literature review on organizational structure pdf

Organizational Structure

Cite this chapter.

• Sebastian Kortmann 6  

Part of the book series: Betriebswirtschaftliche Studien in forschungsintensiven Industrien ((BSFI))

2473 Accesses

“An organization is a system which, as the attainment of its goal, ‘produces’ an identifiable something which can be utilized in some way by another system; that is, the output of the organization […]. In the case of an organization with economic primacy, this output may be a class of goods or services”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Münster, Germany

Sebastian Kortmann

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Kortmann, S. (2012). Organizational Structure. In: The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Ambidexterity. Betriebswirtschaftliche Studien in forschungsintensiven Industrien. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3630-1_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3630-1_2

Publisher Name : Gabler Verlag

Print ISBN : 978-3-8349-3629-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-8349-3630-1

eBook Packages : Business and Economics Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

An Exploration of Organizational Structure and Strategy in Virtual Organizations: A Literature Review

2015, Journal or Organizational Perspectives in Organization Behavior, Management, and Leadership

The study of organizational structure and strategy in virtual organizations is a broad and current topic. This literature review includes a number of virtual organizational theorists’ and authors’ positions and philosophies about how structure and strategy affect the virtual organization. The virtual organization emerged as a need existed to conduct business in a fast-paced, innovative, global market place whose reach to clients and customers is exponentially staggering as the world has moved to another plateau in conducting business. In order for the virtual organization to be successful, leadership (E-leaders) must be able to depend on the structure of the organization to support the strategy necessary to build a business that could thrive. The structure of the organization must include talented people who are innovative and visionary within this new entity, and leaders need to learn how to lead, manage, and earn trust in this environment. The rhetoric concerning virtual organizat...

Related Papers

British Journal of Management

rekha nicholson

Academy of Management Perspectives

Nicolai Foss

International Business Review

Prof. Demetris Vrontis

During the past decade, ambidexterity research has broadened from its traditional macro-level focus to examine the micro-level perspectives of ambidexterity on various settings. The authors systematically review and critically appraise the literature of ambidexterity from a micro-foundational perspective, within the context of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). By synthesizing the review findings, the authors develop a comprehensive framework that maps extant literature within and across various disciplines and multiple levels of analysis. As part of their review, the authors also identify and discuss important emerging themes and fruitful areas for future research and present the implications to both research and management practice.

Management international

Nicole Sprafke

This paper gives emphasis to four categories most relevant for microfoundations of dynamic ca-pabilities (DCs): (1) leadership behavior, (2) team interaction, (3) individual capabilities, and (4) job characteristics. We study whether micro-variables operate firm-specifically when constituting DCs and how they relate to one another. Data result from employee surveys (n = 486) conducted in five German organizations. The cross-firm comparison based on discriminant analyses reveals that micro-variables that constitute DCs often build firm-specific configurations in a broader set of variables. Only structural empowerment and team learning function as cross-firm commonali-ties. There is evidence to consider firm-specificity when explaining competitive advantages.

Hong Park , hyejung chang

Cogent Business & Management

hyejung chang

Administrative Sciences

Jorge Pereira

The main purpose of this paper is to integrate the literature on human resource management (HRM) and environmental management. Moreover, the paper shows the role that green human resource management (GHRM) plays in environmental management activities. This article examines the main relationships between human resource management and environmental strategy, emphasizing reciprocal influences. Moreover, the main human resource practices used in the literature are examined. In addition, methodological approaches that can be appropriate to advance the study of the link between human resource management and environmental strategy are proposed. Ideas for future research are also provided. As the role of human capital in implementing environmental management is a mature field of research, a new topic known as green human resource management has emerged. We examine studies that analyze both the relationship between general human resource management and environmental strategy and between gree...

Andrew Schenkel , Robin Teigland

Firms downsize to improve their bottom line results often in reactive response to negative external shocks, such as economic downturns, but even in proactive efforts to enhance organizational performance when they are financially ‘healthy’, such as restructuring. Research reveals, however, that not only does downsizing generally fail to improve a firm’s financial performance, but that it may even lead to reduced financial performance. To investigate this puzzling outcome, we build on previous research and integrate the concepts of downsizing, social capital, dynamic capabilities and performance in a multi-level model as well as discuss how social capital mediates the relationship between downsizing and dynamic capabilities. Thereafter, we develop (a) four propositions to elucidate how changes to the structural dimension of social capital due to downsizing, i.e. the removal of three key social network positions and changes to the firm’s network structure, negatively mediate the relationship between downsizing and a firm’s dynamic capabilities, and (b) two propositions incorporating internal (knowledge intensity) and external (institutional pressures) contextual variables in our model. We conclude by discussing how our research contributes to the downsizing and SHRM literature as well as the resource-based view and social capital literature before providing suggestions for future research and practitioners.

Journal of Knowledge Management

Sara Lombardi

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations. Design/methodology/approach – To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Findings – The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships. Research limitations/implications – Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge sharing activities. Originality/value – The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective. Keywords: Top management support, Knowledge sharing, Organizational culture, Subsidiaries, Multinational companies

Family Business Review

Alfredo De Massis

RELATED PAPERS

Joseph Pham

Economics and Business Review (EBR)

David Kauffmann

Johananta M

Paul Benjamin Lowry

Francesco Rullani

Edward Elgar

Nicolai Bang Foss

SSRN Electronic Journal

Alessandra Tutida

Journal of Management Studies

Business & Management Studies: An International Journal

Mehmet Bağış

Mary Crossan

Alexandros Hondros

Norhayati Zakaria

Florian Becker-Ritterspach

Paul Gooderham

Hussain G Rammal

Giuseppe Renga

Journal of Business Research

Anastasia Katou

Baltic Journal of Management

Olivier Furrer

Nicholas Chileshe

Maurizio Maraglino

Raymond Noe , Howard J Klein

Amy Edmondson

Randall Westgren

The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Luciara Nardon

Management Decision

Deepraj Mukherjee

Diogo Cotta

Academy of Management Proceedings

Henry Lopez-vega

Managing Emerging Technologies for Socio-Economic Impact

Dimitris Assimakopoulos

Pikka-Maaria Laine , Eero Vaara

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

Sofia Pemsel

Andrew Corbett

Annals of Operations Research

Saradhi Motamarri

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Literature Reviews

• "How To" Books
• Examples of Literature Reviews
• Collecting Resources for a Literature Review
• Organizing the Literature Review
• Writing the Literature Review
• Endnote This link opens in a new window
• Evaluating Websites

Organization

Organization of your Literature Review

What is the most effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include? What order should you present them?

Just like most academic papers, literature reviews must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper.

Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.

Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each).

Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing the literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?

Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.

To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario and then three typical ways of organizing the sources into a review:

You've decided to focus your literature review on materials dealing with sperm whales. This is because you've just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale's portrayal is really real. You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology journals written in the 1980's. But these articles refer to some British biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. So you check those out. Then you look up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to do. This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel.

Chronological

If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. For instance, first you would talk about the British biological studies of the 18th century, then about Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century. But there is relatively no continuity among subjects here. And notice that even though the sources on sperm whales in other art and on American whaling are written recently, they are about other subjects/objects that were created much earlier. Thus, the review loses its chronological focus.

By publication

Order your sources chronologically by publication if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on biological studies of sperm whales if the progression revealed a change in dissection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies.

Another way to organize sources chronologically is to examine the sources under a trend, such as the history of whaling. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899. Using this method, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even though the authors wrote a century apart.

Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for whale hunting. While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically. The only difference here between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.

More authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. For instance, a thematic review of material on sperm whales might examine how they are portrayed as "evil" in cultural documents. The subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their behaviors misunderstood. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made.

Methodological

A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the "methods" of the researcher or writer. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.

Once you've decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. They should arise out of your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.

Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider:

Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review.

History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.

Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals.

Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

• << Previous: Collecting Resources for a Literature Review
• Next: Writing the Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Nov 2, 2021 12:11 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.stonybrook.edu/literature-review
• Request a Class
• Hours & Locations
• Ask a Librarian
• Special Collections
• Library Faculty & Staff

Library Administration: 631.632.7100

• Stony Brook Home
• Campus Maps
• Web Accessibility Information
• Accessibility Barrier Report Form

Comments or Suggestions? | Library Webmaster

Except where otherwise noted, this work by SBU Libraries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .