• Search Menu
  • Sign in through your institution
  • Advance articles
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Site
  • Open Access
  • Why Publish?
  • About Science and Public Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertising and Corporate Services
  • Journals Career Network
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Dispatch Dates
  • Journals on Oxford Academic
  • Books on Oxford Academic

Issue Cover

Article Contents

  • 1. Background
  • 3. Findings and discussion
  • 4. Conclusion
  • Conflict of interest statement
  • Supplementary data
  • < Previous

Public procurement and innovation: a systematic literature review

ORCID logo

  • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Supplementary Data

Oishee Kundu, Andrew D James, John Rigby, Public procurement and innovation: a systematic literature review, Science and Public Policy , Volume 47, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages 490–502, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa029

  • Permissions Icon Permissions

Public procurement and innovation is the subject of a growing body of literature. This article systematically reviews the existing research, documenting its evolution and highlighting dominant and overlooked themes. We find a dramatic increase in the number of journal publications on this topic since 2008, the existence of thematic communities within the literature, and a focus on empirical work. We analysed keywords and abstracts to identify the broad boundaries of research on public procurement and innovation as well as particular areas of focus in the literature. We found a variety of terms used to describe the application of public procurement as an innovation policy tool and a variety of thematic interests and theoretical foundations. We argue that this makes it challenging to consolidate the research on the topic. From a policy perspective, the geographical context of research is overwhelmingly concentrated in OECD and EU countries.

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

  • Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

  • Online ISSN 1471-5430
  • Print ISSN 0302-3427
  • Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
  • About Oxford Academic
  • Publish journals with us
  • University press partners
  • What we publish
  • New features  
  • Open access
  • Institutional account management
  • Rights and permissions
  • Get help with access
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Media enquiries
  • Oxford University Press
  • Oxford Languages
  • University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

  • Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
  • Cookie settings
  • Cookie policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Public procurement from the triple bottom line lens: the identification of sustainability criteria from the international literature review

  • Published: 22 May 2024

Cite this article

literature review on project procurement

  • André Luiz Trajano dos Santos   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3051 1 &
  • Augusto da Cunha Reis 1  

The implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in the light of the criteria triple bottom line (TBL) is still little explored by researchers on this theme. This review article aims to analyze the integration of the TBL dimensions in public procurement practices in the international literature. This systematic literature review was guided by the PRISMA Protocol, covering n  = 105 articles indexed to the scientific databases Scopus and Web of Science, which observe sustainability criteria in public procurement in its scope from 2000 to 2021. Among the reviewed studies, it was identified that only 21.90% ( n  = 23) presented an integrated approach to the three dimensions of TBL sustainability in its content. In comparison, 35.24% ( n  = 37) of the studies presented an economic approach, 40.95% ( n  = 43) a social approach and in greater proportion, 86.67% ( n  = 91) environmental approach. It identified 26 sustainability criteria in public procurement present in the international literature, of which the eco-labeling ( n  = 50) stands out in the environmental aspect. In the economic dimension, the life cycle cost and the development of the local economy ( n  = 14) and the defense and job creation ( n  = 20) stand out in the social aspect. Thus, in a perspective that public managers should prioritize increasing awareness of their ability to influence the ecosystem of sustainable public procurement to integrate actions focused on the three dimensions of sustainability, this article is the first to systematically review the integration of environmental, economic, and social dimensions proposed by the triple bottom line of sustainability with a focus on public procurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

literature review on project procurement

Adjei-Bamfo, P., & Maloreh-Nyamekye, T. (2019). The “baby steps” in mainstreaming sustainable public procurement in Ghana: A “double-agency” perspective. Journal of Public Affairs, 19 , e1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1902

Article   Google Scholar  

Ahmad, A. M., Abubakar, M. J., & Umaru, N. H. (2019). Awareness and readiness of public procurement officers on sustainability in North Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8 (5C), 824–830. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1116.0585C19

Ahsan, K., & Rahman, S. (2017). Green public procurement implementation challenges in Australian public healthcare sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152 , 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.055

Al Nuaimi, B. K., Khan, M., & Ajmal, M. (2020). Implementing sustainable procurement in the United Arab Emirates public sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 20 , 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2019-0044

Aldenius, M., & Khan, J. (2017). Strategic use of green public procurement in the bus sector: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164 , 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.196

Alencastro, M. A. C., Da Silva, E. V., & Lopes, A. M. D. (2014). Sustainable procurements in the Brazilian public administration: The federal executive power’s experience. Revista De Administracãoo Pública, 48 , 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122014000100009

Amann, M., Roehrich, J. K., Eßig, M., & Harland, C. (2014). Driving sustainable supply chain management in the public sector: The importance of public procurement in the European Union. Supply Chain Management, 19 (3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0447

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11 , 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo (1a) . São Paulo: Edições 70.

Badell, D., & Rosell, J. (2021). Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59 (6), 1555–1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13204

Bakir, S., Khan, S., Ahsan, K., & Rahman, S. (2018). Exploring the critical determinants of environmentally oriented public procurement using the DEMATEL method. Journal of Environmental Management, 225 , 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.081

Bernal, R., San-Jose, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2019). Improvement actions for a more social and sustainable public procurement: A Delphi analysis. Sustainability, 11 , 4069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154069

Biberos‐Bendezú, K., Cárdenas, Ú., Kahhat, R., & Vázquez‐Rowe, I. (2021). Introducing environmental decision‐making criteria to foster Green Public Procurement in Peru. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18 (5), 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4488

Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31 , 452–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551

Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S., Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., & Oldmark, J. (2013). Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52 , 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.007

Braulio-Gonzalo, M., & Bovea, M. D. (2020b). Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81 , 106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106310

Braulio-Gonzalo, M., & Bovea, M. D. (2020a). Criteria analysis of green public procurement in the Spanish furniture sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258 , 120704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120704

Brennan, S. E., & Munn, Z. (2021). PRISMA 2020: A reporting guideline for the next generation of systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 19 , 906–908. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00112

Bucea-Manea-ţoniş, R., Martins, O. M. D., Ilic, D., Belous, M., Braicu, C., & Simion, V.-E. (2021). Green and sustainable public procurement—an instrument for nudging consumer behavior: A case study on Romanian green public agriculture across different sectors of activity. Sustainability, 13 , 1–25.

Google Scholar  

Burchard-Dziubińska, M., & Jakubiec, T. (2012). Green public procurements (GPP) as an instrument of implementation of sustainable development. Analysis of the experience of the Łódź region local government. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 15 (3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0015-9

Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9 , 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Chellappandi, P., & Vijayakumar, C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics–An emerging field in library and information science research. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7 , 5–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529398

Cheng, W., Appolloni, A., D’Amato, A., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green public procurement, missing concepts and future trends: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176 , 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.027

Chiarini, A., Opoku, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2017). Public healthcare practices and criteria for a sustainable procurement: A comparative study between UK and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162 , 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.027

Chowdhury, N. A., Ali, S. M., Mahtab, Z., Rahman, T., Kabir, G., & Paul, S. K. (2019). A structural model for investigating the driving and dependence power of supply chain risks in the readymade garment industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51 , 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.024

Ciumara, T., & Lupu, I. (2020). Green procurement practices in Romania: Evidence from a survey at the level of local authorities. Sustainability, 12 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310169

Costa, B. B. F., & Motta, A. L. T. S. (2019). Key factors hindering sustainable procurement in the Brazilian Public sector: A Delphi study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 14 , 152–171. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V14-N2-152-171

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative research and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3a) . Penso Publishing House.

Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Pereira, S. C. F., Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2018). Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134 , 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033

Dias, I. C. L., França, V. L., Bezerra, D. S., Rabêlo, J. M. M., & Castro, A. C. L. (2018). Spatial distribution of river basin sustainability indicators in transition region of northeastern Brazil. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 16 , 3729–3754. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1604_37293754

Diofasi-Kovacs, O., & Valko, L. (2014). Step by step towards mandatory green public procurement. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 22 (1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.2151

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8 , 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Elkington, J. (2012). Sustainability: Cannibals with fork and knife (M. Books, Org.) . São Paulo.

Etse, D., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N. (2021). Comparing sustainable public procurement in the education and health sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279 , 123959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123959

Ferreira, E. B. (2020). R software and food and nutrition research. Sustinere Journal, 8 , 611–616. https://doi.org/10.12957/sustinere.2020.55436

Fourie, D., & Malan, C. (2021). Can public procurement requirements for railway transport promote economic and social sustainability in South Africa? Sustainability, 13 (21), 11923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111923

Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., González-Cruz, M. C., & González-Gaya, C. (2017). Environmental criteria in the spanish public works procurement process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020204

Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., Ferrer-Gisbert, P. S., González-Cruz, M. C., & Bastante-Ceca, M. J. (2019). Green public procurement at a regional level. Case study: The valencia region of Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 , 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162936

Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert, P., & Carmen Gonzalez-Cruz, M. (2018). Analysis of green public procurement of works by Spanish public universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 , 1888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091888

Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., Bastante-Ceca, M. J., Ferrer-Gisbert, P. S., & Gonzalez-Cruz, M. C. (2021). Analysis of the situation of social public procurement of works at the valencian region (Spain). Sustainability, 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010175

Gallon, I., Flores, G. M., Trevisan, M., & Kneipp, J. M. (2019). Analysis of the sustainability criteria applied to biddings of a federal public university. Environmental Management and Sustainability Journal, 8 , 313–332. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v8i2.1211

Gauthier, E. (1998). Bibliometric analysis of scientific and technological research: A user’s guide th the methodology. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies, 8 , 1–81.

Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Vluggen, R. (2017). Development of sustainability in public sector procurement. Public Money and Management, 37 , 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1344027

Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B. (2008). Greening government procurement in developing countries: Building capacity in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88 , 932–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.016

Giacomo, M. R., Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Formentini, M. (2019). Does green public procurement lead to life cycle costing (LCC) adoption? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25 , 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.05.001

Grandia, J., & Kruyen, P. M. P. (2020). Assessing the implementation of sustainable public procurement using quantitative text-analysis tools: A large-scale analysis of Belgian public procurement notices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26 , 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100627

Grandia, J., Steijn, B., & Kuipers, B. (2015). It is not easy being green: Increasing sustainable public procurement behaviour. Innovation, 28 , 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1024639

Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019). Sustainable public procurement: The impact of ability, motivation, and opportunity on the implementation of different types of sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11 , 5115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195215

Guedes, V. L., & Borschiver, S. (2005). Bibliometrics: A statistical tool for information and knowledge management in information, communication and scientific and technological evaluation systems. National Meeting on Information Science, 6 , 1–18.

Haddadi, T. El, Mourabit, T., & Haddadi, A. El. (2021). Sustainable public procurement in morocco: An investigative survey regarding tender preparation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26 , 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.002

Hafsa, F., Darnall, N., & Bretschneider, S. (2021). Social public purchasing: Addressing a critical void in public purchasing research. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13438

Hall, P., Löfgren, K., & Peters, G. (2016). Greening the street-level procurer: Challenges in the strongly decentralized Swedish system. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39 , 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9282-8

Henrique, B. M., Sobreiro, V. A., & Kimura, H. (2020). Contracting in Brazilian public administration: A machine learning approach. Expert Systems, 37 , e12550. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12550

Ho, L. W., Dickinson, N. M., & Chan, G. Y. (2010). Green procurement in the Asian public sector and the Hong Kong private sector. Natural Resources Forum, 34 , 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2010.01274.x

Hsueh, L., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., & Darnall, N. (2020). Implementation of sustainable public procurement in local governments: A measurement approach. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33 , 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2019-0233

IPEA. (2019). The Brazilian government procurement market (2006–2017): Measurement and analysis. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada—IPEA. http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/9315/1/td_2476.pdf

Igarashi, M., Boer, L., & Michelsen, O. (2015). Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108 , 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.010

Jiménez, J. M., López, M. H., & Escobar, S. E. F. (2019). Sustainable public procurement: From law to practice. Sustainability, 11 , 6388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226388

Kanapinskas, V., Plytnikas, Z., & Tvaronaviciene, A. (2014). Sustainable public procurement: Realization of the social aspect in Republic of Lithuania. Business: Theory and Practice, 15 , 302–315. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2014.529

Kaye Nijaki, L., & Worrel, G. (2012). Procurement for sustainable local economic development. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25 (2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551211223785

Khalil, N., Mohamad Bohari, A. A., Shamsudin, S. M., Abd Rashid, A. F., & Husin, H. N. (2021). Key approaches of life-cycle cost in green government procurement (GGP) for green projects. Planning Malaysia, 19 (16), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.21837/PM.V19I16.949

Knebel, S., & Seele, P. (2021). Framing sustainability in public procurement by typologizing sustainability indicators - the case of Switzerland. Joural of Public Procurement, 21 (2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2020-0066

Lacerda, R. T. O., Ensslin, L., & Ensslin, S. R. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of the literature on strategy and performance measurement. Management and Production, 19 , 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2012000100005

Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9 (2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805807

Leal, A. R., Perez-Castillo, D., Amorós, J. E., & Husted, B. W. (2020). Municipal green purchasing in Mexico: Policy adoption and implementation success. Sustainability, 12 , 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208339

Lindfors, A., & Ammenberg, J. (2021). Using national environmental objectives in green public procurement: Method development and application on transport procurement in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280 (2), 124821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124821

Liu, J., Xue, J., Yang, L., & Shi, B. (2019). Enhancing green public procurement practices in local governments: Chinese evidence based on a new research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211 , 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.151

Liu, J., Ma, Y., Appolloni, A., & Cheng, W. (2021). How external stakeholders drive the green public procurement practice? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Public Procurement, 21 (2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-04-2020-0035

Lundberg, S., Marklund, P.-O., Strömbäck, E., & Sundström, D. (2015). Using public procurement to implement environmental policy: An empirical analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 17 , 487–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0102-9

Lăzăroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Uţă, C., Hurloiu, I., Andronie, M., & Dijmarescu, I. (2020). Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability, 12 , 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052110

Leal Filho, W., Skouloudis, A., Brandli, L. L., Salvia, A. L., Avila, L. V., & Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2019). Sustainability and procurement practices in higher education institutions: Barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231 , 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.202

Majernik, M., Daneshjo, N., Chovancova, J., & Sanciova, G. (2017). Modelling the Process of Green Public Procurement. Tem Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics, 6 (2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem62-12

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12 , 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Melissen, F., & Reinders, H. (2012). A reflection on the Dutch sustainable public procurement programme. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9 (1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2012.658815

Malolitneva, V., & Dzhabrailov, R. (2020). Implementation of the environmental policy objectives within the public procurement system in the context of the EU-Ukraine association agreement. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 35 , 78–92.

McCrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural Resources Forum, 28 , 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x

Montalbán-Domingo, L., García-Segura, T., Sanz, M. A., & Pellicer, E. (2018). Social sustainability criteria in public-work procurement: An international perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198 , 1355–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.083

Mendonça, R. C. A., Pedrosa, I. V, & Camara, M. A. O. A. (2021). Sustainable public procurement in a Brazilian higher education institution. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 (11), 17094–17125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01345-9

Michelsen, O., & Boer, L. (2009). Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. Journal of Environmental Management, 91 , 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.001

Miyamoto, T., Yajima, N., Tsukahara, T., & Arimura, T. H. (2020). Advancement of green public purchasing by category: Do municipality green purchasing policies have any role in japan? Sustainability, 12 , 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218979

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Molin, E., Martin, M., & Björklund, A. (2021). Addressing Sustainability within Public Procurement of Food: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13 (23), 13395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313395

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional De La Informacion, 29 , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Murray, J. G. (2000). Effects of a green purchasing strategy: The case of Belfast City Council. Supply Chain Management, 5 (1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540010312954

Neto, B., & Gama Caldas, M. (2018). The use of green criteria in the public procurement of food products and catering services: A review of EU schemes. Environment Development and sustainability, 20 , 1905–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9992-y

Nikolaou, I. E., & Loizou, C. (2015). The green public procurement in the midst of the economic crisis: Is it a suitable policy tool? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12 , 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2014.993657

Nissinen, A., Parikka-Alhola, K., & Rita, H. (2009). Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005. Ecological Economics, 68 (6), 1838–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.005

OECD. (2020a). Amount spent in OECD countries on public procurement. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gov/contratacion-publica/

OECD. (2020b). Public procurement toolbox. Retrieved May 3, 2021, from https://www.oecd.org/governance/procurement/toolbox/about/terminology/

Oliveira, B. C. S. C. M., & dos Santos, L. M. L. (2015). Public procurement as a policy for sustainable development. Public Administration Journal, 49 , 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-76121833

O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., Koricheva, J., Noble, D. W. A., Parker, T. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: A PRISMA extension. Biological Reviews., 96 , 1695–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12721

Pacheco-Blanco, B., & Bastante-Ceca, M. J. (2016). Green public procurement as an initiative for sustainable consumption. An exploratory study of Spanish public universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133 , 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.056

Parikka-Alhola, K. (2008). Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecological Economics, 68 , 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.004

Parikka-Alhola, K., & Nissinen, A. (2012). Environmental impacts and the most economically advantageous tender in public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 12 (1), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-12-01-2012-B002

Patarlageanu, S. R., Dinu, M., & Constantin, M. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of the Field of Green Public Procurement. www.Amfiteatrueconomic.Ro, 22(53), 71. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/53/71

Peck, F., & Cabras, I. (2011). The impact of local authority procurement on local economies: The case of Cumbria, north west England. Public Policy and Administration, 26 , 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076709356859

Ponte, M., Foley, M., & Cho, C. H. (2020). Assessing the degree of sustainability integration in Canadian public sector procurement. Sustainability, 12 , 5550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145550

Pouikli, K. (2020). Towards mandatory Green Public Procurement (GPP) requirements under the EU Green Deal: reconsidering the role of public procurement as an environmental policy tool. ERA Forum, 21 (4), 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00635-5

Preuss, L. (2009). Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: The case of local government. Supply Chain Management, 14 , 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910954557

Prier, E., Schwerin, E., & McCue, C. P. (2016). Implementation of sustainable public procurement practices and policies: A sorting framework. Journal of Public Procurement, 16 , 312–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-16-03-2016-b004

Rangelov, M., Dylla, H., Mukherjee, A., & Sivaneswaran, N. (2021). Use of environmental product declarations (EPDs) of pavement materials in the United States of America (U.S.A.) to ensure environmental impact reductions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283 , 124619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124619

Rainville, A. (2017). Standards in green public procurement: A framework to enhance innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167 , 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.088

Rietbergen, M. G., & Blok, K. (2013). Assessing the potential impact of the CO2 Performance Ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52 , 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.027

Roesch, S. M. A. (2013). Internship and research projects in management (3a) . São Paulo. Publisher Atlas.

Roman, A. V. (2017). Institutionalizing sustainability: A structural equation model of sustainable procurement in US public agencies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143 , 1048–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.014

Rosell, J. (2020). Getting the green light on green public procurement: Macro and meso determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123710

Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: Current practices, drivers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109 , 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.007

Ryu, Y., & Sueyoshi, T. (2021). Examining the relationship between the economic performance of technology-based small suppliers and socially sustainable procurement. Sustainability, 13 (13), 7220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137220

Sachs, I. (2009). Paths to sustainable development . Publisher Garamond.

Santos, A. C. D. S. G. D., Reis, A. D. C., Souza, C. G. D., Santos, I. L. D., & Ferreira, L. A. F. (2020). The first evidence about conceptual vs analytical lean healthcare research studies. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 34 , 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2020-0021

Schaltegger, S., Christ, K. L., Wenzig, J., & Burritt, R. L. (2022). Corporate sustainability management accounting and multi-level links for sustainability—A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24 , 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12288

Senna, P., Reis, A., Santos, I. L., Dias, A. C., & Coelho, O. (2020). A systematic literature review on supply chain risk management: Is healthcare management a forsaken research field? Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28 , 926–956. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2020-0266

Severo, E. A., & De Guimarães, J. C. F. (2022). Antecedent and consequents of eco-innovation for sustainability: Generations’ perceptions in Brazil and Portugal. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7 , 1–30. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.280

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Shafiq, A., Johnson, P. F., Klassen, R. D., & Awaysheh, A. (2017). Exploring the implications of supply risk on sustainability performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37 , 1386–1407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2016-0029

Shai, L., Molefinyana, C., & Quinot, G. (2019). Public procurement in the context of broad-based black economic empowerment (BBBEE) in South Africa-lessons learned for sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11 , 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247164

Silva, R. C., Betiol, L., Villac, T., & Nonato, R. (2018). Sustainable public procurement: The Federal Public Institution’s shared system. Management Journal, 25 , 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-001

Silva, J. A., & Bianchi, M. L. P. (2001). Cientometria: A métrica da ciência. Paidéia (ribeirão Preto), 11 , 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-863x2001000200002

Simanovska, J., Pelsa, I., & Kibilda-Kinna, N. (2021). When is green really green? A latvian case study on updating of food supply green public procurement. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 24 (3), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0120

Simcoe, T., & Toffel, M. W. (2014). Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68 (3), 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.001

Smith, J., Andersson, G., Gourlay, R., Karner, S., Mikkelsen, B. E., Sonnino, R., & Barling, D. (2016). Balancing competing policy demands: The case of sustainable public sector food procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 , 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065

Snider, K. F., Halpern, B. H., Rendon, R. G., & Kidalov, M. V. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and public procurement: How supplying government affects managerial orientations. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19 , 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.01.001

Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020). Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245 , 118901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901

Sourani, A., & Sohail, M. (2013). Enabling sustainable construction in UK public procurement. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166( 6), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.12.00022

Sparrevik, M., Wangen, H. F., Fet, A. M., & Boer, L. (2018). Green public procurement: A case study of an innovative building project in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188 , 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.048

Stevens, C. (2010). Linking sustainable consumption and production: The government role. Natural Resources Forum, 34 (1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2010.01273.x

Stoffel, T., Cravero, C., Chimia, A., & Quinot, G. (2019). Multidimensionality of sustainable public procurement (SPP)-exploring concepts and effects in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe. Sustainability, 11 , 6352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226352

Stritch, J. M., Bretschneider, S., Darnall, N., Hsueh, L., & Chen, Y. (2020). Sustainability policy objectives, centralized decision making, and efficiency in public procurement processes in U.S. Local Governments. Sustainability, 12 (17), 6934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176934

Swanson, M., Weissman, A., Davis, G., Socolof, M. L., & Davis, K. (2005). Developing priorities for greener state government purchasing: a California case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13 (7), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.011

Tariq, S., Hussein, M., Wang, R. D., & Zayed, T. (2021). Trends and developments of on-site crane layout planning 1983–2020: Bibliometric, scientometric and qualitative analyzes. Construction Innovation . https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2021-0015

Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016a). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: An effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 , 1893–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.092

Testa, F., Grappio, P., Gusmerotti, N. M., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016b). Examining green public procurement using content analysis: Existing difficulties for procurers and useful recommendations. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18 , 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9634-1

Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., & Daddi, T. (2012). What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecological Economics, 82 , 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.011

Thomson, J., & Jackson, T. (2007). Sustainable procurement in practice: Lessons from local government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50 , 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701261695

Torres-Pruñonosa, J., Plaza-Navas, M. A., Díez-Martín, F., & Beltran-Cangrós, A. (2021). The intellectual structure of social and sustainable public procurement research: A co-citation analysis. Sustainability, 13 (2), 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020774

Treviño-Lozano, L. (2021). Sustainable public procurement and human rights: Barriers to deliver on socially sustainable road infrastructure projects in Mexico. Sustainability, 13 (17), 9605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179605

Tsai, W.-T. (2017). Green public procurement and green-mark products strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions: Experience from Taiwan. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22 , 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9695-3

Tvaronavičiene, A. (2012). The possibilities to use public procurement as one of the instruments of implementation of sustainable development concept in republic of Lithuania. Business Theory and Practice, 13 , 197–207. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2012.21

Uttam, K., & Roos, C. L. (2015). Competitive dialogue procedure for sustainable public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86 , 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.031

Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). From bibliometrics to webometrics: A conceptual exploration of the mechanisms used to measure information recording and knowledge diffusion. Information Science, 31 , 369–379.

Van Berkel, J. R. J., & Schotanus, F. (2021). The impact of “procurement with impact”: measuring the short-term effects of sustainable public procurement policy on the environmental friendliness of tenders. Journal of Public Procurement, 21 (3), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-10-2020-0070

Vejaratnam, N., Mohamad, Z. F., & Chenayah, S. (2020). A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 20 , 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013

Vidal, R., & Sánchez-Pantoja, N. (2019). Method based on life cycle assessment and TOPSIS to integrate environmental award criteria into green public procurement. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44 , 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.011

Vieira, I. L., Silva, E. R., & Mattos, U. A. D. O. (2020). Public sector social-environmental diagnosis model: Application in a federal autarky. Rio de Janeiro. Gestao e Producao, 27 , e4957. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x4957-20

Walker, H. (2015). New development: Public procurement research at IPSERA-aligning research and practice, and future trends. Public Money and Management, 35 , 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1007710

Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management, 14 , 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910941993

Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012). The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 , 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008

Wang, C., Qiao, Y., & Li, X. (2020). A systems approach for green public procurement implementation. Journal of Public Procurement, 20 , 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-2019-0017

Wang, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, M., Bu, Z., & Liu, J. (2021). Green public procurement as a promoter for green consumption: From the perspective of individual’s knowledge. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3 (March), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100035

Waris, M., Panigrahi, S., Mengal, A., Soomro, M. I., Mirjat, N. H., Ullah, M., & Khan, A. (2019). An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for sustainable procurement of construction equipment: Multicriteria-based decision framework for Malaysia. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019 , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6391431

Witjes, S., & Lozano, R. (2016). Towards a more circular economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112 , 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015

Wontner, K. L., Walker, H., Harris, I., & Lynch, J. (2020). Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: Tensions and trade-offs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40 , 1909–1939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2019-0395

Xu, S., Chu, C., Ju, M., & Shao, C. (2016). System establishment and method application for quantitatively evaluating the green degree of the products in green public procurement. Sustainability, 8 , 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090941

Yu, C., Morotomi, T., & Yu, H. (2020). What influences adoption of green award criteria in a public contract? An empirical analysis of 2018 European public procurement contract award notices. Sustainability, 12 , 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031261

Zaidi, S. A. H., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Ashraf, R. U. (2019). Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68 , 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.008

Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 126 , 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.009

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Production Engineering and Systems Department, Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Avenue Maracanã, 229, Rio de Janeiro, 20271-110, Brazil

André Luiz Trajano dos Santos & Augusto da Cunha Reis

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Luiz Trajano dos Santos .

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

dos Santos, A.L.T., da Cunha Reis, A. Public procurement from the triple bottom line lens: the identification of sustainability criteria from the international literature review. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04343-1

Download citation

Received : 04 May 2022

Accepted : 18 December 2022

Published : 22 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04343-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Sustainable public procurement
  • Triple bottom line
  • Sustainable development
  • Sustainability criteria
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    literature review on project procurement

  2. (PDF) " LITERATURE REVIEW OF ADOPTION OF E PROCUREMENT PRACTICES BY CON

    literature review on project procurement

  3. Summary of literature reviews on CSFs for E-Procurement implementation

    literature review on project procurement

  4. The literature review on procurement

    literature review on project procurement

  5. 50 Smart Literature Review Templates (APA) ᐅ TemplateLab

    literature review on project procurement

  6. (PDF) A REVIEW OF STRATEGIC PROCUREMENT: PRIMARY STEP TO RESEARCH ON e

    literature review on project procurement

VIDEO

  1. Chapter 12: Project Procurement Management

  2. Project Procurement: Negotiation Techniques

  3. Project Procurement and Corporate Procurement detail explanation

  4. Cetacean Social Structure in Captivity

  5. Project 8: Literature Review Project #PPA1R65T3P8 #รัฐประศาสนศาสตร์

  6. Bid Opening of the Project: Procurement of Testing Materials for Various 2024 Assessment Test

COMMENTS

  1. Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    A literature review taking 119 articles in project procurement is presented. • Quality and cost/price are the most cited groups of criteria for supplier selection. • Multicriteria methods are the most widely used approaches in project procurement. • Environmental, social and risk factors should be considered in procurement process.

  2. Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    the contract is being implemented, plays an important. role in ensuring a good outcome. Thus, managers should. pay special attention to two phases of the project. procurement process: (1) supplier ...

  3. Services procurement: A systematic literature review of practices and

    In particular, Obwegeser and Müller conducted a systematic literature review on innovative procurement and compared their SLR outputs with what they called the 'traditional procurement' practices, identified in their review as being grounded in institutional theory (Edquist & Hommen, 2000; Rolfstam, 2012; Rolfstam et al., 2011; Scott, 2013 ...

  4. Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    The key aspects of procurement in project management: investigating the effects of selection criteria, supplier integration and dynamics of acquisitions. Paper aims: This study aims to identify the key aspects of procurement in the Project Management context and their relation to project success. Particularly, the effects of selection criteria,….

  5. (PDF) The key aspects of procurement in project management

    Modern selection criteria for procurement methods in construction: a state-of-the-art literature review and a survey. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

  6. Critical Review of Procurement Method Research in ...

    The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive literature review that seeks to address modern factors that are associated with the selection of current procurement. ... Guide to Sustainable Procurement in Construction, CIRIA. Ball, D and Fortune, C., 2000. Building project procurement processes and the development of environmentally ...

  7. PDF Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    In this context, this paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of the criteria and the methods used in the phases of selecting and evaluating suppliers in projects, as given in papers published from 1973 to 2015. The papers were classified into categories in accordance with the type of project and the phase of the ...

  8. PDF Services procurement : a systematic literature review of practices and

    of service procurement, which, as noted by Kleemann and Essig (201 ) and Molin and Åge (2017), remains significantly under-researched. Therefore, conducting an updated literature review related to service procurement is considered necessary to provide a systematic analysis and enrich the currently fragmented and quite diverse research in this ...

  9. Services procurement: A systematic literature review of practices and

    A descriptive and thematic analysis concluded that services procurement can be classified into seven research domains: 'service production', 'governance', 'pur-chasing approach', 'supplier selection', 'performance management', 'the service triad' and 'specification of requirements'. We offer a comparative framework ...

  10. Public procurement and innovation: a systematic literature review

    1. Background. There is a growing body of literature on public procurement and innovation. While there are a number of excellent reviews on this topic (Hommen and Rolfstam 2009; Lember et al. 2015; Chicot and Matt 2018), to our knowledge there has been no systematic review of the literature.Lember et al. (2015) and Chicot and Matt (2018) are specific in their attention to 'public procurement ...

  11. Services procurement: A systematic literature review of practices and

    curement of services remains under-researched. T o address this challenge and. develop a strategic platform for new directions in future research in the ar ea, this paper undertakes a systematic ...

  12. Insights from a project procurement strategy through an ...

    The paper reports on a PAR (Participatory Action Research) involving a project procurement process of a building retrofitting project in a real case [12], as well as the special benefits obtained through a strategic approach more compatible with the employer’s goals. ... Some literature review is always required as an auxiliary way to ...

  13. Construction Procurement Selection Criteria: A Review and ...

    This paper presents a comprehensive literature review that addresses procurement selection criteria associated with procurement system evaluation in the construction sector. The aim is to consolidate the knowledge of construction procurement selection criteria (PSC) and provide future research directions. A systematic literature review (SLR) of 37 peer-reviewed journal articles from 1998 to ...

  14. The key aspects of procurement in project management ...

    As an additional control base for the study, a new search was performed in the Scopus database, using only the search string " procurement " and refining the result by source. The authors' source of interest is the " International Journal of Project Management ", owing to its high impact factor (4.034 for the year 2016 according to JCR) in the project management literature.

  15. Services procurement: A systematic literature review of practices and

    A descriptive and thematic analysis concluded that services procurement can be classified into seven research domains: 'service production', 'governance', 'purchasing approach', 'supplier selection', 'performance management', 'the service triad' and 'specification of requirements'.

  16. Full article: Assessing the impact of procurement practice on

    Introduction. Public procurement has become an issue of concern worldwide and has been subjected to reforms, restructuring, rules, and regulations (Kabega et al., Citation 2016).Carr and Smeltzer (Citation 1997) state that procurement practices comprise the actions taken by the purchasing organization to navigate and integrate its performance to increase productivity by reducing cost and time.

  17. A Systematic Review of Implementation Challenges in Public E-Procurement

    For example, Patrucco undertook a systematic literature review on public e-procurement, focusing only on papers published in the Journal of Public Procurement. While this provides an initial view of e-procurement, such studies fail to provide a holistic view of the phenomenon given that e-procurement spans works in e-government, information ...

  18. The Impact of Procurement Practices on ...

    Effective procurement practices play a critical role in the successful functioning of organizations and directly impact their overall performance. However, many organizations struggle to optimize their procurement processes to achieve desired performance outcomes. This study aims to comprehensively review the existing literature on the impact of procurement practices on organizational ...

  19. PDF Project procurement management: A structured literature review

    In this context, this paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of the criteria and the methods used in the phases of selecting and evaluating suppliers in projects, as given in papers published from 1973 to 2015. The papers were classified into categories in accordance with the type of project and the phase of the ...

  20. PDF EFFECTS OF PROCUREMENT ON PROJECT PERFORMANCE: A SURVEY OF ...

    understanding of how procurement procedures affect project performance. A procurement model including eight hypotheses is first developed on the basis of a literature review and then tested through multivariate statistical techniques based on empirical data collected through a survey investigation of 106 Swedish construction clients. The results of

  21. Public procurement and innovation: a systematic literature review

    Public procurement and innovation is the subject of a growing body of literature. This article systematically reviews the existing research, documenting its evolution and highlighting dominant and ...

  22. PDF Systematic Literature Review

    the project's life cycle is not better and more clearly understood. In addition, while the above papers are well established in the field, there is not yet a firm theoretical foundation for the topic. This study reports the findings of a systematic review of publications published primarily between 2006 and 2017 in front-end project literature.

  23. Systematic literature review of integrated project scheduling and

    In the real world, material procurement and project implementation occur concurrently (Zhang & Cui, 2021). ... and solution method, in the fifth step and presenting the results of the literature review. Project scheduling problem type: This aspect deals with the characteristics of the resources, activities, and other project elements involved ...

  24. Sustainability in Project Management Practices

    An online survey was developed based on a comprehensive literature review of which a total of 107 valid responses were collected and analyzed. The results show the most useful sustainable project management practices perceived by experienced project professionals, including 'Sustainability team management', 'Lessons learned towards ...

  25. Public procurement from the triple bottom line lens: the ...

    The implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in the light of the criteria triple bottom line (TBL) is still little explored by researchers on this theme. This review article aims to analyze the integration of the TBL dimensions in public procurement practices in the international literature. This systematic literature review was guided by the PRISMA Protocol, covering n = 105 articles ...

  26. Readiness for Implemented Sustainable Procurement in Indonesian

    Procurement is the process of obtaining goods and services in a construction project and is a crucial point for the success of a design and build (DB) project. The success of a DB project has an effect on work performance metrics such as cost, quality, and time. Therefore, this research aims to develop a readiness model for implementing sustainable procurement in a DB project with a financing ...

  27. Raw Material Purchasing Optimization Using Column Generation

    The raw material purchasing (RMP) problem is to determine the purchasing quantities of raw materials in given periods or cycles. Raw material purchasing optimization is crucial for large-scale steel plants because it is closely related to the supply of raw materials and cost savings. The raw material purchasing of large-scale steel enterprises is characterized by many varieties, large ...

  28. PDF Solicitation Number: Issuance Date: Closing Date/Time: 06/02/2024

    4. Through literature review, research, and regular communication with technical experts at USAID/Washington, bilateral and multilateral development partners, civil society, and other local and international stakeholders, stay abreast of state-of-the-art knowledge on programming and policy development as well as on funding opportunities and

  29. PDF Child Abuse and Neglect Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes March 8th

    • Developing a report using the data and a literature review of various models for workforce support to provide recommendations. This report should be finalized in April. Home Visiting Funding Update, Laurel Aparicio • The governor's budget included funding for home visiting, including a slight increase to help pull down more federal funding.