pen can be had for Rs.10. Then the price of one pen is Rs.10 and the price of one pencil is Rs.5.

Value is a relative concept in comparison to the concept of price. It means that there cannot be a general rise or fall in values, but there can be a general rise or fall in prices. Suppose 1 pen = 2 pencils. If the value of pen increases it means that one pen can buy more pencils in exchange.

Let it be 1 pen= 4 pencils. It means that the value of pencils has fallen. So when the value of one commodity raises that of the other good in exchange falls. Thus there cannot be a general rise or fall in values. On the other hand, when prices of goods start rising or falling, they rise or fall together.

It is another thing that prices of some goods may rise or fall slowly or swiftly than others. Thus there can be a general rise or fall in prices.

3. Wealth :

In common use, the term ‘wealth’ means money, property, gold, etc. But in economics it is used to describe all things that have value. For a commodity to be called wealth, it must prossess utility, scarcity and transferability. If it lacks even one quality, it cannot be termed as wealth.

Forms of Wealth:

Wealth may be of the following types:

1. Individual Wealth:

Wealth owned by an individual is called private or individual wealth such as a car, house, company, etc.

2. Social Wealth:

Goods which are owned by the society are called social or collective wealth, such as schools, colleges, roads, canals, mines, forests, etc.

3. National or Real Wealth:

National wealth includes all individual and social wealth. It consists of material assets possessed by the society. National wealth is real wealth.

4. International Wealth:

The United Nations Organisation and its various agencies like the World Bank, IMF, WHO, etc. are international wealth because all countries contribute towards their operations.

5. Financial Wealth:

Financial wealth is the holding of money, stocks, bonds, etc. by individuals in the society. Financial wealth is excluded from national wealth. This is because money, stocks, bonds, etc. which individuals hold as wealth are claims against one another.

Some differences :

Wealth is different from capital, income and money.

Wealth and Capital:

Goods which have value are termed as wealth. But capital is that part of wealth which is used for further production of wealth. Furniture used in the home is wealth but given on rent is capital. Thus all capital is wealth but all wealth is not capital.

Wealth and Income:

Wealth is a stock and income is a flow. Income is the earning from wealth. The shares of a company are wealth but the dividend received on them is income.

Wealth and Money:

Money consists of coins and currency notes. Money is the liquid form of wealth. All money is wealth but all wealth is not money.

4. Stocks and Flows :

Distinction may be made here between a stock variable and a flow variable. A stock variable has no time dimension. Its value is ascertained at some point in time. A stock variable does not involve the specification of any particular length of time. On the other hand, a flow variable has a time dimension. It is related to a specified period of time.

So national income is a flow and national wealth is a stock. Change in any variable which can be measured over a period of time relates to a flow. In this sense, in ventories are stocks but change in inventories in a flow.

A number of other examples of stocks and flows can also be given. Money is a stock but the spending of money is flow. Government debt is stock. Saving and investment and operating surplus during a year are flows but if they relate to the past year, they are stocks.

But certain variables are only in the form of flows such as NNP, NDP, value added, dividends, tax payments, imports, exports, net foreign investment, social security benefits, wages and salaries, etc.

5. Optimisation :

Optimisation means the most efficient use of resources subject to certain constraints it is the choice from all possible uses of resources which gives the best results, it is the task of maximisation or minimisation of an objective function it is a technique which is used by a consumer and a producer as decision-maker.

A consumer wants to buy the best combination of a consumer good when his objective function is to maximise his utility, given his fixed income as the constraints. Similarly, a producer wants to produce the most suitable level of output to maximise his profit, given the raw materials, capital, etc. as constraints.

As against this, a firm cans hence the objective of minimisation of its cost of production by choosing the best combination of factors of production, given the manpower resources, capital, etc. as constraints. Thus optimisation is the determination of the maximisation or minimisation of an objective function.

Essay # Types of Goods in Economics:

1. material and non-material goods:.

Goods may be material and non-material. Material goods are those which are tangible. They can be seen, touched and transferred from one place to another. For example, cars, shoes, cloth, machines, buildings, wheat, etc., are all material goods.

On the other hand, non-material goods are intangible for they do not possess any shape or weight and cannot be seen, touched or transferred. Services of all types are non-material goods such as those of doctors, engineers, actors, lawyers, teachers, etc. The characteristics common to both material and non-material goods are that they have value and satisfy human wants.

Economic and Non-economic Goods:

Material goods are further divided into economic and non-economic goods. Economic goods are those which have a price and their supply is less in relation to their demand or is scarce. The production of such goods requires scarce resources having alternative uses. For example, land is scarce and is capable of producing rice or sugarcane.

If the farmer wants to produce rice he will have to forgo the production of sugarcane. The price of rice equals the production of sugarcane forgone by the farmer. Thus economic goods relate to the problem of economizing scarce resources for the satisfaction of human wants. In this sense, all material goods are economic goods.

Non-economic goods are called free goods because they are free gifts of nature. They do not have any price and are unlimited in supply. Examples of non-economic goods are air, water, sunshine, etc. The concept of non-economic goods is relative to place and time. Sand lying near the river is a free good but when it is collected in a truck and carried to the town for house construction, it becomes an economic good.

It is now scarce in relation to its demand and fetches a price. There was a time when water could be had free from the wells and rivers. Now when it is stored and pumped through pipes to houses it is sold at a price to consumers.

Thus what is a free good today may become an economic good with technological advancement. For example, air which is a free good becomes an economic good when we install air conditioners, room coolers and fans.

Consumers’ Goods and Producers’ goods:

Economics goods are further divided into consumers’ goods and producers’ goods.

1. Consumers’ Goods:

Consumers’ goods are those final goods which directly satisfy the wants of consumers. Such goods are bread, milk, pen, clothes, furniture, etc. Consumers’ goods are further sub-divided into single-use consumers’ goods and durable use consumers’ goods.

(a) Single-use Consumers’ Goods:

These are goods which are used up in a single act of consumption. Such goods are foodstuffs, cigarettes, matches, fuel, etc. They are the articles of direct consumption because they satisfy human want directly. Similarly, the services of all types such as those of doctors, actors, lawyers, waiters, etc. are included under single use goods.

(b) Durable-use Consumers’ Goods:

These goods can be used for a considerable period of time. It is immaterial whether the period is short or long. Such goods are pens, tooth brushes, clothes, scooters, TV sets, etc.

2. Capital or Producers’ Goods:

Capital goods are those goods which help in the production of other goods that satisfy the wants of the consumers directly or indirectly, such as machines, plants, agricultural and industrial raw materials, etc. Producers’ goods are also classified into single-use producers’ goods and durable- use producers’ goods.

(a) Single-use Producers’ Goods:

Theses goods are used up in a single act of production. Such goods are raw cotton, coal used in factories, paper used for printing books, etc. When once used, these goods lose their original shape.

(b) Durable-use Producers’ Goods:

These goods can be used time and again. They do not lose their usability through a single use but are used over a long period of time. Capital goods of all types such as machines, plants, factory buildings, tools, implements, tractors, etc. are examples of durable-use producers’ goods.

The distinction between consumers’ goods and capital goods is based on the uses to which these goods are put. There are many goods such as electricity, coal, etc. which are used both as consumers’ goods and capital goods.

The distinction between single-use goods and durable-use goods has great significance from the point of the economy. The demand for single-use goods is more regular and steady over time and can be predicted in advance.

On the other hand, the demand for durable-use goods is irregular and uncertain. It takes much longer time to adjust supply to changes in demand in the case of such goods. This is partly the cause for trade cycles in an economy which produces durable-use goods in large quantities.

2. Intermediate Goods:

Goods sold by one firm to another for resale or for further production are called intermediate goods. They are single-use producers’ goods that are transformed to manufacture final goods. Intermediate goods are also termed as inputs.

Cotton from the fields is sold to the spinning mill where it is transformed into yarn. In turn, the yarn leaves the spinning mill by way of sale to the textile mill where it disappears into a new product, cloth. Again, cloth is sold by the mill to the trader to be sold as final goods.

3. Final Goods:

On the other hand, goods sold not for resale or for further production but for personal consumption or for investment are called final goods. On the basis of this definition, a particular good or service may be classified intermediate good or final good.

For instance, the water sold by the municipal corporation to commercial and industrial undertaking is an intermediate good because it is used by them for further production.

On the other hand, the water sold to individual households is final good because it is used for personal consumption. Similarly, the postal services sold to business houses are intermediate goods and those to households are final goods.

Thus the services of government enterprises and of non-profit institutions should be classified as intermediate or final goods according to the definition given above. What these enterprises and institutions purchase from firms are intermediate goods because they are used in the services they render to final consumers.

When the government buys cement, steel and other raw materials to build roads and bridges, consumers use the services of the roads and bridges which are final goods. The distinction between intermediate and final goods is of much importance in the computation of national income. It is especially so while computing national income by the product method or value added method.

Essay # Utility in Economics:

Meaning of utility:.

The want satisfying power of a commodity is called utility. It is a quality possessed by a commodity or service to satisfy human wants. Utility can also be defined as value-in-use of a commodity because the satisfaction which we get from the consumption of a commodity is its value-in-use.

Types of Utility :

Utility may take any of the following forms:

(1) Form Utility:

When utility is created and or added by changing the shape or form of goods, it is form utility. When a carpenter makes a table out of wood, he adds to the utility of wood by converting it into a more useful commodity like furniture. He has created form utility.

(2) Place Utility:

When the furniture is taken from the factory to the shop for sale, it leads to place utility. This is because it is transported from a place where it has no buyers to a place where it fetches a price.

(3) Time Utility:

When a farmer stores his wheat after harvesting for a few months and sells it when its price rises, he has created time utility and added to the value of wheat.

(4) Service Utility:

When doctors, teachers, lawyers, engineers, etc. satisfy human wants through their services, they create service utility. It is acquired through specialised knowledge and skills.

(5) Possession Utility:

Utility is also added by changing the possession of a commodity. A book on economic theory has little utility for a layman. But if it is owned by a student of economics, possession utility is created.

(6) Knowledge Utility:

When the utility of a commodity increases with the increase in knowledge about its use, it is the creation of knowledge utility through propaganda, advertisement, etc.

(7) Natural Utility:

All free goods such as water, air, sunshine, etc., possess natural utility. They have the capacity to satisfy our wants.

Characteristics of Utility :

The following are the characteristics of utility:

1. Utility and Usefulness:

Anything having utility does not mean that it is also useful. If a good possesses want satisfying power, it has utility. But the consumption of that good may be ‘useful’ or ‘harmful’. For example, the consumption of wine possesses utility for a man habitual to drinking because it satisfies his want to drink. But the use of wine is harmful for health, but it has utility. Thus utility is not usefulness.

2. Utility and Satisfaction:

Utility is the quality or power of a commodity to satisfy human wants, whereas satisfaction is the result of utility. Apples lying in the shop of a fruit seller have utility for us, but we get satisfaction only when we purchase and consume them. It means utility is present even before the actual consumption of a commodity and satisfaction is obtained only after its consumption. Utility is the cause and satisfaction is the effect or result.

3. Utility and Pleasure:

It is not necessary that a commodity processing utility also gives pleasure when we consume it. Utility is free from pain or pleasure. An injection possesses utility for a patient, because it can relieve him of his illness. But injection gives him no pleasure; instead it gives him some pain. Quinine is bitter in taste but it has the utility to treat the patient from malaria. So, there is no relationship between utility and pleasure.

4. Utility is Subjective:

Utility is a subjective and psychological concept. It means utility of a commodity differs from person to person. Opium is of great utility for a man accustomed to opium, but it has no utility for a man who is not accustomed to opium. In the same manner, utility of different commodities differs from person to person. Therefore, utility is subjective.

