research paper on corporate governance in banking sector

• Open access
• Published: 27 November 2023

Strengthening banking sector governance: challenges and solutions

• Kawa Wali   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-6900 1 ,
• Kees van Paridon 2 &
• Bnar Karim Darwish 1  

Future Business Journal volume  9 , Article number:  95 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

1261 Accesses

1 Citations

Metrics details

This study examines the understanding of banking governance among the sample participants and its effectiveness in achieving significant objectives. The research methodology employed in this study adopts a descriptive and analytical approach, aiming to comprehensively examine the multifaceted phenomenon of corporate governance within the context of private banks. The purpose of this study was to assess the comprehension of banking governance and its effectiveness in achieving important objectives. This investigation was undertaken to gain insights into the current state of banking governance, its implementation, and the challenges it faces. By conducting this research, we aimed to provide a clearer understanding of the issues surrounding banking governance and offer recommendations for improvement and finding solutions. The findings of our study indicate that the sample participants have a clear comprehension of governance as an efficient system. However, we identified significant obstacles in the implementation of governance and its objectives, primarily stemming from legal challenges and the overall environment. We also noted that success for private banks is contingent on meeting governance requirements, but the banking sector faces challenges both internally and externally, which render control systems less effective. Furthermore, we found that the Basel standards for banking supervision, through the implementation of supervision and control procedures, seek to enhance solvency and risk management, along with prudential measures. These findings are crucial as they provide a roadmap for strengthening governance practices in the banking sector, which is vital for its stability and effective operation. By addressing the issues identified in this study, stakeholders can work toward achieving a more robust and effective banking governance framework.Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 2 Given name: [Kees] Particle [van] Last name [Paridon]. Author 3 Given name: [Bnar Kareem] Last name [Darwish]. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.correct

Introduction

In recent decades, both industrialized and developing economies have shown an increased interest in corporate governance. This interest has been prompted by big crises in finance and failures which resulted in far-reaching consequences for the worldwide financial system. Corporate governance is the institutional authority and administration of a firm, encompassing the distribution of privileges and duties between different players such as a board of executives, directors, investors, and other stakeholders. This involves the processes and laws that regulate making decisions within the firm. Employees, vendors, and clients are only a few of the parties involved in corporate governance. Lenders, banks, and lawmakers are all involved. According to Freeland Basel [ 1 ], the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defines corporate governance as the system of interactions between a company's management, board of directors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. In light of this concept, bank governance may be regarded as a complete system of financial and non-financial monitoring that is put in place to manage, monitor, and guarantee a bank's ethical behavior and activities. The main goal of this system is to protect the interests of investors and beneficiaries by preventing corruption in the administrative process.

One area of particular interest is the governance of financial institutions, with researchers exploring comprehensive systems of financial and non-financial oversight to ensure ethical conduct and operations within banks. Notably, Hussain et al. [ 2 ] highlight the impact of knowledge sharing and innovation on sustainable performance in Islamic banks, underscoring the importance of these factors in the context of corporate governance. Moreover, Rehman et al. [ 3 ] shed light on the imperative role of managerial traits in navigating the impact of the financial crisis and the advent of industry on the tourism industry, emphasizing the significance of technology adoption and reshaping human management systems.

Furthermore, the evolving landscape of corporate governance is intricately linked with advancements in education and technology. Meng et al. [ 4 ] offer insights into the role of human–computer interaction and digital literacy in fostering educational learning and psychological resilience among pre-school children, thereby emphasizing the interplay between technological proficiency and mental well-being. These studies collectively underline the multifaceted nature of corporate governance and its intertwined relationship with diverse domains, ranging from finance to education and hospitality.

While the existing literature has made significant strides in understanding the intricacies of corporate governance, there remains a distinct gap in comprehensively elucidating the specific mechanisms through which corporate governance frameworks contribute to mitigating corruption and safeguarding the interests of stakeholders. This study seeks to address this gap by examining the intricate interplay between corporate governance mechanisms and ethical practices within the banking sector, thereby providing a nuanced understanding of the measures essential for fostering transparency and accountability.

Research problem and research questions

The major issue of the study revolves around the ineffective contribution of banks, both governmental and private, to financial and accounting development. This ineffectiveness is attributed to legislative deficiencies, an absence of openness, possible threats to shareholder trust, financial and administrative misconduct, and the effects of technical improvements are all blamed for this inefficiency. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop work systems and mechanisms within the banking sector. Particularly in private banks without a strategic component to their business, the distance between the board of directors and shareholders is a serious problem.

The following questions are the focus of the research:

To what extent are the principles, regulations, and governance culture applied in banking activities?

Do private banks provide a conducive environment for the implementation of governance mechanisms?

Do beneficiary parties have to adopt governance practices?

The research problem pertains to the ineffective role of banks in financial and accounting development, influenced by legislative weaknesses, lack of transparency, potential risks, corruption, and technological changes. The research questions focus on ideal banking conditions, the application of governance in banking activities, the presence of suitable governance mechanisms in private banks, and the need for beneficiary parties to adopt governance practices.

Research objectives

The following goals are what the research aims to accomplish:

Investigate the present state of banking activity, particularly inside private banks, and respond appropriately. Additionally, propose effective crisis management strategies that not only ensure financial stability but also foster customer trust and maintain market confidence, thereby fortifying the resilience of the banking sector.

Evaluate the relevance of corporate governance in the private sector and financial institutions.

Develop comprehensive guidelines and mechanisms to strengthen risk management protocols, improve transparency, and establish a culture of ethical conduct, thereby safeguarding the interests and rights of all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, and customers.

Research methodology

The research methodology employed in this study adopts a descriptive and analytical approach, aiming to comprehensively examine the multifaceted phenomenon of corporate governance within the context of private banks. The primary objective is to develop a holistic framework that encapsulates the various characteristics and dimensions of corporate governance, enabling a nuanced understanding of its implications and outcomes.

To effectively conduct the study, a rigorous selection process was undertaken to identify a diverse set of private banks, ensuring representation from various regions and scales of operation. The chosen banks were integral to the field investigation, providing crucial insights into the practical implementation and adherence to governance practices within their respective institutions.

A meticulously designed questionnaire served as the primary instrument for data collection, encompassing two main areas of inquiry closely aligned with the overarching research objectives. The questionnaire was strategically crafted to elicit comprehensive responses from experts, officials from private banks, and other relevant stakeholders, facilitating a thorough exploration of the intricacies of corporate governance within the banking sector.

The first section of the questionnaire was dedicated to eliciting insights into the fundamental concept of governance, focusing on its definition, objectives, and perceived significance within the banking industry. This section comprised eight carefully formulated questions that aimed to gauge the respondents' understanding and interpretation of the core tenets and principles underpinning effective corporate governance practices.

The second section of the questionnaire delved deeper into the practical aspects of governance, exploring the specific principles, regulations, and methodologies employed by private banks to ensure the effective implementation of governance frameworks. It consisted of two divisions, each tailored to assess distinct facets of governance practices, encompassing a total of nine targeted questions aimed at capturing nuanced perspectives and experiences related to governance adherence and application.

To ensure comprehensive and accurate data analysis, a standardized five-point Likert scale was employed to evaluate the responses provided by the participants. This scale facilitated a systematic assessment of the participants' opinions and perspectives, enabling the researchers to derive meaningful insights into the prevailing attitudes and perceptions surrounding corporate governance within the sampled private banks.

The sample selection process was deliberately structured to ensure a diverse representation of private banks, considering various operational scales and regional contexts. A combination of deliberate and random sampling techniques was employed to enhance the inclusivity and representativeness of the study, thereby reinforcing the validity and reliability of the research findings.

Hypotheses for research

By adopting a comprehensive governance framework, banking institutions can witness a significant improvement in their operational efficiency and overall performance. This, in turn, is expected to contribute significantly to the upward valuation of the market. This association indicates that strong governance practices not only streamline internal processes but also act as a catalyst to enhance investor confidence and market perception, ultimately promoting an environment conducive to sustainable growth and profitability in the banking sector. Therefore, the first research hypothesis can be formulated:

There is a clear correlation among implementing governance as a comprehensive framework and improving banking performance efficiency, thereby leading to a rise in valuation of market.

Incorporating a well-defined governance framework within banks is expected to foster a culture of increased responsibility and accountability among stakeholders. By establishing transparent guidelines and protocols, such a framework can effectively reduce instances of administrative and financial misconduct, thus enhancing a culture of integrity and ethical behavior within the organization. Moreover, the systematic integration of governance practices ensures that shareholders' interests are protected, underscoring the pivotal role of governance in nurturing an enabling environment that prioritizes the long-term sustainability and growth of the organization while supporting the rights and interests of all relevant stakeholders. Hence, the second research hypothesis can be formulated as follows:

Incorporating a governance framework within banks enhances responsibility, diminishes instances of managerial and financial misconduct, and guarantees shareholder interests are protected.

The paper is structured as follows: after the introduction, it provides an overview of the theoretical framework (Section. “ Research methodology ”), followed by a presentation of the literature review (Section “ Framework for the concept of banking governance ”). Section “ Results ” discusses the empirical findings, while Section “ Discussion ” offers a discussion of the results. Finally, the paper concludes and recommended solutions with implications, limitations, and avenues for future research in Section “ Conclusions ”.

Framework for the concept of banking governance

Over the last two decades, the corporate establishment in general and banks in particular have encountered huge problems.

The adoption of the concept of governance and supporting its application in banks, while noting the effective application of banking governance, were inevitable due to the banking industry's prosperity, intense competition, the emergence of the financial banking services market's liberalization, and the spread of financial corruption. Understanding the motivations for adopting banking governance, which we touched on in the first demand, as well as the fundamental components of banking governance, which we covered in the second demand, is crucial. It is also important to understand the dimensions of banking governance, which we covered in the third demand [ 5 ].

The first demand is the justification for the use of banking governance. In light of the changes and developments in the financial sector, the banking environment has undergone major modifications. According to the International Monetary Fund 6 , the growth of the banking industry and the expansion of the geographic and functional scope of its operations has led to a boom as a result.

The rise of non-banking financial organizations as formidable rivals has increased competition among banks, forcing them to modify their strategy via a variety of established channels in order to stay ahead in the changing banking environment. These changes have led to the adoption of banking governance practices. Several factors have contributed to this necessity, including the following:

Financial liberalization:

Financial liberalization is a key characteristic of the modern financial system and a significant aspect of economic progress. The professionalization of liberal methods and the tendency for most nations to move toward global economic integration have grown to be closely related during the course of the twentieth century. According to Al-Saydiya and Muhammad [ 7 ], financial liberalization is a collection of policies aiming at diminishing the financial sector's onerous regulations, reducing the state's monopoly over it, and promoting competition.

Technological advancements and digital transformation:

Technological advancements and the widespread adoption of digital solutions have revolutionized the banking industry and intensified competition among banks. Non-banking financial institutions, leveraging innovative technologies, have emerged as strong competitors. In response, banks have recognized the need to adapt their operations and embrace digital transformation to remain competitive.

This shift toward technology-driven banking practices has been driven by several factors. Firstly, customers' expectations have evolved, with a growing demand for convenient and seamless digital banking experiences. Banks have had to invest in digital channels, such as mobile banking apps and online platforms, to meet these expectations.

Furthermore, new financial services and products have been made possible by technology, including robo-advisory services, peer-to-peer lending platforms, and online payment systems. Non-banking financial institutions, often unburdened by traditional banking regulations, have capitalized on these opportunities, forcing banks to innovate and expand their offerings.

Additionally, technology has streamlined internal banking processes, increasing efficiency and reducing costs. Automation, artificial intelligence, and data analytics have empowered banks to enhance risk management, fraud detection, and customer relationship management.

In light of these advancements, banks have recognized the importance of robust banking governance practices to effectively manage technological risks, ensure data security, and maintain regulatory compliance. Embracing technological advancements while adhering to governance standards has become essential for banks to navigate the competitive landscape and deliver value to their customers.

