family law essay competition 2023

Leading in family law

Administrative Law

Arbitration

Child Abduction

Court of Protection

Direct Access

Employment Law

Jurisdiction and Cross-Border Family Cases

Mediation / Early Neutral Evaluation

Medical Defence

Private DRA

Private FDR

Private Law Children

Private Law Children & The International Movement of Children

Pro Bono Work

Professional Negligence

Public Law Children

1KBW Essay Competition 2023

We are pleased to announce the winners of our 2023 essay competition “Does the family court put up too many barriers to children participating in proceedings (children/domestic abuse and finance)?” .

Congratulations to:

WINNER Imogen Forrester

RUNNERS UP Charles Collins Hia Alhashemi Emma Canavan

The winner will receive a mini pupillage and the runners up will be invited to participate in a panel discussion with members of chambers about the issues raised in the essay competition and to discuss life and pupillage at 1KBW and the family bar generally.

https://www.1kbw.co.uk | [email protected] | 020 7936 1500 | Copyright 1 King's Bench Walk 2024

We use cookies on our website to give the best personalised experience. Please read our cookie policy to find out more.

UPDATE: Our 2023 Essay Competition is now closed for entries. The winner and runners-up have been notified, and they will be formally announced at a Women in Family Law event in 2024. The winning entry will also be published on our website.

Thank you to all who submitted entries and keep your eyes peeled for details of the 2024 competition. We will launch this in late summer 2024.  

• Privacy Overview
• Strictly Necessary Cookies

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

• IAFL Officials & Committees
• Find an IAFL Fellow
• Members' Publications
• USA Chapter Documents
• European Chapter Documents
• Asia Pacific Chapter Documents
• Canadian Chapter Documents
• IAFL Relief Committee for Ukraine
• Support for LGBTI Rights in Morocco
• HUNGARIAN BAN
• LGBT Rights Recognition
• Brunei Penal Code
• Restriction of US Visas
• US Border Separation
• Support for LGBTI in India
• Forced Marriage Position
• Surrogacy Symposium
• Pakistani Stoning
• Gay Marriage
• Surrogacy Legal Issues
• Forced Marriage
• IAFL Webinars
• Golan v Saada case
• Manuela/others vs El Salvador
• UKSC 2019/0145 NY (A child)
• 18-935 Monasky v. Taglieri
• Calixto v. Lesmes Order
• 17-15364 Calixto v. Lesmes
• 16-582 Cahue v. Martinez
• T15-26664 Bowie v. Gaslain
• 12-820 Lozano v. Alvarez
• Family Law Books
• Audrey Ducroux Lectures
• Alternatives to Court
• Articles for Discussion
• Choice of Jurisdiction
• Marital Agreements
• Religious Issues
• IAFL Brochures
• Branding Materials
• Past Events
• Other Events
• Member Login
• IAFL European Chapter Young Lawyers Award 2023

IAFL European Chapter Young Lawyers' Award 2023

Posted: 17 Oct 2022

Approximately 12 years ago, the European Chapter of IAFL established an annual writing award for young family lawyers. The award aims to promote research and excellence among young family lawyers and to increase awareness among other legal professionals of the work and objectives of the IAFL.

The Young Lawyers' Award carries a prize of €1,000, awarded to the author of the winning contribution, and two €500 prizes for the best runners up.

The prizes will be presented at the IAFL Introduction to European Family Law Conference in November 2023.  

The winners will be announced on Tuesday 20   June 2023. The winner and two best runners up will also receive a subsidy of up to €500 for travel and accommodation plus free registration.

A panel of European Chapter Fellows will be responsible for the selection of the winning contributions. The Young Lawyers' Award winner will be selected by the panel on the basis of the written composition concerning International or European Family law, the practical and theoretical interest and the legal analysis of the contribution.

Subject Matter - Case Study 

The case study for the 2023 award is:  'Junior is 25, he is a Brazilian football player, he plays for Paris and lives and resides in France.

He has a brilliant career; he has a great contract with his club and has a number of sponsorship deals.  He knows he won't stay in Paris all his career and plans to go to another club in England, Spain or Germany soon.

He is in a relationship with Eva who is a model and actress with dual British and American citizenship. She has inherited from her father, and she is the sole heir of her mother who is a very wealthy and famous film producer. Eva lives mainly in London.

Junior and Eva want to marry and to do a prenuptial agreement.

Junior would like to be protected because he may have a very successful career but he has also a lot of uncertainty.  Eva would like to protect her family assets and to be protected if they have a family.  

How will you proceed to establish this prenuptial agreement?'

The contribution should ideally be written in English, however, translations can be obtained should the applicant wish to write in their own language. It should be no more than 3000 words and should not contain any information which could reveal the identity of the writer to the judging panel as otherwise they will be disqualified.

Eligibility

The author of the composition should be a qualified practising family lawyer of up to ten years qualification and/or experience and be residing in a European jurisdiction. Iceland, Turkey and Russian Federation are all included.  Entries from trainee lawyers, pupil barristers or the equivalent are also welcomed.

Publication

The winning entry will be published on the IAFL website. The entry should not have been published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, although it can subsequently be published elsewhere with appropriate reference to the IAFL. 

The contributions for consideration in respect of the 11th annual award should be submitted by 11.59pm (BST) on Friday 14 April 2023. Submissions should be sent electronically to Ele Dexter of the IAFL at   [email protected]  

Previous Story

• Find a Lawyer

More Search Options

© 2024 IAFL. All rights reserved.

IAFL is a worldwide association of practising lawyers who are recognised by their peers as the most experienced and skilled family law specialists in their respective countries.

• European Chapter 35th Anniversary Celebrations Begin!
• President's Blog, May 2024
• President's Blog, April 2024
• President's Blog, January 2024
• Member Options
• Terms and Conditions

Website by:

Announcing the Seventh Annual Student Essay Competition

The Yale Law Journal is excited to announce its seventh annual Student Essay Competition. The Journal ’s Student Essay Competition challenges the next generation of legal scholars and practitioners to reflect on emerging legal problems. The Competition is open to current law students and recent law-school graduates nationwide. Up to three winners will be awarded a $300 cash prize. Winning submissions will be published in the Yale Law Journal Forum , the Journal ’s online component. All Forum Essays are fully searchable and available on LexisNexis, Westlaw, and our website. Last year’s winning Essays can be viewed on our website.

Competition Topic: Emerging Issues in Law and the Family

This year, we invite submissions focusing on novel developments in the law as a result of shifting social norms, public policy, and legal developments concerning the family, broadly understood. We encourage submissions on a range of topics, including family law; children and the Constitution; immigration law's effect on families; parental rights in education; sexual orientation and gender identity; abortion, childbirth and family planning; elder law; domestic violence, and policy proposals that bear on the family. We welcome topics in related areas as well, and we hope to receive both clinical and academic submissions.

Eligibility and Submission Details

The competition is open to all current law students and recent law school graduates (JDs and LLMs from the Classes of 2019-2026) from any ABA-accredited law school. Each individual may submit only one piece. Submissions must be previously unpublished Essays and may not be submitted to other publications during the competition period.

The deadline for submissions is September 15, 2023 at 5pm ET. Submissions must be no shorter than 4,000 words and no longer than 8,000 words, including footnotes.

Essays must be submitted via the Journal’s online submissions portal. When asked to select “Submission Type,” please select “Student Essay Competition” (do not select “Forum Essay (Students)”).

Please submit your Essay as a Word document. Your submission file should be titled “YLJ Essay Competition - [ESSAY TITLE]” and include a header with “YLJ Essay Competition” in the main text of your document. To ensure anonymized review, please do not include any identifying information, including name, class year, or institution, in your Essay’s body or metadata. Failure to anonymize your Essay may disqualify it from consideration by the Selection Committee.

A Selection Committee will consider all submissions anonymously. Winners will be announced in October 2023. Authors who submit winning Essays commit to publication in the Yale Law Journal Forum and agree to participate in our full editing process. This process involves both structural and substantive suggestions, as well as sourceciting for content and adherence to Bluebook style.