5. Utility is Relative:

Utility is a relative concept. A commodity may possess different utility at different times or at different places or for different persons. In olden days, a Tonga had greater utility. But now with the invention of bus, its utility has become less. A rain coat has greater utility in hilly areas during rainy season than in plain areas. A fan has greater utility in summer than in winter.

6. Utility is Abstract:

Utility is abstract which cannot be seen with eyes, or touched or felt with hands. For example, the argumentative power of an advocate is abstract. Similarly, utility is abstract. Utility of a commodity can neither be seen not touched or felt with hands.

Measurement of Utility :

According to Marshall, the utility of a commodity can be measured in terms of money. If a consumer is willing to pay Rs.2 for an orange and Re 1 for a banana, then the utility of an orange is equal to Rs.2 and that of a banana is Re. 1 to him.

It means that the utility of one orange is equal to 2 bananas. In other words, the utility of an orange to the consumer is twice that of the banana. But this analysis does not hold when there are two different consumers offering two different prices for the same commodity.

Suppose Bhanu offers Rs.2 for a banana for which Gautam is prepared to pay Re. 1.The higher price paid by Bhanu does not mean that he gets more utility and Gautam less utility. Thus money does not measure the utility from a commodity. It simply measures the intensity of our desire for a commodity. Despite this weakness, money is used as a measure of utility.

Cardinal and Ordinal Utility:

The terms ‘cardinal’ and ‘ordinal’ have been borrowed from mathematics. The numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. are cardinal numbers. According to the cardinal system, the utility of a commodity is measured in units and that utility can be added, subtracted and compared.

For example, if the utility of one apple is 10 units, of banana 20 units and of orange 40 units, the utility of banana are double that of apple and of orange four times the apple and twice the banana.

The ordinal numbers are 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. which may stand for 1, 2, 4, 6 or 30, 40, 60, 80, etc. They tell us that the consumer prefers the first to the second and the third to the second and first, and so on. But they cannot tell by how much he prefers one to the other.

The entire Marshallian utility analysis is based on the cardinal measurement of utility. According to Hicks, utility cannot be measured cardinally because utility which a commodity possesses is subjective and psychological. He, therefore, rejects the quantitative measurement of utility and measures utility ordinally in terms of the indifference curve technique.

Related Articles:

• Economics: Definition, Criticisms, Scope and Problems
• Scarcity: Definition, Important Characteristics and Criticism
• An Outstanding Essay on Economics
• Essay on Welfare Economics

Descriptive Essay

Definition of descriptive essay.

A descriptive essay , as the name implies, is a form of essay that describes something. In this genre , students are assigned the task of describing objects, things, places, experiences, persons, and situations. The students use sensory information to enable readers to use their five senses of touch, taste, smell, hearing, and sight to understand the topic of the essay.

Qualities of a Descriptive Essay

• Clear and Concise
• Use of Images
• Use of Five Senses

As far as clear and concise language is concerned, it is necessary to describe things precisely. Imagery is used to make things seem real and remarkable. The use of the five senses creates the imagery, or a mental picture, for each reader.

Difference Between a Description and a Descriptive Essay

A description could be just a paragraph, or it could be longer, as needed to fully describe the thing. However, a descriptive essay has five paragraphs. It is written in a coherent way with a good thesis statement at the end of the introduction , three body paragraphs , and a conclusion .

Examples of Descriptive Essays in Literature

Example #1:  the corner store (by eudora welty).

“Our Little Store rose right up from the sidewalk; standing in a street of family houses, it alone hadn’t any yard in front, any tree or flower bed. It was a plain frame building covered over with brick. Above the door, a little railed porch ran across on an upstairs level and four windows with shades were looking out. But I didn’t catch on to those. Running in out of the sun, you met what seemed total obscurity inside. There were almost tangible smells — licorice recently sucked in a child’s cheek, dill pickle brine1 that had leaked through a paper sack in a fresh trail across the wooden floor, ammonia-loaded ice that had been hoisted from wet croker sacks and slammed into the icebox with its sweet butter at the door, and perhaps the smell of still untrapped mice.”