In the context of banking, governance refers to how the Board of Directors and senior management handle the affairs of the Bank, including:

(The Development of the bank's direction as well as priorities), included delivering financial returns for the shareholder.

Establishing the bank's degree of risk tolerance.

Control the bank's day-to-day activities.

Taking into account the interests of everyone who has a stake in the Bank, including shareholders, workers, and customers.

Aligning the bank's operations and actions so that it may carry out its duties in a safe, sound way and with a dedication to adhering to all applicable laws and regulations.

Review of literature

The financial sector, both public and private, is confronted with issues such as inadequate laws, rules, and transparency. Private banks struggle to contribute to economic growth, particularly those lacking strategic departments, excellent practices, and international standards. The International Monetary Fund (2015), emphasizes the significance of corporate governance in developing human capital and mitigating risks. To enhance corporate governance, banks must promote awareness among all stakeholders, strengthen the role of administration in risk reduction, crisis prevention, and beneficiary rights protection. Banks may improve their performance, control, and client focus by applying corporate governance, thereby contributing to financial prosperity.

According to Moghadam (2015), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was established to develop mechanisms and standards for the adoption of governance in financial and banking institutions in order to play a significant and effective role in controlling the activities of banks and preventing crises. This was done in response to the financial collapses that occurred in some major economies. Through the function of the bank, the principles of governance are properly applied in the financial system. The financial system has undergone various changes, but while there are some indications of their implementation, they have not been as effective as they could have been.

Wali [ 8 ] explored the influence of Dutch firms' performance on discretionary accrual models, highlighting the complexities of financial management and reporting practices. The study emphasized the importance of regulatory oversight and compliance measures to foster transparency and accountability within the banking sector, underscoring the significance of maintaining ethical standards in financial operations [ 8 ].

According to Matouk and Tarih [ 9 ], this study examines the idea of governance as defined by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Furthermore, governance has been defined from a banking perspective and in accordance with the Basel Committee, the importance of governance, particularly its application to the banking system, is emphasized with special reference to examples of financial crises such as the one in Southern Eastern Asia in 1997 or the international crisis. The paper uses these instances to emphasize that the banking system's poor practices, particularly its inadequate application of governance, were a key cause of the aforementioned crises, and to demonstrate how they drove certain governments to issue legislation linked to the right application of governance.

Agoba (2017) investigates the influence of financial systems and political institutions on the efficiency of central bank independence in lowering inflation. The study finds that the relationship between central bank independence and inflation is complex and contingent on various factors, drawing from different economic and political theories.

In a rapidly globalizing world, central banks have evolved their primary goal to safeguard their native currency and maintain low and steady inflation rates [ 10 ], Mohamed (2019) emphasizes the significance of central bank independence in achieving monetary stability and effective monetary policy. Independent central banks can operate without political interference, emphasizing the importance of this autonomy. In a similar vein, Wali et al. [ 11 ] delved into the causes and effects of earnings management on stock prices, emphasizing the intricate relationship between financial manipulation and market performance. Their findings underscored the significance of implementing robust governance frameworks to mitigate the adverse impact of such practices on the banking sector's stability [ 11 ]. Furthermore, Mahmood et al. [ 11 ] shed light on the effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors, emphasizing the moderating role of social media marketing in enhancing the sustainable performance of businesses.AUTHOR: Bedikanli 2018 has been changed to Bedikanli 2018 so that this citation matches the Reference List. Please confirm that this is correct.correct AUTHOR: Wali et al. 2019 has been changed to Wali et al. 2019 so that this citation matches the Reference List. Please confirm that this is correct.correct

Additionally, drawing from contemporary literature, Zhang et al. [ 12 ] illuminate the importance of knowledge management in fostering sustainable innovation within small and medium enterprises, highlighting the mediation analysis utilizing a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Muhamad Ali et al. [ 13 ] investigated the impact of changes in accounting standards on earnings management, providing applied research spanning from 2003 to 2014. Their study shed light on the dynamic relationship between accounting regulations and financial manipulation, underscoring the importance of robust regulatory frameworks to control unethical practices within the banking sector [ 13 ].

Moreover, Wali's [ 14 ] research on the detection of earnings management through a decrease in corporate income tax highlighted the critical need for transparency and accountability in financial reporting. The study emphasized the importance of stringent monitoring mechanisms to curb deceptive practices that could potentially destabilize the sector [ 14 ]. Furthermore, Li et al. (2022) investigate the impact of tax avoidance culture and employees' behavior on sustainable business performance, emphasizing the moderating role of corporate social responsibility. The study emphasizes the critical relationship between ethical business practices, corporate social responsibility, and long-term sustainable performance.AUTHOR: Muhamad Ali et al. 2020 has been changed to Muhamad Ali et al. 2020 so that this citation matches the Reference List. Please confirm that this is correct.correctAUTHOR: Wali, 2021 has been changed to Wali 2021 so that this citation matches the Reference List. Please confirm that this is correct.correct

Finally, with the advent of technological advances, Wali [ 15 ] explored the security and confidentiality of information in the banking sector, especially in the context of cloud accounting versus traditional accounting methods. This research emphasizes the need for comprehensive data protection and risk management strategies, emphasizing the importance of a governance framework that adapts to the evolving technological landscape [ 15 ].

The present study aims to contribute to the existing literature by examining the specific mechanisms through which robust governance frameworks within the banking sector contribute to mitigating risks, enhancing performance, and safeguarding stakeholder interests. By analyzing the interplay between governance practices, financial stability, and market valuation, this study seeks to bridge the existing gap in understanding the nuanced relationship between corporate governance and banking performance. The following sections will provide a comprehensive analysis of the empirical findings and discuss the implications for policy and practice within the financial sector.

Sample data analysis and research methods

This research will concentrate on private banks particularly, Kurdistan International Bank, Bank of Cihan, Bank of Erbil, and Bank of Harem. The objective was to collect opinions and views from professionals and employees of these private banks. The data were gathered and analyzed using a well-designed questionnaire, and frequency distribution tables, percentages, arithmetic means, and standard deviation were produced using statistical software (SPSS). These statistical methods assisted in gathering data and producing visual displays like graphs. The survey had two sections:

The participants' demographic information was collected in the first section.

The principles, guidelines, and controls necessary to execute efficient governance, was devoted to examining in the second section.

The analysis of the collected data involved a thorough examination of the frequency distribution for each answer category, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the prevailing trends and patterns within the dataset. Additionally, the use of the standard deviation as a statistical metric further facilitated a robust analysis of the data, providing valuable insights into the variations and consistency of responses across the sample.Reference (The International Monetary Fund (2015), Moghadam (2015), Agoba (2017), Mohamed (2019)) was mentioned in the manuscript; however, this was not included in the reference list. As a rule, all mentioned references should be present in the reference list. Please provide the reference details to be inserted in the reference list.okay

Testing of hypotheses

The results of the hypothesis testing reveal strong support for both hypotheses. The participants showed complete agreement with both hypotheses, indicating a high level of consensus among them. The participants' thorough comprehension of these elements is further evidenced by the fact that the average scores for all the questions pertaining to the idea, goals, foundations, laws, and processes of governance continuously clung at about 4. According to Hypothesis 1, there is a clear correlation between implementing comprehensive governance and improving banking performance, which results in a rise in market value and the eradication of market issues. The overall average score of 4.050 reinforces the participants' agreement with this hypothesis. This finding suggests that the participants recognize the importance of comprehensive governance in improving banking performance and addressing market challenges.

According to Hypothesis 2, the integration of the governance system within banks enhances responsibility, reduces cases of administrative and financial misconduct, and ensures the protection of shareholders' rights. The participants' strong agreement with this hypothesis is evident through their consistently high scores. This indicates that the participants acknowledge the role of governance in promoting responsible behavior, mitigating misconduct, and safeguarding shareholders' rights.

In this section, we provide a description and analysis of the research variables. We also present the results obtained from the study with discussion.

The descriptive statistics for the demographic questions are shown in Table 1 . The bulk of participants (51.7%) are between the ages of 20 and 30, followed by those between the ages of 31 and 40 (26.7%), 41 and 50 (16.7%), and those above 50 (5%). Females constitute a larger proportion (65%) compared to males (35%). Regarding education, most participants hold a master's degree (58.3%), while 23.3% have a diploma, and 18.3% possess a bachelor's degree. None of the participants have a PhD. In terms of work experience, the majority (33.3%) have less than four years, and a significant number (26.7%) have a background in finance and banking.

To offer a comprehensive understanding of the study's participants, Table 1 showcases the descriptive statistics pertaining to the demographic questions. These statistics serve as a valuable lens through which we can discern the diverse characteristics and backgrounds of the individuals involved, thereby enriching the contextual understanding of the research outcomes. Through this analytical lens, we aim to provide a nuanced perspective that not only encapsulates the numerical data but also paints a vivid portrait of the participants, highlighting the diverse tapestry of their experiences and perspectives.

Table 2 provides illustrative data on the goals, significance, and notion of governance. As shown in Figs.  1 and 2 , Q1 has the highest mean score (4.133) out of all the questions, followed by Q7 (4.117), Q5 (4.100), Q4 (4.050), Q6 (4.050), Q8 (4.050), Q2 (4.017), and Q3 (3.967). The total average is 4.062, suggesting that respondents overwhelmingly concur with all of the inquiries on the idea of governance, its goals, and its significance. It is proven that governance exists and is important as a result of this acceptance of the first hypothesis.

The mean of each question on governance

The second section of the study, which was divided into two subsections with a total of nine questions, concentrated on the concepts, principles, and tools for applying governance. For the purpose of gathering data, the researchers used a five-point Likert scale. To analyze the responses, frequency distribution was used, aligning with the study's objectives. The sample was intentionally selected but also had random elements, and standard deviation was utilized in the analysis.

Table 3 contains descriptive data on the foundations, norms, and procedures involved in governance implementation. Interesting insights about the responses obtained are revealed by the analysis. Among the questions in this section, Q17 stands out with the highest mean score of 4.150, indicating that participants hold strong opinions regarding this particular aspect. It is closely followed by Q13 with a mean of 4.133, Q12 and Q16 with means of 4.117, Q11 with a mean of 4.050, Q9 with a mean of 4.033, Q10 with a mean of 4.017, and Q15 with a mean of 3.967. The question with the lowest mean score in this section is Q14 with a mean of 3.950. These findings are visually represented in Fig.  2

The results suggest that the surveyed experts and officials attribute significant importance to Q17, indicating that they consider it a crucial element in the successful implementation of governance. Q13, Q12, and Q16 also received high mean scores, suggesting that they are highly valued aspects in the context of governance. On the other hand, Q14 received a relatively lower mean score, indicating that it may be perceived as less significant compared to other questions in this section.

The results of the study provide clear evidence that the respondents have a comprehensive understanding of governance and its various components. Their shared understanding of the importance of governance lends credence to the idea that they are well equipped to put governance measures in place and help their organizations establish strong governance practices. Descriptive statistics, such as means, help provide an understanding of participants' opinions and positions regarding the foundations, guidelines, and procedures for governance performance. The findings contribute to a comprehensive analysis of corporate governance practices in private banks. By examining the statistics, researchers can gain valuable insights into the strengths and potential areas for improvement in private banks' governance frameworks.

The significance of the results lies in the fact that they show that the participants have the skills and awareness required to implement governance practices within their organizations. The findings underline how important it is for them to understand effective governance and promote excellent results within their own organizations.

A study by Abbas [ 16 ] discusses crisis management and transnational healthcare challenges, highlighting the crucial role of effective governance in handling crises. This study underscores the importance of the respondents' skills and awareness in implementing governance practices within their organizations, as it prepares them to manage crises and challenges effectively.

Moreover, Shah et al. [ 17 ] in Utilities Policy emphasizes the importance of environmental policy in the context of renewable electricity generation. The findings of this study resonate with the significance of comprehensive governance practices, as effective governance often involves implementing policies that prioritize sustainable practices.

