learning outcomes assignment

Learning Outcomes 101: A Comprehensive Guide

For those trying to figure out what are learning outcomes, its types, steps, and assessments, this article is for you. Read on to find out more about this guide in developing your teaching strategies.

Table of Contents

Introduction.

In today’s education landscape, learning outcomes play a pivotal role in shaping the educator’s teaching strategies and heralding the academic progress of students. Defining the road map of a learning session, the learning outcomes focus on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that learners should grasp upon the completion of a course or program.

The relevance and applicability of learning outcomes extend to both the educators and the learners, providing the former with a clear teaching structure and the latter with expectations for their learning.

In the broader sense, understanding these integral aspects of our education system would be incomplete without delving into the types of learning outcomes, elucidating the steps involved in formulating them, exploring their assessment, and shedding light on their impacts and challenges.

Defining Learning Outcomes

What are learning outcomes.

Learning outcomes are statements that describe the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that students should have after completing a learning activity or program. These outcomes articulate what students should know or be able to do as a result of the learning experience. This includes knowledge gained , new skills acquired , a deepened understanding of the subject matter , attitudes and values influenced by learning, as well as changes in behavior that can be applied in specific contexts.

Learning outcomes are statements that describe the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that students should have after completing a learning activity or program.

Learning outcomes are critical in the educational setting because they guide the design of curriculum , instruction, and assessment methods. They are the foundation of a course outline or syllabus, providing clear direction for what will be taught, how it will be taught, and how learning will be assessed. They hold teachers accountable for delivering effective instruction that leads to desired learning outcomes and help students understand what is expected of them, enhancing their learning experience.

Learning outcomes also equip students with transferrable skills and knowledge. They provide a clear description of what the learner can apply in real-world contexts or in their further studies. This makes learning outcomes not only crucial in the academic setting but also in preparing learners for the workforce.

Differentiating Learning Outcomes from Learning Objectives

Learning outcomes and learning objectives are often used interchangeably. However, they have distinct meanings and roles in education.

Learning Objectives

Learning objectives are more teacher-centered and describe what the teacher intends to teach or what the instruction aims to achieve in the scope of a lesson or unit. These may involve specific steps or methodologies used to impart knowledge or skills to the students.

Learning Outcomes

On the other hand, learning outcomes are student-centered and focus on what the student is expected to learn and demonstrate at the end of a learning period. These are usually measurable and observable, making them useful tools for assessing a student’s learning progress and the effectiveness of a lesson or course.

For instance, a learning objective may state, “The teacher will explain the process of photosynthesis.” The associated learning outcome could be, “Students will be able to describe the process of photosynthesis and explain its importance to plant life.”

Examples of Learning Outcomes

Various academic disciplines utilize explicit learning outcomes to provide students with a clear understanding of what they are expected to achieve by the end of a course, unit, or lesson. Here are some examples:

• Mathematics: By the close of the course, students should be capable of solving linear equations and inequalities.
• Science: Upon finishing the module, students will be equipped to accurately elucidate the importance of DNA in genetic inheritance.
• English: Students should be proficient in crafting an organized, eloquent essay that effectively puts forth an argument.
• Social Studies: By the term’s conclusion, students should possess the ability to assess the impacts of World War II from varied perspectives.
• Arts: After completing the lesson, learners should be adept at recreating a piece of art employing learnt techniques, such as watercolor painting.

These specific learning outcomes are instrumental in steering the progress of students throughout their educational journey. They provide key alignment within the education system, ensuring that instructions, learning activities, assessments, and feedback are all constructed around accomplishing these predefined objectives.

3 Types of Learning Outcomes

1. knowledge outcomes.

Knowledge outcomes represent a student’s capacity to remember and comprehend the information and concepts imparted during lessons. These outcomes are usually assessed through examinations or tests, which gauge how well the student has retained the information.

To illustrate, a history student may be tested on their ability to remember specific dates or events, whereas a science student may be required to understand and demonstrate the process of photosynthesis.

This strand of learning outcomes is generally divided into two categories: declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge . Declarative knowledge outcomes evaluate the student’s aptitude to recollect and identify factual information , such as the capital city of a country. In contrast, procedural knowledge outcomes measure the student’s ability to utilize rules and processes fruitfully to solve problems , such as mathematical calculations. Thus, both these subsets form the bedrock of a student’s academic accomplishments.

2. Skill Outcomes

Skill outcomes assess a student’s ability to apply learned theories or concepts within real-world contexts. These are practical skills often developed through hands-on experience and active participation, such as fieldwork or lab experiments. They may also stem from the application of theoretical knowledge to solve practical problems.

For instance, a student studying biology may be required to carry out a dissection as part of their assessments. Similarly, a computer science student might be assessed based on their problem-solving skills using programming languages.

Skill outcomes are commonly split into two categories: generic skills and specific skills . Generic skills are transferable skills that can be used across various fields , such as communication or teamwork skills. Specific skills pertain to specific fields or jobs, such as the ability to use laboratory equipment correctly or the ability to compile code in a specific programming language.

3. Attitudinal Outcomes

When assessing a student’s growth and learning, attitudinal outcomes come into play. These are used to measure a student’s attitudes, values, and beliefs . Given their inherent subjectivity, these outcomes can be a challenge to measure. However, educators utilize various methods such as surveys , reflective journals , and direct observations to evaluate them accurately.

For example, in an ethics course, an attitudinal outcome may include the student’s ability to comprehend, value, and respect different cultural or ethical contexts. Similarly, in an environmental studies course, an outcome could involve evaluating the student’s attitudes towards sustainable practices.

Such outcomes play a significant role in shaping a student’s viewpoint and actions, both in the classroom and beyond. Attitudinal outcomes can reflect changes in attitudes, enhanced appreciation of alternate perspectives, or an inclination to engage with different individuals or groups.

While these outcomes may be more challenging to assess than knowledge or skill-based outcomes, they are imperative for nurturing lifelong learners dedicated to ongoing personal and professional development .

Steps in Formulating Learning Outcomes

1. determine the knowledge, essential skills, and attitude expected.

Once an understanding of knowledge, skills, and attitudinal outcomes is obtained, educators then identify the necessary knowledge, skills and attitude (KSA) that students need to acquire in a specific subject. This stage involves identifying the important competencies and understandings that should be mastered by the end of a course or learning program.

For example, in a mathematics course, core skills that a student may need to develop could include solving linear equations, while key knowledge to be absorbed might involve grasping the principles of calculus.

By identifying these skills and knowledge, the foundation is laid for designing effective learning outcomes. These insights then guide subsequent steps in the process of formulating concrete and measurable learning outcomes for specific courses or programs.

2. Draft the Learning Objectives

Once the necessary skills and knowledge have been identified, the next step entails crafting preliminary learning objectives.

At this juncture, educators start to formulate the objectives that guide the learning process. These objectives should be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) to ensure they can effectively guide students’ learning.

For example, in a history course, a learning objective could be: “By the end of the semester, students will be able to identify and analyze the primary causes and effects of the First World War.” But you can break this objective into two as it is good practice to have only one learning objective as guide for your lessons.

Hence, we can rephrase the learning objective as “By the end of the semester, students will be able to 1) identify the primary causes of the First World War, and 2) analyze the effects of the First World War.”

3. Develop the Learning Outcomes

The third step in the process involves evolving these learning objectives into learning outcomes. Unlike objectives, which refer to goals that educators set for their students, learning outcomes refer to demonstrable skills or competencies that learners should exhibit upon the completion of a course or program. They are typically written from a learner’s perspective and are often accompanied by associated assessment criteria.

A related outcome to the previous example would be: “Students will demonstrate their understanding of the causes and effects of the First World War through a detailed written content analysis .”

4. Write Clear and Achievable Outcomes

Writing clear and achievable outcomes is the next significant step.

An effective learning outcome should be worded clearly enough that it becomes obvious to both learners and educators whether or not it has been achieved. Each outcome must also be achievable within the constraints of the learning program.

For example, an achievable outcome of an English course might be: “At the end of the course, students will be able to write a well-structured and clearly argued essay”.

5. Understand and Refine Learning Outcomes

Learning outcomes are a critical piece of the educational process. They lay the groundwork for curriculum design , teaching methods, and evaluation procedures in our educational system. These outcomes are the skills, knowledge, or mental attitudes that students are anticipated to gain throughout their learning experience. They may pertain to subject-specific understanding, general knowledge, or transferable skills like problem-solving or analytical thinking. Once these learning outcomes are initially established, it’s necessary to reassess and refine them to ensure they remain relevant and beneficial to the students.

Assessment of Learning Outcomes

Regularly refine and revise the learning outcomes.

Once the preliminary draft of learning outcomes is developed, educators need to evaluate them to certify they align properly with the program’s curriculum and the distribution of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills is accurate. Refining these outcomes might involve rephrasing for clarity , confirming their relevance to the course and student needs , ensuring they are attainable and manageable within the parameters of the course. Regular revisions, reflections, and refinements of these outcomes become necessary to make certain they stay potent and significant.

For instance, an English course’s prior outcome might be modified following a review to something like: “Upon completing the course, students will demonstrate their capability to write a well-structured persuasive essay with hardly any grammatical errors.”

Methods to Assess Learning Outcomes

Achievement of learning outcomes can be assessed via various methods, largely dependent on the nature of the learning outcome itself. Traditional methods of evaluation include written tests and quizzes, which are effective at measuring content knowledge and comprehension skills. Provided students have been well-prepared and the assessment is fair, results from these can accurately reflect student learning.

Other methods include project-based assessments or portfolios , which are ideal for evaluating more complex learning outcomes, such as problem-solving skills, creativity, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. These types of assessments allow students to demonstrate their skills and knowledge in a more meaningful context, and they provide evidence of learning that is more authentic and comprehensive than a single test score.

Importance of Consistent and Fair Assessments

Consistency and fairness in assessments are not only important for accuracy, but also for promoting a positive learning environment. Assessments should be built around clear and measurable outcomes , and students should understand these outcomes ahead of time. This ensures that every student knows what they are expected to learn and how their learning will be measured.

Assessment tasks and criteria should be structured in a way that all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their learning. Moreover, assessments should challenge students appropriately, pushing them to extend their learning while not imposing unrealistic expectations.

If the assessment is perceived to be unfair or inconsistent, students may lose motivation, resulting in decreased performance and engagement with the subject matter. They may also develop negative attitudes toward learning and education in general, which can have detrimental effects on their future learning experiences.

Different Ways to Evaluate Learning Outcomes

The most common way to evaluate learning outcomes is through formative and summative assessments .

Formative assessments occur throughout the learning process and provide ongoing feedback to students. They can take the form of quizzes, assignments, class discussions , and more informal methods like self or peer assessments .

Summative assessments take place after instruction and are often used to evaluate student’s mastery of content and skills. These assessments might include final exams , term papers , or presentations .

However, regardless of the type, all assessments must be developed with clear and direct alignment to learning outcomes.

Moreover, rubrics are often used in assessing more complex learning outcomes. This tool articulates expectations about an assignment by listing the criteria or what counts, and describing levels of quality from excellent to poor.

Feedback as a Key Component in Evaluating Learning Outcomes

In evaluating learning outcomes, feedback stands as a central tool. When offered promptly and constructively, feedback can work wonders in elevating learning experiences. It not only offers students a mirror to reflect on their performance, strengths and opportunities for augmentation but also deepens their understanding and motivates their progress—thus enriching the overall learning outcomes.

Through consistent, purposeful and tailored feedback, educators have the power to steer their students’ learning trajectory towards achieving desired outcomes. It’s a navigational tool that informs students’ journey in gaining new knowledge and honing skills that are in sync with envisioned learning outcomes.

Impacts and Challenges of Learning Outcomes

Learning outcomes: proven catalysts in students’ upward progression.

Learning outcomes hold the potential to significantly influence a student’s learning journey – they serve as beacons, inspiring, steering, and propelling learners towards pre-determined goals. A clear understanding and grasp of these outcomes can help students to strategically streamline their efforts to accomplish these objectives, thus promoting focused learning.

Notable facets of well-formulated learning outcomes include fostering active participation among learners in their learning process. Armed with identified objectives, learners transform from being mere passive consumers of information to active measurers of their own progress, calibrating their strategies accordingly.

Learning outcomes also fuel learners’ confidence and desire to learn. They provide incremental milestones towards the ultimate goal, enabling learners to revel in frequent success and thus perpetuate a positive feedback loop. This heightened morale becomes a natural motivator that drives persistent learning endeavors.

Nevertheless, learning outcomes pose potential drawbacks as well. These come to the fore if the outcomes are overly specific and rigid , thereby stifling critical thinking and creativity. On the other hand, unduly lofty outcomes could leave students grappling to meet them, causing frustration and eventual disinterest. Accordingly, there lies a crucial need for balanced, flexible, and attainable learning outcomes.

Challenges in Implementing Learning Outcomes

Despite the obvious benefits, the implementation of learning outcomes can present specific challenges. These include potential resistance from teachers or educators who may have grown comfortable with traditional methods and perceive the introduction of learning outcomes as an unnecessary burden or interference.

The formulation of learning outcomes itself is a complex process that demands a deep understanding of the domain of learning. It is crucial to balance the need for specificity of outcomes, with the breadth and richness of the learning experience. Getting this balance right can be a painstaking process.

Differing interpretations and perspectives among faculty about what constitutes good learning outcomes can also be a point of contention. This can lead to a lack of consensus and inconsistencies in implementation.

Overcoming Challenges

Overcoming these challenges requires a holistic approach. Organizational culture plays a crucial role in this regard. Encouraging a culture of change and innovation can mitigate resistance from faculty.

Professional development programs , workshops, and training can be helpful in honing faculty’s skills for creating and implementing effective learning outcomes. These programs can also be used to foster a shared understanding of the purpose and role of learning outcomes.

Another pragmatic approach could be to incrementally introduce learning outcomes while reassuring educators of continued support during the transition. This can be further backed up by regular assessments to provide constructive feedback for improvements.

Thoroughly comprehending learning outcomes and effectively implementing them in educational circumstances is a challenging yet rewarding task. Learning outcomes, including knowledge outcomes, skill outcomes, and attitudinal outcomes, provide a comprehensive framework for a constructive learning environment. They are cardinal in structuring the teaching methods, allowing educators to chart a clear course for student learning, and rightly assessing the achieved outcomes offers vital insights into their effectiveness.

However, it’s essential to consider the challenges that might be encountered in this process. Notwithstanding these challenges, the potential benefits of learning outcomes to students’ educational progress present them as a crucial factor in the quest for enhanced education quality.

Related Posts

14 Challenges of Modular Learning to Students and Teachers

Five Characteristics of an Effective Communication Arts Teacher

Development and Examples of a Written Curriculum

About the author, patrick regoniel.

Dr. Regoniel, a faculty member of the graduate school, served as consultant to various environmental research and development projects covering issues and concerns on climate change, coral reef resources and management, economic valuation of environmental and natural resources, mining, and waste management and pollution. He has extensive experience on applied statistics, systems modelling and analysis, an avid practitioner of LaTeX, and a multidisciplinary web developer. He leverages pioneering AI-powered content creation tools to produce unique and comprehensive articles in this website.

Writing Student Learning Outcomes

Student learning outcomes state what students are expected to know or be able to do upon completion of a course or program. Course learning outcomes may contribute, or map to, program learning outcomes, and are required in group instruction course syllabi .

At both the course and program level, student learning outcomes should be clear, observable and measurable, and reflect what will be included in the course or program requirements (assignments, exams, projects, etc.). Typically there are 3-7 course learning outcomes and 3-7 program learning outcomes.

When submitting learning outcomes for course or program approvals, or assessment planning and reporting, please:

• Begin with a verb (exclude any introductory text and the phrase “Students will…”, as this is assumed)
• Limit the length of each learning outcome to 400 characters
• Exclude special characters (e.g., accents, umlats, ampersands, etc.)
• Exclude special formatting (e.g., bullets, dashes, numbering, etc.)

Writing Course Learning Outcomes Video

Watch Video

Steps for Writing Outcomes

The following are recommended steps for writing clear, observable and measurable student learning outcomes. In general, use student-focused language, begin with action verbs and ensure that the learning outcomes demonstrate actionable attributes.

1. Begin with an Action Verb

Begin with an action verb that denotes the level of learning expected. Terms such as know , understand , learn , appreciate are generally not specific enough to be measurable. Levels of learning and associated verbs may include the following:

• Remembering and understanding: recall, identify, label, illustrate, summarize.
• Applying and analyzing: use, differentiate, organize, integrate, apply, solve, analyze.
• Evaluating and creating: Monitor, test, judge, produce, revise, compose.

Consult Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy (below) for more details. For additional sample action verbs, consult this list from The Centre for Learning, Innovation & Simulation at The Michener Institute of Education at UNH.

2. Follow with a Statement

• Identify and summarize the important feature of major periods in the history of western culture
• Apply important chemical concepts and principles to draw conclusions about chemical reactions
• Demonstrate knowledge about the significance of current research in the field of psychology by writing a research paper
• Length – Should be no more than 400 characters.

*Note: Any special characters (e.g., accents, umlats, ampersands, etc.) and formatting (e.g., bullets, dashes, numbering, etc.) will need to be removed when submitting learning outcomes through HelioCampus Assessment and Credentialing (formerly AEFIS) and other digital campus systems.

Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning: The “Cognitive” Domain

To the right: find a sampling of verbs that represent learning at each level. Find additional action verbs .

*Text adapted from: Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York.

Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

Examples of Learning Outcomes

Academic program learning outcomes.

The following examples of academic program student learning outcomes come from a variety of academic programs across campus, and are organized in four broad areas: 1) contextualization of knowledge; 2) praxis and technique; 3) critical thinking; and, 4) research and communication.

Student learning outcomes for each UW-Madison undergraduate and graduate academic program can be found in Guide . Click on the program of your choosing to find its designated learning outcomes.

This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.

Contextualization of Knowledge

Students will…

• identify, formulate and solve problems using appropriate information and approaches.
• demonstrate their understanding of major theories, approaches, concepts, and current and classical research findings in the area of concentration.
• apply knowledge of mathematics, chemistry, physics, and materials science and engineering principles to materials and materials systems.
• demonstrate an understanding of the basic biology of microorganisms.

Praxis and Technique

• utilize the techniques, skills and modern tools necessary for practice.
• demonstrate professional and ethical responsibility.
• appropriately apply laws, codes, regulations, architectural and interiors standards that protect the health and safety of the public.

Critical Thinking

• recognize, describe, predict, and analyze systems behavior.
• evaluate evidence to determine and implement best practice.
• examine technical literature, resolve ambiguity and develop conclusions.
• synthesize knowledge and use insight and creativity to better understand and improve systems.

Research and Communication

• retrieve, analyze, and interpret the professional and lay literature providing information to both professionals and the public.
• propose original research: outlining a plan, assembling the necessary protocol, and performing the original research.
• design and conduct experiments, and analyze and interpret data.
• write clear and concise technical reports and research articles.
• communicate effectively through written reports, oral presentations and discussion.
• guide, mentor and support peers to achieve excellence in practice of the discipline.
• work in multi-disciplinary teams and provide leadership on materials-related problems that arise in multi-disciplinary work.

Course Learning Outcomes

• identify, formulate and solve integrative chemistry problems. (Chemistry)
• build probability models to quantify risks of an insurance system, and use data and technology to make appropriate statistical inferences. (Actuarial Science)
• use basic vector, raster, 3D design, video and web technologies in the creation of works of art. (Art)
• apply differential calculus to model rates of change in time of physical and biological phenomena. (Math)
• identify characteristics of certain structures of the body and explain how structure governs function. (Human Anatomy lab)
• calculate the magnitude and direction of magnetic fields created by moving electric charges. (Physics)

Additional Resources

• Bloom’s Taxonomy
• The Six Facets of Understanding – Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). ASCD
• Taxonomy of Significant Learning – Fink, L.D. (2003). A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning. Jossey-Bass
• College of Agricultural & Life Sciences Undergraduate Learning Outcomes
• College of Letters & Science Undergraduate Learning Outcomes

Teaching Commons Conference 2024

Join us for the Teaching Commons Conference 2024 –  Cultivating Connection. Friday, May 10.

Creating Learning Outcomes

Main navigation.

A learning outcome is a concise description of what students will learn and how that learning will be assessed. Having clearly articulated learning outcomes can make designing a course, assessing student learning progress, and facilitating learning activities easier and more effective. Learning outcomes can also help students regulate their learning and develop effective study strategies.

Defining the terms

Educational research uses a number of terms for this concept, including learning goals, student learning objectives, session outcomes, and more. 

In alignment with other Stanford resources, we will use learning outcomes as a general term for what students will learn and how that learning will be assessed. This includes both goals and objectives. We will use learning goals to describe general outcomes for an entire course or program. We will use learning objectives when discussing more focused outcomes for specific lessons or activities.

For example, a learning goal might be “By the end of the course, students will be able to develop coherent literary arguments.” 

Whereas a learning objective might be, “By the end of Week 5, students will be able to write a coherent thesis statement supported by at least two pieces of evidence.”

Learning outcomes benefit instructors

Learning outcomes can help instructors in a number of ways by:

• Providing a framework and rationale for making course design decisions about the sequence of topics and instruction, content selection, and so on.
• Communicating to students what they must do to make progress in learning in your course.
• Clarifying your intentions to the teaching team, course guests, and other colleagues.
• Providing a framework for transparent and equitable assessment of student learning. 
• Making outcomes concerning values and beliefs, such as dedication to discipline-specific values, more concrete and assessable.
• Making inclusion and belonging explicit and integral to the course design.

Learning outcomes benefit students 

Clearly, articulated learning outcomes can also help guide and support students in their own learning by:

• Clearly communicating the range of learning students will be expected to acquire and demonstrate.
• Helping learners concentrate on the areas that they need to develop to progress in the course.
• Helping learners monitor their own progress, reflect on the efficacy of their study strategies, and seek out support or better strategies. (See Promoting Student Metacognition for more on this topic.)

Choosing learning outcomes

When writing learning outcomes to represent the aims and practices of a course or even a discipline, consider:

• What is the big idea that you hope students will still retain from the course even years later?
• What are the most important concepts, ideas, methods, theories, approaches, and perspectives of your field that students should learn?
• What are the most important skills that students should develop and be able to apply in and after your course?
• What would students need to have mastered earlier in the course or program in order to make progress later or in subsequent courses?
• What skills and knowledge would students need if they were to pursue a career in this field or contribute to communities impacted by this field?
• What values, attitudes, and habits of mind and affect would students need if they are to pursue a career in this field or contribute to communities impacted by this field?
• How can the learning outcomes span a wide range of skills that serve students with differing levels of preparation?
• How can learning outcomes offer a range of assessment types to serve a diverse student population?

Use learning taxonomies to inform learning outcomes

Learning taxonomies describe how a learner’s understanding develops from simple to complex when learning different subjects or tasks. They are useful here for identifying any foundational skills or knowledge needed for more complex learning, and for matching observable behaviors to different types of learning.

