beyond good and evil book review

Big Book Review

Read More, Discover More – Uncover Your Next Great Book

Beyond Good And Evil Book Review

It’s time to research into Friedrich Nietzsche’s seminal work, “Beyond Good and Evil,” to uncover its provocative and controversial take on conventional moral concepts. Nietzsche challenges readers to rethink traditional notions of good and evil, sparking critical thinking and deep reflection. This book serves as a bold and daring exploration of morality and philosophy that continues to inspire and challenge readers worldwide. Let’s explore the key themes and unconventional ideas presented in this seminal philosophical work.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways:

• Exploration of morality: Friedrich Nietzsche provides a thought-provoking examination of traditional views of good and evil, challenging readers to think beyond conventional moral frameworks.
• Philosophical depth: The book examines into complex philosophical concepts such as the will to power, the eternal recurrence, and the concept of the übermensch, offering readers deep insights into Nietzsche’s unique perspective.
• Provocative and controversial: Beyond Good and Evil is known for its provocative and controversial ideas that have sparked debates and discussions among scholars and readers alike, making it a seminal work in philosophy.

Contextual Background

Philosophical climate.

One of the most significant elements contributing to the context of Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘Beyond Good and Evil’ is the philosophical climate of the late 19th century in Europe. This period saw a shift in traditional thought and the emergence of new ideas challenging established beliefs.

Nietzsche’s Influence and Controversies

On the other hand, Nietzsche’s influence and controversies cannot be overlooked when delving into the context of ‘Beyond Good and Evil’. His critique of traditional morality and his concept of the “will to power” sparked debates and stirred up controversy in the philosophical community.

The controversial nature of Nietzsche’s ideas and the radical departure from conventional norms made him a central figure in the philosophical landscape of the time. Despite facing criticism and challenges , Nietzsche’s impact on modern philosophy is undeniable .

Key Themes and Concepts

The will to power.

For Nietzsche, the concept of the Will to Power is central to his philosophy. It refers to the driving force behind human behavior, the desire for power, creation, and achievement. This concept suggests that all human actions are ultimately motivated by a desire for power and domination.

Master-Slave Morality

The concept of Master-Slave Morality is a fundamental idea in Nietzsche’s work. The Master morality values strength, power, and individualism, while the Slave morality values compassion, humility, and submissiveness. Nietzsche critiques traditional morality, arguing that it suppresses individual potential and creativity.

Beyond Good And Evil Book Review: Dive Into Your Next Adventure

Power dynamics play a crucial role in Nietzsche’s critique of traditional moral values. He believed that traditional morality, based on notions of good and evil, serves to uphold the interests of the weak and suppress the potential of the strong.

Beyond Traditional Morality

Master-Slave Morality goes beyond traditional concepts of right and wrong. Nietzsche challenges the idea of objective moral truths and argues for a reevaluation of values based on individual perspective and experience. This pushes individuals to question societal norms and create their own moral code.

The Übermensch Ideal

On the concept of the Übermensch, Nietzsche presents an ideal of self-mastery and self-overcoming. The Übermensch transcends conventional morality and societal constraints, embracing individual creativity, strength, and authenticity. This ideal challenges individuals to strive for greatness and self-actualization beyond traditional moral boundaries.

Structure and Style of the Book

Aphoristic approach.

Style: Many readers of Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil” are struck by his unique aphoristic approach to philosophy. Each section consists of short, profound statements that challenge traditional thinking and encourage deeper reflection on ethics and morality.

Use of Language and Imagery

Imagery: In “Beyond Good and Evil,” Nietzsche’s use of language is sharp and deliberate, creating vivid imagery that captures the complexity of his ideas. He employs metaphors and allegories to convey profound philosophical concepts in a way that is both engaging and thought-provoking.

Understanding: Nietzsche’s aphoristic style and rich imagery serve to enhance the reader’s comprehension of his philosophical arguments. By distilling his ideas into concise, powerful statements and painting vivid mental pictures, Nietzsche challenges readers to think critically about fundamental moral and ethical principles. This approach not only stimulates intellectual growth but also prompts readers to question their preconceived notions, ultimately leading to a deeper understanding of the complexities of human nature and morality.

Critical Analysis

Strengths of nietzsche’s arguments.

One of the strengths of Nietzsche’s arguments in “Beyond Good and Evil” lies in his ability to challenge traditional moral values and question the foundations of philosophical thought. He presents a unique perspective that encourages readers to think critically about established beliefs and societal norms. Nietzsche’s writing is thought-provoking and forces readers to reevaluate their understanding of ethics and truth.

Potential Weaknesses and Criticisms

Any analysis of Nietzsche’s work must acknowledge the potential weaknesses and criticisms that have been raised by scholars and critics. Some argue that Nietzsche’s ideas are vague and open to misinterpretation, while others question the ethical implications of his philosophy. Critics also point to the sometimes contradictory nature of his arguments, which can make his work challenging to fully grasp.

Another potential criticism of Nietzsche’s arguments is the perceived elitism and controversial nature of his beliefs. His critiques of traditional morality and embrace of the “will to power” have led some to view his philosophy as dangerous or nihilistic. However, it is important to consider the broader context of Nietzsche’s ideas and the impact they have had on the field of philosophy.

Nietzsche’s Legacy

Impact on modern thought.

After publishing “Beyond Good and Evil,” Friedrich Nietzsche’s ideas sparked significant debates and influenced various philosophical movements. His concepts of the ubermensch, the will to power, and the critique of traditional morality challenged the prevailing beliefs of his time.

Relevance in Contemporary Society

For centuries, Nietzsche’s philosophical insights have continued to resonate in contemporary society, shaping discussions on individualism, morality, and the nature of truth. His emphasis on questioning conventional values and embracing authenticity appeals to individuals seeking to navigate the complexities of the modern world.

To truly understand Nietzsche’s relevance today, one must analyze how his ideas have been interpreted and applied in diverse fields such as psychology, literature, and even politics. The notion of perspectivism advocated by Nietzsche encourages individuals to critically evaluate their own viewpoints and recognize the subjectivity inherent in human experiences .

Now that we have explored into the complexities of Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil,” it is evident that this philosophical masterpiece challenges traditional notions of morality, truth, and power. Through sharp critiques and thought-provoking aphorisms, Nietzsche invites readers to reexamine their beliefs and question societal norms. While the book may be dense and at times ambiguous, its impact on modern philosophy and intellectual discourse cannot be understated. “Beyond Good and Evil” remains a cornerstone of Nietzsche’s work, offering a unique perspective on ethics and human nature that continues to inspire deep reflection and debate.

Q: What is the book “Beyond Good and Evil” about?

A: “Beyond Good and Evil” is a philosophical book written by Friedrich Nietzsche that explores into the concepts of morality, ethics, and the nature of good and evil. Nietzsche challenges traditional ideas of morality and explores the idea of a higher form of morality that goes beyond conventional notions of good and bad.

Q: What are some key themes discussed in “Beyond Good and Evil”?

A: Some key themes in “Beyond Good and Evil” include the will to power, the critique of traditional morality, the idea of the Ubermensch (Overman), and the concept of eternal recurrence. Nietzsche explores the idea of self-overcoming and encourages readers to question societal norms and values.

Q: Why is “Beyond Good and Evil” considered an important work in philosophy?

A: “Beyond Good and Evil” is considered an important work in philosophy because it challenges conventional thinking about morality and ethics. Nietzsche’s ideas have had a profound impact on existentialist philosophy, psychology, and literary theory. The book continues to be studied and interpreted by scholars and readers interested in exploring the complexities of human nature and ethics.

• NONFICTION BOOKS
• BEST NONFICTION 2023
• BEST NONFICTION 2024
• Historical Biographies
• The Best Memoirs and Autobiographies
• Philosophical Biographies
• World War 2
• World History
• American History
• British History
• Chinese History
• Russian History
• Ancient History (up to 500)
• Medieval History (500-1400)
• Military History
• Art History
• Travel Books
• Ancient Philosophy
• Contemporary Philosophy
• Ethics & Moral Philosophy
• Great Philosophers
• Social & Political Philosophy
• Classical Studies
• New Science Books
• Maths & Statistics
• Popular Science
• Physics Books
• Climate Change Books
• How to Write
• English Grammar & Usage
• Books for Learning Languages
• Linguistics
• Political Ideologies
• Foreign Policy & International Relations
• American Politics
• British Politics
• Religious History Books
• Mental Health
• Neuroscience
• Child Psychology
• Film & Cinema
• Opera & Classical Music
• Behavioural Economics
• Development Economics
• Economic History
• Financial Crisis
• World Economies
• Investing Books
• Artificial Intelligence/AI Books
• Data Science Books
• Sex & Sexuality
• Death & Dying
• Food & Cooking
• Sports, Games & Hobbies
• FICTION BOOKS
• BEST NOVELS 2024
• BEST FICTION 2023
• New Literary Fiction
• World Literature
• Literary Criticism
• Literary Figures
• Classic English Literature
• American Literature
• Comics & Graphic Novels
• Fairy Tales & Mythology
• Historical Fiction
• Crime Novels
• Science Fiction
• Short Stories
• South Africa
• United States
• Arctic & Antarctica
• Afghanistan
• Myanmar (Formerly Burma)
• Netherlands
• Kids Recommend Books for Kids
• High School Teachers Recommendations
• Prizewinning Kids' Books
• Popular Series Books for Kids
• BEST BOOKS FOR KIDS (ALL AGES)
• Ages Baby-2
• Books for Teens and Young Adults
• THE BEST SCIENCE BOOKS FOR KIDS
• BEST KIDS' BOOKS OF 2023
• BEST BOOKS FOR TEENS OF 2023
• Best Audiobooks for Kids
• Environment
• Best Books for Teens of 2023
• Best Kids' Books of 2023
• Political Novels
• New History Books
• New Historical Fiction
• New Biography
• New Memoirs
• New World Literature
• New Economics Books
• New Climate Books
• New Math Books
• New Philosophy Books
• New Psychology Books
• New Physics Books
• THE BEST AUDIOBOOKS
• Actors Read Great Books
• Books Narrated by Their Authors
• Best Audiobook Thrillers
• Best History Audiobooks
• Nobel Literature Prize
• Booker Prize (fiction)
• Baillie Gifford Prize (nonfiction)
• Financial Times (nonfiction)
• Wolfson Prize (history)
• Royal Society (science)
• Pushkin House Prize (Russia)
• Walter Scott Prize (historical fiction)
• Arthur C Clarke Prize (sci fi)
• The Hugos (sci fi & fantasy)
• Audie Awards (audiobooks)

Book Reviews on...

Beyond good and evil, by friedrich nietzsche & walter kaufmann (translator), recommendations from our site.

“You mentioned that Beyond Good and Evil is a good one to dip into for people who are new to Nietzsche books, because it provides a good overview to his thoughts? Yes, I think that’s right. It touches on almost all Nietzsche’s central concerns – on truth, on the nature of philosophy, on morality, on what’s wrong with morality, will to power…in the first chapter of the book…Nietzsche tells us that the great philosophers are basically fakers when they tell you that they arrived at their views because there were good rational arguments in support of them. That’s nonsense, says Nietzsche. Great philosophers, he thinks, are driven by a particular moral or ethical vision. Their philosophy is really a post-hoc rationalisation for the values they want to promote.” Read more...

The Best Nietzsche Books

Brian Leiter

Other books by Friedrich Nietzsche and Walter Kaufmann (translator)

The birth of tragedy out of the spirit of music by friedrich nietzsche, twilight of the idols by friedrich nietzsche, ecce homo by friedrich nietzsche, the gay science friedrich nietzsche (trans. walter kaufmann), the birth of tragedy and the case of wagner by friedrich nietzsche, on the genealogy of morality by friedrich nietzsche, our most recommended books, war and peace by leo tolstoy, on liberty by john stuart mill, middlemarch by george eliot, nineteen eighty-four by george orwell, republic by plato, the odyssey by homer and translated by emily wilson.

Support Five Books

Five Books interviews are expensive to produce, please support us by donating a small amount .

We ask experts to recommend the five best books in their subject and explain their selection in an interview.

This site has an archive of more than one thousand seven hundred interviews, or eight thousand book recommendations. We publish at least two new interviews per week.

Five Books participates in the Amazon Associate program and earns money from qualifying purchases.

© Five Books 2024

University of Notre Dame

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

• Home ›
• Reviews ›

The Soul of Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil

Maudemarie Clark and David Dudrick, The Soul of Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil , Cambridge University Press, 2012, 282pp., $29.99 (pbk), ISBN 9780521793803.

Reviewed by Mattia Riccardi, Universidade do Porto

Beyond Good and Evil  (1886) (BGE) arguably occupies a privileged position in the economy of Nietzsche's works. Certainly, it is the best place to look if one is interested in his views on thosetopics which traditionally come under the heading of "first philosophy". The book is also intimately connected to other important pieces Nietzsche wrote in this period, like  On the Genealogy of Morality  (1887) and the fifth book of  The Gay Science  (1887). Moreover, BGE is supposed to provide an "introduction to the background of Zarathustra", as Nietzsche wrote to his editor. [1]  It is, at the same time, an extraordinarily intricate piece of philosophical writing. Clark and Dudrick take on the ambitious task of offering a textually careful as well as philosophically sensitive reading of the book. The result is a powerfully argued and challenging investigation, which shows how sophisticated Nietzsche's treatment of the traditional questions about the True and the Good is. Their focus is on Part 1 of BGE, for there Nietzsche lays the theoretical ground for his subsequent treatment of ethics.

The authors claim that BGE can be read either exoterically or esoterically. Prima facie, the book seems to articulate a completely naturalistic project. This, however, they claim, is just how it looks exoterically. Nietzsche's way of writing, they suggest, aims at urging the (attentive) reader to overcome this allegedly superficial impression and access the deeper, esoteric meaning of his book. This would be true, in particular, of the physiological and biological talk he often adopts. To take this talk at face value would be to remain blind to the esoteric meaning Nietzsche is actually trying to convey to the (careful) reader. Once this blindness is removed, she would realize that "he does not turn his back on the normative aspirations of traditional philosophy" (9).

The strategy by which Clark and Dudrick substantiate this general approach is carried out in two main steps. In the first part of the book, they argue that Nietzsche doesn't aim at resolving the tension between the "will to truth" (as best represented by scientific knowledge) and the "will to value" (our normative commitments) in favor of one of these two poles. Rather, he envisages a "philosophy of the future" according to which both wills or drives can productively cohabit. The second part focuses on Nietzsche's philosophical psychology, which the authors interpret as a renewal of Plato's view of the soul. I shall summarize how they proceed in articulating these two main points and then raise some worries about their reading.

Clark and Dudrick start by spelling out a metaphor which appears in BGE's "Preface". There, Nietzsche refers to the "magnificent tension of the spirit"  [2]  resulting from the millenarian "struggle against Plato" and "Christianity" (BGE,  Preface ). According to their proposal, this "magnificent tension" is the one between the "will to truth" and "will to value". Accordingly, the aphorisms ofBGE One should be read as telling a story about the role of and mutual relation between these two conflicting drives. As the authors read this story, it is wrong to take Nietzsche as criticizing either the "will to truth" -- the mistake of postmodern readings -- or, alternatively, the "will to value" -- the mistake of naturalist readings. [3]

On the one hand, Nietzsche's talk of "fictions of logic" (BGE 4) and of physics as "only an interpretation" and " not  an explanation of the world" (BGE 14) may induce the reader into the first kind of mistake and into falsely believing that he simply denies that science and even knowledge in general are possible. However, Clark and Dudrick maintain, this is just the exoteric surface of Nietzsche's text. In fact, he praises the "will to truth" embodied by scientific knowledge. This clearly emerges from his endorsement of (a version of) sensualism according to which the senses are the only sources of knowledge (BGE 15), an epistemological position which smoothly combines with Nietzsche's rejection of dogmatism understood as the view that "truth can be won by a priori means" (17). [4]

On the other hand, though his commitment to sensualism shows that "Nietzsche is a naturalist in an important sense" (9), it would be wrong to conclude that he is a  thorough  naturalist. One might well be (incorrectly) led to this conclusion by his claim that philosophy doesn't have "a 'drive for knowledge'" as its "father" (BGE 6), but rather corresponds to a mere projection of the philosopher's own values. However, the authors deny that Nietzsche is thereby suggesting that philosophers should renounce their normative commitments. Quite the contrary, being able to "see" things in terms of values is what constitutes, in his eyes, the very essence of philosophy. A key passage for Clark's and Dudrick's reading is GS 373, where Nietzsche writes that "a 'scientific' interpretation of the world might still be one of the  stupidest ", for "an essentially mechanistic world would be an essentially  meaningless  world". To better illustrate his point, Nietzsche uses the example of music:

Suppose one judged the  value  of a piece of music according to how much of it could be counted, calculated, and expressed in formulas -- how absurd such a 'scientific' evaluation of music would be! What would one have comprehended, understood, recognized! Nothing, really nothing of what is 'music' in it! (GS 373)

For Clark and Dudrick, Nietzsche is here drawing the limits of science's explanatory power:

Scientific explanations at their best are true, but they lose their truth when accompanied by an insistence that everything can be explained scientifically.  . . .  The only things that stand outside the range of scientific explanation  . . .  are human beings and their various forms of expression, including thought and behavior."(131)

As they put it elsewhere, Nietzsche clearly separates the "space of causes" -- the realm of scientific  explanation --  from the "space of reasons" -- the realm of rational  justification  (124). Values such as the beauty of a piece of music are located in the latter. Hence, Clark and Dudrick claim, Nietzsche doesn't aim at naturalizing Kant's program, but rather at carrying on his "normative project" (75). In this way, Nietzsche becomes a precursor of Wilfrid Sellars and of John McDowell (the former is explicitly mentioned, p. 124).

The second part of the book is devoted to Nietzsche's philosophical psychology. The authors oppose the widespread thesis that he simply dismisses normatively loaded notions like 'soul' and 'will'. They first address Nietzsche's treatment of the soul and argue that he only criticizes the "atomistic" conception which takes it to be "something indestructible, eternal, indivisible" (BGE 12). Contrary to this view, Nietzsche proposes to think of "'the soul as a society constructed out of drives and affects'" (BGE 12). In so doing, Clark and Dudrick suggest, he revives Plato's view of the soul as composite. In Nietzsche's modified picture, however, the multiple elements which form the soul and whose mutual interrelations determine one's behavior are simply our drives. In turn, the order of one's drives is what constitutes one's will. Importantly, this would lend the will enough causal power to disprove epiphenomenalist readings of Nietzsche's position.

The key point of the authors' reading is that "the drives are arranged not merely in a causal order but in a political one" (175). This would emerge from Nietzsche's description -- in BGE 19, of which they provide an impressive reading (at pp. 176-85) -- of the drives as standing in rank relations of command and obedience to one another. The order of the drives which constitutes someone's will is thus the "normative order" also constituting her "values" (195). Having such a will is what makes us persons able to act on reasons. As such, we enter the "space of reasons" to which scientific explanations are blind.

Provided this framework, Clark and Dudrick go on to address two last questions. The first concerns Nietzsche's notion of will to power, which they read psychologically as a kind of "second-order drive" (220) shared by all other drives and underlying the process through which these end up forming the political order which constitutes one's will. Furthermore, they argue that Nietzsche's notion of will to power has no role to play outside his philosophical psychology. To substantiate this claim, they offer an esoteric reading of those aphorisms where it is apparently employed in a biological (BGE 13), physical (BGE 22) or ontological (BGE 36) sense. In addition, the authors maintain that the view of the soul they ascribe to Nietzsche has the advantage of providing an illuminating rationale for his peculiar way of writing. They propose to see his style not as a departure from argumentative rigor, but rather as the attempt to revitalize Socrates' and Plato's agonic and erotic understanding of dialectic. However, given that Nietzsche doesn't consider reason to be an autonomous part of the soul, as Plato did, but rather as resulting from the (normative) order of the drives, a philosophical piece of writing is effective, to his eyes, only if it is able to " affect  the drives" (259). And this is precisely what Nietzsche tries to achieve in writing the way he does.

Though Clark and Dudrick's case in favor of a normative reading of BGE is supported by a meticulous and often penetrating interpretation of Nietzsche's book, I think it faces some substantial difficulties. I shall focus on two main points.

The first concerns their appeal to the distinction, found in BGE, between exoteric and esoteric. As Nietzsche explicitly endorses it, it seems obvious that his book has been written in view of it (see, e.g., p. 8). However, by praising this distinction he doesn't seem to suggest that a text should have both an overt and a covert meaning, as Clark and Dudrick suppose. His point is rather that, since the kind of reaction one has to certain views depends on one's being a "higher" or a "lesser" type of man (BGE 30), in many cultures such views were allowed -- rightly, for Nietzsche -- to circulate only within limited circles of initiates. The same point is made with regard to books, some of which "have inverse values for soul and for health, depending on whether they are used by the lower souls  . . .  or by the higher  . . .  ones" (BGE 30).

Nonetheless, the authors are right in stressing that Nietzsche's texts are written so as to misguide hasty readers and that his usage of certain terms differs from the current one. Thus, even if the exoteric-esoteric distinction is of little help in illuminating such peculiarities, their exegetical efforts are more than justified. In some cases, such efforts also strike me as successful, as when they propose to read Nietzsche's claim that logical principles are "false" as tantamount to "not-transcending our cognitive practices". [5]  In my view, however, what makes the authors' approach successful in this case is that "falsity" is a term which -- together with "belief", "truth", "knowledge", "consciousness", "will", "freedom of the will", etc. -- belongs to philosophy's traditional vocabulary. Such terms often appear double-quoted in Nietzsche's texts, [6]  a stylistic device he employs to advise the (attentive) reader to bracket out their standard meaning. This doesn't , though, usually happen when he adopts the physiological or biological talk that is the main target of the authors' esoteric reading. Thus, it seems to me more natural to hold that, in referring to his "foreign"-sounding "new language" (BGE 3), Nietzsche wants to make us reflect on his usage of the traditional philosophical jargon.

More serious difficulties, I think, concern the core of Clark and Dudrick's interpretation. In particular, there are reasons to doubt that the normative aspects they find in BGE suffice to ground the attribution to Nietzsche of substantial concerns with rational justification. Consider for instance their view of Nietzsche as carrying on Kant's normative program. Nietzsche characterizes the "space of reasons" which Kant separates from the "space of causes" of empirical knowledge as a less attractive "logical 'Beyond'" (D,  Preface  3). Given that ,  it seems hard to see both philosophers as here embarking on the same project. [7]  At least, it indicates that Nietzsche doesn't draw the same kind of distinction Kant draws. Nor do the authors tell us in which sense the "space of reasons" envisaged by Nietzsche might differ from Kant's "logical 'Beyond'".