Additionally, Wang et al. [ 18 ] focus on the impact of economic corridors and tourism on the local community's quality of life under the context of the One Belt One Road initiative. This study's insights can be related to the discussion on the significance of the respondents' ability to understand governance and its implementation within their organizations. Furthermore, the study by Micah et al. [ 19 ] in The Lancet Global Health, this study's emphasis on the importance of investments in healthcare and pandemic preparedness aligns with the discussion's key point regarding the importance of understanding effective governance in promoting excellent results within organizations.

The recent studies provide additional context and support for the idea that a comprehensive understanding of governance is essential for effective management, especially in the areas of environmental policy, crisis management, community development, and healthcare preparedness. Participants' ability to understand governance concepts and practices is likely to enhance their effectiveness in these areas, ultimately benefiting their organizations and the broader community. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the importance of aligning governance with evolving accounting standards, detecting and preventing earnings management, and adapting to technological advances, all while maintaining strict regulatory compliance and ethical standards. These insights provide valuable recommendations to policy makers and industry stakeholders to strengthen governance mechanisms and enhance the long-term sustainability and stability of the sector.

Conclusions

This study looked at how well the sample participants understood governance and how well it worked to accomplish important goals. Analyzing data from a chosen sample of responses was part of the research technique. The research sample shows that participants have a good concept of governance as a system that works well and has accomplished important goals. Legal challenges and the overall environment continue to impede the implementation of governance and its objectives. The efficiency of control mechanisms in the banking system is hampered by both internal and external factors, despite the fact that adherence to governance criteria is essential for private banks to succeed. Moreover, the study underscores the critical role of regulatory frameworks, such as the Basel requirements for banking supervision, in bolstering the resilience and stability of the banking system. While acknowledging the existing limitations, the research emphasizes the progressive nature of the Basel requirements, extending beyond conventional prudential safeguards to encompass comprehensive monitoring and control systems. By enhancing solvency and risk management practices, the Basel requirements aim to fortify the foundations of governance within the banking sector, fostering greater transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability.

Overall, this study underscores the intricate interplay between governance, legal frameworks, environmental dynamics, and regulatory structures, highlighting the need for continuous adaptation and innovation to address the persistent challenges and foster a more robust and resilient governance framework conducive to achieving sustainable objectives across diverse sectors, especially within the intricate landscape of the banking industry.

Recommendations

Several recommendations were made, including increasing public awareness and understanding of the governance culture, strengthening the legal system through enforceable directives and regulations, and investing in workforce development. These recommendations are considered appropriate solutions for private banks:

Private banks should prioritize the development and implementation of comprehensive governance guidelines that encompass clear objectives, ethical standards, and transparent practices. This involves creating a robust framework that outlines the responsibilities and roles of various stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of integrity and accountability at all levels of the organization.

Private banks should actively engage with all stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, employees, and regulatory authorities, to foster transparency and build trust. Regular communication, feedback mechanisms, and stakeholder consultations can significantly enhance the alignment of organizational objectives with stakeholder expectations, thereby fostering a culture of openness and collaboration.

Private banks should invest in advanced risk management tools and technologies, coupled with comprehensive internal and external audits, to proactively identify and mitigate potential risks and compliance breaches.

Private banks should leverage technological advancements to enhance transparency and accountability within their operations. This involves the implementation of advanced digital systems for data management, reporting, and monitoring, enabling real-time tracking of financial transactions and governance practices. Embracing fintech solutions that prioritize security and transparency can significantly enhance the overall governance framework within the bank.

Potential limitations

Sample Size and Selection Bias The study's findings might be influenced by the relatively limited sample size and potential selection bias, which could affect the generalizability of the results. The inclusion of a more diverse and larger sample, encompassing a broader spectrum of banking institutions, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the nuanced dynamics of corporate governance within the banking sector.

Data Quality and Validity Potential limitations related to data quality and validity might have influenced the accuracy and reliability of the study's results. The reliance on self-reported data and potential inaccuracies in the reporting process could have introduced biases, thereby impacting the robustness of the empirical analysis.

External Factors and Economic Conditions: The study's findings might be subject to external factors and economic conditions that were not fully accounted for during the analysis. Macroeconomic fluctuations, regulatory changes, and global financial trends could have influenced the observed relationship between corporate governance practices and banking performance, thereby necessitating a more nuanced understanding of the contextual factors at play.

Implications and future research

The implications of the study's findings hold substantial significance for both academia and the banking industry. Academically, the research highlights the pivotal role of robust governance frameworks in fostering sustainable banking practices, mitigating risks, and enhancing overall performance. It underscores the critical need for continued research and development in the field of corporate governance, particularly within the context of the dynamic and evolving banking landscape.

For the banking industry, the study underscores the imperative need for the adoption and implementation of comprehensive governance frameworks to ensure transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability. The findings emphasize the potential benefits of integrating governance practices in enhancing operational efficiency, minimizing risks, and fostering a culture of integrity and ethical conduct within banking institutions.

Future research endeavors could build upon this study by delving deeper into the specific mechanisms through which governance practices influence various facets of banking operations. This could involve exploring the role of technology and digital transformation in reshaping governance frameworks, examining the impact of cultural and ethical dimensions on governance implementation, and assessing the long-term implications of governance practices on stakeholder relationships and market valuation. Additionally, comparative studies across different global regions and banking systems could provide valuable insights into the cultural and contextual variations influencing the efficacy of governance practices within the banking sector.Reference [20 to 30](after sorting) was provided in the reference list; however, this was not mentioned or cited in the manuscript. As a rule, if a citation is present in the text, then it should be present in the list. Please provide the location of where to insert the reference citation in the main body text. Kindly ensure that all references are cited in ascending numerical order.okay

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Freeland C (2007), Basel committee guidance on corporate governance for banks, paper presented to: corporate governance and reform: paving the way to financial stability and development, a conference organized by the Egyptian Banking Institute.

Hussain I, Hussain S, Akram S, Shaheen I, Niu B (2019) The impact of knowledge sharing and innovation upon sustainable performance in islamic banks: a mediation analysis through an SEM approach. Sustainability 11(15):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154049

Article   Google Scholar  

Rehman S, Aldereai O, Al-Sulaiti KI, Shah SAR (2023) Tourism management in financial crisis and industry 4.0 effects: managers traits for technology adoption in reshaping, and reinventing human management systems. Human Syst Manag 42(5):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-230

Meng Q, Yan Z, Shankar A, Subramanian M (2023) Human-computer interaction and digital literacy promote educational learning in pre-school children: mediating role of psychological resilience for kids’ mental well-being and school readiness. Int J Human-Comput Interact. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2248432

Agenor PR (2013). Monetary policy under flexible exchange rates, an introduction to inflation targeting, World Bank Working Papers, No. 2511

International Monetary Fund (2005). Inflation? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean, Working Paper.

Al-Saydiya MA, Saja Fathi Muhammad MM (2008), Governance and rational banking, Tikrit J Administ Econ Sci , Univ Tikrit, 4(10).

Wali K (2017) The influence of Dutch firm’s performance on discretionary accrual models: evidence from the Netherlands. Zanco J Hum Sci 21(2):374401. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs

Matouk AE, Tarih AM (2017) Investigating dynamical … difference equation. Int J Differ Equ 12(2):267–280

Google Scholar  

Bedikanli M (2018). Umea University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umea School of Business and Economics (USBE), Economics.

Wali K, Saleh S, Van Paridon K (2019) The causes and effects of earnings management on stock prices. J Econ Admin Sci 25(116):93110. https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v25i116.1789

Zhang Q, Hussain I, Akram S, Afaq A, Shad MA (2020) Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability 12(6):2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062407

Muhamad Ali KW, Saleh SM, van Paridon K (2020) The impact of changes in accounting standards on earnings management: applied research from 2003–2014. Koya Univ J Hum Soc Sci 2(2):166–175. https://doi.org/10.1450/kujhss.v2n2y20191

Wali K (2021) The detection of earnings management through a decrease of corporate income tax. Futur Bus J 7:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00083-8

Wali K, Darwish KB, Abdulfattah AJ (2022), Security and confidentiality of information under the application of cloud accounting compared to traditional accounting. 10.33095%2Fjeas.v25i116.1789

Abbas J (2021) Crisis management, transnational healthcare challenges and opportunities: the intersection of COVID-19 pandemic and global mental health. Res Glob 3:100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100037

Shah SAR, Zhang Q, Abbas J, Tang H, Al-Sulaiti KI (2023) Waste management, quality of life and natural resources utilization matter for renewable electricity generation: the main and moderate role of environmental policy. Util Policy 82:101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101584

Wang S, Al-Sulati KI, Shah SAR (2023) The impact of economic corridor and tourism on local community’s quality of life under one belt one road context. Eval Rev 47(3):0193841X231182749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231182749

Micah AE, Bhangdia K, Cogswell IE, Lasher D, Lidral-Porter B, Maddison ER, Dieleman JL (2023) Global investments in pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: development assistance and domestic spending on health between 1990 and 2026. Lancet Glob Health 11(3):e385–e413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00007

Al-Sulaiti, K, Abbas J, and Al-Sulaiti I (2023), Tourists' online information influences their dine-out behaviour: country-of-origin effects as a moderator. In (1 ed., pp. 1–20). Qatar University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1012/qu.2023.100007

Al-Sulaiti K, Al-Sulaiti I, and Shah SAR (Eds.) (2023), Resetting the hospitality redux through country-of-origin effects: Role of tourism, culture, transportation and restaurants selection in Arab countries (1st` ed.). Qatar University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/qu.2023.100011 .

Bilin N (2013), Budget deficit and inflation, the roles of central independence and financial market development, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, (5) Carl, Cottarelli: Limiting

Basel committee on Banking Supervision (2016) Enhancing Corporate Governance for Banking Organization, Bank For international settlements, Switzerland.

Central Bank Credit to the Government (2012). Theory and Practice, International Monetary Fund, Occasional Paper No. 110

Jaffar A, Raza S, Nurunnabi M, Minai MS, Bano S (2019) The impact of entrepreneurial business networks on firms’ performance through a mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability 11(11):3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006

Mahmood S, Ali H, Ali Raza M, Ali G, Aman J, Bano S, Nurunnabi M (2019) The effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors through a moderating role of social media marketing on sustainable performance of business firms. Sustainability 11(12):3434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123434

Wahiba M (2012). Respecting governance controls in banks as a way to avoid economic crises, research presented to a conference (future papers for central and local governments, the private sector and civil society), Arab Organization for Administrative Development.

Ghader MY (2012), Determinants and standards of governance, a research presented to the conference on globalization of management in the age of knowledge.

Li Y, Al-Sulaiti K, Dongling W, Al-Sulaiti I (2022) Tax avoidance culture and employees’ behavior affect sustainable business performance: the moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Front Environ Sci 10:964410

Zhang X, Husnain M, Yang H, Ullah S, Zhang R (2022) Corporate business strategy and tax avoidance culture: moderating role of gender diversity in an emerging economy. Front Psychol 13:827553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827553

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank everyone who contributed any information, especially the bank managers

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Salahaddin University-Erbil, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Kawa Wali & Bnar Karim Darwish

Erasmus University -Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Kees van Paridon

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was conducted collectively.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kawa Wali .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Wali, K., van Paridon, K. & Darwish, B. . Strengthening banking sector governance: challenges and solutions. Futur Bus J 9 , 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00279-0

Download citation

Received : 24 August 2023

Accepted : 14 November 2023

Published : 27 November 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00279-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Institutions of private banking
• Governance goals
• Governance of bank

The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study

• Original Article
• Published: 30 May 2023
• Volume 20 , pages 374–394, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Wajdi Affes   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-8935 1 &
• Anis Jarboui 2  

25k Accesses

5 Citations

Explore all metrics

Corporate governance remains the focus of current research and a concept that continues to evolve to meet the needs of business managers. Faced with the need for companies to cope with a world characterized by perpetual change and successive economic crises (Prowse in Revue d'économie financière 31:119–158, 1994), the identification of the results of the implementation of good governance mechanisms in the structure of the management of companies on financial performance remains a necessity that helps managers and researchers specialized in management sciences and financial accounting to have a better visibility on the importance of corporate governance. It should be mentioned that the economic environment and the characteristics of the sectors of activity of the companies remain a relevant criterion in the study of the relation between the governance of the companies and their financial performance. In this sense, we have tried through this research work to study the impact of the implementation of effective corporate governance on the financial performance of 160 companies in the UK between 2005 and 2018 while taking into account the specificity of the business sectors. Through our study, we used multivariate regressions based on FGLS models while dividing our sample to several clusters. As a result, we found that the implementation of good corporate governance leads to the improvement of the financial performance of companies measured by the return on equity. As a motivation, it must be said that this study can be of major importance for future studies that want to make comparisons on the sectoral and temporal level. Indeed, this study gives the possibility for future research work to make comparative studies based on comparisons for different sectors of activity in the UK before and after the Brexit and also after the COVID 19 period.

