assignment of benefits reddit

Home » Coverage Exclusions » Assignment of Benefits

Assignment of Benefits for Homeowners

• How They Work
• Using Your AOB
• Pros & Cons
• Safe & Secure
• Watch Out for Abuse
• Frequently Asked Questions

An assignment of benefits (AOB) is a contractual agreement that enables a third party to access insurance benefits on behalf of the policyholder.[1] When the policyholder signs an AOB agreement, it grants the third party the authority to initiate an insurance claim and receive reimbursement directly from the insurance company. 

Assignment of benefits for homeowners means that any contractors , plumbers, or other professionals who perform work to repair your home or property after a claim will work with your insurance provider directly to get compensated. You step aside as the middleman, and they work together.  

While AOB can work with most types of insurance, not every insurance company will allow it. The party performing the work (the insurance claimant) and your insurance company must both agree to the process.

• As the policyholder, you must willingly sign an AOB agreement, giving explicit consent for a third party to access their insurance benefits.
• AOBs make things easier for both you as the policyholder and for the service provider.
• The service provider takes care of filing the claim, deciding on repairs, and getting paid by the insurance company, relieving you (the policyholder) of having to manage these details.

How Do Assignment of Benefits Work?

AOB is a straightforward process that simplifies insurance billing for both service providers and policyholders. Here is how an AOB works:

Coverage Approved

Before hiring a service provider, the policyholder must make sure that the service is covered by their policy by checking in with the insurance provider. In most medical situations, the billing staff will handle this on behalf of the patient, but in the cases of homeowners insurance, it may be necessary for the policyholder to manage this step.

Service Rendered

The policyholder, whether a patient or property owner, receives necessary services covered by their insurance policy, such as medical treatment or repairs.

Mutual Agreement

The policyholder and the service provider agree to utilize an AOB form.[2] This agreement authorizes the service provider to handle direct billing to the insurance company for the services provided.

Billing Submission

With the AOB form in place, the service provider submits all relevant documentation, including invoices and service records, to the insurance company for payment.

Claim Evaluation

The insurance company thoroughly reviews the submitted documents to verify that the provided services are indeed covered under the policy terms and that the contractor provided those same services.

Direct Payment

If the services are eligible and covered by the insurance policy, the insurance company promptly issues payment directly to the service provider. This payment aligns with the agreed-upon costs as outlined in the insurance policy.

Policyholder’s Responsibility

Generally, the policyholder is only responsible for any deductibles, copays, or out-of-pocket expenses specified in their insurance policy.[3] They are relieved of the responsibility of managing the billing process or handling reimbursement paperwork.

Example of an Assignment of Benefits

A hurricane hit Rachel’s town, severely damaging the shed where she keeps her tools and lawn equipment. The shed is covered under her home insurance policy, and she files a claim with the insurance provider quickly with photographs and documents that show the damage and provide proof of the value and potential cost to rebuild. The insurance provider approves the replacement of the shed.

To streamline the process of paying the contractor, Rachel signs an AOB allowing the contractor to bill the insurance provider rather than billing her. This means that if there are any disputes about the costs of materials, timeliness of payment, or any other issues, those will happen between the insurance company and the contractor, and Rachel will not be required to step in. 

Additionally, rather than having to pay the contractor out of pocket and wait for a reimbursement check from the provider, the contractor will be paid directly by the insurance company, so Rachel doesn’t have to pay the cost of the shed replacement.

When Would You Use Your Assignment of Benefits?

AOBs can be useful in various situations:

• Assign benefits to contractors for property damage repairs, simplifying the insurance claim process. It can often expedite the process and help claimants to get paid faster.
• AOBs can help in emergencies, ensuring timely payment without paperwork hassles. This can be particularly helpful during already high-stress times. 
• Consider AOBs for complex claims with multiple providers or extensive paperwork. You’ll have less to manage if the parties work together directly.
• You can use an AOB for a range of professionals that relate to a homeowners insurance claim, such as plumbers, roofers, window repair specialists, landscapers, carpenters, and restoration specialists.

Pros & Cons of Using Assignment of Benefits

Making sure your aob is safe & secure.

To ensure the safety of an AOB:

• Check the reputation of the service provider and seek multiple quotes for services.[4]
• Carefully examine the AOB terms, ensuring clarity and alignment with your insurance policy.
• Beware of high-pressure tactics and take your time to decide.
• Confirm the provider’s licensing and insurance.
• Get multiple estimates in writing for the needed work.
• Consult an attorney or insurance advisor if you have concerns.
• Keep records of communication and contracts.
• Inform your insurer about the AOB and their requirements.
• After services, check the results against AOB terms and your satisfaction.

Assignment of Benefits Being Abused: What Are My Options?

While an AOB can offer convenience, the process may be susceptible to misuse by those who would take advantage of the insurance company and overcharge for services or claim to have provided services that they did not actually perform. 

If you suspect AOB abuse, consider these options:

Contact Your Insurer 

If you suspect AOB abuse, promptly reach out to your insurance company. Express your concerns and provide any evidence you have to support your concerns. Insurers have units dedicated to investigating potential fraud or AOB misuse.

Report Fraud

If you suspect fraudulent activities, report the issue to your state’s insurance fraud bureau or department, which investigates such cases and takes legal action when appropriate. However, fraud is generally difficult to prove. 

Seek Legal Counsel

Get advice from an attorney who is experienced in insurance claims to navigate your specific situation. Be aware that pursuing legal action can be costly and lengthy, so it generally won’t be your first course of action. But if the process gets complicated, it’s helpful to have a legal professional on your side.

Know About Potential Litigation

If the contractor or service provider isn’t paid by your insurance company, they might pursue legal action against your provider, leading to a dispute that may require your action or response.

Frequently Asked Questions About Assignment of Benefits (AOB) for Homeowners

We have compiled some of the most frequently asked questions about AOBs and how to use them most effectively, so you can make the most informed decisions about your situation.

An assignment of benefits, also referred to as an AOB, in homeowners insurance is when you allow a contractor or service provider to take over your insurance claim process. They deal directly with the insurance company for tasks like repairs or damage assessments.  This can simplify and expedite the process since the service provider is dealing directly with your insurance company without you serving as the intermediary. 

All parties must agree to the process. As the policyholder, you’ll sign off on the process, and both the services provider and your insurance company must also agree to the process.

Using an AOB can be beneficial if it is used wisely and for the purposes of working with reputable service providers. It streamlines claims, but it also comes with potential risks like fraud. Proceed with caution and agree to an AOB only if you feel confident that you are working with trusted parties. Also, be aware that not all insurance companies allow AOBs. Consult your insurance provider to ensure they do before proceeding.

In recent years, AOBs have been the target of fraud. Some service providers have inflated their invoices, billing for work that wasn’t performed. In some cases, claimants sue the insurance company, resulting in higher premiums for the policyholder down the road.

An AOB simplifies the insurance claims process for policyholders, letting service providers handle the work of getting paid for their services. This reduces responsibility and stress for policyholders and can often serve the best interests of all parties.

An AOB on a claim form is a line item where you authorize a service provider to receive insurance benefits for a specific claim. It lets that provider directly bill and get paid by the insurance company, simplifying the process for you. Make sure to understand the terms before signing it.[2] In some cases, it could mean you are responsible for any fees billed by your service provider if your insurance company doesn’t pay the full amount.

Related Pages

• The Do’s & Don’ts of Submitting a Homeowners Insurance Claim
• How Long Will My Homeowners Insurance Claim Take?
• How to File a Homeowners Insurance Claim
• How to Document Property Damage for Your Claim
• How to Speed Up Your Homeowners Insurance Claim
• Insurance Claims & Appeals

Post Disaster Claims Guide . National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Assignment of Benefits . Department of Health and Human Services – North Dakota.

Understanding Dental Assignment of Benefits . West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner.

Assignment of Benefits: Consumer Beware . (April 2020). National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

• Construction Accidents

Practice Areas

Assignment of benefits: what you need to know.

• August 17, 2022
• Steven Schwartzapfel

Insurance can be useful, but dealing with the back-and-forth between insurance companies and contractors, medical specialists, and others can be a time-consuming and ultimately unpleasant experience. You want your medical bills to be paid without having to act as a middleman between your healthcare provider and your insurer.

However, there’s a way you can streamline this process. With an assignment of benefits, you can designate your healthcare provider or any other insurance payout recipient as the go-to party for insurance claims. While this can be convenient, there are certain risks to keep in mind as well.

