the british museum essay

The British Museum

The British Museum holds in trust for the nation and the world a collection of art and antiquities from ancient and living cultures.

The British Museum was founded in 1753, the first national public museum in the world. From the beginning it granted free admission to all ‘studious and curious persons’. The Museum was based on the practical principle that the collection should be put to public use and be freely accessible. It was also grounded in the Enlightenment idea that human cultures can, despite their differences, understand one another through mutual engagement. The Museum was to be a place where this kind of humane cross-cultural investigation could happen. It still is.

Housed in one of Britain’s architectural landmarks, the collection is one of the finest in existence, spanning two million years of human history. Visitor numbers have grown from around 5,000 a year in the eighteenth century to nearly 6 million today.

• Visit britishmuseum.org/
• Are you an expert from this institution? Register to write
• Article Feed

Displaying all articles

Friday essay: Indigenous afterlives in Britain

Gaye Sculthorpe , The British Museum

We identified 39,000 Indigenous Australian objects in UK museums. Repatriation is one option, but takes time to get right

Maria Nugent , Australian National University ; Gaye Sculthorpe , The British Museum , and Howard Morphy , Australian National University

Friday essay: 5 museum objects that tell a story of colonialism and its legacy

Alistair Paterson , The University of Western Australia ; Andrea Witcomb , Deakin University ; Gaye Sculthorpe , The British Museum ; Shino Konishi , The University of Western Australia , and Tiffany Shellam , Deakin University

Tall ship tales: oral accounts illuminate past encounters and objects, but we need to get our story straight

Maria Nugent , Australian National University and Gaye Sculthorpe , The British Museum

The Palestinian Museum opened without artefacts, but it’s still a beacon of hope

James Fraser , The British Museum

Curator & Section Head, Oceania, The British Museum

Project Curator for the Ancient Levant, The British Museum

More Authors

The British Museum: The Complete Guide

 Gautier Houba / TripSavvy

The British Museum

London is home to dozens of memorable museums, from the Tate Britain to the National Portrait Gallery, but one of its most extensive collections of objects and art can be found in the British Museum. The national museum, which is free for visitors in its permanent collection, has an expansive range of cool stuff, including Egyptian mummies, the Rosetta Stone and the Sutton Hoo ship burial. It welcomes travelers of all ages (who doesn't love a mummy?) and its experience can be tailored to any attention span or interest. Be sure to include the museum in your London itinerary, even if it's just to come in to see the impressive Great Court or to catch a glimpse of some historic samurai armor. Here's everything you need to know ahead of your visit.

Museum History

Founded in 1753, the British Museum first opened its doors to the public in 1759 as the first national museum to cover all fields of human knowledge. The museum was created by an act of Parliament and was intended to invite in "all studious and curious persons," meaning that the initial visitors needed to apply for tickets. In the 1830s, the museum began to welcome in more and more visitors, and today more than six million people explore the British Museum each year. Its collection now includes around eight million objects, which cover two million years of human history, and the Reading Room, completed in 1857, has become a popular place to seek out knowledge.

The museum's much-photographed Great Court, which is known in full as Queen Elizabeth II Great Court, is the largest covered public square in Europe. The two-acre room, designed by Foster and Partners, was redesigned reopened in 2000 (when it was opened by the Queen herself). Inside, visitors can find the Lion of Knidos, among other famed antiquities.

Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images

What to See and Do

The British Museum can be overwhelming as there's a lot to see in the museum's permanent collection. Some of the highlights include the Egyptian sculpture gallery, where you'll find the Rosetta Stone and the Statue of Ramesses II, and the Africa Galleries, which include both antiquities and contemporary pieces. The entire world is represented throughout the galleries, from Oceania to Japan to Britain itself, so it's best to plan a route that suits your interests. The British Museum's museum map offers several possible trails to follow through the rooms, including one suited to kids and another that looks specifically at LGBTQIA+ history.

The museum typically hosts one or two special exhibitions alongside their collection at any given time, which you can check out in advance on their website. The special exhibitions are usually hosted for several months and most require a purchased tickets to enter. The institution's calendar also includes regular lectures, talks and special events, some of which are free to visitors.

Once you've fully explored the galleries and exhibitions, head to one of the museum's eateries. These include the Court Café, a casual spot inside the Great Court serving sandwiches, snacks and drinks, and the Great Court Restaurant, which serves morning tea and coffee, lunch and afternoon tea, as well as dinner on Fridays when the museum is open late. There is also the Pizzeria, Montague Café and the Coffee Lounge, and food trucks can frequently be found in the outdoor area of the museum along with tables.

 Oli Scarff/Getty Images

How to Visit

The British Museum is an extremely popular attraction for visitors to London and it's easily accessible in the central part of the city. Because the museum is convenient to other attractions, including the West End and Trafalgar Square, and because the permanent collection is free, a visit to the British Museum can be as long or short as you want. Whether you prefer to stop by to see the Rosetta Stone (which can be found not far from the entrance) or you want to fully explore all the exhibitions, the museum is pretty hassle-free.

Visitors are required to purchase tickets for any special exhibitions (which can be done in advance online or at the ticket office), but entry to the regular collection is free and doesn't require a ticket. The museum is open Monday through Sunday, closing during the year only from December 24-26, and last entry is at 3:30 p.m. daily. The museum also hosts late hours on Fridays , with the galleries open until 8:30 p.m. alongside events and talks.

Getting There

The British Museum is located on Great Russell Street near Russell Square and can be accessed easily from several London Underground stations. The museum is equidistant from the Russell Square, Tottenham Court Road, Goodge Street and Holborn Tube stations, which serve numerous London Underground lines. There is also a variety of London bus lines that stop close to the museum, including the 14, 168, 176, 19, 24, 38, 68, 8 and 98. Use the Transport for London Trip Planner tool to find your best route to the museum.

For those who prefer not to take public transportation (although that's the recommended way to get to the British Museum), look for London's black cabs or use the Uber app to hail a ride share car. When leaving, head to the taxi rank on Great Russell Street at the museum's main gates. There is no parking at the museum so it's best to avoid driving your own car into Central London when visiting. Bicycle racks are also available inside the gates of the Main Entrance on Great Russell Street.

You can, of course, also walk to the museum, which is a great way to see the surrounding area on a nice day. From Big Ben or Trafalgar Square, stroll north through Covent Garden (where you'll find lots of shops and restaurants) to find the British Museum (and be sure to check out Russell Square, a beautiful park, on your way out).

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

Tips For Visiting

• All visitors are required to pass through a security check, which includes a bag search, at the entrance to the British Museum. Be sure to be prepared and avoid bringing in large luggage. Wheeled suitcases and sports equipment are not allowed inside the museum. Luggage storage can be found at nearby train stations, including Euston, King's Cross and Charing Cross.
• The British Museum has an easy access route for those with accessibility issues. The route is available for disabled visitors and visitors with strollers and/or children under five, as well as museum members. Strollers are allowed, but must be kept with you during your visit. Wheelchairs can be reserved in advance for those who need them.
• Free Wi-Fi is available to all visitors. Look for the "British Museum WiFi" network on your device and enter your name and email address to access.
• Most galleries allow hand-held flash photography and video recording as long as it's for private purposes, although tripods, monopods and selfie sticks are not allowed. Watch for signs indicating when photography is prohibited (often in special exhibitions).
• Don't miss the British Museum Shop, which sells a huge array of souvenirs and gifts, from books to jewelry to small replicas of some of the museum's memorable works.
• If you plan to make several visits to the British Museum or simply want to support the institution, consider purchasing a museum membership. There are several levels of membership and all include unlimited free access to the special exhibitions and access to the Members' Room.

20 Best Things to Do in London When It Rains

19 Things to See If You Only Have a Few Hours in London

9 Top Things to Do in London for Easter

The Top 20 Things to Do in London

January in London: Weather, What to Pack, and What to See

The Complete Guide to the Museum of Modern Art in New York City

London's 10 Best Museums

10 Treasures of the British Museum

Top 10 London Attractions

Stay Cheaper By Staying Close to - Not in - London

What to Do and See During One Week in London

The Louvre Museum in Paris: A Complete Guide for Visitors

How to Enjoy a Quick Layover in London on a Budget

Les Invalides in Paris: The Complete Guide

How to Visit the Vatican Museums and Sistine Chapel in Rome

10 Little Known Roman Ruins in England, Scotland and Wales

KU ScholarWorks

• Enroll & Pay
• KU Directory
•   KU ScholarWorks
• Libraries Scholarly Works

Collecting the World: Hans Sloane and the origins of the British Museum. [Review Essay]

Collections

• Libraries Scholarly Works [533]

Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, [email protected] , 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

Empire & Decolonisation

Coloniality and the British Museums

Conversations on the decolonisation of museums are increasing in British academia and popular discourse. The recent revelation of thefts from the British museum have once again throw museums into the spotlight, but attention on individual artefacts such as the Rosetta Stone or Benin Bronzes has been intensifying for some time. British museums have started to respond to decolonisation demands, but in a climate where museums directors claim that “to decolonise is to decontextualise” , does this work produce an antirascist, educational atmosphere that addresses the coloniality of museums?

The holdings of many British museums were formed through colonialism and its legacies. Imperial networks were vital for acquiring objects from Asia and Africa through purchase, excavation, and theft. For example, a myriad of Egyptian wings in various British museums display objects acquired through European imperial interventions in Egypt since 1798, and especially after Britain’s colonisation of Egypt, which began in 1882. Other European empires, notably that of France, also yields objects to British museums, particularly through imperialists who used European colonial expansion to travel and acquire cultural artefacts in the Global South. There should be no doubt that British museums are colonially formed. The only question is how this should be dealt with now.

My research focuses on the coloniality embodied by North African objects in British museums. Part of this work involves research on specific objects held by the Victoria and Albert Museum. Coloniality proved to be deeply embedded in these objects: from Islamic ornaments taken from Egypt to illustrate British claims about the ‘backwardness’ of Islam; to luxury dishes made from minerals extracted from Algeria by the French Empire; to Amazigh (Indigenous Algerian) pottery collected by British elites who saw Europe as the custodians of African culture. I also visited five other English museums (the Ashmolean, Brighton Museum, Bristol Museum, the British Museum, and the Pitt Rivers Museum) to explore the coloniality of their displays. Despite overt attempts to decolonise, the experience of museums housing objects from the Global South was largely consistent, starkly colonial, and unexpectedly harrowing.

Many museums have responded to calls for decolonisation with plaques about imperialism, diversity, or race. Whether the British Museum’s ‘Collecting and Empire’ tour, Bristol Museum’s ‘Uncomfortable Truths’ podcast series , or the Ashmolean’s ‘Our Museum Our Voices’ plaques, these take roughly the same form across many local and national museums, explaining the colonial histories of a small number of objects. Far from systematic decolonisation, though, these betray a merely surface-level approach, like a plaster trying to cover the gaping wound of colonialism. A QR code to a podcast or a sign with a poem might be better than nothing, and some of these attempts (especially the Bristol Museum’s podcast series) reflect a genuine desire to engage with decolonisation. Still, they fall short of earnestly acknowledging the coloniality of museums holistically.

The broader issue that most museums have not grappled with is that acknowledging British colonialism and exploring museum coloniality are not the same. It is one thing to state that Britain had an empire, as the various trails do. It is quite another to explain how violent British imperialism contributed to the holdings of British museums. By failing to do the latter systematically, the sparse mentions of colonialism remain shallow and unanalytical. For example, the Victoria and Albert Museum does mention the British Empire in a display about trade in the 19th century. However, their displays on objects from the Global South do not address their imperial acquisition methods, like a display on Algerian Amazigh pottery that never mentions the French colonisation of Algeria. Repatriation discourse rarely figures into museum displays, and despite informative panels about the British Empire as a system of acquiring wealth for Britain, they rarely delve into the specific racist, extractivist , and paternalistic histories of their own objects.

To put it simply, British museums do not present their objects’ colonial histories. Instead, they opt for a celebratory tone. Multiple museums contain praise of Egyptologists like the eugenicist Flinders Petrie or Francis Llewelyn Griffith, an archaeologist praised as a local hero in the Brighton Museum without reflecting on how colonialism enabled his work. Similarly, the Ashmolean has a board celebrating archaeologist John Myres for his excavations in Cyprus without mentioning that Cyprus was colonised by Britain at the time of his work. These museums dedicate space to education about their histories, such as the British Museum’s ‘Collecting the World’ room. They demonstrate an interest in their own histories of acquisition, so the absence of information on the coloniality of acquisitions is a striking silence. By failing to mention colonisation as the context that archaeologists operated in, the celebratory tone that museums often employ obscures imperialism and the violence committed to allow archaeological interventions to occur. Far from Victoria and Albert Museum director Tristram Hunt’s claim that “to decolonise is to decontextualise”, by failing to decolonise, British museums are failing to contextualise at all.

My research has allowed me to reflect on the personal experience of museum coloniality. As a person of colour, I am well-acquainted with histories of the British Empire and its cruelties. I considered my understanding of imperialism, from my family and my current History degree at the University of Sussex, to be sufficient preparation for the coloniality of British museums. However, the museums were unexpectedly distressing, most of all because of the human remains I encountered in all museums but the Victoria and Albert and Pitt Rivers Museums. These are remains that were exported to Britain through colonial systems, predominantly from Egypt, and they continue to be displayed at scale, interspersed with artefacts, and sat in sarcophaguses without explanation or contextualisation. They rarely come with sensitivity warnings and often have no information about the person being displayed. I felt acutely unwelcome, seeing displays of remains that sent a clear, harmful message: the bodies of people of colour are objects, not to be valued or respected.

In this way, British museums perpetuate a specific and centuries-old colonial violence: the erasure of personhood. They display corpses as objects of scientific interest and morbid curiosity, denying them individuality and humanity. This, in turn, creates a feeling of personal devaluation and unbelonging: British museums do not see these deceased individuals as worthy of personhood, and if that is the case, how can they value modern communities of colour? Understanding coloniality means not only understanding historic cruelties, but also contemporary plights faced by communities of colour, both in Britain and the multitude of nations formerly colonised by European empires.

Museums reinforce this devaluation in their treatment of “grave goods” – a sterile and insensitive term for items looted from graves, many of which had religious significance to their original owners. Sarcophaguses, protective amulets, and shabtis (funerary figures), for instance, were all used to protect the spirits of ancient Egyptians in the afterlife. These looted artefacts are crammed together in cabinets, often with labels exotifying these historic faiths – the British Museum exemplifies this in its display discussing the “strange-looking” gods of ancient Egypt. Furthermore, by retaining these religious items in Britain, do curators not deny people protection in the afterlife? Though we might not share the religious beliefs of ancient Egyptians, it is ahistorical and disrespectful to disregard them entirely. Respect for religious beliefs should not have an expiry date and should not be racially predicated.

One Comment

Well written, well argued and interesting. Explanation and contextualisation including colonisation are all important in our understanding of museum exhibits and must form part of plaques, handbooks and museum websites.

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name and email address in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may opt out or contact us anytime.

Zócalo Podcasts

Why Is the British Museum Still Fighting to Keep the Parthenon’s Marble Sculptures? 

Removed from greece more than 200 years ago, they now fuel a post-brexit fight over who is civilized and who is a barbarian.

Passengers walk past copies of some of the Parthenon Sculptures displayed in the British Museum, at the Acropolis Metro station in Athens, Greece, in 2009. Courtesy of Thanassis Stavrakis/ Associated Press .

by Gabrielle Bruney | March 18, 2020

Two-and-a-half millennia ago, Athenian artist Phidias depicted the Greek myth of the Centauromachy in his sculptures for Athens’ Parthenon. Athens, the wealthy and powerful democratic nation-state, was of course analogous in the story to the civilized Lapiths; any foes the city faced resembled the barbaric Centaurs, who, as the tale goes, attempted to rape the bride at a Lapith wedding feast, launching a battle between the two peoples.

The Parthenon still stands all these centuries later, but Phidias’ work, which once adorned the building, is scattered between the Athens’ Acropolis Museum and the British Museum nearly 2,000 miles away.

It’s been more than 200 years since Thomas Bruce, Earl of Elgin, obtained a royal Ottoman mandate to excavate near the Parthenon, document the sculptures, and “take away any pieces of stone with old inscriptions, or sculptures therein.” An international debate has raged ever since: Did Britain’s Lord Elgin, who was the British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, which then ruled Greece, have the legal right to remove the sculptures? Should the British Museum, the current home of the sculptures, yield to Greek demands for their return?

Recently, a line in a potential post-Brexit trade deal being drafted by Europe demanding that Britain “return unlawfully removed cultural objects to their countries of origin” has reignited the debate. It’s an issue that, much like Brexit itself, boils down to a question of “Leave” or “Remain.” But perhaps it’s also a question of who, in modern Europe, are the civilized Lapiths, and who are the barbaric Centaurs?

To understand the turns the discussion has taken, it’s helpful to go back to the sculptures’ beginning, 2,500 years ago, when the Athens city-state was at the height of its power and influence—Euripides and Sophocles were writing their great tragedies; Socrates was still young.

After a Persian invasion destroyed an older temple, Athens celebrated Greece’s victory by building the Parthenon in its place. Its name means “the virgin’s abode,” and the temple was dedicated to Athena, the virgin goddess of war and wisdom. Though a temple, it was not strictly a religious site and was used as a treasury.

The building featured hundreds of sculptures by Phidias, one of the greatest artists of Ancient Greece, whose figures tell stories of gods, celebrations, and battles. Phidias installed finely carved sculptures on multiple levels of the building: the most fully modeled were on its pediment, while the 92 highly sculpted friezes known as the metopes, sat right below the roof. Finally, the frieze, in low relief, lined the walls just above the temple’s inner columns.

Like the Centauromachy, some of the stories carved into the marble are allegorical. It’s perhaps not a coincidence that the frieze contained exactly 192 horsemen, which was the number of Athenian warriors who died at the Battle of Marathon during the first Persian invasion of Greece.

Greek Foreign Minister George Papandreau, accompanied by his wife Anda and daughter Margarita visit the British Museum in London in 2000. Courtesy of Alastair Grant/ Associated Press .

The beauty and detail of the sculptures are truly awe-inspiring—every fold of every peplos, the draping, sleeveless tunic favored by women of ancient Greece, is included; not even fingernails are neglected on a frieze that was mounted 30 feet above eye level. At the center of the temple stood a giant gold-plated statue of Athena herself, known as the Athena Parthenos. At some point, that sculpture disappeared from the temple and the historical record, its whereabouts unknown.

Over the millennia, the Parthenon has changed with times, states, and faiths. Around 450 A.D., it was rededicated to a different virgin saint, Mary of Nazareth, and next became a mosque after the Ottomans took Athens in the 15th century. When a Venetian shell hit the temple in 1687, during a war between the Turks and Venice, it became the temple we know now—a ruin.

That was how Elgin viewed it at the dawn of the 19th century, when, armed with his mandate from the royal Ottoman empire, he chiseled off and conveyed to England the sculptures, metopes, and friezes from the temple that would become known as the Parthenon Marbles.

It has since been the subject of fierce debate whether or not the hazy perimeters of the stunningly inexact document Elgin obtained allowed him to simply sift through the debris surrounding the Parthenon and collect any treasures that had already fallen from the building, or remove the works from the structure.

By contemporary standards, what happened at the Parthenon was deeply unethical. No major institution like the British Museum would today acquire artifacts from an occupied land under the permission of the invading force. But those who would return the sculptures see the question of lawfulness simply: “They were ‘stolen’ in that an alien Ottoman regime was in power at the time,” says Dame Janet Suzman, celebrated Shakespearean actress and chairperson of the British Committee for the Reunification of the Parthenon Marbles.

And this isn’t merely a modern interpretation of Elgin’s actions: Even in 1801 contemporary witnesses to the despoiling of the Acropolis were framing the situation as a tragedy. “Athena wept over her lost virginity,” one traveler wrote at the time.

In 1816, the British Museum bought the Marbles from Elgin. The Elgin Marbles, as they became known, became an instant phenomenon when they went on view the following year. Keats was observed gazing at them in an uninterruptible rapture, and wrote his famous sonnet “On Seeing the Elgin Marbles” in response. The French Romantic Alphonse de Lamartine declared the Marbles “the most perfect poem ever written in stone on the surface of the earth.”

But they were also instantly controversial when they went on view—even in early 19th-century England, it was considered shocking for an ancient monument to be stripped of its adornments. Byron, Greece’s most famous foreign champion, was appalled, and dedicated five stanzas of “Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage” to his outrage.

When Greece won its independence in 1832, the campaign for the Marbles’ return began in earnest.

The British Museum, would, in turn, begin to justify its possession of the marbles by positioning itself as preservers of the sculptures, which the Ottomans had taken to grinding up for limestone. More recently, the institution has gone on to argue that it sheltered and preserved the marbles from environmental damage as the Parthenon was subject to acid rain and other environmental pollutants.

But those who advocate for repatriation point to the shoddy record of British care for the marbles, starting with the two years some of the works spent at the bottom of the ocean when one of Elgin’s ships sank, and continuing through a 1930s effort to scrub them whiter-than-white with steel wool and household bleach. In 2014, Britain undermined its longstanding argument that the Marbles were too fragile to be moved by loaning them to a museum in St. Petersburg.

The controversy will not go away, especially at the British Museum’s Duveen Gallery, which attempts to help visitors envision the works as they were intended to be displayed. Here, it’s impossible to escape the fact that this is not the way these works were supposed to be displayed. The sculptures of the east pediment are arranged at one end of the rectangular gallery; the sculptures of the west at the other, while friezes and metopes line the walls in between at eye level. This attempt to emulate what was lost in stripping the stones from the Parthenon only underscores one of the most convincing arguments cited by those who would repatriate the Marbles to Athens: this art is intensely site-specific.

“This case is unique because the Parthenon itself is standing there,” says political sociologist and University of Virginia researcher Fiona Rose-Greenland. “So you have the idea that these things are actually ornaments for a structure that exists. It’s not like they were statues pulled out of the ash heap of some building that’s no longer there.”

The Duveen Gallery does contribute one major benefit to viewers—they’re no longer dozens of feet from the ground, as they were when they decorated the Parthenon. But Phidias explicitly carved the sculptures with this distance in mind; figures in the frieze were sculpted to account for the distorting perspective of eyes 35 feet below.

Though no one will ever again stand at the Parthenon and gaze up at the sculptures above, it would be possible for visitors to see the art closer to its birthplace. Partially in response to the British Museum’s long-held contention that Greece lacked a suitable home for the Marbles, the country in 2003 opened the Acropolis Museum, where the Parthenon sculptures owned by Greece are now displayed. The Parthenon itself is visible from the galleries of the Acropolis Museum, “an eye flicker [away] from the picture window in the dedicated Parthenon Gallery,” according to Suzman.

Visitors at Athens’ Acropolis Museum look at the vista to the ancient Temple of Parthenon. Courtesy of Petros Giannakouris/ Associated Press .

Though a British government spokesperson recently said that returning the marbles is “ not up for discussion as part ” of the Brexit trade deal, there are precedents for similar returns of ancient art. In 2006, New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art agreed to repatriate to Italy the Euphronios Krater, a terra cotta bowl that predates the Parthenon by approximately 100 years. The Krater may be the finest surviving example of ancient Greek pottery, and in 1972 the Met purchased it for more than one million dollars, a staggering amount at the time. But the bowl had been looted from an Italian tomb, and eventually the museum agreed to return it to Italy, in exchange for three lesser early vases.

Opponents of repatriation in the op-ed pages of the British press trot out the rather hoary argument that the return of the Marbles could lead to the gradual emptying of the world’s encyclopedic museums. The Rosetta Stone would follow the marbles out the doors of the British Museum shortly thereafter, then Berlin’s Neues Museum would be forced to ship its bust of Nefertiti back to Egypt. In fact, Egyptian wings the world over would be empty husks.

It is in global institutions like the British Museum, these advocates argue, that art achieves its true cosmopolitan promise. If art is for all peoples and all ages, then it’s most appropriate that it be showcased in museums featuring art made by all peoples during all ages, rather than segregated in far-flung state museums that serve narratives of glorious nationalistic pasts. Shortly after the Euphronios Krater was returned to Italy, a reporter for the New York Times noted that the bowl didn’t seem to attract many visitors in its new-old home. Is the Krater better served at the relatively little-known Cerveteri Museum where it now resides than it was at the Met, with its more than 6 million annual visitors?

But, “if really what we’re talking about is equal share for all, and a universal culture, then why isn’t there an old Dutch masters museum in Namibia?” asks Rose-Greenland, “Why isn’t the Art Institute of Chicago handing over its exquisite collection of French 19th-century watercolors to a Peruvian museum for a long-term loan?”

“Ownership necessarily betrays historical balances of power,” says James Cuno, art curator, historian, and president and CEO of the Getty Trust. But he argues that the fact that Western developed nations possess a disproportionate share of the world’s encyclopedic museums doesn’t mean that the idea of such museums is invalid. The cure isn’t fewer encyclopedic museums, but more of them, in more countries.

More problematic is another question raised by some supporters of global museums—that contemporary communities lack serious claims on objects built for and by people who lived centuries ago on the same patch of earth. The logic of this objection is that either art knows no age or national boundary, or it so grounded in its context that every other culture and era is equally without claim to it.

In his book Cosmpolitanism , Kwame Anthony Appiah argues that parsing thousands of years of human creation into categories of “yours” and “mine” isn’t easy, particularly since it can hardly be argued that the ancients were creating art with any of us in mind. He points out that the Euphronios Krater, found in and returned to Italy, was actually a Greek bowl. “Patrimony, here,” he writes, “equals imperialism plus time.”

In the case of the Parthenon Marbles, however, the suggestion that contemporary Greek people are not the legitimate heirs of Ancient Greece has a very ugly history. Elgin himself remarked that “The Greeks of today do not deserve such wonderful works of antiquity,” and “[Modern Greeks] have nothing whatsoever in common with [Ancient Greeks]. He made this claim based on the idea, popularized by the 19th-century Austrian travel writer and theorist Jakob Philipp Fallmerayer, that modern Greeks are descended from Slavs. “The race of the Hellenes has been wiped out in Europe,” he wrote in 1830. “Physical beauty, intellectual brilliance, innate harmony and simplicity, art, competition, city, village, the splendour of column and temple … [have] disappeared from the surface of the Greek continent.”

Though controversial from its inception and now debunked, Fallmerayer’s implicitly racist theory has appeared as recently as 2015 in the conservative German newspaper Die Welt , in an article in which the author argued that Greece was the perpetual demolisher of Eurozone order, from the early 19th century through austerity. He writes that Greeks are not “descendants of a Pericles or Socrates” but “a mixture of Slavs, Byzantines, and Albanians”—less worthy of a place in the European order, pretenders to admission to the EU. As if foretold in Phideas’s sculptures of the Centauromachy, the discussion has been reduced to an explicitly racist rumination on who inherits the title of civilization from the Ancient Greeks, and who is cast out as a barbarian.

The works of Phidias were completed in 432 B.C., but it might be argued that the Parthenon Marbles were created in 1687 when that shell turned the Parthenon into a husk and many of its adornments to dust. These were the sculptures that Elgin began excavating in 1801— and no one can argue that the 19th-century Greeks who watched the Parthenon defiled are unrelated to the Greeks today who clamor for their return.

The Parthenon Marbles as they are now are not the same art as the works Phidias painted and sculpted. Recreations of the works are almost jarring—their bright colors seem garish to contemporary eyes—accustomed as we are to the cool white scrubbed marble that western curators claimed showed the elegant simplicity of Ancient Greece. And of course, in the place of missing faces and limbs we project our own imaginings of the ancients, projections that have become part of the works themselves. As Margaretha Rossholm Lagerlof writes in The Sculptures of the Parthenon , “The ancient artifact naturally possesses a certain sublimity from the sheer passing of time, but also because it represents an unfilled and unfillable void.”

Send A Letter To the Editors

Please tell us your thoughts. Include your name and daytime phone number, and a link to the article you’re responding to. We may edit your letter for length and clarity and publish it on our site.

(Optional) Attach an image to your letter. Jpeg, PNG or GIF accepted, 1MB maximum.

By continuing to use our website, you agree to our privacy and cookie policy . Zócalo wants to hear from you. Please take our survey !-->

Get More Zócalo

No paywall. No ads. No partisan hacks. Ideas journalism with a head and a heart.

• Environment
• Road to Net Zero
• Art & Design
• Film & TV
• Music & On-stage
• Pop Culture
• Fashion & Beauty
• Home & Garden
• Things to do
• Combat Sports
• Horse Racing
• Beyond the Headlines
• Trending Middle East
• Business Extra
• Culture Bites
• Year of Elections
• Pocketful of Dirhams
• Books of My Life
• Iraq: 20 Years On

The repatriation debate: should museums return colonial artefacts?

The british museum is willing to loan out the objects it once pillaged (or bought), but is that enough.

Workmen deliver a portion of the Parthenon frieze, the socalled Elgin Marbles, to the British Museum in 1961. Greece has demanded the sculptures be returned to Athens. Getty

Imagine the British Museum in London without Egypt's Rosetta Stone. The city's Victoria and Albert Museum without Ethiopia's Maqdala treasures. Or the British capital's Natural History Museum without the scientific wonders that are Gibraltar's Neanderthal skulls.

After a summer of repatriation requests, the debate over the right of British museums to retain contested artefacts – objects that were often "removed" by Brit ish citizens from territories once ruled by the UK during its centuries as a colonial power – has gathered pace. In August, a Jamaican government minister requested that the British Museum hand back objects taken from the island when it was a UK colony. Only a month earlier, renowned Egyptian writer Ahdaf Soueif resigned her position as a member of the museum's Board of Trustees, citing its "immovability on issues of critical concern", including repatriation. 

But speaking to The National , Soueif acknowledge s that "on the issue of restitution there is no one-size-fits-all solution".

"It has to be a case-by-case deliberation, and the solutions [must] stretch across the whole spectrum," sa ys Soueif, 69, who had served as a trustee since 2012 .

She says the spectrum ranged "from the object remaining where it is in the 'colonial' museum, but is provided with an appropriate context, to the object returning to the location where it was made – with lots of varied possibilities in between".  

A history of disputes 

Last month, a historic dispute between London and Athens over the so-called Elgin Marbles reared its head once more. Gree k Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis made a request to take the marbles from Britain on loan, with a view to putting them on show in 2021 to commemorate the Greek War of Independence, which began in 1821.

On display at the British Museum, this collection of classical Greek marble sculptures assumed their name after they were acquired by Britain's Lord Elgin from Greece in the early 1800s. But, according to media reports, the museum's precondition for any loan would be to acknowledge British ownership of the sculptures, which are about 2,500 years old and known in Greece as the Parthenon Marbles. But former Greek prime minister Alexis Tsipras was critical of the notion, writing on Facebook that, far from asking to simply borrow them, Mitsotakis "should ask for the permanent return of the Parthenon Marbles".

As a result of its controversial colonial past, Britain has been the target of frequent and varied attempts to return objects seized from regions including the Middle East and Africa in eras gone by.

Take the Rosetta Stone, for instance. This ancient slab of granodiorite was discovered by French troops in 1799 after Napoleon Bonaparte's invasion of Egypt a year earlier. But after France's defeat by Britain in 1801, the stone fell into British hands. For more than 200 years, the artefact – inscribed in 196 BC and used to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphs – has been exhibited at the British Museum. 

But last year, Tarek Tawfik, director of Cairo's Grand Egyptian Museum, asked for it back.

"It would be great to have the Rosetta Stone back in Egypt but this is something that will still need a lot of discussion and co-operation," Tawfik told London newspaper the Evening Standard last year.

How the UK is behind when it comes to repatriation

Today, restitution efforts have become more pronounced as painful attempts by the UK to extricate itself from the European Union continue to stir debate over the country's place in the world and its colonial legacy.

British-Nigerian historian, broadcaster and filmmaker, David Olusoga, sa ys Britain ha s often lacked the sense of empathy necessary to understand why its former colonial territories long to see removed objects repatriated. "That is, to imagine what it is like to live in a country in which your national treasures – things that are of historical, cultural and sometimes religious and spiritual significance – are in the museums of other countries," says Olusoga, who personally advocates restitution. "Often as a result of unfair purchases or historic acts of violence, invasion and colonisation."

Olusoga, who is also a professor of public history at England's University of Manchester, sa ys Britain is "behind the curve" as far as repatriation is concerned. While museums across western Europe are filled with treasures lifted during the age of empire and colonisation, some nations have taken steps to right perceived wrongs of the past that took place under British rule. 

In May, the German Historical Museum in Berlin announced that it was returning a 15th-century artefact known as the Stone Cross to Namibia. And late last year, a report commissioned by French President Emmanuel Macron called for museums in France to return artworks removed from African nations during the country's own colonial period.

Why it may not be such a great idea

But not everybody thinks restitution is such a good idea, relevant or even helpful. Tiffany Jenkins , author of Keeping Their Marbles: How the Treasures of the Past Ended up in Museums, and Why They Should Stay There , has challenge d the idea that removed objects should be repatriated. She says that asking for artefacts to be returned to "repair the sins of colonisation" is an unwarranted "politicisation of culture".

She also contends that the clamour for restitution, not least from British critics of UK museums, has arisen from “an insecurity and crisis in the idea of what a museum is for”.

"In recent times, museums have been seen as simply reflecting the elite and offering nothing to anybody else," she explain s. "And the positive things that museums can do – that is showing different cultures and times and places to different people – have been abandoned, or people are not as confident about [their role]."

But a representative for the British Museum t ells The National that "internationally, the museum works extensively in partnership with museums across the globe to consider, understand and reflect … complicated shared histories".  

"We lend many thousands of objects all over the world . For example, with regard to our work in Africa, we have committed to lending objects from the collection on a rotating basis to the planned new Royal Museum Benin in Benin City, within a three-year timeframe."

Soueif has no intention of returning to her British Museum role , saying that "the changes I think are necessary need a younger person who has a lot more time" . But she maintains that the debate about restitution should continue.

"There's a global conversation that has started and needs to be encouraged," she sa ys. "It's about the relationship of the south and the north, about cultural 'property' and what constitutes it, and about who gets to determine how objects with cultural or heritage significance are used . It's a conversation that needs to be entered into with an open mind and with a will to explore the past and the future. "

British Museum on the hunt for 'visionary' design team to help transform space

The institution launches competition to find an architectural firm that can transform its bloomsbury site.

Shortlisted teams will each receive an honorarium of £50,000 (plus VAT) for their proposals, moving them to the next stage of the competition

Photo: Paul Hudson via Wikimedia Commons

The British Museum has launched a competition to find an architectural practice which can transform around 7,500 square metres of gallery space—approximately a third of the museum’s galleries at its Bloomsbury site—as part of its ambitious masterplan.

A vast swathe of the British Museum’s display space—encompassing the “Western Range” which currently houses collections such as Ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome—and significant back-of-house areas are set to be redesigned under the revamp.

On receipt of a compliant bid, shortlisted teams will each receive an honorarium of £50,000 (plus VAT) for their proposals. A public display of the proposals by the shortlisted architects will launch this winter; the winner is expected to be announced February next year.

“The winning team will need to put forward a proposal which is both a contemporary vision for how to present the collection for a modern day visitor experience, but remains sympathetic to the original Smirke building [the museum was designed by Sir Robert Smirke in 1823],” a museum statement says. The winning practice will also need to consider how the museum can remain open to visitors for the period of building works.

“This is not a competition to judge a finished design for the Western Range. It is a competition to find a visionary team with which the museum can work, to conceive and deliver an exceptional design solution that is full of creative endeavour, while also being functional, realisable and operational,” the museum adds.

Next month, in the first phase of the masterplan, the museum will launch a new £64m storage and research facility in Berkshire, UK, which will store around 1.3 million objects (BM_ARC, British Museum Archaeological Research Collection). The new centre, designed by the UK practice John McAslan + Partners and run in partnership with the University of Reading, will be accessible to academics and members of the public later this year.

Other parts of the masterplan include a new museum Energy Centre, which will phase out the use of fossil fuels, replacing them with low-carbon technologies. This should save 1,700 tonnes a year of carbon dioxide, making the institution more sustainable (the project will be partly funded with government support).

The cost of the full masterplan project is likely to end up costing hundreds of millions of pounds, possibly more than a billion. In a controversial move, the oil and gas company BP is to give £50m to the museum over the next decade to help fund the redevelopment.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

What a Scandal at the British Museum Reveals

By Jason Felch

Mr. Felch is a co-author of “Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World’s Richest Museum.”

The news that roughly 2,000 objects, dating from antiquity to the 19th century, have disappeared over a decade from the vast storerooms of the British Museum — a fact the museum acknowledged a few weeks ago — should be enough to endanger the job security of any museum’s director. Add in the news that the thief is suspected to have been a curator of Greek antiquities at the museum, and that the precious objects were being peddled in the digital marketplace, and you can understand why the museum’s director recently resigned.

These revelations have shaken the staid museum world and raised important questions about security, record keeping and funding priorities. But the root problem goes deeper, to the origins of our national museums. And the fix will take more than new security protocols.

The British Museum must use this scandal as an opportunity to update the dusty notion of the so-called universal museum — rethinking how these institutions can exist in a 21st-century world where the sharing and blending of cultures has never been more crucial. Rather than resisting calls to repatriate contested objects in their collections, museums should be transparent about their holdings and how they were acquired. They should embark on a campaign of generous, long-term loans that allows objects to circulate freely across borders. And they should embrace digital tools to open their storage facilities to public scrutiny.

This is an opportunity to radically reimagine the mission and purpose of the universal museum — places like the Metropolitan Museum, the Louvre, the Prado and the British Museum — and what they owe to the world.

The dream of a “universal” or “encyclopedic” museum was born centuries ago as a product of the Enlightenment. During the 1700s, in a burst of noblesse oblige, many art collections were moved from private drawing rooms into public spaces, where they theoretically could be appreciated by all. The grand institutions that were built over the next century to house them were established on the notion that access to the world’s art and artifacts would foster an enlightened, democratic culture — and, implicitly or explicitly, on the idea that only institutions in the West could properly preserve, protect and study the world’s great wonders.

The Enlightenment led into the age of empire, and these new museums were quickly filled with plunder. Thomas Bruce (a.k.a. Lord Elgin) whisked sculptures from the Parthenon away to London. “The Winged Victory of Samothrace” landed in the Louvre. The “Benin Bronzes” were dispersed around the globe, including to the Met. Egypt’s Nefertiti bust was shipped off to Berlin.

At the time, many considered this kind of acquisition to be benign, even necessary, arguing that the museums would be suitable curators and custodians of the objects. That view is still invoked as the rationale to keep vast collections of antiquities in museum storerooms now. In 2002, more than a dozen leading museums, including the Louvre and the Met, signed on to a “Declaration on the Importance and Value of Universal Museums,” partly as a retort to Greece’s nagging claims for a return of the Parthenon marbles in London and to the growing criticism that these museums embodied a colonial view of culture that needed correcting.

“Over time, objects so acquired — whether by purchase, gift or partage — have become part of the museums that have cared for them, and by extension part of the heritage of the nations which house them,” the statement read. “To narrow the focus of museums whose collections are diverse and multifaceted would therefore be a disservice to all visitors.”

But the theft of objects from the bowels of the British Museum put the lie to that threadbare view: If these institutions fail at the fundamental task of physically protecting the treasures they are supposedly preserving, how can they justify keeping things they themselves have taken from other societies?

Indeed, the British Museum thefts might have gone unnoticed if not for an antiquities dealer who was browsing eBay and recognized an ancient Roman cameo as one from the museum’s collection. The dealer notified the museum in 2021 that, after tracking and buying many such objects, he had identified the anonymous seller via a PayPal account. The evidence presented by the dealer was doubly disturbing: Not only were the thefts an inside job, but they were allegedly carried out by a curator (who is now facing a police investigation) whose duty was to protect these objects.

As an investigative reporter, I spent years uncovering how the J. Paul Getty Museum, along with peer institutions in Boston, New York and elsewhere, had built world-class collections of Classical antiquities in the 1980s and ’90s by doing business with a thriving black market. After the Getty’s curator was criminally charged by the Italian government (a case that was later dropped when a three-judge panel ruled that the statute of limitations had expired), the mounting evidence compelled several museums to return over 100 looted antiquities to Italy, Greece, Turkey and beyond.

Several antiquities dealers have likewise been heavily involved in the theft and sale of antiquities from across Asia, selling them to collectors and museums, including some in the United States. Some of the dealers have since faced criminal charges, and federal agents at Homeland Security Investigations, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency usually charged with investigating antiquities trafficking, have worked with federal and state prosecutors to seize and repatriate tens of thousands of looted objects.

European museums are facing a similar reckoning about their colonial acquisitions. A report commissioned by France’s president recommended the restitution of major artifacts and any illegally obtained works to African countries on the basis of bilateral agreements. Last year, Germany announced it would return more than 1,000 bronzes from the historical Kingdom of Benin.

As the very first of the universal museums, the British Museum built its collection over several hundred years of colonial boondoggles and the result is a treasure house of epic proportions: The collection contains some eight million objects (nobody knows for sure), of which only about 4.5 million have been fully documented online. A mere 1 percent are on display. But the museum is largely prohibited by law from disposing of its holdings, and it has often justified its position by invoking its ability to safeguard the world’s treasures.

That position no longer makes sense. The universal museum, a relic of the Enlightenment, was never truly universal: Virtually all universal museums reside in Western cities, far beyond the reach of many of the communities from which their objects were taken. And there is nothing enlightened about hoarding the world’s culture in storage, unseen by many and often, apparently, unsafe.

Jason Felch is a former investigative reporter for The Los Angeles Times and a co-author of “Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World’s Richest Museum.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram .

Visiting Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion? You must join the virtual exhibition queue when you arrive. If capacity has been reached for the day, the queue will close early.

Edward Burne-Jones: Victorian Artist-Dreamer

"In the palace of art there are many chambers, and that of which Mr. Burne-Jones holds the key is a wondrous museum. His imagination, his fertility of invention, his exquisiteness of work, his remarkable gifts as a colourist—all these things constitute a brilliant distinction." With these words the American critic and novelist Henry James, in 1877, sang the praises of Edward Burne-Jones (1833–1898), the British painter and designer whose work was creating a sensation at the recently opened Grosvenor Gallery in London.

A pupil of Dante Gabriel Rossetti and a protégé of John Ruskin, Burne-Jones belonged to the second generation of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, creating a narrative style of romantic symbolism steeped in medieval legend and fused with the influence of Italian Renaissance masters that was to have widespread influence on both British and European art. Within the sophisticated culture of the late Victorian period Burne-Jones's star rose rapidly, and by the 1880s he had become the establishment artist par excellence, one of the most admired and sought-after painters in Europe. By the 1890s, however, Burne-Jones was ceding popularity to the growing taste for abstraction, and until recently he was all but ignored. Today, one hundred years after his death, in what John Christian, the leading authority on the artist, in this volume terms a "critical somersault," Burne-Jones is once again considered the greatest British painter of the nineteenth century—after only Turner and perhaps Constable.

Edward Burne-Jones, Victorian Artist-Dreamer is the catalogue for the first exhibition in the United States devoted to this painter. The works in the exhibition, organized under the auspices of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, the Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery, England, and the Réunion des musées nationaux, Musée d'Orsay, Paris, were selected by Stephen Wildman, Curator of the Ruskin Library at Lancaster University, England.

A prodigiously productive artist, Burne-Jones, in addition to being a successful and innovative painter, was also an important force in the Arts and Crafts movement, working closely with his lifelong friend William Morris in the production of such decorative arts as ceramic tiles, stained glass, large-scale tapestries, and illustrated books to be printed at Morris's renowned Kelmscott Press. Examples of works in all these media are presented in the exhibition, with full-color and black-and-white reproductions of each of the 173 works included in the catalogue. Arranged chronologically, the volume is divided into eight sections, each introduced by a vibrant and broadly informative text by John Christian, followed by catalogue entries written by Mr. Wildman and Mr. Christian. An essay by the British scholar Alan Crawford explores Burne-Jones's contribution as a decorative artist, and an essay by Laurence des Cars, Curator at the Musée d'Orsay, Paris, deals with the artist's reputation and influence in France and Belgium.

Met Art in Publication

You May Also Like

A Private Passion: Nineteenth-Century Paintings and Drawings from the Grenville L. Winthrop Collection, Harvard University

British Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1575–1875

Gifts of Art: The Met's 150th Anniversary

Hudson River School Visions: The Landscapes of Sanford R. Gifford

Related Content

• Essay Design Reform
• Essay The Salon and the Royal Academy in the Nineteenth Century
• Essay The Pre-Raphaelites
• Essay Symbolism

Wildman, Stephen, Edward Coley Burne-Jones, John Christian, Alan Crawford, and Laurence Des Cars. 1998. Edward Burne-Jones, Victorian Artist-Dreamer . New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art : Distributed by Harry N. Abrams.

THE 10 CLOSEST Hotels to Viki Cinema

Hotels near viki cinema, property types, distance from, traveller rating, hotel class.

• Best Value Properties ranked using exclusive Tripadvisor data, including traveller ratings, confirmed availability from our partners, prices, booking popularity and location, as well as personal user preferences and recently viewed hotels.
• Traveller Ranked Highest rated hotels on Tripadvisor, based on traveller reviews.
• Distance from Viki Cinema See properties located closest to the place of interest first with confirmed availability for your dates from our partners.

40 Facts About Elektrostal

Written by Lanette Mayes

Modified & Updated: 10 May 2024

Reviewed by Jessica Corbett

Elektrostal is a vibrant city located in the Moscow Oblast region of Russia. With a rich history, stunning architecture, and a thriving community, Elektrostal is a city that has much to offer. Whether you are a history buff, nature enthusiast, or simply curious about different cultures, Elektrostal is sure to captivate you.

This article will provide you with 40 fascinating facts about Elektrostal, giving you a better understanding of why this city is worth exploring. From its origins as an industrial hub to its modern-day charm, we will delve into the various aspects that make Elektrostal a unique and must-visit destination.

So, join us as we uncover the hidden treasures of Elektrostal and discover what makes this city a true gem in the heart of Russia.

Key Takeaways:

• Elektrostal, known as the “Motor City of Russia,” is a vibrant and growing city with a rich industrial history, offering diverse cultural experiences and a strong commitment to environmental sustainability.
• With its convenient location near Moscow, Elektrostal provides a picturesque landscape, vibrant nightlife, and a range of recreational activities, making it an ideal destination for residents and visitors alike.

Known as the “Motor City of Russia.”

Elektrostal, a city located in the Moscow Oblast region of Russia, earned the nickname “Motor City” due to its significant involvement in the automotive industry.

Home to the Elektrostal Metallurgical Plant.

Elektrostal is renowned for its metallurgical plant, which has been producing high-quality steel and alloys since its establishment in 1916.

Boasts a rich industrial heritage.

Elektrostal has a long history of industrial development, contributing to the growth and progress of the region.

Founded in 1916.

The city of Elektrostal was founded in 1916 as a result of the construction of the Elektrostal Metallurgical Plant.

Located approximately 50 kilometers east of Moscow.

Elektrostal is situated in close proximity to the Russian capital, making it easily accessible for both residents and visitors.

Known for its vibrant cultural scene.

Elektrostal is home to several cultural institutions, including museums, theaters, and art galleries that showcase the city’s rich artistic heritage.

A popular destination for nature lovers.

Surrounded by picturesque landscapes and forests, Elektrostal offers ample opportunities for outdoor activities such as hiking, camping, and birdwatching.

Hosts the annual Elektrostal City Day celebrations.

Every year, Elektrostal organizes festive events and activities to celebrate its founding, bringing together residents and visitors in a spirit of unity and joy.

Has a population of approximately 160,000 people.

Elektrostal is home to a diverse and vibrant community of around 160,000 residents, contributing to its dynamic atmosphere.

Boasts excellent education facilities.

The city is known for its well-established educational institutions, providing quality education to students of all ages.

A center for scientific research and innovation.

Elektrostal serves as an important hub for scientific research, particularly in the fields of metallurgy, materials science, and engineering.

Surrounded by picturesque lakes.

The city is blessed with numerous beautiful lakes, offering scenic views and recreational opportunities for locals and visitors alike.

Well-connected transportation system.

Elektrostal benefits from an efficient transportation network, including highways, railways, and public transportation options, ensuring convenient travel within and beyond the city.

Famous for its traditional Russian cuisine.

Food enthusiasts can indulge in authentic Russian dishes at numerous restaurants and cafes scattered throughout Elektrostal.

Home to notable architectural landmarks.

Elektrostal boasts impressive architecture, including the Church of the Transfiguration of the Lord and the Elektrostal Palace of Culture.

Offers a wide range of recreational facilities.

Residents and visitors can enjoy various recreational activities, such as sports complexes, swimming pools, and fitness centers, enhancing the overall quality of life.

Provides a high standard of healthcare.

Elektrostal is equipped with modern medical facilities, ensuring residents have access to quality healthcare services.

Home to the Elektrostal History Museum.

The Elektrostal History Museum showcases the city’s fascinating past through exhibitions and displays.

A hub for sports enthusiasts.

Elektrostal is passionate about sports, with numerous stadiums, arenas, and sports clubs offering opportunities for athletes and spectators.

Celebrates diverse cultural festivals.

Throughout the year, Elektrostal hosts a variety of cultural festivals, celebrating different ethnicities, traditions, and art forms.

Electric power played a significant role in its early development.

Elektrostal owes its name and initial growth to the establishment of electric power stations and the utilization of electricity in the industrial sector.

Boasts a thriving economy.

The city’s strong industrial base, coupled with its strategic location near Moscow, has contributed to Elektrostal’s prosperous economic status.

Houses the Elektrostal Drama Theater.

The Elektrostal Drama Theater is a cultural centerpiece, attracting theater enthusiasts from far and wide.

Popular destination for winter sports.

Elektrostal’s proximity to ski resorts and winter sport facilities makes it a favorite destination for skiing, snowboarding, and other winter activities.

Promotes environmental sustainability.

Elektrostal prioritizes environmental protection and sustainability, implementing initiatives to reduce pollution and preserve natural resources.

Home to renowned educational institutions.

Elektrostal is known for its prestigious schools and universities, offering a wide range of academic programs to students.

Committed to cultural preservation.

The city values its cultural heritage and takes active steps to preserve and promote traditional customs, crafts, and arts.

Hosts an annual International Film Festival.

The Elektrostal International Film Festival attracts filmmakers and cinema enthusiasts from around the world, showcasing a diverse range of films.

Encourages entrepreneurship and innovation.

Elektrostal supports aspiring entrepreneurs and fosters a culture of innovation, providing opportunities for startups and business development.

Offers a range of housing options.

Elektrostal provides diverse housing options, including apartments, houses, and residential complexes, catering to different lifestyles and budgets.

Home to notable sports teams.

Elektrostal is proud of its sports legacy, with several successful sports teams competing at regional and national levels.

Boasts a vibrant nightlife scene.

Residents and visitors can enjoy a lively nightlife in Elektrostal, with numerous bars, clubs, and entertainment venues.

Promotes cultural exchange and international relations.

Elektrostal actively engages in international partnerships, cultural exchanges, and diplomatic collaborations to foster global connections.

Surrounded by beautiful nature reserves.

Nearby nature reserves, such as the Barybino Forest and Luchinskoye Lake, offer opportunities for nature enthusiasts to explore and appreciate the region’s biodiversity.

Commemorates historical events.

The city pays tribute to significant historical events through memorials, monuments, and exhibitions, ensuring the preservation of collective memory.

Promotes sports and youth development.

Elektrostal invests in sports infrastructure and programs to encourage youth participation, health, and physical fitness.

Hosts annual cultural and artistic festivals.

Throughout the year, Elektrostal celebrates its cultural diversity through festivals dedicated to music, dance, art, and theater.

Provides a picturesque landscape for photography enthusiasts.

The city’s scenic beauty, architectural landmarks, and natural surroundings make it a paradise for photographers.

Connects to Moscow via a direct train line.

The convenient train connection between Elektrostal and Moscow makes commuting between the two cities effortless.

A city with a bright future.

Elektrostal continues to grow and develop, aiming to become a model city in terms of infrastructure, sustainability, and quality of life for its residents.

In conclusion, Elektrostal is a fascinating city with a rich history and a vibrant present. From its origins as a center of steel production to its modern-day status as a hub for education and industry, Elektrostal has plenty to offer both residents and visitors. With its beautiful parks, cultural attractions, and proximity to Moscow, there is no shortage of things to see and do in this dynamic city. Whether you’re interested in exploring its historical landmarks, enjoying outdoor activities, or immersing yourself in the local culture, Elektrostal has something for everyone. So, next time you find yourself in the Moscow region, don’t miss the opportunity to discover the hidden gems of Elektrostal.

Q: What is the population of Elektrostal?

A: As of the latest data, the population of Elektrostal is approximately XXXX.

Q: How far is Elektrostal from Moscow?

A: Elektrostal is located approximately XX kilometers away from Moscow.

Q: Are there any famous landmarks in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal is home to several notable landmarks, including XXXX and XXXX.

Q: What industries are prominent in Elektrostal?

A: Elektrostal is known for its steel production industry and is also a center for engineering and manufacturing.

Q: Are there any universities or educational institutions in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal is home to XXXX University and several other educational institutions.

Q: What are some popular outdoor activities in Elektrostal?

A: Elektrostal offers several outdoor activities, such as hiking, cycling, and picnicking in its beautiful parks.

Q: Is Elektrostal well-connected in terms of transportation?

A: Yes, Elektrostal has good transportation links, including trains and buses, making it easily accessible from nearby cities.

Q: Are there any annual events or festivals in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal hosts various events and festivals throughout the year, including XXXX and XXXX.

Elektrostal's fascinating history, vibrant culture, and promising future make it a city worth exploring. For more captivating facts about cities around the world, discover the unique characteristics that define each city . Uncover the hidden gems of Moscow Oblast through our in-depth look at Kolomna. Lastly, dive into the rich industrial heritage of Teesside, a thriving industrial center with its own story to tell.

Was this page helpful?

Our commitment to delivering trustworthy and engaging content is at the heart of what we do. Each fact on our site is contributed by real users like you, bringing a wealth of diverse insights and information. To ensure the highest standards of accuracy and reliability, our dedicated editors meticulously review each submission. This process guarantees that the facts we share are not only fascinating but also credible. Trust in our commitment to quality and authenticity as you explore and learn with us.

Share this Fact:

Electrostal History and Art Museum

Most Recent: Reviews ordered by most recent publish date in descending order.

Detailed Reviews: Reviews ordered by recency and descriptiveness of user-identified themes such as wait time, length of visit, general tips, and location information.

Electrostal History and Art Museum - All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go (2024)

• (0.19 mi) Elektrostal Hotel
• (1.21 mi) Yakor Hotel
• (1.27 mi) Mini Hotel Banifatsiy
• (1.18 mi) Elemash
• (1.36 mi) Hotel Djaz
• (0.07 mi) Prima Bolshogo
• (0.13 mi) Makecoffee
• (0.25 mi) Amsterdam Moments
• (0.25 mi) Pechka
• (0.26 mi) Mazhor

THE 10 BEST Resorts near Museum and Exhibition Center, Elektrostal

Resorts near museum and exhibition center, property types, distance from, traveller rating, hotel class.

• Best Value Properties ranked using exclusive Tripadvisor data, including traveller ratings, confirmed availability from our partners, prices, booking popularity and location, as well as personal user preferences and recently viewed hotels.
• Traveller Ranked Highest rated hotels on Tripadvisor, based on traveller reviews.
• Distance from Museum and Exhibition Center See properties located closest to the place of interest first with confirmed availability for your dates from our partners.