a systematic literature review analysis

A systematic review collects all possible studies related to a given topic and design, and reviews and analyzes their results [ 1 ]. During the systematic review process, the quality of studies is evaluated, and a statistical meta-analysis of the study results is conducted on the basis of their quality. A meta-analysis is a valid, objective ...

A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available evidence. It answers a clearly formulated research question and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer. Example: Systematic review. In 2008, Dr. Robert Boyle and his colleagues published a systematic review in ...

Method details Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure [12].An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject [6].The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a ...

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

A well-designed systematic review includes clear objectives, pre-selected criteria for identifying eligible studies, an explicit methodology, a thorough and reproducible search of the literature, an assessment of the validity or risk of bias of each included study, and a systematic synthesis, analysis and presentation of the findings of the ...

A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016).A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular ... SRs treat the literature review process like a scientific process, and apply concepts of empirical ... Perform sensitivity analysis if possible. If the results of all studies are pooled together in a quantitative analysis, this is called ...

Review Manager (RevMan) is a web-based software that manages the entire literature review process and meta-analysis. The meta-analyst uploads all studies to RevMan library, where they can be managed and exanimated for inclusion. Like CMA, RevMan enables authors to conduct overall analysis and moderator analysis. 4.4.6.3 Stata

R provides packages for various areas of interest, including systematic literature review or the related field of meta-analysis. 2 These include Bibliometrix (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017), Revtools (Westgate, 2018) and Litsearchr (Grames et al, 2019) of the Metaverse project, 3 as well as Adjutant (Crisan et al., 2018) and Metagear (Lajeunesse ...

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline.

CONCLUSION. Siddaway 16 noted that, "The best reviews synthesize studies to draw broad theoretical conclusions about what the literature means, linking theory to evidence and evidence to theory" (p. 747). To that end, high quality systematic reviews are explicit, rigorous, and reproducible. It is these three criteria that should guide authors seeking to write a systematic review or editors ...

A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

Nevertheless, to carry out a systematic literature review /meta-analysis, researchers must deeply understand its methodology. This narrative review aims to act as a learning tool for new ...

Qualitative, narrative synthesis. Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models. Rapid review. Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Completeness of searching determined by time constraints.

Systematic review and meta-analysis • Synthesizes guidelines for systematic literature reviews • Provides guidelines for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis in social sciences. Palmatier et al. (2018) Marketing: Review papers and systematic reviews •

Systematic Review. Attempts to identify, appraise, and summarize all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. clearly defined question with inclusion/exclusion criteria. rigorous and systematic search of the literature. thorough screening of results. data extraction and management.

Types of reviews and examples. Definition: "A term used to describe a conventional overview of the literature, particularly when contrasted with a systematic review (Booth et al., 2012, p. 265). Characteristics: Example: Mitchell, L. E., & Zajchowski, C. A. (2022). The history of air quality in Utah: A narrative review.

The total score of the scale ranged from 0 to 10; higher scores indicated better quality of the literature. Data analysis. All data were performed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis 3.3 (CMA 3.3). ... Through systematic review and meta-analysis, this study established a positive correlation between PSNU and anxiety symptoms (i.e., ...

The general literature review is a synthesis and analysis of published research on a relevant clinical issue, and is a common format for academic theses at the bachelor's and master's levels in nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, public health and other related fields. ... This article seeks to describe a systematic method of data ...

Increased interest in sustainability and related issues has led to the development of disclosed corporate information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Additionally, questions have arisen about whether these disclosures affect the firm's value. Therefore, we conducted a bibliometric analysis coupled with a systematic literature review (SLR) of the current literature in ...

3.2 Descriptive analysis. Figure 2 offers an analytical synthesis of the publication trends within the realms of servitization and digital servitization over a span of more than three decades, utilizing data harvested from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The blue bars across all three charts articulate the volume of literature pertaining to servitization, encompassing its theoretical ...

This systematic literature review focused on 20 diseases selected as NTDs by WHO: Buruli ulcer, Chagas disease, dengue and chikungunya, dracunculiasis ... The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis should be interpreted under the following limitations. The included studies in our review only focused on patients who sought ...

Similarly, this study consists of category analysis based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, research design used, research method utilised, different data analysis techniques and different Industry 4.0 technologies were used to solve different applications in the BRICS nations.,According to the analysis of past literature, the ...

Leadership style has an important role in the implementation of quality management. This systematic review describes the characteristics of leadership in quality management in healthcare, and analyses their association with successful or unsuccessful quality management by using content analysis.