what's an assignment brief

NCI LIBRARY

Academic writing skills guide: understanding assignments.

• Key Features of Academic Writing
• The Writing Process
• Understanding Assignments
• Brainstorming Techniques
• Planning Your Assignments
• Thesis Statements
• Writing Drafts
• Structuring Your Assignment
• How to Deal With Writer's Block
• Using Paragraphs
• Conclusions
• Introductions
• Revising & Editing
• Proofreading
• Grammar & Punctuation
• Reporting Verbs
• Signposting, Transitions & Linking Words/Phrases
• Using Lecturers' Feedback

Below is a list of interpretations for some of the more common directive/instructional words. These interpretations are intended as a guide only but should help you gain a better understanding of what is required when they are used. 

Communications from the Library:  Please note all communications from the library, concerning renewal of books, overdue books and reservations will be sent to your NCI student email account.

• << Previous: The Writing Process
• Next: Brainstorming Techniques >>
• Last Updated: Apr 23, 2024 1:31 PM
• URL: https://libguides.ncirl.ie/academic_writing_skills

Assignment briefs

An assignment brief explains the task you are being asked to do for your assessment and how your lecturers would like you to do it. It could be as short as a single essay question, or it could be more detailed, such as a project brief with a number of sections or stages.  

Scroll down for our recommended strategies and resources.  

Get informed

As well as your assignment brief, you may have other documents with useful information for your assignment. Check on Moodle for things like the deadline, format, marking criteria, and any additional guidance that may be in lecture slides. If you have looked, but cannot find something, do ask your lecturer.

Take time to understand everything in the question and exactly what you are being asked to do. If you do not understand a word, look it up. Language learner dictionaries can be useful as they offer longer and clearer definitions of words.

Do initial research

Although understanding the words in your assignment brief is important, usually you won’t fully comprehend the concepts or ideas behind those words without doing some reading first. Don’t worry if you don’t immediately know how to answer your brief; this is normal. List some questions about what you don’t understand and need to find out, and use these to guide your initial reading around the topic. See the resource below for a series of questions to get you started:

Model to generate critical thinking (University of Plymouth)

Keywords and overview

Break the question down and look at keywords but also consider the overall purpose and main issues raised by the question as a whole.

Analysing questions using keywords (UNSW, Australia)

More complex or implied questions (UNSW, Australia)

Answer the question

It may sound obvious, but make sure you are answering the question you have been set, not the question you would prefer to answer. If the brief has a number of tasks or parts, answer all of them. Parts that involve evaluation or analysis are usually longer and worth more marks than parts that ask for description or explanation. Keep the brief in front of you and check it regularly.

Marking criteria

Unless you have been told otherwise, your marking criteria is not usually a guide to the structure of your assignment. Each section of the criteria is not a separate paragraph in your assignment, but qualities that you need to demonstrate throughout. Treat the marking criteria as a checklist at the end not as a plan at the beginning. Also the criteria often tells you what to demonstrate (e.g. critical analysis) but not necessarily how to do it. For the how to do it, look back at the skills and activities you have covered in the rest of the module.

Back to top

Cookie statement

Understanding your assignment questions: A short guide

Introduction.

• Breaking down the question
• Further reading and references

It is important to understand what an essay question or assignment brief is asking of you.

Before you start to research or write, it is worth spending time considering the wording of the question and any learning outcomes that may accompany it.

Failure to do this could result in an unfocussed response which does not answer the question.

Before you start to research, plan or write:

• Check the word count, deadline and any guidance from your department.
• Read through any learning outcomes or marking criteria.
• If there is a choice of questions, make some initial notes on each one (or a few that appeal) and make a careful decision.
• Unpick your chosen (or given) question and ensure that you understand exactly what it is asking you to do.
• Next: Breaking down the question >>
• Last Updated: Nov 13, 2023 4:28 PM
• URL: https://libguides.bham.ac.uk/asc/understandingassignments

• CAW's Student Portal
• CAW's Staff Portal
• Research Support

CAW LibGuides: How to Analyse an Assignment Brief

• CAW Homepage
• Meet the Team
• Using CAW's Workshop Support
• Academic Writing Tutorial Policy
• Making the most of your academic writing tutorial
• Using CAW's Single Question Drop-in Support
• Academic Writing Workshops
• Academic Writing Tutorials
• Single Question Drop-in Sessions
• Referencing Support
• Exam Writing Support
• CAW's Add+Vantage Modules
• The Short Guide to Assessment
• The Writing Process

How to Analyse an Assignment Brief

• Paragraph Structure
• Understanding and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Tips for Polishing and Proofreading
• Self or Peer Assessing an Essay
• Understanding Written Assignment Feedback
• Structuring an Academic Essay
• Writing a Literature Review
• Writing a Report
• Reflective Writing
• Writing a Dissertation Proposal
• Essay Writing in Exams
• Definitions of Directive Words
• Style and Register
• Punctuation for Academic Writing
• Integrating Sources using Signal Phrases
• Glossary of Written Assignment Feedback Terms
• Glossary Terms for Types of Academic Misconduct
• Writing for Presentations, Infographics, and Posters
• Other Support Services

To do well in your assignments, you will need to analyse your assignment briefs carefully.

The purpose of this handout is to:

• Provide you with an effective strategy for analysing assignment briefs
• Demonstrate the strategy on an example assignment brief
• Give you the opportunity to practice the strategy on further examples

The example briefs may not be from your subject area. However, as you will see, the strategy we demonstrate will be useful for almost all assignment briefs.

Using a strategy

When your markers write an assignment brief, they choose their words carefully in order to communicate their expectations. Therefore, a structured analysis of your assignment brief gives you the best chance of writing a successful assignment.

In almost every brief, there will be words and phrases that:

• Direct you towards the kinds of thinking and writing you need to demonstrate;
• Advise on what the content should be.

There may also be words and phrases that:

• Inform your approach ;
• Give you clues about how your writing should be organised and presented .

Therefore, an effective strategy is to highlight words and phrases in these categories so that you are able to take note of them. This handout uses an example assignment brief to walk you through this process.

Step 1. Highlight directive words

Directive words prompt you to engage in the kinds of thinking and writing you need to demonstrate in the assignment.

Directive words may include:

Verbs like evaluate , analyse , explain , recommend and illustrate .

Sometimes these words may be in the present tense:

e.g. “… illustrating your points with examples”

• The result of actions:

Words like evaluation , analysis , explanation , and illustration tell you the output of the kind of thinking your markers are looking for. These are called nominalised verbs.

These kinds of words are paired with others like write , conduct , include or produce :

For example:

• ‘write an explanation’
• ‘conduct an analysis’
• ‘include an illustration’
• ‘produce an evaluation’

There is no need to highlight words like write and include .

• A special case:

You may also see words and phrases like use, utilise, draw on and apply. These words usually precede words and phrases that will inform your approach. Highlight these in a different colour.

In the example brief, there are several directive words:

Using the IKEA case study provided and at least one theory from the module, produce a critical analysis and evaluation of IKEA’s recruitment policies.

Discuss potential approaches that IKEA could implement to improve its recruitment practices.

Step 2. Highlight content words

After highlighting the directive verbs, use a different colour highlighter to identify the content words—i.e. the content you are expected to write about.

In the example, the content words are highlighted in green:

Using the IKEA case study provided and at least one theory from the module, produce a critical analysis and evaluation of IKEA’s recruitment policies .

Discuss potential approaches that IKEA could implement to improve its recruitment practices .

If you are analysing a complex assignment brief, it can often be useful to identify the pairings of directive words and content words.

In the example brief, there are three pairs of directive and content words:

Directive word(s):    critical analysis

Content words:        IKEA’s recruitment policies

Directive word(s):    evaluation

Directive word(s):    discuss

Content words:        potential approaches that IKEA could implement to improve its recruitment practices

Once you have identified the content words/phrases , these should be the focus of your reading and research. The directive words allow you to identify the kinds of questions you will need to be thinking about as you read.

For instance, in the example brief, the markers have asked you to discuss potential approaches . Therefore, as you read about a potential approach, you will need to be asking questions like:

• What are the different points of view about this approach?
• What evidence is there for these points of view?
• What are the approach’s strengths and weaknesses?
• What are the implications of this approach?
• What is my point of view?

Step 3. Highlight words that inform your approach

Some briefs may include words and phrases that are designed to inform your strategy or approach towards the assignment. These tend to be in two categories:

• Tools and resources you should use.

These may include:

• Types of evidence/data
• Case studies
• Specific personal experiences (e.g. for a reflective assignment)
• Limits or boundaries you must stay within
• The number of theories, models, etc. to include
• The types/categories of examples, models, theories, etc. to consider

Not all briefs are prescriptive in this way. However, you will still need to consider whether and how you should use these kinds of tools in order to write an effective answer.