Similar problems emerge if we turn to Clark and Dudrick's account of Nietzsche's theory of the soul. According to it, the "political" order of the drives constituting the soul cannot just correspond to their "causal" order, for it is not merely "an order of strength" (189). Now, it is right to stress that the will to power underlying the formation of such a political order is not equivalent to brute strength. This is reflected by Nietzsche's using the German term  Macht , which is germane to the political sphere, rather than  Kraft . However, this doesn't show that the power relations between the drives cannot be captured in causal terms. For one thing, it certainly seems wrong to assume that brute strength is the only option available here. It is possible to conceive such relations as realized by sophisticated psychological mechanisms and still treat them as causal. If this is so, why not think of the "political" order as constituted by, or resulting from, the way in which the drives (causally) interact? Moreover, it is not clear in which sense the power relations between the drives might be captured in terms of reasons, as the authors claim. They argue that Nietzsche's command-obedience talk implies that the lower-ranked drives "recognize the authority" of the higher-ranked drives (193). But how are we to make sense of it? Clark and Dudrick compare the order of the drives to the "'dominance hierarchies'" which structure the social life of primates (199). This might be an insightful way of seeing it, but it doesn't help us to see how the transactions between the drives happen within something that might be called a "space of reasons". Rather, it seems to suggest that they don't.

Let us move from the sub-personal level of the drives to the personal level of the agent (a distinction the authors themselves utilize). Perhaps what motivates talking in terms of rational justification is the way the agent is committed to her values. Clark and Dudrick claim that one's values are constituted by the normative order of one's drives. Each drive highlights a certain aspect of reality as something valuable. If a drive occupies a high-ranked position in the agent's internal normative economy, she will normally assume the drive's "viewpoint" and take to be valuable whatever it highlights as such. Thus, if the agent's value-commitments are constituted by the value-commitments of her highest-ranked drives, it is hard to see how the former ones might be rationally justified independently from the latter ones. (This, indeed, sits nicely with Nietzsche's insistence that the actual motives of our actions lie at the level of our drives.) As we have seen, however, the (sub-personal) transactions between our drives don't seem to leave room for something like a "space of reasons".

There is less doubt that Clark and Dudrick's book will be agenda-setting. Though one might doubt that their case in favor of a normative reading of BGE is successful, it surely provides the most sophisticated and powerful arguments so far brought against the naturalist one. It is also a major example of philosophical exegesis. The accurate, often even commentary-like, interpretation they offer of Nietzsche's aphorisms is always refreshingly insightful and philosophically stimulating. It is the kind of thorough, passionate and fascinating investigation one could only wish to come across more often, especially in the field of Nietzsche studies. [8]

(I use the standard abbreviations for Nietzsche's works)

Clark M. (1990):  Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hussain N. (2004): 'Nietzsche's Positivism',  European Journal of Philosophy  12/3: 326 -- 368.

Leiter B. (2002):  Nietzsche on Morality , London: Routledge.

Nietzsche (1878-1880):  Human, All Too Human , trans. by R.J. Hollingdale, with an Introduction by R. Schacht, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. (=HUH)

Nietzsche F. (1881):  Daybreak. Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality , ed. by M. Clark and B. Leiter, trans. by R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. (=D)

Nietzsche F. (1882/1887):  The Gay Science , ed. by B. Williams, trans. by J. Nauckhoff and A. Del Caro, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. (=GS)

Nietzsche F. (1886):  Beyond Good and Evil. Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future , ed. by R.P. Horstmann and J. Norman, trans. by J. Norman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. (=BGE)

Nietzsche F. (1980):  Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bände , ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. (=KSA)

Nietzsche F. (1986):  Sämtliche  Briefe. Kritische Studienausgabe in 8 Bände , ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. (=KSB)

[1]  To E.W. Fritzsch, 7 th  August 1886, KSB 7, 224.

[2]  I adopt here the same translation as Clark and Dudrick.

[3]  The main target here is Leiter (2002).

[4]  This line of reading is not new for those familiar with Clark's previous (1990) book on Nietzsche. Here, however, it is refined and defended against Hussain (2004), who offers aphenomenalist interpretation of Nietzsche's sensualism.

[5]  This is my rephrasing of Clark and Dudrick's interpretation (see pp. 48-63, in particular p. 57) of Nietzsche's claim that logical principles are among our "falsest judgments" (BGE 4).

[6]  In fact, all the terms just listed appear double-quoted in BGE 2, 3 or 19. "Falsity" does not occur double-quoted in BGE 4, but appears immediately before Nietzsche's explicit reference to "new language", to which I shall come back to shortly.

[7]  It is worth stressing that the "Preface" to  Daybreak  was also written in 1886. More important is that Kant's move of setting limits to empirical knowledge in order to leave room for a normative (moral) realm is consistently rejected by the middle and late Nietzsche. Relevant passages are: HUH II,  Assorted Opinions and Maximes  27; D 197; KSA 12, 9[178], 442-43.

[8]  Many thanks to Brian Leiter for his helpful comments on a previous draft.

• Health, Family & Personal Development
• Personal Transformation

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

Beyond Good And Evil [Paperback] Friedrich Nietzsche Paperback – 7 May 2017

Save extra with 2 offers.

• Free Delivery

10 days Replacement

• Amazon Delivered
• Pay on Delivery
• Secure transaction

Replacement Instructions

Purchase options and add-ons

• Friedrich Nietzsche's influential work, Beyond Good and Evil
• Engage with Nietzsche's exploration of morality, power, and human nature
• Thought-provoking insights that challenge conventional beliefs
• Perfect for philosophy enthusiasts and those seeking intellectual stimulation
• An essential addition to any philosophical library, igniting deep contemplation and discourse.
• Print length 228 pages
• Language English
• Dimensions 12.7 x 1.52 x 20.32 cm
• Publisher Fingerprint! Publishing
• Publication date 7 May 2017
• ISBN-10 8175994444
• ISBN-13 978-8175994447
• See all details

Frequently bought together

Popular titles by this author

From the Publisher

Product description

About the author, product details.

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Fingerprint! Publishing; 2017th edition (7 May 2017); Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd, 113A, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, +9111-23265358
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 228 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 8175994444
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-8175994447
• Reading age ‏ : ‎ Customer suggested age: 17 years and up
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 176 g
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 12.7 x 1.52 x 20.32 cm
• Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ India
• Net Quantity ‏ : ‎ 1 count
• Importer ‏ : ‎ Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd
• Packer ‏ : ‎ Prakash Books India Pvt Ltd
• #30 in Society & Culture (Books)
• #245 in Personal Transformation

About the author

Friedrich nietzsche.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

Reviews with images.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from India

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Press Releases
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell under Amazon Accelerator
• Protect and Build Your Brand
• Amazon Global Selling
• Become an Affiliate
• Fulfilment by Amazon
• Advertise Your Products
• Amazon Pay on Merchants
• COVID-19 and Amazon
• Your Account
• Returns Centre
• 100% Purchase Protection
• Amazon App Download
• Conditions of Use & Sale
• Privacy Notice
• Interest-Based Ads

• Literature & Fiction
• History & Criticism

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Beyond Good and Evil: The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche (Booklover's Library Classics) Paperback – June 23, 2022

• Print length 121 pages
• Language English
• Publication date June 23, 2022
• Dimensions 6 x 0.28 x 9 inches
• ISBN-10 1915582024
• ISBN-13 978-1915582027
• See all details

Customers who bought this item also bought

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Booklover’s Library Classics (June 23, 2022)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 121 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1915582024
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1915582027
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 8.5 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.28 x 9 inches
• #126 in Religious Fiction Short Stories
• #197 in Deconstructivist Philosophy
• #310 in German Literary Criticism (Books)

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top review from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices