Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History Essays

Great zimbabwe (11th–15th century).

Department of the Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas , The Metropolitan Museum of Art

October 2001

Stone Ruins The ruins of this complex of massive stone walls undulate across almost 1,800 acres of present-day southeastern Zimbabwe. Begun during the eleventh century A.D. by Bantu-speaking ancestors of the Shona, Great Zimbabwe was constructed and expanded for more than 300 years in a local style that eschewed rectilinearity for flowing curves. Neither the first nor the last of some 300 similar complexes located on the Zimbabwean plateau, Great Zimbabwe is set apart by the terrific scale of its structure. Its most formidable edifice, commonly referred to as the Great Enclosure, has walls as high as 36 feet extending approximately 820 feet, making it the largest ancient structure south of the Sahara Desert. In the 1800s, European travelers and English colonizers, stunned by Great Zimbabwe’s grandeur and its cunning workmanship, attributed the architecture to foreign powers. Such attributions were dismissed when archaeological investigations conducted during the first decades of the twentieth century confirmed both the antiquity of the site and its African origins.

Great Zimbabwe’s most enduring and impressive remains are its stone walls . These walls were constructed from granite blocks gathered from the exposed rock of the surrounding hills. Since this rock naturally splits into even slabs and can be broken into portable sizes, it provided a convenient and readily available building resource. All of Great Zimbabwe’s walls were fitted without the use of mortar by laying stones one on top of the other, each layer slightly more recessed than the last to produce a stabilizing inward slope. Early examples were coarsely fitted using rough blocks and incorporated features of the landscape such as boulders into the walls. The technique was refined over the years, and later walls were fitted together closely and evenly over long, serpentine courses to produce remarkably finished surfaces.

Great Zimbabwe’s Inhabitants Little is known about the Bantu-speaking people who built Great Zimbabwe or how their society was organized. The ruling elite appears to have controlled wealth through the management of cattle, which were the staple diet at Great Zimbabwe. At its height, Great Zimbabwe is estimated to have had a population greater than 10,000, although the majority lived at some distance from the large stone buildings. Only 200 to 300 members of the elite classes are thought to have lived within Great Zimbabwe’s massive edifices.

The enormous walls are the best-preserved testaments of Great Zimbabwe’s past and the largest example of an architectural type seen in archaeological sites throughout the region. The function of these stone walls, however, has often been misinterpreted. At first glance, these massive nonsupportive walls appear purely defensive. But scholars doubt they ever served a martial purpose and have argued instead that cattle and people were valued above land, which was in any event too abundant to be hoarded. The walls are thought to have been a symbolic show of authority, designed to preserve the privacy of royal families and set them apart from and above commoners. It is also important to note that the walls surrounded and later adjoined huts made of daga (mud and thatch), linked with them to form a series of courtyards. Daga was also used to form raised seats in particularly significant courtyards, and was painted to enrich its artistic effect. Since Great Zimbabwe’s daga elements have long since eroded, the remaining stone walls provide only partial evidence of the architecture’s original appearance.

Soapstone Birds In addition to architecture, Great Zimbabwe’s most famous works of art are the eight birds carved of soapstone that were found in its ruins. The birds surmount columns more than a yard tall and are themselves on average sixteen inches tall. The sculptures combine both human and avian elements, substituting human features like lips for a beak and five-toed feet for claws. Excavated at the turn of the century, it is known that six of the sculptures came from the Eastern Enclosure of the Hill complex, but unfortunately their precise arrangement can only be surmised. Scholars have suggested that the birds served as emblems of royal authority, perhaps representing the ancestors of Great Zimbabwe’s rulers. Although their precise significance is still unknown, these sculptures remain powerful symbols of rule in the modern era, adorning the flag of Zimbabwe as national emblems.

Department of the Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “Great Zimbabwe (11th–15th Century).” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History . New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/zimb/hd_zimb.htm (October 2001)

Further Reading

Huffman, Thomas N. "The Soapstone Birds from Great Zimbabwe." African Arts 18, no. 3 (May 1985), pp. 68–73, 99–100.

McIntosh, Roderick J. "Riddle of Great Zimbabwe." Archaeology 51 (July–August 1998), pp. 44–49.

