essay on solitude class 12

English Essay on “Solitude : Advantages and Disadvantages” English Essay-Paragraph-Speech for Class 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 CBSE Students and competitive Examination.

Solitude : Advantages and Disadvantages

• He who loves solitude is either a beast or a God.”
• Some noble characters have loved solitude, e.g., Milton; Shelley, Virgil, Wordsworth, Cowper, and Byron
• Solitude is free from the distractions that disturb thought.
• Yet few would be content in absolute solitude.
• Absolute solitude deprives us of opportunities of doing good of friendship, and of the intellectual advantages derived from society with our equals and superiors.

An ancient philosopher remarks that the men who delight in solitude must be either above or below ordinary human nature. It would not be easy to give instances of men who have courted solitude because of the brutality of their disposition. Those human beings who Count of their degraded nature, live in solitude have not voluntarily accepted this condition of life, but have been driven to it by the aversion of their fellow-men.

For the other side of Aristotle’s remarks we find clearer port in historical instances. Many of the noblest characters known in the history of human thought took delight in solitude. it was in the wilderness, rather than among the haunts of men, that the greatest religious teachers thought out their solutions of the great mystery of life. Many great poets took delight in solitude and derived their highest thoughts from lonely communing with nature. Milton knew Well that “solitude sometimes is the best society,” and composed his great epic when the loss of his eyesight shut him out, to a large extent, from close companionship with his fellow-men. Shelley, in one of his letters to his wife, wrote: “My greatest delight would be utterly to desert all human society. I would retire with you and our child to a solitary island in the sea: would build a boat, and shut upon my retreat the floodgates of the world.” Similar sentiments are expressed by Virgil, Wordsworth, Cowper, and still more frequently by Byron.

The explanation of their love for loneliness is that in solitude they were far away from all the petty meanness’s of humanity and everything else that could distract them from their high thinking. Nothing is more conducive to deep and noble thought than to be alone, surrounded by the beauties of Forest Mountain, valley, lake and river.

Yet even the most elevated minds would surely tire of continual solitude unrelieved by any human presence. We see that Shelley, in, his vision of a solitary island, had enough of ordinary human nature to find a place on it for his wife and child. Absolute solitude is the greatest punishment that can be inflicted upon vulgar Criminals, and it would probably be even more painful for Minds of high culture. A Byron, a Wordsworth, or a Cowper, if condemned for years to solitude existence on a desert island, would have the feelings of disgust expressed by the last mentioned poet through the mouth of Alexander Selkirk.

In perfect solitude men are deprived of much that makes life worth living, and are in danger of becoming entirely centered in self by their removal from the sight of the joys and sufferings of humanity. They lose the consolations of friendship and love, and have little opportunity of training themselves in moral virtue in their retreat, where there are few temptations and no opportunities of directly increasing human happiness or relieving human misery. Even from an intellectual point of view they are sure to suffer from the want of stimulating conversation with other minds equal or superior, to their own. On these grounds, although it is a good thing for reflective persons occasionally to retire for short’ periods from human society, perpetual solitude would promote neither their happiness, nor their virtue, nor their intellectual well-being.

Related Posts

Absolute-Study

Hindi Essay, English Essay, Punjabi Essay, Biography, General Knowledge, Ielts Essay, Social Issues Essay, Letter Writing in Hindi, English and Punjabi, Moral Stories in Hindi, English and Punjabi.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

The Culturium

Timeless, Wise & Beautiful

Oct 07 2016

Michel de Montaigne: On Solitude

How withdrawal from the active life is the only peaceful way to live

“We must take the soul back and withdraw it into itself; that is the real solitude, which may be enjoyed in the midst of cities and the courts of kings; but it is best enjoyed alone.”

THE SADDEST THING about contemporary life is the way in which choosing not to participate in endless chatter and mindless conversation is deemed to be antisocial, boring, affecting a pose or even downright rude. In a world that cannot stop talking, to coin Susan Cain,  the need for a more introverted, contemplative way of living has never been so coveted by those of us who simply wish not to verbalize our every passing thought and emotion within our surrounding environment.

Despite eminent gurus, such as Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi, suggesting to us that it is perfectly possible to find peace of mind in the midst of the bustling marketplace or backstabbing office, many philosophers from time immemorial have advocated a retreat from familial and societal obligations into the solitary life as being the only means to acquire emotional harmony and mental equilibrium.

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (28th February 1533–13th September 1592) was one such thinker who championed the solo existence. A French Renaissance middle-class lawyer and civil servant, he himself retired from public life at the age of 38, locking himself away in near total reclusion in the southern tower of the Château de Montaigne in order to contemplate the nature of things and write his illustrious Essays:

‘Tis not that a wise man may not live everywhere content, and be alone in the very crowd of a palace; but if it be left to his own choice, the schoolman will tell you that he should fly the very sight of the crowd: he will endure it if need be; but if it be referred to him, he will choose to be alone.

Witness to the heinous crimes and carnage of the Huguenot Wars, Montaigne became increasingly sceptical of the motives of religion, politics and all forms of societal regulation, preferring to put his trust in reason alone. His writings—informal, personal compositions reflecting upon subjects as diverse as the education of children, cannibals, smells, prayers and the human mind—thus became a means for examining his own conscience, illustrated by his motto: “What do I know?”

An advocate of the classics, Montaigne quotes liberally from a vast array of Latin scholars—Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Horace—lending his prose authority and gravitas and harking back to a time when civilization understood the need to live a life grounded in imagination and virtue.

“On Solitude”, number 39 of a collection of scores of essays, is a particularly potent piece of prose, wherein the very nature of human existence is appraised, and in particular the vainglory of political and civic office. Despite acknowledging it is the mental realm that is the root cause of all our problems, if we are to have any hope of finding inner stillness, we must remove ourselves completely from all the ties that bind:

Our disease lies in the mind, which cannot escape from itself; and therefore is to be called home and confined within itself: that is the true solitude, and that may be enjoyed even in populous cities and the courts of kings, though more commodiously apart … It is not enough to get remote from the public; ’tis not enough to shift the soil only; a man must flee from the popular conditions that have taken possession of his soul, he must sequester and come again to himself … Now, since we will attempt to live alone, and to waive all manner of conversation amongst men, let us so order it that our content may depend wholly upon ourselves; let us dissolve all obligations that ally us to others; let us obtain this from ourselves, that we may live alone in good earnest, and live at our ease too.

Only in solitary confinement, Montaigne argues, is it possible to take stock of our lives, dissolve attachments and rediscover equipoise, peace and purpose. Indeed, exchanging one set of circumstances for another—livelihood, career, spouse—is merely exacerbating the problem and the cycle of pain and suffering will persist until we have sequestered and repossessed our own souls.

He concedes that the renunciate life is not always possible for the average man (we must remember that Montaigne was extremely wealthy and, therefore, had the economic means to live separately from society); nevertheless, in the manner of Eastern philosophy advocating dispassion and detachment, we must develop a state of living whereby we reside in the world and yet are not of it:

Wives, children, and goods must be had, and especially health, by him that can get it; but we are not so to set our hearts upon them that our happiness must have its dependence upon them; we must reserve a backshop, wholly our own and entirely free, wherein to settle our true liberty, our principal solitude and retreat. And in this we must for the most part entertain ourselves with ourselves, and so privately that no exotic knowledge or communication be admitted there; there to laugh and to talk, as if without wife, children, goods, train, or attendance, to the end that when it shall so fall out that we must lose any or all of these, it may be no new thing to be without them. We have a mind pliable in itself, that will be company; that has wherewithal to attack and to defend, to receive and to give: let us not then fear in this solitude to languish under an uncomfortable vacuity.

Indeed, in the twilight of our years, we should not fear a descent into solitude and silence but rather embrace it willingly, regarding such a state as release from worldly demands and obligations, leaving us the space and time to caress our spirits and soothe our souls:

Solitude seems to me to wear the best favor in such as have already employed their most active and flourishing age in the world’s service, after the example of Thales. We have lived enough for others; let us at least live out the small remnant of life for ourselves; let us now call in our thoughts and intentions to ourselves, and to our own ease and repose. ‘Tis no light thing to make a sure retreat; it will be enough for us to do without mixing other enterprises. Since God gives us leisure to order our removal, let us make ready, truss our baggage, take leave betimes of the company, and disentangle ourselves from those violent importunities that engage us elsewhere and separate us from ourselves. We must break the knot of our obligations, how strong soever, and hereafter love this or that, but espouse nothing but ourselves: that is to say, let the remainder be our own, but not so joined and so close as not to be forced away without flaying us or tearing out part of our whole. The greatest thing in the world is for a man to know that he is his own. ‘Tis time to wean ourselves from society when we can no longer add anything to it; he who is not in a condition to lend must forbid himself to borrow. Our forces begin to fail us; let us call them in and concentrate them in and for ourselves. He that can cast off within himself and resolve the offices of friendship and company, let him do it. In this decay of nature which renders him useless, burdensome, and importunate to others, let him take care not to be useless, burdensome, and importunate to himself. Let him soothe and caress himself, and above all things be sure to govern himself with reverence to his reason and conscience to that degree as to be ashamed to make a false step in their presence.

And thus, as we relinquish the temporal world, we withdraw back into our own selves, like animals removing their traces at the opening of their lairs, burrowing deep into quiet oblivion:

You are to do like the beasts of chase, who efface the track at the entrance into their den. You are no more to concern yourself how the world talks of you, but how you are to talk to yourself. Retire yourself into yourself, but first prepare yourself there to receive yourself: it were a folly to trust yourself in your own hands, if you cannot govern yourself.

• Susan Cain, The Power of Introverts (TED.com)
• Marcus Aurelius: Meditations
• Rousseau: Meditations of a Solitary Walker
• Philip Gröning: Into Great Silence
• Sri V. Ganesan: The Ultimate Question
• Seneca: On Tranquillity of Mind
• Leo Tolstoy: A Confession
• Ralph Waldo Emerson: Waldeinsamkeit
• Albert Camus: Jonas or The Artist at Work
• Rainer Maria Rilke: On Solitude
• Wallace Stevens: Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction
• John Zerzan: Silence

Join Our Newsletter

You might also like some of the following recent posts on The Culturium …

• David Whyte: Consolations April 28, 2024
• Paula Marvelly: The Sacred Feminine Through the Ages April 5, 2024
• Pocket Canons Bible Series March 31, 2024
• Vladimir Lossky: Eckhart’s Apophatic Theology March 24, 2024
• Anna Gillespie: Give Me Shelter March 17, 2024
• Abhay K. & Sarah Thilykou: 100 Great Indian Poems March 10, 2024
• Stephen Nachmanovitch: Free Play March 3, 2024
• Masood Hussain & Gabriel Rosenstock: Love Letter to Kashmir February 11, 2024
• Carol Raphael: The Beauty We Create January 28, 2024

The Joy of Solitude

Loneliness as a subjective state of mind..

Posted November 5, 2017 | Reviewed by Kaja Perina

• Understanding Loneliness
• Find a therapist near me

[Article revised on 24 April 2020.]

According to a recent study, many people prefer to give themselves a mild electric shock than to sit in a room alone with their own thoughts.

Loneliness can be defined as a complex and unpleasant emotional response to isolation or lack of companionship. The pain of loneliness is such that, throughout history, solitary confinement has been used as a form of torture and punishment .

More than just painful, loneliness is also damaging. Lonely people eat and drink more, and exercise and sleep less. They are at higher risk of developing psychological problems such as depression , psychosis , and addiction , as well as physical problems such as infection, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

Loneliness has been described as ‘social pain’. Just as physical pain has evolved to signal injury and prevent further injury, so loneliness may have evolved to signal social isolation and stimulate us to seek out social bonds. Human beings are profoundly social animals and depend on their social group for sustenance and protection, and also for identity , narrative, and meaning. Historically and still today, to be alone is to be in mortal danger of losing oneself.

The infant is especially vulnerable and dependent, and loneliness brings back (or at least evokes) early fears of helplessness and abandonment.

In later life, loneliness can be precipitated by breakup, divorce , death, or the sudden loss or undermining of any important long-term relationship. To make matters worse, losing someone close often entails losing that person’s entire social circle.

Loneliness can also result from disruptive life events such as moving schools, changing jobs, immigrating, getting married, or giving birth; from social problems such as racism and bullying ; from psychological states such as shyness , agoraphobia, or depression; and from physical problems that restrict mobility or require special care.

Loneliness is a particular problem of modernity. One US study found that between 1985 and 2004, the proportion of people reporting having no one to confide in almost tripled. In 1985, respondents most frequently reported having three close confidants; by 2004, the modal response had fallen to nought close confidants.

Although it affects all segments of society, loneliness is most prevalent and protracted in the elderly population. According to a poll carried out in 2017 for the Jo Cox Commission on Loneliness, three-quarters of older people in the UK are lonely. Shockingly, two-fifths of respondents agreed with the statement, ‘sometimes an entire day goes by and I haven’t spoken to anybody.’

Some of the factors behind these stark statistics include: smaller household sizes, greater migration, rising self-employment, higher media consumption, and longer life expectancy.

Large conglomerations built on productivity and consumption at the expense of connection and contemplation can feel profoundly alienating. Aside from being intrinsically isolating, long commutes can undermine community cohesion and compromise time and opportunities for socializing.

The Internet has become the great comforter and seems to offer it all: news, knowledge, music, entertainment, shopping, relationships, and even sex . But over time, it foments envy and division, confuses our needs and priorities, desensitizes us to violence and suffering, and, by creating a false sense of connectedness, entrenches superficial relationships at the cost of living ones.

Man has evolved over millennia into one of the most social and interconnected of all animals. Suddenly, he finds himself apart and alone, not on a mountaintop, in a desert, or on a raft at sea, but in a city of millions, in reach but out of touch. For the first time in human history, he has no practical need, and therefore no pretext, to interact and form attachments with his fellow men and women.

Against nature, there are a few people who actively choose to remove themselves from the rest of society, or, at least, not to actively seek out social interaction. Such ‘loners’ (the very term is pejorative, implying, as it does, abnormality and deviousness) may revel in their rich inner life or simply dislike or distrust the company of others, which, they feel, comes with more costs than benefits.

Timon of Athens, who lived at around the same time as Plato, began life in wealth, lavishing money upon his flattering friends, and, in accordance with his conception of friendship , never expecting anything in return. When he ran out of coin, all his friends deserted him, reducing him to the hard toil of labouring the fields. One day, as Timon tilled the earth, he uncovered a pot of gold, and, suddenly, all his old friends came piling back. But rather than welcome them with open arms, he cursed them and drove them away with sticks and clods of earth. Timon declared his hatred of humankind and withdrew into the forest, where, much to his chagrin, people began to seek him out as some kind of holy man.

Did Timon feel lonely in the forest? Probably not, because he did not believe he lacked for anything. As he no longer valued his friends or their companionship, he could not have desired or missed them—even though he may have pined for a better class of person, and, in that limited sense, felt lonely.

As I argue in my new book, Heaven and Hell: The Psychology of the Emotions , loneliness is not so much an objective state of affairs as a subjective state of mind, a function of desired and achieved levels of social interaction and also of type or types of interaction.

Lovers often feel lonely in the single absence of their beloved, even when completely surrounded by friends and family. Jilted lovers feel much lonelier than lovers who are merely apart from their beloved, indicating that loneliness is not merely a matter of the amount or degree of interaction, but also of the potential or possibility for interaction.

Conversely, it is common to feel lonely within a marriage because the relationship is no longer validating or nurturing us, but diminishing us and holding us back. As Chekov admonished, ‘If you are afraid of loneliness, do not marry’.

And yet for many people marriage is, among others, an attempt to flee from their lifelong loneliness and escape from their inescapable demons.

At the bottom, loneliness is not the experience of lacking but the experience of living. It is part and parcel of the human condition. Unless a person is resolved, it can only be a matter of time before the feeling of loneliness resurfaces, often with a vengeance.

On this account, loneliness is the manifestation of the conflict between our desire for meaning and the absence of meaning from the universe, an absence that is all the more glaring in modern societies which have sacrificed traditional and religious structures of meaning on the thin altar of truth.

So much explains why people with a strong sense of purpose and meaning, or simply with a strong narrative, such as Nelson Mandela or St Anthony of the Desert, are protected from loneliness regardless of the circumstances in which they find themselves.

St Anthony sought out loneliness precisely because he understood that it could bring him closer to the real questions and value of life. He spent fifteen years in a tomb and twenty years in an abandoned fort in the desert of Egypt before his devotees persuaded him to withdraw from his seclusion to instruct and organize them, whence his epithet, ‘Father of All Monks’ (‘monk’ and ‘monastery’ derive from the Greek, monos, ‘solitary’, ‘alone’). Anthony emerged from the fort not ill and emaciated, as everyone had been expecting, but healthy and radiant, and expired in his hundred and sixth year, which in the fourth century must in itself have counted as a minor miracle.

St Anthony did not lead a life of loneliness, but one of solitude. Loneliness, the pain of being alone, is damaging; solitude, the joy of being alone, is empowering.

Our unconscious requires solitude to process and unravel problems, so much so that our body imposes it upon us each night in the form of sleep. By removing us from the constraints, distractions, and influences imposed upon us by others, solitude frees us to reconnect with ourselves, assimilate ideas, and generate identity and meaning.

For Nietzsche, men without the aptitude or opportunity for solitude are mere slaves because they have no alternative but to parrot culture and society. In contrast, anyone who has unmasked society naturally seeks out solitude, which becomes the source and guarantor of a more authentic set of values and ambitions:

I go into solitude so as not to drink out of everybody’s cistern. When I am among the many I live as the many do, and I do not think I really think. After a time it always seems as if they want to banish my self from myself and rob me of my soul.

Solitude removes us from the mindless humdrum of everyday life into a higher consciousness which reconnects us with our deepest humanity, and also with the natural world, which quickens into our muse and companion. By setting aside dependent emotions and constricting compromises, we free ourselves up for problem solving, creativity , and spirituality . If we can embrace it, this opportunity to adjust and refine our perspectives creates the strength and security for still greater solitude and, in time, the substance and meaning that guards against loneliness.

The life of St Anthony can leave the impression that solitude is at odds with attachment , but this need not be the case so long as the one is not pitted against the other. For the poet RM Rilke, the highest task of a bond between two people is not merely to tolerate but to ‘stand guard over’ the solitude of the other.

In Solitude: A Return to the Self (1988), the psychiatrist Anthony Storr convincingly argues that:

The happiest lives are probably those in which neither interpersonal relationships nor impersonal interests are idealized as the only way to salvation. The desire and pursuit of the whole must comprehend both aspects of human nature.

Be this as it may, not everyone is capable of solitude, and for many people aloneness will never amount to anything more than bitter loneliness. Younger people often find aloneness difficult, while older people are more likely, or less unlikely, to seek it out.

So much suggests that solitude, the joy of being alone, stems from, as well as promotes, a state of maturity and inner richness.

Wilson T (2014): Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science 345(6192), 75–77.

Siddique H (2017): Three-quarters of older people in the UK are lonely, survey finds. Theguardian.com, 21 March 2017.

DePaulo B (2016): What no one ever told you about people who are single. Plenary address to the APA, 5 August 2016.

Chekov A (1921): Note-Book of Anton Chekhov. Trans. SS Koteliansky & Leonard Woolf.

Nietzsche F (1886): Beyond Good and Evil 2, 49. Trans. Helen Zimmern.

Nietzsche F (1881): The Dawn of Day, 491. Trans. John McFarland Kennedy.

Rilke RM (1902): Letter to Paula Modersohn-Becker, dated 12 February 1902. Trans. Jane Bannard Greene & MD Herter Norton.

Storr A (1988): Solitude, p. 202. Flamingo.

Neel Burton, M.D. , is a psychiatrist, philosopher, and writer who lives and teaches in Oxford, England.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Online Therapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Welcome to Mrs F.M. Richards English online resource site. I hope that you will find the tools provided an invaluable asset to your learning.

                Solitude                                                           by Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Recorded Lesson 001

Recorded Lesson 00 2

Recorded Lesson 00 3

Recorded Lesson 00 4

Henry David Thoreau

Ask litcharts ai: the answer to your questions.

Ode On Solitude: Summary and Questions Answers

Table of Contents

Ode On Solitude By Alexander Pope

‘Ode on Solitude” is a small ode written by Alexander Pope’s. It is considered to have been written possibly in 1700, when Pope was merely twelve years old.

Please enable JavaScript

The Poets deepest desire is that he should have a few acres of his own land, where he is happy to live and work. He will be happy to breathe the air of his native land. It means that he is happy with what he has in his native place and he does not wish to have more.

In the second paragraph, the poet simply means that the man is self-sufficient. His land, now shown to be a farm, provides for all of his needs — his herds provide him with milk, he is able to bake his own bread. In the summer, his trees provide ample shade, and in the winter the wood from those same trees can be lit to keep him warm. He does not need anything beyond his own land.

The narrator considered this farmer blessed! Time almost doesn’t have meaning for this man; his world provides for all of his needs. Hours go by, days go by, years go by, and everything remains the same. The health the man is in at the beginning of this cycle is the health he remains in when it is finished. He has peace of mind which is a blessing for him.

The poet says that he sleeps a sound sleep. He is ignorant about the knowledge and competition in the world. It’s a strange idea and casts the character of the farmer in a different light. He does not know about the world. And so he could sleep a sound sleep.

Here the poet wants an unseen life. He wants to live in solitude until he dies. He wants to die unlamented. Not a stone should be carved on his grave so that no one will know where he lies after death. A perfect life of solitude and peace.

Reference To Context

1) Thus let me live, unseen, unknown; Thus unlamented let me die.

2) Whose herds with milk, whose fields with bread, Whose flocks supply him with attire.

Context : As Above Explanation : His land provides for all of his needs — his herds provide him with milk, he is able to bake his own bread. In the summer, his trees provide ample shade, and in the winter the wood from those same trees can be lit to keep him warm. He does not need anything beyond his own land.

3) Blest, who can unconcernedly find Hours, days, and years slide soft away, In health of body, peace of mind, Quiet by day.

Context : As Above Explanation : Third paragraph

Questions and Answers

Q. What is the theme of Ode on Solitude? Ans . Alexander Pope’s poem “Ode on Solitude” is a small ode that has one central theme: the bliss of solitude. The poem is based on the idea that complete solitude is the only true way to be happy. Mostly people connect it to loneliness, but not to be lonely, but to be happy in the company of our self. In this poem, Pope says that loneliness is the blessed thing of life. The poem talks about the freedom of responsibility for society and social norms. It’s a poem about a happy man who’s happy in his own acre of land. But he says in the quotation that, like a happy man, he wants to remain unseen and unknown to the world.

Q. What type of poem is Ode on Solitude? Ans. Alexander Pope’s ”Ode on Solitude” is a Horatian ode. Horatian odes are the odes written in the style of the ancient Latin poet, Horace. The odes written by Horace were informal, intimate, calm and contemplative.