Similar content being viewed by others

Implications of corporate governance on financial performance: an analytical review of governance and social reporting reforms in India

Does corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in india empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis.

Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence of the Selected Telecommunication Companies of GCC

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

There has been much research on the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance. Referring to the literature on the role of corporate governance, we can cite the work of Shleifer and Vishny ( 1997 ) who consider corporate governance as the set of mechanisms by which capital providers guarantee shareholder profitability. Denis and McConnell ( 2003 ) have emphasized the importance of distinguishing between the notion of internal and external mechanisms of governance and their importance for the providers of funds on all points of value creation.

The study of the relationship between governance expressed by the corporate governance score and the improvement of the performance of the latter remains a vast field of study and research that has inspired researchers in the field of accounting, finance, and taxation (Louizi 2007 ).

The existence of such a relationship has led us to wonder about the factors that can impact this relationship in a direct or indirect way. Considering this fact, we note that managers who behave in a discretionary manner will exert a major influence on the fate of the accounting and tax manipulation of companies and will try to increase their discretionary power.

Within this framework, agency theory has explained this behavior by focusing on the interests of the funders and decision makers in a way that reflects the interest of each party (Jensen and Meckling 1976 ).

From an accounting perspective, the manager often has the power to manipulate earnings while using the accounting estimates and manipulation techniques available to him (Ahadiat and Hefzi 2013 ).

The practices of corporate governance have not stopped evolving. This is presented via the succession of guides to good governance practices that seek to counter the failures detected over time and which manifest themselves at the level of financial scandals, sometimes inducing a harmful imbalance for the global economic fabric. Based on the "FTSE 350 corporate governance review (2013), for the UK, the evolution of good governance guidelines as well as institutions in the field of corporate governance has developed to respond to the panoply of problems that may be directly related to corporate governance.

In the same context, it is important to emphasize that the study of corporate governance must take into account the specificity of each sector of activity since each sector has its own regulations, key success factors, and compliance rules. In our research paper, as our focus is on UK companies, we have chosen to use the 2 digit ICB industry code, which is relevant to the context of our study. In addition, it should be noted that previous research has studied the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance while focusing only on a particular governance mechanism or a particular specificity related to the strengthening of these mechanisms. Again, it must be emphasized that the majority of research studies have examined the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance without giving much importance to the sectoral specificity of the companies studied.

To give a clearer idea of the orientation of our research work and based on previous developments, we can form the following research question:

What relationship can exist between the governance score and financial performance, taking into account the characteristics of the different business sectors in the United Kingdom economy?

It follows that the objective of the research is to examine the relationship between governance score and financial performance while taking into account the characteristics of the business sectors.

This research paper contributes to the existing literature on several levels. Indeed, it consolidates previous research that tried to show the importance of corporate governance in improving financial performance. Moreover, it focuses on the effect of changes in the business sectors of UK firms so that we can identify the effect of the quality of corporate governance on the performance of firms related to a particular business sector.

This research paper allows us to study the impact of corporate governance on the financial performance sought by shareholders while basing ourselves on the FGLS method, which allowed us to eliminate the various sources of bias identified when using different regressors, namely the generalized least squares method, the regression with the consideration of the presence of the fixed effect as well as the persistence of the autocorrelation problem.

We will try through this research work to emphasize the possible relations between corporate governance and financial performance which is mainly based on the agency theory. It should also be added that the study of the previous relationship by taking into consideration the sectoral characteristics will lead us to turn to the foundations of the institutional theory. The latter theory emphasizes that an institution is constrained by its social, political, economic, legal and technological environment, which it conforms to in order to guarantee its legitimacy and durability.

In order to achieve our research objective, we will not use a simple governance mechanism to reflect the importance of corporate governance on financial performance, but we will opt for a governance score that better reflects all managerial, strategic and CSR characteristics. To achieve the objective of this research work, the remainder of the paper is arranged as follows. First, in “ Review and development of hypotheses ” section, we briefly discuss previous literature and the development of hypotheses. In “ Research methodology ” section, the research design and methodology are discussed including data, variables description. “ Empirical approach to the analysis of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance ” section summarizes the empirical results, the discussions of the findings and their implications, including the focus on the difference in industry specifications using different regressors. Finally, in the last section, we conclude the study and provide the implications of our findings and the recommendations for future research.

Review and development of hypotheses

Agency theory and corporate governance.

Corporate governance has always played a fundamental role in monitoring and controlling the proper functioning of business processes transparently. By referring to the various research works, we can see that the agency theory is at the heart of the studies on corporate governance. The work of Ross ( 1973 ) and subsequently Jensen and Meckling ( 1976 ) has indicated that the agency theory is the most appropriate sphere to study corporate governance.

This theory can lead us to reflect on the way in which managers can behave. We can cite the case of companies that offer their managers variable remuneration depending on the growth of turnover. In the same sense, it must be said that internal control efficiency and internal audit within companies can play an important role in strengthening the governance structure of companies. It represents one of the guarantors of the proper functioning of business processes in a controlled environment to ensure the improvement of financial performance (Nyakundi et al. 2014 ).

To further develop the role of agency theory in the governance-performance relationship, we can say that agency theory is an analytical framework for understanding the relationships between a firm's stakeholders, including shareholders and management. According to this theory, shareholders have different objectives from those of managers, which can lead to conflicts of interest. Managers seek to maximize their own wealth and power, while shareholders seek to maximize the value of their shares. To align the interests of stakeholders and improve the financial performance of the firm, agency theory advocates the establishment of an effective governance system. Good corporate governance involves putting in place control and oversight mechanisms to ensure that management acts in the best interests of shareholders. This can include the appointment of an independent board of directors, executive compensation linked to company performance, financial transparency and disclosure of relevant information to shareholders. By establishing appropriate incentives and controls, corporate governance can help reduce conflicts of interest and improve the company's financial performance by increasing the value of the company and the return on investment for shareholders. The importance of corporate governance mechanism and its impact on the financial performance was studied by Yermack ( 1996 ), en plus Shleifer and Vishny ( 1997 ) reviewed the state of corporate governance research using a review of the existing literature. The authors concluded that agency theory is an important framework for understanding the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance, and that it can be used to develop effective governance mechanisms for firms.

Consider a publicly traded company whose shareholders are concerned with maximizing the value of their shares. The company's managers, on the other hand, may have different objectives, such as maximizing their own compensation or maintaining their power within the company. This divergence of interests can lead to strategic decisions that are not optimal for the company or its shareholders. In this case, agency theory suggests that strong corporate governance can help align stakeholder interests and improve the firm's financial performance. For example, the appointment of an independent and competent board of directors can help monitor the activities of executives and make strategic decisions in the interests of shareholders. Similarly, compensating executives based on company performance can provide an incentive to work hard to increase the value of the company.

In summary, agency theory shows that corporate governance is essential for aligning stakeholder interests and improving the financial performance of the firm. By putting in place appropriate control and oversight mechanisms, corporate governance can help reduce conflicts of interest and improve shareholder value.

Effect of governance score on performance

In studies that have introduced corporate governance as a main variable, two main areas have been examined. The first seeks to address governance from a shareholder and capital structure perspective, the second seeks to address the composition of boards of directors and the improvement of the quality of governance mechanisms to improve financial performance. Among the research that has emphasized the importance of capital structure, we can cite McConnell and Servaes ( 1990 ), Nesbitt ( 1994 ), Smith ( 1996 ), Del Guercio and Hawkins ( 1999 ), and Hartzell and Starks ( 2003 ), who found that the presence of institutional shareholders positively affects management behavior. Regarding the research that has dealt with the functioning of boards of directors, we can cite Brickley et al. ( 1994 ), Lee et al. ( 1999 ) who have emphasized the importance of independent or outside directors in improving the level of governance quality. In addition, Jensen ( 1993 ) has shown that dual directorships increase the discretion of the director so that the director can influence the financial outcome. For Dechow and Sloan ( 1991 ), the introduction of the CEO's age as a variable makes it possible to reflect the difference between executives and their behaviors throughout their career and especially in the last year of service. During the last two decades, institutional theory has contributed greatly to the understanding of the behavioral aspect and the explanation of the reaction of the different stakeholders toward corporate governance (Aguilera and Jackson 2003 ; Judge et al. 2008 ). It must be said that this theory has contributed enormously to the study of the interaction between the governance mechanism and the institutional framework in which any firm operates. Several studies tried to examine closely the main characteristics of corporate governance to show if there is a possible explanation of the relationship between corporate governance and fiscal management in a perspective of improving financial performance. While Armstrong et al. ( 2015 ) and Seidman and Stomberg ( 2017 ) found a significant relationship between the latter two variables, Blaylock ( 2016 ) did not find any relationship between these two concepts. Before proposing the research hypothesis of the first chapter, it was necessary to first list the results found by researchers who studied the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance based on the governance index or score.

Indeed, La Porta et al. ( 2000 ) have shown that the value of firms is positively associated with minority shareholders' rights. In their research, they emphasized the role of compliance with good governance practices while focusing on the impact of external governance mechanisms such as the level of control of firms in the market.

Indeed, other research works, such as those of Guney et al. ( 2019 ), have shown that the quality of corporate governance measured by Data Stream's ESG ASSET 4 governance score presents a negative and significant association with financial performance for panel data for a sample of 10171 US companies between 2002 and 2014 classified into 10 industries. Indeed, these authors indicated that there are several studies that have given importance to the relationship between corporate governance and its financial performance and whose results of impact or association are mixed while taking into consideration the sectoral characteristics. Other research works have emphasized the importance of internal governance mechanisms while studying factors related to other aspects such as board structure, board function, executive properties of management, and the effect of compensation (Bhagat et al. 2008 ; Guney et al. ( 2019 ); Walsh and Seward 1990 ). In addition and while referring to the work of Guney Guney et al. ( 2019 ), we can say that several research works have tried to investigate the relationship between governance and the performance of companies that seeks to be consistent with the principles of good governance codes. They have used a governance index in particular; the G-INDEX of Gompers et al. ( 2003 ) which focused on the structure and characteristics within American companies to find in conclusion a positive and significant association between their governance index and the value of the companies, their level of profits, their growth in sales and their reduction in capital expenditure.

We also distinguish the E-INDEX index used by Bebchuk et al. ( 2006 , 2002 ). According to Bebchuk et al. ( 2006 ), the E-INDEX derives from an index that consists of 6 attributes related to the IRRC provisions in the USA and that can allow academics to find meaningful results. In fact, these authors divided the Gompers et al. ( 2003 ) index into two indices: the E-INDEX, which is made up of six governance factors, and the O-INDEX, which is made up of the rest of the provisions or attributes used by Gompers et al. ( 2003 ). It should be remembered that this E-INDEX index includes six provisions, which are: the board of directors, limits on changes in shareholder regulations, poison pills, golden parachutes, the requirement of an absolute majority for mergers, and changes in the charter. As a result, they found that increases in the index level are monotonically associated with economically significant reductions in firm valuation and large negative abnormal returns over the period 1990–2003. Regarding the other 18 Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC) requirements that formed the O-INDEX, they do not correlate with reductions in firm valuation or with abnormal market returns. Ribando and Bonne ( 2010 ) tried to analyze the relationship between the ASSET4 ESG index of Data Stream and the performance of the company. Indeed, they used the information coefficient (IC) while trying to find possible relationships between ESG characteristics of firms between 2003 and 2009 and future returns. For these characteristics, they found positive and significant associations with all scores except for the corporate governance component. Jun Xie et al. ( 2019 ) found that board independence has a positive and significant association with financial performance as measured by (ROA). On the other hand, there is a negative and significant association between executive compensation, duality, number of audit committee meetings on the one hand, and financial performance on the other hand. Concerning the presence of women on boards of directors, it does not show a significant relationship with ROA. Finally, the control variable, which is research and development expenses, shows a positive and significant association with financial performance. We can notice that the literature on the subject has not ceased to emphasize the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance while missing the importance of the deconstruction of the relationship by taking into account the sectoral characteristics of the firms under study. For this reason, we can say that our work will present an added value to the previous literature because it gives a lot of importance to the sectoral characteristics. As we have seen, the literature on the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance can present mixed results. This leads us to propose the first research hypothesis, which is as follows:

Corporate governance score has a positive and significant association with financial performance.

In our study, we will try to investigate this relationship taking into account the sectoral characteristics of the firms in the UK economy (ICB Code). In the same sense, it is important to underline the importance of taking into account the contribution of institutional theory which has been the basis of several research works on the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance. For example, we can cite the research work of Rachmawati et al. ( 2018 ) who examined the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance in different economic sectors in Indonesia, using institutional theory as a theoretical framework. The authors found that corporate governance had a positive impact on financial performance in all sectors studied, but that the impact was greater in more regulated sectors. In addition, Boubakri et al. ( 2019 ) examined the relationship between corporate governance, institutional environment and financial performance of Russian firms. The authors found that corporate governance had a positive impact on financial performance. Qin et al. ( 2019 ) studied the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of technology firms in the United States and China. These authors found that corporate governance had a positive impact on financial performance, but that the impact was greater in firms operating in stronger institutional environments. In addition, Muda et al. ( 2018 ) examined the relationship between corporate governance and firm financial performance in different economic sectors in Malaysia, using institutional theory as a theoretical framework. The authors found that corporate governance had a positive impact on financial performance in all the sectors studied, but the impact was greater in the more regulated sectors.

Research methodology

When studying the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance, we must always refer to certain theories that can guide us in establishing our research methodology in order to test our conceptual model. Referring to the governance literature, we can indicate that there is no single pioneering theoretical framework that can be considered as a foundation for governance research. Nevertheless, we can face a particular set of research currents gathered in a paradigm to explain the logic of the relationships in corporate governance. Thus, we can distinguish the research stream focusing on the contractual aspect of the relationship between agents, principals, and creditors. A such relationship can be detailed in the following part of this research paper.

Sample selection

As mentioned at the beginning of this paper, the targeted context is the United Kingdom. Given that we seek to identify the nature of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance, we first selected all UK-listed companies for which governance characteristics are available from the ASSET4 database, a Thomson Reuters domain, which provides environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information. This initial selection attempts to capture an initial sample of panel data that corresponds to 349 companies that will remain active, between the period of 1998 and 2019, and we will limit ourselves to the period of 2005–2018, i.e., 14 years. This choice is justified by two reasons. The first is the choice of 2005 as the reference year, which corresponds to the year of adoption and application of IFRS by the United Kingdom. The second is the elimination of the year 2019 which does not present complete information when we collected data. In order to obtain a homogeneous sample that allows us to achieve a consistent interpretation, we have eliminated banks and companies that provide financial services, as well as life and non-life insurance (Table 1 ).

This first elimination reduces our sample to 301 companies, obtained as follows:

When processing the panel data that make up our sample, we were obliged to eliminate observations relating to firms whose functional currency does not correspond to the currency of the context of the study, i.e., the pound sterling. These companies number is about 15. In preparing our data, we were obliged to remove the English companies that are not listed on the London Stock Exchange. The number of these companies is 2. We also eliminated 2 other companies that belong to sectors of activity that could cause outliers in our analysis (Financial services according to the ICB classification). This data processing allowed us to obtain a final sample of 282 companies that served as a basis for the study of the relationship between corporate governance and the financial performance of UK companies (Table 2 ). These steps are summarized in the following data processing table:

For a more in-depth study that aims to analyze the impact of governance on financial profitability, we also eliminated firms with missing observations and with a missing value or a very high age of establishment. They are 21 firms. This reduced the number of firms in the sample to 261 firms. We also eliminated 101 firms with outliers in the dependent variable so that the value varies between − 100% and + 200%, which leads us to a final sample of 160 firms with better homogeneity in the dependent variable (ROE). In fact, there is no hard and fast rule for determining an appropriate range for ROE. However, a range of − 100% to + 200% for ROE can be considered as less extreme for our study because we identified more extremum values. We can add that we have tried to refer to other previous works that have tried to present a homogeneous value of financial profitability ROE cite Masood and Ahmad ( 2012 ) who studied the determinants of capital structure of firms in the manufacturing sector in Pakistan. The authors used regression analysis to study the effect of various factors on the capital structure of firms. The authors also used a homogeneous value of ROE by eliminating ROE outliers to reduce the effect of extreme values on the results of the analysis. The results showed that firm size, tax rate, firm growth, and liquidity have a significant influence on the capital structure of firms in the manufacturing sector in Pakistan. We also refer to Almazari and Abuzayed ( 2016 ), who studied the relationship between corporate governance and capital structure in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The authors used regression analysis to study the effect of corporate governance on firms' capital structure. The authors also used a homogeneous ROE value by eliminating ROE outliers to reduce the effect of extreme values on the results of the analysis (Table 3 ). The results showed that corporate governance has a significant effect on the capital structure of firms in the GCC countries.

In the processing of the data obtained at the level of the variables of the research model, we found some missing observations that could influence the results. To solve this problem, we have resorted to the literature to know how to treat them. In this framework and by reference to Florou and Galarniotis ( 2007 ), missing values (i.e., not disclosed) are treated as an absence of the variable at the study level and thus, the firms constituting the study sample are penalized in the evaluation of the variable studied. Indeed, the missing values were excluded from the analysis. We can add that in the field of corporate governance research, the variables do not present a remarkable change between the following years. For this reason, we preferred to replace the missing values by the weighted average of the existing variables in order not to reduce our sample of panel data further, which remained cylindrical. This choice was made with reference to Rahman et al. ( 2016 ) and White et al. ( 2011 ).

Measures of variables

The study of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance requires particular attention in the choice of variables of the model to be used. Indeed, we can refer to the work of Alodat et al. ( 2022a ), who assessed the effect of the board of directors and the audit committee attributes and ownership structure on firm performance. They stated that better governance leads to better financial performance. Mansour et al. ( 2022 ) investigated the relationship between corporate governance quality, capital structure and firm performance for Jordanian non-financial firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2019. The results show that good corporate governance practices have a positive impact on firm performance, and that capital structure can strengthen this relationship. The variables reported that summarizes our model are in the form of dependent variables reflecting the financial performance of firms and independent explanatory variables reflecting the quality of corporate governance as well as other control variables relating to the characteristics of UK firms and reflecting size, debt, and age. Our choice of variables was the result of several investigations of the prior research literature on the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance. Alodat et al. ( 2022a , 2022b ) studied ESG disclosure in Jordanian industrial firms. ESG disclosure is low but improving due to stakeholder pressure. Board size and meetings have an impact on ESG performance, but other corporate governance mechanisms do not. The study provides recent evidence from the literature on disclosure in emerging markets. Other research has attempted to study the mediating role of sustainability disclosure in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance (Alodat et al. 2022a , 2022b ).

In this sense, we will try to detail the measures of the variables used in our research work starting with the dependent variable, the independent variable and then control variables.

Dependent variable

Previous studies used variables reflecting the financial performance while taking into account the effect of governance (Cornett et al. 2008 ). The latter used EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) divided by total asset value to measure financial performance. Indeed, the use of EBIT or operating profits divided by total asset value has been used by a range of research studies (Eberhart et al. 2004 ; Denis and Denis 1995 ; Hotchkiss 1995 ; Huson et al. 2004 ; Cohen et al. 2005 ). Also, Cornett et al. ( 2008 ) provide another measure of performance which is profitability, not subject to result management. This is the financial profitability with neutralization of the effect of discretionary accruals which is detailed as follows:

While referring to the research on corporate finance, we can see that several researchers have adopted accounting and non-accounting evaluations to arrive at the quantification of this variable. In our study, we will measure the financial performance as follow (measure proposed by data stream):

It reflects the variation of ROE that adjusts for the effect of preferred dividends. We have opted for the ROE because our objective is to measure the company's performance in terms of shareholder return, ROE measures the return on shareholder investment by comparing the company's net income to the value of its equity. It measures the company's ability to generate profits from the funds invested by shareholders. We will thus consider that this measure of the dependent variable is the most adequate for our analysis which remains adaptable.

Independent variable

Corporate governance practices have not stopped evolving. This is presented through the succession of good governance practice guides that seek to counter the failures detected over time and which manifest themselves in financial scandals, sometimes inducing a harmful imbalance in the global economic fabric. Based on the "FTSE 350 corporate governance review (2013)" elaborated by Grant Thornton (auditing and consulting firm), especially for the UK, the evolution of good governance guides, as well as institutions in the field of corporate governance, have developed to respond to the panoply of problems that may be directly related to corporate governance.

Zahra and Pearce ( 1989 ) have identified several studies that have attempted to investigate the effect of corporate governance characteristics on financial performance. We cite the research work of Zahra and Stanton ( 1988 ) who studied the relationship between the size of the board of directors and the financial performance of companies by measuring it based on the variable (ROE), the gross sales margin, the ratio of revenues net of capital, the earnings per share (EPS), and the log of revenues. Based on a sample of 100 Fortune, 500 companies in the USA between 1980 and 1983 found that board size and the ratio reflecting the proportion of outsiders on boards are not associated with financial performance. Schmidt ( 1977 ), taking into account the US context, focused on the external affiliation of outsiders while measuring financial performance by ROE in 156 industrial firms. Schmidt found no relationship between these two variables. Kesner ( 1987 ) studied the effect of the proportion of insiders at the board level and the percentage of equity held by board members while aiming to explain their effects on gross margin, (ROE), (ROA), earnings per share (EPS), stock price and (ROI). Based on a sample of 250 Fortune 500 companies across 27 industries, he found a positive association between the percentage of board members' ownership and the cited financial performance. In addition, Baysinger and Bulter ( 1985 ) studied the impact of outsiders on the financial profitability (ROE) of 266 companies between 1970 and 1980 and found that the presence of a significant number of outsiders on the board of directors improved their financial performance. Pearce ( 1983 ) studied the effect of directors' skills and attitudes on the financial performance of firms measured by several variables including (ROE). He found, based on the responses of 137 respondents in 8 banks, that there is a strong association between the attitude of directors and the financial performance of their company. Referring to the above, we can say that previous studies have tried to examine the relationship between the different governance mechanisms and financial performance while quantifying the latter by using different variables and financial ratios. Among these variables, it is important for us to focus on the financial profitability of shareholders, namely the ROE, which will be used as the dependent variable for our research. Regarding the variables that measure governance mechanisms, we can distinguish variables that were proposed by Cornett et al. ( 2008 ).