In the example below, the words/phrases designed to inform your approach are all highlighted in blue:

Using the IKEA case study provided and at least one theory from the module , produce a critical analysis and evaluation of IKEA’s recruitment policies.

Even though sources are not mentioned in this example brief, all assignments at university will need to make use of high-quality, relevant sources, such as journal articles and academic books.

However, remember that different disciplines (and also assignments) may require you to make use of different types of sources. If in doubt, discuss your choice of sources with your lecturer or your academic liaison librarian.  You can find who this is for your discipline at this link: https://libguides.coventry.ac.uk/all .

If your brief asks you to choose a theory, model, case study, etc., you will first need to identify your options. Start by reviewing the material from your lectures and the reading list to identify appropriate options. It can also often be a good idea to discuss your options with your tutor.

Once you have identified your options, you will need to identify the best one(s) for your assignment. You will want to consider their relevance, usefulness, and whether they are accepted within your field. Depending on the assignment, you may need to justify your choice in your writing.

Step 4. Highlight words related to organisation and presentation

You will already be aware that your assignment will have a word count. However, you may also be given further direction about how to organise and present your assignment.

For example, the brief may be explicit about the genre you are expected to produce. You may be asked to write any of the following genres:

• Research proposal
• Project proposal
• Reflective log
• Annotated bibliography
• Literature review
• Dissertation
• Presentation
• Academic poster

This is not an exhaustive list. There is a wide range of academic genres you may be asked to write at university. Each genre is organised and presented in conventional ways, which may vary from discipline to discipline. You will find useful information about genres in many of the books about academic writing in the Study Skills Section of the library.

Your markers may also have provided a structure (i.e. a set of sections) for your assignment. When analysing the brief, remember to highlight whether this structure is mandatory or simply a suggestion:

• If the structure is mandatory, you must use the structure in the brief. If you fail to do so, you will lose marks.  
• If the structure is a suggestion, try generating your own ideas first. Develop a structure that makes sense to you, then compare your structure with theirs. You can use your structure, theirs or a hybrid. Just make sure your choice is appropriate for the genre, logical, coherent, and allows you to fully answer the brief.

Exercises on Analysing an Assignment Brief

The best way to learn any new skill is to put it into practice.  The pdf document contains A ppendix One for two example briefs and Appendix Two for the answers.

Cottrell, S. (2019). Macmillan study skills: The study skills handbook (5th ed.). Red Globe Press.

Greetham, B. (2018). How to write better essays (4 th ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

The University of Adelaide. (2014). Writing essays: Writing centre Learning Guide. Writing Centre. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/writingcentre/sites/default/files/docs/learningguide-writingessays.pdf

University of Birmingham. (2017). A short guide to understanding your assignments. Library Services. https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/as/libraryservices/library/asc/documents/public/Short-Guide-Understanding-assignment.pdf

To cite this resource:

Coventry University. (2022). Analysing an Assignment Brief. Centre for Academic Writing. https://libguides.coventry.ac.uk/CAWhomepage/analysinganassignmentbrief

The Meaning of Directive Words

A ‘ Definitions of Directive Words ’ document can be found downloaded as a pdf document at the bottom of this page.  The document lists directive verbs and their typical meanings. However, be aware that the meanings of these words can vary between disciplines. Additional definitions can be found in Cottrell (2019, p. 285) and Greetham (2018, pp. 48-50).

Further Support

CAW offers writing development workshops across all genres of academic writing in order to build on your learning.  To view available workshops and book online, please visit:  https://libcal.coventry.ac.uk/calendar/caw

• How to Analyse an Assignment Brief Download pdf of 'How to Analyse an Assignment Brief' containing exercises.
• Definitions of Directive Words Download pdf of 'Definitions of Directive Words'
• << Previous: The Writing Process
• Next: Paragraph Structure >>
• Last Updated: May 10, 2024 4:12 PM
• URL: https://libguides.coventry.ac.uk/CAWhomepage

Assignment Writing: Following the Brief

• Following the Brief
• Researching
• Reading Tips
• Writing Tips
• Writing a First Draft
• Proofreading and Editing
• Formatting Assignments
• Assignment Submission
• Using Feedback

Completing assignments involves learning and showing what you have learnt . A great thing about doing assignments is that it is  one of the ways you can show your new knowledge and/or skills . It will take time so spend the first part planning and organising. This will make it easier to complete later on. This guide will help you think about the tasks you have been asked to do.

Assignment Brief

The first thing you want to do is read and understand the assignment brief .

The Assignment brief tells you:

• What the purpose is
• What you need to do
• What the word count is
• When the assignment is due

When you receive an assignment brief, it will look something like this.

Written Assignment (Summative) -  Te Tiriti o Waitangi in Aotearoa New Zealand

The student will be required to locate information from a variety of sources and critically assess this information to demonstrate an understanding of the relevance of te Tiriti o Waitangi in modern day Aotearoa New Zealand. This assessment allows the student to demonstrate that they can write a formal academic essay and communicate clearly in written, oral and visual forms.

Assessment Task

Write a formal essay addressing the following tasks:

• Briefly describe te Tiriti o Waitangi
• Explain the relevance that te Tiriti o Waitangi has in Aotearoa New Zealand today
• Give an example of how you might demonstrate applying te Tiriti o Waitangi in your professional or study life

Structuring your assignment

• Follow standard essay structure and use formal language.
• Use in-text citations and have a reference list using APA format.

Word Count:         1,200 (+/- 10%)

  Due:       12 October                

Take a moment

• What is purpose of your assignment?
• What have you been asked to do?
• When is assignment your due?
• What is the word count?

Some people find it useful to highlight the key information. This can help you find it quickly, and make sure you do everything that is required.

Marking Rubric

There is another useful document that will give you information about your assignment. It is a Marking Rubric. Sometimes this will be attached to your assignment brief, but other times you may need to search for it on Moodle.

How will my assignment be marked?

The marking rubric tells you:

• What the marker is looking for
• What you're being marked on
• What is needed to achieve a certain grade

Aim to meet the level for the top grade

When you receive a marking rubric, it will look something like this.

Grading Rubric for Te Tiriti Assignment

Your marking rubric will typically include requirements for your ideas, research and evidence, and the organisation of your ideas.

Take another moment

• What is the marker looking for?
• What are you being marked on?
• What is needed to achieve the grade you are aiming for?

The assignment brief and the marking rubric are connected. They both hold important information so make sure you understand them both. If you need help with this, ask a classmate, your tutor, or a learning advisor. 

How to write an Assignment in Seven easy steps! by Groobles Media

Don't know what you're being asked to do?

When you are given an assignment, it can sometimes be difficult to work out exactly what you need to do. This is often because assignment briefs are written using academic words. These words, or verbs, below will give you an idea of what you are being asked to do. 

If your assignment includes words that are not on this list, type them into a dictionary to find out their meaning. 

• What do the words mean? What am I being asked to do?

What's this all about?

It might all feel a bit overwhelming to begin with. Start by reading and understanding the task. Use the activities on this page to guide you. 

Image: Creative Commons

What do I already know?

Before you go any further, it can be useful to write down what you already know about the topic. 

Ask yourself,

• What do I already know about this topic?
• What do I want to know?

Answering questions like these can help prepare your mind to explore the topic further. 

Image citation: Possessed Photography. (2019, September 8).  Rerouting  [Photograph]. Unsplash.  https://unsplash.com/photos/0La7MwJhSyo

• << Previous: Overview
• Next: Planning >>
• Last Updated: Mar 11, 2024 2:50 PM
• URL: https://whitireia.libguides.com/Assignment_Writing

Learning and Teaching

• Assessment and Feedback
• Marking criteria, assessment briefs and feedback

Assessment briefs

Have you set an assessment, only to be bombarded with queries from students about how to approach the task?  Or, marked work to find that the cohort has missed the point of the assessment?   

Sources of difficulty

Writing a clear assessment brief is a skill that is fraught with challenges and requires practise. Assessments should have elements of difficulty built in that support academics in making valid judgments about the quality of the response – these are legitimate difficulties.   

However, where assessments include or omit information that benefits some groups of students over others, this prevents valid judgements from being made regarding student ability and instead increases awarding gaps and time spent on fruitless feedback. These, often unconscious barriers, are known as illegitimate difficulties. 

Legitimate sources of difficulty

Intentional demands of the assessment question. They allow assessors to make judgements about the quality of a response:

• Open v closed questions​
• Abstract v concrete concepts​
• The number of cognitive processes

Illegitimate sources of difficulty

Unintentional features of an assessment brief that give unfair advantage or disadvantage to some students:

• ​Inaccessible language​
• Cultural-specific​ language or examples
• Irrelevant additional materials

Checking your brief

It is also good practice to consider the ‘bigger picture’ of an assessment from the perspective of a student, especially if several colleagues have collaborated to create a single exam or assessment. Items such as diagrams and images intended to be a support, could instead be a point of confusion.

• Additional resources (diagrams, images, case studies): do they provide useful support? ​
• Clarity: are there any superfluous words, negatives, ambiguous terms/words with more than one meaning? ​
• Presentation of the brief: do the layout, marks available, command terms align with what you would like students to do?​
• Any intended/unintended clues that students may use to support their response. ​
• Intended level of difficulty: is the word count or number of reasoning/ processing steps appropriate for the marks and time available? ​
• Clarity of expectations: is there one clear way of a approaching the task? Would different approaches be acceptable?

Further approaches

Where time and budget allow, employing a ‘scribe’ can be an excellent insight into the effectiveness of an assignment brief.  A scribe’s role is to attempt an assessment before it is set for the majority of students.  They complete the task and provide feedback on the level of difficulty involved- this would usually be someone who has completed the relevant level of the course previously and should be able to complete the task with relative ease.

Related Articles

• Improving Clarity with Structured Assignment Brief Templates 
• Effective feedback practice
• Marking criteria

Article Contents

• Digital Teaching and Learning Tools
• Assessment and Feedback Tools

Assessment Criteria and Rubrics

An introduction.

This guide is an introduction to:

• Writing an assessment brief with clear assessment criteria and rubrics
• Grading tools available in Turnitin enabling the use of criteria and rubrics in marking.

Clear and explicit assessment criteria and rubrics are meant to increase the transparency of the assessment and aim to develop students into ‘novice assessors’ (Gipps, 1994) and facilitating deep learning.  Providing well-designed criteria and rubrics, contributes to communicating assessment requirements that can be more inclusive to all (including markers) regardless of previous learning experiences, and or individual differences in language, cultural and educational background.  It also facilitates the development of self-judgment skills (Boud & Falchikov, 2007).

• Assessment brief
• Assessment criteria
• Assessment rubric
• Guidance in how to create rubrics and grading forms
• Guidance on how to create a rubric in Handin

Terminology Explored

The terms ‘assessment brief’ , ‘assessment criteria’ and ‘assessment rubrics’ however, are often used interchangeably and that may lead to misunderstandings and impact on the effectiveness of the design and interpretation of the assessment brief.  Therefore, it is important to first clarify these terms:

Assessment Brief

An assessment (assignment) brief refers to the instructions provided to communicate the requirements and expectations of assessment tasks, including the assessment criteria and rubrics to students.  The brief should clearly outline which module learning outcomes will assessed in the assignment.

NOTE: If you are new to writing learning outcomes, or need a refresher, have a look at Baume’s guide to “Writing and using good learning outcomes”, (2009).  See list of references.

When writing an assessment brief, it may be useful to consider the following questions with regards to your assessment brief:

• Have you outlined clearly what type of assessment you require students to complete?  For example, instead of “written assessment”, outline clearly what type of written assessment you require from your students; is it a report, a reflective journal, a blog, presentation, etc.  It is also recommended to give a breakdown of the individual tasks that make up the full assessment within the brief, to ensure transparency.
• Is the purpose of the assessment immediately clear to your students, i.e. why the student is being asked to do the task?  It might seem obvious to you as an academic, but for students new to academia and the subject discipline, it might not be clear.  For example, explain why they have to write a reflective report or a journal and indicate which module learning outcomes are to be assessed in this specific assessment task.
• Is all the important task information clearly outlined, such as assessment deadlines, word count, criteria and further support and guidance?

Assessment Criteria

Assessment criteria communicate to students the knowledge, skills and understanding (thus in line with the expected module learning outcomes) the assessors expect from students to evidence in any given assessment task.  To write a good set of criteria, the focus should be on the characteristics of the learning outcomes that the assignment will evidence and not only consider the characteristics of the assignment (task), i.e., presentation, written task, etc.

Thus, the criteria outlines what we expect from our students (based on learning outcomes), however it does not in itself make assumptions about the actual quality or level of achievement (Sadler, 1987: 194) and needs to be refined in the assessment rubric.  

When writing an assessment brief, it may be useful to consider the following questions with regards to the criteria that will be applied to assess the assignment:

• Are your criteria related and aligned with the module and (or) the course learning outcomes?
• What are the number of criteria you will assess in any particular task?  Consider how realistic and achievable this may be.
• Are the criteria clear and have you avoided using any terms not clear to students (academic jargon)?
• Are the criteria and standards (your quality definitions) aligned with the level of the course?   For guidance, consider revisiting the  Credit Level Descriptors (SEEC, 2016) and the QAA Subject Benchmarks in Framework for the Higher Education Qualifications that are useful starting points to consider.

Assessment Rubric

The assessment rubric, forms part of a set of criteria and refers specifically to the “levels of performance quality on the criteria.” (Brookhart & Chen, 2015, p. 343)

Generally, rubrics are categorised into two categories, holistic and or analytic. A holistic rubric assesses an assignment as a whole and is not broken down into individual assessment criteria.  For the purpose of this guidance, the focus will be on an analytic rubric that provides separate performance descriptions for each criterion.

An assessment rubric is therefore a tool used in the process of assessing student work that usually includes essential features namely the:  

• Scoring strategy – Can be numerical of qualitative, associated with the levels of mastery (quality definitions). (Shown as SCALE in Turnitin)
• Quality definitions (levels of mastery) – Specify the levels of achievement / performance in each criterion.

 (Dawson, 2017).

The figure below, is an example of the features of a complete rubric including the assessment criteria. 

When writing an assessment brief, it may be useful to consider the following questions with regards to firstly, the assessment brief, and secondly, the criteria and associated rubrics.

• Does your scoring strategy clearly define and cover the whole grading range?  For example, do you distinguish between the distinctions (70-79%) and 80% and above?
• Are the words and terms used to indicate level of mastery, clearly outlining and enabling students to distinguish between the different judgements?  For example, how do you differentiate between work that is outstanding, excellent and good?
• Is the chosen wording in your rubric too explicit?  It should be explicit but at the same time not overly specific to avoid students adopting a mechanistic approach to your assignment.  For example, instead of stating a minimum number references, consider stating rather effectiveness or quality of the use of literature, and or awareness or critical analysis of supporting literature.

NOTE: For guidance across Coventry University Group on writing criteria and rubrics, follow the links to guidance.

 POST GRADUATE Assessment criteria and rubrics (mode R)

 UNDER GRADUATE Assessment criteria and rubrics (mode E)

Developing Criteria and Rubrics within Turnitin

Within Turnitin, depending on the type of assessment, you have a choice between four grading tools:

• Qualitative Rubric – A rubric that provides feedback but has no numeric scoring.  More descriptive than measurable.  This rubric is selected by choosing the ‘0’ symbol at the base of the Rubric.
• Standard Rubric – Used for numeric scoring.  Enter scale values for each column (rubric score) and percentages for each criteria row, combined to be equal to 100%.  This rubric can calculate and input the overall grade.  This rubric is selected by choosing the % symbol at the base of the Rubric window.
• Custom Rubric – Add criteria (row) and descriptive scales (rubric), when marking enter (type) any value directly into each rubric cell.  This rubric will calculate and input the overall grade.  This rubric is selected by choosing the ‘Pencil’ symbol at the base of the Rubric window.
• Grading form – Can be used with or without numerical score.  If used without numerical score, then it is more descriptive feedback.  If used with numerical scoring, this can be added together to create an overall grade.  Note that grading forms can be used without a ‘paper assignment’ being submitted, for example, they can be used to assess work such as video submission, work of art, computer programme or musical performance.

Guidance on how to Create Rubric and Grading Forms

Guidance by Turnitin:

https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/turnitin-website/instructor/rubric-scorecards-and-grading-forms/creating-a-rubric-or-grading-form-during-assignment-creation.htm

University of Kent – Creating and using rubrics and grading form (written guidance):

https://www.kent.ac.uk/elearning/files/turnitin/turnitin-rubrics.pdf

Some Examples to Explore

It is useful to explore some examples in Higher Education, and the resource developed by UCL of designing generic assessment criteria and rubrics from level 4 to 7, is a good starting point.

Guidance on how to Create Rubric in Handin

Within Handin, depending on the type of assessment, you have a choice between three grading tools, see list below, as well as the choice to use “free-form” grading that allows you to enter anything in the grade field when grading submissions.

• None = qualitative
• Range = quantitative – can choose score from range
• Fixed = quantitative – one score per level

Guide to Handin: Creating ungraded (“free-form”) assignments

https://aula.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360053926834

Guide to Handin: Creating rubrics https://aula.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360017154820-How-can-I-use-Rubrics-for-Assignments-in-Aula-

References and Further Reading

Baume, D (2009) Writing and using good learning outcomes. Leeds Metropolitan University. ISBN 978-0-9560099-5-1 Link to Leeds Beckett Repository record: http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/2837/1/Learning_Outcomes.pdf

Boud, D & Falchikov, N. (2007) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

Brookhart, S.M. & Chen, F. (2015) The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics, Educational Review, 67:3, pp.343-368.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.929565

Dawson, P. (2017) Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), pp.347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294

Gipps, C.V. (1994) Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Psychology Press.

Sadler, D.R. (1987) Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), pp.191-209.

SEEC (2016) Credit Level Descriptors. Available: http://www.seec.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/SEEC-descriptors-2016.pdf

UK QAA Quality Code (2014) Part A – Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards. Available: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qualifications-frameworks.pdf

• The Open University
• Guest user / Sign out
• Study with The Open University

My OpenLearn Profile

Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning

About this free course

Become an ou student, download this course, share this free course.

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

8 Understanding the assignment brief

When faced with an assignment, ask yourself the following: Do you know what the assignment is asking you to do? Are you certain that you know how to interpret the question that has been set (i.e. what approach you are expected to take)? Understanding the assignment brief and interpreting the question correctly are essential requirements.

Assignment keywords can inform you about topics, resources or a particular area that you should focus on. These ‘content’ words tend to be nouns. Other keywords and phrases instruct you on the approach that you should take in answering the assignment, often expressed as imperatives such as ‘Assess the impact of…’ or ‘Explain the importance of …’. These are ‘process words’ or ‘command verbs’.

Table 1 Keywords (‘process words’) and phrases frequently used in assignment questions [ Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. ( Hide tip ) ]   highlights some important process words and phrases that are frequently used in assignment questions. The table also indicates the style or approach expected for the piece of writing. While the explanations provided here are generally accepted, you should consider process words in the context of the question as a whole. If you are in doubt about the wording of a question, you should consult your tutor. Box 2 in the previous section has further useful tips on writing assignments.

Activity 3 An effective assignment

In your view, and based on what has been discussed so far in this session, what do you think an effective assignment (piece of academic writing such as an essay or dissertation) should demonstrate at postgraduate level?

Write down your thoughts. You may wish to use a mind map for this activity.

We don’t expect you to have noted everything down! You may have picked up on a few of these points however, and we will be exploring these further a little later on, but do take the time to reflect on the following at this point.

An effective assignment (piece of academic writing at postgraduate level) would:

• show that you understand the subject and have addressed the learning outcomes
• show you have answered the question being asked and interpreted this correctly
• meet the requirements of the assignment (the assignment brief) fully
• be focused and well-structured and written in a coherent manner, with sentences and paragraphs that link logically
• use different theories, examples, arguments and perspectives to create a discussion of the topic
• show that you have read more widely and engaged with the subject at a deeper level
• be referenced correctly in the style of your discipline
• use formal language with correct use of grammar, punctuation and spelling
• express your arguments clearly and concisely
• adopt a style and ‘academic voice’ (tone) that is suited to the task and target audience.

Understanding Assignments

What this handout is about.

The first step in any successful college writing venture is reading the assignment. While this sounds like a simple task, it can be a tough one. This handout will help you unravel your assignment and begin to craft an effective response. Much of the following advice will involve translating typical assignment terms and practices into meaningful clues to the type of writing your instructor expects. See our short video for more tips.

Basic beginnings

Regardless of the assignment, department, or instructor, adopting these two habits will serve you well :

• Read the assignment carefully as soon as you receive it. Do not put this task off—reading the assignment at the beginning will save you time, stress, and problems later. An assignment can look pretty straightforward at first, particularly if the instructor has provided lots of information. That does not mean it will not take time and effort to complete; you may even have to learn a new skill to complete the assignment.
• Ask the instructor about anything you do not understand. Do not hesitate to approach your instructor. Instructors would prefer to set you straight before you hand the paper in. That’s also when you will find their feedback most useful.

Assignment formats

Many assignments follow a basic format. Assignments often begin with an overview of the topic, include a central verb or verbs that describe the task, and offer some additional suggestions, questions, or prompts to get you started.

An Overview of Some Kind

The instructor might set the stage with some general discussion of the subject of the assignment, introduce the topic, or remind you of something pertinent that you have discussed in class. For example:

“Throughout history, gerbils have played a key role in politics,” or “In the last few weeks of class, we have focused on the evening wear of the housefly …”

The Task of the Assignment

Pay attention; this part tells you what to do when you write the paper. Look for the key verb or verbs in the sentence. Words like analyze, summarize, or compare direct you to think about your topic in a certain way. Also pay attention to words such as how, what, when, where, and why; these words guide your attention toward specific information. (See the section in this handout titled “Key Terms” for more information.)

“Analyze the effect that gerbils had on the Russian Revolution”, or “Suggest an interpretation of housefly undergarments that differs from Darwin’s.”

Additional Material to Think about

Here you will find some questions to use as springboards as you begin to think about the topic. Instructors usually include these questions as suggestions rather than requirements. Do not feel compelled to answer every question unless the instructor asks you to do so. Pay attention to the order of the questions. Sometimes they suggest the thinking process your instructor imagines you will need to follow to begin thinking about the topic.

“You may wish to consider the differing views held by Communist gerbils vs. Monarchist gerbils, or Can there be such a thing as ‘the housefly garment industry’ or is it just a home-based craft?”

These are the instructor’s comments about writing expectations:

“Be concise”, “Write effectively”, or “Argue furiously.”

Technical Details

These instructions usually indicate format rules or guidelines.

“Your paper must be typed in Palatino font on gray paper and must not exceed 600 pages. It is due on the anniversary of Mao Tse-tung’s death.”

The assignment’s parts may not appear in exactly this order, and each part may be very long or really short. Nonetheless, being aware of this standard pattern can help you understand what your instructor wants you to do.

Interpreting the assignment

Ask yourself a few basic questions as you read and jot down the answers on the assignment sheet:

Why did your instructor ask you to do this particular task?

Who is your audience.

• What kind of evidence do you need to support your ideas?

What kind of writing style is acceptable?

• What are the absolute rules of the paper?

Try to look at the question from the point of view of the instructor. Recognize that your instructor has a reason for giving you this assignment and for giving it to you at a particular point in the semester. In every assignment, the instructor has a challenge for you. This challenge could be anything from demonstrating an ability to think clearly to demonstrating an ability to use the library. See the assignment not as a vague suggestion of what to do but as an opportunity to show that you can handle the course material as directed. Paper assignments give you more than a topic to discuss—they ask you to do something with the topic. Keep reminding yourself of that. Be careful to avoid the other extreme as well: do not read more into the assignment than what is there.

Of course, your instructor has given you an assignment so that they will be able to assess your understanding of the course material and give you an appropriate grade. But there is more to it than that. Your instructor has tried to design a learning experience of some kind. Your instructor wants you to think about something in a particular way for a particular reason. If you read the course description at the beginning of your syllabus, review the assigned readings, and consider the assignment itself, you may begin to see the plan, purpose, or approach to the subject matter that your instructor has created for you. If you still aren’t sure of the assignment’s goals, try asking the instructor. For help with this, see our handout on getting feedback .

Given your instructor’s efforts, it helps to answer the question: What is my purpose in completing this assignment? Is it to gather research from a variety of outside sources and present a coherent picture? Is it to take material I have been learning in class and apply it to a new situation? Is it to prove a point one way or another? Key words from the assignment can help you figure this out. Look for key terms in the form of active verbs that tell you what to do.

Key Terms: Finding Those Active Verbs

Here are some common key words and definitions to help you think about assignment terms:

Information words Ask you to demonstrate what you know about the subject, such as who, what, when, where, how, and why.

• define —give the subject’s meaning (according to someone or something). Sometimes you have to give more than one view on the subject’s meaning
• describe —provide details about the subject by answering question words (such as who, what, when, where, how, and why); you might also give details related to the five senses (what you see, hear, feel, taste, and smell)
• explain —give reasons why or examples of how something happened
• illustrate —give descriptive examples of the subject and show how each is connected with the subject
• summarize —briefly list the important ideas you learned about the subject
• trace —outline how something has changed or developed from an earlier time to its current form
• research —gather material from outside sources about the subject, often with the implication or requirement that you will analyze what you have found

Relation words Ask you to demonstrate how things are connected.

• compare —show how two or more things are similar (and, sometimes, different)
• contrast —show how two or more things are dissimilar
• apply—use details that you’ve been given to demonstrate how an idea, theory, or concept works in a particular situation
• cause —show how one event or series of events made something else happen
• relate —show or describe the connections between things

Interpretation words Ask you to defend ideas of your own about the subject. Do not see these words as requesting opinion alone (unless the assignment specifically says so), but as requiring opinion that is supported by concrete evidence. Remember examples, principles, definitions, or concepts from class or research and use them in your interpretation.

• assess —summarize your opinion of the subject and measure it against something
• prove, justify —give reasons or examples to demonstrate how or why something is the truth
• evaluate, respond —state your opinion of the subject as good, bad, or some combination of the two, with examples and reasons
• support —give reasons or evidence for something you believe (be sure to state clearly what it is that you believe)
• synthesize —put two or more things together that have not been put together in class or in your readings before; do not just summarize one and then the other and say that they are similar or different—you must provide a reason for putting them together that runs all the way through the paper
• analyze —determine how individual parts create or relate to the whole, figure out how something works, what it might mean, or why it is important
• argue —take a side and defend it with evidence against the other side

More Clues to Your Purpose As you read the assignment, think about what the teacher does in class:

• What kinds of textbooks or coursepack did your instructor choose for the course—ones that provide background information, explain theories or perspectives, or argue a point of view?
• In lecture, does your instructor ask your opinion, try to prove their point of view, or use keywords that show up again in the assignment?
• What kinds of assignments are typical in this discipline? Social science classes often expect more research. Humanities classes thrive on interpretation and analysis.
• How do the assignments, readings, and lectures work together in the course? Instructors spend time designing courses, sometimes even arguing with their peers about the most effective course materials. Figuring out the overall design to the course will help you understand what each assignment is meant to achieve.

Now, what about your reader? Most undergraduates think of their audience as the instructor. True, your instructor is a good person to keep in mind as you write. But for the purposes of a good paper, think of your audience as someone like your roommate: smart enough to understand a clear, logical argument, but not someone who already knows exactly what is going on in your particular paper. Remember, even if the instructor knows everything there is to know about your paper topic, they still have to read your paper and assess your understanding. In other words, teach the material to your reader.

Aiming a paper at your audience happens in two ways: you make decisions about the tone and the level of information you want to convey.

• Tone means the “voice” of your paper. Should you be chatty, formal, or objective? Usually you will find some happy medium—you do not want to alienate your reader by sounding condescending or superior, but you do not want to, um, like, totally wig on the man, you know? Eschew ostentatious erudition: some students think the way to sound academic is to use big words. Be careful—you can sound ridiculous, especially if you use the wrong big words.
• The level of information you use depends on who you think your audience is. If you imagine your audience as your instructor and they already know everything you have to say, you may find yourself leaving out key information that can cause your argument to be unconvincing and illogical. But you do not have to explain every single word or issue. If you are telling your roommate what happened on your favorite science fiction TV show last night, you do not say, “First a dark-haired white man of average height, wearing a suit and carrying a flashlight, walked into the room. Then a purple alien with fifteen arms and at least three eyes turned around. Then the man smiled slightly. In the background, you could hear a clock ticking. The room was fairly dark and had at least two windows that I saw.” You also do not say, “This guy found some aliens. The end.” Find some balance of useful details that support your main point.

You’ll find a much more detailed discussion of these concepts in our handout on audience .

The Grim Truth

With a few exceptions (including some lab and ethnography reports), you are probably being asked to make an argument. You must convince your audience. It is easy to forget this aim when you are researching and writing; as you become involved in your subject matter, you may become enmeshed in the details and focus on learning or simply telling the information you have found. You need to do more than just repeat what you have read. Your writing should have a point, and you should be able to say it in a sentence. Sometimes instructors call this sentence a “thesis” or a “claim.”

So, if your instructor tells you to write about some aspect of oral hygiene, you do not want to just list: “First, you brush your teeth with a soft brush and some peanut butter. Then, you floss with unwaxed, bologna-flavored string. Finally, gargle with bourbon.” Instead, you could say, “Of all the oral cleaning methods, sandblasting removes the most plaque. Therefore it should be recommended by the American Dental Association.” Or, “From an aesthetic perspective, moldy teeth can be quite charming. However, their joys are short-lived.”

Convincing the reader of your argument is the goal of academic writing. It doesn’t have to say “argument” anywhere in the assignment for you to need one. Look at the assignment and think about what kind of argument you could make about it instead of just seeing it as a checklist of information you have to present. For help with understanding the role of argument in academic writing, see our handout on argument .

What kind of evidence do you need?

There are many kinds of evidence, and what type of evidence will work for your assignment can depend on several factors–the discipline, the parameters of the assignment, and your instructor’s preference. Should you use statistics? Historical examples? Do you need to conduct your own experiment? Can you rely on personal experience? See our handout on evidence for suggestions on how to use evidence appropriately.

Make sure you are clear about this part of the assignment, because your use of evidence will be crucial in writing a successful paper. You are not just learning how to argue; you are learning how to argue with specific types of materials and ideas. Ask your instructor what counts as acceptable evidence. You can also ask a librarian for help. No matter what kind of evidence you use, be sure to cite it correctly—see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial .

You cannot always tell from the assignment just what sort of writing style your instructor expects. The instructor may be really laid back in class but still expect you to sound formal in writing. Or the instructor may be fairly formal in class and ask you to write a reflection paper where you need to use “I” and speak from your own experience.

Try to avoid false associations of a particular field with a style (“art historians like wacky creativity,” or “political scientists are boring and just give facts”) and look instead to the types of readings you have been given in class. No one expects you to write like Plato—just use the readings as a guide for what is standard or preferable to your instructor. When in doubt, ask your instructor about the level of formality they expect.

No matter what field you are writing for or what facts you are including, if you do not write so that your reader can understand your main idea, you have wasted your time. So make clarity your main goal. For specific help with style, see our handout on style .

Technical details about the assignment

The technical information you are given in an assignment always seems like the easy part. This section can actually give you lots of little hints about approaching the task. Find out if elements such as page length and citation format (see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial ) are negotiable. Some professors do not have strong preferences as long as you are consistent and fully answer the assignment. Some professors are very specific and will deduct big points for deviations.

Usually, the page length tells you something important: The instructor thinks the size of the paper is appropriate to the assignment’s parameters. In plain English, your instructor is telling you how many pages it should take for you to answer the question as fully as you are expected to. So if an assignment is two pages long, you cannot pad your paper with examples or reword your main idea several times. Hit your one point early, defend it with the clearest example, and finish quickly. If an assignment is ten pages long, you can be more complex in your main points and examples—and if you can only produce five pages for that assignment, you need to see someone for help—as soon as possible.

Tricks that don’t work

Your instructors are not fooled when you:

• spend more time on the cover page than the essay —graphics, cool binders, and cute titles are no replacement for a well-written paper.
• use huge fonts, wide margins, or extra spacing to pad the page length —these tricks are immediately obvious to the eye. Most instructors use the same word processor you do. They know what’s possible. Such tactics are especially damning when the instructor has a stack of 60 papers to grade and yours is the only one that low-flying airplane pilots could read.
• use a paper from another class that covered “sort of similar” material . Again, the instructor has a particular task for you to fulfill in the assignment that usually relates to course material and lectures. Your other paper may not cover this material, and turning in the same paper for more than one course may constitute an Honor Code violation . Ask the instructor—it can’t hurt.
• get all wacky and “creative” before you answer the question . Showing that you are able to think beyond the boundaries of a simple assignment can be good, but you must do what the assignment calls for first. Again, check with your instructor. A humorous tone can be refreshing for someone grading a stack of papers, but it will not get you a good grade if you have not fulfilled the task.

Critical reading of assignments leads to skills in other types of reading and writing. If you get good at figuring out what the real goals of assignments are, you are going to be better at understanding the goals of all of your classes and fields of study.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

Search form

How to write the best college assignments.

By Lois Weldon

When it comes to writing assignments, it is difficult to find a conceptualized guide with clear and simple tips that are easy to follow. That’s exactly what this guide will provide: few simple tips on how to write great assignments, right when you need them. Some of these points will probably be familiar to you, but there is no harm in being reminded of the most important things before you start writing the assignments, which are usually determining on your credits.

The most important aspects: Outline and Introduction

Preparation is the key to success, especially when it comes to academic assignments. It is recommended to always write an outline before you start writing the actual assignment. The outline should include the main points of discussion, which will keep you focused throughout the work and will make your key points clearly defined. Outlining the assignment will save you a lot of time because it will organize your thoughts and make your literature searches much easier. The outline will also help you to create different sections and divide up the word count between them, which will make the assignment more organized.

The introduction is the next important part you should focus on. This is the part that defines the quality of your assignment in the eyes of the reader. The introduction must include a brief background on the main points of discussion, the purpose of developing such work and clear indications on how the assignment is being organized. Keep this part brief, within one or two paragraphs.

This is an example of including the above mentioned points into the introduction of an assignment that elaborates the topic of obesity reaching proportions:

Background : The twenty first century is characterized by many public health challenges, among which obesity takes a major part. The increasing prevalence of obesity is creating an alarming situation in both developed and developing regions of the world.

Structure and aim : This assignment will elaborate and discuss the specific pattern of obesity epidemic development, as well as its epidemiology. Debt, trade and globalization will also be analyzed as factors that led to escalation of the problem. Moreover, the assignment will discuss the governmental interventions that make efforts to address this issue.

Practical tips on assignment writing

Here are some practical tips that will keep your work focused and effective:

–         Critical thinking – Academic writing has to be characterized by critical thinking, not only to provide the work with the needed level, but also because it takes part in the final mark.

–         Continuity of ideas – When you get to the middle of assignment, things can get confusing. You have to make sure that the ideas are flowing continuously within and between paragraphs, so the reader will be enabled to follow the argument easily. Dividing the work in different paragraphs is very important for this purpose.

–         Usage of ‘you’ and ‘I’ – According to the academic writing standards, the assignments should be written in an impersonal language, which means that the usage of ‘you’ and ‘I’ should be avoided. The only acceptable way of building your arguments is by using opinions and evidence from authoritative sources.

–         Referencing – this part of the assignment is extremely important and it takes a big part in the final mark. Make sure to use either Vancouver or Harvard referencing systems, and use the same system in the bibliography and while citing work of other sources within the text.  

–         Usage of examples – A clear understanding on your assignment’s topic should be provided by comparing different sources and identifying their strengths and weaknesses in an objective manner. This is the part where you should show how the knowledge can be applied into practice.

–         Numbering and bullets – Instead of using numbering and bullets, the academic writing style prefers the usage of paragraphs.

–         Including figures and tables – The figures and tables are an effective way of conveying information to the reader in a clear manner, without disturbing the word count. Each figure and table should have clear headings and you should make sure to mention their sources in the bibliography.

–         Word count – the word count of your assignment mustn’t be far above or far below the required word count. The outline will provide you with help in this aspect, so make sure to plan the work in order to keep it within the boundaries.

The importance of an effective conclusion

The conclusion of your assignment is your ultimate chance to provide powerful arguments that will impress the reader. The conclusion in academic writing is usually expressed through three main parts:

–         Stating the context and aim of the assignment

–         Summarizing the main points briefly

–         Providing final comments with consideration of the future (discussing clear examples of things that can be done in order to improve the situation concerning your topic of discussion).

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Lois Weldon is writer at  Uk.bestdissertation.com . Lives happily at London with her husband and lovely daughter. Adores writing tips for students. Passionate about Star Wars and yoga.

7 comments on “How To Write The Best College Assignments”

Extremely useful tip for students wanting to score well on their assignments. I concur with the writer that writing an outline before ACTUALLY starting to write assignments is extremely important. I have observed students who start off quite well but they tend to lose focus in between which causes them to lose marks. So an outline helps them to maintain the theme focused.

Hello Great information…. write assignments

Well elabrated

Thanks for the information. This site has amazing articles. Looking forward to continuing on this site.

This article is certainly going to help student . Well written.

Really good, thanks

Practical tips on assignment writing, the’re fantastic. Thank you!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

• Richard G. Trefry Library
• Writing & Citing

Q. I'm writing a policy brief. Where can I find examples?

• Course-Specific
• Textbooks & Course Materials
• Tutoring & Classroom Help
• 1 Artificial Intelligence
• 43 Formatting
• 5 Information Literacy
• 13 Plagiarism
• 23 Thesis/Capstone/Dissertation

Answered By: APUS Librarians Last Updated: Sep 15, 2022     Views: 30229

• Writing effective reports : Preparing policy briefs . This document has lots of examples of briefs and describes the format and contents.
• Policy Brief - The Writing Center at UNC. This link Includes specifics on formatting.
• Harvard Kennedy School. Policy Briefs .
• RAND Corporation. Research Briefs .
• OECD Policy Briefs
• Rasmussen Library FAQ: What is a briefing paper and how do I write one?
• Share on Facebook

Was this helpful? Yes 12 No 4

writing tutor

Related topics.

Need personalized help? Librarians are available 365 days/nights per year!  See our schedule.

Learn more about how librarians can help you succeed.    

Assignments usually ask you to demonstrate that you have immersed yourself in the course material and that you've done some thinking on your own; questions not treated at length in class often serve as assignments. Fortunately, if you've put the time into getting to know the material, then you've almost certainly begun thinking independently. In responding to assignments, keep in mind the following advice.

• Beware of straying.  Especially in the draft stage, "discussion" and "analysis" can lead you from one intrinsically interesting problem to another, then another, and then ... You may wind up following a garden of forking paths and lose your way. To prevent this, stop periodically while drafting your essay and reread the assignment. Its purposes are likely to become clearer.
• Consider the assignment in relation to previous and upcoming assignments.  Ask yourself what is new about the task you're setting out to do. Instructors often design assignments to build in complexity. Knowing where an assignment falls in this progression can help you concentrate on the specific, fresh challenges at hand.

Understanding some key words commonly used in assignments also may simplify your task. Toward this end, let's take a look at two seemingly impenetrable instructions: "discuss" and "analyze."

1. Discuss the role of gender in bringing about the French Revolution.

• "Discuss" is easy to misunderstand because the word calls to mind the oral/spoken dimension of communication. "Discuss" suggests conversation, which often is casual and undirected. In the context of an assignment, however, discussion entails fulfilling a defined and organized task: to construct an argument that considers and responds to an ample range of materials. To "discuss," in assignment language, means to make a broad argument about a set of arguments you have studied. In the case above, you can do this by
• pointing to consistencies and inconsistencies in the evidence of gendered causes of the Revolution;
• raising the implications of these consistencies and/or inconsistencies (perhaps they suggest a limited role for gender as catalyst);
• evaluating different claims about the role of gender; and
• asking what is gained and what is lost by focusing on gendered symbols, icons and events.

A weak discussion essay in response to the question above might simply list a few aspects of the Revolution—the image of Liberty, the executions of the King and Marie Antoinette, the cry "Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite!" —and make separate comments about how each, being "gendered," is therefore a powerful political force. Such an essay would offer no original thesis, but instead restate the question asked in the assignment (i.e., "The role of gender was very important in the French Revolution" or "Gender did not play a large role in the French Revolution").

In a strong discussion essay, the thesis would go beyond a basic restatement of the assignment question. You might test the similarities and differences of the revolutionary aspects being discussed. You might draw on fresh or unexpected evidence, perhaps using as a source an intriguing reading that was only briefly touched upon in lecture.

2. Analyze two of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, including one not discussed in class, as literary works and in terms of sources/analogues.

The words "analyze" and "analysis" may seem to denote highly advanced, even arcane skills, possessed in virtual monopoly by mathematicians and scientists. Happily, the terms refer to mental activity we all perform regularly; the terms just need decoding. "Analyze" means two things in this specific assignment prompt.

• First, you need to divide the two tales into parts, elements, or features. You might start with a basic approach: looking at the beginning, middle, and end. These structural features of literary works—and of historical events and many other subjects of academic study—may seem simple or even simplistic, but they can yield surprising insights when examined closely.
• Alternatively, you might begin at a more complex level of analysis. For example, you might search for and distinguish between kinds of humor in the two tales and their sources in Boccaccio or the Roman de la Rose: banter, wordplay, bawdy jokes, pranks, burlesque, satire, etc.

Second, you need to consider the two tales critically to arrive at some reward for having observed how the tales are made and where they came from (their sources/analogues). In the course of your essay, you might work your way to investigating Chaucer's broader attitude toward his sources, which alternates between playful variation and strict adherence. Your complex analysis of kinds of humor might reveal differing conceptions of masculine and feminine between Chaucer and his literary sources, or some other important cultural distinction.

Analysis involves both a set of observations about the composition or workings of your subject and a critical approach that keeps you from noticing just anything—from excessive listing or summarizing—and instead leads you to construct an interpretation, using textual evidence to support your ideas.

Some Final Advice

If, having read the assignment carefully, you're still confused by it, don't hesitate to ask for clarification from your instructor. He or she may be able to elucidate the question or to furnish some sample responses to the assignment. Knowing the expectations of an assignment can help when you're feeling puzzled. Conversely, knowing the boundaries can head off trouble if you're contemplating an unorthodox approach. In either case, before you go to your instructor, it's a good idea to list, underline or circle the specific places in the assignment where the language makes you feel uncertain.

William C. Rice, for the Writing Center at Harvard University

• Wigan and Leigh College
• Learning Resources
• Study Skills Guides

Help to boost your grades

• Key words in Assignment Briefs

Assignment Brief

• Researching Information
• Note Taking
• Writing Essays & Assignments
• Writing Reports
• Writing a Critique
• Writing a literature review
• Writing short answer questions
• Reflective Writing
• Designing & Analysing Questionnaires
• Oral Presentations
• Creating a Podcast
• Creating a Blog
• Fast Reading Techniques
• Time Management
• Referencing This link opens in a new window
• Further help and advice

It is important to understand what an essay question or assignment brief is asking of you. Before you start to research or write, it is worth spending time considering the wording of the question and any learning outcomes that may accompany it. Each assignment will generally have at least three learning outcomes which you must cover if you are to achieve a pass.

Breaking down an assignment question

Before you attempt to answer an assignment question, you need to make sure you understand what it is asking. This includes not only the subject matter, but also the way in which you are required to write. Different questions may ask you to discuss, outline, evaluate… and many more. The task words are a key part of the question.

• Key Words in Assignment Briefs
• << Previous: Home
• Next: Researching Information >>
• Last Updated: Feb 27, 2024 11:24 AM
• URL: https://libguides.wigan-leigh.ac.uk/Boost_Your_Grades

ARE LAW SCHOOL RANKINGS REALLY IMPORTANT?

How to Write a Case Brief: Essential Skills for Law Students

Ever been in a courtroom, or watched one on TV and wondered how attorneys keep track of all those cases? Imagine trying to recall each fact, rule, or precedent at the drop of a gavel! It’s enough to make your brain whirl!

Welcome to the world of case briefs – an attorney’s secret weapon. They’re like maps guiding lawyers through the complex labyrinth that is law. Writing them well can be daunting though, right?

We’ve got you covered! You’ll soon master writing clear and concise case briefs. We’ll dissect every component from facts to conclusions while helping you avoid common pitfalls.

The best part? This isn’t just for future Atticus Finches out there; anyone looking for enhanced understanding of legal principles will find this handy too!

Ready? Court is now in session…

Jump Ahead To:

Understanding the Importance of a Case Brief

Imagine you’re a chef preparing to whip up a gourmet meal. A case brief is your recipe – it outlines the ingredients (facts), method (legal principles), and expected outcome (judgment). Without this ‘recipe’, you might miss an important step or ingredient, resulting in a less-than-stellar dish.

A case brief plays much the same role for law students and professionals alike. It’s an essential tool that helps dissect complex legal cases into manageable chunks. Think of it as your roadmap through dense legal jungles filled with precedent-setting decisions, intricate arguments, and landmark judgments. Litigators especially find them handy when they need to recall specific details from previous cases.

The Beauty of Brevity:

In law school, time is gold but so are words. You’ll be dealing with hefty textbooks and long-winded court rulings – more than enough reason why brevity becomes beautiful. A well-written case brief distills these verbose documents into their core elements: facts, procedural history, issue at hand, rule applied by the court (the holding) , rationale behind it (the reasoning) , decision reached (the judgment) , along with any concurring or dissenting opinions.

A Lifeline for Legal Eagles:

Ever heard of the phrase ‘standing on the shoulders of giants’? That’s exactly what you’re doing when you use a case brief. You’re leveraging past knowledge to build your own understanding, and perhaps even contribute something new. By analyzing how previous cases were argued and decided, budding lawyers can sharpen their critical thinking skills – an invaluable asset in this profession.

Essential Elements of a Case Brief

A well-structured case brief is like a blueprint for understanding complex legal cases. Just as architects use blueprints to visualize and construct buildings, law students and professionals use case briefs to break down intricate details of court rulings.

First off, every robust case brief begins with the case name . It’s your marker in the vast sea of legal proceedings. Identifying it correctly allows you not only to distinguish between cases but also to recall them quickly when needed.

Facts: The Foundation Stones

The facts are what make each case unique. They’re like foundation stones on which entire arguments rest. Including essential information about who did what and why can help lay this foundation strong in your mind, helping you understand how laws apply in real-world scenarios.

Procedural History: Tracing Legal Footsteps

The procedural history traces all steps taken by lower courts before reaching its current status. Think of it as tracking footprints left behind during previous stages – knowing where they lead can give valuable insight into how decisions were made along the way.

The Issue & Rule: Navigating Through Complexity

In every case lies an issue—a specific question asked within the context of these detailed facts—and corresponding rules or principles applied by courts answer this query.

Analysis & Conclusion: Drawing Lessons

The analysis discusses how courts apply rules to specific facts. The conclusion ties everything together with a clear, concise statement of who won and why.

Becoming adept at identifying these elements will help you become an expert case brief writer – because every great building starts with a well-drawn blueprint.

Steps to Writing an Effective Case Brief

To craft an effective case brief, you should begin by reading the entire court document. This lets you get a grasp on the context and details.

Dig Into The Facts

After reading, start by noting down all important facts. Identify who’s involved, what happened, and why it matters in legal terms. Make sure not to miss out on any crucial information here because this forms your foundation.

Note Down Procedural History

The next step is jotting down procedural history: where did this dispute start? Which courts heard it before reaching its current state? Remember – each stage influences how laws are interpreted.

Identify The Issue At Hand

Moving forward from there is identifying issues at hand. What specific legal question does this case pose? Get into detective mode.

This helps clarify what rule or precedent will be applied.

Catch That Rule of Law.

Your fourth task is spotting that elusive rule of law being used in the judgment process.

Analyze And Conclude:

The fifth move involves analyzing how judges apply rules identified earlier in these particular circumstances. They might interpret them differently based on various factors; see if you can pinpoint these variations.

Last but definitely not least, draw your conclusions. What is the result of this situation? How does it impact future legal scenarios?

Following these steps ensures you have a well-structured and comprehensive case brief that will be invaluable in understanding complex cases.

Tips for Writing a Clear and Concise Case Brief

Writing a clear and concise case brief is much like preparing a recipe. You need to gather all the right ingredients, follow the steps meticulously, and in the end, you have something palatable that everyone can understand.

Choose Your Words Wisely

The first step is choosing your words wisely. Avoid legal jargon when simpler language will do just as well.

Maintain Focus on Key Points

Next up – maintain focus on key points. Stick strictly with facts directly related to resolving the issue at hand in your case briefs. Avoid irrelevant details because they cloud understanding rather than enhancing it – stay focused.

Fine-Tune Your Formatting Skills

Last but not least: formatting matters too. Consider using bullet points or numbered lists where appropriate so information stands out clearly (remember our recipe analogy?).

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Case Brief

As law students, we often make mistakes while drafting our first few case briefs. But remember, errors are stepping stones to learning. Here’s a rundown of common blunders and how you can sidestep them.

Failing to Understand the Facts Fully

Sometimes, in an effort to keep things concise, important details may be overlooked or misunderstood. To prevent this from happening, understand your case thoroughly. You might find that re-reading helps uncover missed nuances.

Omitting Legal Precedents

We tend to focus on the current case at hand and forget about previous rulings that set precedents. These play a pivotal role in judicial decisions. Research past cases to strengthen your understanding and enhance your argument.

Lack of Clarity and Precision

The purpose of writing a case brief is not just for academic evaluation but also as a tool for future reference. It should therefore be clear enough for others (and future you) to get the gist quickly without needing further explanation . Make sure every sentence counts.

Relying Too Heavily on Templates or Examples

Tailor-made solutions always outshine one-size-fits-all approaches. While templates can guide you, don’t be a slave to them. Rather than conforming to an existing template, it is essential to bring out the distinctive elements and perspectives of your case.

Misplacing Focus

A common pitfall is overemphasizing less critical aspects while sidelining key issues. Always keep sight of what matters most: the legal issue at hand and how it was resolved. Writing a solid case brief isn’t just about skill – it’s an art form.

The Role of Precedent in Case Briefs

Precedents play a significant role in case briefs, acting as guiding lights for legal reasoning. But what exactly are precedents? Simply put, they are past judicial decisions used to help interpret and apply the law to new cases.

Analyzing Legal Precedence in Your Case Brief

In your case brief, analyzing the relevant precedent will involve examining prior rulings on similar issues or facts. This process lets you predict how a court might rule based on established patterns.

But remember not every old decision serves as good illumination; only those from higher courts within the same jurisdiction do so. For instance, if we consider U.S Federal Courts system hierarchy, U.S District Court rulings don’t bind Appellate Courts or the Supreme Court.

Using Precedent to Craft Strong Arguments

Beyond predicting potential outcomes, using precedent can also help build robust arguments. When a previous ruling aligns with your case, citing it can strengthen your argument. Conversely, if an unfavorable precedent exists, you might argue why it shouldn’t apply to your situation.

Understanding and effectively using precedents in case briefs isn’t just helpful; it’s essential. They give context for decisions and offer predictability in the legal process – all while lighting up that otherwise dark path of legal reasoning.

Reviewing and Revising Your Case Brief

So, you’ve written your case brief. But are you done? Not quite. Revisiting and refining your work is an essential part of the process to ensure accuracy. Ensure that your brief is a precise representation of the case by thoroughly examining it.

Meticulous Examination for Accuracy

To start with, check if all elements in your case brief template are correctly filled out. Make sure that each point, from facts to legal principles applied, lines up perfectly with what was in the actual case document.

If any discrepancies arise between your summary and the original text during this review stage, take steps to fix them right away.

Critical Evaluation for Clarity

Beyond accuracy lies clarity – does your briefing make sense not only to you but also to others who might read it?

The Power of Peer Reviews

This brings us onto peer reviews: they can be invaluable here. A fresh set of eyes often catches things we miss, after all.

Ask a fellow law student or even your professor to review your brief and provide feedback. Their perspectives can help you spot any gaps in explanation, unclear language, or legal inaccuracies.

A Continuous Process

Last but not least, remember that revising is an ongoing process – it’s rare for anything to be perfect on the first go. As you learn more about the law and develop as a lawyer, come back and revise older case briefs with fresh insights.

The Impact of a Well-Written Case Brief

A well-crafted case brief not only gives you a sense of direction and understanding, but also helps to simplify intricate legal concepts.

Imagine walking into a courtroom with an encyclopedia’s worth of knowledge condensed into easily digestible notes. It’s like having your very own toolbox, filled with precisely what you need to make compelling arguments.

A robust case brief is more than just an outline; it’s a roadmap that guides you through the labyrinthine world of law. Each section—facts, procedural history, issue, rule analysis—is not merely informative but instructive too.

Improved Legal Understanding

Diving deep into past cases lets us swim around legal precedents and understand their impact on current laws. A detailed summary allows us to examine these influences from various angles which ultimately sharpens our analytical skills and broadens our perspectives about the law itself.

In essence, preparing comprehensive case briefs isn’t simply busywork—it’s mental gymnastics for future lawyers. So don’t think twice before rolling up those sleeves because as we say at The Art of Law School: No pain (in this case reading lots.), no gain.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary purpose of writing a case brief in law school? The primary purpose of writing a case brief is to condense and synthesize complex legal cases into a manageable format. It helps law students and professionals understand and recall key aspects of cases, such as facts, legal issues, and judgments, which is crucial for classroom discussions, exams, and legal practice.

2. What are the key components of an effective case brief? An effective case brief typically includes the case name, relevant facts, procedural history, the legal issue(s) at hand, the rule of law applied, the court’s analysis, and the final judgment or conclusion. Each component provides a structured overview of the case, making it easier to understand and remember.

3. How can a case brief help in legal studies and practice? Case briefs help in legal studies by facilitating better comprehension and recall of complex cases, improving critical thinking and analytical skills, and preparing students for class participation and exams. In legal practice, they serve as quick references to legal precedents and assist in formulating legal strategies and arguments.

4. What are common mistakes to avoid while writing a case brief? Common mistakes include missing out on crucial facts or legal issues, overly summarizing the case to the point of losing important details, failing to clearly articulate the rule of law, and not aligning the case analysis with the conclusion. Avoiding these errors ensures the brief is both accurate and useful.

5. How does technology aid in writing case briefs? Technology, particularly legal research tools and AI-powered applications, aids in writing case briefs by providing easy access to a vast database of legal cases and precedents, enabling efficient research, and offering analytical insights that can enhance the quality of case briefs.

Mastering the art of case briefing is a pivotal step in your legal education journey, and now, equipped with the right techniques and insights, it’s within your reach. These skills are more than academic necessities; they are crucial in demystifying the complexities of legal cases, helping you transition from classroom theory to real-world application seamlessly.

As you delve into each case, remember the importance of accurately capturing the case name, facts, and the ruling. These key elements form the backbone of your legal analysis, guiding you through the nuances of each case. With the strategies and tips provided, you’re well-prepared to craft briefs that are both precise and insightful. Embrace this skill as a continuous learning process, refining and honing with each brief you compose. Stay dedicated, and watch as your ability to dissect and understand complex legal scenarios reaches new heights, setting the stage for a successful legal career.

Stephen Metellus

I am a 3L law student in Washington D.C and owner of theartoflawschool.com! I started law school with a lot of hopes and expectations, and it has certainly been a wild ride from the start! My goal is writing articles that help you in navigating through law school.

Recent Posts

Spotting the Issue: Strategies for Law Students to Excel in Exams

Ever felt like you're searching for a needle in a haystack? That's what issue spotting can feel like to law students. A whirlwind of cases, principles, and exceptions; it's easy to miss the key...

Best Note Taking Apps: Boost Your Law School Productivity

Ever felt like you're drowning in a sea of legal texts, case studies, and lecture notes? That's law school for you. You've got stacks of books to read, tons of cases to review - it can feel...

create an account

Login to your account.

Sports | MLB: Kingston High grad Zack Short designated…

Share this:.

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
• Things to Do
• Classifieds

SUBSCRIBER ONLY

Sports | mlb: kingston high grad zack short designated for assignment by red sox following brief stay.

The move coincided with the Red Sox’s announcement that they had reinstated infielder/outfielder Romy Gonzalez from the 10-day injured list to the major league club.

Short, 28, a former Kingston High star infielder, was traded from the New York Mets to Boston on May 1 for cash considerations.

Short appeared in just two games for Boston and was hitless in seven at-bats. He struck out four times.

Short saw time at second and third base for the Red Sox, but was designated for assignment to make room for Gonzalez’s return.

Short started at second base on May 2 and went 0-for-3 with two strikeouts in a 3-1 loss to the San Francisco Giants at Fenway Park.

Short started at third base and went 0-for-4 with two strikeouts in his final appearance for the Red Sox on May 5 in Minneapolis as Boston ended the Twins’ 12-game winning streak with a 9-2 victory.

When contacted by the Freeman following his trade to the Red Sox, Short said he was happy for the opportunity to play in Boston.

“I am super excited to be there,” Short said. “They’re a young and talented team and I’m very excited to join them.”

Short did not return a message Wednesday on being designated for assignment by Boston.

Short played parts of three seasons for the Detroit Tigers from 2021 through 2023.

The Ulster County native was claimed by the Mets on Nov. 6, 2023, after he was put on waivers by the Tigers. But he was used sparingly by the Mets, appearing in 10 games this season. He had one hit in nine at-bats for a .111 average.

New York designated Short for assignment on April 26 in order to make room for veteran designated hitter J.D. Martinez on its active 26-man roster.

A player who is designated for assignment is immediately removed from the team’s 40-man roster, after which the team must, within seven days, return the player to the 40-man roster, place the player on waivers, trade the player, release the player, or send outright the player from the 40-man roster into Minor League Baseball.

Short was selected in the 17th round of the 2016 draft by the Chicago Cubs. He played in the Cubs’ minor league organization for four seasons, advancing to their Triple-A affiliate, the Iowa Cubs, in 2019.

On Aug. 31, 2020, Short was traded to the Tigers for outfielder Cameron Maybin.

During his three seasons in the Tigers’ organization, Short shuttled back and forth between the Tigers’ Triple-AAA affiliate, the Toledo Mud Hens, and the major league franchise.

His most productive season came in 2023 when he appeared in 110 games for the Tigers, batting .204 with seven home runs and 33 RBIs. He had 45 hits, including nine doubles in 221 at-bats.

More in Sports

Sports | High school boys lacrosse: Red Hook downs Stillwater in non-league match

Sports | High school softball: Saugerties defeats Kingston

Sports | High school baseball: Saugerties pitcher Ty Van Valkenburg’s college choice came at an early age

Sports | High school girls golf: Alexandra Young shines in Onteora’s win over Red Hook