hypothesis xvii

• Publications

GIS Taipei Tech Convention Center is the venue for HYPOTHESIS XVII. It is located inside National Taipei University of Technology.      

TRANSPORT FACILITIES

The venue is located at the heart of Taipei and is easily accessible from the closest metro stations (less than 10 minutes). You can download here the MRT map . It is also equipped with ample parking lots for those arriving by car. The distance from Taipei-Taoyuan International Airport is about 50 km, that is about 40 minutes with regular traffic and a little more more than 1 hour using public transports, which are quite frequent (every 30 minutes). The airport has good connectivity to major Asian-Pacific cities, Europe and North America.

OFFICIAL AIRLINE ALLIANCE

• Help & FAQ

Preface to the special issue dedicated to the hydrogen power theoretical and engineering solutions international symposium (HYPOTHESIS) – XVII edition

• Department of Mechanical Engineering

Research output : Contribution to journal › Editorial

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

• 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119737

T1 - Preface to the special issue dedicated to the hydrogen power theoretical and engineering solutions international symposium (HYPOTHESIS) – XVII edition

AU - Iulianelli, Adolfo

AU - Spazzafumo, Giuseppe

AU - Tseng, Chung Jen

PY - 2024/1

Y1 - 2024/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178102211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119737

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119737

AN - SCOPUS:85178102211

SN - 0960-1481

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

M1 - 119737

• 燃料電池載具發展委員會
• 學會公告 announcement
• 產業交流 Industry news
• 學會相關辦法 Regulations
• 第十八屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十七屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十六屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十五屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十四屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十三屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十二屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第十屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第九屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第八屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 第六屆氫能與燃料電池研討會
• 聯絡我們 contact

「HYPOTHESIS XVII 2022暨第十七屆全國氫能與燃料電池學術研討會暨2022第十四屆全國學生盃氫能車競賽」相關資訊

各位研究先進 您好：, 我國於今年3月正式公布「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」，提供至2050年淨零之軌跡與行動路徑，以促進關鍵領域之技術、研究與創新，引導產業綠色轉型，其中氫能技術在能源轉型中扮演相當重要的角色。本次「hypothesis xvii 2022暨第十七屆全國氫能與燃料電池學術研討會暨2022第十四屆全國學生盃氫能車競賽」將於9/25-9/29於集思北科大會議中心舉辦，9/28並規劃氫能產業論壇邀請產官學重量級專家與會交流。「hypothesis」為氫能及燃料電池領域極具聲望的國際學術研討會，國際學研界均積極參與此盛會，展示氫能領域最新的研究進展，本次會議論文亦將擇優轉投收錄至「international journal of hydrogen energy」。本會議的主軸議題包括：氫能經濟技術與產業發展、氫的生產技術、氫的運輸、儲存與純化、燃料電池基礎研究、燃料電池檢測技術、燃料電池bop分析、ai電能分析與管理、系統整合與應用等，幾乎涵蓋潔淨能源之多數領域。提供各國研究先進創新觀念及研究成果之國際交流平台，期望促進氫能產業及燃料電池領域技術交流，並提升國內研究成果之能見度及影響力, 本次會議由台灣氫能與燃料電池學會與國立臺北科技大學主辦，大會誠摯地邀請各位蒞臨參與，我們竭誠歡迎您來共同提昇台灣氫能與燃料電池領域學界與產業的蓬勃發展。, (topic 1) 氫能技術 h2 (請投稿至hypothesis 2022), (topic 2) 燃料電池fuel cell (含生物燃料電池，請投稿至hypothesis 2022), (topic 3) 其他相關能源議題 other (請投稿至 hefc 2022), ＊國內參加 hypothesis 2022 國際會議者，註冊費同 hefc 2022 國內會議。, hypothesis 2022： http://www.hypothesis.ws/, hefc 2022： https://sites.google.com/view/hefc-2022/home, 氫能產業論壇： https://sites.google.com/view/hefc-2022/%e6%b0%ab%e8%83%bd%e8%ab%96%e5%a3%87  , 活動時間：2022/9/25(日)-2022/9/29(四), 活動地點：國立臺北科技大學，集思北科大會議中心, 主辦單位：台灣氫能與燃料電池學會、國立臺北科技大學、國立中央大學, 贊助單位：科技部、碳能科技股份有限公司、臺北市政府觀光傳播局, 徵稿日期：2022 年 7 月31日 (日), 報名截止：2022 年 8 月31日 (三)，早鳥優惠至8月15日, 大會信箱： [email protected]     (若有任何問題，歡迎來信詢問), ※大會亦規劃展示攤位區，廠商欲贊助此會議請來信此信箱洽詢：[email protected] ,  「hypothesis xvii 國際氫能會議」籌備委員會   誠摯邀請.

Universe Today

Space and astronomy news

Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XVII: What is the “SETI-Paradox” Hypothesis?

Welcome back to our Fermi Paradox series , where we take a look at possible resolutions to Enrico Fermi’s famous question, “Where Is Everybody?” Today, we examine the possibility that we haven’t heard from any aliens is because no one is transmitting!

In 1950, Italian-American physicist Enrico Fermi sat down to lunch with some of his colleagues at the Los Alamos National Laboratory , where he had worked five years prior as part of the Manhattan Project. According to various accounts, the conversation turned to aliens and the recent spate of UFOs. Into this, Fermi issued a statement that would go down in the annals of history: “Where is everybody?”

This became the basis of the Fermi Paradox , which refers to the disparity between high probability estimates for the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) and the apparent lack of evidence. Since Fermi’s time, there have been several proposed resolutions to his question, including the possibility that everyone is listening, but no one is broadcasting – otherwise known as the “SETI-Paradox.”

This theory comes down to the noticeable divide between what is referred to as “passive SETI” and “active SETI,” the latter of which is more commonly known today as Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence (METI). These differences in approach have become the focal point of attention in recent years as the two have become more differentiated, and the latter has become more common.

Passive SETI, which is generally characterized by listening to space for signs of radio communications (or other discernible technosignatures), accounts for the vast majority of SETI measures to date. This includes what is arguably the first example of an extraterrestrial radio search, which was performed by Nikola Tesla in 1899 while conducting experiments at his Colorado Springs laboratory.

On this occasion, Tesla believed he had detected an extraterrestrial radio signal because of the way it ceased as soon as Mars set in the night sky. Further analysis proved inconclusive, and explanations included radio interference from a neighboring experimental station, a misreading of the results, and background noise caused by Jupiter’s moon Io passing through its magnetic field.

The first modern SETI experiment, which took place in 1960, was also passive by definition. This was Project Ozma , a survey led by Cornell astronomer Frank Drake that relied on the 26-meter (85-foot) radio telescope at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia. The project examined the nearby stars Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani for signs of radio transmissions in a 400-kilohertz band around the 1.420 gigahertz marker frequency.

In fact, the concept of METI as being distinct from SETI is a relatively recent development. Russian scientist Alexander Zaitsev coined the term METI in a 2006 paper of the same name. As Zaitsev emphasized:

“The science known as SETI deals with searching for messages from aliens. METI science deals with the creation of messages to aliens. Thus, SETI and METI proponents have quite different perspectives. SETI scientists are in a position to address only the local question ‘does Active SETI make sense?’ “In other words, would it be reasonable, for SETI success, to transmit with the object of attracting ETI’s attention? In contrast to Active SETI, METI pursues not a local and lucrative impulse, but a more global and unselfish one – to overcome the Great Silence in the Universe, bringing to our extraterrestrial neighbors the long-expected annunciation ‘You are not alone!'”

History of METI

Meanwhile, the first attempt to send a message was directed at Venus in 1962 by scientists from the Evpatoria Planetary Radar (EPR) center in Crimea. This was known as The Morse Message , which consisted of a radio transmission sent in Morse Code – the letters M-I-R (Mir, the Russian word for “peace”) followed by “Lenin” and “SSSR.” In 1974, the most powerful (and most famous) broadcast was beamed to space from the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.

This was known as the Arecibo Message , a 1679 bit transmission arranged into 73 lines (23 characters per line) of binary code. The message consisted of simple images of the Arecibo telescope, the Solar System, DNA, a stick figure of a human, and some of the biochemicals of earthly life. The message was aimed at the globular star cluster M13, located roughly 21,000 light-years from Earth, near the edge of the Milky Way galaxy,

Between 1999 and 2003, three transmissions (Cosmic Call 1, Teen Age Message, and Cosmic Call 2) were all made from the Evpatoria Planetary Radar (EPR) center in Crimea to various nearby stars. Whereas Cosmic Calls consisted of code denoting the alphabet, numbers, periodic table, and scientific concepts, the Teen Age Message consisted of a coherent sounding signal, an analog message encoded in Theremin music, and digital data (images and text).

In 2008, NASA transmitted the song “Across the Universe” by the Beatles in the direction of the star Polaris using the Deep Space Network’s (DSN) 70-meter (~230 foot) dish at the Madrid Deep Space Communication Complex . The broadcast marked the 40th anniversary of the song’s recording, the 45th anniversary of the DSN, and the 50th anniversary of NASA. In 2012, on the 35th anniversary of the Wow! Signal, a reply was transmitted from the Arecibo Observatory.

This message, known as the “Wow! Reply,” consisted of more than 10,000 Twitter messages and videos from celebrities. In 2016, the radio message “ A Simple Response to an Elemental Message ” (ASREM) was transmitted from the ESA’s Cebreros Station (DSA2) towards Polaris. This message consisting of 3775 worldwide responses to the question, “How will our present, environmental interactions shape the future? ” and a series of images of Earth.

In 2016, Israeli-Russian billionaire Yuri Milner announced the creation of Breakthrough Initiatives , a non-profit organization dedicated to investigating the fundamental questions of life in the Universe. Among their suite of space science programs is Breakthrough Message , an international competition to create an interstellar message. This program is intended to encourage debate about how humanity could communicate with extraterrestrial intelligence.

At present, there are no plans to send the message until there is a wide-ranging debate among scientists and world leaders about the ethical and philosophical issues involved. However, Breakthrough Initiatives has hinted that once these issues are addressed at length, this might change.

To Listen or to Message?

To date, all attempts at METI (aka. active-SETI) have been very humble compared to traditional (or passive) SETI efforts. As Zaitsev summarized:

“[O]ur civilization is indeed in the communicative phase and it indeed conducts SETI activities. However, our METI/SETI ratio is less than one percent: these data follow from the review of Jill Tarter published in the recently released “SETI-2020” collection of papers (Tarter 2003). “ It lists 100 various SETI programs starting from the first OZMA project to our time. The total time of search is several years, whereas the total transmission time is only 37 hours (Zaitsev 2006). This characterizes the attitude of researchers. However, we must also take into account the METI-phobia inherent to the planetary consciousness as a whole.”

In short, METI efforts have been limited in large part because of the very real fear that broadcasting humanity’s existence to the Universe could have serious consequences. Notable critics include Stephen Hawking and famed scientist and author David Brin. In a 2006 article titled, “ Should we be Shouting at the Cosmos ,” Brin expressed how many notable scientists objected to METI:

“Let there be no mistake. METI is a very different thing than passively sifting for signals from the outer space. Carl Sagan, one of the greatest SETI supporters and a deep believer in the notion of altruistic alien civilizations, called such a move deeply unwise and immature. (Even Frank Drake, who famously sent the “Arecibo Message” toward the Andromeda Galaxy in 1974, considered “Active SETI” to be, at best, a stunt and generally a waste of time.) “Sagan — along with early SETI pioneer Philip Morrison — recommended that the newest children in a strange and uncertain cosmos should listen quietly for a long time, patiently learning about the universe and comparing notes, before shouting into an unknown jungle that we do not understand.”

What’s more, Brin argued that Zaitsev’s constituted a modified form of Universal Altruism (UA), a Soviet-era doctrine that states that all advanced civilizations naturally evolve towards the altruistic and socialistic:

“Ironically Dr. Alexander Zaitsev has modified this doctrine to suggest that advanced aliens are not only altruistic but also cowardly — thus explaining their failure (so far) to create beacons or beam messages at Earth. He reasons that the youngest and most ignorant technological race (humanity) is behooved to overcome this universal cowardice by boldly announcing ourselves. .. “If aliens are so advanced and altruistic… and yet are choosing to remain silent… should we not consider following their example and doing likewise? At least for a little while? Is it possible that they are silent because they know something we don’t know?”

This is reminiscent of the “Dark Forest” Hypothesis , another possible resolution to the Fermi Paradox (which was covered in a previous installment). According to this hypothesis, ETIs are not in the habit of broadcasting their existence for two major reasons – “Chains of Suspicion” and “Technological Explosions.” Basically, civilizations could essentially be either malevolent, which are likely to attack others for the sake of territory, resources, conquest, etc.

Benevolent civilizations, in contrast, are not likely to attack others unless they feel threatened. Unfortunately, the time lag imposed by interstellar communications prevents open communication from being established. Since the intentions of other species cannot be gauged, this creates a “chain of suspicion” where both sides are left to consider if it would be wise to attack first until one of them finally does.

The other assumption involves technological development, which is exponential in nature (if human history is any guide). Given how long it would take to reach even the nearest stars, any fearful civilization would likely conclude that it would be futile to send a fleet of warships to attack another species. By the time they arrived, the attacker’s technology would not have matured one bit, while the defender would have progressed by decades or centuries.

Under these circumstances, it is entirely reasonable to theorize that most ETIs (who are also contemplating if they are alone in the Universe) have chosen to take the “passive SETI” approach rather than actively seek contact and advertise their existence to the Universe. If this is the conclusion that most advanced species have reached, then the “Great Silence” is entirely understandable.

Like many proposed resolutions to the Fermi Paradox, this hypothesis assumes that the behavior of extraterrestrial civilizations is uniform. Similar to the Dark Forest and Zoo Hypotheses, all that is required for the “Great Silence” to be broken is for one ETI to speak out. And given humanity’s own experiments with crafting interstellar messages, it is hard to believe that one civilization would be able to enforce a “radio silence” policy, let alone many.

In addition, if any civilization were to detect a signal from Earth (much like Carl Sagan explored in his novel Contact ), it’s safe to assume that they would want to respond to it. Douglas Vakoch , the president of METI, argued that passive SETI is already an endorsement of active SETI, since “If we detect a signal from aliens through a SETI program, there’s no way to prevent a cacophony of responses from Earth.”

Alas, the fact that we have no signals to go by and are not even sure if the “Great Silence” is real or perceived, no conclusions can be drawn at this time. But as theoretical frameworks go, it has a ring of truth to it. It is entirely possible that we are not picking up signals from extraterrestrial civilizations because they don’t want to broadcast their existence either. After all, if you were an alien civilization, would you want to talk to a species like us?

We have written many interesting articles about the Fermi Paradox, the Drake Equation, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) here at Universe Today. Here’s Where Are The Aliens? How The ‘Great Filter’ Could Affect Tech Advances In Space , Why Finding Alien Life Would Be Bad. The Great Filter , How Could We Find Aliens? The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) , and Fraser and John Michael Godier Debate the Fermi Paradox .

And be sure to check out the rest of our Beyond Fermi’s Paradox series:

• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” I: A Lunchtime Conversation- Enrico Fermi and Extraterrestrial Intelligence
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” II: Questioning the Hart-Tipler Conjecture
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” III: What is the Great Filter ?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” IV: What is the Rare Earth Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” V: What is the Aestivation Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” VI: What is the Berserker Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” VII: What is the Planetarium Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” VIII: What is the Zoo Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” IX: What is the Brief Window Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” X: What is the Firstborn Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XI: What is the Transcension Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XII: What is the Water World Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XIII: What is the “Ocean Worlds” Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XIV: What is the Aurora Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XV: What is the Percolation Theory Hypothesis?
• Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” XVI: What is the “Dark Forest” Hypothesis?

Astronomy Cast has some interesting episodes on the subject. Here’s Episode 24: The Fermi Paradox: Where Are All the Aliens? , Episode 110: The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence , Episode 168: Enrico Fermi , Episode 273: Solutions to the Fermi Paradox .

• Brin, G.D. “ The Great Silence – the Controversy Concerning Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life .” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 24 (1983)
• Marsden, P. “ Memetics and Social Contagion: Two Sides of the Same Coin? ” Journal of Memetics – Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, Vol. 2, No. 2 (1998)
• Gato-Rivera, B. “ A Solution to the Fermi Paradox: The Solar System, Part of a Galactic Hypercivilization? ” World Mystery Forum 2005 (2005)
• Brin, G.D. “ Shouting at the Cosmos… Or How SETI has Taken a Worrisome Turn Into Dangerous Territory .” Lifeboat Foundation (2006)
• Zaitsev, A. “ Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence .” arXiv:physics/0610031 (2006)
• Arti, D. (et al.) “ A protocol for messaging to extraterrestrial intelligence .” Space Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3 (2011)
• Deshmuk, G. “ The Dark Forest Theory: A Chilling Solution to Fermi’s Paradox .” Gaurav Deshmukh (Medium), Jan. 4 th , 2019.

Share this:

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

GLAMOUR presented at the HYPOTHESIS XVII conference

The HYPOTHESIS conference took place in Muscat (Oman) from October 23 to 25, 2023, and gathered representatives from industry, public laboratories, universities, and governmental agencies to discuss and present the most recent advances in hydrogen technology.

Our colleague Adam Zaidi from the University of Manchester joined the keynote “Platform for pure Hydrogen and Fischer Tropsch fuel production from waste biomass with inherent negative emissions” to provide a comprehensive overview of the GLAMOUR project, introducing the consortium and the project’s objectives, with a focus on the experimental chemical looping work at The University of Manchester.

GET IN TOUCH WITH US

Have a question or feedback about GLAMOUR?

Subscribe to receive the GLAMOUR newsletter with latest news and events.

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy

Collaborate with anyone, anywhere .

Use Hypothesis to annotate anything online with classmates, colleagues, or friends. Create a free personal account , or talk to our sales team about Education solutions.

Get Started

Bringing content and conversation together.

Hypothesis adds a collaborative layer over any online content. Through the power of social annotation, we can make online discussions more meaningful, productive, and engaging.

Hypothesis is for

Keep students engaged and connected with a seamless learning experience.

Create a new method of peer review and engagement for researchers and publications.

Share and discuss intriguing content with family, friends, and like-minded groups.

Comment on and highlight what interests you.

Annotate articles, websites, videos, documents, apps, and more – without clicking away or posting elsewhere. Hypothesis is easy to use and based on open web standards, so it works across the entire internet.

Turn annotations into conversations.

Classrooms, coworkers, and communities can share ideas, ask questions, and respond to annotations. Set groups to public or private to create your ideal discussion.

Build durable, shared knowledge.

No more losing valuable knowledge across email, forums, and apps.  Annotations are saved at the source and accessible to everyone, preserving commentary in context.

• 01. Comment & Highlight
• 02. Conversations
• 03. Knowledge

Changing online discussions for good.

Hypothesis is a mission-driven organization building universal collaboration into the internet with open-source technology.

Vision and Values

Start the conversation.

Create a free account and install the Hypothesis browser extension to start annotating. For Education  solutions, contact our sales team.

Create A Free Account Contact Sales Team

• Project overview
• AEM-HUB – Reshaping green hydrogen production
• Planned & Achieved
• Results through time
• Publications

ANIONE results presented by CNRS at CARISMA 2023 | October 2023

Anione results presented by cnrs at fdfc 2023 | september 2023, anione final event and joint workshop, anione results presented by cnrs at isiem 2023 | june 2023, isiem 2023 | june 2023, work update | aem hub | march 2023, fems euromat 2023 | september 2023, fdfc 2023 | feb 2023, european hydrogen week 2022 | oct 2022, hypothesis xvii taipei 2022 | sep 2022, european hydrogen week | nov 2021, ich2p-2021 | sep 2021, international workshop on fuell cells | sep 2021, fch-ju webinar | july 2021, anione successful mid-term review | june 2021.