Below, we’ll explore what an assignment of insurance benefits is (as well as other forms of remediation), how it works, and when you should employ it. For more information, or to learn whether you may have a claim against an insurer, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers now at 1-516-342-2200 .

What Is an Assignment of Benefits?

An assignment of benefits (AOB) is a legal process through which an insured individual or party signs paperwork that designates another party like a contractor, company, or healthcare provider as their insurance claimant .

Suppose you’re injured in a car accident and need to file a claim with your health insurance company for medical bills and related costs. However, you also need plenty of time to recover. The thought of constantly negotiating between your insurance company, your healthcare provider, and anyone else seems draining and unwelcome.

With an assignment of benefits, you can designate your healthcare provider as your insurance claimant. Then, your healthcare provider can request insurance payouts from your healthcare insurance provider directly.

Through this system, the health insurance provider directly pays your physician or hospital rather than paying you. This means you don’t have to pay your healthcare provider. It’s a streamlined, straightforward way to make sure insurance money gets where it needs to go. It also saves you time and prevents you from having to think about insurance payments unless absolutely necessary.

What Does an Assignment of Benefits Mean?

An AOB means that you designate another party as your insurance claimant. In the above example, that’s your healthcare provider, which could be a physician, hospital, or other organization.

With the assignment of insurance coverage, that healthcare provider can then make a claim for insurance payments directly to your insurance company. The insurance company then pays your healthcare provider directly, and you’re removed as the middleman.

As a bonus, this system sometimes cuts down on your overall costs by eliminating certain service fees. Since there’s only one transaction — the transaction between your healthcare provider and your health insurer — there’s only one set of service fees to contend with. You don’t have to deal with two sets of service fees from first receiving money from your insurance provider, then sending that money to your healthcare provider.

Ultimately, the point of an assignment of benefits is to make things easier for you, your insurer, and anyone else involved in the process.

What Types of Insurance Qualify for an Assignment of Benefits?

Most types of commonly held insurance can work with an assignment of benefits. These insurance types include car insurance, healthcare insurance, homeowners insurance, property insurance, and more.

Note that not all insurance companies allow you to use an assignment of benefits. For an assignment of benefits to work, the potential insurance claimant and the insurance company in question must each sign the paperwork and agree to the arrangement. This prevents fraud (to some extent) and ensures that every party goes into the arrangement with clear expectations.

If your insurance company does not accept assignments of benefits, you’ll have to take care of insurance payments the traditional way. There are many reasons why an insurance company may not accept an assignment of benefits.

To speak with a Schwartzapfel Lawyers expert about this directly, call 1-516-342-2200 for a free consultation today. It will be our privilege to assist you with all your legal questions, needs, and recovery efforts.

Who Uses Assignments of Benefits?

Many providers, services, and contractors use assignments of benefits. It’s often in their interests to accept an assignment of benefits since they can get paid for their work more quickly and make critical decisions without having to consult the insurance policyholder first.

Imagine a circumstance in which a homeowner wants a contractor to add a new room to their property. The contractor knows that the scale of the project could increase or shrink depending on the specifics of the job, the weather, and other factors.

If the homeowner uses an assignment of benefits to give the contractor rights to make insurance claims for the project, that contractor can then:

• Bill the insurer directly for their work. This is beneficial since it ensures that the contractor’s employees get paid promptly and they can purchase the supplies they need.
• Make important decisions to ensure that the project completes on time. For example, a contract can authorize another insurance claim for extra supplies without consulting with the homeowner beforehand, saving time and potentially money in the process.

Practically any company or organization that receives payments from insurance companies may choose to take advantage of an assignment of benefits with you. Example companies and providers include:

• Ambulance services
• Drug and biological companies
• Lab diagnostic services
• Hospitals and medical centers like clinics
• Certified medical professionals such as nurse anesthetists, nurse midwives, clinical psychologists, and others
• Ambulatory surgical center services
• Permanent repair and improvement contractors like carpenters, plumbers, roofers, restoration companies, and others
• Auto repair shops and mechanic organizations

Advantages of Using an Assignment of Benefits

An assignment of benefits can be an advantageous contract to employ, especially if you believe that you’ll need to pay a contractor, healthcare provider, and/or other organization via insurance payouts regularly for the near future.

These benefits include but are not limited to:

• Save time for yourself. Again, imagine a circumstance in which you are hospitalized and have to pay your healthcare provider through your health insurance payouts. If you use an assignment of benefits, you don’t have to make the payments personally or oversee the insurance payouts. Instead, you can focus on resting and recovering.
• Possibly save yourself money in the long run. As noted above, an assignment of benefits can help you circumvent some service fees by limiting the number of transactions or money transfers required to ensure everyone is paid on time.
• Increased peace of mind. Many people don’t like having to constantly think about insurance payouts, contacting their insurance company, or negotiating between insurers and contractors/providers. With an assignment of benefits, you can let your insurance company and a contractor or provider work things out between them, though this can lead to applications later down the road.

Because of these benefits, many recovering individuals, car accident victims, homeowners, and others utilize AOB agreements from time to time.

Risks of Using an Assignment of Benefits

Worth mentioning, too, is that an assignment of benefits does carry certain risks you should be aware of before presenting this contract to your insurance company or a contractor or provider. Remember, an assignment of benefits is a legally binding contract unless it is otherwise dissolved (which is technically possible).

The risks of using an assignment of benefits include:

• You give billing control to your healthcare provider, contractor, or another party. This allows them to bill your insurance company for charges that you might not find necessary. For example, a home improvement contractor might bill a homeowner’s insurance company for an unnecessary material or improvement. The homeowner only finds out after the fact and after all the money has been paid, resulting in a higher premium for their insurance policy or more fees than they expected.
• You allow a contractor or service provider to sue your insurance company if the insurer does not want to pay for a certain service or bill. This can happen if the insurance company and contractor or service provider disagree on one or another billable item. Then, you may be dragged into litigation or arbitration you did not agree to in the first place.
• You may lose track of what your insurance company pays for various services . As such, you could be surprised if your health insurance or other insurance premiums and deductibles increase suddenly.

Given these disadvantages, it’s still wise to keep track of insurance payments even if you choose to use an assignment of benefits. For example, you might request that your insurance company keep you up to date on all billable items a contractor or service provider charges for the duration of your treatment or project.

For more on this and related topic, call Schwartzapfel Lawyers now at 1-516-342-2200 .

How To Make Sure an Assignment of Benefits Is Safe

Even though AOBs do carry potential disadvantages, there are ways to make sure that your chosen contract is safe and legally airtight. First, it’s generally a wise idea to contact knowledgeable legal representatives so they can look over your paperwork and ensure that any given assignment of benefits doesn’t contain any loopholes that could be exploited by a service provider or contractor.

The right lawyer can also make sure that an assignment of benefits is legally binding for your insurance provider. To make sure an assignment of benefits is safe, you should perform the following steps:

• Always check for reviews and references before hiring a contractor or service provider, especially if you plan to use an AOB ahead of time. For example, you should stay away if a contractor has a reputation for abusing insurance claims.
• Always get several estimates for work, repairs, or bills. Then, you can compare the estimated bills and see whether one contractor or service provider is likely to be honest about their charges.
• Get all estimates, payment schedules, and project schedules in writing so you can refer back to them later on.
• Don’t let a service provider or contractor pressure you into hiring them for any reason . If they seem overly excited about getting started, they could be trying to rush things along or get you to sign an AOB so that they can start issuing charges to your insurance company.
• Read your assignment of benefits contract fully. Make sure that there aren’t any legal loopholes that a contractor or service provider can take advantage of. An experienced lawyer can help you draft and sign a beneficial AOB contract.

Can You Sue a Party for Abusing an Assignment of Benefits?

Sometimes. If you believe your assignment of benefits is being abused by a contractor or service provider, you may be able to sue them for breaching your contract or even AOB fraud. However, successfully suing for insurance fraud of any kind is often difficult.

Also, you should remember that a contractor or service provider can sue your insurance company if the insurance carrier decides not to pay them. For example, if your insurer decides that a service provider is engaging in billing scams and no longer wishes to make payouts, this could put you in legal hot water.

If you’re not sure whether you have grounds for a lawsuit, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers today at 1-516-342-2200 . At no charge, we’ll examine the details of your case and provide you with a consultation. Don’t wait. Call now!

Assignment of Benefits FAQs

Which states allow assignments of benefits.

Every state allows you to offer an assignment of benefits to a contractor and/or insurance company. That means, whether you live in New York, Florida, Arizona, California, or some other state, you can rest assured that AOBs are viable tools to streamline the insurance payout process.