This description of the “Little Store” is not only clear and concise, but also has images and sensory information about the store building.

Example #2: And the Orchestra Played On (by Joanne Lipman)

“The hinges creaked when I opened the decrepit case. I was greeted by a cascade of loose horsehair — my bow a victim of mites, the repairman later explained. It was pure agony to twist my fingers into position. But to my astonishment and that of my teenage children — who had never heard me play — I could still manage a sound. “It turned out, a few days later, that there were 100 people just like me. When I showed up at a local school for rehearsal, there they were: five decades worth of former students. There were doctors and accountants, engineers and college professors. There were people who hadn’t played in decades, sitting alongside professionals like Mr. K.’s daughter Melanie, now a violinist with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. There were generations of music teachers.”

In the first paragraph of this descriptive excerpt, the author clearly describes the decrepit nature of the violin case, as well as the damage time has done to the bow. The second paragraph is a description of the characters , and their similarities.  Both use sensory information for effective descriptions.

Example #3: Yarn (by Koyoko Mori)

“The yellow mittens I made in seventh-grade home economics proved that I dreamed in color. For the unit on knitting, we were 1 supposed to turn in a pair of mittens. The two hands had to be precisely the same size so that when we held them together, palm to palm, no extra stitches would stick out from the thumb, the tip of the fingers, or the cuff. Somewhere between making the fourth and the fifth mitten to fulfill this requirement, I dreamed that the ball of yellow yarn in my bag had turned green. Chartreuse, leaf, Granny Smith, lime, neon, acid green. The brightness was electric. I woke up knowing that I was, once again, doomed for a D in home ec.”

See the use of colors in this paragraph by Koyoko Mori. This is called “pure description,” in that the description appeals to the senses. The use of word “brightness” in the last line is striking one.

Example #4: The Taj Mahal (by Salman Rushdie)

“And this, finally, is why the Taj Mahal must be seen: to remind us that the world is real, that the sound is truer than the echo, the original more forceful than its image in a mirror. The beauty of beautiful things is still able, in these image-saturated times, to transcend imitations. And the Taj Mahal is, beyond the power of words to say it, a lovely thing, perhaps the loveliest of things.”

Check this short description of the Taj Mahal by Salman Rushdie. This description presents a different picture of the Taj Mahal.

Function of Descriptive Essay

A descriptive essay presents a person, place, or thing, in a way that readers feel as if it is in front of their eyes, or that they are tasting it, or that they can hear it, or that they can smell it. Writers use sensory information to describe object . The object of the writer is to present a picture of something as honestly as he can.

Related posts:

• Elements of an Essay
• Narrative Essay
• Definition Essay
• Types of Essay
• Analytical Essay
• Argumentative Essay
• Cause and Effect Essay
• Critical Essay
• Expository Essay
• Persuasive Essay
• Process Essay
• Explicatory Essay
• An Essay on Man: Epistle I
• Comparison and Contrast Essay

Post navigation

• Our Services
• Additional Services
• Free Essays

Andre Cardoso

Some FAQs related to our essay writer service

• Our Services
• Additional Services
• Free Essays

Experts to Provide You Writing Essays Service.

You can assign your order to:

• Basic writer. In this case, your paper will be completed by a standard author. It does not mean that your paper will be of poor quality. Before hiring each writer, we assess their writing skills, knowledge of the subjects, and referencing styles. Furthermore, no extra cost is required for hiring a basic writer.
• Advanced writer. If you choose this option, your order will be assigned to a proficient writer with a high satisfaction rate.
• TOP writer. If you want your order to be completed by one of the best writers from our essay writing service with superb feedback, choose this option.
• Your preferred writer. You can indicate a specific writer's ID if you have already received a paper from him/her and are satisfied with it. Also, our clients choose this option when they have a series of assignments and want every copy to be completed in one style.

Finished Papers

Customer Reviews

Who are your essay writers?

Laura V. Svendsen