- Arts & Humanities
- Communications
![](http://help4study.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
group-assignment-business-plan-ent300-d1ba1195a
Related documents.
![ent300 group assignment Req doc](https://s3.studylib.net/store/data/025302039_1-5733f5d98d33bfadfc1e888b7e49a5d9-300x300.png)
Add this document to collection(s)
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Add this document to saved
You can add this document to your saved list
Suggest us how to improve StudyLib
(For complaints, use another form )
Input it if you want to receive answer
Pardon Our Interruption
As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:
- You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
- You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
- You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
- A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .
To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.
- Integrations
- Learning Center
MoSCoW Prioritization
What is moscow prioritization.
MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements.
The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”
What is the History of the MoSCoW Method?
Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.
You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.
How Does MoSCoW Prioritization Work?
Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.
At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.
Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.
With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.
Start prioritizing your roadmap
Moscow prioritization categories.
![ent300 group assignment Moscow](https://www.productplan.com/uploads/MoSCoW-01.png)
1. Must-have initiatives
As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.
The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.
![ent300 group assignment moscow-initiatives](https://www.productplan.com/uploads/MoSCoW-02.png)
If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”
2. Should-have initiatives
Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.
“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.
3. Could-have initiatives
Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.
So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.
4. Will not have (this time)
One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).
Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame.
Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.
How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW?
Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example:
![](http://help4study.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Prioritize based on budgetary constraints.
What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete.
Prioritize based on the team’s skillsets.
A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.
Prioritize based on competing needs at the company.
Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.
What Are the Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritization?
Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.
1. An inconsistent scoring process can lead to tasks placed in the wrong categories.
One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.
Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .
2. Not including all relevant stakeholders can lead to items placed in the wrong categories.
To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.
For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.
One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders.
3. Team bias for (or against) initiatives can undermine MoSCoW’s effectiveness.
Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives.
One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.
But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.
When Do You Use the MoSCoW Method for Prioritization?
MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.
Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.
What Are Best Practices for Using MoSCoW Prioritization?
If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.
1. Choose an objective ranking or scoring system.
Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.
You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:
- Weighted scoring
- Value vs. complexity
- Buy-a-feature
- Opportunity scoring
For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .
2. Seek input from all key stakeholders.
To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context.
At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss.
3. Share your MoSCoW process across your organization.
MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects.
The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.
Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made.
If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.
Related Terms
2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model
Prioritizing your roadmap using our guide
Talk to an expert.
Schedule a few minutes with us to share more about your product roadmapping goals and we'll tailor a demo to show you how easy it is to build strategic roadmaps, align behind customer needs, prioritize, and measure success.
Share on Mastodon
![](http://help4study.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
ENT300 Group Assignment A3 Business Plan. Business plan assignment. Course. Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship (ENT 300) 999+ Documents. Students shared 2206 documents in this course. University Universiti Teknologi MARA. Academic year: 2023/2024. Recommended for you. 25. BMC Report (ENT300)
ENT300 BUSINESS PLAN (GROUP ASSIGNMENT) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. De'Boba is a partnership business located in Miri, Sarawak that plans to sell boba milk tea and other beverages. The business is formed by 4 partners who will take on roles like General Manager and Marketing Manager. The business plan provides details on the partnership ...
ENT300 - Business PLAN - GROUP ASSIGNMENT. GROUP ASSIGNMENT. Course. Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship (ENT 300) 999+ Documents. Students shared 2203 documents in this course. University Universiti Teknologi MARA. Academic year: 2019/2020. Uploaded by: Aniezwoozi 17carat. Universiti Teknologi MARA. 0 followers. 5 Uploads.
ENT300 Group Assignment THE Bakery CAFE-1. Fundamental Entreprenuership. Mandatory assignments. 100% (10) 20. Case study ent 300 if u need help use this. Fundamental Entreprenuership. Mandatory assignments. 100% (8) 2. BMC Fashion template - qwerty. Fundamental Entreprenuership. Mandatory assignments.
y located at Starmoon Bakery, S/22 Lot 401(297 - A) Kg. Sireh, Jalan Kota Bharu Darul Naim, 15050, Kota Bharu, Kelantan. This business plan includes administration p. an, marketing plan, operational plan, and financial plan. Furthermore, the name of this bakery shop which is "STARMOON Bakery" is come.
Group Assignment Business PLAN ENT300 D1BA1195A. Fundamental Entreprenuership (Universiti Teknologi MARA) Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Downloaded by Studocu Unlocks ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|11383104. ENT300.
Ent300 Business Plan - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. An arcade café aims to provide entertainment and fresh food for customers of all ages. The business wants to be unique by serving as both an arcade with classic video games and a café with quality food. By fusing food and amusement in one place, the arcade café sees an ...
13 1.4 Business / Company Background Business name D&S Capsule Business Address 38, Jalan Eko Botanic 3/3, 79100, Gelang Patah, Johor Bahru, Johor. Correspondence Address 38, Jalan Eko Botanic 3/3, 79100, Gelang Patah, Johor Bahru, Johor. Main product Laundry cubes with three scents Telephone number +60 104472641 Fax number 07-59783434 Email ...
Assignment ENT300 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Entreprenuership
fundamental of entrepreneurship (ent300) business plan topic: group assignment (sucree bakery company) prepared by: name student no group/class muhammad syahmi bin zahri 2021828496 hm115/2ea shahrul naim bin ayub khan 2021479318 hm115/2ea siti nur aisyah binti alias 2021499098 hm115/2ea siti nur nabihah a`isyah binti rais 2021206202 hm115/2ea
ENT300 GROUPING FINAL REPORT (1) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Administrative Manager Name of Owner/Partners Nurul Fatiha binti Salim. Identity Card Numbers 011128-01-1231. Permanent Address No. 8, Jalan Mawar 2, Taman Mawar, 81200 Johor Bahru, Johor.
MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won't-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the "W" in MoSCoW to mean "wish.".
Assignment group project, final ent assignment making business plan create by our own. faculty of hotel and tourism management uitm pulau pinang fundamentals. Skip to document. ... ENT300 Individual Assignment Alisya; ENT300 Business Plan (ENT300)Business Plan Report Latest; Business Opportunity ENT300;
Literature groups are utilized throughout the year with small group assignments and activities. Newsela.com articles are used weekly for non-fiction and current news throughout the world. Weekly Reading Logs are required which consist of: 100 minutes of reading non-school text per week. A full week is given to complete the reading log with the ...
ENT300 group assignmet - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. HOMEBrella is a partnership business providing multi-purpose umbrellas. It is located in Ayer Keroh, Melaka and was founded to take advantage of the growing umbrella market. The business aims to offer innovative yet affordable umbrella designs.
Group 2 Bakery - BUSINESS PLAN ASSIGNMENT . Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship. Mandatory assignments. 100% (25) 17. ... ENT300 BOP - Assignment; Business PLAN - Alamart Grocery Store (ENT 300) Related documents. Syahirah Nabilah Binti Azman 2018 285168 RAC1205C CASE Study Habib Jewels SDN.BHD;
A highly original, engrossing and accessible book, Assignment Moscow stands out among journalistic accounts of Russia for its subtlety, humility and historic scope. It tells the story of British and American journalists who aimed to throw light on Russia from Lenin to Putin, and in the process illuminated the West itself. Arkady Ostrovsky ...
Reading Writing Assignment 10; Diabetes Case - N/A; Fluid Volume Deficit; Pre-eclampsia Concept Map; Preview text. You are teaching a group of high beginners (A-2). These students are adults (ages 25- 50) in Moscow, Russia taking English classes at a community center.