Can You Revoke an Assignment of Benefits?

Yes. There may come a time when you need to revoke an assignment of benefits. This may be because you no longer want the provider or contractor to have control over your insurance claims, or because you want to switch providers/contractors.

To revoke an assignment of benefits agreement, you must notify the assignee (i.e., the new insurance claimant). A legally solid assignment of benefits contract should also include terms and rules for this decision. Once more, it’s usually a wise idea to have an experienced lawyer look over an assignment of benefits contract to make sure you don’t miss these by accident.

Contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers Today

An assignment of benefits is an invaluable tool when you need to streamline the insurance claims process. For example, you can designate your healthcare provider as your primary claimant with an assignment of benefits, allowing them to charge your insurance company directly for healthcare costs.

However, there are also risks associated with an assignment of benefits. If you believe a contractor or healthcare provider is charging your insurance company unfairly, you may need legal representatives. Schwartzapfel Lawyers can help.

As knowledgeable New York attorneys who are well-versed in New York insurance law, we’re ready to assist with any and all litigation needs. For a free case evaluation and consultation, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers today at 1-516-342-2200 !

Schwartzapfel Lawyers, P.C. | Fighting For You™™

What Is an Insurance Claim? | Experian

What is assignment of benefits, and how does it impact insurers? | Insurance Business Mag

Florida Insurance Ruling Sets Precedent for Assignment of Benefits | Law.com

Related Posts

Who can sue for wrongful death.

If your family has recently been impacted by the tragedy of a wrongful death, our hearts go out to you.

Which Technology Would Be Best In Locating Soft Tissue Injuries?

Car accidents often leave victims with more than just visible injuries. Soft tissue injuries, which are a common result from

Can You Collect Social Security Disability And Workers’ Compensation At The Same Time?

A workplace injury can turn your life upside down. Medical bills are piling up, you might not be able to

We'll Fight For You

Schwartzapfel® lawyers has a 99% client satisfaction rate, quick links.

• News & Events
• Verdicts & Settlements
• Video Gallery
• Wrongful Death
• Vehicle Accidents
• Slip & Fall
• Medical Malpractice
• Workers' Compensation
• Personal Injuries
• Product Liability
• Garden City

Assignment of benefits

Assignment of benefits is a legal agreement where a patient authorizes their healthcare provider to receive direct payment from the insurance company for services rendered.

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

What is Assignment of Benefits?

Assignment of benefits (AOB) is a crucial concept in the healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) process. It refers to the legal transfer of the patient's rights to receive insurance benefits directly to the healthcare provider. In simpler terms, it allows healthcare providers to receive payment directly from the insurance company, rather than the patient being responsible for paying the provider and then seeking reimbursement from their insurance company.

Understanding Assignment of Benefits

When a patient seeks medical services, they typically have health insurance coverage that helps them pay for the cost of their healthcare. In most cases, the patient is responsible for paying a portion of the bill, known as the copayment or deductible, while the insurance company covers the remaining amount. However, in situations where the patient has assigned their benefits to the healthcare provider, the provider can directly bill the insurance company for the services rendered.

The assignment of benefits is a legal agreement between the patient and the healthcare provider. By signing this agreement, the patient authorizes the healthcare provider to receive payment directly from the insurance company on their behalf. This ensures that the provider receives timely payment for the services provided, reducing the financial burden on the patient.

Difference between Assignment of Benefits and Power of Attorney

While the assignment of benefits may seem similar to a power of attorney (POA) in some respects, they are distinct legal concepts. A power of attorney grants someone the authority to make decisions and act on behalf of another person, including financial matters. On the other hand, an assignment of benefits only transfers the right to receive insurance benefits directly to the healthcare provider.

In healthcare, a power of attorney is typically used in situations where a patient is unable to make decisions about their medical care. It allows a designated individual, known as the healthcare proxy, to make decisions on behalf of the patient. In contrast, an assignment of benefits is used to streamline the payment process between the healthcare provider and the insurance company.

Examples of Assignment of Benefits

To better understand how assignment of benefits works, let's consider a few examples:

Sarah visits her primary care physician for a routine check-up. She has health insurance coverage through her employer. Before the appointment, Sarah signs an assignment of benefits form, authorizing her physician to receive payment directly from her insurance company. After the visit, the physician submits the claim to the insurance company, and they reimburse the physician directly for the covered services.

John undergoes a surgical procedure at a hospital. He has health insurance coverage through a private insurer. Prior to the surgery, John signs an assignment of benefits form, allowing the hospital to receive payment directly from his insurance company. The hospital submits the claim to the insurance company, and they reimburse the hospital for the covered services. John is responsible for paying any copayments or deductibles directly to the hospital.

Mary visits a specialist for a specific medical condition. She has health insurance coverage through a government program. Mary signs an assignment of benefits form, granting the specialist the right to receive payment directly from the government program. The specialist submits the claim to the program, and they reimburse the specialist for the covered services. Mary is responsible for any applicable copayments or deductibles.

In each of these examples, the assignment of benefits allows the healthcare provider to receive payment directly from the insurance company, simplifying the billing and reimbursement process for both the provider and the patient.

Assignment of benefits is a fundamental concept in healthcare revenue cycle management. It enables healthcare providers to receive payment directly from the insurance company, reducing the financial burden on patients and streamlining the billing process. By understanding the assignment of benefits, patients can make informed decisions about their healthcare and ensure that their providers receive timely payment for the services rendered.

Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle

Related terms, summary of benefits and coverage (sbc).

Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) is a standardized document that provides clear and concise information about health insurance plan benefits and costs.

Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS)

Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS) is a payment system used by Medicare to determine reimbursement rates for physician services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries.

Subscribe to the 

 Healthcare Clarified newsletter

Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox

Assignment of benefits: A growing concern

By Kevin Poll

Evaluating claims properly and determining the appropriate amount of a loss are crucial for insurance companies, especially when trying to offer competitive premiums to customers and maintain profitable financial results.

Factors that affect profitability

In the business of insurance, many factors—some that can’t be controlled—affect financial profitability. Predictive analytics and more refined modeling are helping insurers reduce uncertainty, but even the best of models have their limitations.

Further, many variables can’t be predicted but could have significant financial impact on the bottom line. One of those variables—the potential for the benefits of an insurance policy being assigned post-loss to predatory adjusters—has been a hot topic, particularly in those states where laws and regulations currently prevent insurance companies from being able to mitigate the problem.

What is assignment of benefits?

Typically, an insurance policy has a loss payment provision that advises the policyholder that any payment for a first-party loss will be paid directly to the insured unless another party is legally entitled to collect payment. However, a common practice by consumers after a loss is to have the contractor that will be making the repairs to the damaged property work directly with the insurance company for payment.

Some insurance providers have simplified this process by developing a network of trusted contractors that are allowed to inspect claims on their behalf. This creates a consumer-friendly environment where the insured, for the most part, is removed from the claims settlement process. However, consumers generally are free to make other choices, so if they decide on a contractor not in that network, the insurer most likely will work with the entity selected by the insured.

When a contractor, who is not in an insurance provider’s network, is chosen, the insured has two options: either receive payment from the insurance company and then work directly with the contractor or allow the contractor to work directly with the insurance company regarding repairs and payment. Insurance companies would likely prefer the first option because they can then more closely monitor the claims process. While the second option may be less desirable to the insurance company, certain states, like Florida, have laws in place that actually prevent the carrier from disallowing it.

What are the concerns with assignment of benefits?

Transferring the benefits of a policy to a third party, such as a contractor, does create a better customer experience; however, insurers generally lose a bit of control managing the claims process when working directly with the third party.

Several states (especially Florida as discussed below) have seen an influx in predatory public adjusters and contractors that seek out consumers who may potentially have a loss covered by their homeowners policy. These adjusters (that may also serve as the contractor making the repairs to the home) will have the consumer sign a transfer of benefits to them almost immediately after suffering the loss, and then they will work directly with the insurance company to complete the claims process.

One issue that arises (and often the consumer is unaware of this) is that the adjuster/contractor could be inflating the actual cost of the claim by reporting damage that may not actually have occurred. Additionally, the claim may not be reported to the insurance company until the repairs have already been completed so the insurance company has not had an opportunity to inspect the damage. Such tactics can result in additional profits for the adjuster/contractor, which translates to inflated severity and rising premiums for the consumer.

This issue may be particularly problematic in Florida, where insurance carriers may not be aware of potential losses until they’re served with a lawsuit for expenses incurred by the contractor that completed the repairs. In fact, the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FLOIR) released results from a study it conducted showing that the number of lawsuits attributed to assignment of benefits (AOB) increased from 408 in 2000 to more than 28,000 in 2016. Further, the average severity for claims where there is an AOB is about 85 percent more than those claims without an AOB.

How has this issue escalated?

Several factors have contributed to the growing problem of assignment of benefits in Florida; however, a combination of case law and legislation, which has made it difficult for insurance companies to mitigate claim costs and potential fraud, may be the most impactful.

In the 1917 landmark case of West Florida Grocery Co. v. Teutonia Fire Ins. Co., 77 So. 209, 210-, the state Supreme Court rendered a decision holding that the insured was able to assign the benefits of the policy following a loss directly to a third party without the written consent of the insurance provider. The precedent established by this 100-year-old case continues to make it very difficult for an insurance company to prohibit the assignment of benefits in Florida.

In addition to this case, Florida Statute §627.428 governing payment of attorneys’ fees related to insurance practices requires that insurance companies pay legal fees to third parties successfully suing to obtain payment for their services even if the ruling from the court places the amount of the claim only $1 above the insurance company’s offer in settlement. As a result, this statute incentivizes contractors to sue insurance companies for reimbursement, because the likelihood that they’ll have to pay their own legal fees for the case is very slim.

As reported by The Sun Sentinel earlier this year, consumers in southern Florida could expect to see rate increases averaging 5-15% as a result of claims abuse. Additionally, if it can be assumed that a significant number of the lawsuits complied in the FLOIR study referenced above were initiated by public adjusters and contractors seeking to be unjustly compensated, it could be suggested that this predatory behavior is factoring into these rate increases.

Despite this potential correlation, the legislature has yet to make changes to existing laws. While some members of Florida’s legislature favor the existing legislation, others are advocating for consumers and supporting legislation that would eliminate the abuse. Although remedial legislation did fail in 2017, some members have said they’re hopeful to get legislation passed in 2018.

How is ISO responding?

ISO has been reviewing policy language to determine the best course of action for responding to the growing crisis, especially in Florida. While prohibiting assignment of benefits post-loss altogether is not allowed by state law, several policy provisions can be modified to introduce parameters on how the benefits of the policy can be assigned to a third party. ISO is finalizing these changes and hopes to file in the first quarter of 2018 so that member companies can address this concern with or without any future changes to Florida law.

• Personal Property
• Risk Assessment
• Homeowners Underwriting

• Commercial Insurance
• Current Customers
• Request A Quote

The Good and Bad of Assignment of Benefits Agreements

• August 23, 2022

An Assignment of Benefits Agreement (AOB) is an agreement that allows a third party to work directly with your insurance company on your behalf. If an AOB is signed, the third party can file insurance claims, collect money and make decisions without having you do anything extra. While this all may sound great for you, there are some things you need to consider before signing an Assignment of Benefits Agreement.

Where you may see an Assignment of Benefits agreement:

If you are a homeowner and have some unexpected damage to your house, such as a water leak, you would naturally hire a contractor to fix the damage. One of your contractor’s selling points might include taking care of all the paperwork. The paperwork would most likely have an AOB. Unfortunately, this could result in more of a headache for you than working with your insurance agent yourself.

Contractors like to work directly with insurance companies to try and get the most money out of them for the hard work they did or will be doing on your home. If your contractor inflated the price of a claim, the insurance company will take its time and maybe even fight the claim. This process could take weeks. This means your house could still be in shambles, or the damage could be getting worse. If the work has been completed, but the insurance company hasn’t settled yet, the contractor can place a lien on your home until you pay, which could mean money out of your own pocket.

If the insurance company agrees to pay the large amount of money, it could result in your premium going up. Insurance companies need money to pay claims to remain in business. The way that they get this money is by increasing your premiums.

If you find yourself being asked to sign an Assignment of Benefits Agreement, be cautious before doing so. Not sure if you should sign one? Reach out to a DSI agent, and we can talk you through it to see if it is the best route for you to take.

We serve all of Florida from Leesburg to Jacksonville to Fleming Island .

Want to Learn More About DSI?

See how DSI can help provide you or your business the coverage you need.

Assignment of Benefits vs Direction to Pay vs Assignment of Policy

Assignment of Benefits vs. Assignment of Policy

Assignment of Benefits forms, also known as AOBs, play a crucial role in the restoration industry’s contractor-client dynamics. These legal documents empower policyholders to transfer their insurance policy benefits to a third party, effectively connecting their restoration contractor directly to their insurance company. By doing so, policyholders can bypass many of the complications and anxieties typically associated with a restoration project, streamlining the process.

According to Josh Ehmke, Co-owner and General Consult at One Claim Solution , there’s a  common misunderstanding between assignment of benefits and assignment of policy. An assignment of policy refers to the transfer of the benefits and rights of an insurance policy from one party (the policyholder) to another party (the assignee).

“An assignment of policy is never going to be valid. In fact, I haven’t come across a state that allows an assignment of an insurance policy without the insurance company’s prior written consent,” Josh said. “The reason it’s not allowed is because it’s against public policy. It increases the insurance risk substantially.”

For example, a policyholder might have a history of filing numerous claims against their insurance provider, suggesting a pattern that they might be well-versed in exploiting certain loopholes and taking advantage of insurance companies. Additionally, there are concerns that they may not adequately maintain or safeguard their property, leading to an increased risk for the insurance company. 

“That is absolutely different from an assignment of benefits, which grants the rights the policyholder had to the payment under the policy to be transferred to the assignee,” Josh said. ”The only prerequisite for an assignment of benefits other than having a covered claim, is that the loss has already occurred. If you get an assignment of benefits before the loss occurs, that’s essentially a transfer of a policy.”

OCS recently encountered a case where the question arose regarding the scope of an assignment of benefits. Specifically, the issue was whether only the rights of the policyholder are transferred, or if the policyholder’s obligations are also transferred alongside the benefits under the assignment.

“By taking the assignment, the contractor doesn’t assume the policyholder’s obligations under that policy,” Josh said. “It’s very important to word your assignment of benefits appropriately to clearly state that you’re not agreeing to assume any of those policy obligations, and to specify which rights you want.”

Direction to Pay vs. Assignment of Benefits

Direction to pay (DTP) is a financial arrangement where the policyholder, who is entitled to receive an insurance claim payment, instructs the insurance company to pay the claim proceeds directly to a third party. This third party could be a vendor, contractor, service provider, or any other entity to whom the policyholder owes a debt or has entered into an agreement.

“The issue with direction to pay is that the carrier doesn’t have to honor it because it’s not enforceable,” Josh said. “It’s very limited in what it can do, whereas an assignment of benefits is much more powerful because it obligates the insurance company legally to pay you.”

According to Josh, DTP’s are rarely used, except in states like Texas and Florida where AOBs are detrimental to contractors or illegal.

“A DTP is better than nothing and allows you to at least show the carrier that the homeowner granted approval to request payment,” Josh said. “But outside of those situations, the direction to pay in my mind is worthless. When you can have an assignment of benefits, there’s no reason to have a direction to pay at all.”

A Final Word

Understanding the differences between an AOB, Assignment of Policy, and DTP is crucial because each term represents distinct legal and financial arrangements that can significantly impact insurance claims and policyholder rights. To learn more about the value of assignment of benefits in helping you navigate the restoration process, be sure to subscribe to our newsletter .

(602) 491-2588

335 E Germann Rd, Suite 340/370 Gilbert, AZ 85297

WHO WE SERVE

Partner With Us

PRIVACY POLICY

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2024.

Connor Trahan

Account executive.

Hi there! I’m Connor, the Account Executive for One Claim. My goal is to guide our contractors through the sales process, ensuring you’re equipped with all the information you need to make your decision and hit the ground running once aboard. We view ourselves as an extension of your business and I strive to make the process an enlightening and consultative one. My career has primarily been focused in software sales over a few different industries but the last few years were spent helping general contractors solve similar problems to what we’re doing here at OCS! Outside of work, I love spending time with my family, cooking and boating during the summer months.

Nicole Liesenfelt

Director, human resources.

Hello! I’m Nicole, and I’m here to champion for our employees, recruit for new talent, and impact culture at One Claim Solution. I find satisfaction in supporting a memorable employee experience and bring innovation, problem solving, and strategic view to the process. Nothing is more important than our people, and a healthy culture is my top priority! I have had the pleasure of building my career in various sectors, specializing in small to medium size firms focused on high-growth. My experience is centered around driving and implementing change, leading high-performing teams, and driving process improvements. I am excited to make an impact at One Claim. Outside of work, my family and I enjoy getting outdoors as much as possible to explore beautiful Colorado!

Elizabeth McGlone

Demand generation manager.

Great to meet you! I’m Elizabeth, and I’m the one behind all the emails and advertisements you’ve been seeing. As the Demand Generation Manager at One Claim Solution, my mission is to connect with contractors like you who need our services. I’m passionate about having an impact on others and I bring a wealth of experience in demand generation and marketing strategy to create moments of delight, curiosity, and education for you.

Prior to One Claim Solution, I had the privilege of building marketing departments from the ground up at companies in a variety of industries, including IT consulting, first protection, and healthcare. Personally, I love being outdoors, playing Dungeons and Dragons and board games, singing, and traveling.

Alisha Yartzoff

Director of contractor success.

Welcome! I’m Alisha, and I’m here to champion your success as the Director of Contractor Success at One Claim. With a passion for helping contractors thrive, I bring a wealth of experience in onboarding, customer service, and account management to ensure your journey with us is nothing short of exceptional.

Prior to joining One Claim, I had the privilege of scaling SMB and Enterprise Customer Success teams at fast-growing SaaS startups. With over six years of experience at companies like Mavenlink, Teamwork, and ServiceTitan, I honed my expertise in building high-performing teams and fostering proactive, consultative relationships. This background has equipped me with a deep understanding of the challenges faced by businesses like yours, and I’m dedicated to helping you overcome them.

Hi there, my name is Eric! I am the Chief Technology Officer here at OCS, spearheading our technical strategy. I have a background in computer science, graduating cum laude from BYU-Idaho with a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Information Technology.

Before coming to One Claim, I served as the Director of Engineering at Slingshot Technology, Inc., a company later acquired by WorkWave in 2021. My professional journey has spanned both emerging startups and established corporations, with a steadfast focus on cultivating high-trust, low bureaucracy teams and innovating technology using agile methodologies.

In my free time, you can find me flying drones, enjoying the outdoors, and spending time with my family.

Hello, my name is Cam, I’m the COO of One Claim Solution! I come from a management consulting background (Bain & Company) and hold an MBA from the University of Michigan. I have worked at a wide variety of organizations, from Fortune 500 to small-cap, in an equally wide variety of industries. I have over 15 years of experience in operations and strategic growth, and I have spent much of my career focused on developing high-performing tech-enabled service organizations through early stage and high growth phases.

Outside of work, my wife Brittny and I have four kids, ages 13 to 6. As residents of Mesa, Arizona, we love to ski and explore the national parks of the southwest!

Hello, my name is Dan, and I am the CEO of One Claim Solution. I am super excited by everything we are doing at OCS to be the market leading insurance billing specialist that advocates on behalf of our restoration contractors. 

My professional experiences are predominantly corporate in nature. My career started at General Electric in finance and accounting. Immediately prior to joining OCS, I spent time as an investor at Bondcliff Partners and management consultant with Bain & Company. I also hold an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and got my BS in finance and accounting from Northeastern University.

Outside of the office, I enjoy spending time with my wife, two young children, and our family dog, Whiskey. We live in Charleston, SC and take advantage of the beautiful weather by spending as much time as possible outside at the beach or adventuring around town

Co-Founder and General Counsel

Hi, I’m Josh! In 2016, I co-founded One Claim Solution with my partner Jeremy Traasdahl, and I serve as General Counsel of One Claim Solution. Working in the restoration industry, Jeremy and I saw contractors struggling to get paid quickly and fairly and we knew there was a need for change. We founded One Claim Solution to be this change and it’s been my privilege to see our company grow and to advocate for our clients as general counsel.

Outside of my passion for helping the restoration industry, I enjoy spending time outdoors, fly-fishing, hunting, skiing, and coaching my kids’ baseball teams. I’ve been married to my amazing wife for 20 years and we have a beautiful family of 5 children.

Jeremy Traasdahl

Hey, I’m Jeremy! In 2016, I co-founded One Claim Solution with my partner Josh Ehmke. Working in the restoration industry, Josh and I saw contractors struggling to get paid quickly and fairly and we knew there was a need for change. We founded One Claim Solution to be this change and it’s been my privilege to lead our amazing team.

Prior to One Claim Solution, I started my career as an inside sales rep for Avnet, then moved to Pepsico as a district sales manager. Outside of work, I love spending time with my wife and four children, two boys and two girls!

Caring ‣ Urgent ‣ Aggressive

• Call For A Free Legal Consultation: (201) 261-1700
• Physician Reimbursement
• PIP / No-Fault Arbitration
• Workers’ Compensation Recovery
• Hospital Reimbursement
• ERISA Litigation Claim Attorneys
• Healthcare Arbitration
• Bicycle Accident
• Brain Injury
• Bus Accident
• Car Accident
• Construction Accident
• Hit and Run
• Motorcycle Accident
• Negligent Supervision
• Nursing Home Negligence
• Pedestrian Accident
• Slip and Fall
• Truck Accident
• Train Accident
• Wrongful Death
• Workers Compensation
• Business Disputes
• Business Justice Attorneys
• Employment Counseling and Litigation
• Shareholder/Partner Issues
• Shareholder Derivative Actions
• Business Dissolutions
• Business Transactions
• Buying/Selling a Business
• Corporate Entity Formation
• Director and Officers Duties
• Executive Compensation
• Negotiating Vendor Agreements
• Regulatory and Statutory Compliance
• Age Discrimination
• Disability Discrimination
• Gender Identity Discrimination
• Race Discrimination
• Religious Discrimination
• Sex Discrimination
• Appellate Law
• Child Custody
• Child Custody College Expenses
• Child Support
• Divorce for Business Owners
• Divorce Mediation
• Domestic Violence
• Prenuptial Agreements
• Property Distribution
• Understanding The Divorce Process
• Auto Insurance/Property Damage
• All-risks Property Insurance
• Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance
• Disability Insurance
• Health Insurance
• Insurance Agent/Broker Negligence
• Life Insurance
• Long-term Care Insurance
• Marine/Boat Insurance
• Wind & Flood Property Insurance
• Commercial Purchase
• Commercial Sales
• Commercial Lease Agreement
• First-Time Home Buyer
• Lease Agreements
• Real Estate Closing
• Refinancing
• Residential Purchases
• Residential Sales
• Title Review
• Estate Planning
• Estate Planning for Business Owners
• Healthcare Directives
• Powers of Attorney
• Trust Drafting
• Will Contest
• Will Drafting
• Sean Callagy Esq
• The Callagy Law Team
• Testimonials
• Join Our Team
• Message of Empathy
• Business Law
• Commercial Litigation
• News & Events
• Medical Revenue Recovery
• Personal Injury
• Free Legal Guides
• Paramus, NJ Office
• New York, NY Office
• Phoenix, AZ Office
• East Hanover, NJ Office

Call For A Free Legal Consultation

(201) 261 - 1700

Insurance claims , medical revenue recovery, what should an assignment of benefits form include.

An assignment of benefits form (AOB) is a crucial document in the healthcare world. It is an agreement by which a patient transfers the rights or benefits under their insurance policy to a third-party – in this case, the medical professional who provides services. This way, the medical provider can file a claim and collect insurance payments. In the context of personal injury protection coverage, an AOB is a critical step in the reimbursement process.

Personal injury protection coverage , or PIP, is designed to cover medical expenses and lost wages incurred after an auto accident, regardless of who is at fault. In New Jersey, drivers are required to carry PIP. Now, let’s say there’s an accident: the driver sees a medical provider for treatment, and the provider bills the patient’s carrier. There is nothing that requires that the insurance carrier to pay the provider. 

This is why an assignment of benefits form is so important. It essentially removes the patient from the equation and puts the medical provider in their place as far as the insurance policy is concerned. This enables the provider to be paid directly. If you see PIP patients and want to be paid directly by the insurer (and avoid claim denials or complex legal situations later) you must get an AOB.

The AOB authorization creates a legal relationship between the provider and the insurance carrier. What should it include?

• Correct Business Entity

Fill out your business name correctly: it seems simple, but this can be a stumbling block to reimbursement. If your business name is Dr. Smith’s Chiropractic Care Center, you cannot substitute Dr. Smith’s, Smith’s Chiropractic, etc.  It must be Dr. Smith’s Chiropractic Care Center. If you have a FEIN number, use the name that is listed on your Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) form.

• “Irrevocable” 

It is important that you include this term to indicate that the patient cannot later revoke the assignment of benefits. This tells the court that the AOB is the only document determining standing , or the ability to bring a lawsuit on related matters.

Another key term: the court sees benefits as payments. It does not necessarily give you the right to bring a lawsuit. Include language such as, “assigns the rights and benefits, including the right to bring suit…” 

• Benefit of Not Being Billed At This Time for Services

Essentially, this means that a provider gives up the right to collect payments at the time of service in exchange for the right to bring suit against the insurance company if they are not paid in full. Likewise, the patient gives up the right to bring suit, but they do not have to pay now. The wording will look like this: “In exchange for patient assigning the rights and benefits under their PIP insurance, Dr. Smith’s Chiropractic Care Center will allow patients to receive services without collecting payments at this time.”

• Patient Signature 

Yes, it’s basic, but make sure the assignment of benefits form is signed and dated by the patient! This renders the AOB , for all intents and purposes, null and void. It is not an executed contract. You would have to start the entire process again, which means waiting longer to be reimbursed for the claim. 

• Power of Attorney Clause

Including a power of attorney clause, which supports not only “the right of collecting payment” but also the provider’s ability to take legal action on behalf of the patients, is vital. At Callagy Law, we always argue this is inherent within the no-fault statute; however, there are carriers to argue against the right to arbitration when the language is not in the AOB.

As medical providers, it is critical that you receive proper – and timely – reimbursement for services rendered. The assignment of benefits form is one of the most important pieces in this puzzle. It is essential for an attorney to prepare, or at least review, your AOB and other admission paperwork to ensure that you are able to collect pursuant to your patients’ insurance benefits in whatever ways needed. 

Callagy Law can not only review these documents, but also ensure you are pursuing all recoverable bills to which you are eligible. If you have any questions, would like us to review your AOB form, or have issues collecting payment from insurance companies, please contact the Callagy Law team today .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Wind & Flood Property Insurance
• FREE LEGAL GUIDES

• 855-717-0022
• Log In  /  Create an Account

How to spot an AOB homeowner’s insurance scam

Tue Dec 03 2019

For Florida homeowners, a roof leak or other home insurance claim might just be the start of their troubles. Some contractors may take advantage of what’s called an assignment of benefits (AOB) agreement and leave homeowners in the lurch.

Thankfully, Florida passed a bill in 2019 aimed to curb the abuse of assignment of benefits. Then the state passed two additional bills in two different special sessions in 2022. The first removed the ability to get attorney fees for AOB vendors ; the second completely prohibited AOBs .

Louisiana also passed its own bill prohibiting AOBs in 2023 . 

While these bills help protect homeowners, you still need to understand the potential pitfalls of signing over your claim benefits to another party. Let’s look at what AOB abuse is so you don’t get taken for a ride.

What is an assignment of benefits?

An assignment of benefits is an agreement that transfers your insurance claims rights to another party. When you sign an AOB form, you give someone else the authority to:

File an insurance claim.

Make decisions about repairs.

Collect insurance payments.

File a lawsuit against your insurance company regarding your claim.

Homeowners who are dealing with major damage may assign their benefits to the business making the repairs because they believe it has more experience working with an insurance company to settle a claim. They may believe the business can help them better navigate the claims process . 

But in actuality, these vendors are not licensed to assist with the claims process and there is no need for an assignment of benefits.

How can assignment of benefits be abused?

A disreputable business can easily abuse an assignment of benefits. Once you sign this agreement, you give up your rights as the policyholder. This may mean:

Your insurance company will only communicate with the vendor regarding that portion of your claim.

You lose all rights regarding that portion of your claim.

You lose the right to mediate that portion of your claim.

You may have to pay penalties if you don’t comply with the AOB.

The other party can sue your insurance company.

Dishonest contractors take advantage of this situation by padding the bill and hiring an attorney to sue the insurance company when it does not pay the bill in full or denies the claim. 

Some found the system so lucrative that they paid plumbers up to $2,500 for every homeowner who signs an AOB . Lawsuits filed by contractors who have been assigned benefits by their clients were on the rise, according to the Tampa Bay Times – AOB claims in Florida jumped from 405 in 2006 to 28,000 in 2016 .

Florida’s and Louisiana’s legislature actions on AOB lawsuits should help prevent these opportunistic practices. Florida insurance regulators have also taken steps to share information and resources about AOBs and AOB scams .

How assignment of benefits abuse hurts homeowners

Assignment of benefits abuse, like all insurance fraud, can hurt policyholders. The abundance of AOB lawsuits against insurance companies drove up home insurance premiums to offset losses – in fact, this type of litigation is one of the reasons that home insurance costs in Florida have risen considerably in recent years. The hope is that the legislation to reform AOB practices will help bring those costs down over time.

Plus, most AOB agreements allow the contractor to collect their fees from the policyholder if the insurance policy doesn’t cover the damage or the insurance provider won’t pay the full amount demanded. If the AOB vendor tries to collect from you and you can’t pay, they can place a lien on your property for the amount owed.

How homeowners can avoid assignment of benefits abuse

To avoid unscrupulous vendors, watch out for these red flags:

Someone knocks on your door and tells you there is damage you didn’t know about or offers a free inspection to see if there is any damage.

A contractor promises something for nothing or for just the cost of your deductible, such as a free roof or kitchen renovation.

Someone claims the damage is greater than it clearly is.

Repairs begin before your insurance company is notified or allowed to inspect damages.

The form looks unprofessional or has misspellings and poor grammar.

Forms have any blank spaces to be filled in later, after you’ve signed.

You can also avoid an assignment of benefit scam by doing the things you would normally do before signing a contract:

Ask questions. A reputable business owner is willing to answer any question you ask.

Read the forms. Make sure you understand what benefits you’re signing away.

Check your policy documents. AOBs may not be permissible for your policy, so be sure to check before you sign.

Know your rights. You never need an AOB to get your claim processed or the repairs started.

Contact your carrier. Before executing any AOB, repair, or mitigation agreement, check with your insurance carrier or agent to first report the damage and then get their opinion on the validity of the agreement.

It’s not a small thing to sign away the rights to your insurance benefits. Assignment of benefits are only truly needed when you go to your doctor.

Discover Something Worth Writing Home About

Get our latest stories curated just for you.

Related Posts: Keep exploring

Displaying post 1 / 3

• Received a document?

Assignment of Benefits for Contractors: Pros & Cons of Accepting an AOB

22 articles

Insurance , Restoration , Slow Payment

When a property owner files an insurance claim to cover a restoration or roofing project, the owner typically deals directly with the insurance company. They may not have the funds available to pay the contractor out of pocket, so they’re counting on that insurance check to cover the construction costs.

But insurance companies often drag their feet, and payments can take even longer than normal. Contractors often wish they could simply deal with the insurance company directly through an assignment of benefits. In some circumstances, an AOB can be an effective tool that helps contractors collect payment faster — but is it worth it?

In this article, we’ll explain what an assignment of benefits is, and how the process works. More importantly, we’ll look at the pros and cons for restoration and roofing contractors to help you decide if an AOB is worth it . 

What is an assignment of benefits? 

An assignment of benefits , or AOB, is an agreement to transfer insurance claim rights to a third party. It gives the assignee authority to file and negotiate a claim directly with the insurance company, without involvement from the property owner. 

An AOB also allows the insurer to pay the contractor directly instead of funneling funds through the customer. AOBs take the homeowner out of the claims equation.

Here’s an example: A property owner’s roof is damaged in a hurricane. The owner contacts a restoration company to repair the damage, and signs an AOB to transfer their insurance rights to the contractor. The contractor, now the assignee, negotiates the claim directly with the insurance company. The insurer will pay the claim by issuing a check for the repairs directly to the restoration contractor. 

Setting up an AOB

A property owner and contractor can set up an assignment of benefits in two steps: 

• The owner and the contractor sign an AOB agreement
• The contractor sends the AOB to the insurance company

Keep in mind that many states have their own laws about what the agreement can or should include .

For example, Florida’s assignment of benefits law contains relatively strict requirements when it comes to an assignment of benefits: 

• The AOB agreements need to be in writing. The agreement must contain a bolded disclosure notifying the customer that they are relinquishing certain rights under the homeowners policy. You can’t charge administrative fees or penalties if a homeowner decides to cancel the AOB. 
• The AOB must include an itemized, per-unit breakdown of the work you plan to do. The services can only involve how you plan to make repairs or restore the home’s damage or protect the property from any further harm. A copy must be provided to the insurance company. 
• A homeowner can rescind an AOB agreement within 14 days of signing, or within 30 days if no work has begun and no start date was listed for the work. If a start date is listed, the 30-day rule still applies if substantial progress has not been made on the job. 

Before signing an AOB agreement, make sure you understand the property owner’s insurance policy, and whether the project is likely to be covered.

Learn more: Navigating an insurance claim on a restoration project

Pros & cons for contractors

It’s smart to do a cost-benefit analysis on the practice of accepting AOBs. Listing pros and cons can help you make a logical assessment before deciding either way. 

Pro: Hiring a public adjuster

An insurance carrier’s claims adjuster will inspect property damage and arrive at a dollar figure calculated to cover the cost of repairs. Often, you might feel this adjuster may have overlooked some details that should factor into the estimate. 

If you encounter pushback from the insurer under these circumstances, a licensed, public adjuster may be warranted. These appraisers work for the homeowner, whose best interests you now represent as a result of the AOB. A public adjuster could help win the battle to complete the repairs properly. 

Pro: More control over payment

You may sink a considerable amount of time into preparing an estimate for a customer. You may even get green-lighted to order materials and get started. Once the ball starts rolling, you wouldn’t want a customer to back out on the deal. 

Klark Brown , Co-founder of The Alliance of Independent Restorers, concedes this might be one of the very situations in which an AOB construction agreement might help a contractor. “An AOB helps make sure the homeowner doesn’t take the insurance money and run,” says Brown.  

Pro: Build a better relationship with the homeowner

A homeowner suffers a substantial loss and it’s easy to understand why push and pull with an insurance company might be the last thing they want to undertake. They may desire to have another party act on their behalf. 

As an AOB recipient, the claims ball is now in your court. By taking some of the weight off a customer’s shoulders during a difficult period, it could help build good faith and further the relationship you strive to build with that client. 

Learn more : 8 Ways for Contractors to Build Trust With a Homeowner

Con: It confuses payment responsibilities

Even if you accept an AOB, the property owner still generally bears responsibility for making payment. If the insurance company is dragging their feet, a restoration contractor can still likely file a mechanics lien on the property .

A homeowner may think that by signing away their right to an insurance claim, they are also signing away their responsibility to pay for the restoration work. This typically isn’t true, and this expectation could set you up for a more contentious dispute down the line if there is a problem with the insurance claim. 

Con: Tighter margins

Insurance companies will want repairs made at the lowest cost possible. Just like you, carriers run a business and need to cut costs while boosting revenue. 

While some restoration contractors work directly with insurers and could get a steady stream of work from them, Brown emphasizes that you may be sacrificing your own margins. “Expect to accept work for less money than you’d charge independently,” he adds. 

The takeaway here suggests that any contractor accepting an AOB could subject themselves to the same bare-boned profit margins. 

Con: More administrative work

Among others, creating additional administrative busywork is another reason Brown recommends that you steer clear of accepting AOBs. You’re committing additional resources while agreeing to work for less money. 

“Administrative costs are a burden,” Brown states. Insurers may reduce and/or delay payments to help their own bottom lines. “Insurers will play the float with reserves and claims funds,” he added. So, AOBs can be detrimental to your business if you’re spending more while chasing payments. 

Con: Increase in average collection period

Every contractor should use some financial metrics to help gauge the health of the business . The average collection period for receivables measures the average time it takes you to get paid on your open accounts. 

Insurance companies aren’t known for paying claims quickly. If you do restoration work without accepting an AOB, you can often take action with the homeowner to get paid faster. When you’re depending on an insurance company to make your payment, rather than the owner, collection times will likely increase.

The literal and figurative bottom line is: If accepting assignment of benefits agreements increases the time it takes to get paid and costs you more in operational expense, these are both situations you want to avoid. 

Learn more: How to calculate your collection effectiveness 

AOBs and mechanics liens

A mechanics lien is hands down a contractor’s most effective tool to ensure they get paid for their work. Many types of restoration services are protected under lien laws in most states. But what happens to lien rights when a contractor accepts an assignment of benefits? 

An AOB generally won’t affect a contractor’s ability to file a mechanics lien on the property if they don’t receive payment. The homeowner is typically still responsible to pay for the improvements. This is especially true if the contract involves work that wasn’t covered by the insurance policy. 

However, make sure you know the laws in the state where your project is located. For example, Florida’s assignment of benefits law, perhaps the most restrictive in the country, appears to prohibit an AOB assignee from filing a lien. 

Florida AOB agreements are required to include language that waives the contractor’s rights to collect payment from the owner. The required statement takes it even further, stating that neither the contractor or any of their subs can file a mechanics lien on the owner’s property. 

On his website , Florida’s CFO says: “The third-party assignee and its subcontractors may not collect, or attempt to collect money from you, maintain any action of law against you, file a lien against your property or report you to a credit reporting agency.”

That sounds like a contractor assignee can’t file a lien if they aren’t paid . But, according to construction lawyer Alex Benarroche , it’s not so cut-and-dry.

“Florida’s AOB law has yet to be tested in court, and it’s possible that the no-lien provision would be invalid,” says Benarroche. “This is because Florida also prohibits no-lien clauses in a contract. It is not legal for a contractor to waive their right to file a lien via an agreement prior to performance.” 

Learn more about no-lien clauses and their enforceability state-by-state

Remember that every state treats AOBs differently, and conflicting laws can create additional risk. It’s important to consult with a construction lawyer in the project’s state before accepting an assignment of benefits. 

Best practices for contractors 

At the end of the day, there are advantages and disadvantages to accepting an assignment of benefits. While it’s possible in some circumstances that an AOB could help a contractor get paid faster, there are lots of other payment tools that are more effective and require less administrative costs. An AOB should never be the first option on the table . 

If you do decide to become an assignee to the property owner’s claim benefits, make sure you do your homework beforehand and adopt some best practices to effectively manage the assignment of benefits process. You’ll need to keep on top of the administrative details involved in drafting AOBs and schedule work in a timely manner to stay in compliance with the conditions of the agreement. 

Make sure you understand all the nuances of how insurance works when there’s a claim . You need to understand the owner’s policy and what it covers. Home insurance policy forms are basically standardized for easy comparisons in each state, so what you see with one company is what you get with all carriers. 

Since you’re now the point of contact for the insurance company, expect more phone calls and emails from both clients and the insurer . You’ll need to have a strategy to efficiently handle ramped-up communications since the frequency will increase. Keep homeowners and claims reps in the loop so you can build customer relationships and hopefully get paid faster by the insurer for your work.

I am doing some part-time administrative work for a friend who has an owner/operator pressure washing business located in NC in its first year of business. Recently, my friend has expressed interest in expanding his operations to FL so that he can eventually live and work between both...

I am a homeowner, 4 days prior to Ida, we had solar panels installed. Half were damaged and blown off of course, so after we allowed the solar panel co to do our roof and redo our panel system. After a year, they finally replaced our roof and...

I believe a person was impersonating as a licensed general contractor. When I verified the license in GA, the license belonged to a completely different individual. When I called the provided insurance carrier of the general contractor, the insurance company said the company did not have an active...

Thomas Tracy

View Profile

About the author

Recommended for you

Conditional vs. unconditional lien waivers: the difference & why it matters.

Unconditional vs. conditional lien waivers: which type of lien waiver should you use on your construction projects and jobs? We...

Construction Punch Lists Explained

Punch list work might seem minor, but it has an improportionate impact on payment. Without getting punch work out of...

What Is a Notice of Completion?

What is a Notice of Completion? As anyone reading this surely knows, the construction industry loves its documents! There's a...

What Does ‘Pay-When-Paid’ Mean?

In the construction business, everything comes down to the contract. And that's unfortunate because most of the people who make...

How to Protect Your Payments When Dealing with a Construction Bankruptcy

Bankruptcies in the construction industry are unfortunately very common. Learn how a mechanics lien can help make sure your company...

6 Construction Project Delivery Methods Compared

The steps required in a project’s journey to completion are importation to how successful the project will be. That’s why...

The Ultimate Guide to Lien Waivers in Construction

What are lien waivers in construction? This article is the ultimate guide for construction lien waivers including essential information and...

What are the Certified Payroll Requirements for Federal Construction Jobs?

What does Certified Payroll mean? This post covers the certified payroll requirements for contractors working on federal construction projects.

Trending News

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

• Health Law & Managed Care
• Insurance Reinsurance & Surety
• Litigation / Trial Practice
• All Federal

When a patient sees a provider, the patient signs an “assignment of benefits” contract with the provider, assigning the patient’s legal rights to recover benefits from the insurance company to the provider so that the provider can be directly reimbursed for the services rendered to the patient. When the provider is in-network, this process is executed with little fanfare. However, for an out-of network provider, the road to reimbursement is not always as smooth. Not all states expressly permit assignment-of-benefits clauses, and as a result, insurers send the reimbursement to the beneficiary rather than the provider. The beneficiary is then supposed to forward the reimbursement onto the provider, which many of them do. However, if they do not, providers are put in the uncomfortable and difficult position of suing the patient, which has an uncertain likelihood of success. Given this arduous task, some providers contend that insurance companies have begun to utilize direct payment to patients in retaliation against providers for refusing to join the insurer’s networks.

In fact, in 2015, providers of inpatient and outpatient substance abuse and/or mental health treatment to chemically-dependent individuals filed suit against a group of insurers that includes several Blue Cross entities for this exact practice. In Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., et al. v. Blue Cross of California, et. al., the providers alleged that defendants purposefully ignored valid assignments of benefits and instead directly reimbursed providers’ patients in order to punish the providers for being a few of a small number of providers who had not joined the insurers’ networks.

In their defense, the insurers stated that some of the plans contained anti-assignment provisions, prohibiting beneficiaries from entering into assignment-of-benefits contracts with providers. The original complaint sought to recover benefits, remove breaching fiduciaries and, against the Blue Cross insurers, injunctive and declaratory relief that Blue Cross’ pattern of denying providers’ assigned claims without reviewing the operative plan document or informing providers of the denial violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the federal law that regulates employee sponsored retirement and welfare benefit plans. The court granted insurers’ motion to dismiss without prejudice, specifically to allow the providers to amend their complaint to demonstrate that waiver or estoppel would apply to the anti-assignment provisions.

The providers filed a second amended complaint, which was dismissed by the court with leave to amend, and the providers filed a third amended complaint in October 2017. The third amended complaint brought two claims: a claim for plan benefits under ERISA and a state law claim under California law alleging that the Blue Cross insurers misled providers about the assignability of benefits (specifically, misrepresenting that benefits were assignable when they were not and also representing that benefits were not assignable when they were). The insurers filed a motion to dismiss on the state law claim, which the court granted on the grounds of insufficient standing because the providers did not properly allege an economic injury. Specifically, the court held that collection costs, bad debt, preventing the providers from assisting their patients in the administrative appeals process and denying providers the opportunity to make alternate payment arrangements or collect additional money from their patients up front were insufficient to allege that the insurers’ conduct resulted in economic injury to the providers. The providers’ claim for benefits under ERISA still stands. However, there is no date set for hearing at this time.

The outcome of this case will set the stage for future litigation and out-of-network payment strategies. In addition to this and other pending cases, out-of-network providers or those considering an out-of-network strategy should closely monitor proposed legislation in their states of operation regarding direct-pay-to-patient methods. Some states, such as Indiana, have proposed legislation requiring insurers to directly reimburse out-of-network providers for certain services. These types of laws, in combination with litigation, will significantly influence the risk associated with pursuing an out-of-network payment strategy.

Current Legal Analysis

More from polsinelli pc, upcoming legal education events.

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

Google AI said to put glue in pizza — so I made a pizza with glue and ate it

Katie Notopoulos , Senior Correspondent covering technology and culture

• Google's AI search results said you could put glue in pizza sauce to keep the cheese from sliding off.
• Google had obviously ingested a Reddit comment that was meant as a joke — but the AI didn't get it.
• I still went ahead and made a pizza with 1/8 of a cup of glue. What's this all mean for the future?

Google launched its AI search results last week, and people have been noticing it's been giving some wildly wrong results . It's said that, yes, a dog has played in the NHL, that running with scissors has health benefits, and that 17 US presidents attended the University of Wisconsin.

But the most ridiculous of all was someone who noticed on X that if you asked Google about "cheese not sticking to pizza," (don't you hate it when that happens?) artificial intelligence would give you a helpful answer. Adding glue to the pizza sauce:

https://t.co/W09ssjvOkJ pic.twitter.com/6ALCbz6EjK — SG-r01 (@heavenrend) May 22, 2024

I knew my assignment: I had to make the Google glue pizza. ( Don't try this at home! I risked myself for the sake of the story, but you shouldn't!)

I did use Google to make sure that "nontoxic" glue was indeed semisafe to eat. Google's AI answer said that small quantities might lead to an upset stomach but not, say, death. That's good enough for me.

(Since I know you're wondering, yes, I did eat paste as a kid. I loved it. It was minty. I stopped only because of shame from the other first graders. But now I'm an adult and can't be shamed for eating glue pizza.)

I assembled my ingredients from my local grocery store: shredded cheese, marinara sauce, a ball of pizza dough, and, of course, nontoxic school glue (which I already had at home).

OBVIOUS WARNING: DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME. DO NOT EAT GLUE. SERIOUSLY.

And to anyone who feels compelled to point out I shouldn't have used jarred sauce or preshredded cheese: Please … keep in mind I'm eating glue here.

I spread out the dough, now to mix the sauce and glue.

Google said to use 1/8 cup of glue, but not how much sauce. I eyeballed that the pizza would need about 1/2 cup of red sauce.

I had imagined the amount would be more like a "light drizzle" of glue. But 1/8 of a cup is 2 tablespoons, and it looked like quite a bit more than I'd expected.

It came out a nice orange color, like vodka sauce. As I mixed and spread, I didn't notice a significant change in the consistency of the sauce.

Now for the cheese and some fresh basil. Ready for the oven!

I baked it at 450 degrees for 12 minutes, which turned out to be a little too long — it was lightly burned.

Related stories

When I opened the oven door, I was hit with a blast of steam and fumes, and I momentarily freaked out. I remember that when "NyQuil chicken" was a viral meme , doctors warned that the real danger was lung damage from toxic fumes.

By heating up the chemicals in the glue, would I create some kind of toxic gas?

Well, let's hope not! Here we go!

Finally, the taste test:

pic.twitter.com/HkS0HftQfW — Katie Notopoulos (@katienotopoulos) May 24, 2024

My verdict: This wasn't the best homemade pizza I'd had — I couldn't necessarily tell whether the glue was the problem or that the cheap jarred sauce could've used a little more seasoning. (In the marinara's defense, it's hard to complain about taste when you add glue.)

But also … it was kind of OK? I had only a few bites because I was afraid of poisoning myself.

Most importantly: Did the glue keep the cheese from sliding off? You bet it did:

Happy to report NO movement or sliding of the cheese pic.twitter.com/DKdCa6LUap — Katie Notopoulos (@katienotopoulos) May 24, 2024

What does this all mean? For me personally, this means that I'm an idiot who eats glue. But what does it mean for Google and the future of AI-powered search?

These goofy AI answers are funny but apparently rare. A Google spokesperson told Business Insider: "The examples we've seen are generally very uncommon queries and aren't representative of most people's experiences. The vast majority of AI Overviews provide high-quality information, with links to dig deeper on the web."

But still: Google AI spits out wild answers often enough that it's reasonable to say that there's a user mistrust of AI-powered answers (for now). The pizza-glue controversy is silly — no one with three brain cells would actually do this — but we can assume that AI also gives answers that are less obviously wrong but still wrong.

It appears that the origin of the pizza glue was a joke made on Reddit 11 years ago about adding glue to sauce. That Google's AI search answers are based on Reddit should largely be a good thing: Reddit is full of useful answers for how to do things and other common quandaries. But Google's AI failed to decipher that this Reddit answer was clearly a joke.

What will this mean for the general public's trust in Google and AI? I'm not sure! This week's OpenAI-Scarlett Johansson debacle probably had a much bigger effect on worries about whether the companies behind AI are operating ethically, regardless of what actually went down.

Presumably, Google AI search results will improve, and these weird flukes of bad results will become increasingly rare. There's a very reasonable concern among a lot of people that "let Google do the Googling for you" will have a very bad effect on the web as we know it. Depriving clicks to the websites that actually provide the information that powers AI results will probably have some unfortunate long-term effects.

If you'd like to hear some more smart thoughts on this, I recommend the most recent episode of the "Search Engine" podcast on this topic. It would be great to listen to as you cook up your own homemade, nonglue pizza.

Lastly, I have to say, once again: DO NOT TRY THIS YOURSELF. DO NOT EAT GLUE PIZZA.

On February 28, Axel Springer, Business Insider's parent company, joined 31 other media groups and filed a $2.3 billion suit against Google in Dutch court, alleging losses suffered due to the company's advertising practices.

Watch: How Domino's makes 1 billion pizzas a year amid labor shortages

• Main content