phd defence iheid

GENEVA GRADUATE INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE EDUCATION

Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A Case postale 1672 CH - 1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland +41 (0)22 908 57 09 [email protected]

Conflict and Fragility Management

Executive certificate and diploma, executive education course.

Global peace and security challenges, amplified by deep geopolitical tensions, have never been so high, calling into question the achievement of the development goals set out in the Agenda 2030.

The programme explores the implementation of development processes in complex environments and gives you the skills to apply the triple nexus approach. By engaging with peers and leading experts in the field, you will be encouraged to reflect critically on your practice.

<Back to course catalogue

Learn about the impact of protracted crises and conflicts on development policies and practices, to better understand the challenges at stake in your local context

Acquire strategic management tools to improve your projects and/or formulate new strategies with a conflict-sensitive approach

Sharpen your professional skills and critical thinking to elaborate innovative solutions and become more agile in decision-making

Conduct a professional thesis to deepen your expertise and recommend concrete and effective changes in your working environment

Strengthen your leadership and communication skills to gain influence and better interact with different types of stakeholders in fragile settings

Expand your professional network to develop synergies and exchange best practices on topics of common interest

Who is this programme for?

Professionals who hold or aspire to hold leadership positions in governments, international organisations, NGOs, and the broader civil society space

Professionals from the private sector seeking to gain knowledge and experience in the humanitarian/development/peacebuilding fields

Related SDG

3 weeks full-time at the Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU) in Doha, Qatar & 2 weeks full-time online - Certificate & Diploma

Get critical perspectives on key issues related to contemporary peace and security concerns

Analyse the complex implementation of development processes in fragile contexts

Rethink projects using strategic management tools, with a conflict-sensitive approach

Acquire methodological skills to carry out a professional thesis

The participants in the Certificate must write a paper and submit it two months after the end of the module.

4 months part-time at your workplace with e-learning - Diploma only

Conduct data collection and analysis for your professional thesis

Write your professional thesis (on a thematic relevant to your work)

Attend elective e-learning courses on different topics, including on gender

2.5 weeks full-time in international Geneva - Diploma only

Strengthen your leadership and communication skills

Present the findings of your professional thesis to your peers

Participate in work sessions with public administrations, international organisations and NGOs

PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES

Peer-to-peer learning - engage with peers from various continents and sectors

Interactive teaching - learn actively with learner-centred approaches

Partners faculty and speakers - benefit from guidance and coaching from our staff

Case studies, field visits - look into concrete field projects and classes

Diversity - benefit from exposure to international speakers, faculty staff and peers

Professional thesis - write a paper with professional relevance and impact through guidance from teachers and discussions with peers

Certificate: CHF 8'500 Diploma: CHF 3'500 to 25'000, according to country of origin

Priority countries - Diploma only

If you come from a country that is on this list , your financial contribution will be limited to CHF 3'500 . Special consideration will be given to applicants from the first column (least developed countries), as well as those working in local NGOs. Logistics are provided and covered by the programme. You are only required to organise and take at your expense the round trip to attend Module 1.

Opportunities for other countries - Diploma only

If your country is not included in the above list, you may still be eligible for cost reduction. Your financial contribution will be fixed according to the Human Development Index (HDI):

CHF 12'500 for candidates coming from a country with a low-to-medium HDI

CHF 17'500 for candidates coming from a country with a high HDI

CHF 25'000 for candidates coming from a country with a very high HDI

Logistics are provided and covered by the programme. You are only required to organise and take at your expense the round trip to attend Module 1.

Swiss candidates - Diploma only

Your contribution will vary between CHF 3'500 and CHF 25'000 and will be fixed according to your 'Revenu Déterminant Unifié' (RDU). For more information, please, contact Stéphanie Roy Michael .

If you are a Geneva taxpayer, you may be eligible for the chèque annuel de formation (CAF) up to CHF 2'250, delivered by the Canton of Geneva . You must make the CAF request before the start of the training. The programme reference for the Executive Certificate is 7110. The programme reference for the Executive Diploma is 7130.

Scholarship Terms and Conditions

Bachelor's degree (minimum three years) and several years (ideally 5-7 years) of professional experience (or an equivalent combination of training and experience)

Proficiency in English (no certificate is required, although interviews by skype or in-person in Geneva may be requested)

Support of the applicant's organisation - Diploma only

Executive Certificate in Development Policies and Practices - Conflict and Fragility Management Certificate of Advanced Studies (15 ECTS) Requires successful completion of Module 1 assessments and final paper

Executive Diploma in Development Policies and Practices - Conflict and Fragility Management Diploma of Advanced Studies (30 ECTS) Requires successful completion of Modules 1, 2 and 3 assessments and professional thesis

Both programmes count towards the Executive Master in International Relations

Online application form

Scanned copies of your academic degrees

Letter of reference from your current or previous employer - Certificate only

Letter from your current employer explaining the relevance of your professional thesis for the institution's activities and objectives. This letter must be written on headed paper and include the full contact details of the person signing it: surname, first name, position, email address and telephone number - Diploma only - Download letter outline

Membership of the Graduate Institute alumnae-i network of 20,000+

10% discount on Executive Education programmes

Networking and professional development opportunities through the alumnae-i regional chapters and the DPP community of practice

Engage with professors, renowned professionals and peers from around the world. A close collaboration between the Graduate Institute and its partners provides the participants with the best expertise from universities, bilateral agencies, NGOs, public administrations and international organisations. Each year, the programme welcomes a high number of guest speakers from all sectors in addition to our core faculty. It also emphasises peer-to-peer learning and offers multiple spaces for discussion and exchange between participants and alumnae-i.

EXECUTIVE EDUCATION

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

core faculty

Margaux Pinaud - Programme Academic Coordinator (CCDP)

Duygu Sever Mehmetoglu - Post-Doctoral Researcher (HBKU)

Alexandre Freire Dormeier - Programme Director (IHEID)

Keith Krause - Director, Center on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding (CCDP)

Sultan Barakat - Professor of Public Policy (HBKU)

Claudia Seymour - Senior Researcher, Center on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding (CCDP)

Oliver Jütersonke - Fellow, Center on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding (CCDP)

Cristina Hoyos - Head of the Latin America and Caribbean Unit, Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF)

STAFF

Bruno Medroa - Programme Manager (IHEID)

Stéphanie Roy Michae l - Promotion & Community Officer (IHEID)

Claire Francioli - Programme Assistant (IHEID)

Brianna Elder - Student Researcher (CCDP)

DPP community of practice

The DPP programme seeks to contribute to the dissemination and promotion of the professional theses among actors involved in development and international cooperation. These theses are listed by country and by topic.

If you want to receive one or the other of these theses, please contact Stéphanie Roy Michael .

Professional theses - by country:

Professional theses - by topic:

Outcomes 2012 - 2021

arian Abdul wassay '19

General Director of Planning and Evaluation, Ministry of Education, Afghanistan

"The programme has perfectly met my expectations. It taught me how to consider aspects of conflict and fragility in the Educational Planning and Management in Afghanistan. We have got acquainted with analytical tools and carried out a professional thesis with coherent arguments.

The findings and recommendations of my professional thesis have served as a baseline study of the Ministry of Education strategy for the expansion of private schools in the country."

Gulnara Abdykalykova '19

Director, Central Asian Institute of Sustainable Development, Kyrgyz Republic

"The DPP programme is an excellent Executive Education program that meets the continuous education needs of working professionals from different fields of development. I expanded my horizons to keep myself updated about the current development context focusing on conflict and fragility aspects. I acquired research skills to see the development topic through the lens of social sciences.

After the programme, I have founded the Central Asian Institute of Sustainable Development to apply DPP theoretical knowledge in the Central Asian development context. My professional thesis topic on sustainable management of pastures under collaborative governance will certainly be taken further with national, regional and international partners."

OMARO KANE '19

Sustainability Project Coordinator, Private Sector, Ivory Coast

"I work for a multinational company that implements important development programmes, notably in the communities where it operates and gets its supplies. Familiar with these programmes in rural areas for almost 10 years, I have decided to join this Executive Master to strengthen my analytical and leadership capacities in development policies and practices.

The variety of case studies, the immersions at the heart of projects and institutions in Osh / Kyrgyzstan and in Geneva, combined with the interactions between peers, professors and experts of the Institute made it a unique experience for me. I was able to step outside my comfort zone in choosing the subject of my thesis, consisting in the contribution of the private sector to youth employment projects in Ivory Coast.

Thanks to this programme, I have acquired a know-how that enables me to better articulate global initiatives to the local context, with a more strategic perspective."

Yasser alemad '19

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Yemen

"I disseminated the recommendations of my DPP professional thesis in Yemen, which led to the development of more services for people with disabilities in the country. Moreover, thanks to this degree, I was granted the 'international staff' status by ICRC."

Upcoming events

Genre et développement FAQ

Tech diplomacy and the futures of diplomacy, the right to pre-school education, subscribe to our newsletter.

By completing this form, you agree that the Institute may store and use your e-mail address to send you the newsletters you have chosen. To learn more .

* indicates required

I'm interested in

Executive Education Newsletter

Applications 2024

Applications are now closed

Module 1 22 July to 2 Aug. 2024 (online); 25 Aug. to 12 Sept. 2024 (Doha) Module 2 Sept. to Nov. (e-learning); Aug. to Dec. 2024 (Professional Thesis) - Diploma only Module 3 15 to 31 Jan. 2025 - Diploma only

Fees Certificate: CHF 8'500 Diploma: CHF 3'500 to 25'000 (according to country of origin)

Fees include logistics, except for travel to Module 1

Discounts Scholarships, Alumni or Chèque de formation Contact us

Module 1 in Doha, Qatar & online Module 2 at workplace with e-learning Module 3 in Geneva

Language English

For organisations

Stéphanie Roy Michael Promotion & Community Officer [email protected]

In partnership with

in collaboration with the American University of Central Asia (AUCA)

With the support from

Research Voyage

Research Tips and Infromation

PhD Defence Process: A Comprehensive Guide

Embarking on the journey toward a PhD is an intellectual odyssey marked by tireless research, countless hours of contemplation, and a fervent commitment to contributing to the body of knowledge in one’s field. As the culmination of this formidable journey, the PhD defence stands as the final frontier, the proverbial bridge between student and scholar.

In this comprehensive guide, we unravel the intricacies of the PhD defence—a momentous occasion that is both a celebration of scholarly achievement and a rigorous evaluation of academic prowess. Join us as we explore the nuances of the defence process, addressing questions about its duration, contemplating the possibility of failure, and delving into the subtle distinctions of language that surround it.

Beyond the formalities, we aim to shed light on the significance of this rite of passage, dispelling misconceptions about its nature. Moreover, we’ll consider the impact of one’s attire on this critical day and share personal experiences and practical tips from those who have successfully navigated the defence journey.

Whether you are on the precipice of your own defence or are simply curious about the process, this guide seeks to demystify the PhD defence, providing a roadmap for success and a nuanced understanding of the pivotal event that marks the transition from student to scholar.

Introduction

A. definition and purpose:, b. overview of the oral examination:, a. general duration of a typical defense, b. factors influencing the duration:, c. preparation and flexibility:, a. preparation and thorough understanding of the research:, b. handling questions effectively:, c. confidence and composure during the presentation:, d. posture of continuous improvement:, a. exploring the possibility of failure:, b. common reasons for failure:, c. steps to mitigate the risk of failure:, d. post-failure resilience:, a. addressing the language variation:, b. conforming to regional preferences:, c. consistency in usage:, d. flexibility and adaptability:, e. navigating language in a globalized academic landscape:, a. debunking myths around the formality of the defense:, b. significance in validating research contributions:, c. post-defense impact:, a. appropriate attire for different settings:, b. professionalism and the impact of appearance:, c. practical tips for dressing success:, b. practical tips for a successful defense:, c. post-defense reflections:, career options after phd.

Embarking on the doctoral journey is a formidable undertaking, where aspiring scholars immerse themselves in the pursuit of knowledge, contributing new insights to their respective fields. At the pinnacle of this academic odyssey lies the PhD defence—a culmination that transcends the boundaries of a mere formality, symbolizing the transformation from a student of a discipline to a recognized contributor to the academic tapestry.

The PhD defence, also known as the viva voce or oral examination, is a pivotal moment in the life of a doctoral candidate.

PhD defence is not merely a ritualistic ceremony; rather, it serves as a platform for scholars to present, defend, and elucidate the findings and implications of their research. The defence is the crucible where ideas are tested, hypotheses scrutinized, and the depth of scholarly understanding is laid bare.

The importance of the PhD defence reverberates throughout the academic landscape. It is not just a capstone event; it is the juncture where academic rigour meets real-world application. The defence is the litmus test of a researcher’s ability to articulate, defend, and contextualize their work—an evaluation that extends beyond the pages of a dissertation.

Beyond its evaluative nature, the defence serves as a rite of passage, validating the years of dedication, perseverance, and intellectual rigour invested in the research endeavour. Success in the defence is a testament to the candidate’s mastery of their subject matter and the originality and impact of their contributions to the academic community.

Furthermore, a successful defence paves the way for future contributions, positioning the scholar as a recognized authority in their field. The defence is not just an endpoint; it is a launchpad, propelling researchers into the next phase of their academic journey as they continue to shape and redefine the boundaries of knowledge.

In essence, the PhD defence is more than a ceremonial checkpoint—it is a transformative experience that validates the intellectual journey, underscores the significance of scholarly contributions, and sets the stage for a continued legacy of academic excellence. As we navigate the intricacies of this process, we invite you to explore the multifaceted dimensions that make the PhD defence an indispensable chapter in the narrative of academic achievement.

What is a PhD Defence?

At its core, a PhD defence is a rigorous and comprehensive examination that marks the culmination of a doctoral candidate’s research journey. It is an essential component of the doctoral process in which the candidate is required to defend their dissertation before a committee of experts in the field. The defence serves multiple purposes, acting as both a showcase of the candidate’s work and an evaluative measure of their understanding, critical thinking, and contributions to the academic domain.

The primary goals of a PhD defence include:

Presentation of Research: The candidate presents the key findings, methodology, and significance of their research.
Demonstration of Mastery: The defence assesses the candidate’s depth of understanding, mastery of the subject matter, and ability to engage in scholarly discourse.
Critical Examination: Committee members rigorously question the candidate, challenging assumptions, testing methodologies, and probing the boundaries of the research.
Validation of Originality: The defence validates the originality and contribution of the candidate’s work to the existing body of knowledge.

The PhD defence often takes the form of an oral examination, commonly referred to as the viva voce. This oral component adds a dynamic and interactive dimension to the evaluation process. Key elements of the oral examination include:

Presentation: The candidate typically begins with a formal presentation, summarizing the dissertation’s main components, methodology, and findings. This presentation is an opportunity to showcase the significance and novelty of the research.
Questioning and Discussion: Following the presentation, the candidate engages in a thorough questioning session with the examination committee. Committee members explore various aspects of the research, challenging the candidates to articulate their rationale, defend their conclusions, and respond to critiques.
Defence of Methodology: The candidate is often required to defend the chosen research methodology, demonstrating its appropriateness, rigour, and contribution to the field.
Evaluation of Contributions: Committee members assess the originality and impact of the candidate’s contributions to the academic discipline, seeking to understand how the research advances existing knowledge.

The oral examination is not a mere formality; it is a dynamic exchange that tests the candidate’s intellectual acumen, research skills, and capacity to contribute meaningfully to the scholarly community.

In essence, the PhD defence is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation that encapsulates the essence of a candidate’s research journey, demanding a synthesis of knowledge, clarity of expression, and the ability to navigate the complexities of academic inquiry. As we delve into the specifics of the defence process, we will unravel the layers of preparation and skill required to navigate this transformative academic milestone.

How Long is a PhD Defence?

The duration of a PhD defence can vary widely, but it typically ranges from two to three hours. This time frame encompasses the candidate’s presentation of their research, questioning and discussions with the examination committee, and any additional deliberations or decisions by the committee. However, it’s essential to note that this is a general guideline, and actual defence durations may vary based on numerous factors.

Sciences and Engineering: Defenses in these fields might lean towards the shorter end of the spectrum, often around two hours. The focus is often on the methodology, results, and technical aspects.
Humanities and Social Sciences: Given the theoretical and interpretive nature of research in these fields, defences might extend closer to three hours or more. Discussions may delve into philosophical underpinnings and nuanced interpretations.
Simple vs. Complex Studies: The complexity of the research itself plays a role. Elaborate experiments, extensive datasets, or intricate theoretical frameworks may necessitate a more extended defence.
Number of Committee Members: A larger committee or one with diverse expertise may lead to more extensive discussions and varied perspectives, potentially elongating the defence.
Committee Engagement: The level of engagement and probing by committee members can influence the overall duration. In-depth discussions or debates may extend the defence time.
Cultural Norms: In some countries, the oral defence might be more ceremonial, with less emphasis on intense questioning. In others, a rigorous and extended defence might be the norm.
Evaluation Practices: Different academic systems have varying evaluation criteria, which can impact the duration of the defence.
Institutional Guidelines: Some institutions may have specific guidelines on defence durations, influencing the overall time allotted for the process.

Candidates should be well-prepared for a defence of any duration. Adequate preparation not only involves a concise presentation of the research but also anticipates potential questions and engages in thoughtful discussions. Additionally, candidates should be flexible and responsive to the dynamics of the defense, adapting to the pace set by the committee.

Success Factors in a PhD Defence

Successful defence begins with a deep and comprehensive understanding of the research. Candidates should be well-versed in every aspect of their study, from the theoretical framework to the methodology and findings.
Thorough preparation involves anticipating potential questions from the examination committee. Candidates should consider the strengths and limitations of their research and be ready to address queries related to methodology, data analysis, and theoretical underpinnings.
Conducting mock defences with peers or mentors can be invaluable. It helps refine the presentation, exposes potential areas of weakness, and provides an opportunity to practice responding to challenging questions.
Actively listen to questions without interruption. Understanding the nuances of each question is crucial for providing precise and relevant responses.
Responses should be clear, concise, and directly address the question. Avoid unnecessary jargon, and strive to convey complex concepts in a manner that is accessible to the entire committee.
It’s acceptable not to have all the answers. If faced with a question that stumps you, acknowledge it honestly. Expressing a willingness to explore the topic further demonstrates intellectual humility.
Use questions as opportunities to reinforce key messages from the research. Skillfully link responses back to the core contributions of the study, emphasizing its significance.
Rehearse the presentation multiple times to build familiarity with the material. This enhances confidence, reduces nervousness, and ensures a smooth and engaging delivery.
Maintain confident and open body language. Stand tall, make eye contact, and use gestures judiciously. A composed demeanour contributes to a positive impression.
Acknowledge and manage nervousness. It’s natural to feel some anxiety, but channelling that energy into enthusiasm for presenting your research can turn nervousness into a positive force.
Engage with the committee through a dynamic and interactive presentation. Invite questions during the presentation to create a more conversational atmosphere.
Utilize visual aids effectively. Slides or other visual elements should complement the spoken presentation, reinforcing key points without overwhelming the audience.
View the defence not only as an evaluation but also as an opportunity for continuous improvement. Feedback received during the defence can inform future research endeavours and scholarly pursuits.

In essence, success in a PhD defence hinges on meticulous preparation, adept handling of questions, and projecting confidence and composure during the presentation. A well-prepared and resilient candidate is better positioned to navigate the challenges of the defence, transforming it from a moment of evaluation into an affirmation of scholarly achievement.

Failure in PhD Defence

While the prospect of failing a PhD defence is relatively rare, it’s essential for candidates to acknowledge that the possibility exists. Understanding this reality can motivate diligent preparation and a proactive approach to mitigate potential risks.
Failure, if it occurs, should be seen as a learning opportunity rather than a definitive endpoint. It may highlight areas for improvement and offer insights into refining the research and presentation.
Lack of thorough preparation, including a weak grasp of the research content, inadequate rehearsal, and failure to anticipate potential questions, can contribute to failure.
Inability to effectively defend the chosen research methodology, including justifying its appropriateness and demonstrating its rigour, can be a critical factor.
Failing to clearly articulate the original contributions of the research and its significance to the field may lead to a negative assessment.
Responding defensively to questions, exhibiting a lack of openness to critique, or being unwilling to acknowledge limitations can impact the overall impression.
Inability to address committee concerns or incorporate constructive feedback received during the defense may contribute to a negative outcome.
Comprehensive preparation is the cornerstone of success. Candidates should dedicate ample time to understanding every facet of their research, conducting mock defences, and seeking feedback.
Identify potential weaknesses in the research and address them proactively. Being aware of limitations and articulating plans for addressing them in future work demonstrates foresight.
Engage with mentors, peers, or advisors before the defence. Solicit constructive feedback on both the content and delivery of the presentation to refine and strengthen the defence.
Develop strategies to manage stress and nervousness. Techniques such as mindfulness, deep breathing, or visualization can be effective in maintaining composure during the defence.
Conduct a pre-defense review of all materials, ensuring that the presentation aligns with the dissertation and that visual aids are clear and supportive.
Approach the defence with an open and reflective attitude. Embrace critique as an opportunity for improvement rather than as a personal affront.
Clarify expectations with the examination committee beforehand. Understanding the committee’s focus areas and preferences can guide preparation efforts.
In the event of failure, candidates should approach the situation with resilience. Seek feedback from the committee, understand the reasons for the outcome, and use the experience as a springboard for improvement.

In summary, while the prospect of failing a PhD defence is uncommon, acknowledging its possibility and taking proactive steps to mitigate risks are crucial elements of a well-rounded defence strategy. By addressing common failure factors through thorough preparation, openness to critique, and a resilient attitude, candidates can increase their chances of a successful defence outcome.

PhD Defense or Defence?

The choice between “defense” and “defence” is primarily a matter of British English versus American English spelling conventions. “Defense” is the preferred spelling in American English, while “defence” is the British English spelling.
In the global academic community, both spellings are generally understood and accepted. However, the choice of spelling may be influenced by the academic institution’s language conventions or the preferences of individual scholars.
Academic institutions may have specific guidelines regarding language conventions, and candidates are often expected to adhere to the institution’s preferred spelling.
Candidates may also consider the preferences of their advisors or committee members. If there is a consistent spelling convention used within the academic department, it is advisable to align with those preferences.
Consideration should be given to the spelling conventions of scholarly journals in the candidate’s field. If intending to publish research stemming from the dissertation, aligning with the conventions of target journals is prudent.
If the defense presentation or dissertation will be shared with an international audience, using a more universally recognized spelling (such as “defense”) may be preferred to ensure clarity and accessibility.
Regardless of the chosen spelling, it’s crucial to maintain consistency throughout the document. Mixing spellings can distract from the content and may be perceived as an oversight.
In oral presentations and written correspondence related to the defence, including emails, it’s advisable to maintain consistency with the chosen spelling to present a professional and polished image.
Recognizing that language conventions can vary, candidates should approach the choice of spelling with flexibility. Being adaptable to the preferences of the academic context and demonstrating an awareness of regional variations reflects a nuanced understanding of language usage.
With the increasing globalization of academia, an awareness of language variations becomes essential. Scholars often collaborate across borders, and an inclusive approach to language conventions contributes to effective communication and collaboration.

In summary, the choice between “PhD defense” and “PhD defence” boils down to regional language conventions and institutional preferences. Maintaining consistency, being mindful of the target audience, and adapting to the expectations of the academic community contribute to a polished and professional presentation, whether in written documents or oral defences.

Is PhD Defense a Formality?

While the PhD defence is a structured and ritualistic event, it is far from being a mere formality. It is a critical and substantive part of the doctoral journey, designed to rigorously evaluate the candidate’s research contributions, understanding of the field, and ability to engage in scholarly discourse.
The defence is not a checkbox to be marked but rather a dynamic process where the candidate’s research is evaluated for its scholarly merit. The committee scrutinizes the originality, significance, and methodology of the research, aiming to ensure it meets the standards of advanced academic work.
Far from a passive or purely ceremonial event, the defence involves active engagement between the candidate and the examination committee. Questions, discussions, and debates are integral components that enrich the scholarly exchange during the defence.
The defence serves as a platform for the candidate to demonstrate the originality of their research. Committee members assess the novelty of the contributions, ensuring that the work adds value to the existing body of knowledge.
Beyond the content, the defence evaluates the methodological rigour of the research. Committee members assess whether the chosen methodology is appropriate, well-executed, and contributes to the validity of the findings.
Successful completion of the defence affirms the candidate’s ability to contribute meaningfully to the academic discourse in their field. It is an endorsement of the candidate’s position as a knowledgeable and respected scholar.
The defence process acts as a quality assurance mechanism in academia. It ensures that individuals awarded a doctoral degree have undergone a thorough and rigorous evaluation, upholding the standards of excellence in research and scholarly inquiry.
Institutions have specific criteria and standards for awarding a PhD. The defence process aligns with these institutional and academic standards, providing a consistent and transparent mechanism for evaluating candidates.
Successful completion of the defence is a pivotal moment that marks the transition from a doctoral candidate to a recognized scholar. It opens doors to further contributions, collaborations, and opportunities within the academic community.
Research presented during the defence often forms the basis for future publications. The validation received in the defence enhances the credibility of the research, facilitating its dissemination and impact within the academic community.
Beyond the academic realm, a successfully defended PhD is a key credential for professional advancement. It enhances one’s standing in the broader professional landscape, opening doors to research positions, teaching opportunities, and leadership roles.

In essence, the PhD defence is a rigorous and meaningful process that goes beyond formalities, playing a crucial role in affirming the academic merit of a candidate’s research and marking the culmination of their journey toward scholarly recognition.

Dressing for Success: PhD Defense Outfit

For Men: A well-fitted suit in neutral colours (black, navy, grey), a collared dress shirt, a tie, and formal dress shoes.
For Women: A tailored suit, a blouse or button-down shirt, and closed-toe dress shoes.
Dress codes can vary based on cultural expectations. It’s advisable to be aware of any cultural nuances within the academic institution and to adapt attire accordingly.
With the rise of virtual defenses, considerations for attire remain relevant. Even in online settings, dressing professionally contributes to a polished and serious demeanor. Virtual attire can mirror what one would wear in-person, focusing on the upper body visible on camera.
The attire chosen for a PhD defense contributes to the first impression that a candidate makes on the examination committee. A professional and polished appearance sets a positive tone for the defense.
Dressing appropriately reflects respect for the gravity of the occasion. It acknowledges the significance of the defense as a formal evaluation of one’s scholarly contributions.
Wearing professional attire can contribute to a boost in confidence. When individuals feel well-dressed and put-together, it can positively impact their mindset and overall presentation.
The PhD defense is a serious academic event, and dressing professionally fosters an atmosphere of seriousness and commitment to the scholarly process. It aligns with the respect one accords to academic traditions.
Institutional norms may influence dress expectations. Some academic institutions may have specific guidelines regarding attire for formal events, and candidates should be aware of and adhere to these norms.
While adhering to the formality expected in academic settings, individuals can also express their personal style within the bounds of professionalism. It’s about finding a balance between institutional expectations and personal comfort.
Select and prepare the outfit well in advance to avoid last-minute stress. Ensure that the attire is clean, well-ironed, and in good condition.
Accessories such as ties, scarves, or jewelry should complement the outfit. However, it’s advisable to keep accessories subtle to maintain a professional appearance.
While dressing professionally, prioritize comfort. PhD defenses can be mentally demanding, and comfortable attire can contribute to a more confident and composed demeanor.
Pay attention to grooming, including personal hygiene and haircare. A well-groomed appearance contributes to an overall polished look.
Start preparation well in advance of the defense date. Know your research inside out, anticipate potential questions, and be ready to discuss the nuances of your methodology, findings, and contributions.
Conduct mock defenses with peers, mentors, or colleagues. Mock defenses provide an opportunity to receive constructive feedback, practice responses to potential questions, and refine your presentation.
Strike a balance between confidence and humility. Confidence in presenting your research is essential, but being open to acknowledging limitations and areas for improvement demonstrates intellectual honesty.
Actively engage with the examination committee during the defense. Listen carefully to questions, respond thoughtfully, and view the defense as a scholarly exchange rather than a mere formality.
Understand the expertise and backgrounds of the committee members. Tailor your presentation and responses to align with the interests and expectations of your specific audience.
Practice time management during your presentation. Ensure that you allocate sufficient time to cover key aspects of your research, leaving ample time for questions and discussions.
It’s normal to feel nervous, but practicing mindfulness and staying calm under pressure is crucial. Take deep breaths, maintain eye contact, and focus on delivering a clear and composed presentation.
Have a plan for post-defense activities. Whether it’s revisions to the dissertation, publications, or future research endeavors, having a roadmap for what comes next demonstrates foresight and commitment to ongoing scholarly contributions.
After successfully defending, individuals often emphasize the importance of taking time to reflect on the entire doctoral journey. Acknowledge personal and academic growth, celebrate achievements, and use the experience to inform future scholarly pursuits.

In summary, learning from the experiences of others who have successfully defended offers a wealth of practical wisdom. These insights, combined with thoughtful preparation and a proactive approach, contribute to a successful and fulfilling defense experience.

You have plenty of career options after completing a PhD. For more details, visit my blog posts:

7 Essential Steps for Building a Robust Research Portfolio

Exciting Career Opportunities for PhD Researchers and Research Scholars

Freelance Writing or Editing Opportunities for Researchers A Comprehensive Guide

Research Consultancy: An Alternate Career for Researchers

The Insider’s Guide to Becoming a Patent Agent: Opportunities, Requirements, and Challenges

The journey from a curious researcher to a recognized scholar culminates in the PhD defence—an intellectual odyssey marked by dedication, resilience, and a relentless pursuit of knowledge. As we navigate the intricacies of this pivotal event, it becomes evident that the PhD defence is far more than a ceremonial rite; it is a substantive evaluation that validates the contributions of a researcher to the academic landscape.

Upcoming Events

Visit the Upcoming International Conferences at Exotic Travel Destinations with Travel Plan
Visit for Research Internships Worldwide

Preparing for your PhD thesis defence

As you start thinking about the end stages of your PhD, it’s important to understand the processes and timelines related to the thesis defence so that your degree completion is not delayed. Even if your thesis defence seems far away, there are several planning considerations you can consider early on to help the end stages of your PhD go smoothly.

On this page you will find videos, tools, and information about what the PhD thesis defence is , timelines for the PhD thesis defence , and tips for a successful PhD thesis defence .

All PhD students should also ensure that they read the PhD thesis examination regulations and review the thesis preparation guidelines prior to their oral defence. If your thesis defence will be conducted remotely, you should also review the process for a remote thesis defence .

What is the PhD defence?

Understanding the purpose, processes and possible outcomes of the thesis defence can help you feel more prepared for the defence itself. In this video, you’ll learn about what the defence is, who’s there, what happens, and the deliberation and range of possible outcomes.

Transcript - Demystifying the thesis defence at University of Waterloo (PDF)

You may wish to learn more about some of the topics discussed in this video. Here are some helpful links to learn more:

Examination committee members (including the external examiner): Visit the PhD thesis examination regulations section on the PhD thesis examining committee for more information about the committee members, including information about the external examiner and conflicts of interest.

Closed thesis defences and non-disclosure agreements: Visit the PhD thesis examination regulations section on guidelines for thesis examination without public disclosure for more information about closed thesis examinations.
Thesis defence decisions and outcomes: Visit the PhD thesis examination regulations section on decisions for additional information about decisions and outcomes.
Thesis submission: Visit the thesis submission webpage for information about the thesis submission process, including approvals that must be obtained before submitting your thesis.
UWSpace: Visit the Library’s UWSpace webpage for information about what UWSpace is and how to submit, or deposit, your thesis to UWSpace.

Timeline to defence

Early planning considerations.

Well before your defence date, there are several considerations to think about that can help make the end stages of your degree go smoothly and ensure your defence date and degree completion are not delayed:

Being aware of formatting requirements will save you time on revisions later on – the last thing you want to be doing before submitting your thesis to UWSpace is updating page numbers or your table of contents! Consider using the Microsoft Word or LaTeX thesis template produced by Information Systems & Technology.
The Dissertation Boot Camp can help you develop effective writing practices and strategies for completing your thesis, while the three-part Rock Your Thesis workshop series will provide practical guidance for planning, writing, revising, and submitting your thesis project. You can also book an individual appointment to do backwards planning with an advisor. They can help you utilize the planning tools most effectively, while providing hands-on guidance and feedback.
If you are using third-party content, including your own previously published work in your thesis, or seeking intellectual property protection (for yourself or another involved party), there may be implications for your thesis or defence. Learn more about copyright for your thesis , and email [email protected] for help with copyright questions related to your thesis.
Depending on your departmental or discipline’s norms, you may require approval from your entire committee, or just your supervisor. Ensure you talk with your supervisor and/or committee early on to confirm processes and timelines, so you’re not surprised later.
Depending on your departmental or discipline’s norms, your supervisor may select an external examiner themselves, or they may seek your input. Talk to your supervisor early on about this process, as in some faculties the external examiner may need to be vetted and approved as early as the term before you wish to defend. Remember that there are conflict of interest guidelines around the appointment of the external examiner , and the PhD candidate should not be in communication with the external examiner prior to the defence.
A PhD thesis must be on display for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the defence date. To accommodate, you may need to submit your thesis as early as 6-8 weeks prior to your defence. Review your faculty specific backwards planning tool for the thesis submission deadline in your faculty and learn more about the display period in the PhD thesis examination regulations.
After your successful thesis defence, you will likely have some required revisions to your thesis. It’s important to understand revision timelines , especially if you’re hoping to become “degree complete” before a tuition refund or convocation deadline. Find tuition refund and convocation deadlines in the important dates calendar .
Following your thesis defence, there are several steps to be taken before your final, approved thesis is accepted in UWSpace. Ensure that you’re aware of these thesis submission steps and timelines in advance.

Backwards planning tools

Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Affairs, in collaboration with the Faculties, have prepared faculty specific backwards planning tools to help PhD candidates map out the timelines related to their thesis defence and degree completion.

Select your faculty below to download a PDF copy of the backwards planning tool. We encourage you to discuss your ideal timelines with your supervisor(s) and your department graduate program co-ordinator.

Faculty of Health backwards planning tool (PDF)
Faculty of Arts backwards planning tool (PDF)
Faculty of Engineering backwards planning tool (PDF)
Faculty of Environment backwards planning tool (PDF)
Faculty of Mathematics backwards planning tool (PDF)
Faculty of Science backwards planning tool (PDF)

Tips for success

The PhD thesis defence is the culmination of years of hard work! The tips outlined in this video, compiled from recent PhD graduates and experienced thesis defence chairs, cover tips for preparing for your defence, day-of logistics, and defending successfully.

Transcript - Your Thesis Defence: Tips for Success (PDF)

Will your PhD thesis defence be held remotely? We’ve compiled additional tips for success specifically related to the remote defence.

Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Affairs (GSPA)

Needles Hall, second floor, room 2201

Graduate Studies Academic Calendar

Website feedback

Contact Waterloo
Maps & Directions
Accessibility

The University of Waterloo acknowledges that much of our work takes place on the traditional territory of the Neutral, Anishinaabeg and Haudenosaunee peoples. Our main campus is situated on the Haldimand Tract, the land granted to the Six Nations that includes six miles on each side of the Grand River. Our active work toward reconciliation takes place across our campuses through research, learning, teaching, and community building, and is co-ordinated within the Office of Indigenous Relations .

The Graduate Press – La Gazette de la Paix

The independent student publication of the Geneva Graduate Institute

‘Fully-funded’ IHEID PhD Package: a False Promise?

By a group of PhD researchers

The first generation of the ‘fully-funded’ PhD package researchers mark the midpoint of their PhD programme this year. These four-year packages are touted by the Direction as having addressed long-standing issues raised by PhD and Assistants’ representatives but leave researchers underfunded and precarious, expecting them to survive the expenses of Geneva at less than half the city’s minimum wage for unskilled labour.

On April 15th 2024, the Graduate Institute Student Association (GISA) VP for PhDs presented the Geneva Graduate Institute’s PhD report at the Collège des Enseignantes. The result of an extensive survey, the report compiles the views and experiences of 66 PhD researchers at the IHEID. The PhD package, hailed as a comprehensive solution to current issues with the PhD programme, offers two years of the old financial aid scholarship and two optional years of the current Teaching Assistantship. It received extensive critique in the PhD survey, holding a mirror to the Direction’s claims about it solving issues raised in the past.

Notably, PhDs on the package scholarship give the lowest score of all PhDs to the programme: a rating of 5.6 out of 10. The grade given by TAs, who have long been alerting to the Direction’s flawed policies around the PhD programme, is a 5.8. This stands in stark contrast to the 7.4 rating given by those working under the more favourable labour conditions stipulated by the Swiss National Science Foundation through either a doc.ch scholarship, or an SNF-funded research project.

Discontent permeates the Institute, with a significant portion of respondents expressing reluctance to reapply or recommend the program to friends. 37% of respondents would not reapply to the Institute if they could choose again, and an additional 21% have serious reservations about their decision. Among them, those under the package and Teaching Assistants are disproportionately represented. Factors such as lack of transparency before applying fuel this regret, with students on the package recommending applicants to consider other universities within Switzerland first.

The Institute’s website touts the PhD package as ‘a financial support package covering the four years of the PhD programme’ and affirms that ‘doctoral students will be fully funded with a support package’. This sounds fair, competitive, and in line with other academic institutions in Switzerland and abroad. Why then do the current PhDs on the package give the lowest score out of all respondents?

The prime reason stated is that the financial support package does not live up to its promise. Respondents refer to its financial insufficiency, describing it as ‘way too low’, ‘insufficient for a dignified life’, and ‘absolutely not a liveable stipend’. This has parallels to Teaching Assistants’ PhD research being remunerated like a ‘personal passion project’ rather than academic research. As one researcher on the package notes, ‘[the package is] unreasonably lower than the stipend of many PhD researchers in Switzerland’. This could no-doubt be excused by the Direction’s ‘Anglo-American model’ as a justification for the Institute’s low level of support provided to PhDs (of which we are all tired). However, very importantly, where is this model and philosophy mentioned before applicants commit to being locked in this insufficient arrangement for the 4 years of PhD research?

The fact that Geneva routinely makes it to the top ten most expensive cities to live in is not news, but that this cost of living has not been factored in by the Institution is indeed quite a shock. This is particularly true for respondents coming from outside Switzerland/ Europe who apply to the Institute based on the reputations of the professors and the departments – naively trusting endorsements of the ‘fully-funded PhD program’. When asked whether the PhD lives up to the expectations created, one respondent writes: “ No, and considering most of us have to go to the food bank (that IHEID doesn’t even contribute to) it’s really ridiculous and embarrassing that they are convinced it’s enough. ” Another mentions being left with 230 CHF per month for food, transport, and clothes once they have paid the costly rent in student housing, tuition fees, and student health insurance. Another respondent noted that they did not expect to be forced to choose between medicines and food. The mental health impact of this level of precarity, and the lack of transparency in endorsements to join must be highlighted for future researchers, who need to decide between offers across institutions and countries, often with limited information.

A significant number of PhDs on the new package also indicate that their experience at the institute has pushed them away from pursuing a career in academia. About half express that the constant financial precarity has pushed them away altogether. Additionally, it is said that even if desired, the structure of the package complicates staying competitive in academia. Researchers cannot leave for visiting fellowships in the third and fourth years of the PhD, an essential element if they want to build relationships and explore a future in academia. They currently risk losing the much-needed TA salary, as well as the TA spot permanently if they choose such research stays.

As scholars transition from the package to Teaching Assistantships, and given that the Direction shows no intention of improving the frequently flagged issues with the TA-ship either, the future looks bleak. In unveiling the hidden reality of pursuing a PhD at the Geneva Graduate Institute, we add to the mounting calls for transparency, accountability, dialogue, and genuine support for scholars who come to the IHEID. PhD candidates are a valuable resource for the university, and their contribution should be recognised, and participation valued. The report should therefore be a clear call to action for the Direction.

PhD Dissertation Defense Slides Design: Start

Tips for designing the slides
Presentation checklist
Example slides
Additional Resources

Purpose of the Guide

This guide was created to help ph.d. students in engineering fields to design dissertation defense presentations. the guide provides 1) tips on how to effectively communicate research, and 2) full presentation examples from ph.d. graduates. the tips on designing effective slides are not restricted to dissertation defense presentations; they can be used in designing other types of presentations such as conference talks, qualification and proposal exams, and technical seminars., the tips and examples are used to help students to design effective presentation. the technical contents in all examples are subject to copyright, please do not replicate. , if you need help in designing your presentation, please contact julie chen ([email protected]) for individual consultation. .

Example Slides Repository
Defense slides examples Link to examples dissertation defense slides.

Useful Links

CIT Thesis and dissertation standards
Dissertations and Theses @ Carnegie Mellon This link opens in a new window Covers 1920-present. Full text of some dissertations may be available 1997-present. Citations and abstracts of dissertations and theses CMU graduate students have published through UMI Dissertation Publishing. In addition to citations and abstracts, the service provides free access to 24 page previews and the full text in PDF format, when available. In most cases, this will be works published in 1997 forward.
Communicate your research data Data visualization is very important in communicating your data effectively. Check out these do's and don'ts for designing figures.

Power Point Template and other Resources

CEE Powerpoint Slide Presentation Template 1
CEE Powerpoint Slide Presentation Template 2

Source: CEE Department Resources https://www.cmu.edu/cee/resources/index.html

CMU Powerpoint Slide Template

Source: CMU Marketing and Communications

https://www.cmu.edu/marcom/brand-standards/downloads/index.html

Use of CMU logos, marks, and Unitmarks

Email me for questions and schedule an appointment

2. Emphasize YOUR contribution

Having a ph.d. means that you have made some novel contributions to the grand field. this is about you and your research. you need to keep emphasizing your contributions throughout your presentation. after talking about what needs to be solved, try to focus on emphasizing the novelty of your work. what problems can be solved using your research outcomes what breakthroughs have you made to the field why are your methods and outcomes outstanding you need to incorporate answers to these questions in your presentation. , be clear what your contributions are in the introduction section; separate what was done by others and what was done by you. , 3. connect your projects into a whole piece of work, you might have been doing multiple projects that are not strongly connected. to figure out how to connect them into a whole piece, use visualizations such as flow charts to convince your audience. the two slides below are two examples. in the first slide, which was presented in the introduction section, the presenter used a flow diagram to show the connection between the three projects. in the second slide, the presenter used key figures and a unique color for each project to show the connection..

Xiaoju Chen Defense Slides with Notes

4. Tell a good story

The committee members do not necessarily have the same background knowledge as you. plus, there could be researchers from other fields and even the general public in the room. you want to make sure all of your audience can understand as much as possible. focus on the big picture rather than technical details; make sure you use simple language to explain your methods and results. your committee has read your dissertation before your defense, but others have not. , dr. cook and dr. velibeyoglu did a good job explaining their research to everyone. the introduction sessions in their presentations are well designed for this purpose. .

Laren M. Cook Defense Slides with Notes
Irem Velibeyoglu Defense with Notes

5. Transition, transition, transition

Use transition slides to connect projects , it's a long presentation with different research projects. you want to use some sort of transition to remind your audience what you have been talking about and what is next. you may use a slide that is designed for this purpose throughout your presentation. , below are two examples. these slides were presented after the introduction section. the presenters used the same slides and highlighted the items for project one to indicate that they were moving on to the first project. throughout the presentation, they used these slides and highlighted different sections to indicate how these projects fit into the whole dissertation. .

You can also use some other indications on your slides, but remember not to make your slides too busy. Below are two examples. In the first example, the presenter used chapter numbers to indicate what he was talking about. In the second example, the presenter used a progress bar with keywords for each chapter as the indicator.

Use transition sentences to connect slides

Remember transition sentences are also important; use them to summarize what you have said and tell your audience what they will expect next. if you keep forgetting the transition sentence, write a note on your presentation. you can either write down a full sentence of what you want to say or some keywords., 6. be brief, put details in backup slides , you won't have time to explain all of the details. if your defense presentation is scheduled for 45 minutes, you can only spend around 10 minutes for each project - that's shorter than a normal research conference presentation focus on the big picture and leave details behind. you can put the details in your backup slides, so you might find them useful when your committee (and other members of the audience) ask questions regarding these details., 7. show your presentation to your advisor and colleagues, make sure to ask your advisor(s) for their comments. they might have a different view on what should be emphasized and what should be elaborated. , you also want to practice at least once in front of your colleagues. they can be your lab mates, people who work in your research group, and/or your friends. they do not have to be experts in your field. ask them to give you some feedback - their comments can be extremely helpful to improve your presentation. , below are some other tips and resources to design your defense presentation. .

Tips for designing your defense presentation

How important is your presentation, and cookies?

Next: Tips for designing the slides >>
Last Updated: Jan 9, 2024 11:18 AM
URL: https://guides.library.cmu.edu/c.php?g=883178

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering

College of engineering, ph.d. dissertation defense - ning guo.

Title : Non-invasive Arc Duration Measurement Based on Different Physical Emissions

Dr. Lukas Graber, ECE, Chair, Advisor

Dr. Morris Cohen, ECE

Dr. Raheem Beyah, ECE

Dr. Santiago Grijalva, ECE

Dr. Iris Tien, CEE

Ph.D. Student Isabelle Rathbun Receives Department of Defense Fellowship

Isabelle Rathbun , a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Maryland, has been awarded a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship by the Department of Defense for her research in artificial intelligence within the computer vision and sensor fusion domains. Rathbun was one of 165 individuals from 68 institutions nationwide to receive a three-year NDSEG fellowship this year.

The NDSEG Fellowship program, established by Congress, aims to increase the number of U.S. citizens earning doctoral degrees in science and engineering fields critical to national defense. The program supports students pursuing advanced education in these areas through competitive fellowship opportunities.

The fellowship covers all tuition, mandatory fees, and health insurance, provides a monthly stipend and includes a travel budget for professional development.

“I am honored to have this opportunity as a first-year student,” Rathbun said. “I look forward to taking advantage of NDSEG's resources over the next three years. This support will help me pursue impactful research while building new connections and professional relationships.”

Rathbun's research aims to create more reliable and resilient AI systems, focusing on sensor fusion algorithms central to modern robotics and autonomous navigation systems. By combining complementary sources of information, such as lidar and cameras, sensor fusion allows these systems to perform high-level tasks, like navigation, more effectively than with any single modality alone. However, adding sensors also introduces additional points of failure.

Her research addresses these critical challenges in autonomous systems, aiming to enhance their robustness and reliability.

"Isabelle's research will characterize the performance of sensor fusion algorithms in the presence of failed sensors," said Christopher Metzler , Department of Computer Science assistant professor and Rathbun’s advisor. "She will then develop novel, human-in-the-loop techniques to mitigate the impact of sensor failures. Her research will thus improve the reliability, performance and safety of future autonomous navigation and robotics systems."

In the future, Rathbun plans to continue her research beyond her doctoral studies.

"After I complete my Ph.D., I intend to pursue research in an environment where there is the opportunity for positive impact and pushing the boundaries of cutting-edge research,” Rathbun shared. “I plan to continue developing safer and more reliable technology for public use and deployment, such as in autonomous vehicles and improving their performance in real-world environments with increased uncertainty.”

The NDSEG Fellowship program is critical in workforce development for STEM fields. Since its inception in 1989, the program has awarded nearly 4,700 fellowships from over 70,000 applications.

—Story by Samuel Malede Zewdu, CS Communications

The Department welcomes comments, suggestions and corrections. Send email to editor [-at-] cs [dot] umd [dot] edu .

Skip to navigation
Skip to content

Announcements

June 14: phd student yali deng proposal defense 6/14.

The PhD Program is excited to announce Yali Deng will defend her dissertation proposal on Friday, 6/14 at 12pm . Her project, titled " Minority Stress, Community Connectedness and Suicidal Ideation: A Longitudinal Examination among Three Generations of Sexual Minority Adults " is chaired by Dr. Jodi Frey. If you are interested in attending the public presentation, please contact Jen Canapp at [email protected] .

Best wishes, Yali!

Recent Announcements

Jun 5 (Wed) @ 11:30am: “Surface Acoustic Waves Integrated with Solid-State Single Photon Sources and Superconducting Electronics,” Michael Choquer, ECE PhD Defense

Zoom Meeting – https://ucsb.zoom.us/j/85158988362?pwd=anR5eW9wYTYzR0R4eld5TEpacVFhZz09

Quantum interconnects—devices or processes that transfer quantum information between distinct physical degrees of freedom—are an essential component of many future quantum technologies. The promise of quantum interconnects to preserve fragile quantum states across vast frequency ranges and long distances would open many opportunities for distributing quantum information between spins, phonons, and photons. A variety of approaches are being investigated to connect such systems; recently, elastic waves, and in particular surface acoustic waves (SAWs), have become a versatile tool for controlling individual artificial atoms, including microwave-frequency superconducting qubits and optical-frequency quantum emitters. However, the coupling of SAWs and optically active systems is lagging the current state-of-the-art with SAWs and microwave-frequency superconducting circuits. This research aims to address this technology gap by combining superconducting and optical qubit systems with SAW resonators to mediate coherent interactions between microwave and optical frequency quantum systems. This thesis focuses on two leading quantum emitter platforms—semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and defect-based quantum emitters in van der Waal materials (vdWMs). Developing a new heterogeneous platform—the first demonstration of strong piezoelectric lithium niobate integrated with both superconducting electronics and III/V semiconductors—SAW resonators with high internal quality factors Qi > 16,000 were demonstrated, and photoluminescence of the QD emission showed evidence of both strain-based SAW modulation of the QD exciton as well as acoustoelectric carrier injection. Experiments with vDWM emitters showed SAW modulation with some of the highest demonstrated strain sensitivities, as well as novel phenomena, including the mixing of excitonic states, which provides a path towards entangled photon pair generation from vDWMs. Further experiments will probe a new set of novel optomechanical devices designed to maximize the optomechanical interaction strength and with the SAW resonator cryogenically cooled to its quantum ground state, moving towards the quantum regime of SAW-quantum emitter optomechanics.

Michael Choquer received his B.Sc. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Washington, Seattle in 2018 and M.Sc. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara in 2021. Michael is a Ph.D. candidate in the group of Assistant Professor Galan Moody in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Michael's current research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of quantum photonic and phononic devices, including quantum emitters heterogeneously integrated with mechanical resonators.

Hosted by : Professor Galan Moody, Quantum Photonics Lab

Submitted by : Michael Choquer < [email protected] >

+1 805.893.5364
[email protected]
Office Harold Frank Hall, Rm 4155

Dept. Resources

Services & Support
Cntrl Admin Office (CAO)
Electronics Shop
Technical Support
Room Reservations
Submit Event | News | Book
Information
Terms of Use

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering College of Engineering • UC Santa Barbara 2023 © Regents of the University of California

GENEVA GRADUATE INSTITUTE

Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A Case postale 1672 CH - 1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland +41 22 908 57 00

[email protected] + 41 22 908 58 98

MEDIA ENQUIRIES

[email protected] +41 22 908 57 54

[email protected] + 41 22 908 57 55

MASTER IN INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Global challenges call for a new generation of professionals , working on creative solutions for a more sustainable, equitable and peaceful world. In this context, we believe that the best preparation is, on the one hand, a deep understanding of common systemic interdependencies enriched with thematic specialisations, and on the other, the fostering of adequate skills such as resilience, agility, innovative and critical thinking. To that end, our Master in International and Development Studies ('MINT') proposes a ground-breaking combination of a solid common core with the possibility to specialise in one of seven areas. The MINT mixes the advantages of being a rigorous academic programme with a strong accent on applied research, practice and skills, and is ideally located at the heart of International Geneva.

A programme for all those wanting to work in:

International cooperation, in intergovernmental, non-governmental organisations, or national administrations.

Private sector, notably multinational companies, the finance sector, law firms, consulting and public relations agencies.

Research on global issues, such as in think tanks, international foundations, universities, in the media, or as a consultant.

Master & PhD Programmes
Financing your studies
Building a career
How to apply

Our programme offers the possibility of becoming a generalist of a specific kind, with an expertise in international and development studies, a background in several disciplines and a groundbreaking experience in applied research.

Davide Rodogno, Head, MINT programme

Our Applied Research Project with the Aladdin Project was an extraordinary experience that brought together brilliant students and professors who inspired us greatly. Being a part of it was indeed an honour, and we gained valuable insights not only from an academic standpoint but also on a personal level. The program was truly enriching both with the content discussed both within and outside the lecture halls, and the vast backgrounds and experiences of the students who attended greatly widened our scope of view of world affairs.

SOL & RYAN / Interdisciplinary master students

COMPULSORY COURSE

Following an interdisciplinary approach , our core course offers a creative space to reflect on global challenges by drawing on the expertise of the Institute and of International Geneva.

RESEARCH METHODS ELECTIVES

Part of the programme's foundations, they offer students different ways of analysing a reality, and introduce them to new ways of thinking. They are eclectic, and encompass qualitative, quantitative, hybrid and legal / philosophical methods.

SPECIALISATIONS

They enable students to dive into one of the following seven areas:

Conflict, Peace and Security;
Environment and Sustainability;
Gender, Race and Diversity;
Human Rights and Humanitarianism;
Mobilities, Migrations and Boundaries;
Sustainable Trade and Finance;
Global Health.

Students can choose the extent to which they specialise. However, because today's global issues are intertwined and can't be confined to a specific field, students will be encouraged to learn beyond a specialisation and explore their interlinkages.

TRANSVERSAL THEMES ELECTIVES

Thematic courses on issues transcending the specialisations. These themes are:

Sustainability;
Democracy and Inequality;
Fairness and Justice;
Digital & Emerging Technologies;
Global Governance;

SKILLS WORKSHOPS

They provide students with tools and practical skills needed for their ARPs and for their professional lives.

APPLIED RESEARCH PROJECTS (ARPs) & MASTER THESIS

The Applied Research Project and the Master Thesis allow for the synthetic and practical mobilisation of knowledge, methods, tools and skills acquired in the programme.

INTERNSHIPS (optional)

They provide students the opportunity to connect to the fertile International Geneva microcosm, to gain professional experience and to put their knowledge into practice.

The programme is based on solid common foundations, to ensure students acquire the rigorous analytical framework and methodological bases they will need throughout the programme and in their professional lives.

1 | Compulsory course on Global Issues & Perspectives

To be followed by all MINT Students during their first semester.

Why do we think students need this course?

MINT students are coming from very diverse countries and disciplines. They need to come together around a common understanding of global affairs.

Global issues are constantly evolving, thereby requiring a constantly refreshed analysis.

This course sets up the analytical foundations of the programme. All MINT students are together to familiarise themselves with the programme approach, vocabulary, and the global issues it addresses.

2 | Compulsory course on Statistical Literacy

Taken by all MINT Students during their first semester.

Why is this course organised?

In today’s world, it is crucial to know how to decipher, interpret and use with a critical eye, the quantitative information we receive on a daily basis.

Statistical literacy (the ability to understand statistics) is one of the foundations for effective decision-making today.

This course establishes one of the methodological basis of the programme. As it is a beginner-level course, students with demonstrated knowledge of statistics can request a waiver (to be replaced by another course).

3 | Research Electives

Students must validate two Research Electives , during their MINT first year. Students can choose amongst a list.

Categories are: quantitative methods, qualitative methods, hybrid methods and legal & philosophical methods (new this year!).

Why Research Electives are part of the curriculum?

They introduce students to new ways of thinking – they are methodological courses taught by experts / professors from different disciplines.

Students need to acquire innovative perspectives on international affairs, and a critical-thinking mindset.

They aim at providing students with solid, interdisciplinary methodological foundations.

OVERVIEW

The Applied Research Projects (ARPs) are a foundational component of the MINT. ARPs involve small student groups coming together to conduct policy-relevant research with partner organisations on issues relating to international relations and development.

Through ARPs, students learn and apply analytical and practical skills to policy-relevant issues. Students work under the supervision of a Faculty Lead and are expected to: elaborate project Terms of Reference and frame appropriate research questions; conduct in-depth literature reviews and design relevant methodologies; undertake original research; analyse primary data; write analytic preliminary and final reports; and present final research findings. Teamwork, collaboration, professionalism, effective communication, and problem solving are crucial skills that the ARP process aims to teach students.

PARTNER ORGANISATIONS

Organisations working on issues of global concern are invited to submit applications to sponsor an ARP. Partner organisations are expected to provide guidance and support to students to generate research that is of policy and practical relevance. Applying to serve as an ARP Partner Organisation is a competitive process; successful applicants demonstrate a commitment to supporting students across the project period, including through the provision of technical expertise, supporting students’ professional learning, and helping students connect with other leading experts in the relevant field of practice.

ARP Partner Organisations are expected to:
provide overall framing of the research project;
participate in approximately 4 meetings with students across the project period;
attend the final presentation;
provide feedback on and validate students’ deliverables, including the Terms of Reference, Literature Review and Methodology, and the Preliminary and Final Reports.

Students will select from the list of ARP Partner Projects at the end of September 2024, and will work on their projects from early October 2024 to mid-May 2025.

Applications for ARP Partner Organisations open in mid-May and will close on 31 July 2024.

For more information, please contact the Head of Applied Research Projects and Practice .

Faculty Leads

Claire SOMERVILLE

Lecturer, international affairs, executive director of the gender centre.

Christophe GIRONDE

Senior lecturer, development studies, affiliated with the centre for international environmental studies and the gender centre.

Jérôme DUBERRY

Managing director, tech hub, academic advisor, executive education, senior researcher, ahcd & cies.

Ruxandra STOICESCU

Valerio SIMONI

Faculty lead, applied research projects (arps), interdisciplinary master, visiting professor, anthropology and sociology, senior research fellow, global migration centre, research associate, albert hirschman centre on democracy.

Denis Ruysschaert

Faculty lead environment and sustainablity centre for international environmental studies.

Rémi Pierre VINE

Visiting lecturer in the department of international relations/political science, visiting lecturer master in international and development studies.

Carole PRESERN

Faculty lead, applied research projects (arps), specialisation in global health, global health centre, geneva graduate institute, professor of practice, global health policy, london school of hygiene and tropical medicine (lshtm).

Sandeep SENGUPTA

Visiting lecturer, interdisciplinary masters.

Erica MORET

Managing researcher of sanction and sustainable peace hub, senior researcher: global governance centre, coordinator, geneva international sanctions network (gisn), visiting lecturer: department of international relations/ political science.

Delidji Eric DEGILA

Professor of practice of international relations, faculty associate, global migration centre, faculty associate, centre on conflict, development and peacebuilding, faculty associate, global governance centre.

SOUHAIL BELHADJ KLAZ

Visiting professor, transdisciplinary master programme (mint).

Angèle FLORA MENDY

Visiting lecturer, applied research projects catalogue.

The MINT offers a common core and seven specialisations. Each of them follows an interdisciplinary approach , informed by the rich expertise of the Institute in five disciplines : anthropology and sociology, international economics, international history and politics, international law, and international relations and political science. Specialisations are not self-standing silos: they are interconnected curricula providing to students the possibility to tailor to a certain extent. their individual paths.

Most of today's global issues are broader than a specific domain, and we also encourage students to explore their interlinkages through courses dedicated to wider transversal themes (Sustainability, Democracy & Inequality, Fairness & Justice, Digital & Emerging Technologies, Global Governance, and Education).

1 | CONFLICT, PEACE AND SECURITY

This specialisation focuses on the issues of conflict, peace, and security and the interactions among them. It examines the drivers and manifestations of conflict, the nature and conditions of peace, and the determinants of security. Within an interdisciplinary approach, we survey the various historical and contemporary manifestations of these processes.

Some courses taught in 2023 – 24:

Conflict Resolution and Peace Mediation in Times of Radical Uncertainty

Peacebuilding and Peace Making in a Violent World

Predicting Crisis

Technology, Power, Global Governance

The Evolution of Global Security

The Politics and Practice of International Conflict Resolution

Head: Prof. Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamedou

2 | ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY

This specialisation focuses on global environmental challenges, which lie at the heart of the search for a sustainable human future on Earth. It examines the impacts of contemporary political economies locally and at the planetary scale. It adopts an interdisciplinary approach to the understanding of the economics and politics of decisions about the environment, from the global scale (e.g. climate change or global ecology) to the local (e.g. agrarian change, biodiversity conservation, urbanisation or mining).

International Environmental Law

Environmental Economics & Sustainability

Trade and Development

Climate Science and Policy

Political Economy and Geopolitics of International Energy

History and Politics of Global Environment Governance

Head: Prof. James Hollway

3 | GENDER, RACE AND DIVERSITY

This specialisation addresses how power relations based on gender, race, and other forms of difference structure international affairs. The goal is to provide students with the knowledge, skills, and tools to help redress intersecting inequalities and oppressions globally. Students gain interdisciplinary training that addresses a broad range of topics, including histories of colonialism and decoloniality; anthropologies and sociologies of (anti)racism, sexuality and gender; the economics of gender and development; and the gendered and racialised politics of international governance and international law.

Some courses from 2023 – 24:

Sociology of Gender

Public Policy, Economic Development and Gender

Gender and Bodies in Global Health

Feminist Political Economy

Gender, Sexuality and Decolonization in the Global South

The History of Inequality

Head: Prof. Elisabeth Prügl

4 | GLOBAL HEALTH

This specialisation focuses on power, politics and governance in global health. Students will learn how global health issues affect, and are affected by, geopolitics through global institutions and transnational actors, political economy, and epistemological and regulatory regimes. Students will also learn how to work across professional disciplines, how to obtain meaningful input from different stakeholders including affected communities, and how to translate knowledge into policy.

Some of the 2023 - 24 courses:

Health technology innovation and access: politics and policies

Global Governance and Health: Problems and Politics

Global Health Law

Global Health: History, Politics, Controversies

Global History of Reproductive Politics

Migration and Health from an International Perspective

Head: Prof. Gian-Luca Burci

5 | HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMANITARIANISM

'This specialisation will introduce students to these inter-related ethical / legal topics, and their changing relationship. The overall aim of the specialisation is to equip students with a mix of theoretical insights and practical skills that are essential for reflection and effective participation in these two fields of activity.

Some courses taught in 2023 - 24:

Humanitarian Adventures: Actors, Institutions and Contemporary Issues

Humanitarians and Human Trafficking

Human Rights and Development

Self-determination and Minority Rights: International Law and Politics

Seminar on Human Rights and Political Justice

Head: Prof. Andrew Clapham

6 | MOBILITIES, MIGRATIONS AND BOUNDARIES

This specialisation aims to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of mobility, its centrality in our societies, the governance of mobility, and its centrality for modern-day governance.

Forced Migration and International Law

Managing and Solving Refugee Problems

Critical Refugee Studies

Mobility Conflicts, Border Forensics

Urbanization and its Discontents

Law without the State

Head: Prof. Alessandro Monsutti

7 | SUSTAINABLE TRADE AND FINANCE

This specialisation focuses on the challenges and opportunities of financial deepening and international economic integration, with a spotlight on sustainability and inclusiveness.

Some courses from 2023 - 24:

Development Finance for the SDGs – Opportunities and Challenges

Dynamics of Global Economic Governance

International Trade Law

Social Finance for Sustainable Development

Head: Prof. Ugo Panizza

The full catalogue of courses is available electronically by clicking here .

The thesis is a piece of independent writing carried out by students under faculty supervision .

Students present an original research question addressing an issue relevant to international affairs and/or international development. Students may choose a supervisor among any of the Geneva Graduate Institute’s faculty members, affiliated to their specialisation or to other specialisations.

All complete Master theses are referenced in the online Institutional Repository .

Davide RODOGNO

Professor, international history and politics, head of interdisciplinary programmes, academic advisor, executive certificate in advocacy and international public affairs, affiliated to the albert hirschman centre on democracy, centre on conflict, development and peacebuilding, global governance centre, global migration centre, global health centre.

Claudia SEYMOUR

Head, applied research projects and practice, mint.

Guillemette CARLUCCI

Academic coordinator, master in international & development studies (mint).

Antonella GHIO

Department manager, interdisciplinary programmes.

Diplomacy: how is it taught in our largest Master?

All of the seven dedicated thematic specialisations of our recently-revamped Master in International and Development Studies (MINT) delve into generic and specific aspect of the new layered and multiple diplomacies. Besides, one of the compulsory courses in the common core part of the programme, “Global Issues and Perspectives”, devotes fifty per cent of its sessions on discussions that directly deal with questions and aspects of diplomacy and multilateralism.

Learn more about Diplomacy at the Geneva Graduate Institute

BEYOND THE CLASSROOM

A podcast series produced by our students to explore further specific topics discussed in class.

Latest news from MINT

Je suis d'où je vais !

Reintroducing “Competition Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector”

A Student Journey to Davos

From Diplomacy to New Diplomacies: Building on History & Shaping the Future

From the Classroom: Considering the Ethical Environment of our Times

MINT Students engage with Ambassador Thomas Greminger

Through a shared vision, Aline Wani (MDEV ‘22) and Maevia Griffiths (MDEV ‘22) founded the Visibility for Transformation Lab

Swiss Alumnae Launch NGO Using Visual and Immersive Technology to Tell Stories

From February 10-19, three interdisciplinary master students specialising in Global Health participated in the first Global Model WHO, a global, authentic, student-led simulation of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) World Health Assembly (WHA).

Institute Students Win Big at 2023 Global Model WHO

Displacement severity: Assessing the severity of displacement situations: data gaps and ways forward

Migration and the EuroMed Partnership: MINT Students meet with the EU delegation at the UN

Venice Biennale

Kenyan Human Rights Defenders share insights with students

Applied Research Project (Capstone) Applications 2022

Partner Organization Applications open for 2023 Applied Research Projects

Students’ Capstone Project Published by World Meteorological Organization

The Integration of Refugees through Sport

Applying to the mint.

In the application we ask candidates to indicate their specialisation preferences. We do so to try and have a balanced number of students per specialisation. However, candidates are applying to the MINT in its entirety , and as such, their choices will have no bearing on their admission: we evaluate applications based on their overall strength ( see our admission criteria here ).

Specialisations are attributed according to a number of criteria (including the candidate's preferences, academic standing in relation to other admitted students, the number of seats left in each specialisation). Candidates will receive their specialisation assignment together with their admission offer.

If we are not able to place some candidates in their selected specialisations, we will contact them before the decision notification deadline to discuss available options.

Note that the programme allows students to explore topics from different specialisations , through the Applied Research Projects, elective courses, and Master thesis. Students will be able to use these programme components to investigate topics in any specialisation, beyond the one assigned.

IMAGES

(PDF) PhD defence
13 Tips to Prepare for Your PhD Dissertation Defense
(PDF) PhD defence presentation
PhD Defence 22nd November: Topology Optimization for Additive
PhD Defence Process: A Comprehensive Guide for 2024
PhD Defence

VIDEO

Why China is Against THAAD?
U.S. Army. Powerful THAAD missile defense system on exercises in Israel
Public PhD Defence Matthias Fabry
Eye on IDA: About FFRDCs
Phd Defence of Mathew Francis
Phd Defence of Sergey Primakov

COMMENTS

Calendar of PhD thesis defences
GENEVA GRADUATE INSTITUTE. Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A Case postale 1672 CH - 1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland +41 22 908 57 00 . ADMISSIONS. [email protected]
PhD Programmes at the Graduate Institute, Geneva
PhD programmes at the Institute require a four-year commitment, with the first three semesters in residence. During the first two semesters, you will take theoretical and methodological doctoral seminars before presenting a preliminary thesis at the end of the third semester, with the defence of your thesis taking place at the end of the eighth semester.
Conflict and Fragility Management
Claire Francioli - Programme Assistant (IHEID) Brianna Elder - Student Researcher (CCDP) Our Community. Join an impressive and diverse community of 20'000+ Graduate Institute alumnae-i, 110 nationalities for Executive Education alumnae-i alone, and 1000+ DPP alumnae-i in more than 80 countries, coming from all sectors and backgrounds! ...
PhD Defence Process: A Comprehensive Guide for 2024
The PhD defence, also known as the viva voce or oral examination, is a pivotal moment in the life of a doctoral candidate. PhD defence is not merely a ritualistic ceremony; rather, it serves as a platform for scholars to present, defend, and elucidate the findings and implications of their research. The defence is the crucible where ideas are ...
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (French: Institut de hautes études internationales et du développement, abbreviated IHEID), also known as the Geneva Graduate Institute, is a public-private graduate-level university located in Geneva, Switzerland.. The institution counts one UN secretary-general (), seven Nobel Prize recipients, one Pulitzer Prize winner, and ...
(PDF) Planning and Passing Your PhD Defence: A Global ...
tips from former PhD stude nts and super visors, this book. unpacks the principles and unwritten rules underpinning. the defence. Addressing planning and preparing for the. doctoral defence, and ...
Mastering Your Ph.D.: Defending Your Thesis With Flair
Getting a Ph.D. is a once-in-a-lifetime event, so enjoy it and take satisfaction in what you've accomplished. Patricia Gosling and Bart Noordam are the authors of Mastering Your Ph.D.: Survival and Success in the Doctoral Years and Beyond ( Springer, 2006 ). Gosling is a senior medical writer at Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics in Germany and ...
Preparing for your PhD thesis defence
The PhD thesis defence is the culmination of years of hard work! The tips outlined in this video, compiled from recent PhD graduates and experienced thesis defence chairs, cover tips for preparing for your defence, day-of logistics, and defending successfully. Watch video on YouTube.
PhD Defences
The IT University of Copenhagen hosts PhD defences in a variety of fields within the research departments of Computer Science, Business IT and Digital Design. These are academic events where the PhD candidates present and defend their research projects in front of an assessment committee. Below, you can find the information of the upcoming and ...
'Fully-funded' IHEID PhD Package: a False Promise?
The result of an extensive survey, the report compiles the views and experiences of 66 PhD researchers at the IHEID. The PhD package, hailed as a comprehensive solution to current issues with the PhD programme, offers two years of the old financial aid scholarship and two optional years of the current Teaching Assistantship. It received ...
PhD Dissertation Defense Slides Design: Start
This Guide was created to help Ph.D. students in engineering fields to design dissertation defense presentations. The Guide provides 1) tips on how to effectively communicate research, and 2) full presentation examples from Ph.D. graduates. The tips on designing effective slides are not restricted to dissertation defense presentations; they can ...
PDF A Guide for Graduate Students Preparing for a PhD Defense
A Guide for Graduate Students Preparing for a PhD Defense in Arts, Sciences and Engineering . Table of Contents . I. Before Defense a. Get Permission to Start Writing b. Nominate a Faculty Member to Serve as Chair for Your Defense c. Selecting a Defense Date d. International Students and Work Visas e. Registration Categories for Defense f.
Ph.D. Dissertation Defense
Title: Non-invasive Arc Duration Measurement Based on Different Physical EmissionsCommittee:Dr. Lukas Graber, ECE, Chair, AdvisorDr. Morris Cohen, ECEDr. Raheem Beyah ...
Ph.D. Student Isabelle Rathbun Receives Department of Defense
Isabelle Rathbun, a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Maryland, has been awarded a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship by the Department of Defense for her research in artificial intelligence within the computer vision and sensor fusion domains. Rathbun was one of 165 individuals from 68 institutions nationwide to receive a
PhD Student Yali Deng Proposal Defense 6/14
The PhD Program is excited to announce Yali Deng will defend her dissertation proposal on Friday, 6/14 at 12pm.Her project, titled "Minority Stress, Community Connectedness and Suicidal Ideation: A Longitudinal Examination among Three Generations of Sexual Minority Adults" is chaired by Dr. Jodi Frey.If you are interested in attending the public presentation, please contact Jen Canapp at ...
PhD Defence on the Management of Natural Disaster
I do not feel that my PhD topic is "exhausted", which is quite good news. Full citation of the thesis: Schemper, Lukas. "Humanity Unprepared: International Organization and the Management of Natural Disaster (1921-1991)". PhD thesis, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2016.
PhD Dissertation Defense: Zachary Sexton
Title: SYNTHETIC VASCULAR DESIGN AND SIMULATIONS FOR BIOMANUFACTURED TISSUES AND PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING APPLICATIONS Abstract: All air-breathing vertebrates rely on extensive, multiscale vascular networks to supply nutrients and remove waste from solid organs; as such, these biophysically and biochemically entangled structures are critical for proper function in native tissues. However, the ...
PhD Defence on Humanitarian Considerations and Immigration Control
GENEVA GRADUATE INSTITUTE. Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A Case postale 1672 CH - 1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland +41 22 908 57 00 . ADMISSIONS. [email protected]
Jun 5 (Wed) @ 11:30am: "Surface Acoustic Waves Integrated with Solid
Jun 5 (Wed) @ 11:30am: "Surface Acoustic Waves Integrated with Solid-State Single Photon Sources and Superconducting Electronics," Michael Choquer, ECE PhD Defense Date and Time June 5, 2024 - 11:30am
Our PhD programme
PhD in International History and Politics. The PhD in International History and Politics is a four-year programme equipping students with the analytical, conceptual and methodological tools to successfully complete a work of original, book-length research. A small number of required courses orient students before they are permitted to move on ...
PhD Defence on Armed Groups under International Law
GENEVA GRADUATE INSTITUTE. Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A Case postale 1672 CH - 1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland +41 22 908 57 00 . ADMISSIONS. [email protected]
International Relations & Political Science
Office: P2-632. The Departmental Manager supports the efforts of the Head of Department in the successful coordination of the department. Mailing Address. International Relations & Political Science. Maison de la paix. Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2A. Case Postale 1672. CH-1211 Genève 1.
Master in International and Development Studies
To that end, our Master in International and Development Studies ('MINT') proposes a ground-breaking combination of a solid common core with the possibility to specialise in one of seven areas. The MINT mixes the advantages of being a rigorous academic programme with a strong accent on applied research, practice and skills, and is ideally ...