After having exposed these research works, we can see that previous research has used particular measures of governance mechanisms to reflect the quality of corporate governance we allow ourselves to indicate that in our research work we are going to use the governance score (CGVS: Corporate Governance Score) which encompasses a significant number of governance mechanisms, and this one manifests itself as the governance score that we have obtained from the database (Data Stream) for the companies that make a disclosure according to ASSET 4. The latter measures a company's governance systems and processes, ensuring that its board members and executives act in the best interests of shareholders over the long term. It reflects a company's ability, through its use of best management practices, to direct and control its rights and responsibilities through the creation of incentives and control mechanisms to generate long-term value for shareholders. Its value is presented as a percentage so that it can be used to detect the effectiveness of companies in terms of governance. Based on the Thomson Reuters ESG Scores calculation guide (February 2019), we can see that the governance score we will use as an independent variable in our analysis plays an important role in determining the governance component of the ESG score.

Control variables

Control variables refer to the characteristics of UK firms and reflect size, leverage and age. The selection of variables is based on a review of some of the previous research literature on the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance.

LNTA: It is the total assets of the company; in our research work, we will use as recommended in the literature the Log of TA as a control variable for our research model.

leverage = ((short-term debt and a current portion of long-term debt + long-term debt)) /(total assets).

AGE: the age of the company

Empirical approach to the analysis of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance

For the study of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance, we have tried to respect the scientific approach that ensures a quality analysis of the data that have been initially collected. It is a matter of following a positivist epistemological posture according to a hypothetical-deductive approach. Indeed, when analyzing panel data, there is a very specific approach to follow and a set of econometric tests that will allow us to obtain the research model that leads us to the realization of the necessary predictions. First, when we use cylindrical panel data, we must verify the necessary conditions that give us the assurance of the reliability of the database studied. The verification of such conditions allows us to have the best unbiased predictor that ensures an efficient interpretation of the associations that may exist between the variables. Then, we must analyze the influence of the fixed effect and the random effect of the observations, which will guide us toward the path of analysis to follow. It should be added that the results of the preliminary tests will give us a better idea of which regressor to use so that we can ensure that all sources of bias in the results are eliminated. Among these preliminary tests, we can mention the homoscedasticity test, the autocorrelation test, the multicollinearity test. In our research approach, we made sure to verify these preliminary tests in order to be able to move on to the analysis of associations via the execution of adequate regression models.

At this level, it should be noted that the estimation of panel data can be carried out through 3 possible estimators depending on the behavior of the data. In this respect, we mention 3 methods, which are the Pooled OLS regression (pooled OLS) which can lead us to the use of the GLS method which eliminates estimation bias problems. As an illustration, it is relevant to mention that the GLS method allows us to overcome the heteroscedasticity problem and the first-order autocorrelation problem. The second method is the fixed effect model (or within model): This model is characterized by the existence of a particular characteristic or behavior for a well-defined set of individuals or the firms in the sample. In our analysis, we are going to move directly toward an approach that targets the verification of the fixed effect while taking into consideration the specific characteristics related to each sector of activity (ICB industry code).

Finally, the third method is the random effect model. In this last case, the individuals understudy can also be influenced by both factors at the same time ( i and t ).

In the context of the analysis of the association that may exist between the governance score and the financial performance of the company and while taking into account a significance level of 5% for the interpretation of the results, we will run the model based on the sample of UK companies that we have specified. This will allow us to verify the strength of the link between the endogenous and exogenous variable which is manifested through an approach that can test the existence of the fixed and random effects. The execution of the model via the command "xtreg" on STATA, which implements the method of generalized least squares (GLS: generalized least square), remains effective for the study of panel type databases. For a more refined analysis and in order to use a more accurate estimator, we will show the results found by the execution of the GLS command which allows finding a better estimate allowing to reduce the bias effect caused by the presence of heteroscedasticity and the first-order autocorrelation. This is the Feasible GLS (FGLS) method. (Feasible Generalized Least Squares).

In our research work, we will first try to have a global vision of our research sample, which consists of 282 companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and which make disclosures according to ASSET 4 as already mentioned (Table 4 ). For this reason, we will expose the descriptive statistics that are manifested as follows:

These descriptive statistics tell us that the sample of 282 firms obtained displays numerous observations, namely 3948 observations.

Regarding the dependent variable, we note that the (ROE) shows a mean of -0.16 which reflects in a global but not precise way that all the companies studied operate in an unstable environment that can be considered unfavorable given the circumstances through which the United Kingdom is passing such as the effect of the repercussions of the global financial crisis of 2008 and the BREXIT. The dependent variable shows a maximum value of 72.06 which is considered an extremely high value in relation to the measure of financial profitability (ROE). The same remark can be made regarding the minimum value of the dependent variable, which is equal to 563.32. It should be noted that these outliers led us to reduce our sample. Concerning the independent variable (CGVS) which is the governance score proposed by Data Stream. This shows an average of 0.67, which indicates that all the companies in our sample give importance to governance and its mechanisms for creating value and improving financial profitability. This governance score has a maximum value of 0.98 and a minimum value of 0.02. These values indicate that there are two types of companies, those that give importance to governance and its mechanisms and those that do not. Moving on to the control variables, we can see that the variable (LNTA), which reflects the size of the company according to the current literature, has an average of 14.03. For the variable (LVERAGE), we have an average of 0.25, which indicates the level of indebtedness of the companies in the sample. Regarding the last control variable, which is the (AGE), it indicates that the average age of the companies studied is equal to 64 years. After presenting the descriptive statistics of our sample which is composed of 282 companies, we will try to start the study of the relationship between their governance score and their financial performance in order to know if we are able to confirm the hypothesis providing the existence of a positive and significant relationship between these variables.

For this reason, we will present our correlation matrix for the sample of 282 companies (Table 5 ).

This correlation matrix clearly shows that (CGVS) has a positive and significant correlation at the 5% level with (ROE). This supports the hypothesis of the existence of a relationship. Indeed, the analysis of the correlation remains insufficient to decide on such a relationship. For this reason, we will proceed to the analysis of the regressions necessary to provide a precise vision of the association between these two variables.

It should be noted that the outliers identified in the descriptive statistics forced us to reduce our sample to avoid problems of discordance and observations with outliers as explained in the approach to the selection of our final sample, which reflects the shift from the sample of 282 companies to the sample of 160 companies. In the rest of our analysis, we will limit ourselves to this sample of 160 firms to avoid being influenced by the high values of financial profitability. During our analysis, we will even try to perform robust regression to validate our results.

It must be said that in our analysis we have based ourselves on the book by William Greene ( 2011 ). Our research approach will be based on the identification of biases that can affect the quality and the level of convergence of the estimator to be used. Indeed, we will check the effect of the individuals studied which merit the use of an approach that takes into account the individual effect of each sector of activity for the analysis of the results. For the random effect and while basing ourselves on William Greene ( 2011 ), we can say that the most adequate estimator is the generalized least square as well as the quasi-generalized least square estimator (feasible) which presents a better level of correction of possible sources of bias (Table 6 ). Indeed, we will start by exposing the descriptive statistics of the 160 companies as follows:

The descriptive statistics mentioned above indicate that the value of the dependent variable which is financial profitability measured by (ROE) has an average of 16.9%, which could lead to an increase in results management. In the same framework, the governance score indicates that it varies between 2 and 98%, with an average of 68.5%. In fact, for companies with a low governance score, we can say that the security of shareholders can be negatively affected. Regarding the control variables, we find that (LNTA) displays an average of 14.152. For the level of debt that is presented through (LEVERAGE), it shows that the companies in our sample display leverage equivalent to 24.5%, and the average age of the companies studied is equal to 68 (Table 7 ). In fact, we did not limit ourselves to the presentation of descriptive statistics according to the companies which are the object of our global sample only but also we used descriptive statistics by sector according to the criterion ICB industry which is summarized as follows:

Moving forward in our analysis of the results, we present the correlation matrix for our sample of 160 listed companies that are characterized by the disclosure of governance characteristics according to ASSET4 (Table 8 ).

This correlation matrix indicates the absence of correlation at the 5% level between (ROE) and (CGVS). However, we can estimate that there is a correlation at the 15% level, which means that in 85% of the situations we distinguish a positive and significant correlation between the financial performance and the governance score. Despite a weak correlation, there is a possible link between the dependent and independent variables. Moreover, and concerning the control variables, we can notice the existence of a negative and significant correlation at the 5% level between (LEVERAGE) and (ROE) which reflects the negative effect of debt on English companies. Similarly, LNTA shows a negative and significant correlation with the financial performance of firms, which is explained by an unfavorable effect of the growth of the political visibility of firms in the UK. In order to unravel and further analyze such a relationship, it is necessary to conduct a correlation analysis by sector to identify those that may imply a correlation. Indeed, the present research work will be based essentially on the study of the relationship between governance and financial performance which has been widely studied by most researchers. Thus, OLS regression will allow us to approach this analysis as presented in Table 9 :

Indeed, it remains clear that the OLS regression presents a positive and a significant association at the 5% level between the governance of firms and their financial performance, measured on the basis of the ROE. But at this level, we cannot admit such results for the analysis of the mentioned relationship due to the fact that the data we are analyzing is panel data that require the absence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation problems (Table 10 ). Thus, we can present the preliminary tests in question. We start with heteroscedasticity, which presents a remarkable problem in the data. This manifests itself through the Breusch–Pagan test, which is displayed as follows:

This test is based on a null hypothesis predicting the equality of the variance of the residuals. However, as indicated, it follows that we will reject this hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis which reflects the existence of a heteroscedasticity problem (Table 11 ).

Still, within the framework of the reliability of the data quality, we used the Woodridge autocorrelation test which shows the following results:

This test includes a null hypothesis that considers the absence of an autocorrelation problem. However, we find that such a hypothesis can only be rejected. This indicates the presence of a first-order autocorrelation problem, which will be corrected.

We also tested the multicollinearity problem by computing the VIF (Table 12 ). We found that such a problem does not taint the processed data. The multicollinearity test is displayed as follows:

After checking the quality of the data, we proceed to the use of a second estimator namely, the GLS, which is an efficient and unbiased estimator of the parameters of the model with a lower variance. The use of such an estimator presents the following results:

Table 13 shows a P value < 5%. This means that the model is significant in its entirety. Furthermore, it remains clear that the governance score has a positive and significant relationship at the 5% level with financial profitability.

Regarding the control variables, we find that they also show a significant association with the dependent variable. For example, the debt ratio has a negative and significant association at the 5% level with financial performance. This is due to the fact that excessive debt can damage the financial performance of the firm. Regarding age, we find that it does not show a significant association with the dependent variable. These results can only reinforce the confirmation of the basic hypothesis predicting the existence of the positive and significant association between governance and financial performance.

An analysis of the GLS regression by sector for the study of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance remains essential (Table 14 ). This regression will be presented in this synthetic table, which is displayed as follows:

This table indicates that with the use of GLSs we obtain a positive and significant association at the 5% level between (ROE) and (CGVS) this is in line with the confirmation of our research hypothesis at the level of ICB10, 40, and 50 namely the technology sector, the sector of non-essential discretionary consumption and industrial (Table 15 ). To determine whether the fixed or random effect is the effect that influences the research data, we referred to the Hausman test which indicates a P value = 0.0000 < 0.05, this leads us to reject the null hypothesis predicting the existence of the random effect. The last test is as follows:

To refine the quality of the analysis, we will, in the following, analyze the presence of the fixed effect which will allow us to reinforce the expected result (Table 16 ).

Indeed, the regression of the data taking into account the existence of a fixed effect is as follows:

It remains clear that taking the fixed effect into consideration can only confirm the previous results regarding the association between the governance score and financial performance at the 5% level.

In order to analyze this association by sector, we performed the sectoral GLS regression, taking into account the presence of the fixed effect. In fact, based on the results obtained we can say that we found a positive and significant relationship at the 5% level between corporate governance and financial performance in the ICB 15 40 50 and 60 sectors. However, it should be noted that the association found in ICB 15 will not be taken into account because the model is not significant in its entirety for the companies in this last sector (Table 17 ). To summarize our results, we can present the table of results found, by sector according to the regressor that takes into account the fixed effect which is presented as follows:

In the following, we will try to take into account the autocorrelation problem identified by the fact that the fixed effect estimator is consistent (Table 18 ). Indeed, the regression in the presence of a fixed-effect by correcting the effect of autocorrelation can be presented as follows:

Taking into account the correction of the first-order, autocorrelation leads us to the same finding, which predicts the existence of a positive and significant association at the 5% level between governance and financial performance. An analysis by sector based on the sectoral regression with the presence of the fixed effect, with correction of the autocorrelation for the study of the relationship between governance and the financial performance of the company remains adequate to detail our results. This regression is presented in Table 19 . This analysis by sector, with the correction of the autocorrelation problem of order 1, indicates that we have a positive and significant association at the 5% level between the two main variables studied at the level of ICB35, 40, and 50. It is true that we had found a significant relationship at the level of ICB 15, but such an association will not be taken into account because Fisher test for this sector indicates that there is no overall significance of the model.

To summarize these results, we present the following table, which presents the fixed effect regression correcting for the effect of the first-order autoregressive autocorrelation.

Still, in the context of supporting the confirmation of our initial hypothesis, we will, in the following, try to develop our analysis by seeking the resolution of the problem of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation that have been detected. It must be said that the econometric tools of "STATA" have made it possible to find solutions to such problems by using the Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) method which can make the GLS estimation feasible by correcting the autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity problem (Table 20 ). The use of such a regressor gives us the following results:

By analyzing this FGLS regression, we can see that this model is generally significant in its entirety because the P value < 5%. Thus, there is at least one explanatory variable that can analyze the variable to be explained.

The results found indicate that we have a positive and significant association at the 5% level for the 160 firms in our study. In addition, to identify the effect of sectors of activity, we propose the FGLS regression by sector for the study of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance which is presented in Table 21 . The results obtained can be summarized as follow:

These results indicate that when correcting for the statistical problems identified, we were able to obtain in almost all the sectors of activity studied a positive and significant association at the 5% level between the governance index and financial performance in fact for ICB 10,20,40,45,50 and 55, we were able to obtain a very significant association at the 5% level. It must be said that with the correction of inconsistencies, we can confirm our H1 hypothesis in almost all sectors of activity. This leads us to emphasize the importance of governance in improving the financial performance of firms.

To further summarize our results, we can present the following summary table that analyzes, by sector and by regressor used, the type of association between governance and financial performance (Table 22 ).

As part of the validation of our results, we used robust regression to ensure that our results remained free of bias.

Indeed, we performed robustness checks on the overall sample of 160 companies as well as by sector of activity studied (Table 23 ).

For the overall sample we found these results:

The results obtained after the verification of the robustness of our model validate the results obtained previously indicating the fact that corporate governance presents a positive and significant association with financial performance which further confirms our research hypothesis (Table 24 ).

In addition, we performed robustness checks on the detailed results by sector and obtained the following results:

The results of the robustness checks lead us to validate the previous results obtained mainly in the ICB40 (Consumer Discretionary) and ICB50 (Industrials) sectors.

Comparing the validation results with the previous results, we can see that for the sector ICB 10 (Technology), ICB 35 (Real Estate), ICB 45 (Consumer Staples) and ICB 60 (Energy) we could visualize a positive association between ROE and CGVS (Table 25 ).

These results can be summarized in the following table:

Benefits and contributions

These results indicate that when correcting for the identified statistical problems, we were able to obtain in almost all the sectors of activity studied a positive and significant association at the 5% level between the governance index and financial performance in fact for ICB 10,20,40,45,50 and 55, we were able to obtain a very significant association at the 5% level. It must be said that with the correction of inconsistencies, we can confirm our H1 hypothesis in almost all sectors of activity. This leads us to emphasize the importance of governance in improving the financial performance of firms active in industries, which gives specific importance to the role of governance. It should be noted that our in-depth investigations and the use of robust regression have shown that the significant association between corporate governance and financial performance is still mainly valid for the ICB10 and ICB40 sectors.

Interpretation of results

At this level, we can see that the results that were found by reference to the different regression methods used, lead us to confirm our first hypothesis H1 predicting the existence of a positive and significant association between the governance score and financial performance. Indeed, in order to have better visibility of the effect of the improvement of the results via the correction of the identified econometric problems and to reflect the approach that led us to adopt the FGLS regressor, we propose the following summary table that shows the corrections of the estimates of the strength of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance when taking into account the sectoral influences and the correction of the various sources of bias.

In our present research, we have tried to focus on the impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of firms in the United Kingdom. The 160 companies studied between 2005 and 2018 are listed on the London Stock Exchange and are characterized by the achievement of corporate social responsibility disclosures according to ASSET4.

In this chapter, we have tried to clarify the important concepts that are directly related to our study on the relationship between corporate governance score (CGVS) and corporate financial performance (ROE). In this chapter, we have also tried to demonstrate how the adoption of good governance measures can be associated with better firm performance. In this sense, we conducted a sectoral analysis according to the ICB code, which allowed us to identify a positive and significant association in the companies of 6 sectors of activity, which are ICB 10 (Technology), 20 (Health), 40 (Secondary consumption), 45 (Basic consumption), 50 (Industrial) and 55 (Basic material or raw materials). These results led us to observe that companies that are characterized by best practices in governance, as well as those with a favorable structure of their board of directors that are well organized and disciplined, can have better financial profitability through the enhancement of their corporate organizational architecture. It should also be added that the establishment of controls and compensation committees reinforces the role of governance in achieving better financial performance. In addition, the protection of shareholders' interests and the consideration of social and environmental factors at the decision-making level can only improve the financial performance of companies. We must add that the robustness checks we have performed confirm and validate the results obtained mainly in the ICB 40 and 50 sectors, i.e., the Consumer Discretionary sector and the Industrial sector.

Through our study, we have corroborated the findings drawn by a significant number of research works. Nevertheless, the originality of ours, which we consider innovative, consists in focusing attention on the different sectors of activity in the UK (United Kingdom). We have followed an approach advocating achieving a cross-sector benchmark which allows to reflect the ideas proposed by the institutional theory. This paper evinces that despite the variation in the sectors of activity, the corporate governance plays a key role in improving the financial performance of English corporations. This result is consistent with the foundations of agency theory. We also emphasize the prominence of using the clustering technique with a view to targeting the analysis of the relationship between the corporate governance and financial performance. The analytical approach we have used has inspired several previous authors, including Lo and Shekhar ( 2018 ) who examined the impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of companies in Germany. They identified a positive association between strong corporate governance and financial performance in all industries studied. In addition, and for the economy of the UK, we can cite the research of O'Sullivan and Carroll ( 2021 ) which studied the impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of firms in the United Kingdom using a cluster approach to distinguish firms according to their industry. The results found suggest that corporate governance is positively associated with financial performance, but that this relationship varies across industries. This confirms the role of our research in consolidating the results of previous research and highlighting the importance of the use of cluster analysis in the dissection of the phenomena studied.

Moreover, identifying the positive and significant association between the corporate governance in most sectors studied makes us confirm our research hypothesis, which remains well founded by a rich literature (Alodat et al. 2022a , 2022b ; Jia et al. 2021 ; Khan and Hanafi 2021 ; Agyei-Mensah and Gyimah 2020 ; Abdulsalam and Oyewo 2019 ). Previous research has identified mixed results owing to the differences in the measures used to assess the corporate governance quality or to measure the financial performance level.

Through this research work, we have also been able to validate that corporate governance plays a key role in improving the performance of English companies, mainly in the consumer discretionary sector and in the industrial sector. These results reflect the level of detail of our analyses which give a lot of importance to the sectoral characteristics of the firms.

Like any research study, we have found difficulties in the data collection process. Yet, our strength and originality consist in a new empirical approach making us dismantle a particular phenomenon. This latter has been widely studied in the different sectors of activity through analyzing the corporate governance research. This remains substantial from a managerial point of view, and extremely beneficial for advisors and decision-makers at a scale characterized by a more remarkable degree of precision. What is more, it is worth noting that our work has some limitations related to the study period dealing only with the period before Brexit (the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union). The process of preparing the database has also led us to eliminate several companies, but this is necessary to avoid any source of econometric bias.

To put this into perspective, we suggest carrying out a comparative study of the UK corporations before and after the Brexit period. This period has been characterized by a political and regulatory flow, especially at the European and international levels. Furthermore, the studies on corporate governance mechanisms in times of health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic period, are significantly important. In this sense, we have only introduced in our study the health sector, but this may necessitate more detailed investigations in future works.

Abdulsalam, O.O., and B. Oyewo. 2019. Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 16 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0049-8 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Aguilera, R.V., and G. Jackson. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 447–465.

Agyei-Mensah, B.K., and F. Gyimah. 2020. Board composition, corporate governance and financial performance in emerging markets. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies 27 (2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-01-2020-0012 .

Ahadiat, N., and H. Hefzi. 2013. An investigation of earnings management practices: examining Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. International Journal of Business and Social Science , 3 (14).

Almazari, A.A., and B. Abuzayed. 2016. The relationship between corporate governance and capital structure: Evidence from GCC countries. Corporate Governance: THe International Journal of Business in Society 16 (5): 860–874.

Google Scholar  

Alodat, A.Y., Z. Salleh, H.A. Hashim, and F. Sulong. 2022a. Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 20 (5): 866–896.

Alodat, A.Y., Z. Salleh, and H.A. Hashim. 2022b. Corporate governance and sustainability disclosure: evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society 23 (3): 587–606.

Armstrong, C.S., J.L. Blouin, A.D. Jagolinzer, and D.F. Larcker. 2015. Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60 (1): 1–17.

Baysinger, B.D., and H.N. Butler. 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performanceeffects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1: 101–124.

Bebchuk, L., J.C. Coates, and G. Subramanian. 2002. The powerful antitakeover force of staggered boards: Theory, evidence and policy. National Bureau of Economic Research . https://doi.org/10.3386/w8974 .

Bebchuk, L., A. Cohen, and A. Ferrell. 2006. What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies 22 (2): 783–827.

Bhagat, S., B. Bolton, and R. Romano. 2008. The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. Columbia Law Review 108 (8): 1803–1882

Blaylock, B.S. 2016. Is tax avoidance associated with economically significant rent extraction among U.S. Firms? Contemporary Accounting Research 33 (3): 1013–1043.

Boubakri, N., O. Guedhami, D.R. Mishra, and W. Saffar. 2019. Corporate Governance, Institutional Environment, and Firm Performance in Russia. Journal of Business Research 102: 449–460.

Brickley, James A., Jeffrey L. Coles, and Rory L. Terry. 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics 35 (3): 371–390.

Cohen, D.A., Dey, A., Lys, T.Z.,( 2005). Trends in earnings management and informativeness of earnings announcements in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. Available at SSRN:/ http://ssrn.com/abstract=658782S .

Cornett, M.M., A.J. Marcus, and H. Tehranian. 2008. Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 357–373.

Dechow, P.M., and R.G. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (1): 51–89.

Denis, D.K., and J.J. McConnell. 2003. International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 1–36.

Denis, D.J., and D.K. Denis. 1995. Firm performance changes following top management dismissals. Journal of Finance 50: 1029–1057.

Diane, Del Guercio, and Jennifer Hawkins. 1999. The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics 52 (3): 293–340.

Eberhart, A.C., W.F. Maxwell, and A.R. Siddique. 2004. An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. Journal of Finance 59: 623–650.

Florou, A., and A. Galarniotis. 2007. Benchmarking Greek corporate governance against different standards. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (5): 979–998.

Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 107–155.

William Greene (2011) econométrie, 7 éme edition pearson .

Guney, Y., Hernandez-Perdomo, E., & Rocco, C. M. (2019). Does relative strength in corporate governance improve corporate performance? Empirical evidence using MCDA approach . Journal of the Operational Research Society , 1–26.

Hartzell, Jay C., and Laura T. Starks. 2003. Institutional investors and executive compensation. The Journal of Finance 58 (6): 2351–2374.

Hélène Hamisultane.ECONOMETRIE.Licence.France. 2002. cel-01261163 .

Hotchkiss, E.S. 1995. Postbankruptcy performance and management turnover. Journal of Finance 50: 3–21.

Huson, M.R., P.H. Malatesta, and R. Parrino. 2004. Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 74: 237–275.

Jensen, M.C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831–880.

Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.

Jia, S., J. Luo, and Y. Wang. 2021. Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research 131: 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.004 .

Judge, W.Q., T.J. Douglas, and A.M. Kutan. 2008. Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management 34 (4): 765–785.

Kesner, I.F. 1987. Directors’ stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management 13 (3): 499–508.

Khan, M.A., and N.M. Hanafi. 2021. Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the ASEAN region. Journal of Business Research 133: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.001 .

La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1–2): 3–27.

Lee, Yung Sheng, Stuart Rosenstein, and Jeffrey G. Wyatt. 1999. The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics & Finance 8 (4): 421–431.

Lo, J., and C. Shekhar. 2018. The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: Evidence from Germany. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19 (3): 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2016-0119 .

Louizi, A. 2007. Les pratiques de gouvernance et la performance des entreprises françaises, XVI ème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique.

Mansour, M., H. Al Amosh, A.Y. Alodat, S.F. Khatib, and M.W. Saleh. 2022. The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure. Sustainability 14 (17): 10525.

Masood, O., and N. Ahmad. 2012. Determinants of capital structure: An empirical study of firms in manufacturing sector of Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 47: 147–155.

McConnell, J.J., and D.H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 595–612.

Muda, M., N.F. Azmi, and R.M. Haniffa. 2018. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Different Economic Sectors: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19 (3): 297–318.

Nesbitt, Stephen L. 1994. Long-term rewards from shareholder activism: A study of the “CalPERS effect.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 6 (4): 75–80.

Nyakundi, D.O., M.O. Nyamita, and T.M. Tinega. 2014. Effect of internal control systems on financial performance of small and medium scale business enterprises in Kisumu City, Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship 1 (11): 719–734.

O’Sullivan, N., and R. Carroll. 2021. Corporate governance and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK firms. European Management Journal 39 (1): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.06.002 .

Pearce, J.A., II. 1983. The Relationship of Internal Versus External Ori-entations to Financial Measures of Strategic Performance. Strate-Gic Management Journal 4: 297–306.

Prowse, S. 1994. Corporate governance: Comparaison internationale: Une étude des mécanismes de contrôle d’entreprise aux états-unis, en grande-bretagne, au japon et en allemagne. Revue D’économie Financière 31: 119–158.

Qin, X., Y. Heng, and Y. Zhou. 2019. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Technology Industry. Technology in Society 58: 101138.

Rachmawati, I.A., T.M. Basuki, and A. Yulianto. 2018. Corporate governance and firm performance in different economic sectors: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 5 (4): 71–81.

Rahman, A., M.H.F. Sulaiman, and N. Yusoff. 2016. Imputation of missing data using mean imputation method in predicting the performance of students in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice 7 (26): 97–103.

Ribando, J.M., and G. Bonne. 2010. A new quality factor: Finding alpha with ASSET4 ESG data: Starmine Research Note . New York: Thomson Reuters.

Ross, S.A. 1973. The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review 63 (2): 134–139.

Schmidt, R. 1977. The board of directors and financial interests. Academy of Management Journal 20 (4) 677–682.

Seidman, J.K., and B. Stomberg. 2017. Equity compensation and tax avoidance: Disentangling managerial incentives from tax benefits and reexamining the effect of shareholder rights. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 39 (2): 21–41.

Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate gouvernance. The Journal of Finance 52 (2): 737–783.

Smith, Gordon. 1996. Corporate Governance and Managerial Incompetence: Lessons from Kmart’(1996). North Carolina Law Review 74: 1059–1054.

Walsh, J.P., and J.K. Seward. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 15 (3): 421–458.

White, I.R., P. Royston, and A.M. Wood. 2011. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in longitudinal data analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (1): 13.

Xie, Jun, Wataru Nozawa, Michiyuki Yagi, Hidemichi Fujii, and Shunsuke Managi. 2019. Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance ? Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (2): 286–300.

Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185–211.

Zahra, S.A., and J.A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15 (2): 291–334.

Zahra, S.A., and W.W. Stanton. 1988. The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management 5 (2): 229–236.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

Wajdi Affes

Higher Institute of Business Administration of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

Anis Jarboui

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wajdi Affes .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Affes, W., Jarboui, A. The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study. Int J Discl Gov 20 , 374–394 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00182-8

Download citation

Received : 11 August 2022

Accepted : 06 May 2023

Published : 30 May 2023

Issue Date : December 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00182-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Corporate governance
• Financial performance
• Cross-sector study
• FGLS analysis
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Role of Corporate Governance in Banking Sector: Evidence from All over the World

This paper is focused on the recent research in the area of performance effect of corporate governance in banking sector. We review the results of studies devoted to two key nonfinancial characteristics of a commercial bank influencing its performance. In the first part of the paper we analyze the evidence on board of directors structure impact on bank performance. We focus on the performance effect of board size, independent directors and gender diversity of the board. In the second part we discuss the issue of bank ownership structure. In this paper we pay special attention to the difference between performance drivers in developed and emerging markets as well as to the performance drivers changes in times of financial crisis.

Related Papers

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)

Ahmad Nazri Wahidudin

This study uses a sample of 119 commercial banks in Asia (specifically China, Philippine, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia and Thailand) to test the impact of board governance on the bank performance. The result reported based on OLS and within estimators. In addition, two step system estimator is employed in this study to solve endogeneity problem in corporate governance literature. The finding reported that bank with large board and more independent directors sit on board it help the bank to achieve higher performance. The result shows that bank can achieve better performance with younger directors. While CEO duality and female directors are insignificant to influence the bank performance. The result also reported that the higher loan losses provision leads to bank performance decline. This study employ various governance characteristics towards performance among banking sector in selected Asian countries. The result of this study highlight the effectiveness of the board as a functionin...

International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies

Publishing India Group , Shailesh Gohel

This paper reviews the literature of research done regarding the impact of corporate governance variables on performance of the company. There have been various researches done to measure the impact of corporate governance variables on performance of the company. The paper reviews all relevant research literature from the last two decades. Major variables of corporate governance that were studied are: board and board subcommittee composition, chairman and CEO duality, gender diversity, ownership structure, and shareholders' participation. Researchers studied the impact of these variables on financial performance, viz., return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), NPA level, capital adequacy ratio, and earnings per share (EPS).

The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business

Syeda Fizza Abbas

South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS)

Oscar Agyemang Opoku , Deborah Osei-Baidoo

Following the recent corporate scandals and turbulences in the Ghanaian financial sector, a fierce debate on banks and corporate performance nexus has emerged. While literature on banks-corporate performance subject remain highly contested, evidence within the Ghanaian contest is sparse. This paucity of literature has motivated this study to examine the effect of corporate governance practices on commercial banks' performances within the Ghanaian contest drawing evidence from the Ghana Stock Exchange market for the period 2009-2019. Correlational analysis and fixed effect and random effect regression estimator have been employed as the main estimation techniques. Results show that board diversity positively influence corporate performance indicators such ROA and EPS. The study further found that size of the board of directors has negative effects on bank's performance. Another very important discovery from this study was that, composition of board of directors has effects on bank's performance. Thus, independent board of directors have positive effects on bank's performance. Ownership concentration has negative effects on bank's performance in that larger ownership was usually associated with higher risks. As a sequel, policy should aim at enhancing corporate governance practices while females should be given a fair representation on board committees. The study again advises that independent directors should be included in the board to achieve greater firm results. The arrangement of company ownership should be assessed and controlled. Concentrated ownership structure in specific should be promoted and banks should strive to increase the size of the Independent Board to improve results.

Journal of Banking & Finance

Pablo de Andres , Eleuterio Vallelado

We use a sample of large international commercial banks to test hypotheses on the dual role of boards of directors. We use a suitable econometric model (two step system estimator) to solve the well-known endogeneity problem in corporate governance literature, and demonstrate the empirical and theoretical superiority of system estimator over OLS and within estimators. We find an inverted U-shaped relation between bank performance and board size, and between the proportion of non-executive directors and performance. Our results show that bank board composition and size are related to directors’ ability to monitor and advise management, and that larger and not excessively independent boards might prove more efficient in monitoring and advising functions, and create more value. All of these relations hold after we control for the measure of performance, the weight of the banking industry in each country, bank ownership, and regulatory and institutional differences.

Prof. Dr. Ahmed Al-Baidhani

Staff Studies

Shamini Abeysirigunawardana

Jordan Journal of Business Administration

Academic Journal of Accounting and Economic Researches

World of Researches Publication WRP

Weak and ineffective corporate governance mechanisms in banks are pointed out as the main factors contributing to the recent financial crisis. Deep changes in this area are necessary to reinforce the financial sector stability. The purpose of this study is to survey the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and Iranian listed banks performance during the years 2010-2015. The dependent variable of this study is financial performance of banks. That is a function of capital adequacy. According to CAMEL rating system, a high capital adequacy ratio is a symbol of healthy activity of banks and has a great weight on CAMEL rating. The independent variables are included the size of the board, the proportion of independent directors, the proportion of ownership of Institutional shareholders, the proportion of ownership of major shareholders and separation between CEO and chairman. After collecting data, we have used descriptive and regression model for analyzing data. The model for testing the hypothesis is multiple linear regressions. The result of this study according to multiple regression shows that only the proportion of ownership of Institutional shareholders have a positive impact on Capital Adequacy of banks and there is not any relationship between other independent variables and capital adequacy of banks.

Sumon Kumar Das

This study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on firm's performance on listed conventional banking companies at Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). Based on existing empirical studies, five key attributes of corporate governance (board size, the proportion of independent directors on board, the proportion of female directors on board, institutional ownership and size of audit committee) have been selected to identify their influence on firm's financial performance. Tobin's Q (a market-based performance measure) and Return on Asset-ROA (an accounting based performance measure) consider as financial performance measures. Using OLS as a method of estimation, the results provide evidence of a significant negative relationship between the performance of the firm and the proportion of independent directors on board as well as size of the audit committee. The result also provides evidence of a significant negative relationship between Tobin's Q and institutional ownership but a positive and insignificant between ROA and institutional ownership. Furthermore, there is a negative relationship between the proportion of female directors in board and the performance of the firm but is not significant. Board size as predictor variable is negative and insignificant with Tobin's Q.

RELATED PAPERS

Apresentações Trabalhos Científicos

Claiton Costa

5th EMAN Conference Proceedings (part of EMAN conference collection)

Matea Hanžek

Anthony Cohn

ruperto aduviri

World neurosurgery

Ulrich-wilhelm Thomale

Tiara Ernita

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

milind patil

Macromolecules

susan roberts-bleming

Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Stephen Livesey

MATEC Web of Conferences

Ahmad Rusdiansyah

Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

Michael Wrinn

Gianfranco Bertani

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

Paolo Saracco

Gibas Monika Haufe Rudiger

Siegfried Weichlein

The Pan African medical journal

NICAISE KONAN

Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Decio Lopes Cardoso

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Moazzam Aslam

Hanna Carlsson

Optics express

Chi-Hao Cheng

Patrick Leroyer , Henrik K. Simonsen

mjnvffd nnjgffd

UCLA文凭证书 加州大学洛杉矶分校文凭证书 klhjkgh

Robin Armit

Journal of Stored Products Research

Maria Elisa Christie

Advances in Polymer Technology

Dmitri Ossipov

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024