public speaking critique essay

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• Communication Skills
• Public Speaking

How to Critique a Speech

Last Updated: February 13, 2023 Approved

This article was co-authored by Lynn Kirkham and by wikiHow staff writer, Christopher M. Osborne, PhD . Lynn Kirkham is a Professional Public Speaker and Founder of Yes You Can Speak, a San Francisco Bay Area-based public speaking educational business empowering thousands of professionals to take command of whatever stage they've been given - from job interviews, boardroom talks to TEDx and large conference platforms. Lynn was chosen as the official TEDx Berkeley speaker coach for the last four years and has worked with executives at Google, Facebook, Intuit, Genentech, Intel, VMware, and others. There are 9 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. wikiHow marks an article as reader-approved once it receives enough positive feedback. In this case, several readers have written to tell us that this article was helpful to them, earning it our reader-approved status. This article has been viewed 195,448 times.

A good speech critique helps build the speaker’s skills by honestly identifying areas for improvement in a constructive, encouraging manner. Offering a good critique can also benefit your own public speaking skills! This article lists several questions you should ask yourself while critiquing a speech’s content and the speaker’s delivery, then provides pointers for effectively sharing your findings.

Does the speech resonate?

• If possible, note audience reactions to the speech. Do they seem to understand it? Are they paying close attention or getting bored?
• Remember to view the speech from the perspective of the target audience, which can be a bit tricky if you’re not actually in the target audience. Use your best judgment.

Is the speech easy to follow?

• Is the introduction effective? Does the speaker make their primary argument apparent within the first few sentences, or does it take awhile before you figure out what they are getting at?
• Is the speech full of distracting tangents that do not relate to the primary topic, or does it build in a logical manner toward the conclusion?
• If you were to summarize the speech to someone else, could you recite all the main points or would you have trouble remembering what it was really about?

Is the speech convincing?

• Listen for clear evidence (like names, dates, statistics, and other data) that backs up the points the speaker is making. Take notes so you can do some fact-checking to make sure the evidence is accurate.
• Once you’ve evaluated the quality of the evidence, make sure it supports the arguments and analysis made in the speech. A truly convincing speech has to hit on both elements—solid evidence and strong analysis.

Is the speech entertaining?

• Does it start with a good hook? Good speeches usually start with a funny or intriguing point that draws the audience in.
• Does it stay engaging the entire time? Well-placed anecdotes and jokes can grab and keep listeners' attention.
• Are the anecdotes and jokes distracting, or do they help build the speaker’s argument?
• Does the speaker use examples judiciously? One really superb, memorable example is better than three that don't stick with the audience.

Does the speech have a strong closing?

• It’s natural for the audience’s focus to lag as the speech carries on, so the closing should regain their attention by being powerful, thoughtful, deep, and concise.
• Both the speech and the speaker should exude confidence during the conclusion. This helps the audience gain confidence in the presentation.

How is the speaker’s vocal delivery?

• A person who is speaking too loudly may seem aggressive, while one who is speaking too quietly may struggle to be heard. See if the person seems to have a good sense of how loudly to speak.
• Many speakers tend to speak too quickly without realizing it. See if the person is speaking at a pace that sounds natural and easy to understand.
• Well-placed and well-timed pauses help the audience digest what’s just been said and prepare for what’s about to be said. Pauses that are too short or non-existent don't give the audience these opportunities, while pauses that are too long are distracting.

How is the speaker’s body language?

• Make easy, natural eye contact with audience members scattered throughout the crowd. This helps every part of the audience feel included.
• Stand up confidently, but not stiffly, and without fidgeting too much.
• Use natural arm and hand gestures from time to time, especially to emphasize key points.
• When appropriate, walk around the stage in a confident but relaxed manner instead of staying behind the podium.

Is the speaker showing high anxiety?

• Note any repeated movements or gestures that take away from the content of the speech; these could be signs of nervousness.
• A shaky voice or tendency to mumble are also signs of nervousness.

Did they read, memorize, or master the speech?

• Mastering the speech allows the speaker to better engage with the audience and make adjustments “on the fly” without wrecking the speech’s flow.

Take notes during and after the speech.

• Instead of a blank notebook, you may instead want to jot down several key questions or areas of focus (like those listed in this article) as a checklist you can refer to during the speech. Make sure to also take notes to flesh out your checklist, though.
• If there are no restrictions against it and you have time, record video or just audio of the speech. Always get the permission of the speaker first. [12] X Research source

Critique the speech’s content first.

• Note which elements of the speech were interesting, which parts were confusing, and which areas need more references to back them up.
• Identify jokes or anecdotes that either really hit the mark or just didn’t work. It’s better to be honest now than to let the person tell the same bad joke twice!
• Note whether you felt the speech was appropriate for the intended audience.

Critique the speaker’s delivery second.

• If, for example, the speaker seemed really nervous, it’s important to point this out as a distracting element that blunted the impact of the speech. You might also constructively point out techniques that help reduce stage fright, like exercising before the speech, laughing before the speech, and practicing in front of a small group of people first.

Offer positive encouragement throughout.

• Try the feedback sandwich technique: give the person a compliment on an element of their speech, tell them what needs improvement, then give them another compliment. For example, tell them they started with a brilliant hook, then explain that the second point was confusing, and finish by noting how the conclusion clarified the main point. [16] X Research source
• As a way to encourage the person to keep learning and improving, you might suggest they watch videos of speeches given by famous speakers. Point out similarities and differences between the speech you’re critiquing and the famous speech.

Expert Q&A

• Use a standardized evaluation form, rating scale, or point system in a classroom setting or competition. This helps you assign a grade to the speech or decide who presented a better speech. Thanks Helpful 1 Not Helpful 0

You Might Also Like

• ↑ http://faculty.washington.edu/mcgarrit/COM220/online%20readings/Peer_Critique_Assignment_Description.pdf
• ↑ Lynn Kirkham. Public Speaking Coach. Expert Interview. 20 November 2019.
• ↑ http://www.uvm.edu/~cals183/spring2017/outside.html
• ↑ http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-evaluation-1-how-to-study-critique-speech/
• ↑ https://www.psycom.net/glossophobia-fear-of-public-speaking
• ↑ https://hbr.org/2020/02/dont-just-memorize-your-next-presentation-know-it-cold
• ↑ http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-evaluation-2-art-of-delivering-evaluations/
• ↑ https://www.toastmasters.org/magazine/magazine-issues/2016/oct2016/evaluation
• ↑ http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-evaluation-3-modified-sandwich-technique/

About This Article

To critique a speech, start by evaluating whether or not the speaker made their argument apparent in the first few sentences of their speech. Then, decide if the rest of the speech supported that argument in a smooth, understandable manner. You should also focus on the speaker’s voice inflections, like speaking at a natural pace and knowing when to pause for effect. Additionally, evaluate their body language, which should project confidence with gestures like making eye contact and standing up straight without fidgeting too much. For more advice, including how to give constructive feedback in areas like credibility and emotional intelligence, keep reading. Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Gabriel Martinez

Apr 5, 2017

Did this article help you?

Charlie Adolfo

Sep 22, 2016

Alex Flores

Sep 1, 2020

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Level up your tech skills and stay ahead of the curve

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

32 Reflect – Informative Speech Self Critique

Informative Speech Self Critique Assignment

Understand the mn state communication pathways learning outcomes for this assignment:, students should be able to:.

1.4 Utilize appropriate research strategies to discover and ethically integrate supporting materials from diverse sources and points of view.

1.5 Demonstrate the ability to listen, analyze, and provide feedback on public discourse.

Description

Start: After you give your speech, ASAP — watch your video one time without stopping it. Then, watch it a second time and answer these questions, rewinding, stopping and playing, etc. as you go. Answer the questions honestly. Remember to use specific examples to support your responses. Remember to quote your online textbook – OR notes online in the Content Area that are relevant to your response — often folks forget and that is the only reason they get poor scores (really!). You will “cite” the textbook like you would a source in your outline.

Read: look back at the chapters related to this unit.

Practice: review the vide of your speech

Do: Complete this

A nice job here will help bolster your grade…!!!

•  How did you practice for this speech (honestly)? How did your preparation differ from the Introduction Speech? What went well in your preparation and what will you do differently for your next speech? How was anxiety similar/different this time? Answer fully below (about at least a paragraph – and please use proper grammar/spelling for full credit – i mn not “texting” mezaages k?):
• Did you state your sources at least 3 times during your speech? When — be specific – add times from your video if possible. Did you say “who, where and when” — be SPECIFIC).  Add the “times” on the video for full credit.
• Watch your speech carefully. Now describe your greatest strength concerning the CONTENT of your speech (content is “what” you said, delivery is “how” you said it careful not to mix these up).

Look to chapters that talk about supporting materials and organization for this question.

Include a specific example from your speech to illustrate your response (yes, quote yourself); explain why this is a strength and include a quote and citation from the free online textbook  (or if you have a hard copy, you can use this too) to support your explanation.

My greatest strength in the content area was my use of transitions. An example of this was when I moved from my first main point to my second main point I said, “Now that I have told you how this book represents my hard exterior, let’s open it up and see how it can also represent the softer side of me.” This was a strength because I was clear and creative in my movement between ideas, as described on page 8-7 in chapter 8 of the online textbook, it says, ” One way to connect points is to include transitional statements. Transitional statements are phrases or sentences that lead from one distinct but connected idea to another. They are used to alert audiences to the fact that you are getting ready to discuss something else.” Thus, these should be smooth and help you move from one point to another” (Barnett, 8-7).

• Now watch your speech carefully and describe your greatest strengths concerning the DELIVERY of your speech (delivery is “how” you said it, content is “what” you said).

For this question,  include a specific example from your speech to illustrate your response (yes, quote yourself and describe the delivery of that quote); explain why this is a strength and include a quote and citation from the free online textbook to support your explanation.

My greatest strength in the delivery area was my use of eye contact. For example, in the body of my speech, when I was covering my second point on why this occurs, I said “this could happen to each of us” and began to look directly at the audience members, and looked to each side very slowly (at 1:30 in the video). I think that this is a strength because if you can look someone in the eye, you generally appear sincere. In the text, on page 12-10, it states, “The eyes are called the windows to the soul, and the importance of eye contact in communication cannot be overemphasized. Ideally, a speaker should include 80% to 90% of the delivery time with eye contact” (Capecce, 12-10). Thus, the online stresses you should not read your speech, with my eye contact I was able to avoid that!

• What will you want to improve upon concerning your delivery? List three areas you will focus upon for the next speech. For each area to improve, give a specific example from your speech to illustrate your response. Then describe how you will work to improve in this area.

I used too many hand gestures. For example, when I was describing the first reason the ball represents me, I looked like I was flying. I raised my hands 10 times in just 43 seconds! I plan to watch myself in a mirror and actually practice my gestures next time. I will write out on my note cards when I should use the gestures….  (then add 2 more areas to improve and your plans for improvement as above).

The Public Speaking Resource Project Copyright © 2018 by Lori Halverson-Wente and Mark Halverson-Wente is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

The Tech Edvocate

• Advertisement
• Home Page Five (No Sidebar)
• Home Page Four
• Home Page Three
• Home Page Two
• Icons [No Sidebar]
• Left Sidbear Page
• Lynch Educational Consulting
• My Speaking Page
• Newsletter Sign Up Confirmation
• Newsletter Unsubscription
• Page Example
• Privacy Policy
• Protected Content
• Request a Product Review
• Shortcodes Examples
• Terms and Conditions
• The Edvocate
• The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
• Write For Us
• Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
• The Edvocate Podcast
• Assistive Technology
• Child Development Tech
• Early Childhood & K-12 EdTech
• EdTech Futures
• EdTech News
• EdTech Policy & Reform
• EdTech Startups & Businesses
• Higher Education EdTech
• Online Learning & eLearning
• Parent & Family Tech
• Personalized Learning
• Product Reviews
• Tech Edvocate Awards
• School Ratings

Achievement Exams: Everything You Need to Know

The worst state for education in the us, teaching in public and private schools: everything you need to know, the science of geography should be taught in schools, benefits of a boarding school education: everything you need to know, transitioning from undergraduate to grad learner: everything you need to know, college textbooks costs: everything you need to know, what is an ahk file, keeping yourself safe in college: everything you need to know, myths about online high schools: everything you need to know, 13 ways to critique a speech.

Introduction:

Public speaking is an essential skill that can be honed and improved through practice, feedback, and constructive criticism. This article aims to provide you with 13 effective ways to critique a speech, so you can help others sharpen their public speaking capabilities.

1. Analyze The Structure

Examine the beginning, middle, and end of the speaker’s speech. Well-structured speeches should have a catchy introduction, logical flow of ideas, and a strong conclusion.

2. Focus on Delivery

Take note of body language, posture, eye contact, and gesture usage. A successful speech must have clear pronunciation, proper tone variation, pauses where needed, and suitable facial expressions.

3. Gauge Audience Engagement

Observe the audience’s reaction during the speech. Note if they appear interested or not. A good speech captivates its audience.

4. Evaluate Vocal Variety

Assess whether the speaker uses different pitch levels, pausing techniques, and rhythm patterns that make content engaging to listen to.

5. Check for Clarity & Brevity

A good speech must convey its message clearly without being overly complicated or too long.

6. Examine Visual Aids

Review the visual aids used in the presentation and their effectiveness in conveying information and supporting key points.

7. Identify Purpose & Goals

Determine if the speaker effectively conveyed the purpose of their speech and achieved their desired outcome.

8. Evaluate Use of Humor

Note if humor was used appropriately and contributed positively to the overall presentation.

9. Consider Emotional Appeal

Assess whether the speech effectively connected on an emotional level with the audience through storytelling or emotive language that supports key messages.

10. Reflect on Facts & Data Used

Examine how well facts were used and how they supported main points while checking for accuracy and sources of information presented.

11. Suggest Improvement Areas

Identify any weak points in the speaker’s speech that could be improved, such as content organization, language used, visual aids, or delivery techniques.

12. Highlight Strengths

Ensure you point out strengths in the speaker’s performance to encourage and reinforce good habits.

13. Provide Constructive Feedback

Share your observations with the speaker in an empathetic manner and offer specific suggestions on how they can improve while acknowledging their effort and achievements.

Conclusion:

By examining these 13 areas of critique when evaluating someone’s speech, you will be able to provide valuable insights and suggestions for improvement. Remember that effective critiques are constructive and aim to help the speaker become better at public speaking by learning from experience.

5 Ways to Be Good at Volleyball

4 ways to be drug-free.

Matthew Lynch

Related articles more from author.

3 Ways to Learn Chinese Fast

3 Ways to Tell the Sex of a Baby Duck

How to Hook Up a Trailer: 12 Steps

3 Ways to Teach Empathy to Adults

How to Replace a Zipper Pull: 13 Steps

3 Simple Ways to Dispose of Old Makeup

• Speech Writing
• Delivery Techniques
• PowerPoint & Visuals
• Speaker Habits
• Speaker Resources

Speech Critiques

• Book Reviews
• Browse Articles
• ALL Articles
• Learn About Us
• About Six Minutes
• Meet Our Authors
• Write for Us
• Advertise With Us

Speech Preparation #9: Prepare Now for Your Next Speech

This article focuses on the sixth step: critiquing your speech so you can learn from your strengths and weaknesses . Thus, a self-critique is really the first step in preparation for your next speech.

• How to Prepare Your Presentation
• Select Your Speech Topic
• Plan Your Speech Outline
• Writing Your First Draft
• Editing Your Speech
• Add Speech Impact with Rhetorical Devices
• Staging, Gestures, and Vocal Variety
• Practicing Your Presentation
• Self-Critique: Preparation for Next Time
• Winning a Toastmasters Speech Contest

Why Critique Your Presentation Skills?

Great speakers realize that presentation skills are not easily mastered in one or two or ten speeches. Speaking skills are improved incrementally one speech at a time.

To realize these incremental improvements, it is essential to periodically review your skills . Some people prefer to do this review once a week or once a month; I recommend that you review your skills after every speech , especially if you are a novice speaker just dipping your toes into the public speaking pool.

Critiquing Your Own Speech

It only takes a few minutes to review a speech , and the best time to do it is the same day that you delivered it. Your delivery is still fresh in your mind, as is your preparation for the speech.

When critiquing your own speech, you can apply many of the same criteria that you would when critiquing someone else’s speech. You will find an extensive list of these criteria in a previous Six Minutes article about speech analysis .

Those criteria are a great start, but you can also ask yourself many other questions too.

• Overall, were you satisfied with your final speech? If not, why not?
• Did you achieve your objective ? Was your core message received by the audience?
• Were you confident during your delivery? Were you more nervous or less nervous than previous speeches?
• What audience feedback did you receive during or after delivery of the speech? What strengths were mentioned? What weaknesses were revealed?
• What did you think of your delivery ?
• Did you have any stumbles ? Were they caused by nervousness, or was there another cause?
• How long did you speak ? Was this shorter or longer than you had planned? If you were under time, this may be an indication that your speaking rate was a bit fast. If you were over time, this may be an indication that you should have cut more material.
• Did you try any new techniques, either in the preparation phase or in your delivery? If so, what did you think? What lessons can you extract?

Depending on the context of the speech , a few other questions include:

• Was your pre-speech audience analysis accurate ? If not, what did you learn about this audience that you could apply to the speech to make it better?
• If you led a Q&A session during the presentation, how did it go? From the types of questions asked, did it seem like your audience “got” the message?
• If you obtained an audio recording , what did you learn from listening to it? Was your voice clear throughout? Did you have any distracting habits? (e.g. um’s, ah’s, trailing off at the end of sentences)
• If you obtained a video recording , what did you learn from watching it? How was your posture and eye contact? Were your gestures varied and timed well? Did you have any distracting habits?

And, one final question:

• If you were going to deliver the same speech to the same audience, what would you do differently ?

Remember that the aim of the self-critique is not to beat yourself up over any slips or mistakes you might have made. Instead, the true aim is to celebrate your successes and look ahead to see how you can improve for your next speech.

Self-Critique Example — Face the Wind

Overall, I’m very happy with my 2007 contest speech Face the Wind . I won the club, area, and division contests, and presented on the “big stage” at the district conference.

Unfortunately, I didn’t achieve the goal I had set for myself — winning the District 21 Speech Contest. I felt that I could have won, but the field of ten contestants was very strong.

Here’s my self-assessment, aided by the fact that I have an excellent video of my performance!

Speech Self-Critique: Strengths

• I did my best. I honestly felt that I delivered the best possible speech that my skills allowed at that given time. As I was walking off the stage, I wanted to give someone a high-five because I knew the delivery was my best.
• Gestures and Staging. I felt my choreography was second to none . I received numerous compliments on this aspect of the speech. This made me quite happy because I had spent a great deal of time working on gestures and staging.
• I got laughter from the audience in most places where I was aiming for it.
• Several audience members suggested that I have the skill set to be a full-time motivational speaker .
• I had lots of fun through the whole process! I received such positive encouragement from so many people. The organizers of the district speech contest treated the contestants like royalty!

Speech Self-Critique: Weaknesses

• In the future , I should videotape my rehearsal sessions to see if I can pick up on this trait.
• In the future , I need to work on writing so I have better punchlines and punch words .
• In the future , I need to keep my voice strong even during “quiet” lines.
• In the future , I need to solicit more feedback specifically about the core message and what might be done to strengthen it. Perhaps I need to devote a little more time to speech writing, and less to delivery techniques.

A question for you, my esteemed readers … How could I have improved the speech?

Next in the Speech Preparation Series

The last article in the Speech Preparation Series examines Toastmasters Speech Contests and the preparation necessary to be successful.

Please share this...

This is one of many public speaking articles featured on Six Minutes . Subscribe to Six Minutes for free to receive future articles.

Image credit: Girl in Mirror by FreeImages.com/Alex Bramwell ( license )

Add a Comment Cancel reply

E-Mail (hidden)

Subscribe - It's Free!

Similar articles you may like....

• Speech Preparation #8: How to Practice Your Presentation
• Speech Analysis #1: How to Study and Critique a Speech
• Speech Analysis #2: The Art of Delivering Evaluations
• Speech Analysis #4: Evaluation Forms, Tools, and Resources
• Speech Critique: Jacqueline Novogratz (TED 2009)
• Speech Analysis #3: Modified Sandwich Technique for Evaluations

Find More Articles Tagged:

Great point to critique yourself and I’m constantly amazed at how many people don’t. Actually, I’m not – because in the relief of having finished and not dieing of fright during their presentation they are on such a high they just don’t think.

One way I’ve encouraged myself to do it is to put it on my checklist of things to do – which obviously covers the things before I go on stage but also includes the things to do afterwards: thank X, speak to the sound person, check my kit etc….

Simon: I like the idea of a post-presentation checklist. That may help to form the speech self-critique habit.

Two hopefully helpful critiques: First, while your gestures were overall really excellent–evocative and well delivered–there were a few that I felt were overdone. Gestures which hit the audience over the head a bit too much, as it were. Two that come to mind: when you went down on your knees in the tree story, that felt over-done and somewhat un-natural. And in the Maximus story when you made the baby-cradling gesture, it felt almost hyperbolic–we get that it’s an emotional story, and I don’t feel that the words actually needed a gesture to underscore them. To me, the best gestures have an “organic” feel to them, they seem wholly natural in the context of the words that surround them. But those two gestures struck me as having been added solely to “punch up” your speech, and not because they were natural. Thus they ring false and detract from your overall message and the audience’s perception of it.

Second, on the speech content itself: As you moved from story to story, I had trouble understanding the connection between them. Part of this was because such a large part of the first story was taken up with talking about yardwork, which was only peripheral to your real message. I’d have spent less (or no) time talking about moving your maple tree and more time talking about the threat posed by the neighbor’s tree. So as the speech moved from yardwork to the neighbor’s tree to miscarriage, my concept of the speech’s theme had to keep shifting from “work” to “risk” to “challenge”. That, too, undermined your message. Taking each story within the speech, paring it to the essentials that focus on your real message, and briefly stating the message at the end of each story would have helped enormously. They say that if you want people to remember anything, you have to say it three times. So with two stories, each one concluding with the message, and an overall speech conclusion that really lays out the message for all to see, you’ve got your three times.

Jason: I appreciate your detailed and specific speech critique. It is very helpful, and also a great example of the type of evaluation I discuss in the Speech Analysis Series .

I find your columns quite helpful! So I would pass on a couple of thoughts on your performance in Face The Wind.

I agree with the comments listed and would like to add two more. 1. Lug the tree – wrap your arms around it and walk like it is heavy. 2. Add energy to your voice. Make it more dynamic. Increase the volume range, variation and energy.

Hi, It really was a great speech. Content great. I think it could have been pruned a little to make it snappier.

Body language was perfect.

I have just delivered my ‘ice breaker’ so what do I know?!

What I feel personally is that many speeches lack congruency. What I mean by that is that although they are executed well, they don’t connect with the audience. They are a speech and not a conversation with the audience.

Anthony Robbins is that master at congruent speaking. Even though he is running through set material it is like he is doing it for the first time and its all off the cuff. You can really see his emotional connection with his words.

I think if you had attached emotional congruency with the sadness of the bad weather and also with the lost of the babies, it would have been more powerful.

Check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpc-t-Uwv1I for the master at work. I have no connection to the guy what so ever but I am working on improving my skills based on his talent.

Hi, Andrew: I am preparing my third speech-get to the point and searched at web and found you web that is absolutely helpful to me-a new member of TM since Sep. this year. I read all the 1-9 of your speech preparation series (have not done the 10 as you mentioned feedback to your FACE the WIND, I decide to write you before reading the 10). I love your face the wind and reviewed it for different learning purposes from step 1 to 9. The first time I viewed it, I expected your two hands and arms would be upper or higher for “the mortgage is tripled” than you said your living space is doubled, same expectation when I reviewed it more times later. Thanks to find your web, I am more confident to prepare for the third one and wished I found you earlier, I would do better for the Ice breaker speech and the second one Organize your speech. Regards, Zhou Hui

Recent Tweets

Speech Self-Critique – http://t.co/JolmOABl #Fear #PublicSpeacking in #Brighton — The Spence Practice Oct 3rd, 2011

Speech Self-Critique – http://t.co/shTBdSyR Fear PublicSpeacking in Brighton http://t.co/CGM9rDhA — Brightonfeed Oct 3rd, 2011

Featured Articles

• Majora Carter (TED, 2006) Energy, Passion, Speaking Rate
• Hans Rosling (TED, 2006) 6 Techniques to Present Data
• J.A. Gamache (Toastmasters, 2007) Gestures, Prop, Writing
• Steve Jobs (Stanford, 2005) Figures of speech, rule of three
• Al Gore (TED, 2006) Humor, audience interaction
• Dick Hardt (OSCON, 2005) Lessig Method of Presentation

Books We Recommend

Six Minutes Copyright © 2007-2019 All Rights Reserved.

Read our permissions policy , privacy policy , or disclosure policy .

Comments? Questions? Contact us .

Public Speaking at Church – Critique Essay

Attending a successful speech is an experience that can be remembered and recalled as a new resource of inspiration. Nevertheless, many of the speeches as regular traditions in local churches can fall into the category of obliged duty either to the listeners or to the speakers themselves. This fact can outline an important part of church speeches which sometimes surpasses the importance of the content of the speech. This part consists of many details that cannot be limited to a single word, such as delivery, reaction, and message. As an attempt to observe and critique these components of a church speech, this paper covers a personal experience of attending a local church and analyzing it from a perspective of inspiration rather than content.

The attended speech was held on Wednesday, March 04, 2009, in Calvary Chapel which is located at 2955 Minton Rd Melbourne. The speech was titled “The Lord Is My Shepherd” and was presented by pastor Mark Balmer. The speech was a part of regular teachings connected with explaining excerpts from the bible and relating them to a particular event. The aforementioned speech specifically was addressed to analyzing Psalm 23 and the context of the phrase “The Lord Is My Shepherd”.

The speaker used as an introduction of his speech a real-life example in delivering the main idea of his speech. The main idea after that gradually shifted into explaining the title of the speech. In that matter, the speaker used imagery, figurative language, and symbolism in relating the bible to the simple events that everyone is facing each day. It also can be sensed that the subject of the speech along with its content indirectly was used as guidelines in assessing certain behavior in the light of the recent difficult financial situation that the country and the world are facing. This the element can be especially perceptible with the emphasis on “a sheep need a shepherd” which can be heard in different interpretations throughout the whole speech.

It can be sensed that the delivery methods used by the speaker were directed mainly toward the younger audience as the pastor used the internet, the blogs, the newspaper, the obituary notice, and especially the staff with the sheep dummy. All of these elements combined with the speaker’s natural and delicate sense of humor can be attributed to the delivery strategies that he used. Although the natural characteristic of the speaker can be mainly attributed to his nature, it can be sensed how smoothly he transitioned from funny subjects into serious ones never letting the audience feeling as the teachings are imposed on them.

The success of the speech can be sensed through the personal reaction and the reaction of the audience. In that matter, it can be said that the speech was very successful. The speaker has perfectly mastered his speech already sensing that this passage will let the people laugh and the other one will make them fall deep in thought. The reaction o the public was predictable, but at the same time there was a strong feeling of improvisation in pastor’s words which can indicate his masterfulness. The most important sign of the speech’s success is that the speaker succeeded in making the audience care and at the same time he never let them feel bored.

If describing the climate in the event in general, it can be said that it was filled with warmth and friendship. This fact was even noticeable in a way as it could be noticed how the people were coming to the church with a look showing the weight of the world on their shoulders and leaving with a smile and a feel of spiritual satisfaction. Such observations were so obvious that the flow of the speech accompanied by the thoughts that ran through the audience’s head could be read from the faces. In a personal opinion, the climate and the success of the speech are all the results of the efforts of the speaker who served as a director rather than a pastor in attracting people’s emotions and empathies and sending away all the troubles and worries.

Presenting a speech is a talent of delivery as much as it is a talent of composing. In that sense, the ability to present a religious speech is a great gift that can be used as a dangerous weapon due to the responsibility that lies on the shoulders of the speakers. Analyzing the aforementioned speech it cannot be said that it was flawless, but it was close to that meaning. The ways that the speaker could have improved his speech consist in omitting some of the symbolism features which might have been a little childish. Nevertheless, the usage of such elements as the dummy sheep and the staff were accepted by listeners of all ages. Another point is the speech’s feel of continuity, as each speech should have been independent. The references to previous speeches as the subject that was previously approached give the absent listeners a feeling of loss, especially if the subject is unfamiliar or requires additional explanation.

• Profile of Pastor Lin
• The Parable of the Lost Sheep
• The United States Since the Civil War
• The Metaphor and Its Use in Political Language
• "You Are What You Say" by Robin Lakoff Analysis
• Differences Between Singaporean and Australian English
• Phonetic Alphabet in Different Languages
• Slang Language and Its Characteristics
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, December 6). Public Speaking at Church - Critique. https://ivypanda.com/essays/public-speaking-at-church-critique/

"Public Speaking at Church - Critique." IvyPanda , 6 Dec. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/public-speaking-at-church-critique/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Public Speaking at Church - Critique'. 6 December.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Public Speaking at Church - Critique." December 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/public-speaking-at-church-critique/.

1. IvyPanda . "Public Speaking at Church - Critique." December 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/public-speaking-at-church-critique/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Public Speaking at Church - Critique." December 6, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/public-speaking-at-church-critique/.

Home — Essay Samples — Education — Class Reflection — What I Learned on Public Speaking Class: a Reflection

What I Learned on Public Speaking Class: a Reflection

• Categories: Class Reflection Communication Skills Speak

About this sample

Words: 861 |

Published: Mar 18, 2021

Words: 861 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Works Cited

• DeVito, J. A. (2020). The essentials of public speaking (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Hamilton, C. (2014). TED Talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Lucas, S. E. (2014). The art of public speaking (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• O'Hair, D., Stewart, R., & Rubenstein, H. (2019). A pocket guide to public speaking (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Pearson, J. C., & Nelson, P. E. (2000). An introduction to human communication : Understanding and sharing (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Petersen, C., & Gallagher, K. (2017). Public speaking: Strategies for success (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Pride, W. M., Hughes, R. J., & Kapoor, J. R. (2020). Business communication (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Quintanilla, K., & Wahl, S. (2016). Business and professional communication: KEYS for workplace excellence (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Verderber, R. F., Verderber, K. S., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). Communicate! (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Zarefsky, D. (2017). Public speaking: Strategies for success (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Education Life Sociology

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

6 pages / 2529 words

1 pages / 441 words

1 pages / 360 words

3 pages / 1304 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Class Reflection

What I learned in sociology class essay offers an opportunity to delve into the enriching insights and valuable knowledge gained from the study of human behavior, social interactions, and societal structures. Sociology provides [...]

Active class participation is a critical component of a successful academic journey. It involves engaging with course material, contributing to discussions, and collaborating with peers. In this self-evaluation essay, I will [...]

Life is an intricate journey filled with unique experiences and profound lessons. As a college student, I find myself constantly reflecting on various aspects of life, questioning its purpose, and exploring my own perspectives. [...]

Education is a lifelong journey filled with opportunities for growth, discovery, and personal development. Throughout my academic journey, I have been fortunate to learn from dedicated teachers and engage in a variety of [...]

Allen, W. (Director). (Year). Title of Woody Allen film . Production Company.Boggs, J. M., & Petrie, D. W. (2019). The art of watching films. McGraw-Hill Education.Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2017). Film art: An introduction. [...]

In the course of this semester I have learned my understandings of sexual gender through classes and discussions presented amongst the class. The cultural aspect of sex and gender allowed me to make connections to my previous [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Module 2: Informative Speech

Required and extra credit listening critiques.

As you learned in  Course Information Documents  about requirements for this course, there are TWO required listening critiques in COM101.  This means that I have selected two speeches for everyone in class to view and to respond to using the required template to record your thoughts.  Think of this as a “lab report” on a presentation.  It is not an essay. A successful critique will include heading information and five areas of evaluation indicated and separated by roman numerals.   It will visually look exactly like the  blank template  provided to you.  I encourage you to copy and to paste the blank template into a new document and save it on your computer.  Then, you can easily copy and paste the template to a fresh page each time you work on a required critique or an extra-credit credit critique, if you chose to do one.  Save time creating the framework and spend time providing details of what makes the speech being analyzed effective or ineffective in reaching the goal of the speech and/or eliciting the desired audience reaction.  Required listening critiques are not optional.  At least one must be submitted for evaluation in order to pass the course because it is a Queue Item.

I find it easier to have a hard copy of the  blank template  with me when I am viewing a presentation to critique.  This enables me to record my thoughts in an organized way as they occur to me. It also gives me a rough draft to revise and to edit for my final draft to upload for a grade.  When you are asked to do a required listening critique, I will provide the fill-in information for the heading information.  If you  choose  to do an extra-credit critique, you fill in the heading information as part of your critique.

The first video to view and to critique is an informative speech written and delivered by one of my  former students at Clinton Community College, David Curry.  I wish you to see an example of the “end game.”  This is also good practice reviewing what we have learned so far in the course about tailoring a topic for an audience, speaker delivery choices, basic organization of effective openings/closings.

The recording was made when he gave his speech as a guest speaker in one of my classes the semester following when he was enrolled in the course.  The recording is with his permission and he knows we plan to talk about its strengths and what would make it more effective.  The recorder for David attempts to zoom in on the  visual aids , but as we practice in this class, the speaker is the lead story.   Visual aids  are present and visible but should not be the focus. If a slide presentation or video is used, it can be provided as an attachment with the recording of the speaker. Other than the differences in recording rules, David had the exact same Informative Speech Assignment Requirements you have to work with in preparing and presenting your informative speech.  Ready?

Have your hard copy,  blank template  printed with the following heading information inserted:

Template organization is  bold.  Insert information and your critique is not bold.   

Required Listening Critique

Speaker:  David Curry

Target Audience:  College Students

Date of Speech:  Viewed in Module 3: Informative Speech

Location:  College Classroom

Occasion:  Informative Speech Presentations by Students

Subject/Topic:  To be revealed ( insert once you view the speech)

Main public speaking goal:   To inform

Get situated to view and to take notes for your critique.  Allow yourself a full, 30 minutes of uninterrupted time to fully view and to respond to the recording.   You will find link to the video in DO folder.  Our discussion this week will focus on David Curry’s presentation.  You are invited and expected to cite responses and feedback from classmates about the speech in area ” IV.  Audience Reaction” in the template of your critique.   This means you will earn points from your discussion posts in DISCUSS and earn points for referring/citing information from DISCUSS thread in your critique.

• Authored by : Lee Ann Thomas. Provided by : Clinton Community College. License : CC BY: Attribution

Privacy Policy

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Rhetoric

Critique Of Public Speaking Essay Samples

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Rhetoric , Speech , Eye , Voice , Quality , Speaker , Trends , Evaluation

Published: 01/25/2022

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

In modern challenging world, being a successful speaker is a critical factor of achieving success. In terms of this paper, brief evaluation of the speech will be presented. While making the evaluation of speech, it is important to analyze the quality of the verbal delivery skills. It is remarkable that the words were being uttered clearly, understandably, and with appropriate pronunciation and good articulation. Also the volume of the voice was suitable and pleasant for listening. Voice inflection, in general, was proper; however, sometimes, a little bit more expressiveness would be preferable. Thus it might be reasonable to recommend practicing experimenting with the voice’s pitch, loudness and softness in order to make the speech slightly more dynamic and expressive. Furthermore, although the voice rate was mainly moderate, and efficient pauses were fittingly used within the speech, sometimes the tendency to speak too rapidly took place; that is why it can be suggested that certain reduce of the speech’s speed might be desirable. Another significant aspect of the public speaking which is needed to be assessed is the quality of nonverbal communication. Firstly, the posture which was applied during the speech and represented by confident standing up straight can be described as a suitable one. Secondly, the gestures used during the speech were rather efficient ones as they were contributing to enhancing speech’s expressiveness and brightness. Thirdly, facial expressions were accurate and mostly appropriate; nevertheless, it can be advised to the speaker to let his face express wider spectrum of emotions while presenting material. Eventually, an attempt of keeping sufficient eye contact with imagining audience was made; but sometimes, there was a tendency to loosing eye contact and looking around for rather long period of time. That is why the attention should be paid to improving the quality of the eye contact. In addition, it is interesting to analyze first words used by to start the speech and last words used to end the speech. The introduction part was catching and suitable due to which the positive first impression was created. There were no any “Umso, I guess” at the beginning of the speech, and, in general, a right choice for the first words of the presentation was made. However, it is reasonable to suggest that the conclusion of the speech needs to be slightly improved. Although the idea was presented at the end of the speech was interesting and suitable for the conclusion, it might be better to make it more developed. Finally, it is fascinating to calculate the number of “Umms” and broken eye contacts per minute. During the first minute, there were 2 “Umms” and 4 broken eye contacts made by the speaker. During the second minute, there were 3 “Umms” and 8 broken eye contacts. Finally, during the third minute, there were 4 “Umms” and 3 broken eye contacts.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 264

This paper is created by writer with

ID 263341840

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Free essay on acceptance of death, good example of local erie county need from paper 1 1 pt immunization report, good example of lao in tunisia case study, free essay about survey questions, future of managed health care delivery system research proposal samples, good example of essay on the design cultures of the middle west, free evaluating bias in research essay sample, advantages and disadvantages of competition essay you might want to emulate, essay on farenheit 451, uvu writing center type to use as a writing model, binomial random variable real life example essay sample, constituting essays, alpha centauri essays, sex crimes essays, information revolution essays, audibility essays, rhyming essays, commas essays, true feelings essays, extroversion essays, maleki essays, mito essays, endovascular essays, sadhu essays, morone essays, tasco essays, monolayer essays, industrial wastewater treatment essays, human reproduction essays, bended knee essays, ne yo essays, perfect love essays, safe harbor essays, north texas essays, otsuka essays, foaming essays, gas liquid essays, trichomonas vaginalis essays, trichomonas essays, flows term papers, felonies term papers, expressions term papers.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline