Learning Beyond the Classroom: Implications for School Science
- First Online: 23 November 2011
- pp 1123–1134
Cite this chapter
- Peter Aubusson 4 ,
- Janette Griffin 4 &
- Matthew Kearney 4
Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 24))
12k Accesses
14 Citations
Studies of children’s learning with family and friends give us insight into how children can learn beyond the classroom. The learning process is often characterised by autonomy, choosing what they learn, curiosity, interest and enjoyment, interactions and conversations with friends, and operating at their own pace and in their chosen way. The argument is that ways of learning science outside school can inform a framework to enhance school science experiences. Evidence in the chapter is drawn from research on learning in informal settings, studies located in web-mediated environments and project based activities.
- Informal learning
- Learning environment
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
The word museum is used to encompass a wide variety of informal learning settings such as zoos, gardens, science centres, museums, etc.
Abu-Shumays, M., & Leinhardt, G. (2002). Two docents in three museums: central and peripheral participation. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 45–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Aubusson, P., & Griffin, J. (2008). High support–High challenge–High Learning. Science techno-museum report . Sydney, NSW: University of Technology Sydney.
Ayre, K. (2004, March) How Australian science students are being bitten by the research bug. Educare News , 145 , 55–57.
Bamberger, Y., & Tal, R. T. (2005, August). Learning in a personal context: levels of choice in a free choice learning environment at science and natural history museums. Paper presented at European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Barry, D. M., & Kanematsu, H. (2006). Science fair competition generates excitement and promotes creative thinking in Japan (ED491740). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
Barth, L. (2007). A revamped science expo. Science and Children , 45 (4), 36–39.
Bellipani, L. J., & Lilly, J.E. (1999). What have researchers been saying about science fairs? Science and Children , 99 , 46–50
Brown, J. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change , 32 (2), 11–20.
Article Google Scholar
Brown, J., & Adler, R. P. (2008, January/February). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review , 43 (1), 17–32.
Carlisle, R. W., & Deeter, B. C. (1989). A research study of science fairs. Science and Children , 26 , 24–26.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Foots, B. K. (1984). Does your science fair do what it should? The Science Teacher , 51 (8), 24–26.
Craven, J., & Hogan, T. (2008, May). Rethinking the science fair. Phi Delta Kappan , 89 (9), 679–680.
Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions (BECTA Research Report). Retrieved on April 28, 2009, from http://www.becta.org.uk
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life . New York: Basic Books.
Czerniak, C. M. (1996). Predictors of success in a district science fair competition: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics , 96 (1), 21–27.
De Witt, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education , 29 , 685–710.
Downes, S. (2006). E-learning 2.0. ELearn Magazine . Retrieved on April 28, 2009, from http://elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1
Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: Children and computing in the home . London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
Book Google Scholar
Falk, J. (2006). An identity-centered approach to understanding museum learning. Curator , 49 (2), 151–166.
Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums . Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind–How children think and how schools should teach . New York: Basic Books.
Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education , 23 , 535–549.
Grant, L. (2007). Crest awards evaluation: Impact study . Retrieved on April 16, 2009, from http://www.lauragrantassociates.co.uk/Resources/Resources/35/CRESTfinalevaluationreport.pdf .
Green, C., & Hannon, C. (2007). Their space: Education for a digital generation . Retrieved on January 27, 2009, from http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/theirspace .
Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education , 88 (Supplement 1), S59–S70.
Griffin, J., & Aubusson, P. (2007). Teaching and learning science and technology beyond the classroom. In V. Dawson & G. Venville (Eds.), The art of teaching primary science (pp. 216–232). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education , 81 , 763–779.
Griffin, J. M. (2007). Students, teachers, and museums: Toward an intertwined learning circle. In J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 31–42). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
Grote, M. (1995). Science teacher educators’ opinions about science projects and science fairs. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 6 (1), 48–52.
Hsi, S. (2007). Conceptualizing learning from the everyday activities of digital kids. International Journal of Science Education , 29 , 1509–1529.
Kisiel, J. (2003). Teachers, museums and worksheets: A closer look at a learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 14 (1), 3–21.
Koelsche, C. I. (1965). Characteristics of potential scientists. Science Education , 49 (1), 72–79.
Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Leinhardt, G., & Gregg, S. M. (2002). Burning buses, burning crosses: student teachers see Civil Rights. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 139–166). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lewin, C. (2004). Access and use of technologies in the home in the UK: Implications for the curriculum. The Curriculum Journal , 15 (2), 139–154.
Lomas, C., Burke, M., & Page, C. (2008). Collaboration tools. Educause Learning Initiative , August. Retrieved on April 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3020.pdf
Lyman, P., Billings, A., Ellinger, S., Finn, M., & Perkel, D. (2005). Literature review of kids’ informal learning and digital-mediated experiences . White paper for the MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved on November 5, 2006, from http://www.exploratorium.edu/research/digitalkids/Lyman_DigitalKids.pdf .
McFarlane, A., & Sakellariou, S. (2002). The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education , 32 , 219–232.
Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions . Bristol, UK: Nesta FutureLab.
Paris, S. (1997). Situated motivation and informal learning. Journal of Museum Education , 22 (2&3), 22–26.
Rennie, L. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scanlon, E., Jones, A., & Waycott, J. (2005). Mobile technologies: prospects for their use in learning in informal science settings. Journal of Interactive Media in Education , 25 , 1–17.
Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Informal learning with technology outside school . Bristol, UK: Nesta FutureLab.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of elearning research (pp. 221–47). London, UK: Sage.
Shoring, N. (2000). Evaluation of the CREST award program in Australia. Australian Science Teachers Journal , 46 (2), 24–27.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning , 2 (1). (Electronic journal)
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Video games as designed experiences. Educational Researcher , 35 (8), 19–29.
Steinkuehler, C. A., & Duncan, S. C. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology , 17 , 530–543.
Thelen, L. J. (1964). The impact of science fairs on student exhibitors. Science Education , 48 , 442–446.
Walsh, C. (2007). Creativity as capital in the literacy classroom: Youth as multimodal designers. Literacy , 41 (2), 79–85.
Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry , 1 (1), 41–49.
Willett, R. (2007). Technology, pedagogy and digital production: A case study of children learning new media skills. Learning, Media, & Technology , 32 , 167–181.
Yasar, S., & Baker, D. (2003, March). Impact of involvement in a science fair on seventh grade students . Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Peter Aubusson, Janette Griffin & Matthew Kearney
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Peter Aubusson .
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
Science & Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, West Australia, Australia
Barry J. Fraser
The Graduate Centre, City University of New York, New York, 10016-4309, New York, USA
Kenneth Tobin
Ctr. Mathematics & Science Education, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, 4059, Queensland, Australia
Campbell J. McRobbie
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Aubusson, P., Griffin, J., Kearney, M. (2012). Learning Beyond the Classroom: Implications for School Science. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_74
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_74
Published : 23 November 2011
Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN : 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN : 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Education (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING WITH TECHNOLOGY BEYOND THE CLASSROOM: THE USE OF UNCONVENTIONAL TOOLS AND METHODS
This paper addresses mathematical problem solving with technologies in a beyond school web-based competition. We aim to disclose the ways mathematical and technological knowledge are used and combined for solving the given problems. A specific conceptual framework for accounting both these components was developed. By means of the Mathematical Problem Solving with Technology model (MPST) we report the case of Marco, aged 13, solving and expressing a geometrical problem. His ability in perceiving affordances in the tools that he chose is in line with the efficient use he made of them in the development of mathematical understanding that was crucial for finding and expressing the solution. Results suggest that digital thinking and experience have to be seen as relevant as the mathematical cognitive resources.
Related Papers
Helia Jacinto
"Being aware that school is just one of many places where youngsters learn, the research community has been stressing the need to deepen knowledge about the role and relevance of beyond school mathematical learning contexts. In this paper we are focusing on the mathematical problem solving activity that occurs at Sub14 - a beyond school web-based competition. Our purpose is to describe and understand how do participants engage in solving mathematical problems within the competition, and what are their perspectives regarding the differences and the similarities of the problem solving activity in the mathematics classroom and in the competition Sub14. Participants’ perspectives show an overlap between mathematical activity developed in those two contexts. The analysis of participants’ productions illustrate how they merge knowledge about problem solving acquired in this beyond school context with mathematics content knowledge, learnt at school. Keywords: mathematical problem solving; beyond school learning; web-based competition."
Susana Carreira
This paper addresses mathematical problem solving activity within the context of aweb-based beyond-school competition – SUB14. Using a qualitative approach, we aimat finding evidences of the contestants’ mathematical competence and technological fluency by analysing four solutions to a particular geometry problem from participantswho decided to use GeoGebra. Even though they all make use of the same tool, their approaches to the problem differ in terms of the mathematical and technological fluency they show. We interpret their different ways of dealing with the tool and withmathematical knowledge as instances of students-with-media in problem solving.
Mathematics Education in the Digital Era
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
This study offers a view on students’ technology-based problem solving activity through the lens of a theoretical model which accounts for the relationship between mathematical and technological knowledge in successful problem solving. This study takes a qualitative approach building on the work of a 13-year-old girl as an exemplary case of the nature of young students’ spontaneous mathematical problem solving with technology. The empirical data comprise digital records of her approaches to two problems from a web-based mathematical competition where she resorted to GeoGebra and an interview where she explains and describes her usual problem solving activity with this tool. Based on a proposed model for describing the processes of mathematical problem solving with technologies (MPST), the main results show that this student’s solving and expressing the solution are held from the early and continuing interplay between mathematical skills and the perception of the affordances of the t...
International Group For the Psychology of Mathematics Education
CRISTHIAN ALEJANDRO PARADA PAEZ
International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies
Monika Czajkowska
Mathematical problems are the source of mathematical and logical experience, in which student’s mind builds its mathematical competences. The sort of mathematical problems that are given to students and its form are not of no importance. Herein focus will be put on certain issues resulting from the usage of mathematical tasks presented to students in a digital form. The author, based on her own study, characterizes the strategies that were used by the middle school students while solving interactive mathematical tasks. She states that no intervention from teacher’s side, thus letting students use a free method for solving tasks, does not positively influence the mathematical competences to be acquired. With this, she questions the thesis that the middle school students grew up in the world of multimedia where the work with such mathematical task solving comes in a natural way. To the author’s way of thinking, it is necessary to work out a methodology that will be aiming at introduci...
The Mathematics Enthusiast
Fernando Barrera-Mora
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
RELATED PAPERS
Gyula Klima
Hasna Bestari
Indian journal of biochemistry & biophysics
Dr. Achintya Saha
Synne Myhre
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Diwakar Jain
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Daniela Aranis
Pantiru Ciprian
History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Oliver Victor
Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena
INFORME DE PRÁCTICAS PRE-PROFESIONALES REALIZADAS EN LA EMPRESA NARANJO LOPEZ CONSTRUCTORES CÍA. LTDA EN EL AREA CONTABLE
REPOSITORIO INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TECNOLOGICO CEMLAD
Acta Oecologica
Rofiqul Islam
Varsha Gejji
Pro-Posições
Cintya Ribeiro
Journal of Gastric Cancer
Tunny Sebastian
Caderno Seminal
Sydney Freitas
Scientific Reports
Odete Mendes
Manfred Stoll
International Journal of Molecular Medicine
Prescilla Nagao
Composite: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian
SARI SURYANAH
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia
Gustavo Rodrigues Barbosa
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Arthur Spector
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Adriana Caroci
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Revista de Enfermagem UFPE on line
Augusta Santos
See More Documents Like This
RELATED TOPICS
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Linda . urawski Critical Thinking in the Classroom…and Beyond. 26. Spring 2014 Volume 10 ssue 1) Journal of earning in igher ducation. 27. tuned to thinking that occurs to solve problems, analyze . issues or make decisions. Staying with the aforementioned example, if the road normally driven is blocked or closed,
engaging in problem-solving. So, I designed and delivered a three session workshop for middle school teachers (ages 10Ð14) interested in bringing problem-solving into their classrooms. This was not a difÞ cult thing to attract teachers to. At that time, there was increasing focus on problem-solving in both the curriculum and the text-books.
nificant when viewing problem solving beyond prescribed formats or strategies. Although the teacher in classroom A may be preparing stu-dents to respond to a set of questions aligned with a particular way of approaching problem solving (e.g., restating the problem, explain-
for this is problem solving tasks. Thus, my early efforts to build thinking classrooms was oriented around problem solving. This is a subtle departure from my earlier efforts in Ms. Ahn's classroom. Illumination inducing tasks were, as I had learned, too ambitious a step. I needed to begin with students simply engaging in problem solving.
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered approach that teachers use. to promote students' critical thinking or analytical skills to solve real-life or. open-ended problems in a group ...
This paper addresses mathematical problem solving activity within the context of aweb-based beyond-school competition - SUB14. Using a qualitative approach, we aimat finding evidences of the contestants' mathematical competence and technological fluency by analysing four solutions to a particular geometry problem from participantswho decided to use GeoGebra.
Being aware that school is just one of many places where youngsters learn, the research community has been stressing the need to deepen knowledge about the role and relevance of beyond school mathematical learning contexts. In this paper we are focusing on the mathematical problem solving activity that occurs at Sub14 a beyond school web-based competition.
The null hypothesis (H0) of the study is that creative problem-solving cannot be taught to students in higher education. The alternate hypothesis (H1) is that, using targeted interventions, creative problem-solving can be taught to students in higher education (see Table 1). In particular, it can be taught to undergraduate business majors.
Recent research has shown that many upper elementary school children do not master the skill of solving mathematical application problems. In this design experiment, a learning environment for ...
The Role of the Student in Problem Solving The student's role in a problem solving oriented classroom is an active one. He/she is asked to read the relevant literature in a par-ticular content area, such as alternative life styles, and to consider the personal or inter-personal problem solving situations which might be associated with this ...
leadership problem-solving during real-time, emergent leadership moments within and beyond the classroom. Introduction One of the primary roles associated with the practice of leadership is the ability to solve complex problems; however, leaders often fall into old habits of isolationist thinking when faced with the pressure
family. As tempting as it might be to help our children solve the problems in their lives, it might be much more valuable to let them tackle their problems on their own. Help them build the mindset to see themselves as capable and effective problem-solvers. Then you can step back, cheer them on, and watch them grow. PROBLEM-SOLVING Beyond the ...
encouraging students to solve authentic problems, educators can foster creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking (Partnership for 21st Century Skills). Th is approach allows students to se e
The Problem-solving Classroom. By NRICH Primary Team and Jenny Earl. This article forms part of our Problem-solving Classroom Feature, exploring how to create a space in which mathematical problem solving can flourish. At NRICH, we believe that there are four main aspects to consider: • Highlighting key problem-solving skills • Examining ...
order learning initiatives and to support problem-solving classroom strategies. To address this gap, this manuscript first begins by exploring the emergence of problem-solving ... As time progressed, practitioners beyond medical edu-cation began to adopt PBL within their own domains. To date, K-12 teachers have employed PBL in upper grade ...
Abstract. Studies of children's learning with family and friends give us insight into how children can learn beyond the classroom. The learning process is often characterised by autonomy, choosing what they learn, curiosity, interest and enjoyment, interactions and conversations with friends, and operating at their own pace and in their ...
The Problem@Web International Conference is an opportunity to gather together participants from the research community in mathematics education as well as from related research areas such as the psychology of education, technology education, mathematics popularization and other relevant fields that converge to the study of mathematical problem solving in different educational environments in ...
This paper addresses mathematical problem solving activity within the context of aweb-based beyond-school competition - SUB14. Using a qualitative approach, we aimat finding evidences of the contestants' mathematical competence and technological fluency by analysing four solutions to a particular geometry problem from participantswho decided to use GeoGebra.
A comparative study of the use of unconventional tools and methods in mathematics education and their applications in the classroom. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 27-34. Szeged, Hungary: PME. 3-27 MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING WITH TECHNOLOGY BEYOND THE CLASSROOM: THE USE OF UNCONVENTIONAL TOOLS AND METHODS Hélia Jacinto1,2, Susana Carreira2,3, Maria ...
This paper addresses mathematical problem solving with technologies in a beyond school web-based competition. We aim to disclose the ways mathematical and technological knowledge are used and ...
By looking at the global context of two inclusive mathematical problem solving competitions, the Problem@Web Project intends to study young students' beyond-school problem solving activity and aims to integrate a perspective on problem solving that emphasises understanding and expressing thinking with a view on the representational practices connected to students' digital mathematical ...
The store will not work correctly in the case when cookies are disabled.
problem-solving club pilot scheme, with the aim to set up a new mathematics or computing focused problem-solving club for their students. Each club developed its own programme of activities, and teachers were encouraged to explore opportunities to embed the problem-solving activities they ran into the curriculum.