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical model and includes three domains of learning: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. In this model, learning occurs hierarchically, as each skill builds on previous skills towards increasingly sophisticated learning. For example, in the cognitive domain, learning begins with remembering, then understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and lastly creating. 

Taxonomy of Significant Learning

The Taxonomy of Significant Learning is a non-hierarchical and integral model of learning. It describes learning as a meaningful, holistic, and integral network. This model has six intersecting domains: knowledge, application, integration, human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn. 

See our resource on Learning Taxonomies and Verbs for a summary of these two learning taxonomies.

How to write learning outcomes

Writing learning outcomes can be made easier by using the ABCD approach. This strategy identifies four key elements of an effective learning outcome:

Consider the following example: Students (audience) , will be able to label and describe (behavior) , given a diagram of the eye at the end of this lesson (condition) , all seven extraocular muscles, and at least two of their actions (degree) .

Audience 

Define who will achieve the outcome. Outcomes commonly include phrases such as “After completing this course, students will be able to...” or “After completing this activity, workshop participants will be able to...”

Keeping your audience in mind as you develop your learning outcomes helps ensure that they are relevant and centered on what learners must achieve. Make sure the learning outcome is focused on the student’s behavior, not the instructor’s. If the outcome describes an instructional activity or topic, then it is too focused on the instructor’s intentions and not the students.

Try to understand your audience so that you can better align your learning goals or objectives to meet their needs. While every group of students is different, certain generalizations about their prior knowledge, goals, motivation, and so on might be made based on course prerequisites, their year-level, or majors. 

Use action verbs to describe observable behavior that demonstrates mastery of the goal or objective. Depending on the skill, knowledge, or domain of the behavior, you might select a different action verb. Particularly for learning objectives which are more specific, avoid verbs that are vague or difficult to assess, such as “understand”, “appreciate”, or “know”.

The behavior usually completes the audience phrase “students will be able to…” with a specific action verb that learners can interpret without ambiguity. We recommend beginning learning goals with a phrase that makes it clear that students are expected to actively contribute to progressing towards a learning goal. For example, “through active engagement and completion of course activities, students will be able to…”

Example action verbs

Consider the following examples of verbs from different learning domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy . Generally speaking, items listed at the top under each domain are more suitable for advanced students, and items listed at the bottom are more suitable for novice or beginning students. Using verbs and associated skills from all three domains, regardless of your discipline area, can benefit students by diversifying the learning experience. 

For the cognitive domain:

• Create, investigate, design
• Evaluate, argue, support
• Analyze, compare, examine
• Solve, operate, demonstrate
• Describe, locate, translate
• Remember, define, duplicate, list

For the psychomotor domain:

• Invent, create, manage
• Articulate, construct, solve
• Complete, calibrate, control
• Build, perform, execute
• Copy, repeat, follow

For the affective domain:

• Internalize, propose, conclude
• Organize, systematize, integrate
• Justify, share, persuade
• Respond, contribute, cooperate
• Capture, pursue, consume

Often we develop broad goals first, then break them down into specific objectives. For example, if a goal is for learners to be able to compose an essay, break it down into several objectives, such as forming a clear thesis statement, coherently ordering points, following a salient argument, gathering and quoting evidence effectively, and so on.

State the conditions, if any, under which the behavior is to be performed. Consider the following conditions:

• Equipment or tools, such as using a laboratory device or a specified software application.
• Situation or environment, such as in a clinical setting, or during a performance.
• Materials or format, such as written text, a slide presentation, or using specified materials.

The level of specificity for conditions within an objective may vary and should be appropriate to the broader goals. If the conditions are implicit or understood as part of the classroom or assessment situation, it may not be necessary to state them. 

When articulating the conditions in learning outcomes, ensure that they are sensorily and financially accessible to all students.

Degree 

Degree states the standard or criterion for acceptable performance. The degree should be related to real-world expectations: what standard should the learner meet to be judged proficient? For example:

• With 90% accuracy
• Within 10 minutes
• Suitable for submission to an edited journal
• Obtain a valid solution
• In a 100-word paragraph

The specificity of the degree will vary. You might take into consideration professional standards, what a student would need to succeed in subsequent courses in a series, or what is required by you as the instructor to accurately assess learning when determining the degree. Where the degree is easy to measure (such as pass or fail) or accuracy is not required, it may be omitted.

Characteristics of effective learning outcomes

The acronym SMART is useful for remembering the characteristics of an effective learning outcome.

• Specific : clear and distinct from others.
• Measurable : identifies observable student action.
• Attainable : suitably challenging for students in the course.
• Related : connected to other objectives and student interests.
• Time-bound : likely to be achieved and keep students on task within the given time frame.

Examples of effective learning outcomes

These examples generally follow the ABCD and SMART guidelines. 

Arts and Humanities

Learning goals.

Upon completion of this course, students will be able to apply critical terms and methodology in completing a written literary analysis of a selected literary work.

At the end of the course, students will be able to demonstrate oral competence with the French language in pronunciation, vocabulary, and language fluency in a 10 minute in-person interview with a member of the teaching team.

Learning objectives

After completing lessons 1 through 5, given images of specific works of art, students will be able to identify the artist, artistic period, and describe their historical, social, and philosophical contexts in a two-page written essay.

By the end of this course, students will be able to describe the steps in planning a research study, including identifying and formulating relevant theories, generating alternative solutions and strategies, and application to a hypothetical case in a written research proposal.

At the end of this lesson, given a diagram of the eye, students will be able to label all of the extraocular muscles and describe at least two of their actions.

Using chemical datasets gathered at the end of the first lab unit, students will be able to create plots and trend lines of that data in Excel and make quantitative predictions about future experiments.

• How to Write Learning Goals , Evaluation and Research, Student Affairs (2021).
• SMART Guidelines , Center for Teaching and Learning (2020).
• Learning Taxonomies and Verbs , Center for Teaching and Learning (2021).

Information Literacy Toolkit: Resource for Teaching Faculty

• Learning Outcomes

Writing Learning Outcomes

• Introducing the UMD Libraries
• Finding a Research Question
• Finding Articles
• Finding Books
• Evaluating Information
• Artificial Intelligence
• Promotional Materials

• Objectives vs Outcomes
• Checklist for Outcomes

Structure of a Learning Outcome Statement:

• An  action  word that identifies the performance to be demonstrated
• A l earning statement  that specifies what learning will be demonstrated in the performance
• A broad statement of the  criterion  or standard for acceptable performance 

Characteristics of Good Learning Outcomes:

• Specify the level, criterion, or standard for the knowledge, skill, ability, or disposition that the learner must demonstrate
• Include conditions under which they should be able to demonstrate their knowledge, skills, abilities, or dispositions
• Contain active verbs using  Bloom's taxonomy
• Be measurable / assessable 
• Example of a poorly written outcome: At the end of the session, students will create a search strategy using Boolean operators and write a correctly formatted MLA citation for a scholarly article. 

"Learning objectives" and "learning outcomes" are often used interchangeably in the literature. In general, "objectives" are intended results or consequences of instruction, curricula, programs, or activities, while "outcomes" are achieved results or consequences of what was learned, i.e. evidence that learning took place. Objectives are often focused on teaching intentions and typically indicate the subject content that the teacher intends to cover. Learning outcomes, on the other hand, are more student-centered and describe the actions the learner should be able to take as a result of a learning experience. 

Learning Objective:  This workshop will cover background and method for writing learning objectives.

Learning Outcome:  At the end of this session, participants will be able to construct a learning outcome for an undergraduate course

• Are the outcomes written using action verbs to specify definite, observable behavior? OR Do they use vague or unclear language, such as "understand" or "comprehend"?
• Is it possible to collect accurate and measurable data for each outcome?
• Is it possible to use a single method to measure each outcome? 

Achievable/Actionable 

• Do the outcomes clearly describe and define the expected abilities, knowledge, and values of learners?
• Are the outcomes aligned with the mission, vision, values, and goals of the institution? program? course?
• Can the outcome be used to identify areas for improvement?
• Are learners at the center of the outcome, or does it focus on the teacher's behaviors?
• Is the language used to describe an outcome, not a process?

Timely/Timebound

• Can the outcome be assessed within the duration of the learning experience (course session, assignment, course, degree program, etc.)?
• How to Write Objectives and Outcomes Basics of writing learning outcomes. Includes information on how to clarify an "unclear outcome."
• Learning Outcomes: University of Connecticut Excerpt from "Assessment Primer: Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes." Quick overview of the basics of learning outcomes with a focus on course-level outcomes.
• Northern Illinois University Instructional Toolkit This guide is a brief compilation of teaching-related information from several sources, including instructional guidebooks from other institutions, journals, and contributions from master teachers and academic support units at Northern Illinois University. The guide is meant to be a quick reference and not a comprehensive source on teaching-related information.

3 Methods for Writing Learning Outcomes

• Bloom's Taxonomy
• ABCD Method
• Backwards Design

Bloom's Taxonomy forms the base of any learning outcome statement. The action verbs used in the taxonomy are measurable and discrete. Aim for learning outcomes that include skills that span across the pyramid. Although it is easy to focus on the foundations of "remember" and "understand," try to include at least one outcome that strives for "evaluation" or "creation." 

Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching (2015).  Bloom's Taxonomy .

• Teaching Guide for Bloom's Taxonomy: Vanderbilt University Overview of the original (1956) taxonomy and revised (2001) version.
• Bloom's Taxonomy Action Verbs Cheat Sheet One page handout including list of verbs for each level of the taxonomy.

Learning Outcome Statements can be written using the ABCD (audience, behavior, condition, and degree) method.  While the method is often directed at learning objectives, it can also be used to write learning outcomes. 

• A(udience) Who is the target audience? (e.g., " ENGL397 students will be able to..." )
• Should be both observable and measurable behaviors
• Should refer to action verbs that describe behaviors 
• C( ondition ) What are the conditions/constraints in which the learners will be expected to perform these tasks? (e.g., "At the end of the session" )
• D( egree ) How will the behavior need to be performed (e.g., " between primary and secondary sources ")

Learning Outcome: "At the end of the session, ENGL397 students will be able to distinguish between primary and secondary sources"

• ABCD Method: Maryland Faculty Online Three page overview of the ABCD method including specific examples.

Backwards Design is a method of instructional design which asks users to begin with the "end" - desired results, goals, or standards - and then build a curriculum from the "evidence of learning (performances) called for by the standard and the teaching needed to equip students to perform" (Wiggins and McTighe). In short, it calls on teachers to identify learning outcomes as a first step and then build a lesson plan that works in service toward those goals. This process has three stages:

• Identify desired results:  establish curricular priorities by separating desired outcomes into three categories: (1) "Enduring Understanding,"  things you want learners to remember after they have forgotten everything else about the course, or concepts that have to be grasped before other knowledge can be gained (2) "Important to Know and Do," skills, methods, principles, and concepts without which learning would be incomplete (3) "Worth Being Familiar With, " things that can be covered if there is time, or may be covered adequately through supplementary material, such as tutorials or readings.
• Determine acceptable evidence : think about the evidence needed to document and validate that the desired learning outcomes have been achieved. Evidence should be collected over time and does not have to be entirely focused on an end of workshop activity. For example, if one of your goals is for students to learn how to problem-solve, give them an assessment that requires a demonstration of problem-solving skills (Vanderbilt University, Center for Teaching). 
• Plan learning experience and instruction:  once you have identified outcomes and assessment measures, decide how you will teach the concepts. Focus instruction around the "enduring understanding" concepts and "important to know and do." Only include the "worth being introduced to" when the other two categories are completely satisfied.
• Understanding by Design: Vanderbilt University Short and sweet overview of Understanding by Design by Wiggins and Tighe.
• Backward Design for Hybrid Instruction This interactive guide walks faculty through the 9 steps of Backward Design. It is oriented toward hybrid courses, but can be useful for any instructional designer.

Program & Institutional Learning Outcomes

• Nesting Learning Outcomes
• UMD Outcomes

Learning outcomes should build on one another. The learning outcomes you set for a particular session should contribute to the development of the course or unit outcomes, which build toward macro-level program and university-wide learning outcomes. Each of these learning outcomes should work in concert with one another, building towards the same set of goals, although individual outcomes will vary in specificity. 

Not every lesson, course, or unit outcome will address every program or institutional outcome. However, to build consensus among student learning, it is important that members of these large educational communities agree on learning outcomes. 

• Mission, Vision, and Values for Instruction Guiding Principles for UMD Libraries Instruction program.
• University-Wide Learning Outcomes for Undergraduates Provided by the Provost's Commission on Learning Outcomes Assessment. Includes specific information literacy outcomes.
• General Education Learning Outcomes by Course Learning outcomes for general education courses. Although it does not include specific information literacy outcomes, information literacy concepts are incorporated into the Academic and Professional Writing Program outcomes.
• Graduate-Level Learning Outcomes Assessment Efforts are being made to improve the graduate-level process and add learning outcomes.
• << Previous: Learning Outcomes
• Next: Introducing the UMD Libraries >>
• Last Updated: Nov 13, 2023 11:06 AM
• URL: https://lib.guides.umd.edu/InfoLitToolkit

CENTRE FOR TEACHING SUPPORT & INNOVATION

• What We Offer Home
• Consultations
• CTSI Programming
• Teaching with Generative AI at U of T

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

• Course Evaluations
• Teaching Awards
• Teaching Feedback Services
• Resources Home
• Assessing Learning
• Engaging Your Students
• Improving Practice
• Planning and Delivering Your Courses
• Tool Guides
• Tool Finder
• Teaching with Technology
• Search for:
• Advanced Site Search

Developing Learning Outcomes

What are learning outcomes.

Learning outcomes are statements that describe the knowledge or skills students should acquire by the end of a particular assignment, class, course, or program. They help students:

• understand why that knowledge and those skills will be useful to them
• focus on the context and potential applications of knowledge and skills
• connect learning in various contexts
• help guide assessment and evaluation

Good learning outcomes emphasize the application and integration of knowledge. Instead of focusing on coverage of material, learning outcomes articulate how students will be able to employ the material, both in the context of the class and more broadly.

Consider using approximately five to ten learning outcomes per assignment; this number allows the learning outcomes to cover a variety of knowledge and skills while retaining a focus on essential elements of the course.

Learn how you can add learning outcomes to your Quercus course .

Examples of Learning Outcomes

For reference, Bloom’s Taxonomy of relevant active verbs.

• identify and describe the political, religious, economic, and social uses of art in Italy during the Renaissance
• identify a range of works of art and artists analyze the role of art and of the artist in Italy at this time
• analyze the art of the period according to objective methods
• link different materials and types of art to the attitudes and values of the period
• evaluate and defend their response to a range of art historical issues
• provide accurate diagrams of cells and be able to classify cells from microscopic images
• identify and develop data collection instruments and measures for planning and conducting sociological research
• identify and classify their spending habits and prepare a personal budget
• predict the appearance and motion of visible celestial objects
• formulate scientific questions about the motion of visible celestial objects
• plan ways to model and/or simulate an answer to the questions chosen
• select and integrate information from various sources, including electronic and print resources, community resources, and personally collected data, to answer the questions chosen communicate scientific ideas, procedures, results, and conclusions using appropriate SI units, language, and formats
• describe, evaluate, and communicate the impact of research and other accomplishments in space technology on our understanding of scientific theories and principles and on other fields of endeavour
• By the end of this course, students will be able to categorize macroeconomic policies according to the economic theories from which they emerge.
• By the end of this unit, students will be able to describe the characteristics of the three main types of geologic faults (dip-slip, transform, and oblique) and explain the different types of motion associated with each.
• By the end of this course, students will be able to ask questions concerning language usage with confidence and seek effective help from reference sources.
• By the end of this course, students will be able to analyze qualitative and quantitative data, and explain how evidence gathered supports or refutes an initial hypothesis.
• By the end of this course, students will be able to work cooperatively in a small group environment.
• By the end of this course, students will be able to identify their own position on the political spectrum.

Specific Language

Learning outcomes should use specific language , and should clearly indicate expectations for student performance.

Vague Outcome : By the end of this course, students will have added to their understanding of the complete research process.

More Precise Outcome : By the end of this course, students will be able to:

• describe the research process in social interventions
• evaluate critically the quality of research by others
• formulate research questions designed to test, refine, and build theories
• identify and demonstrate facility in research designs and data collection strategies that are most appropriate to a particular research project
• formulate a complete and logical plan for data analysis that will adequately answer the research questions and probe alternative explanations
• interpret research findings and draw appropriate conclusions

Vague Outcome : By the end of this course, students will have a deeper appreciation of literature and literary movements in general.

• identify and describe the major literary movements of the 20th century
• perform close readings of literary texts
• evaluate a literary work based on selected and articulated standards

For All Levels

Learning outcomes are useful for all levels of instruction, and in a variety of contexts.

By the end of this course students will be able to:

• identify the most frequently encountered endings for nouns, adjectives and verbs, as well as some of the more complicated points of grammar, such as aspect of the verb
• translate short unseen texts from Czech
• read basic material relating to current affairs using appropriate reference works, where necessary
• make themselves understood in basic everyday communicative situations

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

• identify key measurement problems involved in the design and evaluation of social interventions and suggest appropriate solutions
• assess the strengths and weaknesses of alternative strategies for collecting, analyzing and interpreting data from needs analyses and evaluations in direct practice, program and policy interventions
• identify specific strategies for collaborating with practitioners in developmental projects, formulation of research questions, and selection of designs and measurement tools so as to produce findings usable by practitioners at all levels
• analyze qualitative data systematically by selecting appropriate interpretive or quantified content analysis strategies
• evaluate critically current research in social work
• articulate implications of research findings for explanatory and practice theory development and for practice/program implementation
• instruct classmates and others in an advanced statistical or qualitative data analysis procedure

By the end of the course you will be able to:

• identify several learning style models and know how to use these models in your teaching
• construct and use learning objectives
• design a course and a syllabus
• implement the principles of Universal Instructional Design in the design of a course
• use strategies and instructional methods for effective teaching of small classes and large classes
• identify the advantages and disadvantages of different assessment methods
• construct a teaching portfolio

Why Develop Learning Outcomes?

For students:.

• By focusing on the application of knowledge and skills learned in a course and on the integration of knowledge and skills with other areas of their lives, students are more connected to their learning and to the material of the course.
• The emphasis on integration and generalizable skills helps students draw connections between courses and other kinds of knowledge, enhancing student engagement.
• Students understand the conditions and goals of their assessment.

For instructors:

• Developing learning outcomes allows for reflection on the course content and its potential applications, focusing on the knowledge and skills that will be most valuable to the student now and in the future.
• Learning outcomes point to useful methods of assessment.
• Learning outcomes allow instructors to set the standards by which the success of the course will be evaluated.

For institutions and administrators:

• When an instructor considers the particular course or unit in the context of future coursework and the curriculum as a whole, it  contributes to the development of a coherent curriculum within a decentralized institution and helps to ensure that students are prepared for future work and learning.
• The application and integration of learning emphasized by learning outcomes reflect and support the contemporary nature and priorities of the university, enhancing student engagement, uncovering opportunities for interdisciplinary, and providing guidance and support for students with many different kinds of previous academic preparation.
• Learning outcomes provide structures from which courses and programs can be evaluated and can assist in program and curricular design, identify gaps or overlap in program offerings, and clarify instructional, programmatic, and institutional priorities.

Context of Learning

In developing learning outcomes, first consider the context of the learning taking place in the course might include:

• If the course is part of the major or specialization, what knowledge or skills should students have coming into the course? What knowledge or skills must they have by its conclusion in order to proceed through their program?
• How can this course contribute to the student’s broad learning and the student’s understanding of other subjects or disciplines?
• What are the priorities of the department or Faculty? How does the particular focus of the course contribute to those broader goals?
• Does the course play a particular role within the student’s program (introductory, elective, summative)? How is the course shaped by this role?
• What knowledge or skills gained in this course will serve students throughout their lives? How will the class shape the student’s general understanding of the world?
• Which careers commonly stem from education in this field? What are the skills or knowledge essential to these careers?
• What kinds of work are produced in those careers?
• How can this course enrich a student’s personal or professional life?
• Where will the student encounter the subject matter of the course elsewhere in his or her life? In what situations might the knowledge or skills gained in the course be useful to the student?

Tools for Developing Learning Outcomes

The process of developing learning outcomes offers an opportunity for reflection on what is most necessary to help learners gain this knowledge and these skills. Considering the following elements as you prepare your learning outcomes.

To begin the process of developing learning outcomes, it may be useful to brainstorm some key words central to the disciplinary content and skills taught in the course. You may wish to consider the following questions as you develop this list of key words:

• What are the essential things students must know to be able to succeed in the course?
• What are the essential things students must be able to do to succeed in the course?
• What knowledge or skills do students bring to the course that the course will build on?
• What knowledge or skills will be new to students in the course?
• What other areas of knowledge are connected to the work of the course?

Scholars working in pedagogy and epistemology offer us taxonomies of learning that can help make learning outcomes more precise. These levels of learning can also help develop assessment and evaluation methods appropriate to the learning outcomes for the course.

Bloom’s Taxonomy and Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy

These three areas can be used to identify and describe different aspects of learning that might take place in a course.

Content can be used to describe the disciplinary information covered in the course. This content might be vital to future work or learning in the area. A learning outcome focused on content might read:

By the end of this course, students will be able recall the 5 major events leading up to the Riel Rebellion and describe their role in initiating the Rebellion.

Skills can refer to the disciplinary or generalizable skills that students should be able to employ by the conclusion of the class. A learning outcome focused on skills might read:

By the end of this course, students will be able to define the characteristics and limitations of historical research.

Values can describe some desired learning outcomes, the attitudes or beliefs imparted or investigated in a particular field or discipline. In particular, value-oriented learning outcomes might focus on ways that knowledge or skills gained in the course will enrich students’ experiences throughout their lives. A learning outcome focused on values might read:

By the end of this course, students will be able to articulate their personal responses to a literary work they have selected independently.

Characteristics of Good Learning Outcomes

Good learning outcomes are very specific , and use active language – and verbs in particular – that make expectations clear and ensure that student and instructor goals in the course are aligned.

Where possible, avoid terms, like understand or demonstrate, that can be interpreted in many ways.

See the Bloom’s Taxonomy resource for a list of useful verbs.

Vague Outcome : By the end of the course, I expect students to increase their organization, writing, and presentation skills.

More precise outcome : By the end of the course, students will be able to:

• produce professional quality writing
• effectively communicate the results of their research findings and analyses to fellow classmates in an oral presentation

Vague Outcome : By the end of this course, students will be able to use secondary critical material effectively and to think independently.

More precise outcome : By the end of this course, students will be able to evaluate the theoretical and methodological foundations of secondary critical material and employ this evaluation to defend their position on the topic.