Q. Who is a happy man? Ans- According to the poet, Alexander Pope, a happy man is that who is content to breathe his native air and has his paternal land, eats the things that he gets from his land and animals by serving them. Such a person leads a healthy and peaceful life living at his own place with satisfaction.

Q. Whom does the pronoun ‘his’ in the third line of the first stanza refer to? Ans- The pronoun ‘his’ in the third line of the first stanza refers to the common people who are content to breathe in the native air.

Q. Who gives him milk? Ans- The herds of poet’s cattle give him milk.

Q. What gives him bread? Ans- Poet’s own field gives him bread.

Q. From where does he get his clothes? Ans- The poet gets his clothes from the wool of his own sheep.

Q. How do trees help him? Ans- Trees help him by giving him shade in summer.

Q. Name the poem and the poet. Ans- The name of the poem is ”Ode On Solitude” and Alexander Pope is the poet.

Q. Who is a blessed man? Ans- A blessed man is one who lives a smooth life without any worry and has a healthy body with peace of mind and enjoys a sound sleep at night.

Q. How does a happy man spend his time? Ans- A happy man spends his time in study, recreation, meditation and sound sleep at night.

Q. Whom does ‘me’ refer to in the last stanza? Ans- In the last stanza, the word ‘me’ refers to the poet himself.

Q. What do you mean by ‘slide soft away’? Ans- In the poem ”Ode on Solitude” the phrase ‘slide soft away’ means to pass along smoothly.

Q. What does the poet wish for after death? Ans- The poet, Alexander Pope, ”Ode on Solitude” expresses that he wishes an unmourned and quiet death. He does not want any stone mark on his tomb.

Q. How does the poet want to live? Ans- The poet wants to live a peaceful life on his native land enjoying the beauty of nature.

Q. How does the poet want to die? Ans- The poet wants an unlamented and quiet death.

Q. What are the features of a happy life? Ans- A healthy body, peace of mind, satisfaction, sound sleep at night are the features of a happy life.

Have something to say Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Discover more from Smart English Notes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

Paragraph, Essay and Speech on “Solitude” Paragraph for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.

Solitude is the state or situation of being alone without companions. Likes and dislikes for solitude depend upon the temperament of people.

An absolute solitude is not natural, because man is a social being. There are some people who loath solitude, and there are others who prefer it. There are people who loathe solitude and long for companionship. And there are some other people who dislike company and long for solitude.

Solitude is a burden to men who love company. They feel lost and miserable when separated from human society. Solitude is horrible to them.

Solitary imprisonment is a severe punishment and it has been annulled in civilized society. A solitary man is often selfish and narrow-minded. Certain amount of solitude is necessary for cultivation of thought. Scientists, philosophers, poets need solitude to do their work. The monks and sages live in solitude. The sages have found charms in solitude.

Related posts:

• Paragraph, Essay and Speech on “Speech on Unity is Strength” Paragraph for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Describe how you have been helped relatives, friends in preparing for exams” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Marine National Park-Gulf of Mannar in Tamil Nadu” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Education makes people easy to lead but difficult to drive” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Effective means of keeping law and order in today’s society” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Billie Jean King : An Advocate of Equal Rights for women” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Types of Speech” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.
• Essay, Paragraph, Speech on “Pollution caused by burning coal and petroleum base fuels” Essay for Class 9, Class 10, Class 12 Class and Graduate Exams.

About The Author

Baljit Singh

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Search Suggest

Class with Mason - School of Literary Studies

• Full Courses
• Poetry Analysis
• Notes on Novels
• Drama Notes
• Prose Notes
• Biographies
• Literary Terms
• Literary Theory
• Bridge of Faiths
• Mobile-First Slides
• Sub Menu 03
• Sub Menu 04
• Sub Menu 05

Solitude, Ella Wheeler Wilcox: Summary & Analysis

"Solitude" by Ella Wheeler Wilcox reflects on the contrasting experiences of joy and sorrow, companionship and isolation, success and failure in the journey of life. Through vivid imagery and thoughtful observations, the poem highlights the transient nature of human relationships and the individual's inevitable journey through both happiness and hardship. The poem's structure and language underscore the bittersweet nature of existence.

Laugh, and the world laughs with you; Weep, and you weep alone. For the sad old earth must borrow its mirth, But has trouble enough of its own. Sing, and the hills will answer; Sigh, it is lost on the air. The echoes bound to a joyful sound, But shrink from voicing care. Rejoice, and men will seek you; Grieve, and they turn and go. They want full measure of all your pleasure, But they do not need your woe. Be glad, and your friends are many; Be sad, and you lose them all. There are none to decline your nectared wine, But alone you must drink life's gall. Feast, and your halls are crowded; Fast, and the world goes by. Succeed and give, and it helps you live, But no man can help you die. There is room in the halls of pleasure For a long and lordly train, But one by one we must all file on Through the narrow aisles of pain.

Critical Analysis

"Solitude" provides a contemplative exploration of the dichotomies of life, emphasizing the transient nature of human experiences and the shifts in relationships based on emotions and circumstances.

The poem begins with a stark contrast between laughter and weeping. The speaker notes that the world shares in joy but withdraws during moments of sorrow. The metaphor of the "sad old earth" borrowing its mirth implies that happiness is a fleeting commodity.

Imagery of sound is employed in the lines "Sing, and the hills will answer; / Sigh, it is lost on the air." This underscores the idea that positive emotions resonate and are acknowledged, while expressions of pain are ignored or overlooked.

The theme of companionship's fragility is further explored as the poem suggests that people seek company in times of joy but distance themselves during times of grief. The concept that others want to partake in happiness but avoid sharing sorrow reflects the superficial nature of some human connections.

The poem's second half focuses on the themes of success and mortality. The speaker remarks that success attracts attention and assistance, but ultimately, no one can help in the face of death.

The imagery of "the halls of pleasure" and "the narrow aisles of pain" paints a vivid contrast between the expansive nature of joyful moments and the isolating experience of suffering. This metaphorical portrayal emphasizes the individual's solitary journey through life's challenges.

"Solitude" encapsulates the idea that life is a mix of highs and lows, connections and separations, and it reminds readers of the inherent loneliness of certain moments despite the presence of others.

"Solitude" by Ella Wheeler Wilcox delves into the transient nature of human experiences, relationships, and emotions. Through vivid imagery and contrasts, the poem underscores the ebb and flow of companionship, success, and sorrow, while also emphasizing the individual's solitary journey through life's challenges.

Themes of the Poem

• Transient Nature of Emotions: The poem explores how joy and sorrow come and go, affecting human relationships and interactions.
• Human Connections: The poem discusses the superficiality of some connections, as people are drawn to happiness but distance themselves from sorrow.
• Isolation and Solitude: The concept of solitude is presented as a recurring theme, highlighting how individuals ultimately navigate life's challenges alone.

Imagery and Language

• Metaphorical Imagery: The metaphors of laughter and weeping, the hills responding to singing, and the halls of pleasure create vivid images that convey the transient nature of human experiences.
• Contrasts: The poem effectively uses contrasts between joy and sorrow, success and failure, to highlight the fleeting and changing nature of life.

Ad-Blocker Detected!

Sorry, we detected that you have activated Ad-Blocker. Please consider supporting us by disabling your Ad-Blocker, it helps us in developing this Website. Thank you!

May 10, 2024

published by phi beta kappa

Print or web publication, solitude and leadership.

If you want others to follow, learn to be alone with your thoughts

Listen to a narrated version of this essay:

The lecture below was delivered to the plebe class at the United States Military Academy at West Point in October 2009.

My title must seem like a contradiction. What can solitude have to do with leadership? Solitude means being alone, and leadership necessitates the presence of others—the people you’re leading. When we think about leadership in American history we are likely to think of Washington, at the head of an army, or Lincoln, at the head of a nation, or King, at the head of a movement—people with multitudes behind them, looking to them for direction. And when we think of solitude, we are apt to think of Thoreau, a man alone in the woods, keeping a journal and communing with nature in silence.

Leadership is what you are here to learn—the qualities of character and mind that will make you fit to command a platoon, and beyond that, perhaps, a company, a battalion, or, if you leave the military, a corporation, a foundation, a department of government. Solitude is what you have the least of here, especially as plebes. You don’t even have privacy, the opportunity simply to be physically alone, never mind solitude, the ability to be alone with your thoughts. And yet I submit to you that solitude is one of the most important necessities of true leadership. This lecture will be an attempt to explain why.

We need to begin by talking about what leadership really means. I just spent 10 years teaching at another institution that, like West Point, liked to talk a lot about leadership, Yale University. A school that some of you might have gone to had you not come here, that some of your friends might be going to. And if not Yale, then Harvard, Stanford, MIT, and so forth. These institutions, like West Point, also see their role as the training of leaders, constantly encourage their students, like West Point, to regard themselves as leaders among their peers and future leaders of society. Indeed, when we look around at the American elite, the people in charge of government, business, academia, and all our other major institutions—senators, judges, CEOs, college presidents, and so forth—we find that they come overwhelmingly either from the Ivy League and its peer institutions or from the service academies, especially West Point.

So I began to wonder, as I taught at Yale, what leadership really consists of. My students, like you, were energetic, accomplished, smart, and often ferociously ambitious, but was that enough to make them leaders? Most of them, as much as I liked and even admired them, certainly didn’t seem to me like  leaders. Does being a leader, I wondered, just mean being accomplished, being successful? Does getting straight As make you a leader? I didn’t think so. Great heart surgeons or great novelists or great shortstops may be terrific at what they do, but that doesn’t mean they’re leaders. Leadership and aptitude, leadership and achievement, leadership and even ex­cellence have to be different things, otherwise the concept of leadership has no meaning. And it seemed to me that that had to be especially true of the kind of excellence I saw in the students around me.

See, things have changed since I went to college in the ’80s. Everything has gotten much more intense. You have to do much more now to get into a top school like Yale or West Point, and you have to start a lot earlier. We didn’t begin thinking about college until we were juniors, and maybe we each did a couple of extracurriculars. But I know what it’s like for you guys now. It’s an endless series of hoops that you have to jump through, starting from way back, maybe as early as junior high school. Classes, standardized tests, extracurriculars in school, extracurriculars outside of school. Test prep courses, admissions coaches, private tutors. I sat on the Yale College admissions committee a couple of years ago. The first thing the admissions officer would do when presenting a case to the rest of the committee was read what they call the “brag” in admissions lingo, the list of the student’s extracurriculars. Well, it turned out that a student who had six or seven extracurriculars was already in trouble. Because the students who got in—in addition to perfect grades and top scores—usually had 10 or 12.

[adblock-left-01]

So what I saw around me were great kids who had been trained to be world-class hoop jumpers. Any goal you set them, they could achieve. Any test you gave them, they could pass with flying colors. They were, as one of them put it herself, “excellent sheep.” I had no doubt that they would continue to jump through hoops and ace tests and go on to Harvard Business School, or Michigan Law School, or Johns Hopkins Medical School, or Goldman Sachs, or McKinsey consulting, or whatever. And this approach would indeed take them far in life. They would come back for their 25th reunion as a partner at White & Case, or an attending physician at Mass General, or an assistant secretary in the Department of State.

That is exactly what places like Yale mean when they talk about training leaders. Educating people who make a big name for themselves in the world, people with impressive titles, people the university can brag about. People who make it to the top. People who can climb the greasy pole of whatever hierarchy they decide to attach themselves to.

But I think there’s something desperately wrong, and even dangerous, about that idea. To explain why, I want to spend a few minutes talking about a novel that many of you may have read, Heart of Darkness . If you haven’t read it, you’ve probably seen Apocalypse Now , which is based on it. Marlow in the novel becomes Captain Willard, played by Martin Sheen. Kurtz in the novel becomes Colonel Kurtz, played by Marlon Brando. But the novel isn’t about Vietnam; it’s about colonialism in the Belgian Congo three generations before Vietnam. Marlow, not a military officer but a merchant marine, a civilian ship’s captain, is sent by the company that’s running the country under charter from the Belgian crown to sail deep upriver, up the Congo River, to retrieve a manager who’s ensconced himself in the jungle and gone rogue, just like Colonel Kurtz does in the movie.

Now everyone knows that the novel is about imperialism and colonialism and race relations and the darkness that lies in the human heart, but it became clear to me at a certain point, as I taught the novel, that it is also about bureaucracy—what I called, a minute ago, hierarchy. The Company, after all, is just that: a company, with rules and procedures and ranks and people in power and people scrambling for power, just like any other bureaucracy. Just like a big law firm or a governmental department or, for that matter, a university. Just like—and here’s why I’m telling you all this—just like the bureaucracy you are about to join. The word bureaucracy tends to have negative connotations, but I say this in no way as a criticism, merely a description, that the U.S. Army is a bureaucracy and one of the largest and most famously bureaucratic bureaucracies in the world. After all, it was the Army that gave us, among other things, the indispensable bureaucratic acronym “snafu”: “situation normal: all fucked up”—or “all fouled up” in the cleaned-up version. That comes from the U.S. Army in World War II.

You need to know that when you get your commission, you’ll be joining a bureaucracy, and however long you stay in the Army, you’ll be operating within a bureaucracy. As different as the armed forces are in so many ways from every other institution in society, in that respect they are the same. And so you need to know how bureaucracies operate, what kind of behavior—what kind of character—they reward, and what kind they punish.

So, back to the novel. Marlow proceeds upriver by stages, just like Captain Willard does in the movie. First he gets to the Outer Station. Kurtz is at the Inner Station. In between is the Central Station, where Marlow spends the most time, and where we get our best look at bureaucracy in action and the kind of people who succeed in it. This is Marlow’s description of the manager of the Central Station, the big boss:

He was commonplace in complexion, in features, in manners, and in voice. He was of middle size and of ordinary build. His eyes, of the usual blue, were perhaps remarkably cold. . . . Otherwise there was only an indefinable, faint expression of his lips, something stealthy—a smile—not a smile—I remember it, but I can’t explain. . . . He was a common trader, from his youth up employed in these parts—nothing more. He was obeyed, yet he inspired neither love nor fear, nor even respect. He inspired uneasiness. That was it! Uneasiness. Not a definite mistrust—just uneasiness—nothing more. You have no idea how effective such a . . . a . . . faculty can be. He had no genius for organizing, for initiative, or for order even. . . . He had no learning, and no intelligence. His position had come to him—why? . . . He originated nothing, he could keep the routine going—that’s all. But he was great. He was great by this little thing that it was impossible to tell what could control such a man. He never gave that secret away. Perhaps there was nothing within him. Such a suspicion made one pause.

Note the adjectives: commonplace , ordinary , usual , common . There is nothing distinguished about this person. About the 10th time I read that passage, I realized it was a perfect description of the kind of person who tends to prosper in the bureaucratic environment. And the only reason I did is because it suddenly struck me that it was a perfect description of the head of the bureaucracy that I was part of, the chairman of my academic department—who had that exact same smile, like a shark, and that exact same ability to make you uneasy, like you were doing something wrong, only she wasn’t ever going to tell you what. Like the manager—and I’m sorry to say this, but like so many people you will meet as you negotiate the bureaucracy of the Army or for that matter of whatever institution you end up giving your talents to after the Army, whether it’s Microsoft or the World Bank or whatever—the head of my department had no genius for organizing or initiative or even order, no particular learning or intelligence, no distinguishing characteristics at all. Just the ability to keep the routine going, and beyond that, as Marlow says, her position had come to her—why?

That’s really the great mystery about bureaucracies. Why is it so often that the best people are stuck in the middle and the people who are running things—the leaders—are the mediocrities? Because excellence isn’t usually what gets you up the greasy pole. What gets you up is a talent for maneuvering. Kissing up to the people above you, kicking down to the people below you. Pleasing your teachers, pleasing your superiors, picking a powerful mentor and riding his coattails until it’s time to stab him in the back. Jumping through hoops. Getting along by going along. Being whatever other people want you to be, so that it finally comes to seem that, like the manager of the Central Station, you have nothing inside you at all. Not taking stupid risks like trying to change how things are done or question why they’re done. Just keeping the routine going.

I tell you this to forewarn you, because I promise you that you will meet these people and you will find yourself in environments where what is rewarded above all is conformity. I tell you so you can decide to be a different kind of leader. And I tell you for one other reason. As I thought about these things and put all these pieces together—the kind of students I had, the kind of leadership they were being trained for, the kind of leaders I saw in my own institution—I realized that this is a national problem. We have a crisis of leadership in this country, in every institution. Not just in government. Look at what happened to American corporations in recent decades, as all the old dinosaurs like General Motors or TWA or U.S. Steel fell apart. Look at what happened to Wall Street in just the last couple of years.

Finally—and I know I’m on sensitive ground here—look at what happened during the first four years of the Iraq War. We were stuck. It wasn’t the fault of the enlisted ranks or the noncoms or the junior officers. It was the fault of the senior leadership, whether military or civilian or both. We weren’t just not winning, we weren’t even changing direction.

We have a crisis of leadership in America because our overwhelming power and wealth, earned under earlier generations of leaders, made us complacent, and for too long we have been training leaders who only know how to keep the routine going. Who can answer questions, but don’t know how to ask them. Who can fulfill goals, but don’t know how to set them. Who think about how to get things done, but not whether they’re worth doing in the first place. What we have now are the greatest technocrats the world has ever seen, people who have been trained to be incredibly good at one specific thing, but who have no interest in anything beyond their area of exper­tise. What we don’t have are leaders.

What we don’t have, in other words, are thinkers . People who can think for themselves. People who can formulate a new direction: for the country, for a corporation or a college, for the Army—a new way of doing things, a new way of looking at things. People, in other words, with vision .

Now some people would say, great. Tell this to the kids at Yale, but why bother telling it to the ones at West Point? Most people, when they think of this institution, assume that it’s the last place anyone would want to talk about thinking creatively or cultivating independence of mind. It’s the Army, after all. It’s no accident that the word regiment is the root of the word regimentation . Surely you who have come here must be the ultimate conformists. Must be people who have bought in to the way things are and have no interest in changing it. Are not the kind of young people who think about the world, who ponder the big issues, who question authority. If you were, you would have gone to Amherst or Pomona. You’re at West Point to be told what to do and how to think.

But you know that’s not true. I know it, too; otherwise I would never have been invited to talk to you, and I’m even more convinced of it now that I’ve spent a few days on campus. To quote Colonel Scott Krawczyk, your course director, in a lecture he gave last year to English 102:

From the very earliest days of this country, the model for our officers, which was built on the model of the citizenry and reflective of democratic ideals, was to be different. They were to be possessed of a democratic spirit marked by independent judgment, the freedom to measure action and to express disagreement, and the crucial responsibility never to tolerate tyranny.

All the more so now. Anyone who’s been paying attention for the last few years understands that the changing nature of warfare means that officers, including junior officers, are required more than ever to be able to think independently, creatively, flexibly. To deploy a whole range of skills in a fluid and complex situation. Lieutenant colonels who are essentially functioning as provincial governors in Iraq, or captains who find themselves in charge of a remote town somewhere in Afghanistan. People who know how to do more than follow orders and execute routines.

Look at the most successful, most acclaimed, and perhaps the finest soldier of his generation, General David Petraeus. He’s one of those rare people who rises through a bureaucracy for the right reasons. He is a thinker. He is an intellectual. In fact, Prospect magazine named him Public Intellectual of the Year in 2008—that’s in the world . He has a Ph.D. from Princeton, but what makes him a thinker is not that he has a Ph.D. or that he went to Princeton or even that he taught at West Point. I can assure you from personal experience that there are a lot of highly educated people who don’t know how to think at all.

No, what makes him a thinker—and a leader—is precisely that he is able to think things through for himself. And because he can, he has the confidence, the courage , to argue for his ideas even when they aren’t popular. Even when they don’t please his superiors. Courage: there is physical courage, which you all possess in abundance, and then there is another kind of courage, moral courage, the courage to stand up for what you believe.

It wasn’t always easy for him. His path to where he is now was not a straight one. When he was running Mosul in 2003 as commander of the 101st Airborne and developing the strategy he would later formulate in the Counterinsurgency Field Manual and then ultimately apply throughout Iraq, he pissed a lot of people off. He was way ahead of the leadership in Baghdad and Washington, and bureaucracies don’t like that sort of thing. Here he was, just another two-star, and he was saying, implicitly but loudly, that the leadership was wrong about the way it was running the war. Indeed, he was not rewarded at first. He was put in charge of training the Iraqi army, which was considered a blow to his career, a dead-end job. But he stuck to his guns, and ultimately he was vindicated. Ironically, one of the central elements of his counterinsurgency strategy is precisely the idea that officers need to think flexibly, creatively, and independently.

That’s the first half of the lecture: the idea that true leadership means being able to think for yourself and act on your convictions. But how do you learn to do that? How do you learn to think? Let’s start with how you don’t learn to think. A study by a team of researchers at Stanford came out a couple of months ago. The investigators wanted to figure out how today’s college students were able to multitask so much more effectively than adults. How do they manage to do it, the researchers asked? The answer, they discovered—and this is by no means what they expected—is that they don’t. The enhanced cognitive abilities the investigators expected to find, the mental faculties that enable people to multitask effectively, were simply not there. In other words, people do not multitask effectively. And here’s the really surprising finding: the more people multitask, the worse they are, not just at other mental abilities, but at multitasking itself.

One thing that made the study different from others is that the researchers didn’t test people’s cognitive functions while they were multitasking. They separated the subject group into high multitaskers and low multitaskers and used a different set of tests to measure the kinds of cognitive abilities involved in multitasking. They found that in every case the high multitaskers scored worse. They were worse at distinguishing between relevant and irrelevant information and ignoring the latter. In other words, they were more distractible. They were worse at what you might call “mental filing”: keeping information in the right conceptual boxes and being able to retrieve it quickly. In other words, their minds were more disorganized. And they were even worse at the very thing that defines multitasking itself: switching between tasks.

Multitasking, in short, is not only not thinking, it impairs your ability to think. Thinking means concentrating on one thing long enough to develop an idea about it. Not learning other people’s ideas, or memorizing a body of information, however much those may sometimes be useful. Developing your own ideas. In short, thinking for yourself. You simply cannot do that in bursts of 20 seconds at a time, constantly interrupted by Facebook messages or Twitter tweets, or fiddling with your iPod, or watching something on YouTube.

[adblock-right-01]

I find for myself that my first thought is never my best thought. My first thought is always someone else’s; it’s always what I’ve already heard about the subject, always the conventional wisdom. It’s only by concentrating, sticking to the question, being patient, letting all the parts of my mind come into play, that I arrive at an original idea. By giving my brain a chance to make associations, draw connections, take me by surprise. And often even that idea doesn’t turn out to be very good. I need time to think about it, too, to make mistakes and recognize them, to make false starts and correct them, to outlast my impulses, to defeat my desire to declare the job done and move on to the next thing.

I used to have students who bragged to me about how fast they wrote their papers. I would tell them that the great German novelist Thomas Mann said that a writer is someone for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people. The best writers write much more slowly than everyone else, and the better they are, the slower they write. James Joyce wrote Ulysses , the greatest novel of the 20th century, at the rate of about a hundred words a day—half the length of the selection I read you earlier from Heart of Darkness —for seven years. T. S. Eliot, one of the greatest poets our country has ever produced, wrote about 150 pages of poetry over the course of his entire 25-year career. That’s half a page a month. So it is with any other form of thought. You do your best thinking by slowing down and concentrating.

Now that’s the third time I’ve used that word, concentrating . Concentrating, focusing. You can just as easily consider this lecture to be about concentration as about solitude. Think about what the word means. It means gathering yourself together into a single point rather than letting yourself be dispersed everywhere into a cloud of electronic and social input. It seems to me that Facebook and Twitter and YouTube—and just so you don’t think this is a generational thing, TV and radio and magazines and even newspapers, too—are all ultimately just an elaborate excuse to run away from yourself. To avoid the difficult and troubling questions that being human throws in your way. Am I doing the right thing with my life? Do I believe the things I was taught as a child? What do the words I live by—words like duty , honor , and country —really mean? Am I happy?

You and the members of the other service academies are in a unique position among college students, especially today. Not only do you know that you’re going to have a job when you graduate, you even know who your employer is going to be. But what happens after you fulfill your commitment to the Army? Unless you know who you are, how will you figure out what you want to do with the rest of your life? Unless you’re able to listen to yourself, to that quiet voice inside that tells you what you really care about, what you really believe in—indeed, how those things might be evolving under the pressure of your experiences. Students everywhere else agonize over these questions, and while you may not be doing so now, you are only postponing them for a few years.

Maybe some of you are agonizing over them now. Not everyone who starts here decides to finish here. It’s no wonder and no cause for shame. You are being put through the most demanding training anyone can ask of people your age, and you are committing yourself to work of awesome responsibility and mortal danger. The very rigor and regimentation to which you are quite properly subject here naturally has a tendency to make you lose touch with the passion that brought you here in the first place. I saw exactly the same kind of thing at Yale. It’s not that my students were robots. Quite the reverse. They were in­tensely idealistic, but the overwhelming weight of their practical responsibilities, all of those hoops they had to jump through, often made them lose sight of what those ideals were. Why they were doing it all in the first place.

So it’s perfectly natural to have doubts, or questions, or even just difficulties. The question is, what do you do with them? Do you suppress them, do you distract yourself from them, do you pretend they don’t exist? Or do you confront them directly, honestly, courageously? If you decide to do so, you will find that the answers to these dilemmas are not to be found on Twitter or Comedy Central or even in The New York Times . They can only be found within—without distractions, without peer pressure, in solitude.

But let me be clear that solitude doesn’t always have to mean introspection. Let’s go back to Heart of Darkness . It’s the solitude of concentration that saves Marlow amidst the madness of the Central Station. When he gets there he finds out that the steamboat he’s supposed to sail upriver has a giant hole in it, and no one is going to help him fix it. “I let him run on,” he says, “this papier-mâché Mephistopheles”—he’s talking not about the manager but his assistant, who’s even worse, since he’s still trying to kiss his way up the hierarchy, and who’s been raving away at him. You can think of him as the Internet, the ever-present social buzz, chattering away at you 24/7:

I let him run on, this papier-mâché Mephistopheles and it seemed to me that if I tried I could poke my forefinger through him, and would find nothing inside but a little loose dirt. . . . It was a great comfort to turn from that chap to . . . the battered, twisted, ruined, tin-pot steamboat. . . . I had expended enough hard work on her to make me love her. No influential friend would have served me better. She had given me a chance to come out a bit—to find out what I could do. No, I don’t like work. I had rather laze about and think of all the fine things that can be done. I don’t like work—no man does—but I like what is in the work,—the chance to find yourself. Your own reality—for yourself, not for others—what no other man can ever know.

“The chance to find yourself.” Now that phrase, “finding yourself,” has acquired a bad reputation. It suggests an aimless liberal-arts college graduate—an English major, no doubt, someone who went to a place like Amherst or Pomona—who’s too spoiled to get a job and spends his time staring off into space. But here’s Marlow, a mariner, a ship’s captain. A more practical, hardheaded person you could not find. And I should say that Marlow’s creator, Conrad, spent 19 years as a merchant marine, eight of them as a ship’s captain, before he became a writer, so this wasn’t just some artist’s idea of a sailor. Marlow believes in the need to find yourself just as much as anyone does, and the way to do it, he says, is work, solitary work. Concentration. Climbing on that steamboat and spending a few uninterrupted hours hammering it into shape. Or building a house, or cooking a meal, or even writing a college paper, if you really put yourself into it.

“Your own reality—for yourself, not for others.” Thinking for yourself means finding yourself, finding your own reality. Here’s the other problem with Facebook and Twitter and even The New York Times . When you expose yourself to those things, especially in the constant way that people do now—older people as well as younger people—you are continuously bombarding yourself with a stream of other people’s thoughts. You are marinating yourself in the conventional wisdom. In other people’s reality: for others, not for yourself. You are creating a cacophony in which it is impossible to hear your own voice, whether it’s yourself you’re thinking about or anything else. That’s what Emerson meant when he said that “he who should inspire and lead his race must be defended from travelling with the souls of other men, from living, breathing, reading, and writing in the daily, time-worn yoke of their opinions.” Notice that he uses the word lead . Leadership means finding a new direction, not simply putting yourself at the front of the herd that’s heading toward the cliff.

So why is reading books any better than reading tweets or wall posts? Well, sometimes it isn’t. Sometimes, you need to put down your book, if only to think about what you’re reading, what you think about what you’re reading. But a book has two advantages over a tweet. First, the person who wrote it thought about it a lot more carefully. The book is the result of his solitude, his attempt to think for himself.

Second, most books are old. This is not a disadvantage: this is precisely what makes them valuable. They stand against the conventional wisdom of today simply because they’re not from today. Even if they merely reflect the conventional wisdom of their own day, they say something different from what you hear all the time. But the great books, the ones you find on a syllabus, the ones people have continued to read, don’t reflect the conventional wisdom of their day. They say things that have the permanent power to disrupt our habits of thought. They were revolutionary in their own time, and they are still revolutionary today. And when I say “revolutionary,” I am deliberately evoking the American Revolution, because it was a result of precisely this kind of independent thinking. Without solitude—the solitude of Adams and Jefferson and Hamilton and Madison and Thomas Paine—there would be no America.

So solitude can mean introspection, it can mean the concentration of focused work, and it can mean sustained reading. All of these help you to know yourself better. But there’s one more thing I’m going to include as a form of solitude, and it will seem counterintuitive: friendship. Of course friendship is the opposite of solitude; it means being with other people. But I’m talking about one kind of friendship in particular, the deep friendship of intimate conversation. Long, uninterrupted talk with one other person. Not Skyping with three people and texting with two others at the same time while you hang out in a friend’s room listening to music and studying. That’s what Emerson meant when he said that “the soul environs itself with friends, that it may enter into a grander self-acquaintance or solitude.”

Introspection means talking to yourself, and one of the best ways of talking to yourself is by talking to another person. One other person you can trust, one other person to whom you can unfold your soul. One other person you feel safe enough with to allow you to acknowledge things—to acknowledge things to yourself—that you otherwise can’t. Doubts you aren’t supposed to have, questions you aren’t supposed to ask. Feelings or opinions that would get you laughed at by the group or reprimanded by the authorities.

This is what we call thinking out loud, discovering what you believe in the course of articulating it. But it takes just as much time and just as much patience as solitude in the strict sense. And our new electronic world has disrupted it just as violently. Instead of having one or two true friends that we can sit and talk to for three hours at a time, we have 968 “friends” that we never actually talk to; instead we just bounce one-line messages off them a hundred times a day. This is not friendship, this is distraction.

I know that none of this is easy for you. Even if you threw away your cell phones and unplugged your computers, the rigors of your training here keep you too busy to make solitude, in any of these forms, anything less than very difficult to find. But the highest reason you need to try is precisely because of what the job you are training for will demand of you.

You’ve probably heard about the hazing scandal at the U.S. naval base in Bahrain that was all over the news recently. Terrible, abusive stuff that involved an entire unit and was orchestrated, allegedly, by the head of the unit, a senior noncommissioned officer. What are you going to do if you’re confronted with a situation like that going on in your unit? Will you have the courage to do what’s right? Will you even know what the right thing is? It’s easy to read a code of conduct, not so easy to put it into practice, especially if you risk losing the loyalty of the people serving under you, or the trust of your peer officers, or the approval of your superiors. What if you’re not the commanding officer, but you see your superiors condoning something you think is wrong?

How will you find the strength and wisdom to challenge an unwise order or question a wrongheaded policy? What will you do the first time you have to write a letter to the mother of a slain soldier? How will you find words of comfort that are more than just empty formulas?

These are truly formidable dilemmas, more so than most other people will ever have to face in their lives, let alone when they’re 23. The time to start preparing yourself for them is now. And the way to do it is by thinking through these issues for yourself—morality, mortality, honor—so you will have the strength to deal with them when they arise. Waiting until you have to confront them in practice would be like waiting for your first firefight to learn how to shoot your weapon. Once the situation is upon you, it’s too late. You have to be prepared in advance. You need to know, already, who you are and what you believe: not what the Army believes, not what your peers believe (that may be exactly the problem), but what you believe.

How can you know that unless you’ve taken counsel with yourself in solitude? I started by noting that solitude and leadership would seem to be contradictory things. But it seems to me that solitude is the very essence of leadership. The position of the leader is ultimately an intensely solitary, even intensely lonely one. However many people you may consult, you are the one who has to make the hard decisions. And at such moments, all you really have is yourself.

William Deresiewicz  is an essayist and critic. His book Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life is based in part on his essays “ The Disadvantages of an Elite Education ” and “ Solitude and Leadership .” To read all the posts from his weekly blog, “All Points,” click here . He is a contributing editor of the magazine.

● NEWSLETTER

Gyan IQ .com

Essay on “a moment of solitude” for students and children, best essay, paragraph, speech for class 7, 8, 9, 10.

A Moment Of Solitude

At a young age, the importance of a moment of solitude might not be felt. In fact, you might resent having to sit with yourself with nothing to do. Too much thinking might make you bored and fidgety. There, however, will come a time when you wait for your moment of solitude as if it were the greatest boon from heaven.

Spending time with yourself with nothing to disturb you brings in a certain peace and this is followed by revelations. For instance, if there is something bothering you, for which you do not have a solution and the advice received is not satisfactory, you can turn to yourself for answers. Just take twenty minutes aside – away from people, TV, mobiles or any other distraction and relax. Do not force yourself to think of the problem; rather do not think of it. Block out negativity. In time, you will begin to understand your inner self. This is not a religious sermon on meditation and its benefits. It is just a relaxation technique which happens to bring in insight. If you take out even ten minutes at the same time and same place for a fortnight, this will grow on you and in time you will wait for this period of introspection. As you become adults and the responsibilities start mounting on you, this moment of solitude will see you through and bring some order into your life.

I lead a happy life despite the different challenges thrown at me and I can claim that I would not be half the pleasant person, I like to believe I am, if it weren’t for that “me time” in solitude.

Related posts:

Related posts.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address: *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Solitude Poem Summary Notes and Line by Line Explanation in English Class 8th

Back to: Kerala Board Class 8th English Guide and Notes

Table of Contents

Introduction

Ella Wheeler Wilcox’s “Solitude” is about the relationship between the individual and the outside world. Wilcox wrote this poem after encountering a grieving woman on her way to Madison, Wisconsin. Despite her efforts, Wilcox was not able to comfort the woman over her loss. Distraught, Wilcox returned to her hotel and after looking at her lonely face in the mirror, began to write this poem.

The context of the poem suggests that what follows is not a parade of moral platitudes but a series of choices. If you laugh, sing, rejoice, or feast, the world will be drawn to you. If you weep, sigh, fast, or grieve, the world will abandon you. The poem is neither an anthem of positive thinking nor a dour account of existential loneliness. It is an invitation to move through the world with practicality and self-reliance.

About the poet

Ella Wheeler Wilcox was an American author and poet. She is well known for her works that are full of social criticism, in her poems she expresses sentiments of cheer and optimism in plainly written, rhyming verse. Her popular works include Poems of Passion (1883) and Solitude (1883).

Solitude means loneliness and it is the hard reality of life that a man has to live alone and die alone. In this poem, the Poetess reveals the real face of the people. This poem is a great satire on us, our thoughts, and our level of thinking. The Poetess points out a social evil. We cannot decline what the Poetess says to us in this poem. We should think deeply about this poem.

In the first stanza, Wilcox tells the reader that if one were to laugh then the world would laugh with you. This statement is meant to appeal on multiple levels in that happiness within oneself creates happiness in others. Then she describes the opposite emotion, sadness displayed through weeping. If one were to Weep, it would happen alone. People do not flock to the side of someone upset, human beings are not attracted to negativity, perhaps for fear it too may be shared.

The earth is described as being sad and old. It does not have a well of happiness to draw from so it must seek mirth somewhere else. This is why it laughs with you. In regards to sadness, the speaker says that the earth has enough sadness without taking in other people’s troubles. This is a very perceptive generalized statement about how many people view the problems of others. No one wants the burden of someone else’s unhappiness if it can be avoided.

The speaker says that one would receive a response from the world or society, and happiness would be multiplied. In contrast, the sound and the emotion dissipate without anyone acknowledging, or certainly repeating it. The first stanza concludes with the two emotions being translated into sounds. The sound of singing will bound like a joyful echo while the sigh will be ignored.

In the next set of eight lines of ‘Solitude,’ the speaker presents another five statements that outline how the world at large reacts to positivity and negativity. The first line says that if you are to spend your days rejoicing then others will seek you out and want to spend time with you. She once again presents a contrast, that if you Grieve then the same men will turn and go.

These people do not want your woe but are happy to take on your pleasure. The speaker gives the reader some advice in the next lines that if you want to have friends, then you need to be glad. If you are not, then you are going to lose them all. In the last two lines of this stanza, the speaker describes how if you are happy and drink nectared wine then you are never going to be short on a friend to drink it with. Continuing the metaphor of drinking, she states that life’s gall must be consumed alone.

In the final stanza of ‘Solitude,’ the speaker presents her final set of comparisons between what a happy life and a sad one is like and the reactions they provoke. She begins by utilizing another comparison to the way meals can bring people together. If one was to hold a Feast then their halls would be crowded. Just as if one Fasted then the whole world would pass by.

These two examples are meant as metaphors for a larger way of being in everyday life. A welcoming community, companionship, and happiness are going to inspire even more of the same. The following lines are different than those which proceeded them. In the last section, she makes larger statements about life and death and the way that humans deal with pain.

She describes how success and a willingness to give will help one live a longer life but there will be no one there when you die. Similarly, the pain has to be faced alone. No one wants to pile onto a train that is headed for that kind of unhappiness. The world would much rather gather in a “hall…of pleasure.”

The Treasure Notes

• QUESTION PAPERS
• SOLVED PAPERS

AHSEC Class 12 Alternative English The Solitude Of Alexander Selkirk Question Answers [H.S 2nd Year Alte. English Poetry Chapter 4 Solution]

The Solitude Of Alexander Selkirk By William Cowper is a beautiful Poetry of AHSEC Class 12 Alternative English (Harmony: An Anthology of Prose and Poetry) Poetry Chapter 4 . Here you will find Brief Summary of the poem and a detailed Question Answer of The Solitude Of Alexander Selkirk with additional And Important Questions for Upcoming 2024 Examination.  

📌  Complete Notes of Alte. English

AHSEC Class 12 Alternative English Module II Poetry

Chapter: 4 -  The Solitude Of Alexander Selkirk

About the poet :

William Cowper (1731-1800) was an English poet who wrote a variety of veress of which some are religious in nature, while his secular poems attest this creative and imaginative vision. In his literary career, Cowper produced a significant body of work that included poetry, prose, and translations. His poetry mostly focused on nature and the beauty of the English countryside; however, he also explored such themes as faith, morality, and the human condition. 'The Task' is one of Cowper's most recognised works. This long poem explores the relationship between man and nature. Besides his literary accomplishments, Couper was also known for his staunch support for the abolition of slavery. Regarded as one of the most important writers of his time his works continue to be celebrated for their beauty, insight and emotional power.

THE SOLITUDE OF ALEXANDER SELKIRK

I am monarch of all I survey,

My right there is none to dispute, From the centre all round to the sea,

I am lord of the fowl and the brute. 

O Solitude! are the charms 

That sages have seen in thy face? 

Better dwell in the midst of alarms Than reign in this horrible place.

I am out of humanity's reach,

I must finish my journey alone,

Never hear the sweet music of speech,- 

I start at the sound of my own. 

The beasts that roam over the plain My form with indifference see; 

They a are so unacquainted with man,

Their tameness is shocking to me. 

Society, Friendship, and Love,

Divinely bestow'd upon man, 

Oh, had I the wings of a dove, 

How soon would I taste you again! My sorrows I then might assuage 

In the ways of religion and truth, Might learn from the wisdom of age, And be cheer'd by the sallies of youth.

Ye winds that have made me your sport, 

Convey to this desolate shore 

Some cordial endearing report 

Oh a land I shall no more! 

My friends do they now and then send

A wish or a thought after me? 

Oh, tell me I yet have a friend, Though a friend I am never to see.

How fleet is a glance of the mind! Compared with the speed of its flight, The tempest itself lags behind,

And the swift-winged arrows of light. When I think of my own native land, In a moment I seem to be there; 

But alas! recollection at hand 

Soon hurries me back to despair.

But the seafowl is gone to her nest, The is laid down in his lair,

Even here is a season of rest, 

And I to my cabin repair.

There's mercy in every place, 

And mercy, encouraging thought! Gives even affliction a grace, 

And reconciles man to his lot.

First published in 1782, William Cowper's poem 'The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk draws inspiration from the real-life experience of Alexander Selkirk, Scottish sailor who was marooned on an uninhabited island in the South afe for over four years in the early 18th century. By the time Selkirk was sued by a passing ship, his story had become famous in England. The poem escribes Selkirk's experiences of isolation, hardship, as well as his eventual scue and retum to civilisation. The story of Alexander Selkirk became an inspiration for many writers of the time. The poem begins by the scene of Selkirk's voluntary abandonment on an uninhabited island. The speaker, in the poem, imagines Selkirk's despair and eventual acceptance of his situation, as he becomes accustomed to the rhythms of nature and the daily routines for The speaker also reflects on the emotional toll that such solitude could have taken on selkirk.

The poem begins with Selkirk's happiness at being the lone master of that island. He was that the island was ignorant of any human existence because even the deadliest beast took no notice of him. Soon this rejoice gives way to desperation. He desperately longs for human company. To make his disappointment tolerable, Selkirk tries to find solace in the natural world around him. befriends the local wildlife, including goats and sea turtles, and pends his days exploring the island and contemplating on his own existence. The poem presents a vivid description of the beauty of the island. Throughout the of his stay in the island, religion provides emotional support to him. The poem ends with the speaker imagining Selkirk looking back on his time on the island with a sense of nostalgia and longing for the simplicity and beauty of his solitary life. 

The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk can be read as a meditation on the human Condition, exploring such themes as isolation, loneliness and the relationship between man and nature. The poem's vivid descriptions of Selkirk's soundings and his emotional journey makes it a powerful reflection on the man experience of solitude. Cowper employs various poetic devices such as imagery, personification alliteration, repetition, metaphor and symbolism in the poem. The poem consists of six stanzas with four lines each and follows a regular rhyme scheme. The use of the ballad form helps reinforce the story-like quality of the poem and contributes to its melancholic and reflective tone.

AHSEC Class 12 Alternative English Poetry Chapter: 5 - The Solitude Of Alexander Selkirk

COMPREHENSION

A. Answer these questions in one or two words.

1. Who was Alexander Selkirk?

Ans:- Alexander Selkirk was a Scottish sailor.

2. What kind of an island was Selkirk marooned on? 

Ans:- Selkirk was marooned on an uninhabited island.

3. Does Selkirk regret his decision of living in solitude? 

Ans:- Yes, Selkirk eventually regrets his decision of living in solitude.

4. For how many years was Selkirk stranded on the island?

Ans:- Selkirk was stranded on the island for over four years.

5. Name one poetic device used in the poem.

Ans:- One poetic device used in the poem is imagery.

B. Answer questions in a few words each.

1. What is the significance of the island in the poem?

Ans:- The island in the poem represents the setting of Alexander Selkirk's isolation and solitude, where he is the sole master and ruler.

2. What is the emotional state of Alexander Selkirk in the poem? 

Ans:- The emotional state of Alexander Selkirk in the poem fluctuates between initial happiness at his solitary rule, desperation for human company, and eventual acceptance and contentment with his situation.

3. What do you understand by the words 'sweet music of speech? 

Ans:- The phrase "sweet music of speech" refers to the joy and comfort derived from human conversation and communication.

4. What elements of nature does the speaker think of using while trying to connect with civilisation?

Ans:- The speaker in the poem thinks of using the elements of nature such as winds and birds to convey messages and receive news from civilization while in isolation on the island.

C. Answer these questions briefly in your own words.

1. What message did Selkirk want to convey to his friends? 

Ans:- Selkirk wanted to convey to his friends that he longed for their thoughts and wishes to be sent after him. He desired a connection to the outside world and craved the reassurance that he still had friends, even though he might never see them again. He hoped that his friends would remember him and send him their kind regards, as it would bring him comfort and solace in his isolated and desolate environment.

2. How does Selkirk reflect upon the flight of the mind?

Ans:- Selkirk reflects upon the flight of the mind with a sense of awe and wonder. He compares the speed of thought to be much swifter than any physical entity, even surpassing the speed of a tempest or the swift-winged arrows of light. Selkirk recognizes the power of the mind to transcend time and space, as he can instantly transport himself back to his native land in his thoughts. However, he also acknowledges the bittersweet nature of recollection, as it quickly brings him back to the reality of his despairing situation.

3. What is Selkirk's view about solitude? 

Ans:- Selkirk's view about solitude evolves throughout the poem. Initially, he revels in the solitude, feeling like a monarch with no disputes over his rights. However, as time passes, he begins to feel the overwhelming weight of isolation and longs for the company of other human beings. He finds the absence of human interaction to be distressing and starts to value the importance of society, friendship, and love. Selkirk realizes that solitude, when prolonged, can become unbearable and that human connection is essential for one's well-being and happiness.

4. How is mercy seen by Selkirk?

Ans:- Selkirk sees mercy as a comforting and uplifting force that can bring grace even in the face of affliction. He believes that mercy has the power to reconcile a person with their circumstances and bring solace to their suffering. Selkirk finds solace in the thought that mercy exists everywhere, even in the desolate place he finds himself in. He sees mercy as an encouraging and hopeful concept that gives meaning to his hardships. It is through the lens of mercy that Selkirk finds a glimmer of hope and resilience, allowing him to accept his situation and find a measure of peace within his solitude.

D. Answer these questions in detail. 

1. Discuss the significance of the title 'The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk' in relation to the poem's themes and content. 

Ans:- The significance of the title "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" lies in its connection to the themes and content of the poem. The word "solitude" refers to a state of being alone or isolated, and it directly reflects the experience of Alexander Selkirk, who was marooned on a remote island for an extended period. The title sets the tone for the entire poem, suggesting that it will delve into the emotions, thoughts, and challenges associated with solitude.

The poem explores the various dimensions of solitude, highlighting its impact on Selkirk's psyche and his relationship with the natural world. It reflects on the initial sense of power and dominion that Selkirk feels as the sole ruler of his surroundings, but also the subsequent despair and longing for human companionship. The title encapsulates Selkirk's experience of isolation and emphasizes the central theme of the poem: the profound effects of solitude on an individual's emotional and psychological state.

2. How does the poem the theme of isolation and loneliness? Give examples from the poem to support your answer.

Ans:- The theme of isolation and loneliness is a central focus in the poem, "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk." The poem vividly portrays Selkirk's feelings of isolation and his longing for human connection. Here are a few examples from the poem that highlight this theme:

- In the first stanza, Selkirk expresses his dominion over the island, claiming to be the "monarch of all I survey." While this initially seems empowering, it quickly reveals his isolated state, as there is no one to challenge his authority.

- Selkirk's yearning for companionship becomes evident in the second stanza. He questions the sages who have praised solitude, stating that he would rather face the alarms and dangers of society than remain in his desolate place.

- Selkirk's isolation from humanity is emphasized in the third stanza. He remarks that he is out of reach of any human contact and starts at the sound of his own voice, highlighting the absence of communication and interaction with others.

- The fourth stanza describes Selkirk's encounter with the animals on the island. While they are indifferent to his presence, their "tameness" shocks him because they are so unacquainted with human beings. This reinforces his sense of loneliness and estrangement from his fellow humans.

- The fifth stanza expresses Selkirk's yearning for society, friendship, and love. He longs for the wings of a dove to reunite with those human connections and find solace in the wisdom of age and the energy of youth.

- The final stanza portrays Selkirk's bittersweet contemplation of his situation. He acknowledges that even in his isolation, there is mercy and grace, but he still longs for the friends he left behind, even if he may never see them again.

Additional Question Answer

Very short type Question Answer

1. Who wrote the poem "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk"?

Ans:- William Cowper.

2. What inspired the poem "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk"?

Ans:- The real-life experience of Alexander Selkirk, a Scottish sailor marooned on an uninhabited island.

3. What themes does the poem explore?

Ans:- The themes of isolation, loneliness, and the relationship between man and nature.

4. How does Selkirk cope with his solitude?

Ans:- Selkirk finds solace in the natural world around him, befriends local wildlife, and relies on his faith.

5. What emotions does Selkirk experience during his time on the island?

Ans:- Selkirk goes through a range of emotions, including happiness, despair, nostalgia, and longing.

6. What role does religion play in Selkirk's life on the island?

Ans:- Religion provides emotional support to Selkirk and helps him find meaning and solace in his circumstances.

7. How does the poem end?

Ans:- The poem ends with Selkirk looking back on his time on the island with nostalgia and longing for the simplicity and beauty of his solitary life.

8. What is the rhyme scheme of the poem?

Ans:- The poem follows a regular rhyme scheme, typically using four-line stanzas.

9. What is the overall tone of the poem?

Ans:- The poem has a melancholic and reflective tone.

10. What literary devices are used in the poem?

Ans:- The poem utilizes various literary devices such as imagery, personification, alliteration, repetition, metaphor, and symbolism.

11. When was "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" first published?

Ans:- The poem was first published in 1782.

12. How does Selkirk describe his relationship with the animals on the island?

Ans:- Selkirk describes the animals' indifference towards him, as they are unacquainted with humans and their tameness is shocking to him.

13. What is the significance of the title "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk"?

Ans:- The title highlights the central theme of solitude experienced by Alexander Selkirk during his time on the uninhabited island.

14. What impact did Selkirk's story have on writers of the time?

Ans:- Selkirk's story became an inspiration for many writers, including William Cowper, who wrote this poem based on Selkirk's experiences.

15. How does Selkirk imagine his return to civilization?

Ans:- Selkirk longs for the comforts of society, friendship, and love. He envisions a hypothetical return to his homeland with the wings of a dove.

16. What is the role of mercy in Selkirk's perspective?

Ans:- Selkirk believes that mercy, even in the midst of affliction, can give grace and reconcile a person to their circumstances.

17. What effect does recollection have on Selkirk?

Ans:- Recollection brings both moments of joy, as he momentarily imagines being back in his native land, but also despair as it reminds him of his current reality.

18. How does the poem portray the speed of thought compared to natural phenomena?

Ans:- The poem suggests that the speed of thought, represented as a glance of the mind, surpasses even the swift and powerful forces of nature.

19. How does the poem use the cabin as a symbol?

Ans:- The cabin represents a place of refuge and rest amidst the solitude and challenges faced by Selkirk on the island.

20. How does the poem's ballad form contribute to its overall tone and style?

Ans:- The ballad form adds a storytelling quality to the poem and enhances its melancholic and reflective tone.

Short Question Answer

1. What is the theme of "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk"?

Ans:- The theme of the poem revolves around isolation, loneliness, and the relationship between man and nature.

2. How does Alexander Selkirk find solace in the natural world?

Ans:- Alexander Selkirk finds solace in the natural world by befriending the local wildlife, exploring the island, and contemplating his own existence.

3. What role does religion play in the poem?

Ans:- Religion provides emotional support to Alexander Selkirk throughout his stay on the island, helping him cope with his solitude and find meaning in his experiences.

4. How does the poem use poetic devices to enhance its meaning?

Ans:- The poem employs various poetic devices such as imagery, personification, alliteration, repetition, metaphor, and symbolism to evoke emotions and create a vivid portrayal of Alexander Selkirk's isolation and inner journey.

5. What is the structure of the poem?

Ans:- The poem consists of six stanzas, each with four lines, and follows a regular rhyme scheme. The use of the ballad form contributes to the melancholic and reflective tone of the poem.

6. What impact did Alexander Selkirk's story have on English literature?

Ans:-   Alexander Selkirk's story of isolation and eventual rescue became a popular inspiration for writers of the time, including William Cowper. It showcased the human experience of solitude and influenced literary works exploring similar themes.

7. How does the poem reflect on the human condition?

Ans:- The poem reflects on the human condition by exploring the feelings of isolation, loneliness, and longing for connection that Alexander Selkirk experiences. It delves into the fundamental aspects of human nature and the search for meaning in solitude.

8. What is the significance of Alexander Selkirk's longing for simplicity and beauty?

Ans:- Alexander Selkirk's longing for the simplicity and beauty of his solitary life on the island highlights the desire for a more genuine and uncluttered existence, contrasting with the complexities and pressures of civilized society.

9. How does the poem use imagery to depict the island and Selkirk's experiences?

Ans:- The poem employs vivid imagery to describe the island's natural beauty, the wildlife, and Selkirk's emotional journey. It helps the reader visualize the setting and empathize with Selkirk's solitude.

10. How does "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" connect with William Cowper's overall body of work?

Ans:- The poem aligns with Cowper's exploration of nature, faith, and the human condition found in his other works. It showcases his ability to capture emotions and create powerful reflections through his poetry.

11. How does "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" reflect the Romantic era of literature?

Ans:- The poem reflects the Romantic era through its emphasis on the individual's emotional and imaginative experiences, the sublime beauty of nature, and the exploration of solitude and introspection.

12. What is the significance of the title "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk"?

Ans:- The title highlights the central theme of solitude and emphasizes Alexander Selkirk's isolated existence on the uninhabited island, setting the tone for the poem's exploration of his emotional and psychological journey.

13. How does the poem address the concept of freedom?

Ans:- The poem explores the idea of freedom through Alexander Selkirk's initial enjoyment of being the sole ruler of the island, yet it also portrays the limitations and longing for human connection that accompany his isolation.

14. What is the role of memory and nostalgia in the poem?

Ans:-   Memory and nostalgia play a significant role in the poem as Alexander Selkirk reminisces about his past and yearns for the familiarity and comfort of his native land, even while grappling with the hardships of his current situation.

15. How does "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" connect with William Cowper's advocacy for the abolition of slavery?

Ans:-   While the poem does not directly address the issue of slavery, Cowper's support for the abolitionist cause can be seen in his portrayal of Alexander Selkirk's longing for freedom and human companionship, reflecting the value Cowper placed on individual liberty and equality.

Long Question Answer

1. How does Selkirk find solace in the natural world around him?

Ans:-   Selkirk finds solace in the natural world by befriending the local wildlife, such as goats and sea turtles. He spends his days exploring the island and immersing himself in the beauty of nature. The serene and untouched environment provides him with a sense of tranquility and helps alleviate his feelings of loneliness and isolation.

2. What role does religion play in Selkirk's life on the island?

Ans:-   Religion plays a significant role in Selkirk's life on the island. It provides him with emotional support and a source of strength during his solitude. Selkirk turns to religious practices and contemplation to find solace, seek guidance, and make sense of his circumstances. The ways of religion and truth offer him a path to assuage his sorrows and find comfort amidst the challenges he faces.

3. How does the poem explore the themes of isolation and loneliness?

Ans:-   The poem explores the themes of isolation and loneliness through Selkirk's experiences on the uninhabited island. Initially, Selkirk embraces his solitude, but as time passes, he starts feeling the effects of isolation. The absence of human contact and conversation takes a toll on him, and he yearns for companionship. The poem delves into the emotional and psychological impact of prolonged isolation, highlighting the innate human need for connection and the challenges faced when that need goes unfulfilled.

4. What effect does the ballad form of the poem have on its tone and overall impact?

Ans:-   The ballad form of the poem contributes to its melancholic and reflective tone. The regular rhyme scheme and four-line stanzas create a rhythmic and musical quality, enhancing the poem's storytelling nature. This form lends itself well to the exploration of Selkirk's emotional journey and adds to the sense of nostalgia and longing present in the poem. The ballad form allows for a cohesive structure that guides the reader through Selkirk's experiences, emphasizing the emotional and psychological aspects of his solitude.

5. How does Selkirk's perspective on his solitude change over time?

Ans:-   Selkirk's perspective on his solitude evolves throughout the poem. Initially, he embraces the solitude and feels a sense of power and ownership over the uninhabited island. However, as time passes, he begins to feel the weight of loneliness and yearns for human companionship. His view shifts from seeing solitude as a source of freedom to recognizing its isolating and challenging nature.

6. How does Selkirk use his surroundings to cope with his isolation?

 Ans:-  Selkirk uses his surroundings to cope with his isolation by immersing himself in nature. He forms connections with the local wildlife and finds solace in the beauty of the island. Exploring the natural world and observing its rhythms become a source of comfort and distraction for Selkirk, helping him endure the hardships of his solitary existence.

7. How does the poem explore the theme of resilience?

Ans:-   The poem explores the theme of resilience through Selkirk's ability to adapt and find strength in the face of adversity. Despite the challenges of isolation, he learns to accept his circumstances and seeks solace in religion and nature. Selkirk's resilience is seen in his ability to endure and survive, as well as in his capacity to reflect on his experiences and find moments of peace and grace amidst his hardships.

8. How does the poem portray the emotional impact of human connection and companionship?

Ans:-   The poem portrays the emotional impact of human connection and companionship through Selkirk's longing for social interaction. It highlights the deep emotional need for friendship, society, and love. Selkirk's isolation intensifies his appreciation for these relationships, and he yearns for the comfort and support they provide. The absence of human contact accentuates the emotional toll it takes on Selkirk, emphasizing the significance of companionship in the human experience.

9. How does Selkirk's experience reflect the broader human condition?

Ans:-   Selkirk's experience reflects the broader human condition by exploring themes of isolation, longing, and the search for meaning. His journey on the uninhabited island becomes a metaphor for the universal human experience of loneliness and the innate desire for connection. Selkirk's emotional struggles and eventual acceptance of his circumstances resonate with the complexities of human existence, highlighting the universal need for relationships, purpose, and understanding.

Very Long Question Answer

1. How does religion play a role in Selkirk's experience of solitude in the poem?

Ans:- Religion serves as an emotional support for Selkirk throughout his time on the island. In the poem, Selkirk finds solace in the ways of religion and truth. He mentions that in the absence of human companionship, he could assuage his sorrows and find comfort through religious and spiritual practices. Religion provides him with a sense of purpose, guidance, and connection to something beyond his immediate surroundings. It becomes an anchor for him in his solitary existence, offering him hope, solace, and a means to make sense of his situation.

2. Discuss the impact of nature and the natural world on Selkirk's state of mind.

Ans:- Nature plays a significant role in Selkirk's experience of solitude. As he spends his days on the island, Selkirk immerses himself in the rhythms of the natural world, observing and befriending the local wildlife. The poem portrays his connection with nature as a source of solace and comfort. He finds beauty and peace in the landscape, describing the charm of the island and its inhabitants. Nature becomes a companion to Selkirk, offering him a sense of belonging and familiarity in an otherwise lonely environment. It becomes a backdrop against which he contemplates his own existence and finds moments of respite from his isolation.

3. How does the structure and form of the poem contribute to its overall impact?

Ans:- "The Solitude of Alexander Selkirk" follows a regular rhyme scheme and consists of six stanzas, each comprising four lines. The use of the ballad form, common in narrative poetry, enhances the storytelling quality of the poem and contributes to its melancholic and reflective tone. The structured and rhythmic nature of the poem mirrors the routine and monotony of Selkirk's life on the island, reinforcing the themes of solitude and isolation. Additionally, the poem's concise yet evocative lines allow for a focused exploration of Selkirk's emotions and experiences, capturing the essence of his solitary existence.

4. Discuss the significance of the speaker's reflections on the fleeting nature of human thoughts and the power of recollection.

Ans:- Throughout the poem, the speaker reflects on the transitory nature of human thoughts and the potency of recollection. The speaker acknowledges that Selkirk's thoughts of his own native land and human society are fleeting, but in those moments, he feels a strong sense of connection and longing. This reflection emphasizes the profound impact of memory and the imagination in sustaining Selkirk's spirit during his isolation. It highlights the human capacity to find solace and escape in the realm of thought, even in the absence of physical companionship. The speaker's contemplation of recollection also adds to the poem's overall melancholic tone, underscoring the bittersweet nature of Selkirk's reflections on his past life.

5. How does the poem explore the theme of resilience in the face of solitude and hardship?

Ans:- The poem delves into the theme of resilience by depicting Alexander Selkirk's ability to adapt and find strength despite the challenges of his solitary existence. Selkirk initially experiences despair and longing for human companionship, but as time passes, he gradually becomes accustomed to his surroundings. He forms a connection with the natural world, befriends the local wildlife, and establishes a routine. Selkirk's resilience is evident in his ability to find solace in religion, nature, and his own thoughts. The poem suggests that even in the most isolated and difficult circumstances, individuals have the capacity to endure and find inner strength.

6. How does the poem use imagery to evoke the emotions and experiences of Alexander Selkirk?

Ans:- The poem employs vivid imagery to evoke the emotions and experiences of Alexander Selkirk. For example, it describes Selkirk as the "monarch of all I survey," emphasizing his initial sense of power and control. The image of him starting at the sound of his own voice emphasizes his profound isolation. Additionally, the poem paints a picture of the island's beauty and tranquility through descriptions of the natural world, such as the seafowl returning to their nests and the season of rest. These images serve to convey the emotional landscape of Selkirk's solitude, evoking a range of feelings from despair and longing to moments of peace and appreciation for the natural surroundings.

7. How does the theme of longing and nostalgia manifest in the poem?

Ans:- The theme of longing and nostalgia is prevalent throughout the poem. Selkirk experiences a deep longing for human company, expressing his desire for society, friendship, and love. He yearns for the wings of a dove to be reunited with those connections he left behind. The poem also depicts Selkirk's nostalgic reflections on his time on the island after his rescue. He looks back on the simplicity, beauty, and moments of respite he experienced, despite the challenges of his solitude. The theme of longing and nostalgia underscores the longing for human connection and the yearning for the familiarity and comfort of the past.

8. How does the poem explore the concept of freedom within the context of solitude?

Ans:- The poem explores the concept of freedom within the context of solitude by presenting a complex perspective on Selkirk's experience. At first, Selkirk revels in the freedom and power he feels as the sole ruler of the island. However, as the poem progresses, it becomes clear that this freedom comes at the cost of human companionship and the absence of societal comforts. Selkirk's longing for human contact and his eventual acceptance of his situation highlight the limitations of his freedom in the face of isolation. The poem suggests that true freedom may be found in the balance between solitude and connection, rather than in absolute isolation.

Post a Comment

• connect with us
• 1800-572-9877
• [email protected]
• We’re on your favourite socials!

Frequently Search

Couldn’t find the answer? Post your query here

ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024: Most important topics, last-minute tips

• TS EAMCET 2024 May 10 Question Paper
• Tamil Nadu SSLC 10th Toppers 2024
• NEET OMR Response Sheet 2024
• NEET Paper Analysis 2024
• NEET Answer Key 2024
• NEET Question Paper 2024
• NEET Expected Rank 2024
• NEET Percentile Score 2024
• NEET Cutoff 2024
• TS EAMCET Agriculture Response Sheet 2024

Updated On: February 13, 2024 04:27 pm IST

ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024 : As per the schedule, ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024 examination will be conducted on February 13, 2024 . Since only a few days are remaining for the test, check out the most important topics for revision here, and prioritize them during the study to be able to secure good marks on the test. Furthermore, last-minute tips have also been provided. Go through the tips to make a strategic preparation plan, and stay prepared for all sorts of questions that might appear in the test. 

ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024: Most Important Topics

Almost all the topics from ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024 syllabus are important and questions are asked from each on a rotational basis every year. Given this pattern, the following topics are more important this year. Some of these topics were asked for 10 marks, and hence are important for objective this year, and vice versa. 

The Tempest Act 3 Scene 1 and 2, Act 4

Story of an Hour

B Wordsworth

Dover Beach

Also Read |  ISC English Paper 2 Specimen Question Paper 2024

ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024: Last-Minute Tips

As only a few days are left for the test, candidates can check out the last-minute preparation tips for ISC 12th English Paper 2 2024 here: 

While revising the short stories, and drama is important, having a personal opinion on the events is also crucial since questions might test the candidate’s analytical skills.

For objective questions, candidates must read and memorize the facts.

Candidates must note down the key points of the plot for better revision.

The poems should be read and understood line-by-line.

Candidates must focus on character analysis while reading the drama. Questions asking for characteristics are common.

White studying, prepare a topic such that you’re able to answer questions for both 5 and 10 marks. 

Keep visiting CollegeDekho for the latest Education News on entrance exams, board exams and admissions. You can also write to us at our email ID [email protected].

Are you feeling lost and unsure about what career path to take after completing 12th standard?

Say goodbye to confusion and hello to a bright future!

Was this article helpful?

Be the first to know.

Get Access to Latest Updates

Do you have a question? Ask us.

Typical response between 24-48 hours

Get personalized response

Free of Cost

Access to community

Recent News

• Karnataka SSLC 10th Toppers List 2024 (Available): District-wise topper names with marks
• Tamil Nadu SSLC 10th Toppers List 2024 (Available): District-wise list of best performing students
• School Assembly News Headlines for Tomorrow (11 May 2024): National, International and Sports
• Tamil Nadu 10th SSLC Result Link 2024 Activated
• School Assembly News Headlines for 10 May 2024: National, International and Sports
• Gujarat SSC Result Date and Time 2024 Declared
• AICTE Academic Calendar 2024-25 Released: Check important dates here
• Tamil Nadu SSLC Result Date and Time 2024 Declared
• West Bengal HS Toppers List 2024 (Out): Stream-wise topper names with marks
• GSEB Gujarat HSC 12th Result Link 2024
• GSEB HSC Science Result Link 2024
• CBSE Result 2024 NOT Anytime Soon: CBSE responds to rumours, confirms tentative date
• School Assembly News Headlines for 9 May 2024: Top Stories, National, International, Sports
• CBSE Marks Verification and Re-evaluation 2024: Here's what CBSE explained about the process
• Instructions to access CBSE Results 2024 through DigiLocker
• ICSE Class 10 Toppers List 2024 (Available): State-wise best performing students, percentage scored
• West Bengal HS 12th Result Link 2024 Activated
• School Assembly News Headlines for 7 May 2024: Top Stories, National, International and Sports
• Karnataka SSLC Result 2024 Expected Date and Time
• Tamil Nadu HSC 12th Toppers List 2024 (Available): District-wise best performing students, marks
• WB HS Result 2024 Today (May 8): Check announcement time
• ISC Class 12 Toppers List 2024 (Available): Stream-wise topper names, percentage
• ISC 12th Result Link 2024 Activated
• ICSE 10th Result Link 2024 Activated
• Tamil Nadu 12th Result Link 2024 Activated
• School Assembly News Headlines for 4 May 2024: Top Stories, National, International and Sports
• CBSE Result 2024 for 10th and 12th TODAY or NOT? Latest updates here
• ICSE Result 2024 Fake Link Circulating on Social Media: Result not released
• MPSOS Class 10 and 12 Board Exam 2024 Dates Out
• HBSE 10th Result 2024 Expected Today: Results to be released at bseh.org.

Trending Now

Subscribe to CollegeDekho News

• Select Stream Engineering Management Medical Commerce and Banking Information Technology Arts and Humanities Design Hotel Management Physical Education Science Media and Mass Communication Vocational Law Others Education Paramedical Agriculture Nursing Pharmacy Dental Performing Arts

CollegeDekho's expert counsellors can help you with all your doubts

• Enter a Valid Name
• Enter a Valid Mobile
• Enter a Valid Email
• By proceeding ahead you expressly agree to the CollegeDekho terms of use and privacy policy

Details Saved

Your College Admissions journey has just begun !

Try our AI-powered College Finder. Feed in your preferences, let the AI match them against millions of data points & voila! you get what you are looking for, saving you hours of research & also earn rewards

For every question answered, you get a REWARD POINT that can be used as a DISCOUNT in your CAF fee. Isn’t that great?

1 Reward Point = 1 Rupee

Basis your Preference we have build your recommendation.