Additional Essays by Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas

  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ La Venta: Sacred Architecture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ La Venta: Stone Sculpture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Monte Albán .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Monte Albán: Sacred Architecture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Monte Albán: Stone Sculpture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Teotihuacan: Mural Painting .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Teotihuacan: Pyramids of the Sun and the Moon .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Valdivia Figurines .” (October 2004)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Hopewell (1–400 A.D.) .” (October 2002)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Indian Knoll (3000–2000 B.C.) .” (October 2003)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Poverty Point (2000–1000 B.C.) .” (October 2003)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ African Rock Art .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ African Rock Art: Tassili-n-Ajjer (?8000 B.C.–?) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ African Rock Art: The Coldstream Stone .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Apollo 11 (ca. 25,500–23,500 B.C.) and Wonderwerk (ca. 8000 B.C.) Cave Stones .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Monumental Stelae of Aksum (3rd–4th Century) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Tikal .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Tikal: Sacred Architecture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Tikal: Stone Sculpture .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Art and the Fulani/Fulbe People .” (October 2002)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Ife Pre-Pavement and Pavement Era (800–1000 A.D.) .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Foundations of Aksumite Civilization and Its Christian Legacy (1st–8th Century) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Ife (from ca. 6th Century) .” (originally published October 2000, last revised September 2014)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Inland Niger Delta .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Lydenburg Heads (ca. 500 A.D.) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Nok Terracottas (500 B.C.–200 A.D.) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Empires of the Western Sudan .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Empires of the Western Sudan: Ghana Empire .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Empires of the Western Sudan: Mali Empire .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Empires of the Western Sudan: Songhai Empire .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Trans-Saharan Gold Trade (7th–14th Century) .” (October 2000)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Trade and the Spread of Islam in Africa .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Mangarevan Sculpture .” (October 2003)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Tahiti .” (October 2003)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Cave Sculpture from the Karawari .” (October 2003)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ The Fulani/Fulbe People .” (October 2002)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Great Serpent Mound .” (October 2002)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Ancient American Jade .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Jade in Costa Rica .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ Jade in Mesoamerica .” (October 2001)
  • Department of Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. “ La Venta .” (October 2001)

Related Essays

  • African Rock Art
  • African Rock Art of the Central Zone
  • Mapungubwe (ca. 1050–1270)
  • Portraits of African Leadership
  • Portraits of African Leadership: Living Rulers
  • Portraits of African Leadership: Memorials
  • Portraits of African Leadership: Royal Ancestors
  • Eastern and Southern Africa, 1000–1400 A.D.
  • Eastern and Southern Africa, 1400–1600 A.D.
  • Great Zimbabwe
  • 11th Century A.D.
  • 12th Century A.D.
  • 13th Century A.D.
  • 14th Century A.D.
  • 15th Century A.D.
  • Archaeology
  • Architecture
  • Southern Africa

ENCYCLOPEDIC ENTRY

Great zimbabwe.

Great Zimbabwe was a medieval African city known for its large circular wall and tower. It was part of a wealthy African trading empire that controlled much of the East African coast from the 11th to the 15th centuries C.E.

Geography, Human Geography, Social Studies, Ancient Civilizations, World History

Great Zimbabwe's Great Enclosure

Great Zimbabwe is the name for the stone remains of a medieval city in southeastern Africa. It is composed of three parts, including the Great Enclosure (shown here). It is believed to have been a royal residence or a symbolic grain storage facility.

Photograph by Christopher Scott

Great Zimbabwe is the name for the stone remains of a medieval city in southeastern Africa. It is composed of three parts, including the Great Enclosure (shown here). It is believed to have been a royal residence or a symbolic grain storage facility.

Great Zimbabwe is the name of the stone ruins of an ancient city near modern day Masvingo, Zimbabwe. People lived in Great Zimbabwe beginning around 1100 C.E. but abandoned it in the 15th century. The city was the capital of the Kingdom of Zimbabwe, which was a Shona (Bantu) trading empire . Zimbabwe means “stone houses” in Shona. Great Zimbabwe was part of a large and wealthy global trading network. Archaeologists have found pottery from China and Persia, as well as Arab coins in the ruins there. The elite of the Zimbabwe Empire controlled trade up and down the east African coast. However, the city was largely abandoned by the 15th century as the Shona people migrated elsewhere. The exact reasons for the abandonment are unknown, but it is likely that exhaustion of resources and overpopulation were contributing factors. The archaeological site at Great Zimbabwe consists of several sections. The first section is the Hill Complex, a series of structural ruins that sit atop the steepest hill of the site. This is generally believed to have been the religious center of the site. The Hill Complex is the oldest part of Great Zimbabwe, and shows signs of construction that date to around 900 C.E. The ruins of the second section, the Great Enclosure, are perhaps the most exciting. The Great Enclosure is a walled, circular area below the Hill Complex dating to the 14th century. The walls are over 9.7 meters (32 feet) high in places, and the enclosure’s circumference is 250 meters (820 feet). The walls were built without mortar , relying on carefully shaped rocks to hold the wall’s shape on their own. Inside the enclosure is a second set of walls, following the same curve as the outside walls, which end in a stone tower 10 meters (33 feet) high. While the function of this enclosure is unknown, archeologists suggest it could have been a royal residence or a symbolic grain storage facility. It is one of the largest existing structures from ancient sub-Saharan Africa. The third section is the Valley Ruins. The Valley Ruins consist of a significant number of houses made mostly of mud-brick ( daga) near the Great Enclosure. The distribution and number of houses suggests that Great Zimbabwe boasted a large population, between 10,000–20,000 people. Archaeological research has unearthed several soapstone bird sculptures in the ruins. These birds are thought to have served a religious function, and may have been displayed on pedestals. These birds appear on the modern Zimbabwean flag and are national symbols of Zimbabwe. The ruins of Great Zimbabwe were designated a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site in 1986. There have only been a limited number of archaeological excavations of the site. Unfortunately, significant looting and destruction occurred in the 20th century at the hands of European visitors. Although they were all too happy to explore and loot the ruins of Great Zimbabwe, in their racism, European colonists thought the city was too sophisticated to have been built by Africans, and instead thought it had been built by Phoenicians or other non-African people. However, despite the damage done by these colonial looters , today, the legacy of Great Zimbabwe lives on as one of the largest and most culturally important archaeological sites of its kind in Africa.

Media Credits

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Production Managers

Program specialists, last updated.

October 19, 2023

User Permissions

For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.

If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.

Text on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service .

Interactives

Any interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.

Related Resources

Great Zimbabwe

Aerial view of Great Zimbabwe’s Great Enclosure and adjacent ruins, looking southeast (photo: Janice Bell , CC BY-SA 4.0)

Great Zimbabwe and Harare (underlying map © Google)

Great Zimbabwe has been described as “one of the most dramatic architectural landscapes in sub-Saharan Africa.” [1] It is the largest stone complex in Africa built before the modern era, aside from the monumental architecture of ancient Egypt . The ruins that survive are a four-hour drive south of Zimbabwe’s present-day capital of Harare. It was constructed between the 11th and 15th centuries and was continuously inhabited by the Shona peoples until about 1450. But Great Zimbabwe was by no means a singular complex—at the site’s cultural zenith, it is estimated that seven comparable states existed in this region.

The word  zimbabwe  translates from the Bantu language of the Shona to either “judicial center” or “ruler’s court or house.” A few individual zimbabwes (houses) have survived exposure to the elements over the centuries. Within these clay structures, excavations have revealed interior furnishings such as pot-stands, elevated surfaces for sleeping and sitting, as well as hearths. Taken together, the settlement encompasses a cluster of approximately 250 royal houses built of clay, which in addition to other multi-story clay and thatch homes would have supported as many as 20,000 inhabitants—a exceptional scale for a sub-Saharan settlement at this time.

Plan of Great Zimbabwe showing the different constituent enclosures. Adapted from Chirikure & Pikirayi Shadreck Chirikure and Innocent Pikirayi, “Inside and outside the dry stone walls: Revisiting the material culture of Great Zimbabwe,” Antiquity 82 (December 2015), pp. 976–993.

The stone constructions of Great Zimbabwe can be categorized into roughly three areas: the Hill Ruin (or Hill Complex, on a rocky hilltop), the Great Enclosure, and the Valley Ruins (or Enclosures). The Hill Ruin dates to approximately 1250, and incorporates a cave that remains a sacred site for the Shona peoples today. The cave once accommodated the residence of the ruler and his immediate family. The Hill Ruin also held a structure surrounded by 30-foot high walls and flanked by cylindrical towers and monoliths carved with elaborate geometric patterns.

Between two walls, Great Enclosure, Great Zimbabwe (photo: Mandy , CC BY 2.0)

The Great Enclosure was completed in approximately 1450, and it too is a walled structure punctuated with turrets and monoliths, emulating the form of the earlier Hill Ruin. The massive outer wall is 32 feet high in some places. Inside the Great Enclosure, a smaller wall parallels the exterior wall creating a tight passageway leading to large towers. Because the Great Enclosure shares many structural similarities with the Hill Ruin, one interpretation suggests that the Great Enclosure was built to accommodate a surplus population and its religious and administrative activities. Another theory posits that the Great Enclosure may have functioned as a site for religious rituals.

The third section of Great Zimbabwe, the Valley Ruins, include a number of structures that offer evidence that the site served as a hub for commercial exchange and long distance trade. Archaeologists have found porcelain fragments originating from China, beads crafted in southeast Asia, and copper ingots from trading centers along the Zambezi River and from Central African kingdoms. [2]

A monolithic  soapstone sculpture of a seated bird resting on atop a register of zigzags was unearthed here. The pronounced muscularity of the bird’s breast and its defined talons suggest that this represents a bird of prey, and scholars have conjectured it could have been emblematic of the power of Shona kings as benefactors to their people and intercessors with their ancestors.

Conical Tower, Great Zimbabwe (photo: Mandy , CC BY 2.0)

Conical tower

All of the walls at Great Zimbabwe were constructed from granite hewn locally. While some theories suggest that the granite enclosures were built for defense, these walls likely had no military function. Many segments within the walls have gaps, interrupted arcs or elements that seem to run counter to needs of protection. The fact that the structures were built without the use of mortar to bind the stones together supports speculation that the site was not, in fact, intended for defense. Nevertheless, these enclosures symbolize the power and prestige of the rulers of Great Zimbabwe.

The conical tower of Great Zimbabwe is thought to have functioned as a granary. According to tradition, a Shona ruler shows his largess towards his subjects through his granary, often distributing grain as a symbol of his protection. Indeed, advancements in agricultural cultivation among Bantu-speaking peoples in sub-Saharan Africa transformed the pattern of life for many, including the Shona communities of present-day Zimbabwe.

Great Enclosure entrance (restored), Great Zimbabwe (photo: Mandy , CC BY 2.0)

Wealth and trade

Great Zimbabwe and port of Sofala (underlying map © Google)

Archaeological debris indicate that the economy of Great Zimbabwe relied on the management of livestock. In fact, cattle may have allowed the Shona peoples to move from subsistence agriculture to mining and trade. Iron tools have been found on site, along with copper, and gold wire jewelry and ornaments. Great Zimbabwe is thought to have prospered, perhaps indirectly, from gold that was mined 25 miles from the city and that was transported to the Indian Ocean port at Sofala where it made its way by dhow , up the coast, and by way of Kilwa Kisiwani , to the markets of Cairo.

By about 1500, however, Great Zimbabwe’s political and economic influence waned. Speculations as to why this occurred point to the frequency of droughts and environmental fragility, though other theories stress that Great Zimbabwe might have experienced political skirmishes over political succession that interrupted trade, still other theories hypothesize disease that may have afflicted livestock. [3]

Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) banknote featuring the conical tower at Great Zimbabwe, 1955 (© Trustees of the British Museum)

Great Zimbabwe stands as one of the most extensively developed centers in pre-colonial sub-Saharan Africa and stands as a testament to the organization, autonomy, and economic power of the Shona peoples. The site remains a potent symbol not only to the Shona, but for Zimbabweans more broadly. After gaining independence from the British, the nation formerly named after the British industrialist and imperialist, Cecil Rhodes, was renamed Zimbabwe.

[1] Webber Ndoro, The Preservation of Great Zimbabwe: Your Monument, Our Shrine (ICCROM, 2005), p. 16.

[2] Peter Garlake, Early Art and Architecture of Africa (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 153.

[3] Garlake, 157.

Bibliography

The Economist Magazine interactive.

Great Zimbabwe World Heritage Site (UNESCO).

Great Zimbabwe student worksheet (The British Museum).

Great Zimbabwe on the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.

Webber Ndoro, The Preservation of Great Zimbabwe: Your Monument, Our Shrine (ICCROM, 2005).

Thomas N. Huffman, “Debating Great Zimbabwe,” South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66 (2011), pp. 27–40.

Thomas N. Huffman, The Soapstone Birds from Great Zimbabwe, African Arts , 18 (May 1985), pp. 68–73.

P. Hubbard, “The Zimbabwe Birds: Interpretation and Symbolism,” Honeyguide: Journal of Birdlife Zimbabwe 55 (2009), pp. 109–116.

Great Zimbabwe from Scientific American.

“Lost cities # 9: racism and ruins – the plundering of Great Zimbabwe,” The Guardian (August 18, 2016).

Peter S. Garlake, Great Zimbabwe (Stein & Day Pub, 1973).

Cite this page

Your donations help make art history free and accessible to everyone!

IMAGES

  1. Zimbabwe Essay

    describe great zimbabwe essay

  2. (PDF) Great Zimbabwe

    describe great zimbabwe essay

  3. Great Zimbabwe History Overview

    describe great zimbabwe essay

  4. The Debate on Great Zimbabwe History Free Essay Example

    describe great zimbabwe essay

  5. Great Zimbabwe History Overview

    describe great zimbabwe essay

  6. Great Zimbabwe 1

    describe great zimbabwe essay

VIDEO

  1. I Didn't Expect This at Great Zimbabwe Ruins 🇿🇼| Vlog

  2. Exploring Great Zimbabwe: A Glimpse into Ancient Africa #shorts

  3. DAY 71: Great Zimbabwe

  4. Great Zimbabwe Monuments

  5. Ancient Wonders of Great Zimbabwe

  6. Great Zimbabwe