Keep in mind, learning outcomes:

• should be flexible : while individual outcomes should be specific, instructors should feel comfortable adding, removing, or adjusting learning outcomes over the length of a course if initial outcomes prove to be inadequate
• are focused on the learner: rather than explaining what the instructor will do in the course, good learning outcomes describe knowledge or skills that the student will employ, and help the learner understand why that knowledge and those skills are useful and valuable to their personal, professional, and academic future
• are realistic , not aspirational: all passing students should be able to demonstrate the knowledge or skill described by the learning outcome at the conclusion of the course. In this way, learning outcomes establish standards for the course
• focus on the application and integration of acquired knowledge and skills: good learning outcomes reflect and indicate the ways in which the described knowledge and skills may be used by the learner now and in the future
• indicate useful modes of assessment and the specific elements that will be assessed: good learning outcomes prepare students for assessment and help them feel engaged in and empowered by the assessment and evaluation process
• offer a timeline for completion of the desired learning

Each assignment, activity, or course might usefully employ between approximately five and ten learning outcomes; this number allows the learning outcomes to cover a variety of knowledge and skills while retaining a focus on essential elements of the course.

• Speak to the learner : learning outcomes should address what the learner will know or be able to do at the completion of the course
• Measurable : learning outcomes must indicate how learning will be assessed
• Applicable : learning outcomes should emphasize ways in which the learner is likely to use the knowledge or skills gained
• Realistic : all learners who complete the activity or course satisfactorily should be able to demonstrate the knowledge or skills addressed in the outcome
• Time-bound : the learning outcome should set a deadline by which the knowledge or skills should be acquired;
• Transparent : should be easily understood by the learner; and
• Transferable : should address knowledge and skills that will be used by the learner in a wide variety of contexts

The SMART(TT) method of goal setting is adapted from Blanchard, K., & Johnson, S. (1981). The one minute manager. New York: Harper Collins

Assessment: Following Through on Learning Outcomes

Through assessment, learning outcomes can become fully integrated in course design and delivery. Assignments and exams should match the knowledge and skills described in the course’s learning outcomes. A good learning outcome can readily be translated into an assignment or exam question; if it cannot, the learning outcome may need to be refined.

One way to match outcomes with appropriate modes of assessment is to return to Bloom’s Taxonomy . The verbs associated with each level of learning indicate the complexity of the knowledge or skills that students should be asked to demonstrate in an assignment or exam question.

For example, an outcome that asks students to recall key moments leading up to an historical event might be assessed through multiple choice or short answer questions. By contrast, an outcome that asks students to evaluate several different policy models might be assessed through a debate or written essay.

Learning outcomes may also point to more unconventional modes of assessment. Because learning outcomes can connect student learning with its application both within and outside of an academic context, learning outcomes may point to modes of assessment that parallel the type of work that students may produce with the learned knowledge and skills in their career or later in life.

Unit of Instruction (e.g. lecture, activity, exam, course, workshop) and Assessment Examples

Objective : What content or skills will be covered in this instruction?

• Identification and evaluation of severe weather patterns, use of weather maps

Outcome : What should students know or be able to do as a result of this unit of instruction?

• By completing this assignment, students will be able to accurately predict severe weather using a standard weather map.

How do you know? : How will you be able to tell that students have achieved this outcome?

• Student predictions will be compared with historical weather records.

Assessment : What kind of work can students produce to demonstrate this?

• Based on this standard weather map, please indicate where you would expect to see severe weather in the next 24-hour period. Your results will be compared with historical weather records.
• Stylistic characteristics and common themes of Modernist literature
• By the end of this unit, students will be able to identify the stylistic and thematic elements of Modernism.
• Students will be able to identify a passage from a Modernist novel they have not read.
• Read this passage. Identify which literary movement it represents and which qualities drew you to that conclusion.

Course, Program, Institution: Connecting Learning Outcomes

Learning outcomes can also be implemented at the program or institutional level to assess student learning over multiple courses, and to monitor whether students have acquired the necessary knowledge and skills at one stage to be able to move onto the next.

Courses that require prerequisites may benefit from identifying a list of outcomes necessary for advancement from one level to another. When this knowledge and these skills are identified as outcomes as opposed to topics, assessment in the first level can directly measure preparation for the next level.

Many major and specialist programs identify a list of discipline-specific and multi-purpose skills, values, and areas of knowledge graduating students in the program will have. By articulating these as things that students will know or be able to do, the benefits of a program of study can be clearly communicated to prospective students, to employers, and to others in the institution.

Athabasca University developed learning outcomes for all its undergraduate major programs. Please see their Anthropology BA learning outcomes as an example.

Academic plans increasingly include a list of learning outcomes that apply across programs of study and even across degree levels. These outcomes provide an academic vision for the institution, serve as guidelines for new programs and programs undergoing review, and communicate to members of the university and the public at large the academic values and goals of the university. As previously discussed, the best learning outcomes address course-specific learning within the context of a student’s broader educational experience. One way to contribute to a coherent learning experience is to align course outcomes, when appropriate, with institutional priorities.

The University of Toronto’s academic plan, Stepping Up: A framework for academic planning at the University of Toronto, 2004-2010, outlines institutional goals in relation to the learning experience of our undergraduate and graduate students. These priorities are further articulated in “Companion Paper 1: Enabling Teaching and Learning and the Student Experience”. The skills outcomes meant to apply to all undergraduate programs follow.

• knowing what one doesn’t know and how to seek information
• able to think: that is, to reason inductively and deductively, to analyze and to synthesize, to think through moral and ethical issues, to construct a logical argument with appropriate evidence
• able to communicate clearly, substantively, and persuasively both orally and in writing
• able not only to answer questions through research and analysis but to exercise judgment about which questions are worth asking knowledgeable about and committed to standards of intellectual honesty and use of information
• knowing how to authenticate information, whether it comes from print sources or through new technologies
• able to collaborate with others from different disciplines in the recognition that multidisciplinary approaches are necessary to address the major issues facing society
• understanding the methods of scientific inquiry; that is, scientifically literate

Curriculum Mapping: Translating between local and global learning outcomes

At the global program or institutional level, learning outcomes are often necessarily vague to allow for flexibility in their implementation and assessment. Consequently, in order to be effectively applied at the local level of a course or class, they must be reformulated for the particular setting. Similarly, learning outcomes from individual courses may be extrapolated and generalized in order to create program or institution-wide learning outcomes.

Both of these processes are most frequently accomplished through a technique called “curriculum mapping” . When moving from programmatic or institutional to course or class outcomes, curriculum mapping involves identifying which courses, portions of courses, or series of courses fulfill each programmatic or institutional learning outcome.

The global learning outcomes can then be matched with course-specific outcomes that directly address the content and skills required for that particular subject material. Identifying and locating all the learning outcomes encountered by a student over the course of their program can help present learning as a coherent whole to students and others, and can help students make the connection between their learning in one course and that in another. Maki (2004) notes that understanding where particular pieces of learning take place can help students take charge of their own education:

A map reveals the multiple opportunities that students have to make progress on collectively agreed-on learning goals, beginning with their first day on campus. Accompanied by a list of learning outcomes, maps can encourage students to take responsibility for their education as a process of integration and application, not as a checklist of courses and educational opportunities. Maps can also position students to make choices about courses and educational experiences that will contribute to their learning and improve areas of weakness.

For more information about and examples of curriculum mapping, please see Maki, P. (2004). Maps and inventories: Anchoring efforts to track student learning. About Campus 9(4), 2-9.

Teaching Assistants' Training Program

For information on graduate student and Teaching Assistant professional development and job training, please visit the TATP  for resources, events and more.

Enroll in the SoTL Hub  to access resources, share ideas and engage with your U of T community.

Table of Contents

Related topics (tags), related tool guides.

• Quercus Learning Outcomes

• Columbia University in the City of New York
• Office of Teaching, Learning, and Innovation
• University Policies
• Columbia Online
• Academic Calendar
• Resources and Technology
• Instructional Technologies
• Teaching in All Modalities

Designing Assignments for Learning

The rapid shift to remote teaching and learning meant that many instructors reimagined their assessment practices. Whether adapting existing assignments or creatively designing new opportunities for their students to learn, instructors focused on helping students make meaning and demonstrate their learning outside of the traditional, face-to-face classroom setting. This resource distills the elements of assignment design that are important to carry forward as we continue to seek better ways of assessing learning and build on our innovative assignment designs.

On this page:

Rethinking traditional tests, quizzes, and exams.

• Examples from the Columbia University Classroom
• Tips for Designing Assignments for Learning

Reflect On Your Assignment Design

Connect with the ctl.

• Resources and References

Cite this resource: Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning (2021). Designing Assignments for Learning. Columbia University. Retrieved [today’s date] from https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/teaching-with-technology/teaching-online/designing-assignments/

Traditional assessments tend to reveal whether students can recognize, recall, or replicate what was learned out of context, and tend to focus on students providing correct responses (Wiggins, 1990). In contrast, authentic assignments, which are course assessments, engage students in higher order thinking, as they grapple with real or simulated challenges that help them prepare for their professional lives, and draw on the course knowledge learned and the skills acquired to create justifiable answers, performances or products (Wiggins, 1990). An authentic assessment provides opportunities for students to practice, consult resources, learn from feedback, and refine their performances and products accordingly (Wiggins 1990, 1998, 2014). 

Authentic assignments ask students to “do” the subject with an audience in mind and apply their learning in a new situation. Examples of authentic assignments include asking students to: 

• Write for a real audience (e.g., a memo, a policy brief, letter to the editor, a grant proposal, reports, building a website) and/or publication;
• Solve problem sets that have real world application; 
• Design projects that address a real world problem; 
• Engage in a community-partnered research project;
• Create an exhibit, performance, or conference presentation ;
• Compile and reflect on their work through a portfolio/e-portfolio.

Noteworthy elements of authentic designs are that instructors scaffold the assignment, and play an active role in preparing students for the tasks assigned, while students are intentionally asked to reflect on the process and product of their work thus building their metacognitive skills (Herrington and Oliver, 2000; Ashford-Rowe, Herrington and Brown, 2013; Frey, Schmitt, and Allen, 2012). 

It’s worth noting here that authentic assessments can initially be time consuming to design, implement, and grade. They are critiqued for being challenging to use across course contexts and for grading reliability issues (Maclellan, 2004). Despite these challenges, authentic assessments are recognized as beneficial to student learning (Svinicki, 2004) as they are learner-centered (Weimer, 2013), promote academic integrity (McLaughlin, L. and Ricevuto, 2021; Sotiriadou et al., 2019; Schroeder, 2021) and motivate students to learn (Ambrose et al., 2010). The Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning is always available to consult with faculty who are considering authentic assessment designs and to discuss challenges and affordances.   

Examples from the Columbia University Classroom 

Columbia instructors have experimented with alternative ways of assessing student learning from oral exams to technology-enhanced assignments. Below are a few examples of authentic assignments in various teaching contexts across Columbia University. 

• E-portfolios: Statia Cook shares her experiences with an ePorfolio assignment in her co-taught Frontiers of Science course (a submission to the Voices of Hybrid and Online Teaching and Learning initiative); CUIMC use of ePortfolios ;
• Case studies: Columbia instructors have engaged their students in authentic ways through case studies drawing on the Case Consortium at Columbia University. Read and watch a faculty spotlight to learn how Professor Mary Ann Price uses the case method to place pre-med students in real-life scenarios;
• Simulations: students at CUIMC engage in simulations to develop their professional skills in The Mary & Michael Jaharis Simulation Center in the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and the Helene Fuld Health Trust Simulation Center in the Columbia School of Nursing; 
• Experiential learning: instructors have drawn on New York City as a learning laboratory such as Barnard’s NYC as Lab webpage which highlights courses that engage students in NYC;
• Design projects that address real world problems: Yevgeniy Yesilevskiy on the Engineering design projects completed using lab kits during remote learning. Watch Dr. Yesilevskiy talk about his teaching and read the Columbia News article . 
• Writing assignments: Lia Marshall and her teaching associate Aparna Balasundaram reflect on their “non-disposable or renewable assignments” to prepare social work students for their professional lives as they write for a real audience; and Hannah Weaver spoke about a sandbox assignment used in her Core Literature Humanities course at the 2021 Celebration of Teaching and Learning Symposium . Watch Dr. Weaver share her experiences.  

​Tips for Designing Assignments for Learning

While designing an effective authentic assignment may seem like a daunting task, the following tips can be used as a starting point. See the Resources section for frameworks and tools that may be useful in this effort.  

Align the assignment with your course learning objectives 

Identify the kind of thinking that is important in your course, the knowledge students will apply, and the skills they will practice using through the assignment. What kind of thinking will students be asked to do for the assignment? What will students learn by completing this assignment? How will the assignment help students achieve the desired course learning outcomes? For more information on course learning objectives, see the CTL’s Course Design Essentials self-paced course and watch the video on Articulating Learning Objectives .  

Identify an authentic meaning-making task

For meaning-making to occur, students need to understand the relevance of the assignment to the course and beyond (Ambrose et al., 2010). To Bean (2011) a “meaning-making” or “meaning-constructing” task has two dimensions: 1) it presents students with an authentic disciplinary problem or asks students to formulate their own problems, both of which engage them in active critical thinking, and 2) the problem is placed in “a context that gives students a role or purpose, a targeted audience, and a genre.” (Bean, 2011: 97-98). 

An authentic task gives students a realistic challenge to grapple with, a role to take on that allows them to “rehearse for the complex ambiguities” of life, provides resources and supports to draw on, and requires students to justify their work and the process they used to inform their solution (Wiggins, 1990). Note that if students find an assignment interesting or relevant, they will see value in completing it. 

Consider the kind of activities in the real world that use the knowledge and skills that are the focus of your course. How is this knowledge and these skills applied to answer real-world questions to solve real-world problems? (Herrington et al., 2010: 22). What do professionals or academics in your discipline do on a regular basis? What does it mean to think like a biologist, statistician, historian, social scientist? How might your assignment ask students to draw on current events, issues, or problems that relate to the course and are of interest to them? How might your assignment tap into student motivation and engage them in the kinds of thinking they can apply to better understand the world around them? (Ambrose et al., 2010). 

Determine the evaluation criteria and create a rubric

To ensure equitable and consistent grading of assignments across students, make transparent the criteria you will use to evaluate student work. The criteria should focus on the knowledge and skills that are central to the assignment. Build on the criteria identified, create a rubric that makes explicit the expectations of deliverables and share this rubric with your students so they can use it as they work on the assignment. For more information on rubrics, see the CTL’s resource Incorporating Rubrics into Your Grading and Feedback Practices , and explore the Association of American Colleges & Universities VALUE Rubrics (Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education). 

Build in metacognition

Ask students to reflect on what and how they learned from the assignment. Help students uncover personal relevance of the assignment, find intrinsic value in their work, and deepen their motivation by asking them to reflect on their process and their assignment deliverable. Sample prompts might include: what did you learn from this assignment? How might you draw on the knowledge and skills you used on this assignment in the future? See Ambrose et al., 2010 for more strategies that support motivation and the CTL’s resource on Metacognition ). 

Provide students with opportunities to practice

Design your assignment to be a learning experience and prepare students for success on the assignment. If students can reasonably expect to be successful on an assignment when they put in the required effort ,with the support and guidance of the instructor, they are more likely to engage in the behaviors necessary for learning (Ambrose et al., 2010). Ensure student success by actively teaching the knowledge and skills of the course (e.g., how to problem solve, how to write for a particular audience), modeling the desired thinking, and creating learning activities that build up to a graded assignment. Provide opportunities for students to practice using the knowledge and skills they will need for the assignment, whether through low-stakes in-class activities or homework activities that include opportunities to receive and incorporate formative feedback. For more information on providing feedback, see the CTL resource Feedback for Learning . 

Communicate about the assignment 

Share the purpose, task, audience, expectations, and criteria for the assignment. Students may have expectations about assessments and how they will be graded that is informed by their prior experiences completing high-stakes assessments, so be transparent. Tell your students why you are asking them to do this assignment, what skills they will be using, how it aligns with the course learning outcomes, and why it is relevant to their learning and their professional lives (i.e., how practitioners / professionals use the knowledge and skills in your course in real world contexts and for what purposes). Finally, verify that students understand what they need to do to complete the assignment. This can be done by asking students to respond to poll questions about different parts of the assignment, a “scavenger hunt” of the assignment instructions–giving students questions to answer about the assignment and having them work in small groups to answer the questions, or by having students share back what they think is expected of them.

Plan to iterate and to keep the focus on learning 

Draw on multiple sources of data to help make decisions about what changes are needed to the assignment, the assignment instructions, and/or rubric to ensure that it contributes to student learning. Explore assignment performance data. As Deandra Little reminds us: “a really good assignment, which is a really good assessment, also teaches you something or tells the instructor something. As much as it tells you what students are learning, it’s also telling you what they aren’t learning.” ( Teaching in Higher Ed podcast episode 337 ). Assignment bottlenecks–where students get stuck or struggle–can be good indicators that students need further support or opportunities to practice prior to completing an assignment. This awareness can inform teaching decisions. 

Triangulate the performance data by collecting student feedback, and noting your own reflections about what worked well and what did not. Revise the assignment instructions, rubric, and teaching practices accordingly. Consider how you might better align your assignment with your course objectives and/or provide more opportunities for students to practice using the knowledge and skills that they will rely on for the assignment. Additionally, keep in mind societal, disciplinary, and technological changes as you tweak your assignments for future use. 

Now is a great time to reflect on your practices and experiences with assignment design and think critically about your approach. Take a closer look at an existing assignment. Questions to consider include: What is this assignment meant to do? What purpose does it serve? Why do you ask students to do this assignment? How are they prepared to complete the assignment? Does the assignment assess the kind of learning that you really want? What would help students learn from this assignment? 

Using the tips in the previous section: How can the assignment be tweaked to be more authentic and meaningful to students? 

As you plan forward for post-pandemic teaching and reflect on your practices and reimagine your course design, you may find the following CTL resources helpful: Reflecting On Your Experiences with Remote Teaching , Transition to In-Person Teaching , and Course Design Support .

The Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) is here to help!

For assistance with assignment design, rubric design, or any other teaching and learning need, please request a consultation by emailing [email protected] . 

Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) framework for assignments. The TILT Examples and Resources page ( https://tilthighered.com/tiltexamplesandresources ) includes example assignments from across disciplines, as well as a transparent assignment template and a checklist for designing transparent assignments . Each emphasizes the importance of articulating to students the purpose of the assignment or activity, the what and how of the task, and specifying the criteria that will be used to assess students. 

Association of American Colleges & Universities (AAC&U) offers VALUE ADD (Assignment Design and Diagnostic) tools ( https://www.aacu.org/value-add-tools ) to help with the creation of clear and effective assignments that align with the desired learning outcomes and associated VALUE rubrics (Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education). VALUE ADD encourages instructors to explicitly state assignment information such as the purpose of the assignment, what skills students will be using, how it aligns with course learning outcomes, the assignment type, the audience and context for the assignment, clear evaluation criteria, desired formatting, and expectations for completion whether individual or in a group.

Villarroel et al. (2017) propose a blueprint for building authentic assessments which includes four steps: 1) consider the workplace context, 2) design the authentic assessment; 3) learn and apply standards for judgement; and 4) give feedback. 

References 

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., & DiPietro, M. (2010). Chapter 3: What Factors Motivate Students to Learn? In How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching . Jossey-Bass. 

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., and Brown, C. (2013). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(2), 205-222, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566 .  

Bean, J.C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom . Second Edition. Jossey-Bass. 

Frey, B. B, Schmitt, V. L., and Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 17(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/sxbs-0829  

Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., and Oliver, R. (2010). A Guide to Authentic e-Learning . Routledge. 

Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48. 

Litchfield, B. C. and Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 142 (Summer 2015), 65-80. 

Maclellan, E. (2004). How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 29(3), June 2004. DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000188267

McLaughlin, L. and Ricevuto, J. (2021). Assessments in a Virtual Environment: You Won’t Need that Lockdown Browser! Faculty Focus. June 2, 2021. 

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development . MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 1(1). July 2005. Mueller’s Authentic Assessment Toolbox is available online. 

Schroeder, R. (2021). Vaccinate Against Cheating With Authentic Assessment . Inside Higher Ed. (February 26, 2021).  

Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., and Guest, R. (2019). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skills development and employability. Studies in Higher Education. 45(111), 2132-2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015    

Stachowiak, B. (Host). (November 25, 2020). Authentic Assignments with Deandra Little. (Episode 337). In Teaching in Higher Ed . https://teachinginhighered.com/podcast/authentic-assignments/  

Svinicki, M. D. (2004). Authentic Assessment: Testing in Reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 100 (Winter 2004): 23-29. 

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S, Bruna, D., Bruna, C., and Herrera-Seda, C. (2017). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43(5), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396    

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice . Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 

Wiggins, G. (2014). Authenticity in assessment, (re-)defined and explained. Retrieved from https://grantwiggins.wordpress.com/2014/01/26/authenticity-in-assessment-re-defined-and-explained/

Wiggins, G. (1998). Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. Educational Leadership . April 1989. 41-47. 

Wiggins, Grant (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment . Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 2(2). 

Wondering how AI tools might play a role in your course assignments?

See the CTL’s resource “Considerations for AI Tools in the Classroom.”

This website uses cookies to identify users, improve the user experience and requires cookies to work. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's use of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice .

Learning Outcomes

Ivan Andreev

Demand Generation & Capture Strategist

ivan.andreev@valamis.com

July 26, 2022 · updated April 3, 2024

10 minute read

After reading this guide, you will understand the best way to set clear, actionable learning outcomes, and how to write them to improve instruction and training within your organization.

What are learning outcomes?

5 types of learning outcomes.

• Learning outcomes vs learning objectives

Examples of learning objectives and learning outcomes

Learning outcomes examples, how to write learning outcomes, learning outcomes verbs.

Learning outcomes are descriptions of the specific knowledge, skills, or expertise that the learner will get from a learning activity, such as a training session, seminar, course, or program.

Learning outcomes are measurable achievements that the learner will be able to understand after the learning is complete , which helps learners understand the importance of the information and what they will gain from their engagement with the learning activity.

Creating clear, actionable learning outcomes is an important part of the creation of training programs in organizations. When developing these programs, both management and instructors need to be clear about what learners should understand after completing their learning path.

Learning outcomes also play a key role in assessment and evaluation, making clear what knowledge learners should have upon completion of the learning activity.

A well-written learning outcome will focus on how the learner will be able to apply their new knowledge in a real-world context, rather than on a learner being able to recite information.

The most useful learning outcomes include a verb that describes an observable action, a description of what the learner will be able to do and under which conditions they will be able to do it, and the performance level they should be able to reach.

Use learning data to accelerate change

Understand learning data and receive a practical tool to help apply this knowledge in your company.

1. Intellectual skills

With this type of learning outcome, the learner will understand concepts, rules or procedures. Put simply, this is understanding how to do something.

2. Cognitive strategy

In this type of learning outcome, the learner uses personal strategies to think, organize, learn and behave.

3. Verbal information

This type of learning outcome is when the learner is able to definitively state what they have learned from an organized body of knowledge.

4. Motor skills

This category is concerned with the physical ability to perform actions, achieving fluidity, smoothness or proper timing through practice.

5. Attitude

This is the internal state that reflects in the learner’s behavior. It is complex to quantify but can be shown in the learner’s response to people or situations.

Learning outcomes vs learning objectives: what is the difference?

You will often see learning outcomes and learning objectives used interchangeably, but they are different. The following concepts and examples will show how learning objectives and learning outcomes for the same activity are different, although connected to each other.

Perspective of the teacher vs student

Learning objective : Why the teacher is creating a learning activity.

Example : This training session will discuss the new policy for reporting travel expenses.

Learning outcome : What the learner will gain from the learning activity.

Example : The learner understands how to properly report travel expenses.

Purpose vs outcome

Learning objective : States the purpose of the learning activity and the desired outcomes.

Example : This class will explain new departmental HR policies.

Learning outcome : States what the learner will be able to do upon completing the learning activity.

Example : The learner is able to give examples of when to apply new HR policies.

Future vs past

Learning objective : What the teacher hopes that the learning activity will accomplish. It looks to the future, what will happen.

Example : This seminar will outline new health and safety protocols.

Learning outcome : This looks at what has been accomplished, what has happened for the learner as a result of their participation in the activity.

Example : Seminar participants can correctly identify new protocols and explain why they have been established.

Intended outcome vs observed outcome

Learning objectives : What the creators of the learning activity hope to achieve.

Example : This training activity will illustrate the five styles of effective communication in the workplace.

Learning objectives : What can be demonstrably shown to have been achieved by the activity.

Example : Learners can list and define the styles of communication.

Specific units of knowledge vs broad outcome

Learning objective : Describes discrete concepts, skills, or units of knowledge.

Example : This lecture will list ten ways to de-escalate a confrontation in the workplace.

Learning outcome : Describes a wider range of behavior, knowledge and skill that makes up the basis of learning.

Example : Learners can reliably demonstrate how to use de-escalation techniques to neutralize conflicts.

Activity : An onboarding class for new hires

Learning objective : After taking this class, new hires will understand company policies and know in which situations to apply them.

Learning outcome : Learners are able to identify situations in which company policies apply and describe the proper actions to take in response to them.

This type of learning outcome deals with knowledge or intellectual skills. The learner understands the new concept that they are being taught.

Activity : A seminar designed to help HR officers improve mediation

Learning objective : This seminar will teach learners how to effectively mediate disputes using basic conflict dynamics and negotiation.

Learning outcome : Learners understand and be able to apply basic conflict resolution practices in the workplace.

This type of learning outcome measures performance, learners are able to use what they learned in a real-world situation.

Activity : An online training session for new product management software

Learning objective : Session will cover the three main areas of the software.

Learning outcome : Learners are able to operate software and explain the functions that they are using.

This type of learning outcome deals with competence or skill. The learner can demonstrate their understanding of the new concept.

Activity : A virtual reality training session on how to replace machine components

Learning objective : Session will demonstrate the steps to remove and replace components.

Learning outcome : Learners can correctly remove and replace components of each machine, explaining what they are doing and why.

This learning outcome deals with motor skills. Learners can physically demonstrate the outcome of their learning.

Activity : A lecture on organization strategies

Learning objective : Lecture will illustrate how proper organization can help managers optimize workflow within their teams.

Learning outcome : Learners can demonstrate how they will use organization strategies with actionable steps.

This outcome deals with verbal information. Learners can verbalize the knowledge they have gained and synthesize solutions for their workflow.

You can see that, although learning objectives and learning outcomes are related, they are different, and address different aspects of the learning process.

As mentioned above, well-written learning outcomes focus on what the learner can concretely demonstrate after they complete the learning activity. A learning outcome is only useful if it is measurable. So, it should include the learning behaviors of the learner, the appropriate assessment method, and the specific criteria that demonstrates success.

The following examples are well-written learning outcomes:

• learners will be able to identify which scenarios to apply each of the five types of conflict management.
• learners will be able to use the company’s LMS to effectively engage with and complete all training materials.
• learners will understand how to interpret marketing data and use it to create graphs.
• learners will understand how to employ company-prescribed SEO practices while writing copy.
• learners can properly use company guidelines to create case studies.
• learners will be able to properly operate and clean the autoclaves.

The following examples are poorly written learning outcomes:

• learners will understand conflict management.
• learners will know how to use the company’s LMS.
• learners will appreciate how to use marketing data.
• learners will know about the company’s SEO practices.
• learners will understand what goes into a case study.
• learners will learn about autoclaves.

Defining learning outcomes is also a key stage of instructional design models such as the ADDIE model and SAM . The first step of the more in-depth ADDIE model is “analyze.” During this stage is to set the goals for the new training program. This goal should be broken down into a list of clearly explained learning outcomes. While SAM takes a more rapid approach to instructional design, the primary purpose of the first preparation stage is to identify the desired learning outcomes of the program.

When writing learning outcomes, there are a few rules that you should follow.

1. Learning outcomes always use an action verb .

What action verbs can be used when writing learning outcomes?

Depending on the type of outcome, different verbs are appropriate.

Intellectual skills

• Demonstrate

Cognitive strategy

• Differentiate
• Distinguish

Verbal information

• Give examples

Motor skills

2. Learning outcomes must be written clearly, and should be easy to understand.

3. Learning outcomes should clearly indicate what learners should learn from within the discipline they are studying.

4. Learning outcomes must show what the expected level of learning or understanding should be, and it should be reasonable to the level of the learners.

5. Learning outcomes help with assessment, and thus should clearly indicate what success looks like for the learner.

6. There should not be too few or too many learning outcomes. Four to six is the ideal number.

Here are some additional tips (with example) for writing learning outcomes.

Example: a course on accounting software.

You must first start with the main learning goal of the learning activity.

The learning goal would be that the learners will become adept at the software. But that is too vague to be a learning outcome. It doesn’t tell learners what they are expected to learn, nor is it useful for assessments. Instead, that goal should be broken down into smaller parts.

The learning outcomes for this accounting course might be:

• Learners are able to generate invoices.
• Learners understand how to process income tax payments.
• Learners can demonstrate how to properly set up payroll.
• Learners can explain how to use reports to track company expenses.

All of these outcomes are clear, action-oriented and can be assessed by the instructor.

Using a simple formula of action verb plus content to be learned plus the context in which it will be used, you can create a well-written learning outcome. These learning outcomes will improve the results of learners, as they will be clear about what they are expected to learn and will be able to focus on the most pertinent information throughout the course.

You might be interested in

Enterprise Learning Platform

Discover what an enterprise learning platform is and why you need a new learning solution. Discover the main features every enterprise LMS should have.

Learning Record Store (LRS)

Learn what Learning Record (LRS) is and what it enables. Discover 4 key steps on how to implement it and how to choose the right vendor.

Skills-based talent management 

Discover what a skills-based approach in talent hiring and management is. Learn the key 5 steps on how to implement it in your organization.

Ohio State nav bar

The Ohio State University

• BuckeyeLink
• Find People
• Search Ohio State

Designing Assessments of Student Learning

Image Hollie Nyseth Brehm, ​​​​​Associate Professor, Department of Sociology  Professor Hollie Nyseth Brehm was a graduate student the first time she taught a class, “I didn’t have any training on how to teach, so I assigned a final paper and gave them instructions: ‘Turn it in at the end of course.’ That was sort of it.” Brehm didn’t have a rubric or a process to check in with students along the way. Needless to say, the assignment didn’t lead to any major breakthroughs for her students. But it was a learning experience for Brehm. As she grew her teaching skills, she began to carefully craft assignments to align to course goals, make tasks realistic and meaningful, and break down large assignments into manageable steps. "Now I always have rubrics. … I always scaffold the assignment such that they’ll start by giving me their paper topic and a couple of sources and then turn in a smaller portion of it, and we write it in pieces. And that leads to a much better learning experience for them—and also for me, frankly, when I turn to grade it .”

Reflect  

Have you ever planned a big assignment that didn’t turn out as you’d hoped? What did you learn, and how would you design that assignment differently now? 

What are students learning in your class? Are they meeting your learning outcomes? You simply cannot answer these questions without assessment of some kind.

As educators, we measure student learning through many means, including assignments, quizzes, and tests. These assessments can be formal or informal, graded or ungraded. But assessment is not simply about awarding points and assigning grades. Learning is a process, not a product, and that process takes place during activities such as recall and practice. Assessing skills in varied ways helps you adjust your teaching throughout your course to support student learning

Research tells us that our methods of assessment don’t only measure how much students have learned. They also play an important role in the learning process. A phenomenon known as the “testing effect” suggests students learn more from repeated testing than from repeated exposure to the material they are trying to learn (Karpicke & Roediger, 2008). While exposure to material, such as during lecture or study, helps students store new information, it’s crucial that students actively practice retrieving that information and putting it to use. Frequent assessment throughout a course provides students with the practice opportunities that are essential to learning.

In addition we can’t assume students can transfer what they have practiced in one context to a different context. Successful transfer of learning requires understanding of deep, structural features and patterns that novices to a subject are still developing (Barnett & Ceci, 2002; Bransford & Schwartz, 1999). If we want students to be able to apply their learning in a wide variety of contexts, they must practice what they’re learning in a wide variety of contexts .

Providing a variety of assessment types gives students multiple opportunities to practice and demonstrate learning. One way to categorize the range of assessment options is as formative or summative.

Formative and Summative Assessment

Opportunities not simply to practice, but to receive feedback on that practice, are crucial to learning (Ambrose et al., 2010). Formative assessment facilitates student learning by providing frequent low-stakes practice coupled with immediate and focused feedback. Whether graded or ungraded, formative assessment helps you monitor student progress and guide students to understand which outcomes they’ve mastered, which they need to focus on, and what strategies can support their learning. Formative assessment also informs how you modify your teaching to better meet student needs throughout your course.

Technology Tip

Design quizzes in CarmenCanvas to provide immediate and useful feedback to students based on their answers. Learn more about setting up quizzes in Carmen. 

Summative assessment measures student learning by comparing it to a standard. Usually these types of assessments evaluate a range of skills or overall performance at the end of a unit, module, or course. Unlike formative assessment, they tend to focus more on product than process. These high-stakes experiences are typically graded and should be less frequent (Ambrose et al., 2010).

Using Bloom's Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy is a common framework for thinking about how students can demonstrate their learning on assessments, as well as for articulating course and lesson learning outcomes .

Benjamin Bloom (alongside collaborators Max Englehart, Edward Furst, Walter Hill, and David Krathwohl) published Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in 1956.   The taxonomy provided a system for categorizing educational goals with the intent of aiding educators with assessment. Commonly known as Bloom’s Taxonomy, the framework has been widely used to guide and define instruction in both K-12 and university settings. The original taxonomy from 1956 included a cognitive domain made up of six categories: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. The categories after Knowledge were presented as “skills and abilities,” with the understanding that knowledge was the necessary precondition for putting these skills and abilities into practice. 

A revised Bloom's Taxonomy from 2001 updated these six categories to reflect how learners interact with knowledge. In the revised version, students can:  Remember content, Understand ideas, Apply information to new situations, Analyze relationships between ideas, Evaluate information to justify perspectives or decisions, and Create new ideas or original work. In the graphic pictured here, the categories from the revised taxonomy are imagined as the layers of a cake.

Assessing students on a variety of Bloom's categories will give you a better sense of how well they understand your course content. The taxonomy can be a helpful guide to predicting which tasks will be most difficult for students so you can provide extra support where it is needed. It can also be used to craft more transparent assignments and test questions by honing in on the specific skills you want to assess and finding the right language to communicate exactly what you want students to do.  See the Sample Bloom's Verbs in the Examples section below.

Diving deeper into Bloom's Taxonomy

Like most aspects of our lives, activities and assessments in today’s classroom are inextricably linked with technology. In 2008, Andrew Churches extended Bloom’s Taxonomy to address the emerging changes in learning behaviors and opportunities as “technology advances and becomes more ubiquitous.” Consult Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy for ideas on using digital tools to facilitate and assess learning across the six categories of learning.

Did you know that the cognitive domain (commonly referred to simply as Bloom's Taxonomy) was only one of three domains in the original Bloom's Taxonomy (1956)? While it is certainly the most well-known and widely used, the other two domains— psychomotor and affective —may be of interest to some educators. The psychomotor domain relates to physical movement, coordination, and motor skills—it might apply to the performing arts or other courses that involve movement, manipulation of objects, and non-discursive communication like body language. The affective domain pertains to feelings, values, motivations, and attitudes and is used more often in disciplines like medicine, social work, and education, where emotions and values are integral aspects of learning. Explore the full taxonomy in  Three Domains of Learning: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor (Hoque, 2017).

In Practice

Consider the following to make your assessments of student learning effective and meaningful.

Align assignments, quizzes, and tests closely to learning outcomes.

It goes without saying that you want students to achieve the learning outcomes for your course. The testing effect implies, then, that your assessments must help them retrieve the knowledge and practice the skills that are relevant to those outcomes.

Plan assessments that measure specific outcomes for your course. Instead of choosing quizzes and tests that are easy to grade or assignment types common to your discipline, carefully consider what assessments will best help students practice important skills. When assignments and feedback are aligned to learning outcomes, and you share this alignment with students, they have a greater appreciation for your course and develop more effective strategies for study and practice targeted at achieving those outcomes (Wang, et al., 2013).

Provide authentic learning experiences.

Consider how far removed from “the real world” traditional assessments like academic essays, standard textbook problems, and multiple-choice exams feel to students. In contrast, assignments that are authentic resemble real-world tasks. They feel relevant and purposeful, which can increase student motivation and engagement (Fink, 2013). Authentic assignments also help you assess whether students will be able to transfer what they learn into realistic contexts beyond your course.

Integrate assessment opportunities that prepare students to be effective and successful once they graduate, whether as professionals, as global citizens, or in their personal lives.

To design authentic assignments:

• Choose real-world content . If you want students to be able to apply disciplinary methods, frameworks, and terminology to solve real-world problems after your course, you must have them engage with real-world examples, procedures, and tools during your course. Include actual case studies, documents, data sets, and problems from your field in your assessments.
• Target a real-world audience . Ask students to direct their work to a tangible reader, listener or viewer, rather than to you. For example, they could write a blog for their peers or create a presentation for a future employer.
• Use real-world formats . Have students develop content in formats used in professional or real-life discourse. For example, instead of a conventional paper, students could write an email to a colleague or a letter to a government official, develop a project proposal or product pitch for a community-based company, post a how-to video on YouTube, or create an infographic to share on social media.

Simulations, role plays, case studies, portfolios, project-based learning, and service learning are all great avenues to bring authentic assessment into your course.

Make sure assignments are achievable.

Your students juggle coursework from several classes, so it’s important to be conscious of workload. Assign tasks they can realistically handle at a given point in the term. If it takes you three hours to do something, it will likely take your students six hours or more. Choose assignments that assess multiple learning outcomes from your course to keep your grading manageable and your feedback useful (Rayner et al., 2016).

Scaffold assignments so students can develop knowledge and skills over time.

For large assignments, use scaffolding to integrate multiple opportunities for feedback, reflection, and improvement. Scaffolding means breaking a complex assignment down into component parts or smaller progressive tasks over time. Practicing these smaller tasks individually before attempting to integrate them into a completed assignment supports student learning by reducing the amount of information they need to process at a given time (Salden et al., 2006).

Scaffolding ensures students will start earlier and spend more time on big assignments. And it provides you more opportunities to give feedback and guidance to support their ultimate success. Additionally, scaffolding can draw students’ attention to important steps in a process that are often overlooked, such as planning and revision, leading them to be more independent and thoughtful about future work.

A familiar example of scaffolding is a research paper. You might ask students to submit a topic or thesis in Week 3 of the semester, an annotated bibliography of sources in Week 6, a detailed outline in Week 9, a first draft on which they can get peer feedback in Week 11, and the final draft in the last week of the semester.

Your course journey is decided in part by how you sequence assignments. Consider where students are in their learning and place assignments at strategic points throughout the term. Scaffold across the course journey by explaining how each assignment builds upon the learning achieved in previous ones (Walvoord & Anderson, 2011). 

Be transparent about assignment instructions and expectations. 

Communicate clearly to students about the purpose of each assignment, the process for completing the task, and the criteria you will use to evaluate it before they begin the work. Studies have shown that transparent assignments support students to meet learning goals and result in especially large increases in success and confidence for underserved students (Winkelmes et al., 2016).

To increase assignment transparency:

• Explain how the assignment links to one or more course learning outcomes . Understanding why the assignment matters and how it supports their learning can increase student motivation and investment in the work.
• Outline steps of the task in the assignment prompt . Clear directions help students structure their time and effort. This is also a chance to call out disciplinary standards with which students are not yet familiar or guide them to focus on steps of the process they often neglect, such as initial research.
• Provide a rubric with straightforward evaluation criteria . Rubrics make transparent which parts of an assignment you care most about. Sharing clear criteria sets students up for success by giving them the tools to self-evaluate and revise their work before submitting it. Be sure to explain your rubric, and particularly to unpack new or vague terms; for example, language like "argue," “close reading,” "list significant findings," and "document" can mean different things in different disciplines. It is helpful to show exemplars and non-exemplars along with your rubric to highlight differences in unacceptable, acceptable, and exceptional work.

Engage students in reflection or discussion to increase assignment transparency. Have them consider how the assessed outcomes connect to their personal lives or future careers. In-class activities that ask them to grade sample assignments and discuss the criteria they used, compare exemplars and non-exemplars, engage in self- or peer-evaluation, or complete steps of the assignment when you are present to give feedback can all support student success.

Technology Tip   

Enter all  assignments and due dates  in your Carmen course to increase transparency. When assignments are entered in Carmen, they also populate to Calendar, Syllabus, and Grades areas so students can easily track their upcoming work. Carmen also allows you to  develop rubrics  for every assignment in your course. 

Sample Bloom’s Verbs

Building a question bank, using the transparent assignment template, sample assignment: ai-generated lesson plan.

Include frequent low-stakes assignments and assessments throughout your course to provide the opportunities for practice and feedback that are essential to learning. Consider a variety of formative and summative assessment types so students can demonstrate learning in multiple ways. Use Bloom’s Taxonomy to determine—and communicate—the specific skills you want to assess.

Remember that effective assessments of student learning are:

• Aligned to course learning outcomes
• Authentic, or resembling real-world tasks
• Achievable and realistic
• Scaffolded so students can develop knowledge and skills over time
• Transparent in purpose, tasks, and criteria for evaluation
• Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty (book)
• Cheating Lessons (book)
• Minds online: Teaching effectively with technology (book)
• Assessment: The Silent Killer of Learning (video)
• TILT Higher Ed Examples and Resource (website)
• Writing to Learn: Critical Thinking Activities for Any Classroom (guide)

Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., Lovett, M.C., DiPietro, M., & Norman, M.K. (2010).  How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching . John Wiley & Sons. 

Barnett, S.M., & Ceci, S.J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer.  Psychological Bulletin , 128 (4). 612–637.  doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612  

Bransford, J.D, & Schwartz, D.L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications.  Review of Research in Education , 24 . 61–100.  doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001061  

Fink, L. D. (2013).  Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses . John Wiley & Sons. 

Karpicke, J.D., & Roediger, H.L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.  Science ,  319 . 966–968.  doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408  

Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help?.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest ,  17 (1), 4-34.  doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267     

Salden, R.J.C.M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills.  Computers in Human Behavior , 22 (3). 321–333.  doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.003  

Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010).  Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college . John Wiley & Sons. 

Wang, X., Su, Y., Cheung, S., Wong, E., & Kwong, T. (2013). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in course design and its impact on students’ learning approaches.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 38 (4). 477–491.  doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.003  

Winkelmes, M., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K.H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success.  Peer Review , 18 (1/2). 31–36. Retrieved from  https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2016/winter-spring/Winkelmes

Related Teaching Topics

A positive approach to academic integrity, creating and adapting assignments for online courses, ai teaching strategies: transparent assignment design, designing research or inquiry-based assignments, using backward design to plan your course, universal design for learning: planning with all students in mind, search for resources.

News & More is your official source for what's happening at the IHP.

• Features & Spotlights
• Awards & Accolades
• In The Media
• Campus Culture
• Communication Sciences & Disorders
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Education & Careers

Teaching Tip: Linking Assignments to Learning Outcomes

Adapted from  Scaffolding Student Learning Tips for Getting Started  (Faculty Focus)

Take some time to evaluate how you’ve designed the learning experiences in your courses. Reflect on whether (or not) the assignments/assessments for the course are clearly linked to the learning outcomes of the course.

While completing this exercise, you may discover that either you have an assignment that is no longer relevant or you are missing something that might even be a more meaningful gauge of student learning.

• Write a brief description of each major assignment/assessment. The description must include the learning outcomes you intend to evaluate using the assignment/assessment.
• List the skills and knowledge the students need to have and know in order to be successful in the assignment/assessment. If there is anything on the list that the students will not learn about in the course, is this a prerequisite for the course?
• Is successfully completing the assignment/assessment a  reasonable expectation  for the students? Will you cover or expose the students to what they need to know to be successful on the assessments?
• Look at the  scope of the course  to determine if there are any  mini assignments  or learning experiences that can be purposefully introduced throughout the schedule of sessions in a way that offers learners time to learn and practice the knowledge and skills they need to have to be successful in the major assignments.
• Create a visual  curriculum map or outline  showing how each major assignment/assessment is related and linked to the teaching and learning strategies and activities as well as to the outcomes of the course.
• Is there a rationale for the assignment included in the description of the assignment? Is the relevance of the assignment/assessment clearly explained?

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Louiseville, Quebec: Brookline Books.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (J. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Submitted by : Valerie Lopes, Ph.D. Director, Teaching & Learning Seneca College Toronto, Ontario senecacollege.ca/teaching

Take the next step

• Clinical Affiliations

National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment

• Mission & Vision
• National Advisory Panel
• NILOA Staff
• Partner & Collaborating Organizations
• Occasional Papers
• Assessment in Practice
• Case Studies
• Assignment Library
• Featured Assignments
• Assignment Charrette
• Equity Responses
• Transparency Framework
• Excellence in Assessment
• Evidence-Based Storytelling
• Featured Websites Archive
• Curriculum Mapping
• Learning Recognition Collaborative
• Degree Qualifications Profile
• Assessment Resources
• Newsletters
• NILOA Surveys Archive
• Resources for Newcomers
• LARC Assessment Modules
• Questions at Hand
• Audience Type

The materials in the Assignment Library underwent a three part review process. NILOA team members review the initial submission, then the assignment is peer-reviewed by faculty in an assignment charrette. Assignment authors revise their assignment informed by the feedback and implement it in a course, gathering feedback from students along the way. Finally, authors resubmit their materials to NILOA, where they pass through a final review prior to posting. Authors are encouraged to submit updated versions of their materials and to continue reporting how the assignment is being used in their classrooms.

Users are invited to search the assignment library for ideas using the identified tags below of disciplines and assignment characteristics, degree level, or Degree Qualifications Profile Proficiencies.

Browse the NILOA Assignment Library

Academic disciplines and assignment characteristics, degree levels, dqp proficiencies, privacy overview.