Disbursement of the cash prize to each winner is subject to any applicable tax reporting and withholding requirements.

Please direct questions about the Student Essay Competition to the Managing Editors, Jordan Kei-Rahn ( [email protected] ) and Sara Méndez ( [email protected] ). We look forward to reading your submissions!

Volume 133’s Emerging Scholar of the Year: Robyn Powell

Announcing the eighth annual student essay competition, announcing the ylj academic summer grants program.

Law Reform Essay Competition: winners of the 2023 competition

Read the winning essays from 2023's Law Reform Essay competition.

The winning essay

Louis Dejeu-Castang: 'Not OK Computer: a proposed AI transparency framework for the UK'

Read the essay in Counsel magazine

The runner-up

Nathan Thompson: 'Frozen Assets, Thawed Reforms: An argument to have AFrOs and AFOs transferred to the High Court in complex cases'

About the essay, and why others should apply:

"This essay argues that statutory amendment is required to provide a route to transfer civil freezing and forfeiture from the Magistrates’ Court to the High Court, where complex issues arise.   

I believe others should apply for this competition as it gives you a fantastic opportunity to express your opinion on an area of law which really interests you. You never know your chances of getting a prize!"

Read the essay [PDF] 

Winner (Graduate Diploma in Law)

Iona McNeill: 'Paving the way for modernisation and better clarity of UK surrogacy practice: proposals for reform of current statute'

What this essay is about, and why the topic was chosen

"The essay examines legislation governing surrogacy, and identifies shortcomings in current statute. It explores how law reform could offer more robust protection for the parties involved and safeguard their interests.

Researching surrogacy law for a university module, I realised that the legal framework was outdated as legislation has not kept pace with changing societal attitudes towards surrogacy. The Law Commissions’ joint report identifies issues with current statute, but their recommendations for change would not entirely fix these shortcomings.

Having explored international surrogacy regulations, I decided to use the essay to suggest ideas for reform that might better govern surrogacy arrangements."

Read the essay [PDF]

Runner-up (Graduate Diploma in Law)

Emily Edwards Blair: 'Criminally insane or just mentally ill? A case for the reform of the insanity and automatism defences'

What the essay is about, and why this topic was chosen:

"My essay explores the need for reform to the insanity and automatism defences, arguing that adequate defences for mentally ill offenders would prevent unfair sentencing, particularly prison sentences, which can result in the worsening of their mental ill health.

The topic of mental health is near and dear to my heart, and I was horrified when I found out that the M'Naghten rules have not been updated since their inception in 1843. Our laws must serve our population, and with increasing mental illness among the population we need adequate defences for those who offend due to their illness.

I believe that with a reformed defence centred on medical fact (not legal fiction) we can create a fairer justice system for all - not just the mentally healthy. I wrote this essay to try to raise awareness for this, as in its current state, our justice system is unfair and biassed against those with mental illness."

 Highly commended

Bryn Auger: 'Extending the coroner’s jurisdiction to stillbirths: transparency, accountability, and independent answers'

What the essay is about, and why this topic was chosen

"An exclusive extension to the Coroner’s jurisdiction enabling the investigation and/or holding of an inquest into all stillbirths, addressing deficiencies of investigation practices, improving accountability, and creating better learning opportunities.

I have worked with families who have suffered the loss of stillbirth. I learnt of their grief. Many felt let down with current investigation practices, yet they had nowhere else to turn. They wanted an independent process that provides answers to what happened. They wanted to stop their loss and grief passing to another family. I decided that extending the Coroner’s jurisdiction was the best approach for providing independent accountability."

Emma Townend: 'Barrier to justice: why the mandatory reconsideration stage of the Personal Independence Payment appeals process should be abolished'

What this essay is about, and why this topic was chosen

"An essay exploring how the DWP’s internal Mandatory Reconsideration stage of the Personal Independence Payment appeals process blocks access to First-tier Tribunal and therefore recourse to real justice.

I chose this topic because I have seen first-hand the impact the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) process has on those living with disability through my volunteer work with a local disability charity. Over time, it became clear to me that the Mandatory Reconsideration stage was acting to deter people from exercising their right to appeal to tribunal. And as someone who lives with disability myself, the issue is close to my heart."

• Read winning entries from previous years

International Law Book Facility

• Trustee position at the International Law Book Facility (ILBF)
• Archived news
• Competition 2023-2024
• Apply for books
• Sign up for the ILBF newsletter!

Competition 2023-2024: sponsorship announcement

The ILBF is delighted to announce that the 2023-2024 law undergraduate essay competition is sponsored by international law firm McDermott Will & Emery.

The 2023-2024 essay competition is a fantastic opportunity for law undergraduates in the UK to win an internship with McDermott. The firm is committed to providing opportunities to the next generation of lawyers, as well as promoting pro bono activities across the firm to create positive change around the world. The ILBF is immensely grateful for the support of McDermott for the 2023-2024 essay competition and our mission to share legal resources with organisations overseas.

Sponsoring the ILBF’s law undergraduate essay competition allows McDermott Will & Emery to marry two of its passions: supporting and encouraging the future careers of law students and, equally important, giving back to communities around the world where resources are stretched or non-existent. We wish all entrants to the competition the best of luck! Hamid Yunis, London Managing Partner, McDermott Will & Emery

We are extremely grateful to McDermott for sponsoring the essay competition for 2023-2024 and offering the winner a valuable internship with the firm. Their support for the work of the ILBF is hugely appreciated as is their commitment to providing this opportunity to lawyers of the future. Paul Lowenstein KC, chairman of the ILBF trustee board

Watch out for more information about the 2023-2024 essay competition over the coming weeks when we will announce the launch date and the competition details.

Categories: Competition   Partners

Posted on 19/09/2023 at 8:50 am.

NEW! 15th Anniversary Film

Help us to support legal education worldwide

Get our newsletter to your inbox.

Sign up for our newsletter here

Watch the ILBF story

Providing printed legal texts to institutions involved in access to justice

‘The establishment of the rule of law is most obvious in underpinning individual liberty and democratic government, but the development of successful modern economies cannot take place without it. No judiciary can accomplish this task without the help of lawyers that have access to good libraries and good libraries themselves.’

The Right Honourable The Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales

Future Lawyer Blog

Kick off the year by entering an essay competition.

Tags: bar council , essay competition , law reform , prize .

Now open for 2023, the Bar Council’s Law Reform Essay Competition is aimed at developing and fostering an interest in law reform. Students and pupils are invited to submit essays making the case to reform English, Welsh and European law.

The competition is offering a top prize of £4,000 (wow!), plus prizes for runners-up and highly commended essays. Here are the details:

• The winner: £4,000, and their essay published on Counsel magazine’s website
• Runner-up: £2,500 
• Best GDL entry: £1,500
• Runner-up GDL entry: £1,000
• Highly commended award: 2 x £500

In addition, all prize winners will be invited to meet members of the Law Reform Committee at a small reception held at a set of chambers.

How long have you got to craft your masterpiece? The deadline: 23rd October 5pm

If you need further inspiration, watch the video below to hear from past winners. Or read the essays from previous years (dating back to 2018).

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Human rights

Graham Turnbull essay competition to be held in 2023 and organised by Memorial Fund

The Graham Turnbull essay competition  encourages law students and junior lawyers to examine current pressing human rights issues and to consider their impact on the wider system of human rights and law.

Held in memory of Graham Turnbull, a human rights lawyer killed in 1997 while working as a United Nations human rights monitor, the winner is awarded £500 at an annual lecture.

Since its inception, the competition was administered by the Law Society in partnership with the Graham Turnbull Memorial Fund.

From now, it will be organised by the Graham Turnbull Memorial Fund independently.

While we're sorry to no longer be hosting the competition and lecture, we are glad that its legacy – and that of Graham Turnbull – will continue.

Dates for the 2023 competition will be released soon.

We will keep members updated through our social media channels.

For more information, email  Tony Fisher . 

Maximise your Law Society membership with My LS

• Junior Solicitors Network

• MEET OUR TEAM
• Ayesha Vardag
• David Lister
• Simon McKirgan
• Full Divorce Team
• Reputation & Privacy
• Commercial & Civil Litigation
• Company and Commercial
• All Locations
• Covent Garden
• Earl's Court
• Holland Park
• Knightsbridge
• Notting Hill
• Regent's Park
• St Paul's
• Westminster
• Basingstoke
• Bournemouth
• Southampton
• Tunbridge Wells
• Bury St Edmunds
• King's Lynn
• Chesterfield
• Milton Keynes
• Northampton
• Peterborough
• Middlesbrough
• Huddersfield
• Vardags International
• Australia Desk
• Bahrain Desk
• Bermuda Desk
• Canada Desk
• Cayman Islands Desk
• Dubai (UAE) Desk
• France Desk
• Germany Desk
• Gibraltar Desk
• Greece Desk
• Guernsey Desk
• Hong Kong Desk
• Jersey Desk
• Kuwait Desk
• Liechtenstein Desk
• Luxembourg Desk
• Malaysia Desk
• Mauritius Desk
• Monaco Desk
• Netherlands Desk
• New Zealand Desk
• Russia Desk
• Portugal Desk
• Poland Desk
• Saudi Arabia Desk
• Scotland Desk
• Singapore Desk
• South Africa Desk
• Switzerland Desk
• United States of America Desk
• I'm getting divorced and want to protect my wealth
• I'm getting divorced and I want to get my fair share
• I want to maintain my lifestyle post-divorce
• My spouse is hiding or undervaluing their business or other assets
• My spouse is overvaluing my business or other assets
• I'm already divorced but I'm still not satisfied
• I'm already divorced but my spouse still isn't satisfied
• My divorce isn't going well, can I switch divorce solicitors?
• My spouse wants me to sign a post-nuptial agreement
• I’m working to save my marriage but want financial security
• I’m involved in someone else’s divorce
• I have another issue related to divorce
• Cayman Islands
• Dubai (UAE)
• Liechtenstein
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Saudi Arabia
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United States of America
• High Net Worth Individuals
• Bankers and financiers
• Company executives
• Entrepreneurs and private company owners
• Professionals
• Celebrities
• Footballers and other sportspeople
• Heirs and heiresses
• Royalty and the aristocracy
• Farmers and farm owners
• The Ultimate Guide to Trusts in Divorce
• The ultimate guide to high net worth and ultra high net worth divorces
• The Ultimate Guide to ‘Special Contributions’ in Divorce
• The Ultimate Guide to Post-Separation Accrual
• The Ultimate Guide to coercive and controlling behaviour in divorce
• The Ultimate Guide to Jurisdiction in Divorce
• Radmacher v Granatino
• Chai v Peng
• Young v Young
• Quan v Bray
• Client Testimonials
• Reputation & Privacy
• Children & Family Introduction
• I need to know more about child abduction
• My ex is accusing me of abducting our children
• My ex has abducted our children
• I need to know more about international child relocation
• My ex wants to take our children abroad
• I want to take my children abroad
• I need to know more about international adoption
• I’m considering international adoption
• I'm facing a dispute over international adoption
• I’ve adopted a child internationally and I need legal advice
• I’m undergoing international adoption and I need legal advice
• I’ve had a child via assisted reproduction or adoption and I need a will
• My fiancé(e) wants me to sign a prenuptial agreement
• I’m getting married and want to be protected in case it all goes wrong
• I need to know more about cohabitation agreements and prenups
• My partner wants me to sign a cohabitation agreement
• I want a cohabitation agreement
• My former partner is making a claim against me
• I need to make a claim against my former partner
• Reputation & Privacy Introduction
• I am a high-profile individual needing specialist reputation and privacy advice
• My business needs specialist reputation and privacy representation
• I am an advisor looking for reputational or privacy legal advice for my client
• Commercial & Civil Litigation Introduction
• My company is involved in a procurement dispute
• My company is involved in a dispute with a shareholder
• My company is involved in a contractual dispute
• My company is involved in a joint venture dispute
• My company is involved in an M&A dispute
• My company is involved in an insolvency dispute
• I am involved in a shareholder dispute
• I am/my company is involved in an intellectual property dispute
• I have/my company has an injunctions issue
• My company has been served with a seizure order
• My company has been served with an injunction
• Criminal Defence
• Fertility & Surrogacy
• Professional Negligence
• Wills, Trusts and Probate
• Domestic Abuse Lawyers
• Essay Competition

Family Law Essay Competition: Win a prize of £2,000

The competition has now closed and is no longer accepting entries.

We invite all university students to take part in our law essay competition aimed at uncovering exceptional young minds. All entries meeting our submission criteria (see below) and of a high quality will be published on our website, with each author credited. You will be able to share and repost this across your social channels, as well as make reference to it on your CV and any future applications to Vardags.

Vardags is a top family law firm specialising in high net worth, international, complex cases. Our legal services help our clients through the most challenging of circumstances – led by “ Britain ’ s top divorce lawyer ” , Ayesha Vardag, we take pride in working at the cutting edge of legal practice and seek to hire the brightest talent.

PRIZES ON OFFER

The winner will receive £2,000 , in addition to a one-to-one with our Founder and President, Ayesha Vardag. There will additionally be £1,000 and £500 prizes for 2 nd and 3 rd place respectively.

The top 5 entries will be fast-tracked to interviews for Vardags ’  Graduate Trainee recruitment, and the best essays will be published on the Vardags website. Read our T&Cs for full details.

submission criteria

Please write an essay, no longer than 3 ,000 words on a contemporary   topic of your choosing related to family law in England & Wales.  We value quality over quantity and the depth and creativity of your arguments will be judged more than the length of your content.

• Applicants must be currently enrolled in a university.
• As such, all submissions must be from a university email address.
• Applicants must submit their essay to Vardags prior to the deadline of 31/01/2024 .
• The essay must include a word count at the foot of the essay - The bibliography and any footnotes of fewer than 25 words will not be included in the word count.

TIMELINE AND KEY DATES

9th October 2023: Competition opens

Midnight 31st January 2024: Competition closes

29th February 2024: Winners announced

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Submissions must be the original work of the entrant and must not infringe on the rights of any other party. We may use various means to identify plagiarism, contract cheating and other forms of fraud. Our determinations in all such matters are final.

Submissions must not contain defamatory, obscene, offensive, or any other unsuitable material.

Vardags retains the right to publish or reproduce at any time all or part of any work submitted on the Vardags website and elsewhere. Vardags reserve the right to delete or omit from any published article anything that in their absolute discretion should not be published on editorial or legal grounds.

Submissions must be made by our online entry system - this competition therefore requires access to the internet.

The decision of our judging panel will be final. Please note that entries will not be returned and entrants may therefore wish to keep their own copy of the submitted essay. Vardags does not enter into correspondence about any aspect of the competition or the results thereof. Feedback on the essays submitted is not provided.

Candidates fast-tracked to interviews for Vardags ’ graduate trainee recruitment will be for our intakes from 2025 onward.

The organizers of the competition will collect data in line with the law and our privacy policy (accessible here: Vardags | Privacy Policy ) for the purposes of the Competition, in the ways described in these terms and conditions. The information collected will be used to contact the winners, and to administer the competition and (in the case of successful entrants) to publicise and promote this competition and future such competitions and for any marketing or other purposes you may indicate your consent to. When publishing essays on the Vardags website, Vardags will publish the name and institution of the author alongside this.

The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.

Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.

Vardags uses the term ‘ Partner ’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’ Director ’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.

A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’ Director ’ and ’ Partner ’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags ’ registered office.

YOU CAN ALWAYS CONTACT US BY