research paper of senior high school students

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 02 December 2020

Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program

• Locke Davenport Huyer   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-7122 1 , 2   na1 ,
• Neal I. Callaghan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-3395 1 , 3   na1 ,
• Sara Dicks 4 ,
• Edward Scherer 4 ,
• Andrey I. Shukalyuk 1 ,
• Margaret Jou 4 &
• Dawn M. Kilkenny   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-9767 1 , 5  

npj Science of Learning volume  5 , Article number:  17 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

42k Accesses

4 Citations

13 Altmetric

Metrics details

The multi-disciplinary nature of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers often renders difficulty for high school students navigating from classroom knowledge to post-secondary pursuits. Discrepancies between the knowledge-based high school learning approach and the experiential approach of future studies leaves some students disillusioned by STEM. We present Discovery , a term-long inquiry-focused learning model delivered by STEM graduate students in collaboration with high school teachers, in the context of biomedical engineering. Entire classes of high school STEM students representing diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds engaged in iterative, problem-based learning designed to emphasize critical thinking concomitantly within the secondary school and university environments. Assessment of grades and survey data suggested positive impact of this learning model on students’ STEM interests and engagement, notably in under-performing cohorts, as well as repeating cohorts that engage in the program on more than one occasion. Discovery presents a scalable platform that stimulates persistence in STEM learning, providing valuable learning opportunities and capturing cohorts of students that might otherwise be under-engaged in STEM.

Similar content being viewed by others

Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States

Academic ecosystems must evolve to support a sustainable postdoc workforce

Dataset and validation of the approaches to study skills inventory for students

Introduction.

High school students with diverse STEM interests often struggle to understand the STEM experience outside the classroom 1 . The multi-disciplinary nature of many career fields can foster a challenge for students in their decision to enroll in appropriate high school courses while maintaining persistence in study, particularly when these courses are not mandatory 2 . Furthermore, this challenge is amplified by the known discrepancy between the knowledge-based learning approach common in high schools and the experiential, mastery-based approaches afforded by the subsequent undergraduate model 3 . In the latter, focused classes, interdisciplinary concepts, and laboratory experiences allow for the application of accumulated knowledge, practice in problem solving, and development of both general and technical skills 4 . Such immersive cooperative learning environments are difficult to establish in the secondary school setting and high school teachers often struggle to implement within their classroom 5 . As such, high school students may become disillusioned before graduation and never experience an enriched learning environment, despite their inherent interests in STEM 6 .

It cannot be argued that early introduction to varied math and science disciplines throughout high school is vital if students are to pursue STEM fields, especially within engineering 7 . However, the majority of literature focused on student interest and retention in STEM highlights outcomes in US high school learning environments, where the sciences are often subject-specific from the onset of enrollment 8 . In contrast, students in the Ontario (Canada) high school system are required to complete Level 1 and 2 core courses in science and math during Grades 9 and 10; these courses are offered as ‘applied’ or ‘academic’ versions and present broad topics of content 9 . It is not until Levels 3 and 4 (generally Grades 11 and 12, respectively) that STEM classes become subject-specific (i.e., Biology, Chemistry, and/or Physics) and are offered as “university”, “college”, or “mixed” versions, designed to best prepare students for their desired post-secondary pursuits 9 . Given that Levels 3 and 4 science courses are not mandatory for graduation, enrollment identifies an innate student interest in continued learning. Furthermore, engagement in these post-secondary preparatory courses is also dependent upon achieving successful grades in preceding courses, but as curriculum becomes more subject-specific, students often yield lower degrees of success in achieving course credit 2 . Therefore, it is imperative that learning supports are best focused on ensuring that those students with an innate interest are able to achieve success in learning.

When given opportunity and focused support, high school students are capable of successfully completing rigorous programs at STEM-focused schools 10 . Specialized STEM schools have existed in the US for over 100 years; generally, students are admitted after their sophomore year of high school experience (equivalent to Grade 10) based on standardized test scores, essays, portfolios, references, and/or interviews 11 . Common elements to this learning framework include a diverse array of advanced STEM courses, paired with opportunities to engage in and disseminate cutting-edge research 12 . Therein, said research experience is inherently based in the processes of critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration. This learning framework supports translation of core curricular concepts to practice and is fundamental in allowing students to develop better understanding and appreciation of STEM career fields.

Despite the described positive attributes, many students do not have the ability or resources to engage within STEM-focused schools, particularly given that they are not prevalent across Canada, and other countries across the world. Consequently, many public institutions support the idea that post-secondary led engineering education programs are effective ways to expose high school students to engineering education and relevant career options, and also increase engineering awareness 13 . Although singular class field trips are used extensively to accomplish such programs, these may not allow immersive experiences for application of knowledge and practice of skills that are proven to impact long-term learning and influence career choices 14 , 15 . Longer-term immersive research experiences, such as after-school programs or summer camps, have shown successful at recruiting students into STEM degree programs and careers, where longevity of experience helps foster self-determination and interest-led, inquiry-based projects 4 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 .

Such activities convey the elements that are suggested to make a post-secondary led high school education programs successful: hands-on experience, self-motivated learning, real-life application, immediate feedback, and problem-based projects 20 , 21 . In combination with immersion in university teaching facilities, learning is authentic and relevant, similar to the STEM school-focused framework, and consequently representative of an experience found in actual STEM practice 22 . These outcomes may further be a consequence of student engagement and attitude: Brown et al. studied the relationships between STEM curriculum and student attitudes, and found the latter played a more important role in intention to persist in STEM when compared to self-efficacy 23 . This is interesting given that student self-efficacy has been identified to influence ‘motivation, persistence, and determination’ in overcoming challenges in a career pathway 24 . Taken together, this suggests that creation and delivery of modern, exciting curriculum that supports positive student attitudes is fundamental to engage and retain students in STEM programs.

Supported by the outcomes of identified effective learning strategies, University of Toronto (U of T) graduate trainees created a novel high school education program Discovery , to develop a comfortable yet stimulating environment of inquiry-focused iterative learning for senior high school students (Grades 11 & 12; Levels 3 & 4) at non-specialized schools. Built in strong collaboration with science teachers from George Harvey Collegiate Institute (Toronto District School Board), Discovery stimulates application of STEM concepts within a unique term-long applied curriculum delivered iteratively within both U of T undergraduate teaching facilities and collaborating high school classrooms 25 . Based on the volume of medically-themed news and entertainment that is communicated to the population at large, the rapidly-growing and diverse field of biomedical engineering (BME) were considered an ideal program context 26 . In its definition, BME necessitates cross-disciplinary STEM knowledge focused on the betterment of human health, wherein Discovery facilitates broadening student perspective through engaging inquiry-based projects. Importantly, Discovery allows all students within a class cohort to work together with their classroom teacher, stimulating continued development of a relevant learning community that is deemed essential for meaningful context and important for transforming student perspectives and understandings 27 , 28 . Multiple studies support the concept that relevant learning communities improve student attitudes towards learning, significantly increasing student motivation in STEM courses, and consequently improving the overall learning experience 29 . Learning communities, such as that provided by Discovery , also promote the formation of self-supporting groups, greater active involvement in class, and higher persistence rates for participating students 30 .

The objective of Discovery , through structure and dissemination, is to engage senior high school science students in challenging, inquiry-based practical BME activities as a mechanism to stimulate comprehension of STEM curriculum application to real-world concepts. Consequent focus is placed on critical thinking skill development through an atmosphere of perseverance in ambiguity, something not common in a secondary school knowledge-focused delivery but highly relevant in post-secondary STEM education strategies. Herein, we describe the observed impact of the differential project-based learning environment of Discovery on student performance and engagement. We identify the value of an inquiry-focused learning model that is tangible for students who struggle in a knowledge-focused delivery structure, where engagement in conceptual critical thinking in the relevant subject area stimulates student interest, attitudes, and resulting academic performance. Assessment of study outcomes suggests that when provided with a differential learning opportunity, student performance and interest in STEM increased. Consequently, Discovery provides an effective teaching and learning framework within a non-specialized school that motivates students, provides opportunity for critical thinking and problem-solving practice, and better prepares them for persistence in future STEM programs.

Program delivery

The outcomes of the current study result from execution of Discovery over five independent academic terms as a collaboration between Institute of Biomedical Engineering (graduate students, faculty, and support staff) and George Harvey Collegiate Institute (science teachers and administration) stakeholders. Each term, the program allowed senior secondary STEM students (Grades 11 and 12) opportunity to engage in a novel project-based learning environment. The program structure uses the problem-based engineering capstone framework as a tool of inquiry-focused learning objectives, motivated by a central BME global research topic, with research questions that are inter-related but specific to the curriculum of each STEM course subject (Fig. 1 ). Over each 12-week term, students worked in teams (3–4 students) within their class cohorts to execute projects with the guidance of U of T trainees ( Discovery instructors) and their own high school teacher(s). Student experimental work was conducted in U of T teaching facilities relevant to the research study of interest (i.e., Biology and Chemistry-based projects executed within Undergraduate Teaching Laboratories; Physics projects executed within Undergraduate Design Studios). Students were introduced to relevant techniques and safety procedures in advance of iterative experimentation. Importantly, this experience served as a course term project for students, who were assessed at several points throughout the program for performance in an inquiry-focused environment as well as within the regular classroom (Fig. 1 ). To instill the atmosphere of STEM, student teams delivered their outcomes in research poster format at a final symposium, sharing their results and recommendations with other post-secondary students, faculty, and community in an open environment.

The general program concept (blue background; top left ) highlights a global research topic examined through student dissemination of subject-specific research questions, yielding multifaceted student outcomes (orange background; top right ). Each program term (term workflow, yellow background; bottom panel ), students work on program deliverables in class (blue), iterate experimental outcomes within university facilities (orange), and are assessed accordingly at numerous deliverables in an inquiry-focused learning model.

Over the course of five terms there were 268 instances of tracked student participation, representing 170 individual students. Specifically, 94 students participated during only one term of programming, 57 students participated in two terms, 16 students participated in three terms, and 3 students participated in four terms. Multiple instances of participation represent students that enrol in more than one STEM class during their senior years of high school, or who participated in Grade 11 and subsequently Grade 12. Students were surveyed before and after each term to assess program effects on STEM interest and engagement. All grade-based assessments were performed by high school teachers for their respective STEM class cohorts using consistent grading rubrics and assignment structure. Here, we discuss the outcomes of student involvement in this experiential curriculum model.

Student performance and engagement

Student grades were assigned, collected, and anonymized by teachers for each Discovery deliverable (background essay, client meeting, proposal, progress report, poster, and final presentation). Teachers anonymized collective Discovery grades, the component deliverable grades thereof, final course grades, attendance in class and during programming, as well as incomplete classroom assignments, for comparative study purposes. Students performed significantly higher in their cumulative Discovery grade than in their cumulative classroom grade (final course grade less the Discovery contribution; p  < 0.0001). Nevertheless, there was a highly significant correlation ( p  < 0.0001) observed between the grade representing combined Discovery deliverables and the final course grade (Fig. 2a ). Further examination of the full dataset revealed two student cohorts of interest: the “Exceeds Expectations” (EE) subset (defined as those students who achieved ≥1 SD [18.0%] grade differential in Discovery over their final course grade; N  = 99 instances), and the “Multiple Term” (MT) subset (defined as those students who participated in Discovery more than once; 76 individual students that collectively accounted for 174 single terms of assessment out of the 268 total student-terms delivered) (Fig. 2b, c ). These subsets were not unrelated; 46 individual students who had multiple experiences (60.5% of total MTs) exhibited at least one occasion in achieving a ≥18.0% grade differential. As students participated in group work, there was concern that lower-performing students might negatively influence the Discovery grade of higher-performing students (or vice versa). However, students were observed to self-organize into groups where all individuals received similar final overall course grades (Fig. 2d ), thereby alleviating these concerns.

a Linear regression of student grades reveals a significant correlation ( p  = 0.0009) between Discovery performance and final course grade less the Discovery contribution to grade, as assessed by teachers. The dashed red line and intervals represent the theoretical 1:1 correlation between Discovery and course grades and standard deviation of the Discovery -course grade differential, respectively. b , c Identification of subgroups of interest, Exceeds Expectations (EE; N  = 99, orange ) who were ≥+1 SD in Discovery -course grade differential and Multi-Term (MT; N  = 174, teal ), of which N  = 65 students were present in both subgroups. d Students tended to self-assemble in working groups according to their final course performance; data presented as mean ± SEM. e For MT students participating at least 3 terms in Discovery , there was no significant correlation between course grade and time, while ( f ) there was a significant correlation between Discovery grade and cumulative terms in the program. Histograms of total absences per student in ( g ) Discovery and ( h ) class (binned by 4 days to be equivalent in time to a single Discovery absence).

The benefits experienced by MT students seemed progressive; MT students that participated in 3 or 4 terms ( N  = 16 and 3, respectively ) showed no significant increase by linear regression in their course grade over time ( p  = 0.15, Fig. 2e ), but did show a significant increase in their Discovery grades ( p  = 0.0011, Fig. 2f ). Finally, students demonstrated excellent Discovery attendance; at least 91% of participants attended all Discovery sessions in a given term (Fig. 2g ). In contrast, class attendance rates reveal a much wider distribution where 60.8% (163 out of 268 students) missed more than 4 classes (equivalent in learning time to one Discovery session) and 14.6% (39 out of 268 students) missed 16 or more classes (equivalent in learning time to an entire program of Discovery ) in a term (Fig. 2h ).

Discovery EE students (Fig. 3 ), roughly by definition, obtained lower course grades ( p  < 0.0001, Fig. 3a ) and higher final Discovery grades ( p  = 0.0004, Fig. 3b ) than non-EE students. This cohort of students exhibited program grades higher than classmates (Fig. 3c–h ); these differences were significant in every category with the exception of essays, where they outperformed to a significantly lesser degree ( p  = 0.097; Fig. 3c ). There was no statistically significant difference in EE vs. non-EE student classroom attendance ( p  = 0.85; Fig. 3i, j ). There were only four single day absences in Discovery within the EE subset; however, this difference was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.074).

The “Exceeds Expectations” (EE) subset of students (defined as those who received a combined Discovery grade ≥1 SD (18.0%) higher than their final course grade) performed ( a ) lower on their final course grade and ( b ) higher in the Discovery program as a whole when compared to their classmates. d – h EE students received significantly higher grades on each Discovery deliverable than their classmates, except for their ( c ) introductory essays and ( h ) final presentations. The EE subset also tended ( i ) to have a higher relative rate of attendance during Discovery sessions but no difference in ( j ) classroom attendance. N  = 99 EE students and 169 non-EE students (268 total). Grade data expressed as mean ± SEM.

Discovery MT students (Fig. 4 ), although not receiving significantly higher grades in class than students participating in the program only one time ( p  = 0.29, Fig. 4a ), were observed to obtain higher final Discovery grades than single-term students ( p  = 0.0067, Fig. 4b ). Although trends were less pronounced for individual MT student deliverables (Fig. 4c–h ), this student group performed significantly better on the progress report ( p  = 0.0021; Fig. 4f ). Trends of higher performance were observed for initial proposals and final presentations ( p  = 0.081 and 0.056, respectively; Fig. 4e, h ); all other deliverables were not significantly different between MT and non-MT students (Fig. 4c, d, g ). Attendance in Discovery ( p  = 0.22) was also not significantly different between MT and non-MT students, although MT students did miss significantly less class time ( p  = 0.010) (Fig. 4i, j ). Longitudinal assessment of individual deliverables for MT students that participated in three or more Discovery terms (Fig. 5 ) further highlights trend in improvement (Fig. 2f ). Greater performance over terms of participation was observed for essay ( p  = 0.0295, Fig. 5a ), client meeting ( p  = 0.0003, Fig. 5b ), proposal ( p  = 0.0004, Fig. 5c ), progress report ( p  = 0.16, Fig. 5d ), poster ( p  = 0.0005, Fig. 5e ), and presentation ( p  = 0.0295, Fig. 5f ) deliverable grades; these trends were all significant with the exception of the progress report ( p  = 0.16, Fig. 5d ) owing to strong performance in this deliverable in all terms.

The “multi-term” (MT) subset of students (defined as having attended more than one term of Discovery ) demonstrated favorable performance in Discovery , ( a ) showing no difference in course grade compared to single-term students, but ( b outperforming them in final Discovery grade. Independent of the number of times participating in Discovery , MT students did not score significantly differently on their ( c ) essay, ( d ) client meeting, or ( g ) poster. They tended to outperform their single-term classmates on the ( e ) proposal and ( h ) final presentation and scored significantly higher on their ( f ) progress report. MT students showed no statistical difference in ( i ) Discovery attendance but did show ( j ) higher rates of classroom attendance than single-term students. N  = 174 MT instances of student participation (76 individual students) and 94 single-term students. Grade data expressed as mean ± SEM.

Longitudinal assessment of a subset of MT student participants that participated in three ( N  = 16) or four ( N  = 3) terms presents a significant trend of improvement in their ( a ) essay, ( b ) client meeting, ( c ) proposal, ( e ) poster, and ( f ) presentation grade. d Progress report grades present a trend in improvement but demonstrate strong performance in all terms, limiting potential for student improvement. Grade data are presented as individual student performance; each student is represented by one color; data is fitted with a linear trendline (black).

Finally, the expansion of Discovery to a second school of lower LOI (i.e., nominally higher aggregate SES) allowed for the assessment of program impact in a new population over 2 terms of programming. A significant ( p  = 0.040) divergence in Discovery vs. course grade distribution from the theoretical 1:1 relationship was found in the new cohort (S 1 Appendix , Fig. S 1 ), in keeping with the pattern established in this study.

Teacher perceptions

Qualitative observation in the classroom by high school teachers emphasized the value students independently placed on program participation and deliverables. Throughout the term, students often prioritized Discovery group assignments over other tasks for their STEM courses, regardless of academic weight and/or due date. Comparing within this student population, teachers spoke of difficulties with late and incomplete assignments in the regular curriculum but found very few such instances with respect to Discovery -associated deliverables. Further, teachers speculated on the good behavior and focus of students in Discovery programming in contrast to attentiveness and behavior issues in their school classrooms. Multiple anecdotal examples were shared of renewed perception of student potential; students that exhibited poor academic performance in the classroom often engaged with high performance in this inquiry-focused atmosphere. Students appeared to take a sense of ownership, excitement, and pride in the setting of group projects oriented around scientific inquiry, discovery, and dissemination.

Student perceptions

Students were asked to consider and rank the academic difficulty (scale of 1–5, with 1 = not challenging and 5 = highly challenging) of the work they conducted within the Discovery learning model. Considering individual Discovery terms, at least 91% of students felt the curriculum to be sufficiently challenging with a 3/5 or higher ranking (Term 1: 87.5%, Term 2: 93.4%, Term 3: 85%, Term 4: 93.3%, Term 5: 100%), and a minimum of 58% of students indicating a 4/5 or higher ranking (Term 1: 58.3%, Term 2: 70.5%, Term 3: 67.5%, Term 4: 69.1%, Term 5: 86.4%) (Fig. 6a ).

a Histogram of relative frequency of perceived Discovery programming academic difficulty ranked from not challenging (1) to highly challenging (5) for each session demonstrated the consistently perceived high degree of difficulty for Discovery programming (total responses: 223). b Program participation increased student comfort (94.6%) with navigating lab work in a university or college setting (total responses: 220). c Considering participation in Discovery programming, students indicated their increased (72.4%) or decreased (10.1%) likelihood to pursue future experiences in STEM as a measure of program impact (total responses: 217). d Large majority of participating students (84.9%) indicated their interest for future participation in Discovery (total responses: 212). Students were given the opportunity to opt out of individual survey questions, partially completed surveys were included in totals.

The majority of students (94.6%) indicated they felt more comfortable with the idea of performing future work in a university STEM laboratory environment given exposure to university teaching facilities throughout the program (Fig. 6b ). Students were also queried whether they were (i) more likely, (ii) less likely, or (iii) not impacted by their experience in the pursuit of STEM in the future. The majority of participants (>82%) perceived impact on STEM interests, with 72.4% indicating they were more likely to pursue these interests in the future (Fig. 6c ). When surveyed at the end of term, 84.9% of students indicated they would participate in the program again (Fig. 6d ).

We have described an inquiry-based framework for implementing experiential STEM education in a BME setting. Using this model, we engaged 268 instances of student participation (170 individual students who participated 1–4 times) over five terms in project-based learning wherein students worked in peer-based teams under the mentorship of U of T trainees to design and execute the scientific method in answering a relevant research question. Collaboration between high school teachers and Discovery instructors allowed for high school student exposure to cutting-edge BME research topics, participation in facilitated inquiry, and acquisition of knowledge through scientific discovery. All assessments were conducted by high school teachers and constituted a fraction (10–15%) of the overall course grade, instilling academic value for participating students. As such, students exhibited excitement to learn as well as commitment to their studies in the program.

Through our observations and analysis, we suggest there is value in differential learning environments for students that struggle in a knowledge acquisition-focused classroom setting. In general, we observed a high level of academic performance in Discovery programming (Fig. 2a ), which was highlighted exceptionally in EE students who exhibited greater academic performance in Discovery deliverables compared to normal coursework (>18% grade improvement in relevant deliverables). We initially considered whether this was the result of strong students influencing weaker students; however, group organization within each course suggests this is not the case (Fig. 2d ). With the exception of one class in one term (24 participants assigned by their teacher), students were allowed to self-organize into working groups and they chose to work with other students of relatively similar academic performance (as indicated by course grade), a trend observed in other studies 31 , 32 . Remarkably, EE students not only excelled during Discovery when compared to their own performance in class, but this cohort also achieved significantly higher average grades in each of the deliverables throughout the program when compared to the remaining Discovery cohort (Fig. 3 ). This data demonstrates the value of an inquiry-based learning environment compared to knowledge-focused delivery in the classroom in allowing students to excel. We expect that part of this engagement was resultant of student excitement with a novel learning opportunity. It is however a well-supported concept that students who struggle in traditional settings tend to demonstrate improved interest and motivation in STEM when given opportunity to interact in a hands-on fashion, which supports our outcomes 4 , 33 . Furthermore, these outcomes clearly represent variable student learning styles, where some students benefit from a greater exchange of information, knowledge and skills in a cooperative learning environment 34 . The performance of the EE group may not be by itself surprising, as the identification of the subset by definition required high performers in Discovery who did not have exceptionally high course grades; in addition, the final Discovery grade is dependent on the component assignment grades. However, the discrepancies between EE and non-EE groups attendance suggests that students were engaged by Discovery in a way that they were not by regular classroom curriculum.

In addition to quantified engagement in Discovery observed in academic performance, we believe remarkable attendance rates are indicative of the value students place in the differential learning structure. Given the differences in number of Discovery days and implications of missing one day of regular class compared to this immersive program, we acknowledge it is challenging to directly compare attendance data and therefore approximate this comparison with consideration of learning time equivalence. When combined with other subjective data including student focus, requests to work on Discovery during class time, and lack of discipline/behavior issues, the attendance data importantly suggests that students were especially engaged by the Discovery model. Further, we believe the increased commute time to the university campus (students are responsible for independent transit to campus, a much longer endeavour than the normal school commute), early program start time, and students’ lack of familiarity with the location are non-trivial considerations when determining the propensity of students to participate enthusiastically in Discovery . We feel this suggests the students place value on this team-focused learning and find it to be more applicable and meaningful to their interests.

Given post-secondary admission requirements for STEM programs, it would be prudent to think that students participating in multiple STEM classes across terms are the ones with the most inherent interest in post-secondary STEM programs. The MT subset, representing students who participated in Discovery for more than one term, averaged significantly higher final Discovery grades. The increase in the final Discovery grade was observed to result from a general confluence of improved performance over multiple deliverables and a continuous effort to improve in a STEM curriculum. This was reflected in longitudinal tracking of Discovery performance, where we observed a significant trend of improved performance. Interestingly, the high number of MT students who were included in the EE group suggests that students who had a keen interest in science enrolled in more than one course and in general responded well to the inquiry-based teaching method of Discovery , where scientific method was put into action. It stands to reason that students interested in science will continue to take STEM courses and will respond favorably to opportunities to put classroom theory to practical application.

The true value of an inquiry-based program such as Discovery may not be based in inspiring students to perform at a higher standard in STEM within the high school setting, as skills in critical thinking do not necessarily translate to knowledge-based assessment. Notably, students found the programming equally challenging throughout each of the sequential sessions, perhaps somewhat surprising considering the increasing number of repeat attendees in successive sessions (Fig. 6a ). Regardless of sub-discipline, there was an emphasis of perceived value demonstrated through student surveys where we observed indicated interest in STEM and comfort with laboratory work environments, and desire to engage in future iterations given the opportunity. Although non-quantitative, we perceive this as an indicator of significant student engagement, even though some participants did not yield academic success in the program and found it highly challenging given its ambiguity.

Although we observed that students become more certain of their direction in STEM, further longitudinal study is warranted to make claim of this outcome. Additionally, at this point in our assessment we cannot effectively assess the practical outcomes of participation, understanding that the immediate effects observed are subject to a number of factors associated with performance in the high school learning environment. Future studies that track graduates from this program will be prudent, in conjunction with an ever-growing dataset of assessment as well as surveys designed to better elucidate underlying perceptions and attitudes, to continue to understand the expected benefits of this inquiry-focused and partnered approach. Altogether, a multifaceted assessment of our early outcomes suggests significant value of an immersive and iterative interaction with STEM as part of the high school experience. A well-defined divergence from knowledge-based learning, focused on engagement in critical thinking development framed in the cutting-edge of STEM, may be an important step to broadening student perspectives.

In this study, we describe the short-term effects of an inquiry-based STEM educational experience on a cohort of secondary students attending a non-specialized school, and suggest that the framework can be widely applied across virtually all subjects where inquiry-driven and mentored projects can be undertaken. Although we have demonstrated replication in a second cohort of nominally higher SES (S 1 Appendix , Supplementary Fig. 1 ), a larger collection period with more students will be necessary to conclusively determine impact independent of both SES and specific cohort effects. Teachers may also find this framework difficult to implement depending on resources and/or institutional investment and support, particularly if post-secondary collaboration is inaccessible. Offerings to a specific subject (e.g., physics) where experiments yielding empirical data are logistically or financially simpler to perform may be valid routes of adoption as opposed to the current study where all subject cohorts were included.

As we consider Discovery in a bigger picture context, expansion and implementation of this model is translatable. Execution of the scientific method is an important aspect of citizen science, as the concepts of critical thing become ever-more important in a landscape of changing technological landscapes. Giving students critical thinking and problem-solving skills in their primary and secondary education provides value in the context of any career path. Further, we feel that this model is scalable across disciplines, STEM or otherwise, as a means of building the tools of inquiry. We have observed here the value of differential inclusive student engagement and critical thinking through an inquiry-focused model for a subset of students, but further to this an engagement, interest, and excitement across the body of student participants. As we educate the leaders of tomorrow, we suggest that use of an inquiry-focused model such as Discovery could facilitate growth of a data-driven critical thinking framework.

In conclusion, we have presented a model of inquiry-based STEM education for secondary students that emphasizes inclusion, quantitative analysis, and critical thinking. Student grades suggest significant performance benefits, and engagement data suggests positive student attitude despite the perceived challenges of the program. We also note a particular performance benefit to students who repeatedly engage in the program. This framework may carry benefits in a wide variety of settings and disciplines for enhancing student engagement and performance, particularly in non-specialized school environments.

Study design and implementation

Participants in Discovery include all students enrolled in university-stream Grade 11 or 12 biology, chemistry, or physics at the participating school over five consecutive terms (cohort summary shown in Table 1 ). Although student participation in educational content was mandatory, student grades and survey responses (administered by high school teachers) were collected from only those students with parent or guardian consent. Teachers replaced each student name with a unique coded identifier to preserve anonymity but enable individual student tracking over multiple terms. All data collected were analyzed without any exclusions save for missing survey responses; no power analysis was performed prior to data collection.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School Board External Research Review Committee (Protocol # 2017-2018-20). Written informed consent was collected from parents or guardians of participating students prior to the acquisition of student data (both post-hoc academic data and survey administration). Data were anonymized by high school teachers for maintenance of academic confidentiality of individual students prior to release to U of T researchers.

Educational program overview

Students enrolled in university-preparatory STEM classes at the participating school completed a term-long project under the guidance of graduate student instructors and undergraduate student mentors as a mandatory component of their respective course. Project curriculum developed collaboratively between graduate students and participating high school teachers was delivered within U of T Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering (FASE) teaching facilities. Participation allows high school students to garner a better understanding as to how undergraduate learning and career workflows in STEM vary from traditional high school classroom learning, meanwhile reinforcing the benefits of problem solving, perseverance, teamwork, and creative thinking competencies. Given that Discovery was a mandatory component of course curriculum, students participated as class cohorts and addressed questions specific to their course subject knowledge base but related to the defined global health research topic (Fig. 1 ). Assessment of program deliverables was collectively assigned to represent 10–15% of the final course grade for each subject at the discretion of the respective STEM teacher.

The Discovery program framework was developed, prior to initiation of student assessment, in collaboration with one high school selected from the local public school board over a 1.5 year period of time. This partner school consistently scores highly (top decile) in the school board’s Learning Opportunities Index (LOI). The LOI ranks each school based on measures of external challenges affecting its student population therefore schools with the greatest level of external challenge receive a higher ranking 35 . A high LOI ranking is inversely correlated with socioeconomic status (SES); therefore, participating students are identified as having a significant number of external challenges that may affect their academic success. The mandatory nature of program participation was established to reach highly capable students who may be reluctant to engage on their own initiative, as a means of enhancing the inclusivity and impact of the program. The selected school partner is located within a reasonable geographical radius of our campus (i.e., ~40 min transit time from school to campus). This is relevant as participating students are required to independently commute to campus for Discovery hands-on experiences.

Each program term of Discovery corresponds with a five-month high school term. Lead university trainee instructors (3–6 each term) engaged with high school teachers 1–2 months in advance of high school student engagement to discern a relevant overarching global healthcare theme. Each theme was selected with consideration of (a) topics that university faculty identify as cutting-edge biomedical research, (b) expertise that Discovery instructors provide, and (c) capacity to showcase the diversity of BME. Each theme was sub-divided into STEM subject-specific research questions aligning with provincial Ministry of Education curriculum concepts for university-preparatory Biology, Chemistry, and Physics 9 that students worked to address, both on-campus and in-class, during a term-long project. The Discovery framework therefore provides students a problem-based learning experience reflective of an engineering capstone design project, including a motivating scientific problem (i.e., global topic), subject-specific research question, and systematic determination of a professional recommendation addressing the needs of the presented problem.

Discovery instructors were volunteers recruited primarily from graduate and undergraduate BME programs in the FASE. Instructors were organized into subject-specific instructional teams based on laboratory skills, teaching experience, and research expertise. The lead instructors of each subject (the identified 1–2 trainees that built curriculum with high school teachers) were responsible to organize the remaining team members as mentors for specific student groups over the course of the program term (~1:8 mentor to student ratio).

All Discovery instructors were familiarized with program expectations and trained in relevant workspace safety, in addition to engagement at a teaching workshop delivered by the Faculty Advisor (a Teaching Stream faculty member) at the onset of term. This workshop was designed to provide practical information on teaching and was co-developed with high school teachers based on their extensive training and experience in fundamental teaching methods. In addition, group mentors received hands-on training and guidance from lead instructors regarding the specific activities outlined for their respective subject programming (an exemplary term of student programming is available in S 2 Appendix) .

Discovery instructors were responsible for introducing relevant STEM skills and mentoring high school students for the duration of their projects, with support and mentorship from the Faculty Mentor. Each instructor worked exclusively throughout the term with the student groups to which they had been assigned, ensuring consistent mentorship across all disciplinary components of the project. In addition to further supporting university trainees in on-campus mentorship, high school teachers were responsible for academic assessment of all student program deliverables (Fig. 1 ; the standardized grade distribution available in S 3 Appendix ). Importantly, trainees never engaged in deliverable assessment; for continuity of overall course assessment, this remained the responsibility of the relevant teacher for each student cohort.

Throughout each term, students engaged within the university facilities four times. The first three sessions included hands-on lab sessions while the fourth visit included a culminating symposium for students to present their scientific findings (Fig. 1 ). On average, there were 4–5 groups of students per subject (3–4 students per group; ~20 students/class). Discovery instructors worked exclusively with 1–2 groups each term in the capacity of mentor to monitor and guide student progress in all project deliverables.

After introducing the selected global research topic in class, teachers led students in completion of background research essays. Students subsequently engaged in a subject-relevant skill-building protocol during their first visit to university teaching laboratory facilities, allowing opportunity to understand analysis techniques and equipment relevant for their assessment projects. At completion of this session, student groups were presented with a subject-specific research question as well as the relevant laboratory inventory available for use during their projects. Armed with this information, student groups continued to work in their classroom setting to develop group-specific experimental plans. Teachers and Discovery instructors provided written and oral feedback, respectively , allowing students an opportunity to revise their plans in class prior to on-campus experimental execution.

Once at the relevant laboratory environment, student groups executed their protocols in an effort to collect experimental data. Data analysis was performed in the classroom and students learned by trial & error to optimize their protocols before returning to the university lab for a second opportunity of data collection. All methods and data were re-analyzed in class in order for students to create a scientific poster for the purpose of study/experience dissemination. During a final visit to campus, all groups presented their findings at a research symposium, allowing students to verbally defend their process, analyses, interpretations, and design recommendations to a diverse audience including peers, STEM teachers, undergraduate and graduate university students, postdoctoral fellows and U of T faculty.

Data collection

Teachers evaluated their students on the following associated deliverables: (i) global theme background research essay; (ii) experimental plan; (iii) progress report; (iv) final poster content and presentation; and (v) attendance. For research purposes, these grades were examined individually and also as a collective Discovery program grade for each student. For students consenting to participation in the research study, all Discovery grades were anonymized by the classroom teacher before being shared with study authors. Each student was assigned a code by the teacher for direct comparison of deliverable outcomes and survey responses. All instances of “Final course grade” represent the prorated course grade without the Discovery component, to prevent confounding of quantitative analyses.

Survey instruments were used to gain insight into student attitudes and perceptions of STEM and post-secondary study, as well as Discovery program experience and impact (S 4 Appendix ). High school teachers administered surveys in the classroom only to students supported by parental permission. Pre-program surveys were completed at minimum 1 week prior to program initiation each term and exit surveys were completed at maximum 2 weeks post- Discovery term completion. Surveys results were validated using a principal component analysis (S 1 Appendix , Supplementary Fig. 2 ).

Identification and comparison of population subsets

From initial analysis, we identified two student subpopulations of particular interest: students who performed ≥1 SD [18.0%] or greater in the collective Discovery components of the course compared to their final course grade (“EE”), and students who participated in Discovery more than once (“MT”). These groups were compared individually against the rest of the respective Discovery population (“non-EE” and “non-MT”, respectively ). Additionally, MT students who participated in three or four (the maximum observed) terms of Discovery were assessed for longitudinal changes to performance in their course and Discovery grades. Comparisons were made for all Discovery deliverables (introductory essay, client meeting, proposal, progress report, poster, and presentation), final Discovery grade, final course grade, Discovery attendance, and overall attendance.

Statistical analysis

Student course grades were analyzed in all instances without the Discovery contribution (calculated from all deliverable component grades and ranging from 10 to 15% of final course grade depending on class and year) to prevent correlation. Aggregate course grades and Discovery grades were first compared by paired t-test, matching each student’s course grade to their Discovery grade for the term. Student performance in Discovery ( N  = 268 instances of student participation, comprising 170 individual students that participated 1–4 times) was initially assessed in a linear regression of Discovery grade vs. final course grade. Trends in course and Discovery performance over time for students participating 3 or 4 terms ( N  = 16 and 3 individuals, respectively ) were also assessed by linear regression. For subpopulation analysis (EE and MT, N  = 99 instances from 81 individuals and 174 instances from 76 individuals, respectively ), each dataset was tested for normality using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. All subgroup comparisons vs. the remaining population were performed by Mann–Whitney U -test. Data are plotted as individual points with mean ± SEM overlaid (grades), or in histogram bins of 1 and 4 days, respectively , for Discovery and class attendance. Significance was set at α ≤ 0.05.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author DMK. These data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns of personal data according to the ethical research agreements supporting this study.

Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M. & Lloyd, A. An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 16 , 655–675 (2018).

Article   Google Scholar  

Dooley, M., Payne, A., Steffler, M. & Wagner, J. Understanding the STEM path through high school and into university programs. Can. Public Policy 43 , 1–16 (2017).

Gilmore, M. W. Improvement of STEM education: experiential learning is the key. Mod. Chem. Appl. 1, e109. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6798.1000e109 (2013).

Roberts, T. et al. Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. Int. J. STEM Educ. 5 , 35 (2018).

Gillies, R. M. & Boyle, M. Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 26 , 933–940 (2010).

Nasir, M., Seta, J. & Meyer, E.G. Introducing high school students to biomedical engineering through summer camps. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-20701 (2014).

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z. & Tai, R. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study. Sci. Educ. 96 , 411–427 (2012).

Sarikas, C. The High School Science Classes You Should Take . https://blog.prepscholar.com/the-high-school-science-classes-you-should-take (2020).

Ontario, G. o. The ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12. Science http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/2009science11_12.pdf (2008).

Scott, C. An investigation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the US. J. STEM Educ.: Innov. Res. 13 , 30 (2012).

Google Scholar  

Erdogan, N. & Stuessy, C. L. Modeling successful STEM high schools in the United States: an ecology framework. Int. J. Educ. Math., Sci. Technol. 3 , 77–92 (2015).

Pfeiffer, S. I., Overstreet, J. M. & Park, A. The state of science and mathematics education in state-supported residential academies: a nationwide survey. Roeper Rev. 32 , 25–31 (2009).

Anthony, A. B., Greene, H., Post, P. E., Parkhurst, A. & Zhan, X. Preparing university students to lead K-12 engineering outreach programmes: a design experiment. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 41 , 623–637 (2016).

Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. researcher 18 , 32–42 (1989).

Reveles, J. M. & Brown, B. A. Contextual shifting: teachers emphasizing students’ academic identity to promote scientific literacy. Sci. Educ. 92 , 1015–1041 (2008).

Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L. & Burgess, W. D. Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: mediating effects of research self-efficacy. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50 , 940–951 (2013).

Boekaerts, M. Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn. Instr. 7 , 161–186 (1997).

Honey, M., Pearson, G. & Schweingruber, H. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and An Agenda for Research . (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2014).

Moote, J. K., Williams, J. M. & Sproule, J. When students take control: investigating the impact of the crest inquiry-based learning program on self-regulated processes and related motivations in young science students. J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 12 , 178–196 (2013).

Fantz, T. D., Siller, T. J. & Demiranda, M. A. Pre-collegiate factors influencing the self-efficacy of engineering students. J. Eng. Educ. 100 , 604–623 (2011).

Ralston, P. A., Hieb, J. L. & Rivoli, G. Partnerships and experience in building STEM pipelines. J. Professional Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 139 , 156–162 (2012).

Kelley, T. R. & Knowles, J. G. A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Int. J. STEM Educ. 3 , 11 (2016).

Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C. W. & Black, A. An examination of middle school students’ STEM self-efficacy with relation to interest and perceptions of STEM. J. STEM Educ.: Innov. Res. 17 , 27–38 (2016).

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Dev. 72 , 187–206 (2001).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Davenport Huyer, L. et al. IBBME discovery: biomedical engineering-based iterative learning in a high school STEM curriculum (evaluation). Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-30591 (2018).

Abu-Faraj, Ziad O., ed. Handbook of research on biomedical engineering education and advanced bioengineering learning: interdisciplinary concepts: interdisciplinary concepts. Vol. 2. IGI Global (2012).

Johri, A. & Olds, B. M. Situated engineering learning: bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. J. Eng. Educ. 100 , 151–185 (2011).

O’Connell, K. B., Keys, B. & Storksdieck, M. Taking stock of oregon STEM hubs: accomplishments and challenges. Corvallis: Oregon State University https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/hq37vt23t (2017).

Freeman, K. E., Alston, S. T. & Winborne, D. G. Do learning communities enhance the quality of students’ learning and motivation in STEM? J. Negro Educ. 77 , 227–240 (2008).

Weaver, R. R. & Qi, J. Classroom organization and participation: college students’ perceptions. J. High. Educ. 76 , 570–601 (2005).

Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M., Toy, D. & Wright, L. Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. J. Manag. Educ. 30 , 557–569 (2006).

Hassaskhah, J. & Mozaffari, H. The impact of group formation method (student-selected vs. teacher-assigned) on group dynamics and group outcome in EFL creative writing. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 6 , 147–156 (2015).

Ma, V. J. & Ma, X. A comparative analysis of the relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance. Int. J. STEM Educ. 1 , 3 (2014).

Weinstein, C. E. & Hume, L. M. Study Strategies for Lifelong Learning . (American Psychological Association, 1998).

Toronto District School Board. The 2017 Learning Opportunities Index: Questions and Answers. https://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/LOI2017v2.pdf (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been possible due to the support of many University of Toronto trainee volunteers, including Genevieve Conant, Sherif Ramadan, Daniel Smieja, Rami Saab, Andrew Effat, Serena Mandla, Cindy Bui, Janice Wong, Dawn Bannerman, Allison Clement, Shouka Parvin Nejad, Nicolas Ivanov, Jose Cardenas, Huntley Chang, Romario Regeenes, Dr. Henrik Persson, Ali Mojdeh, Nhien Tran-Nguyen, Ileana Co, and Jonathan Rubianto. We further acknowledge the staff and administration of George Harvey Collegiate Institute and the Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), as well as Benjamin Rocheleau and Madeleine Rocheleau for contributions to data collation. Discovery has grown with continued support of Dean Christopher Yip (Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, U of T), and the financial support of the IBME and the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) PromoScience program (PROSC 515876-2017; IBME “Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM” initiative co-directed by DMK and Dr. Penney Gilbert). LDH and NIC were supported by Vanier Canada graduate scholarships from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and NSERC, respectively . DMK holds a Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professorship in the Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, U of T.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Locke Davenport Huyer, Neal I. Callaghan.

Authors and Affiliations

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Locke Davenport Huyer, Neal I. Callaghan, Andrey I. Shukalyuk & Dawn M. Kilkenny

Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Locke Davenport Huyer

Translational Biology and Engineering Program, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Neal I. Callaghan

George Harvey Collegiate Institute, Toronto District School Board, Toronto, ON, Canada

Sara Dicks, Edward Scherer & Margaret Jou

Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Dawn M. Kilkenny

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

LDH, NIC and DMK conceived the program structure, designed the study, and interpreted the data. LDH and NIC ideated programming, coordinated execution, and performed all data analysis. SD, ES, and MJ designed and assessed student deliverables, collected data, and anonymized data for assessment. SD assisted in data interpretation. AIS assisted in programming ideation and design. All authors provided feedback and approved the manuscript that was written by LDH, NIC and DMK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn M. Kilkenny .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental material, reporting summary, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Davenport Huyer, L., Callaghan, N.I., Dicks, S. et al. Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program. npj Sci. Learn. 5 , 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00076-2

Download citation

Received : 05 December 2019

Accepted : 08 October 2020

Published : 02 December 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00076-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

How to Write a Research Paper as a High School Student

By Carly Taylor

Senior at Stanford University

6 minute read

Read our guide to learn why you should write a research paper and how to do so, from choosing the right topic to outlining and structuring your argument.

What is a research paper?

A research paper poses an answer to a specific question and defends that answer using academic sources, data, and critical reasoning. Writing a research paper is an excellent way to hone your focus during a research project , synthesize what you’re learning, and explain why your work matters to a broader audience of scholars in your field.

The types of sources and evidence you’ll see used in a research paper can vary widely based on its field of study. A history research paper might examine primary sources like journals and newspaper articles to draw conclusions about the culture of a specific time and place, whereas a biology research paper might analyze data from different published experiments and use textbook explanations of cellular pathways to identify a potential marker for breast cancer.

However, researchers across disciplines must identify and analyze credible sources, formulate a specific research question, generate a clear thesis statement, and organize their ideas in a cohesive manner to support their argument. Read on to learn how this process works and how to get started writing your own research paper.

How do I choose my topic?

Tap into your passions.

A research paper is your chance to explore what genuinely interests you and combine ideas in novel ways. So don’t choose a subject that simply sounds impressive or blindly follow what someone else wants you to do – choose something you’re really passionate about! You should be able to enjoy reading for hours and hours about your topic and feel enthusiastic about synthesizing and sharing what you learn.

We've created these helpful resources to inspire you to think about your own passion project . Polygence also offers a passion exploration experience where you can dive deep into three potential areas of study with expert mentors from those fields.

Ask a difficult question

In the traditional classroom, top students are expected to always know the answers to the questions the teacher asks. But a research paper is YOUR chance to pose a big question that no one has answered yet, and figure out how to make a contribution to answering that question. So don’t be afraid if you have no idea how to answer your question at the start of the research process — this will help you maintain a motivational sense of discovery as you dive deeper into your research. If you need inspiration, explore our database of research project ideas .

Be as specific as possible

It’s essential to be reasonable about what you can accomplish in one paper and narrow your focus down to an issue you can thoroughly address. For example, if you’re interested in the effects of invasive species on ecosystems, it’s best to focus on one invasive species and one ecosystem, such as iguanas in South Florida , or one survival mechanism, such as supercolonies in invasive ant species . If you can, get hands on with your project.

You should approach your paper with the mindset of becoming an expert in this topic. Narrowing your focus will help you achieve this goal without getting lost in the weeds and overwhelming yourself.

Would you like to write your own research paper?

Polygence mentors can help you every step of the way in writing and showcasing your research paper

How do I prepare to write a research paper?

Conduct preliminary research.

Before you dive into writing your research paper, conduct a literature review to see what’s already known about your topic. This can help you find your niche within the existing body of research and formulate your question. For example, Polygence student Jasmita found that researchers had studied the effects of background music on student test performance, but they had not taken into account the effect of a student’s familiarity with the music being played, so she decided to pose this new question in her research paper.

Pro tip: It’s a good idea to skim articles in order to decide whether they’re relevant enough to your research interest before committing to reading them in full. This can help you spend as much time as possible with the sources you’ll actually cite in your paper.

Skimming articles will help you gain a broad-strokes view of the different pockets of existing knowledge in your field and identify the most potentially useful sources. Reading articles in full will allow you to accumulate specific evidence related to your research question and begin to formulate an answer to it.

Draft a thesis statement

Your thesis statement is your succinctly-stated answer to the question you’re posing, which you’ll make your case for in the body of the paper. For example, if you’re studying the effect of K-pop on eating disorders and body image in teenagers of different races, your thesis may be that Asian teenagers who are exposed to K-pop videos experience more negative effects on their body image than Caucasian teenagers.

Pro Tip: It’s okay to refine your thesis as you continue to learn more throughout your research and writing process! A preliminary thesis will help you come up with a structure for presenting your argument, but you should absolutely change your thesis if new information you uncover changes your perspective or adds nuance to it.

Create an outline

An outline is a tool for sketching out the structure of your paper by organizing your points broadly into subheadings and more finely into individual paragraphs. Try putting your thesis at the top of your outline, then brainstorm all the points you need to convey in order to support your thesis.

Pro Tip : Your outline is just a jumping-off point – it will evolve as you gain greater clarity on your argument through your writing and continued research. Sometimes, it takes several iterations of outlining, then writing, then re-outlining, then rewriting in order to find the best structure for your paper.

What are some key tips when writing?

Introduction.

Your introduction should move the reader from your broad area of interest into your specific area of focus for the paper. It generally takes the form of one to two paragraphs that build to your thesis statement and give the reader an idea of the broad argumentative structure of your paper. After reading your introduction, your reader should know what claim you’re going to present and what kinds of evidence you’ll analyze to support it.

Topic sentences

Writing crystal clear topic sentences is a crucial aspect of a successful research paper. A topic sentence is like the thesis statement of a particular paragraph – it should clearly state the point that the paragraph will make. Writing focused topic sentences will help you remain focused while writing your paragraphs and will ensure that the reader can clearly grasp the function of each paragraph in the paper’s overall structure.

Transitions

Sophisticated research papers move beyond tacking on simple transitional phrases such as “Secondly” or “Moreover” to the start of each new paragraph. Instead, each paragraph flows naturally into the next one, with the connection between each idea made very clear. Try using specifically-crafted transitional phrases rather than stock phrases to move from one point to the next that will make your paper as cohesive as possible.

In her research paper on Pakistani youth in the U.S. , Polygence student Iba used the following specifically-crafted transition to move between two paragraphs: “Although the struggles of digital ethnography limited some data collection, there are also many advantages of digital data collection.” This sentence provides the logical link between the discussion of the limitations of digital ethnography from the prior paragraph and the upcoming discussion of this techniques’ advantages in this paragraph.

What is a research paper conclusion?

Your conclusion can have several functions:

To drive home your thesis and summarize your argument

To emphasize the broader significance of your findings and answer the “so what” question

To point out some questions raised by your thesis and/or opportunities for further research

Your conclusion can take on all three of these tasks or just one, depending on what you feel your paper is still lacking up to this point.

How do I cite my sources?

Last but not least, giving credit to your sources is extremely important. There are many different citation formats such as MLA, APA, and Chicago style. Make sure you know which one is standard in your field of interest by researching online or consulting an expert.

You have several options for keeping track of your bibliography:

Use a notebook to record the relevant information from each of your sources: title, author, date of publication, journal name, page numbers, etc.

Create a folder on your computer where you can store your electronic sources

Use an online bibliography creator such as Zotero, Easybib, or Noodletools to track sources and generate citations

You can read research papers by Polygence students under our Projects tab. You can also explore other opportunities for high school research .

If you’re interested in finding an expert mentor to guide you through the process of writing your own independent research paper, consider applying to be a Polygence scholar today!

Your research paper help even you to earn college credit , get published in an academic journal , contribute to your application for college , improve your college admissions chances !

Feeling Inspired?

Interested in doing an exciting research project? Click below to get matched with one of our expert mentors!

senior high school students Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

• Latest Documents
• Most Cited Documents
• Contributed Authors
• Related Sources
• Related Keywords

The Development of Historical Thinking Assessment to Examine Students’ Skills in Analyzing the Causality of Historical Events

<p style="text-align: justify;">This research aimed to develop a historical thinking assessment for students' skills in analyzing the causality of historical events. The development process of Gall and colleagues and Rasch analysis models were used to develop an assessment instrument consisting of two processes, including the analysis of the framework of cause and consequence, the validity, reliability, and difficultness test. This research involved 150 senior high school students, with data collected using the validation sheet, tests, and scoring rubric. The results were in the form of an essay test consisting of six indicators of analyzing cause and consequence. The instruments were valid, reliable, and suitable for assessing students’ skills in analyzing the causality of historical events. The developed instruments were paired with a historical thinking skills assessment to improve the accuracy of the information about students' level of historical thinking skills in the learning history.</p>

Gender pairing variations in peer tutoring: The case of senior high school students in Eastern Visayas, Philippines

Senior high school students' knowledge and attitudes toward information on their health in the kumasi metropolis.

The study examines senior high school students' understanding and attitudes toward information on their health in the Kumasi Metropolis. Multiple sampling techniques (convenient and simple random sampling techniques) were used in the study. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 391 respondents for the study. Frequencies and percentages were used to analyze the sociodemographic data. Again, the study used Pearson's correlation coefficient to show the degree of relationship between the level of knowledge of health information and attitudes toward seeking and sharing health information. The study found students' knowledge of the causes and symptoms of malaria, cholera, and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) to be appreciably high as a result of readings from textbooks and health professionals. Again, the study found that the students preferred sharing their health information with friends than their parents and schools' authorities. The study further found that the major sources of students' health information included health professionals and textbooks. Lastly, even though some of the students claimed internet sources to their health information, it was not a major source to the student body at large. The study recommends strong health systems on the campuses of senior high schools as they have become communities on their own as a result of the emergence of the free senior high school program. The monitored positive peer-counseling group should also be encouraged by the schools' management and by extension the counseling units for the students to share views on themselves, particularly on health issues where they deem fit.

Senior high school students’ understanding of mathematical inequality

Mathematics inequality is an essential concept that students should fully understand since it is required in mathematical modeling and linear programming. However, students tend to perceive the solution of the inequalities problem without considering what the solution of inequality means. This study aims to describe students’ mistakes variations in solving mathematical inequality. It is necessary since solving inequality is a necessity for students to solve everyday problems modeled in mathematics. Thirty-eight female and male students of 12th-grade who have studied inequalities are involved in this study. They are given three inequality problems which are designed to find out students’ mistakes related to the change of inequality sign, determine the solution, and involve absolute value. All student work documents were analyzed for errors and misconceptions that emerged and then categorized based on the type of error, namely errors in applying inequality rules, errors in algebraic operations, or errors in determining the solution set, then described. The result shows that there were some errors and misconceptions that students made caused by still bringing the concept of equality when solving the inequalities problem. It made them did not aware of the inequality sign. Students are still less thorough in operating algebra and do not understand the number line concept in solving inequalities. The other factor was giving “fast strategy” to the students without considering the students’ understanding.

Predictors of condom use intention among senior high school students in the Hohoe Municipality, Ghana using the theory of planned behaviour

Students attitude in learning english conversations.

English conversation is an important lesson for Senior High School students in order to face the globalization effects. Many students considered English conversation as a controversial lesson through their positive and negative attitudes toward it. This study aimed to investigate the types of attitudes of the Senior High School students in learning English conversation, to describe the realization of the attitudes of Senior High School students in learning English conversations, and to explain the reason of the attitude which Senior High School students realized in the ways they are. The subjects of this study were 20 students consisting 12 females and 8 males at the age of 16-18 years old. The data were collected by observations and interviews then were analyzed using Interactive Models. The result showed that positive and negative attitude in learning English conversations, five types of realizations, and the reasons of the students realized their attitudes i.e. the language loyalty, language pride,  and awareness of language norms. It was concluded that the students’ attitude varied as to positive and negative ones and realized in numerous manners affected by several factors. Keywords: Discourse Markers, Students Interactions, Nonformal Education, Conversation

Analysis of Science Process Skills for Senior High School Students in Banjarmasin

The uncovering environmental knowledge of senior high school students about the local potential area based on reviewed from gender and grade, self-reported anxiety level and related factors in senior high school students in china during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019, an analysis of mood and modality.

Since the outbreak of Coronavirus in 2020, teaching and studying activities commonly conducted in the classrooms were shifted to online, which caused students to adapt and accept without compromising. This study analyzed the dialogue texts expressing students' hopes and views about the future of learning amidst the Covid-19 pandemic written by the Senior High School students of Nanyang Zhi Hui school in Medan, Sumatera Utara. The objectives are to analyze the mood, modality, and modality orientation types; and figure out the dominantly-applied mood, modality, and orientation types in the dialogue texts. This descriptive qualitative research applied the Mood and Modality theory by Halliday and other linguists. The study revealed that 1) three mood types: declarative, interrogative, and imperative, four types of modality: probability, usuality, obligation, and inclination range from low, median, and high degrees; four orientations: subjective-explicit, subjective-implicit, objective-explicit, and objective-implicit occurred in the texts; and 2) the clauses are represented through the extensive use of declarative mood (80,74%), median probability (47%), and implicitly objective modality orientation (45,15%). The study concludes that the students tend to give their insights using statements with median probability and orientation of objective-implicit in the dialogue, which shows a lack of confidence in the utterances.

Export Citation Format

Share document.

What are your chances of acceptance?

Calculate for all schools, your chance of acceptance.

Your chancing factors

Extracurriculars.

100 Interesting Research Paper Topics for High Schoolers

What’s covered:, how to pick the right research topic, elements of a strong research paper.

• Interesting Research Paper Topics

Composing a research paper can be a daunting task for first-time writers. In addition to making sure you’re using concise language and your thoughts are organized clearly, you need to find a topic that draws the reader in.

CollegeVine is here to help you brainstorm creative topics! Below are 100 interesting research paper topics that will help you engage with your project and keep you motivated until you’ve typed the final period. 

A research paper is similar to an academic essay but more lengthy and requires more research. This added length and depth is bittersweet: although a research paper is more work, you can create a more nuanced argument, and learn more about your topic. Research papers are a demonstration of your research ability and your ability to formulate a convincing argument. How well you’re able to engage with the sources and make original contributions will determine the strength of your paper. 

You can’t have a good research paper without a good research paper topic. “Good” is subjective, and different students will find different topics interesting. What’s important is that you find a topic that makes you want to find out more and make a convincing argument. Maybe you’ll be so interested that you’ll want to take it further and investigate some detail in even greater depth!

For example, last year over 4000 students applied for 500 spots in the Lumiere Research Scholar Program , a rigorous research program founded by Harvard researchers. The program pairs high-school students with Ph.D. mentors to work 1-on-1 on an independent research project . The program actually does not require you to have a research topic in mind when you apply, but pro tip: the more specific you can be the more likely you are to get in!

Introduction

The introduction to a research paper serves two critical functions: it conveys the topic of the paper and illustrates how you will address it. A strong introduction will also pique the interest of the reader and make them excited to read more. Selecting a research paper topic that is meaningful, interesting, and fascinates you is an excellent first step toward creating an engaging paper that people will want to read.

Thesis Statement

A thesis statement is technically part of the introduction—generally the last sentence of it—but is so important that it merits a section of its own. The thesis statement is a declarative sentence that tells the reader what the paper is about. A strong thesis statement serves three purposes: present the topic of the paper, deliver a clear opinion on the topic, and summarize the points the paper will cover.

An example of a good thesis statement of diversity in the workforce is:

Diversity in the workplace is not just a moral imperative but also a strategic advantage for businesses, as it fosters innovation, enhances creativity, improves decision-making, and enables companies to better understand and connect with a diverse customer base.

The body is the largest section of a research paper. It’s here where you support your thesis, present your facts and research, and persuade the reader.

Each paragraph in the body of a research paper should have its own idea. The idea is presented, generally in the first sentence of the paragraph, by a topic sentence. The topic sentence acts similarly to the thesis statement, only on a smaller scale, and every sentence in the paragraph with it supports the idea it conveys.

An example of a topic sentence on how diversity in the workplace fosters innovation is:

Diversity in the workplace fosters innovation by bringing together individuals with different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences, which stimulates creativity, encourages new ideas, and leads to the development of innovative solutions to complex problems.

The body of an engaging research paper flows smoothly from one idea to the next. Create an outline before writing and order your ideas so that each idea logically leads to another.

The conclusion of a research paper should summarize your thesis and reinforce your argument. It’s common to restate the thesis in the conclusion of a research paper.

For example, a conclusion for a paper about diversity in the workforce is:

In conclusion, diversity in the workplace is vital to success in the modern business world. By embracing diversity, companies can tap into the full potential of their workforce, promote creativity and innovation, and better connect with a diverse customer base, ultimately leading to greater success and a more prosperous future for all.

Reference Page

The reference page is normally found at the end of a research paper. It provides proof that you did research using credible sources, properly credits the originators of information, and prevents plagiarism.

There are a number of different formats of reference pages, including APA, MLA, and Chicago. Make sure to format your reference page in your teacher’s preferred style.

• Analyze the benefits of diversity in education.
• Are charter schools useful for the national education system?
• How has modern technology changed teaching?
• Discuss the pros and cons of standardized testing.
• What are the benefits of a gap year between high school and college?
• What funding allocations give the most benefit to students?
• Does homeschooling set students up for success?
• Should universities/high schools require students to be vaccinated?
• What effect does rising college tuition have on high schoolers?
• Do students perform better in same-sex schools?
• Discuss and analyze the impacts of a famous musician on pop music.
• How has pop music evolved over the past decade?
• How has the portrayal of women in music changed in the media over the past decade?
• How does a synthesizer work?
• How has music evolved to feature different instruments/voices?
• How has sound effect technology changed the music industry?
• Analyze the benefits of music education in high schools.
• Are rehabilitation centers more effective than prisons?
• Are congestion taxes useful?
• Does affirmative action help minorities?
• Can a capitalist system effectively reduce inequality?
• Is a three-branch government system effective?
• What causes polarization in today’s politics?
• Is the U.S. government racially unbiased?
• Choose a historical invention and discuss its impact on society today.
• Choose a famous historical leader who lost power—what led to their eventual downfall?
• How has your country evolved over the past century?
• What historical event has had the largest effect on the U.S.?
• Has the government’s response to national disasters improved or declined throughout history?
• Discuss the history of the American occupation of Iraq.
• Explain the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
• Is literature relevant in modern society?
• Discuss how fiction can be used for propaganda.
• How does literature teach and inform about society?
• Explain the influence of children’s literature on adulthood.
• How has literature addressed homosexuality?
• Does the media portray minorities realistically?
• Does the media reinforce stereotypes?
• Why have podcasts become so popular?
• Will streaming end traditional television?
• What is a patriot?
• What are the pros and cons of global citizenship?
• What are the causes and effects of bullying?
• Why has the divorce rate in the U.S. been declining in recent years?
• Is it more important to follow social norms or religion?
• What are the responsible limits on abortion, if any?
• How does an MRI machine work?
• Would the U.S. benefit from socialized healthcare?
• Elderly populations
• The education system
• State tax bases
• How do anti-vaxxers affect the health of the country?
• Analyze the costs and benefits of diet culture.
• Should companies allow employees to exercise on company time?
• What is an adequate amount of exercise for an adult per week/per month/per day?
• Discuss the effects of the obesity epidemic on American society.
• Are students smarter since the advent of the internet?
• What departures has the internet made from its original design?
• Has digital downloading helped the music industry?
• Discuss the benefits and costs of stricter internet censorship.
• Analyze the effects of the internet on the paper news industry.
• What would happen if the internet went out?
• How will artificial intelligence (AI) change our lives?
• What are the pros and cons of cryptocurrency?
• How has social media affected the way people relate with each other?
• Should social media have an age restriction?
• Discuss the importance of source software.
• What is more relevant in today’s world: mobile apps or websites?
• How will fully autonomous vehicles change our lives?
• How is text messaging affecting teen literacy?

Mental Health

• What are the benefits of daily exercise?
• How has social media affected people’s mental health?
• What things contribute to poor mental and physical health?
• Analyze how mental health is talked about in pop culture.
• Discuss the pros and cons of more counselors in high schools.
• How does stress affect the body?
• How do emotional support animals help people?
• What are black holes?
• Discuss the biggest successes and failures of the EPA.
• How has the Flint water crisis affected life in Michigan?
• Can science help save endangered species?
• Is the development of an anti-cancer vaccine possible?

Environment

• What are the effects of deforestation on climate change?
• Is climate change reversible?
• How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect global warming and climate change?
• Are carbon credits effective for offsetting emissions or just marketing?
• Is nuclear power a safe alternative to fossil fuels?
• Are hybrid vehicles helping to control pollution in the atmosphere?
• How is plastic waste harming the environment?
• Is entrepreneurism a trait people are born with or something they learn?
• How much more should CEOs make than their average employee?
• Can you start a business without money?
• Should the U.S. raise the minimum wage?
• Discuss how happy employees benefit businesses.
• How important is branding for a business?
• Discuss the ease, or difficulty, of landing a job today.
• What is the economic impact of sporting events?
• Are professional athletes overpaid?
• Should male and female athletes receive equal pay?
• What is a fair and equitable way for transgender athletes to compete in high school sports?
• What are the benefits of playing team sports?
• What is the most corrupt professional sport?

Where to Get More Research Paper Topic Ideas

If you need more help brainstorming topics, especially those that are personalized to your interests, you can use CollegeVine’s free AI tutor, Ivy . Ivy can help you come up with original research topic ideas, and she can also help with the rest of your homework, from math to languages.

Disclaimer: This post includes content sponsored by Lumiere Education.

Related CollegeVine Blog Posts

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Qualitative Research for Senior High School Students

2019, SAMSUDIN N. ABDULLAH, PhD

This power-point presentation (pdf) is specially prepared for the teachers who are teaching Practical Research 1 (Qualitative Research) in senior high school curriculum. Practical Research 1 aims to develop the critical thinking and problem solving skills of senior high school students through Qualitative Research. Its goal is to equip them with necessary skills and experience to write their own research paper. The actual research process will let the students experience conducting a research; from conceptualization of the research topic or title until the actual writing of their own research paper. Towards the end of the subject, the students are expected to produce their own research paper in group with four members.

Related Papers

Hernando Jr L Bernal PhD

Teaching Practical Research in the Senior High School was a challenge but at the same time a room for exploration. This study investigated the key areas in the interconnected teaching strategies employed to grade 12 students of which are most and least helpful in coming up with a good research output and what suggestions can be given to improve areas that are least useful. It is qualitative in nature and used phenomenological design. Reflection worksheets and interview schedule were the main sources of data. Results reveal that students come up with a good research output because of the following key areas: 'guidance from someone who is passionate with research' as represented by their research critique, research teacher, resource speaker from the seminar conducted, and group mates; 'guidance from something or activities conducted' like the sample researches in the library visitation, worksheets answered, and the research defenses; and 'teamwork' among the members of the group. On the other hand, key areas which are least useful are: 'clash of ideas and unequal effort' among the members; 'time consuming for some of the written works'; and 'no review of related literature' during the library hopping. Suggestions given where: to choose your own group mates of which each member should have the same field of interest, to remove worksheets not needed in the research paper; and to check online regarding availability of literature in the library. Further suggestions are to rearranged the sequence of the interconnected strategies which are as follows: grouping of students, having a research critique, seminar in conducting research, library visitation/work activity, proposal defense, final defense and the worksheet activities be given throughout the semester. Furthermore, there should be a culminating activity for students to share their outputs. Teaching research is a wholesome process. By then, the researcher recommends to organize a group orientation for the teacher-coaches/mentors on the creation of school research council or school mentoring committee for peer reviewing on the students research output. Further, student research presentation (oral, poster, gallery type, etc.), student research conference/colloquium, student research journal, etc. be organized to further nourish the culture of research in the part of the students, teachers and staffs involve.

Marcella Stark , John Slate Ph. D. , Julie Combs

In this article, we outline a course wherein the instructors teach students how to conduct rigorous qualitative research. We discuss the four major distinct, but overlapping, phases of the course: conceptual/theoretical, technical, applied, and emergent scholar. Students write several qualitative reports, called qualitative notebooks, which involve data that they collect (via three different types of interviews), analyze (using nine qualitative analysis techniques via qualitative software), and interpret. Each notebook is edited by the instructors to help them improve the quality of subsequent notebook reports. Finally, we advocate asking students who have previously taken this course to team-teach future courses. We hope that our exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research will be useful for teachers and students alike.

Dr. Purnima Trivedi

International Journal of Research

Tahani Bsharat

Gaudensio Angkasa

Mjhae Corinthians

Can tenth graders go beyond writing reports to conduct "authentic" research? English teachers and the school librarian collaborate to gather data in a qualitative action research study that investigates the effectiveness of an assignment that requires primary research methods and an essay of two thousand words. The unit is designed as a performance-based assessment task, including rubrics, student journals, and peer editing. Students develop research questions, write proposals, design questionnaires and interviews, and learn techniques of display and analysis. Concurrently, their teachers gather data from observation, journals, and questionnaires to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the assignment. The research assignment has become analogous to "Take two aspirins and call me in the morning." It doesn't seem to do any harm and may even do some good. Educators adjust the dosage for older students: the length of the paper grows with the time allotted to the task but the prescription is the same. It is universally accepted as a benign activity, as evidenced by the prevalence of standards and objectives for research skills in school curricula. It has become a staple in the educational diet of the high school student. Librarians promote the research assignment because they want students to get better at searching, retrieving, and evaluating information. English teachers see it as an opportunity for sustained writing. Parents like it because it is good preparation for college. Everyone likes it because it gets students into the library and reading. So, what is wrong with research as it is traditionally taught in secondary schools? And what do students think?

Methodological Issues in Management Research: Advances, Challenges, and the Way Ahead

Richa Awasthy

Current paper is an overview of qualitative research. It starts with discussing meaning of research and links it with a framework of experiential learning. Complexity of socio-political environment can be captured with methodologies appropriate to capture dynamism and intricacy of human life. Qualitative research is a process of capturing lived-in experiences of individuals, groups, and society. It is an umbrella concept which involves variety of methods of data collection such as interviews, observations, focused group discussions, projective tools, drawings, narratives, biographies, videos, and anything which helps to understand world of participants. Researcher is an instrument of data collection and plays a crucial role in collecting data. Main steps and key characteristics of qualitative research are covered in this paper. Reader would develop appreciation for methodiness in qualitative research. Quality of qualitative research is explained referring to aspects related to rigor...

Nurse Education Today

Stefanos Mantzoukas

SAMSUDIN N. ABDULLAH, PhD, MOHAMAD T. SIMPAL, MAST & ARJEY B. MANGAKOY

SAMSUDIN N ABDULLAH, PhD

This Self-Instructional Module (SIM) in Practical Research 2 (Quantitative Research) is specially designed for the senior high school students and teachers. The explanation and examples in this SIM are based from the personal experiences of the authors in actual conduct of both basic and action researches. There is a YOUTUBE Channel of the major author (Samsudin Noh Abdullah) for the detailed video lessons anchored on this module.

Marula seed cake (MSC) is a nutritionally-rich natural feed resource that can enhance the healthiness of animal-derived foods (ADFs) for human consumption. This study compared the health-related fatty acid (FA) profiles of MSC products from South Africa and Eswatini. Composite samples monthly collected from both countries were analysed for FAs. MSC products from both countries were found to be dominated by oleic acid (&gt;70%), followed by palmitic, linoleic and stearic acids. Consequently, both products had their FA totals dominated by ƩMUFA followed by ƩSFA, ƩPUFA, Ʃn-6 PUFA and Ʃn-3 PUFA. Both oleic and stearic acids were higher (P &lt; 0.01) whilst linoleic (P &lt; 0.001), α-linolenic (P &lt; 0.05), margaric (P &lt; 0.05), palmitoleic (P &lt; 0.05) and eicosatrienoic (P &lt; 0.05) acids were lower in South African in comparison to Eswatini MSC. Consequently, South African MSC had higher ƩMUFA (P &lt; 0.01) but lower ƩPUFA (P &lt; 0.001), Ʃn-6 PUFA (P &lt; 0.001) and Ʃn-3 PUFA (P...

RELATED PAPERS

Emily Morris

Milan Stupar

Neurophotonics

Physical Review D

Zoltán Keresztes

Fazliddin Turaev

HANDAN ÇULAL-KILIÇ

Sergio Kodato

Revista Brasileira de Engenharia e Sustentabilidade

Robson Evaldo Gehlen Bohrer

Pelataran Seni

Sumasno Hadi

Marzia Marchi

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Oceanography

Deborah Day

Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação

Christina Ferraz Musse

Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica

Sergio Buiza Hernández

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)

Sur y Tiempo

Sur y Tiempo Revista de Historia de América

Giuseppe Vanoni Martinez

Cesar mendoza sanchez

Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Marek Oleszczyk

Nikolaos Paraskevopoulos

Jakob Lindgaard

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Depression, anxiety and stress among high school students: A cross-sectional study in an urban municipality of Kathmandu, Nepal

Contributed equally to this work with: Anita Karki, Bipin Thapa

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected] (PB); [email protected] (AK)

Affiliation Central Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Child, Adolescent Health and Maternal Care, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Community Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

• Anita Karki, 
• Bipin Thapa, 
• Pranil Man Singh Pradhan, 

• Published: May 31, 2022
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516
• Peer Review
• Reader Comments

Depression and anxiety are the most widely recognized mental issues affecting youths. It is extremely important to investigate the burden and associated risk factors of these common mental disorders to combat them. Therefore, this study was undertaken with the aim to estimate the prevalence and identify factors associated with depression, anxiety, and stress among high school students in an urban municipality of Kathmandu, Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 453 students of five randomly selected high schools in Tokha Municipality of Kathmandu. Previously validated Nepali version of depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21) was used to assess the level of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress (DAS). Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to decide statistically significant variables of symptoms of DAS at p-value<0.05. The overall prevalence of DAS was found to be 56.5% (95% CI: 51.8%, 61.1%), 55.6% (95%CI: 50.9%, 60.2%) and 32.9% (95%CI: 28.6%, 37.4%) respectively. In the multivariable model, nuclear family type, students from science or humanities faculty, presence of perceived academic stress, and being electronically bullied were found to be significantly associated with depression. Female sex, having mother with no formal education, students from science or humanities faculty and presence of perceived academic stress were significantly associated with anxiety. Likewise, female sex, currently living without parents, and presence of perceived academic stress were significantly associated with stress. Prevention and control activities such as school-based counseling services focusing to reduce and manage academic stress and electronic bullying are recommended in considering the findings of this research.

Citation: Karki A, Thapa B, Pradhan PMS, Basel P (2022) Depression, anxiety and stress among high school students: A cross-sectional study in an urban municipality of Kathmandu, Nepal. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(5): e0000516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516

Editor: Khameer Kidia, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, UNITED STATES

Received: February 22, 2022; Accepted: May 2, 2022; Published: May 31, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Karki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The data that support the findings of descriptive analysis of this study are available in Figshare with the identifier given below: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19203512 The data that support the findings of inferential analysis of this study are available in Figshare with the identifier given below: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19203491 .

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Mental disorders contribute to a huge proportion of disease burden across all societies [ 1 ]. Among them, depression, anxiety and stress are the leading causes of illness and disability among adolescents [ 2 ]. The physical, psychological, and behavioral changes that occur throughout adolescence predispose them to a variety of mental health issues [ 3 ]. Despite this, mental health and mental disorders are largely ignored and not given the same importance as physical health [ 4 ].

The existing community-based studies conducted among high school students of various parts of Nepal have reported a wide range of prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety. The prevalence of depressive symptoms has been reported to range from 27% to 76% [ 5 – 7 ]. Likewise, the limited studies conducted in Nepal have estimated the proportion of symptoms of anxiety to range from 10% to 57% [ 7 – 9 ]. A nationwide survey conducted in Nepal revealed the prevalence of mental distress among adolescents (13-17years) to be 5.2% [ 10 ]. The Global School Health Survey which was a nationwide survey conducted in 2015 reported anxiety among 4.6% of the students [ 11 ].

Previous studies have revealed that sex [ 12 – 16 ], staying away from home [ 17 ], grade [ 12 , 14 , 16 ], stream of study [ 18 ], academic performance and examination related issues [ 7 , 19 ], cyber bullying [ 20 ] were linked with depression. Likewise, sex [ 8 , 21 ], grade of students and type of school i.e., public or private [ 8 ], family type [ 17 ], not living with parents, educational level of parents [ 21 ] and high educational stress [ 22 ] had been the determinants of anxiety as per previous studies.

High school education is an important turning point in the life of academic students in Nepal [ 23 ]. As the educational system becomes more specialized and tough in high school, the students become more likely to experience stress at this level. This might put them at risk of developing common mental disorders such as depression, anxiety and stress (DAS). However, there is a paucity of research studies that have assessed DAS among high school students in Nepal.

Exploring the magnitude and risk factors of symptoms of DAS are very crucial to combat the burden of adolescent mental health issues [ 24 ]. However, due to limited access to psychological and psychiatric services as well as the significant social stigma associated with mental health issues, anxiety and depression in early adolescence frequently go undiagnosed and untreated, particularly in developing countries such as Nepal. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence and identify factors associated with the symptoms of DAS among high school students in an urban municipality of Kathmandu, Nepal.

Materials and methods

Study setting, design, and population.

This was a cross-sectional survey conducted in randomly selected high schools of Tokha Municipality, Kathmandu District in province no. 3 of Nepal. The data collection period was from 27 th August to 11 th September 2019. This municipality was formed on 7 December 2014 by merging five previous villages. It has an area of 16.2 sq.km. and comprises 11 wards [ 25 , 26 ]. The municipality is rich in cultural and ethnic diversity [ 25 ]. According to Nepal government records as of 2017, there were total 218,554 students in Tokha municipality in 82 schools. High school students were the study population for this study [ 26 ]. In Nepal, high school students comprise of grade 11 and grade 12 students. The high school differs from lower schooling level since the students have the opportunity to enroll in specialized areas such as science, management, humanities and education. High school are also popularly known as 10+2 [ 27 ].

Sample size calculation and sampling technique

Sample size was estimated using the formula for cross-sectional survey [ 28 ], n = Z 2 p(1-p)/ e 2 considering the following assumptions; proportion (p) = 0.24 [ 12 ], 95% confidence level, the margin of error of 5%. The estimated proportion used for sample size calculation was based on proportion of symptoms of anxiety i.e., 24%, as reported by a similar study conducted in Manipur, India [ 12 ].

After calculation, the minimum sample size required was 280. After adjusting for design effect of 1.5 to adjust variance from cluster design and assuming non-response rate of 10%, final sample of 467 was calculated. Two-stage cluster sampling was used. A list of all high schools of Tokha municipality was obtained from the education division of the municipality. Out of twelve high schools (8 private schools and 4 public schools), five schools were randomly selected. Within each selected high school further two sections each of grades 11 and 12 were randomly selected. A total of 20 sections were selected, 4 from each selected school, and all the students from the selected sections were included in the study.

Data collection tools

A structured questionnaire was prepared based on our study objectives which was divided into three sections. The first section included information about socio-demographic, familial and academic characteristics of the students. The second section included two item question to assess socializing among the students which was based on a previous study by Vankim and Nelson [ 29 ], two questions to assess bullying among the students based on 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey [ 30 ] and one item question to assess perceived academic stress. The third section consisted of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) used to assess level of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress among the students.

DASS-21 is a psychological screening instrument capable of differentiating symptoms of DAS. Depression, anxiety, and stress are three subscales and there are 7 items in each subscale. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale which ranges from 0 i.e., did not apply to me at all to 3 i.e., applied to me very much. Scores for DAS were calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. and multiplying by two [ 31 ]. A previously validated Nepali version of DASS-21 was obtained and used for data collection. Nepali version of the DASS-21 has demonstrated adequate internal consistency and validity. However, in the validation paper, the construct validity of the tool was evaluated against life satisfaction scale and not a systematic diagnostic tool [ 32 ]. Reliability for the symptoms of DAS was tested by Cronbach alpha. Cronbach alpha values for DAS were 0.74, 0.77, and 0.74 respectively.

Data collection procedure and technique

Data was collected after obtaining permission from the municipality’s education division as well as individual high schools. The questionnaire was in both English and Nepali language and had been pre-tested among 45 high school students of neighboring municipality. Self-administered anonymous questionnaires were distributed to students in their respective classrooms and requested for participation. An orientation session was conducted for the filling the questionnaire before distribution. Written informed consent was taken from all students prior to data collection whereas additional written parental consent was obtained from students below 18 years of age. One of the investigators herself collected the data from students. After data collection, a session on depression, anxiety, and stress along with the importance of discussing it with the guardians/ teachers and asking for help was conducted.

Study variables

The study variables are described in Table 1 .

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t001

Data analysis

Compilation of data was done in EpiData 3.1 and then exported to IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed. Frequency tables with percentages were generated for categorical variables, while mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for continuous variables.

Binary logistic regression was performed to identify associated factors of symptoms of DAS. Firstly, we performed univariate analysis in which each co-variate was modeled separately to determine the odds of DAS. Those variables with p-value <0.15 in univariate analysis were identified as candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression. In multivariable logistic regression, a p-value of < .05 was considered to be statistically significant and strength of association was measured using adjusted odds ratio (AOR) at 95% confidence interval.

Multicollinearity of variables was tested before entering them in the regression analysis. No problem of multicollinearity was seen among the variables (the highest observed VIF was 1.25,1.10 and 1.13 for symptoms of DAS respectively. The goodness of fit of the regression model was tested by the application of the Hosmer and Lemeshow test; the model was found to be a good fit (P >.05).

The regression model was explained by the equation:

Log [Y/ (1-Y)] = b 0 + b 1 X 1 + b 2 X 2 + b 3 X 3 … ..b n X n + e

Where Y is the expected probability for the outcome variable to occur, b 0 is the constant/intercept, b 1 through b n are the regression coefficients and the X 1 through X n are distinct independent variables and e is the error term.

Ethical approval and consent

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of the Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University (Reference no. 23/ (6–11) 76/077). Approval to conduct this study was also obtained from the education division of Tokha Municipality (Ref: 076/077-23) and respective school authorities. A written informed consent (in the Nepali language) was obtained from the students before the data collection to assure their willingness to participate and no identifiers were listed in the questionnaire to make it anonymous and confidential. Parental consent was obtained for students who were under the age of 18. No incentives were provided.

Sociodemographic, academic and contextual characteristics of the students

The research questionnaire was distributed to a sample of 468 high school students, one of whom refused to participate in this study, with a response rate of 99.78%. Responses from 14 students were excluded due to incompleteness. This study presents the analysis on a total of 453 students.

The mean age of the students was 16.99 years (SD = ±1.12), ranging from 14 to 22 years. The proportion of female students (54.1%) was higher than male students (45.9%). Majority of the students were found to be currently living with their parents i.e., 65.8%. Around 70% of the students were from nuclear family. Regarding parent’s educational level, majority of the students responded that their father as well as mother had attained secondary level of education i.e., 31.6% and 33.3% respectively.

With regards to academic characteristics, more than two- third of students i.e., 69.5% were from private high schools while the remaining 30.5% were studying in a government or public high school. More than half i.e. (53.4%) of the students studied in grade eleven. About half of the students i.e., 50.6% were from management faculty. Only 3.8% students reported to have failed in the previous examination.

It was noted that about 60% of students perceived themselves to be stressed due to their studies. Most students were low socializing i.e., 60.9%. Around one-tenth students reported being bullied electronically in the past 12 months (10.2%). Similar proportion of students i.e., 10.4% also reported being bullied on school property in the past 12 months ( Table 2 ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t002

Level of symptoms of DAS among the students

The prevalence of symptoms of DAS was found to be 56.5% (51.8%, 61.1%), 55.6% (50.9%, 60.2%) and 32.9% (28.6%, 37.4%) respectively. About a quarter of students showed moderate level of symptoms of depression and anxiety i.e., 25.8% and 24.5% respectively. On the other hand, symptoms of mild stress were most prevalent among the students. i.e., 14.8% ( Table 3 ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t003

Factors associated with symptoms of depression

The results from multivariable logistic regression analyses for correlates of symptoms of depression are shown in Table 4 . The variables that remain in the final model were age, type of family, father’s education, mother’s education, type of school, grade, faculty, perceived academic stress, and bullied electronically as these variables had p-value less than 0.15 in the univariate model. In the final model, nuclear family type (AOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.06–2.52), students from science/humanities faculty (AOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05–2.40), presence of perceived academic stress (AOR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.44) and bullied electronically in past 12 months (AOR: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.34–5.99) were significantly associated with symptoms of depression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t004

Factors associated with symptoms of anxiety

The results from multivariable logistic regression analyses for correlates of symptoms of anxiety are shown in Table 5 . The variables that remained in the final model were age, sex, mother’s education, stream/ faculty, perceived academic stress, bullied electronically, and bullied on school property (p<0.15). Female sex (AOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.23–2.71), no formal education attained by the mother (AOR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.08–2.47), students from science or humanities faculties (AOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.01–2.21), and presence of perceived academic stress (AOR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.30–2.87), and were significantly associated with symptoms of anxiety.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t005

Factors associated with symptoms of stress

The results from multivariable logistic regression analyses for main correlates of symptoms of stress are shown in Table 6 . The variables that remained in the final model were sex, current living status, grade, stream / faculty, perceived academic stress, bullied electronically and bullied on school property. In the final model, female sex (AOR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.01–2.34), currently living without parents, (AOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.11–2.61), and presence of perceived academic stress (AOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.36–3.26) were significantly associated with stress symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.t006

In our study, the prevalence of depressive symptoms among high school students was found to be 56.5%. The existing community-based studies conducted among high school students of various parts of Nepal have reported a wide range of prevalence of depressive symptoms. A study by Gautam et al. reported that more than one quarter i.e., 27% of high school students in a rural setting of Nepal showed depressive symptoms [ 6 ]. Similarly, in a study conducted by Bhattarai et. al. in four schools of a metropolitan city in Nepal, it was found that more than 2/5 th i.e., 44.2% students exhibited depressive symptoms [ 5 ]. Similar proportion of depressive symptoms i.e., 41.6% was also reported by Sharma et. al in a study conducted among adolescent students of public schools of Kathmandu [ 9 ]. The prevalence estimated by these studies are lower than the findings of our study [ 5 , 6 , 9 ]. On contrary, a single high school study by Bhandari et al reported depressive symptoms among 76% students [ 7 ]. In our study, the proportion of students showing symptoms of anxiety were 55.6%. A study by Sharma et al. revealed that more than half i.e. 56.9% of public high school students showed symptoms of anxiety [ 9 ]. Another study by Bhandari et. al, also found out that nearly one out of two students i.e., 46.5% suffered from anxiety [ 8 ].These findings are in line with the findings of our study. On contrary, a study by Bhandari reported that only 10% students had mild anxiety [ 7 ]. In our study, the prevalence of stress symptoms among students was 32.9%. A study by Sharma et. al reported that more than 1/4 th students i.e., 27.5% showed symptoms of stress which corroborates with the findings of our study.

While the prevalence of symptoms of DAS reported by our study corroborates with the existing literatures in Nepal, it is exceptionally high. One possible explanation for this could be that the data was collected at the beginning of academic session. The students in the eleventh grade were undergoing sudden transition from secondary school life to high school life with regards to new friends, teachers, school environment, and change in daily schedules whereas the students in 12 th grade were awaiting results of previous board exam. This anticipation and the tremendous pressure faced by 12 th grade students for tertiary education might have contributed to the high prevalence of symptoms of DAS among 12 th grade students whereas the higher prevalence of symptoms of DAS among 11 th grade students could be possibly explained by the inability to cope with the adjustment of sudden transition from secondary to high school life. Moreover, the wide range in prevalence of DAS symptoms among these community-based studies could be attributed to the difference in the setting (rural or urban) and difference in methodology used.

Among South Asian countries, the prevalence of depression reported by our study is in line with the studies conducted in India, and Bangladesh, but slightly higher than one conducted in China and [ 13 , 17 , 33 , 34 ]. On contrary, our study has shown higher prevalence of anxiety among students as compared to study conducted in India, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and China [ 12 , 19 , 22 , 34 ].The prevalence of symptoms of stress in this study is comparable to the study from Chandigarh but higher than similar study from Manipur, India [ 12 , 17 ]. Hence, it can be suggested that there is a huge burden of DAS among high school students in South Asia. In context of Nepal, there is no standalone mental health policy. Further, there is inadequate funding allocated for mental health services along with shortage of qualified mental health professionals. In addition, there is much stigma that surrounds mental illness which acts as a barrier to seek and utilize mental health care services [ 35 ]. Due to these reasons, mental health illnesses are likely to remain untreated and continue to persist in the society. This may explain the high prevalence of DAS in our setting.

Socio-demographic characteristics and association with symptoms of DAS (depression, anxiety and stress)

In current study, it was found that females were more likely to suffer from symptoms of anxiety and stress than their male counterparts. This finding corroborates with the findings from previous studies [ 19 , 21 , 36 – 39 ]. On the contrary, a study conducted in Dang, Nepal reported that males were 1.5 times more likely to become anxious [ 8 ].One possible explanation for this is adolescent stage in girls is marked by hormonal changes as a result of various reproductive events which may have a role in the etiology of anxiety disorders [ 40 ]. Furthermore, when compared to boys, girls are more likely to be subjected to stressful situations such as sexual and domestic violence, which may make them more prone to anxiety and stress problems [ 41 ].

This study revealed that the students who live in nuclear families were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms compared to students from joint or extended families. There are more members in a joint family system, which may provide better opportunities for adolescents to share their emotions and issues, hence providing a strong support system that may serve as a protective factor against depression which may be lacking in nuclear families [ 42 ]. Moreover, this study also found out that risks of stress symptoms was higher among students who were staying far from their parents. A similar finding was reported by Arif et al., 2019 in Uttar Pradesh, India [ 43 ]. One of the possible explanations might be that students who live without their parents may spend a substantial amount of time alone after school, which does not encourage familial intimacy [ 44 ]. As a result, they may feel alone and disconnected from their parents [ 45 ]. These adolescents may miss out on the opportunity to internalize the support they would otherwise get, leading to increased stress.

In our study, the students who reported no formal mother’s education were at greater risk of showing symptoms of anxiety. This was in accordance with other similar studies [ 38 , 46 ]. The attachment theory provides a robust foundation for understanding how parental behavior affects a child’s ability to recognize and manage stressful events throughout their lives [ 47 ]. The theory supports that the educated mother plays a stronger parenting role in the development of emotional skills and mental health outcomes in teenagers which might be protective for anxiety.

Academic characteristics and association with symptoms of DAS

In our study, the students from science or humanities faculties were more likely to have depression and anxiety as compared to management students. This was in line with other studies which showed higher proportion of depressive symptoms among science students. [ 48 ]. Generally, science students have to compete more, study longer hours and have a higher level of curriculum difficulty than management students which explains the finding. Likewise, it is believed that the humanities students have a poorer past academic performance in the secondary school, and may have chosen this stream / faculty as a secondary choice [ 49 ]. This combined with the uncertainty regarding future work prospects among humanities students may likely explain the higher prevalence of depression among humanities students.

In our study, the students who reported to be stressed due to their studies were more likely to suffer from symptoms of DAS. Several studies have documented similar findings [ 7 , 22 ]. A possible explanation might be that high school is an important stage in an individual’s academic life. However, the inability to meet the expectation of parents, teachers, and oneself in terms of academic performance can lead to overburden of stress [ 50 ]. This persistent academic related stress might accelerate the development of mood disorders such as depression, anxiety and stress among the adolescents [ 51 ].

Contextual factors and association with symptoms of DAS

In our study, the risk of depressive symptoms was higher among those students who were bullied via electronic means. Literature suggests that higher the level of cyberbullying/electronic bullying leads to higher the level of depressive symptoms among adolescents [ 52 ]. A similar study by Perren et. al demonstrated that depression was significantly associated with cyberbullying even after controlling for traditional forms of bullying [ 20 ]. The victims of cyberbullying may experience anonymous verbal or visual threats via electronic means. These repeated incidents can cause the victims to feel powerless which exacerbates the feeling of fear. This can cause significant emotional distress among victims and contribute to development of depressive symptoms [ 53 ].

Even though widely utilized in both clinical as well as research setting, DASS scales are screening tools for symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Hence, they cannot be used as a modality for diagnosis. This limitation should be considered when interpreting the findings of this study. Due to its cross-sectional design, this study was unable to establish causal relationship of depression, anxiety, and stress with associated factors. Since the study tools used in this study investigate the habits and activities of the high school students in the past, recall and reporting bias are likely; however, the effect due to potential confounders have been controlled. As Nepal is a culturally diverse country, the findings of only one municipality may not be generalized to the whole country. Therefore, future studies covering a larger population of high school students employing more robust study designs such as interventional studies are recommended to get the real scenario of common mental disorders.

In conclusion, more than half of the students had depression and anxiety symptoms and nearly one third of the students had stress symptoms. Nuclear family type, students from humanities/science faculty, presence of perceived academic stress, and being bullied electronically were found to be significantly associated with symptoms of depression. Female sex, no formal mother education, students from humanities/science faculty, and presence of perceived academic stress were significantly associated with symptoms of anxiety. Likewise, symptoms of stress were significantly associated with female sex, currently living without parents, and presence of perceived academic stress.

Therefore, prevention and control activities such as school-based counseling services focusing to reduce and manage academic stress and electronic bullying faced by the students are recommended considering findings of this research.

Supporting information

S1 file. questionnaire form used in data collection..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000516.s001

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Tokha municipality for granting permission to conduct the study. Special thank goes to the school management and teachers for their co-ordination during data collection. Lastly, we would like to thank all the study participants for their co-operation and support during the study.

• View Article
• PubMed/NCBI
• Google Scholar
• 2. Adolescent mental health. [cited 27 Jul 2021]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
• 3. World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia. Mental health status of adolescents in South-East Asia: evidence for action. New Delhi: World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2017. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254982%0A
• 9. Sharma P, Choulagai B. Stress, anxiety, and depression among adolescent students of public schools in Kathmandu. [cited 19 Mar 2022]. Available: www.jiom.com.np
• 10. Nepal Health Research Council. National Mental Health Survey, Nepal-2020. In: Nepal Health Research Council [Internet]. 2020 pp. 1–4. Available: http://nhrc.gov.np/projects/nepal-mental-health-survey-2017-2018/
• 25. Brief Introduction | Tokha Municipality, Office Of the Municipal Executive. [cited 25 Jul 2021]. Available: https://www.tokhamun.gov.np/en/node/4
• 26. Tokha Municipality Profile | Facts & Statistics–Nepal Archives. [cited 25 Jul 2021]. Available: https://www.nepalarchives.com/content/tokha-municipality-kathmandu-profile/
• 27. Nepal—Secondary Education—Level, Schools, Technical, and Training—StateUniversity.com. [cited 22 Mar 2022]. Available: https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1058/Nepal-SECONDARY-EDUCATION.html
• 30. 2019 State and Local Youth Risk Behavior Survey. 2019; 7. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2019/2019_YRBS-Standard-HS-Questionnaire.pdf
• 35. World Health Organization (WHO). Nepal WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health Situational Assessment CONTEXT.

Challenges Encountered by Senior High School Students in their Research Undertakings

• Jane Marie Leonares

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of senior high school in the Philippines brought along the advancement of subject offerings. For grades 11 and 12, significant changes are the addition of applied subjects that are research driven, namely: Practical Research 1-Qualitative, Practical Research 2-Quantitative, and Inquiries, Investigations and Immersion, where the students can freely choose which of the two approaches, or the combination of both, they would like to use to come up with a sound research paper that will be of help to the society. This study seeks to determine the difficulties encountered by a senior high school class as they undertake researches in grades 11 and 12. It further seeks to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the research curriculum in a classroom context in the perception of the students.

Thematic Analysis was used to treat the behavioral data. Sub-themes were generated to facilitate data analysis and further specify findings. A researcher-made semi-structured questionnaire was utilized to gather data. 10 Grade 12 students, the research team leaders in the class, were chosen as respondents. The respondents belong to the pioneering batch of Senior High School. Since the perception of the students is behavioral, open-ended questions were used so as not to limit their responses.

The study has found out the following challenges that research students encountered: 1) Lack of basic research background from Junior High School, 2) Formulating a Topic, 3) Dealing with a research team, 4) Insufficiency of Resources, 5) Data Analysis and Treatment, and 6) Staying motivated in the course of the study. It also revealed that time management played a vital role in the completion of the study because research subjects were offered simultaneously with specialized and applied subjects. These also required term papers and reports and were sometimes due for submission within the same time frame.

DISCUSSIONS

The results revealed the significant need for the integration of basic lessons in research in junior high school years, suggestively among grades 9 and 10. The study also emphasized the need for Time Management Seminars for Senior High School students to help them cope with the new demands of the program which prepares them for higher education. Furthermore, a collaborative work plan among SHS teachers handling applied and specialized subjects could be designed and utilized to consider students' schedule of performances and work submission.

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

©2017 by Ascendens Asia Pte. Ltd. | NLB Singapore-Registered Publisher.

Are you seeking one-on-one college counseling and/or essay support? Limited spots are now available. Click here to learn more.

60 Senior Project Ideas for High School Students – 2024

May 13, 2024

Many high school students look forward to the exciting moment of choosing a senior project. This makes sense since senior projects provide opportunities for students to direct what they’ve learned into something they care about, and to take their academic interests beyond the classroom. At the same time, deciding what to pursue can be nerve-wracking. After all the anticipation, when it finally comes time to decide on a project, students might ask themselves, now what ? If you find yourself in this dilemma, or if you could just use some further inspiration, continue reading for a list of 60 senior project ideas for high school students. Once you find a senior project idea that catches your eye, you can always put your own spin on it, or use it to inspire projects on topics outside this list.

What is a senior project?

Put simply, a senior project is a semester-long project you take on in your final year of high school. So, what counts as a senior project? This can vary widely. While different schools have different requirements (for example, some high schools expect students to focus specifically on internship experiences), the assignments tend to be pretty flexible. In the senior project ideas listed below, you will find suggestions ranging from assisting a science researcher, to interning at a local museum, to organizing an academic tutoring program, to helping with community voter registration. The final outputs for senior projects may also vary in form, from guidebooks, to plays, to research papers, and apps.

Considerations when choosing a senior project

Because a senior project is often seen as the culmination of your high school experience, you should choose a topic that reflects your passions and interests. At the same time, it’s an opportunity to develop new skills and challenge yourself as you prepare for your next steps after graduation. Whether you have plans to begin a 4-year university program, enroll in a 2-year degree program , take a gap year , or start a new job, a senior project can prepare you with experience that you wouldn’t receive in your high school classes in an ordinary semester.

Here are a few questions you can ask yourself when thinking of a senior project idea:

• What field or career do you wish to pursue? If you’re not sure, what are 2-3 fields that you could possibly see yourself pursuing at this point in your life?
• What world issues do you care most about? Climate change? LGBTQIA+ rights? Accessible healthcare? If thinking about a particular issue sparks a passion, this could be a great place to start.
• Based on your high school coursework experience, could you see yourself spending extra time on an artistic project? A science-based one? A research paper with a political theme?
• What do you enjoy doing in your free time? Volunteering with kids? Hiking and camping? Dancing? Cooking? Perhaps you can orient your senior project to something that you already know brings you joy.

60 senior project ideas

Below you can find 60 high school senior project ideas, divided into some general categories that might help you focus your search. As you read through, feel free to stick to these exact ideas or use them to inspire other ones.

Business – Senior Project Idea

• Write a printed or virtual guidebook to small local businesses in your area, including descriptions, photographs phone numbers and social media accounts.
• Help a local business with an advertising campaign, through local news outlets and social media.
• Develop a mentorship program to help those who are searching for jobs with resumes, interviews, and cover letters.
• Intern at a start-up based in your area.
• Write a research paper about models for sustainable businesses.
• Organize an after-school program that helps students learn financial literacy.

Community service

• Organize a ride service to bring elderly community members to and from doctor’s appointments, or to provide them with groceries and other needs.
• Volunteer at a local soup kitchen.
• Organize a food drive at your school.
• Create a social media campaign for a local animal shelter to raise awareness.
• Collaborate with a local charity or non-profit with a mission you believe in to organize a fundraiser.
• Collect school supplies and art supplies for families in need.

Creative writing – Senior Project Ideas

• Write and illustrate a children’s book.
• Create a handmade poetry book.
• Intern at a small local publisher or magazine.
• Work to translate a short story or poem to another language.
• Write a screenplay for a short film.
• Start a school literary magazine that accepts student submissions of poems, essays, and short stories. Organize a team so that the magazine can continue after you graduate.
• Organize a peer tutoring program at your school for students who need extra help with writing, languages, or math.
• Construct a free library box in your neighborhood so that more people have access to books.
• Volunteer at a local elementary school to help children with their homework after school.
• Work with a local senior center to teach a foreign language to residents.
• Develop a website or app for students to match with language partners for practicing conversation skills.
• Start a visual or performing arts class for children in your community.

Environmentalism- Senior Project Ideas

• Design and build a sustainable garden.
• Organize a community clean-up day, or a series of community clean-up days, at a local park or waterfront.
• Organize an Earth Day festival at your school. This could involve live music and performance, environmental art displays, local vegetarian food, and sustainable clothing swaps.
• Write a research paper on one thing that contributes to climate change, as well as potential solutions.
• Write a guidebook to local parks and hiking trails so that locals and visitors alike can appreciate these outdoor spots.
• Create a fashion line with all reused materials.
• Research historic sites in your neighborhood or town, and write a printed or online guidebook to these points of local history.
• Record a podcast on the history of one of your hobbies (fashion? sports?) Contact an expert on this history to ask if you can interview them on the podcast.
• Write a research paper on the history of a particular protest movement.
• Write and direct a short play with a contemporary take on a historical event that interests you.
• Create a documentary film on the history of your community (school, town, etc.), and organize a community screening.
• Intern at a local history museum.

Performing Arts – Senior Project Ideas

• Write and record an original song.
• Write, direct, and show a one-act play.
• Organize a community dance performance with student choreographers and performers, featuring a range of different styles.
• Volunteer to help with accessibility needs (theater access, live captioning, etc.) at a local theater.
• Organize a school comedy night or talent show that benefits a charity of your choice.
• Research the history of a film genre, and direct a short film that reflects this genre.
• Intern for a local political newspaper or magazine.
• Volunteer on the campaign of a local candidate.
• Create an online blog to write on a political issue you care about, or write a series of op-eds for a local newspaper.
• Write a research paper on a local problem (housing prices, green space, voting access) that discusses possible solutions to this problem.
• Create a Model UN or Mock Trial team at your school if one doesn’t already exist.
• Help teens and other community members register to vote.

Science and medicine – Senior Project Ideas

• Build a Rube Goldberg machine .
• Work in the lab of a STEM professor at a nearby university who works on a topic you’re interested in.
• Research a community health problem (drug safety, air/water quality, nutritional food access) and develop solutions with the help of local politicians and/or medical experts. Create a research paper, blog, or documentary film on your findings.
• Assist at a doctor’s office or hospital by helping to translate for patients who are non-native English speakers.
• Design an architectural structure (for example, a house or bridge) and build a 3D model.
• Organize a technology support group at your school to make technology more accessible and help with easy tech repairs.

Visual arts

• Design a mural for your school to highlight an aspect of the school culture or commemorate an important moment in its history.
• Intern at a local art museum and learn how to give a tour of its current exhibits.
• Organize the collaborative building of a sculpture at your school made of all reused or found objects.
• Offer to take wedding or senior photographs for those who might not be able to afford a professional photographer.
• Study a famous painter, and then create a series of paintings (or art of another medium) based on, or in response to, their works.
• Create a school-wide photography exhibition, with a theme of your choosing.

Senior Project Ideas – Final thoughts

We hope that this list has sparked inspiration for your high school senior project. Remember that while senior projects are important (and hopefully fun) opportunities to culminate your high school experience, you don’t need to do it all in one project! If you’re inspired by more than one of these project ideas, hold onto them for years to come or pursue them as summer internships .

If you’re interested in more project ideas for high school students, we recommend the following articles:

• 100 Examples of Community Service Projects
• 98 Passion Project Ideas
• 100 Best Clubs to Start in High School
• Persuasive Speech Topics
• High School Success

Sarah Mininsohn

With a BA from Wesleyan University and an MFA from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Sarah is a writer, educator, and artist. She served as a graduate instructor at the University of Illinois, a tutor at St Peter’s School in Philadelphia, and an academic writing tutor and thesis mentor at Wesleyan’s Writing Workshop.

• 2-Year Colleges
• Application Strategies
• Best Colleges by Major
• Best Colleges by State
• Big Picture
• Career & Personality Assessment
• College Essay
• College Search/Knowledge
• College Success
• Costs & Financial Aid
• Data Visualizations
• Dental School Admissions
• Extracurricular Activities
• Graduate School Admissions
• High Schools
• Law School Admissions
• Medical School Admissions
• Navigating the Admissions Process
• Online Learning
• Private High School Spotlight
• Summer Program Spotlight
• Summer Programs
• Test Prep Provider Spotlight

“Innovative and invaluable…use this book as your college lifeline.”

— Lynn O'Shaughnessy

Nationally Recognized College Expert

College Planning in Your Inbox

Join our information-packed monthly newsletter.

I am a... Student Student Parent Counselor Educator Other First Name Last Name Email Address Zip Code Area of Interest Business Computer Science Engineering Fine/Performing Arts Humanities Mathematics STEM Pre-Med Psychology Social Studies/Sciences Submit

Stand Out in High School

When applying to college, make sure your application showcases who you are in and out of school. While grades and test scores are important, colleges also want to see the person you're becoming and the skills you've learned outside of class.

High School Classes Colleges Look For

If you’re in high school and thinking about college you should know that the courses you take matter. That’s because college admissions officers want to see a solid foundation of learning you can build on in college.

How to Convert Your GPA to a 4.0 Scale

Colleges report GPA (grade point average) on a 4.0 scale. See how to calculate your GPA and convert your grades to the 4.0 scale.

Extracurriculars Matter—to You and to Colleges

Participating in extracurricular activities like clubs, sports, or a job can foster new interests and help you discover more about yourself. It can also show colleges your dedication and leadership skills.

Five Washington Students Named 2024 U.S. Presidential Scholars

Media contact.

Katy Payne   she/her 360-764-0201

Every year since 1964, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) selects high school seniors from across the country for recognition as U.S. Presidential Scholars, one of the nation’s highest honors for high school students.

U.S. Presidential Scholars demonstrate exceptional talent in career and technical education (CTE) fields, in the visual, creative, and performing arts, or on academic assessments. Today, ED announced that five Washington students have earned the distinction.

The Scholars are:

• Ashwin Joshi, Southridge High School, Kennewick School District
• Lexi J. Molnar, Goldendale High School, Goldendale School District (Presidential Scholar in CTE)
• Siddhartha Dylan Pant, Lakes High School, Clover Park School District (Presidential Scholar in CTE)
• Jacob J. Scrupps, Odessa High School, Odessa School District (Presidential Scholar in CTE)
• Kosha Upadhyay, Bellevue Senior High School, Bellevue School District

"While most states had three scholars earn the recognition, Washington has five from across our diverse state––and we couldn't be prouder," said State Superintendent Chris Reykdal. “Washington’s students have worked hard and their accomplishments in academics, leadership, and service speak for themselves. I look forward to their success in the careers and pathways that they choose.”

Up to 161 students are selected for the honor each year. As directed by Presidential Executive Order, the 2024 U.S. Presidential Scholars are comprised of two students from each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, as well as U.S. students living abroad. The recognition is also extended to 15 scholars chosen at-large, 20 scholars in the arts, and 20 scholars in CTE.

Of the more than 3.7 million students expected to graduate from high school this year, more than 5,700 qualified for the 2024 awards. There are three paths for selection as a candidate for the award:

• General program: Candidates are selected based on outstanding performance on the SAT or ACT exams.
• Arts program: Candidates must participate in YoungArts , a national program identifying and recognizing young people demonstrating excellence in visual arts, performing arts, and creative writing. YoungArts nominates students who meet the U.S. Presidential Scholars candidacy requirements.
• CTE program: Candidates are selected based on their accomplishments in CTE fields. Chief state school officers nominate students who meet the candidacy requirements.

Once selected as candidates, students complete essays and self-assessments, as well as submit school evaluations and transcripts. A review committee, comprised of experts in secondary and postsecondary education, evaluates candidates on their academic achievement, personal characteristics, leadership and service activities, and an analysis of their essay. The White House Commission on Presidential Scholars then selects the students who will receive the award.

Scholars are invited to name a teacher they consider to be the most influential in their knowledge, skills, and impact on the school community. These teachers are recognized as Distinguished Teachers as part of the U.S. Presidential Scholars Program. The teachers that Washington’s awarded students selected are:

• Valentina Craciunoiu, Bellevue Senior High School, Bellevue School District (Nominating Scholar: Kosha Upadhyay)
• Heather Gallagher, Goldendale High School, Goldendale School District (Nominating Scholar: Lexi J. Molnar)
• Terri King, Odessa High School, Odessa School District (Nominating Scholar: Jacob J. Scrupps)
• Jannette Salisbury, Southridge High School, Kennewick School District (Nominating Scholar: Ashwin Joshi)
• Randall Wilson, Lakes High School, Clover Park School District (Nominating Scholar: Siddhartha Dylan Pant)

Since the U.S. Presidential Scholars Program was created in 1964, more than 8,200 of the nation’s students have received the honor. The program was expanded in 1979 to recognize students who demonstrate exceptional talent in the arts. The program was expanded again in 2015 to recognize students who demonstrate ability and accomplishment in CTE fields.

This year marks the 60th anniversary of the U.S. Presidential Scholars Program. The 2024 Scholars will be recognized for their outstanding achievement this summer with a U.S. Presidential Scholars medallion and an online recognition program.

For More Information

• U.S. Presidential Scholars Program (ED)
• The Commission on Presidential Scholars (ED)

Related News

Elementary Students Take Charge Running Their Own BizTown!

More Than Two-Thirds of Washington Students Access Local Foods in School Meals

Student Stories: My Experience of Running Start

• Artificial Intelligence (AI)
• Learning Standards
• Performance Assessments
• Resources and Laws
• K-12 Learning Standards
• Computer Science Grants
• Learning Standards and Best Practices for Instruction
• Comprehensive Literacy Plan (CLP)
• Strengthening Student Educational Outcomes (SSEO)
• Washington Reading Corps
• OSPI Contacts
• Regional ELA Coordinators
• Assessments
• Environmental and Sustainability Literacy Plan
• Resources and Research
• About FEPPP
• Trainings and Events
• Committees, Meetings, and Rosters
• Partnership
• Resources and Links
• Legislation and Policy
• Laws & Resources
• ASB Frequently Asked Questions
• Comprehensive Sexual Health Education Implementation
• Sexual Health Education Standards Comparison
• 2023 Sexual Health Education Curriculum Review
• Sexual Health Curriculum Review Tools
• Training/Staff Development
• Math Graduation Requirements
• Family Resources
• Modeling Our World with Mathematics
• Modern Algebra 2
• Outdoor Education for All Program
• Grants, Resources, and Supports
• Professional Learning Network
• SEL Online Education Module
• Academic Learning is Social and Emotional: Integration Tools
• Washington-Developed SEL Resources
• Learning Standards & Graduation Requirements
• OSPI-Developed Social Studies Assessments
• Resources for K-12 Social Studies
• Civic Education
• Holocaust Education
• History Day Program Components
• Washington History Day and Partners
• Temperance and Good Citizenship Day
• Social Studies Grant Opportunities
• Social Studies Laws and Regulations
• Social Studies Cadre of Educators
• Social Studies Showcase
• Early Learning Curriculum
• Elementary Curriculum
• Middle School Unit 1C Washington State History—Medicine Creek Treaty of 1854
• High School Unit 1 Contemporary World Problems
• High School Unit 1 US History
• High School Unit 2 Contemporary World Problems
• High School Unit 2 US History
• High School Unit 3 Contemporary World Problems
• High School Unit 3 US History
• High School Unit 4 Contemporary World Problems
• High School Unit 4 US History
• High School Unit 5 US History
• High School Unit 6 US History
• Tribes within Washington State
• Implementation and Training
• Indigenous Historical Conceptual Framework
• Regional Learning Project Videos
• Language Proficiency Custom Testing
• Proficiency Assessment Options
• Credits & Testing for Students
• Testing Process For Districts
• Laws/Regulations
• Washington State Seal of Biliteracy
• Talking to Young People About Race, Racism, & Equity
• Open Educational Resources
• Course Design & Instructional Materials
• Reporting Instruction and Assessment
• Washington State Learning Standards Review
• High School and Beyond Plan
• Waivers and CIA
• Career Guidance Washington Lessons
• High School Transcripts
• Graduation Pathways
• Credit Requirements
• Career and College Readiness
• Family Connection
• Whole-child Assessment
• Early Learning Collaboration
• Training and Webinars
• WaKIDS Contacts
• Professional Development
• Calculator Policy
• ELA Assessment
• Smarter Balanced Tools for Teachers
• 1% Alternate Assessment Threshold
• Access Point Frameworks and Performance Tasks
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Scoring and Reporting
• INSIGHT Portal
• State Testing Frequently Asked Questions
• Achievement Level Descriptors
• Technical Reports
• Testing Statistics (Frequency Distribution)
• Scale Scores State Assessments
• Sample Score Reports
• Request to View Your Student’s Test
• ELP Annual Assessments
• English Language Proficiency Screeners
• Alternate ACCESS
• WIDA Consortium
• Trainings, Modules, and Presentations
• Assessment Resources
• Monitoring of State Assessments
• Principal Letter Templates
• NAEP State Results
• NAEP Publications
• Timelines & Calendar
• Approval Process
• Carl D. Perkins Act
• Program of Study and Career Clusters
• 21st Century Skills
• Career Connect Washington
• Methods of Administration (MOA)
• Statewide Course Equivalencies
• Work-Based Learning
• Skill Centers
• Federal Data Collection Forms
• Special Education Data Collection Summaries
• File a Community Complaint
• Special Education Due Process Hearing Decisions
• Request Mediation (Special Education)
• Request a Due Process Hearing
• Special Education Request Facilitation
• Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicator 7)
• Transition from Part C to Part B (Indicator 12)
• Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) - Indicator 6
• Behavior and Discipline
• Disagreements and Complaints about Special Education
• Eligibility for Special Education
• Evaluations
• How Special Education Works
• Individualized Education Program (IEP)
• Making a Referral for Special Education
• Need Assistance?
• Parent and Student Rights (Procedural Safeguards)
• Placement Decisions and the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
• Prior Written Notice
• Transition Services (Ages 16–21)
• What Is Special Education?
• Current Nonpublic Agencies
• Rulemaking and Public Comment
• Special Education WAC and Federal IDEA
• Personnel Qualifications Guidance
• Annual Determinations
• Model Forms for Services to Students in Special Education
• Self-Study and System Analysis
• Significant Disproportionality
• Washington Integrated System of Monitoring
• Technical Assistance
• Special Education Community Complaint Decisions
• State Needs Projects
• Mental Health Related Absences
• Attendance Awareness Materials
• Improving Attendance for Schools
• Attendance Resources
• Policies, Guidance, and Data Reporting
• District Truancy Liaison
• Building Bridges Grant Program
• GATE Equity Webinar Series
• Contact Us - CISL
• Course-Based Dual Credit
• Exam-Based Dual Credit
• Transitional Kindergarten
• Early Learning Resources
• Early Learning District Liaisons
• Early Learning Fellows Lead Contact List
• How the IPTN Works 
• Menus of Best Practices & Strategies
• MTSS Events
• Integrated Student Support
• MTSS Components and Resources
• Ninth Grade Success
• Equity in Student Discipline
• Student Discipline Training
• Student Transfers
• Whole Child Initiative
• Continuous School Improvement Resources
• Migrant Education Health Program
• Migrant Education Parent Advisory Council
• Migrant Education Workshops and Webinars
• Migrant Education Student Resources
• TBIP Program Guidance
• WIDA Resources
• Dual Language Education and Resources
• Title III Services
• Family Communication Templates
• Webinars and Newsletters
• Migrant & Multilingual Education Program Directory
• Tribal Languages
• Types of Tribal Schools
• State-Tribal Education Compact Schools (STECs)
• Support for Indian Education and Culture
• Curriculum Support Materials
• Rules and Regulations
• Title VI Indian Education Programs — By District
• Contact Information
• Native Educator Cultivation Program
• Tribal Consultation
• McKinney-Vento Act
• Liaison Training Update Webform
• Homeless Student Data and Legislative Reports
• Homeless Education Posters and Brochures for Outreach
• Resources for Homeless Children and Youth
• Interstate Compact for Military Children
• Foster Care Liaison Update
• Building Point of Contact Update Form
• State and Federal Requirements
• Foster Care Resources and Training
• Postsecondary Education for Foster Care
• Children and Families of Incarcerated Parents
• Project AWARE
• Youth Suicide Prevention, Intervention, & Postvention
• Best Practices & Resources
• Prevention/Intervention SAPISP Coordinators
• Behavioral Health Resources
• Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)
• Digital/Internet Safety
• HIB Compliance Officers Contact List
• Student Threat Assessment
• School Safety and Security Staff
• Active Shooter
• Bomb Threat & Swatting
• Gangs in Schools
• School Drills
• Terrorism and Schools
• Weapons and Schools
• Youth-Centered Environmental Shift Program
• Erin's Law 2018 Curriculum Review
• Erin’s Law – House Bill 1539
• Allergies and Anaphylaxis
• Health Services Resources
• Immunizations
• School Nurse Corps
• Workforce Secondary Traumatic Stress
• 2021 COVID-19 Student Survey Results
• Healthy Youth Survey
• School Health Profiles
• Alternative Learning Experience
• Continuous Learning
• Graduation, Reality And Dual-Role Skills (GRADS)
• Guidance and Resources for Educators and Families
• HiCapPLUS Professional Learning Modules for Educators
• Home-Based Instruction
• Home/Hospital Instruction
• For Applicants
• For Schools & Districts
• Course Catalog
• Online Learning Approval Application
• Approved Online Schools and School Programs
• Approved Online Course Providers
• Getting Started Toolkit
• Open Doors Reports
• Washington's Education Options
• The Superintendent's High School Art Show
• Daniel J. Evans Civic Education Award for Students
• Washington State Honors Award
• Pre-Residency Clearance In-State Applicant
• Teacher College Recommendation
• Conditional Teacher Certificate - In-State
• Intern Substitute Certification In-State Applicants
• Emergency Substitute Certification In-State Applicants
• First Peoples' Language, Culture and Oral Traditions Certification
• Pre-Residency Clearance Out-of-State Applicant
• Residency Teacher Out-of-State
• Professional Teacher Out-of-State
• Substitute Teaching Out-of-State
• Conditional Teacher Out-of-State
• Intern Substitute Teacher Certificate Out-of-State
• Emergency Substitute Teacher Certification Out-of-State
• Foreign Trained Applicants Teacher Certification
• Residency Teacher Renewal
• Professional Teacher
• Transitional Teaching Certificate
• Conditional Teacher Certification
• Emergency Substitute Certificate
• First Peoples' Language, Culture and Oral Traditions Renewal
• Initial Teaching Certificate
• Standard/Continuing Teaching Certificate
• Provisional Teaching Certificate
• Upgrading Initial to Continuing
• Upgrade from Residency to Professional
• Converting Initial to Residency Teaching Certificate
• STEM Renewal Requirement for Teacher Certification
• Adding a CTE Certification Vocational Code (V-Code)
• Renewal of a Career and Technical Educator (CTE) Initial Certificate
• Renewal of a Career and Technical Educator (CTE) Continuing Certificate
• Career and Technical Educator Conditional Certificate
• Initial/Continuing CTE Career Guidance Specialist Certificate
• Career and Technical Educator (CTE) Director Certificate
• Washington State Certification - Frequently Asked Questions
• General Paraeducator
• English Language Learner Subject Matter
• Special Education Subject Matter
• Paraeducator First Time Applicant - Advanced Paraeducator
• English Language Learner Subject Matter Renewal
• Special Education Subject Matter Renewal
• Advanced Paraeducator Renewal
• Administrator College Recommendation
• Substitute Administrator Certificate In-State
• Conditional Administrator (Principals Only)
• Superintendent College Recommendation
• Residency Principal or Program Administrator
• Substitute Administrator Out-of-State
• Professional Principal or Program Administrator
• Initial Superintendent
• Professional Principal or Program Administrator Renewal
• Initial (Superintendent, Program Administrator, or Principal)
• Continuing (Superintendent, Program Administrator, Principal)
• Standard/Continuing Administrator Certificate
• Transitional Administrator Certificate
• Residency Principal and Program Administrator Upgrade to Professional
• Initial Upgrading to Continuing
• Initial Converting to Residency Administrator
• School Orientation and Mobility Specialist
• School Counselor First Time Applicant
• School Psychologist First Time
• School Nurse
• School Social Worker First Time
• School Occupational Therapist First Time
• School Physical Therapist First Time
• Speech Language Pathologist/Audiologist First Time
• School Behavior Analyst
• Substitute ESA
• School Behavior Analyst Renewal
• School Orientation and Mobility Specialist Renewal
• School Counselor Reissue and Renewal
• School Psychologist Reissue and Renewal Applicant
• School Nurse Renewal
• School Social Worker Renewal Applicant
• School Occupational Therapist Renewal
• School Physical Therapist Renewal Applicant
• Speech Language Pathologist/Audiologist Renewal Applicant
• Conditional ESA
• Transitional ESA Renewal
• Upgrade from Residency to Professional ESA
• Upgrade from Initial to Continuing ESA
• Converting Initial to Residency ESA
• National Board Candidate FAQ
• OSPI National Board Conditional Loan
• Support National Board Candidates
• National Board Certification and Washington State Teaching Certificate
• National Board Candidate and NBCT Clock Hours
• Washington State National Board Certified Teacher Bonus
• National Board Cohort Facilitator
• National Board Certification Regional Coordinators
• Washington State National Board Certification - NBCT Spotlight
• Professional Certification Webinars and Presentations
• Regulations and Reports
• Helpful Links
• Certification-Forms
• Professional Certification Fee Schedule
• Fingerprint Office Locations
• Fingerprint Records Forms and Resources
• Fingerprint Records Alternatives for Applicants
• Fingerprint Records Private School Applicants
• Fingerprint Records Frequently Asked Questions
• International Education
• Washington State Recommended Core Competencies for Paraeducators
• Standards for Beginning Educator Induction
• Washington State Standards for Mentoring
• Mentor Foundational Opportunities
• Mentor Specialty Opportunities
• Mentor On-going Opportunities
• Induction Leader Opportunities
• Educator Clock Hour Information
• STEM Clock Hours
• Approved Providers
• Become an Approved Provider
• Department of Health License Hours as Clock Hours Information
• Comprehensive School Counseling Programs
• School Psychology
• School Social Work
• Laws, Regulations & Guidance
• Support & Training
• Teacher-Librarians
• School Library Programs - Standards and LIT Framework
• School Library Research and Reports
• Student Growth
• Research and Reports
• Training Modules
• AWSP Leadership Framework
• CEL 5D+ Instructional Framework
• Danielson Instructional Framework
• Marzano Instructional Framework
• CEL 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric 3.0
• Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
• Marzano’s Teacher Evaluation Model
• Washington State Fellows' Network
• NBCT Leadership Opportunities
• Teacher of the Year and Regional Winners
• History Teacher of the Year
• Winners' Gallery
• Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching (PAEMST)
• From Seed to Apple
• ESEA Distinguished Schools Award Program
• U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools
• Blue Ribbon Schools Program
• Disciplinary Action Notices
• Investigation Forms
• Investigations FAQ
• OSPI Reports to the Legislature
• Asset Preservation Program
• High-Performance School Buildings Program
• School District Organization
• School Facilities Construction Projects Funding
• Building Condition Assessment (BCA)
• Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS)
• Forms and Applications
• Small District Energy Assessment Grant
• Emergency Repair Pool Grant
• CTE Equipment Grant Program
• Health and Safety ADA Access Grants
• Healthy Kids-Healthy Schools Grants
• Skill Centers Capital Funding
• Lead in Water Remediation Grant
• Small School District Modernization Grant
• Urgent Repair Grant
• Regulations and Guidance
• Special Education Funding In Washington State
• Applying for Safety Net Funding
• Apportionment, Enrollment, and Fiscal Reports
• Apportionment Attachments
• Budget Preparations
• District Allocation of State Resources Portal
• Election Results for School Financing
• ESD Reports and Resources
• Tools and Forms
• ABFR Guidelines
• Accounting Manual
• EHB 2242 Accounting Changes
• EHB 2242 Guidance
• Enrollment Reporting
• Federal Allocations
• Indirect Cost Rates
• Personnel Reporting
• School Apportionment Staff
• 1801 Personnel Reports
• Financial Reporting Summary
• Organization and Financing of Washington Public Schools
• Personnel Summary Reports
• Property Tax Levies
• Training and Presentations
• Legislative Budget Requests
• 2023 Proviso Reports
• Washington State Innovates
• Washington State Common School Manual
• EGMS Resources & Guides
• OER Project Grants
• Nita M. Lowey Grant Competition
• Program Guidance
• Balanced Calendar
• Beginning Educator Support Team Grants
• Ask a Question about the Citizen Complaint Process
• Professional Learning Opportunities for Title I, Part A and LAP
• Fiscal Guidance
• Digital Equity and Inclusion Grant
• Private School Participation in Federal Programs
• Public Notices & Waiver Requests to the U.S. Department of Education
• State Applications and Reports Submitted to U.S. Department of Education
• Washington School Improvement Framework
• Homeless Education Grants
• Allowable Costs
• Educator Equity Data Collection
• LifeSkills Training (LST) Substance Abuse Prevention Grants
• Rural Education Initiative
• Student Support and Academic Enrichment (Title IV, Part A)
• Washington School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG)
• Federal Funding Contact Information
• CGA Contacts
• Meals for Washington Students
• Washington School Meals Application Finder
• At-Risk Afterschool Meals
• Family Day Care Home Providers/Sponsors
• Meal Patterns and Menu Planning
• CACFP Requirements and Materials
• Child and Adult Care Food Program Training
• Menu Planning and Meal Patterns
• Bulletins and Updates
• Summer Food Service Program Training
• Food Distribution
• Procurement
• Local Food for Schools
• Food Service Management Companies
• Claims, Fiscal Information and Resources
• Washington Integrated Nutrition System (WINS)
• Child Nutrition Program Reports
• Child Nutrition Grants
• EdTech Plan for K-12 Public Schools in Washington State
• IP Address Assignment
• School Technology Technical Support
• E-rate Program
• Computers 4 Kids (C4K)
• Digital Equity and Inclusion
• Legislation & Policies
• Media Literacy & Digital Citizenship Grants
• Best Practices
• State Technology Survey
• 2023-24 State Quote Specifications
• Student Transportation Allocation (STARS) Reports
• Instructor Training Programs
• CWU Training Program
• Publications and Bulletins
• Online School Bus Information System
• Online Bus Driver Certification
• Complaints and Concerns About Discrimination
• Information for Families: Civil Rights in Washington Schools
• Resources for School Districts
• Nondiscrimination Law & Policy
• Language Access
• Report Card
• Data Portal
• Data Administration
• Education Data System Administration (EDS)
• EDS Application User Guides
• Training and Materials
• District and School Resources
• Student Growth Percentiles FAQ
• Student Data Sharing
• Educator Data Sharing
• Protecting Student Privacy
• Discipline COVID-19 Data Display
• Monthly Enrollment and Absences Display
• Substitute Teachers Data
• K-12 Education Vision & McCleary Framework
• Use of the OSPI Logo
• Nondiscrimination Policy & Procedure
• Agency Leadership
• News Releases and Stories
• Special Projects
• Job Opportunities
• OSPI Interlocal Agreements
• Competitive Procurements
• Sole Source Contracts
• Accounting Manual Committee
• Children & Families of Incarcerated Parents Advisory Committee
• Committee of Practitioners (COP), Title I, Part A
• Publications and Reports
• Family Engagement Framework Workgroup
• GATE Partnership Advisory Committee
• Institutional Education Structure and Accountability Advisory Group
• K-12 Data Governance
• Language Access Advisory Committee
• Multilingual Education Advisory Committee
• Online Learning Advisory Committee
• Reopening Washington Schools 2020-21 Workgroup
• School Facilities Advisory Groups
• School Safety and Student Well-Being Advisory Committee Meetings
• Social Emotional Learning Advisory Committee
• Special Education Advisory Council (SEAC)
• Teacher Residency Technical Advisory Workgroup
• About Dyslexia
• Screening Tools and Best Practices
• Washington State Native American Education Advisory Committee (WSNAEAC)
• Work-Integrated Learning Advisory Committee
• African American Studies Workgroup
• Compensation Technical Working Group
• Ethnic Studies Advisory Committee
• Expanded Learning Opportunities Council
• K–12 Basic Education Compensation Advisory Committee
• Language Access Workgroup
• Race and Ethnicity Student Data Task Force
• Past Meeting Materials
• School Day Task Force
• Sexual Health Education Workgroup
• Staffing Enrichment Workgroup
• Student Discipline Task Force
• Transitional Bilingual Instruction Program (TBIP) Accountability Task Force
• OSPI Public Records Request
• How to File a Complaint
• Directions to OSPI
• Social Media Terms of Use
• 2023-24 School Breaks
• 180-Day School Year Waivers
• ESD Contact Info
• Maps & Applications
• Websites and Contact Info
• Web Accessibility Request Form
• Emergency Relief Funding Priorities
• State & Federal Funding
• School Employee Vaccination Data
• Washington’s Education Stimulus Funds
• Special Education Guidance for COVID-19
• Academic and Student Well-being Responses
• School Reopening Data